Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM031488 .. . .~ &, IiIlII &1 IiIlII En IiIlII IiIlII &1 &1 I &1 lilli' District No. 1 Commissioner: District No. 2 Commissioner: District No. 3 Commissioner: Larry W. Dennison, Member B.G. Brown, Chairman George C. Brown, Member & IiIlI - IiIlI & - IiIlI BI - IiIlI IiIlI - 3EFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Clerk of the Board: Public Works Director: Jerdine C. Bragg Gary A. Rowe MI NUT E S Week of March 14, 1988 The meeting was called to order by Chairman B. G. Brown. Commissioner Larry W. Dennison and Commissioner George Brown were both present APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Dennison moved to approve the minutes of February 1, and 8~ 1988, as read. Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. Robert Rosner from the SmokinG Policy Institute: Mr. Rosner explained that he is the Executive Director of the Smoking Policy Institute based in Seattle. The Institute designs no-smoking policies for businesses. The insti tute tries to design the best possible smoking policy for each organization based on that organizations needs, which doesn't necessarily mean a ban on smoking. Mr. Rosner reported, referring to an article from the University of puget Sound Law Review "The Legal Rights of Non-Smokers", that non- smokers have a right to breathe c'lean air in the work place. Non- smokers can sue organizations that fail to protect their health and safety for such issues as injunctive relief (declare a smoke free building), disability and/or unemployment compensation for smoke sensitive people, and negligence. Smoking is a privilege not a right. There are cost savings associated with non-smoking policies. Anytime there is fire and smoke is in an enclosed environment there is damage. Smoke is very harmful to computer equipment and to people. Mr. Rosner suggested that if the County adopts a no-smoking policy for County buildings, that they should also pursue discounts available for employees health and life insurance as well as fire and group auto insurance discounts for county property. There are impacts to main- tenance, employee productivity and employee absenteeism associated with non-smoking policies. Studies have shown that smokers take 33 minutes of break time more per day than non-smokers. Statistically speaking studies of Uni ted Airlines, Dow Chemical and the federal government have shown that smokers have a 40 to 60% greater absentee rate than non-smokers. The reason that so many life insurance companies provide discounts to non-smokers is that studies have shown that smokers die on the average seven years earlier than non-smokers. There are two pollution problems, one is the air pollution created by smokers and the other is the noise pollution created by non-smokers. The smokers and the non-smokers have to be educated. Non-smokers have to realize what a serious addiction smoking is. Nicotine is the most I 'J0l 14 rAr,~ '0 0985 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of March 14, 1988 Page: 2 serious addictive substance in the country according to the Surgeon General. The Board explained that currently smoking is not allowed in the halls of the Courthouse except a designated area on second floor in front of the Courtroom. The Superior Court Judge has expressed concern for the jurors and the people who are coming into Court who smoke and are coming into a stressful situation. Mr. Rosner explained that there is an implicit assumption that smokers need to smoke or it will be too stressful. This view is giving stress concern for a minority precedence over the same concern for the majori ty of non-smokers. In looking at the situation as one of competing stresses, it becomes a social problem instead of viewing it as a health and safety problem. The bottom line is one of protecting employees and the public from a health and safety hazard. The people who come into the building for court will eventually leave, but the employees who have to work in the building day after da.y are being exposed to a I health hazard. , i As soon as Ii t is acknowledged that smoke is a problem there is a certain amo~nt of pressure to deal with it. A policy should be developed thrt will provide smokers with a place that they can smoke and that is I effectively ventilated. If the County is going to move toward a tougher policy by limiting smoking to designated areas or banning smoking inside county buildings, Mr. Rosner stated that he believes thel County should offer free smoking cessation programs for employees wh~ smoke. The policy should also be phased in over a period of time. Ifl people are asked to go outside to smoke the County should provide a PI;ace with benches and -ashtrays, near ,doors" and covered if possible, wh re people can smoke. Some time should also be spent to educate smok rs and non-smokers regarding the policy and