HomeMy WebLinkAbout054Michelle Farfan
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
David W. Johnson < djohnson@cojefferson.wa.us>
Friday, November 01, 2013 9:54 AM
peckassoc@comcast,net; Karen Swenson
David W. Johnson; Stacie Hoskins
RE: PH SEIS
SEIS Deficiency Memo-CP-10 2L 13.pdf
Craig,
ls it possible to get anticipated dates for completion for these items? We are trying to plan our Planning Commission
schedule for next year and it would be helpfulto get a more firm date on when the DEIS will be released.
Thanks!
From : peckassoc@comcast. net Imailto : peckassoc@comcast. net]
Sent: Monday, October 27,20t3 8:46 AM
To: David W. Johnson; Karen Swenson
Subject: PH SEIS
David and Karen,
Please see attached for today's call at 9:00.
Thank you,
Craig
1
XFINITY Connect
Page I of2
peckassoc@comcast.ne
+ Font Size I
Outstanding items for Pleasant Harbor Draft SEIS
From : Karen Swenson <ks,venson@eaest.com>
Subject : Outstanding items for Pleasant Harbor Draft SEIS
To : Craig Peck (peckassoc@comcast. net) <peckassoc@comcast.net>
Cc: David W. Johnson (djohnson@co.jefferson.wa.us) <djohnson@co.jefferson.wa.us>, Rich
Schipanski <rschipanski@eaest.com>, Kristy Hollinger <khollinger@eaest.com>, Karen
Swenson < ksalenson@eaest.com >
Craig,
As requested during our conference call with Kitsap County yesterday, here is the list of outstanding items that will need be provided to EA to
complete the Draft SEIS for Pleasant Harbor:
1. Energy Demand Memo (short memo to accompany the conceptual load spreadsheet previously provided by Hargis on 7-3-13)Hargis
Energy Supply Report/Memo from Scott Taylor at the PUD regarding transmission capacity and transformers on- and off-site PUD
Water Report Dwight
Technical Memorandum to sewer report outlining the phasing of the WWTP including the onsite septic system for the
Maritime Village
Revised site plans to show the removal of the two 12-unit buildings in the Maritime Village area and any changes to Marina Access Drive
Revised impervious surface area calculations per the removal of the two 12-unit building in the Maritime Village area CP, Natalie
Any revisions to the Maritime Village building including commercial building square footage, height or building footprint (we understand
that the 24 units from the Harborview House and Reunion House will be shifted to the Maritime Vil lage building but the overall unit
count for the project will remain the same)Natalie
9. Revised data tables from GMH Architects (Natalie) for Alternatives 1 and 2 indicating redistribution of parking (surface vs structured) in
the Maritime Village area due to the consolidation of buildings in this area Natalie
10, fUapshowingwellheadprotectionareasaroundthetwoexistingwellsandalistofrestrictionsintheseareas(plusanycorrespondence
with DOH regarding written variances for paving and sanitary sewer forcemains)Dwight, CP
11. Map showing revised SEIS site boundary to include 28-acre WDFW property (this map should indicate that this WDFW property is not
owned by the applicant)SEIS Boundary is new map - excludes BSP?
12. lmpactsofconstructionoftherealignedWDFWboatlaunchroad(includingoveralllength,conditionandgradeofexistingroadand
proposed road, and quantity of clearing and grading for proposed road)CP - thought covered in previous response
13. Revised phasing list (in Chapter 2 of the Preliminary Draft SEIS) to indicate change in time of construction of the Maritime Village building
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8,
Sewer Report
and the addition of the onsite septic system, as well as timing of the realigned boat launch road (Stage 1, Phase 1?)
14. ConfirmationthatAlternative2shouldbenotedasthePreferredAlternativeintheDraftSEls(perSandyMackie's5-23-13memo).
15. Edits to Section 3.1 and 3.2 from Craig Peck (the rest of the edits for the Preliminary DEIS sections were already provided by Craig on 6-6-
13)CP
16. Clarification/confirmation of what is allowed under the amended BSP (currently the SEIS indicates that redevelopment and renovation is
CP, David
@
Tue, Oct 08, 2013 01:59 PM
&1 attachment
rV
within existing footprints only, but Craig added 'qrryhele$Atu orlj )
PageZ of2
17. Clarification of compliance with the first part of BoCC 63(g) - "The developer shall commission a study of the number of jobs
expected to be created as a direct or indirect result of the MPR that earn 80o/o or less of the Brinnon area average median
income (AMl)." The 2012 Jobs study, Summary of Pleasant Harbor lmpacts: Job Creation and Value Addecl to National
Economy, did not include salary levels of proposed jobs and/or comparison the the Brinnon AMl. Garth noted that "Aaron Goforth of
Wright Johnson LLC would address the reports for accuracy and proposed salaries."Garth
18. Revisions to the description of the proposal (Chapter 2) and the list of required permits due to the inclusion of the zipline, the removal of
the 2 structures in the Maritime Village area, and the inclusion of the realigned boat launch road in the proposal - the applicant can
revise Chapter 2 and the Fact Sheet ofthe Preliminary Draft SEIS accordingly, or EA can draft changes for applicant review
I believe this covers all the outstanding items that are needed to complete the Draft SEIS and to complete revisions due to changes to the
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Karen Swensons
lGren Swenson, AICP
Senior Planner
2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 707 | Seattle, WA 98121
206.452.5350 x 1716
ksalenson@eaest.com
CP,
David
imageOO2jpg
997 B