HomeMy WebLinkAbout048Michelle Farfan
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Consu ltares@aol.com
Tuesday, September 10, 2013 9:19 PM
teresa.wa I ker@doh,wa.gov; S Porto@co jefferson.wa.us;
garth.mann@statesmang roup.com
peckassoc@comcast.net; paul@statesmanusa.com; diane@pleasantharbormarina.com;
don@ pleasantharborma rina.com; mcoleman@ pleasantharbormarina.com
Pleasant Harbor
05 - 149-F application.pdf; 10 - ltr rev of submittal - approach.pdf; 15 - MPR
Boundary.pdf; 20 - EX-01 EXIST WTR SYS.pdf; 22 - MPR WATER PRESSURE ZONES.pdf;
24 - MPR WATER Layout.pdf; 30 - Marina Well 1 Test-Analysis.pdf; 32 - Harbor
Certificate-G2-2a359-C.pdf;34 - MPR Certificate-G2-30436.pdf; 36 - Project Report 370-
F self assess.pdf; 40 - expansion demand-13.09.10,pdf; 42 - historical data - 09.08.pdf;
50 - reservoir volume-13.09.08.pdf
To all prior receivers, Consultares has been requested to insert the package with an application form, and we were to only
send to Teresa and Susan. Corina stated she does not require the product
We were asked to submit the documents in hard copy, as email is not acceptable.
So, you all get another email delivery.!!
have a good rest of the week
thanks
dwight
Gonsultares Engineering
Dwight L Holobaugh, PE
PO Box 608
Issaquah, WA 98027
cell 206-919-1319
consultares@aol.com
1
AWffi Project Approval Application Form
Please fill in all project description information and check all boxes that apply below. If you are submitting a Water System Plan, please use
the Water System Plan Submittal Form DOH 331-397.
Bistro Expansion and Storage lmprovement
(project name)
Pleasant Harbor Marina & Golf Resort [I\PR] 47629 Dwight L Holobaugh, PE, Principal
Jefferson County
(county)
(water system name)
Pleasant Harbor Marina and Golf Resort
PWS ID#(design engineer)
Consultares Engineering
(system owner)
3089 l 3 l0l
Brinnon
(engineering firm)
23712SE 1706 Street
WA
(steet)
Maple Valley wA 98038
(city)
(800) s47-3479
(state)(zip code)(city)
206.919.1319
(st) (zip code)
(phone number)
Diane Coleman, Manager
(phone number)
(8oo) s+z-sqzg
(project contact ifdifferent than above)
Don Coleman, Operations & Maintenance
(daytime phone number)
(360)796-4611
(evening phone number)
(866 848-461 r)
(billing contact name--required ifnot the same as above)
Same as above
(billing phone number)(billing fax number)
(billingaddress) (city) (state/zip)
SYSTEM CLASS: I c.oup A Community ! c.oup A NTNC Elcroup A TNC ! croup n
# SERVICE CONNECTIONS (for Group A systems only - # services afier project completion):
-rlM L"sthan 100 E too-soo ! sor-eee E t,ooo -g,ggg ! to,oooormore
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:-
AREA SERVED (for distribution projects only-name subdivision, site qddress, parcel numberg efc./:Master Planned Resort by JCC
TYPE OF PROJECT (check all that app$i Reminder: If submitting a Water System Plan, use form #331-397.
t. !owsnrroan
Application #
Loan #
:. f] New Group B design report (Workbook)
4. E New Water System (A completed Water Facilities Inventory Report Form (WFI) must be included with this submittal)
s. Ellro.lect report: (Is a water system plan required: EIv tr N If required, is it current and approved: E v M N1
(Is the project identified as part of the capital improvement plan: EIt tr lrlf
2. l-l Enforcement
Type
Docket #
Filtration or other complex treatment
Chemical addition only (ion exchange, hypochlorination, corrosion control, or fluoridation)
Complete new water system
trtrtr
EI rrru3o, system modification
Special reports or plans:
! Corrosion Control Report
7. ! Predesign study
Corrosion Control Study
Plan to Cover Uncovered Reservoir
Uncovered reservoir plan of operation
Tracer study plan
Surface water or GWI treatment facility operation plan
! fittration pilot study
DOH Form 331-149 (Updated 08/10)Page I of2
98320
6.E
g. E Pxistingsystem approval
n Non-.*p*ding; not detailed evaluation
! Nor-"*panding, detailed evaluation
! expanding, not detailed evaluation
EI rxpanding, detailed evaluation
e. ! Construction documents:
lo.! Waivers:
trT
Inorganic chemical (initial)
Organic chemical (initial)
Use
Area wide renewal
Inorganic chemical (renewal)
Organic chemical (renewal)
Use (renewal)
Coliform (w/departmental inspection)
Coliform (w/third-party inspection)
tt.! other
Ttr
Filtration or other complex treatment
Chemical addition only
Complete new water system
New source only
System modification
f] system modification; design standards used; PE prepared
V
Well-site evaluation and approval
Regulatory monitoring plan
Unfiltered system annual report
Water system compliance report (loan letter)
Water right self-assessment (if applicable)
12. Other projects (describe)
Please return completedform to the Ol/ice of Drinking Water regional ol/ice checked below.
Elsouthwest Drinking Water
Department of Health
PO Box 47823
Olympia, WA 98504-7823
Phone: (360) 236-3030
Fax: (360) 664-8058
For Department use only
ODW Project
lnvoice #
Initial fee Amount
Fee received:
Date construction report received:
Date invoice mailed: _;
Review lefters sent:
Approval Date:
Area served:
DOH Form 331-149 (Updated 08/10)
# approved connections
Page2 of2
Provisions:
trTtrtr
CONSULTARES ENGR
Dwight L. Holobaugh, PE Cell:206-919-1319
2013 September 08; Revised 2013 September 10
Ms Teresa Walker, Regional Engineer
Washington State Department of Health
Town Center # 3
243 lsrael Road SE
Tumwater, WA 98501
Ms Susan Porto, Sanitarian Specialist
Jefferson Co Public Health
615 Sheridan Street
Port Townsend, WA 98368
Re: Pleasant Harbor Water System, lD # 47629
Source Approval and Capacity Approval
Stage l, Phase I Preliminary Project Report
Ms. Walker, and Ms. Porto:
First, Consultares thanks you for the response as recently made by Corina regarding our
questions. In our effort to proceed quickly, we are spurred to present our understanding of the
key items as follows:
l) The existing upland system of the harbor area is planned to be fully replaced in Stage l,
Phase I of the Master Planned Resort construction. This action will be described in some
detail as will be a part of the submitted Water System Plan this early fall of 2013 September.
2) In discussions with Consultares, Ms Walker focused on and requested us to provide a
capacity analysis as the base information, and then we can have continuing discussions.
Consultares has prepared the capacity analysis.
3) During the meeting with DOH and Jefferson County at the site at Pleasant Harbor,
Consultares suggested the Deli is planning to expand, and we project our capacity may even
allow for 24 additional daily rental units southerly of the Harbor House and northerly of the
planned Maritime Building. At this time, we have decided to not include the two new
buildings between the Harbor House and Maritime Bldg.
4) Along with the capacity request, DOH had previously suggested we test the existing Well # I
and make application for purposes of source approval. We have conducted the test for Well
# I Source Approval application, and believe you will find the Well # I source as adequate.
5) Having analyzed the expansion capacity, we intuitively recognize the necessity for additional
storage. The capacity we had currently have, and the amount we could immediately use, we
noted our obligation to assure both the capacity and the storage with others system facilities
required our analysis. We have therefore fully analyzed the entire existing system for
proficiency and confirmed the only component needing improvement was concerning storage
volume. We have calculated the present plus expansion volume requirement, and have
PO Box 608 Issaquah, WA 98027 consultares@aol.com
To: DOH / JC Date: 2013 September 08
determined the appropriate betterment. You will find the storage calculations to be a second
base function of the existing water system. We believe you will find the storage
improvement adequate for the existing system along with the expansion need.
6) These analysis packages as developed also will be used when considering the ultimate
facilities over the next two years or so, and will be useful for the soon to be submitted WSP.
Technical Efforts
l. Background
a. The existing water system has two wells, one storage tank, a pressure booster
pump, and piping for transmission and distribution. Service meters have not yet
been installed, however source meters are available.
b. In an effort to move forward on full improvement with both the water service and
the sewer service for the harbor and its upland development, we are seeking to
obtain of the capacity analysis approval of the existing water current capacity.
The Pleasant Harbor and Consultares are seeking expansion of this water system
to include services to more patrons in the deli, lounge, pool, laundry, restrooms,
day rentals, and if sufficient capacity is existing, to use that capacity to improve
conditions of services to the attractions and revenue for marina operations.
d. The source testing of Well # I has been completed and is documented by Binder
Consulting, LLC Well Aquifer Test attached hereto.
2. Analysis
a. Using the record of the recent two years of historical consumption, we have the
monthly average daily demand for the last 24 months, and we can identify the
monthly maximum amounts of consumption, and with calculations we can
identify a MMD.
b. With the records of the daily reads during 2013 July 04 Holiday period, we have
also derived a very probable MDD.
i. Please note given the seasonal usage which is, and we believe the MDD
will always be, one of the first Saturday of May Boat Season, or Memorial
Day, or July 04, or Labor Day.
ii. Installing meters for distribution will also assist knowledge of operations
and are required on or before 2016 December 3 L
c
Holobaugh page 2 of 6
To: DOH / JC
3. Process
4. Results
Date: 2013 September 08
a. Obtain and use the records of the MAD during each month through-outthe2
years, and find the highest monthly demands, and compare to the records from
Apr 15, until Sep 15. Consider the findings of comparison to understand the
seasonal issues.
b. Derive the results of the ADD of a new twin development according to the DOH
Table 5 - 2 from the Dec 2009 Design Manual. Use this for a comparison
between the calculated result and the existing source meter result.
c. Search through the data for indications for a guide to a MDD, and confirm
monthly information as to seasonal [summer] high usages.
d. A spreadsheet is attached to this document showing the last 24 months from:
i. From June of 201I thru July 2013
a. The monthly source production meter that has been recorded on a monthly basis
for the recent 2 yearc, then has been reduced to provide an Annual Average Daily
Demand [ADD] at6,847 gallons.
i. Please note the calculated Annual ADD per the DOH 2009 Design
Manual, Chapter 5, Table 5 - 2 shows the calculations for a result in the
amount of annual ADD at 9,483 gallons - - - a ratio of 1.38 the records.
ii. As to this result, Consultares recommends using the 2 year records as
opposed to the DOH Manual, therefore the ADD is 6,847 gallons.
b. Consultares recognizes we do not have a Maximum Daily Demand [MDD] from
the 2 years of records. However, having foreseen the need for MDD Consultares
did take advantage of the 2013 July Holiday period as follows:
i. We began reading the Well# I flow meter daily from beginning 2013 Jul
01 and ending at20l3 Jul 08. There were two time errors in the meter
readings, but not of a large significance.
ii. Consultares recommends using the DOH ratio at 1.75 for western
Washington, therefore the MDD is I1,982 gallons.
c. Consultares has plans to bracket Labor Day for MDD efforts. We will begin daily
readings 2013 Aug 28 and ending daily readings as 2013 Sep 05, all at the same
time each day.
d. Consultares intends to compare our findings of both Holidays, and if significant
issues arise, to forward our findings to your offices, along with any recommended
changes we have considered.
Holobaugh page 3 of 6
To: DOH / JC Date: 2013 September 08
e. We have confirmedl the capacity facilities for this analysis are the well # 1 pump
and the storage, and in combination with each other.
f. Note that the distribution and / or transmission has been functioning satisfactory,
and is primarily pvc about 40 years aged.
g. We find no past reason to have and operate a treatment system and I or hypo-
chlorination. Further, the only transmission piping will be from Well # I to the
pump house, which has never shown any evidence of transmission carrier
problems.
h. Well # I has been tested as needed for submittal to DOH to obtain source
approval of Well # l. The approval request has been created and it will be a
portion of this Capacity Report, and it is a part of this submittal for DOH
approval.
i. The Well # I DOE well log identifies its capacity is 18 gpm. In discussion with
Scott Bender, PE, who is the professional engineer that performed and certified
the source testing report for DOH, Mr. Bender also recommends a l5 gpm flow
rate of production. Consultares recommends the existing well pump is l0 gpm,
and will have significant rest times given a combination with storage
improvement. Therefore, the l0 gpm well pump is of sufficient volume to
maintain adequate flow, and we recommend it not be changed until in the future if
needed. If however a change is indicated, the well can be changed to 15 gpm.
i. ADD :6,847 gallons
ii. The well at l0 gpm has a volume accumulation in excess of MDD of
ll,gg2
l. 24 hrs = 14,400 gallons
2. l8 hrs: 10,800 gallon
iii. As can be seen above, with a production of the 12,000 gallons there will
be ample time to replenish full storage capacity
j. The storage items and calculations yield the following:
i. Existing: 3,183 gallons
ii. Fire suppression: 4,000 gallons
iii. Stand-by: 0 gallons
iv. Equalization 2,579 gallons
v. Operational 1,441 gallons
l The -a*i.um number of service connections or ERU's that the water system can serve when considering the
limitation of each water system component such as source, treatment, storage, transmission, or distribution,
individually and in combination with each other.
page 4 of 6Holobaugh
To: DOH / JC Date: 2013 September 08
It is imperative to review the calculations spreadsheets attached to this report. We believe the
calculations have been done well, and will provide the required storage that the system can
handle easily.
Reservoir Storage
There remains one portion of storage not currently resolved, and that is Fire Suppression
Volume. Meetings are in process to find a resolution in good faith with the local Fire Chief of
the Brinnon Fire Department. A confirmation of the approach by both parties, and will be
resolved shortly. We expect to make an acceptable proposal for the next two years, and we will
advise DOH of our resolution with the FD. A letter of confirmation is attached with a copy of
said letter.
The calculations currently contain the results of Standby, Equalizing, Operational, and existing
storage. At this time, we are anticipating a temporary storage "pillow" with capabilities for
storing at 15, 000 or 20,000 gallons of system volume.
The pillow volume will be at a slightly higher elevation [2'] then the existing steel tank, and will be
controlled by an altitude valve for storage usage between the pillow and steel tank. The wellwill fill
the pillow, the altitude valve will allow flow between the pillow and the steel tank give certain
elevations, and the pressure booster pump will provide the appropriate pressure distribution for
services.
System Expansion
The "capacity" analysis found that Well # 1 production is recommended to be l0 gpm, which will be
automated for call on / call off depending on the steel tank storage elevation at any time.
The expansion of the existing system is only possible by the well production which is set for
operations such that resting times will be readily available through-out any maximum day demand.
The ERU's as existing currently, were calculated as they are derived per DOH Guide for ADD of the
unknown. However, in this case, Pleasant Harbor has historical data records such that we used the
most recent 2 year period. From that comparison, we found that the actual ERU's [39] were in fact
38% less than the DOH Guide. That finding then set the existing for comparison with the system
facilities of the DOH Guide but without the reduction in expansion ERU's.
Given the discussion immediately above, there is an actual number of 39 ERU's existing. Further,
the future expansion is available without reduction for comparison. The availability can support
increase for service areas for the deli [restaurant] and lounge,. This provides for l0 additional
ERU's. Together, the actual and planned expansion can readily provide service from the
improvements being proposed for additional storage and source production.
The Marina water facilities including Production and Storage will all be fully replaced in
approximately 2 years. By that time when both a sewer Reclamation Treatment Plant and additional
source improvements including approximately 310,000 gallons of storage will be in service for all of
the PH MPR including the marina.
