Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutstamped_022 MLA21-00080 Public CommentsExhibit 22 - Page 1 of 33 Brian & Liana Barger 61 Robbins Rd. Nordland, WA 98358 LianaBarger@gmail.com October 9, 2021 Jefferson County Dept. of Community Development Development Review Division 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Ref: MLA21-00080 Project: Marrowstone Inn @ 10 Beach Dr. Nordland, WA 98358 Greetings, We have read through Mr. Nordstrom’s proposals and site plan for the renovation and operation of the Marrowstone Inn. We appreciate Andy stopping by our house personally to discuss the project and answer questions. Our home is directly across the street to the east of this property. We were pleased to learn of his plans to finally bring this lovely piece of property up to code as well as the intention to operate this as a small-scale resort. We are in full support of this project. We would, however, like to request that consideration be taken as to the of the ultimate height of the trees/vegetation planted across from our property. We would prefer that they do not block our precious views of the water and mountains. Thank you, Brian & Liana Barger Exhibit 22 - Page 2 of 33 From: Hope Borsato <hopeborsato@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 8:56 AM To: DCD Front Staff Subject: Can you direct me to where I might respond to a current permit in process CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hello. Perhaps you could forward this to the correct department. I am a resident of Marrowstone Island and would like to comment on the proposal of the Marrowstone Inn property. I do feel that traffic and the road angle at the intersection needs to be addressed. Coming down the hill on Robbins Road in a south direction, the corner is difficult to travel due to the dip in the right side of the road and how it is banked. One must go out in the other lane ( oncoming traffic) in order to drive more than 5 mph. Looking into the engineering if the current roadway is of concern even without more traffic in the future. Thank you for addressing this concern. Hope Borsato 872 East Marrowstone Rd 369.301.1350 Exhibit 22 - Page 3 of 33 Exhibit 22 - Page 4 of 33 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PO Box 47775  Olympia, Washington 98504-7775  (360) 407-6300 711 for Washington Relay Service  Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341 October 11, 2021 Shannen Cartmel, Project Planner Jefferson County Community Development Department 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Dear Shannen Cartmel: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the optional determination of nonsignificance/notice of application for the Marrowstone Inn Project (MLA21-00080) located at 10 Beach Drive as proposed by Andrew Nordstrom. The Department of Ecology (Ecology) reviewed the environmental checklist and has the following comment(s): SHORELANDS & ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE: Rebecca Rothwell, Wetlands/Shorelands Specialist (360) 407-7273 The OHWM as shown on the site plan (Appendix E Proposed Expansions) may be waterward of actual ordinary high. In high-energy marine environments, the OHWM is coincident with the landward limit of persistent vegetation (WAC 173-22-030(5)(a)(i)). Aerial imagery shows the landward limit of persistent vegetation landward of the OHWM line as shown on the site plan. I am available to verify the OHWM onsite, so please let me know if I can be of assistance with this. Per JCC 18.25.270.4.c: "Buffers shall not extend across lawfully established paved roads or hardened surfaces to include areas which are functionally isolated from the shoreline or critical area." Any development proposed within the shoreline buffer in areas that are not functionally isolated per the above citation will require a shoreline variance. Based on my review of aerial imagery, some of the locations shown on the site plan do not appear to be functionally isolated by paved roads or hardened surfaces. The burden of proof is on the applicant to demonstrate the location and extent of lawfully established paved roads or hardened surfaces. All variance criteria in WAC 173-27-170 must be met in order for a variance to be approved. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT: Derek Rockett (360) 407-6287 All grading and filling of land must utilize only clean fill. All other materials may be considered solid waste and permit approval may be required from the local jurisdictional health department prior to filling. All removed debris resulting from this project must be disposed of at an approved site. Contact the local jurisdictional health department for proper management of these materials. Exhibit 22 - Page 5 of 33 Shannen Cartmel October 11, 2021 Page 2 WATER QUALITY/WATERSHED RESOURCES UNIT: Jessica Eakens (360) 407-0246 Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent stormwater runoff from carrying soil and other pollutants into surface water or stormdrains that lead to waters of the state. Sand, silt, clay particles, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered to be pollutants. Any discharge of sediment -laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48 RCW, Water Pollution Control, and WAC 173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, and is subject to enforcement action. Construction Stormwater General Permit: The following construction activities require coverage under the Construction Stormwater General Permit: 1. Clearing, grading and/or excavation that results in the disturbance of one or more acres and discharges stormwater to surface waters of the State; and 2. Clearing, grading and/or excavation on sites smaller than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of development or sale, if the common plan of development or sale will ultimately disturb one acre or more and discharge stormwater to surface waters of the State. a) This includes forest practices (including, but not limited to, class IV conversions) that are part of a construction activity that will result in the disturbance of one or more acres, and discharge to surface waters of the State; and 3. Any size construction activity discharging stormwater to waters of the State that Ecology: a) Determines to be a significant contributor of pollutants to waters of the State of Washington. b) Reasonably expects to cause a violation of any water quality standard. If there are known soil/ground water contaminants present on-site, additional information (including, but not limited to: temporary erosion and sediment control plans; stormwater pollution prevention plan; list of known contaminants with concentrations and depths found; a site map depicting the sample location(s); and additional studies/reports regarding contaminant(s)) will be required to be submitted. For additional information on contaminated construction sites, please contact Carol Serdar at Carol.Serdar@ecy.wa.gov, or by phone at (360) 742-9751. Additionally, sites that discharge to segments of waterbodies listed as impaired by the State of Washington under Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act for turbidity, fine sediment, high pH, or phosphorous, or to waterbodies covered by a TMDL may need to meet additional sampling and record keeping requirements. See condition S8 of the Construction Stormwater General Permit for a description of these requirements. To see if your site discharges to a TMDL or 303(d)-listed waterbody, use Ecology’s Water Quality Atlas at: https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/waterqualityatlas/StartPage.aspx. The applicant may apply online or obtain an application from Ecology's website at: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/stormwater/construction/ - Application. Construction Exhibit 22 - Page 6 of 33 Shannen Cartmel October 11, 2021 Page 3 site o perators must apply for a permit at least 60 days prior to discharging stormwater from construction activities and must submit it on or before the date of the first public notice. Ecology’s comments are based upon information provided by the lead agency. As such, they may not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations that must be obtained or legal requirements that must be fulfilled in order to carry out the proposed action. If you have any questions or would like to respond to these comments, please contact the appropriate reviewing staff listed above. Department of Ecology Southwest Regional Office (GMP:202104944) cc: Rebecca Rothwell, SEA Derek Rockett, SWM Jessica Eakens, WQ Andrew Nordstrom (Proponent) Exhibit 22 - Page 7 of 33 From:Shannen Cartmel To:Helena Smith Subject:FW: MLA21-00080 Notice of Application/SEPA Date:Thursday, October 14, 2021 3:11:02 PM Respectfully, Shannen Cartmel Lead Associate Planner Jefferson County Community Development scartmel@co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4454 From: Brian Tracer <btracer@ejfr.org> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 9:23 AM To: Shannen Cartmel <SCartmel@co.jefferson.wa.us> Subject: RE: MLA21-00080 Notice of Application/SEPA CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi Shannen, No comments other than ensuring all applicable laws, building codes, any other ordinance or regulation are adhered to including but not limited to all applicable IFC regulations, addressing and roadway standards. V/R Brian From: Shannen Cartmel <SCartmel@co.jefferson.wa.us> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 3:32 PM To: Rothwell, Rebecca (ECY) <rebs461@ECY.WA.GOV>; Sherrie Shold <SShold@co.jefferson.wa.us>; Pinky Mingo <pmingo@co.jefferson.wa.us>; Scott Bancroft <Sbancroft@jeffpud.org>; Terry Duff <TDuff@co.jefferson.wa.us>; John Fleming <JFleming@co.jefferson.wa.us>; sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov; sepa@dahp.wa.gov; sepadesk@dfw.wa.gov; samg@portofpt.com; greg@portofpt.com; eric@portofpt.com; Brian Tracer <btracer@ejfr.org>; bgraham@jeffpud.org; dsarff@skokomish.org; Stormy Purser <thpo@pgst.nsn.us>; romac@pgst.nsn.us; crossi@pnptc.org; sbruch@jamestowntribe.org; thpo@jamestowntribe.org; stodd@Suquamish.nsn.us; Jolivette, Stephanie (DAHP) <stephanie.jolivette@dahp.wa.gov>; ngauthier@jeffersontransit.com Cc: lleach@peninsuladailynews.com; jlester@ptleader.com; jmcmacken@peninsuladailynews.com; jeffconews@peninsuladailynews.com Subject: MLA21-00080 Notice of Application/SEPA Exhibit 22 - Page 8 of 33 Good afternoon, Please see the below notice of Type III Conditional Use, Shoreline Variance and SEPA. Due to the delay in the email. The comment period has been extended until Monday, October 11, 2021. All project documents are located here: https://test.co.jefferson.wa.us/WebLinkExternal/0/fol/3249828/Row1.aspx JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE III LAND USE APPLICATION, SHORELINE VARIANCE, AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATIONMLA21‑00080 APPLICANT: ANDREW NORDSTROM 4014 HUNTS POINT RD BELLEVUE WA 98004 Application Received Date: August 12, 2021 Application Complete Date: August 23, 2021 Application Notice Date: September 8, 2021 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: Parcel #'s: 921084010 and 921084011; S8 T29 R1E TAX NO. 10 (N300') and (LESS N300'); 10 Beach Drive, Nordland, WA 98358. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: ZON2021-00049: SMALL SCALE TOURIST AND RECREATION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITH MAJOR VARIANCE AND SEPA to bring Marrowstone Inn into conformance as Rural Recreation Lodging and Cabins. The parcels are in total 8.3 acres and per Jefferson County Code (JCC) 18.20.350(9)(a) requires a variance from the 10‑acre parcel requirement. Additionally, the applicants are requesting a variance from JCC 18.20.350(9)(b), to allow more than the 6000 square feet of development for 10 acres to accommodate the existing 11 rental cabins totaling 9,097 SF with an additional assembly space, garage with caretaker’s unit above, and three utility buildings totaling 4,459 SF (excluding the caretaker's residence). The property has been continuously operated as a grandfathered, non‑conforming beach resort since the 1940s. Part of the proposal includes renovating and improving the existing structures, upgrading the septic system to meet current commercial standards, the addition of a sauna, improving existing paths onsite, the addition of more gravel parking, and two "glamping" tents on the property. SDP2021-00012: SHORELINE VARIANCE WITH SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT to remodel and renovate existing non‑conforming cabins. The renovations mostly include lateral, landward development within the shoreline jurisdiction. Waterward development includes supplying existing non‑conforming cabins 1‑4 with the required septic transport lines. There are two wetlands on‑site, a category I marine wetland and a category IV wetland, with a 300‑foot and 40‑foot buffer, respectfully. The applicants are requesting an administrative buffer reduction of 25% per JCC 18.22.730 (9). The entryway of Cabin 2 is proposed to be located waterward of the existing entryway, but will not be the most waterward portion of the cabin and the entryway to cabin 3 will be relocated to the eastern side of the cabin, a lateral expansion that is parallel to the shoreline of Oak Bay. The previous unpermitted expansion of a restroom in cabin 5, which the applicants have requested to keep and upgrade is parallel to the shoreline of Kilisut Harbor and is necessary to provide restroom facilities for the guests utilizing this cabin. Associated access road improvements and portions of the areas where sewer lines are proposed are waterward of cabins 1‑4. The septic system has been designed to minimize land disturbance in association with the onsite contours and conditions. The proposal is the most minimally invasive option to the shoreline and is required to bring the property into compliance. The proposal is accompanied by a Shoreline, Wetland, Fish and Wildlife Habitat, and FEMA Floodplain assessment prepared by Soundview Consultants. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All Exhibit 22 - Page 9 of 33 interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379‑4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on October 11, 2021. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The optional DNS process of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197‑11‑355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. DCD reviewed the proposal for probable adverse environmental impacts and expects to issue a DNS. This determination is based upon a review of the SEPA Checklist, project submissions, and other available information. Additional conditions or mitigation measures may be required under SEPA. The SEPA Official has determined that: This will be the only opportunity to make comments related to SEPA. There will not be another comment period after the threshold (final) SEPA determination is made. If the threshold determination is a Determination of Non‑Significance (DNS) or a Mitigated Determination of Non‑Significance (MDNS), parties of record may appeal the decision to the Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Notice of Decision. A Determination of Significance (DS) may not be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: This is a Type III permit application that is subject to SEPA review. An open record hearing will be scheduled. Separate public notice of the SEPA threshold (final) determination by the Administrator and the date of the hearing will be provided at least 15 days prior to the hearing. Appeals of the Administrator's threshold decision will be handled at the same hearing. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven calendar days prior to such a hearing. The final permit decision for this Type III permit application will be made by the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court. APPEALS: Appeals of SEPA decisions are described above in the SEPA Environmental Review section. The final permit decision for this Type III permit application will be made by the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court. Project Planner: Shannen Cartmel, 360‑379‑4450 Respectfully, Shannen Cartmel Lead Associate Planner Jefferson County Community Development scartmel@co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4454 ***Email may be considered a public record subject to public disclosure under RCW 42.56*** Exhibit 22 - Page 10 of 33 From:Shannen Cartmel To:Helena Smith Subject:FW: ORCAA Comment on SEPA #202104944; File #MLA21-00080 Date:Thursday, October 14, 2021 3:11:28 PM Attachments:2021_0805_Marrowstone_SEPA_Checklist.pdf Respectfully, Shannen Cartmel Lead Associate Planner Jefferson County Community Development scartmel@co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4454 From: Lauren Whybrew <lauren.whybrew@orcaa.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 11:25 AM To: Shannen Cartmel <SCartmel@co.jefferson.wa.us>; andrewlnordstrom@gmail.com Cc: Tony Gibson <tony.gibson@orcaa.org> Subject: ORCAA Comment on SEPA #202104944; File #MLA21-00080 CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Greetings, I recently reviewed an environmental checklist for the Marrowstone Inn Project (attached). The project proposes remodeling the main lodge to include a commercial kitchen for event purposes, remodeling and upgrading all of the existing cabins, the mobile home and associated garage. Olympic Region Clean Air Agency (ORCAA) has the following comments for the applicant: ORCAA regulations require an asbestos survey for all demolition projects. Demolition projects by definition also include renovations performed to load-bearing structural members on the current building as part of a remodel. Prior to any demolition project, the following must be completed: 1. A good faith asbestos survey must be conducted on the structure by a certified Asbestos Hazardous Emergency Response Act (AHERA) building inspector; 2. If asbestos is found during the survey, an ORCAA Asbestos Removal Notification must be completed and all asbestos containing material must be properly removed prior to the demolition; and, 3. If the structure is 120 sq. ft. or greater, an ORCAA Demolition Notification must be submitted regardless of the results of the asbestos survey. There is a mandatory 14-day waiting period after ORCAA receives notification, so we recommend the applicant complete the Demolition Notification promptly after Exhibit 22 - Page 11 of 33 receiving the survey. *These requirements are specific to ORCAA and are not synonymous with any city or county permitting jurisdiction requirements Helpful Links: A list of certified asbestos contractors is available at https://www.orcaa.org/wp- content/uploads/2020/01/Asbestos_Contractors_Jan2020.pdf The Demolition Notification form is available at https://www.orcaa.org/asbestos- demolition-programs/demolition-notification/ If applicable, the Contractor Asbestos Removal Application is available at https://www.orcaa.org/asbestos-demolition-programs/contractor-asbestos/ If you have any questions or concerns regarding the process, please feel free to contact Tony Gibson (cc’d) by email or by calling our main office at 360-539- 7610. Thank you, Please note: I am working from home until further notice. The best way to reach me is via email. Lauren Whybrew, Engineer I Olympic Region Clean Air Agency - "Clean Air is Everyone's Business!" 