HomeMy WebLinkAbout141County AdministratonS
Briefing Session .r
August 14,2017
enda
Project Overview
and Planning History
Development
Agreement - purpose
Development
Regulations - synopsis
Next Steps
Pleasant Harbor
IVlaster Planned
Resort
t
J111
lt..;
Project Update .
and Status Report
I
ty.,, .,l
I r,a
)t
4 4
Phvsical Location: South
Jefferson County along the
Hood Canal comprised of
Pleasant Harbor and the
southern portion of the
Black Point Peninsula in
Brin non.
2
,lr-u- - l-t I
I
jIr
l1 fi
F
I).
,4
A
'''. -; s.i;'.t.t
L\r r l'r .I-
JI,/t
:.11',t*'f 1rffi\. I
1'..'
tI !('.It&i=:=!.r:-.-
(
I
tir
,\
Phvsical Location: Black
Point peninsula located
between two major Hood
Cana! river deltas
leasant Harbor and
lack Point Peninsula
*/
/,
I A-t
*
,l
I
I
-tul,
V ,r
/
,l
3
Former Campground
LodgeE
Showers
@,o
Restrooms
HERF
-EtllF ric lFa l^t :.H - l0 x.r.r-
h+r,,ra,-O{v.drhiilar.-.rd'+
O!-Edaldi.r.i d*!;ltib-#ijlh-'...d.
l- tc -ia.dl@r.draF-.-lc',Gtrh.FbS@..r,q-+dlF&bF+!-
k**E*.dbd-4
J
i
l t 'tf
f-
*
tt
.'l}
t
ll€
t
a
\\.1\,
'v 't-
dri-
\-$-a-1,,
Former Campground lncludes:
. System of Paved and Gravel Roads
. Parking Areas
. 500+ RV Pad Sites
. Buildings with Septic Tanks and Drain Fields
I .{+
'l ffif -''l
r*lrf{ffiu$l
rir 1'
I
IOAIO O; COUft[Y COMl,tlSS0NlrS
PffiTERMD ATIETilANVE DIA'I
mootftEo Ftom JAxuAlY la. 2002 Dlafl
It€orflEilo:D tY ?tAr{tNG c otulEstoil
lxo AUGU$ 2! 2@t Ol/rn
rrcoHt:iloED tY tilililor{ SulAllA ttAr{tlrNc 6tou?
Brinnon Subarea Plan
A ('hrplcr of lhc
JcJfcnoo ('otruh- ('omprchcmltc Pler
r,lAY l.2OUl
Black Porut existurg busruesses ruchde the Pleasaut llarbor l{auua arrd the lbrrru Old NAC0
\!est R\' Park aud Carupgrouud aud assocrnted cout.ucralhuildmgs artd uses as well as [It.
Arrto Repau aud Coldrvell Ballier Setilers Real Estate otlice on r0l
ioalD o, couxTY comtiStof,tls
?tEtatttoatrttf,aTrvt Dtafl
ta, I m2
rwlolHJliurar l. &il^,rcilu*otrtrrN{rccomd
^NO^@Utt2a Ar illnftofr.m ar mM lut^rlr rl^xffioNt
Brinnon Subarea Plan
A ( l.pl*., ltJ.&rs ( {rl} ( x9F}d'. Pbr
Rural (lommercial - Black Point
The Brinuou Snbarea Planuiug Group suggests that the Black Point area na-v be an appropriate
locatiou for a possible ftlnrre Nlaster Plauned Resort. This idea is discussed iu this sectiou. The
land use uaps provided are for initial discussion puposes only and do uot constitute land use
designatiou proposals. Final land use ruap designations can only be nrade through a fonual. private
land use application for a lrlaster Plaured Resort. pru'suant to the Comprehensive Plau and the
NOTE: Jefferson County Code 18.15.126 through 135 sets forth local code
requirements for the preparation, content, criteria for and the approval process of
Master Planned Resorts, including development standards and development
agreement stipulations 7
r-t
,l','
I
t,i
si .t
\
r
,
t
J
/
w:>
l^.'
. 2006: Application for
MPR designation.
. November 2OO7:
Final Programmatic
Environ menta I
lmpact Statement.
. 473 comments
. Analyzed i
changing I
m pacts of
a nd use
from residential to
master planned
reso rt.Aeuet
oPtrynt
8
4r"
-l {qso.,
lil lll
le-
n
A \*
I
':./.
