The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About076Michelle Farfan From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: David W. Johnson < djohnson@cojefferson.wa.us > Monday, November 24,2074 4:09 PM Planning Commission Desk; Elizabeth Williams David W. Johnson December 3 PC meeting materials image003jpg; image004jpg; PC Meeting Materials 12-3-1.4.pdf; Presentation to PC 12-3-L4.doc; PHMPR Baskets.ppt; PHMPR SEIS Timeline.pdf; PC cover memo on PHMPR DSEIS 11-24-14.docx Attached as a PDF and individual docs David Wayne Johnson - LEED AP - Neighborhood Development Associate Planner - Port Ludlow Lead Planner Department of Community Development Jefferson County 360.379.4465 IND_cmyk] Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. P SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary All e-mail may be considered subject to the Public Records Act and as such may be disclosed to a third-party requestor IBrand Promoter lmage small.jpg] 1 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street I Port Townsend, WA 98368 | Web: www,co.jefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment Tel: 360.379.4450 | Fax: 360.379.4451 | Email: dcd@co.jefferson.wa.us Building Permits & /nspecflons I Development Consistency Review I Long Range Planning I Watershed Stewardship Resource Center TO: Planning Commission FROM: David Wayne Johnson, Associate Planner DATE: November24,2014 RE: Pleasant Harbor Draft Supplemental Environmental lmpact Statement (DSEIS) At long last the Pleasant Harbor DSEIS is available for review and comment. Part of that review by the Planning Commission (PC) is understanding what role you play in the process. To that end I have attached several documents designed to help break down the approval process into manageable steps. The first document is a two page outline of the Phase 2 SEIS Approval Process. We will use this as an outline for Staffs presentation during the meeting. lt provides some background information on the project, then breaks down the core elements in the approval process so you may better understand what they are, and why they are necessary to approval. The outline then details what the Planning Commission's role is in the process. And lastly, a concise summary of the actions and steps necessary to approve Phase 2. The next document is a matrix of the overall MPR approval process by phases. The first page is a summary of all the phases necessary to build the resort. Notice the little arrow pointing down to Phase 2 - that's where we are today with Phase 1 completed in January 2008. The remaining five pages are the detail of each Phase. This process matrix is helpful to see the "big picture" of the approval process, what's involve and why it takes so long. lt also shows who has decision making authority, when the Public has an opportunity to comment. The last document is the Phase 2 SEIS Process & Timeline. lt breaks down the Phase 2 process into individual steps by chronological order in who, what, why and when format with associate dates for those listed actions. For example, step 7 is the release of the DSEIS and that occurred on November 19,2014. Step 11 is when the Planning Commission would likely hold their official public hearing on the request to amend the Jefferson County Code. Code cites are also included to help you reference those sections that are relevant. lf you have questions on any of this, you should probably save them for the meeting where I can answer them for the benefit of everyone. We will also have our applicant's representative, Craig Peck and our SEIS Consultants EA Engineering in attendance to present aspects of the project and answer any questions you may have. We look fonruard to seeing you and discussing this very important project at the December 3'd Planning Commission meeting. Page 1 of '1 Pleasant Harbor Phase 2 SEIS Approval Process December 3,2014 Plannlng Commisslon Meetlng Background: What's been done so far? . Project initiated in 2005 . Pre-application conference in January 2006 o Comprehensive Plan map change approval and 30 BoCC Conditions on further development January 2008 - Phase I of approval process . Request for UDC Text Arnendment and Development Agreement April 2008 - triggers SE|S . Today - review of DSEIS, Development Agreement and Development Regulations Three parts to the Phase 2 Approval Process: o Supplemental Environmental lmpact ltatementr What is it? o Draft (as opposed to Final)SEIS- project level EIS. Why is it important? o Required under Comp Plan approva!- ensures no Probable Significant Adverse lmpacts through mitigation or current regulation. What role does it play in the approval process? o lnforms the decision makers about Environmental lmpacts - ensures consistency with prior approval and current regulations. r Becomes in essence, the "Resort Plan" o "'."'"rflffiTAgreement. A contract with the County similar to Port Ludlow - authorized under RCW 36.708.L70 - 210. Appendix S to DSEIS. Why is it important? . Contract on how the Resort shall be built, vesting for developer, vesting, phasing, MOUs, etc,r What role does it play in the approval process? . Required for any MPR under JCC 18.15.125(2) o pevelopmentRegulations What is it? o Determines standards for development and includes zoning, setbacks, density, etc. to be codified as Title 17 Article ll - Appendix S to DSEIS. What role does it play in the approval process? . Resort cannot be built as proposed since current underlying zoning is residentia!