Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM012885 '" . II . 81 . ? District No. 1 Commissioner: District No. 2 Commissioner: District No. 3 Commissi'oner: Larry W. Dennison, Member B.G. Brown, Member John L. Pitts, Chairman Clerk of the Board: Public Works Director: Jerdine C. Bragg Brian L. Shelton ~~~~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Week of January 28, 1985 The meeting was call with Commissioner B.G.Brown a to order by Chairman John L. Pitts, Larry W. Dennison present. moved to for 1985. Cancellation of Unclaimed Warrants:' The cancellation of the unclaimed warrants issued during the last quarter of 1983 was approved by motion of Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Dennison, to sign Resolution No. 12-85. Harriette Buchman, Director, Clallam/Jefferson Juvenile Diver- sion; Contract tor Diversion WQrker and Request tor CJSFunds: Since the resignation of Jay Colden as the Diversion worker for Jefferson County, a replacement was sought and Harriette Buchman reported that she has interviewerljarrl recommends that the County contract with Erys K. Tea to fill this vacancy. Commissioner Brown moved to approve and sign the Professional Services Contract with Erys K. Tea as a Diversion Worker. Commissioner Dennison seconded the motion. An overview of the projected to the Board by Mrs. Buchman as years 1985 to 1989, and the requ Jefferson County for 1985. ets for 1985 through 1987 was presented ell as a Narrative of Goals for the st for Juvenile Diversion funds from The narrative of goals was prese ted, Mrs. Buchman noted, to give the Board and Lois Smith, Jefferson ~ounty Juvenile Services Director, an idea of the items that shouldb maintained if Jefferson County decides to separate from the Cl,allam-Jef' erson Counties Juvenile Diversion Unit in 1986. Chairman Pitts advised Mrs. Buchman that no decision had been reached regarding a possible sep ration from Clallam County. Jack Westerman, Assess inquired as to t e status 0 t e the Board regarding 1985 salarie that all that would be needed to would be $1,500 when you conside budget was $10,000 less than was costs in the Assessor's office a of a total 1984 Assessor's Offic and turned back to the County. , r re: Budget 1985: Jack Westerman or~gina proposa he had submitted to in the Assessor's Office. He noted break even on his original proposal that the preliminary 1985 salaries budgeted in 1984. The 19'5 personnel e not any greater than in 1984. Out budget of $226,000, 15% as unused i Chairman Pitts advised that saia ies are being dealt with and the various Unions involved tnd that the Board would m to the Elected Officials and D~p rtment Heads at their nex in February, and the would also like to meet with the Ass another meeting to discuss some pecific personnel matters y the Board ke a report staff meeting ssor at \Jol 11 'P/HjL 73 " Minutes, Week of January 28, 1985 Page 2: The Assessor then reported that a draftsman has beenihired for his office. One long range project that he will be working on will be to draw every quarter section in Eastern Jefferson County on mylar in 200th scale, with roads and their physical location o~ the right-of-way noted as well as the meander lines and their physical ilocation on the waterfront. Aerial photographs of all the sections in i200th scale would then be needed. The Assessor's office would provide ~he draftsman, and would hope to be able to get funding from other departments such as County Roads for the aerial photos. This project would probably take about five yearsto complete but then these maps would be available to all county departments, and other interested agencies ,such as the roD. . , The Board would like to establish priorities onprojedts ,for all County offices, Chairman Pitts advised, and put those projects into a scheme that will enable them to facilitate the departments n~eds in the most effective manner. This would also allow for coordinattiot). of