HomeMy WebLinkAbout051622A01 JEFFERSON COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA REQUEST
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Amanda Christofferson,Environmental Health Specialist II
DATE: May 16,2022
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING re: Inform citizens of the availability of funds and
eligible uses of the State Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) and to receive
comments on Jefferson County's proposed activities.
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Staff will present information regarding the Washington State Department of Commerce Community
Development Block Grant(CDBG)program for unentitled rural counties. In particular the General Purpose
grant program and the potential uses will be discussed. Staff recommends that the Board of County
Commissioners hear the public feedback on needs in Jefferson County. In addition, staff of Jefferson County
Public Health will present their application to the CDBG—General Purpose Grant Program for$ 483,570 to
be used for `Housing Rehabilitation' to expand the Septic Cost Share Program to all areas of the county. The
budget estimates that twenty, low to moderate income households can receive up to $20,000 in grant dollars
that would help them accomplish major repairs or installations of new septic systems.
ANALYSIS:
This hearing is a requirement of the grant application and intended to inform citizens of the availability of
funds and eligible uses of the State Community Development Block Grant. It is our interest to receive
comments on proposed activities in particular from low-to moderate-income citizens of our county.
Receiving public comment can change the scope of the current grant application and will guide future grant
applications.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Grant funding total of$483,570
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive public comment and provide recommendations for changes to the current application and/or
approve and sign Resolution of the JCPH 2022-2023 CDBG—General Purpose grant application for Septic
Cost Share Program.
REVIEWED BY:
L
Mark McCaul County Administrator Date
JEFFERSON COUNTY
STATE OF WASHINGTON
In the Matter of Certification of Compliance)
For CDBG General Purpose Grant ) RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, Jefferson County is authorized to apply to the State Department of Commerce for a
Community Development Block Grant(CDBG); and,
WHEREAS, Jefferson County has identified a community development and housing priority
need for which to seek CDBG funding; and,
WHEREAS, it is necessary that certain conditions be met to receive CDBG funds;
NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Jefferson County Commissioners
authorizes submission of this application to the Washington State Department of Commerce to
request$483,570 and any amended amounts to fund a Housing Rehabilitation activity specific to
Septic System repair, replacement and installation, and certifies that, if funded, it:
o Will comply with applicable provisions of the Title I of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974, as amended, and other applicable State and federal laws;
o Has provided and will provide opportunities for citizen participation that satisfy the CDBG
requirements of 24 CFR 570.486;
o Will not use assessments against properties owned and occupied by low- and moderate-
income persons or charge user fees to recover the capital costs of CDBG-funded public
improvements from low- and moderate—income owner-occupants;
o Has established or will establish a plan to minimize displacement as a result of activities
assisted with CDBG funds; and assist persons actually displaced as a result of such activities,
as provided in the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act
of 1970, as amended;
o Will conduct and administer its program in conformance with the Title VI of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 and the Fair Housing Act, will affirmatively further fair housing (Title VIII of
the Civil Rights Act of 1968); and
o Has adopted and enforce a policy to prohibit the use of excessive force by law enforcement
agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in nonviolent civil rights
demonstrations; and has adopted and implemented a policy to enforce existing applicable
State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location
which is the subject of such nonviolent civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction, in
accordance with Section 104(1) of the Title I of the Housing and Community Development
Act of 1974, as amended;
o Certifies to meeting the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) through a determination
the CDBG-funded public services will not have a physical impact or result in any physical
changes and are exempt under 24 CFR 58.34(a), and are not applicable to the other
requirements under 24 CFR 58.6; and are categorically exempt under the State
Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)per WAC 197-11-305(2); and
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Board of Jefferson County Commissioners, designates
the County Administrator, as the authorized Chief Administrative Official and authorized
representative to act in all official matters in connection with this application and Jefferson
County's participation in the Washington State CDBG Program.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of May, 2022.
