HomeMy WebLinkAboutM060986
,
",t
...................................................................
i
II
i
i District No. 1 Commissioner:
I District No. 2 Commissioner:
I District No. 3 Commissioner:
II
i
I
I
3EFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
I
i
I
Larry W. Dennison, Member i
B.G. Brown, Member i
John, L. Pitts, Chairman Ii
I
i
i
I
Jerdine C. Bragg
Gary A. Rowe
Clerk of the Board:
Public Works Director:
...................................................................
M I NUT E S
Week of June 9, 1986
Chairman John L. Pitts called the meeting to order at the
appointed time in the presence of Commissioner B.G. Brown and
Commissioner Larry W. Dennison.
Ella Sandvia, Coordinator, Human Services Department re:
Insurance coveraae and Employee raises and other matters:
Salary increases: Human Services Coordinator, Ella Sandvig, presented
a request to the Board for salary increases to begin July 1, 1986 for
the Human Services Department positions of Office Aide, Day Treatment
Driver/Counselor and Mental Health Counselor III. In light of the
Salary Survey that the County is currently doing, the Board advised
Ella that they would like to look into these requests further before
making a decision.
3une 10, 1986: After further discussion o.f the requested salary
increases, Commissioner Brown moved to approve the salary increases as
requested by the Human Services Coordinator, with the increases to come
out of the 1986 Human Services budget with no new appropriations.
Commissioner Dennison seconded the motion.
Reauest for Leave of Absence: A written request for an unpaid
maternity leave has been received, from Laurie Gates who is also
requesting that she be allowed to save any accrued sick leave and
vacation until her return to work.
3une 10, 1986: Commissioner Brown moved to approve the unpaid
maternity leave as requested by Laurie Gates with the amendment that
she can carryover any accrued sick leave until she returns to work but
she will be required to use any accrued vacation before the unpaid
leave begins. Commissioner Dennison seconded the motion
Insurance: Ella Sandvig asked if the County has any theft, or fire
insurance on equipment in the building and advised that the mental
health staff is concerned about their malpractice insurance, which they
understand is provided by the County's insurance coverage. The Board
directed Ella to write to Homer Smith Insurance and ask about the
specific coverage for the Human Services Department, under the County's
insurance package.
Employees Guild Aareement: Even though the Human Services Department
does not have any Guild employees, Ella Sandvig advised that when she
had a chance to read over the County's agreement with the Guild she
found that a new employee in her department, had she joined the Guild
would have had six more days of vacation this year, and stated that she
is making a formal complaint that she was not given a copy of the Guild
agreement.
Chairman Pitts advised that employees not covered under either the
Guild agreement or a Union contract are covered by the Personnel
vuL
i 2, rAGt
o 1978
Ii
Minutes: Week of June 9, 1986
Page:
2
Policy. A Personnel Policy Review Committee is reviewing all of the
changes that have been suggested for the policy over the years and will
be submitting a recommendation on these changes at a later date.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The Minutes of May 19, and 21, 1986
were approved as corrected by motion of Commissioner Brown, seconded by
Commissioner Dennison.
David Stalheim, Planner re: AQUaculture Task Force: Ten
interested area residents were present when David Stalheim presented
the draft of the County's Aquaculture Policy. David Stalheim then
introduced Kenn Brooks, Cedric Lindsay, Bart Phillips, Doris Coates,
Leslie Aickin, Linda Clifton and Scotty McComb, members of the Task
Force who developed this draft policy.
The Task Force, David Stalheim continued, found three general purposes
of an aquaculture policy: 1) Aquaculture is a very diverse industry,
and policy cannot dictate, but should provide methodology that provides
for the reasonable and consistent examination of each proposal, 2)
The current level of knowledge provides management practices that if
followed will provide a reasonable degree of assurance that many
aquaculture activities can be pursued with little or no degradation to
water quality or associated aquatic communities, and 3) Aquaculture, if
conscientiously developed, managed and monitored, is a highly
appropriate industry consistent with the accepted resource related
industries that have historically provided the economic base for the
County.