projects that would benefit more than one department. Ken Brooks re: Ombudsman Prog~am: Ken Brooks reviewed his proposed program to address the need faced by decisio~ makers in local government for information,so they axe better 'able to ,make sound decisions on a wide variety of environmental issues. ,His proposal is to create an "Environmental Ombudsman" position to organize the energy of the various grass roots environmental groups ,in thEt area ahd address the issues they are involved with and to tap theknow~edge and skills of the politically active, intelligent and well trainEtd x:etirees who (!auld provide ne~ded information by doing research into these issues. The "Ombudsman" position would not make decisions, bU4 he would provide the decision makers with information so they can make !decisions for which they don't have the training, the money or the staff ~o investigate and research. Mr. Brooks asked for the Bomdssupport and thoughts on how to implement such a program, and he would investigate ithe resources available to provide funding. ' The Board noted the following concerJs that would need to before they felt they could endorse ~uch a progrq.m: How be chosen and who would he be respon~ible to; would tqis employee or a consultant on contract iand would the Board of what this person would be doing i~ the community? , be addressed would the person person be an have control Mr. Brooks noted that if an agency otlher than local g~vernment provided funding, that agency would have to understand that the "Ombudsman" would be under the guidance of the local gdvernment decision makers. Mr. Brooks funding suggestion as outlined in hi~ letter, was to contract with a person to perform this function beca4se this would reduce cost and the amount of administrative work at the Ilocal level. The Bbard concurred that a letter of Isupport for the general, broad context of th~ project, be written to give t9 Mr. Brooks. The letter is to in- clude, wording that there is need for icoordination of efforts by local government as to the primary responstbility of this p9sition to include the d~rection of projects and scope 1f work to be provided. I BUSINESS FROM COUNTY DEPARTMENTS: i , i PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT I I Processing of R.I.D. for Nip Lee Road: The Public Works Department reported that the petition requestin& that a Road Improvement District be fo-rmed for Nip Lee Road meets ,all iof the requirements for formation of a district, and is therefore suff~ci~nt. Commissioner Brown moved to approve Jnd sign Resolution No. 13-85 a Resolution of Intention to form Road IImpr~vemeht District No. 3 with boundaries as designated in the Reso~ution. Cpmmissioner Dennison seconded the motion. ! I I i A public hearing was set for February 126, 1985 at, 2~OO p.m. by motion of Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commilssioner Dennison. , I I "01.11 P4'1e3 73-a.. ....,~..~,'"' ~;1; }'; '" Minutes,. Week of Januar Page 3: Gary Rowe, Assistant Pu estimate of cost to imp the R.I.D. is $10,250.0 by a method of assessme Commissioner Brown move notification letter to this R.I.D. which will property determined by footage and 3) equal as bination of two of the the final assessment me February 26, 1985. Com Purchase of Sheriff's v a vise t at t e tree been put on special ord as ordered. There is a Brian Shelton suggested cars in addition to th for delivery in the nex the. C&rS be ordered thr The Board asked that th status of the three car information on ordering set up for the Board to he is requesting. HEARING Re: Proposed Je Fee Schedule: Chairman time. Planning/Buildin proposed fee increases fees will cover the act fees were added under t and administrative viol When no one appeared to the Chairman closed the and sign Ordinance No. Department Fee Schedule The consultant for the boats that would be use would need'to be. Mr. be checking the fish fo FDA approved medication would