SEAL: JEFFERSON COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST:
Heidi Eisenhour, Chair
Carolyn Gallaway, CMC Kate Dean, member
Clerk of the Board
Greg Brotherton, member
a)
V
L.
cu L E 4-• _ 4J
Ec co cn
EE
a)
CU
a)
V
O V' CO a) ,c
0 b�A (.7 0
4 V Oe(i) I a)
O O w v)
+-d co co
E '
i 4—
E
O Co
ore" � O = 4_,
i 44— °aix a) N a)
a cu om w = ...c tio -§
� cn •—
ni l'a CL la '1.3 o
;�= i O ca V
c w W p .}., C cn
OI._ a-+ I 4—
tid E cu g .- J>ft 6--. c ,2 6
e= E w .-+7, E 0 2
co = a — CO
sVf O C Ci-
i o "' o a)
ca
4- a = •cn O _c
O a. 0 a. v)
. . ,
.,. I 8
i ---.,
. - (...0 . 2 • a li
s I sit 15/2 It
..J, ' . :.-• .
4 ....
1 i /111 tillif! 44
-*, 0
(..) ,,, _ .
I ii. 11 I 11 i
,,..,
,
, .
.. . __ ,..
. — ' H i 4 iii
..... ... .._, II 1 it i 11 c)
4
V 9 S i:X
•C
': ,......, e Z ':' -.• >: :: ' i 1
4 ' ' 4. I I II II 1
2. , , .. ,
A 1 ' ' ' i 1 2 S
2 c)
:::,'' i'''' -:;.' it I "
0 23
11104ata011148
044. ..!
4 1 "g, :,! I C) Ilk t 0 ° ' t'l
* .- •—i 0 ft: .7 C) E •- (II C
ir, 4: CIO 0` e4.,-; 0 -; 6' • 4-, r. 1:',. :, °I: , ', • --
'44
_ eV „,--. :.f.S: 41 ; 4'' .41 4 '
1--
—
I ‘,. ; 7 Z (N- t:' •!.'. ••_iI (r) {,‘; „.) 7," „,,, 4___. Z.
- • , ' t- ' ,-- . t.: - • --- a 3
1,-I-1 (f) 4' ti ' -) 4 : -2 "
tN lc 1.), ',., 2 ''', -;„ c 0 -,.., :. ..-:-
. . .s =`--"' ::, -, c „ . , -
2 7- " 4,
C..-
1 ' 1 '
ill
v '7
.** ,
V a
ie. ,..,., ., , ),,
1 i, -
.0* - ,, . .•, " '''''' °i kt: E '.. , S k
C 9 ,.
1 , , =3 c 64 .,, (ft 94' :41 :
'-; • el', i.' ; - I - .
- 1.1.1
i y 0 4,, -
tO , . E '.., - - .2 .-
*6
) , 13 -., - ,,..
:I?.1 • , , , , ,,,
,
1.' v it
t*•,'.' , t .* * ',, <0-- >, 't 4 h,*., (-; !.... -0 ....J (,,
i 4,,,' 3 t3 - „,` 7, - 1.. - -3, , --- ,, -,-, L' 0
t, a.' " 44 r ° 6 4 4 ..0 Lt. ,u
r-- (t) .c :
to --- , . ..
0 :- it ;' -a (Ts. 7,' '''' i," h (1 17 - 6. :. 0 6 3 v,
1„71, ,), , 10;,1 •- t Z 0 0- ) --..., ;-. .c. •-?, .; . , :' t - 3 V') E • '_* '4", 5-„4
Tr-
e 2 _ c.z..- .., (.., ; F., , 77'
.1.4.,, 4 ' 2 (t) C 1 F c ..t. '4
ill)
2
.,, 4h, .. 1 0 (7 0, I.--: .' -.'--.. 6 0 t :-i, 1 .4-..• — .,;,i, , „- (T1 't ,. • • • '''''.
. • : s . (....)
.'. ' , A
C f0 fa
O o
N
V v 13 a� Q
2
co L Q,
nos 4—
LA co E g
Ts .a.)
ai
a) b.0 N .N O ,�
co
ma C co
a) o 1 c
CU 4-0
O N -o = E
L
a) O = c O co
co U +-+ , `F. O
vi O L
C5U 4— L O o Q
U CO L.. 4= 00 u
CO
C co a)
CO U 72 +-. '- v -a13
..CV) N W 0 >, c
c
cU w E :}.r CD L
taD
N , a-+ O D
0 L LI)
U � O
N 'v) C c6 },
S u cn U w 2 a O 0
F— .— • • • • • • < E N
..;
I a 6 q
- 1 4 2.4 Pi 1
11 11 1 /11/ girt el
11114 11 8 1 kit il It 1 i] i ttli ' 116. 113 i 11
14 I& II I 4 0 $ I 1 I al 1 4 1
!s, 11 ,,,. 11,1
1 4, 1 '011 II 1111 tit 11 ti ..,g, S Ili
!..: 2, 1 1 ij i Hs 'e,' -ghtLi .1 §
i
.-. 1 1 j g 1 .fi i ti I 2 is i ilti 41
1 415 I I, all 1 ii g 9 1 i .14 : E 1 4.
