Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM092093 c...t~ 'c;;:? ~~ MINUTES WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 20, 1993 Commissioner Robert Hinton and Commissioner Glen Huntingford were present to call the meeting to order after an entrance conference with representatives of the State Auditor's Office. Chairman Richard Wojt was not present. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Commissioner Huntingford moved to approve the Minutes of September 13, 1993 as presented. Commissioner Hinton seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. Marie Hebert. Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe re: Request for Support of Purchase of Tonanamus (Chimacum) Rock by the State Parks Department: Marie Hebert, Cultural Resources Director, for the Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe introduced Judith Bendor, Environmental Attorney for the Tribe, and then explained that the Tomanamus Rock area has been used by the Tribe for many years. They are asking the Board to support their efforts to preserve this area. There is a Class IV Forest Practice permit application to log 25 acres in this area. Judy Bendor added that the Tribe would like time to have an archaeological survey done of the area. The Tribe is working with the current land owner to see if an easement can be negotiated. Commissioner Hinton asked if the Tribe has considered purchasing the property? Marie Hebert reported that the Tribes have discussed this and it would take all three area Tribes putting in funds to make the purchase. The State is considering purchasing the property because it is next to the State Park. Commissioner Hinton stated that he doesn't feel that the County Commissioners can take a position on this matter because it may prejudice consideration of a project in the future. The Board members suggested that the Tribe contact the Jefferson County Park's Board for more information. Warren Steurer. Facilities Mana~er re: Update on the A~reement with Port Townsend School District for Use of Pool and Hirin~ Freeze: Agreement for Use of Pool: Warren Steurer reported that the proposed contract for use of the School District swimming pool included increased sewage costs. The School District was contacted to see if they would allow the County to operate the pool without a contract for a month to allow time for negotiations with the City. The School District has responded that they do not want to allow continued use of the pool without a contract. Warren Steurer then presented a fact sheet on pool costs and use. He noted that the School District has been passing on the real costs from the City since January. VOL 1 9 rACE no ~249 Commissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of September 20, 1993 Page: 2 David Goldsmith reported that the City was contacted about these costs. He suggested that the County go ahead and sign the contract with the School District. A letter will be sent to the City advising them of the County's position regarding the cost of the swimming program and the need for City participation. Hiring Freeze: David Goldsmith reported that several departments, including Recreation, have asked for clarification on the recent hiring freeze enacted by the Commissioners and how it will effect clerk hire positions. He presented a draft memorandum outlining his understanding of how the hiring/promotion freeze will be implemented. After reviewing the memo the Board concurred that it be sent to all County departments. AGREEMENT re: Use of Mountain View Middle School Swimmin~ Pool: Port Townsend School District: Commissioner Huntingford moved to approve the agreement with Port Townsend School District #50 for use of the swimming pool for the 1993 - 1994 school year. Commissioner Hinton seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: The following items were discussed: The need for maps, copies of community plans, and the County Comprehensive Plan for the community planning committees; the number of parks in the County; and the amount of impact fees for government services and how that will impact the cost of housing. APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE CONSENT AGENDA: Commissioner Huntingford moved to adopt and approve the items on the consent agenda as presented. Commissioner Hinton seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. 1. RESOLUTION NO. 78-93 re: Transferring Line Authority for the Planning and Building Department to the Director of Community Services 2. Approve Hearing Notice re: Setting date for Public Hearing on appeal of Final Mitigated Determination of Non-significance; LL02-92 Large Lot Subdivision; Pulali Point Partners; Hearing set for Monday October 18, 1993 at 2:00 p.m. in the Commissioners' Chambers 3. AGREEMENT, Supplement No.1; Clarification of Relationship between County, Port and Skookum Products and Services for the CDBG Grant; Port of Port Townsend and Skookum Products and Services 4. Request for Payment of Third Quarter Allocation; Clallam Jefferson Community Action Council 5. AGREEMENT, Consultant Services; Planning Services for the Jefferson County Zoning Ordinance; Madrona Planning and Development Services 6. Findings, Conclusions and Final Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance; Discovery Bay Ridge (#LL-11-02) Large Lot Subdivision, Divisions 4 and 5; Pope Resources 7. Approval