Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSpecial Report (104) - - - - PACIFIC RIM SOIL _' A~ER , . . .... ~,. '.- . '. LISA PALAZZI' 203 FOURTH AVENUE EAST SUITE 321 OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98501 . VOICE: (360) 534-0346 FAX: (360) 534-9027 Terry Milliken MadronaPlaIwin'g. '. ., . '. and Development Services. ..' .60T:-ATyler~tr~et . ',' .... . .P6itTo..wnsend,:WA98,3,68 .:. .. . . . '. July 3,. 1995 . . ReportFile'Number: . Report Subject:. Location: . ..".. : '.' : ~5~006b . :.... . ;;cW~tland.assessment rep()rt. '. . . .. .': Larry Scott-T.rail Pr?ject; approximately from theilltersection of . , 'Crutcheran~lSand Road, then south,to the southern boundary of . 'the'Polhick ranch (~out 2'niiles), then east to cross.-the drainage .:' 'aD.9south again alongthe east side of the drainagefor'about 1/8 . .. ... . . :'~Je~ then east to follow the railroad easement (across.Discovery . . ....:Road); triril :more or less folloWs the boundary'be~een. Sections , . ...... '.17 and I8?: 19 and 20,30 arid.29, then meanders through Secti9ns " .:....:.. .: ':29 ~d:32Jlfa southeastefIy direction, Township 30N, Range 1 W. .. -. ... ... :.' ..... .. . . . . Field work -w.as'cariled:out by Lis'~P8:lazZi, (ARCP ACS' certifi~d' soils specialist and wetlands . specialist)on.Jtin~ 13;:19.95<Wetl~9s'were delineategonlyatthe' single crossing, Otherwise,. they werefield:checke~ wl?en dire.~dy aCgessibr~ (te.:, with. permission of property oWner), visually exanriIi.edfromadistance )vhen. .tiot .directly accessible,. or simply evaluated on. the.aerial photo\yhen ilO(YisibIe' fro~.#Ie:~alI: .th-e:approxnnaie we~and boundaries. and: wetl~d :classes ." 'were in~k~~oriJ"~~ qOl.scale'aenal P~Qto~C A prel~ary .estim'ate was' proYide~ o,n the '.' wetland'ra!IDg, .:" .:.- . .. :~. ; '::' '.' " : ;~ .~'. ....... :.; . '. '. .' : .' .. . ... ., ,. ..;'.'. . ..... ..: .. ',. . t. .~ ..i ... ~. .: ... _. :_. . GENERAL REGULATORY FRAMEWORK' . '. ..' '.. '. . T o qUalify.. as' a.ju'risdi~tion.al wetl~nd;::~: defined' by the i28TCoips ofEn8meers"Man~ (required by;tiieJeffeis9ri"(;6uniy.Tnterun CriticafAreas.':Orquumce),an area mUst:. ,:' ,predomiri.antlYisiipport\vetlaridveg~tation,"miIst 'have hydric soils, and must'have wetland hydiolggy: characteristics defmed'for the onsite soiltype - uSually' evidence or. observation pf a long-<iunition,w~~~:.Wl?:le at 12:'in~.hes odessdepili.. . , Ac:coiding to th~'In~st 'f~~~~t,~8:ft.pf the !e~~rs~n Co~!y interimCri~ical ~e~ Orclinanc~ :. .....1 .'.' .. -. .'. ....... .. .. ".- .... _.... _ . Page 1 . (effective February 28"l994)~ the ll1immurn regulatory wetland size is 10,000 sq. ft. The wetland edge is located by eva.luating the presence or absence of the three parameters, then flagged in the field for subsequent survey. , Once identIfied as jurisdictional wetlan~ the wetland is "rated" using the October 1991 Washington State Wetlands Rating System. The rating system combines a series of questions and a point system to determine the specific value of the individual wetland. Depending on site specific~ pre-development wetland vegetation, soils, hydrology and buffer characteristics, the wetland has greater or lesser value ands~ is afforded varying levels of protection in the form of wetland buffers. The' higher the rating, the greater the buffer, ranging from a minimum of 25 feet for relatively low quality;'srilall.erwetlands adjacent to low intensity development areas up to a maximum of 150 feet:forth~ bigh~st <}uality, or rare wetlands adjacent to high intensity development areas. ' ' The area' within the 'wetland and l?uffers is generally considered miavailable for development, unless there "is no reasonable alternative. .Jefferson County involvement is initiated by a "triggering perinit", which'g~nerany refers to a buil~g permit of some sort Any impacts to the wetland are regUlated-at least by JeffersonCoWlty and the federal Army Corps o:fEngineers (COE). Other potentially involved agencies in~lude the state Dept. ofFish and Wildlife (WDFW)i and the DNR NaturalBeritag~ Program. In generai, any direct impacts must be mitigated for through. either wetland creation or eiIhancement program with the intent being no net loss of wetland 'acreage. ,- " ' , , - Impacts within the buffer are regulated only by Jefferson ,County, although theWDFW can become involved with setting, buffer "reqUirements if they are involved in providing permits for any plaimed stream cro,ss~gs. , " , , OVERVIEW.., Attached maps include: 1) A series of siX 1 "=lOp', scale 19.95 aerial photos of the site.(source: DeGross Aerial Mapping, Kir~anc4 WA) ", - . ",. 2)On-site soil maps (soUrce:-Jefferson County SCS Soil Survey, issued in'1972 from work done OIl a photo .baSe dateg. 1 Q51 '~d J954).' , ' Attached Appendices include:. ';', . 1) A summary.oftp:6 soil 'senes de~criptions: 2) Wetland data fonn, ", . Approximate wetland boundaries art? marked on the aerial photo. Only the wetland crossing in the NE corner of Section 19"is flagged in the field. At this time, it is 'not considered necessary to survey in that crossing. -The lines proyidedonthe attached aerial photo maps give. sufficient detail to show both that the crossing is located at a narrow point in the wetland complex and that Page 2 the total area impacted is very small. The Larry Scott Trail is proposed to start in Port Townsend, winding south through the Port properties east of Sims Way, and continuing south past the pulp mill, then west along the old railroad right of way (ROW) for sev~ral miles. Due to private ownership of some portions of the ROWand an unwillingness of some owners to permit trail access, the trail leaves the ROW approximately when it crosses Nelson Landing Road, and continues cross-country to the west to Sand Road. At that point, it turns south and. more or less follows the boundary between Sections 17 and 18, then between Sections 19 and 20, then meandering through Sections 29 and 32 along plat boundaries to meetback up with the railroad ROW about halfway through Section 29. The exact location of the trail.south of that point is limited by varying'details of access permission given by the surrounding land owners and by topography. In some cases, the trail location is restri~ted by a need .