The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About017Michelle Farfan From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Swenson, Karen < kswenson@eaest.com > Tuesday, February 26,20L3 5:54 PM Ga rth M @statesma ncorporation.com; peckassoc@comcast.net; do n @ p I easa ntha rbo rma ri n a.co m; dwjo h nso n @ co jeffe rso n.wa. u s csmith@co jefferson.wa.us; shoskins@co jefferson.wa.us; jaustin@co jefferson.wa.us; Schipanski, Rich Pleasant Harbor Info Needs Memo - revised 2-26 Pleasant Harbor Info Needs Memo - revised 2-26.doc It was a pleasure to meet all of you face to face yesterday. lt definitely was beneficial for me to touch base with everyone as we kick off the SEIS, and make sure we are all on the same page. ln that vein, I have revised the lnformation Needs Memo again to reflect our discussion on Monday. The updated items since Monday's meeting are reflected in red text. Please review the memo to see if you have been assigned any items, and if so, please send them to me this week, electronically if possible. Thank you, Karen Swenson EA I Blumen 1 H5 ISTUMEN- 720 Sixth Street South, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98033 Telephone: 425.284.5401 Fax: 425.284.5402 ffi To: JT Cooke, Perkins Coie; Craig Peck, P.E. GG: David Johnson and Stacie Hoskins, Jefferson County Planning Department From: Rich Schipanski and Karen Swenson, EAlBlumen Date: January 10,2013; Revised January 17,2013, February 25,2013; February 26, 2013 (per A25/13 onsife meeting) Subjecft lnformation Needs for the Pleasant Harbor SEIS The purpose of this memo is to provide a preliminary list of information needed to prepare the Pleasant Harbor SEIS. The following table is considered a preliminary list, because it is possible that additional information will be required as the SEPA alternatives are fully defined. We have reviewed the information provided by the applicant to date and identified additional information that will be required to commence with drafting the SEIS. Ultimately, all technical reports will need to provide enough detail for adequate SEPA environmental analysis of development under the Proposed Actions and EIS Alternatives. We recognize that a considerable amount of existing information has been provided to date. We have reviewed the information to determine the gaps in information, but not for the quality of the technical reports. As we continue to review the technical reports in detail over the next week, we may revise this table to reflect future information needs. To the extent that the information provided is relevant to the Pleasant Harbor SEIS, it will be used to prepare, or will be referenced in, the document. As appropriate, information from those documents will be used to prepare the SEIS analyses. However, since new alternatives will be included in the SEIS (which exclude the marina portion), certain information may need to be updated for the SEIS. The following table focuses on additional information that will be needed per our discussions on January 9, 2013 and February 25, 2013. lt is assumed that the SEIS will address two development alternatives and one No Action Alternative. The SEIS will recognize the limited redevelopment in the marina portion of the site under the existing Binding Site Plan Permit, but that portion of the resort will not be included in the SEIS analyses. Likewise, the potential environmental impacts from a realigned WDFW access road to the boat ramp (as acknowledged under Alternative 2) will be assessed under a separate permiUprocess. The lnformation Needs table includes a column indicating our assumption about the person/entity anticipated to be responsible for providing the requested information. Where more than one name is provided in the responsibility column, the first name listed will have the primary responsibility for coordinating the provision of the information. The table also indicates the date by which the requested information will be needed (or has been provided), and the EAIBLUMEN Pleasant Harbor SEIS lnformation lVeeds February 26,2013 1 status of receipt of the information (we will periodically update the status column as we receive information). Refer to the updated schedule for deliverable dates. Please contact us with any questions on the information needs below. EAIBLUMEN Pleasant Harbor SEIS lnformation Needs February 26,2013 2 INFORMATION NEEDS SOURCE DATE NEEDED STATUS 1) Existing