of Drafting a Camp Facilities Plan; Beausite Lake/Gibbs Lake Property; Parks Advisory Board 8. Letter to Rhododendron Festival Association re: Formula for Supplemental Funding for 1993 9. RESOLUTION NO. 79-93 re: Updating Official County Road Log; Addition of West Patison Street 10. RESOLUTION NO. 80-93 re: The Statutory Vacation of a Portion of Market Street in the Plat of Harrisburg; William Humiston 11. RESOLUTION NO. 81-93 re: Initiating a County Project Designated as CRll08; Improve intersection and bicycle/pedestrian facilities, and improve traffic facilities; Chimacum Road from Milepost 0.41 to 1.15 12.Approve Federal Aid Project Prospectus;Chimacum Road South Project CRII08 13.AGREEMENT re: Chimacum Road South Project CR1108; State Department of Transportation 14.RESOLUTION NO.82-93 re: Initiating a County Project Designated as CR1107; Improve Overlay, widen and pave shoulders, intersection improvements, and traffic markings; lrondale Road from Milepost 0.00 to 0.65 15. Approve Federal Aid Project Prospectus; Irondale Road Project CRII07 VOL 19 rA('~ 00 ~250 Commissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of September 20, 1993 Page: 3 16.AGREEMENT re: Irondale Road Project #CR1107; State Department of Transportation 17. CONTRACT re: Professional Services - Dental Assistant; Olympic Primary Care Dental Program through the Health Department; Kathi Doty 18. CONTRACT re: Professional Services - Dental Hygienist; Olympic Primary Care Dental Program through the Health Department; Sheila Pickett 19.AGREEMENT re: Participating Health Care Service Contractor (Health Department); Kitsap Physicians Service 20. Appointment to the Developmental Disabilities Advisory Board Members; Louise Raymond, Helen Brink, Richard Wojt, Ruth Kerschbaum, Judy Harder, Lorna Schoenenman, Joy Marrs, Ed Sasser, and Homer Smith; Each to a three year term (Term will expire September 19, 1996) BUSINESS FROM COUNTY DEPARTMENTS PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT Hearin~ Examiner Recommendation; Conditional Use Permit #IZ40-93; Bed and Breakfast as a Home Business; 19550 Hi~hwav 101. Ouilcene; Ham and Eleanor Caulev: Associate Planner Jerry Smith reviewed the Hearing Examiner's recommendation which is to approve this conditional use permit for a bed and breakfast home business. Commissioner Hinton asked Mr. & Mrs. Cauley if they agree with the conditions placed on this project by the Hearing Examiner? Mr. Cauley answered that they have agreed to these conditions. Commissioner Huntingford moved to approve the conditional use permit as recommended, with conditions, by the Hearing Examiner. Commissioner Hinton seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. HEARING re: The Intention of Jefferson County to Sell Surplus County Property: Commissioner Hinton opened the public hearing regarding the County's intent to sell surplus personal property at an auction. Hearing no testimony for or against this intent, Commissioner Hinton closed the hearing. Commissioner Huntingford moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 83-93 finding and determination for the sale of surplus County personal property. Commissioner Hinton seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. Application for Special Occasion Liquor License for October 16. 1993 at Arcadia Inn: Commissioner Huntingford moved that the County has no objection to the special occasion liquor license for October 16, 1993 at the Arcadia Inn, as presented by Ted Shoulberg. Commissioner Hinton seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. Hollow: questions: Q) Is there anyone in the audience who objects to the participation of any of the County Commissioners in these proceedings? There was no objection from anyone in the audience. Do any of the Commissioners have an interest in this property or issue? A) Both Board members answered no. Do any of you stand to gain or lose any financial benefit as a result of the outcome of the hearing? A) Both Board members answered no. Can you hear and consider this in a fair and objective manner? A) Both Board members answered yes. HEARING re: Appeal of Final SEPA Threshold Determination; LL-II-92 Deer Commission Hinton explained the hearing procedures and asked the following Q) Q) Q) VOL 1 9 rAG~ 00 1251 Commissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of September 20, 1993 Page: 4 Q) Has any member of the Board engaged in communication outside this hearing with opponents or proponents on the issue to be heard? A) Both Board members answered no. Associate Planner Jim Pearson then reviewed the information packet submitted by the Planning Department which includes the following items: the final mitigated determination of non- significance, the environmental checklist, the Planning Department staff memo analyzing the proposal and comments received, the preliminary DNS which was revised based on comments, the findings and conclusions of the Board regarding adequate provision for schools and fire services for the Inn at Port Ludlow plat, the Minutes of the Board's consideration of that issue, the notice of appeal from the Chimacum School District and copies of comments from various agencies and persons on this proposal. He explained that the MDNS on this plat was issued prior to the Board's determination of adequate provision for schools and fire services on the Inn at Port Ludlow. The