HomeMy WebLinkAbout037 87
IT(t. ./J;' ,,' ,y 1'1 {i C '{
l..~.I~ ct/~\d\..V~'~ lo</J
, '
RESOLUTION NO._~Z=~Z_
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION
WHEREAS, Jefferson County is applying to the State of Washington
for a Community Development Block Grant,
WHEREAS, it is necessary that certain conditions be met as part
of the application requirements,
WHEREAS, Jefferson County shall agree to comply with all
applicable federal and state regulations in the event that this
application is selected for funding, now, therefore be it
resolved:
WHEREAS, Jefferson County will provide citizens with the
opportunity to comment on the proposed housing and community
development activities and the estimated cost of the project in
relation to the activities planned to benefit low- and
moderate-income persons,
That Larry Dennison, Chairman, Board of County Commissioners, is
authorized to submit this application to the state of Washington
on behalf of Jefferson County.
WHEREAS, Jefferson County will minimize displacement as a result
of activities assisted with CDBG funds; and assist persons
actually displaced as a result of such activities;
WHEREAS, Jefferson County will conduct and administer its program
in conformance with Title VI and Title VIII, and affirmatively
further fair housing;
WHEREAS, Jefferson County will provide opportunities for citizen
participation comparable to the state's requirements (those
described in Section 104(a)(2) of the Act, as amended); and
WHEREAS, Jefferson County will not use assessments or fees to
recover the capital costs of CDBG-funded public improvements from
low- and moderate-income owner-occupants.
WHEREAS, Jefferson County has complied with all public input
requirements and will certify to this compliance.
If
APPROVED and ADOPTED this _~~ day of April, 1987.
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF JEFFERSON
COUNTY, WASHINGTON
~4I!~~~~~M_'-_::~-
~~
...
-~~~!_----------------
B. G. Brown, Member
'~
J, ' "
~ . > ,/ <_..J
, t\ j //7 "
ATTEST/'=' ,)I J-/ fU / j/{~, ..4:.'h //.~, ,:"/0
-..-......--""--'<:-=-/ _....._,-"1, :
, , (.L.//
&.~~~~~--
Member
. VOL
13 rAt~
t) -41 r-3"'"
. .. ..,.., -t(
\ ......U' t,t'
State of Washington
DEPARIMENI' OF crM1IJNITY' DEVEU)PMEN1'
crM1IJNITY' DE.VEIDPMENI' BLOCK GRAN!' APPLICATION
PROJECI' SUM-1ARY
Phone
DAVID GOLDS~ITH, DlqECTOP.
PLANNING & qUILDING
DEPA~TMEr\jT
PO BOX 1220
PORT TOI~~NSEND, :VA 98368
206-385-0949
1.
Applicant JEFFERSON COUf\lTY
2.
Contact
Phone
PO BOX 1220
PORT TOWNSEND, ~A 98368
385-1427
h3dress
hJdress
3. Project Stmtal:Y
A PROJECT TO AID LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSEYOLDS IN JEFFERSOf\l
COUNTY, REHABILITATE HOUSING BY PROVIDING LO!~-INTEREST LOANS FOR
REPAIR OF MALFUNCTIONING ON-SITE !~ASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS TO REMOVE A
8LIGHTING INFLUENCE, PURLICH HEALTH HAZARD Af\lD SOURC= ON NO~POINT
POLLUTION.
4. Project categOl:Y (Please check one)
X Houso
- mg
Public Facilities
_ a::ancmi.c Develq:ment
_ O::Irt;>rehensive
5. State Cbjective (s) addressed (Please check as many as applicable)
~ Principally benefits la-l- and m:x1erate-incane hcuseholds
~ Eliminate sluns or blight
~ Eliminate threat to public health and safety
Official
\
Title CHA I R~1AN
Name
LARRY DENNISON
Date APRIL 30, 1987
23
,VOL
13
r~G~
~
n,:l ~ r;..., ,1
~Y ..-...t...;,Ut
Sta te of Washington
DEP.ARIMEm' OF 0)lvMJNI'lY DE\TE!DPMENr
0)lvMJNI'lY DE.VELDE!1ENT BLOCK GRANI' APPLICATION
PROBLEM/NEED STATEMENI'
PROBLEM DESCRIPTION
The problem that will be addressed with this proposal is one
of failing on-site waste disposal systems (septic systems).
Failing systems present a public health hazard, contribute to
water pollution, and prevent expansion and upgrading of the
housing unit until the system meets health regulations.
From surveys done in the Quilcene and Dabob watersheds of
Jefferson County (Jefferson County 1987) failures are generally
caused by a combination of factors. The age of the system is the
primary factor found to correlate with failures. Older systems
installed befor~ 1974, when septic system regulations were
adopted, were generally not designed to meet modern standards.
Systems were designed to provide disposal but not necessarily
treatment of sewage effluent. Many systems were designated to
service' summer homes that have since become year-round residences
and therefore have undersized systems and systems that do not
operate properly during wet winter months. Many systems also
have been installed with steel tanks that over the years have
rusted through.
Another major factor is the types of soil found in Jefferson
County. They are generally very tight, glacially deposited silts
and clays. This type of soil presents severe limitations to the
installation of septic systems (soil survey USDA 1975). Special
design considerations must be given to installations in these
soils.
Besides these physical problems (undersize, poor soil, and
poor materials) there are also some social and institutional
contributions to the problem. The institutional problems (which
are being addressed as a result of the Quilcene/Dabob water
quality study) include a health department that due to under-
staffing has given septic system repairs a low priority and.an
unfounded fear by the public that if failures are reported they
would be evicted from their homes. The social problems include a
lack of awareness by homeowners of the proper operation and
maintenance of systems (out of sight - out of mind) and a lack of
money to repair and upgrade systems. Sept~c repairs can be quite
expensive and there always seems to be a higher priority need.
The older systems tend to be found with older, lower-valued
housing and older, lower-income residents. ,
The Quilcene/Dabob study found five percent of the 254
systems surveyed to be failing to some degree, from a straight
pipe to a ditch, to occasional surfacing of effluent. Other
studies done in Mason, Thurston and Kitsap counties have found
similar failure rates. Besides the systems that can be seen to
be failing others may be failing but not evident at the surface.
In failures of this type the effluent enters the ground
(ATrACH lIDDITIONAL PAGES IF NECESSARY)
_ ,_:~___,J:Qt ,13r~CE' f 153~
--' -- .---
. rl.'-'~{
Sta te of Wash.i.ngton
DEP~ OF cnM.JNI'IY DEVElOPMENT
cnM.JNI'IY DEVELDPMENl' BLOCK GRAN.I' APPLICATION
POOBLEM/NEED STA'I'E1>1ENI'
==
water untreated or reaches a "hardpan" layer and flows away from
the site. A study of a lake shore in eastern Washington by
Entranco of Seattle found that of the identified failing systems
twenty-five percent were not evident at the surface.
It is being assumed here that the five percent failure rate
will be found to exist county-wide. Washington State Department
of Social Health Services report that there were 8,379 systems in
use in Jefferson County in 1985. If the five percent failure
rate is applied county-wide there are about 420 systems in need
of repair. This is a fairly conservative number and without a
systematic approach to correction the problem can only get worse.
Problem Impact: .Failing on-site waste disposal systems affect
the entire community by presenting a direct and potentially
severe public health hazard to anyone coming in contact with
surfacing, untreated, sewage effluent. The community is also at
risk when this effluent is directly input or washes off into
, surface water or enters the ground water untreated posing a
threat of well contamination. Contamination of surface waters
poses an economic risk as well as a health risk. Failing septic
systems contribute to fecal coliform bacteria contamination
leading to closures of shellfish beds.
Failing systems also impact the property owner directly.
Besides the direct health threat, home owners with failing
systems can not upgrade or expand the housing unit without
repairing the system first. An example of this from the Quilcene
area is the problems of a secretary at the USFS ranger station in
Qui1cene. She bought a small house in town without much
knowledge or the condition of location of the system. She has
adopted several children and when she applied for a building
permit to add on a bedroom it was denied due to an inadequate
septic system. She was capable of doing much of the work
involved with adding a bedroom but, the replacement of the septic
system was beyond her capabi~ities, physically and financiarly.
