The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About007Michelle Farfan From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: a Swenson, Karen < kswenson@eaest.com > Thursday, January 17,20L3 1:50 PM Cooke, John T. (JT) (Perkins Coie); Craig Peck (peckassoc@comcast.net) David W. Johnson; Stacie Hoskins; Schipanski, Rich RE:lnformation Needs Pleasant Harbor Info Needs Memo - revised 1-17.docx JT and Craig - | have added two items to the lnfo Needs Memo. Do you have any information regarding existing conditions other than what is presented on pg2-4 of the FEIS (which is dated)? ln particular, we are looking for: o Number of existing structures (all structures on site) o Which structures are currently occupied/utilized o lf vacant, previous use (if available) o Square footage (if available) Current impervious surface area (if available) Also, we found some project objectives on page 5 of the Pleasant Harbor application binder (pg. 13 of the pdf) submitted in 2006 (http://www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/PDFS/Black%20Point%20MPR/app binder 3-1- 06.pdf ). JT, is this what you were thinking of? While some of them may not still apply ("designate sufficient land..."), perhaps this is a starting point. a 1 Objectiver a To enoourage deeigns that oomplernent the natural setting and prornote the alpine and maritime vlllage theme" r To establish appropriate $tyl66, rnaterials and scale of detrelopment that contribute to a ooneistent and cornplimentary architectural clraracter. To enoourage *le use of the ec<bntive pethway eyetem and open speffi end tuduce nelianoe on motorized traE$parl. To reduoe the impact on environrnertally eensitive ereas by designing a mad netrr$orh to pres€ruo and protect more of the natura! vegetation, dreinage courtes, and $hpe$. To establish the eiting of buildings to reduce impads on sensitive areas. To incorporate a fire protection plan that preserves a beautiful hlend of forest end hom6 by adopting FireSmart planning prinoiples that combine clearing of selective undergrouvth with the use of proven non-combustible construqtion rnaterie l$. To incorporate a well designed system for potabie and non-potable uuater conservetlon and treetrnant, To incorporate a state-of-th+art sewage and efHuent treafilent plant to delirrer Class A urater. a a To desfinate sufficient buildabb land for reeidential development to acoommodate the econornic fuasibility by prouiding a varioty of housing Spee to rupport an ertay of amenities. To elirninate the riske to Hood Canalfrorn the eutrophication effecls of poor development, To prevent ealt water intrusiott risks to potabta water welle, J a a I a a a Thanks so much, and we look forward to receiving the remaining information Kare*wSvto*tlow HI Karen Swenson, AICP Senior Planner 2200 SDdh Avenue, Suite 707 | Seattle, WA 98121 206.452.5350 x 1716 kswenson@eaest.com From: Cooke, John T, (JT) (Perkins Coie) [mailto:JCooke@perkinscoie.com] Sent: Monday, January L4,20L3 11:21 AM 2 To: Swenson, Karen Subject: RE: Information Needs Thanks, Karen. I am working on pulling this together. Have you received a signed contract yet? JT From: Swenson, Karen [mailto:kswenson@eaest.com] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 1:48 PM To: Craig Peck (oeckassoc@comcast.net); Cooke, John T. (JT) (Perkins Coie) Cc: Schipanski, Rich; Hollinger, Kristy; David W. Johnson; Stacie Hoskins Subject: Information Needs As discussed at our meeting on Wednesd aV $/9l1, here is our lnformation Needs Memo (Phase 1, Task 3) that details additional information that we will need to commence drafting the SEIS. We set a target of next Wednesday l7/L6l for submittal of these items. We realize not all of these documents will be available at that point, and we'll continue to revise and circulate this memo as we receive the items requested. Thanks, Kore*w Svtl*1,tpr,w el Karen Swenson, AICP Senior Planner 2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 707 | Seattle, WA 98121 206.452.s350 x 1716 kswenson@eaest.com IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with Treasury Department and IRS regulations, we inform you that, unless expressly indicated otherwise, any federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written by Perkins Coie LLP to be used, and cannot be used by the taxpayer, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer under the lnternal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein (or any attachments). NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. lf you have received it in error, please advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or dlsclosing the contents. Thank you. 3 HtlsruMEN- 720 Sixth Street South, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98033 Telephone: 425.284.5401 Fax: 425.284.5402 ffi To: GG: From: Date: Subject: JT Cooke, Perkins Coie; Craig Peck, P.E. David Johnson and Stacie Hoskins, Jefferson County Planning Department Rich Schipanski and Karen Swenson, EAlBlumen January 10, 2013; Revised January 17, 2013 lnformation Needs for the Pleasant Harbor SEIS The purpose of this memo is to provide a preliminary list of information needed to prepare the Pleasant Harbor SEIS. The following table is considered a preliminary list, because it is possible that additional information will be required as the SEPA alternatives are fully defined. We have reviewed the information provided by the applicant to date and identified additional information that will be required to commence with drafting the SEIS. Ultimately, all technical reports will need to provide enough detail for adequate SEPA environmental analysis of development under the Proposed Actions and EIS Alternatives. We recognize that a considerable amount of existing information has been provided