2940 Limited Lane NW · Olympia WA 98502 · www.orcaa.org (360) 539-7610 ext. 107 · 1-800-422-5623 Please take notice that any records or communications with ORCAA are subject to public disclosure under the Public Records Act (RCW 42.56) unless exempt under applicable law. Please consider the environment before printing this email. Thank you. Exhibit 22 - Page 12 of 33 From:Shannen Cartmel To:Helena Smith Subject:FW: Shannon Cartmel, re the Marrowstone Inn project Date:Thursday, October 14, 2021 3:10:39 PM Respectfully, Shannen Cartmel Lead Associate Planner Jefferson County Community Development scartmel@co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4454 From: Mary Anne Martin <mastusser@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 4:51 PM To: Shannen Cartmel <SCartmel@co.jefferson.wa.us> Subject: Shannon Cartmel, re the Marrowstone Inn project CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Mary Anne and Chuck Martin 302 Beach Drive Nordland, WA 98358 September 21, 2021 Jefferson County Department of Community Development Development Review Division 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 RE: Marrowstone Inn—Andrew Nordstrom Dear Review Division: We are writing this letter regarding the proposed redevelopment of property located at 10 Beach Drive on the island of Marrowstone, two houses from where we live. We drive by it every time we leave or return to our home. Presently, this property is composed of several unsightly buildings and overgrown vegetation. Until its recent sale, it has been used as a short-term lodging facility. The previous owners, as much as they may have tried, were unsuccessful in maintaining the property and it has suffered disrepair. It is sorely in need of some TLC or it will further deteriorate and become a greater eye-sore than it is at present. Andrew Nordstom (Andy) has purchased the property with a dream of creating a small resort and special events center. He has the energy, enthusiasm and means to beautify and enhance this little corner of our island. We are thrilled. We have had a chance to talk with Andy about his concept and have learned that he is working with architects, landscapers, engineers, and environmental Exhibit 22 - Page 13 of 33 consultants to ensure that the ecosystem of the property in not only maintained but enhanced and improved. He understands the fragility of this particular part of the island and with his experts, plans to protect and preserve it. We feel the improvements Andy intends to make for a small, upscale resort and special events venue will improve our community in many ways, and we whole-heartedly request that the County grant the variances requested to move this project to completion. We feel that the concept envisioned by Andy will be a major enhancement to our community and to the island of Marrowstone. Thank you for reading our comments. Warm regards, Mary Anne and Chuck Martin Exhibit 22 - Page 14 of 33 Exhibit 22 - Page 15 of 33 Exhibit 22 - Page 16 of 33 October 1, 2021 Terese Grace 121 Robbins Rd. Nordland, WA 98358 teresegrace@gmail.com Jefferson county Department of community development Development Review Division 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA. 98368 Re: #10 Beach drive, Nordland, WA,98358 Dear Review Committee: I appreciate the opportunity to comment on the proposed project by Andrew Nordstrom at #10 beach drive Nordland, WA 98358. I live directly across the street from #10 Beach Drive. I have lived here since 1976. The proposed project is too big and intrusive; I do not feel it is a good fit for the neighbors, wildlife and the island. Marrowstone Island has a master development plan with Jefferson County. The master plan does not allow for new commercial development, therefore an owner would need a variance to expand. My understanding is that the variance for this project would be one of the largest issued. I am aware that variances are sometimes given for issues of hardship. I see no hardship here, none at all. I would approve of modest upgrades to the property such as upgrading the septic system, fixing up the cabins, fixing and cleaning up the lodge and clearing away all the garbage. Because the proposal is so large and the impacts will be significant, there are many issues and concerns that should be addressed before any approval of the plan is considered. Traffic: I am requesting a traffic impact study be performed before approval of this project. The Robbins road –Beach Drive intersection, where the Exhibit 22 - Page 17 of 33 entrance to the resort is located is very dangerous with a hill that goes into a blind corner where there is a history traffic accidents. I am very concerned about increased traffic and the impact it would have for bikers, walkers, and wildlife. If this project is approved, I am requesting significant lowering of the speed limit as well as installing traffic calming devices. Property site: A very large commercial parking lot is proposed directly across from me as well as my neighbors. Turning a large grazing field attached to a marshland into a commercial parking lot has the potential to create many significant environmental impacts that must be studied. The parking lot will also create increased noise and light issues with traffic coming and going all hours of the day and night. Planting a few trees will not mitigate any of those concerns just add a bit of privacy. These