She is now forced to live in an over-crowded condition and the
chances of being able to sell the home and move to a larger unit
are slim. She is now participating in the county's septic repair
and loan program established in the Qui1cen~ area.
Severity: The survey of septic systems conducted as part of the
Qui1cene/Dabob study found five percent of the systems failing.
These would be considered "gross failures" ~o be detected by
surface inspection. Uncovering and inspecting drainfie1ds would
undoubtedly discover many more systems not working properly.
This five percent would indicate about 420 units in immediate
need of repair. These units are not concentrated in anyone area
but can be found throughout the county in similar proportions.
The exceptions being Port Townsend, Port Ludlow, and Cape George
(ATI'AOi ADDITIONAL P!IGES IF NECESSARY)
24
,., "
-----...vO~
13 '.' '0.Atr..-: "J..J..:
.-. -mt--t-~...!H;'-.-- ---
:''-
Sta te of Washington
OEPAIm1ENI' OF a:;MvUNIT'f oEVELOPMENI'
a:;MvUNIT'f OEVELOEMENl' BLOCK GRAN!' APPLICATION
PROBLElW'NEED S'I'ATEMENl'
=
areas that are served by community sewer systems. The
legislature of the State of Washington declared in 1977 that "the
failure of large numbers of such [SEPTIC] systems has resulted in
significant health hazards, loss of property values, and water
quality degradation" (RCW 70.118-010). It is difficult to
quantify the risk to health or the amount of lost property value
or the value of clean water lost; but because the problem exists
fairly uniformly thought the county, all people and property in
the county are at risk.
Past Effort: Washington state Department of Social Health
Services conducted a water quality study of Quilcene Bay in 1984.
that study found high enough levels of fecal coliform
contamination in" the marine waters that DSHS closed the head of
the bay to commercial shellfish growing/harvest. As a result,
Jefferson county conducted a more intensive water quality,study
of the Quilcene and Dabob watersheds beginning in 1986. the cost
of the study was $91,750.00 of which $63,800.00 was financed by
grants from the Washington State Department of Ecology. These
watersheds have been designated priority watersheds by the puget
Sound Water Quality Authority and the Washington State Department,
of Ecology. This study found failing septic systems to be one of
the causes of bacterial contamination of the bay. The results of
the septic system survey portion of the study were discussed in
the "Problem Description" section.
The recommendations (Appendix A) developed by the study team
and the Citizen Advisory Committee (formal of local residents to
guide the study) have ~egun to be implemented by the county. The
county has taken steps to upgrade the health department to
provide more intensive code enforcement and to institute a
"designer" program to address some of the institutional obstacles
to septic repairs. The county has also begun a program in the
Quilcene area, as part of the study, to address the physical and
social problems hampering septic repairs. One member of the
study team was a registered sanitarian and this person contacted
owners of the systems identified as failing and provided design
services at no cost and provided coordination between the owner
and the health department. The county also established a
revolving loan fund with $22,000.00 of previously loaned
Community Development Block Grant funds. This money was made
available for low interest loans for septic repairs to low and
moderate income families. Very low income families were aided in
applying for Farmers Home Administration home improvement loans
and grants. The county, the puget Sound Water Quality Authority,
and the Hood Canal Coordinating Council have also been providing
public education on the proper operation and maintenance of
septic systems.
(~ ADDITIONAL PAGES,f!3NECFSSARYO' ) ,~r:.;: ~':'
'101 'lrj;' , .......u-u "
24 ",_ ' r...","
.,.- - ---.. --- -~ ----..-- _....~.._---
____._ _..__-:--:~_":""___.~_"~~_..:'-. 0_- ',_'.~~:='~-:'~_:-:-"=- ~_:':~.:~::,:-:;~: _.:~~_.--:-;::,,"':"':-::-::_~-'-=;;:.,:, .;:
Sta te of Washington
DEPAR'IMENI' OF cnMJNIT'f DEVELOPMENI'
cnMJNIT'f DEVELDPMEN1' BlDCK GRANl' APPLICATION
PROBLEM/NEED STATEMEN!'
The puget Sound Water Quality Authority has mandated that
all watersheds of the county be prioritized, watershed management
committees be formed and watershed management plans be developed
for each watershed. The county will be doing all it can
financially afford, with the help of grants form the department
of ecology, to address non-point pollution, including development
of management plans, providing public education on the proper
operation and maintenance of septic systems, surveying areas for
failing systems, and providing design service for systems
identified as failing. The county's concept paper for non-point
pollution control (Appendix B) details the comprehensive program
submitted to the department of ecology for approval and funding.
Funding could come from a variety of sources including (Section
205(j) of the Federal Clean Water Act and the State's Centennial
Clean Water Fund. The loan program was an integral part of the
Quilcene project and is anticipated to be an integrated p~rt of
the county's comprehensive strategy.
(ATI'AOl ADDITIONAL PAGES IF NECESSARY)
13 '0
24 VO:_ r~~~ f d 153r'~
--- ----~- . '.~ ~ .
-.__ ...._. _ '." _ ... 7'- ._~_....- _..... ~n__-r..#.:: ,~--r-~--,.__
"r- .
StateofWashingtan
DEPARIMENr OF CXM1JNI'I'Y DEVELDPMENr
cnMJNI'IY DEVELDPMENI' Bt.()C1{ GRAN!' APPLICATION
SOLurION STATEMENI'
SOLUTION STATEMENT
Project Design: This project involves expansion of the existing
housing rehabilitation loan fund to provided "deferred payment"
loans (redeemable upon death, transfer of title, or transfer of
interest) at a low-interest rate to low and moderate income
families. These loans would be made available to upgrade
existing on-site waste disposal systems to protect public health
and safety, water quality and property values. The staff of
Jefferson County will provide technical design assistance,
financial work-ups, develop bid specifications, and provide
construction inspection. The staff will also work with very low-
income families in applying for Farmers Home Administration home
improvement loans and grants. The sequence of activities would
be as follows:
1. Survey septic systems in priority watersheds and inform
residents of program details and hold public meetings in all
areas of the county to inform the public of program details
(August through February) .
2. Inspect systems, collect applications, conduct financial
interviews, design systems (December .through March).
3. Selection of priority projects (March).
4. Obtain bids and award contacts (April).
5. Construction and Inspection (April through September).
To encourage early repayment of loans, no interest will be
charged for the first five years, and to help maintain a future
loan fund interest of two percent per annum, compounded annually,
will be charged thereafter.
,One longstanding problem with repair of malfunctioning
systems has been a fear that if property owners contact the
health 'department for assistance with a septic repair, they would
be forced into an expensive repair or eviction. As a result,
unnecessary health hazards and water quality degradation has
continued while people who do recognize the inadequacy of their
septic system avoid health department involvement and do nothing
or install inadequate systems without departmental review.
Recognizing this problem the county's study team provided septic
repair assistance in the form of site inspections, septic systems
designs, public education, and financial assistance as part of
the water quality project. Integral in the repair process has
been the low-interest loan program for low and moderate income
households. Approaching these repairs from the non-regulatory
perspective has yielded favorable results and a high level of
cooperations. Because of the success of this approach and
because of a system is in place and is capable of being quickly
(ATI'AOi ADDITIONAL p~' IF ~,.,. )n,
25 .~Ol_ lJ rACE u 153~~
_...~ __.....~_________'L'.____..-'
-,- -..._---;..--~ --, - '; ---:-:: --.' ...- '--:--",--'.--:--- .",~- .,' -::', '..-,~-~ ,-:.-.,......,~':..:::::.::;:
\
State of Washington
DEPARIMEm' OF a:M-IJNI'I'i" DEVEI.DFMENl'
CDM>1lNI'IY DEVEWa1ENI' BWCK GRAN!' APPLICATION
SOLUI'ION STATEMENI'
expanded, the county is proposing an intensive educational
planning and management effort to last two years (June 1987
through June 1989). It is anticipated that the septic repair and
loan program would run concurrently. At the end of two years the
success of the program will be evaluated and the future level of
activity decided. It is anticipated the majority of eligible
systems will have been corrected in two years, but the loan
program will remain in effect for several years after the
intensive educational and planning efforts end. The loan program
would be managed the same as the first two years, the change
being that there would not be a sanitarian position directly
funded to encourage participation, instead private designers and
the health"department would refer people to the program.
General administration would be handled by the planning and
building department.