~o keep the trail grade as flat as possible. This wetland assessment report is limited to those portions of the trail southwest of the Nelson Landing Road split from the railroad ROW. The wetlands adjacent to the trail north and east of this section are limited to those at the south end of the Port property in Port Townsend. They have been fully delineated, rated and surveyed. That report is available through the Port of Port Townsend. Geomorphology Overall, the topography on the portion of the trail covered by this report is flat to mildly sloping. The trail follows an old logging road westerly through a Clearcut just north of the quarter-quarter section boundary. About halfway through the c1earcut, the road heads north and the trail heads southwest along asidehilltowardSandRoad. Once the trail reac.4es the road, it heads south and is relatively flat for about ~ mile,ruiming aIring the eastern edge of a horse ranch located approximately in the northwestq~er of.Sectiori20. Just southwest of the ranch's race track, the trail crosses a wetland swale, then climbs slowly up along the western valley side slope. The trail follows the western side slope for about 1.25 miles, then crosses back to the eastern side of the swale to' eventually meet up again with the railroad ROW in about the middle of Section 29. From that point, the trail.follows the ROW south-southeast to Discovery Road. USGS topography maps indicate that elevations across this portion of the trail range more or less between 100 and200 feet With the higher elevations near the north end of the trail, and the lower elevations at drainage crossings. Soils . Accordingto the Jefferson County soil survey, the following soil-series are mapped across or near the trail: the Agnewsilt loam, 0':'8% slopes (classified as a fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic OchraqualfI); the Belfast silty clay loam and the Belfast silt loam, wet variants, (both classified Fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Ochraqualf, generally meaning the soil has an argillic (clay) horizon and greater than 35% base saturation (alt), is expected to have a seasonal high water table within 18 inches of the soil surface (aqu), has a pale-colored, low base saturation (less than. 50%) surface horizon (oebr), is ptherwise typical (typic), has a mesic temperature regime (mean nnnual temperature ranges from g.to 15. C (47"- 59' F), no specific mineralogic source (mixed)~ and is greater than 18% clay and less than 15% sand (or coarser) by weight (fine-silty). . Page 3 as coarse-loamy, mixed, non-acid, mesic Typic Udifluvent2); the Casey silt loam, 0-8% slopes (classified as a fine, mixed, mesic Typic Albaqualfs3; the Cassolary sandy loam, (classified as a fine-loamy, mixed mesic Typic Xerochrept4); the Clallam gravelly sandy loam, 0-15%, and 15- 30% slopes (classified' as a lo~my-skeletal, mixed, mesic Entic-DurochreptS);- the Dick loamy sand, (classified as a mixed, meskAlfic Xeropsamment6); the Hoypus gravelly loamy sand and sandy loam-, O~ 15% slopes (both classified as a sandy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Typic Xerorthene); the McMurray" Peat, (claSsified, as a euie, mesic Typic Medihemist8). the Mukilteo muck (classified as a dystric, mesic TyPic Medihemist9); the Semiahoo muck, moderately shallow 2" coarse-loamy, mixed, ~on-acid, D;lesic Typi~_Udiflu~t gene~lly ~eaning the'soil is very young with minimal horizon development (ent), is a result of periodic flooding activity (fluv),hAs a Udic moisture regime - in most years the soil between 4 and 12 inches depth not dry for more than"90 days"(udi), has otherwise" average characteristics for t!1ese soil types (typic), has a mesic temperature regime (mean annual temperature ranges from 80 to 150 C (470 - 590 F), bas apH greater than 5.0 (non-acid), has no specific mineralogical source (mixed), has >15% sand content and <18% clay content by dry weight (p0ars6..1oamy). ". . . 3 Fine, mixed, mesic Typic AlbliqUiUfs, generally meaning lhesOil has an argillic (clay) horizon and has greater than 35% base saturation (alf), is expected to have a seasonal bigb water table within approx:. 12 inches of the soil surface (aqu), has an abrupt tex'tUra! change between the argillic (clayey) B horizon and the.overlying albic or oehric horizon (alb)3 is otherwise typical (typic), has a mesic temperature regime (mean annual temperature ranges from 80 to 150 C (~no'~ 590 F), no specific inineralogic source (mixed), and has 35-50% clay content (fine), .4 Fine-loamy, mixed ~c Typic Xerocbrept, generally meanirig, soil ~ miniIria.Iho~ development (ept). the surface epipedon has a pale color and low base. saturation (Oehr), the soil bas developed tinder c1imatic conditions of wet wlliters and dry summers (xer), soil properties are Qtherwise typical of these soil types (typic), has a mesic temperature regime (mean annual temperature ranges from 80 to 150 C (470 _ 59" F), has no specific mineralogi.c source (mixed), and has 15% sand and.18-34%clay by weight (fine-loamy)." . " 5 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, mesic :E;ntic Durochrept, generally meaning the soil has minimaI horizon development (ept and entic), has a pale- colored, low base saturation surface horizon (oehr), has an silicate-cemented subsurface layer (dur), has a mesic temperature regime (mean annual temperature ranges from 80 to 150 C (470 - 590 F), has no specific mineralogic source (mixed), texture of the fine fraction is loam and coarse fragment content is greater than 35% (loamy~skeletal). . . " . 6 MPced, mesic Alfie Xeropsamment, genemlly meaning the soil is very young with little horizon development (ent), bas a sandy or loamy sand texture with low coarse fragment percentage .throughout (psamin), has develoj>ed under climate conditions of wet winters and droughty summers (xer), has sOme sign ofleaching that indicates beginning of development into an more mature soil type, such as having higher clay content or base saturation in a B horizon (~c), has a mesic temperature regime (m~annuallemperatureranges from gOto 150C (470 _ 590 F), and bas no specific parent material miIieralogy (inixed). 