Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBLD1985-00424 i Foundation Evaluation of Mobile Home Site for John Dineson Property February 1985 General On February 16 , 1985 , Norman A . Dixon of Clark Associates , A Division of Northwestern Territories , Inc . , made a field inspection of a mobile home site on the property of John Dineson. This property is located just off Lindsey Hill Road, about two and three quarters of a mile from the junction of Lindsey Hill Road and East Quilcene Bay Road . At the time of Mr . Dixon's visit , forms for a non-bearing perimeter wall , and four sixty-six foot long concrete footings to support a double wide mobile home had been constructed , and appeared to be ready for the placement of concrete . Non Uniformity of Foundation Soils The native soils at the Dineson property site can be classified as silty-gravelly sands , covered by only a few inches of humus topsoil . As shown in the enclosed sketch , the northern two thirds of the mobile home foundation has been developed in a "cut" area of the native soil , and thus has an adequate foundation due to the relatively high natural soil density and moderately low soil moisture . In contrast , the southernmost one third of the foundation has been developed in disturbed and loose "fill" soil materials . Although these are geologically similar soil types , the fill portion of the foundation is much less dense , and therefore absorbs more water which further increases its weakness . As a result , the foundation footings now rest on two different soil types , in so far as supporting capacity is concerned . This situation can ultimately give rise to substantial differential settlement , with possible damage to the mobile home , if some type of remedial action is not now taken . General Observations If time were not a consideration , allowing the fill materials to slowly consolidate over a period of one or two seasons would likely improve the bearing capacity of the soils to the point where they could be safely utilized for at least moderate • , x a III foundation loading . However , the Dinesons wish to proceed with construction as soon as possible . Accordingly , the type of remedial treatment recommended will be somewhat more expensive , but capable of immediate implementation . One further important consideration is the preservation, if possible , of all the existing footing and wall forms during the course of remedial treatment . Recommendations Each of the present footings are sixteen inches wide , and contain two longitudinal Number 4 bars of reinforcing steel . By temporarily removing the reinforcing bars , a number of twelve inch auger holes can quickly be drilled through the fill material utilizing a two man motorized auger . These holes , of maximum depth of about four feet , should penetrate at least one foot into original soil , and be drilled on five foot centers , but only in those portions of the footings on fill materials ( see sketch ) . Once drilled and cased , if necessary to prevent caving , the holes should be filled with concrete , after placement of four Number 4 vertical rebars in each hole . This vertical steel reinforcement should be structurally attached to the overlying footing before placement of footing concrete . It is also recommended that each portion of the footings which have been placed on fill material , be reinforced by four Number 4 bars of longitudinal reinforcement in lieu of the existing two bars , which are adequate only for the non-fill portions of the foundations . In addition to providing protection against differential settlement , the proposed reinforced piling will provide additional hold down force to the mobile home , which has several points of built in structural steel attachment to each concrete footing . This additional hold down feature may at some future date be an important consideration in view of the fact that nearly one hundred knot winds were believed to have traversed this area on the night that the Hood Canal floating bridge was destroyed . 7 7, i / L._, '-'77-"t-2-2/e3)' 1----/ p Norman A. Dixon p 1• : �oF"'"sil,: %,�2 ° Engineering Geologist a ,,j j i c":',cas � ' ,'P.e. J . R . Jerry Newlin , PE ee' "��D"e'a `,� Principal Engineer e� C, �•;0 t a,, Ilik. Ovos�s • I .. . ,.. .i D _..... • • -/ ,, . _ _ ... .. . ... ........_ I .. • •( A . i 1 -- - -I ,... ...c 1-1---- 5 _:-_-._,c2c,„cre -/-,,,, rooi-7/1s .--- a r _11 , - 0 0 a a Q...--4 : A - i A ( 1,- - ., _,.. . .ea, . a ., , . 0 0, 1 r ' . .de 62-----4 --7).• ‘ '' ...- A70 ii fie 7 t I'1//_..7 7-1-2 tin')62./e k ' ..,//- - M , . ! J —— .' ' • . . .--r'- :-: -.41.77-.1--:-;---i ..) „ D 1.- ille,d- 00 1 _ ._, - . __-_ .•-•• , .___ C' -.D, .- --/-7v? _riii:cofr re:/1";--- 72'e.:71°/-caj 1=1/e I ' / me., , ,,.... I - i I 1 . iti 0.1 C2rtr,.Una/ ,L) CA I F 1 1 0 Optax ) . cnen I pec_omin en c/a. I I o n,s : 71,ti --) 4L./L ionyl 71.ei 1 nn.I a ts it? cu7 orr-...t. .... 7 -._... ,...i FT)u r 214 /Ong li-Zil mai 130 1-.5' ill p1/ 0 re& irOdifiri-S' .i t //) -0:-,,kr2,A Conoit-e7Le.,Pe, 0 n no- Ac,0 1-/h ct tva//c- . iv) --c. - , Vei 7 /1-- _ __0.0 u)- C 0/2 f‘I--eff, -j.C.)//e<c,-; I MOBILE HOME, FOUNDATION .1)t? r). ei i[so n F i-0 Pet-747j '_ -1 yo-:-L4 8 ' N. Da04/ -,,,-.2-2/1-z-- -