-g § 1. 11 Ili 1 i 11 1111 1611 ,!;i111 ilf if
I
z ... 1
i lip " .' 1 11 6162 / g 1 191 ig gi
1.1* 1111-8 1; 111 lilt I 8S3i -51 2
45 1-61: 111 g. I II 1
c illi-691 11 V" il `?' lq 111:121llw 1 i Vil 1 1B
co .- 4
1 ::' 11111.1 ill. fr., fd 11 li . 1-st pil/ 1, 1_ 1 .
1 .1 1
0
6. ,
_ : hi i or . ' 1 kl 91 iiiiii J111140 Piii 01-c. J c
c ' 1 ri EJ i 16,4 ill '4• • • • 44 u fij tl Atil
Ill '.
;
. . .
....1 "H
, • . ,
. , •. .• , , .•
1 t 4, .t. . 4 , , , I
„ , • , • , . .
. - • i '
•
' ',' ; ' - '' : "• „ : :, - :.: , - '• ; -, :. •
....., i ..„.. h,...
•
•
•
•
6 .2C:111. 4i
Lau [ti0
Q
= IL-11
5 Z
a)
S V
+-+ 47J
Q.
-5 a) N Q)
o O0 O v)
V
}+ co
E E a)
Lu rna Cil •_
00 a) co
L. O O a) a v)
a) -N- >. ago c > ,�
4-• ,_
a)
� — co
- _0
ca a) o
2 c >% -0
w -0
a-+ o .v O. 1 c 0
VI 411 ci,) >, •(....— 2 . u
CO -0 = E E 4.7- i �, V)
WC- O ca '>7 E
N - L_ ' ' -0 0_ 0 cr 0
co 0_ U o a O
NI
L c c c6 +a co "
cu O
+� ° cry O 4-0 a;
CO u a) N = O N O CD
.— q- O -o o a) o) > E
.—
V
co —
s — CV o C s O > Q
I— To V _J a) v, a- v) Q
• • • •
Washington State Department of Commerce
Community Development Block Grant - General Purpose
Grant Program Application for Housing Rehabilitation
Jefferson County Septic System Cost Share Grant
Application Narrative
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Questions
What is the proposed project?
• Provide a project title
o Jefferson County Septic System Cost Share Grant
• List all essential project components
o The project will provide grant funding to low and moderate income (LMI) property
owners for either the repair or replacement of failed septic systems, or to install new
septic systems where citizens are dwelling on property full time without access to sewer
or septic. Property owners will be supported by staff in moving through the process of
installing a permitted septic system from design to achieving a final on the permit.
• Who owns or will own the funded facility, improvements or plan
o The property owners will retain all ownership of the septic system once it has been
installed on their private property.
• Identify the service area
o The grant funds will be available to all financially qualified property owners within
Jefferson County who do not have access to sewer infrastructure.
• If, applicable will the project be phased or involve more than one competitive bid/construction
process? If so, describe.
o N/A: The project will not be phased.
Will there be a subrecipient? (A subrecipient is another local government or not-for-profit entity to
receive CDBG funds from the grantee to implement or own the project.)
N/A: No subrecipient.
• Describe the nrganization's experience in similar activities
Who will manage the project? List all members of the management team and their
qualifications/experience with similar projects.
The Environmental Health department at Jefferson County Public Health will manage the grant. This
department has responsibility for the On-Site Septic Program code compliance and permitting for the
county. The staff in this department are likely the most knowledgeable about septic code and
permitting in the public sector. As a function of their regulatory role they are also aware of individual
property owners who have septic systems that are currently in "priority violation" status due to
1
surfacing sewage. This puts them in a strong position to proactively contact owners who may need
financial assistance to repair a failing on-site septic system.