Project Impact: Of the 420 systems estimated to be in need of
repair it is estimated from survey results in Quilcene that forty
percent of the owners of these systems would qualify for the loan
program (168 homeowners). The other owners of failing systems,
above the income guidelines, would be encouraged to correct their
systems by the county's ongoing program of education,
identification and design assistance. As well the institution of
a designer program, proper registration, keeping records of system
maintenance, and stricter health code enforcement should
encourage repairs and ensure future installation will not cause
similar problems.
It is anticipated that seventy-five percent of the 168
qualified homeowners (126) will be able to be brought into the
program in the first two years. This is based upon the
participation rate in Quilcene. It is encouraging to note
incr.eased interest as the program nears its end. The cost of
repairing 126 systems in the first two years, at an average cost
of $3,000.00, "amounts to $378,000.00 needed for loans. It is
anticipated that loans being repaid from this and previous loan
programs would make available sufficient funds to correct five to
ten more systems per year thereafter. Of the estimated forty-two
systems remaining after the first two years, a few qualif~ed
homeowners will not participate in any program, and the "others
will be brought into the program by referrals from private
designers and pumpers and the health department.
A program evaluation will be done at the end of the two year
intensive effort to determine the success of the program and to
determine if additional failures are occurring. This information
will be used to plan the future of the loan program. If the
septic system problem has been substantially addressed, other
eligible uses of recycled loan funds may be considered.
(ATI'ACE ADDITIONAL P.AGES IF NECESSARY)
25 13 n ~ SilO
VOL · ~,r~G~ ~1 ..... -" ,,'
---- ---'_._~ -------------:-,----.. -'-'.
StateofWa.shingt.on
DEPARJ.Mrnr OF c:nMJNITY DE.VELDPMEm'
(DMolJNI'lY DEVELOI:11ENI' BLOCK GRAN!' APPLICATION
SOLUI'ION S'I'A'l>>1ENI'
Relationship of Community Development Block Grant and other
Fund/Resources: Again community development block grant funds
will be used as part of a comprehensive program. As a result of
problems identified during the Quilcene/Dabob study, the county
health department has intensified health code enforcement, and is
in the process of developing a designer program, pumper
registration program and septic systems maintenance recording
system. The health department has also been assisting in system
design and permitting and referring potential applicants to the
repair and loan programs.
In an effort to encourage proper maintenance and operation
of systems the county is cooperating with the puget Sound Water
Quality Authority and the Hood Canal Coordinating Council in
providing public education and increasing public awareness of the
importance of-septic system maintenance. In order to develop a
comprehensive program that addresses all of the county's non-
point pollution problems the county and the Jefferson
Conservation District have cooperated to develop such a program.
The proposed sources of funding are Section 205(j) of the Federal
Clean Water Act and the State's Centennial Clean Water Fund. A
copy of the memorandum of understanding with the conservation
district is appended (Appendix B). Budget "A" in this "concept
paper" assumes that this loan program will be funded and be an
integral part of the comprehensive program. The county's in-kind
and cash contributions to this program are noted.
Impact of Decision not to Fund the Project: As was noted
previously, this proposed loan program is anticipated to be an
integral 'part of a comprehensive program to address problems of
non-point pollution. Should this proposal not be funded, the
entire comprehensive program would be reduced. The ambient and
educational sampling programs, the educational programs, and of
course the septic system repair program would be severely
reduced. There will never be another opportunity to accomplish
such a comprehensive program. The Puget Sound Water Quality
Authority has mandated that certain water quality programs be
implemented with the next two years; department of ecology is
making funds available to accomplish many of these tasks, the
C.D. is making a concentrated effort to address agriculturally
related problems, and the county has developed a watershed
management plan for Quilcene/Dabob watersheds, and has developed
(on a small scale) a successful septic system repair and loan
program. Without funding for a county-wide repair and loan
program the continuity will be lost and much of the value of the
public education program will be lost.
(ATrAOl ADDITIONAL PAGES' IF NECF.SSARY)
25 I . 13,.," '., ~ ~ r; '1
,._,.' ,_ ' _ ______ _ __ _._ __.~=--__.__'_ _____~.-,....,- .,rAIl\':- ,., g, - .......#'L\....., ~.~"" ~,
,__ ___,..,__---:_,_.. ....~_> ~""~<<'~~--"~-'~'--'.~7~t""""";:"'r:-~";.-- '!r" __ _,--:,c" .." .,_..., --- '"',"'~~-'- ..-- ~"-'"._''~'''''..''' ....., ..-. ,.'-' ......... ,""- ._-"""~. ",-""" <.-.,~ ..",.......""""':'7"..-.- '^,::"'':..'lI'l
StateofWa.sh.ingtan
DEPARIMml' OF cnM.lNITY" DEVELOPME:Nl'
cnMJNIT'l DEVELOPMENl' BLCQ{ GRAN!' APPLICATION
PROJECI' BENEFIT 'IO IJ:JiI- AN) MDERATE -:m:x::ME HOUSEHOIDS
Please carplete the follad.ng table:
A B C D E F
Activity -' . Total Number of Benefit Activity Total Benefit
Number of Low & Moderate Index Cost to Low & Moderate
:~ Households
-.:;' Households Income Households
Benefited Benefited
R:PAIR/LON' ~ 126 126 1 422,000 422,000
G. Total. Project Benefit to Lc:w- and M:ldeI:ate-Incare Households:
Total of column F422K.;. total of column E 4221( =100 %
- --
H. Divide the total anamt in E by the rn.mi:>er of persons benefiting fran the
projects (5):
Total. of column E $422,000:- Nurrber of ~ 2illL = $ 1370
26
~VOl
13 rACE
,"-1'
fi \;'t, t~, L1 .,.
,,~,lI .....~' :.;t:.,..
. " '. _.~~'- -~-.. -"-
..--. ~
~ ':'t
For each activity identified an the Benefit Table, please i.rxlicate which state goal it
neets: SEPTIC F1PAIR/LQ\1\J PRCXRJ\1I,1
X Pri.ncipally benefits ION- and m:derate-inc:are households
X Eliminating slums or blight
X ResOlving threat to public health arrl safety.
Please list all data sources and describe net:hcrls used to generate data for the Benefit
Table:
Nl.M3ER a= LNITS IN ~ a= J;E=>AIR IS FR(J:1 ESTIMl\1ED FAI LL..R:: RAlES IN THE Fa.LQ\'Ir--..G ~:
STAlE a= THE SUN), 1986 R:PCRf: PU:ET saN) !\lAlffi QUALllY Aun-lCRllY, l1-IE !-JENl:R3CN,
f!>N) ao I f\JL.I=T t\IA Tffi QUIlL IlY SnDY; lHLRSTCN
COlNTY 1984
SURCES AFFECTII\G 1HE S;\I\JITARY CXJ\DITICN3 a= ~^JATER Ar-.D S-ELLFI9-I IN ~1lNl"!::R gAY PMJ
8LREY LAaxN; ~JASHIr\GTCN STAlE'CEPARTTYENT a= ECClJX;Y 1985
MJ EVJ\LU\TlCN a= f\Q\J-POINT 8ACTERIJ\L CCNTAMlNATlCN IN HCXD CANAL; KITSl\P COlNTY 1987
qJILCE\E/DA903 BAYS l\IATffi QUALIlY PROJECT; JEFFERSO'J CUNTY 1987
NLM3ER a= La'll AND l'vUlRATE II\CO'IE HQ6EHQDS AND AVEPA(E HCl.6u-tOlJ) SI2E NE. Fro,' THE
1980 u.S. CEN3lS a= R:>PU.ATICN.
l1-IE AVERA(E CCST a= A J;E=>AIR IS ESTHMTED FRCJ',1 PAST EXPtRIEJ\ICE WITY T!-E LQl\.1\J FR(XPN4
IN THE QJI L(DE ~ f!>N) nE ~18'JCE a= 1HE COlNTY SAI\J I TAR I flN.
(ATrACli ADDITIONAL P.N3ES IF NECESSARY)
27
~'~.':,.-~"..~,--=::.~rr--::-.~'- ~.---:-.' - -----~'-.---~--,..~.