the need for it. I Sheriff Mel ~efford and Jail Manager reported on the no smoking policy at the jail. I Sheriff Mefford explained that he plans to make the whole facility smo~e free by June 1, 1988. I I I I J r Getz re: 3efferson Count ualit Pro ram: Mr. Getz came be ore the Board to ask how much money the County is putting into the Water Quality Program and what they are getting for it? The Board advise4 Mr. Getz that the water quality program is a continuation of a program, begun last year. Mr. Getz stated that he is in favor of I clean water Ibut questioned the need for three people to work on the program. The Board ex~lained that the funding for this program comes partially from State gjrant funds, which have a scope of work identified. The discussion continued regarding the water quality program, the work that was done last year and the people working on the program. I Ole Brekke. Brinnon Seniors re: Brinnon Senior Center: Mr. Brekke repo~ted to the Board that the administration of the Brinnon Senior Cente~ is becoming more difficult as time goes on with regard to the personne~ and policies. Mr. Brekke urge the Board to implement the agreement f,~r administration of the-Center that he previously gave them, as soo~ as possible. Mr. Brekke then reviewed a proposed budget for the ope~ation of the Center that was developed by the Community Action Counc~l. After discus~ion of the proposed budget the Board advised Mr. Brekke that the Sepior Citizen Organization has to set up and document procedures for accounting, etc. before this agreement can be approved. VOL 14 rAGE 0:0986 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of March 14, 1988 Page: 3 BUSINESS FROM COUNTY DEPARTMENTS HEALTH DEPARTMENT Aqreement re: Physical Theraoist for County Health Depart- ment; 3efferson General Hosoi tal: Commissioner Dennison moved to approve the agreement with Jefferson General Hospital to provide the Health Department with the services of a Physical Therapist. Commis- sioner George Brown seconded the motion. The motion passed by a unanimous vote. PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT re: Rental of "Road Rater"; Clark County: Public Works Director, Gary Rowe, explained that this agreement is for the rental of Clark County's road rating machine to rate the roads which will be receiving funds through the Rural Arterial Program. This machine determines the structural strength of the asphalt and aggregate on the road surface and helps determine how much asphalt should be used to repair the road. Commissioner Dennison moved to approve the rental agreement with Clark County for use of their Road Rater. Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. EstablishinQ' a Name for a Private Road; Lindsey Lane: Gary Rowe reported that he has discussed this suggested road name change from Lindsey Road to Lindsey Lane with Mr. Jerry Lindsey who approved of it. Commissioner Dennison moved to approve and sign Resolution No. 24-88 establishi.ng a private road named Lindsey Lane. Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion. The motion passed by a unanimous vote. Revision of CR0528; Point Whitney Road: This revision is to revise the appropriation for this project which was originally approved several years ago. The original appropriation included $18,000 for engineering and $25,000 for right-of-way acquisition. These figures need to be revised to $32,000 for engineering and $78,000 for right-of- way. Construction is estimated to cost $243,750, of which $195,000 will be reimbursed through the Rural Arterial Program. Commissioner George Brown moved to approve and sign Resolution No. 25- 88 revising the Point Whitney Road Project funding as recommended by the Public Works Department. Commissioner Dennison seconded the motion. The motion passed by a unanimous vote. Application to Open County Road RiQ'ht-of-Way (Trail Ease- ment); Elaine Braun. Olvmous Beach Plat: Elaine Braun who owns lots 35 and 36 of the Olympus Beach Plat is requesting that a 10 foot section of dedicated easement (which is part of the public right-of-way) be opened for a walkway to the beach adjacent to Lots 22 and 23. It was found during the site inspection that the grade of the ground is acceptable for a trail and that one of the adjacent owners is using a portion of the ten foot easement as part of their yard. There is no timber on the easement. Commissioner Dennison moved to table action on this request until the Public Works Department has an opportunity to notify each of the adjacent property owners regarding this application. Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. CONTRACT re:' Bank Control Work on Wildwood Road alonQ' the Little Ouilcene River; Deoartmentof the Army (Armv Coros of Enaineers: This agreement between the County and the Army is for work on Wildwood Road. Commissioner Dennison moved to approve the contract as sub- VOl 14 rAGE ffl' 0987 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of March 14, 1988 Page: 4 mi tted. Commissioner George Brown seconded the, motion. passed by a unanimous vote. The motion PLANNING AND BUILDING Shoreline ManaQ'ement Substantial Develo1:'l' Permit: Boat PumP- out Station. Mvsterv Bay: WashinGton State Parks: Planning and Building Director, David Goldsmith, reminded the Board that last week a shoreline permit was approved for the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission to put a boat pump out station on the dock at Mystery Bay on the condition that the proposal would be reconfigured and that reconfiguration be approved by the Board before the permit was signed. Mr. Heiser from the State Parks and Recreation Commission reported that he had tried to meet with Mrs. McDonnell to review with her the re- configuration that was designed to accommodate the adjacent neighbors concerns on this project. Phase 1 of the project was left as original- ly designed so that the facility can be functioning by the July 1 mandated date imposed by the pugetSound Water Quality Authority. Mrs. McDonnell told Mr. Heiser that she would be unable to meet with him and that the plan was unacceptable to her because of the Phase 1 location. Mr. Heiser explained to her that the Phase 1 location was a temporary location for this one season only. The redesigned proposal is es- timated to cost $11,000 mqre than the original proposal. Mr. Heiser further reported that he did finally meet with Mrs. McDon- nell on Wednesday, when she suggested that an alternative of one float parallel to the existing floats, be considered. She later called Mr. Heiser's office to say that this plan was not acceptable to her either. After discussing all of the options with the Director and Assistant Director of the Parks Commission, Mr. Heiser reported, that it is their conclusion that the only viable plan is their original plan. The Parks Commission is asking that their original proposal be approved or denied. They feel they are unable to satisfy Mrs. McDonnell at this location and they believe that this facility is of more importance to the State of Washington than one persons personal viewpoint. Commissioner Dennison stated that it is his understanding that Mrs. McDonnell is agreeable to the compromise design for Phase 2, but she is questioning Phase 1. Chairman B. G. Brown added that it isn't fair to say that only one person is objecting to this proposal. Eighteen people signed a letter to the Governor objecting to this project after the last meeting. Mr. Heiser stated that he verified the information he gave at the last meeting about the floats being removed from the water at Fort Flagler in the winter and that information is correct. Florence Hubbard stated that this proposal creates an expenditure of money that doesn't have to be spent. She stated that she is a tax payer and a boater and she is sick and tired of all the nonsense. The Board explained that the money will be spent for a pump out facility somewhere even if this proposal is not approved. Ted Bucklin: Mr. Bucklin stated that the judgement for this location is purely some persons opinion which was made with no local input on either the boat traffic or the impact on the community. Mrs. McDonnell: Mrs. McDonnell stated that Mr. Heiser did not address her suggestion for changes in the first phase of the proposal from a technical standpoint since he is not an engineer. The original proposal is appalling because it not only puts this facility on the end of the dock but it also extends the dock. Mrs. McDonnell asked how long Phase 1 is expected to last? Discussion ensued about the proposed changes that would be made to this project and the communication problem between Mrs. McDonnell and Mr. Heiser. Chai rman B. G. Brown explained that since there is not an al ternate VOl 1 & r,~N" ~n~ 0988 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of March 14, 1988 Page: 5 proposal to discuss, the Board must decide to either approve or deny the first proposal. Daryl Goodwin: Mr. Goodwin stated that if a pumpout station is to be placed at Mystery Bay the best place would be on the west end of the dock because it is easier for the boats to get in and out of and is closer to the middle of the park. Chairman Brown explained that changing the proposal to that degree can not be accomplished in the time frame allowed by the Department of Fisheries. Mrs. Hubbard questioned the ability of boats to maneuver around private moorings on the west end of the dock and the possible problems created for emergency vehicles to lend aid to someone in trouble on the dock. The Chairman called a recess to allow everyone present to review the plan submitted by the Parks and Recreation Commission for the permanent installation (Phase 2) of the facility. This plan would move the facility from the east