HomeMy WebLinkAboutM022784
I
Soldiers' and Sallors' Relief Fund Applic
Brown move to approve an ISlgn t e app lcatlon or
amount of $125,00 for Edwatd Swisher. Commissioner
motion, Unanimous, I '
I
I
Rental of the VFW Hall~ The following re tal agreements for
the VFW Hall were approved Ion the motion of Commiss_oner Pitts seconded
by Commissioner Brown: I
Port Townsend Friends of Central America for Mar
Victorian Squares for M~rch 9, 1984, from 7:30 t
Domestic Violence Program for March 8, 1984, All
I
I
Clerk's Office revolving Fund Extension:
was approved on the motionlof Commissioner Pitts, s
Brown, This resolution wLU extend from $50 to $75
Clerk's Office revolving f~nd.
I
Resignation from1the Shoreline Management
by David Cunn1.ng am: omm~ss__oner rown move
secon e t.e motlon to acc~pt the resignation
the Shoreline Hanag ment Advisory Commission,
will be sent to Mr. Cunningham.
I
State Liq~or Con'rol Board
occasion 11.cense y tea ormaster est
to the issuance 0 wo speq a occaSlon lquor
master Restaurant a movedlby Commissione
Pitts. I
District No, 1
District No, 2
District No, 3
Public Works Director:
Clerk of the Board:
The meeting
present,
HEARING r
cerned County resi
opened the hearing
fees, The Chairman
from four arearesid
I
Greg Wright of the
Enterprises, Inc. r
proponents of the p
form a basis for a
of solid waste disp
for littering shoul
bage may cause more
to explain that the
ducted in East Jeff
of Ecology fundihg,
in a rural area ~f
tion of recycLab1Les
project is in the 0
be operational by A
'". i
Q
;t, '. .
.
.
.
Commissioner:
Commissioner:
Commissioner:
A.M, O'Meara, Cpairman
.G, Brown, Member
Joh L. Piits, Member
Brian L, Shelton
Jerdine C. Bragg
1Il1il.._.~
Week of February 27, 1984
I
was dalled to order at 10:00
I
I
.m, with all members
tion: Commissioner
asslstance in the
Pitts seconded the
h 23 & 24, All day.
10:00 p.m,
day,
Resolution No.18-84
conded by Commissioner
the amount in the
Advisory Commission
ommlssioner Pitts
id Cunningham from
ter of appreciation
for special
ere was 0 objection"
ses for the Harbor-
conded by Commissioner
i
; Inte t
nts were in atten anc w.en
egarding the County's intent
noted ~hat written testimony
nts, I
es: Thirteen con-
rman A,M, O'Meara
adopt solid waste
been received
,
effers~n Recycling Pr
spondeq to the Chairm
oposedlfees. Mr. Wri
ystem ~f control and
sal, 1he possibility
be examined sincech
roadsi4e dumping, Mr.
Model ~itter Control
rson Cqunty, by Baysh
is the Ifirst Source S
he Sta4e. This proje
from homes and busin
ganiza~ion stages rig
ril 15 ,with funding f
gram oper ted by Bayshore
n's reque t for comments from
ht feels his proposal will
eeping tr ck of the problems
of imposi g a stiffer penalty
rginga f e for dumping gar-
Wright su gested, He went on
rogram te t project to be con-
re Enterp ises with Department
paration roject to be conducted
t will co duct curbside collec-
sses in t.e County, The
t now and it is projected to
r 18 ~on t .s,
,VOl
10 tAtE r~' 565
,
bruary 27, 1984
I
I
,
d that there could be
I .
con~rol through the D
rami if the County cou
o shpervise a groupo
ive~sion Program) to
I
I
Several of thos i at~endance spoke whe the Chai man asked for comments
in opposition t. t is prop6sal. The con erns they expressed were:
* Penalty ch Irg s fbr uncovered or un ecured 10 ds which contribute
to the lit er proplem ~hould be con idered.
* If fees ar arg~d~the backroads a d logging roads will be used
for dumpin stead of the drop box s or landfill.
* The increa imp~ct on garbage can in public areas such as
County par s, Nat~onalForests and chools, s ould be considered,
* Lack of 1 nforcement to police or indiscriminate dumping and
and the di , ultr in prosecuting 0 fenders S ould be considered.
* Increased :dminis~rative costs for anning such an operation 10 to
14 hours p.r ay,1 plus .costs of put ing in gates and fencing at
all sites, sh uld: be taken into con ideration.
,
* Adjustment.i th~ fees should be c nsidered' for Senior Citizens
and for pe 'pie whp have to clean up garbage a ped on their property
by other pople. I
~ !
* Considerat'on shopld be given to ta ing off the $2.00 minimum
charge.. I
. I
I
* The septic .waste pumping fees are t
Dr, Clifford W. ~Ca pbetl, Superintendent
sented a petiti:n: ithl 92 signatures of
He also indicat Id that I these fees would
per year for th · Sc oo~ District under t
I
I
Minutes, Week o~ F
Page 2: I
i
I
Mr. Wright indi
funding for lit
Litter Control
hire a crew chi
from the Juveni e
a possibility of dbtaining
partment f Ecology Model
d generat enough revenue to
young pe pie (young people
ick up hi hway litter.
ought to be excessive.
of the Quilcene Schools pre-
esidentsa ainst user fees,
mount to:a proximately $2,000
e proposed fee schedule,
Gary Rowe, Assi ita t P4blic Works Direct r, gave ~o e background infor-
mation regardin ' t e C?st of operating t e Solid Waste Department, and
the method used lin detfrmining the propo ed fee 8th dule,
! . I I'
The cost of the solid o/aste department 0 eration& h in the past,
been funded parially by fees from comme cial us~t"s (it is estimated
that approximat :ly 50%1 of the commercial users aqtu lly paid as such)
with the balanc ma e up by diverting Co nty Roadf nds to the Solid
Waste departmen, Com~issioner Brown in erjecte4t at since a new law
came into affec last rear, diversion of road fUr1.ds. is undesirable.
because, if don no , ~t can make the Co nty ine~ig'ble for State Rural
Arterial Fundin : fo r?ad improvement. i .
