Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout106 92 JEFFERSON COUNTY STATE OF WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 106-92 } Amendments to the Jefferson-port Townsend } Shoreline Management Master Program, passed } by the City Council of the city of Port } Townsend on October 28, 1992 } (Ordinance 2320). In the Matter of WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, Jefferson County and the City of Port Townsend have jointly adopted the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program pursuant to the Washington State Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58); and the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Advisory Commission has requested the City of Port Townsend consider amendments to address certain inconsistencies within the Master Program and between the Master Program and the Port Townsend Urban Waterfront Plan; and the City of Port Townsend has proposed certain amendments to clarify inconsistent provisions as well as to further delineate uses permitted within the shoreline areas of Port Townsend; and the City of Port Townsend has accepted lead agency responsibilities for the amendments and has issued a Determination of Nonsignificance with addendum pursuant to the Washington State Environmental Policy Act, and the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Advisory Commission has conducted a public hearing and has recommended the amendments be adopted with certain revisions; and the Port Townsend City council and the Jefferson county Board of commissioners conducted a joint public hearing on the recommendations of the Shoreline Management Advisory Commission on Monday, October 26, 1992; and by passage of Ordinance 2330, the Port Townsend city Council has adopted the recommendations of the Jefferson- Port Townsend Shoreline Management Advisory commission with certain additional revisions; Page 1 of 2 ; '.- 18 ~~;.; 00115B NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners hereby approve and adopt herein by reference the amendments to the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program as passed by the City council of the city of Port Townsend by City Ordinance 2320. APPROVED AND SIGNED this 2nd day of November, 1992. JEFFERSON COUNTY BOAR F COMMISSIONERS I , .,'......, SEAL. ,'.1 'I~"f" . ,,' "" ",,"'-",' " "f/~~'t,_,' " , . J 'J Ju; ~.. "" lj", " ~ . :.-.:......,~ ,.: ~"- ;., \':' /'. ""..'..~', . '\, "',' . \',,1 ~ \. "I( , . ~. ,,'" i~ 1/"") ,,1;'\; '..,.'. .~ " ..'.\(~:..:, . ~\!,!; ..ft'. "" . ..' .',"-'-, ",'/ 0\. ...11 .' )..:,1;. ,', .. " Vt . .........:......"...,. ' -'.... . ~'" -'.',. .. '<..~.'" oS;)" ,,' """'" .. ATTEST: rÝ~J. ~ Lorna L. Delaney 6 Clerk of the Board Page 2 of 2 \foe 18 fAF 00 1159 ø' /1\/~f~,*~~~~~ {~;~i: 4. ".. ~ '" 1-- ~,~ . ¡ ..a.. !;(,', '~.' '.- ,7""'", .,¡:"~' ~~" '~:.. , " ,'l'! lit ""'.t", ,c""'~t 'í~ ,)~f ,"-C, '", " ,',.'t:",t ,,~ rt, ,,/'j~:~ ' "', ,. 1, , ~ t-':' ~,'&, It?,',-,-a,-'-~-, ,ç,~,~,:"" .-¡,. ,.,' ~~~~,~~~ IS"""" Œ>UN'n GAT - .....,. TO_, .,...""""'. Mark Huth JEFFERSON COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY Courthouse - P. 0, Box 1220 Port Townsend, Washington 98368 Telephone (206) 385-9180 FAX (206) 385-0073 John S. Adcock, Deputy Walter H. Perry, Deputy Sharon Thatcher, Deputy MEMORANDUM To: Jefferson County Board of Commissioners From: Mark Ruth, Prosecuting Attorney Date: November 3, 1992 Re: Proposed revisions to the Jefferson-Port Shoreline Management Master Program Townsend You have requested my opinion regarding the following issues as they pertain to the referenced proposal: * Do the revisions to section 4.105 Urban Shoreline Designation constitute a substantive revision to that section that would affect properties and development proposals in Jefferson county? * Was it appropriate for the City of Port Townsend to be lead agency for the environmental review of the proposal? * Was there adequate public hearing notice as provided for in State law? I have reviewed the proposed revisions to the Master Program and have discussed them with Mr. Dennis McClerran, Port Townsend City Attorney. I have the following comments: * The purpose of the proposal is to incorporate the City of Port Townsend's waterfront planning process into the Shoreline Master Program and specifically to revise section 4.106 Port Townsend Urban Waterfront Special District. section 4.106 only regulates development within the jurisdiction of the City of Port Townsend. section 4.105 Urban Shoreline Designation regulates development within all shoreline areas of Jefferson County and the City of Port Townsend that are designated as urban. The proposed revisions to section 4.105 do not constitute a substantive change in the Master Program. Rather, they resolve an inconsistency between Performance Standard #1, the Urban Designation definition, and the use classification for residential