end of the dock. The floats that have been on the east end of the dock will be moved to the west end and recon- figured. Mr. Heiser stated that if this compromise proposal is accep- table to the parties present, he would like to the Board to make a determination on it. The discussion then turned to Phase 1. Chairman Brown noted that Mrs. McDonnell expressed concern about it because it would be in place for the full summer boating season. Mr. Heiser stated that they would like to install phase 2 as soon after Labor Day as possible so as not to disturb the boat activity in this area during the summer. The Chairman asked if this installation could be started on June 15 and be finished before Labor Day? Mr. Heiser stated that it is department policy to not work on facilities during the tourist season except in the case of an emergency. Phase 1 would be installed by July 1 and be left in place through the end of the year. Commissioner Dennison moved to approve the compromise proposal sub- mitted by the Parks and Recreation Commission for the pumpout facility to be located no further than 43 feet from east of the entrance ramp to the boat dock and placement of the other recreational floats on the west end of the dock at the angle as proposed on the Parks Commission drawing and agreed to by Mrs. McDonnell. Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion because Mrs. McDonnell stated that this proposal was the least unacceptable to her. Commissioner Dennison amended his motion to include a condition that this permit will expire on December 31, 1988. Commissioner George Brown seconded the amendment. The Chairman called for a vote on the motion and the amendment to the motion. The motion and amendment carried by a unanimous vote. Preliminary Subdivision Aggroval: Pope Resources Recreational Vehicle Park. Port Ludlow; Poge Resources, applicant: (See also Minutes of February 8, 1988) Senior Planner Rachel Nathanson reviewed this project which consists of a 40 unit recreational vehicle park located a t the corner of Oak Bay Road and Paradise Bay Road. The proposal would be constructed in two phases with the first twenty units and the restroom building being completed in the first phase. Each of the sites will measure 20 by 60 feet and be served with domestic water, a sewer connection, electricity, cable television and telephone. The restroom/shower building will be approximately 600 square feet and will include recreational facilities such as horse shoe pits and a volleyball court. Access to the park will be provided off a private road which has access to Oak Bay Road and Paradise Bay Road. 3.9 acres will be allocated to open space which is approximately 55% of the total acreage. There is a minimum of 120 foot buffer planned along Oak Bay Road. Various agencies (PUblic Works"Planning, State DOE, County PUD, and Fire District #3) have reviewed the project, and made suggestions for conditions of approval. No objections to preliminary approval of the project were reported. Ms. Nathanson then reviewed the conditions of approval suggested for the project as well as the Planning Commission's VOl 14 rAr.~ ~n 0989 . , Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of March 14, 1988 Page: 6 recommendation and their suggested changes to the conditions of approval. The Planning Commission reviewed and suggested changes to the following conditions: Drainage Requirements: Add a sentence to this condition stating "necessary drainage control work as determined by the Public Works Department shall be implemented prior to final approval. Special attention shall be given to sediment and petroleum product runoff and potential contamination of Ludlow Creek and Ludlow Bay." SiQ'ns: That signs for the Recreational Vehicle Park shall only be permitted in sub-area 12 (as identified by the Port Ludlow Master Plan). These signs are to be consistent with the overall community signs in that area. Bill Whitney of the Planning Commission explained that sub- area 12 is the general area where the park will be located (can considered to be on-premise) and these signs are to provide adequate direction and information as a matter of safety. Site Use: The use of the site shall be limited to Recrea- tional Vehicles. David Cunningham, representing Pope Resources, explained to the Board that the reasons for this R.V. Park: 1) It will be a place for people who come to visit homeowners in the development to stay in their R. V. 's, 2) To accommodate the contractors and workers who will be working on the expansion of the Port Ludlow Development, and 3) It will be used as a marketing tool to encourage potential purchasers to come to the area and stay the night to become familiar with the community. Port Ludlow will be redesigning their uniform signing program and signs for this park will be kept in the commercial area (sub-area 12) and they will be consistent with the sign program. Commissioner Dennison moved to issue the preliminary subdivision approved as recommended by the Planning Commission with the conditions as revised, for the Pope Resources Recreational Vehicle Park at Port Ludlow. Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion. The motion' passed by a unanimous vote. S~ate Environmental Policy Act Review: Salmon Farm. South Point: OlvmDic Sea Farms: Planning and Building Department Director, David Goldsmith, reported that the Board issued a Declaration of Non- Significance on the OlYmPic Sea Farms Salmon Net Pen proposal at South Point. The fifteen day comment period triggered by the action was extended to March 14, 1988 to give the State Department of Fisheries time to prepare a response to concerns expressed about the conflict with the traditional fisheries in this area. Six other responses have been received on this DNS. Department of EcoloQ'V: The DOE states that the County should pursue a mitigated DNS on this proposal to bring it into compliance with the interim guidelines for aquaculture projects. The mitigation should address the following items: depth of water under the pen system; geoduck production and habi tat loss that may occur; and phasing of the project so that impacts can be evaluated at each step. South Point Coalition: The South Point Coalition listed the following reasons that they feel a DNS is inappropriate for this project: * A major conflict exists with a pre-existing fishery. * Other adverse impacts that need further analysis - accumulation of waste on nearby beaches, effect on the geoduck brood stock habitat, effects on sea cucumbers and sea urchins, and potential for water quality VOL 14 rAC~ L 00990 , " Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of March 14, 1988 Page: 7 * degradation as well as problems for navigation in Hood Canal. Cumulative impact of all the minor impacts would render the project major and significant. The SEPA rules require that a Declaration of Sig- nificance be prepared for projects that are determined to have a probable significant adverse environmental impact. * WashinQ'ton State Parks << Recreation Commission: They suggest the following: * The pens should be re-configured to be parallel to the shoreline. The four outside corners of the system be equipped with navigational lights. The checklist and supplemental information should be upgraded to address the impacts to nearby recreational shellfish harvesting. * * State Department of Fisheries: comments: They made the following * The project deviates from the Interim Guidelines and the project proponent should substantiate that no environ- mental degradation would occur from this variance and/or bring the project in line with the interim guidelines. Project design changes and/or monitoring should be required to mitigate potential impacts to water quality. The geoduck impacts can be dealt with during the hydraulics permit approval. * * Point No Point Treatv Council: They stated that the project will "have a significant adverse impact on the exercise of the Tribes treaty reserved fishing rights". They are also concerned about the cumulative impacts of this particular facility and potential future facilities. State Department of Fisheries: This is a response to the County's request for information on the conflict between the capture fishery and the proposed net pen facility. * The DOF was unable to quantify how much the South Point Area contributed to the Area 12 fishery. This proposal may alter the ability of non-indians to meet resource allocations. The fleet as a whole could be impacted by this proposal because it may constrict the area available for the fishery. Consideration should be given to potential cumulative impacts of other facilities in Hood Canal particularly if this proposal sets a precedent for other similar projects. Mitigation of impacts should be to the fishery and not the type of gear that is used. The potential impacts on geoduck, sea cucumbers and sea urchins are not considered significant. * * * * * The Board, David Goldsmith advised, has several choices: 1) Request additional information from the applicant to address the issues raised during this comment period, 2) Determine that no additional environmen- tal review is necessary and retain the DNS which would allow the, project to move into the permit phase, 3) Determine that the proposal requires specific mitigation to address environmental concerns which would mean that the mitigative measures would have to be specified and a mitigated Declaration of Non-Significance issued, or 4) Determine that the proposal will have a probable significant environmental impact and issue a Determination of Significance and require the preparation of an environmental impact statement. Gina McMather asked that the Board review each specific comment received in detail because of the complex nature