HomeMy WebLinkAbout007David W. Johnson
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Rstlss49@aol.com
Sunday, January 04,2015 9:56 PM
David W. Johnson
Rstlss49@aol.com
Comments on MPR at Black Point revised
Mr. Johnson,
I have revised my comments to fix a couple of typo's. Ihis rs my final version. Please submit fhis as my comments on the
MPR.
Mr Johnson,
I write to you today concerning the proposed MPR at Black Point in Brinnon Wa. I strongly oppose this development and
urge a "No Action" determination.
I was involved with this process early in the Brinnon Sub Area Plan, which was simply a vehicle to push forward this MPR,
with no consideration to any adverse effects on the people who live in Brinnon or the environment.
Most people who visit the Brinnon area do so for the shell fishing and the beauty of the low lands and mountains. I doubt
very much if many could afford a round of golf or a home at the proposed resort.
Hood Canal is an extremely sensitive body of water already under stress. Who will be responsible for the restoring the
habitat after being contaminated with run off and fertilizer? To think that this could never happen is both irresponsible and
naive.
Once a habitat is destroyed there is neither the money nor the resources to clean it up
This was a poor idea at the beginning and a dangerous one now
Peter Siefert
PO Box 573
Brinnon,WA. 98320
1
Michelle Farfan
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
windycrest@aol.com
Sunday, January 04,2015 9:50 PM
dwjoh nson @co jefferson.wa.u s
windycrest@aol.com
Comment DSEIS Pleasant Harbor MPR
After reviewing the draft SEIS for "Pleasant Harbor MPR" and Marina my preference is Option #3 No Action. The DSEIS
fails to address and mitigate the complex impacts of Options #1 and #2 on the citizens of Washington State, Jefferson
County and specifically the residents of Brinnon and Black Pt.
The DSEIS provides no requirements for a bond or process to protect the citizens from liability to repair damages that
would be left behind should Statesman's group abandons project.
Further, the fact that the MPR has the potentialto compromise the aquifer, localwellwater, and shorelines with
saltwater intrusion and runoff was not adequately addressed in the DSEIS. And the fact that lt is very likely options 1
and 2 would result in adverse impact on the community, marine environment, fish and wildlife, and commercial and
recreation resources was not thoroughly considered by The Statesman Proposal and the DSEIS.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
Deborah Siefert
PO Box 573
Brinnon, WA 98320
1
David W. Johnson
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Bonnie BeaudoinPLU <beaudobj@plu.edu>
Sunday, January 04,2015 8:09 PM
David W. Johnson
Master Planned Resort (MPR)
Dear David Johnson,
I would like to weigh in on the master plan for the proposed resort/golf course proposal for Hood Canal area
South of Brinnon. Option 3 seems the best option in light traffic impact, fresh water (wells) concerns, and other
environmental factors. Option 3 provides recreational access for a variety of people as opposed to a golf course
which seems rather elitist.
Let's look at the big picture, not just the lSth hole.
Bonnie Beaudoin
Using stories, artifacts, and experiences to teach, connect, and inspire
beaudobi@plu.edu
EDUC. 412: Social Studies Methods
Outreach Education Coordinator
1
David W. Johnson
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Rstlss49@aol.com
Sunday, January 04,2015 6:54 PM
David W. Johnson
Rstlss49@aol.com
Brinnon MPR Comments
Mr Johnson,
I write to you today concerning the proposed MPR at Black Point in Brinnon Wa. I strongly oppose this development and
urge a "No Action" determination.
I was involved with this process early in the Brinnon Sub Area Plan, which was simply a vehicle to push forward this MPR,
with no consideration to any adverse effects on the people who live in Brinnon or the environment.
Most people who visit the Brinnon area do so for the shell fishing and the beauty of the low lands and mountains. I doubt
very much if many could afford a round of golf or a home at the proposed resort.
Hood Canal is an extremely sensitive body of water already under stress. Who will be responsible for the restoring the
habitat after being contaminated with run off and fertilizer? To think that this could never happen is both irresponsible and
naive.
Once a habit is destroyed there is neither the money nor the resources to clean it up.
This was a poor idea at the beginning and a dangerous one now
Peter Siefert
Brinnon,WA.
1
David W. Johnson
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Bonnie Beaudoinjj <beaudoinjj@yahoo.com>
Sunday, January 04,2015 5:47 PM
David W. Johnson
Proposed ResorUgolf course master plan
Dear David Johnson ,
I would like to weigh in on the proposal for the resort/golf course plan on Hood Canaljust South of Brinnon. Option 3
seems the least disruptive considering traffic, well water, and other community/environmental concerns. Option 3
offers resort/wilderness access for a variety of people while the golf option seems rather elitist. Let those golfers trade
in their clubs for a nature vacation.
Please add me to the email list regarding this concern.
Bonnie Beaudoin
Beaudobj@plu.edi
Sent from my iPhone
1
David W. Johnson
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Sarah Clawson-Schuch <saclawso@gmail.com>
Sunday, January 04,2015 3:57 PM
David W, Johnson
DSEIS proposal for a Master Planned Resort (MPR)
Dear Mr. Johnson:
I am writing to voice my opinion regarding the DSEIS proposal for a Master Planned Resort (MPR)just south of Brinnon
on the Hood Canal/Black Point peninsula. I am endorsing "no action" because of issues about traffic, lack of available
wellwaterto the proposed development, public safety, lack of a bond if the project should begin and fail, infrastructure,
andthemassivesizegiventhelocale. lalsofeelthisdecisionisbeingrushedconsideringthebriefwindowfrom
ThanksgivingtoNewYear's. lliveinPortLudlowbuthavehikedextensivelyintheBrinnonareaandsouthofthere. lt
would be a shame to spoil the natural beauty of this area with large-scale development.
Sincerely,
Soroh Clowson-Schuch
saclaws.o@omail.com
(360)215-4065 home
(765)776-68i9 cell
1