7 Sandy-skeletal, 'mixed, mesic Typic Xerortheiu, generally meaning the soil has minimal. horizon development (ent), has no distinguishing charaCteristics at the Great Group level (orth=standard), bas developed under climatic conditions of wet winters and dI)' summers (xer), has a mesic temperature regime (mean annual temperature ranges from go to" 150 C (470 - 590 F), has no specific mineralogic source (mixed), texture of the fine fraction is sand or lOamy sand and coarse fragment content is gr~ than 35% (sandy-skeletal).' . . " " " 8 Euic, me~ic Typic Medihemist, generally meaning that the.soil 'is composed of organic fibers (ist); the organics are approlC.- half decomposed organic gels, and half fibric plant materials (hemi); there are few other unusual features, i.e. they are typical (medi and typic), they have developed under conditions of a mesic temperature regime (mean annual tempemture ranges from 80 to 150 C (470 _ 590 F), and they have a pH above 4.5 (euic). . 9 Dysic, mesic Typic Medihemist, generally meaning the soil is dominated by orgariic rather than mineral components, is greater than 20-30% organic matter (ist), has moderately- (as compared to slightly- or extremely-) decomposed organic materials (hem), is" otherwise not very unusual for an organic soil (mediand typic), has developed under conditions ofa mesic climate (mean annual temperature ranges from 80 to 150 C (470 _ 590 F), and has a pH lower than 4.5 (dysic). . . Page 4 variant (classified as a euic, mesic Typic Medisaprist 10); the Semiahoo muck (classified as a euic, mesic Typic Medisapristll); and the Tukey gravelly loam (classified as a loamy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Entic DurochreptI2). The Belfast, McMurray, Mukilteo, and Semiahoo soils are hydric -- wetland soils. The Casey is somewhat fine textured and can have limited drainage in swales arid across broad, flat areas. The Clallam and Tukey"soils both have a shallow gla"cial till surface within 2-4 feet of the soil surface. "k:," a result, they also can have some wet areas at toeslopes and in slowly draining swales. The Hoypi.Is, and Dick soils are" generally deep and well-drained. Please refer to the attached soil map for more details" on the e~tent of the various soils. F or your information; standard char~cteristics of the mapped soil series are described in APPENDIX II. Please note that the:"Jefferson County SCS soil "series maps were done at a more general scale than other counties. Furthermore, the soils map units and their related general descriptions characterize expected characteristics in only the top 60-100 inches of soil. The maps units can have extensive inclusions of other soil types, and in some cases, can be entirely" In error. The soH at the wetland crossing was a Belfast, wet variant, being very fine textured with gleyed, mottled colors at less ~aD. 12 inches - indicating long-duration saturation during the wet season. The soils up the side slope were also somewhat mottled relatively close to the surface - at 12-24 inches depth." But some of that was due" to soil :disturbance and compaction from past trail impacts. When the off-trail soils were assessed, the mottled conditions were deeper. However, the wetland hydrology along the edges appears-to be at least partially controlled by disturbance creating locally perched water tables, "pulling ~e wetland edge upslope in broad; flat areas with limited' surface drainage "potential: _ " " . . ". '. There is "a marginally wet area that starts about at the southeast corner of Section 18, and continues along the side slope in Section 19-for some distance to the south. The soil maps show that this is mapped as the same soi~ that occurs in the wetlands below~ but the steeper side slope allows it to drain faster. ", The disturbed soils along the trail show some evidence of shallow 10 "Euic, mesic TyPic Medisapris~ gen~y ~ the soil is dominated by organic rather than mineral components, is greater than 20-30% organic matter (ist), has extxemely- (as complli-ed to slightly- ormoderotely- ) decomposed organic materials (sap), is otherwise not very unusual for an organic soil (medi and typic), has developed under conditions ofamesic cliniat.e (mean annual temperature rangesJrom S'te lSoC (47' _ S90 F), and has a pH of 4.5 or higher (euic). ."" II Euic; mesic" Typic Medisaprist, generallr ~eaning the soil is dominated by orgariic rather than ~eral components, is greater than 20-30% organic matter (ist), has extxemely- (as compared to slightly- ormodemtely-) decomposed organicr1llllterials (sap), is otherwise not very unusual for an organic soil (medi and typic), has developed IUlder conditions of a mesic climate (mean annual temperature ranges from SOto IS'C (470 _ 59' F), and has a.jlH of 4.5 or higher (euic). 12 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, m~ic Entic Durochrept; g~y meaning the soil bas IllirrimaJ horizon development (ept and entic); has a pale- colored, low base saturation surface horizon (oehr), has an silicate-cemented subsurface layer (dur), has a mesic temperature regime (mean annual temperature ranges from Sou; ISO C (470 - 590 F); has no "specific mineralogic source (mixed), texture of the fine fraction is loam and coarse fragment content is greater thaiJ 35% Ooamy-skeletal). Page 5 water table, but the undisturbed soils off the trail were not hydric -- i.e., they did not show evidence of a long duration water table at 12 inches or less. However, there was ample evidence of periodic flooding. It.should be noted that while this area would not be regulated as a wetland due to the water not standing long enough to develop anaerobic conditions, it still will be quite wet during the winter months. Because the. drainage is widespread across a broad section ofthe side slope with no.clear drainage channel, itis unlikelYJo be regulated as astream. But it will still require best managemerit practices both d~g construction and for later trail' maintenance. Periodic culverts sh9uldb.eplaced to assUre that ci!aining water does Il,ot back up against or run ~ver the trail, creating erosion gullies and muddy sections thatmay become impassable during periods of extended rainfalL The culvert locations should be decided upon dUring the rainy season by simply..walking the trail and marking those areas where water is actively flowing. Ve2etation . .... Vegetation in the swale area is predorninantlyaso1l1:ewhatdisturbed complex of Jefferson Counties most common wetland pHmts With some weedy speciesand influence from pasture. . grasses. Vegetation across' the ~ntire wetland complex, which is' more or less continuous from north of where the trail.crosses all the way to Discovery Bay is quite diverse. . A limited list is provided below: . Tree species '. " ." ScientificName(acronym) . Salix sitcherisis(SASI)* Alnus rubra (ALRU) '. .'