Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM092484 " . . . . . District No. 1 Commissioner: District No. 2 Commissioner: District No.3 Commiss'oner: Vac nt B.G Brown, Member Joh L. Pitts, Member Clerk of the Board: Public Works Director: Jer ine C. Bragg Bri n L. Shelton , M l N N: 1'. E $, , ----~------------ ~eek of Sept:" Tom Jay & Re ing of Her ici es 1n place and format: of the Committee for a Moratorium 0 Hillman of Pope and Tatbot were pre public meeting agendas ,\ format, and agreed to by both the jno spray" an present: There will be two,thre hour meetin meeting. [,he.Board, ,ad ised that th mation only, and\therelwill be pre- groups present at this Imeeting. Th audience. The meeting~ will be regular public meeting]. The first meeting will be held in cuss the following que tions: 1) Are there health donsideration applied pesticide~? 2) Are there long-term and short- erm effects of ater contamination by aerially applied pesticides. ot re: Aerial Spray- ture meeting ates, An rus an Cha Smith e Spraying; and Ken the Board to set The following was stry representatives s Iwith a possib nJ1eetings will b rranged speaker re will be no p nttinuation of t e shorter third to: gather infor- selected by the two rticipation by the e County Commissioner's Each side will be allowed 30 minute will be one hour for the Board to October at t e Courthouse, to dis- , rlelated to the use of aerially to address eac question and there s~ questions af er the presentations. Tri-Area Community , The second meeting will be held in id-November at Center, and will address the follow. a issues: 1) Physical Impacts of Each side will have Economics of aerial spraying i Each side will have 10 minutes 3) Local experience with aerial a Each side will be allowed thre The balance of the ancedotal i Board in written form. of Aerial Ap lication of Herbicides? to speak. , the timber ind to speak. 1ication of he bicides. ~peakers for 5 minutes each. fqrmation will e presented to the 2) Commissioner Pitts asked that each or text of their presentation with ~aker provide written outline eferences and a bibliography. i i A possible third meeting to discuss tHe legal quest'on of the County im- posing a moratorium on aerial appli tion of herbic'des will be discussed with the Prosecuting Attorney. vnt. ~ '0: It u't' ilL \ If '~\IJ_ 0314 Minutes, Week of Se tem er 24, 1984 Page 2: Commissioner Pitts has the opportunity communities and are issue. ote that by se ting up these m etings the County to start a dial gue and be an e ample for other s to develop an interchange of nformation on this Mr. Cochr n & Mr. Mills r advised that ~s s rt at approva ment until a well i drilled and he roval: Mr. Cochran p y the Health Depart- nd why. The Board advised into the matter. will co tact the Health Department to look minutes of September 4, 1984) Jess Covi adjacent to 0 our acres, ess 0 land covered by sta years, and since th Mr. Covington has 0 is being caused by The Board assured M . Co ington tha they would 100 into the matter of what State\agency h s t e authority to check into t is problem and let him know who to con act. ve water buildu ~s water stan to the Board. ncreased over t problems previo , he does not f on pasture land ng on ~s ower he amount of pasture- e last two ~ to three sly in the 12 years el this water backup reo with the to take. BUSINESS FROM COUNT Parks/Recreation reo Public Works reo ract with DOE for ss~oner PlttS moved ent No. 1 on DOE extension of the 30 to December 31, Planning n request: The pro- pe eorge has run ertification of the d obtaining Fire anson reported. should be forth on of the Planning moved.and Chairman pprove a 30 day he final Cresthaven of July 16, 1984, There are two Commission from on, according to r can be reappointed to have someone the the Department to ny on the Planning 'l 10 h\t~ 3015 Minutes, Week of September 24, 1984 Page 3: BUSINESS Planning 9/25/84 ". re: on; Order of to approve and Vacation, Portions thin the Plat of ies have been re- e motion. (See also & Extension Request: , rev~ewe t e request t Plat No. 1,west / Quilcene, commercial The Planning eny the request. are to either commenda.tion or the Board would be age for an amendment he Pla:nning Commission Mr. osc~' Zabel, at orney for Don Kirs spoke in avor of th Emel sp e against he redesig suggest that the, ossibility lots (0 of Highwa .: 101) to b while I ving the a jacent lot conside d. Ellis, and Mrs. uest while Mrs. n. Carroll Mercer llowing the back esignated commercial dential,couldbe Commissi ner Pitts oved and C tbe mot. n to d~nYf. ,he redesig by the anning Com ission. ion made 0 storage is is allowe . ercial, it ort to not consider osed for this property nce the property be put to any type The PIa the fact if the is redes of comm an Brown secondkd n as recommended . ' , n: David Goldsmith ista Plat which . sencl',have bee~", nditionthat the ,,' was.aiso~a condi1=ion the management lias ng.permits'willbe ed. (Seea.Lso'. ' Franchise Appl~cat:ton' , .. COU1ities $on Grant . . " Clallam $20,000 1,450 . 