HomeMy WebLinkAbout116David W. Johnson
From
Sent:
To:
Cc:
David W. Johnson
Wednesday, June 08, 2016 10:35 AM
'Barbara IVIoore-Lewis'
Philip Morley; Cynthia Koan; Gary Felder; Kevin Coker; Lorna Smith; Mark Jochems; Matt
Sircely; Richard Hull;Tom Giske; David Goldsmith
RE: FW: Transcript of my statement to the Planning Commission 611116Subject:
Thanl<s, Barbara
I appreciate yoLrr feedback and will consider it. There will be at least one more public hearing with the BoCC in which is
subject will be f ully discussed.
For me, the discussions in the body of the FSEIS about the BOCC conditions and the chart you refer to are
incomplete and difficult to use. Again, the conditions related to the tribes are a good example. The structure of
it seems to be
1. here is the condition
2. look in another place or places fbr what has been done or is being proposed.
Electronic links would be helpful or a ditl'erent structure.
As you know, this complex and difficult to navigate around document was given to both the public and the
Planning Commission over the holidays and there was a very short time to figure out all this at a time when
people had othcr plans.
A robust discussion of the BOCC conditions and how they are met would be to everyone's benefits.
Thanks. Barbara
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:15 PM, David W. Johnson <djohnson@co.iefferso wrote:
Barbara,
lf you had taken the time to actually read the SEIS you would know that Section 3.18 (attached in final draft version)
specifically addresses the 30 conditions, and contains Table 3.18-1 - the "chart" you refer too. Those 30 conditions only
need be complied with prior to signing a final Development Agreement.
From: Barbara M oore-Lewis Im a ilto: brin nongrou p@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 10:16 AM
To: David W. Jo h nson <djohnso n @co.je fferso n.wa. us>
Cc: Philip Morley <pmorley@co.jefferson.wa.us>; Cynthia Koan <cynthia.koan@gmail.com>; Gary Felder
<gfelder@broadstripe.net>; Kevin Coker <cokerdesignworks@msn.com>; Lorna Smith <smithsnoh@aol.com>; Mark
Jochems <mdjochems@gmail.com>; Matt Sircely <mattsircely@gmail.com>; Richard Hull
<richardhull@embarqmail.com>; Tom Giske <tgiske@gmail.com>; David Goldsmith <DGoldsmith@co.jefferson.wa.us>
Subject: Re: FW: Transcript of my statement to the Planning Commission 6l7lL6
1
From: Haylie Clement On Behalf Of Planning Commission Desk
Sent: Tuesday, June 07,2076 1:46 PM
To: David W. Jo hnson <diohnson @co. lefferson.wa. us>
Subject: FW: Transcript of my statement to the Planning Commission 6ltl16
From: Barba ra Moore-Lewis Ima ilto: brinnongrou p@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 1:12 PM
To: Cynthia Koan <cvnthia.koan@gmail.com>; Philip Morley <pmorlev@co.iefferson.wa.us>; Planning Commission Desk
<PCom mission Desk@co.iefferson.wa.u Pla nning Commission Desk <PCommissionDesk@co. iefferson.wa.us>
Subject: Transcript of my statement to the Planning Commission 6/U76
. The county ordinance puts about 30 conditions on the mpr
. The FSIIIS was to address all conditions adequately
. The FSEIS did not adequately address all conditions
. The Port Gamble S'Klallam fribe has pointed out how the county did not adequately address the
conditions related to them
. Thcrc are likely other conditions that are not met
. So, thc IiSEIS is not "out ol'scquence"
. The FSIIIS is incomplete
. The Brinnon Group suggested several times that county staff prepare a chart of the conditions and how
they had been met in the FSEIS
. This chart would be used both by the county officials and by the public to understand the FSEIS
. Our recommendation was ignored
o Accountability by county staff and elected officials for the situation that now exists with the FSEIS
rcquires such a chart and such a discussion so that county officials and the public can have this
irnportant discussion
. l'he FSIIIS is incomplete, not in compliance with the conditions
2