of the information received. Discussion ensued regarding the review process and the VOl 14 rAr,~ o 0991 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of March 14, 1988 Page: 8 implications of the various actions that the Board may take on this project. Commissioner George Brown moved to table action on this project for one week to allow time to review the information received and to discuss this matter wi th the Prosecuting Attorney. Commissioner Dennison seconded the motion. The motion passed by a unanimous vote. Variance Request: Setback to Street Side Prooerty Line. Coyle Road: United Telephone Co. Rachel Nathanson reported that this setback var iance request is for a 10 by 10 foot wood frame structure to be bui 1 t on a si te in the Coyle area at the intersection of Zelatchet Point Road and Hazel Point Road (on Coyle Road) for maintenance of equipment. This parcel of property is only 20 feet by 20 feet and in order to construct the proposed building on the site a three foot setback from the back property line and a six foot, eight inch, setback from the road right of way are needed. The Public Works Department inspected the site and found that there is no problem with sight distance and they have no objection to granting the variances. Commissioner George Brown moved to grant the variances are requested by Uni ted Telephone Company. Commissioner Dennison seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. Amendment to the Shine Plat and Second Shine Plat Covenants: The Shine Plat was filed with the 'Auditor on March 17, 1958 and the Second Shine Plat was filed on September 8, 1959 along with the protective covenants. A petition by 100% of the property owners in the two plats, David Goldsmith reported, has been submitted to amend items 1 and 7 of the protective covenants. Covenant number 1 will be amended to include the following: "each dwelling house shall be used for a single family residence only." Item 7 will state that "These protec- tive restrictions shall be perpetual" instead of for twenty five years from the date of the plat as currently stated. Commissioner Dennison moved to approve and sign Resolution No. 26-88 amending the Shine Plat and the. Second Shine Plat as requested. Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion. The motion passed by a unanimous vote. Shoreline Commission vacancY on West End of, County: David Goldsmith explained that there are nine full time Shoreline Commission members and one ex-officio member from the west end of the county. The west end member resigned and there has been no response to the adver- tisements for someone to serve from that area. * * * Homer Smith III re: County Insurance PolicY Renewals: Homer Smith III submitted a listing of the renewal costs for renewal of the County's various insurance policies for 1988-89 which total $153,911 opposed to $128,398 for the same coverage last year. Homer Smith advised that he is still waiting for quotes from other carriers and will report back next week. 3ack Westerman. Assessor:30hn Ravmond. Prosecuting' Attorney; Gary Rowe. Public Works Director and David Goldsmith. PlanninG and BuildinQ' Department Director re: Railroad RiQ'ht-of-Wav on County Property: The Assessor, Prosecuting Attorney, Public Works Director and the Planning and Building Department Director, came before the Board to discuss the County's position on the railroad right-of-way that the County has claim to in platted areas. The question in platted areas is over the ownership of the railroad corridor. Jack Westerman suggested that the County consider offering the railroad the net vot 14 rAnr '. (l 0992 ~, Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of March 14, 1988 Page: 9 liquidation value for the property in instances where it may have some claim to the right-of-way based on usage, in return to a quitclaim deed with no reservations. There is still a question regarding the platted interest of adjacent property owners, which could be taken to court for settlement. The meeting was recessed on Monday evening and reconvened Tuesday afternoon with all Board members present. Mayor Brent Shirley. Members of the Caoe GeorGe Sewer District Board of Commissioners. Bob WUbbena of Economic and EnGineer- inG Services and Public Works Director Gary Rowe re: Sewaae Disposal: (See also Minutes of February 8, 1988) Representatives of the City, Cape George Sewer District, Economic and Engineering Services, CH2M Hill and the Public Works Department met to discuss further plans for designing the Port Townsend sewage treatment facility to handle sept age that is currently being dumped at the County landfill and possibly handling septage disposal for the new Cape George sewer system. Gordon Nicholson of CH2M Hill, which is the firm the City has hired to engineer their wastewater treatment plant, explained that the City has been asked to design their