5,000 $26,450. JEFFERSON $15,000 1,450 3,750 '\. -~:: --'" - :.----~. - Grant In Ki d Cash $20,200 -.------ ------- ---------- -------........-- ! :j 1 Thecaslmatching f nds.requir be paid ~rom the -00 nty' s cont Economic IDevelopmenLCouncil. Th ~~:m~ig es develOPr, dby Mr. W.ls v~ 10UG~ 0 the County will ion to the local Board concurred~that are acceptable 'to 3016 Minutes, Week of September 24, 1984 Page 4: BUSINESS FROM COUNTY DEPARTMENTS (continued): re: New SEPA Ordinance; discussion: he State amended,the State Environmental Protection Ac in 1982 and gave the Counties a time frame to bring th ir SEPA regulati<;ms up to date with the changes, Mito :Pre$s, Associate Planner reported to the Board. A public earing to review' the County's proposed Implementing Or inance has been set for Mond y October 8, 1984 at 3 p.m. in the Commissioner's Chambers Planning 9/24/84 Followin are some of the changes at that 'earing: * The charge for doing a checkl is costlof public notice, curren * Charge for review and/or draf Impa t Statement would be $10 bein negotiated at the start base on the time spent by th * The lanning/Building Departm agen y to coordinate response * Ther will not be Proposed an Non- ignificance. There will Sign ficance or Non-Significa 15 d y review period. * Conc pt of environmentally se that will be reviewed changed to $50 ~lus ly $25.00. . ing an Environmental minimum with the cost of the process and County staff. nt will be the County to other agenci$s. Final Declarations of be a Determination of ce made, with the same areas. horeline SubstanialDeve~opment permit, site T e project proponent b t i~ prbposai to sh rearing pens in Port owns end Bay for the f scientific research an commercial production, cted the'J CraneJ! Point sit . (See also minutes , 1984). Mitch Pr pens can is the p tion in is charg navigati comment selected ss, Associate Planner re not be put closer to sho ssibility of interferenc he Portage Canal. The A d with making sure nothi n in Portage Canal, but bout this site until the site. orted that since,the e at this site tbere with vessel naviga- my Corps of Engineers g interferes with hey cannot make a County approves the Commissi as se~ec outli*e, d June 4, received the conc Associat ner Pitts moved to appro e the Crane Point site ed by Scan Am Fishfarm, td. with the conditions by the Shoreline Commiss. onr'and the Board. on 984, and, with; reference' b, ,theinformatio1j1 to be from the Army Corps of E gineers in regard to rns for navigation as st ted by the Tow Boat on. " T e Board concurred that ancy on the Shoreline s are received. The k area. avating noise level: A I tter was received xcavating s attorney, Tom Majhan, in re- the Board's letter of 9 11/84 ~hich requested e within 10 days. A 20 d y extention is b~ing by the attorney. The Bard referred the the Prosecuting Attorne . 9/27/84 Bank Pro grante Anna Bol three co seconded will adv I Approval was oJect requested by ne River subjectito Commissioner Pitts by Chairman Brown. T e lanning Departme~t se Mrs. Bolander in w it.ng of this approval. VOL o fAG~ o 3017 Minutes, Week of September 24, 1984 Page 5: CONTRACT re; #14 0-36860 (2) and Health erV1ces: T e ontract amen from the Department of Soc al and Healt (2) was approved and signe on the moti by Chairman Brown. o. 60-84 was approved Commissioner: the final The County, Beverly Brice eported, is Block Grant funding from teState to p furniture store in Brinnon for a Senior the Senior Nutrition Progr m and meetin the motel on the upper flo r. Profits used to operate the center. A staff of the motel. Community Develo'pment enovate the motel! use such things 'as e lower floor and I operation will be hired to work ip The Chairman then asked grant application. The Q. What is the cost of f gr~nt fun as create j e prope ty ity!s i -ki s which will meeit the bs. The projec~ in- ear the tidal la'goon d contribution fpr This is an exciting and in ovative needs of the seniors in Br.nnon as cludes a picnic area on th corner of t which will be done as part of the commu the grant. there were a y questions regarding the I lowing quest.ons were an wered by the Board: motel/furni sto A: The County will purchase the buildi The current assessed p ice is $407, Q: What will be the opera ing costs from the motel operati n and how