HomeMy WebLinkAbout124 92
Jefferson County
Resolution 124-92
Port Townsend
Resolution 92-110
A JOINT RESOLUTION of the Board of County
Commissioners of Jefferson County and the
Port Townsend City Council, updating the
regional growth management strategy.
WHEREAS, Jefferson County and the City of Port Townsend are complying with the regional
growth management strategy entered into in September 1990; and
WHEREAS, the regional growth management strategy needs to be updated to reflect
amendments to the workplan and schedule; NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF JEFFERSON
COUNTY AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND that the
attached Regional Growth Management strategy of the County and the City is hereby adopted
as the amended overall strategy of the County and the City to provide for orderly, coordinated
management of growth within our jurisdictions in implementation of Engrossed Substitute House
Bill 2929, the Washington State Growth Management Act, as amended.
Adopted by the Board of County
~?~j1~S of Jefferson C~~~t~f
'. , 1992.
.
Lorna, L. Delaney
l<,:¿?~""'{~~1'.~,.of the Board
.,. ~>!j<'.f.!.,.,.......
. 0.),". "",. .. . -" - . '
-t., '\~-.
'. . I
r - ,.
.. . , ...
. .
. -
At~t: It l:i ~
David A. Grove
City Clerk
l'
Approved as to form: .
~~.;y-~
,t'
. " :
.f '. , J
. . ..
. . I -
,.. . .., -.. ..
. ," J <
"' -' . .
.. :(.J IJ '\ ::. .
4
18~AiI
01G:17
JEFFERSON COUNTY -PORT TOWNSEND
REGIONAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
INTRODUCTION
Pur¡x>se This is the strategy by which Jefferson County and the City of Port Townsend will
provide for orderly and coordinated management of growth as intended by the legislature in its
enactment of Engrossed Substitute House Bill 2929, as amended by Engrossed Substitute House
Bill 1025 (hereafter referred to as "Growth Management").
Since the City of Port Townsend is the only incorporated community in Jefferson County, this
agreement includes all of the local governments of region.
Overall Planning Concept In order to assure that each comprehensive plan element, as well as
implementing actions are considered within a unifying policy framework, the regional strategy
builds upon a visioning project (Jefferson 2000) to assess community values and develop an
over-arching framework, and includes a process for developing a regional county-wide planning
policy. The visioning process has included many opportunities for public involvement in
addition to the Jefferson 2000 process, and the remaining process of implementing GMA will
comply with the Public Involvement Plan described in Exhibit A.
The comprehensive plans will be dynamic documents, build on the foundations of existing
comprehensive plans of the City and County. These plans will be amended to conform with
the requirements of Growth Management as each element is prepared.
The County and City intend to adopt the ordinances and plan amendments necessary to meet
the requirements of Growth Management in an iterative fashion. This will require considering
and adopting comprehensive plan elements and implementing ordinances as they are prepared
(see Exhibit B), rather than compiling full sets of revisions and adopting them en mass at one
time. This method is chosen over a linear planning model for two important reasons:
1.
Current growth pressures require that priority planning elements be implemented
as soon as possible.
Past experience in Port Townsend and Jefferson County has shown that effective
citizen participation more readily occurs when implementing measures are under
serious consideration.
2.
Smaller Cities Assistance As the only City within the County, Port Townsend's planning needs
will be accommodated through funding as described in the budget included in this strategy (see
Budget below).
Contractual Horizon The proposed workplan is a conceptual framework that commits Jefferson
County and the City of Port Townsend through June 1993. Workplan deadlines are considered
statements of the jurisdiction's intentions to comply with Growth Management requirements,
but both jurisdictions reserve the right to negotiate amendments to the timing or nature of
deliverables after July 1992.
2
,'-lit". .18 '~Nii
01618
(;OV~TAL ~WORK
Joint Growth Mana¥ement Committee: Project management and oversight is provided by a joint
committee formed of three Jefferson County Commissioners, two ~embers <?f the Port
Townsend City Council and the Mayor of Port Townsend. The commltt~ provides overall
policy direction and coordination, and make joint policy-level recommendatiOns to the Board
of County Commissioners and the City Council.