Holobaugh page 5 of 6
To: DOH / JC Date: 2013 September 08
This important Project analysis is now recommended as:
o *"1 o,i1T,:;H:ffi'*lilis:;",1iffi
ffil#;,-
qua,itv
o Existing and Proposed Storage Volume and controllers
o Existing transmission lines are at par with2" diameter pvc with flow of 78 gpm
o Service lines are at par with l" diameter pvc functioning well at 20 gpm
At this point however, we hereby ask for your approval of the Well # I Source Application, and
your approval of the Capacity, Expansion analysis, and storage betterment for the Marina during
a temporary time of approximately 2 years.
Present
o This document anticipates a full replacement of the Marina Harbor water facilities
as shown within the coming submittal of the WSP of the Pleasant Harbor Master
Planned Resort. A map of the MPR proposed replacement is attached hereto.
o Consultares considered the Well # I production as the primary factor. The well
has recently been tested for purposes of aquifer quantity, intruding man-caused
un-safe contaminates, natural un-safe contaminates, and of course general water
quality.
o The system does have records for meter flows, however there is only one source
meter of importance, and with no service meters at this time. Consultares
references the WS DOH Design Manual, Chapter 5.2,we note that source meters
are acceptable for quantifying system capacity, and that is how we have presented
our findings.
Mr. Mann has asked that we seek a response as quickly as reasonable, and I ask that you contact
us with any questions such that we can investigate any problems immediately if necessary. As
you know,
Holobaugh page 6 of 6
Pleasant Harbor Marina and Golf Master Planned Resort
Brinnon MPR
BOCC Adopted Bound"ry
January 14.2008
DNR Lease
I
Legend
E] MPR Bourxlary
*
0 250 500 1.000Fc.t
lrrrlrrrl Flgurc 8
2013 September C o n s u I ta res E n gi n e e ri n g
I
I \
I
{I
I
l-*.__.?
i
I
II
I,t
II
I
It
t
i,
t
I
I
I
a
If
h
t
€
I
il
I
WELL T1
EXSIING 2'WAIER
./ \ "",/)/
/lt/ / .' ./ \
PUMP HOUSE
GRAPHIC SCALE
EXEflI{G Z WATER
WE-L
(
EXSNNG 3/4'WATEB
/,
EXSIING 1'WATER
I
L -J _---_\-./ /-----:
tl i
i\l!
ttrl
-..-" (- "
I
PLEASANT HARBOR MARINA
SECTIONS 15 &22, TOWNSHIP 25N., RANGE 2W., W.M.
I
5
.l
ol
I
b
q
E
I
;
(,ll2|
EilzIEI
Ell,
Elle
r>
50
!4?
=;E
i8.
lri<
EooE
z
o
UJ
o-
SIEEI
EX-01
/
,""h
-"I-/ GRAPHIC scALE
gfiE-
FrPrflElrot It TAt(
TE.Tl4 f S€R'EE /'(
.LEGEt{D{2 PS
f--*..ri-----ri----!g
- - - -lt:s----li--*-!u -, - - -l
l
t a\\ l;o: )
"Jli \\
2fia
200
150o
PESSE ZOIG 292 FI
PES$EZq\E E4FT
/,PETTE ZOIG ?4FT
PESS,E ZOIG $FT
{I r-
---- -_\_
,-.t ----_----\
-./ -./- \"
PESSEED(rcIGVALVE
AAC( ROW PEIET{IEniJ,iEIU{EEYAIq{
E_OWOP€t
\
I
I
I
JiEIloI AEVAIrcil
0-45 Pg
-'-- -t'TISIION E-EVAIIOI{
/tF& PS
PLEASANT HARBOR MARINA & GOLF COURSE
SECTIONS 15 &22, TOWNSHIP 25N., RANGE 2W.. W.M.
R
5i
,i !:
i ;9
s5E:
oo
<€.9oO)v n
nO(l}i0)(/,OL<
@"
?
z
7
0klI Elps 2t sz Sr ,.El -.
> Ei ExdB6;Q An, rd
^!: &qo ao
r'.&
-L.F.Wo&Ur!
I
2
.//./ \ ,'/'l/
// ,l // / /'\,,///HIrcE-
PUP to.E rlo t
I It
p
l'
U SEfiTEE (
GRAPHIC SCALE
PS
{aRI/,
{
I
L --,----\-
--a--l---.-....----)
.ri
r\llI'
tlrl
tl _/
-./ //
,-t
-/-
PLEASANT HARBOR MARINA & GOLF COURSE
SECTIONS 15 &22, TOWNSHIP 25N., RANGE 2W., W.M.
IU' E*oi?.tig{ jd.9,r{I
q'- 8 !:Ei
P 3 3:;;i(Jo-<:!J3
@"
x
!
PU:A Lrr6>SS trLd tsuu) F
t!,
ord
()
.-.\..m..wffiu8
I
4
August 8,2013
Mr. Garth Mann
The Statesman Corporation
7370 Siena Morena Blvd. S.W.
Calgary,Alberta T3H 4H9
BENDER
CONSULTING. tTC
AV pl it rl 6 rott ul a,t I e r Stl u I io r s
P[.tB l5{
1992 Souli Elgcr Br!.RoodCffio liLnd. ltA 9t:t:
ph lfl)6ll.5a(xr
.cll {l( Aq{ Xe{ |
vrttt l*ilv|fu *rm
tds.htnlarllc.utm
PLEASAI\T HARBOR MARINA WELL TESTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASAI\TT HARBO&
WASHINGTON
Dear Garth:
This letter summarizes the procedures, analysis, and findings from testing Well I at the marina. The
testing was performed to identit/ the performance of the well, aquifer properties in the vicinity of the
well, and to provide the basis for a susceptibility analysis for the well and aquifer.
Marina Well I
The marina supply well I is located on the north end of the site as shown in Figure l. The well was
drilled to a depth of 88 feet in 1977 . Based on the well log, the sand and gravel aquifer was encountered
between depths of about 76 and 88 feet. The aquifer is confined by overlying and underlying glacial till.
The well log is provided in Figure 2.
Marina Well 2 is located on the south end ofthe site. This well is about 195 feet deep and is completed
in basalt. This is the closest known well to Well l. Since the well is located in a different aquifer, the
well could not be used for a monitoring well during the test.
Methods
Pumping and recovery tests were performed at Marina Well I in general accordance with the procedures
in Appendix E ofthe Washington State Departrnentof Health Water System Design Manual (2009). In
preparation for the test the water storage tank at the Marina was filled and the piping from the pump was
reconfigured to pump the water to waste; water could not be sent to the tank because the varying head
conditions the pump would realize over time would change, and this would affect pumping rates and
invalidate the assumptions of the test.
Due to the limited storage capacity at the site, a step test was not performed. An initial test was
performed for about 10 minutes to check the piping and drawdown in the well. The water level was then
allowed to recover to static.
BENDER CONSULTING, LLC
ClUs6\S@tt Badcr\Docmmts\0535-01 PleMt HlrbodPle6et Hsrtor\lt{arina Tesing\Plml }larbor Mrina Well T6t ed Analysis.doq
1026-01
€
Letter to Mr. Garth Mann
August 8, 2013
Page2
The pumping test was performed atarate of 7 .2 gpmfor a period of 24-hours. Groundwater drawdown
in the well was about l7 feet at this rate. Groundwater level recovery was then monitored for a period of
about 1,000 minutes, though full water level recovery occurred within 200 minutes ofpump shut down.
Groundwater levels were measured and recorded with a datalogger installed in the supply well. Manual
measurements were also made periodically throughout the test. A datalogger was also installed in
Pleasant Harbor to record tidal fluctuations.
Static Water Level
Based on site survey information, the elevation of the well head is 48.63 feet. A static depth to water
measurement was collected I hour before a high tide of 8.08 feet in Pleasant harbor. The depth to water
was 42.90 feet below top of casing. The static water level elevation was therefore 5.73 feet.
Pumping Test Analysis
Groundwater level data were first corrected for tidal fluctuations based on pre-test static water level
information. A tidal efficiency of about 0.22 was measured. This correction was applied to the pumping
and recovery data to eliminate the effects of the tides.
The drawdown and recovery data were then plot according to methods by Theis and Jacob. Figure 3
shows graphical plots ofthe test data. The semi-log plot indicates that a positive hydraulic boundary was
reached within about 20 minutes ofthe test start. The hydraulic boundary is presumably that of Pleasant
Harbor; this does not mean that the aquifer is receiving water from the harbor, but merely that it is within
the hydraulic influence ofthe harbor. The positive boundary was also measured during the recovery test.
Analysis of the drawdown portion of the test indicates an aquifer transmissivity of 0.06 to 0.14
d/minute. Analysis of the recov ery data indicates an aquifer transmissivity of about 0.24 fflminute.
The estimation of aquifer transmissivity from a single well (supply well) pumping test is always
underestimated because friction losses in the well screen during pumping increase drawdown greater
than actually occurs in the aquifer. It is for this reason that monitoring wells provide a better indication
of aquifer transmissivity during aquifer tests. Figure 4 provides a plot of calculated water level elevation
in the aquifer for a rate of 7.2 gpm under the calculated range in transmissivity. As shown, the
calculations become invalid for an aquifer transmissivity of 0.06 f/minute or less; in this case the aquifer
would be pumped dry, and the pumping conditions in the well clearly indicated that this did not occur.
BENDER CONSULTING, LLC
C:\Users\Scott Bender\Documens\o535-01 Pleset Hebor\Ple6ut Hador\trleina Testing\Plesmt Harbor Meina Well Test md Analysis.docx
t 026-0 I
Letter to Mr. Garth Mann
August 8,2013
Page 3
Based on the pumping and recovery analyses, we conclude that aquifer transmissivity is on the order of
0. I 4 to 0.24 ff lminute. At a pumping rate of 7 .2 gpm, this produces an aquifer drawdown (outside the
well) between2.5 and 4.5 feet.
Thestoragecoefficientisestimatedtobelxl0-3orless(dimensionless). Asinglewellpumpingtestdoes
not yield a storage coeffrcient. Because the water level in the well is above the contact with the overlying
confining unit, the aquifer is confined. As such, the well and supply is not groundwater under the
influence of surface water.
WellEfficiency
We understand that the well has been used effectively for many years. In a few years, however, the well
has had a lower yield; these were times such as the July 4 holiday weekend when there was a high
demand.
Figure 4 indicates that there is likely less than 4.5 feet of drawdown in the aquifer, just outside the well,
when pumping at a rate of 7 .2 gpm. A drawdown of l7 feet was measured inside the well. This is direct
evidence of well ineffrciencies. We would anticipate a maximum drawdown inside the wellof 5 feet for
the given aquifer conditions and well construction.
Figure 5 shows the entire record of drawdown measured during the site visit. Drawdown after July 17,
2013 17:00 is due to normal operation of the well. This was a period of relatively low use ofthe marina.
As shown, oyer27 feet of drawdown occurred in the well during this period; this is about 60 percent of
the available drawdown in the well. Given the types of water uses at the marina (showers, facilities, dock
use); it is possible that the remainder of the available drawdown can be consumed during peak periods.
It is our opinion that the drying up of the well is not due to seasonal influences. First, the aquifer is
confined and very pervious; even in low recharge years with a typical, say, 5 feet of regional
groundwater level decline, there is still over 40 feet ofwater available to the well. Second, if the aquifer
essentially dried up, then given the proximately and hydraulic connection to Pleasant Harbor, sea water
intrusion would have occurred. The well has years of use with no decline in water quality. The
occasional limitation in supply can only be from well inefficiencies.
It is our opinion that the well limitations during peak use times are related to inefficiencies in the well
screen. Well screens can become clogged with native materials in the aquifer and/or incrustation of the
screen over time. The well log indicates that the well screen has 0.050 inch-wide slots; this is a large slot
size for most sand and gravel formations in the Pacific Northwest. It is possible that sand particles have
wedged in and partially clogged the slots.
BENDER CONSULTING, LLC
Ci\Users\Scott Bender\Documents\os35-01 Pleomt Hrbor\Pleomt Harbor\.1\,luina Testing\Ple6mt Hebor Marina Well Test md Analysis.docx
1026-0t
Letter to Mr. Garth Mann
August 8,2013
Page 4
Since the well is generally operating reliably, you may choose not to improve the inefficiencies at this
time. You could also choose to pump at lower rates for longer durations to reduce pump and piping
wear. You also have the option to redevelop the well to remove particles and/or incrustation from the
well screen. This carries some risk since the formation material is largely unknown, and could increase
the flow of sediments through the screen.
Water Ouality
Water samples were collected during the pumping test. The test results are attached. The water appears
to be free of contaminants. The chloride levels are low and are within State and County drinking water
standards.
Susceptibilitv
The aquifer is overlain by about 76 feet oftill. Till is a very dense soil consisting of sand, gravel, and silt.
The silt percentage in tills is sufficiently high to make the unit an aquitard, which significantly limits the
vertical migration ofwater. As such, tills are confuring unis and groundwater in the underlying outwash
aquifer is confined. Due to the thickness and low permeability of the till, the susceptibility of the well
and aquifer to contamination at ground surface is low. The attached water quality test results indicate
that the supply is not contaminated.
Because the source of supply is in a confined aquifer, the well is not under the influence of surface water
(Gwr).
The well is not susceptible to sea water intrusion at the past and projected water demands. The water
quality data from the test samples indicated that the chloride levels are between 3.5 and 4.3 mg/I. This is
far below the State maximum contaminant level of 250 mg/I. This is also far below the Jefferson County
"at Risk" chloride level of 100 mg/I. The projected aquifer drawdown in the well is at or above sea level,
and as such, does not promote sea water intrusion. This is confirmed by many years of well use without
poor water quality.
BENDER CONSULTING, LLC
C:\Use6\Scott Bender\Documents\o535-01 Pledut Harbor\Ple6ut Harbor\Ir{uina Testing\Plesilt Harbor Meina Well Test md Analysis.docx
I 026-0 I
Letter to Mr. Garth Mann
August 8,2013
Page 5
Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. Please call us at (360) 631-5600 should you have any
questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Scott F. Bender L.H.G., C.G.W.P.
Mr. Dwight Holobaugh
Mr. Craig Peck
Enclosures:Figure 1. Well Location Map
Figure 2. Marina Supply Well 1 log
Figure 3. Pumping and Recovery Test Data
Figure 4. Calculated Actual Water Level Elevation Outside of Marina Well I
Figure 5. Groundwater Level and TidalData Collected During Testing Program
Water Quality Data
CC
a74
SCOTT F BENDER
BENDER CONSULTING, LLC
C:\UserelScon Boder\Docmens\os35-01 Plecot Hubor\Plec&t Harbor\l\,Idina Te$ing\Ple6et Hebor Meina Well Tet od Analysis.docx
I 026-0 I
MARINA
IIPII\NDS II\YOUT rQ6&a
uF a*Ga.@H(I$X.C-S . r&(lAlltCF.!l!
AMENDED FINAL BINDING SITE PLAN FOR
PLEASANT HARBOR MARINA
APORTTONOp@vr.t0t,S8C. tJ,T.2Jl.i.,R:W.,W.M.,'EPFBRSO|C?UNTY,WASIINGION ./
/' uL^12-fi207 / slJBr2-ooor8
WCtc*,
NOITS:
oorro(rl r,[A i $qilIns aEr gnr
20 6 {ffrrtr 8omorrrtlul ru rf,at [rrfot,il("
r) rrlfr(mrs$xrIil lf urt,rcu.ril nxEcolnd.Gtaol
uof,.rltFlx. i0rilAr rs@rlo tOrS
lls PiwtD
\/+r,7*
algE n
0 B
$
F lFctlto
€[rrrnr. Ff.,E]
oan c,aa!
irD?-r,rx.l SSR($.9
F-i .r-E
,rrtfl, rrix'tltaeaf, stt.t
CRAPHIC SCALE
corrn Eiroll txrort!, trE r! linIncawtrEnitmr1tm{ nllf, r6gdl alti araS [r t ,ll ro Eardt t rElra tgrBrtrrltae$tDn (el.lt|u$Gs rmplrrt{lr?r^l. rt rrn$lc st.tr trErt
S}IEEI J OF 5
BENDERC-coNsutTtNG. Itc
Atrli.l Cr!!ilE trt sdl.tio$
Pleasant Harbor Marina and Golf Resort
Marina Supply Well Evaluation
Statesman Corporation
Site Plan
Project Number
1026-01
Figure I
m, v#--
Drd lfa.