development in the urban designation in section 4.40 Use Matrix. * The inconsistency was noted by the City and the opinion of the Department of Ecology was sought and received. DOE indicated that the text of the performance standard would control over the Use 'iiY. 18 fA"~ 00 .1160 Matrix. That is well-settled administrative law. The Shoreline Hearings Board has previously ruled that the text of a master program is the controlling factor in questions of interpretation. Therefore, the amendment represents a necessary classification to avoid ambiguity. * The City of Port Townsend initiated the proposal and acted as lead agency for the environmental review. A determination of nonsignificance was issued on October 6, 1992. The determination states that the anticipated environmental impacts were adequately addressed in the environmental checklist and that the preparation of an environmental impact statement was not necessary. An Addendum which discusses the changes to the proposal which resulted from the public hearing process was adopted by the City Council on October 28, 1992. The State Environmental Policy Act Rules Chapter 197-11-926 WAC provide that the agency initiating a proposal is the lead agency for that proposal. Since the proposal does not include a substantive change to the Master Program regulation in Jefferson County outside of the City of Port Townsend, it is appropriate that the City act as lead agency for the environmental review. If the only change proposed had been the removal of the inconsistency between the performance standard and the Use Matrix, the action would have been categorically exempt from SEPA pursuant to WAC 197-11-800 (20). Thus the County portion of the proposal required neither a lead agency designation nor the other procedural steps under SEPA. * The Shoreline Management Advisory Commission held a hearing on the proposal on October 14, 1992. Notice to this effect was published in the Port Townsend Leader on September 23 and 30 and October 7 and 14, 1992. A joint hearing was held by the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners and the Port Townsend City Council on October 26, 1992. Chapter 173-19-061 WAC requires that in adopting amendments to Shoreline Master Programs, local government shall conduct at least one public hearing. Prior to conducting a public hearing, local government shall publish notice in each of three weeks immediately vat 18 FA(ýf 00 1.161 preceding the hearing. The requirements in WAC 173-19-061 for conducting a public hearing and publishing notice of that hearing have been substantially complied with for this proposal by the Shoreline Commission's public hearing and the notice published for that hearing. '~--,-s L ~. MARK HUTH cc:BOCC Jim Pearson/Shoreline's Planner Dennis McClerran/Port Townsend Attorney vat 18 r.\~~ 00.1162 it ~ PL 1- /.,.2 - r=s Ii ORDINANCE 2320 AN ORDINANCE pertaining to shoreline management, amending the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program and providing an effective date therefor. The City Council of the City of Port Townsend finds as follows: 1. In 1990, the City Council adopted the Port Townsend Urban Waterfront Plan (UWP) to protect the cultural, historic, aesthetic, and environmental quality of the City's waterfront. Although the plan and its implementing ordinances provide design guidelines and a special height overlay, it does not include development policies for waterfront residential or transient accommodation uses. Waterfront residential development is reviewed for consistency under the policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program (SMP). It is necessary and desirable to augment the plan by amending the SMP with respect to permitted and conditional uses. 2. The current SMP contains inconsistent provisions r~garding whether residential development requires a conditional use permit in order to be developed in the Port Townsend Urban Waterfront Special District shoreline environment. It is necessary to correct these inconsistencies. 3. The Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Advisory Commission has requested the City Council to begin a public process that would determine if the SMP should be amended to address the inconsistencies between the SMP and UWP. 4. In 1988, Jefferson County and the City of Port Townsend reached a settlement with the Washington State Department of Ecology on the appeal concerning the proposed Union Wharf redevelopment project. One condition of that appeal was to adopt certain amendments to the SMP which specifically authorized the Union Wharf project. Now, - as that the project proponents have failed to proceed and the permits have expired, the special amendments made then appear inappropriate. Thus, these amendments should be revised. 1 (port Townsend, November 1992) VOL 18 fAE 00 1163 5. 