praised price. f there are no p~ofits pay for them? A: Current expense funds ould have be us.ed to un the building as a "Community Center" w ich would me n an ad iso y Board would be, appointed to decide re ts, ect for he ~se of t e building. Another option if th for the County to decl The proceeds from this I motel opera ion'isn't p re the build.ng surplus sale would g to the Cou of it able would be roperty and sell! it. ty. Q: If the grant is not aw rded to this project wil it go to another project in Brinnon? A: This grant application lar site. The State D applications from all They are the agency th be spent. is for this partment of ver the Stat t makes the oject at this pa:rticu- elopment receiv~s izes them for funding. where the moneYI will VOl 10 U:G 3018 Minut~s, Week of September 24, 1984 Page ~: i Q: H~w many dollars is the grant application for? A: $575,000: $109,000 for renovation; $440,000 t pu chase the building and $25,000 for project administ ati n. Q: Were any other properties considered beside: the mot l/furniture store? A: Yes, but none of the other properties could pro ide a way to fund the operation as well as create jobs in the are . Q: Any studies done on the water and septic to to handle the volume generated by this type A: The Health Department has been dealing with present owner. These matters would have to purchase would be finalized. see if hey will be able of ' per tion? tha si uation with the be eso ved before the The Chairman asked for testimony since there were n about the grant application. Sixteen residents gav against the proposed grant application. Followi g comments: Otto Schramm: There is already a letter of ihte t rent office space in the buildlng. point for seniors and there ar,e alot utilize such a center. Russell Hicks:*What is needed is a facility wheooe t on a day by day basis. Currently th Booster Club once a week. Seniors n theirs. Mark Scruggs: *Last year's application and this pp r .1 t' is no place for a Senior Cente,r i B ~comp~ a ~on CI bh d . h f MS.' u asacte as a center In t e co o r.t cruggs and it stands idle 75% of the tim . commen s. *Can we afford two like buildings .n 1,200 people. A grant of this: size to getting $500 for every man,wom n ther questions timony for and ome of the , business to on needs a focal eniors who would niors can meet e the Brinnon place that is ion state there The Booster ty for years, his community of oul be equi\l:alent nd hild in Brinnon. *The Booster Club only needs a ne wa no difference between this {~he Boos you're talking about. To expand som done about it. Just a matter of tim water supply. *Many people are not here tonight ec use Many people feel they have aright t vo You,arep1l1ttingpeople against peopl an people this way. Have had many call of against it but don't want to argue With I have installed water and sewer sys ems there is no way the Booster Club cou d e system to s rve meals. AI,Pinkert n: Betty Fenn , to expand the Boo.ster C here. May be five years em, nothing is set,. Boo the communities needs. The only wa serve food a water sys fill all of er er thi un ub bef ter eed ystem. There is iub} and the facility g would have to be il Brinnon has a of intimidation. e {on this issue). you intimidate people who are riends. for 20 years - pand its sewer s up. Can't re Brinnongets Club can not ful- both centers. The ambulan e and Fire Department ne d t be at the Booster Clu , no r,oom for anythi g e, se. V~L li ',0. i 11!rr . . . J .;u.~J..... 3 19 I want to go on reco d as being It is too much money and to exp something the community can sup the Fir.e Department nd ambulan , Minutes; W ek of September 24, 1984 Page! 7: i Jean Phillips: Have to agree with . Scruggs. who would not come to this meet there were ill feeli gs and if not talkl with them a d this sho Ole Brekke: Eleanor Thornton: Cedric Lindsey: i1;:h 6 people e they knew out people would ppem~ ed' 0 buying the motel. to run. Let's build itli the Booster Club .iri the same building. On behalf of the Senior Citizen tablished to provide services f tributed all around the ~ountry this source in Brin on is the S This may not be the ideal proje lines of the Depart entof COffim Mr. Brekke strongly rges the C and feels it is in t e best int the County. A fed se ior d he. Nut it Dev to of ral act was es- with money dis- nly funds from ition Program. does meet the guide- lopment. pply for the grant he community and Ms. Thornton is opposed to the reasons: 1) Didn't agree to all of th Community PIa because it Brinnon Flats is a poor a 2) $500,000 is too much for property to i clude a pIa g included. The Booster CI b 3) The project will not supp r the money could be spent 0 