;;t.tl,{f'"u (a'
.rl't(ti.,
({rr
'-1
,r
January 2008: BoCC approves the MPR
Designation in Ordinance No. 01-0128-08
Adopted Ordinance
lists thirty (30)
conditions that must be
used for the planning
and development of
the Pleasant Harbor
Master Planned Reso;t
#53. ln consideration of the public
interest, and pursuant to the
authority that is granted the County
legislative authority...the Board
enters certain of the following
conditions....
Anotulr^tlcl^ttlovlrcofil I Orttcir ::'o:;urooxrrttt[tyt tt^r ^xtrolltm. I,tl"tt{unl Ixlrlltlrr^llrllrq I
*llltlAll, b. E-a ol.lsfkh- ('.d, cffirEr l* Erf)tr $Edr!,
i, dr (..!nil llrfcil Ad t'Ur.(ll^) r c.fi.{ , f(:Y 16 ,04010.u.q-. { b
di. !d E cqld $. r.r.Fb.ad,!in d tal* db d ffid rlo
E Gr 5 rr ra dl lFd -ahb b L C.4*'r CoratlrE ['1, all..|y
rdqri ly fa*ir Xo A.9t a AIa 2l l9I ii - rLedt Er5, -a.
WlGllAA r rfi |, llt.Oir^"rk Dcl trFLrd d yd tq tic
fopaci naioo p 6c Cdr'r Coql,dEatr llr fCFl b coqoldt! ,lm
CoGt hG }'b Arilhor D.d.t ('rk DoCd-L ra;
Wtllll,ll of ti. E ( lol Frlldh i- Grqr tt tBa ilr f } c niar.a,
arrrfilI frLXn-l0r.bto irrr6b..:olCtCrdG.tb !..dL F!64 r
rrFol ?0 ca-a u tat d A rrq ,!rra.l. lhn l5r.a rH n dyd a
or&-.. tlo 0:{:M: .- ; icb rltd h aty c frqal l!,A06{,
lsEl. rLlE l|rlrlaE i, *B(.: rd
Illlll/tr. r f.?ia (l'f.E . rCfta I hrJr .. ac-a'. lri.l-E
&a6raE.cbEAGar.d
wtllllAl, a. lila r.lD 0r. Abrit F*a. oa fE rl Cddr rf
t4a o lic till? Corg*anir nr Amh.il C,rI rd ri. Erh .{.bd lnl:
t. lt Cil).aq..arc{Fl-wnraA+ l;,. rdbdaeaqa
nt&b - tlr.r.a Dn aF-. C& (Lrr} ll|. la i & ,.tsr- Cc, Cca.
lrct*r r lF.ns(rltr ltcClw rird dr?fi.air 2dL.
2. fh Cilo MaaH r.t tcMAI ti .n d5 ff ,.lhrot Corry ;:lrc d
..qtrC?,*orqiotr llr tc hde r focb n a .l C?. T] UDC
ffi FEdt td.F6. sdn 9. -d. It ll.i. rOC.
"'hl*i'*
I|TAIL Of YASIIL\IOTOI{
Cd) oar.firE
AN (nDllArc? A?mot1lc Or:
cof, ttf, tfiIr$w ?t"AIr ailHrDil rrT.
NLIIL'UIIN
ul^lr?l$ArusilAil
(hiht..llr ":-::''.'t
sIArL 0f y^sx[{ilot{
Cod!ofJctkur
38. Thc Board aflirmed thc appropriatencss of tlre prcposal with respccr to JCC lt.l5.l20 on
purposc and intent, and consistency with RCW 36.70A.360. A new MPR is thrs
approprialc at this location.
I
NOTE:. Ordinance No. 01-0128-08 was appealed and upheld on September 15. 2008 by the
Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board
I
. This decision was challenged and upheld in Superior Court on June 30, 2009 and further
upheld by the Court of Appeals on Januarv 19, 2011
10
!
I
!
I
i
.t
o
a
Supplemental EIS &aa
a
Analyzed M PR development
alternatives, zoning regulations
and development agreement
M itigation req u irements. Environmental. Services. Housing. Traffic. Utilities
November 2Ot4:Draft Supplem
December 2015: Final Supplemental ElS.
\ntr,2org
a
a
11
b\.
