Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM120594 "·V Cf:i::.l;I..~ ~'.\.~;''- . . ~ ~":,,)h.'\\'i7; '-"l'~' i~-: ~ :.~; ~_ ,. 7'~ ........~..~: . ~.~~ ~'.., íE~iJ.am.šôÑi1øûNœ¥BOÃRDøFÊÔ_ŠŠÌØNERŠ% .............................................................................................. ............................................................................................. .............................................................................................. .............................................................................................. .............................................................................................. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ............................................................................................. .............................................................................................. ............................................................................................. ß.ºþ~lmp.tºp]<GKªœmªp CGJ~ªHºijtiñg(ºr~·UM~mþ~rC lJ~lçþ'ªrªmºjt;M¢mJj~ç) þQg@}J@lQ¢Þ"'P¢ÿ)· ~~~iåi~r~ðT.1!~ ............................................................... .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.....:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-'.:,'.:.'::.'.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::.:.:::::::.:::.:.:::.:.::::::::::;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;::::::::::.:.:.:........... , ~~ .~".~~-.~~~::-_" ~;Y ;:~, t.~ ;I~','-~_."_ \:;){, ,t.."T~."_"'.. . r-ø \:õ~ __..¿.;.çh"47? ~....,. MINUTES WEEK OF DECEMBER 5, 1994 Commissioner Glen Huntingford opened the meeting in the absence of Chairman Robert Hinton. Commissioner Richard Wojt was present. Discussion re: Prioritization of Projects for Jefferson County to the Washin¡:ton Community Economic Revitalization Team (CERT): Community Services Director David Goldsmith explained that the projects being submitted for funding through the Washington Community Economic Revitalization Team, must be prioritized by the County. The projects requesting funding for the next application period are: Port of Port Townsend heavy haulout, the Port Townsend School District Magnet Center and the Olympic Peninsula Foundation small woodlot owners cooperative network. He then explained the suggested point system for determining prioritization. The Board needs to assign the points to determine the priority for these projects. Eric Anderson, Jefferson County Economic Development Council, reported that part of the problem with this process has been that applicants for these funds have been submitting their applications directly to the federal or State government and not notifying the County. After reviewing the priority criteria, Commissioner Huntingford moved to approve RESOL- UTION NO. 127-94 supporting the prioritization for the three projects submitted for funding from the President's Economic Adjustment Initiative for 1995, and to approve the prioritization criteria as presented. Commissioner Wojt seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. Commissioner Wojt moved to write a letter of support for the Port of Port Townsend heavy haulout project increased loan request. Commissioner Huntingford seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Commissioner Wojt moved to approve the Minutes of November 14, and 21, 1994 as presented. Commissioner Huntingford seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. GMA Update: Gary Rowe presented a schedule for GMA activities and then reported on the meeting schedule for this week. The Forest Lands workshop scheduled for today is being postponed. A revised timeframe is being developed for this draft ordinance. A suggestion was made that the Planning Commission hearing on the draft Rural Overlay District ordinance be moved to a larger building than the Chimacum Grange because there are a lot of people confused and concerned about this draft ordinance. YOf. £~o -- tf",~ 0.. ~;. z;.~} . '~'--';'-Q-þg .. ..:::t::::::::I::::::::::::::::~: ....................... ....................... ........................ .i.::~~~tt~~~~~~t~~~~t~J~t;;;;;f: Commissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of December 5, 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Board concurred that they will meet to discuss setting a hearing for the re-establish- ment of the Port Ludlow Interim Urban Growth Area on Tuesday December 6, 1994 at 9:00 a.m. Gary Rowe reported that community meetings have been set up to discuss general planning and GMA issues with the Board: December 22, 1994 in Quilcene; January 5, 1995 in the Tri Area; January 19, 1994 in Port Ludlow and a meeting will be arranged in February. These are not public hearings on the community plans, they are meetings to provide opportunity for feedback from citizens. Permit Center Supervisor Kent Anderson reported on the building permits issued, and the subdivision applications submitted last week. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: The following items/issues were dis- cussed: the public hearing being held by the Planning Commission on the Rural Overlay District and the opinion that the document is not ready for public hearing; the need for checks and balances in preparing and reviewing ordinances for publication; the advertise- ments being published by the County in the newspaper and the cost for doing this; concern for lack and/or inadequacy of public process and the need for the Planning Commission and the Board to listen to the public more accurately; the need for the County to preserve planning options; the Leland Planning Committee survey and the process used by that planning committee, and the request from the Elected Officials for a raise in pay when they ran for the office knowing what the pay for the position was. APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE CONSENT AGENDA: Commissioner Wojt moved to adopt and approve the consent agenda except for Item 5 which is deleted and will be considered at 9:45 a.m. on Thursday. Commissioner Hun- tingford seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. 1. Purchase Requisition for four (4) 1995 Crown Victoria Police Interceptor Automobiles off of the State Bids; State Department of General Administra- tion, Office of State Procurement 2. Request for Payment of 4th Quarter Allocation, $5,000; Jefferson County Conservation District 3. HEARING NOTICE re: Revisions to Jefferson County Franchise Ordinance No. 2-81; Public Hearing Set for Monday, December 19, 1994 at 11:15 a.m. 4. LICENSE re: Use of County Property; Provide a Firing Range, Hunter Safety Courses, Training for Local Law Enforcement Agencies, and Various Sponsored Events; Located near the Jefferson County Landfill; Jefferson County Sportsmen's Club 5. DELETE AGREEMENT re: Restoration of Wildlife Habitat in the Lower Big Quilcene River Basin; U.s. Fish and Wildlife Service and Washington Wildlife Heritage Foundation BUSINESS FROM COUNTY DEPARTMENTS The Board met in Executive Session with Prosecuting Attorney regarding pending litigation. PLANNING AND PERMIT CENTER Discussion Re: Adoption Process for the Resource Lands Ordinance: This discussion was postponed until a later date. 'iOL 20 rAt}~ 00' .:...:.;) {(~, 0 ..:::/t:::!dllllllllll!I!lilll ..e.,,::::r::::iI:rrrri:rrr: Commissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of December 5, 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT HEARING re: Establishina: a County Road: Access Road to the Newly Constructed Animal Shelter: Critter Lane: Public Works Administrative Assistant Eileen Simon reported that the County Engineer recommends establishment of this road, to be named Critter Lane, to provide access to the new animal shelter. A 60 foot right-of-way will be established for this road. Commissioner Huntingford opened the public hearing. Julie Jaman. representing the Quimper Planning Committee, stated that the Quimper Plan encourages that rights-of-way be left in a natural condition, and she asked that the County consider this provision even though the plan has not been formally adopted yet. Hearing no further public comment, Commissioner Huntingford closed the public hearing. Commissioner Wojt moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 128-94 establishing a County Road to be known as Critter Lane and to approve the dedication of the right-of-way to the public forever. Commissioner Huntingford seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. HEARING re: Establishina: a County Road: Access Road to Serve a Planned Unit Development and Other Properties (in the vicinity of West Arcadia Road): Third Street: Public Works Director Gary Rowe reported that this portion of Third Street has been prepared for paving from the intersection of Discovery Road, in the easterly half of vacated Third Street, to just past the access road into the Arcadia Terrace Sub- division. This road was built by Mr. Hagen and provides access to West Arcadia Road and to residences in that general vicinity. The County Engineer has examined the road and found that it is necessary to provide access to the residential area in the vicinity of West Arcadia Road. The road has been built in 30 feet of right-of-way which is acceptable since other provisions for utility access exist. He recommends this road be established as a County Road and that by the Board's acceptance of the road, the right-of-way width is approved for a reduction from 60 feet to 30 feet. Commissioner Wojt asked about the space by West Aracadia Road? Alan Carman, repre- senting Mr. Hagen, answered that there is an easement for that road at that point. Gary Rowe added that the Arcadia West Road is built in the southern portion