. Salix scoulerana.(SASC). .' Malus fusca (MAFU)' Thuja plicata (THPL). . Common Name . Sitka.willow red alder' ..scoulers willow .... "PaCific:crabapple western redcedar . Indicator Status FAC FAC FACW FACW FACW Shrub species .' . Scientific Name(acronym) Rosa pisocai"pa(ROPI)*:. Spiraea douglasii (SPD(j)~. . Rubus spectabilis (RUSP)*'. Common Name . clustered rose "hardhack . " salmonberry . Indicator Status 'FAC FACW FAC Grass. and other herb~ceous species. '. Scientific' Name(acronym) .', Juncus effusus (JUEF)*' Carex obimpta (CAOB)* Circium eduIe (CIED)* .. Ranunculus repen~ (RARE)* Urtica dioica (URDI)*' '.' . Equisetum ~en~e (EQAR). Common Name . soft rush. "slough. sedge .' edible thistle' .'. creeping buttercup . stinging nettles . field horsetail. Indicator Status FACW+ GEL FACW- FACW FAC+ 'FAC Page 6 Typha latifolia (TYLA) Veronica sc~tellata,(VESC) . cattails marsh ~peedwell OBL OBL Upland ve~etation includes, but is not limited to: Scientific Name(acronvm), Pseudoisuga menzie~ii {PS:ME} ," Thuja plicata (THPL) , : ' Sambucus .cerulea (pACE)' Symphocarptis albtis (SYAL).' Pteridiumaquilinum (l'TAQ),; PolystiChimi munitum (POMU) '. Holodiscus discolor {HODI) , Rubus ursinus (RUUR) , Common Name Douglas-fir western redcedar . blue el~erbeny' .' :snowbeny . , bracken fern .- ;,' sword fern ' . oceanspray , . . . tniiling .blackberry Indicator Status .FACU* FACW FAC- FACU FACU FACU not listed not listed Hydrology' . ' , . The source ofhyCh:ology appears tobe:surface and subsUrface, flowalong.thebase of a broad swale that nins up the'. center 9f the valley~ draining to the south. The soils have been ditched . and drained m manyplaces;'~U:~ in mose cases appear to still bejurisdictional wetlands despite the extensive drainage ~d,cultiva~on.' On OlJ.e of the' properties about halfway down the trail system, duri~g delineation:workfor another project, waterwas:observed within 20 inches of the surface even.inlate Al;lgUSt," atline pe~o.4 whenniost stonnwater fed systems are dry. So it is assumed that there is. ~t least .soIlle'source f;rom underground' springs, but the great annual flows. are a result" of Winter pre~~I?itatioll ,a,nd subseq~ent tun off, ,.' '.' '.',... . . '. GeneralDiscuss~OIi., ; .': . ," ','. '. " As mentioned above; th~ wetland~bmple~ is ~ore or less' continuous down the valley floor aU the way to DiscoveryBay. . The. trill crosses the complex oric~ a few hundred feet north of the '. southeast comer.<JfSection 18, then runs along the west 'side'ofthe complex, then ,moves back to the east side oithe valley' about 1/4 :nnle into Settion"29; At that point, it runs directly along the wetlariddrainage fqr i ~ewhun~ed feet; then crosses Discovery Road to meetupwi~ the railroad ROW well above'~e'wetIands, At that point, the ROW. runs along the side slope above the valley. There are severallarge:yJetlands in the golf ~o~se complex, but. aside fram one . crossing'where ~e railroad Ro.Wa~p,ears to. have ~ut offdrainage .from the east~ the trail is not at all near to the ~etI~d' coniPlex)ill :the way to its 4itersection with Discovery Road to the south. ' . .' ..' . . . . Wetland Classification and .R:ating . , ,. . . . . Because so little of the ~~tland complex is, directly accessible~ we must approximate the rating, using the' Field RatingFonri as guidance; ,In' general, Ior systeIl1~ of this size, even with all the perturbatio~ associated Withfarining and draining activiii~s,there are enou~ relatively . . undisturbed areas.that.s~ suppoifa.vari~ty afplant B;lld animal speciesthatthewetla.nd will Page 7 rate as a Category IT system. It cannotrate as a Category I system despite its extensive organic soils due to the extensive draining and disturbance. It is too large and diverse to rate as a Category III or IV. Class IT wetlands are given a 100 feet wide standard buffers for high intensity development proposals,'and a 50 feet wide buffer for low intep.sity development proposals. Wetlands Regulatorv Issues If there are any proposed impacts.to wetlands or the standard buffers as a result of this project, if there is a triggering permit for the project.~ i.e., if there is any proposed activity that will require a permit from the County, the impacts mustbe mitigated for to some degree with the primary jurisdictional agency being Jefferson County for buffer and wetland impacts, the Washington Dept. ofFish and Wil~ife for stream impacts, an~ the Ariny Corps of Engineers for wetland impacts. . . . Based on preliminary ~onversations with a Jefferson County representative, it does not appear that any triggering perniits will ,be required for this project However, it is recommended to follow best management practices in relation to impacts caused by the trail crossing. That entails: minimiiing the width and b.readth of the crossing~ revegetating any areas that are impacted by .construction; and enhancing the buffer in those areaS where the trail is within 50 feet of the wetland edge by planting some nath~e barrier vegetation. No guidance is provided in the ordinan~e about the req1,1ired replacement ratios for wetland creation mitigation projects. But typically, any Impacts to wetlands willreq~e at le~t a 2: 1 or 3: 1. replacement of lost wetland acreage and restoration in areas temporarily impacted. Sometimes, wetland restoration or buffer enhancement'is allowed as a partial credit toward the replacement ratio. Army Corps of Engineers and State Dept. ofFish and Wildlife , The wetland' crossing is very sin.all;so falls below the minimum acreage impacts that the COE wold regulat~. . But they shoUld still be officially notified of the proposed activity. Because the crossing is not in a fish bearing stream~ if does not appear that the WDFW would be involved, but it is still advisable to notify them and let them verify that iris not within their)urisdictional authority. The COE regulates all Waters' of the United States, including streams and wetlarids. The. WDFW regulates all salmon or fish-bearing streams. Both agencies require notification and a detailed proposal describing the proposed'crossing and potential impacts. They may also ask for a justification of the impact -: i.e.