Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM120787 "( ,. J , E. -I _I _I -, _I _I I -, _I -I District No. 1 Commissioner: District No. 2 Commissioner: District No. 3 Commissioner: Larry W. Dennison, B.G. Brown, Member George C. Brown, Member , I 1 Chairman I I I 1 I 1 1 - -.'. ~ - - - - lIE ~ ~ - - - - JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Clerk of the Board: Public Works Director: Jerdine C. Bragg Gary A. Rowe MINUTES Week of December 1, 1981 Chairman Larry W. Dennison called the meeting to order in the presence of Commissioner B.G. Brown and Commissioner George C. Brown. . Tom Jav re: Centennial Salmon Festival, Chimacum: Mr. Jay came before the Board to report on the Centennial Salmon Festival planned to be .held in Chimacum. The Chimacum School has been working on a project which is in accord with the State's proposed Centennial Salmon project. The School will sponsor this educational type celebra- tion of the wild salmon. The School has sponsored a "Salmon Awareness Week" in the past. School Superintendent Lloyd Olsen and the Elementary School Principal, Gary Brightstein, are very excited about this project, Tom Jay report- ed. The Elementary School faculty will be encouraged to use the wild salmon as an educational tool during the Centennial year. These activities would then culminate in the festival which would have booths featuring such things as the history of salmon, biology, etc. Story- tellers would be given time on stage to relate stories of salmon folklore. Music could be incorporated into the festival by having a song writing contest, with awards for the class that developed the best wild salmon enhancement project. The following groups have been contacted for support of this project: the State Environmental Education Department, the Soil Conservation District, and the Point No Point Treaty Council. The Gilnetter's Association and the State Centennial Commission will also be contacted as well as the County Centennial Committee. Mr. Jay further reported that he is trying to interest enough people in this project to establish a Board of Directors so that policy can be written and possibly the festival could become a county wide festival. The discussion turned to funding for this project and the need to apply for grant funds. The Board suggested that Mr. Jay contact the Jeffer- son County Conservation District about being the lead agency for grant applications. Other possible support agencies suggested by the Board were: the Port Townsend Marine Science Center, the Hood Canal Coor- dinating Council and the various Indian Tribes in this area. Mr. Jay concluded by asking the Board to consider declaring a "Wild Salmon Week" when the festival is scheduled to take place. -'. .. - . ft8L 1:J" I . r -'4132 . f Commissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of December 7, 1987 Page: 2 BUSINESS FROM COUNTY DEPARTMENTS PUBLIC WORKS BEARING re: Proposed Jefferson County 911 Emeraencv Locator System Ordinance: Chairman Dennison opened the public hearing on the proposed 911 Emergency Locator System Ordinance. Planning and Building Department Director, David Goldsmith, explained that this proposed ordinance will codify the procedures and policy for the 911 system. The 911 system was set up in 1982 to put in motion the system to address all of the structures in the County. This proposed ordinance includes of the procedures and methodologies for the system and it assigns responsibility for them to the county departments involved. The Public Works Department is responsible for determining a new address and assigning it. A building permit for a new structure cannot be issued until an address is assigned. 2) of the proposed ordinance that should be reviewed are: Determining the County's responsibility for homeowner costs incurred if an address change is initiated by the County. (Page 7, #3). The proposed ordinance makes the homeowner liable for these costs. Private road signs: A determinatio'n should be made regarding the County's responsibility to provide signs for private roads. If a road sign is not installed on a private road it is hard for emergency vehicles to find the address. The proposed ordinance makes it the property owners responsibility to install a private road sign. (Page 3, #10). Two areas 1) Public Works Director Gary Rowe added that guidelines have been included in this proposed ordinance on the procedures that must be followed to change a road name. Commissioner B.G. Brown stated that he feels if an address change initiated by the County creates a hardship on a homeowner or business, the County has an obligation to help offset that cost, and this ordinance include wording to that