6. . - _." A 1990 study by the Jefferson County Economic Development Council, "A Survey of the Economic Impacts of the Marine Trades Industry in Jefferson County," documents that the marine trades industry in Jefferson County is a major component of the local economy. There is a direct connection between commercial vessel storage and repair facilities and the need for preserving shoreline properties for water-dependent uses in order to maintain a strong marine trades economy. Properties in the Port Townsend Urban Waterfront Special District that are particularly well suited for these uses are the Boat Haven Marina and Point Hudson Marina Districts. The Port Townsend School District has recently received a $400,000 federal grant to fund a Magnet Training Center. The purpose of the Center is to integrate schools and the business community in a partnership in vocational training. A primary target of the Center is to provide vocational training for high school students interested in working in the marine trades. The Center will also provide classes and additional training for marine trade employees. 7. A 1992 report prepared for the Port of Port Townsend evaluates the feasibility of increasing the capacity of marine haulout facilities at the Boat Haven port property. Enhanced haulout facilities will allow existing and new marine trade businesses to service a class of vessels that' will constitute new clients, which could allow Port Townsend firms to service over 96 % of the commercial and recreational fleet based on the west coast. The report states that "this activity will create between 70 and 97 new jobs. Marine trades employment is especially important to the community as it has one of the highest average annual wages per employee of all economic sectors. " 8. A statistically validated 1991 Citizen survey undertaken in 1991 by the Port Townsend Main Street Project found that the uses citizen respondents felt were most appropriate for the Port Townsend commercial waterfront include: open space (86%), boat repair (85%), boat building (84%), other marine related uses (84%), restaurants (76%) and festivals (72 % ). Uses respondents felt were not appropriate for the waterfront included R. V. parks (81 %), condominiums (74%), and apartments (72%). 9. Public testimony on recent shoreline permits have indicated public concern about the loss of traditional shoreline uses. Many of these uses are essential to the traditional fishing and boat building/repair businesses which continue to be a mainstay of our local economy. These uses, which must be on the shoreline to survive, are often displaced by the economic pressures of tourist facilities and residential developments. The current SMP fails to address this concern and actually favors residential uses over some water-oriented uses. 10. The current SMP fails to recognize certain District's unique suitability to accommodate preferred uses such as water-dependent and water-related uses, while other districts could further increase water-enjoyment uses. Therefore, the SMP should provide for. 2 (port Townsend, November 1992) '1°'- 18 fMë ÙO1164 11. 12. 13. 14. preservation of future opportunities for uses which require a waterfront location, uses which might otherwise be lost to shoreline development for other uses. The Commercial Historic District, however, has very few water-dependent uses today. In this area, permitting non-water dependent uses appears appropriate and may further promote renovation and adaptive reuse of existing buildings in the District, thereby economically assisting historic preservation and improved public safety though seismic strengthening projects in these buildings. The Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58.020.7) states in part that, "uses shall be preferred which are consistent with control of pollution and prevention of damage to the natural environment, or are unique to or dependent upon use of the state's shoreline... shall be given priority for single family residences, ports, shoreline recreational uses including but not limited to parks, marinas, piers, and other improvements facilitating public access to the shorelines of the state, industrial and commercial developments which are particularly dependent on their location on or use of the shorelines of the state and other development that will provide an opportunity for substantial numbers of the people to enjoy the shorelines of the state. " Administrative rules implementing the Shoreline Management Act (WAC 173-16-040-(4» states that, "Because shorelines suitable for urban uses are a limited resource, emphasis should be given to development within already developed areas and particularly to water- dependent industrial and commercial uses requiring frontage on navigable waters." The proposed amendment recognizes the unique suitability of certain areas to accommodate preferred shoreline water dependent or related uses while also encouraging a broad range' of urban