HomeMy WebLinkAbout089Michelle Farfan
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
David,
Attached well log
Craig
peckassoc@comcast. net
Thursday, May 1-9, 2016 9:29 AM
David W. Johnson
Fwd: Pleasant Harbor Dev Regs
American Campground.pdf
From: "David W. Johnson" <diohnson@co.iefferson.wa.us>
To: peckassoc@comcast. net
Cc: "David W. Johnson" <diohnson@co.iefferson.wa.us>
Sent: Thursday, May 19,2016 8:16:52 AM
Subject: FW: Pleasant Harbor Dev Regs
Craig,
Could you forward this to Scott Bender?
Tha nks I
From : gfe lde r(O broadstri pe. net Ima i lto :gfelde r@ broadstri pe, net]
Sent: Thursday, May 19,201.6 8:13 AM
To: David W. Joh nson <d iohnson @co. iefferson.wa.us>
Subject: Re: Pleasant Harbor Dev Regs
This not related to below item. Can you explain why there is no well log for the old primary well on the BP site . This
could be useful in many of the considerations we may need to think about . Gary
1
From: "David W. Johnson" < >
To: "Cynthia Koan" <cynthia.koan@qmail.com>, "Gary Felder" <qfelder@broadstripe.net>, "Kevin Coker"
<cokerdesiqnworks@msn.com>, "Lorna Smith" <smithsnoh@aol.com>, "Mark Jochems"
<mdiochems@qmail.com>, "Matt Sircely" <mattsircelv@qmail.com>, "Richard Hull"
<richardhull@embarqmail. com>, "Tom Giske" <tqiske@qmail.com>
Cc: "David W. Johnson" <diohnson@co.iefferson.wa.us>
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 7:0214 AM
Subject: FW: Pleasant Harbor Dev Regs
PC members,
Sorry I missed last night's meeting. Below are answers to some of the questions we had about the regulations.
From: JT Cooke Imailto:JT@houlihan-law.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 1:33 PM
To: David W. Johnson <d iohnson @co. iefferson.wa.us>
Subject: RE: Pleasant Harbor Dev Regs
David-
The 80' height limit is for the "f errace" building that is currently located in approximately the middle of the MPR. lf it
helps, we could add language that increase the setback to 40' for buildings over 60' in height.
With respect to 17.80.070, we can add that a change will be considered minor even if it does not meet conditions a-d if
it does not otherwise qualify as a major revision in 17.80.080.
Let me know if you need anything else
Thanks,
2
JT
mfr HouLTHAN r&!r/
too N" 35,h street . $sttilc. wA s8to3
.,OHN T" (J.T,} COOKH
ATTSRNHY
?06.$47.1075 ur*nct
206.S47.1E58 rAx
?53.72?.8257 M0mrE
wryw,htutlhnr-law.com
NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. lf you have received it in error, please advise
the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents.
Thank you.
From: David W. Johnson Ima ilto :diohnson @co.iefferson.wa.us]
Sent: Tuesday, May !7,20161:43 PM
To: JT Cooke <JT@houlihan-law.com>
Cc: David W. Johnson <diohnson @co. iefferson.wa.us>
Subject: Pleasant Harbor Dev Regs
JT,
Per our discussion today:
17.65.030 references a max building height of 80 feet. We are wondering where that height came from and if that is still
the case. 17.65.040 references a 20 foot setback from resort boundary lines, which means an 80 foot building could be
built 20 feet from a boundary line. Could there be setback that accounts for increased distances based on height?
t7 .80.70 says a change to the Resort Plan may still qualifu as a minor revision even if it fails to satisfy conditions a - d,
but doesn't say how. Could language be added to allow Administrative discretion?
3
Thanks!
David Wayne Johnson - LEED AP - Neighborhood Development
Associate Planner - Port Ludlow Lead Planner
Department of Community Development
Jefferson County
360.379.4465
Mission: To preserve ond enhonce the quolity of life in Jefferson County by promoting o vibront economy, sound
communities ond o heolthy environment.
jf, SAVe PAPER - Pleose do not print this e-moil unless qbsolutely necessory
A// e-mail may be considered subject to the Public Records Act and as such may be disclosed to a third-party requestor.