intrusions must be addressed to protect the fragile environment and wildlife as well the adjacent property owners. Wildlife: Wildlife is ever present in this area and is such a joy. Destroying their habitat with excess traffic, noise, and light pollution is not conducive to the spirit of the island. We have worked very hard through the years to mend the many environmental issues at the isthmus cut. Countless people treading on the marsh and beach will have a terrible impact. We must all continue to support limited wildlife impacts even if we may have to change our land use plans. Fires and fireworks: I strongly oppose both all year round. We have seen a promotional video on the web site “Marrowstone Inn.com” promoting a fire on the beach. With drought issues as well the environmental issues, fires and fireworks should never be allowed on the beach or property. If allowed inland, fires must be small and in safe fire pits. Noise: A project this large is meant to have many people visit and stay. Increase of vehicles coming and going at all hours, parties into the night, plus noise from motorcycles, drones, seaplanes, scooters, loud music are a huge concern. How will the county reassure me that the plan will mitigate the Exhibit 22 - Page 18 of 33 noise and that the county will enforce the noise ordinance. Who is responsible and how will these concerns be addressed? Two buildings along Robbins road: There are two small buildings sitting very close to Robbins road. They should not be turned into anything commercial. They are too close to the road, there is not a sufficient parking, and there is a traffic safety concern. Permits and the enforcement of permits: This is an extremely large project with many different government agencies overseeing the permit process. Why is there no SEPA review? The SEPA review will help us all understand how the entire proposal will affect the environment. Will SEPA oversee the rules and give guidance to the state and give assistance to the other agencies that will be involved with a project this size? How can I be reassured that all permit rules will be followed. Does the county have the staff to make sure there will be compliance with each permit. How can I be guaranteed that if the property goes up for sale in the near future that the new owner will be not able to create something even bigger than the current proposal? If a variance of this size is granted, how can we, the residents, be reassured that allowing variances like this one will not be a continuing trend on the Island. In closing, I reiterate that I strongly approve of the property being cleaned and brought up to code, but I believe a project of the proposed size, built in this small, quiet island community requires diligent study and thoughtful consideration to protect the safety& security of the residents and wildlife, the quality of life and the spirit of the island Thank you for your continued service and support of our community. Regards, Terese Grace Exhibit 22 - Page 19 of 33 Exhibit 22 - Page 20 of 33 Exhibit 22 - Page 21 of 33 Exhibit 22 - Page 22 of 33 Exhibit 22 - Page 23 of 33 From: Shannen Cartmel Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 3:10 PM To: Helena Smith Subject: FW: Approval of Marrowstone Inn permit Respectfully, Shannen Cartmel Lead Associate Planner Jefferson County Community Development scartmel@co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4454 -----Original Message----- From: Laura Stusser-McNeil <ljstusser@comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2021 10:09 AM To: Shannen Cartmel <SCartmel@co.jefferson.wa.us> Subject: Approval of Marrowstone Inn permit CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi Shannon— I am one of the Beach Drive residents in favor of the new development of the Marrowstone Inn. Their plans to improve the property while keeping natural habitat and preserving the low key nature of the south end of the island benefits us all. Thank you for soliciting feedback from neighbors and seeing all the positive impact this improvement will bring. Best regards, Laurie Stusser-McNeil 302 Beach Drive Exhibit 22 - Page 24 of 33 September 21, 2021 Jefferson County Department of Community Development Development Review Division 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend WA 98368 Re: 10 Beach Drive, Nordland WA 98358 Dear Review Committee: This letter is in support of the application presented to you by Andrew Nordstrom for the parcels at 10 Beach Drive, Nordland WA 98358. He is seeking approval for a small scale Tourist and Recreation permit to open what he is calling The Marrowstone Inn. I live next door at 50 Beach Drive. We are separated by a narrow county easement, so this project is important to me. For 46 years I have visited or lived here. My parents bought this waterfront property in 1975. In 1991, they moved the cabin over on the property and built a retirement home. In 2012, I was blessed to inherit their home and have resided here