- proof that there is no reasonable alternative to the proposed impact. However; for such a sD.':\all project,' it is unlikely that either will require much more than basic notification. '. SU1v1:1JAR Y . . This portion of the trail crosses. only oneunbridged wetland area with the width at the crossing being between 10 and 20 feet There is a second crossing at an. exis~ng bridge about 1/4 mile from the north end of Section 29. 'The unqridged crossing is at an existing trail, which suggests Page 8 that over tim~; this has b~end~terri1inedto be .the eaSiest (translate narrowest orJeast wet) place to cross. The.~et1and edge at the crossing was delineated,~ut not sUIVeyed at this time due to the costs being excessive for such a sm81l.cross section. Any measurement requirements for mitigation can be done iIi.the field:. The majority of the trail system is more than 100 feet from anywetllli?-d, althou~hthewetl~d:complex is visible from most open vantage poin~s. - .. Please refer.to the~ttached aerial.photos 'for clarification..ofthe above discussion. '. . . I hope this report.providesadeq\iate infonnati"on for you to proceed with project planning. If you have any questio~, .pleaSe fed .f~ee, to c~ll and discuss: - _. " .- ..... ," -.. ." ~ - -., . - .' . ~ ..' . . ," '. ... .... .. Page 9 .": .O'~'..~,,:.\~ ::~ ~APPENDIX I AGNEW SERIES. The Agnew silt loarns are moderately deep, somewhat poorly-dramed soils formed in shallow glaciolacustrine sediments overlying laminated glacial till. These soils are often associated with wetlands. Generally, the upper soils ar.e silt loarns grading to silty clay loarns with depth. Mottling is exPected at 3 inches depth and gleying at 9 inches depth -- evidence of season8I water almost to the surface for extended periods. Below approx. 30 inches (in the C horizon), gravel content increases abruptly from <5% in the surface soils to between 10 and 50% in the subsoils. The lower horizons are highly laminated and very hard glacial till. Average soil percolation rates in the upped inches are expected to be moderate (0.6-2 inches per hour), decreasing to moderately slow (0.2-0.6 inches per hour) below 9 inches depth. . The Agnew soils are generally stiitable for some crops' and pasture With the main liffiitation being seasonal wetness (a perched water table) at 12 to 24 inches depth.. . . The main limitations for onsite septic and stormwater.treatment are related to both the minimal depth to the hardpan and seasonal wetness. .soil water percolirting through these soils will move laterally in the soil.rather than down. The seasonal hiih water tab!e and/or the shallow till. layer limits the amount of soil available to effeCtively treat stormwater or septic.effluent. .. " . . BELFAST SERIES. ..... The Belfast silt loains, wet variant, are very deep, poorly drained soils formed on alluvial flood plains that were originally under forests. TypicallY;.1:he upper 20 indies is a dark gray silt loam; fine sandy loani or loam. Subsoils to a depth of 60+ inches are dark grey. or olive grey str;l1;i.fiedfine. sandy loam,. silt loam, and clay loam. Distinct mottles generally are visible below 9 inches depth. PermeabilitY is moderately slow .(O.2~0.6 inches per hour). . A seasonal high water table is expected at 6 to 12 inches depth. . The Belfast silt loam, wet variant soils are used primarily for pastUre or diversified home garden crops. Its main limitation is the seasonal wetness" at 6.to 12 inches dep):h and very poor trafficability when wet These soils are easily compacted when ~et,. great;IY affecting surface infiltration rates and subsurfaCe flow patterns. BELFAST SERIES .... The Belfast silty clay loams, .wet variant, are very deep, poorly drained soils fonned on alluvial flood plains originally under forests. Typically, the tipJler20 inches is a grayish brown silty clay loam or sandy clay loam. Subsoils to a depth of 60+ inches are~gr~,or~livegrey ~edfine s~dy loam, silt loam, and clay loam. Permeability is moderately slow (0.2~O.6 inches per.hour). A seasonal high water table is expected at 6 to 12 inches depth.' . The Belfast silty clay loam, wet variant soils are used primarily for pasture. Its main limitation is the seasonal wetness at 6 to 12 inches depth and.very poor trafficability when wet. These soils are easily compacted when wet, greatly affecting swface infiltration rates and subsurface flow patterns. CASEY SERIES .. The Casey silt'loams are.moderately deep, somewhat poorly-drained soils fonned in shallow glaciolacustrine or marine sediments. These soils are often associated with wetlands although they are not always within the wetland boundary. Generally, the swface down to 33 incheS is composed oflayers of silt loarns and clays with faint mottles starting at 3 inches and distinct mottles starting at 10 inches. Below 33 inches, there is a layer is loamy fine. sand overlying another thick layer of clay ':from 40 to 60+ inches .depth. . .' . . Soil permeability is expected to be slow (0.06-0.2 inches per hour).. The sand layer, being sandwiched between fine Page 10 textured layers, 'NiIl have no effect on drainage other than to increase perching in the fine layer directly overlying the sand. Casey soils are used for pasture, wildlife habitat, recreation areas and rural homesites 'Nith the main limitation being seasonal wetness, with an expected water table at 12 to i4 inches depth during the rainy season. The main limitations specifically for onsite septic and stormwater treatment ire related to both the very fine soil textures and seasonal wetness. The slow permeability makes potential for septic drainfield faIlure very high, usually evidenced in a surface rather than subsurface failure. during perio~ of exte~ded rainfall CASSOLARY The Cassolary series is a deep, well-drained soil found em upland terraces in reworked glacial and marine sediments. The Cassolary is a series of cqarse and fine-textured -layers, The upper horizons tend to be sandy loam.