Darrhcrt ol Eold,
f;ifft#.^tti*ElBI'WA'l'Ell WELII llEPOBf,' 81raE O" r,rEEleil)f,
4!tlx r.lSrr..nillwr.
OWNE&
(2) rocAmoN oF !IEL:
o
o
,--t-oct ll { 36a! rrr,...woB&OFITTE(4)
hmf(ril.tott$rafaE riG'GrrEhD'Elo
LlcaDsaii'l.ndlptteturi
LOG:(10) WBLLIullrlDrlE(ltrrdllPffOPOSEI'(1)
ni!--rr
btGYdrsr&TTEI.L
:rEd{r*. aLalttsoalora !!E altal....ItrATEB
o
tr
IIEE D6.rr. tr' rdar6 0
.i
oo.oE
o3gsI
g
o
Eo
g
l!
E
Etg
o€
Lo
Eto
(!-oo
ot
-tro
E(!
3
Foz
otE
E
Lo
E
IEo.t
o
F
otllGwclltrl
tr rc|rd tlO Drt.o ElEl tnd tr
lo
lc
IL
nft-L-ilrtdlcd:
ttEdtd
C.d!g
tbb
ltll
tt
ELl &-4n b,-91_s.
-lllc-r!
:tE
b
,tatr ro.d ar.ctrrl.[.
-.
toa.--tLb-lL
Dttt
obL
ldE,
httod:
tr
r.ll
DcCDarad
i@.tfnalad
lf.t
Omdt,"?
LB
(5) DIU![{SIO!8SI trrrrEd 'dt'Diqr6---.---..--.rt. DaD6 C clcdht a
lt
a.
It
IL
rL
lL
It
4
.
SoIbGa nL yrq, xan rr. rl.t.bE ' t.O*-;ffij'f, H;ti,fff-- 7,tfr1777
Dta E tur odl dlr art I'rlf, l"?
trffr drtt--. D+il drEt-
IGHds.[!r!hr@
DEfAILllscoNsrarrGuoN(6)
b.G,.Da&bragoo.
.{oarb6PG
rdottDbdd
E!rB.ilollrtsdat.
DlE" h.a
D&lroqE.nBo
Pcrtroratior:
FCL.&Gisv.l
CrcdGavrl
slNotrYB
BlfoScrcasr
de
.b
LardEturtrtPTIMP:(o
Dcearl.oatIiD.
StzE
DatbnuElc
FsdEtm
JradqadoE tu
Dle-&UG-.ard
tlr--
lr0all'' tat'fiiraiartw,,aJ
zlt :
I.EIIES:4,/-(8)
(0)
I'E
alral
aortfl|{It[ttt/lftttt
Tfi'.vsht
-b
DE,[.T'S Ef,AMEllD . :
*$ rrr ifullhd mdrr'ry lusb.t&6cB rtl tLb t!!ct |!U! bc5t oC ny.haltdltc ild DtU.l
WU.L
lltirbna
li
r.?. lre. ,tt]-$(Bor_. a-?! r.
(urr
^DDl.lIqllAL6!t!D!!
r llrcEltlffi)
ct
AltG'E
tdL;
€,
Dtff
Pr tJtv EoF.z;m t l)>21 G
4trl ,hl. l4-Rlt :
77
L BENDER
coNSutTtNG. llc
Artttc'l c.ot.h'.t.. Srl.tiofi
Marina Well I Log
Pleasant Harbor Marina and Golf Re
Marina Supply Well Evaluation
Statesman Corporation
Project Number
I 026-0 I
Figure 2
--!-T-*i
': : _' I
r^ A-7.....?-f tt37
0.0
4.0
-I
I
T
T
t
I
+
I
I
I
I
1-l-t J
O()t\
'3
E
IJ
.0
I 2 .0
16.0
20.0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Time Since Pumping (Minutes)
0.0 0.0 uT-Tiril'l \\
\
\
4.0 4.0
6)
6)IL
'o
'Eo
8 .0 8 .0
ofl
-a
12.02.0
16.0 16.0
20.0 20.0
0 I t0 t00 1000
Time Since Pumping Minutes)
l 0000 I l0 100
t/t'
1 000 I 000(
I
\
\tl
t+,tl
l\t ,r
I
BENDER
CONSUI.TING, lLC
AtFl i.l C J\,rnl r.t.. So I tt io..
Pleasant Harbor Marina and Golf Resort
Marina Supply Well Evaluation
Statesman Corporation
Marina Well I Pumping and Recovery
Test Data
Project Number
I 026-0 I
Figure 3
l| ilLl- -
tltltl
| | |t| | |t| | |t tltlt | |il| | |t
t | |ilt | |il
t | ||
| | |l| | |l
t | ||
| | |l tllttllt
C
6.0
4.0
-- Static Piezometric
o
Z z.o
B6
. 0-0
c
5 -2.0
-4.0
-6.0
-100 -80 -60 -40 -20
Horizontal Distance (feet)
0 20 40
+ T : 0.24 ft2lmin at7.2 gpm per well
+ T : 0.14 ft2lmin at 7.2 gpmper well
+ T: 0.06 ft2lmin at7.2 gpm per well
L rf
/
i
I
BENDEReCONSULTING. tLC
A$l irl C t.,tal rrt.. S.l, t i.r,
Pleasant Harbor Marina and Golf Resort
Marina Supply Well Evaluation
Statesman Corporation
Calculated Actual Aquifer Water Level
Elevation outside of Marina Well I
Project Number
t026-01
Figure 4
*III
J #-------F
t-__i
--l-+i ft
I_
H I +++l
rtr
---#
l
l-
I
l
,t
):0 20
5 l5
c10oe
=(B
615
o
L
Cd2zo
l0
5
oe
o
o-]()!
F
c)
(B
0)&
0
25 -5
30 -10
711611311:00 7/1611317:00 711611323:00 7117113 5:00 7l'l7l'1311:00 711711317:00 711711323:00 7/18/13 5:00
€- Corrected Marina Well Drawdown
-E Relative Tide Level
BENDERecoNsutTtNG. ltc
AtFl ir t GtrurlF.r.. So I t r iot.
Pleasant Harbor Marina and Golf Resort
Marina Supply Well Evaluation
Statesman Corporation
Groundwater and Tidal Data Collected
During Testing Program
Project Number
1026-0t
Figure 5
l: :
,t.
t.
t:I
I
:
T"
)
TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
26276 Twelvc Trecs lanq Suite C Poulsbo, WA 98370 Tclcphonc (360) 779-sl4l FAX (360) 779-5150
IOC. SHORT
IOC - SHORTby Various EPA Approved Methods
Source / Point ofEntry - Report ofAnalysis
(Stst Rr,porting Lq,ol} itrdica6 thc minimum Eporting lcvcl rcquircd by &c Wa$iryton Dcputmcat of Hodth (Do[D.
DOH Drintiry Wrlcr rosponro lcrrcJ. Sgcms with c,qounds dcrcctcd u coocotntiors in cxccss of this lcwl st rcqu&cd to ta&c ad&liooat sarylos. Conhc,t your
rcgiooal DOH oftoc.br firltor iftm*ion.
(tttadnu Contrriout Lad), If lho coil.ndDaot ooum oxoccds thc MCL, ;m.di.r"lt contact your rcgional DOH offco.
(NotAtrdyzcd), ia6. rc$tl6 ooho! itrdic.Es 6is com0ornd wrs oot inoludoditrtts crurEut ebrsb.
(Not DacaoQ, in ho rlailts colwro iodicatB ttis co@pqlnd wrs atralzod ad not dctoscd at a lq!,!l grrd6 than or cqual to 0ro SRL
indicrtos 6e aompound was not ddcctcd in tbc sampla at or abow the cooccotration indicatod
th.0.010 Eg& MCL for Arscoic is for GroW A NTI{C ay$aos. All o&cr sptcmr Sorld chc& wi& lhcir oootrty lical6 Distriot to &tcrminc wh* lmJ is rplicablc.
SRL:
Triggrr I.orol:
MCL:
NA
ND:
< (0.0Ot):
Date Collccted: 7/1712013
SystemlDNo: 47629}I
Lab - Sample #: 01089203
Sample Locuion: Well I 0800
Samplc Purpose: RC
Sample Compositionl S
Send Roport To: Plcasant Harbor Marina
308913 Hwy l0l
Brinnon, WA 98320
Group:
Systcm Name:
County:
DOH Sourcc No:
Date Reccived:
Date Analyzcd:
Date Reportcd:
Sample Type:
Collccted By:
Phonc Number:
Bill To:
A
Pleasant Harbor Marina
Jcfferson
s0r
7tfin0t3
7il8n013
7tDn0t3
PretrcatmenURaw
Scott Bonder
360-796,4611
Pleasant Harbor Marina
308913 Hwy 101
Brinnos WA 98320
DOH#Analyte Results Units SRL Trigger MCL*MCL
Erceeded
Mcthod
(Analyrt Init )
-1il
21 Chlmidc 777 nsll .20 250 250 EPA 300.0 (KW)
133892
TWrSS ANALYTTCAL LABORATORIES, rNC.
26276 Twelvc Trccs lamc, Suirc C Poulsbo, WA 98370 Telcphone (360) 779-Sl4l FAX (360) 779-5150
IOC - SHORT
IOC - SHORT by Various EPA Approved Methods
Source / Point of Entry - Report of Analysis
(Se Rtpatiry l,1,!l), idic.tss the mhirnuur rcpoting lad reqtrild by Oc W8hin8lom Dcp.rtDctrt of Hcalth (DOH).
DOH DdnldDg W.br rc$ooso lanl, Syscor with oompoundr tlaccbd at cooomarios in cxccrs of this lorrcl E! roquirad !o tekc additioal sanplcr. Cooa yon
rcglnat DOH otrco ftr finthor infrrnatio-
Qufuimua CoOoinm Lcnd), If drc cominut mord Gf,occds 6c MCI imdigtofy odte.t yolr rcgioorl DOH offco.
(Not Atr8lyz.d), in tho rault! colmn indicdcs 6is conporud was not includcd in 6o otnont nnalysic.
(Uothgctsd),h60rcsoltcoolumn indicatcsthisco|ryoudqasenalyzdardnotdctcdcdstsl.1€lgrcatatbmo(GquEltoftGSRL
idicatoc tho oooporrd wss lot d.tcclcd in tto ranplo af or $ow tho concootsatim indicorcd.
nE 0.010 mg/L MCL ftr Arsctris i8 hr Ctoup A NINC sysEtr8. All othc systas sl(Alld ohcc& wilh thcir county ttroalth Dbtsict b detdninc rdst l6rcl fu Eplioablo.
MO,:
N'':
ND:
<(0.0k):
a
SRL:
Trigg:t lad:
Dats Collected: 7/l7D0l3
SystemlDNo: 47629H
Lab - Sample#: 01089202
Sample Location: Well I 1200
Sample Purpose: RC
Sample Composition: S
Scnd Rcport To: Pleasant Harbor Marina
308913 Hwy l0l
Brinnon, WA 98320
Group:
SysternNamc:
County:
DOH SourceNo:
Date Received:
Date Analyzed:
Date Reporbd:
Sample Type:
Collected By:
PhoneNumbcr:
Bill To:
A
Pleasant Harbor Marina
Jefferson
SOI
7^7t20t3
7/18/2013
7fi9t2013
Prc-trearment/Raw
Scott Bcnder
360-7gfi46tt
Pleasant Harbor Marina
308913 Hwy l0l
Brinnon, WA 98320
DOH#Analyte Results Units SRL Trigger MCL*MCL
Exceeded
Method
(Analyst Init)Y(
21 Chloride 3.53 ms.lL 20 250 250 F.pA 3ff) 0 rKW)
133892
MCL:
N/6u
ND
< (0.0k):
TWrSS AN.A.LYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
26276TwclveTres Lrnc, Suite C Poulsbo, WA 98370 Telcphonc (360)779-5141 FAX (360) 779-5150
IOC. SHORT
IOC - SHORT by Various EPA Approved Methods
Source / Point of Entry - Report of Analysis
(Suc Rcpctiog Lwl), itrdicdGs thc minimm 6pr66tfug hry6l rcquircd by tfic Wasbiogm OofqMt of Hoath (DO[I).
DOH Dri*ing Waicr rcspoogc laGl. Sys6r wi6 coalpouo& dctaotod d concootrstimr in orccss of thir lcnrel arc roquircd to tah addirtional smplcs. Conurt f,ourrginal DOH oficc 6r firrta idormatio.
(lfodnum Comuinot Lowl), Iflto oontminaot @rd cxoocds thc MCl" imcdianly c@t .t yor rcgiooal DOH oftcc.
fio fnd5rc{, lo thc rocults cohm indicaes tlis coopmd was not inchrdcd iE tb orrrot an lysit.
(Nd Ddctad), in ltc rcsulB cohrurn indioslcs lhir coq€nlsd wa ortzod ord Dot ddoctcd s[ a levd grcilGr tlal 6 cqud b rhr SRL
indicabs &c c@poud was not dacctod in the surylc at or abovc thc conccarntior indicrtcd.
Thc 0.0 I 0 mg/I. MCL for Argric is fc GroW A NINC systcsrs. All olbcr systccrs shorld cbock wift thoir oouoty HcsIh Disfist b dctlrminc what lct cl ic qpliccblo.
SRL:
Triggalarrl:
Date Collccted: 7/l6D0l3
System ID No: 47629H
Lab- Samplc#: 01089204
Samplelocation: Well I 1730
Samplc Purpose: RC
Samplc Composition: S
Scnd Rcport To: Pl€asant Harbor Marina
30E913 Hwy l0l
Brinnon, WA 98320
Group:
System Namc:
County:
DOH SourccNo:
Date Received:
Datc Analyzed:
Date Rcported:
Sample Type:
Collected By:
Phone Number:
Bill To:
A
Pleasant Harbor Marina
Jefferson
s0r
7fi7t2013
7^8/2013
n9n0t3
Pre-treatmemVRaw
Scott Bcndcr
360-79il61r
Ploasant Harbor Marina
308913 Hwy 101
Brinnon, WA 98320
DOH#Analyte Results Units SRL Trigger MCL*MCL
Exceedcd
Method
(Anatyrt IniL)fi
2l Chloridc 4.?O moll 20 )5$250 EPA300.0 (KW)
133892
TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
26276Twelve Trees Lane, Suite C Poulsbo, WA 98370 Telephone (360\779-5141 FAX (360) 779-5t5C
IOC - IOC
IOC - IOC by Various EPA Approved Methods
Source / Point of Entry - Report of Analysis
Date Collected: 7ll7l20l3
SystemIDNo: 47629H
Lab - Sample #: 01089001
Sample Location: Well I
Sample Purpose: RC
Sample Composition: S
Send Report To: Pleasant Harbor Marina
308913 Hwy l0l
Brinnon, WA 98320
Group:
System Name:
County:
DOH Source No:
Date Received:
Date Analyzed:
Date Reported:
Sample Type:
Collected By:
Phone Number:
Bill To:
A
Pleasant Harbor Marina
Jefferson
s0l
7lt7l20t3
7lt9l20t3
7t31t2013
Pre-treatment/Raw
Scott Bender
360-796-4611
Pleasant Harbor Marina
308913 Hwy l0l
Brinnon, WA 98320
DOH#Analyte Results Units SRL Trigger MCL*MCL
Exceeded
Method
(Analyst Init.)