ADDITIONAT ENVIRONMENTAT I MPACTS ANALYSIS
Ets
a
a
a
Project Process Continues
ln early 2Ot6, after publication of the FSEIS, Planning Commission held a public hearing and
accepted public comments on development standards for the Pleasant Harbor MPR.
Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe (PGST) voiced concerns over proposed project
PGST req uested forma ! govern ment-to-govern ment consu ltations
Jefferson County has rich history of collaboration with PGST on projects
Tribal Consultations occurred while Planning Commission separately deliberate on MPR
development regu lations
The Planning Commission. Deliberated over 5 months. Produced recommended development standards for Pleasant Harbor MPR
' Forwarded their code to the Board of County Commissioners for consideration
Tribal consultations
Two meetings with developer, PGST and County conducted in early 2017
Produced further information on tribal concerns and on how development agreement
could best address issues
Consultations continue and are still on-going
a
a
a
12
Two key p ublic documents set forth m ndates on
developing and operating the Pleasant Harbor MPR....
^fi
(rf,Dltlalt? Amnol'ltc o:\t I
cou?nttElrstTf, n AIr allEttDilf, rI. IflL[rL'rll[n Irlt^|}, [tlAtuuAxl I
ffiIc.ia a:-::,'lli Plceslnt Hertor
Flnrl Srpplrmcntrl EIS
ilsr (Drl-ra
Not covered; worth mentioning:
Special Reports and Studies,
Public lnvolvement, Meetings,
Hea rings, Formal Consultatiorl3
Collectivelv. Ordinance and FSEIS
call for. MOUs with community, life-
safety, service agencies and
groups. Workforcedevelopment. Consultation with area Tribes. Cultural resources management. Wildlife management. Water supply management. Water quality management. Surface and stormwater. Greenbelts and vegetation. Specific mitigations
rl^It Of Y^tKlr(ir0il
Cqrtt olJcfim
,{f
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Bncre nouND: Authorized in state law - 35.708. t7O RCW
'tet forth development standards and other provisions" to govern
development, specific standards and mitigation of development for a specified
timeframe
shall be consistent with applicable local development regulations adopted
under Growth Management Act
public hearing required; adopted by
ordinance or resolution
typica lly accompa ny la rge developments
like housing developments, commercial
areas, resorts
provides clarity, specificity and
predictabil ity for la rge developments
while providing longer-than-normal
timeframes and vesting to existing local
code ,ild ,N
I
\_
/
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
For Pleasant Harbor MPR
Development Agreement will be the
principal vehicle to ensure compliance
with all required conditions
Development Agreement defines phases
for build-out, establishes terms and scope
of vesting period
Development Agreement a rticu ! ates
development standards
- relies on existing local codes for
stormwate6 critical areas, land
division and site development
Development Agreement includes
additional requirements where
compliance with each of the thirty
condition s is spelled out in detail 15
,.}
1a
t
{
,l
\
t
N I
\
J
)
\''
t
T
i'
(I
DEVELOPM ENT REG U LATIONS
RCW 36.708.030 and 36.708.040
Development Regulations set forth the permitted uses, density standards and
zoning development standards and cannot duplicate existing local codes for
stormwater; critical areas, !and division and site development
16
From Earlier Slides:
BoCC approves the MPR Designation in
Ordinance No. 01-0128-08
Adopted Ordinance lists
thirty (30) conditions for the
future planning and
development of the Master
Planned Resort
a
DEVELOPM ENT REG U LATIONS
DCD staff will:
Forward Planning Commission-recommended development
regulations verbatim
Propose revisions to Planning Commission recommendations
Provide an explanation on staff proposed revisions
Revisions are for clarity, consistency with state and local law
and to avoid duplication
Forward staff proposed revisions separately
Recommend that the Board invite public comment on both
o
a
a
a
a
a
t7
I
Conclusions
L8
$
(
I
(
L
!
Pleasant Harbor Master Planned Resort has been a
planning project for over ten years
The MPR-Ordinance requires 30 very specific conditions
for the Pleasant Harbor Master Planned Resort
The Development Agreement is the best vehicle to
ensure compliance with 30 conditions
The Planning Commission-recommended development
regulations set forth standards for permitted uses,
density and zoning; they contain many provisions more
appropriate for the development agreement
19
Next Steps
Tribal consultation continues
Development Agreement will be finalized
Development Regulations to have staff
proposed revisions explained
Both documents to be presented and
explained before Board decides on further
action
20