of the easement. Commissioner Huntingford asked why the newly constructed portion of Third Street extends north of Arcadia West Road? Gary Rowe reported that this was an existing road and it provides public access to more properties in the area. Alan Carmen noted that this road will also allow the elimination of the access to Third Street from the north. In response to a question from Commissioner Huntingford, Michael Glaefke reported that a permit for opening the right-of-way was issued to Mr. Perka in 1977 with a condition that the value of half the trees removed from Third Street be given to the County and in return the County would surface Third Street. Commissioner Huntingford then opened the hearing for public testimony. Colleen Pullen stated that she lives on Arcadia West Road and noted that the new grade of Third Street is higher than Arcadia West Road and it will be hard to make the turn onto Third Street. There is no way that cars from Arcadia West Road can turn onto Third Street without going into the second lane. The turn is too sharp. Gary Rowe stated that the road, at that intersection, is about 24 feet wide covered with gravel from shoulder to shoulder and the planned surfacing is for 20 feet of the roadway. The access road (Arcadia West Road) is about 14 to 16 feet wide. Alan Carmen reported that the paving will be 20 feet wide and will be tapered to match the existing grade of Arcadia West Road. Mrs. Pullen added that Third Street is nice, but there is a steep drop to Arcadia West and when the paving is done it will be worse. Gary Rowe reported that the approach to Arcadia West Road will have to be improved when Third Street is paved so that VOL 20 rA~~ O~··"···¡60 .':::::::::: ..t A.::::¡:¡:¡:¡:¡:¡:~:¡:¡:¡:¡:;:¡:;:~:~:¡:¡:¡:¡:¡:j:¡: .~:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. Commissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of December 5, 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . there is a smooth transition. Typically this work is taken care of when the paving is completed. J.C. Burris stated that his property runs 23.33 feet west of the section line. He stated that he feels eventually a 60 foot right-of-way will be needed for Third Street. He asked Alan Carmen if he started from the north when he did his survey? Alan Carman answered that he tied all of the section and subdivision lines in the area, so it doesn't make any difference if the survey was started from the north or south. Mr. Burris stated that he feels he has an improper property description and he has a claim against the title company because of it. Mr. Burris and Alan Carmen then discussed the way this area was surveyed. Gary Rowe reported that the centerline of Third Street became Mr. Burris' property boundary when a right-of-way vacation was done in that area. The discussion continued with Mr. Burris regarding his property, the vacated right-of-way, the survey of the area, the easement description, and various survey maps in this area. Commissioner Huntingford asked Mr. Burris if the road encroaches on his property or if he is concerned with what will happen in the future? Mr. Burris stated that he is worried about what will happen in the future. Gary Rowe noted that the standard County procedure for acquisition of right-of-way is to do it through an appraisal process or by donation. If a property owner doesn't want to sell then another alternative is found. The discussion continued regarding Mr. Burris' concerns regarding his property and Mr. Hagen's development. Mr. Burris concluded his testimony by stating that he is opposed to this road. He feels there is no reason why the road cannot remain open in the opposite direction. Carol Rose, 300 Arcadia West, stated that they are opposed to the opening of Third Street, and the closing of the north end of Third Street where it intersects Jacob Miller Road for the following reasons: · The proposed new configuration will add a fourth dangerous intersection within about a quarter mile section of Discovery Road. If this is the sole access into the neighborhood it will require a left turn onto a fast strip of road. 90% of all traffic from Arcadia would be headed into town or to the highway. A traffic control device will be required, if accidents are to be avoided. · This configuration will require an unnecessary delay for emergency services to this area. The local Fire Department is located on the north end of Jacob Miller Road. They will have to go past the current access, stop at the intersection of Jacob Miller and Discovery Road and then loop back around to the proposed new entrance at Third Street. This will require a sharp right turn into a narrow entrance, especially in terms of accommodating a fire truck or ambulance. There is a sharp drop off on the far side of that new access road. This could easily cause a delay in emergency