- Horizons from 27 to 40 iD.ches is silt loam and silty clay loam. Below th~ soil texture becomes sandy again; composed of stratified layers offine sandy loam and sanciy.lo!lJll do~to 60 inches. . Soil permeability is moderately slow (0.2-0.6 inches p~r hour). :~~ . . . These soils are used priinacly. as pa.siur~ or woodland . They Can be used for homesites, but ha~e severe restrictions for septic design. The s'low permeability increases chances of on site drainfield failure. Furthermore, the textural layering typical of the' Cassolaxy Caxl result intempormy perched water tables above the finer textured solIs. . The sandy soils below the silt loam and silty clay loani layers have rapid permeability, i. e.. poor filtering capacity. It is, suggested that community sewage systems b~ used to avoidcontainination of water supplies. ,Grass-lined swales or sand.:.Iinedponds may be encouraged for pretreatment of stormwater prior to infiltration in subsoils. CLALLAM SERIES . The Clallam grav~Ily sandy 19~ are moderately deep, well-drained soils formed in glacial till. They aTe usually found on uplands, slop~ ranging from 0-3~1o.' The surface soils are generally grayish-brown to dark grayish-brown gravelly Sandy loarns. They have a weakly cemented glacial till layer.at 20-40 inches depth that will restrict vertical soil percolati~n to some degree.' . . . Average soil permeability is expected to be moperate (Q.6-2 mches per hour) above the cemented till and very slow (less than 0.06 inches per hour) in the till layer. A seasonal perched water table is not expected; the till in these areas must be more'fractured However; the soil is' expected to be saturated periodically dwing the rainy.season and the majority -of soil water will percohl.te laterally. .. . The Cliillam soi1$ origiru!lly developed under a forest, but more than half of the mapped acreage has been cleared and is now used for pa.siure~ gardens, 'orchardS 'and homesites: The primary limitations are related to shallow soil depths. Stormwater will p~rcolate into the soiIieaciily iri undisturbed areas, but will move laterally across the till layer, surfacing in adjacent'drainages.andlow-lyingareaS. Septic system design will be limited by minimal soil depths and fluctuating seasonal high water. . . DICK SERIES The Dick loamy sands are deep,. somewhat excessively drained soils formed in sandy glacial outwash on plains and terraces. They are usually fOWld on uplands, slopes ranging from 0-15%. In unwooded areas, the top 4 inches of the surface soils are generally grayish brown loamy sands uriderlain by lighter brown loamy sands to 10 inches, then olive brown loamy sandS to 60 inches. Sometimes these soil have discontinuous yellowish brown weakly cemented lenses below 37 inches that restrict percolation to v~g degr~. .- '. Average.soil permellbility is ~xPected to be.r~id (6-20 inches per hour): No seasonal water table is expected'within 60 inches of the soil surface. The primary limitations of this soil are related to fast percolation rates. Septic systems may fail due to poor filtering ability. ' Page 11 HOYPUS SERIES The Hoypusgravelly loamy sands are deep, somewhat excessiv~ly drained gravelly soils formed in glacial outwash on terraces. They are usually found on uplands, slopes ranging from O~30%. The surface soils are generally dark gray to darkbrowri gravelly loamy sands. Subsoils are dark yellowish-brown gravelly loamy sands overlying dark grayish brown gravelly loamy sands grading to very gravelly sands with depth, These horizons with varying colors, and textures are a result of different depositional events. Average soil permeability is exPected to be rapid (6-20 inches per hour). Most of the HoypU$s6ils were originally wooded, but a great deal of the mapped acreage has been cleared and is now used for limited pasture, gardens, and homesites. The primary limitations are related to rapid percolation rates and slope. Stormwater will percolate into the soil readily in 'undisturbed areas, but will receive relatively little treatment in the soil due to rapid percolation: Septic system design will be limited also by rapid percolation, poor treatment of effluent, and steep slopes making'design difficult." MCMURRAYPEAT , ' " , ' " ' The McMurray peat is generally 36 to 60 inches of peat over a saturated, slightly compacted sand and gravel substratum. 'The source of the peat organics is decomposed remnants of evergreens, deciduous trees, and shrubs that collected in basins and depressions. Uncleared' areas are often forested with ~aturation tolerant trees and shrubs. These soils ar~ expected to be saturated' most of the year, so unless drained or filled, cannot be used for any type of development. And they tl;lnd to be difficultt6 drain. ' , ' When drmned,the McMurray can ge a v.ery prod~ctive farm soil, but the high organic content will make it unsuitable as a base for any dwelling or structure that may settle. The high water table and organic content will also limit effective desigi1 of septic or stonriwater Systems. ' , " , MUKILTEOSERIES' . ", , " The Mukilteomucks are very deep, verj p()Orly-drained soilsJormed in upland depressions out of organic materials derived primarily from sedges and rushes.'The swface,horizons aresapric (highly decomposed organic materials), but become increasingly himnc (moderately deComposed organic materials) with depth. The high water'table and muckY textures generally greatly limit trafficabilityandlor development of any sort. , , ' PercoiationrMes are expected to be nioderate (0.6-2 inches per hour). Mukilteo ~oils are generally !