The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutM031185 , 01" , .,j,' District No. District No. District No. , . I .. .. Larry W. Dennison, Member B.G. Brown, Member John L.Pitts, Chairman Director Clerk of Works Brian L. Shelton Jerdine C. Bragg III 11' ,:l{;'fll iN:' T!Jl~~,:iE::" Bi ,,6, '1", Robert man presente a long term lease 0 for use as a movi conversion of the a~d $50,000 by th H~ has been searc that the VFW Hall as its ,location d riedman re: Long roposa or t e the main floor theater. Mr. F main floor into time all of the ing for a locati would be good be wntown. erm Lease of VFW Hall: Robert Fried- oar s conSl eratlon concerning a f the VFW Hall at 1020 Water Street iedman noted that he estimates the theater would cost between $35,000 equipment was purchased and installed. n for the past four months and feels ause of its high ceiling as well The mee ing was called to order by Chairman John L. 'Pitts in the absence of Co issioner B.G. B_own. Commissioner Larry W. Dennison was present. Commissioner Denn'sonmoved to app ove Resolution No. 19-85 ordering the budget approp iation for the 0 ympic Area Agency on Aging. Chairman Pitts seconded th motion. Mr Friedman that they would have to check on the legal- y leasing that b ilding on a long term basis to a especially one t at would be in competition with another ea. They also d,. rected Mr. Friedman to talk. with tor to make sure that he is aware of all of the re- ublic building. Currently the bottom floor of this to mostly dance classes on an hourly basis which elocated if the oom was altered. The Board advised ities of the Coun private business, business in the a the Planning Dire quirements for a building is rente iwould have to be ices; Ruffin LeBrane; Mental Health ennJ_son move an C a~rman Pitts Personal Services Contract with unselling services through the Jeffer- t. y Center Rental D posit Refund: A deposit for the ommunity nter was sent to the County Treasurer 1 contract was c ncelled. Commissioner Dennison moved rer refund the $ 5.00 deposit to Gail Jenkins. Chair- the motion. VOL 11 ..' fAG~: ~ =0 0'723 ... - .. Minutes, Page 2: 11, 1985 The Board directed BID OPE ING re following ~ s we e opene time: BIDDERS: Puget Sound Sur Alternate usi Shold Excavatin Del Hur, Inc. Engineer's Inc. Forks cum pit for Item 1 & 4 Hadlock BID TOTALS: $92,440.00 80,280.00 72,598.60 60,128.50 including tax " " including tax " " 72,600.00 without tax Commissioner Denn bids for possible the Board. Chair ed to have the Engineer review and check the and/or ommissions and make a recommendation to s seconded the motion. BUSINESS TREASURER'S OFFICE Petitions for Pro perty tax re un s $30.77 were appro sioner Dennison, Refund; Louis Selk: Three petitions for pro- ~s e in t e amounts of $44.90, $31.48 and ecommended by the Treasure~ by motion of Commis- by Chairman Pitts. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SEPA Determinatio move to issue a for the open pit the Jefferson Cou the motion. Commissioner Dennison ~gn~ ~cance and Lead Agency Status Chimacum and operated by Chairman Pitts seconded PLANNING DEPARTMENT Commissioner B.G. in Olympia and wa eturned from giving testimony at a DNR hearing t for the balance bf the day's business. ensive Plan Consistency Review and SEPA Deter- , ann~ng lrector, su mitte a memo or t e ding consistency in SEPA review and commented and the Washington Administrative Code both nclusion does not necessarily have to be reached lar proposals that are located at separate 10- E & E Enterprises mination: avi Board's informati that the SEPA Gui indicate that the for two separate cations. Rachel Nathanson on the Ian regard to this pr Board find the pr the condition tha the property. iewed the Planning Commission's recommendation als and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, with The Planning Commission recommends that the nsistent with the Comprehensive Plan subject to er,is required along the southern boundary of Commissioner Bro moved to accept the Planning Commission's recommendation and find that the projec is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan with the condition not d. Co missioner Dennison seconded the motion. J;~L 11;;; , if"";JE . ;:~'1 ijJ ~"a Minutes, Week 0 Page 3: 11, 1985 Rachel Nathanso reviewed the environmental checklist and outlined the fourteen mi igati e measures suggested by the planning staff and explained that 'f a S PA