uses, such as commercial and transient uses in the Historic Commercial District. The proposed amendments are designed to meet the Department of Ecology's suggestions for preparing Master Program revisions for mixed use projects. As stated in Ecology's Shoreline Mana~ement Guidebook (1990), "Mixed use developments can be a tool for achieving increased water-dependent activities, civic revitalization and public access on the shoreline. It Now, Therefore, the Port Townsend City Council ordains as follows: Section 1. Subsection 4.105, "Urban," of the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Master Program (SMP) is hereby amended to read as follows: Definition The urban environment is an area of high intensity land use, including residential, commercial, and industrial development. Urban shorelines should be designated for high intensity uses. ef 3 (Port Townsend, November 1992) 'Joe 18 fM.:: 00 . - 1165 multi family rcsidcntial development. The urban designation may also be applied to areas of lower intensity use where the surrounding land use is urban and urban services are available. Section 2. Subsection 4.106, "Port Townsend Urban Waterfront Special District," Shoreline Master Program is hereby amended to read as follows: 4.106 PORT TOWNSEND URBAN WATERFRONT SPECIAL DISTRICT Deimition Within the urban shoreline environment is the Special District designation of the Port Townsend Urban Waterfront. This district encompasses and includes the eoffimereial boat basiR OR Thayer Street OR the southv¡est to the Point HudsOR Resort area on the northeast, includiRg that POrtiOfl froRtiRg Admiralt). Inlet. the Port of Port Townsend properties at Point Hudson. including that portion fronting Admiralty Inlet. and follows the waterfront along Port Townsend Bay to and including the Port of Port Townsend properties at the Boat Haven. and extending to the western edge of the Urban Wetland District. The zone is the most intensely developed waterfront area in the city and includes two major marinas, water dependent and related commercial and industrial uses, as well as the Water Street Historic District. In addition to the policies and standards that follow, the Special District is subject to the policies and standards contained in the urban shoreline environment (Subsection 4.105). If the provisions of this Subsection are s.pecifically inconsistent with any other provisions of this program. the provisions of this Subsection will apply. The Water Street National Historic Distriet exteRds from Polk to JacksOfl Streets. The Port Townsend Urban Waterfront Plan (UWP) describes the district in greater detail and is incor:porated herein by reference. The UWP delineates the district into eight subdistricts from southwest to northeast: l.. b. ~ 4. ~ Q.,. 7. ~ Urban Wetland District Boat Haven Marine District Regional Service Commercial District Bluff Narrows Commercial District Ferry Retail District Historic Commercial District Civic District Point Hudson Marina District The boundaries of these subdistricts are described by the map appended hereto as "Appendix C. " 4 (port Townsend, November 1992) Jot 18 r.W.' 00 1166 The Historic Commercial District is the urban commercial core of the community and is dominated by activities and businesses that are not de1'Cndent on a waterfront location. However. water-related and water-enjoyment activities do exist in the form of parks. restaurants. street-end beaches. and piers that afford an opportunity to enjoy the town's shoreline amenity. Existine development in the remaining seven districts ranges from traditional maritime. water- de,pendent uses to newer transitional uses. principly transient accommodations and residential buildines. Several parcels present °pJ'Ortunities for development of water-dependent. or at least water- oriented uses. General Policies 1. A mixture and variety of uses and activities in the Port Townsend Urban Waterfront District is encouraged, particularly those that: a. Are water-dependent or water related uses or are accessory to or support water dependent and/or water related uses. Provide an opportunity for the public to actively or passively enjoy the community's waterfront amenity. Blend with or enhance the character and flavor of the Port Townsend Urban Waterfront. Provide a physical link or connection open to the public between the upland and the shoreline. Are supportive and reinforcing of the design and architectural qualities of the Water Street National Historic District when located within or adjacent to its boundaries. b. c. d. e. 2. A public pedestrian walkway system should be established along the Special District's waterfront utilizing a combination of natural beaches, BoElftiwalks, pathways, piers, wharves, street-ends, sidewalks, stairways, or other improvements. Although it may not be feasible for the walkway system to be continuous throughout the entire area, it should promote quality pedestrian access to and along major portions of the waterfront. The street-ends of Thayer, Decatur, Kearney, Gaines, Scott, Walker, Calhoun, Tyler, Adams, Quincy, and Monroe Streets should, at a minimum, become developed access points to the shoreline. Linkage between these street-ends should be determined by the physical characteristics of the shorelines, existing development patterns, potential for structural improvements, and other factors relevant to developing a continuous pedestrian system. 