Planning Department recommends that the Board apply the actions taken regarding schools and fire service on the Inn at Port Ludlow to the Deer Hollow plat, which would mean replacing mitigative measures 16, 17, 18 and 19 with the Board's action regarding schools and fire services as set forth in the Inn at Port Ludlow determination. Commissioner Hinton asked if the Planning Department has heard anything from the School District regarding Deer Hollow, since filing their appeal? Jim Pearson reported that he has not discussed this with the School District. Mark Huth added that the Board can hear this appeal even though the School District is not present. In the document submitted by the School District outlining the grounds for their appeal, they objected to the appeal being heard on the basis that they feel County Ordinance precludes the Board from hearing the appeal. He stated that the Board can act on the basis of the written document which addresses the grounds of their appeal which are: · School capacity and mitigation for new students generated by the plat. · Procedural issues which include an alleged illegal meeting between the Planning staff, the Prosecuting Attorney and Pope Resources staff regarding mitigation for Deer Hollow. The meeting they are referring to did not address Deer Hollow it addressed the EIS and mitigation in general and how the EIS suggested language was going to be crafted in order to create mitigation language for any particular plat that Pope was going to come forward with that is in the scope of the programmatic EIS. Deer Hollow was not discussed in particular, so that meeting isn't the subject of today's appeal, Mark Huth reported. Another procedural issue raised by the School District was that after the MDNS was modified, it was not published for comment again. Mark Huth reported that WAC 340(t) says that if a MDNS is modified by the responsible official, he shall circulate it to agencies with jurisdiction. This is very different from beginning another comment period. There is only one comment period. . Mark Huth said that it is his opinion that the only grounds for the School District's appeal are those of capacity and mitigation fot~eneration of new students. Given the testimony the Board previously heard on that issue, they can adopt it and create findings accordingly. Commissioner Hinton then asked if anyone was present to represent the School District? (No one answered.) Commissioner Huntingford asked if EIS mitigation applies if the plat was vested under a previous Subdivision Ordinance? Mark Huth explained that part of the procedure for review of the Deer Hollow plat included an interruption pending environmental review. Once the programmatic environmental review was finished, then the plat review process was started again. Mark Huth reported that the Board's review of the MDNS is on a "de novo" basis because of the appeal, and public comment can be taken on any issue. David Cunningham, Pope Resources, stated that with respect to this appeal on Deer Hollow, the Chimacum School District is alleging several things including procedural flaws in the SEP A process (the 15 day comment period). Pope Resources has reviewed these claims and VOL J 9 rAG~ 00 :t252 Commissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of September 20, 1993 Page: 5 agrees with the Prosecuting Attorney that there is no basis for the School District to claim that there was a procedural error in what was done by the SEP A responsible official. The School District's substantive appeal is that this 28 lot project will generate 10 students. Pope Resources feels that the evidence in the Programmatic EIS is adequate and fair grounds to assume that there will be fewer than two students generated by the project. Pope Resources doesn't agree with the two conditions that require them to reach agreement with the School District and the Fire District. With respect to the substantive portion of the appeal, they feel that the Chimacum School District has presented several factual claims that are in error. This plat has been reviewed by the Hearing Examiner and during the course of those hearings, the School District raised some of the same issues. Pope Resources responded formally to the Hearing Examiner on those issues and David Cunningham offered that testimony to the Board. Commissioner Hinton then opened the public· hearing. Ann Quantock stated that many of the people here today are not concerned about schools, but about water. They believe the issue in Port Ludlow is the availability of potable water. She implored the Board to use this opportunity to take a look at the issue of water availability in Port Ludlow. She reported that the Greater Port Ludlow Community Council has negotiated an agreement with Pope Resources which provides that if there are problems with the aquifer, Pope Resources would cease further development or provide additional capacity and a distribution system at their expense for the development. However, there are many private water systems and wells in the Port Ludlow area that are not part of the Pope Resources development. She asked if the County will take the responsibility of providing water to these properties if their water systems fail? They are asking the County to cease additional development or to provide additional sources of water and distribution systems at County expense because of overdevelopment in the Port Ludlow area. She then offered the following recommendations: 1) Seek an independent analysis of the extent and capability of the aquifer before any further development is allowed in Port Ludlow. In order to have credibility, the County should hire and direct the consultant to do this work. 2) The County should use estimates of water usage that conform to the State Department of Ecology standards (800 gallons per day, per household). 