HomeMy WebLinkAbout055 04
,-
·IIIIIIII(III:~~~:~~
C tv Wð JEFFERSON COUNTY ROA RESO 21.00
Jefferson oun.. "
RETURN ADDRESS
J e.., PlA6ì c- ,,^-l.Q..a- s
?, O· ~()'J. 20 Î 0
~(" -\- TÒ\òYìsenc! \No-- C)){SÍtI'ß
Please print neatly or type information
DOCUl\tIENT TITLE
R~s (J 11A.--h'c)YÎ
REFERENCE NUMBERS (5) OF RELATED DOCUMENTS
Additional Reference #'s on page_
GRANTOR (S) (Last, First and Middle Initial)
~~ (' bl.cnJ
Additional grantor on page_
GRANTEE (S) (Last, First and Middle Initial)
TOY'\~'n ~ý\d '
Add¡:ional grantee on page _
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Abbreviated form: i.e. lot.block,plat or section,tcwnship,range,quarter/quarter)
AI15 in B~5, Lv-vndt?\.k f\.lo,LP .
Additional legal on page _
ASSESSOR'S PROPERTY TAX PARCEL/ACCOUNTl'CUMBER
l1LP~ 114 'Sö I C1 ~~ \\L150:l q-{p,;u 14 505
..
Additional parcel #'s on page _
The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the Information provided on this form. The staff will not read the document
to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing Information provided herein.
/111111111111 InTII ~,~~~,3 - --
10/20/200401:3&P
Jefferson County, WA JEFFERSON COUNTY ROA RESO 21.00
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNIY OF JEFFERSON
In the matter of
x
RESOLUTION NO. 55-04
Vacation of the alley in Block 145, x
Irondale No.6 x
WHEREAS, the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners has reviewed a road vacation petition
submitted by David Tonkin; and
WHEREAS, the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner held a public hearing on the road vacation
petition on Tuesday, October 5, 2004; and
WHEREAS, the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner considered testimony of the public, comments
from applicable departments, agencies and offices, and recommendation from the Jefferson County Public
Works Department and Jefferson County Department of Commutúty Development at the public hearing;
and
WHEREAS, the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner determined at the public hearing that the
public will benefit from the vacation of this alley and such vacation complies with the Jefferson County
Comprehensive Plan and other applicable plans, policies or ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners considered said Hearing Examiner's
report of the public hearing and his recommendation for the vacation request and hereby adopts the
Findings of the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner dated October 8, 2004;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the folloWÍl1g be vacated and abandoned pursuant to
RCW 36.87.140 and Jefferson County Road Vacation Ordinance No. 01-0102-96: the entire platted alley,
being approximately 12' in width by 200' in length, lying within block 145 of the plat of Irondale No.6,
as per plat recorded in volume 2 of plats at page 139, records of Jefferson County, Washington, situate in
the Northwest quarter of Section 35, Township 30 North, Range 1 West, W.M..
ADOPTED THIS 18th DAY OF October
, 2004
.
.
IIIIII~J~~!I;~~~:~~P
Jefferson County.
. -.
l?A A POIN
~ ~ ~ .:::: .... ~ ~ .... ~ ~ ~ CII "U :;:j ~ ~ <.r <.r ~ ~
t:3 ~ ~ eo CII 01 01 ~ <.r ~ 0 eo :;u ~ CII eo 0 ~ <.r <.r ~ t.I
.... 0 '" 0 ~ t.I '"
- ~ 01 (f) ~ t.- ti
,j , I - r\ "U 01 ( 1-
J , 01 T ~ If
î- ! '-- "'41 ~ () rf \ ~
lJ -i ~ ~
! \ '" ~ t.I' V-
It;¡ I~ ~ N~ t.I t.I t.I <.r <.r ~ » ~ I:::: I~ ~ .... .... ~
~~ <.r <.r 01 CII ~ iC ... ~ t.I ~ ~~
i OIØI CIIfD 0 ~ t.I ~ N 011 01 ....0
1.... ... ... 0
~ -ANDREVV AVE.
';J
,- ¡:; :::¡
I .... .... ':::: ~ ~ ~ ~ .... ... CII r ~
t:3 ~ ~ eo 011 01 Ot ~ t.I ~ 0 eo » CII ~ <.r ~ t.I <.r t.I ~ <.r
it 0 '" - ~ eo 0 ~ t.I ~ 01 '"
<.r
¡,.- ~ 01 - ~ ~ ~ Ì'\
V iJ: Ot If
01 ~
'"- -
-t ~ ~ ~ 1\
~ ~ t? lJ <.r ~ ~ t--: u :....