response time. Since her husband is in frail medical condition, any delay is of great concern to their family. · A variance to standard road construction to allow the new Third Street to be only 30 feet wide has been requested. This is ridiculous given the impact of the doubling or more of the neighborhood population due to Mr. Hagen's new development. · They are tired of Mr. Hagen, the new development and the ill will it has created. · This high density, multi-dwelling complex, in the middle of surrounding five acre parcels is not in harmony with surrounding land use. · They feel Mr. Hagen has a buddy in the system and has been able to circum- vent State laws and gain access to water taps when previously there were none to be had. They question how the septic system needed to support so many dwellings will impact surrounding wells already in place. Mr. Hagen seems to have the unbending support of the County in all his actions. · The statutory vacation of a portion of Third Street landlocked every other property owner in this area. She feels the County has no authority to vacate this road. · She suggested that the existing access to Jacob Miller Road be brought up to standard, as was agreed to by the County in the mid '70's. 'Jot 20 rA~~ o~ 'fjl ~ ,,$:::::::::::::::::::::::::::=====:::::::::=::::::.:. Commissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of December 5, 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commissioner Huntingford asked if the sight distance at the intersection of Third Street and Old Discovery has been checked? Gary Rowe noted that it has been checked and the intersection meets the sight distance requirements. The approach is a standard design and it will accommodate emergency vehicles. Mrs. Pullen noted that she feels that emergency vehicles will also have problem turning from Third Street onto Arcadia West. She also stated that the other 30 feet of the Arcadia West easement is actually the buffer zone to Mr. Hagen's development. Alan Carmen reported that there is no buffer on the parcel that borders Arcadia West. There is a buffer for the Arcadia Terrace development. Commissioner Huntingford stated that the Board realizes that there are concerns and prob- lems in this area, but the hearing is regarding establishing a County road that will provide the property owners access. Michael Glaefkey explained the history of the access to the various properties in this area and how that was impacted by the County vacating a portion of Third Street. He asked that the County surface the road. He feels that this road would place a third dangerous intersec- tion off of Discovery Road. The intersection should be developed at Jacob Miller Road and the County should not have vacated Third Street. Mr. Glaefkey noted, for the record, that if the rest of Third Street is blocked off there will be trouble over it. He stated that the Board should right their previous error in vacating a portion of Third Street and not allow the rest of Third Street J.C. Burris asked that the decision on this be postponed to a future date, to allow him time to settle the issues he has. Julie Jaman stated that when this started there were citizens present that advised the Board that this was not a good thing to do. It flies in the face of what is intended for the area by the community. The issue with the Quimper Planning area is that the citizens do not want to subsidize developers. This is a perfect subsidy to a developer. What hasn't been ad- dressed is how many additional vehicle trips there will be into the area; what Larry Gard plans to do to develop his property in the future; how many houses will be in the develop- ment eventually; how wide will this road have to be to accommodate the traffic in the area; how much money is needed to bring this road up to standard; and what will be the cost of the impacts? Mr. Hagen only has two of his houses approved right now and Julie Jaman said that she feels the County should stop any further development until this is sorted out. Carol Rose then reported on some of the things Mr. Hagen did with regard to his project. Alan Carmen, representing Mr. Hagen, stated that this proposal was not of Mr. Hagen's doing. He found that after putting that access in place for Arcadia Terrace it was impos- sible to keep that access open for the sole use of his development. The proposal was made that it should be a County road. When the review started of Arcadia Terrace, the prepon- derance of the testimony was that the residents of the area hated the Jacob Miller inter- section and that the proposal to reconstruct the Discovery Bay intersection was the ap- propriate method of access for this development. This project has gone through all of the required permitting processes. As far as emergency services to the area, the fire trucks may have access from Jacob Miller Road, but the