Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAttachment2_BidComparisonTable-ForReportPort Hadlock Water Reclamation Facility MBR Equipment Bid Evaluation 1 of 10 Port Hadlock Water Reclamation Facility MBR Equipment Procurement Proposal Comparison Table 3/18/21 Worksheet A question Cloacina H2O Innovation Ovivo Compliance with procurement specification Response summary PDF page Response summary PDF page Response summary PDF page 1.01 Pass/Fail Criteria A. Experience Criteria 1: All membrane units and subunits furnished shall be new and unused and shall be the standard products of a Membrane Manufacturer having a minimum 5 years manufacturing the proposed membrane subunit. The Bidder shall document and provide proof or deviation rationale. ◼ Suez ◼ Hollow fiber polymeric membranes ◼ ZeeWeed 500 ZeeWeed since 1990 (Zenon), has since sold product line to Suez. Manufactured in Hungary. 29/86, 44- 45 ◼ Memstar ◼ Hollow-fiber PVDF membranes ◼ 3G -TIPS was launched in 2012. H2O Innovations has manufacturing facilities in Quebec, Minnesota, and Vista (CA); skid mounted systems manufactured in Quebec and Minnesota. 20/212 ◼ Ovivo ◼ Flat plate silicon carbide ceramic membranes Product group inception in 2001. Current membrane manufacturing facilities in Denmark and Hutto, TX. Will be opening a membrane manufacturing facility near Austin, TX – anticipated by late 2022. 4/162 Cloacina – comply H2O Innovation – comply Ovivo – comply B. Experience Criteria 2: Bidder shall have a minimum 5-year history furnishing at least fifteen (15) full scope MBR Package Plant Systems in the USA. The Bidder shall document and provide proof of providing support, service, and applicable inventory or de viation rationale. MEMPAC series MBRs since 2009. Stock all sensory instrumentation and most major equipment replacement parts in warehouse in CA. Expedited parts agreement with vendors. Hero Support Services, after-care support program has ticketing/po rtal program. 29/86 Attached list of projects in US and Canada over the past 10 years. Project manager will be assigned to project during design and construction. Has maintained excellent relationships with vendors. Has in-house service and commissioning support team. 20/212, 25- 28/212, 78-94/212 Have sold >150 MBR package plant systems, since 2003. Has engineering, technical support, fabrication, and controls teams in -house, as well as management of the membrane manufacturing. 6/162, 12- 14/162 Cloacina – comply H2O Innovation – comply Ovivo – comply C. Experience Criteria 3: Bidder shall have supplied at least ten (10) operational plants of the current package plant model proposed. The Bidder shall document and provide the information on projects with their bid. MEMPAC series MBRs since August 2009. Has close to 50 models of MEMPAC family in the “marketplace”. One WA project in the 10 examples provided: in Tri-Cities for private development. 29-33/86 H2O Innovations designs and fabricates custom package plants for each client. 20/212, 78-97/212 microBlox commercially available starting in 2012. Have 50 units in operation. 7/162 Cloacina – comply H2O Innovation – comply Ovivo – comply D. ISO 9001 Certification: the MBR System Supplier shall submit with their Bid, their quality system ISO 9001 certification. The company identification and quality procedures shall indicate for the MBR System Supplier that the Quality Management System is applicable to design, manufacturing, supply, installation, and servicing of wastewater and water treatment plants, associated equipment and systems, and for the Membrane Manufacturer the Quality Suez manufacturing facility for membranes is ISO9001 certified. Exception taken by Cloacina. Cloacina has their own 200+ point QA/QC/QMS system and can provide more information if requested. 42/86, 47/86 Manufacturing facility for Memstar membranes is ISO9001 and ISO14001 certified. Exception taken by H2O Innovation. H2O Innovation has QMS similar to I SO certifications, including audits. 20/212 Complies for Austin, Salt Lake City, and Round Rock fabrication facilities. Proposal states that this is applicable to design, manufacturing, supply, installation, and servicing of treatment plants, associated equipment, and systems. 