Amanda Christofferson will be the program lead. She has proven ability to manage a program such as
this. In 2018, Jefferson County Public Health was awarded a $314,000 grant from the EPA National
Estuary Program (NEP)via the Washington State Department of Health to run a Septic System Cost
Share program. Amanda Christofferson has run this program since late 2020. This program has as of
now expended all of its funding, successfully installing six on-site septic systems for LMI property
owners. This program is only accessible to property owners in Jefferson County who are located
within close proximity to the shoreline. The demand for assistance within our current program has
demonstrated the need our county residents have for financial assistance in making this very
expensive and necessary improvement to maintain safety for themselves, their neighbors, and the
environment. The addition of these CDBG funds will make support available to all LMI residents
county wide.
Upload these documents with the application
• Map(s) showing the project location and the project service area(s) described in your LMI
Benefit Worksheet
• Describe the housing rehabilitation activity and if the program will offer grants, loans or some
combination to owners.
o This housing rehabilitation program will be specific to septic system repairs,
replacements, and installation. We propose to offer these funds to property owners as a
grant. We have found in operating our NEP funded Septic Cost Share program that
owners with failed systems commonly need entire replacements, which often cost in
excess of$20,000 to complete a design and installation. Many of our recipients have
needed to combine our grant funds with a loan via the DOE funded Clean Water Loan
program operated by Craft3. We propose to offer funds on a sliding scale with lesser
funds offered to those with higher income still within the LMI table.
o Property owners will apply to the grant program via the Public Health Department.
Applications will be reviewed for financial qualification by a subcontractor with financial
expertise, most likely Craft3. Once qualified owners will work with staff to determine
next steps; contracting with a designer; additional funding; meeting permit
requirements, etc. Staff will support homeowners in achieving the goal of an installed
septic system and mange the payment to the contractors directly.
• Will the program focus on owner-occupied or rental housing?
o This program will focus on owner-occupied housing.
2
FINANCIAL NEED Questions
Describe the financial need for the level of grant. (30 pts)
Explain how you built the project budget and developed cost estimates.
In order to build the budget we used our current NEP Septic Cost Share program as a template for
cost estimates for this grant. The administrative time involved in processing applications, Cultural
Resource Review, and otherwise supporting property owners to move through the process is based
on our actual experience. At this time, we propose to limit the grant to $20,000 per applicant and
estimate serving approximately 20 households with the funds requested.
List any resources or funding you (and the subrecipient, if applicable) have applied for to
support this proposed project?
• Is all other financial assistance firmly committed to this project?
o N/A
• If not, what are your alternative plans to fund the project?
o N/A
How will the community support the on-going services, operations and maintenance for at
least ten years?
• What are the primary sources of operating funds?
o Property owners will be responsible for maintaining the septic system once it is
installed.
• Will there be increased operating costs? If yes, what are they and how will they be funded?
o N/A
• Identify any revenue-generating activities to be located in the facility, if applicable.
o N/A: CDBG will not fund the income-generating portion of a facility.
Upload these documents with the application
• Table of costs for all systems installed with NEP Septic Cost Share funds
• Internal budget estimate
3
PROJECT NEED Questions
Describe the need facing your community and the public prioritization process. (30 pts)
What is the need, problem or opportunity?
What is the urgency behind the need?
As of March 18, 2022, we have a record of 28 septic systems in priority violation with surfacing
sewage in our county. In addition, with our permitting records we can provide data showing that
in our county we have nearly 6,000 systems that will be over 30 years old in the next 4 years.
That is nearly 50% of the known systems in our county that will have reached the end of their
predicted useful life. Jefferson County also has a significant number of open complaint cases of
property owners living on land full time without septic systems in violation of Jefferson County
code. This concern became so prevalent that in 2018 the county Environmental Health
department developed a memo on Basic Sanitation for Non-Permitted Dwellings to manage the
progress of these enforcement cases. This data points to a need for support of LMI owners in
achieving safe functioning septic systems in order to stabilize them in their existing housing, in
addition to maintaining the safety of our surface and ground waters.
Who is affected and how?
Tell us the number of people affected by the problem and how the problem affects low-and
moderate-income persons.