\llitable for wildlife habittl or woodland, They are not suited for homesites or road building due to wetness and ponding; as well as poor load-bearing capacities. ' SEMIAHOO SERIES' The Serniahoo muck moderately shallow variant is aver)r poorly-drained soil formed on floodplains out of organic materials derived primarily from herbaceous organic depositS. Drainage has often been altered by subsUIface drains and open ditches. Native vegetation is m3inly sedges and rushes. Typically, the'soils have a black muck cap 10-15 inches thick, and in moSt places 2 to 4 layers of muck and mucky peat overlying mineral soil.at 24 to 48 inches. In most of these soils; there is also a thin l~yer (2-5 inches thick) of diatomaceous earth at 10-18 inches from the sUIface. The Serniahoo is a hydric (wetland). soil. Percolation rates are expectedto'be moderate (0.6-2 ~ches per hour). , ' , Semiahoo soilS are Used for croplahd, hayland or pasture. Most crops c~only be grown if a drainage system lowering the water able 2-5 feet during the gro~g season is installed: Subsidence is minimal if the water table is maintained inunediatelybelo:wthe rootzone;"and allowed to return to the surface during the,winter season. . '. . These soils are not suited for building of any sort as -they have poor load-bearing capacities and so will not effectively Page 12 support a foundation o~ road' --"i.e.: ~estruChrre will sink unless support piles are installed into competent. non-organic materials below $e muck. ' SEMIAHOO SERIES. The Semiahoo mucks are very deep; very poorly-drained soils formed on floodplains out of organic materials derived primarily from herbaceous 6rg~c deposits., Drainage has often been altered by subsurface drains and open ditches. Native vegetation is mainly sedges and rush~. Typically, the soils are black muck to a depth of 60 inches or more. The Semiahoo ~'ahydric (wetland) soil.' , , ' , , ' , Percolation rat~s are expectedto, benio~enite (0.6-2 ~inches per ho~).', ' .'. . . Semiahoo soils are uSed for croplimd, hayland or paSture. Most crops can orily be grown if a drainage system lowering . the water able 2-5 feet during the growing .seasqn is~e'd. Subsidence is miirimalif the water table is maintained 'immediately below the root :z;one,and allowed to return to the surface during the winter season. , . These soils are not suited for building, of any sort as they have poor lOad-bearing capacities and so will not effectively support a fooodation Qr road -.- Le. the structUre Will sink unless support piles are installed into competent. non-organic materials below the muck., ' ", , SEMIAHOO SERIE~ " .' , ""., ' , ' The Sermahoo muck moderately shallow variarit is a v.ery poorly-drained soil formed on floodplains out of organic materials derived primarily fr,omherbaceousorganic deposits. Drainage has often been altered by subsurface drairis and open ditches. : Native vege~onis mainly sedges and rushes. Typically. the soils have a black muck caP. lO-15 inches thick, and ill..mostplaceS 2 to 4 layers. of muck and mucky peat.o,!erlying mineral soil at 24 to 48, inches. In most of these soils, there"is also a thin layer (2";5 inches thic~) of diatomaceous earth. at 10-18 inches from the surface. ' The Semiahoo is ahy'dric (we:tland) ,soil: ": .:.'; , '. '.. , . .. . . Percolation fates are expected to be moderate (0.0-2 inches per hour). .' Semiahoo soils are used for' ci:~pland;:haylaI1d or pasture: Most crops can only be grown if a drainage system lowering the water'able 2-5feet duriiig the srowiIig season is inStaIIed.Subsidence is minimal if the water table is maintained immediately below the roOt;zi:ln~,'and allowed to return to the s!1Iface during the Winter season. . , . ... . These soils are not suited for building of any sort as.$ey have poor load-bearing capacities and so will not effectively suppOrt afooodati,on or ro;lci -~ i.e: the' strUcture ,will smk unless supp~rt piles are installed into competent. non-organic materi"als below the,mu9k'" .. '. .' '. - . . , TUKEYSERlES' " " ;.... .'. The Tukey gravelly loams: are moder~e1y d~p~' mogerately well-drained soilS fanned on terraces iri glacial till. The surface soils 'ar~ generally ~l1~bi:own, to browll grayelly loams' The ~ubsoils are grayish-brown gravelly clay loarns. They'have a'eemented.gravelly cl~ loam-glacial till layer at 20-40 inches depth that will restrict vertical soil percolatiOn. ' . '. . . . . Average'soil.l?erni.e~ilityis e~e~tedto,'be'?16deratelyslow (0.2-0.6 inche,s per hour) above .the cemented till and'very slow (less than 0:06 inches per hoUr) in thetill.1ayer. A,seasonal perched water table is expected; at 1-:5-2.5 feet during' the rainy season. Soil water will percolate laterally across the surface of the till, surfacing in low-lying areas and drainages. : ":,' i: ":".:.''-:. ,',' ':~.' ,...:,. ~.. .::." ..,... . .The Tukey soils were ongiriahywooded,..butmore~~ ~6rity atmaPpedacreagehas bee~ cleared ~d il? now'used' '. for paSture, and homesites: :There are iricltlSions' of soil~ with enough cobbles and stones to hinder 'cultivation. The primary limitation;; are rel~eci to :shal1ow soil depths' and slow percolation rates. . Stonnwater will percolate into the soil slowly; increasing the Chance of suiface nui.,off aIlderosion.' Once iri the soil, water will move laterally across the tilllayer;,'s~acing in.adjacent tiraina&es.an;dlow:-lying areas. Septic system desi~ will be limited byIninimaI soil Page 13 " .' depthS, slow p~~latioI} r3.tes;a,nd'~~a;~rial hi~;~~.er. .; '...... ;., ~ .: ';"" "\. "j" .-' ," ;~"'_ .::.:~ . ::: ;'~ ..~ i...: - ~.. "'~.-' ".: - ~ .- -~'-. '" -. -, '-;'",' ,r ,'.:1,_ ....~ ," ..:..~J-~ .-', :-: i. . .;. '.-,' ~- ,'. . -,', " ""'.' "~':~:: >. . ~ ." " .'. ; ~:.. . .;. .~--; .,' ....;.j>".. ",'-..::': ...... .. .' ,",T',. ~.- ;, :;;..~~:.;.:.~._. ~ - :.:'.:.:';:~~.'~ ~-" ", ':;' '>:.,~ ,~.~:.:,/'~,...'. "'~"-':~ :~-_:"'-:''"'''':-. "t...-". ..:'":'.::._ .... ./..i~. ~ :.:.. _.;:. :::.:'. :..-. :' : . -.;, ~:' "',: .;........ ..... .-..... ",'. - .::,"~:.:/>.~,',"''''''.i'\''..:~:.- '. '. .. "': .....:.:,>::.::~~:::/J':~',::::\./ ~..-.... .,.... ....... .... ;. '., ~;:;;;+":' :.'~:' ;:'!;;;0:~~t;{;;:;;.t" " .~,<~ ~<.:.::,:.':~.',;.'.~:.';.:.;~.~{,...;':._.','.~;.?:;_,:...:.!~;.:,.'~.~:,:."';.'.',~.':'~;~~'~,:, ...~.._::. . ,~. I . ~ . '. '" ':-:~~<\:Jf;',:::;:, '" ~:~:<:;{::c~;:::;~;~:.:/~/~:<~~;:;;:;,< _ .,...:. ,._ . .::<.:. :;.:: . ~~,~: :' ... ~ ,:-" .:' " . ~ t .':~ '-'-:: . '~:-f.::': - .....' . .. '.'l-.~.~. ..... . _ .,...~'..('...~ .....FI~.:,.. '.:'. . ".:~' . .:' _: ....:.....: _.:~::,,~~..r::~>-. .. ~ ~ .' .".u ~'.:.:; .)~:~~i:.-..~.:.....;: }:f.).:.,..:;,'.:~.'''~.:. .;J .:>.... _ . ..:: ___' .;'''',,: ~ ~. , . .; ~ I. . .~. '.' ". .... .. - ". ~7... ,..:::...:~.,.;~.~f.~~.,;.1.~>.;~.:.,.i.:A'0;:;&:f!;t~;~@;S:,.'...'". . - .;.... '.; .~-= . ..~...: . . . .:, ~.. '. . '. :... :....~.::. ".,"" ..... ~_. .. ':"':'~.::~::-...::'.,:C";'~!.;";: :-..:,,::; '..... '.. ~ .,.: .;.'L."'. .-. -.. ~. . . .-'.- :,:,.. '. ........ ....: ~ . - .. I"~"; ..- '~I '. .~. . I .\. . :....~_.;.. . .' ~.' .