- must have resort zoning and standards for development o What's the Planning lommlsslon's role? o Hold Public Hearing in April or Mayr Occurs after release of Final SEISr Hear applicant's presentation, staffs report and take public testimonY o Study & Deliberationr Occurs after public hearing per PC schedule o Eoard gf County lommissioner Recommendation. Required under JCC 18.45.090 - Amendments to GMA implementing regulations - UDC Title t7 Article ll of the JCCr lncludes the customary "growth indicators."r Recommend either approval, approval with conditions or denial. . What's the timellne? o See Attachment - Phase 2 SEIS Process and Timeline Summary. PC receives a Draft SEIS that includes the DA, DR and compliance with 30 BoCC Conditions.. PC Holds public hearing to present project, staff report and hear public testimony.. PC Studies, deliberates and makes a recommendation to the BoCC - satisfies 18.45.090 & GMA to amendment JCC.. BoCC with either accept PC recommendation or hold public hearing - must hold public hearing for DA. Programmatic EIS wAc'197-11-192 1 Non-project SEPA EIS BoCC Public Comment Completed January 2008 Today Project-level SE SEIS BoCC Pleasant Harbor MPR Approva! Phases 3 Administrative and Hearing Examiner Public CommentPublic Comment Comprehensive Plan Amendment MPR Boundary 30 conditions Draft & Final sEts Pre-application Conferences for Development Permits Development Regulations - Zoning Amends JCC Title 17 Development Agreement (Gontract between Applicant and County) Applications for Development Permits - Plat or Binding Site Plan - Forest Practice, Stormwater, etc. 4 Administrative Oversight (with Legislative action on ConsentAgenda) Phase 1 of Resort Build-out starts - SEIS Page 2-35 Complete PIaUBSP Build lnfrastructure Project Level EIS 5 Administrative Building Permits 2 Programmatic EIS wAc 197-11-192 Comprehensive PIan (CP) Policy Guidance Conceptua! Master Plan Change CP Land Use Map to one color for BMPR Draft Environmental lmpact Statement (DEIS) Final Environmental lmpact Statement (FEIS) -Chapter 5: Mitigations. Shellfish. Water resources. Transportation. Rural character. Public services. Critical areas TI Planning Agency advises G decision (January 14, 2008) Type V (Legislative) Review ase Project level EIS o Zoning Regulations Zones (including open space and natural areas) Bulk and dimension Setbacks Height lmpervious surfaces Uses Development standards Zoning map (denoting zones with colors within BMPR) Development Agreement Requirement to have MOUs Land use and density Goals and Objectives Standards for review SEPA Vesting Phasing Amenities Disputes o Must be consistent with CP, Land Use Map, and Adopting Ordinance Supplement Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) Type V (Legislative) UDC Amendment Review PC Recommendation & BoCC Decision Phase 2 Project Level EIS Applications for Development Permits P re-a ppl ication Conferences PlaUBinding Site PIan (BSP) Preliminary Approval Forest Practice Class !V General "Conversion to another use" Permit Shoreline Permits Stormwater Permits. Entire site. Habitat plan Water System Plan Approval (DOE and DOH) Sewer Plan (DOE) Resort PIan Approval M construction-level detail. Buffers. Open space Mitigations Types l, ll, and lll (Administrative and Quasi-Judicial) Review Administrative and Hearing Examiner Decisions Phase 3 Project Level EIS Final PIaU Binding Site PIan approved by BoCC & recorded Phase 1 of Resort build-out starts I nfrastructu re Construction. Roads . Sewer o Water . Sewer treatment plant Type IV Review (Administrative Oversight with Legislative on Consent Agenda) Phase 4 Project Level EIS Building Permits Construct Buildings Open for Business! Phase 5 Type I (Administrative) Review PTEASANT HARBOR PHASE 2 SEIS PROCESS & TIMETINE PC = Planning Commission BoCC = Board of County Commissioners * = Completed 20L4 STEP wHo WHAT WHY WHEN !r1 Applicant All Final Reports to consultant For Production of Preliminary Draft SEIS October 20u *2 Consultant Preliminary/Working Draft SEIS to County For County & Applicant Review and comment October 27th (1week) *3 County Staff Review & comment due back to Consultant Ensure accuracy and readability November 1Oh (2 week) *4 Consultant Produce FinalDraft lncorporate staff & applicant comments November 17s (l weeks) *5 County PC meeting & BoCC Afternoon Briefing Opportunity to inform of upcoming release, requirements, work schedule...completed *6 County Notice of Availability, Press Release and Notice of Public Hearing To inform the public of availability Concurrent with Draft SEIS release - SteP 7 *7 County & Consultant Publish Final Draft and release to public Public review for 45 day public comment period November 19th (1.5 weeks) 8 County & Consultant Open House (Brinnon SchoolGym) and PC Public Meeting on Draft SEIS - after release of the Draft but before end of comment period Present Projed, Staff Report & Take Public verbal and written comments December 3d 9 County & Consultant Staff Review of public & agency comments Compile comments to address in Final sEts 45 davs after release of Draft SEIS January 5s 10 County & Consultant lncorporate staff, agency and public comment from Draft - Produce Final SEIS PC holds Public Hearing, Deliberates & makes Recommendation to BoCC Release to public - seven days before BoCC action. 