The three
*
*
goals Of the County's aquaculture policy should be:
Protect existing and future aquaculture resources and
activities from water quality degradation and other
threats.
Minimize adverse impacts resulting 'from aquaculture
operations.
Ensure that aquaculture development oc~urs in a well
planned manner.
*
The balance of the report details the findings and conclusions of each
of these three goals. The findings are findings of fact and are
directly related to the issues that were discussed at the numerous
meetings held by the Task Force. The conclusions are policy statements
that the Task Force feels that the County should adopt, either through
inclusion in the Shoreline Management Master Program or, by action of
the County Commissioners.
Kenn Brooks: Mr. Brooks stated that this policy is a beginning and not
an end, and strongly recommended that the County enter into a
Memorandum of Understanding with the Department of Natural Resources
which would help develop a higher degree of cooperation with this State
department to help find ways to make things work.. This policy is a
good start, but an on-going program is needed to carry out some of the
programs that have been suggested in this report.
To clarify the Memorandum of Understanding with DNR he suggested, Mr.
Brooks explained that in the current process DNR 1s involved with
aquaculture permits after the County permit process is over. DNR is
interested in a broad spectrum of management procedures and
requirements and they would like input on the permits before they are
issued at the County level so that their concerns will be accommodated.
Leslie Aickin: The findings developed were very inclusive. Everything
that the Task Force heard was put into the findings in an effort to .
make the policy reflect as much community response as possible. It was
difficult to develop this policy because the aquaculture industry is so
diverse. The document is a beginning document and in many ways
represents a list of homework.
Bart Phillips:
recommendation.
Mr. Phillips stated that this is a reasonable policy
The policy recommendation allows for private property
~ VOL
12 rAGE
,
o 1979
Minutes: Week of 3une 9, 1986
Page:
3
owner concerns about the growth of the industry; it allows for growth
in the industry and it also allows for the maintenance of the current
industry.
Doris Coates: Mrs. Coates added that the task force paid attention to
the Hood Canal Policy statement developed by the Department of Ecology
and some of the new work of the puget Sound Water Quality Authority,
especially concerning non-point source pollution.
Linda Clifton: One of the implied mandates from this report is for the
Shoreline Commission to revise the current Shoreline Management Plan
and expand that document. Ms. Clifton urged the Board to encourage the
~. Shoreline Commission to work on this revision as soon as possible.
Cedric Lindsay: Mr. Lindsay commented that in providing help to the
applicant, there is not a good system that sets forth the procedures
and checkpoints, with the various State agencies.
Chairman Pitts stated that he shares the concern for the lack of
coordination by the State departments regarding their role with these
aquaculture applications. In discussions with members of these State
agencies, Chairman Pitts reported that they are starting to see the
need to coordinate their activities better. Another question that
needs to be investigated further is that of the proliferation of
aquaculture projects on puget Sound. The discussion continued on the
proliferation issue, and public hearings and input on aquaculture
permit applications.
Kenn Brooks suggested that perhaps one way to continue with the task
that has been started and may help resolve the continuing fish pen
dilemma, would be to identify an area in the County that is acceptable
to the community and to the fish pen industry, for fish pens.
Commissioner Brown stated that one task that needs to be done, is to
determine if there is a middle ground as far as the visual impacts of
fish pens, for the upland property owner. This maybe a certain
distance from the shore or the height of the upland property, etc. and
defined in the policy and reviewed in the public hearing process.
Bart Phillips added that the industry would be willing to ~ompromise to
establish a middle ground and the sooner that this could be defined the
more beneficial it will be for the growth of the industry in the
County.
Mr. Ciprioti responded to Chairman Pitts question regarding what upland
property owners would like .to see done with respect to aquaculture
permits, that the only notice he had about the fish pen application in
their area was a notice pO$ted on a pole. The system for aquaculture
permits doesn't work and it needs to be changed.' The overall picture
needs to be considered on these applications.