effect. This wording should should include what type of cost documentation that the County will require as proof for consideration of a reimbursement request. The Chairman then asked for public comment for or against the proposed ordinance: Virgil See, Fire Chief, Jefferson County Fire District #6: Mr. See stated that he and the Fire District Commissioners have reviewed this proposed ordinance and asked why the 911 locator signs and the road signs have not been left as two separate items? The 911 signs are address location signs (red) which are installed and maintained by the Fire Districts. The road signs (road names) are installed and maintained by the County. Why are these both listed in this proposed ordinance when they are the responsibility of two separate entities? Chairman Dennison explained that both signs were included in this ordinance because they are part of the emergency locator system. The question is whose responsibility is it to purchase and maintain the signs? Commissioner B. G . Brown stated that he doesn't see that this proposed ordinance changes responsibility with regard to these signs. Gary Rowe added that it has never been legislated by the County that the Fire Districts are responsible for maintaining the (red) location signs. The County issues this sign to the property owner who is then responsible for maintaining it. Mr. See then questioned page 5 which states that the location signs will be double faced, which they are not, he advised. Gary Rowe explained that the signs will be issued this way in the future at the request of Fire District #1, so that they can be mounted in such a way as to be seen from both directions. After a VCR.. f3 J~Cif O,l 41.33 Commissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of December 7, 1987 Page: 3 discussion of the ways these signs can and should be mounted, Mr. See stated that the concern should be for uniformity. That is what this ordinance is attempting to assure, David Goldsmith added. Mr. See stated that if the County changes to two faced signs, their installation will disrupt the uniformity that the District has achieved with the signs that are now installed. The discussion then turned to the best way to reword the ordinance to assure that the signs are installed in a uniform manner throughout the county. David Goldsmith suggested, and the Board and Mr. See concurred, that the words "of the road" be deleted from the end of item #3. Mr. See then stated, with regard to Section 4 (Fire District Responsibilities), which states that the property owner is to maintain the (red) location signs, that signs that are exposed to the afternoon sun become bleached white and are not readable. Gary Rowe suggested that the Fire District advise the Public Works Department when new signs are needed in an area so that the signs can be provided to the District or the homeowner for replacement. The proposed ordinance wording makes this a cooperative effort between the Public Works Department and the Fire Districts or the property owners. Hearing no further public comment the Chairman closed the public hearing. Commissioner B.G. Brown moved to adopted the 911 Emergency Locator Ordinance after the folloWing changes are made: Page 5 #3.240 Item #3 "The sign shall be posted three feet above the roadway and positioned so the numbers can be seen from both directions", and Page 7 #4.220 Item #3 to read "require the County to reimburse for verifiable losses as a result of the action" with an additional paragraph defining a verifiable loss. Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion for the purpose of discussion. He then asked how the fees are established for the addressing system. Gary Rowe explained, that the Public Works Department will set fees for the addressing system through the depart- ment's fee schedule. The current fee for issuance of an address and a locator sign is $10.00. BID OPENING re: For Furnishina of Petroleum Products in 1988: The bids for furnishing the County with petroleum products in 1988 were opened and read by Public Works Director Gary Rowe: BIDDER: BID TOTALS: Shell Oil Company, Port Townsend Thomas Oil Company, Port Townsend Oil Heat Company of Port Angeles (Chevron U.S.A.) Wes' Distributing Forks (for West End of County) Paradise Propane (Propane only $.50 per unit) $142,928.95 153,376.95 131,004.96 9,344.50 19,900.00 Commissioner B.G. Brown moved to have the Public Works Department review the bids for accuracy and make a recommendation for bid award based on unit price. Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion. Initiatinq CR0119 OWl Creek Bridge Replacement Project: A federal aid prospectus will be submitted, if approved, to the State Department of Transportation, Gary Rowe reported, asking for preli- minary engineering funds for this project. The estimated preliminary engineering costs are $100,000.00 of which $20,000.00 will be local funds. The following instruments were approved by motion of Commis- sioner B.G. Brown for the Owl Creek Bridge Replacement project CR0719, with Commissioner George Brown seconding the motion: Federal Aid Prospectus Agreement with the State Department of Transportation seeking $12,000 in federal funds. Resolution No. 96-81 initiating CR0719 Owl Creek Bridge Replace- ment project. Determination of Non-significance and Lead Agency Status for the project. '1m 13 0 fic~ 0" 41.34 Commissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of December 7, 1987 Page: 4 Submission of Annual Road Program for 1988 with Associated Environmental Data: Gary Rowe reviewed the annual construction program which will be adopted with the 1988 budget. Upper Hoh Road: The preliminary engineering, grading, base and surfacing is planned for this road in 1988. Oak Bav - Flagler Road Intersection: Funded with federal Rural Arterial (RAP) funds. Point Whitney Road: RAP funding. Right-of-way acquisition is being completed for this project, with construction scheduled to begin next year. Portage Canal Bridge Fender Replacement: This project is funded with bridge replacement funds. Portage Canal Bridge Approach Slabs: This project has been initiated. Owl Creek Bridge Replacement Project: This project was just initiated. Beaver Valley Road: This is for the section of Beaver Valley Road between the Beaver Valley Store and the Oak Bay Road. Safety Project: This funding is for minor work around various in- tersections. Bridge Guardrail Project: There are seven bridges that do not have approach guardrails. Clearwater Road: This project may be postponed until 1989 because the Department of Transportation will being doing a project on Highway 101 in this area. Leland Creek Bridge: This is for the final work needed on Rice Lake Road since the bridge is now complete. Commissioner George Brown moved to issue a determination of non-sig- nificance and lead agency status for the Portage Canal Bridge Fender Project. Commissioner B.G. Brown seconded the motion. The environmental assessment for the 1988 Annual Road Program was approved by motion of Commissioner B.G. Brown, seconded by Commissioner George Brown. BEARING NOTICES: Proposed Road Vacations: The hearing notices for the following proposed road vacations were approved and the hearings set by motion of Commissioner B.G. Brown, seconded by Commis- sioner George Brown: Portion of South Point Road; Matson, petitioner - January 11, 1988 at 10:30 a.m. Portion of Nelson's Landing Road; Weaver, petitioner- January 11, 1988 at 11:00 a.m. Notice to Public: Purchase of COpy Machine: The Public Works Department recommends that the copy machine requested by the County Auditor's Office be purchased from American Office Machines, Seattle for the price as quoted after the notice to the public is posted for the required time. Commissioner B.G. Brown moved to approve the purchase as recommended. Commission~r George Brown seconded the motion. Call for Bids: Renovation Work in Basement of Courthouse: Commissioner B.G. Brown moved to approve the call for bids for renova- tion work (core drilling) in the basement of the Courthouse as speci- fied, and set the bid opening date for December 21, 1987 at 10:30 a.m. Commissioner George Brown seconded the ~otion. ADDENDUM TO CALL FOR BIDS: Construction of an Increased Capacity Water SYstem, Brinnon Senior Center: Commissioner B.G. Brown moved to approve Addendum No. 1 to the call for bids for the water system at the Brinnon Senior Center which changes the bid opening date from December 14 to December 21, 1987 at 10:30 a.m. Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion. ...... ".~ '0' f..' - 4135 VOl 13 fACE I . . C6mmissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of December 7, 1987 Page: 5 PLANKING DEPARTMENT Tri Area Community Development Plan Consistency Review: Motel Proposal, Hadlock: Barold Moe, Developer: Senior Planner, Rachel Nathanson explained that this proposal is for the development of a six unit motel in Hadlock on a 3/4 acre site located directly behind the Odd Fellows Hall west of Rhody Drive. This area is designated as residential by the Tri Area Community Development Plan. The area adjoining Rhody Drive is considered part of the highway business district and is classified as commercial. Properties that do not front on Rhody Drive are designated residential. Ms. Nathanson then reviewed the staff and Planning Commission findings on this proposal. There are a number of