M'__,_' ".'., .. .... . _. '_0 ,_. ,_.'. ~""', ,...,.. v "
VOL
1~JMiE~...1l154;,L.. c' ,..,----
"'~." ..,..~._ __.'. --7~..""_:"" ,-",.,.../ -'''-1',--' ",," ','3'~"""""'''~
. L .' ''';...~ ,,'
Sta te of \'lashingtan
DEPARl11EN1' OF a:.:M-lJNITi" DEVELOPMENl'
a:M-1JNITY DEVELOr:MENI' m.cx::K GRAN!' APPLICATION
~
BtJOOET LINE I1EM3 (CDBG FUNIX3 ONLY)
1. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
2. HOUSING
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
h.
Subtotal
422 000
3. .PUBUC FACIliTY IMPROVEMENlS
a.
b.
it~es
c.
d.
Subtotal
4. ECONOMIC DEVELDPMENT ACTIVITIES
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
5. PUBliC SERVICES
6. PLANNING
1 . 1U1'AL CDBG F'UNIS
422 000
28
, VOL
13 r~CE
! n ''1< r_;,4/'\
, ~.;.lIo.'-i' 0'1:
.. -- ...-~---_._... ~_......- ....~_....._-.:-. ---~~ --:"~~-:----- --. ~.----
", .r----'---.-___-'..-_
-, ---'
. .' .,-". ,............ ..~_......_~..-; --.~'~'.:"'~
{, ("\ /""." /n.l) .-[) (,j{~~~i(.. ';vl-iIJ) 1'~.7Jc'';'+ I-;'::-;;Cr;..+
rUf~\ ..Xl......, "'-'"___':" ..'-'. .' i
CITIZEN'S ADVISOHY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIO:--;S
General
1. (- County Commissioners will strive to keep future water quality
rtudy costs to a minimum. One way this can be achieved is that future water
p. quality studies will be coordinated with other local, state, and federal
sA"') agencies to keep costs and duplication of efforts to a minimum.
(
2. Public education could be enhanced by utilizing environmental education
classes in local schools.
3. County Port and Commissioners should assess the validity and the
feasibility of providing a pumping station and/or informational material at the
Quilcene Boat Haven about the importance of ilOt dumping sewage from boats into
Quilcene Bay.
4. Continue monitoring of stations set up by the study, with the permISSIon of
property owners, to determine if water quality in Dabob/Quilcene Bays is
improving or degrading.
5. When the county upgrades roads it should address issues of upstream
flooding caused by inadequate culvert sizing.
Seals
1. Recommend that the County do all it can to encourage the Congressional
delegation to make changes to the Marine Mammal Act that allows the National
Marine Fisheries Service to manage harbor seal populations. The Act is up for
re-authorization next January and hearings begin this summer.
2. Recommend that the Department of Ecology conduct research on harbor seal
populations to further define the level of fecal coliform bacterial
contamination that can be attributed to seals.
3. Recommend that the Department of Ecology conduct bacterial speciation tests
on a larger number of seal scats to determine the number and types of pathogens
present and the degree to whuch harbor seals present a public health hazard.
4. Recommend that the Department of Social and Health Services and the US Food
anbd Drug Administration begin using an indicator organism (pcl'haps E. coli)
more closely correlated to the presence of a public health hazard. Sanitary
surveys should also be conducted and used in conjunction with sampling for
indicator bacteria when shellfish growing areas are certified or de-certified.
It is felt that the use of an indicator alone, without a sanitary survey, and
the use of fecal coliform bacteria as that indicator. discriminates against
rural areas because domestic animals, wood wastes, and perhaps seals contribute
..YOL
13'r'~(:
,...v_
t.Cr ... r-4r-
~:u J.lJ . ~
------.-------.:,---- - ~ ..
--;-' ----
- --,-- ---."--- _.._'~-' -- ----
to high concentrations of fecal coliform yet may not contribute to a
correspondingly high health hazard.
Agriculture
1. A high priority should be the prOVISIOn of education to landowners and the
general public about the issues of small farm management and water quality.
Landowners should be made aware of the availability of technical assistenace,
financial incentives and exiting educational materials provided by the County
Extension Service, Soil Conservation Service. and the County Conservation
District.
2. Since flood-prone areas can contribute to bacterial pollution even though
the stream itself may be protected, a more comprehensive approach is needed. It
is recommended that the Conservation District sponsor meetings with landowners
and appropriate agencies, at the request of landowners, to work out the
solutions to flooding and water quality problems.
3. The County and the Conservation District should cooperate in developing
criteria and methods for providing tax incentives to landowners who voluntarily
restrict animal access to streams through exclusion fencing. Compensation
should be based on the amount of land lost to agricultural use.
4. It is strongly recommended that no new ordinances or regulations should be
instituted regarding the keeping of livestock or other agricultural enterprises.
The effectiveness of this program will be evaluated in 2 years by the
Conservation District and a Citizen's Advisory Committee.
Septic Systems
1. Continue public education and voluntary compliance. This should include
education about the importance of septic tank pumping, especially in
geologica1Jy sensitive areas in the county.
2. County Commissioners should have a written policy of how they will handle
citizen's voluntarily asking for assistance for failed septic systems. There
shoUld be firm written direction by the County Commissioners to the Health
Department that they will cooperate with citizens, and that no cease and desist
orders will be issued by the Health Department when property owners voluntarily
request assistance.
3. Continue with low cost/interest loan program for upgrading failing septic
systems in the county. Top priority should be septic systems in sensitive
areas.
4. The Health Department must identify what is necessary to insure that septic
systems are being designed and installed to state law. More funding may be
necessary to make sure septic systems are being designed and installed so that
\'O~
j~~
-v
.. t(-
f ,....j:.'
(1 1 t-:tjF
'\..il ~. ~ J. .;.>>.; '.,.,1'.
public health, shellfish production. and water quality are protected and that
degredation of water quality does not continue to occur in the county.
5. Major geographical areas in the county near bodies of water that affect
public health, water quality, and shellfish production should be designated as
"sensitive areas". The Health Department should prioritize work load in these
areas to assure full compliance to state law in these sensitive areas. It
should be mandatory that the Health Department inspect each septic system design
and installation in these sensitive areas before systems are covered by the
installer. There should be no major variance from state law in sensitive areas.
If the Health Department allows any variance in state law in these sensitive
areas they will document their reasons in writing.
6. Continue to encourage voluntary septic tank pumping in sensitive areas.
, vOL
13rM~€
n.... r,- ...,#...
tJ ~JJLJ: .~r
-.-'--" ---'.--- _..- .-' ._- --
,.. ~..._---_.._-- -. --.- .....--.- .,.... -....'-.-
....__._~.---.----- .-...
_.~~--..-........
/-
JrPT W;'lt ~ Ci)lr f; Y
C(l"~ r RCI :E:'Ej I \l::-~ t,!':ltJ rOI : n r lOLL IJT I ON COI n RilL r ;\()(-jF~t' .~
CO!',! CE i=lT PI, PE~,
I~~'~ ~~
_, f\.
rf'l'!>~"
~';;;"
~f 9
PROBLEM STATEMENT:
The problem to be addressed is one of nonpoint pollution from
agricultural practices, forest practices, failing septic systems
and urban stormwater run-off. Jefferson County has found these
sources to be contributOl~s to bacteric:d contamination in the
Quilcene/Dabob priority W2tersheds. There is a need to continue
the correction efforts begun in these watersheds and to monitor
results of implemented projects. As well Jefferson County is
required, under the Puget Sound Water Quality Athority (PSWQA)
1987 Management Plan, to provide to the Department of EcologyX
(DOE) by January 1, 1989 a priority listing of all other
watersheds in the county and to begin preparation of Watershed
Management Plans. In addition, public officials, citizen
advisory committee members, and other residents have voiced the
need for a comprehensive public education and involvement
program.
BACKGROUND:
During 1984 DSHS conducted an examination of water qua~ity in
Ouilcene Bay. Based on the results of that study, the head of
the bay was closed to commercial shellfish growing/harvest.
Because of the importance of the shellfish industry, and because
the closure was an indication that a generdl water quality
problem existed and was possibly getting worse, Jefferson County
applied for and received grants from DOE to conduct an in-depth
study of the problem and to begin correction of identified
sources.
At about the S2me time, the Jefferson Conservation District
applied for and received a Ref. 39 grant to identify sources of
ba~terial pollution from animal keeping practices, to implement
corrective and preventive action, and to provide public
information and education in eastern Jefferson County. This
project is to continue until July 1988. The County's effort in
the Quilcene/Dabob watersheds is scheduled to end June 1987.