for 9 years. The cabin, home and waterfront continue to be enjoyed by our family and friends, and will be passed onto my niece. So this land is an important piece of our family history. I have known the previous resort owners and managers since 1975 and our family have enjoyed several reunions in the existing cabins & lodge. We also had my Mother’s Memorial in the lodge. So I also have a close connection to his property. When the current owners decided to sell the property, I knew it would take someone special to purchase it. It needed a lot of upgrading, and hopefully by someone who saw and cherished it’s natural beauty. Our neighbors at the end of Beach Drive are friends of Andy Nordstrom’s grandparents, and introduced us to him. I found it comforting that folks at both ends of our street know and care for each other. From that first day, I have been so impressed with Andy! He is young, enthusiastic, creative, friendly, thoughtful, and already a wonderful neighbor! I also know that the Exhibit 22 - Page 25 of 33 Nordstrom family love the Northwest, are hard workers and involved in their communities. I cannot imagine a better owner for this property! Andy is a good communicator and we have visited many times. When the Public Notice was posted, Andy sent links to our neighborhood contact list for us to review, and asked to hear from us. I met with him for over an hour to discuss his plans and visions. My BA is in Zoology and Ecology, so I honor nature on my land and Andy will, too. The many permits that are required will ensure that the project will be done carefully and sensitively. Andy will also have a fire hydrant, which will protect many of us in the area. The Marrowstone Inn will be gorgeous and it will support nature and our economy. Andy’s youth and passion are needed on Marrowstone Island and in our community. I am thrilled that Andy Nordstrom is my neighbor and I look forward to seeing his land being honored and enjoyed! I highly support this project and hope you will approve his application. Sincerely, Kathleen Waldron 50 Beach Drive Nordland WA 98358 kathleen.waldron@icloud.com 503-730-1099 Exhibit 22 - Page 26 of 33 Exhibit 22 - Page 27 of 33 First Name Last Name Address Jo Jackson 140 Beach Drive Sandy and Duncan Haynes 6495 Flagler Road John and Carol Gonnella 120 Beach Drive Erick Cody 260 Beach Drive Edward Almquist N/A Helen Stusser 300 Beach Drive Tom and Linda Weiner 123 Beach Drive Department of Ecology PO Box 47775 Kathleen Waldron 50 Beach Drive Brian and Linda Barger 61 Robbins Road Hope Borsato 872 East Marrowstone Road Terese Grace 121 Robbins Road Laurie Stusser-McNeil 302 Beach Drive Lauren Whybrew, ORCAA 2940 Limited Lane NW Brian Tracer btracer@ejfr.org Mary Anne and Chuck Martin 302 Beach Drive Dr. Jackie Canterbury 1640 E. Marrowstone Road Exhibit 22 - Page 28 of 33 City State Zip Code Nature of Comment Nordland WA 98358 Supports buffer reduction and parking Nordland WA 98358 Supports project as an asset to commu Nordland WA 98358 Supports project as an asset to commu Nordland WA 98358 Objects to use of variances on environm N/A N/A N/A Supports project as an asset to commu Nordland WA 98358 Supports project as an asset to commu Nordland WA 98358 Supports project as an asset to commu Olympia WA 98504 OHWM may be higher, grading and filli Nordland WA 98358 Supports project as an asset to commu Nordland WA 98358 Requests plantings not block view from Nordland WA 98358 Concerned that traveling South on Rob Nordland WA 98358 Objects to project as too large and intr Nordland WA 98358 Supports project as an asset to commu Olympia WA 98502 Reviewed environmental checklist, det No comment other than ensuring all ap Nordland WA 98358 Supports project as an asset to commu Nordland WA 98358 Requests variances be minimized, prot Exhibit 22 - Page 29 of 33 lot. Concerned about preserving wildlife and preventing trespass in environmentally sensitive areas. mentally sensitive site for non-essential use when smaller projects for residential use have been denied ing can only use clean fill, erosion control must take place before any activity, construction stormwater g rusive, not in line with master development plan. Requests a traffic impact study on the intersection of R tections for wildlife, fisheries, viewshed, and a smaller parking lot. Requests everything fall under the nat Exhibit 22 - Page 30 of 33 Robbins Road--Beach Drive. Objects to parking lot, impact on wildlife, fire and fireworks, noise, location o ture of minimal impact. Recommends allowing the buffer reduction. Concerned about effects on wildlife Exhibit 22 - Page 31 of 33 of buildings close to Robbins Road. Requests a SEPA review. Questions if county has sufficient staff to en e and wetland. Recommends eliminating the dock. Objects to large parking lot. Wants to know slope of p Exhibit 22 - Page 32 of 33 nsure permit rules are followed. Concerned that this will allow other large developments on the island. Exhibit 22 - Page 33 of 33