3. Existing piers and wharves along the Port Townsend Special District waterfront should be refurbished or rebuilt in order to maintain a modern-day link with the community's maritime history. The refurbishment or redevelopment of existing pier and wharf structures may iHclude a pl8:HHOO æixmre af eoæmereial deyelopmeRt coRsisteRt with 5 (port Townsend, November 1992) YOL 18 rA~~ 00 1167 ~ ~ 2.. community 8:ßå shoreline goals; howcvcr, and new over-water structures 5fteH should effiy be developed only to serve water-dependent uses. Existin~ water-dependent and water-related uses should be preserved and protected as critical elements of the traditional and current economy of the city. as well as elements which define the character of the community. Exce.pt within the Historic Commercial District. new residential or transient accommodation developments should not be allowed unless as part of a mixed-use project incor:porating water-dependent. water-related or water-enjoyment uses. Properties within the Boat Haven Marina District should preserve water-dependent or publicly oriented recreational uses along the shoreline and foster adjacent upland water- related commercial and water-related industrial uses which are necessary to support an economically viable Port District. 7. Properties within the Point Hudson Marina District should preserve or protect existing water-oriented uses. New development or redevelopment should be designed to provide for water-related uses in conjunction with a variety of other water-enjoyment uses. Performance Standards .L Development shall be limited to those uses which can be classified as a water-de.pendent. water-related or water-enjoyment use. Non-water-oriented development. while not preferred. may also be authorized as a conditional use provided said development reco~nizes the public access directive of the Shoreline Management Act and makes provisions for the public's continued and enhanced enjoyment of the shoreline. Such provisions could be the preservation of shoreline views. the establishment of a public access easement across and to the shoreline. enhancement of an adjacent street-end or park. or other consideration commensurate with the degree of impact caused by the development. 2. New structures or exterior alterations of existing structures located within or immediately adjacent to the Water Street National Historic Commercial District shall not detract from the design and architectural integrity of the district. To this end, plans for development shall inelude exterior elevations with enough design details to be evaluated by appropriate historic preservation agencies. 3. Public access provisions shall include consideration for both physical and visual access to the shoreline. Said provisions shall be coordinated with the Port Townsend PaFlei Plannin~ and Building Department and planned in conjunction with ~ an appro-led Comprehensive Public Access Plan, WRen adopted, and shall provide a link between the 6 (port Townsend, November 1992) ,'01- 18 rA~f 00116B .., '. shoreline and upland and/or connect with adjacent access provisions as exists or are planned. The setback for non-water dependent elements of developments within the Port Townsend Urban Waterfront Special District shall be a minimum of fifteen (15) feet from the ordinary high water mark, except for those structures within the \l,Taær Strœt NatioRal Historic Commercial District where there is no standard minimum setback from the ordinary high water mark. 4. New or expanded structures withia the Water Street NatiORal Historic District may extclid I:lI' to fift)' (50) feet ili height above the average grade level of abuttilig iR'lf'ro...ed pl:lÐlie streets, execpt for stnlctl:lres located wat:erv.'ftl'El ef the ordiliary high water m£i1'k, Ìfl wHieh ease the hcigHt SHall Rot exceed thirty fi'le (35) feet as mCRsl:lreå from mca:R higher high water (MHH\V). are subject to the specific hei~ht limits of the special overlay district adopted in the Urban Waterfront Plan and codified in Chapter 17.24 of the Port Townsend Municipal Code (see Appendix E)' 5. 