goals and policies in the Tri Area Plan that apply to this type of development. Motels are required to meet polices as defined for resort and tourist commercial develop- ment and for purposes of location they are governed by the planned commercial development section of the community plan. The planned commercial development plan policies for location (#26 and 21) state that a motel can be located anywhere within the Tri Area, with the exception of a resource production area, but the site must front on or have access to arterial roads. Rhody Drive (County Road 12) is con- sidered an arterial road. The property north of this site, Rachel Nathanson continued, is used for commercial and residential purposes (B << E Storage); to the east of the site is the Chimacum Odd Fellows Hall; to the south of the site the property is residential and commercial (Hadlock Padlock and Ceramics 4U) and the area to the west of the site is currently undeveloped. The Planning Commission recommends that the Board find the proposal BQ! consistent with the resort and tourist commercial development policies of the Tri Area Community Development Plan and that the Board approve a redesignation of the site (lot 131 of Seventh Avenue Acre Tracts) from residential to commercial based on the intent of the community plan and the existing surrounding land uses and contingent on the conditions as suggested by the Public Works Department and that a fence be placed along the northern property boundary and that the proposal comply with the sign policies of the Tri Area Community Development Plan. Ms. Nathanson explained the recommendation further by stating that this project is not consistent with the criteria in the resort and tourist commercial development policies which require a 20% buffer and a five acre or larger si te. This motel proposal had to be reviewed as a planned commercial development because the proposed site is designated as residential and not commercial. The policies of the Tri Area Community Plan which state that a lot that fronts on Rhody Drive is designated as commercial needs to be reviewed by the Planning Commission, Planning Director David Goldsmith stated. Harold Moe, the project developer, stated that he was at the Planning Commission meeting and the Commission's hands were tied because if a property has even a two foot strip of property that fronts Rhody Drive it is commercial property, but if the property doesn't front Rhody Drive it is not designated commercial. The Planning Commission indicated that since they didn't know how to handle this situation they would leave it up to the County Commissioners, Mr. Moe added. Chairman Dennison stated that he would like to see the policy for this area more explicit. Right now all it takes to have a piece of property in the area designated as commercial is frontage along Rhody Drive. Lowell Larson, member of the Planning Commission, stated that the Planning Commission, in .their review of the project, discussed the possible restraints to the building of this motel. The Planning Commission's vote was eight to one in favor of this proposal because they feel it is necessary and useful to hav~ a motel on this site and that it does not violate the property use on either side of Rhody Drive. Mr. Larson, speaking for several members of the Planning 'VOL 13 fAC~ , ;.~:,. 0- 4136 Commissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of December 7, 1987 Page: 6 Commission, stated that they feel that all of the Rhody Drive area should be reviewed to determine if the property on either side of it should be designated as commercial use. The Planning Commission's recommendation was then discussed. Commis- sioner B.G. Brown asked if the Planning Commission's recommendation to redesignate the lot needs to go through the public notice and hearing process? David Goldsmith explained that the hearing notice that was published for this project was for a comprehensive plan consistency review which alerted the public that there could be a change to the Tri Area Community Plan. Redesignating the lot commercial will allow any type of commercial use on this site. Chairman Dennison stated that' his main concern is that the public has been adequately informed and is aware of the possibility that redesig- nation of this lot may be approved. Rachel Nathanson reported that all of the adjacent property owners in the area were represented at the Planning Commission hearing, and had an opportunity to speak regarding this recommendation. Commissioner B.G. Brown moved to find the proposal not consistent with the resort and tourist commercial development policies of the Tri Area Communi ty Development Plan as recommended by the Planning Commission and to approve redesignation of the site (lot 137 of Seventh Avenue Acre Tracts) as commercial contingent on the conditions as suggested by the Public Works Department. Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion. SEPA Threshold Determination re: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit; Marina Breakwater: Cape Georae Marina: Cape Georae Colony Club. Applicant: David Goldsmith reviewed the environmental checklist for this proposal to extend the Cape George Colony Marina breakwater. The northern jetty of the breakwater would be extended an addi tional thirty feet waterward to serve as a sediment trap. The mouth of the marina fills up with sands and gravel each year caused by movement from north to south in Discovery Bay. This proposal to extend the jetty will allow a certain amount of this sand and gravel to fall into a harvest area with the rest of it flowing past the mouth of the marina. Dick Kint, representing Cape George Marina, explained that this proposal was designed by an engineer, and will include a suction dredge that the Marina will maintain. This proposal, David Goldsmith con- tinued, has been planned around the State Department of Fisheries time frame for working in the water. Commissioner George Brown moved to issue and Determination of Non- Signif icance and Lead Agency Status for the Cape George Colony Club Shoreline Substantial Development Permit as presented. Commissioner B.G. Brown seconded the motion. Garrison Short Plat #SP5-81. Leland Valley Road West: Vernon and Candace Garrison, Applicants: Senior Planner, Rachel Nathanson explained that the Garrison Short Plat located on Leland Valley Road West consists of two lots. One lot is 41 acres and the second lot is 1.8 acres, due to the applicants desire to segregate a one acre parcel from their property. The Public Works, Health and Planning Departments have all reviewed and approved this plat. Commissioner B.G. Brown moved to approve the Garrison Short Plat #SP5- 87 as submitted. Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion. Salmon Aauaculture Moratorium Extension: In June of 1987, Resolution No. 89-86 which established a moratorium on filing and processing of shoreline substantial development permits for the growth and culture of fish in marine waters (fish farms), was extended for an additional six month period (to December 10, 1987), David Goldsmith ... . VOL 13 ~ACf U 4137 Commissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of December 7, 1987 Page: 7 reported. The State is doing a statewide environmental impact state- ment on fish farming but that has not yet been completed. A consul- tant as been hired to review the County's Shoreline Management Master Program aquaculture policies, however, no changes have been developed for consideration at this time, and the Planning Department recommends that the moratorium be extended. Commissioner B.G. Brown moved to extend the moratorium as established by Resolution 89-86 for an additional six months (to June 10, 1988). Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion. CONTRACTS re: Grants; 1) Centennial Clean Water Grant for ExDansion of Septic Repair Proaram and 2) 205j Grant to Conduct County Wide Water Quality Monitorino: Washinaton State Department of Ecoloav: Commissioner B.G. Brown moved to approve the following grant contracts with the Washington State Department of Ecology: 1) Centennial Clean Water Grant for expansion of the septic system repair program. 2) 205j Grant to conduct a county wide water quality monitoring program. Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion. * * * Tom Ma1han, Attorney, Representino Georae Cotton and Prosecu- tina Attornev, John Ravmond, re: Moore Street Irondale: Attorney Tom Majhan who is representing George Cotton, explained that he received a call from Mr. Cotton last week asking why the Board has not accepted and recorded the deed to the 100 feet of Moore Street that he submitted to them. Chairman Dennison explained that the Board has not determined that it is in the best interest of the County to accept this deed and they have asked the Prosecuting Attorney to review the matter. Commissioner B.G. Brown stated that, as he recalled Mr. Cotton's offer, he would dedicate the 100 feet of Moore Street in return for the County having no claim to the rest of the road that leads to the beach. Tom Majhan stated that at this time Mr. Cotton just wants to convey this port ion of road to the County without any further conditions. The events that led up to this offer by Mr. Cotton were then reviewed. A title company checked the records, Mr. Majhan reported, and determined that Cotton Corporation has title to that 100 feet