Gary Rowe conti 'ued to I explain that the ro jected I b
in 1984 is $235 1000 ( ~rop box operation $111, OOrl,
$116,425, Adminstr tiye Costs $7,500 an Capitail:e
The fee schedul was determined after ap lying cdnv
estimated 14,00 to s ter year of wastes for the !Co
,
If these fees ae a opted, Gary advised hat income
site would be a ~ro im.tely $78,029~27 a ainst t~~
or an operating ~oss ot $33,077.77. ,
, . i I
Further discussbn aslheld on the possi ility 9~
for the county,~6dd'ti$nal property taxe or use~
funding to pay Ilor oltd waste. I
The Board advisd t at I during the update of the ~Ql
alternatives wee c ecUed int<:> and they f it that Ith
most equitable leth d for financing. Th main otije
tax was that ev .r, yo e would be charged t e same, J~e
small user or a liar e 'ilser, and the County has no tl!e
of such a tax, I . I
I I
I ' i
essed the hearing un il Tuesq<!LY March 13 at 10:00 a,m,
i!
I
o rAG~ r +0. · 566
· .1
I
,
!
dget for Solid Waste
andfill operation
penditures $50,000)
rsion factors to an
nty.
the drop box
of $111,000
tax per household
es, ~s a source of
d Waste Plan, financing
user fees were, the
tions to the household
her they were a
hanism for collection
Chairman O'Mear
VOL
!-1inutes,
Page 3:
Febru ry 27, 1984
Homer
Smith, Jr. 0
Fred Wolfstone
Insurance prese
urance'lfresentations: Homer
wit n torm or PENCO.
Homer Stnil th, Sr. of Homer Smi th
nee pac~ages for their perusal.
I
lained the offered b his company, He
en writing insura ce for public entites for the
d that the t:rend 'n the 1960' s was to write
at covered everyt ing in ~ne policy, Experience
dvantages to havi g separate policies for
which is the way is comp4ny handles their insurance
r differences in is pack4ge over that of PENCO's
e and record.ed wi hin thr.:e ears of the effective
matter how many y ars hav p ssed since the action)
fraud defen~e, 3 Coverlpl intiff legal fees
4) Cover attorne who w~rk on a retainer,
ollution. The on exclusio s are for coverages
I
r policies. !
Fred Wolfs tone
reported that h
past 15 years.
an insurance pa
showed that the
the various cov rages,
package. The ftVe aj
are: 1) Any c,ai ma
date of the pol cy (no
is covered, 2) Co er
and punitive da ages.
and 5) Cover a_ea of
that are found n oth
Both insurance
review of the c
y Homer Smith, Sr,
e County. He ex-
mber 28, 1983
out PENCO Insurance.
Randy Storm of
to outline the ove
plained that du_ing
(see minutes) h ha
PENCO brokers a otal i surance package t
for this area, He wen, on to say that a
include the fol ow.ng 'amed insureds: th
and commissions, e ect d and appointed 0
volunteers, Ot er hig lights of PENCO's
basis coverage ~or cia ms, which eans t
for any act committed 'uring the policy
of coverage and 3) the, umbrella policy w
policies. i '
Insurance Company
coverages
were give to th
and a recommenda
g Attorney for his
BUSINESS
Planning re:
nd Paper Company:
prov~sion or
D
t
b
B
t of Port Townsend
ress the Company's
the County wants
uilding inspections
upp advised that
and constructed
the~r licenses' to
tors hired by these
Paper Company.
sibility of
ports submitted
t the mill. The
r Friedman reported
unninghamfrom the
y to be filled.
he should
ooks & Reid
terested in the
H:inutes,
Page 4:
BUSINESS
nued)
Planning re:
2/27/84
of
Treasurer re:
Donley:
E,
Frank Va
Vane invite<:ra rep
planning meeting b
10, 1984 at 10:00
Chase have been in
solving the water
e~ling: Mr. Frank
n !a water district
for the
The
the
iourned a.
~at the S
ersity on
The Board
sponsored
and after lunch we
and from there to
ting on T
State Uni
an appoin
d Control
_----M~,,:;:.~
, . '17", CtJ .~'
, J f"-~--""';' 'ft i,-'-~
,r j II 'J 1t _ SI / "'- \
,/ '", "",:,.~' :" ,~lw'.!;J\
, ~.- "t:';.4:I:' ~,'''-'''''''--.- . ".. :..... t
l .,;. . \ ~"" ,",~.,. '., " '.
_ .,,- t., ' ';-,:,'_.7 '\ "!\' ~ ~-
~~A~ :'1, r -Lj.' ,\' ; ~ \
\ .. '. (;\,1 -! ,) t ,-
\', \\, '-/;).;.
\. l.~ , \ \ '- _< _ ,/ ',I lit :?c'" ,
\, - .-'" ....1 'J\ .. ~.-,,;.;, '.f!J':;t /
'('- . '; "-~'. ,.", " ~ ~.
, "',-.1 .',
~. "
ATTEST ~ S J 'j ~,1 ,
VOL fAtE [0, .' 568
,
,