determinatfon was made today that additional mitigation may e req ired after th~ Health Department, Port of Port Townsend and th Public Works Deparqment have a chance to r view the proposal. ' Mrs. Udd, one of the p oject proponents, inquired about meas re Number 7 which requires atural vegetative buffers of a certain widt along the boundaries. Sh note that the 75 ~oot buffer along the hi hway is nec- essary for nois as w 11 as visually, but the other buffers which are a minimum of 50 f et wo ld mean that alot of property would h ve to be given up when it hasn't eve been determined if it will be needed for the noise. She also asked .f this buffer could .be put to any other use. The Comprehensi Pia, Rachel Nathanson explained is conce ned about the visual as well noise impact of a .project.TIClt was. determ'ned at a later date that buffer of a parti~ular width was not requ'red the project propone t could ask the Board for a change in the m'tigation. The widths sugg sted in measure number 7 were suggested by he Planning Department staf . Mr. Udd then as ed wh , if the siteiiis considered for indus ,the operating h urs (See Mitigative Measure No. 10) are bei from 7 a.m. to p.m. Other indust~ial users, such as Port Paper Company, un a swing shift. R;.achel Nathanson answered type of operati ns that a company s~ch as Port Townsend Pap runs are done i an i dustrial park :without residential use to them. Other sites, such as the Udd's are proposing, hav hours of operat'on Ii ited. Ai Carmen, represen ing adjacent property owned by BurlalJa Inves that there is a proposed short plat :being considered fqr thi which is only 6 0 feet away from th~ Udd's project site and like to see a 7 foot buffer zone on the west boundary of t rial use, g restricted Townsend that the r Company adjacent had the Commissioner Br buffer depends added that the out over the 15 ments noted property they would e site. In response to the Air Port Ro if the Port or access to their in the maintena be using the ro wn added that the determination of the widt n what is growing in! that area, David Gold xact etermination of the mitigation can be day c mment period. d's inquiry about access being allowe missioner BroWn also noted that it do nty owns that 'road the Udd' ,s wi 11 be ty, however, ~hey may be required to the road due to the increased traffic use of their Broject. ed to issue a Determinatioti of Non-Si Status for the E & E Enterprises, Inc. prop ed the motion.' Any comment.s on this y Wednesday March 27, 1985. over sn't matter ranted articipate that may nificance sale Commis- roject will achel Nathanson mery family rea on the ent Use Tax The Planning Co properties that Community Devel which was prepa to meet the cri ment and Asse$s review and recommendations are as f are designated as "Rural" by.the land use m pment Plan. Each parcel has a forest man ed by a professionat forester and reviewed eria for timber management plans by the Pia r's office. llows for these p of the Coyle gement plan and found ning depart- lVOL 11 fACE . tL 725 .i>'.l. Minutes, Week 0 March 11, 1985 Page 4: Application #C2 84; Lisa Roberts: 13 acres covered with Do er. Ternan gement p an ca s for a portion to be clear and another por ion to be thinned by 1990. There is 307'& to a depth of 2 0 feet that is .not eligible for the timber (1.41 acres). he assessed valuation of the property is cu which would be evised to $1,160 if the application is would mean a $1 9 savings per year in taxes. The Planning Co in the timber c the management port every thre and covering th the next three year period. I removal of the glas Fir and cut and planted tre waterfront lassification rently $21,000 ved. This mission recommends that only 11.59 acres be permitted assification and that it be managed as spec'fied in Ian. The owner must submit an updated mana ement re- years based on an inspection by aprofessi nal forester activities of the past three years as well as plans for ears. The report would be due December 31 or each three the report is not received that would be g ounds for roperty from the timber classification. #C4 pr por $30,000 and the would be $1,000 Application covere w~t calls for a This 10 acre Alder and the ma Planning Commis * the replant within one done. * Management * The propert Application #C5 om~nant on t ~ portion of it b Revised Assesse ion recommended the following conditions of ng specificed in the timber management plan ear