6. The redevelopment and revision of existing wharves and piers may be permitted to serve water dependent or water related uses. Water enjoyment and ROR water oricated uses may be authorized as conditional uses on these structures, provided such uses are integrated elements to an overall redevelopment plan meeting all of the following conditions: a. The redevelopment is to an existing, contributing structure within the Water Street National Historic District as recognized by the National Trust for Historic Preservation. The structure is recognized by appropriate historic preservation agencies as having local and state-wide historic significance. The structure has an established history of mixed uses, both water oriented and non-water oriented uses. - The redevelopment does not exceed the structure's historic, over-water footprint. Buildings and other structures located on the wharf or pier are approved by appropriate historic preservation agencies as being compatible and reinforcing of the architectural integrity of the historic district. A significant element or component of the developed area is dedicated to water dependent and water-related uses. At least one-third of the pile supported structure including a perimeter walkway is dedicated for public access and enjoyment of the shoreline. All public access provisions shall be complete and available for public use upon completion of the first component of the development. The redevelopment will not result in a reduction in the amount of physical public access to and over the water as currently exists. The City of Port Townsend shall be a party to a binding agreement to guarantee that public access and enjoyment provisions are continuously maintained. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. 7 (port Townsend, November 1992) Yûi- 18 tA~,~ 00 11.69 L. New development or redevelopment within the Boat Haven Marina District shall be limited to water-dependent or water-related uses. ~ New development or redevelopment within the Point Hudson Marina District shall be limited to water-oriented uses. Residential or transient accommodation uses may be permitted as a conditional use. provided that each of the fol1owin~ conditions are met in addition to those criteria set forth in Subsection 4.203. ~ a. 12.. Residential and transient accommodation uses shall not occupy any portion of the ~round floor of any buildin~s. Accessory uses. such as lobbies. which provide services or access to residential or transient accommodations are allowed on the ~round floor. A minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the total ground floor area of all buildin~s which include any residential or transient uses shall be reserved on a continuous basis for water-oriented uses. except in the Boat Haven Marina and Point Hudson Marina Districts. Exce.ptions to #9 above: i.. 11. Residential and transient accommodation uses in the Historic Commercial District are primary uses and shall not require a conditional use permit. but shall not contain residential or transient accommodation uses on the ground floor. . The Historic Commercial District is exempt from the 50 % requirement for providin~ water-oriented uses in buildin~s. provided the ~round floor is reserved for commercial retail or service uses permitted by the underlying zonin~. ill... Properties located between Gaines Street and the western boundary of the Historic Commercial District which are on the upland side of Water Street are also exempt from 9(1») above. iv. Pre-existing structures shall not be required to provide water-oriented uses for a minor addition. remodel or alteration when it will not increase the floor area more than twenty percent (20%) of the total floor area of the existing structure as it exists at the time of a~option of this provision. 8 (port Townsend, November 1992) ;('11 tli'. 18 r~F 00.t 170 1Q... Incentives to protect and encourage pier and wharfs: a. The floor area of any existing pier or wharf which provides water-dependent or publicly oriented recreational uses may be substituted for up to one-half of the required floor area developed on the uplands for water-oriented uses. 12:. The floor area for any new wharf or pier constructed to serve water-de~ndent or publicly oriented recreational uses can be substituted for a 1: 1 re,placement of the 50% floor area requirement of providini: water- oriented uses on the eround floor. c. Public access shall be provided to piers and wharfs under a & b above unless incompatible commercial operations on the structure preclude it. lL Uses allowed on piers and wharfs: a.. Water-dependent uses or publicly oriented recreational uses shall be allowed on piers and wharfs as a primary use. 12:. Water-related uses which provide necessary support services to water-de,pendent uses may be allowed on piers and wharfs as a conditional use. Ç,., No uses other than 11 la.) and (b.) above shall be allowed over water except as described in Performance Standard 6 la-i) above. Section 3. Subsection 4.40, Classification Table, of the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Master Program is hereby amended to read as follows: 4.40 CLASSIFICATION TABLE The environmental designation and developments and uses matrix on the following page provides a graphic representation of the policies and performance standards contained in this Master Program by indicating project classifications. The matrix lists various uses that can occur within the shoreline environment on the left column. Environmental designations (obtained from Appendix" A" and "B" for any specific location in the county or city) are listed across the top. The classification is determined by following a use line and a designation line to their mutual intersection. The classification of a project determines the level of review that it will receive. The matrix provides a guide for the classification of project proposals. 