3) The County should require water conserving construction in all new developments. 4) The County should begin a public education campaign to let people know that water is a concern in this County. She asked that the Board defend the protection of wells and water systems and assure that there is enough water in the aquifer to take care of all the development needs as well as the need of the people who currently live in the Port Ludlow area. Hugh Stocker. 130 Huckleberry Lane. Port Ludlow (Shine area) said that he agrees with Ann Quantock's statement. Mr. Stocker explained the problems that a Shine area water system has experienced because of a shortage of water. This system serves about 13 homes, but is certified to serve 27 homes. Mark Huth noted in response to these comments that one of the conditions in the modified MDNS is that Pope Resources is to conduct a groundwater monitoring program. The scope of the monitoring program is to be mutually agreed upon by the County and Pope prior to final plat approval. If the groundwater monitoring program indicates an inadequate yield to support development of the proponents projects, then the proponent and the County are to immediately notify the State Department of Ecology to request action and investigation, pursuant to their groundwater monitoring authority. The County does not have authority over groundwater permitting, the Department of Ecology does. The final statement in that mitigating condition is that in the event that DOE is asked to step in because there is a problem, the County will not issue approval of any further plats in the south aquifer until the groundwater adequacy issues have been resolved. He noted that if this issue came up the County would also have to address it on a building permit basis because the GMA does not allow a building permit to be issued without proof that adequate potable water exists. VOL .f." L [) rAG' 00 1253 Commissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of September 20, 1993 Page: 6 After further questions from Mr. Stocker, Mark Huth reported that the groundwater monitoring program is to be on-going. David Cunningham reported that there are two monitoring programs. There was a dispute between some property owners in the Shine area and the PUD over a water right. An agreement was signed between these people, the PUD and the State for a monitoring program in the south aquifer. Whatever the scope of work is for the monitoring program per that agreement, Pope will not duplicate that work, but will try to fill in additional information, so that a more comprehensive picture is developed from these two monitoring programs. Bob Peet. 801 Ludlow Bay Road asked if this monitoring program goes beyond the development at Port Ludlow? David Cunningham reported that it will. Mark Huth added that the scope of work for the monitoring program will have to be agreed to by the County and Pope prior to final plat approval. Commissioner Huntingford added that it is his understanding that the tests will be done on surrounding wells. Commissioner Huntingford then responded to the points raised by Ann Quantock by noting that the Health Department is working to implement the installation of low water use fixtures in Port Ludlow projects. He also suggested with regard to on-going education, that Katherine Baril from the Jefferson County/WSU Cooperative Extension be contacted about on-going educational programs. Jim Pearson reported that the section of the State Building Code that deals with plumbing fixtures had new requirements effective July 1, for low water use fixtures in residences. Hearing no further public comment, Commissioner Hinton closed the public hearing. Commissioner Huntingford moved that the prior testimony from the Inn at Port Ludlow project regarding schools and fire services be adopted, that the appeal be denied, the final mitigated determination of non-significance issued previously be rescinded, a new final mitigated determination of non-significance be issued and to direct the Planning Department to write the findings and conclusions to support that decision. After discussion of when the preliminary plat would be placed on the Board's agenda for consideration, it was placed on the October 4, 1993 agenda under the Planning and Building Department business at 10:35 a.m. Senior Planner James Holland re: Review of Plannin~ Commission Report on Interim Urban Growth Area Ordinance: Senior Planner James Holland explained that this meeting is for the Board to review the Planning Commission report on the draft Interim Urban Growth Area Ordinance. He then explained that the Planning Commission made it clear that they believe that the adoption of urban growth areas is necessary and they raised the following issues: · Concerns with process because they didn't feel that the City of Port Townsend was fully involved. They also felt that the citizen participation process