It is difficult to determine an exact number of people affected by the problem. Like many rural
counties, Jefferson has a very small land area served by central wastewater treatment system
or sewer. A majority of our county by land area depends on septic systems for sanitation.
Jefferson County, like many others, is experiencing a housing crisis. The cost of housing in the
areas with sewer have ballooned in the last several years. The cost of a septic design and
installation can range from $15,000 to over$40,000 based on the complexity required due to
the geologic and hydrologic conditions of the parcel. Jefferson County code requires that a full-
time dwelling have a functioning septic system if it is not connected to sewer. According to the
US Census Bureau, Jefferson County residents have a median income of$57,693 and a rate of
10.6% living in poverty. Unknown debt burden and the limited opportunities for financing septic
systems add to the problem of LMI property owners achieving the goal of safe sanitation.
What official orders or regulatory requirements confirm the extent and level of need?
Basic Sanitation for Non-Permitted Dwellings
What recent plans,studies, reports, or other data document the need?
• Describe the documents with references to any excerpts.
o We have produced reports from our permitting database in order to determine
number of systems in priority violation and number of properties with septic code
violations. These will be submitted as excel spreadsheets.
• Is the project included in an adopted capital improvement plan?
o No
• How is this project consistent with your comprehensive plan or local economic development
strategies?
o The Washington State Growth Management Act precludes the development of
sewer infrastructure in many of our rural communities. In addition, the diffuse nature
of properties will always be a barrier to central wastewater treatment as a viable
option.
4
Upload these documents with the application
• J.C.C. 8.15 On-site Sewage Code
• Basic Sanitation for Non-Permitted Dwellings
• Reports from our permitting database
• Regulatory orders—(List of NOVs, NOVC)
• Relevant correspondence—(Letters of Support)
5
READINESS Questions
Show how the proposal outlined in your Project Description is ready to proceed for a timely and
successful completion. (20 pts)
If relevant, have you met with the regulatory agency?
• If so, with whom and what was the result?
o We are the regulatory agency for our county. As discussed previously, we are the most
knowledgeable about the status of septic systems in our county and their compliance
with our code as it relates to sanitation.
Describe how your work plan addresses any potential environment review issues or mitigation.
Cultural Resource Review will be completed for each septic installation project based by staff. Septic
permitting requires Endangered Species Act review by Jefferson County Department of Community
Development.
If applicable, do you have site control or easements for this project?
• If not, describe how and when you will secure site control or easements.
o N/A
• In the last 12 months, has this site been occupied by anyone other than the applicant or
subrecipient? If so, describe the circumstances of property transfer or relocation.
o Individual property owners will be expected to own and reside on the property where
the septic repair or replacement is taking place.
Is the project ready to proceed?
• What is the status of any required plans, plan amendments or project reports?
o This project is ready to proceed internally. As described earlier, JCPH has been
running a similar Cost Share program and has the standard operating procedures and
policies developed. Though there will be some modifications to the guidelines for this
program. JCPH has invested in a robust media program with both social media and
print media components to advertise its programs. In addition, the staff currently
operating the Cost Share program have worked to develop awareness of the grant
program and its purpose among professionals in the private sector(professional
certified septic designers and installers), and social service providers in our community
(Habitat for Humanity, OlyCAP, St. Vincent DePaul, Housing Solutions Network,
Cascade Community Connections, Washington State University Extension, Jefferson
County Conservation District, etc.). Social service providers can play a crucial role in
building program awareness. In addition to providing wrap around assistance to owners
who need support managing this type of project.
• What obstacles (other than securing CDBG funding) might affect the timely and successful
completion of this project? Describe how you will address these obstacles.
o The progress from acknowledgement by the property owner that a priority
violation/surfacing sewage exists through to installation of a permitted septic system is
a lengthy one that requires professionals in the private sector, may include locating
additional financing, weather dependent scheduling, and owners' capacity to move
through these milestones.
o The incredible demand on the septic design and installation vendors could slow the
project down, but the three-year timeline should provide ample time for all funds to be
spent.
6
Upload these documents with the application
• Sample GEO 20-21 submission form for Cultural Resource Review
• Contract with Craft3 for Financial Review
• Describe how the activity integrates with weatherization funds or other housing rehabilitation
funding?
o JCPH does not operate weatherization programs or other housing rehabilitation
programs. We do currently operate a NEP-funded Septic Cost Share Program similar to
this one.