9 (port Townsend, November 1992) 'iot 18 r¡\~r 001.1.71 r URBAN PTUW SUBURBAN _ùNSERVANCY NATURAL AQl'ATIC' ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATIONS ADVERTISING On-premise S § S S X C Off-premise C X C C X X AGRICULTURE S § S P C N/A AQUACULTURE S § S P C P BOAT LAUNCHES P l P S C <- COMMERCIAL Warer-related mdlor depeadeDt mdlac P l' S § X <- enjoyment NOD-waler dcpaIdmt C ç' C C X X DOCKS. PIERS. AND FLOATS S § S S C <- DREDGING S § S C X <- FOREST MANAGEMENT S § P P C N/A INDUSTRIAL AND PORT FACILITIES WIler related mdlac depcIIdcut P l s C X <- NOD-waler dcpeodeat S § C C X X lANDFILLS Upland P l P S X N/A Aquatic S § C C X <- MARINAS P l s C X <- MINING C £ C C X <- MOORING BUOYS S ~ P P C <- PAIUaNG FACILITIES VÎIt.U S ~ P P C C NOD-vÎIt.U S ~ S C C C RE CREA TI ON A L FACILITIES Over-ni¡ht P l S s X X Day uae P l P S C <- RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CZ ç"" P S X X SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES P l P P S <- SHORE DEFENSE WORKS S § S S C C TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES P l S C C <- UTILITIES P l s c c C I UW - !'art lownseod Urban Walertront -..... Ulstnct P - PrimaJy S . SccODdary X - Proluòited N/A . Not applicable Projects in die aquatic deaipatioa !bat ori¡ioale walerward of die extreme low tide (ace Ficure 3), but have been classified with an arrow « -), shaD be cOllJidered die same u 1be adjoiaiac upl..s. ReaideaûaJ developmeat !bat medl1be criteria for sÌDIIe family reaideaûaJ dcvelopmeat Ullder Section 3.402(5) shall be a primary uae. I!xc:ept in 1be Historic Commercial Dimic:t wbere tranaic:ot accommodation and reaideaûaJ IIIC8 above the Il'OUIId Roar are primary uael. Except in die Historic Commercial DiJtrict where DOD-waler-depeodeot commercwlllC8 are primary 1IIC8. Except ill die Bo8I HaYaa Marina Di8trict where warer-aajoymeat IIIC8 are DOt permilted. Except in die Bo8I Havaa Marina Di8trict 8Dd Point Hudaoa MariDa Di0uict8 where residCDtial development is prohibited. C ' CoadiÛOO8l < - Sune u upl..s 10 (port Townsend, November 1992) i¡}!. 18 rA~f 001:172 Section 4. Section 8, Program Revisions, is hereby amended to read as follows: SECTION 8 PROGRAM REVISIONS In order to comply with RCW 90.58.190, Jefferson County and the City of Port Townsend shall periodically review this Master Program and make such adjustments that are desirable or necessary . Any such revisions or adjustments shall be submitted to the Washington State Department of Ecology only after completion of at least one public hearing in accordance with the requirements set forth under WAC 173-19, and upon favorable recommendation of the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners and the Port Townsend City Council: provided however. that either any revision or adjustment which applies only within the County or only within the City need not be submitted for recommendation to the unaffected jurisdiction. No such revision or adjustment shall become effective until it has been approved by the Washington State Department of Ecology. Section 5. Severability. In the event anyone or more of the provisions of this ordinance shall for any reason be held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect or invalidate any other provision of this ordinance, but this ordinance shall be construed and enforced as if such invalid provision had not been contained therein; provided, that any provision which shall for any reason be held by reason of its extent to be invalid shall be deemed to be in effect to the extent permitted by law. Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective five days after its passage and publication. Rea r e first, second and third time times and passed by the City Council of the City of P Tow sen, ashington, at a regular meeting thereof, held this 28th day of October, 1992. . A TrEST: ~~ David A. Grove, City Clerk Approved as to~~~:f2 ~, . DennIs McLerran, CIty Attorney 11 (port Townsend, November 1992) VOL 18 rIM 00 11-73 ua.8A.H WE'J'LA,NDS DISI"RICt' 'LUFF NARROWS DISTRICT fERR\" I ~fii~"'êT I I I APPENDIX C SUBDISTRICTS: PORT TOWNSEND URBAN WATERFRONT SPECIAL DISTRICT If f'- ~ e, 0 t\; 4Ct ,- 00 ~ ,.