10/162 Cloacina – exception H2O Innovation – exception Ovivo - comply Port Hadlock Water Reclamation Facility MBR Equipment Bid Evaluation 2 of 10 Worksheet A question Cloacina H2O Innovation Ovivo Compliance with procurement specification Response summary PDF page Response summary PDF page Response summary PDF page Management System is applicable to the manufacturing of membrane material and equipment. The quality system shall be audited by a third- party independent inspector. Certification shall remain in e ffect throughout 1 year past the commissioning of the project. E. Bonding capacity: Have an aggregate bonding capacity of at least $20,000,000. Bonded $5M, with aggregate backlog of approximately $25M. 48/86 Single bond requests by surety for H2O Innovations up to $5M, up to aggregate $30M. 21/212 $15M for single bond, $75M aggregate. 11/162 Cloacina – comply H2O Innovation – comply Ovivo – comply F. System support capacity: Demonstrate sufficient inventory to support the membrane market; ability to provide ancillary membrane support and mounting equipment, pipe and support fabrication, equipment warehouse and staging of project equipment; and the team members necessary to support and service the MBR system both remotely and through in-field efforts, including for plant start-up coordination, mechanical checkout, operator training, and troubleshooting of membrane systems. The Bidder shall provide the following with their Bid: 1. Proof of providing support, service, and applicable inventory; organizational chart with personnel names, titles, contact information, years of experience with MBR system supply and servicing; location of personnel and inventory; or 2. Provide deviation rationale if not able to meet this requirement Suez stocks membranes, cassettes, hardware, accessories in excess of anything necessary for complete and total replacement of Pt. Hadlock project. Cloacina has partnered with Suez before, and Suez support staff is available to Cloacina. Cloacina has its own 24/7 support service for existing customers, with min. 2 full-time post-production staff available at any given time. Cloacina maintains remote SCADA connection to all its systems. All customers enrolled into Cloacina’s subs idiary support program which offers portal access to interactive troubleshooting guides, O&M library, and videos. Hero Services Ticketing Program also provides tracking of service requests, warranty claims, operational assistance. 37/86 Schematic org chart provided, along with several resumes of key staff. Has 24/7 on - call support hotline for emergencies. For non-emergencies there is support staff during business hours. On-site support costs (for performance testing) not included in cost proposal. On page 29/212 of proposal, there is per day rate and charges for such services. Per Spec 464240 3.4.A.2, expected there to be 2 site visits, for 4 working days. Assuming one person, 4 days, two trips, 4 nights x $200, 6 days x $100 = 4*($1250/day/person) + 4*1.15 markup*($200/night lodging) + 6*1.15 markup*($100/day incidentals) + 2*1.15 markup*($500/round trip flight) = $7760 However, as stated in page 53/212, the following are provided in the cost proposal: ◼ Four (4) day site visit by an H2O trained installation specialist delivery inspection and installation assistance, in one (1) trip ◼ Four (4) day site visit by an H2O trained installation specialist for clean water testing and functional testing, in two (2) trips 22-29/212 Org chart provided, and description of engineering, technical support, controls, fabrication, and manufacturing teams at company facilities. 12/162 Cloacina – comply H2O Innovation – comply Ovivo – comply Port Hadlock Water Reclamation Facility MBR Equipment Bid Evaluation 3 of 10 Worksheet A question Cloacina H2O Innovation Ovivo Compliance with procurement specification Response summary PDF page Response summary PDF page Response summary PDF page ◼ Thirty (30) day site visit by an H2O trained installation specialist for commissioning and startup, in two (2) trips G. Warranty and guarantee compliance: General Equipment, System Performance, and Membrane Subunit warranties are specified in Specification 464240 Membrane Bioreactor Equipment Section 1.13. Bidder shall provide evidence of meeting these warranties and provide any exceptions or clarifications with their bid. No exceptions taken. However, design in proposal does not reflect treatment capacity for peak flows equalized to 0.150 mgd, as established in Adden dum 3, and assumes equalization only to peak day flow of 0.111 mgd. 49-50/86 H2O Innovation provided proposed warranty with bid. A major mechanical warranty exception to Specification Section 464240 Section 1.13 B.1: “this warranty does not extend to equipment, parts, or components manufactured by a third party into which the equipment is incorporated”. 