• Do you have a waiting list of homes ready to be rehabilitated?
o Yes
• Do you have rehabilitation program policy manual that includes rehabilitation standards?
o For septic systems the program rehabilitation standard would follow the septic code
permitting requirements.
• Identify your plan methods to ensure all rehabilitated units will be free of lead-based paint
hazards (24 CFR Part 35, Subpart J-Rehabilitation).
o N/A
7
RESULTS Questions
Explain how the completed project will address the need, benefit low- and moderate-income persons
and how you will measure results. (20 pts)
To what extent will the proposed project address the specific issues described in your Project
Need statement?
• Will the project take care of all of the need?
o We estimate that with the funds requested we will be able to support 20 property
owners in achieving a repair, replacement, or installation of a septic system. This does
not encompass all of the present need in our county.
• Will the project solve the problem for the entire community or a smaller area?
o LMI property owners throughout our county will be eligible for this grant program.We
estimate that we will not have the funds to accept every qualified home owners'
application and may apply for additional CDBG General Purpose funds in the future.
Using the table below, provide specific measurements(tangible) of the current conditions and
then the anticipated conditions after project completion.
Examples:
• Number of leaks, permit violations, accidents, • Energy use
etc. • Flow measurements
• Utility rates(w/and w/o CDBG) • Operation expenses
• Emergency response time • Jobs created/retained
• Level of service/capacity • Debt avoided
28 priority septic violations with surfacing 10 priority septic violations resolved
sewage
50*septic code violations in enforcement 10 septic code enforcement cases closed
20*water quality 'hot spots' believed to be Reduction in the number of water quality'hot
attributed to lack of sanitation spots' believed to be attributed to lack of
sanitation
i rr� C r r r�ry ,r r r` r .✓ rr �r r�nry
8
l 0 W 0p
rn
N m m pp0 N
N t~fl N Q 4
V)N V1 N N
IN O tD N
t - N 0
CO to Cr of
✓ i N M.
.i rl
✓T Vf to pp Np
CO N OCO
N O tG
V pp
ti M R 4.
V1.V1 V1 V?N
8O O
O
O O
A N
.ti eel
Di
✓) an
NNa 4-1
IA
O▪0 to .-? Di Di
p m to
a
tO IA
L
H
N
0
V
u
'a.
p.
a
In
E
eo
rr
00
O Y
a
M ,
CO Ol
6 m
d 3
YI a
O m
0.
a
(o
c0
a
c� 4
m
O N
0
M 10
N N
N
LL N
y
T
Ms,/
`_• t 9
events hours subtotal Total % $
Task 1
Interagency Agreement development with Dept of
Commerce 1 8 8 2% $ 308
subcontracting with Craft3 1 4 4 1% $ 154
Internal progress meetings 36 2 72 17% $ 2,772
Submit monthly invoices 36 8 288 67% $ 11,088
Quarterly reports 12 4 48 11% $ 1,848
Close out reports 1 8 8 2% $ 308
Task 1 total 428 428 $ 16,478
Task 2 Rehabilitation Management
Application review 20 4 80 10% $ 3,080
Property research 20 4 80 10% $ 3,080
Cultural Resource Review and submission 20 4 80 10% $ 3,080
Supporting homeowner in locating additional
financing as needed 15 4 60 7% $ 2,310
Support homeowner in locating contractors 20 2 40
Coordination with other support services for wrap
around with homeowner 10 10 100 12% $ 3,850
Owner-County Agreement development 20 4 80 10% $ 3,080
Payment of invoices to contractors 25 4 100 12% $ 3,850
Support homeowner in permitting process 20 10 200 24% $ 7,700
Task 2 total 820 820 $ 31,570
Task 3
Public meetings 2 20 40 18% $ 1,540
Develop presentations/outreach materials 3 20 60 27% $ 2,310
Newsletter articles,press releases,social media,
website updates,articles, Fact Sheets,post cards 8 10 80 36% $ 3,080
Research of county records of septic systems in
priority violation and complaint cases with surfacing
sewage-for development of direct mailing 1 40 40 18% $ 1,540
Task 3 total 220 220 $ 8,470
TOTAL 1,468 $ 56,518