emergency medical services come from Port Townsend because Fire District #6 doesn't have its own ambulance. He has never seen any receipt of funds from the County for the paving of Third Street, or any expenditure of funds on that road. This is the last chance the County has to provide access into these properties. This road will be paved, whether it is a County or private road. Michael Glaefkey then rebutted Mr. Carmen's statements saying that emergency vehicles coming from Port Townsend would cross Jacob Miller Road. He also stated that there is a receipt of money from Mr. Perka for this road. Commissioner Huntingford asked if one of the reasons the County would not pave the road immediately was so the base would be firm? Gary Rowe answered that was correct when the discussion was to put chip seal on the road. The developer is proposing to put an asphalt surface on the road. The Public Works Department will do a compaction test before the paving will be allowed. Alan Carmen reported that the bid the developer has for paving includes compaction to County standards prior to paving. Commissioner Wojt explained that his understanding of what happened on this road, was that a law from the early 1900's indicated if the road had not been developed, the County \Jot 20 r~~~ o· "2 ;!II.~ ¡ ~__..J ~ ....................... ....................... ........................ ........................ .,(;::t:t:t:::::::tt:::::::::::::t:=:: Commissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of December 5, 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . had no right-of-way. This law does not say that people who are using the road for an access don't have rights, it just says that the County doesn't have rights. The property owners have to exercise their rights through the Court system. Gary Rowe added that the County didn't vacate the right-of-way, it was vacated by State statute (statutory vacation.) The County only acknowledges that the road was vacated by statute. Gary Rowe reported that this road is not, and was never, on the County Road Log, so there is no record of any expenditures on it. J.C. Burris read the following from a Planning Department staff report "The improvement of public services such as water, sewer systems, roads, schools, parks, fire protection and emergency services, will be emphasized to serve actual population increases, but not to promote those increases." He feels that this is promoting an increase. Commissioner Huntingford asked if the portion of Third Street that is being improved is different than the portion of Third Street that was subject to the statutory vacation? Public Works Administrative Assistant Eileen Simon reported that the original vacation request was for more of Third Street because it was for portions adjacent to properties owned by Mr. Burris, Mr. Hagen and Mr. Gard. The Chairman closed the public testimony portion of the hearing. Commissioner Wojt moved to postpone a decision on this until Monday December 12, 1994 at 2:00 p.m. Commissioner Huntingford seconded the motion which carried by a un- animous vote. The meeting was recessed at the conclusion of the scheduled budget hearings and reconvened on Tuesday morning at 9:00 a.m. Commissioners Glen Huntingford and Richard Wojt were both present. Chairman Robert Hinton was not present. AGREEMENT l#FWS 14-48-001-94692) re: Restoration of Wildlife Habitat in the Lower Big Ouilcene River Basin: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Washington Wildlife Heritage Foundation: Commissioner Wojt moved to approve this agreement with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Washington Wildlife Heritage Foundation for restoration of wildlife habitat in the Lower Big Quilcene River basin. Commissioner Huntingford seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. Discussion re: Setting Public Hearing on Draft Interim Urban Growth Areas Ordinance Amendment: Adding Port Ludlow as an JUGA: In response to a letter from David Cunningham, Vice President, Land Use for Pope Resources, (see at- tached), Prosecuting Attorney Mark Huth reported that the original IUGA Ordinance was sent to the Planning Commission for their review and a report. This amendment to the ordinance is subject to that same process. He suggested that the Board ask that the Planning Commission have the report back to them by a specific date. After discussion of the time needed to draft the amendment, Commissioner Wojt moved to set the public hearing on the amendment for January 9, 1995 at 2:00 p.m. Commissioner Huntingford seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. Mark Huth will notify Pope Resources of this decision. The meetings were recessed at the conclusion of the scheduled budget hear- ings each day and reconvened the following morning. All three Board members were present for the meetings for the remainder