EPA/State Regulated
4 Arsenic <(0 0014)ms/I 0 0014 0 0l 0 0l EPA 200 9 (KW)
5 Barium <(0. I )ms/L 0.1 2 2 EPA 200.7 (KW)
(\Cadmium </0 001 |mo/l .0 001 0 005 0 005 F,PA ?OO 7 (KW)
'1 Chromirrm <(0 007)ms/l 0 007 0l 0l EPA 200 7 (KW)
ll Mercuru <(0.0002)ms/[0.0002 0.002 0.002 sM 3l l2 B (KW)
t2 Selenium <(0 002)ms/l .0 002 00s 00s EPA 200.9 (KW)
I l0 Rerullirrm <(0 000i\ms/l .0 000i 0 004 0 004 F.PA 200 7 (KW)
lll Nickel <(0.005)melL 0.005 EPA 200.7 (KW)
tt2 Antimonv <(0.003)msJL 0 003 0.006 0 006 EPA 200.9 (KW)
I Ii Thallirrm <(0 001)ms/l.0 001 0 002 0 002 EPA 200 9 (KW)
I l6 Cvanide Free msJL 0.1 0.2 0.2 SM 45OO-CN F (ST)
ls Fluoride <(0.5)mq/l .05 )4 EPA 100 0 (KW)
114 Nitrite-N <(0 l)ms/l.0l 05 I EPA 100 0 (KW)
20 Nitrate-N 0.36 mslL 0.5 5 l0 EPA 300.0 (KW)
l6l Total NitrateNitrite 0.36 ms/L 05 5 t0 EPA 300.0 (KW)
8 Iron <(0 l)msll.0t 03 EPA 200 7 (KW)
l0 Mansanese <(0.01)melL 0.01 0.0s EPA 200.7 (KW)
li Silver <(0.1 )ms/L 0l 0l EPA 200.7 (KW)
2t Chlorrde 429 mpJl 20 250 EPA 300 0 (KW)
22 Sulfate <(50)melL 50 2s0 EPA 300.0 (KW)
24 7.ina <(0 2)ms/l .o2 5 FPA 2OO 7 TKW\
t4 Sodium s.04 ms^5 EPA 200.7 (KW)
t5 Hardness Total /as CaCO3)770 sfl. as CaCC l0 sM 2i40 B (KW)
t6 Conductivitv l6l uS/cm 70 700 SM 25IO B (ST')
17 Turbiditv 015 NTII 0l SM 2130 B (ST)
l8 Color <(l 5)CI]l5 l5 sM 2120 B (ST)
EPA/State Unregulated
9 | .eatl <(0 001)mall.0 001 F.PA 200 I (KW)
z)Cooner <(0.02)melL 0.02 EPA 200.7 (KW)
r 33890
TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
26276Twelve Trees Lane, Suite C Poulsbo, WA 98370 Telephone (360\779-5141 FAX (360)'779-515C
IOC - IOC
IOC - IOC by Various EPA Approved Methods
Source / Point of Entry - Report of Analysis
Date Collected: 7ll7l20l3
SystemIDNo: 47629H
Lab - Sample #: 01089001
Sample Location: Well I
Sample Purpose: RC
Sample Composition: S
Send Report To: Pleasant Harbor Marina
308913 Hwy l0l
Brinnon, WA 98320
Group:
System Name:
County:
DOH Source No:
Date Received:
Date Analyzed:
Date Reported:
Sample Type:
Collected By:
Phone Number:
Bill To:
A
Pleasant Harbor Marina
Jefferson
s0l
7n7t2013
7n9t2013
713U2013
Pre-treatment/Raw
Scott Bender
360-196-4611
Pleasant Harbor Marina
308913 Hwy l0l
Brinnon, WA 98320
DOH#Analyte Results Units SRL Trigger MCL*MCL
Exceeded
Method
(Analyst Init.)
SRL:
Trigger Level:
MCL:
NA:
ND:
< (0.00x):
(State Reporting [rvel), indicates the minimm rcporting lwel required by the Wruhington Departnent of Health (DOH).
DOH Drinking Watu response level. Systems with compomds detsted at concentrations in exess of this level ue required to take additional mples. Contact you
regional DOH office for firtho infomtion.
(Muimm Contaminmt Level), If the contaminilt ilnout exceeds the MCL, imediately contact you regional DOH offic.
(Not Analyred), in the rcsults colm indicates 6is oompomd wm not included in the clmt malysis.
(Not Detected), in the results colm indicates this compomd wm malyred md not detected at a level greater thm or equal to the SRL
indicates the compomd w6 not detected in the sanple at or above the concentration indicated.
The 0.010 mg,/L MCL for Anenic is for Group A NTNC systems. All other systm should check with their comty Health District to detemine what level is applicable.
l 33 890
trDGCANATYTICAL
Burlington WA Bellingham WA Portland OR
cdryde ffi@ Mdobiolow tfrqobidoilChemw
1620 S Wahut St - 98233 805 Odrard Dr Sto 4 - 98225 9i50 SW Pionsor Ct Ste W- 97070
800.755.9295 .360.757.1400 360.67'1.0688 503.682.7802
N ACcO
ReferenceNumber: 13-12907
Project: Pleasant Harlcor Marina
oo I
LABORATORIES
Client Name: Twiss Analytical Laboratories
26276 Twelve Trees Lane Ste C
Poulsbo, WA 98370
VoLATTLE ORGANTC COMPOUNDS (VOC) REPORT
Page 1 oI2
System Name:
System lD Number:
DOH Source Number:
Multiple Sources:
Sample Type:
Sample Purpose:
Sample Location:
County:
Sampled By:
Sampler Phone:
PLEASANT HARBOR MARINA
47629H
01
B - Before treatment
C - Compliance
Well#1
Jefferson
Scott Bender
360-796-4611
Field lD:
Lab Number:
Date Collected:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Report Date:
Analyst:
Released By:
133891-0'1
046-29291
7117113 12:00
524_130723
07t23t13
7t30113
HY
DOH#COMPOUNDS RESULTS UNITS SRL Trigger MCL COMMENT
160
57
60
47
48
49
50
51
63
66
67
68
71
73
74
45
75
76
52
84
95
46
56
102
103
EPAIState Regulated
TOTAL XYLENES
T - 1,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
CIS - 1.2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1.1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2 - DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
1,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
TOLUENE
1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
M/P -XYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
O - XYLENE
STYRENE
P - DICHLOROBENZENE
O - DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,4, . TRICHLOROBENZENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
*ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE (EDB)
1,2.DI BROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
EPA/State Unregulated
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ilD
ND
ilD
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ugil
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.01
0.02
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.02
0.04
Screening Only / PQL 0.5 ug/L
Screening Only / PQL 0.5 ug/L
NOTES:
lf a compound is dctected > or = to thr State Roporting Lcvel, SRL, spscitird increascd monitoring frequcncics may occur per DOH.
blank MCL value indi@tes e level is not curently cstablishod.
ND (Not Oetocled): indicatc8 that th6 parameterwas not delected above the State Roponing Limil (SRL).
An ' in front ofhe paramatar nane indicatas it is not NELAP acqcditcd but it is accreditcd through WSOOH or USEPA Region 1 0.
These test results meet all the requirements of NELAC, unless olherwise stated in writing, and relate only to these samples.
lf you have any questions concerning this report contact Lawrence Henderson at the above phone number.
FORM: VOC
trDGjFANATYTIEAL
Reference Number: 13-12907
Lab Number: 046-29291
ReportDate: 7/30/13 10:38
Page 2 ot 2
LABONATORIES
VoLATTLE ORGANTC COMPOUNDS (VOC) REPORT
DOH#COMPOUNDS RESULTS UNITS SRL Trigger MCL COMMENT
58
59
86
62
104
64
65
69
53
70
72
87
79
78
80
81
88
89
54
82
90
91
92
83
93
94
55
97
96
98
85
31
27
28
29
30
0
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
2,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1 . DICHLOROPROPENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
DIBROMOMETHANE
CIS - 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
TRANS- 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
CHLOROMETHANE
1,3 - DICHLOROPROPANE
1, 1,1,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1,2,3 - TRICHLOROPROPANE
BROMOBENZENE
1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
O - CHLOROTOLUENE
N - PROPYLBENZENE
1,3,5 - TRIMETHYLBENZENE
BROMOMETHANE
-P - CHLOROTOLUENE
TERT - BUTYLBENZENE
1,2,4 - TRIMETHYLBENZENE
SEC - BUryLBENZENE
M - DICHLOROBENZENE
P - ISOPROPYLTOLUENE
N - BUTYLBENZENE
CHLOROETHANE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
NAPHTHALENE
1,2,3 - TRICHLOROBENZENE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
EPA Regulated - Under Trihalometh
TOTAL TRIHALOMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE
BROMOFORM
State Unregulated - Other
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER
ND
ilD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
rnes Prog
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
em
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
60
NOTES:
lla is detgcted > or = to the Stale
by EPA:
may occur p.. DOH.
Fede.al Aclion Lcwls are 0.015 mg/L lor Lcad and l.3 mgA for Copp€r. Sodium has a rocommended limt ol 20 mg/L. AMCLContominant Level) muimum
blank eslablished
ND (Nol Oeteded): indicates that the parameterwas nol detec{ed above the Stat6 RcponinE Limit (SRL).
An r in lront ofhe parametcr hame indicates it is not NELAP .cdcdited bd it i6 acdcdilcd through WSOOH or USEPA Rcgion 1 O.
These test results meet all the requirements of NELAC, unless otherwise stated in writing, and relate only to these samples.
lf you have any questions concerning this report contact Lawrence Henderson at the above phone number.
FORM: VOC
value indicales
-?--
I
:
I
tl
.}(.a
(.
$ATEOFWASTINGN)N
EPARTMEr{TOFEOOUIOY
CERTINCATE OF VATER RIGHT
EI &d.E we l#Sffi#9,$ffiSffitr;3'lfr*Sth$g$ina'r
E crq,r,o wm? g#Imgf#,ggffi,S$Tffi.ffi*-o
Dec.ober I
XAII
TMEnll E. IBtrTI ..:
AODiEI' 6]l[ED
PrO Bor tl6 tC llvl l:rP cooEt
!rlanoa I|aohl,lrcoD 9832()
G
3.0 acra-fect pgr year c@rralt5r tloocrtlc arpply cmtLlrrously
locAflm OF Ollctgon prronAtrAr
ar9ioora?E LocATrona o? orvcRatoaHiltHERewalfrell t 1: 1lifil f.rt esrt *rr ![ff! feat south froa th. N6thtrEst coraer of SGctr,os Ii.
rl8l'l. I 2: 1!i05 lG.t ..ct .{t 1100 fe€t sotrtb froa tbe nofthrf,st corocr of Sccttoa 1:i.
Lt3
Gover@eot Lt 3, Seetl.oa 15, f. 25 til.' R. 2 w.W.U. eod ffid{llt lr{,aB south of Stste B18ht6,
No. 101, ls Scc. 15 T. 25 N., B. 2 I,1.$.1t., TOGEf,IEB tt:tlE the tideleoda of Secoad Clace 1r
froat of Gover@cot I.ot 3.
15 ruTruEI
ECY OaO.t.2 (ir.a-rl ISEE [V3ntE SrOEt GERTTFTCATE I
OOR-
. 3.O
been in hws
-J '._-.-.:!
7 FrrcuSus
It .ccc6a porC aa roqulrcd 6 yalr psrolt ahall be od,rtalnait at ell tbea.
"All sater u.LL. coo.carccod rdthla at .rata sball orst tta !il&lE ataieilg fc cortruc-
ctoB 8Di D.tot.r.!Eo ar prclnrn usa.s GtlPt r 18.f00 IGf (Warn|'88g@ t.tst lhll' h.Eilct .oo
AEt of f9rl) ssd Ch.Et r lr3-1q, WAG Obtm Stuilsrt! fc Co.tttreCtoD d utatoaocc oG
lgater t{clls).tr
Th. tBh, to t h. us ot rha rrut, clondd rtrrr0.y antfutlrd ts r*lctrd a rrtc M G &e ol w hq*t
descdbd, cxct?, ot Weldd h RCW 90.03.380, 90.0t.t90, ad 90.,U.020-
rlir ccrdtrc.la o, u.t r illB lr .Decltr ruy .trU.ct b ]t hdahdtr htr !o@G of rrta a Dtodn a lD iot
eo.r+rl0.
t
Gh;1n.under nt hord and the scal of thls olficc at
of ... ........... 4pr.ll..................... ..., I 9 1.A..........
r:i-.r:XEERIiC D^T^
hy
WILBUA C. EAII.AIIEB, DIBEST{'B
Dspsrtmcnt ofEcologyW,GK-E.U. NSELSTINE, Bs3loael llaila€r
OIyryir
ox..... /.2!.;.,.. -.....,....
:
\
l
Ii
ll adttryna, i tih - -.P. *... b'
.i
i
FOB COUNfy USE OilL'
7
o*'f,.ffi1\1iilii:86!1tu*-{w
.'li',
"i
rt,t. j'tt irt0t0Gr
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OI'ECOLOGY
REPORT OF EXAMINANON
WRTS FileNo.C'2-3M36
(llruGd itr rscodae witfi thc misim of C'hetar ll7- hw of
tsshilgM for lgl]-md mftdmmt! hqrto, dnd thc rfucs md rcgulations
of tlE [Epaimaltof Eolo6/.)
(lsucd in eodacc yith thcwfuimofchEta263- lsof
Wahingtm for l9{5, and amirdmmb th@lo, dnd thc il|Gs snd Egulatiffi
of fic [Eplrtmmt of Eslogy.)
Surfa6'W8tsr
Oround WEEr
October I 2007
APPLICATION NI,,IMBER
G2-30436
PERMITNI'MBER
NAME
Pleasant Harbor Marina and Golf Resort
ADDRESS(STREET) CITY
308913 US Highway 101 Brinnon
STATE ZIP@DE
wA 98320
PIIBLIC WATERS TO BE APPROPRIATEI)
3 Wells
l2l ac-ftlw (Additive) Multiole Domestic and Commercial SuDDlv Year-round- as needed
105 ac-ftfvr inon-addiiive) Irrimiion (61 acres) ' Aoril 1 to S'eDt. 30h
28 ac-ftIyr (non-additive) trri[ation (tZO acre fire Smart Program) Affi t to Sebt 30h
LOCATIONOT
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF DIVERSION_WTII{DRAWAL
Well 1 800 fest north and 1700 fest west of the SE comer of Section 15
Well 2 to be constructed in the SW yt SE yt - site to be determined
Well 3 to be constructed in the NW y.N % - sit€ to be determined
sw%sE%
NE%N%
Jefferson
SECTION
t5
22
TOWNSHIPN.
25N
2sN
RAl.rGE, (E OR w') W.M.
2 W.W.M.
2 W.W.M
l6
W,RLA
LEGAL DESCRTPTTON OF PROPERIY ON WmCf, WATER TS TO BE USEn
PLBASANT IIARBOR MARINA & GOLF RESORT IOCATEd iN JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON AII WithiN
portions of SECTIONS 15 and 22, both in TOWNSHIP 25 NORTII, RATIGE 2 WEST, W.M. AND GOVERNMENT LOT
7 OF SAID SECTION 15, AND GOVERNMENT LOTS 2 AND 3 OF SAID SECTION 22;
Including:
PRJORTTY DATE
LOTS l, 2 and 3 O.F WATERTOUCH SHORT PLAT, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 2 OF SHORT PLATS, PAGES
205 AI{D 206, RECORDS OF JEFItsRSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON, BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 15,
TOWNSHIP 25 NORTII, RANGE 2 WEST, W.tvL, JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON, and
LOTS I and 2 ofPLEASANT IIARBOR MARINA SHORT PLAT, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 2 OF
SHORT PLATS, PAGES 221 TO 223 AND AMENDED IN VOLI,JME 3 OF SHORT PLATS, PAGES 8 TO I O,
RECORDS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON
A complete legal description ofthe project's boundaries is located in thb file
G2-30436_Pleasant Harbof P4e2
Three wells serving the Pleasant Hartor development
DEVELOPMENT SCHEDI'LE
BYTruDATE:
July l, 201 I 1,20251,2018
PROVISIONS
Water Use Metering and Reporting
l. An approved measuring device shall be installed and maintained for each of the diversions authorized by
this water right, in accordance with the rule "Requirements for Measuring and Reporting Water Use",
wAC 173-173.