also have 24 hour , I , I lic Works DiJ.ector, reported that the preli~inary ove the 700 ~eet of Nip Lee Road designated in . Each prop1rty owner will be assessed an amount t~ yet to be Idetermined, to total the $10,250.00. to direct tqe Public ~Qrks Department to send a ac~ propertY.d.lowner wi. th. i..n the '. area designate.d ?y dv~se them o~ the amount of assessment for t~e~r ach of the fqllowing methods: 1) Area, 2) Font essment. They are alsQ to be advised that a com- ethods could Ibe considered. A determination of hod will b ~ade after the public hearing on issioner D n~ison seconded the motion. I I b~ic Works birector, Brian Shelto c~es that were ordered last year ave d ican not be delivered with bucke seats o~ of deliv~ry date for these car . tHe Sheriff would like to order s me rder, and if those three are not cheduled hait the ordl=r be cancelled and a1 t~ contract I. kd Director! check further into th o~ order, ~ well ~s obtaining mo e ~tate con ract. A time will be h~ Sheriff about the additional c rs I i PLANN N~ DEPART I tJ Plannin and Building Departme p~ned the ublic hearing at the a David Gold mith, reported that th r~a of pub ~cation costs. The ne ~he publi,ations. Two new viola ~ubstanti 1 Developments for mat I ! I . riaga~nst ommissione f1rson Cou ner Brown 28, 1985 hicles: P heriff veh r status a so a quest that since three on 30 days, ugh the St Public Wo currently through th talk with roject pro " how they indberg a disease w administe security. Commissioner Dennison m ved to app for Sea Farm of Norway ubject to the last two meetings. Commission ion rial he proposed fee schedu . Dennison moved to app ty Planning and Buildi g bconded the motion. e ove , , ~t Applic 'ens: Plfess, pre ijouse the Qn this p , IMitch Pr dlbe trave .~ould not Hlg space T~o additi tli and a w I o~ent, Jo hI'", Lindber. g, discussed t e wquld be u ed and how large they sQ advised that the personnel wou d iqh,if fou ~, would be treated wi h ed through the food. The project I ' I ote the Sh h~ five co rlBrown se I tion 13-84; Permit App oval: ~ a so Minutes 0 anu ry ented the information hat generator for this pro.ect, rmit application at th ir ss reported, would hou e ing back and forth fro be more than 40 feet 1 f one deck and would nal boats would be use , rk boat for maintenanc . ~eline Permit Applicat on ditions discussed over anded the motion. , ' \10 I .11. f>>-5e. 37 3r- .. ~~ I I I I i 1 I I I 1 ! I eJ;IDit e I Ul lng sites'w t rl ge aVen pit rea: ~soclate ~nner MltC resslrev Peninsula Properties proppsal for e~elopmen of fivelhom area adjacent to the Bridgehaven S iti. The ork woul~ in clearing, bulkheading, fi~ling and'"developme t of a sfPti a drainage system and thel building p~ two do ks. I " . .:!f h "I d" d Alan Carm@nhoc a representatl ~!o t e rOJect pt ent a Vlse that every attempt has befn made t · bake int consider n the environ- mentally. sensitive areas ~n t. his p oject and to leave [ he smallest foot- print possible to still b~ able to g~t throu h those , eas in order to develop the useable areaStl. A deta"l~d soil nalysis p seen conducted by TriAd Associates to pr vide. the H~alth De artment ~ th the soils in- formation they will need 0 make a petermina ion regat in the septic system drainfield and the drainage p~an. Th s SEPA rt ie is just the first of many steps and p rmits th t Iwill be requiredl or this project. 'I . I 1 I Planning Director, David G, oldsmith,! ~dvised he Board I that a policy on treatment of wetlands wil~ need to b~ consid red by bbfh the Shorelines Commission and the Board.' The seq ~rlce of e ents on ~fiS Shoreline Permit is as follows: 1) SEPA D terminat.prt, if a eterminaF. on of Non-Signif- icance is issued there wil 1 be a 1 ' day comm nt perio~ 2) the Shoreline Commission will review th proposa I 1nd make their reftmmendation al.so. Commissioner Dennison mov' d to iss ination ~ Non-Significance for the Coyle Peninsula P operties ith Jeff~ son County assuming Lead Agency Status. Comm:. ssioner ded the Jin tion. Off-Premise Sign Proposalll; Chopsti ant: Th~ Chopsticks Restau- rant ln Port Townsen presente a erect an off-premise, 10 foot by 5 foot sign onl Dave Joh erty on R ody Drive in the Tri Cit.ies Area , Rache. 