HomeMy WebLinkAbout052Michelle Farfan
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Barbara Moore-Lewis < mooreleb@gmail.com >
Tuesday, October 08, 2013 3:49 PM
David W. Johnson
Re: FW: Outstanding items for Pleasant Harbor Draft SEIS
Thank you. Guessing that's our talk for this week.
On Oct 8,2013 3:20 PM, "David W. Johnson" <djohnson@cojefferson wrote:
FYI - It's Jefferson not Kitsap County.
From: Swenson, Karen Imailto:kswenson@eaest.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 2:00 PM
To: Craig Peck (peckassoc@comcast,net)
Cc: David W. Johnson; Schipanski, Rich; Hollinger, Kristy; Swenson, Karen
Subject: Outstanding items for Pleasant Harbor Draft SEIS
Craig,
As requested during our conference call with Kitsap County yesterday, here is the list of outstanding items that
will need be provided to EA to complete the Draft SEIS for Pleasant Harbor:
1. Energy Demand Memo (short memo to accompany the conceptual load spreadsheet previously provided
by Hargis on 7-3-13)
2. Energy Supply Report/Memo from Scott Taylor at the PUD regarding transmission capacity and
transformers on- and off-site
3. Water Report
4. Sewer Report
1
5. Technical Memorandum to accompany sewer report outlining the phasing of the WWTP including the
onsite septic system for the Maritime Village
6. Revised site plans to show the removal of the two 12-unit buildings in the Maritime Village area and any
changes to Marina Access Drive
7. Revised impervious surface area calculations per the removal of the two l2-unit building in the Maritime
Village area
8. Any revisions to the Maritime Village building including commercial building square footage, height or
building footprint (we understand that the 24 units from the Harborview House and Reunion House will be
shifted to the Maritime Village building but the overall unit count for the project will remain the same)
9. Revised data tables from GMH Architects Q.,iatalie) for Alternatives 1 and 2 indicating redistribution of
parking (surface vs structured) in the Maritime Village area due to the consolidation of buildings in this area
10. Map showing wellhead protection areas around the two existing wells and a list of restrictions in these
areas (plus any correspondence with DOH regarding written variances for paving and sanitary sewer
forcemains)
1L Map showing revised SEIS site boundary to include 29-acre WDFW property (this map should indicate
that this WDFW property is not owned by the applicant)
12. Impacts of construction of the realigned WDFW boat launch road (including overall length, condition and
grade ofexisting road and proposed road, and quantity ofclearing and grading for proposed road)
13. Revised phasing list (in Chapter 2 of the Preliminary Draft SEIS) to indicate change in time of
construction of the Maritime Village building and the addition of the onsite septic system, as well as timing of
the realigned boat launch road (Stage 1, Phase 1?)
14. Confirmation that Alternative 2 should be noted as the Preferred Alternative in the Draft SEIS (per Sandy
Mackie's 5-23 -13 memo).
2
15. Edits to Section 3.1 and 3.2 from Craig Peck (the rest of the edits for the Preliminary DEIS sections were
already provided by Craig on 6-6-13).
16. Clarification/confirmation of what is allowed under the amended BSP (currently the SEIS indicates that
redevelopment and renovation is within existing footprints only, but Craig added "or where shown on the
BSP")
17. Clarification of compliance with the first part of BoCC 63(g) - "The developer shall commission a
study of the number of jobs expected to be created as a direct or indirect result of the MPR that earn
80% or less of the Brinnon area average median income (AMl)." The 2012 Jobs Study, Summary of
Pleasant Harbor lmpacts: Job Creation and Value Added to National Economy, did not include salary
Ievels of proposed jobs and/or comparison the the Brinnon AMI. Garth noted that "Aaron Goforth of Wright
Johnson LLC would address the reports for accuracy and proposed salaries,"
18. Revisions to the description of the proposal (Chapter 2) and the list of required permits due to the inclusion
of the zipline, the removal of the 2 structures in the Maritime Village area, and the inclusion of the realigned
boat launch road in the proposal - the applicant can revise Chapter 2 and the Fact Sheet of the Preliminary
Draft SEIS accordingly, or EA can draft changes for applicant review
I believe this covers all the outstanding items that are needed to complete the Draft SEIS and to complete
revisions due to changes to the proposal. Please let me know if you have any questions.
K*raw Sv'tt*tlow
Karen Swenson, AICP
Senior Planner
2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 707 | Seattle, WA 98121
206.452.5350 x 1716
Thanks,
HT
kswenson@eaest.com
3