The county and the District have been working cooperatively in
identifying sources and the development of a basin plan for the
Quilcene/Dabob watersheds and in the implementation of corrective
action. The County has established a septic system repair
program including low interest loans for low- and mode~ate-income
households and an ambient monitoring program that has estabiished
baseline water quality for fresh and marine waters of the
watersheds. The District has established a program for
encouraging the implementation of BMP's in the area.
:~Ol
13 (\ 4
t ,~G~ U ~ C';" "1i
~__._~~..._._ --.9 __ ..- ~-_._._..-
-"--. --.---------.-.---
7'
PROJECT GOALS:
The <;,;oc: I s of t his proj ect ':-XC' toes t c:-.t..Jl i :,::,h i:, ccmpl' c:'I"IC'n ~ i '.'0
p;"ogr2lm for the identiflcation .?nd co.'recticn of r:onpO'~lt SOL'I'Ct?S
of pollution county-wide and to mEEt the objectives And
obligations set forth in the PSWQA Management Plan. To meet
these goals a cooperative effort will be reqLlired ofm Jefferson
County, the Jefferson Conservation District, and the Department
of Ecology. A Memorandum of Und~rstanding detailing the
commitment to cooperation by the County and the District is
appended to this concept p2lper.
This concept paper is a comprehensive look at water qulity needs
in the county and many of" the tasks outlined here have been
included in seperate applications. The County has submitted
applications for Centenial Clean Water Funds, CZMl CDBS, and is
prepared to submit an application for 205(j) and SPS funds. The
District has submitted applications for Centenial Clean Water
funds and for a grant from the Conservation Commission.
PROJECT OBJECTIVES:
The following objectives should all be met to fully meet the
goals of this project, but should a lack of adequate funding
limit the scope of work, the objectives have been listed in order
of priority.
1. Continue the ambient monitoring program established in the
Quilcene/Dabob watersheds to determine effectiveness of
corrective measures and to determine if recertification 1S
possible. Expand ambient monitoring to include other areas of
the county to establish baseline water quality and to provide
information for watershed prioritization.
2. Continue and expand to county-wide the septic system repair
and loan programs. This has been included in a previous
County Centennial fund application. (The degree of expantion
of the loan program contigent upon receipt of a CDBG from the
Dept. of Community D~velopment).
3. Develop watershed maps that would include all water courses,
drainage divides, location and classification of wetlands,
location of clear cuts, and other relevant information in
consistent scale and format. (Included in previous County CZM
application).
4. Convene and provide services to a county committee formed to
begin the Long Term Watershed Selection Process (NP1, Round 2)
(Included in District Centennial fund application).
5. Expand and extend the District's animal keeping/pasture
management technical/financial assistance program. (Currently
funde by Ref. 39 through 7/31/88)
6. Expand and extend the County's and the District's public
education and outreach programs. (Included in County and
District applications for centennial funds)
I/OL
13 r~G~
'0 ,~c...; ...(~,
:.lH" ........,vLJtt.i
. .;..._--~,.. -.
.---,,-----..--. - -:. -::----:--_.,~:-..:..:;:- -~::.-".:--::-:;-:-.- ---- .~- -...-:--"--:-:--::
I. Di'vE"lop 11(Joel W::.:\tershed {lcUon Pl.:m (included 1n Di<";,tr"lCt
Cpntcnnicd fund ,::',pplicatlon).
(1. Develop Moc1pl Septic Sustenl Repair Program.
9. Dev~lop strategy for wetland preservation.
TASKS
Most of the following tasks have been included in current grant
applications. Those tasks in bold type are proposed to be
done by the County. The following codes have been included to
reference the grant application in which they are included.
CC-County Centennial
C2-CoLlnty 20S(j)
CZ-CoLln ty CZt1
CN-County Not covered by a current application
DC-District Centennial
D2-District Conservation Commission
D9-District Currently funded Ref.39
DN-District Not covered by a current application
l---Mor-.: I TOR I NG
( COUt,~TY )
1.1 Continue to monitor most of the established Quilcene/Dabob
ambient stations. (C2)
1.2 Begin ambient monitoring of other watersheds in the county
with emphisis placed on major drainages and enclosed
bays. (C2)
1.3 Begin reconnaisance monitoring of urban and rural stormwater
runoff. (C2)
1.4 Maintain laboritory capability to analyze for fecal
coliform. (C2)
2---SEPTIC SYSTEM REPAIR PROGRAM
(COUNTY)
2.1 Followup and expand repair program begun in the
Quilcene/Dabob priority watershed. (CC)
2.2 Expand septic system repair technical assistance to include
all of eastern Jefferson County. (CC)
2.3 Make septic repair loans available county-wide (contingent
upon receipt of CDBG funding).
2.4 Conduct septic system surveys of select areas of the
county. (CC)
2.5 Coordinate design and permitting with the Health
Department. (CC)
2.6 Maintain loan fund records and seek out other financial
assistance for very low income and elderly applicants. (CC)
2.7 Prepare an engineering report for a community drainfield
disposal system in the Big Quilcene River floodplain area of
the town of Quilcene.(CN)
2.7.1 Evaluate the economic, environmental, and technological
feasibility of sites, facilities and systems.
VOL
13 'H'"
~ f,,\)':
o
.. r.- "-(l.
,: .1: a 'w W
-.L_ ,...,,' ,"
__ ..._.,.__._~_...._~.~_'~'" '-"--'~'. ....- --.-----""7-,-:.~~.--:
,,':"~~ .'~~, \ :':'"-'-"--:-:::-,::-:;';;:"~"
- ..... ,. ...
~
::'.7.:':' Ev..:,JU"tl:' thr:- [Dst-'f'~ffC'r.t.iverlc?~~, of the system ."'Inri V,"'Irious
<-, I t C'r n D t 1 '/ ~_: ~ .
:;".7.3 S~IOl1l cl'n:;,j:-,tenc!::l It'ith gt:.'nerr,ll~J rE'coc_.lll:::cd c-nCJinE,~..'iT'9 Clnci
hGalth st&ndarrl3.
::.7.4 DOCl'rTiC?nt CDfi1pli2.nCf? lJ.I1th SErA.
3---ANIMAL KEEPING/PASTURE MANAGEMENT AND FOREST PRACTICES
TECHNICI'.L/FINf-'ltICIAL ASSISTP,NCE (C. D. )
3.1 Analyze soils and their potential limitations for va:rious
land uses and provirle consultation on soil properties to land
owners and the county. (D9)
3.2 Conduct educational water sampling for various parameters,
particularly f~cal coliform, to determine specific problem
sources and to evaluate the effectiveness of best managemEnt
practice implementation. (D9)
3.3 Provide technical assistance to land owners in pla~ning BMP's
to address resource needs. (D9)
3.4 Facilitate utilization of conservation corps crews, community
service groups, and available cost-share money. DEvelop a
coordination system whereby property owners identified as
contributing to bacterial contamination by animal keeping
practices can be refered to the appropriate program and/or
agency for assistance. (D9)
4---STREAM/BEACH/WETLAND PROTECTION PROGRAM
(C.D. )
4.1 Develop riparian zone management program. (D2)
4.2 Develop Adopt-a-Stream and Adopt-a-Beach programs. (D2)
4.3 Implement corrective action program for practices such as
stream fencing, stream corridor management, and
rehabilitation. (D9)
4.4 Document ways to best reestablish riparien vegetation. (D9)
4.5 Inform residents of the importance of wetland habitat and
develop wetland protection program. (DN)
4.6 Investigate the legal implications, efficacy, cost and
landowner acceptance of a "conservation easement" program for
particularly sensitive areas of the watersheds. (D2)
5---LONG TERM WATERSHED SELECTION PROCESS
( COUt ny & C. D. )
5.1 Assemble all maps, information and data necessary to
accomplish the work of the committee. (DC)
5 ? Organize and schedule regular meetings of the comm:ttEe,
public informational meetings, and at least one public
hea';^ing. (DC)
5.3 Share information with other interested groups and
agencies. (DC)
5.4 A~.i~ the committee in the preparation of the Long Term
, ~~watershed Selection Plan for presentation to DOE by
~ Jan.1, 1989. (CC)
~... .,
VOL
13 r~f.:
n .. r.;c:1
~ l' ___ U" U _".