2. Wder use data shall be recorded weekly and maintained by the project owner for a minimum of five years. The
maximum monttrly rate of withdrawal and the monthly total volume shall be submitted to the Departrnent of
Ecolory by February 28 ofeach calendar year.
3. Reported water use data may be zubmitted via the lotemel To set up an Iatemet reporting account
access https://fortress.wagov/ecylunr./wrx/Ivlet€ring/. If you do not have Intemet access, contact the
Southwest Region Office for forms to submit yor.u data
4. Chapter 173-173 WAC describes the requirements for data accuracy, device installation and operation,
and information reporting. It also allows a water user to petition Ecology for modifications to some of ttre
requirements. Installation, operation, and maintenance requirements are enclosed as a document entifled
"Water Measuremeirt Device Installation and Operation Requirements."
S. Departnent of Ecolory personnel, upon presentation of proper credentials, shall have access at reasonable
times, to the records of water use thd are kept to meet the above conditions md may inspect at reasonable
times, any measuring device used to meet the above conditions.
Static Water Lwel Measurements
By February 28 of each year, the following information shall be zubmitted to the Departuent of Ecolory,
Southwest Regional Office, Lacey, Washin$on.
Static water levels shall be measured quarterly from the following monitoring wells according to Pleasant
llarbor's Groundwater Monitoring Plan, which include: VW?-l, YWP-3, MW-5, VWP-6, MW-2, MW4, MW-
7, and MW-8. Data shall include the following elements:
o UniqueWelllDNumberr Measurementdate andtimeo Measurement method (air line, elecfric tape, pressue transducer, etc,)
o Measurement accuracy (to nearest foot, tenth of foot etc.)
r Description of the measuring point (top of casing, souuding tube, etc.)
o Measuring point elevation above or below land swface to the nearest 0.1 footr Land surface elevation at the well head to the nearest foot.r Static water level below measuring point to the nearest 0.1 foot.
If nearby punping wells interfere wirh monitoring well water levels, pumping wells may need to be shut of for
as long as 4 hours to allow monitoring wells to recover to static conditions.
Chloride Sampling
Chloride and conductivity samples shall be collected quarterly from the wells authorized under this permit Data
shall be submitted to the Department of Ecology, Southwest Regional OfEce, Lacey, Washingtoq by February
28 ofeach year
The ohemical analysis shall be performed by a statc-accredited laboratory.
The chloride/conductivity sampling and the static water level measurement mentioned above shall be oonducted
on the same day.
This data collestion will assist the applicant and Ecology in determining if actions arc necessary to prevent an
hsreaqing trend in chloride concentrations (an indicator ofseawater intrusion). Preventative actions may include
- reducing the instantaneous pumping rate, reduoing the armual volume pumped, scheduling pumping to coincide
G2-3(Xit6_Pleasant Harbor PagE 3
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORI(S
with low tides, raising the pump intake, and./or limiting the number of serrrice connections. Additional
methodologies have been outlined by Pleasant Harbor in their Crrormdwater Monitoring Plan
Groundweter Monitoring Plen
l. Issuance of this permit is continge,nt with ongoing compliance with the Groundvvater Menitoring Plen:
2. The monitoring program will continue for five years or until full build-out whichever is greater, at ufoich
time the frequency of monitoring may be adjustcd based on resrrlts.
3. The pemit holdcr is requircd to prcparc and submit an annual report sgmspf izing monitoring-rasults. The
report must be reviewed and stamped by a licensed hydrogeologist and is due by February 28u of eaoh
year.
Neighborhood Program
hsuanco of this penurit is contingent with ongoing complianco with tho Nelghbofiood Weter Suppty Program roquirod
by Jofforson County Plmning. Ecolog/s approval ofthis pormit doos not limit any torms tho Comty may roquirc in the
Noighborhood Watr Supply Program rcglrding access to tto Pleasant Harbor wator syste,nr by neigtboring parcols ifsah
wator intrusion becomes an issue for neighboring wells on Black Point peninsula"
Dwelopment Schedule .
The development schedule shall be as follows:
Construction shall begin by July l,20ll
Cons&uction shall be completed by July 1,2018.
Proof of Appropriation shall be filed by July 1,2025.
The issuance ofthis permit in no way authorizes or grants any other perrrit required ofthe applicant, including
arxhorizations that may be required from the Deparment of Ecology Water Quality Program and the Deparhent
of Health regarding stormwat€r mrnagemeut and reclaimed water.
The water user is advised that quantities recommended for the instantaneous aud annual rates of withdrawal may
bc roduced at the time of issuance of a final water right commensurate with the oapacity of the installed systertr
and the amount of water used" While this ground water right authorizes water for the full development of this
project domestic needs will be phased in as the resort builds our Accordingly this groundwater permit may be
used for both domestic supply AND irrigation of 61 acres, with the 133 acre feet of inigation demand designated
as a non-additivey'alternate quantity as adhorizcd by surface water permit S2-30437, To the extent the surface
water right has provided a reliable source of zupply for the irrigation requirements, the finel certificate for the
groundwater right may be issued to authorize only domestic, potablq watir, and quantities reported on the Proof
of Appropriation form limited to domestic supply.
FINDINGS OF FACTS AIYD ORDER
Upon rcviewing the investigator's r€port, I find all facts, relevant and material to the subject application, have been
thoro'tshly invcstigated. Furthermore, I find water is available for appropriation and the appropriation as
recommended is a beneficial use and will not be detrimental to existing rights or the public welfare.
Therrefore, I ORDER that a pemrit be issued rmder Ground Water Application Numb er G2-3}436zubject to
existing rights and indicated provisions, to allow appropriation of public grormd water for the emount and uses
specified in this report.
You have a right to appeal this ORDER. To appeal this you must:
o File your appeal with the Pollution Control Heaings Board within 30 days of the "date of receipf' of '\is
document Filing means actual receipt by the Board duing regular office hourso Serve your appeal on the Deparhent of Ecology within 30 days of the l'date of receipt'; of this document.
Service may be accomplisfugd by any of the procedures identified in WAC 371-08-305(10). "Date of
receipt" is defined at RCW 43.218.001 (2).
G2-3(X36_Pleasant Harbor Page 4
Be sure to do the following:
o Include a copy of this document that you arc eppenling with yow Notice of Appeal.r Serve and file your appeal in paper form; electouic copies are not accepted.
1. X'ile your appeal with the Pollution Contrul Hearingp Board
Mail appeal to: Deliver yor.n ap,peal in person to:
The Pollrtion Control Heaings Board
PO Box 40903
Olympia, WA 9850+0903
2. Scrve your rypeal to the Department of Ecologr
Mail appeal to:
The Pollution Contol Hearings Board
4224 - 6th Ave SE Rowe Six, Bldg 2
Lacey, WA 98503
Deliver your appeal in person to:
The Deparhent of Ecology
Appeals Coordinator
300 Desmond Dr SE
Lacey, WA 98503
OR
The Department of Ecology
Appeals Coordinator
PO Box 47608
Olympia, WA 9850+7608
OR
3. Send e copy ofyour appeal to:
Thomas loranger
Department of Ecology
Southwest Regional Offi ce
POBox47775
OlympiaWA 98504-7775
For additiorwl ir{ormation vtstt the Erwironmental Hearings Ofice Website: http:/hvww.eho.wagw. Tofind
lou,s ond agency ruler visit tlze Washington Sta/;e Legislatwe Website: http:/hvwwl.leg.wagov/CodeReviser .
Siped at Olympia, Washington,this /b,rh a"y or {un*2010.
Thomas [oranger, Section lvlanager
$y'ater Resourccs Phogram
Southwest Regional Office
G2-3(Xil6_Pl6s8art Harbor Page 5
gn*u
. IIYYESTIGATOR'SREPORT
Water Right Permit No. G2-30436
BACKGROUND
DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
On October I l, 2007, Pleasant tlarbor Marina and Golf Resort filed two Applications for Water Right Permits;
the first to withdraw ground water at the mardmum rates of 300 gpm for mtrnicipal zupply and inigation of 108
acres; and a second application to use water from a rainwater collection system, also for municipal supply and
irrigation of the same project The applioations were assiped application nr.unbers G2-3U36 and 52-30437
respectively. The project site is located on the Black Point Peninsula situated betr:veen the Dosewallips and
Duckabush Rivers, on the east side of Hood Canal, in the Skokomish River Watershed Inventory fu€a (WRIA
lQ in Sections 15 atd22 of T25N, R2W.
Based ou the provisions of RCW 43.21A.690 and RCW 90.03.265, Pacific Groundwater Group (PGG) pre,pared
this report under contract to Ecology. PGG reviewed all available documents pertaining to these applications,
including site conditions, historical water use, existing rights, and seniority of pe,nding applic*ions that could
potentially be affectcd by the ryplication" PGG also performed zupplemental analysis to evaluate recharge,
aquifer properties, and drawdown associated with the proposed pumping (PGG, 2009). Final detenninations of
water availability were made by the Department of Ecology.
Under the provisions of RCW 90.03.290 nd90.44, a water right sha[ be issued upon findiugs thgt wafsl ig
available for appropriation for abeneficial use, tbat the appropriation will not impair existing rights or be
detrimental to the public welfare. ln accordance with these provisions, I recommend issuance of Permit G2-
30436.
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ISSUANCE OF AWATER RIGHT PERMIT
.Public Notice
A public notice ofthe proposed appropriation was published in the Jefferson County Leader on December 17fi
and24h,2008. In response to the notice a protest letter was received from Mr. Gerald Stecl on behalf of the
Brinnon Grorp, @rinnon). These comments are addressed in the Report of Exnmination under the section
entitled Consideration of Prorcstant's Conce,rns.
State Envlronmental Policy Act (SEPA)
While thc Pleasant Harbor projecfs withdmwal of watcr is less than 2250 gallons per minrfre, rryhich does not in
itself trigger a SEPA review, a water right application is still subject to a SEPA threshold determiuation in
situations where it is part ofa lrger proposal that is subject to SEPA for other reasons (e.g., the need to obtain
other permits that ae not cxempt from SEPA).
The Statcsman Crroup of Companies, L'[D, and Black Point Properticq LLC, gubmitted an application with
Jcfferson County for a lvlagter Plarucd R€sort (MPR) in the Black Point area This project required an
amendment to the County's Comprehensive Plan, and thus this application is part of larger SEPA process.
The County, acting as lead agency, detemined that this proposal was likely to have sipificant adverse
environmental impacts, and required that an Eovironmeirtal ImFact Statement @IS) be prepared.
The Final Environmental Impact Statement for the proposcd Brinnon Master Planned Resort was issued by the
Jefferson Co.rmty SEPA-responsible official oh November 27 , 2007 , and a final decision was made on January
14;2008.
Water Resources Statute and Case Lar
Chapters 90.03 and 90.44 RCW arthorize the appropriation of public water for beneficial use and describe the
proc€ss for obtaining water rights. I-aws governing the water riglt permiting process are coutained in RCW
90.03.250 through 90.03.340 and RCW 90.,14.050. In accordanc€ with RCW 90.03.290, favorable determinations
must be made on the following four criteria in order for an application for a water right to be apprbved:
. Water must be available.
. There mustbe no impairmeut of existing rights.
Pleasant Harbor Page 6
. The water use must be beneficial.
. The watcr use mustnot be detimental to the public hteresl
INVESTIGATION
Evaluation of this application include{ but was not limited to, rqsearch and/or review of the following:
. Departnrent of Ecolory records of surface aod ground water rights and clri-", and well construction
reports within the vicinity of the subject production wells.
. Documents and reports applicable to the are4 as refereirced in the conclusions of this report
. A field visit conducted by Peter SchwarEman of Pacific Groundwater Group and Jobn Pearch of Ecology
on May 7h,z}Og.
. Subsequent analysis ofdrawdoum and pumping water lcvel associated with the requested
withdrawal. PGG developed a pr€liminary groundwater flow model of the Black Foint Peninsula and used
the model to evaluate responses to pumping.
. Chapters 90.03,90.44 and 90.54 Revised Code of Washington
LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE
The Pleasant Harbor development is situated adjacent to Hood Canal, two miles south of Brinnon on the Black
Point Pednsula The peninsula has an area of about 710 acres, and is surrounded on tbree sides (north. south
and east) by the wmers of the Hood Canal. The north side of the Peninsula is also bounded by Pleasant Harbor,
an inlet connected to the Hood Canal via a narrow channel. The westeru edge of Black Point Psninsula is
defined by US Highway l0l, beyond which occur the foothills of the eastem Olympic mormtain rmge.
The property contains stands ofpredominantly coniferous forests, interspersed with open meadow areas that were
logged approximately 40 years ago by previous ownerc. The property is characterized by terraced artas
separated by steep *kettle" formations caused by reoeding glaciers.
The projeot site has been logged and was formerly the site of a 500-unit Thousand Trails (American
Carryground) seasoual campground for trailers and campers.
INTENT OF WATER RIGHT APPLICATION
The intent of these filings is to s€curc water rights for the proposed Pleasant llarbor Resort and Golf Club
(Resod). The final plan for the Resort encompasses approximately 250 acres and includes the golf couse resort
area of approximately 220 acres and the marina resort arpa of approximately 26 aqes. The development will be a
Master Planned Resort that will include at the golf cor.use resort area up to 890 residential units (802 toumhouse
style condo units and at the marina resort 88 residential unis), 46,000 square-feet of commercial space -
including retail and conference spac€s, an l8-hole golfcourse, I 1,5fi) square feet ofcommercial space and the
existing 3 I l-slip marina
PROJECTED WATER USE
The water supply for this project will combine the use of existing gror.rndwater rights, new groundwater rights,
aquifer infiltration" rainfall water harvesting, and treatment and reuse of wastewater. Groundwater wells will be
the potable water supply sor.nce for the resorl Groundwater will also be used idtially for inigation; however, as
surface-water collection facilities arc constructed on the property, surfrce water will replace grormdwater as a
primary source for irrigation- The applicant is also pursuing plans for the development of reclaimed water for the
irrigation program. As this water becomes available, groundwater and surface water use will be reduced by the
available reclaimed water and as provided by the terms in ttre reclaimed water permit. Ultimately, at full resort
buildout, reclaimed water could potentially supply the majority of the irrigation demand, thus reducing the
ovsrall use of groundwater aud srrrface water
POTABLE WATER DEilIANDS
The proposcd development is being designed to consume less than 40% of the water that a typical development
uses by implementing water saving devices. Pleasant Harbor proposes the irse of low flow toilets, motion
activated faucets, low flow showerheads, and high-efficiency washing machines.
The applicant has calculated the potable residential water demand to be only 70 gallsns per day (gpd) for each
residential vnit, Waer resornce mqnagement rcport, 2020 Engineering Report, Morch 22, 2007, section 2.1.2
P8qleT
TRRTGATTON (NON-POTABLE) WATER DEUAND
The irrigation program includes irrigation of the golf course, and a "Firr Smarf'program intended to promote
natural vegctation and reduce firE hazards in other areas.