to date. We have reviewed the information to determine the gaps in information, but not for the quality of the technical reports. As we continue to review the technical reports in detail over the next week, we may revise this table to reflect future information needs. To the extent that the information provided is relevant to the Pleasant Harbor SEIS, it will be used to prepare, or will be referenced in, the document. As appropriate, information from those documents will be used to prepare the SEIS analyses. However, since new alternatives will be included in the SEIS (which exclude the marina portion), certain information may need to be updated for the SEIS. The following table focuses on additional information that will be needed per our discussion on January 9, 2013. lt is assumed that the SEIS will address two development alternatives and one No Action Alternative. The SEIS will recognize the limited redevelopment in the marina portion of the site under the existing Binding Site Plan Permit, but that portion of the resort will not be included in the SEIS analyses. Likewise, the potential environmental impacts from a realigned WDFIV access road to the boat ramp (as acknowledged under Alternative 2) will be assessed under a separate permiUprocess. The lnformation Needs table includes a column indicating our assumption about the person/entity anticipated to be responslble for providing the requested information. Where more than one name is provided in the responsibility column, the first name listed will have the primary responsibility for coordinating the provision of the information. The table also indicates the date by which the requested information will be needed (or has been provided), and the EAIBLUMEN Pleasant Harbor SEIS lnformation Needs January 10,2013 1 status of receipt of the information (we will periodically update the status column as we receive information). Refer to the updated schedule for deliverable dates. Please contact us with any questions on the information needs below. EAIBLUMEN Pleasant Harbor SEIS lnformation Needs January 10,2013 2 SOURCE DATE NEEDED STATUSINFORMATION NEEDS 1) Existing Structureso Number of existing structures (all structures on site)o Which structures are currently occupied/utilizedo lf vacant, previous use (if available)o Square footage (if available) Craig Peck; JT - Perkins Coie 1/18 2) Current impervious surface area (if available) Craig Peck; JT - Perkins Coie 1/18 1) Earth: Final Geotechnical lnvestigation, Subsurface Group, January 9, 2008 This report should address the following (as detailed in the Pleasant Harbor Scoping Notice).. Geologyo Soils. Topographyo Slopes. Erosiono Unique Physical Features Craig Peck; JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 2l Water: Water Supply and Groundwater lmpact Analysis,2007. JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 Rcv'd (Appendix 5 of DEIS) 3) Fish and Wildlife: Habitat Management Plan, GeoEngineers, 2012. JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 4) Transportation: Correspondence/documentation of discussion to construct an alternative WDFW boat ramp access road JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 Existing Gonditions Elements of the Environment 5) Air Quality: ESA Review comments on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Report by Failsafe Canada (2012) David - County; JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 6) Plants: Narrative landscaping plan JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 7) PIants: Confirmation with the County that tree remova!/retention can be addressed in terms of acreage, not individual trees and their diameter. JT - Perkins Coie David Johnson- County 1/16 8) Fiscal Analysis: Fiscal Analysis Report JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 9) Utilities: Electrical documentation regarding electrical demand/load and PUD's response when development causes PUD to reach capacity. JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 10) Utilities: Telecommunications, Cable and Solid Waste - contacts for providers Don Coleman 1/16 EA will contact; Craig to provide Coleman's phone number 111 Public Services - Medical: Confirmation that a medical clinic will be included in the project JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 12) Revised Alternatives Description (edits to 12-12-2011 version). Craig Peck 1/16 13) Revised phasing maps to exclude marina area under existing BSP Craig Peck 1/16 EAIBLUMEN Pleasant Harbor SEIS lnformation Needs January 10,2013 3 INFORMATION NEEDS SOURCE DATE NEEDED STATUS Alternatiyes lnformation *ptffi*,* SOURGE DATE STATUS 29) Provide a list of existing permits that would affect the site (i.e. regarding the Pleasant Harbor Resort). JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 30) Provide a list of all Jefferson Gounty permits and approvals that would be required as part of the Proposed Action and future development. JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 31) Provide a list of Federal and/or State permits and approvals that would be required as part of the Proposed Action and future development. JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 Digital Copies of all documents provided in paper form (MS Word preferred; Adobe pdf documents acceptable) JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 Draft Zoning Regulations for Pleasant Harbor MPR JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 Draft Development Agreement for Pleasant Harbor JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 Project Objectives (required by SEPA)JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 4 INFORMATION NEEDS Additioaal lnformation EAIBLUMEN Pleasant Harbor SEIS lnformation Needs January 10,2013