1 Ni'.' than.son The signl ould be set back 40 feet from the center 1 ne, of Rh nd be on!rrivate pr-operty. The Tri Area Commun"ty Plan' signs i~ that they should .be kept to a minimum in s~ze and n cy 1) an~ that off-premise and private informationalLsigns ar stent wif the character of the Tri-Area and shoul, not be licy 2).1 I Minutes, Week of January Page 4: 8, 1985 Davin Johnson was present and advi this in the area, such as: th~ Shuf that she would like any s.ze sign, ~~~~t.but she would not d~:' any thin Commissioner Dennison mov d to adh Tri-Area Community Develo; ment PIa for an off premise sign f r the Ch Brown seconded the reques~. The C to investigate the Shuff'f Meats Building Permit Refund Re6uests: C nJissione the following building permit refu d~: Dave & Judy Pratt ~I 117.20 ! Bill Melvin 98.00 I Steve Tyner '14.40 I Alan Baumunkl172. 00 : I Commissioneli Dennison secrnded the Fition. Wood Chippin Operation ip. Hadlock.! IDavid G ldsmith irl ported that the secon 0 iCla comp alnt~ as een rdceived n the no~:e made by the temporary wood chipping olperation "n lHadlock. The invtstigation into the noise levels has been! made and alletter ill be se t to the operators asking them to bring the !FPeration 'ihto comp iance wit the noise standards. I; 1 , : I ere are b ign. Mr~ it coulp btainingl her signs like Tso told the Board be seen from the he County's approval , , policies I s stated in the and to de y the request staurant!.1 Commissioner ected thrlplanning Department Brown mO ed to approve ! \loL patte, 3 73 -c . ' , Minutes, Week of Janua y 28, 1985 Page 5: Port Ludlow as assume o-Lea g sewer system expansion been issued and a meet in the Port Ludlow Con contents that will be mente There will be a after which the scope Phil Andrus Supervisor, erson to present his dissent District previously st Mr. Andrus submitted h also summarized a lett Committee for a Morato Mr.. Bricklin is addres in this letter. , osal: The Washington ncy tatus witlh Jeffe project. A Deltermina ng!has been s~t up fo erence Center Ito take eq\lir. ed in t\1.. el. scoped 151 day review period f fhe EIS*W~l~ be det I I 1 e: Proposed H~rbicide oupty onserv~t~on ~ ng: view from ~he posi ted to the Bo~rd (See , i S presentatib~ in wri r from Dave Brlicklin, ~um on A~rial IHerbici ~nF the ~ssue lof Stat . I Mr. Andrus t):l~t the.B ard had n Mrl. Bricklin ecause ti had jus rman also not dthat ~ agreed e matter that lthe con iideration dr~ven out of Ithe Cou ~y by the Attorney infdrmed th iBoard th hir regard is lthe hea ~h issue.1 ic~n Arbitrat~on Asso ~ation re: Jefferson County -i was app~ ve y ~t on 0 omm~ss~oner Brown, r ennis.on tpJdeclare a, Non-deb table Emergency to the Ameri an Arbi ~ation As ociation in the Cbunty Jail' ~nd Palm ~ Contrac ors, Inc. : I I! I I I' I I ,i JEFFERSON COUNTY ~IARD OF ~MI1ISSIONERS I I i ~ I State De~!rtment of Ecology son c,ount,. on the Port Ludlow ion of Si nificance has february 7 at 7:30 p.m. p~blic c9 ment on the Epvironme~tal Impact State- np'.,ing Febr'uary 15, 1985 rmined. I , I I Moratori t!r ct, ca iion that Minutes 0 ! I :ijng s Attorney ~ Sprayin land Fede Phil Andrus e before the Board he Conservation January 21, 1985). e attached, he epresenting the , (See attached). al Preemption, Chairman Pitts advised review the letter from that morning. The Cha statements regarding t be what or who will be issue. The Prosecutin they can deal with in t had a chance to been received ith Mr. Andrus' of the Board cannot r decision on this t the only issue Fees for Jail: Reso ut~on o. seconded by Commission for the payment of $80 matter of the Jefferso MEETING ADJOURNED SEAL: c " ",'.~..;.> 'JOL 11. PCl9e. 3 73~d