Irrigation at the golf course will be applied to 61 acres with state-of-the-art equipment desiped to minimiz€
water use aod promote efficiency. PGG estimated water demaod at the golf course based on the Washington
Inigation Guide assuming turf grass grown in the vicinity of Quilcene with an inigation efficiency of 85 percenq
as summarized below:
Table 2. krigation Der-nnnds
In addition, the applicant has requested 28 aflyr to be applied to I20 aores under the Fire Smart program during
the April-to-October growing season. The FirE Smaxt Program has been designed to promote native vegetation
growth and reduce fire hazards. Native vegetation is primarily domrant in the sumrnermonths and a 20 percent
evapotranspiration faotor has been assip to wet them. Statesmcn applied this rate to 120 aces of properfy that
will not be developed by the proposal, and calculated a Fire Smart program demand ofabout 28 acre-feet per
year. Total irrigation demand is therefore estimated to be 133 aflyr.
' DOH recommends using 175 gpd /ERU for ADD and 350 Sxd/ERU for the maximum daily demand (MDD) to
calculate potable demand, as stipulated in Sections 5.2.1.1 aud 5.2.1.5 of the DOH Water System Design lvlanual
(Design manual)
Page I
Potable Water Demand Based on 890 units
Occupanoy %85o/o 50o/o 30%
# of Month 4 months 3 months 5 months
# Units Occupiod/Day
:t57 445 267
Potable Vy'ater/Day
132,t13 77.240 47.000
Potable Water/Year t6-tt7-79t 7-106-093 7,106,093
Armual use l2l acre-feet per year (includes additional 28 acre-feet associated with commercial uses)
Month Crop lnigation Requirement
(in/mo)
Crop lrrigation Requirement
(acre-ft)
Total I nigation Requirement
(acre-ft)
April 0.il 3.25 3.E3
May 2.37 12.05 14.17
Junc 3.31 16.83 I9.80
July 5.12 26.03 30.62
August 3.99 20.28 23.86
Scptembcr 2.10 r0.68 t2.56
Total t7.53 89.1 I 1(M.84
Q020 Repon). Also see Chapter 3 of the EISfor the Resort. Howev€r, this is recopized to be a low residential
demand" The State Department of Health (DO[D, who will approve the number of connections for the water
syst€m, rocornm€,lrds that for planning purposes, a higher number be used with the that actual
demand.may be more in line with the applicant's estimates.
The annual quantity of water that will be authorized for the domestic use of the Resort is based on the ADD dnd
the seasoual occupancy of the Resort. Because there are no records at ttris time for the lower 70 gpd/ERU
estimste, the application is considered for
" *u"st at this time for a quantity of water for ftll development based
on the 175 gpd/ERUr. The occrqrancy ofthe Resort is determined to raoge from 85% in the high season to 30olo
in the low season, with an average of 53o/o occqpancy. 2020 Report EIS, chapter 3; S/ater Supply and
Groundwater Analysis, Subsurface Group LLC, December 77,2N8 (Subsurfacc Report).
At 175 gpd - proratcd to accouot for seasonal usage, the annual dmand for residential potable water supply is 93
acre feet per year. The application applied fol the water right basd on this.calculation, witl the expectation that
in the futrne thp actual water use will be 40% of this amount. In addition to domestic water needs associated with
the living units, the applicant has estimated 25,000 gpd or 28 aff for commercial use over an expected total area
of approximately 57,500 square feet This is a reasonable quantity requested whe,n considering the commercial
uses include a restauant, lounge, commercial kitchen, a cooference ceirter for tp to 400 guests, marina
operations, offices, and shops.
Given these estimates, the potable water demand at the desip occulnncy is about l2l ac-ft per year. Table I
details the resorts estimated water demand based sn projected occupancy rates.
' Tablo l. Potable Water Demand
Assuming that the Fire Smart program is applied between July and September, PGG estimates that average
monthly irrigation deinand would approach the total requested Qi for the two wat€r rights (300 gm) {uring the
ma:rimum inigation month (July). Because irrigation demand comprises a significant portion of the total
requested Qi duing the dryer summer months, satis&ing this demand will rely on storage of water during other
portions of the year. Irrigation water wil be stored in Kettle B located near the &iving range. The ksttle will be
lined to form a storage pond, and should be capable ofholding 60 million gallons ofwater. Subsurface
Memorandurq page 15. (Note that the total irrigation demand of 133 af is equivaleat to 43.3 million gallons.)
\Mater will be pumped tom the pond with a pressurized pipins system to meet inigation and fire flow needs.
Groundwater under this water right will be used to establish the golf course; however as altemate sources of
water become available they will provide an increasing portion of the irrigation demand- Surface water will
come from rrroftop collection systems and storm runoff. The use of this surface water would be authorized rmdEr
surface water right application 52-30437'. The groundwater right will remain available as a back-up source;
however groundwater is not e:rpected to be needed.
Additionally, the Resort is planning to apply for a reclaimed water permi! and if approved the non-poable water
derived from wastewaGr teated to Class A reclaimed water standards will be the primary source for irrigation of
the 61 acre golf course and also the developer's "Fire Smart''program. Both the groundwater right and the
zurface.water right wi[ be retained as back-up supplies if the reclaimed water source'is not available or is
inadequate for a period of timc. The reclaimed water will be authorized for use under a D€partment of Ecology
Water Quality Program Reclaimed Water P€rmil
Total lnlgaUon Requltement
Since the Washington State Cooperative Extension does not calculate inigation demands for a Brinnon station,
irrigation duty for this project are based on climatic conditions at the nearby Quilceire, l l miles north of the
Black Point Peninsula-
The crop irrigation requirements for the irrigation of pasture and turf amount to 17.54 inches per acre over an
April to September irrigation season. The applicants will be installing a new, efficient irrigation system assumed
to be at l€ast 85% efficient
. Using a Crop Inigation Requirement (CIR) for pasturr/turf, of 17.54 in/yr for the inigation season,
the CIR for 6l acres is (17.54 rn/12 in/ft) {' 6l acres = 89 ac-ft/yr.
ApplicationEfficiency @a) forpop-up sprinklers is approximgtely 85% efficient assuming a 107ri
evaporatibn factor, the estimated Total Irrigation Requirement (TR) = 105 ac-ff/yr.
TOTAL WATER REQUIREMENT
Annual Quantl0es
The total water requirements for this project amount to 254 acre-feet per year. It should be noted that rryhile the
ground water right would anthorize water for the fu.ll developm.ent of this project it is the ryplicant's intent that
domestic needs willbe phased in as the resod builds out. Accordingly the groundwater pemit should be used for
both domestic supply AND irrigation (and Fire Smart) with the 133 acre feet of irrigation demand designated as
an alternste source and a zon-addittve quantity to the right authorized by surface water perurit S2-3M37.
lnstantaneous quantltles
The application requests 300 gallons per minute. This is a maximum quantity of water that would be withdrawn
from up to the 3 wills on the site. ffgr.oundwater supplied the entire Resort, both potable and inigation" the
quantity withdraum from the ground was calculated by the applicant to amount to 150 gallons per minute on an
avsrag€ annual basis. At such time that surface water is available for irrigationthe av€rage annual withdrawal
will be 75 gallons per minute, with a range over thg year of a low of 50 gallons per minute to a peak of 109
gallons per minute. Based on the need for this water for the initial developm.ent and recognizing the needs of
ma"ximum demands for water system planning under DOH regulations, the 300 gallons per minute is reasonable.
EXISTING WATER RIGHTS ASSOCIATED wlTH PROJECT SITE
There are currently 5 other water rights appurtenant to the same property. Two, ground water certificates G2-
20465 ail.G2-24359, are associated directly with facilities that Statesmen will now operate. On paper these two
rights arnount to 28 acre-feet per year. S/ater right certificates G2-27964, G2-21134 atdG2-23623 te
associated with the Pleasant Tides Water Co-op which serves water for domestic supply on the Black Point
2 Rooftop rainwater collcction systems ae excmpt ftom the wacr right permitting process; however thc applicant has electod to get a
waer right permit for tiis portion of their wator use
page 9
Peninsula While the Statasmen project is located partially within the scrvice area of the Co-op, and Pleasant
Tides could zupply an additional 12.5 acre-feet, the parties have uot reached an agree,ment ud Statesne,n has
elected to pursue its own righs.
Tablo 3. Existing Watcr Rights $rrmmnry
Status of Exiating Rightr
Ground watcr c€rtificate G2-2}465issued to American Campgrounds is apprrtenant to one of the production
wells tbat will bc uscd for the resorl The certificate authorizes the withdrawal of 55 gpm, and 25 acre-feet per
year, based on the projected water demand of an 800 tailer RV park and other inciiental water usc. The facility
was never met€red it is uoknown how much watcr was actually used- Since it has been a number of years since
the campground was fiilly operational, the applicant has requested that this certificale not be considered as an
available sourcc ofsupply for tltis project
Ground water certificate Cr2-24359 was iszued for the domestic de,mands of the existing Pleasant llarbor marina
area, including a small comnercial establishment and also.water used at the marina Givelr the tlpe of projec!
and without evidence to the contary we assume that the firll 3 acre-fect is a reasonable water dutlr
HYDROGEOLOGIC ANALYSIS/GROUND-WATER FLOW SYSTEM
Regional Setting, Land Use, and Topography
Black Point Peninsula ii located in the northem portion ofthe Hood Canal, southeastern Jefferson County, about
J milss south of Brinnon and 40 milss aerth of Shelton (Figure l). The Peninsula is pefi of Water Resource
Irwentory Area 16 (Skokomish-Dosewallips). The Peninsula is primarily residential with a small marina on the
north side, however much of the Peninsula was originally intended to be developed as a campground area
The sur'fac€ area of the Peninsula is approximately 1.1 square miles (696 acres; area of the Peninsula east of
Highway l0l) of which Statesman holds approximately 0.34 square.miles Q20 acres) (['igure 1). The
topography ranges from steep, coastal bluffs to genfly rolling uplands. Most of the shoreline consists of steep
bluffs with nanow beaches. The ceirtral portion ofthe Peninsula contains large surface depressions known as
kettles. Kettles are landform features from the Vashon ice age that resulted in blocks of ice calving from the
front of the receding glacier and Seesming buried partially too wholly by glacial outwasb- The Peninsula is
bounded by saltwater on three sides, from Pleasant Harbor to the nortll the Hood Canal to the east and the
Duckabush River delta to the south- The gound surfaoe elevation ranges from about 60 feet in the deepes't kettle,
to elevation 320 feet on a hill in the southeast portion ofthe site. The average site elevation ofthe Pleasant
llarbor Resort is about 180 to 200 feer
CLITATE
The site oscus in the rain shadow of the Olympic Mormtains, although the raih shadow effect is smaller near the
site than furlher to the north and northwest. The climate is northwbst marine; where winter months are typically
moderate and wet, while surnmer months are typically mild and dry. Over 55 inohes of precipitation faliin
Quilcene, about 1l miles north of the site. Most of the precipitation events in the site area are generated from
southerly storms that move north up the canal. Precipitation data are also available from Madrona Ridge, which
is.on the West side of Hwy.l0l across from Pleasant Harbor. The data are collected by Mr. Bruce Klanke, who
was trained by and uses an automated weather station approved by NOAA. His data are tnnsmitted to Mesowest
and are available at their website under location 4'546l . Comparison of dara from the two locations shows
slightly more precipitation at Madrona Ridge (59 vs. 55 in/yr over the period 1992 through 2008), with very
similar seasonal variation @GG, 2009). Over a period from 1948 throryh 2005, average annual precipitation at
Quilcene gage'2 SW" (456840 was 55.4 in/yr, with monthly av€rage temperatures ranglng from a 60.7 T high
to a39.7 Trlow fttto://www.vrrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAlN.pl?waouic). For estimating precipitation recharge to
the Black Point Peninsula, PGG used Quilcene precipitation and temperature data for the period of 1948 to 2005.
Page 10
File #Percon
Do
c Pdortty
Us
e
QI
(spm)
Qa
(aflvr)TRS ao/o
G2-
20d€,5C American CampErounds
Cer
t 8129t1972 DM 55 25
25.0N 02.0W
15 SWSE
G2-
211vC Black PointWater Co lnc
Cer
t 6t14t1973 DM 40 60
25.0N 02.0W
15
SW/N
W
G2-
2#23C Black Point Wabr Co lnc
Cer
t 't/2ot'ts75 DM 45 60
25.0N 02.0W
15
SWN
w
G2-
2/t359C REILLY ROBERT E
Cer
t
1U131197
6 DM 60 3
25.0N 02.0W
't5
G2-27Xt4
Pleasant Harbor Beach
Tract Pmt
'121241199
0 DM 215 25
25.0N 02.0W
15
Geologlc Setting
The project site lies on the boundary of the Physiographic province of the Ollmpic Mountains and the Puget
Sound lowland.
The geology of the Peninsula has been mapped by Dragovich et al. Q002) and Carson (1976), with some
additional mapping by Subsurface Group (2008) on the Statesman prop€rty. Surficial geologic mapping in the
site vicinity shows exposures of recent beach deposits, Vashon age glacial sediments, pre-Vashon non-glacial
sediments, and older bedrock.
Multiple glaciatious have occurred in the project vicinity during Pleistocene times (10,000 to 200,000 years ago).
These glaciations, and intervening non-glacial periods, have deposited sediments in the project area that reflect a
complex history of deposition and erosion Wells and outcrops on the Black Point Peninsula show that the
bedrock is overlain by both glacial sediments from the most recent glaciation (Vashon Stade of the Fraser
Glaciatioq which occupied the area about 19,000 to 13,000 years ago) and older non-glacial sediments. In some
places, the Vashon glaciation is interpreted to have eroded away substantial thicknesses ofpre-Vashon
sediments; urhereas in other areas the pre-Vashon non-glacial sediments are observed closer to the land surface.
The Vashon glacial deposits are interpreted to be thickest in the western and central portions ofthe peninsulq
whereas in more eastem portions ofthe peninsula the older non-glacial sediments escaped deep erosion, and are
observed cropping out on the south-central and south-east beach bluffs.
Vashon glacial sediments include a sequetrce (from bottom to top) of advance outwash, glacial till, and spotty
occunences ofrecessional and ice-contact outwash. As the glacial ice known as the Puget Lobe advanced into
the project area, meltwater steams began depositing advance outwash deposits; Coarser sediments (e.g. sands
and gravels) were deposited in fluvial (stream) environrnents, whereas finer sediments (e.g. silts and silty sands)
were deposited in glacioJacustrine (ake) environments created when portions ofthe Puget lobe blocked drainage
of the meltwater sreams. As the Puget Lobe advanced into site vicinity, advance outwash deposits were overrun
by the glacier and a dense mixture ofsilts, sands, gravel, cobbles and boulders known as Vashon glacial till was
deposited under the advancing glacial ice. As the glacier retreated, the project site experienced active ice margin
deposition and later ice stagnation. Glacial Lake Leland began draining and releasing large volumes ofwater that
flowed through the arca, eroding advance ounrash and till in some areas and depositing recessional outlvash in
others. Large stagnant blocks ofice eventually melted and produced deep localized depressions known as kettles.
Sqrficial geolory on the Black Point Peninsula is dominated by exposures ofglaoial till, ice-contact deposits and
recessional outwash.
Older Pre-Vashon non-glacial deposits are interpreted as part of the Whidbey Formation. They are composed of
very dense sfratified fine to coarse sand interbedded with gravelly sand with occasional 2 to 6-inch thick clayey
silty beds. The sands and gravels are fluvially deposited with a source area in the Olympic Mounain foothills to
the west.
The bedrock rmit of the Peningula is knounr as the Crescent Formation (basaltl, locafed on the strrface along its
northem and east-central portions. The bedrock is ocposed on the northeast comer and the eastern-central
portions of the Black Point Peninsula and in the foothills northwest and southwest of the peninsul4 bedrock is
also known to be close to land surface in locations immediately west of the peninsula Howwer, it is not ccrtain
how deep the Crescent Formation extends below the srrrface, in the southern portion of the Peninsula. Wells have
only penetrated the Crescent Formation on west of Highway 101 and indicate a sepante aquifer that is
disconnected from the Sea Level aquifer. The bedrock surface in the project vicinity has be€n shaped by former
glacial episodes and by the Duckabush and Dosewallips rivers. On the Black Point Peninsula, an e'rosional valley
formed during prior glaciations is interpreted to hend north-south tbrough the westem and ceirtral portions ofthe
peninsulq and has beetr fiId in by both glacial and non-glacial sedimenrs.