of Moore Street. Prosecuting Attorney John Raymond explained that there is a dispute over the portion of road beyond the 100 feet being discussed that is paved and in good repair. The dispute is whether or not the County has a prescriptive easement under the statute for the additional section of road. Accepting Mr. Cotton's deed for the 100 feet that is paved, would not prejudice the County in a lawsuit that may occur in the future regarding the rights to the rest of the road. John Raymond further advised that he sees nothing wrong with the County accepting Mr. Cotton's deed as long as there are no strings attached to it. Jim Pearson asked why the County already has ownership of the right-of- way to the paved portion of the road, is acceptance of a deed from Mr. Cotton necessary? John Raymond' explained that currently on the Assessor I s Off ice records this 100 feet belongs to Mr. Cotton. To establish that 100 foot strip (60 feet wide) as a County road, even though it meets the criteria to be considered a County road, it must be taken to court and formalized with a quiet title action to remove the cloud from the title. Mr. Cotton, by offering this deed, is conceding that this paved portion of road, that is listed as his land, is obviously a County Road and is offering the deed to clear the title to the property. 'vot 13 rAb~ .. l [0 4138 'II' Commissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of December 7, 1987 Page: 8 After discussion of the dispute over ownership of First Street in Irondale, Commissioner B.G. Brown stated that First Street in Irondale is in addition to Moore Street. Tom Majhan explained that Mr. Cotton is conveying 100 feet of road called Moore Street where the property is platted. The discussion then turned to the status of First Street in Irondale. Mr. Leon Lopeman stated that First Street was vacated in 1908, but why, when and who it was vacated to can not be determined from the records. The original plat of Irondalesays that the streets are dedicated to the public forever, Mr. Lopeman added. Commissioner B.G. Brown explained that the dedication to the public forever is not necessarily true if a street is vacated. Mr. Lopeman stated that if the County accepts Mr. Cotton's deed for that portion of Moore street then he feels the public will be denied access forever. The Chairman reiterated that the issue at hand is whether or. not the County should accept the deed to the 100 feet of Moore Street offered by Mr. Cotton with no strings attached. Jim Pearson again asked why the County needs to accept this deed at this time? Tom Majhan ex- plained that Mr. Cotton is liable if something happens on that road, because the property is currently listed in his ownership. Mr. Pearson responded that he still doesn't understand why this small piece of this road which is the widest and the best maintained portion, suddenly needs to be dealt with and the rest of the road isn't a concern? Commissioner B.G. Brown added that if the county is going to consider maintaining this road all the way to the Chimacum Creek then informa- tion is needed on what purpose this would serve and how many people it will serve. Mr. Pearson said that he understands that this would represent a financial burden to the County but the residents feel that it is a very valuable public access to the shorelands and to the salt water. Frank Nelson stated that he did not see any representatives of'the Snohomish Indian Tribe present at this meeting. The Tribe asked to be notified when this issue was going to be discussed with the Board. Jim Pearson asked that the residents of the area also be notified when the Board has this matter scheduled for discussion. The Board then discussed what can be done to resolve this dispute. John Raymond stated that accepting the Quit Claim deed to the portion of Moore Street as offered by Mr. Cotton or not accepting it, will not have any bearing on any future court case with regard to the disputed portion of this road. Since more information is needed before a decision can be made, Chairman Dennison advised that the Board will have a meeting sometime before the second,week in January to define and resolve the issues involved. Commissioner B.G. Brown moved to table action on this issue until January 18, 1988. Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion. BEARING NOTICE re: Emeraencv Budaet Appropriations and Extensions: Various County Departments: Commissioner B.G. Brown moved to approve and sign Resolution No. 91-81 setting the public hearing on the emergency budget appropriations and extensions requested by the following departments for December 21, 1981 at 10:00 a.m.: Law Library $800.00; Parks and Recreation $9,824.27 Auditor $5,711.34; Juvenile << Family Court $3,588.31 Coroner 2,000.00 Human Services (Mental Health) Extension $33,425.00 Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion. . vat 13. U&F n 4:139 . '" Commissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of December 7, 1987 Page: 9 AdoDtina the ".Jefferson County Federal Central Services Cost Allocation Plan and Indirect Cost ProDosal for Fiscal Year Endina December 31, 1988: After meeting and reviewing the cost allocation plan developed for the County by T.JO and Associates, Commissioner B.G. Brown moved to approve and sign Resolution No. 98-81 adopting the cost allocation plan as presented. Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion. Budaet Transfer Reauests: Various County Departments: Commissioner B.G. Brown moved to approve and sign Resolution No. 99-81 ordering budget transfers as requested by the following departments: Assessor, Auditor (Elections), Clerk, Commis- sioners,Cooperative Extension, Health, Juvenile and Family Court Services, Parks/Recreation, Prosecut- ing Attorney and Superior Court. Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion. Designation of a Bazardous Materials Incident Command Aaency: Resolution No. 100-81 designating the Jefferson County Sheriff's Department as the Hazardous Materials Incident Command Agency for the County was approve by motion of Commissioner B. G. Brown, seconded by Commissioner George Brown. PROCLAMATION OF EMERGENCY: Floodina and Slides on the DosewalliDs River: Public Works Director, Gary Rowe, reported that due to the weather conditions the past few days there has been flooding of the Dosewallips River causing slides and damage to the Dosewallips River Road. Commissioner George BroWn moved to approve Resolution No. 101-81 proclaiming an emergency for the Dosewallips River Road No. 250008 due to flooding. Commissioner B.G. Brown seconded the motion. The Board spent the balance of the afternoon in the final budget hearings with the following departments: Assessor, Auditor, and Treasurer. The meeting was recessed after these hearings and recon- vened each successive day with all Board member in attendance for the balance of the final budget hearings as scheduled: Tuesdav - December 8, 9:30 a.m. 10:00 a.m. 10:30 a.m. 11:00 a.m. 11:30 a.m. 2:00 p.m. 3:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Wednesday - December 9, 9:30 a.m. 10:30 a.m. 11:00 a.m. 2:00 p.m. 3:00 p.m. 3:30 p.m. 4:00 p.m. 1987: Clerk, Superior Court, Law Library Board of Equalization and Civil Service Commission Centennial Committee Cooperative Extension County Fair Board Facilities Management Parks and Recreation Planning Commission, Shoreline Commis- sion, Building Inspection and Planning Department. 1987: Health Department .Juvenile and Family Court Services Human Services - Mental Health, Al- coholism, Drug Abuse and Developmental Disabilities Prosecuting Attorney, Coroner << Crime Victims District Court Veterans Relief Commissioners 'VOL 13 rACE [04140 1987: Non Departmental Fund, Economic Develop- ment Council, Peninsula Development Association Domestic Violence Soil Conservation District Community Centers (Clallam Jefferson Community Action Council) Hotel/Motel Fund, Stadium Centrum Chamber of Commerce Historical Museum Region 8 Tourism Council Sheriff, Drug Fund .... ...;> Commissioners' Meeting Minutes: Week of December 7, 1987 Thursdav - December 10, 9:00 a.m. 9:20 a.m. 9:40 a.m. 10:00 a.m. 10:30 a.m. 10:45 a.m. 11:00 a.m. 11:20 a.m. 11:40 a.m. 2:00 p.m. Friday - December 11, 9:30 a.m. Page: 10 1981: Public Works Department, County Parks, Brinnon Flood Control District, Quilcene Flood Control District, County Roads, Solid Waste, Courthouse Building Bond, Construction and Renovation, Capital Improvement, Brinnon Senior Center, Equipment Rental and Revolving Amendment to Solid Waste Fee Ordinance No. 1-86:. (See also Minutes of November 23, 1987) Commissioner B.G. Brown moved to take the matter of the proposed amendment to the Solid Waste Fee Ordinance #1-86 off the table. Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion. After discussion of the Solid Waste budget for 1988 and how the proposed fee increase will effect that budget, Commissioner B.G. Brown moved to table action on this proposal to raise the solid waste fees until further information is available on 1988 costs. Commissioner George Brown seconded the motion. The Public Works Department will work with the Solid Waste Advisory Committee and the City of Port Townsend to determine the necessary fee level. MEETING ADJ9g~ED ",. . JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ~ B.G. Brown, Member -~o-:m, Member SEAL VOl. 13, UCE ff 4141 '---.