HomeMy WebLinkAbout054David Goldsmith
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
David W. Johnson
Wednesday, March 23,2016 8:03 AM
mark jochems; Roma Call;Cynthia Koan; Gary Felder; kevin coker; Lorna Smith; Matt
Sircely; Richard Hull; Tom Giske
David W. Johnson; David Goldsmith
RE: Pleasant Harbor FSEIS: Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe Comments
I respectfully disagree with some of the comments of Mr. Jochem's and am preparing a written response to the Tribes
letter, which you should also read and consider before proceeding with a vote on your recommendation.
From: mark jochems [mailto:mdjochems@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22,20t6 7:32 PM
To: David W. Johnson <djohnson@co.jefferson.wa.us>; Roma Call <romac@pgst.nsn.us>; Cynthia Koan
<cynthia.koan@gmail.com>; Gary Felder <gfelder@broadstripe.net>; kevin coker <CokerDesignWorks@msn.com>;
Lorna Smith <smithsnoh@aol.com>; Matt Sircely <mattsircely@gmail.com>; Richard Hull
<richardhull@embarqmail.com>; Tom Giske <tgiske@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Pleasant Harbor FSEIS: Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe Comments
I would like to encourage my fellow commissioners to re-read the letters in this thread. Specifically the May 19,
2006, March ll,2016 and the March 15 2016. Comparing those letters you will see that they have the same
concems. There will be some supporting letters coming from the tribe also. I conclude that Jefferson county has
clearly ignored the Tribes concerns since 2001. They have been denied access to this property, for them to
complete their own studies. They were not given proper notice that the FSEIS was about to close December
4th. I can go on and on with how this has been mishandled, with the tribe being excluded from the process, for
the last decade.
It is a very reasonable request for the tribe to be allowed to comment on all conditions and mitigation added,
BEFORE WE VOTE.
I am not happy to vote for approval with conditions, knowing that the conditions were rushed at best. Or, as will
probably be necessary to add too later. WE owe the Tribe the privilege of commenting before we vote. The lack
of communication and consideration for the Tribes views has to stop now. I am very certain that the BOCC
would agree with this. Everybody needs to take a deep breath, and consider the Tribes position.
I would also like to point out that we have had no discussions on Phase 18, The Marine Village, which is the
next construction phase to be completed. And of course I will have questions.
Thank you all for your time.
On Tue, Mar 22,2016 at 3:22 PM, David W. Johnson <dohnson@co jefferson wrote:
Planning Commissioners,
Allow me to elucidate. I will be presenting draft language to amendment the development regulations to address the
Tribe's concerns at the April 5th meeting. This draft has nothing to do with the development agreement. Also, the
Planning Commission does not need to wait for the Tribe to review and approve the amendment before considering
and adopting the amendment as part of your recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners.
1
Cc:
Thanksl
From: Roma Call [mailto:romac@pest.nsn.us]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22,20761:56 PM
To: David W. Johnson <d ioh nson@co. iefferson.wa. us>
Cc: mark jochems <mdiochems(ogmail.com>; Cynthia Koan <cvnthia.koan@smail.com>; Gary Felder
<gfelder@broadstripe.net>; Kevin Coker <cokerdesienworks@msn.com>; LornaSmith <smithsnoh@aol.com>; Matt
Sircely <mattsircelv@smail.com>; RichardHull <richardhull@embarqmail.com>; Tom Brotherton
<tomb255@gmail.com>; TomGiske <tsiske@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Pleasant Harbor FSEIS: Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe Comments
Hi David.
I understand that you will be presenting a draft document for approval at the April 6 Planning Commission
meeting. As I understand it, this document will form the basis for the requirements of the development
agreement.
Because this is such an important document, the Tribe will need to review it in detail, and possibly discuss it
with Tribal Council. It is not likely that we will have time between now and the April 6 meeting for this level
of review and the next Tribal Council meeting is not until April 11. Wanted to let you know up front that we
will need more time and will not be prepared to respond at the April 6 meeting.
Thank you.
Roma Call
Romac@pgst.nsn.us
360-516-3979
2
On Mar 16,2016, at 4:33 PM, "David W. Johnson" <djohnson@cojefferson.wa.us> wrote:
Attached is there letter from May 2006
From: markjochems Imailto:mdiochems ]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16,2016 3:14 PM
To: Roma CaU <romac@pest.nsn.uP
Cc: David W. Johnson efferson.Cynthia Koan
<cynthia.koan@gmail.corn>; Gary Felder <gfelder@broadstripe.net>; Kevin Coker
Lorna Smith <smithsnoh@aol.c ; Matt Sircely
<mattsircely@gmail.@; Richard Hull <richardhull@emb@; Tom Brotherton
<tomb2 5 5 @ gmail. com> ; Tom Giske <tgiske@ gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Pleasant Harbor FSEIS: Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe Comments
Roma and David. I would like to again request a packet of letters from the tribe concerning all
the attempts at communication that have been made between Jefferson County, the Tribe and
the Developer. Going back to 2001 and before if applicable. I would appreciate it if these
were included in our agenda packet sent to us electronically. Of particular interest will be
those letters written just after the first EIS. In 2007 and
2008. One of the perplexing things for me has
been why the kettles were not set aside at that time. The tribe has expressed strong concern
toward their preservation recently. And I would like to think they had the same concerns in
2007. As a resident and
business owner here since 1993. I am saddened that PGST's concerns now appear that they
have been largely ignored. It doesn't make me proud to be a resident here. But the past does
not have to be the future. I as one citizen would like to commit to building a better relationship
with PGST. If there is anything I can do, as one person, I would like to make myself available
to build that better relationship. Thanks to everyone for their concerns and efforls.
Mark Jochems.
360-301-1034 Sent from my iPad
On Mar 15,201,6, at 5:43 PM, Roma Call <romac@pgst.nsn.uP wrote:
David Johnson and Planning Commission Members,
Please see the Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe's final response letter to the Pleasant
Harbor Master Planned Resort FSEIS, as well as the Tribal Historic Preservation
Offi cer's letter regarding cultural resources.
As David suggested in his email below, please forward any questions you may
have in preparation for our presentation at the April 6th Planning Commission
meeting.
3
Thank you.
Roma Call
Roma CaIl
Port Gambl-e S'Kfalfam Tribe
Environmental Program
romacGpgst . nsn. us
celf 360-516-3979
office 360-291-6293
On3l9ll6 I l:01 AM, David W. Johnson wrote:
Planning Commission Members,
We will have Roma Call from the PGST give a presentation to us
at the April 6th PC meeting on Pleasant Harbor. Do any of you
have specific questions you'd like to ask them so they can prepare
a response? If so, let me know what your questions are no later
than March 25th so can forward them on and they can response to
your questions at the meeting.
Thanks!
David Wayne Johnson - LEED AP - Neighborhood Development
Associate Planner - Port Ludlow Lead Planner
Department of Community Development
Jefferson County
360.379.4465
<mime-attachment jpg>
Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson
County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and
a healthy environment.
4
gf; SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless
absolutely necessary
All e-mail may be considered subject to the Public Records Act and as
such may be disclosed to a third-pafi requestor.
<mime-attachment jpg>
<PGST_Letter_Blackpoint03 1 5 1 6Final.pdf>
<Pleasant Harbor Golf Course THPO Response-l.pdf)
<PGST Letter 5 2006.pdf>
5