- ----.--------:--.- ~----:. -. _. .-:--=-=.---~,~ -
> #;. .. '.~ .' -. '".
~',~ _. .7 ::;i:.,...:;........~::.,~...:..: "'7~
" C.
:J....I
PI O\,'H;~' 1 iC\ison for the So; 1 Cons"l'vation
.Joffc'I^~~:Jr. COLlnt~o~ lC f':icillt~tp ccn,jJlc-tiOl-,
R1Ve( P~s~n StuJy. (D~)
~C'rviLP 1'1
oft ~Il~ P _' ~ 2 t
~,ound
c----r'ur.L-1C EDUCATI(I:~ e, (JUTr~Ef\CH P !'\OG F: A I'"
(C(l'J'.TYe C.D.)
6.1 Develop and r>resent educational programs on ~~gricLl:u'('c:\l
practicES, strEam corridor management, and forest ~ractices
to groups of commercial and non-commercial farmers, Grange,
4-H, schools, homeowner's associations, fraternal
organizations, and others. (DC)
6.2 Plan organize and conduct (probably in cooperation with
County Extention Service, Washington Agricultural ~xperiment
Station) at least one field day/workshop on pasture/livestok
management for non-commercial farmers. (DC)
6.3 Plan, organize and conduct (probably in cooperation with thew
Department of Natural Resources) at least one field
day/workshop on forest practices for small forest
landownei~s. (DC)
6.4 Increase the frequency of the district newsletter from the
currently obligated 4 to at least 24 published on a monthly
basis. (DC)
6.5 Plan and develop at least one Adopt-a-stream project for the
protection and enhancement of trout, salmon, and/or shellfish
with educational tie-in to water quality issues. (DC)
6.6 Conduct a worksho~ on agricultural best management practices
for the Conservation District, county departments of Public
Works, Planning & Building, County Commissioners, the
Planning Commission, and the Shoreline Commission. CDN)
6.7 Disseminate information on septic system functioning,
maintenance, and repair via a variety of media (including
newspapers, brochures, displays, slide shows, and
presentations to civic groups). (CC)
6.8 Coordinate with schools to provide water quality information
in a classroom setting and to allow par.ticipation in water
quality monitoring. (C2)
6.9 Develop a comfortable and trusting working relationship
amoung property owners, septic installers, and the
county. (CC)
7---WATERSHED MAPPING & WETLAND INVENTORY
( COU~nY )
7.1 Delineate drainage basins by tracing detailed drainage
patterns and the boundary of drainage devides.(CZ)
7.2 Where each watershed flows to salt water, delineate land use
trends and influencing factors (such as farming, timber,
residential development, urban run-off, etc.) or other
contributions to ecological stress.(CZ)
7.3 Map natural hazards and limitations. (CZ)
7.4 Inventory and map wetlands and associated wetlands subject to
the Shoreline Management Act.(CZ)
8---MODEL WATERSHED ACTION PLAN
(C.D. )
;> I
iljj!
'1....,_
1'1 'If....
; l" .....
_'. _., 1~~,:_
n
11 t:; r;,' .,
JO.. u' ~ f' ,;
...
. _....--;.-.....--:..":':".;.;, ..'------..- ---~ ---
.'-.- --.-.---.---.-
-. . .
'. -IJ
8.1 GathL'}' n!:?cc::'=:J.I~y Infor'r:,c.tloil such t:\:: :Juidcl H..::~" fro;,: PS~)(;'<'" :?nd
e ,: i ::. t i :l 'J b ~. 5 i n pIa n == fro!1i t h l~ 0 Ll ~1 Ii OL I t F u CJ C? t Sou n d. : L -: )
D -, ;:-)E::V,~-"lOF ,;:, gr:nr-:ric ~J<3tC?:,,::_hErl f\ctlon PliTT u:ith cr:,pIT:O:';::-S but not
rc::;;trictec1 to local land uSPS 2,nd potr'ntic:d nonpC'lr,t source::,
F\ 1 : d f 'll t t his 0 n ~~ lop p ~ d.i:: c to a i rj i n d i c.: t r 11:11.1 t i. 0 il .:- n d L\ s. e
throughout Puget Sound. (DC)
9---MODEL SEPTIC SYSTEM REPAIR PROGRAM
( C(;U~ ~TY )
9.1 Summarize Jefferson County7s septic system repair program,
its history and accomplishments. (CN)
9.2 Publish, in a form suitable for use in other areas, the
necessary requirements for the program and generic forms
adaptible to any Jurisdiction. (CN)
BUDGET
This budget is for a period of two years and is based upon the
needs of the county for the services of the following Fersonnel:
1. One FTE Water Quality Specialist/Sanitarian (2 yr.) to
administer the septic system repair programs, to provide
sEPtic system maintenance and repair education, and to survey
septic systems in select areas of the,county. This person
would also oversee the water quality lab and the ambient
sampling program. This person would also participate in the
Long Term Watershed Selection Process and the develcpment of
other water quality related policies.
~. One FTE Water Quality Planner (2 yr.) to administer the loan
program, the grants, coordinate"the efforts of the multitude
of agencies, and develop the model program, aid in ~he
formation and development of the Long Term WatershE~ Selection
Process, assist in the formation of Watershed Mana9:ment
Committees and the development of Watershed Action Plans.
3. One FTE Water Quality Specialist/Lab Tech (2 yr.) to operate
the water quality lab, gather samples, analyze results, and
involve students in the scientific process. This person may
also assist in the survey and analysis of septic s~stems.
The Jefferson Conservation District has been working closely with
the county in the development of a basin plan for the Quilcene
Bay priority watershed. The District has hired an agricultural
management/timber management professional under a Ref. 39 grant,
and this position is funded through 6/30/88. In order to
VOL
13
'Arr-
t,.,,~
n
~).J
--t-r'....
'1" ,''lo ~..", '.
~'-f'G..f"'. "
.'" ,-'~ ,.~ ~'=" '.
.~"2;:,,..,....
, r
rr::.~nt<\ql con'-::,is:tt.nC'~1 :,nri (':on+IT1Ui.G cloS'f? c:c~nr(""l'c:,tH")n tl.is bl.lrj'1E:-t
rFfl,..:::::t~;, tho nei~'d;" of thF. ciJ':',trlct for onc' lTlo,'e p::::.sitio1i fO\~ tlllO
~,:r~C1r: ':Hld tor O,lt F-o:'ii:ion fOI~ onr~ ~V:~l~ (7/28--:/Fq).
1. U:,e t,J.::ItC( (:U.?Jlt!.J Project!=. CoordJnatC'.l'" C2 ~.'l"'.) to c<dIT.inister
grants and progr~ms, to dev~lop Adopt-A-Be2ch 2nd
I\(~opt-A-Stre..;._m prograrr,s, tlJol"k llJith the County's Solid ~'Jaste
Management Board to develop a local program for the proper
disposal of farm hazardous wastes, participate in the Long
Term Watershed Selection ProcEss, assist in the development of
Watershed Action Plans and provide coordination between the
District and the Conservation Commission, the Count~, and
other federal and state agencies.
2. OnE Agricultural/Timber Management Specialist (1 yr.) to
provide liason with property owners and encourage
implementation of BMP's. This person would conduct
educational sampling, management workshops, and facilitate
utilization of conservation corps crews, community service
groups and available cost-share money and develop a system
whereby property owners identified as contributing to
bacterial contamination by animal keeping practices can be
refered to the appropriate program and/or agency for
assistance. This person would also aid the county in
maintaining the water quality lab.
Two contigency budgets are shown. Budget "A" assumes that the
Community Development Block Grant will be received to allow for
&n expanded correction effort. The CDBG will be used to finance
the septic repair loan program and 2/3 FTE of the Water Quality
Specialist/Sanitarian position and 1/3 FTE of the Water Quality
Specialist/Lab Tech position. The remaining 1/3 and 2/3 FTE's
will be financed by DOE sources. Budget "B" assumes no help from
the CDBG program which results in the elimination of the Water
Quality Planner position. Without the CDBG the septic repair
program will be severly reduced, as will other portions of the
proposal, and the sanitarian ~osition will assume the
administration and coorcination responsibilities.