plant to accommodate the treatment of septage from the County. The Cape George Sewer District has also asked to be allowed to bring their septic tank effluent to the City for treatment. As these requests were researched concerns about funding arose. The three consultants representing the City, County, and the Cape George Sewer District have met to discuss ideas. Each of these agencies are on different time schedules for their projects and are dealing with different funding arrangements. The ideas that have been discussed are conceptual plans which do not yet have hard costs attached to them. The main things being discussed are: Septage Flexibility: what kind of flexibility can be designed into the City's treatment plant to solve the disposal problem for the County. Three options have been dis- cussed: Option 1) Option 2) 3) Incorporate the septage treatment in the plans for the facility from the beginning, Include the sept age as a deductible alternate in a bid package. Do two parallel designs, one treatment plant with septage and one without. Option Costs associated with these Options: The discussion turned to the funding options available and estimated costs for these options. How to Accommodate Treatment of Leachate: Plans for the treatment of leachate at the landfill or at the treatment plant were then discussed, wi th estimated costs for the various plans. Options to allow Cape George Sewer District to hook up to a system were also discussed. Mayor Brent Shirley advised that the City would like a commitment from the County that they will pay their portion of the cost for the engineering needed to accommodate the final configuration that is adopted. The funding options available to the City and how the County could arrange to pay their portion of the costs were discussed. It was the consensus of the representatives from the City and the County that a "Letter of Understanding" be developed for the two agencies which will outline how the planning and final plan determination will proceed. MEMORANDUMS OF AGREEMENT re: Labor for 1987 and 1988; 3efferson County Emoloyees Guild: Commissioner Dennison moved to approve the Memorandums of Agreement for 1987 and 1988 with the Jefferson County Employees Guild. Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion. The motion passed by a unanimous vote. VOl 14 r.~f,r n 0993 . "- . . Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of March 14, 1988 Page: 10 DANCE LICENSE: The Resort at Port Ludlow: Dennison moved to approve the dance license for 1988 for Port Ludlow. Commissioner George Brown seconded the carried by a unanimous vote. Commissioner the Resort at motion, which PaYback of Loan By the Current ExJ:>>ense Fund to' the County Road Fund: Commissioner George Brown moved to approve and sign Resolution No. 27-88 authorizing the payback of a loan from the County Road fund to the County Current Expense Fund. Commissioner Dennison seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. BudGet Transfers for the Human Services DeDartment: Commis- sioner Dennison moved to approve and sign Resolution No. 28-88 authori- zing budget transfers requested by the Human Services Department. Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion. The motion passed by a unanimous vote. Reauest for 1988 Allocation; Peninsula Tourism Council: Commissioner Dennison moved to approve the payment of the $1,000 allocated in the 1988 budget for the Peninsula Tourism Council as requested. Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion. The motion passed by a unanimous vote. ADDointment to the County Centennial Committee: James L Humphrey was appointed to serve on the County Centennial Committee by motion of Commissioner Dennison, seconded by Commissioner George Brown. The motion passed by a unanimous vote. ReaPDointment; Mental Health Advisory Board: Commissioner Dennison moved to reappoint Commissioner George Brown to serve another three year term on the Mental Heal th Advisory Board. Chairman B. G. Brown seconded the motion. Commissioner Brown's term will expire on January 1, 1991. ReaDDOintments to the OIVDlDic Area Aaency On AainG Advisory Council: Alice Sell and Ole Brekke were each reappointed to serve three year terms as 3efferson County representatives on the OlYmpic Area Agency on Aging Advisory Board, by motion of Commissioner Den- nison, seconded by Commissioner George Brown. The motion passed by a unanimous vote. Their terms will expire on 3anuary 1, 1991. ADDlications for Assistance from the Soldiers' and Sailors' Relief Fund: Commissioner Dennison moved to approve the following applications for assistance from the Soldiers' and Sailors' Relief Fund: Susan LeRoy $500.00 and Mary Gibbons $25.00. Commissioner George Brp~ seconded the motion. The motion passed by a unanimous vote."" " . SEAL , .. ..f...,J> .", "''-:1'' ~i . ~ .,.' "~ " t · \..~ . . ; , 'lOt 14 f'AU n0994