GROUNDWATER OCCURRENCE
Groundwater in the vicinity of the Black Point Peninsula occurs in the Vashon advance outwash deposits, the
pre-Vashon non-glacial drposits and to a lesser extent in bedrock. Because the Vashon and pre-Vashon deposits
have no intervening low-permeability aquitar4 these two unis form a single aquif€r where both are preseut
below the regional water table. For the purpose efthis lgperg saturated conditions within either or both ofthese
units is referred to as the "sea level aquifet''. The sea-level aquifer is can be moderately productive, and is
capable ofproviding several hundred gallons per minute to properly constructed wells. In contrast, bedrock
produces low quantities of groundwater from fractrnes, and therefore constifutes a minor aquifer in the study
area The following points describe salient featwes of the groundwater flow system beneath and immediately
adjacent to the Black Point Peninsula:
1. Investigation of hydrogeologic conditions in the bedrock.aquifer immediately west of the Black Point
Peninsula concluded that the bedrock and sea level aquifers are relatively separate and do not exhibit
sigrificant hydraulic continuity with one another (Aspecq 200Q. This conclusion was based on aquifer
testing conducted at the Tudor Well (water right application G2-29065), which found that drawdoum in the
bedrock aquifer did not propagate to the glacial aquifer and that chloride concentrations increased
sigrificantly in the bedrock aquifer but remained stable in the glacial aquifer system.
Page 11
2. The sea level aquifer generally occnrs under unconfined conditions. The till which overlies the aquifer is
somewlrat discontinuous. No springs or seqrs weFe identified or sampled from the sea level aquifer by the
Subsurfacc Crroup (2008). The top ofthe sea level aquifer isjista few feet above sea level on most parts of
the Peninsula, whereas the aquifer base is well below sea level. Most wells tap this aquifer, but none
pene-trate the entire thickness.
3. The sea level aquifq is expected to be moderately tansmissive based on sedimeirtary textures and aquifer
lhickness. A 24-horn, 65 gallons-per-minute (gpm) pumping test was conducted at the American
Campground on the project site, aud showed a delayed yield r€sponse q/pic8l ofunconfiaed aquifer
conditions (Subsurface Group, 2008). Early-time data from the aquifer test provided an estimated
tansmissivity of approximarcly 2,500 ff/day and a corfined storago coefficie,nt of 0.0007 (PGG; 2009).
Over timefizmes of months to years, rmconfined storage coefficieirt values (e.g. 0.1 to 0.2) are expected in the
sea levcl aquifer.
4. PGG estimated precipitation recharge to the Black Point Peninsula based on precipitation and temperature
data from Quilcene gage'2 SW' (456846) over the period from 1948 through 2005 and the observatiou that
most precipitation infiltrates into surficial soils without sipificant runoff(Subsurface Group, 2008). Using a
proprietary version of the USGS "Deep Percolation Model", PGG estimated that out of an average
precipitation of 55.4 in/yr, associated rccharge is on the order of37.7 in/yr with losses to evapotranspiration
of about 17.7 in/yr (PGG,2009). Potential evapotanspiration was estimated to b€ 26.9 idyr. In addition to
recharge from precipitation, the peninsula receives recharge from the foothills to the west, likely as a
combination ofsubsurfabe groundwater flow ('subfloui) and surface runoff.
5. Groundwater discharge from the Black Point Peninsula primarily occr:rs to maxine water, but may also occur
to small surface-water features and to gromd{/ater wells. The peninsuta is surrounded on three sides by the' marine waters of Hood Canal. Groundwater in the sea level aquifer discharges to marine water to ttre north
(along Pleasant Ik$oD and towards the south- An eastem discharge pathway may also occur, but is at least
partia[y blocked by bedrock
6. Groundwater elevations were mapped at select monitoring wells on the peninsula by the Subsurface Group' (2008). The mapping shows groundwater elevations on the order of 9 to 10.5 fe,et NGVD88 in central
portions of the peirinsula (at wells MW-3 and VW?-6). Higher groundwater elevations (15.2 feet NGVDSS)
are observed along the western peninsula near SRlOl, likely due to the effects of groundwater.recharge from
the uplands to the wesl An anomalously high groundwater elevation is observed along the eastem portion of'
the southern coastline (27.5 feet NGVD88 in Well MW-2), urhich PGG interprets as possibly affeoted by
subsurface bedrock topography. Based on the geometry of the peirinsula and its hydro-geologic tamewor*, it
is reasonable to e:rpect groundwater flow towards the southern and northem coast-lines, a possible flourp*h
towards ttre eastem coastline (depeoding on the zubsurfacc oocumence of bedrock.towards the east), and
higher groundwater elevations in the wpstern and central portions ofthe peninsula.
'7. PGG pcrformed a preliminarywater balance for the peninsula. Precipitation rechargc is estimated to be
approximately 2,230 aflyr over the entirc 710.'acre pe,ninsula and 785 atlyt over the 250-acre project site
based on a recharge rate of 37.7 in/yr. In developing the analytic element groundwater flow model, PGG
produced one interpretation ufiere recharge inflow (sribflow) from the $,sstem foothills was estimated to be
on the order of 100 aflyr, although other interpretations could.also be developed" Out of a total groundwater
inflow of 2,330 afly., cuilent groundwater withdrawals are estimated to be on the order of 47 aflyr (about 2
percent oftotal recharge). This rough estimate is based on an assumed 300 gpd water use at 140 residences
(the Pleasant Tides Water Coop system serves a total of 103 hookups, the Black Point Commercial Power .
water system serves 6 hookups, and about 30 well-log locations are contained iu Ecology;s online well log
database). Given that existing residences predominaofly employ septic systems, at least half that groundwater
withdrawal is re-introduced to the groundwater flow system as septic efluent. On a net basis, about 99
perc€xil of the recharge to the peninsula is curreirtly unconsumed by pumpins. Most of that recbarge is
e4pccted to discharge to marine water, although a small portion may discharge to various minor surface-water
feanrrcs.
8. Given that the Black Point Peuinsula is surounded on three sides by marine water, both the sea level aquifer
and the bedrock aquifer are potentially vulnerable to saltwater intrusion. The potential for saltwater intrusion
depends, in part" on the relative balanoc between freshwater flushing through the aquifer and the magnitu6"
ofgroundwater withdrawals. The bedrock aquifer system appears to be highly susceptible to intusion under
small to moderate ratcs of withdrawd. High chlorides plague the Tudor Well and Pleasant llarbor Well #2,
nrhich are both completed in bedrock. In contrast, the Pleasant Tides Well and Pleasant Harbor Well #3, both
completed in glacial sediments, have no appaxent issues with chloride. Seawater Intusion is fiuther
discu&sed in this ROE in a zubseque,nt section entitled Seawater Intrusion.
Page 12
GROUNDWATER AVAILABILITY
Pleasant Herbor WelI Construction
The existing (former American Campground) production well is located in the cental portion of the Black Point
Peninsula in the SW % SE % Section 15, Township 25 North, Range 2 West W.M. The well was completed in
Jnly,1972 to a total depth of 271 fee! approximately 2,100 feet inland from the sor$heastern shoreline of the
Peninsula The land surface elevation at the well head is 145 feet above meau sea lsvel (MSL). The well is
screened in the sea level aquifer (Pre-Vashon non-glacial deposits) from 215 to 270 feet below ground surface
(bgs) (-70 ft to -125 ft MSL). In May, 200E the static water level in the well was 136.1 feet bgs (S.74 ft MSL)
(Subsurface Group, 2008).
In addition to the existing former campground weU, two additional production wells will be constucted on the
Pleasaot tlarbor prcperty. One of these two new wells is intended as a possible replacement sf 1fos QamJiground.
well whibh is an older well with possible infrastructtue limitations. The other poteirtial new well is to be locaM
on the southeastern portion of theproperty, approximately 340 feet from the southern shoreline of the Hood
Canal in Section 22.
To date, availability has only been established at the Sectioo 15 location, and based on the analysis
of PGG (2009) and Pearch 2010). Monitoring Vy'ell "MW-2" was installed at the Section 22 location,
encoutered grouudwater at a depth of 15 I feet below land surface; however, aquifer testing at this location
would require installation of a larger test or production well. As previously noted, Well MW-2 has an
anomalously high groundwater elevation that may be indicative of a relatively high zubsurface bedrock elwation,
and which could limit available groundwater flow to aproduction well instatld atthis location
Becruse groundwater eveilability et the Section 22 gite has not yet been esteblished, epproval of this
Permit is br$d solely on the at'tributeg of the Sectiqn 15 sitc. Before the applicant would be allowed to
withdraw groundwater from the Sestion 22 locatiorq they would need to: l) install and test a new well, 2) show
that the aquifer test data suggest sufficient availability at the site, and 3) show thd pr.mping from the site will not
causc n€w impairment to zurrormding senior wder-rigfut holders or be dehimerilal to the public interest due to
saltwater intusion conoents (see Section on '!rovisions').
Regardless of whether of the Section 22 site provides sufficient water supply, Ecolory and PGG find that
zufficient zupply for all tbree wells could be derived from the Section 15 site. Groundwater availability at the
Section 15 site is established based ou:
r Interpretation of the 24-hour, 65 gpm aquifer test performed on the American Campground Well;
r Iaterpretation ofshort duration well testing at higher rates (250 and 307 Spm) by the driller;
o Estimated long-term aquifer drawdoram based on aquifer property estimates; an4
o Consideration ofavailable drawdoum in properly constnrcted production wells.
A conservative €stimate of maximum total drawdovm at the American Campground Well pumping at 300 gpm is
54 feet, however drawdown in multiple production wells would be considerably less if the pumping were
distributed befween two or more wells.
The American Qsmpground Well is screened between 275 and,270 feet bls and has a static grouadwater level of
135 feet bls. This provides an available drawdown qf about 80 feet, qf rrvhio[ 6 minimum of 15 feet should be
rcserved for a well pump and seasonal water-lwel fluctuations, thus providing a usable drawdown on the order or
65 feet. Thus, available drawdown appea$ to be sufficient to supply either the American Campground Well
pumping at a maximum pumping rate of 300 gpm or two wells in this general vicinity dividing this total
pumping.
Water balances for the area indicate that estimated groundwater recharge on the Black Point Peninsril a Q.,330
aayr) is sipificantly higfuer than the annual allocation associated with the water right Qsa aflyr). Therefore,
water availability is considered highly likely both at the scale of the production well and the aquifer system.
POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO EXISTING GROUND AND SURFAGE WATER RIGHTS
The proposed water right would withdraw as much as254 aflyr of groundwater from wells completed within the
sea level aquifer. This tanslates to an avqage annual withdrawal of 158 gpm. The water right would be limited
to a maximum instantaneous withdraural of 3 00 gpm from three wells. A portion of this water right quantity is
expocted to be supplied from surface water sources - ufrich are addressed in a separate ROE, or from reclaimed
water. However, for the purpose of evaluating impacts, a conservative approach assumes that the full quantity of
water could be pumped from the sealwel aquifer.
Page 13
PGG developed a groundwatcr flow model to imp,rove estimates of aquifer transmissivity bencath the peninzula
to estinste draudown associated with thc pr,oposcd pumping, and to estimate seawater intrusion potcntial
assooiated with pumping eGG, 2009). Several model scenarios were developed to address ucertainties
regarding aquifer ocourrence (i.e. occltrrence of subsurface bedrcck boundaries), grdtmdwater zubflow from
upgradient (areas west of Highuay I 0 I ), and alternative interpu,etations of aquifer transmissivity by the
Subsurhc€ Group (2008). Modeling resulB found that drawdowns assooiated with the pumping scenarios are
relativcly smalt amoss the peninsula (predicted drawdowns.were ou the order of scveral tmths of a foot iu near
coastal locations), and are not expected to impair the ability of existing wells to obtain customary wdll yields;
SEAWATER INTRUSION
lncreasing chloride concentratious in nearby domestic wells as a result of scawater intusion is a concem to many
individual well orryners and residents on the coast of the Black Point Peninsula In response to these concerns,
Ecolory conducted a study to determine bsseline chloride levels in existing coastal domestic wells in order to
establish a future groundwatsr monitoring stratery for the Pleasant Harbor development. The goals of thiS study
werc to: (1) wahiate the gmaal extent of seawater intrusion; and (2) assess the need for future monitoring of
groundwarcr levels and chloride concentrations. Perch lly*ogeologic Memo Port I: Chloride Sotpling in
Coastal Domestic Wells onthe BlackPoint Peninsula, JeffersonCounty, Washingto4 pertain@to Water Right
Application G2-j0 I 46 Jaru.ary 20 I 0.
The results of this sttrdy allow Ecology to give Pleasant Harbor appropriate provisions pertaining to water quality
aird water level monitoring. Specific mitigation measures will be ideirtified and applied to Pleasant Harbor in
case their production wells increase chlorides levels in any neighboring wells. This teport describes the findings
ofan investigation ofgeology, groundwater quantity, ground-water quality, and seawater intrusion potential on
thc Black Point Peninsula, Jefferson County, Washington.
Ecology fnds that seewater intrusion is not a widespread problem on the Peninsula - chlrcride concentations are
within acccpable limits in most domestic wells. However, there are two ar€as near the shoreline where local
intrusion appears to be indicated in the seaJevel aquifer. Iocal upconing ofthe saltwater wedge was evident in
two domestic wells that exceeded the MCL of 250 mg/L (Washington State Deparhent of Health drinking water
standards). The 367 feet deep well on Corrrorant Drive (ACY954), 3,100 feet west of the ACG well, was
sampled in Augusg 2009 and'had a chloride concentation of 3,500 mg/L. The 58 foot well on Black Point Road
(ABAI l2), 2,400 fcet northcast of the ACG well, was sampled in September, 1998 and had a chloride
concentration of 12,053 rlg[L. It is assumed that both of these wells were originally drilled at a depth within or
close proximity.of the saltwater wedge and high chlorides have forced these wells to be unusable. However,
additional domestic wells sampled in August, 2009 indicate there is not presently a wide-spread lateral intrusion
occnning in the sea-level aquifer (well water in 8 other domestic wells e:rhibit chlorides to be less then 26 wglL),
More detailed reporting of Ecology's sampling results can be found in Pearch (2010).
Regardless, domestic wells on the coast of Black Point Peninnila are still potentially at risk of a wide-spread
latcral seawater intrusion as a result ofPleasant Harbor's proposed groundwater withdrawals. Thus Pleasant
Harbor must continue to monitor chlorides in production wells and monitoring wells @er Pleasaut Harbor's
Groundwater monitoring Plan) and selected private domestic wells (per Jefferson County Ordinance 01-0128-08
Neighborhood Water Supply Prograril). (See attached documents.)
Chloride\Seawater lntrusion fonitorlng Recommendaflons
Both Ecology and Jefferson County have agreed that monitoring for chloride, electical conductivity and static
water levels is essential for ensuring that Pleasant Harbor will maintain an adeguate water supply for the
proposed Pleasant Hartor wells and for thc existing domestic wells oo the coast of the Black Point Peuinsula
As a condition of permit issuance Bcology is requiring monitoring of both onsite production wells and a series of
dedicatd monitoring wells. Ilrith Ecologr's irput Pleasant llarbor has establishd a monitoring plan that will
monitor for saltuder intrusion in all Pleasant hrbor wells and nearby dome*ic wells. Continued compliance
with the Groundwater Monitoring PIan is a requirement of the permit issuance. The monitoring plaraddresses
thc location of both dedicacd and private monitoring wellg the frcquency of data colleqtion and sampling
parmeters. Pleasant llarbor is rcquired to srmmarize this data in an aonual rqort u,ith will be submittcd to
Ecolory for review. The plau is intended to bc adaptable and can be modified if vuarranted based on monitoring
rcsults.