Lead A¥ency: Due to the high level of trust and sense of common purpose between Jefferson
County and the City of Port Townsend, Jefferson County will serve as lead agency. The
County will convene meetings, act as fiscal agent, and make administrative decisions without
unduly cumbersome intergovernmental arrangements. Major decisions may have to be
formalized by memoranda of understandings.
PRIORITY TASKS
Jefferson 2000: A survey of public opinions was conducted as a joint City-County project in
1991 which, in conjunction with meetings of taxing districts, produced a regional strategic plan
for coordinating service and capital facility planning for taxing districts within Jefferson County.
The results provide a community values backdrop for policy analysis, both geographically and
by plan elements, throughout the Growth Management planning process.
To implement the strategic plan produced in the Jefferson 2000 process, meetings will be
developed to formalize the intergovernmental coordination processes included in the regional
strategic plan.
Lead Responsibility:
Target Completion Date:
Jefferson County
May 1993
Population Projections: A joint process was established in 1992 to coordinate population
projections between the City and County, as well as other taxing districts whose capital facilities
planning assumptions must conform with the City and County. A draft document has been
prepared and will be updated annually to incorporate new OFM findings.
Lead Responsibility:
Target Completion Date:
Jefferson County
September 1992
County- Wide Plannin~ Policy A framework to develop a County- Wide Planning Policy was
adopted by the County and City by Joint Resolution on October 1, 1991. Policies will be
prepared for consideration by both jurisdictions in accordance with the Joint Resolution.
Lead Responsibility:
Target Completion Date:
Jefferson County
December 1992
3 .
',~ '1"8 ijrl
(J. 619
Public Involvement Jefferson 2000 and a variety of public information and policy-making
opportunities have provided significant, ea:ly. ~d .contin.u°us pub.lic i?volvement opport.uni~es
to date in Growth Management. Each jUnsdlction wIll establIsh Independent coordInating
committees to provide guidance to the public involvement process throughout the process of
amending the comprehensive plans.
Lead Responsibility: Jefferson County
Target Completion Date: Ongoing
An overall public involvement program has been prepared to direct public involvement
opportunities for the remainder of the Growth Management process (see Exhibit C).
Lead Responsibility:
Target Completion Date:
Jefferson County/City of Port Townsend
Continuous throughout GMA process
Resource Lands & Critical Areas Interim Protection While neither jurisdiction met the March
1 extended deadline for classifying, designating and protecting resource lands and critical areas,
the City of Port Townsend adopted a Critical Areas Ordinance October 19, 1992. Jefferson
County anticipates completing the procedural steps necessary to protect Critical Areas by
December 1992. The County also anticipates adoption of policies to designate and regulations
to protect Resource Lands by February 1993.
Lead Responsibility:
Target Completion Date:
Jefferson County/City of Port Townsend
February 1993
Urban Growth Areas A joint program to define level of service standards for urban growth
areas and prepare county-wide planning policies for un-annexed urban growth areas is
proceeding. Following adoption of the County-wide Planning Policies, the City and County will
assess the relationship of existing Community Planning Areas and potential UGA designation
with the County-wide policies.
Lead Responsibility:
Target Completion Date:
Jefferson County/City of Port Townsend
July 1993
Comprehensive Plan Amendments The County Wide Planning Policies will identify elements
that will be amended or added to the Comprehensive Plans to conform to the requirements of
GMA including provisions for affordable housing, transportation, open space, capital facilities,
transportation, and utilities. The County will also provide elements for rural lands and master
planned resorts.. Both jurisdictions will incorporate changes necessitated by interim protection
policies for resource lands and critical areas, and boundary designations and policies for urban
growth areas. The City of Port Townsend's Growth Management planning strategy and
workplan to adopt required elements is attached as Exhibit C.
Lead Responsibility:
Target Completion Date:
Jefferson County/City of Port Townsend
July 1994
Transportation Both the City and County are participants in the Peninsula Regional
Transportation Planning Organization, and are striving to prepare local transportation plans
which will be coordinated between the City and County as well as the region. The Growth
management workplan includes elements for preparing local and regional transportation plans.
. .