with a verification letter submitted th eport every three years. be managed as specified in the management 84; Lorna~ Alan & Gay Montgomery: Douglas acre parce an t e management plan req commercially thinned. Assessed Value curr Value $1,000 with a $232.00 per year tax s Conditions of a * Commercial submitted. * Management * The propert done within one year with a letter eport every three years. be managed as specified in the management 84; Montgomery Family Partnership: 10 acre r w~t t e recommen at~on t at rush contro 30,000; Revised Assessed Value $1,000 and a ear. Subject to conditions as stated for 0 arcel is agement plan ed value is approved 232~00 per year. ir is pre- ires that a ntly $30,000, vings. f verification predomin- performed. savings parcels. Commissioner Br wn moved to approve the four applicatiorn fo Current Use Tax Assessm nt as submitted by the Montgomery family an as recommended by the Planning Commission with the conditions noted. Comm.ssioner Dennison second d the motion. * * * BID 0 Work for ew a were opene at for: the bid, Statement. The earlier in the their bid, but called in regar bid bond was no Fuel, Tank, Pump, Lines & Electrical rc ~tect avi 0 nston was present w n t e ids : 5 p.m., and noted that the bid specificat"ons called he bid guarantee, bid bond, and an Affirmat"ve Action Clerk of the Board advised that she had tal ed to Petrolane ay and they were not able to include the bi bond with hat one will be forth coming. CNA Insuranc had also to the bid bond for Buckeye Gas and ad ised that their included in the bid but would also be fort coming. BID TOTAL CALEN AR DAYS FOR C NSTRUCTION Petrolane Alterna deduct $67,074.31 (9,597.00) *.5484 cost of 1 of fuel for next t per gallon *Cost to increa e or decrease with source cost. No Affirmative ctionPlan No Bid Bond 1.~ cJJ.. fAGE lVOl gallons r ~ ":"26 Qr ~ 1) BIDDE , B~D TOTAL , I Minutes, Week 0 Rage 5: Buckeye Ga Puyallup Altern I $172,000.00 I , 63 Fuel c (~4,127.00) cost of 25, 00 gallons of : fuel I * .554 for next 12 months with co~t of product or freig t. I I I , I I to have the ~rchitect, Sheriff and Project and check witr the Prosecuting Atto ney regarding d Affirmativel Action statements and then come recommendatipn. Commissioner Denn'son seconded I I 9 a.m, on Marl ch 9, 1985 between t e Prosecuting riff, Project Man ger and the Board to discuss i *Cost to increa No Affirmative No Bid Bond. Commissioner Br Manager review the lack of bid back to the Boa the motion. A meeting was s t up Attorney, Archi ect, the jail ituat on. all I as recessed MO*day evening and recon ened with J t on Tuesd~y Forn'ng. Control: Sheriff L between B points we s met w~t f a contract The following h) Monday thropgh in the Hadlock/I ormal hours, ratr n - Communica~ion and update betwee Animal Control i 's Departmen~. ~'mal Control tp Di patch. · nimal Controli Off'cer, Sheriff and I I , i ] records - d~s~rib , . n order to. prpvid ~ Animal She~tet wi i contractf.orlAni al Control in Jef erson County County and rppor back to the Boar, with the , riday 9:00 a.m. ondale area. 1. 5:00 p.m. 2) 3) dead animals tha are picked information to i quiring public, 1 be in charge of selling kennel Pat Slevi between B contract, March payable in 2/26/85): Road R. I. . against t The Publi proceedin costs and construG( lon 0 propa~r.ty \wi thi oard term'nate the to the fa t that the and 'the omptemplat-ed .0 be . ~eri ad by the Commissio er Br and deny, .,' heJpe . - <'" BVJiPprgV 1 of motion. s Departm nt recommendation D. for Ni Lee Road, Dennison seconded the OL 11 ~A ~ rn kv '-1']1 ..., ". "'.' ,/ , """ {i . Minutes, Page 6: March 12, 1985 ment t6 the Shoreline Co omm~ssioner Brown move term outhe Shoreline Co h 1, 1987. Commissioner After i terviewing t James L Humphrey Mr. Hum hrey's term seconded he motion. permit Brown, Request'; E.W. White: Th refund of half t e building .W. te was approved by mot~ n ofComm ssioner Commissioner Dennison. Co mis ioner Brown moved to con Monday morn'ng t 10:00 a.m. at the Clall meeting was rec nvened in Clallam County in attendan e. It was determined by the meeting to ~isc ss the E.S.M. Investments Session and ICha rman John Pitts was desig County. MEETING ADJ9UR I i I I I SEAL inue th m Count ith al~ artiesl . t tie s~ ua ~ ated to week1s meting to Courthou e. The of the Bo rd members nvolved t at the n should e an Executive represent Jefferson JEFFER BOARD VOL 11 L- In ":,4 728