Chairman Pitts then asked those present who they would consider as
acceptable to provide the local community groups, property owners,
counties, cities, and newspapers with information? Bart Phillips
responded that there are resources available at the State level which
can be expected to be unbiased. The expertise does exist within the
University system in the State. Leslie Aickin added that it is
important that an effort be made to include different points of view if
there is a diversity of opinion in the professional community on an
issue.
Marjorie Ciprioti: Speaking as a representative of the Cape George
Fisherman of Beckett Point, Mrs. Ciprioti noted that their group was
not notified of the informational meeting with Sea Farms of Norway
about the fish pens. The Board of Trustee did ask for views about the
fish pens from their membership and many of those people voted against
the fish pen site because of a lack of informatic;m. Their group as a
whole is not against aquaculture, but they are against it in a
residential area.
VOL 12 rAGE ;,0 1980
. '
Minutes: Week of June 9, 1986
Page:
4
Discussion continued about the State Shoreline Management Act and
aquaculture. David Stalheim concluded his report by stating that one
of the most difficult things about the development of an aquaculture
policy has been trying to define the process to help address the issues
that have been raised such as timeliness, who should be sought for
expertise and when, and how the information is presented to the public
and the decision makers involved. Hopefully the process that has been
outlined in this policy will help the County perform its role better.
Chairman Pitts thanked the members of the Aquaculture Task Force for
their work in the development of this policy.
CarolYn Weika, United Telephone re: Billina for 911 Service:
Sheriff Lee Smith explained that there were two errors in the billings
on the 911 service for the County. The first. error was in the billings
from United Telephone, with the second error being in the code billing
and subsequent billing from Pacific Northwest Bell for the
implementation of 911 service in the County. The Pacific Northwest
Bell portion of the billing was misquoted to the County and the
divestiture of the Bell phone system has caused problems. Jefferson
County is in Pacific Northwest Bell's territory so they acted as
coordinators for the 911 system for United Telephone, but United
Telephone was the only entity with which a contract was signed.
Commissioner Dennison stated that it was his understanding that the
County was paying Pacific Northwest Bell for the United contract and
that PNB was to pass that payment on to them. CarolYn Weika explained
that the 911 equipment that United Telephone is billing the County for
is located in Center, Brinnon, Quilcene and Gardiner and they bill the
County for this directly. The activities are coordinated, however,
through Pacific Northwest Bell. The billing from United for the
Central Office charges under the contract has not been billed
previously as it should have been, due to an error.
CarolYn Weika explained that United has checked with Pacific Northwest
Bell and they have not been collecting any monies from the County for
United Telephone. In response to Commissioner Dennison inquiry as to
why this billing error was not discovered earlier, Ms. Weika explained
that the $600 a month was not discovered until an audit was completed
due to the large number of customers United Telephone deals with
monthly.
To make this as easy as possible, Ms. Weika stated that she does not
want to back bill for the previous three years or get into a legal
problem. She suggested that the contract be changed and the billing be
effective in January rather than September, and continue for five years
from that date. A new contract would be signed that would negate the
previous contract. This would in effect delay the five year paYment
for the equipment as stated in the original contract for five years
from January 1, 1986. Ms. Weika stated that she would have to check
with her superiors about making the new contract effective January 1,
1981.
The Board advised that they would have the Prosecuting Attorney review
the information presented and the revised contract before taking any
action on this matter.
BUSINESS FROM COUNTY DEPARTMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
BEARING re: Petition to Vacate Alley in Coreia's Addition
(Block 2) & Block 5 of Phillips Addition to Irondale; Otto & Kristin
Smith, petitioners: The alley in question located in Hadlock, Carter
Breskin Administrative Assistant for the Public Works Department
reported, is 294 feet in length and 1 feet in width. The petitioners
VOL
12 UGf
o 1981
. '
, ,
Minutes: Week of 3une 9, 1986
Page:
6
are seeking the vacation in order to acquire additional property and
they feel that the alley is not needed in the overall circulation plan
for the County. They own all of the lots in both of the blocks
surrounding the alley.
