Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout030Pleasant Harbor Phase ll Planning Commission Actions January zOtG Summary of Planning Commission actions: t. Hold a Public Hearing and take testimony - (held January 6, 2016). Record held open until February 3,2OL6. 2. Accept Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribes request for 60 days to complete consultation with County - (January 20,2OL6l. Tribe will advise the County on how to proceed after Tribal Council meeting on February 8,2OL6. 3. Close Public Hearing record (February 3, 2016) 4. Begin deliberations (February 3,20761 5. Develop findings under JCC 18.45.080(b) 6. Develop recommendation to the BoCC for denial, approval, or approval with conditions for Title 17 Article ll Pleasant Harbor Master Planned Resort that include findings developed under #5 18.45.090 Amendments to GMA implementing regulations. (3) Planning Commission Review. The planning commission shall hold a public hearing on any amendment(s) to the implementing regulations and shall make a recommendation to the board of county commissioners using the site-specific criteria set forth in JCC 18.45.080(1Xb) and (1)(c), as applicable. 18.45.080 Final docket - Planning commission and board of county commissioners review. (b) Required Findings - Generally. For all proposed amendments, the planning commission shall develop findings and conclusions and a recommendation which consider the growth management indicators set forth in JCC 18.45.050(4Xb)(i)through ( Xb)(vii), as well as the following: (i) Whether circumstances related to the proposed amendment and/or the area in which it is located have substantially changed since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan; (ii) Whether the assumptions upon which the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan is based are no longer valid, or whether new information is available which was not considered during the adoption process or any annual amendments of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan; and (iii) Whether the proposed amendment reflects current widely held values of the residents of Jefferson County. (c) Additional Required Findings - Formal Site-Specific Amendments. ln addition to the required findings set forth in subsection (f Xb) of this section, in order to recommend approval of a formal site-specific proposalto amend the Comprehensive Plan, the planning commission must also make the following findings: (Not applicable - not an amendment to the Comp Plan) (i) The proposed site-specific amendment meets concurrency requirements for transportation and does not adversely affect adopted level of service standards for other public facilities and services (e.g., sheriff, fire and emergency medical services, parks, fire flow, and general governmental services); (ii)The proposed site-specific amendment is consistent with the goals, policies and implementation strategies of the various elements of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan; (iii) The proposed site-specific amendment will not result in probable significant adverse impacts to the county's transportation network, capital facilities, utilities, parks, and environmental features that cannot be mitigated, and will not place uncompensated burdens upon existing or planned service capabilities; (iv) ln the case of a site-specific amendment to the Land Use Map, that the subject parcels are physically suitable for the requested land use designation and the anticipated land use development, including, but not limited to, the following: (A)Access; (B) Provision of utilities; and (C) Compatibility with existing and planned surrounding land uses; (v) The proposed site-specific amendment will not create a pressure to change the land use designation of other properties, unless the change of land use designation for other properties is in the long-term best interests of the county as a whole; (vi) The proposed site-specific amendment does not materially affect the land use and population growth projections that are the bases of the Comprehensive Plan; (vii) lf within an unincorporated urban growth area (UGA), the proposed site-specific amendment does not materially affect the adequacy or availability of urban facilities and services to the immediate area and the overall UGA; (viii) The proposed amendment is consistent with the Growth Management Act (Chapter 36.704 RCW), the County-Wide Planning Policy for Jefferson County, any other applicable inter-jurisdictional policies or agreements, and any other local, state or federal laws. (d) Recommendation. The planning commission's findings and conclusions shall include a recommendation to the board of county commissioners that the proposed amendment(s) be denied, approved, or approved with conditions or modifications. 18.45.050 Compilation of preliminary docket. (Not applicable - the proposal is not part of a period assessment or change to the Comp Plan - consistency with the Comp Plan will be determined under the findings required under JCC 18.45.080(b)) (4) Planning Commission Periodic Assessment - Recommendations. (a) Periodic Assessment - Timelines. The planning commission shall review, and if necessary, recommend revisions to the Comprehensive Plan during the periodic assessment in accordance with RCW 36.70A.130. The planning commission shallcomplete its assessment of the Comprehensive Plan by November 1st of the year prior to the assessment. Any amendments recommended by a majority vote of the planning commission shall be forwarded to the administrator by March tst of the year in which the periodic assessment is conducted. The administrator shall place all such recommended amendments on the preliminary docket to be considered during the final docket selection process set forth in JCC 18.45.060. (b) Criteria Governing Planning Commission Assessment. The planning commission's periodic assessment and recommendation shall be based upon, but shall not be limited to, an inquiry into the following growth management indicators: (i) Whether growth and development as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan is occurring faster or slower than anticipated, or is failing to materialize; (ii) Whether the capacity of the county to provide adequate services has diminished or increased; (iii) Whether sufficient urban land is designated and zoned to meet projected demand and need; (iv) Whether any of the assumptions upon which the plan is based are no longer found to be valid; (v) Whether changes in county-wide attitudes necessitate amendments to the goals of the plan and the basic values embodied within the Comprehensive Plan Vision Statement; (vi) Whether changes in circumstances dictate a need for amendments; (vii) Whether inconsistencies exist between the Comprehensive Plan and the GMA or the Comprehensive Plan and the County-wide Planning Policy for Jefferson County. [Ord. 2-06 S 1]