60 day notice to Commerce - intent to amend UDC prior to BoCC decision Approx. March 3Oh 2015 (12 weeks) 11 County Required per JCC 18.45.090(3)April 1'r or May 6th 2015 72 County BoCC considers PC recommendation on UDC Amendment & schedules Public Hearing on Development Agreement Required per JCC 18.45.090(4) & 18.40.8s0(s) TBD 13 County BoCC holds Public Hearing on Development Agreement Required per JCC 18.40.850(5)TBD 74 County BoCC decision to adopt Development Agreement & regulations by resolution Required per JCC 18.45.090(4) & 18.40.8s0(s) TBD Prepared by Project Planner, David Wayne Johnson revised November 24, 2Ot4 PTEASANT HARBOR PHASE 2 SEIS PROCESS & TIMELINE PC = Planning Commission BoCC = Board of County Commissioners Prepared by Project Planner, David Wayne Johnson 20t4 * = Completed revised November 24, 2Ol4 STEP wHo WHAT WHY WHEN *1 Applicant All Final Reports to Consultant For Production of Preliminary Draft SE|S october 2Oh *2 Consultant Preliminary/Working Draft SEIS to County For County & Applicant Review and comment october 27th (1 week) r3 County Staff Review & comment due back to Consultant Ensure accuracy and readability November lOth (2 week) Consultant Incorporate staff & applicant comments November 17th (l weeks) *5 County PC meeting & BoCC Afternoon Briefing Opportunity to inform of upcoming release, requirements, work schedule...Completed *6 County Notice of Availability, Press Release and Notice of Public Hearing To inform the public of availability Concurrent with Draft SEIS release - Step 7 |7 County & Consultant Publish Final Draft and release to public Public review for 45 day public comment period November 19th (1.5 weeks) 8 County & Consultant Open House (Brinnon SchoolGym) and PC Public Meeting on Draft SEIS - after release of the Draft but before end of comment period Present Project, Staff Report & Take Public verbal and written comments December 3'd 9 County & Consultant Staff Review of public & agenry comments Compile comments to address in Final sErs 45 davs after release of Draft SEIS January Sth 10 County & Consultant lncorporate staff, agency and public comment from Draft - Produce Final SEIS Release to public - seven days before BoCC action. 60 day notice to Commerce - intent to amend UDC prior to BoCC decision Approx. March 30th 2015 (12 weeks) 11 County PC holds Public Hearing, Deliberates & makes Recommendation to BoCC Required per JCC 18.45.090(3)April 1't or May 5th 2015 t2 County BoCC considers PC recommendation on UDC Amendment & schedules Public Hearing on Development Agreement Required per JCC 18.45.090(4) & 18./!0.8s0(s) TBD 13 County BoCC holds Public Hearing on Development Agreement Required per JCC 18.40.850(5)TBD 14 County BoCC decision to adopt Development Agreement & regulations by resolution Required per JCC 18.45.090(4) & 18.40.8s0(s) TBD *4 Produce FinalDraft JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street I Port Townsend, WA 98368 | Web: www.co.jefferson.wa.us/communitydevelooment Tel: 360.379.4450 | Fax: 360.379.4451 | Email: dcd@co.iefferson.wa.us Building Permits & /nspecflons I Development Consisfency Review I Long Range Planning I Watershed Stewardshp Resource C,enter TO: Planning Commission FROM: David Wayne Johnson, Associate Planner DATE: November24,2014 RE: Pleasant Harbor Draft Supplemental Environmental lmpact Statement (DSEIS) At long last the Pleasant Harbor DSEIS is available for review and comment. Part of that review by the Planning Commission (PC) is understanding what role you play in the process. To that end I have attached several documents designed to help break down the approval process into manageable steps The first document is a two page outline of the Phase 2 SEIS Approval Process. We will use this as an outline for Staff's presentation during the meeting. lt provides some background information on the project, then breaks down the core elements in the approval process so you may better understand what they are, and why they are necessary to approval. The outline then details what the Planning Commission's role is in the process. And lastly, a concise summary of the actions and steps necessary to approve Phase 2. The next document is a matrix of the overall MPR approval process by phases. The first page is a summary of allthe phases necessary to build the resort. Notice the little arrow pointing down to Phase 2 - that's where we are today with Phase 1 completed in January 2008. The remaining five pages are the detail of each Phase. This process matrix is helpful to see the "big picture" of the approval process, what's involve and why it takes so long. lt also shows who has decision making authority, when the Public has an opportunity to comment. The last document is the Phase 2 SEIS Process & Timeline. lt breaks down the Phase 2 process into individual steps by chronological order in who, what, why and when format with associate dates for those listed actions. For example, step 7 is the release of the DSEIS and that occurred on November 19,2014. Step 11 is when the Planning Commission would likely hold their official public hearing on the request to amend the Jefferson County Code. Code cites are also included to help you reference those sections that are relevant. lf you have questions on any of this, you should probably save them for the meeting where I can answer them for the benefit of everyone. We will also have our applicant's representative, Craig Peck and our SEIS Consultants EA Engineering in attendance to present aspects of the project and answer any questions you may have. We look forward to seeing you and discussing this very important project at the December 3'd Planning Commission meeting. Page 1 of 1