The Planning Commission and the Public Works Department reviewed the
request and recommended that the vacation be approved. The Assessor's
Office reported that the assessed value of the alley to be vacated is
$1,236.00, which would require compensation of 60% or $611.60.
Chairman Pitts opened the hearing and asked if anyone was present to
speak for or against the requested vacation. Being no public comment
the hearing was closed and Commissioner Brown moved to approve and sign
Resolution No. ~6-860rdering the vacation of the alley between
Correia's Addition and Phillips Addition in Hadlock, contingent upon
the payment of the compensation as established. Commissioner Dennison
seconded the motion.
AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT re: Time Extension. Pazooki & McMenamin:
Survevina & Desian Enqineerina on Beaver Valley Road: Public Works
Director Gary Rowe explained that a contract time extension is being
requested by Pazooki & McMenamin to June 23, 1986 due to weather delays
in the field work on the Beaver Valley Road Project.
Commissioner Dennison moved to approve Supplemental Agreement #1 to the
Contract with Pazooki << McMenamin on the Beaver Valley Road project.
Commissioner Brown seconded the motion.
AGREEMENT re: Cleveland Street Water Line; Charles Broders:
The Oak Bay Park water line project requires that the County gain an
easement across a piece of property owned by CharlesD. Broders, Gary
Rowe reported. Mr. Broders will give the County an easement and the
City of Port Townsend will provide Mr. Broders a water tap on which the
County has agreed to waive the payback requirements. The Prosecuting
Attorney has reviewed and approved the agreement which Mr. Broders has
signed.
Commissioner Brown moved to approve and sign the Agreement with Charles
D. Broders for a water line easement across his property. Commissioner
Dennison seconded the motion.
Establishment of the Solid Waste Advisory Committee: Gary
Rowe reported that persons have been contacted to serve on the Solid
Waste Advisory Committee and by-laws are being developed. Each of the
nine members will serve a two year term.
Commissioner Dennison moved to approve and sign Resolution No. 46-86
establishing the Solid Waste Advisory Committee. Commissioner Brown
seconded the motion.
Restrictina Bicycles on the Beaver Valley Road: The County
can restrict bicycle traffic on road~ in the same manner that is done
for snow and ice or construction conditions, which is by resolution of
the County Commissioners. Restricting a road can be done for weight,
height, traffic safety reasons, etc. A bicycle route sign was put up
on the Beaver Valley Rpad to try to encourage bicyclists to use other
roads. The concern is that the Beaver Valley Road, is unsafe in the
condition that it is presently in, and warrants restricting bicycle
use. The paving project will be completed by September and will
provide more paved area on the side of the road for bicycles.
Commissioner Brown advised that before he would be willing to advertise
a notice of closing the Beaver Valley Road to bicycles, he would like
to discuss the matter with the Sheriff's deputies that patrol the road
and with members of the community who use that road for their input.
,VOl 12 fAGE "0 1982
Page:
6
Minutes: Week of 3une 9, 1986
Removina a Road from the ,County Road Loa: ,Vista Boulevard: The street
in Island Vista Plat, which has been annexed into the City of Port
Townsend, needs to be deleted from the County Road Log, Gary Rowe
reported, since it is now a City Street.
Commissioner Brown moved to approve and sign Resolution 41-86 removing
Vista Boulevard from the Official County Road Log. Commissioner
Dennison seconded th motion.
Em lo ent Trainin Pro ram: De rtment of Labor and
Industries: Fred Gif ord: Gary Rowe reported that Fred Gifford will be
working in the Publi Works Department at no cost to the County under a
job training program through the Department of Labor and Industries.
He will be working f r about 20 hours per week. There is no obligation
to the County for em 10Yment beyond this program.