4
,0'4
"18..~Uf
rf 620
The City of Port Townsend is addressing the problems of growth-related congestion along SR20
within the Port Townsend "Gateway", in coordination with Jefferson County, Jefferson Transit,
and WSDOT. The "Gateway" will be an optional sub-area element under the City's
Comprehensive Plan and is planned for adoption in May 1993. In addition, City intra-
transportation problems will be addressed through preparation of a Comprehensive
Transportation Plan to be adopted in or before July 1993.
Lead Responsibility:
Target Completion Date:
Jefferson County/City of Port Townsend
April 1994
Implementin& Ordinance Updates Jefferson County and the City of Port Townsend will operate
independently to review and revise their implementing ordinances to assure consistency with
their revised Comprehensive Plans in conformance with Growth Management requirements.
Lead Responsibility: Jefferson County/City of Port Townsend
Target Completion Date: April 1995
BUDGET
Jefferson County and the City of Port Townsend will allocate Growth Management funds based
on the population, according to the 1990 census. The census indicates that the City of Port
Townsend had a population of 7,001, or approximately one-third of the total County population
of 20,406. Thus, this budget assumes that the City of Port Townsend will receive one-third of
the County allocation for Growth Management.
Any joint planning activities, such as those related to the development of County-wide Planning
policies, or consulting services to analyze demographic trends, will be funded cooperatively out
of the funds allocated according to each jurisdiction according to the following allocation of
1991-1992 Funds:
Jefferson County
City of Port Townsend
Total
$74,263
36.577
$110,840
5
,«.
18'Mi€
(J. 621
EXHmIT A
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN
Introduction
Jefferson County and the City of Port Townsend have taken the mandate of Growth
Management for" early and continuous public participation" to mean that there should be
opportunities for public involvement from the outset of policy development. This will ensure
that the final outcome reflects the values that are most important to our community.
1990-1991 Growth Management in Jefferson County began with a series of public forums
designed to inform the public about G.M.A. topics and issues. The forums also provided for
facilitated group discussion of the information and issues. Public comments and
recommendations from these forums were compiled for use by elected and appointed
policymakers. Videotapes of the forums were aired over public access television on a schedule
advertised in the local newspapers, and copies are available for checkout from the county
library and Planning & Building Department.
The County also produced two editorials related to Growth Management that were printed in
the Port Townsend Leader, and will provide additional editorial contributions related to Growth
Management as time and staff allow.
Following up on suggestions received at the forums, two citizen workgroups were formed--
one to deal with Critical Areas and one for Resource Lands. Their task was to draft specific
policy recommendations to the County Commissioners for the interim protective ordinances.
Both groups met weekly (with many subgroup meetings in addition) for a period of ten weeks.
A total of 42 people representing a variety of backgrounds and interests, including
representatives of both the City and County Planning Commissions, served on the workgroups.
A professional facilitator conducted the meetings with both groups. The report was completed,
and copies made available to the public.
Following the Work Group process, the recommendations were considered in separate processes
by City and County elected officials to tailor them to the specific requirements of each
jurisdiction.
The City of Port Townsend Planning Commission met throughout the Spring to incorporate the
Work Group recommendations into a form compatible with City needs. The City's
Environmentally Sensitive Areas Ordinance was adopted by the City Council on October 19,
1992.
A public forum was held December 18, 1991 where members of the public met and discussed
the recommendations with the workgroup members, Planning Commission, and County
Commissioners. Advertised public meetings were held repeatedly the Winter of 1991-92 and
Spring of 1992 where the Jefferson County Planning Commission discussed the Work Group
recommendations with additional public comments accepted. In addition, presentations were
made in several locations in the County where the Board of County Commissioners and/or
County staff presented policy options to groups and rèceived comments. Exhibit D highlights
major public meetings and group activities sponsored by Jefferson County to date as components
of the public involvement and intergovernmental coordination process of Growth Management.
6
;'J:t
18~Ai1.
0 1522.
As the both jurisdictions move forward with drafting the interim ordinances and revising the
Comprehensive Plan, each is committed to a continued high level of public involvement,
incorporating the standards and approaches outlined below.