\!!}' 1 '1 'H'"
YVi_ U !..,;:
-.... ....... .... ~~ .,....;~;- -:--;";-'" ~-" .~'."""
0, :,'.. r- r:- ..,
; -: '.., ac.>' It
,."._..,.,.........,!O-__" --, ,._~-_."-
ME 1""1 c) RAr......DUM Cl'F Ut-..IDE RST AI"~D I ....16
between
Jefferson County
anti
Jefferson County Conserv~tion District
In order to facilitate a comprehensive, coordinated approach to
nonpoint pollution control and water resource preservation, the
County and the District agree to cooP2rate in the following
areas:
1.
2.
The County will make available for District USE office
space and office ~quipmEnt as available.
The District will assist the County in forming the county
committee for the Long Term Watershed Selection Process
and will provide technical assistance to the committee.
The District will assist the County in the formation of
Watershed Management Committees and the development of
W2tershed Action Plans.
The District and the County will cooperate in the
development of public education and outreach programs.
The County will provid9 accounting support services to the
District.
The County will continue to give some financial support to
the District.
3.
4.
::, .
6.
This agreement can be amended at any time by mutual consent or
terminated by either party.
For Jefferson Conservation District
Board of Supervisors
For Jefferson County
Board of Commissioners
Date_________________
Date____________________
VOL
13 r~,Gt
O 11 r:;:~r~
" ~~'-"'~,
-
I MON ITo~ I Nu,
Z SE'PTIC l"lAINI ~EPA loR
:3 "EMP IN~TAu.....ATION
4 ~~l~ACH r~loN
5 LoltJC4. T6~M cf/};f(,,~ Pb.~
1.4 E DuC.ATION
7 WAT~RSHCD/~ND MflP
8 IYbDf L P,-fl N
(\10D6L.. ,?~RA M
13 l.I D G.. E ..,- I, A " GSALh ~... co s;-$
a F)O.u:L~ eolJT"K p.:., r w-oo$ ct TKIiVc L.. R~N' -rOjA L... -ro-rAL...
SC:~vICES sc~ "IC~ OTIT€E:.. /"t u foJ/'r' c. 'D,
3000 :3~ooo 4Boo ~ooo :2-100 35,000
5000 c.DUo.) (2--400 ) ~oO) 1500 5,000
1 'I, 000 '-1:1 &'-.. C-t> I c...
(,700 2.0)000 1'200 Z'100 1500 20,0,00
{;700 20,000 3000 1800 /600 20,000
5000 1~J700' / goo tgoo 1500 ' /41700 s,ooo
Coooo 3opoe 5"000 2400 1500 20,300 <1,700
looo (5,000 ~-
,
S;co 5,300 \000 5,"300
!;ao 5. 000 10 5000
,- 80 000 (.cf) 000
lit, ',000 17,800 /4,400 I Q'3 I 200
bUD It 'B " 'SA'-AR."1'
Cou JUT c.p.
~ooo 3000 4800 25, 000
26,000 2..4 00 2400 20, 000
2,<01 000 1200 2Aoo 2..0 e>o 0
,
2.0,000 2000 1800 2-D, 000
'9)000 tBoo 1800 14,000 ~ 000
25700 Sooo 2-400 1(P,cao '1 -, 00
.
ISi 000
5, '300 (OOO 5~oo
,Soo JOoo
TOIAL- "F.;()DG.~ 0-rARt> Mo~'f
I /11\ 0 ^""' , ,.... GI r.z. I to.J ~
2- <;; GP'r \c fY\A l,,;t /RE PA \ R
3 EfVlP INSTAJ....J-AT/CN
4- STRe A ()\ft6l1:-tt I'ROT6crl 0 JJ
5 l-C~ "Tt.t<fY\ ~ Acn O~ PL-AfoS
/P EdlJc..A t, 0 IV
7 WAT6R"S.HE..O/W6TLAIJO mf\f"
<6 mODeL Acnol.) PL..RtV
(YlOOE.L.. S6Prlc.. PRo
l-oc 54 ~ \4 (00
I'OIAt- ~DG..4;\CW)i<o fYb~"r.. -:. /(PI) 000 17/400 IS, (,,00
Q.uTCR,61JT Lv /a
/2. iJ10NTI'+
18 VVlaNT~
I \1(n6
I 2- y)1 ,>J,.5T '-\
I 2.. yv 1 0 ',..tTI-\
I ;J.. n 1 0 I\.1T l-f
"HARO n101J6t'" G.RRAJ/ 'l(G6iuE:s-rS
Co IJ "..iT'( C6 ^.ir~tV N , 19 l.... J 8. ~ co
c. 'D. CeNT6NJ...)I~L,...- 4"3>1/2S"
CoU.0TY C'tfYl IS,ooo
'RGl"l1A IIU 1.0G.. c.n ReJ'. 39 '3.01000
_ CD Col\Jse;jtvATloN COIY\M, 2.4,00d
c.ovtJIY 2-o5C..i) 17) 9-00
I F ~ lyR.. :, R---o"t~" €u~e.G
d-- SAfl1e.. 1~v-eJ .. TO ~jJ8)
37t 800
sa, 300
~5, 000
30, 000
.48!._9.0~
35,80Q
224, 1 DC / :'1-
,
} ,
VOL
13
r~C~
n
itJ
.. r-~L',
~~....~';
.,..,:;r~ ...,-~..~._. .."'"T-4'...."'~~~.-"!:~-::..-__~ -T..... - "-',~ _."J:
.~ .......
. ,
.~
Vl
\!J Z
l- VI
2 ~ ~
S () M
~ ~ ~
0
V \S P- ~
-:r. ;z
A :?
\U 7.. 0
CO ~
OJ ~
(J"' It.!
III
o
"7
o
I-
<(
\,)
:,)
Q
11l
0"-
(f)
C1"'
o
V
<J
:t:
\...;
"
Q
\J
"W-
)-
~
)
o
U
'-"
r'
/".:>-
.)-
..9
CO
Q'
-
:2
o
~
~
~
{il
~
-<(
G.
"
~ - --
---''''-.
."" ~.-<>---'
t.AG~
.~.,.~
, 'f-.
-."......,;.~;:~~
, "
" s
o
~ ~
~ jQ
3 z
F'
J<j
"O~~
;::>~~
~f0
:t> _
3 !l
t't\
-0 0
~ c
o (\
J:' ~
;;oJ _
.:J:> 0
3 Z
.,,1Q1
~ 1>s
~ ~u
;0(11
33
,,\}c ~
~ 10~ ^l
~r t1'I
Ql>~
:D_z~
3. ~o ~
~~~
_I )> ~
}'rrn
"-fJ
t1~
~,
."
d?
!g z
.-1 ;
"ffi
~ b
~ ~8
~ -t ~
:I: tl' ~
[1\ ~-
'0 ~3 i
)> m
~ (j) I'f\
5 ml/\
z. ~1l
, no
1) 'jAJ
o
z.
0('::.
Oc:::.
3.c:.
3:~
~-<
o
z::...
tjB
c;,z
-t II)
:::lJ'"
- :;IV
~~
o
Z.
VOL
'''-.;' --. ._-':. ....~.--.. ",.,..~._~,...- "'.- .. ...-.':,.... .""""':--.~ .~'
. ....."...... ~~.,..~._.....,...~-.~.-..--:"~..,~_.- ~ ---:,,_.,.:-:~:......, .-. --....."':..,....~~. ,"
.
[
:J:::,
-l
m
~
tJ
o
rn
o
C
:::b
r
-;
--t
o
i\I
o
:t>
Z
~
~
o
l-
13 rACE 0 155~
'--'\ '.-';" ',-'-'T';'Y'''''''---7-cc,,........r-'''
Publish i'\pri1 22, 1987
I ~ <..h/,,)/)1< G
NOTICE
Jefterson County will be taking publlC comments concern)ng
submittal of an applicat.ion for Comn'lInity Developnlent Block Grant
funds. The funds will be use~ to finance a revolving loan fund
to prDvlde septic repair loans to lo\!!- arid 1TI0dC:?rate-inconle
households county wide. This program will be similar to the one
established in the Quilcene/Dabob Water Quality Project area.
The meeting on the proposed application will be held~~April
41, at .s..;..:5J!.gd~ in the COm/TI1SSJOner's chamber's of the cOL~llouse.