CONTRACT r Electronic Platform Load Cell Scale
S stems for Landfill' Unitech Cor ration: Commissioner Dennison moved
to approve and sign he contract with Unitech Corporation of Seattle
for purchase and ins allation of two electronic platform load cell
scales at the landfi 1. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion.
Ac isitio
Committee for Outdoo
Outdoor Recreation,
application deadline
funding, to be submi
Open Space Plan need
Gary Rowe will be co
Recreation and David
preparing the grant
Open Space plan.
U ate reo
Chimacum Creek Chi
to hear the determin
to proceed, (See als
an update on the sta
Paper Company and Co
Townsend Paper Corpo
completed and Evergr
necessary building 0
Letter from Helen F. 3ohnston and Anne 3. Cook
ts in Tuke s Addition: Chairman Pitts signed a
hnston and Anne 3. Cook regarding easement to lots
ior Court judgement.
of land ad acent to Oak Ba Park' Intera enc
Recreation: The Interagency Committee for
ary Rowe reported, has waived the grant
and will allow Jefferson County's application for
ted by July 1, 1986. The 1918 Park and Recreation
to be updated for eligibility for these funds.
tacting Warren Steurer, Director of Parks and
Goldsmith, Planning/Building Director about
pplication and updating the Park and Recreation
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Time Extension to com 1 with Noise Standards'
I' 0 ration' Ever reen Fiber: Being the time set
tion of the project proponent on how they intend
Minutes of May 21, 1986) Chairman Pitts asked for
us of the lease contract between Port Townsend
ton Corporation. A representative from Port
ation reported that the lease agreement has been
en Fiber will proceed with construction of the
the Chimacum Creek site.
Mr. Herman, Evergree Fibre stated that they would go along with the
ninety day time fram for the construction of that building. Mr. Sam
Learned, represent in area property owners, advised that they are
perfectly in accorda ce with ninety days being granted to-Evergreen
Fiber. The only sti ulation that they would liike to see added to this
project is that duri g the time of construction of this building, that
Evergreen Fiber keep their chipper work under control and do not add to
it and if the buildi g isn't completed in the pinety days that they be
required to stop the r chipper work and complete the building. If when
the building is comp eted it is determined that they comply with the
noise standards they could start the chipper operation again.
Commissioner Brown m
standards, to begin
construct the necess
lease agreement betw
Company. Commission
ved to grant a ninety (90') day waiver of the noise
mmediately, to allow the ~roject proponent to
ry building. The County pe given a copy of the
en Cotton Corporation and the Port Townsend Paper
I' Dennison seconded the .otion.
i
Redesi t on Rest. Air ort Cutofif Road 8: SR20
Intersection' Cecil reeman: Assistant Planne'r Rachel Nathanson
, IJOL
12 f-AtE
o 1983
Minutes: Week of .1
Page:
1
explained that Mr. F eeman is requesting that approximately eight acres
of commercially desi ated property located at the corne~ of SR20 and
the Airport Cutoff R ad be redesignated as light industrial. Mr.
Freeman wishes to su ivide the property into four lots and has a
potential buyer for the northern most lot (Lot 2) which is the only lot
that he wishes to ha eredesignated as industrial. This buyer would
like to relocate a w lding and steel fabrication business onto the
site. Rachel Natha on then reviewed the findings for this proposal as
well the Planning Co ission's recommendation to ,deny the request based
on the redesignation being for industrial uses since that is all that
the current comprehe sive plan has defined.
commissioner Pitts a
Rachel Nathanson cIa
Transportation has I'
point on Airport Cut
is concerned because
SR20 for his busines
for industrial truck
property to Lot 2 of
In response to a que
presented and Rachel
either side of SR20
Fred Hill property f
area where the grave
Commissioner Dennlso
of the site. Commer
area do not require
uses, Rachel Nathans
differing land use d
necessary, during th
require buffering un
park.