29/212 Ovivo provided list of exceptions to the warranty and the following: ◼ General equipment – 24 months ◼ Fine bubble diffuser – 60 months ◼ MBR system performance – 12 months ◼ Membrane diffuser clogging – 12 months ◼ Membrane plate – 12 years (4 flat/8 prorated) 14/162, 78- 89/162 Cloacina – appear to have missed Addendum 3; have not designed for handling up to peak equalized flow of 0.150 mgd. H2O Innovation – proposed boilerplate warranty. Appears that they will not warrant equipment manufactured by others, which is not in compliance with procurement specification. Ovivo – proposed list of exceptions H. Membrane process description and mandatory process and MBR redundancy requirement: The Bidder shall submit an explanatory statement of the MBR System treatment process. The Bidder shall also certify and include an explanatory statement that the MBR System design meets the reliability requirements described in Specification Section 464240 Paragraphs 2.4.A.4, 2.4.B.1, and 2.4.C.1, and Section 400100 Paragraph 2.7, which includes the following: reliability through redundancy for Class A reclaimed water with no flow bypass nor storage of inadequately treated water; 100% of max month flow system performance requirements listed in Specification Section Proposal acknowledges WAC 173-219-350 Reliability Requirements. ◼ Headworks: appears to have one redundant fine screen ◼ Pre -anoxic basin(s): have 1 basin ◼ Anoxic basin(s): have 2 basins, volumes not redundant ◼ Aerobic basin(s): have partitions, but volumes not redundant; unclear if there is operating scheme to allow fully compliant operation with one out of service indefinitely ◼ MBR basin(s): have full redundancy ◼ UV disinfection: appears to have redundancy with 2 units ◼ Mixers: no shelf spares ◼ Blowers, pumps: unclear if there are hardwired spares; no shelf spares, but rebuild kits included ◼ Controls: no spare PLC provided 33/86, 48/86 “Two trains are provided o n the membranes so that the system can operate with one train offline. A spare process blower is supplied as part of the spare parts, ensuring that the aerobic system can continue to operate in the event of an aerobic blower failure.” ◼ Headworks: appears to have one redundant fine screen, with grease trap ◼ Pre -anoxic basin(s): have 1 basin ◼ Anoxic basin(s): have 1 basin ◼ Aerobic basin(s): have 1 basin ◼ MBR basin(s): have full redundancy ◼ UV disinfection: has redundancy with 2 units ◼ Mixers: shelf spare provided ◼ Blowers, pumps: shelf spares and rebuild kits included, but does not 31-35/212 Page 4/162: 464249 2.4 A.B.1 The aerobic zones shall meet 100% of MMF system performance requirements with one tank out of service indefinitely. “Our design verified by our BioWin modeling provided with this proposal shows MMF goals accomplished with 1 aerobic tank offline indefinitely. microBLOX is set up to easily bypass 1 basin keeping the others online.” 464249 2.4.C.1 The Membrane zones shall meet 100% of MMF system performance requirements Indefinitely “Our design verified by our BioWin modeling provided with this proposal shows MMF goals accomplished with 1 4/162, 15/162 Cloacina – have redundancy in MBR basin volume, but have not demonstrated redundancy/reliability for aeration basin volume. H2O Innovation – have redundancy in MBR basin volume , but have not demonstrated redundancy/reliability for aeration basin volume. Ovivo – appear to comply and submitted simulation results for having one aeration basin or one MBR basin Port Hadlock Water Reclamation Facility MBR Equipment Bid Evaluation 4 of 10 Worksheet A question Cloacina H2O Innovation Ovivo Compliance with procurement specification Response summary PDF page Response