Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout118Michelle Farfan From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: David W. Johnson <djohnson@cojefferson.wa.us> Tuesday, June27,20Il 1\:25 AM Michelle Farfan David Greetham; Jodi Adams; Patty Charnas Pleasant Harbor PC Process PC Review Process Meeting.docx Michelle, Here's my section on the PC process for the Pleasant Harbor MPR. Let me know if you need more, or whatever. Also, Jodi, there are two meetings where the minutes were incomplete (May 4, and June 29). Also, Patty, I found all the references Philip made regarding the PC's review and comment on the Development Agreement, if you want to see those. David Wayne Johnson - LEED AP - Neighborhood Development Associate Planner - Port Ludlow Lead Planner Department of Community Development Jefferson County 360.379.4465 Mission: To preserve ond enhance the quolity of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities ond o healthy environment. 5| SlVe PAPER - Pleose do not print this e-moil unless obsolulely necessory All e-moil moy be considered subject to the Public Records Act and as such moy be disclosed to a third-porty requestor. xefomon Coumy ory*ltflwq of f,;omrurrity m*y*lsplffirffi stuARHffiNs\dMFd/ I-{ffir. S*ttcr 0{l|SnS 5ti*t* H*r*. *lt lrrl.prl *.ttt$.c* tf,frlal t rtll llrllr* I *r***sit+*rmxm 1 N.EET}p f.l0 3) Planning Commission Review. The Planning Commission (PC) shall hold a public hearing on any amendment(s) to the implementing (development) regulations and shall make a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) with findings using the site- specific criteria set forth in JCC 18.45.080(1)(b) and (1)(c), as applicable. StaffComment: the PC required and duly noticed public hearing was held January 6,2016 atthe Brinnon School Gym beginning at 6pm. The hearing included a presentation by the Applicant, by Staff, and testimony by the public on the proposed project, and the amendment to the implementing regulations. The PC Chair allowed the record to remain open until the next PC meeting of February 3'd,2076,to allow additional written comments from the public be submitted to the PC. Subsequent PC meetings at the Tri-area Center in Chimacum, dates, and notes on the PC deliberation to make a recommendation on the development regulations to the BoCC are listed below: o February 3,2016. Deliberations began. Issues discussed were the Kettles, Pesticides on the Golf Course, financial feasibility of the business plan, project phasing and the permitting process. A motion was made and seconded to approve the regulations as proposed. No vote was taken. Further research, discussion and deliberation would take place at the next meeting. Public comment was taken and written comments were received. Further consultation between Staff and the Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe was noted, as well as a future letter from the Tribe to the PC. o March 2,2016. A motion was made and seconded to table the motion to accept the regulations as proposed from the February 3'd meeting. That motion was defeated by a vote of 5 to 4. Deliberations on the first motion continued, mainly focused on the Kettles. . April 6,2016. The meeting began with a presentation by the Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe regarding their concerns over the project and that those concerns have not been addressed despite their repeated requests. A Government to Government meeting between the Tribe and the County Commissioners was scheduled and held on April 18,2016. The PC were assured they would have an opportunity to review and comment on the Development Agreement before the BoCC finals that document. Consultation with the Tribe, Staffand the Developer will be on-going as the PC continues their review. . May, 4,2016. Discussion began with a letter dated May 3rd from the BoCC to the PC regarding a 45-day deadline for their review and recommendation of the development regulations. The PC then began the process ofa section by section, line by line review and deliberations of the proposed regulations. On June 9,2016 the BoCC sent another letter to the PC extending the deadline for submittal of their recommendation from June 20,2016 to July 11,2016. A motion was made and seconded to table the original motion to accept the proposed draft regulations, until the next meeting. That motion carried by a vote of 7 to 0. o June 15,2016. The review of regulations continued discussing specific comments made by Staff and Legal Counsel on a draft PC version of the regulations. A motion was made and seconded to "approve the changes noted tonight, subject to verification ofa final draft atthebeginningof thenextmeeting."Thatmotioncarriedbyavoteof 6to l,with 1 abstention. A revised version was to be prepared by Staff and circulated to the PC before the next meeting, at which time the required GMA findings under JCC 18.45.080. o June 29, 2016. The final draft of the PC version of the regulations was reviewed with minor changes noted. The PC Chair then advised the members that they would begin the process of developing the required findings and conclusions for their recommendation, but before that, the Chair read a letter to the Commission that was drafted by three of the members, with the understanding that it would not go forward with their recommendation unless all the members agreed. The "letter" was meant to inform the BoCC of things the PC had learned about the project and approval process, that they felt were important to know. The meeting concluded with the group agreeing to findings and conclusions, with a a motion that was seconded to instruct Staff to prepare the PC final recommendation for signing by the PC Chair, with subsequent submittal to the BoCC. That motion canied by a vote of 3 to l, with 1 abstention. July 6, 2016.The meeting was held in Port Ludlow at the Beach Club as part of the PC Comp Plan "Road Show." A motion was made and seconded to forward the "letter" read at the June 29ft meeting, to the BoCC on behalf of the PC. That motion carried by a vote of 4 to 2, with I abstention and 2 members absent.