In addition to the Monitoring Plan, Jefferson County's approval of.the FEIS completed for Pleasant llarbor
requires the projest to be zubject to a Neighbortood \ilater Supply Progrem which establishes a smtegy to
protect domestic wells, as well as provide a contingency plan should other water users experience high chloride
levels. The Neighborhood Water Supply Program is required by Jefferson County in Ordinance 0l-0128-08,
and also by this water right permit The Neighborhood Water Supply Program requires Pleasant Harbor to
provide access to its water system by neighboring water users if saltwater intrusion becomes an issue for wells on
Black Point peninsula. (see Neighbortood Water Supply Program for details)
PEge 14
CONSISTENCY WITH WATERSHED PLAN NING
In 1998, the Washington State Legislaturc passed the Watershed Management Act, codified in the Revised Code
of Washington RCW 90.82. This law focuses on addressing water quantity, water quality, fish habitat, and
instreasr flow at the local level. In the Skokomish-Dosewallips watershed (WRIA lQ, the Planning Unit consists
of Mason and Jefferson colmties, the Skokomish Tribe, t}te Port of Hoodspor! Mason County Public Utility
Disfrict #1, local community groups, citizen representatives, and other environmental, developmen! and
recreation interests.
The WRLA 16 Planning Unit has been working together on watershed planning since 1999. The WRIA 16
planning Unit (also knoum as the Skokomish-Dosewallips Water Resource Inventory Area) prepared awatershed
plan for the area which was adopted by the Boards of County Commissioners in both Jefferson and Mason
Counties. The plan includes numerous recommendations to protect and enhance the water quality, water
resoruces and habitat througfuout the watershed.
While the group has opted not to recommend any specific flows for the watershed and has directed Ecology to
work direcfly with the Skokomish Tribe to formally establish insneam flows, there are recommendation in the
plan related to this project, specifically:
l. Develop a golf course management plau that addresses both water conservation and use of pestioides and
fertilizers (see plan recommendation 3.2.4).
2. Conduct compiehensive water quality monitoring at the site.
3. In putrership with a reoopized land tus! permanently protect the shoreline buffer area with a
conservation easemert to ensure that no stuctures are dweloped there and fhat native-vegetation is
maximized and retained.
4. Evaluate and address the indirect and cumulative impacts sf rhis developnent on the Dtrckabush and
Dosewallips River watersheds, including indirect and cumulative impacb to habitat for listed species and
to health.of Hood Canal.
The project proponents are aware ofthe goals ofthe watershed plan, and have ocpresSed intent to develop this
project accordingly. Other components of the Statesman project that are addressed by the watershed plan
include:
Exploring water reclamation from wastcwat€r heafuent plants. Water from wastewater treatrrent plants
can be teated to such a high level that it can be reused safely for nondrinking purpos€s zuch as inigation,
streamflow augmentation, or aquifer recharge. Statesmen intend to use as much non-potable water as
possible to meet its needs.
Enact low-impact development requirements to minimize i6p6lvieus surface and maximize onsite
management of storm water, Low Impact Development (LID) is an innovative approaoh to storm \ilater
management that shives to manag€ storm water on-site rath€r than convey and manage it thrd"gh large,
costly infrastucture investnents. The proposed project is desiped to ma,ximize storm water rccharge, as
well as control runofffrom the site.
a
CONSIDERATTON OF PROTESTANT'S GONGERNS:
A protest letter received from Mr. Gerald Steel on behalf of the Brinnon Gronp, @rinnon) raise.d several issues
regarding this project, specifically that
l. The applicetions filed by the applicant were incomplete because the locations of the wells are not
specified.
PGG notes tlat these applications were accepted as complete by the Deparhent of Ecology. As required by
statute they included information regarding the rate of withdrawal and proposed locations of the production
wells and diversionpoints defi:red by quarter/quarter section. The applications w€re supplemented by other
planning documents specifically the "Water Management Plan" which is included in the references.
Two wells were originally proposed. The first well (American Campgrormd Well) is already installed and
testcd" The second well location has not been teste4 andPGG/Ecology note that it may not provide
favorable hydrogeologic conditions for a production well. ln that case, the second (and third) wells can be
located adjacent to the American Campground Well site, and ttre site is expected to provide sufficient yield
(see water availability section).
2. The project has. not been sufriciently well defined and that it is dfficult to assess ftrture water demaud.
The Protestsnts note discrepancies in thq dgtril ofthe project between the various planning documents.
Pago 15
PGG agrces that this is a large complicated project and that numerous planning doct'ments have been
prepared over the lengthy plnnning process. While there is some variation in certain figrnes, the brcakdown
ofthe project's various component (potable, non-potable) and the source ofthat water (groundwater, rain
captur,e, reclaimed water) is foundto be generally consistent. Giventhe lead tim: needed to secure a water
right it is not uncorlmon for the details of projecs to change slightly so long as the oricinal intent remains
consistenl
3. Thet some of tte existing water righ6 characterized as aVailable for the Recort are not valid in the full
cerfficated amount end should not be considercd for additionel dwelopmenL The Prctestants ako
note tret actuel weter use on the peninrula hes not been adequatcly asEcEled.
PGG concru with the protestant's comment that not all of the water characterized as available is necessarily
in good standing and we have factored that into the overall water budget for this projecl as discussed in the
section of this ROE entifled Other Water Riehts Appurtenant to the Proj€ct Since water use records are not
available from thb American Campground well, and water use today is modest, the applicants have requested
that this water right not be considered as an available source ofsupply
4. That there ere uncertainties in the hydrogeological assessment conducted for the project and issue of
adequate water availability ic unresolvcd
Prior to the issuance of a water right permit Ecology must be able to make a finding that u/at€r is available
without impairment to neighboring wate,! users or the surouuding environment. As detailed in this ROE
under the section entitled Water Availability, available hydrogeologic infolrmation suggest that sufficient
groundwater is available for appropriation at the American Campground site..
5. That no analysis of the potentid impacb to eristing water righh has been done, and that gea water
intrusion could occur as a result ofthis proiect
This ROE addresses both the risk to surrounding water users as well as the potential for seawater intrusion.
Interference drawdowns on neighboring wells due to pumping are expected to be relatively small and should
not impair water availability. Supplemental information detailed in Ecology's seawater intnrsion assessment
indicate that while coastal aroas ile always at some risk for seawater intrusion that this project, as proposed,
will not withdraw enough water to adversely impact ttre water balance. The applicants are zubject to stringent
monitoring requirements as described in Pleasant llarbor's Groundwat€r Monitoring Pla&
['INDINGS
Under the provisions of RCW 90.03.290 and 90.44, a water right shall be issued upon findings thet water is
availablc for appropriation for a beneficial use and that the appropriation theroof, as proposed in the application,
will not impair existing rights or be detrimental to the public welfare. Under state law the following four criteria
must be met for a permit to be approved:
o Watermustbeavailabler There must be 16 imFairment of existing rightsr Thewateruse mustbebeneficialo The water use must not be detrimental to the public inter€st
Water Availability
Water is available for appropriation The aquifer in which the Pleasant Harbor wells are completed is reasonably
mn$nissive and capabie of supporting the additional withdrawals requested. Use of the proposed new
production wells will be contingent on the applicant demonstrating th* they are properly constucted and
adequirtely tested. The quantity appropriated reflects the amorrit needed to meet the needs of the applicant's
intended use. Water is thereforejudgcd to be available for appropriatioo under existing Ecology regulations.
Impairment of Erirting Righb
The approval of this application will not impair existing rights. Giv€n the prov€n transmissivity and yield of the
aqffq: the proposed groundwater withdrawals will not impair existing rights.
Beneficial Use\Purpose of Use
Thesc applications were originally filed for a purpose of use designatcd at Municipal Supply, which encompasses
avariety of water uses including domestio, commercial, industrial and inigation. Sincc the original filin& thc
King County Superior Court mled that several sections of the munioipal water bill were unconstihrtional. One of
tbo scstioDs that uns struck was RCW 90.03.015(aXa) u/hich defind zuppliers and municipal supply
purposes. The Attomey General's Office has interpr€ted tb€ ramificatioas of this ruling to mean that eirtities
Page 16
such as Statesmen, and uses ofwater such as proposed for Pleasant Harbor, do not qualifr as municipal rights.
Accordingly this permit will be issued for Multiple Domestic Supply, and tnigation.
According to RCW 90.14.031, both irrigation and multiple domestic supp.ly are considered a beneficial use of
u/Bter.
Public Interest
The use of the requested allocation of water for public domestic use and irrigation puqrcses is consistent with the
public interesf As additional protection due to the risk ofseawater intrusion in coastal areas conditions
requiring monitoring will be placed on this water right permit, as well as included in the permits issued by
Jefferson County.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Under the provisions of RCW gO.O3.2gO and 90.2t4 a water right shall be issued upon findings that water is
available for appropriation for a beneficial use and that the appropriation, as proposed in the applicatioq will not
impair existing rights or be detrimenal to the public welfare.
I recommend approval of this application and issuance of apermit authorizingwithdrawal of 300 gpm, nd,254
acre-feet per year from 3 wells, (l2l acre-feet for domestic zupply and 133 for inigation). The period of use for
domestic supply shnll be year-round as needed while the irrigation portion may be exercis€d from April 15 to
September 30th.
Reviewedby:
Crane
WderR€sourc€s Progrm
[f you rced this publication in qn alternate fortnat, please call Water Resowces Progron at (360) 407-6600.
Peisons with luwing loss can call 711 for Washingon Relay Service. Persons with a speech disability con call
877433-6i41
REFtsRENCES
Pearc[ J. January l4,zlll,Hydrogeologic Memo Part I: Chloride Sampling in Domestic Wells on the Black
Point Peninsula, Jefferson County, Washington
Pearcfu J. January 14,20L0, Hydrogeologic Memo Part II, Pleasant Harbor Monitoring requiremeirts aod aquifer
testing review.
Pacific Groundwater Group @GG), June 4, 2009, Technical memorandum, Pleasant Harbor Modeling Analysis,
To Phil Crane, Frology; From: Peter Schwartzuran, PGG
Subsurface Group, LLC; December 17 , zWE, Water Supply and Groundwater Inpact Analysis, Pleasant Harbor
Marina and Golf Resort Brinnon, Wdshington, Prepared for Statesman Group, SDEIS Groundwater vl-4.
Page 17
t
/frrffi;
Project Report Form
Water ts Self Assessment
lf you need this publication in an alternate format, call (800) 525-0127. For TTY/TDD call (800) 833-6388
DOH Form 331-370 (Updated 08/10)
Dniin q Etuiwilntel Halh
W@ afDd*htw@
Existing System Capacity - based
on water right limits
Proj ects Productior/withdrawal
with New Project On-line
Projected System Capacity Status
(excess or deficiency ofwater
riehts)
Permit
Certificate or
Claim #
Name of
rightholder or
claimant
Priority
Date
Source
NameA.Iumber
Primary or
supplemental
Maximum
Instantaneous
Flow rate (Qi)
Maximum
Annual
Volume (Qi)
Maximum
Instantaneous
Flow Rate (Qi)
Maximum
Annual
Volume (Qa)
Maximum
Instantaneous
Flow Rate (Qi)
Maximum
Annual
Volume (Qa)
Permits/
Certificates
t.G2-30436
Pleasant Harbor
Marina and Golf
Resort
2007
Octoberll N/A Primary 300 gpm 121 Acre Ft No increase No increase No deficiency No deficiency
2. G2-24359
Pleasant Harbor
Marina and Golf
Resort
1976
December
l3
N/A Primary 60 gpm 3 Acre Ft No increase No increase No deficiency No deficiency
Claims
I. NONE
Total 360 gpm 124 AcleFt
Existing Limits on
Intertie Water Use
Projected Productior/W ithdrawal
with New Proiect On-line
Current Intertie Supply Status
(Excess/Deficiency)
Intertie Name/Identifier Name of Purveyor Providing Water
Marimum
Instantaneous
Flow rate (Qi)
Maximum
Annual
Volume (Qa)
Maximum
Instantaneous
Flow rate (Qi)
Maximum
Annual
Volume (Qa)
Maximum
Instantaneous
Flow Rate (qi)
Maximum
Annual
Volume (Oa)
I. NONE
TOTAL
To return form, please see reverse side.
Please retum completed form to the Office of Drinking Water regional office checked below,
E Northwest Drinking Water
Department of Health
2042572nd Ave S, Suite 310
Kent, WA 98032-2358
Phone: (253) 395-6750
Fax: (253) 395-6760
E Southwest Drinking Water
Department of Health
PO Box 47823
Olympia, WA 98504-7823
Phone: (360) 236-3030
Fax: (360) 664-8058
E Eastern Drinking Water
Department of Health
16201E lndiana Ave, Suite 1500
Spokane Valley, WA 99216
Phone: (509) 329-2100
Fax: (509) 329-2104
E X P AN S I ON S Planned perDOH chaft 5 - 2
gallons per
notes Unit Capacity Analysis Units patron per
day
seats total 125
Bistro
14 hrs
50
with toilets | 7
+ with lounge 2
seats;@5Uo/o I 9 350
peak usage divided by 1.75 for MADD for expected ,[JSE''
patrons per gallons per consumed
day day per day
3,150 3,150
ERU's
E
x
I
S
T
I
N
G
USE
1,800
10
USE
6,847
39
Well# I 1440 pump flow @ 7.2 gpm:
Well # | 1440 pump flow @ l0 grm =
Well # I 1440 pump flow @ 15 gpm :
Well # I 1440 pump flow @ 18 gpm:
5.2.1 Maximum Day Demand
10,368
14,400
21,600
25,920
gal I
gal I
gal /
gal /
MADD
ERU's
duy
day
day
day
Based on the information available, DOH recommends a MDD to MMAD peaking factor of:
.7.7 for water systems in Western Washington.
4 @t.s
4@t.s
I
2
310
I
I
l8
4t
I
Harbor
Harbor House
- kitchen use
Swimming pool
- Bathhouse
Central bath
- and toilets
Store per toilet room
Laundry
hrs - washing machines
deli seats : @50%
patron per hr per seat
all moorage @67%
4
4
1
I
300
60
300
80
1
I
aJ
I
75
8.5
28s
DOHchart5-2
400
9
6
6
30
8
150
190 1,710 1.710
ERU's 70.2
50
l0
l0
l0
35
400
52s0
400
36
174
2,700
1,481
2,700
1,481
8,647
49
date time
WATER USAGE
gal Ave /
day
comments
9,669
I 1,008
9,366
9,522
7,443
7,906
6,208
3,127
4,747
6,768
6,438
7,897
7,659
7,346
7,471
6,455
6,692
5,540
4,677
3,729
6,968
5,669
6,437 construction: rebuild pool, fill pool and
hot tub6,431
6,005
jul 2013
171,,L78
jun 201 I
jul 201 I
aug 201 I
sep 2011
oct 201 I
nov 201 I
dec 201 I
jan2012
feb 2012
mar 2012
apr 2012
may 2012
repair leak in pool area
drain and fill pool
monthly
gallons
299,751
341,257
280,977
295,782
223,278
245,098
L92,460
88,326
L47,L51,
203,037
!99,578
235,998
237,423
227,729
23L,602
193,657
207,463
156,191
744,995
775,592
196,856
175,742
193,'J,Lg
199,347
180,148
t99,21!MADD
anomaly
anomaly
used
used
2012
2012
20t2
20r2
oct2012
nov2012
dec2012
jan2013
feb 2013
mar 2013
apr 2013
2013
jun 2013
348,619 MMD