HomeMy WebLinkAbout090Michelle Farfan
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
JT Cooke <JT@houlihan-law.com>
Thursday, May L9, 2016 9:46 AM
David W. Johnson
RE: Pleasant Harbor Dev Regs
David-
I understand that Planning Commission member Lorna Smith is circulating a heavily redacted version of the
development agreement and/or development regulations. Please send me a copy today.
Thanks,
JT
Efr HouLTHAH LAuu
tOO N. 35'n Street . Seaftle. WA 98t0g
JOHX ?. {J,T.) COOKE
ATTOfth{MY
206.547.1075 unrcr
20S.547.1958 FAx
253-722.8267 MolrLr
www.hsu llhan -larr,sam
NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. lf you have received it in error, please advise
the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents.
Thank you.
From: David W. Joh nson Imailto :djohnson @co.jefferson.wa. us]
Sent: Thursday, May 79,2076 7:02 AM
To: JT Cooke <JT@houlihan-law.com>
Cc: David W. Joh nson <djohnson @co.jefferson.wa.us>
Subject: RE: Pleasant Harbor Dev Regs
Thanks, iT
From: JT Cooke [mailto:JT@houlihan-law.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 1:33 PM
To: David W. Johnson <diohnson@co.iefferson.wa.us>
Subject: RE: Pleasant Harbor Dev Regs
David-
The 80' height limit is for the "Terrace" building that is currently located in approximately the middle of the MPR. lf it
helps, we could add language that increase the setback to 40' for buildings over 60' in height.
I
Let me know if you need anything else
Thanks,
JT
Eil Hour-rHArl LAw
$OS N" 351r,Str#st 3 5e6trls, WA SBt03
JOHN Y. {J,T.} COOKE
ATTORT*EV
206.$47"107S
206"54?t95S
?53.722"8267
DIR*CT
FAX
HOStTE
vrww,hou tl han *l,aur, Eqm
NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. lf you have received it in error, please advise
the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents.
Thank you.
From: David W. Johnson [ma ilto:diohnson@co. iefferson.wa.us]
Sent: Tuesday, May 17,2O'J.61:43 PM
To: JT Cooke <JT@houlihan-law.com>
Cc: David W. Johnson <diohnson@co.iefferson.wa.us>
Subject: Pleasant Harbor Dev Regs
JT,
Per our discussion today:
17.65.030 references a max building height of 80 feet. We are wondering where that height came from and if that is still
the case. 17.65.040 references a 20 foot setback from resort boundary lines, which means an 80 foot building could be
built 20 feet from a boundary line. Could there be setback that accounts for increased distances based on height?
77 .80.7O says a change to the Resort Plan may still qualify as a minor revision even if it fails to satisfy conditions a - d,
but doesn't say how. Could language be added to allow Administrative discretion?
Thanks!
David Wayne Johnson - LEED AP - Neighborhood Development
Associate Planner - Port Ludlow Lead Planner
Department of Community Development
Jefferson County
360.379.4465
2
With respect to 17.80.070, we can add that a change will be considered minor even if it does not meet conditions a-d if
it does not otherwise qualify as a major revision in 17.80.080.
LEEU
AP
Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of lfe in Jefferson County by promoting o vibrant economy,
sound communities and a healthy environment.
;t SlVe PAPER - Pleose do not print this e-moil unless obsolutely necessory
All e-mail may be considered subjed to the Public Records Act and as such may be disclosed to a third-pafi requestor.
ls.*re$on County Dep*rtffent ol Comrnunlty Drleloprfl*ntffi STUARHTilIH\ffi/ rat{,;]:,. Belt?r Eutl$lrlg Strr$ l{arr.
3
HN