summary PDF page Response summary PDF page 464240 Paragraph 2.3, with the largest aerobic zone or MBR zone out of service indefinitely . appear to have hardwired redundancy ◼ Controls: no spare PLC provided membrane tank offline indefinitely. microBLOX is set up to easily bypass 1 basin keeping the others online.” Page 15/162: System sized such that either one aeration tank or one membrane tank can be taken offline indefinitely, and still run at MMF. 3 pre -aeration tanks in parallel, sized such that two are adequate to provide enough oxygen contribution needed for MMF flow. 2 membrane tanks in parallel. Each membrane tank has hydraulic capacity to run at MMF with the other tank out of service indefinitely. All pre -aeration tanks would need to be online to make up for oxygen contribution lost. ◼ Headworks: have one redundant fine screen, coarse screen would be bypassed if out of service ◼ Pre -anoxic basin(s): have 1 basin ◼ Anoxic basin(s): have 1 basin ◼ Aerobic basin(s): have 3 basins; have demonstrated that can run plant at MMF with 1 basin offline ◼ MBR basin(s): have full redundancy ◼ UV disinfection: has redundancy with 2 UV trains ◼ Mixers: shelf spare provided ◼ Blowers, pumps: hardwired spares provided ◼ Controls: shelf spare PLC provided out of service and handling MMF. I. Asset Management Program ZOHO Creator, program created by Cloacina. Cloacina will build module to fit the needs of the project. 34/86 eMaint, program by Fluke/H2O Innovation 35/212, 131- 146/212 WaterExpert, program by inCTRL Solutions/Ovivo 16/162 Cloacina – appears compliant H2O Innovation – appears compliant Ovivo – appears compliant Port Hadlock Water Reclamation Facility MBR Equipment Bid Evaluation 5 of 10 Worksheet A question Cloacina H2O Innovation Ovivo Compliance with procurement specification Response summary PDF page Response summary PDF page Response summary PDF page 1.02 Operations and Maintenance Parameters A. Min influent flow and WQ parameters (BOD, TKN, TSSS, pH, ALK, temp) to operate plant. A. The Bidder shall include a statement that indicates the minimum influent flow and water quality parameters (including but not limited to BOD, TKN, TSS, pH, alkalinity, temperature range) that will be necessary to operate the MBR System and meet water effluent water quality requirements. The Bidder shall include a minimum inflow and wastewater strength that will be necessary in order to operate the entire treatment system from influent through to infiltration bed disposal. Minimum influent flow condition copied from conditions in procurement specification. 60/86 Minimum influent flow condition copied from conditions in procurement specification. Noted that min flows for design load are 33,000 gpd; if flow or loads are under, supplemental carbon would need to be added to aerobic tank. 36-37/212 Turndown capability comes from rotary lobe pumps, basin bypass flexibility because of redundancy. During startup flows, one membrane basin could be taken offline and membrane plates in the unused basin can be stored dry. Provided two minimum start-up flow scenarios of 0.024 mgd and anticipated start-up flow of 0.048 mgd as stated in specification, with one membrane basin offline. 20/162 Cloacina – acknowledged startup flow provided in procurement specification. H2O Innovation – acknowledged startup flow provided in procurement specification. Ovivo – provided system simulation results for operating at two minimum flow conditions (0.024 and 0.048 mgd). B.1 Total MBR System Tank Vol Pre -anoxic basin: 1364 gal Aerobic basin (total of 3): 12081*3 = 36243 gal Anoxic basin (total of 2): 12081*2 = 24162 gal MBR basin (total of 2): 4077*2 = 8154 gal Membrane area: 11100 SF (duty); 11100 SF (spare) 34/86, 57/86, 66/86 Pre -anoxic basin: 18500 gal Aerobic basin: 34500 gal Anoxic basin: 8000 gal MBR basin (total of 2): 8000 gal Membrane area: 11836 SF (duty); 11836 SF spare 38/212 Pre -anoxic basin: 3389 gal Aerobic basin (total of 3): 6901*3 = 20703 gal Anoxic basin (total of 2): 3907 + 6161 = 10068 gal MBR basin (total of 2): 3588*2 = 7176 gal Membrane area: 2860 SF (duty); 2860 SF (spare) 21/162 Cloacina – unclear if have capacity to operate for redundancy/reliability if aeration basin out of service. H2O Innovation – unclear if