should have been more than it was. They feel that there is a need for the County to show more procedural compliance with the GMA, and the Countywide Planning Policies. Need to identify tier 1 and 2 level of service standards for the interim urban growth areas. Concern that the work on the interim urban growth areas does not impede the work on the interim critical areas ordinance. · · · · He then noted that the Planning Department staff disagrees on some of the issues that involve interpretations of the RCW, the WAC and the Countywide Planning Policies. James Holland then reviewed each of the findings that the Planning Commission reported on. After discussion of these items the Board directed the Planning Department to draft changes and/or new findings for review and consideration next Monday. VOL 19 rAG~ 00 ~254 Commissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of September 20, 1993 Page: 7 The meeting was recessed at the end of the scheduled business on Monday and reconvened on Tuesday morning with Commissioner Hinton and Commissioner Huntingford present. After attending a Budget Committee meeting they met with Community Services Director David Goldsmith, Architectural Programs Manager, Frank Gifford, Animal Services Supervisor, Bonita Flagg, and representatives of animal welfare groups regarding the plans for the new animal shelter and the programs. PUBLIC WORKS Dan Y oura re: Concerns about County License to Use Ri~ht-of-way issued to Alyce Clo~ston Carmichael; Hiller Drive. Port Hadlock: Prosecuting Attorney Mark Huth reported that the Board received a letter from Dan Y oura and Pat Thompson regarding the license to use rights-of-way issued to Alyce Clogston Carmichael. He explained that the County grants licenses to use right-of-way that are not needed for road purposes. Dan Youra reported that they purchased their property in 1989. An old culvert was used for one access to this property. About a year after purchasing the property they were told that they could no longer use this access because a license to use the right-of-way was granted to an adjacent property owner. He added that when this license was issued there was no effort to inform neighboring property owners of that deliberation. He added that the license was given to Mrs. Carmichael and she does not park her car on this right-of-way, but does allow other people to park there. Pat Thompson stated that the procedure when people want to open a right-of-way for public access to the beach includes notification of adjoining property owners. She feels that this license needs to be looked at because she had no notification about it. Commissioner Hinton asked who the license was issued to? Mark Huth stated that the application was made by Jack Scott Clogston, but the license was issued to his mother Alyce Clogston Carmichael because she owns the property. Commissioner Hinton asked Mr. Youra who said that he couldn't use the access to his property? Dan Youra reported that Mr. Clogston advised him of the license being issued. Mr. Youra asked if anyone can apply for a license to use right-of-way in front of another person's house? Mark Huth answered that the license must be granted to the property owner adjacent to the right-of-way. He explained that once there is a license other people, with approval of the licensee, can be allowed to use the right-of-way. The discussion continued regarding the right-of..way and what it can be used for. Mrs. Carmichael stated that the license is adjacent to the property where her home is located and her family is living in the house. Tom Carmichael stated that this license does not block access to Mr. Y oura' s property. He has another access to his garage as defined on his building permit. Commissioner Hinton asked if the culvert that was blocked had to be replaced? Pat Thompson reported that before the license was granted they put in another culvert and a different access to their property. Commissioner Hinton asked how far away the wood pile and cars are to their property? Pat Thompson reported that they are right next to their property line. Commissioner Huntingford asked if the license would have been allowed if there was a house existing on the adjacent property at the time the license was considered? Mark Huth reported that the plat that includes this right-of-way indicates that the whole right- of-way goes with the adjacent Carmichael property. The Y ouraffhompson property is located in another plat. Commissioner Huntingford asked if the adjacent property owners (ThompsonlYoura and Sprague) were notified when this license was issued? Mark Huth stated that he doesn't think so because they are not in the plat that dedicated this right-of- way. VOL 1 9 rAf,~ 00 :t255 Commissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of September 20, 1993 Page: 8 Ken Thompson, Builder, stated that he drew the plans for the garage. He noted that the access to the garage was planned and drawn in a less desireable place because this license was issued. Mark Huth explained that a license can be revoked with 90 days notice from the County. Mr. Clogston stated that the County records indicate that the garage plan submitted prior to their license does not show this area as the access to the garage. He noted that the Health Department is requiring that they (Y ouraffhompson) put a septic system reserve area where this access