4) Sanitation pr blems at si Mr. Lindsey feels t at he doesn grant or the project to make a that the evaluation of the oper some point the Coun y will have ject. He is not su e the motel c nter for the following s il the Brinnon ot., or the people. r t e people. roj ct. A piece of d,~tc. should be no~ support itself. set She thinks ise y. ough about the He is concerned sts show that at ney into the pro- rofitable. In response to some of the comments the Board following items: many people have ever 100% commun- ink that this is Commissioner Pitts advised that ov talked about a community center fo ity approval, but the people who h an appropriate program for the co r the year Brinnon. ve talked w unity. When the Building is acquired, loc grant application. If the mot~l d have to come out of the County bud budget. I supportil esn't suppo et at the e as part of the then money will something in that Once the grant is approved, the ap before an earnest money is signed. to be given as well as the State a the project can proceed. Commissioner Brown noted that the and felt it could be a profitable familiar with the situation if the is not locked into taking the gran project. raised pric Health Dep proval of t e to be determined proval will have ystem, before oard had 10 ituation, a grant money money if t e whole project II become more ed. The County roblems with the Commissioner Brown then thanked th se present put. The meeting was recessed and reconvened Commissioners' Chambers with Chair an Brown an and for their in- rning in the oner Pitts present. VOL 1 0 L.:r ; " J,.,... J_ ~ . . , .~ t .~ " Minutes, Week of ,September 24, 1984 Page 8: ,. . .. . ,'\ II Gael Stuart & City Representative Departmert:t u get nee s: 'A ter review 0 t e c r fee sched~le and income provided by this source, he would provide the Board with a recommended f e along with just~fication for the requested fee .n I' I , I ! Mr . Tuberg and Mr. Johnstonre; County r.1 h abush River oa: e u ~c or s epartment 0 n t at t e uc a uS River Roa~ was established in 1891 with a 60 fo t ri ht~of-way. The Road was widened in 1966 up to the "Shierk" drivewayb t here was no project record on' the widening. The recommendation made a te t:iime ,was that no compensation be paid for right-of-way along h s oad. Mr. Tuberg reported that he does not think the oint's claim to a 60 foot riglt~f-wFlY is valid and that the County has ma.n ai ed the road in~n improper ~anner. . He and Mr. Johnston are paying t xe on all of the property includingl the 60 foot right-of-way in question. he County has a 15 foot easement, Mr. Tuberg continued. Mr. Johnston ad t at it has been his understa~ding that the County has a "use" right -w y only. The Title companiesl haven9 record of a 60 foot right-of~ 0 the~r records of this propertY.1 ' i , , i Mr. Tuberg noted that he' and Mr. Johnston would e Iwi workout la reasonable resdution to this right-of w y Public Works Director, advised that his departm n w further. I (See' also Minutes of September 4, 198 ). ling to sit down and ituation. Brian Shelton uld researchth~matter I Ap ointment of Commissioner District Dennison was appo nte to i t e unexp~re te A.M. O'Meara effective as of October 1, 1984, a until the: certification of the general, election motion of: Commissioner Pitts and seconded by Ch Mr. Tuber'g presented a letter to the Board and h outlinin~ the situation and asking for a respon e Community Development Block Grant for Pitts mo~e to approve an s gn eso ut on o. mission o'f a Community Development Block Grant Senior Ciltizens' Center in Brinnon; and to have letter to' accompany the grant application. Ch~ motion. I bltc' Works department m the County. on: Commissioner, ~ut orizing the sub- atIoh to provide ,a hairman sign a cover Brown seconded the osition: Larry ret re ommissioner to hold the position vember 6, 1984, by Brown. The meeting was recessed to allow negotiations T.uesday evening and reconvened present. to attend Union " y,with both members Letter of Understanding re; Peninsula E Planning Grant un ng: ommissioner _tt-s move seconded ~hemotion to ,have the Chairman sign a I to the D.p. Department of Commerce, Economic Deve regarding the Peninsula Economic Associationts c the federal grant documents. ic Association airman Brown of :understanding' ntAdin;i.nistration Director sigp.ing I i . .' , I State Liquor Control Board re; Olym ic transfer:: e app ication oJ::' icens'e, trans er was disapproved by motion of Commissioner Pitts, Brown as'recommended by the .Health Department. and 'ProceduresT e a~rman signed I ' tric Consultant nity Services~8~~ ed by Chairman Br:own.' \ \ \ , VDL 10 n 3021. .... ; .. . . " " i I I I I I !