Public Outreach Policies
An important element for encouraging public participation is ongoing information and education
throughout the process. This will continue to include open access to all public activities,
notice through local newspapers, mail list development and maintenance to disseminate notices
and materials regarding draft policies, public foroms to provide opportunities for public input
on specific topics, wide dissemination of all draft planning documents, public hearings where
formal comments are received, and dissemination of all formal recommendations.
The County Planning & Building Department has appointed a staff public involvement
coordinator who is responsible for public involvement activities for which the County is
responsible. These activities include preparing press releases, keeping records of public
comments, scheduling public activities, providing staff supPort for the various citizen
workgroups and committees, acting as a liaison with other agencies and community groups, and
answering public questions throughout the process.
Citizen Steerin~ Committee
The work of the citizen workgroups involved in developing policy recommendations for interim
regulations will be completed in December. This process, which involved 42 people, proved
to be a useful vehicle for educating the public, providing an opportunity for the public to work
intensively with staff and appointed officials and thereby give specific, structured input to the
County. It has also created a pool of informed community members, of whom a substantial
number are interested in further involvement.
The next major steps in revising the Comprehensive Plan include the projection of population
growth, the establishment of level of public service standards, the designation of urban growth
areas, and addressing such matters as affordable housing, economic development and
employment. Parallel citizen steering committee will be appointed by the City and County to
provide continuing recommendations and public input during this period for each jurisdiction.
These steering committees will consist of members of the community representing the broad
spectrum of people who live in each jurisdiction. For the Jefferson County Growth
Management Steering Committee, special attention will be given to ensuring geographical
representation, especially from those areas which may be designated as urban growth areas.
The initial meeting of the committee will be a workshop designed to inform members of the
over-all policies and time lines for implementing the GMA and the specific policy
recommendations which are needed from the group. Following the workshop, members will
be asked to participate in a series of ad hoc subcommittees for each of the specific elements of
the Comprehensive Plans, to participate in drafting, reviewing and commenting on impending
policy decisions. It is anticipated that additional interested persons and staff members will join
these subcommittees where appropriate. For example, when designating urban growth areas,
persons from those areas will be recruited to serve on the subcommittee and public forums will
be conducted in those areas to encourage public comments and answer questions. Meetings of
the entire steering committee will be held periodicaUy.so that they continue to be informed and
offer comments on the activities of subco.mmittees.
7
. 'rt
18~u; lEJ23
Conclusion
The processes outlined here represent the intent of the both Jefferson County and the City of
Port Townsend to implement the public involvement requirements of the Growth Management
Act. Each jurisdiction retains the right to adjust the public involvement workplans of their
jurisdictions to meet special needs as they arise in order to tailor public involvement to the
needs of their jurisdiction to provide continuing opportunities for the public to review and
comment on impending policy decisions.
-;'J(~
8
1'8' rAf;.
0 ':.524"
COMMUNITY VISION & MISSION
(
GOALS
POLICY
STRATEGY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
KEGULATIONS
Timellne - - -
\:
E.~~~t>~t ß
DTERATDVE COMPlREIHElNSDVE PLAlNlNOlNG ~~IETL....¡jO[D
.Exhi hiLA
¡;;:;>"
,II)
.'~
CO
~
0
Resource/Critical Lands
Planning
!!r!!!
Information & Analysis
--
I
Urban Commercial
Transportation
Planning
!r!!!!
Information & Analysis
Planning
, , , , , !
Information & Analysis
,
, ~
"'"'-
Other Elements'
CV
~
r
, , , , ! ,
Information & Analysis
,
"'"
-..
--".'
t¿ f i,
'\( '-,
. - r-~ \, ~~\ t
1,---
-"(I
CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND
Comprehensive Plan Elements
Land Use Element
Transportation Element
Housing
Open Space and Recreation
Capital Facilities
utilities
Economic Development
Element
Other GMA Planning Components
Interim ESA Ordinance
Public Participation Menu &
Visioning Process (PT 21)
Gateway Development Plan
(sub-area plan)
Point Hudson Sub-Area Plan
Stormwater Master Plan
;~.:>< 18 ~~
Anticipated
Completion
July 1993
July 1993
April 199
December 1994
April 1994
July 1994
December 1994
October 1992
February 1993
May 1993
November 1993
0:. 326
Date
of