~. . -. ....' :.;....~ .. .... ... ........$. .,....:.:.~~--- ...:.:".::.~--f-~; .........""... .. · ;,.E')\3'~';..~:.~.'.r~{~;.:.'-.,..!:'".:,';'\" ;".': > ..~.':. .. . .. .. .;. .....t.. ~ . :..(::.~;.:..:?~::~.:;~:..~- ... .~: : ~'~._' _.~~.~". . . :::'.' ~ :,.. ~~. .:_! :.'-.>-'....;~.>.::?:. . :~) -~L. -. .~.. - : ;.:-~ ~L ... . ., ~ . !-'.:'. .\?~: .~;.. . -:~ ,... . .':-'... -. ..... '.;:..::<'~):~:..r.~:": .... :. .-{-: . ... . ~ :;., . : ~. ,. >: ~ ..~.:~ ~~. ,.. .-:,. .'. ~. . .......:.. . ,.... .., "1 '. ..'. .:.. . ,.':. .. . ,.. '.' . y,' ..'!.\ -:. . .;. :~: . .~ :': ".' .~ . " ... '~I.~ '.. '.r-:. " . ~. .:-:'. '. , .-'.. ~.. . ;-.:: ! :..~, '. ." ':.:.~. .., ,.. .- t".. .'.; '.!. .-..' ~~ge 14 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLO.ND DETERMINATION {19B7 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) . ~. Oats: County: State: ~~~ .tAJ -4 ,. " Project/Site: Applicam/Owl1er: Inv~stlgator: ~ . I"Co PIZSU-J ((]) Community 10: Transect 10: Plot 10: Po. Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? la ~he area a potential Problem Area? (If needed, explain on reverse.) \/EGETAT"iON I OQmll'llSnt Plant Soecln llfllTum IndicaTor Cominant Plant Soeeies ~tr~TUm Indic&t?~ 1: .; Jf)~ f/ ~ ./f ,cA:::-J.I s. 2. . ~~/{J 5 ';.4f.';;J 10. . , 3. -;';f(l/E- }f h1CA/ 11. .. 4. . t3At)6 I+- ~f!;L 12. ' . .. "~! r 6. .5P.ZJ~ ....r- 5 j::,ACW 13. E1. 14. 7. 15. 8. 18. . Perc.nt of Oomlnant $p.clos thlt ar. 091.. FACW or FAC /61tJ ~ .. . (txch,jdinO FAC.). . '. .. l<'in.r.''J!:.t..d~.A "- ~ ~~ ~ ~ f(/vp ~~~./~ -r:o ~ :J~. . ":,. "!~.. .' . '.1. "i. ..: ~ ~~ . !~ . J: " :~. .~ HYDROLOGY .' .:-. ~"~':"1 . . :1" 'f ';j. .. .,. .....". _ Recorded Dllta IOnerlb, In R,markJ): _ Str,.m, ~.k., or 'lida G.uge _ A.,I.I Phol'llgraph. ,J _ Other ..Q... No Aecorded Dati Avoltebl. Walllnd Hydroloov Indlcatorll Primary Indicators: ___Inundated . r;r Satural.d In Uppor 12 Inchta :z:;. W.tll' Mark. . _ Drift Una. ~Soclim.nt Ooposlta ~ Oraina"e Pltternsln Wetland. Secondary Indlcetor. (2 or more required): ~ Oxldizld Root Chlnnlll. In Upper 12/nchll _ Water-Stained L.llvlS .2s1-oeal SoU SUrvlY Oata _ FAC.Nlluual Tilt _ Othar IExplaln In Rem.rks) /JJ - i /it~ 'Fiold Obnrvatloni: Oepth_of Suttace Wat.,: IIn.1 Ceplh to Fro. W.ter In Pit: lin.) J;ltpth to Satuttted ~oll: (In.) Rem.rks: ~ d -ri#u ~ f:-U N7~ - I~ 1~~4! - .~ ....~: tf ':~ . .' ii. " "" ?,.i - ,',.:',:. .}; - .~~:): .$.. :.::.1..... ." -' ~7. :~. ..,' 11. ~ ~~~. .:". /:;.- SOIL$ M.p Unit Name IS.ri.. .nd Ph...l: Orllnag. Clan: ' .. F1.ld Ob.,rvetloMs Confirm Mapped Type1 . Ve.. No 51C./ T,ponomy (Subgroup): :'.'~: Pr~~,le, Oe~9rlotlo~: C~.h . -,' --. llno~~~\ Horizon I" ... M:m:c Color fMunsell Mol,tJ Mottl. Colcrs IMlll'l1lell Moittl . Mottl. Abu"d.nc~/Contrltt T,;(turo, Conorltlonl, Structure, etc. C;;/~/ /;nj I ~/c.11 /1.4....~ 5) d ) nt S" t!J - 'Z- A- t;; q " ,'...' h'~ ~ ~ If /3 I t!) If ((7~, ' zsY~ Z.5"1 )(-z.- c-.~r:-- c.,tFD - I~ 2- s-Y s7G:o ,. ..:. .;.... . ":'(. ,:,';':. "'.- .., . ',7' .,J ., ..:.,. H~.ril! $Q.~ Indlo.fO"t _ HI.tolol . _ Hlatla Epipedon _ Sulfidic Odor ~ "qulc Mol,tur. Rlgln'le v a.....~r__ ,..~r...I.,....... ~ ('..'III"'......" ...,.,. ._.h...._ , J;;. Gley~ 01 Low-Chroma Colora ." . ~.. _ Concrellon. _ High Orglnia Contlnt 11'1 Surl.ce LAy.,. In S.ndy $011$ _ Organlo Streaking In S.ndy Soil, ~ Uttld on t.ooal Hydrlo SoU. Utt _ U.ted on National Hydric Salls US! _ Other IExplain In ROl1'll1k.) R~"k.:. ~ VI ~ ~ Lf) J..L-~ ~ fk,; p~~~-' /PJ<, 4!i,;.~ _~ ~I Ii:-! ~ r ~ > '1'J....-- /7-'~ K ~ ;1 "<'~'...:.: ~Sv~ -..:..' 'WETLANO DETERMINATION <~" 1I!~ :0., :;' ~ . , @ No (Circle) Hydrophytlo Vegetltlon P,...nt7 k vA +J... ~' ." (Clrel.1 Wetland Hydrology Pr...nt1 ~ No - I---<> T'lo-" vJ I t%'.-.; "'-1~I~ . Hyqri~ $oCa Pruontl 0: No f. thl. Sampling Point WIthin a W.tland?~ ,~.. No , .... .."., .R..~.rk.1 ~ ~--f-~ ~~ ~ rA-.a-J, . ., ..... 4:?~ / ~ '1T..J-~ S~ A:.44 ~ , ~ A;?4-r~~ - ~ C": ~t.-d .LJ-<- ~?~ I f ?~ ~ ~~? uvv-fh:-r-zr--.'" .,;,; " ~ .': Approved oy ,- '1I: I. : ~ " i: ,'.1. ::: ..' -;:.: :.5 .~ ~ .} -;. ,:( '.. .; 'to :::: ,). .., . "!/J .','t 0.1 ;::~~ ': '.~ l)1! T , < ,'; .~. " .'1 .. .'. "'1 . "\". ..,..,.~ ~i=~; ~~~~1'11:;:,:-{.~;;,. L.8..l\,l\, I ~l.;U-l--l- M~MU.t\;lAL PARK VICINITY MAP EASTERN JEFFERSON COUNTY _...tt 01 t\)C~ ~~ '\)t. ~~ G 01 $~ C~ ~~ _ ~<t0 ~o CAPE GEORGE PORT TOWNSEND BAY DISCOVERY BAY LEGEND: SEGMENT I ........SEGMENT n SEGMENT ill _"-11-11-11- SEGMENT IV SCALE IN MILES I l I 1/2 0 1 2 Jm.BS OCTOBER 6 1999 NOTE: ..._ -~aa;r- ~----,--_..- --------.. -....... '-.. -.. ~ ~ lL o U 3 ;~{~i~;1t1Jjt~tt.~:;~;yr.r Project DUNGENE ... SP ~s\i1aCOOm&~ . ~:t .J Ml...4'.lntEll( Omi 5 10 15 20 ENCARTA97 WO;tlD ATL4~ LARRY SCOTT MEMORIAL PARK TRAIL Location Map Copyrigix (C) 1988-1996. Mkro5oIl Corponujoa. an::I its supplicn. .-\11 rigfu ro:so.-r..cd. ~-j 11 p'~ deGfOSS aerial mappinG 5/25/96 425.828.4448 ~~f~~~ deGfOSS aerial mappinG 5/25/96 425.828.4448 ,~~,~~$ deGross Clerial moppinG 5/25/96 .:t25.S28.4448 """':1 deGfOSS aerial mappinG 5/25/% 425.828.4448 ~ ;;;) deGross aerial mappinG 5/25/96 425.828.4448 ""-";-0'.:"; -.;:~i":, -~:~:.-~~ ::!~?:~~~r:@~th):~~. ~,-: '.- ..X. ."'--1,.,-,,, 0~ ~{ : -:y~:": ;-:'-r.:~11:;"?;0'r;.~(.;...~:xJ3 .:/?;:::Y";2J-1({:i!J!ki1fi :-,>:;~-?:.?y ~;-':t-1g0: . ~--;;",'.J/~4.:P/a:;Y!-/i:~ ..;::}~,;r~l?2f~M' 7 ;'.' " ,;; /.~l/!/.;;;;:Jj,,--;w<~A ~~~~~{~-;;:i~~}t~~t%1:1~~f~ ~:~ ~ deGfOSS aerial mappinG 5/25/96 425.828.4448 'afiy Scott Memorial Trail . etIand Assessment Report ~:~.. Soil Serics Hoy-pus gIs, gsl, 0-15% McMurray -Mukilteo peat complex MukiIleo peat Semiahoo muck, shallow variant Scmiahoo muck Tukey gL 0-15% Soil Map Unit AgB Bk,Bm CeB erc CrnC, CmD DcC 1 ~;;;H.W rtn tarry Scott Memorial Trail Wctllll1d Asscssmcnl Report JefTerson Counly Soil Sun.cy Map (page I) Soil Series Agnew sil. 0-8% Belfast sil. sic!. O-X% Casey sil Cassolary sl, O-K% Clallam gsl. 0-15%. 15-30%> Dick Is M95-0060 file relerencc mmlbcr Soil MaD Unit Huc, HvC Mm Mu Sh Sc Tue Soil Scri.:s Hoypus gls. gsl. 0-15% McMurray -1\.1ukilteo peat complex MukiItco peal Scmiahoo muck, shallo.w variant Scmi ahoo muck Tukc\. gl. 0-15%> I'"' '. .. ..". ;~: . . .. ". ~... :":" ..-: . . .'~ai:ry S~ttM~~ri~ -Trail WetI~d AsseS~ent.Report' Site Location Map' M95-006Q file r,eference number ,: ..".- : ,";. .