I*{f*r*mr Ccuuy P*pilftr$*nt ${ (nrn*r.rn}ty S**hprn**t
W swu{-*tw,m.$:
tI! *.,sri*trsl{, ,\sl tp*@*,1. Vf&$SWi* I td* l}$ l{til | &d*f{,}ef&"@w{ d
4
I Flrst Copy wtth
iJ{#s co'yrlllefs Copi'
.IYATER, WEI,L REPORT
STAIE OF WASEING]rON
Appllcatlon
Pc(alt No,
",.Q2.:Z-,Q*..$.56L' " ?Lt bf
NC,u
rON OF WELL:
lrom sectlou
J- ( -* J{* -,,r se c * F- r..A{.- --n., a -1( s N.
+j ceL
&u
7/
corner
USE; Domesuc/Khduttder tr uuutclpal E
Irrl8adon E Test WelI tr Othcr D
WOHK:o.mer's nulrber ot wcll l: # /
(u mors thon one).... .-*iISLA.g.
IIELL LOG:
Descrlbe cndot
o
3
.9
+J
o
Eo
-rG,
ELolF
E
o
a.a
Lo
t,E
fi,
G,+,6o
o
+,
New wdl .XDeepcncd tr
EecoDdlflouEd E
Method: DlrE tr lorcd fl
Cable fr Drtven fl
hotsry tr Jc.tted tr
ot otre
TO
2
DNS:Dlameter o! Yell
Dopth of completed
...-.{-----.--. **.".nqt..?J-!---tt 2_tt
,CTION DETAII^S:
,tslled: -:.84-." Dram. rrm **A-- *, to ]-/ L tt.rfltx DleE. toE lL to
---
tL
DlEm. lron ft. to ------ ,t.
nS: 1'g3 E Nol!(
I perforator u.se.l . .---
! peatoratlons , lr, by lD.
---- DcrloraUous trom tt, to ----.-.--. lL
' pertora6oD! i:om ------.-. tt. to -,-----.. lt.
i por{oraflorr {rom -_--- lt. to *-*-- tt.
rfotr
lllodel No--..--.
z!-s-- rt. to 3la-. n.
slot slr. .;}5- rrorn 15{- 71. s 'L7o 1Y
tr Xo$. SlzG ol EtBvGl:ckeil:
Q)r, rr"tct Js coatrolled by---O (Cep,
"elv., ctc,)
9it"t". "*-lowcred b€low Etetla la.rcl - ,f ."aer "* < *"E-;; ;;;;;;;--A iN*-.-.
I rt.lmta, srtn 3/. dr fl, arawoown aner J urs.WELL DEILLEE S STAIEMENI:
Thls
hue to
well war drllled.under my jurisdiction and this report'is
l.lre best of my howledge and beliet.-rrurlf
(TyDc or Drlit)
i':-'.
I EBts-----. Was a dtemlcal and!/rdr made?vesx uo El' jPs
lSlsaedl
ADDTf,IONAT, slfErYf:l It! NECESISAIIY)
iI
TBOM
l-^-o
I J*.29
i-</ I .^.€. J*,/-'r-/t:-tu --*J(,/-q]-: J;{q-{/- 2*4-;(-'=*D--'rr3P
/*, lkt /20
?-a<-i :,4 -.:*-r-l.L 2ty
'r- rM-E'#dL'z't*
L27 1
2L2
z.l.v
I tlo
| .-and-2-E./Z-sP
2,r92- *2 L''
fL(8ev. 1I-7t)O
rz v-7t'
Date..-.
€.3
!r
fi*n. oil
It. to tt,
ral:To ^?2-tt.
Slot slz6 toDl .. t
-. i
:
.,.
t.l
. !l:. i
.' .ti
' --:r
ill.;.. ,'- I
:-:
.
.--:
Foz
oooE
No
'I useil lu
y ttrat8 coEt8la utusablo tetct?
I vatctr?*--.-- DcDth ot
tr
I o! EEaIlnf Etrata
E.P--.
':,
.. i:
2t
/ ,--u