was which means that they could not drive on it if the septic system was ever located there. They have excavated for a garage and they have a driveway to it. Commissioner Hinton asked if there is space on the Carmichael property for parking and wood storage? Mr. Clogston answered that they have a 60 foot lot and a reserve area for the septic system would not allow much area for parking and storage. Mark Huth suggested that the portion of the license that abuts the ThompsonlY oura property be revoked and that the license continue for the remaining portion that abuts the Sprague property. Mr. Clogston stated that they use 28 feet of the license area that is in front of the ThompsonlY oura property. Susan Hopkins added that she doesn't see how they can access the section of the right-of- way adjacent to Sprague's property because there is a steep bank in that area. Commissioner Hinton asked if the license can be amended to include just the Sprague property? Mark Huth suggested that Mr. Sprague be contacted about this, because the right-of-way în front of his property is not being used right now and he may have an objection to its use. Commissioner Huntingford asked where Mr. Clogston parked before this license was issued? Mr. Clogston answered that they had to park right on Hiller Drive. The discussion continued regarding the size of the lots in the area, the size of the houses and areas for reserve septic system, and a property owners right to access their property. Commissioner Huntingford stated that he would like more time to review this situation and the record on it. The decision was rescheduled for Monday September 27, 1993 at 11:15 a.m. Copy of Letter to AI Scalf from Cy Heffernan. Jefferson County Parks and Recreation District No.1 Commissioner re: Concerns about Coyle Community Center buildin~: Al Scalf reviewed the items to be corrected under the warranty for this building. Prosecuting Attorney Mark Huth reported that he feels that there should not be any discussion of why and how these items came up because there has been a threat of a lawsuit by the Park and Recreation District. Commissioner Hinton asked how this project came about originally? Public Works Director Gary Rowe reported that the County was asked to contribute to building a community center on the Coyle peninsula by the Board of the Parks and Recreation District. The original estimate was that the County would provide $40,000 in cash to the project and another $40,000 in services for administration of the construction contract. The Park and Recreation District Commissioners agreed to raise money for some of the interior furnishings. At some point the County was asked to provide funding for kitchen furnishings. The final total cost of the facility was approximately $190,000. The County made a good faith effort to insure that the project would be completed. Commissioner Hinton asked if this was done through written or verbal agreements? Gary Rowe reported that initially there was an outline of what the County would contribute in the form of funds and services, however as the project progressed there were changes made to the project which included some verbal approvals. There have been four or five meetings throughout the year since the project was completed to review, discuss and resolve the warranty issues, Al Scalf reported. VOL 1 9 PM; on1256 Commissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of September 20, 1993 Page: 9 Cy Heffernan stated that he became the representative of the Parks and Recreation District Board in early 1992 due to the death of one of the Commissioners. He reported that the estimate for the cost of the building was $107,000. To allow enough money to cover the cost as well as some possible unanticipated costs, the voters were asked to approve a bond for $115,000.00. The property was donated to the Park and Recreation District by a local resident. Commissioner Hinton asked why these items are being brought up now, if this has been going on for a year or so? Cy Heffernan reported that these items have been pointed out to AI Scalf and have been discussed in meetings with Public Works staff. He stated that if there is no satisfaction on the security issue, the Parks and Recreation District Commissioners have determined that they will fix the problem and then recover the cost from whoever is responsible. After further discussion of the problems with the building and the communication with the County staff, Commissioner Hinton asked what the Park and Recreation District Commissioners want from the County? Cy Heffernan stated that they feel that there are a number of design flaws that have caused major problems. Commissioner Huntingford asked that the Parks and Recreation District Board meet with the Public Works Department to decide how to proceed with these items. Frank Gifford reported that the Architect is currently developing a list of the items that are to be corrected under the warranty and a timeframe for that work. Commissioner Hinton stated that he will be meeting with people at Coyle later this week. MEETING ADJOURNED / i '( (. (\ J,¡ ~ ." ,"",.~.' rJ.;,.\. \1'. '.).. ~~"~ °1\:/"':,( (t·\', '(1f~~~~:"~\J1 . ,.;~' ( : '\ ~'- ¡,; ~' . I ~ , '.~. ; I .. '\1 --, .. '" " / ¡ , :JJ' · ~.' " AmSrr:·. ~ JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS (tx~ ¡J~ . ard W ojt, Chairman VOL. 1 9 r~r; on, 257