Structureso Number of existing structures (all structures on site)o Which structures are currently occupied/utilizedo lf vacant, previous use (if available)o Square footage (if available) Craig Peck; JT - Perkins Coie 1/18 Rcv'd 425 2) Current impervious surface area (if available) Craig Peck; JT - Perkins Coie 1/18 Rcv'd 425 Craig Peck; JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 Rcv'd 425 1) Earth: Final Geotechnical lnvestigation, Subsurface Group, January 9, 2008 This report should address the following (as detailed in the Pleasant Harbor Scoping Notice):. Geology. Soils. Topography. Slopeso Erosion o Unique Physical Features 2l Water: Water Supply and Groundwater lmpact Analysis,2007. JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 Rcv'd (Appendix 5 of DEIS) 3) Fish and Wildlife: Habitat Management Plan, GeoEngineers, 2012. JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 David Johnson to provide CD 4) Transportation: Correspondence/documentation of discussion to construct an alternative WDFW boat ramp access road JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 Craig Peckto provide e- mails to date; will initiate agreement process Existing Gonditions Elements of the Environment INFORMATION NEEDS SOURCE DATE NEEDED STATUS 5) Air Quality: ESA Review comments on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Report by Failsafe Canada (2012) David - County; JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 Rcv'd 425 5) Plants: Narrative landscaping plan JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 Craig Peckto provide general landscaping approach 7) Plants: Confirmation with the County that tree removal/retention can be addressed in terms of acreage, not individual trees and their diameter. JT - Perkins Coie David Johnson- County 1/16 County confirmed acreage is acceptable in SE/S wth mitigation measure for later individualtree assessmenf; David Johnson to provide 2008 Forestry Plan 8) Fiscal Analysis: FiscalAnalysis Report JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 David Johnson to provide CD9) Utilities: Electrical documentation regarding electrical demand/load and PUD's response when development causes PUD to reach capacity. JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 Don Coleman and Gafth to obtain letter of availability and future infrastructure needs upon capacW 10) Utilities: Telecommunications, Cable and Solid Waste - contacts for providers Don Coleman 1/16 Rcv'd Don's contact info 1/31; EA will contact 111 Public Services - Medical: Confirmation that a medical clinic will be included in the project JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 Medi-center to be provided at Maritime Village if Nurse Practioner available EAIBLUMEN Pleasant Harbor SEIS lnformation lVeeds February 26,2013 3 SOURGE DATE NEEDED STATUSINFORMATION NEEDS 12) Revised Alternatives Description (edits to 12-12-2011 version). Craig Peck 1/16 Craig Peckto revise previous alternative description 13) Revised phasing maps to exclude marina area under existing BSP Craig Peck 1/16 Rcv'd 2/25 29) Provide a Iist of existing permits that would affect the site (i.e. regarding the Pleasant Harbor Resort). JT - Perkins Coie; Craig Peck 1/16 30) Provide a list of all Jefferson Gounty permits and approvals that would be required as part of the Proposed Action and future development. JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 David Johnson and Sfacie Hoskins to develop list 31) Provide a list of Federal and/or State permits and approvals that would be required as part of the Proposed Action and future development. JT - Perkins Coie; Craig Peck 1/16 Digital Copies of all documents provided in paper form (MS Word preferred; Adobe pdf documents acceptable) JT - Perkins Coie; David Johnson 1/16 David Johnson to provide CD with all documents Draft Zoning Regulations for Pleasant Harbor MPR JT - Perkins Coie; David Johnson 1/16 David Johnson to provide Draft Development Agreement for Pleasant Harbor JT - Perkins Coie; David Johnson 1/16 David Johnson to provide Proiect Objectives (required by SEPA)JT - Perkins Coie 1/16 EA found objectives in orioinal2006 EAIBLUMEN Pleasant Harbor SEIS lnformation Needs February 26,2013 4 Alternatives lnformation Permits Additional I nformation application binder (pg. 13) EAIBLUMEN Pleasant Harbor SEIS lnformation Needs February 26,2013 5 INFORMATION NEEDS SOURGE DATE NEEDED STATUS