have capacity to operate for redundancy/reliability if aeration basin out of service. Ovivo – demonstrated ability to operate with one aeration basin or one MBR basin out of service. B.2.a MBR System Footprint (all equipment supplied including tanks, skids, platforms, chemical system, maintenance envelope) 1710 SF 34/86 40’x50’ = 2000 SF initial phase 93’x50’ for future expansion phase 38-39/212 54’-6” x 31’-8” = 1729 SF 21/162 Not applicable – for comparison only. B.2.b Equipment slab area 2058 SF 34/86 40’x50’ = 2000 SF initial phase 38-39/212 1729 SF 22/162 Not applicable – for comparison only. Port Hadlock Water Reclamation Facility MBR Equipment Bid Evaluation 6 of 10 Worksheet A question Cloacina H2O Innovation Ovivo Compliance with procurement specification Response summary PDF page Response summary PDF page Response summary PDF page 93’x50’ for future expansion phase B.2.c Building slab area Not appliable; no building supplied. 34/86 Not appliable; no building supplied. 38-39/212 Not appliable; no building supplied. 22/162 Not applicable – for comparison only. B.3 Total interconnecting pipe 100 ft 35/86 Did not provide value; from figure, looks like 10 ft for interconnecting pipes between steel tanks. Proposal states that piping within equipment container is provided by bidder. 40/212 64 ft 22/162 Not applicable – for comparison only. B.4 Total interconnecting wiring 16 ft pre -wired harnesses 35/86 On site electrical work consists of connecting junction or remote IO panels to MCP and power panel in the container. 40/212 COMM 24 VDC; 2-wire, 14 AWG: 6 LF COMM 24 VDC; 2-wire, 14 AWG: 6 LF 480 VAC; 3-wire, 12 AWG: 6 LF COMM 24 VDC; 2-wire, 14 AWG: 12 LF Total 30 LF of interconnecting wire. 23/162 Not applicable – for comparison only. B.5 Membrane sludged weight 4000 lb 35/86 3000 lb. Shipping weight 1280 lb. 40/212 2140 lb 23/162 Not applicable – for comparison only. B.6 Lifting height 17’ 35/86 11.5’ tank height + 8’ lift height over top of membrane wall = 19.5’ total lifting height, plus hook height for crane 40/212 9’-10” to the lifting hook + approx. 3’ to get to platform = 12’-10” 23/162 Not applicable – for comparison only. B.7.a Headworks Max grit level <2 inches 35/86 No answer provided Not applicable “Grit removal is not required for Ovivo coarse and f ine screens…influent grit concentrations shall be reduced to less than 5 mg/L, measured by standard methods” 23/162, 43/162 Not applicable – for comparison only. B.7.b Fine screen perforation size 2 mm 35/86 2mm, no bypass. Grease trap will be provided as part of headworks. 41/212 Coarse screen 5 mm, followed by fine screens 2 mm 23/162 Cloacina – have 2 fine screens. H2O Innovation – have 2 fine screens. Ovivo – have more screens; redundancy in fine scre ens. 1 coarse, 3 fine. B.8 Max influent FOG 150 mg/L 35/86 Max influent FOG to headworks not provided. Max FOG to membranes 50 mg/L if animal/vegetable oil; 3 mg/L if mineral oil-based FOG. 41/212 100 mg/L SiC membranes can be cleaned at pH of 13 after major FOG event. 23/162 Not applicable – for comparison. B.9 membrane chlorine lifetime PPM hours 500,000 PPM-hr 35/86 1,000,000 PPM-hr 41/212 5,000,000 PPM-hr 24/162 Not applicable – for comparison. Port Hadlock Water Reclamation Facility MBR Equipment Bid Evaluation 7 of 10 Worksheet A question Cloacina H2O Innovation Ovivo Compliance with procurement specification Response summary PDF page Response summary PDF page Response summary PDF page Chlorine degradation is related to supporting mate rial of membrane, rather than SiC membrane itself. B.10 Membrane flux at 10 C with one membrane unit offline, MMF 8.1 gfd 35/86 10.5 gfd 41/212 Conflicting information provided: 18.0 gfd or 31.4 gfd 24/162, 82/162 Not applicable – for comparison. B.11 Surface porosity Did not provide answer. 35/86 Nominal pore size is 0.04 micron. Memstar modules have high porosity at 70-80%, and high membrane permeability. 41/212 48% 24/162 Not applicable – for comparison. B.12 Membrane subunit shelf life Indefinite with proper storage 35/86 “Extended periods of time” if stored properly 41/212 Indefinite; can be stored dry 24/162 Not applicable – for comparison. B.13 Total air scour 230 SCFM 35/86 50 SCFM per train 41/212 140 SCFM per membrane basin; 280 SCFM with both membrane basins online 24/162 Not applicable – for comparison. B.14 Chemical degradation No 35/86 Membranes are resistant to some chemicals and are affected by others. 