.Jefferson County COlTllTliSS10ner~
~~~~~~-
I NOTICE
Jefferson County will
~ be taking public com-
ments concerning sub-
mittal of an applica-
tion ,for Community
; Development Block
· Grant funds. The funds
will be used to finance
- a ,revolving loan fund
S to, provide septic
I repair ,loans 'to low
J and moderate income
I households county
,wide. ,This program
~ will be similar, to the .
~ one established in the
Quilcene/Oabob
Water, Quality Project
area. The meeting on
the proposed applica-
tion will be held Mon-
day, April 27, at 3:30
p.m. in the Commis-
sioner's chambers of
the courthouse.
Jefferso~ County
Commissioners
Larry Dennison,
Chairman
~
'.
~ VOL
13 rAGE
o
-4, r; r:: ( ,~
~'-ilu....l
'-
.,,-\
. -.~T- ,,~_._~
- .......--
-,' - .._-~ '.-' ----_.,-'...,..
--
<t
o
<t
:z:
<!
u
.
.
.
,-Q<!IO .
l---"--'-=-~---" r'o_u-~----l"- u_u -"-../-.~~\ ~ i,
i ~ ~ r~l g ! ~ (" g 0_--'-1
h ____0- __o~ fu I !:: t' ~ ...1--- .
: '"'1..-. r UJ .J . s: Dr- ~ "
. ~ z '\ 1 ~ . m
I ~ )-'-'-'-'r-'-'-'\ '\ ~rr-'i
L....--.---.-.--.-... <" 3 i rl"~.---= t
i ~ l....-~ ~ . . i i" ~ ~ i
: c::; .J:J 1 a. .-.... ~ ~ :
. ~ l . < I z \.... I
I . I ':J":
:._----,.. -z-------I I I ~ '\
i - r/".t---------_1._0_01 I ~ /'
: "\ '-L~ 'L 1 ,,-o_oJ
I .") i. I- _0 .V'O ~
: . '- ~ " ~
,. "en I ir 0 w
~ ;oJ ~ > ~ l m
~ \ ~ 5 L L_______.-o
;2 . I ., a.... _ .,./ .
OJ....... ,----r."".-. 1 i
r L....... j-r I -
../0 .-. J I I
rJ/ ~ /' ~ ,....I < ' !
j,-^-0-' ,5 i ~. r' ~ !
~ \__..~~'\ ./ I I
, i ~~I~'/ I
'. ,,( -
!! 1 .,~.J""\J",.,- ~o~_ I
I t ili l t. !. ,--.-.J r
I i!i } ~ J ~ ~f. I {---
I. , /" a:: ,. VI
o I . "w.
! '~. i"'\ I j i:i:.J ,:_0_. -'1 -.-.--
. . ~ -';-'----~I .J I ~ - 2
LM~~ <( ...-,~;~ ' , ~ ,. ~ i ~ {. d
o,/;~~D-O" '" V ,:' 1.';1,l~ ,.",~ VI I cJa ~ .;::; t
. ~ \.-.... 'fi,'(.'/!:j, ~ r- VI' I ~
: /0 ~45~./ ~- ,'filil/fbl/I,',;z" \~ 0 b 0:: I 8
/'''\0 <if. r./"..fllh I 'I ~ ~.'
/). VI \ ~"df,'P~ L:. t- 1 I
l-~i:a"'/'-'\ flfjl, ~ I--'L_--~jr
/9 \ 11~#.2,ft;trr.-,--.-1a:: I I ~
{JO cP : ~1iij,~IfII/;JJ VI ~ i ~ " ~
t'/t / rffft u. t$Z~i >- <( . u_
/ '@~,~, ~z, ~
/ ~~Wi.~P;/1fjl
o 0!~/1 ~In
: 'J.f I '
/ ' ,
I
!
:1
-it:
!!P
:~
t-
<(
I-
:l<:
U
::::i
::.::
:z:
o
C)
W
0::
o
o
.
::E
o
(.)
~
<(
J:
~
J
.
I
'-l-
-
o
A
c-
-J:-
A
~
o
o
..:>
-
'-
~vot
rAGE
" ~ fl
'U ~
I p'OT""O" ~I'-'l~ ~- l' ~"'____
II - 'O:W~~~"O ~',
I I' '\'
L__________.) ~1: ~ .,~~,.. /'~""i:t,;." < \
/ ~V' f ,,0 Gfl - ... \
( '-~~C /1 ~~w....O; tfl \. 1\ -< I
~ f{- ~ I ;~:,T! '~~:K 0 \-- I
: l'\..-'~ ~ 8 \~hll K ~ !
.-. '\l.::~ 0 ~ \ --,.r ~ ,~T \
OA'OI.' .- ~~ '''" ~ r--J..... ,"" =\ "') 'O""LA'O I
.~ ~ 0 ~I ~ (--' - I
~ I \\ 'i~ -"~ 1'-\ I- ~ - \
I ~ ~ ~ '\'\.. Ll I....
I ~ A.O," D. "-<..,Ic \"- ~ f.- - z '\
I '\. LA.. ~ I -
( : 1 < /--< U;, 1\ 9,. t:./ r \
! J. J II ~ -:-: ,",OWACUW "'<$../ \
I #.- Ij ,-( to...... "'\
!=p:;; ,) / ~ r.' 'l_ CITY '\... (\1; , \ \ ';. .. \
I l/ ,! r\J~ ~ rv LUE ~- :~ : ~ $ L \ ~ \
t-~ rc:;. , i \) 01' . <:1 A : J 1 ~ \
I lU_ r-""I I.... 0( ~ ..
i I I.K' \. '~J ~ ~ , PJd ,I ,
i r \ ( .eo.. ." 0:J~ I
I ( ~. ....~. " (" ( "'-' l-^. \ ';;l. fj /
. "~I ......" \.. I f ...< C ~... J '...... I
! k"....." --..j Ii ,)~IO '"' ........ ~ ,- f(j/ ~ - >-. 1 !
! rJ )!' Ukl ~ ,') L .~~. 1 '~r.L, _ A \
I I > ~ '\ ~~~ /><...~~ ~e;~: ...... \)~.~ ~ ~ J II \
I I)", \\ J ~ " FiJ \'"
i r ""1\..1 &>i ,~ ~ ~.~~:~~_ \:
. LA.Il.5"/) l...1) '0:-.. ;..::::::-- o_]~ '.
I LO O. lLA';O~ I ''I \.~ .........,r..... } \ "1D> 1
r , SA O:w~H .. "- \ ') if
_-,-__________________________J J~ I ........... ' ~ '1 "".1 y{ //
I ~ ' '~ '-~ "-V )~' '6 ~}' t:i. \ sO~:~:SH '/
I .. ;;/ ~ (1Lf'. .. /'/
'~.t., .) ~ /1
I /
I 0 l Y M P C ~ r- ~ /)\. ~.~ I'
I, I, OUILC .1' ~~ \ ,,<}'......,/
I (.4 ,1Y; -:"" ~ n ~ (;, \::/;7 /
I ~ .:~~C't. t. ~ ~ ~ tv\. If ~ ,/ '. 0-
I i/?! ; i) I ~ , t v/
I I.... L li1 , ~ M=' ~ '1';" ( ol/
I ~-"l.1. '- · f J ,I
i N AT' 0 N A L \:L III 04:/ / oj if
I .-'14:/ (),lI..Jj
I 'Jr \'\ 'r "v-,
; 4o~~ ~~ I..IQ tr- !
~ (
i "," ....... ,-', I
· 'i\:- AiV.. \\.~: ,.,.) ~ i
- "' "\;~, rr ) '- ,
FOR EST \' ,,~ 11" Y " i
'\ I' V ,,", ~ ./ I
"-j~"':--H-'~, /.. ..0'. """,U'v-' /
~-~0 -" "I'. _ - -~....,/
"- ,\." ~./J ,...~
......... ~'\, '(!t:'d 'V/w,''''
~~~r ~\ o~~'
J J "L..jf yo. /'
\0 -. ,/
,." ,0 ,/
r-.~ .........;0 ,/
t !;~})' ,/
I 13 ()11 r:-61
i r'//" vot. ,rACE u...J .)1.
~ I
I
I
j
~
.
.
;
-
.
. .
-
.