of the week. AGREEMENT, Settlement re: Claims Arising from Flooding of the Big Ouilcene River in December 1993: Washington State Department of Wildlife AND MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT re: Resolution of Issues and Concerns in the Big Ouilcene Watershed: Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife: Commissioner Wojt opened the meeting in the temporary absence of Chairman Hinton. John Conklin, State Department of Fish and Wildlife, Marilyn Mockinstern, State Attorney General's Office and Fletcher Schives, EPA Enforcement Coordinator were present as well as Al Scalf from the Public Works Department and Prosecuting Attorney Mark Huth. Mark ~Ol 20 rA~~ o ~ tj,J ..::::~t¡~~~¡ ..::::fmttI ..::::::::::::::i1i:illllllili·.··:llli ,.':;:t¡¡~¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡tt¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡t¡¡::: Commissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of December 5, 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Huth reported that the County has been negotiating a resolution and a long term solution to flooding problems on the Big Quilcene River. A tentative settlement agreement has been signed by the Director of the State Department of Fisheries which sets forth the actions that will be taken to begin the long term solution proposed as follows: 1) The first of the actions, which was the repair of the dike on the Big Qµilcene River, has been completed. 2) Funding a feasibility study which will look at solutions for the river, beginn- ing with the publicly owned properties (State owned properties east of the breach in the dike.) The County has signed an agreement to provide $40,000 to the State Department Fish and Wildlife Service. The Washington Wildlife Heritage Foundation is acting as the lead entity in creating the feasibility study. Funds will also be provided by Fish and Wildlife. 3) Purchase of the Newman and Shada properties. Negotiations will be started with these property owners and the hope is to come to a full and fair agree- ment with them for acquisition of these properties. The long term resolution is that once the properties are in public control and joined with other properties at the mouth of the river, all of the agencies will be able to work together to create recreational, resource management, and restoration opportunities. By signing these agreements today the County is stepping forward and joins with the State in saying that they support and want to be involved in doing the best job possible on the restoration and enhancement efforts in this area. Commissioner Wojt asked if the studies done by consultants for the County (Goo Max) regarding how to deal with the gravel accumulation along the river, will be taken into consideration in the feasibility study? Mark Huth answered that the Geo Max study has been mentioned during the negotiations, and the intent has been to utilize all the resources available in that study. Al Scalf stated that he will take that concern to the local inter- agency team meeting in January. Another issue raised by Commissioner Huntingford concerning the inclusion of the upstream section of river by the Rogers Street Bridge will also be brought up at this meeting. Commissioner Wojt added that the Forest Service has also done an extensive study of the river channel from the mouth to the source. There have been all kinds of studies done by various agencies, with very little coordination among agencies. John Conklin noted that the draft Request for Proposal for the feasibility study actually named the flood control study done by the County as a resource to be examined. The Memorandum of Agreement mentions cooperating with the principle parties that have been active in this process so far and it mentions that there are other affected parties which should be included, such as the Forest Service. He feels that the Dungeness/Quilcene Planning Council is a logical group to coordinate some of these efforts. He feels that this will be a model for other watershed efforts around the State. Commissioner Huntingford stated that it is nice to have this coordinated effort finally going forward. Previous local efforts to get other agencies to work together with the County and local citizens have been very difficult. Commissioner Huntingford then moved to approve and sign the Settlement Agreement and the Memorandum of Understanding as presented. Commissioner Wojt seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. MEETING ADJOU~~~-I!I~~'-""'·",+ " < ;~t'(4 . J J "- / ~_ . · Of '\ ¡... . "4'tþ SEAL:. . 2;:;' . ~ ... ~ .:' ,p ~~ \ 'f .,., · ~. i , ". I ATTEST: ~CY7#-Cl Lorna L. Delaney, Clerk of the Board 1 ?ii". \'" /1' . \ ~/;-;:.-:-. '-. /"-.' / ",./.~./ ,.~ .... \- :~:. .:":...< "," '. I~. ~."" "-... '~') " 'tOt 20 ~~c.~ Of " 1:.\ .:::::t:::::::li:-llllllllliIIII11111111Iil