41/212 No, for any chemical use and concentration typical for municipal WWTP, including accidental overdose of chemicals. 24/162 Not applicable – for comparison. B.15.a Maintenance clean and backwash – can membranes be backwashed Yes 35/86 Yes 41/212 Yes 25/162 Cloacina – comply H2O Innovation – comply Ovivo – comply B.15.b Maintenance clean and backwash – Is maintenance clean fully or semi-automated Yes 35/86 Yes; Have automated chemically enhanced backpulse weekly, and semi- automated clean in place quarterly. 41/212 Yes, fully automated maintenance clean. For certain conditions, could also add low doses of chemical to backwash cycles. 25/162 Cloacina – comply H2O Innovation – comply Ovivo – comply B.16 Physical damage for fatigued from foreign objects/fatigued from extended operation. Yes by foreign objects. Fatigued from extended operation – yes. Provided explanation that this is no different from other membranes including ceramic membranes, which have sealant to composite headers. Also states that Cloacina is the only mfr that provides triple redundant s afeguard against accidental hand/programmatic membrane damage due to over-pressuring. 35/86 Yes; membranes protected by fine screening and rescreening to minimize risk of foreign objects and sharp object intrusion into MBR. Did not answer question on fatigue. 41/212 No, SiC membranes not prone to physical damage from foreign objects or fatigued from extended aeration. 26/162 Not applicable – for comparison. Port Hadlock Water Reclamation Facility MBR Equipment Bid Evaluation 8 of 10 Worksheet A question Cloacina H2O Innovation Ovivo Compliance with procurement specification Response summary PDF page Response summary PDF page Response summary PDF page B.17 Method of sludge recovery from tank dewatering Automatic desludging button, which activates several valves 35/86 Can be hosed at low pressure or physically cleaned through additional aeration and physical agitation of fibers. Membrane aeration system designed to provide adequate aeration to prevent excess sludging of fibers during normal operation. 42/212 In situ backwash with air scour, or if that is inadequate, modules can be pulled from basin and pressure -washed. 27/162 Not applicable – for comparison. B.18 MLSS operating range 6000-9000 mg/L 35/86 7,000-8,000 mg/L 42/212 8,500-16,507 mg/L depending on the operating conditions. 29/162 Not applicable – for comparison. B.19 Design sludge age (specification minimum is 20 days) 33-42 days 35/86 22 days 42/212 17-24 days 29/162 Cloacina – comply H2O Innovation – comply Ovivo – in at least one operating scenario, does not comply, with 17 days. B.20 Annual labor hours See comparative present worth analysis B.21.a Spare parts See comparative present worth analysis B.21.b Annual power usage (at Design Flow condition) See comparative present worth analysis B.21.c Annual chemical usage (at Design Flow condition) See comparative present worth analysis 21.d.ii Replacement membrane subunits – expected membrane life, replacement interval Example projects have membrane replacement at 10-16 years. 44-45/86 Expected membrane life 10 years 167/212 Membrane life estimated at 20+ years. 36/162 Not applicable – for comparison. 1.03 Other Bid Support Documentation A. List of equipment manufacturers Manufacturers and quantity provided 54/86 Manufacturers and quantity provided 8/212, 43/212 Manufacturers provided, quantity unclear 39/162, 33/162 Not applicable – for comparison. B. Electrical drawings, showing connection/interconnection point characteristics (e.g. voltage, phase, frequency, currency draw, signal level, wiring/cable time, field termination provisions) General information on interconnection points provided; example drawings, including information on typical instrumentation, provided from a similar project. 57/86 Example P&IDs provided showing typical instrumentation, but no information on controls. No information provided on interconnection point. 151- 164/212 Illustration provided of where power is to be connected (under PLC on skid). 