Commissioner Brown m
recommended by the P
the motion which car
3efferson
Fort Townsend Road
Alan Carmen were pre
property owned by Da
Road and west of SR2
Board's action to re
the Planning Commiss
Planning Enabling Ac
Ms. Nathanson then I'
approval and the Pla
request provided tha
for the SR 20 polici
following condition:
and shall be located
The amount of visual
screen and a berm wo
Nathanson added that
there is a 100% sere
it. Any development
review and the buffe
time. Commissioner
reviewed in the past
were established. D
that the buffer be a
like when the site w
Commissioner Brown m
visual buffer of no
the access onto SR20 from Lot 2, which
ified by stating that the State Department of
stricted access from Mr. Freeman's property to one
ff Road. Mr. Daley, owner of OlYmPic Greenhouse,
he has an existing commercial road approach onto
and he does not want that access made available
since a 30 foot road easement exists across his
Mr. FrEiteman's property.
tion from a man in the audience a map was
Nathanson explained that a strip 660 feet wide on
s designated as commercial. The approval of the
r industrial purposes was limited solely to the
exists and is setback 200 feet from SR20.
inquired about the buffering for industrial uses
ial uses, if located in a commercially designated
omplete buffering or screening from adjacent land
n explained. Buffering is required where
signations meet, or if it is determined to be
SEPA process. Industrial uses normally do
ess they are located W'OllY within an industrial
I
I
ved to deny the redesignation request as
anning Commission. Co~issioner Dennison seconded
ied, by a unanimous vo~e.
ount Intent to Redeai I te: 16 acres North of Old
ale Brad Pro ert : ~r.<< Mrs. Dale Brady and
ent when this intent td redesignate 16 acres of
I
e Brady and located no~th of the Old Fort Townsend
was discussed. This ~ntent is a result of the
and Dale Brady's redes~gnation request back to
on in accordance with ~he Washington state
(RCW 36.10.430), Rach~lNathanson reported.
I
viewed the findings, the six conditions of
ing Commission's reco~endation to approve the
the binding site plan lis not used as a precedent
s to be adopted and Wi1h the inclusion of the
Qne multi-tenant sign be permitted for the site
as depicted on the bin ing site plan.
buffer to be left along SR20 was discussed. A 60%
Id not both fit into t~e 30 foot corridor. Rachel
on a site inspection stie found that currently
n in this corridor and Inothing can be seen through
on this property will qo through an environmental
s in front of the siteJwill be reviewed at that
ennison stated that th~ buffers that have been
have never turned out ~s anticipated when they
vid Goldsmith noted that the Board can require
gmented once they see what the buffer will look
rk is finished. I
I,
to approve the red~signation with a plan for a '
than a 60% to be a~proved prior to the
I
i
I
t21f'ACE
I
i
I
, VOL
o
1984
, -.
Minutes:
9, 1986
Page:
8
issuance After further discussion of the area
and what the proper ount of buffer would be, Commissioner Brown
amended the motion to reflect that the natural buffer be left in tact
until an approved buffer plan is designed and approved by the Board
before the issuance of the building permit. Commissioner Dennison
seconded the motion f r purpose of discussion, and asked if there was a
way to make the buffer the last matter that is dealt with on this
project?
David Goldsmith sugge ted that a plan for the whole corridor adjacent
to Mr. Brady's property needs to be devised, not just for the piece
which is adjacent to the portion to be used by Mr. .1ensen, and since
this site is within the SR20 corridor, so it is likely that what is
done in this area will set the tone for what happens along the rest of
that corridor.
Chairman Pitts repeated the motion as follows: approve the
redesignation with t e buffer in tact until a scheme is approved which
will maximize the buffer, but still allow some exposure as requested by
the businesses planni g to relocate at the site. The motion carried by
a unanimous vote.
Setback Va
Mr. Cribby is constr
Olympus Boulevard in
reported and is requ
Works Department and
both recommend appro
us Boulevard' Charles Cribb :
cting a garage next to his existing home on
the OlYmpus Beach Tracts, Rachel Nathanson
sting a setback variance of 10 feet. The Public
the Building Inspector have inspected the site and
a1 of the variance.