480 VAC, 3 ph, 60 Hz, 200 Amp. 40/162 Not applicable – for comparison. C. I&C drawings, showing separately shipped components and assemblies along with field connections. Show location of each connection General information on interconnection points provided; example drawings, including information on typical instrumentation, provided from a similar project. 57/86 Instrumentation diagram provided, but no information on control in diagram; no PLC shown in drawings. No clear indication of where connections are. 151- 164/212 Equipment and instrumentation factory pre -wired other than electrical feed connection. There will need to be a low - voltage communications wire connection to DO probe on supplemental tank. 41/162 Not applicable – for comparison. D.1 Preliminary PFD, Design Flow PFD provided 58/86 PFD provided 150/212 PFD provided 98/162 Not applicable – for comparison. Port Hadlock Water Reclamation Facility MBR Equipment Bid Evaluation 9 of 10 Worksheet A question Cloacina H2O Innovation Ovivo Compliance with procurement specification Response summary PDF page Response summary PDF page Response summary PDF page D.2 Preliminary PFD, Future Expansion No future expansion PFD provided No future expansion PFD provided Future expansion PFD provided 98/162 Cloacina – did not provide plan H2O Innovation – did not provide plan Ovivo – provided plan E. Mechanical layout drawings Layout drawing provided 57/86 Schematic illustration with general dimensions provided. 39/212 Layout drawing provided 99/162 Not applicable – for comparison. F Prelim calcs for biological treatment system Attached. Equalized peak flow to peak day 0.111 mgd, not 0.150 mgd. 60-67/86 Attached. 169- 212/212 Attached. 42/162 Cloacina – comply, did attach calculations, but did not equalize to peak flow in Addendum 3. H2O Innovation – comply, provided simulation results but not in much detail. Ovivo – comply, provided calculations and proof of various operating scenarios. G. UV system CA State Water Board Title 22 approval Aquionics Proline PQ IL 400 UV System, which is Title 22 approved 36/86 Aquionics. Note that additional information could be requested. 48/212 NeoTech finalizing Title 22 conditional acceptance. If conditional acceptance is not finalized, Aquionics will be used instead. With NeoTech UV, Ovivo plans to put in two UV rows with 3 units in series. With one unit out of service, would reduce treatment output capacity. 47/162 Cloacina – comply H2O Innovation – comply Ovivo – comply H. Names, license numbers of registered PEs List of names provided and license numbers 36/86 No specific names provided, but statement that they will be stamped by an engineer registered to practice in Washington State 48/212 One name provided, and license number 47/162 Not applicable I. Warranty information, detailing membrane design fluxes for all seasonal flow conditions No additional information provided. Warranted flux values not explicitly listed; proposed warranty text provided in proposal. 29/212 Attached. 78- 89/162 Any deviations to warranty in specifications will need to be further evaluated. J. System start-up and test procedures Not provided. Instructions would be provided to Contractor. H2O Innovation would 48/212 Attached. 90- 96/162 Cloacina – information missing. Port Hadlock Water Reclamation Facility MBR Equipment Bid Evaluation 10 of 10 Worksheet A question Cloacina H2O Innovation Ovivo Compliance with procurement specification Response summary PDF page Response summary PDF page Response summary PDF page provide representative to site to provide technical assistance for installation prior to clean water testing and system startup. H2O Innovation – information missing Ovivo – some deviation from specification. Other items of note Exceptions taken: ◼ Will not do permeability testing of each membrane module, but would provide testing data for related batches (page 19/212). ◼ Proposed payment terms that are negotiable, but heavily loads payments before County would receive equipment (page 18/212). Other exclusions: ◼ On-site support costs for performance testing are not included in cost proposal; daily and per diem rate schedule provided (page 29/212) ◼ Design, supply and installation of any and all weather protection, buildings or sheds of any kind (page 54/212) Not applicable.