Commissioner Brown m ved to approve the variance as requested by Mr.
Cribby. Commissione seconded the motion.
f Norwa . A lications for fish rearin
Oak Ba: Planning/Building Department Director
ted that letters have been received informing the
of Norway has withdrawn their fish rearing test
iscovery Bay and that their application for test
not be pursued. The only permit left would be for
Since the Board prev
foot test pen at Dis
Planner Bob Duffy ad
that approval or app
Brown moved to grant
their permit for sal
Commissioner Denniso
CONTRACT
contract, David Gold
of ,the shoreline man
Planning Department.
DOE Coastal Zone Man
moved to approve the
Brown seconded the m
CONTRACT P
Brown moved to pay $
services contract wi
funding for the seco
date. Commissioner
Services reo David Stalheim: Commissioner
,000 of the requested $2,000 for the personal
h David Stalheim. The determination of where the
d $1,000 will come from will be made at a later
ennison seconded the motion.
A licatio
Bob Duffy reported t
rearing pen farm at
this application to
Commissioner Denniso
preliminary meeting
information and answ
further and advise t
for a Salmon Rearin Pen Farm: Associate Planner
at an application has been received for a salmon
outh Point. Commissioner Brown moved to refer
he Shoreline Commission for their review.
seconded the motion. Chairman Pitts asked that a
e held for the area residents to provide them with
r their questions. Bob Duffy will look into this
e Board what can be done.
. VOL
12 fACE
o 1.985
. -8
Minute$: Week of .1
1986
Page:
9
HEALTH DEPARTMEN'.r
BEARING re: Pro riation and Pro osed
Bud et Extension. .1e ferson De artment: Chairman Pitts
opened the hearings t the appointed time. When no one appeared to
speak for or against either the proposed budget appropriation in the
amount of $6,814.00 r the budget extension in the amount of $1,632.00
the Chairman closed he hearings. Commissioner Brown moved to approve
Resolution No. 48-86 ordering the budget appropriation and Resolution
No. 49-86 ordering t e budget extension. Commissioner Dennison
seconded the motion.
TREASURER (3une 10, 1986)
Petition f
for property tax ref
approved by motion 0
Dennison.
Tax Refund' Swan School: The petition
d in the amount of $96.26 for Swan School was
Commissioner Brown, and seconded by Commissioner
Cancellati n of Uncollectible Personal Pro ert Taxes:
Commissioner Brown m ved to approve and sign Resolution No. 60-86
cancelling the perso al property taxes as listed and recommended by the
Treasurer. Commissi ner Dennison seconded the motion.
Bob Bar r
Fer Advisor Commi
Advisory Committees
counties. The law g
for the committee me
.1uly 1, 1986 which m
expire at the end of
as follows:
* One member
user group
* One member
depending
* One member
transporta
* * *
Advisor Committee re: New laws re ardin
tee: Mr. Bob Harper reported that the Ferry
ere established many years ago in a number of
verning these committees was updated and the terms
bers were set to start on 3uly 1, 1982 and expire
ans that all of the Committee members terms will
the month. The makeup of this committee should be
should be a representative of an established ferry
or a frequent user of the ferry system.
should represent persons or firms, using or
pon the ferry system for commerce.
should be a member of local government,
ion planning body or staff.
The current Ferry Ad isory Committee members are Bob Harper, Dick
McCurdy, Lyle Win Williams and .1oe Wheeler.
The Board
day on Monday and re
present.
their meeting at the end of the business
on Tuesday morning with all Board members
APPROVAL
May and the first pa
Board.
SIGNING OF BILLS: The bills for the balance of
of .1une, 1986 were reviewed and signed by the
A
for Assistance from the Soldiers' and Sailors'
3. Rub: The application for assistance from the
, Relief Fund in the amount of $411.19 as
3. Ruby was approved by motion of Commissioner
mmissioner Dennison.
,VOL
12 fA~ 0 1986