It; ~ t.I <.r t.I ~ ~ I-
I~ N~ NN <.r ~ <.r t.I 01 01 ... üî I:::: I~ ~ .... .... ....
OtOl Oleo 0 ~ t.I ~ ~ .... 01 ~ t.I ~ ........
.... ~ ~ 011 ....0
'- 0
VICTORY () AVE.
-i
'- f:j -A~I-.I-a.""""-"~""''''' 011 :::¡
» N N t.I <.r ~~
~ N ~ eo 0111.... 01 01 ~ t.I .... 0 eo '" ~ ~ 011 eo 0 ~ t.I <.r ~
0 ....0 ~
v~~~ ~~ <.r
01 ~ I-
Ot !-
o J lbo. h 01 h ~ I
c
- » 'l}'I V ~'" ~ (f) J'.:i ~ I-
<.r » ~ Þ
U) 'r-~ r~ G) ~
o 1t;¡1~ ~ ~~ ~ fg ~ ~ ~ t: ~ <.r ~ ~ N ...;::.
.... üî ... I:::: I~ .... ~ .... ~
1i7~ ~ N 01 ~ <.r ~ ....
::.» 0101 0 011 ~
~ STROMBERG '<~- AVE
-, .... ... :::: ~ ... .... ¡:; .... 011 :;:j
I~ ... ... N
~ ~ eo CII 01 Ot ~ t.I ~ 0 eo ~ <.r t.I t.I ~~
~ 0 ~ CII eo ~ t.I ~
'" .. 0 ~ t.I
f::: ~ 01 .- r/... N f-::þ
/ '\ 01
... 01 '( D ~. II , I..
-
-: ,.. ~ ~ 1\ \; .F
') ) .
\ t.I ~ ~ I-.
It;¡ ~ ~ ~ t.I t.I<.r '~ ~ ~ F-
I~ ~~ ~N <.r ~ t.I t.I ~OI .... I:::: 'm ën~ .... ~
0101 Oleo 0 ~ N üî ... t.I N ~
.. .... 011 ....
- 0
CARNEGIE / 6'< AVE.
VAC 10/16/00
-.. ... ~ CII :;:j
~ .... ~ :::: .... ... .... .... ... N t.I ~~
0) N N eo 011 01 Ot ~ <.r ~ 0 eo Q) N <.r ~ ~
.... 0 '" ~, eo 0 t.I ~
::> » t.I
-:::: P:- OI N ~::
< / Ì\ "U 01
fTl f n 01 :;u ~ I
- 0 I.
. ~ ~ (f) ~ \ , ~
1\ ) t.I "U ~ rJ ~
N -- I~ T
It;¡ ~ NN ~ NN t.I <.rt.l t.I N () N
t.I ~ Ot ... ¡¡; .... ':::: ,~ .... .... .... ....
0101 Oleo 0 N <.r~ -i ~ 01 ~ t.I ~ ....
~ ~ 011 ....
,- eo
LYTER » 01 AVE
t:3~ .... .... I:::: .... .... ~ .... ¡:; .... .... 011 ;r T 1
~ N eo 011 01 Ot ~ t.I .... 0 eo or Pb P5
) 0 '" ,0 tJ~
~~ ~~
l.-:: þ: "\ 01 "'.... fD ~
/
t.I (.,
"'D
o "
t.lt.
"'0
OCC
t.lt.I
"'011
oeo
l
I
r
1
BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY
2
3
4
RE: Petition by David Tonkin to ) File: Irondale 6 Alley Blk 145 RW
vacate the alley in Block 145 of )
Irondale No.6. )
)
) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,
)
) AND RECOMMENDATION
)
)
BACKGROUND:
5
6
7
8
9
10
Irondale No. 6 was platted in 1910 with typical 25'x100' lots and
11 alleys. A number of the alleys have been vacated in recent years as
12 individual lots are developed.
13 PROCEDURAL INFORMATION
14
SEPA: Categorically exempt per WAC 197-11-800 (2) (h) .
Notices: Mailed: September 16, 2004
Posted: September 16, 2004
15
16
17
Publication:
September 22 and 29, 2004
18 Site Visit: October 5, 2004.
19 Hearing Date: October 5, 2004
20 TESTIMONY:
21 The public hearing was opened on October 5, 2004, at 1:00 p.m. in the
22 Courthouse First Floor Conference Room. After the procedures for the
23 public hearing were explained, testimony was accepted. All testimony
24 was taken under oath. A verbatim recording of the public hearing was
25 made and is maintained in the Jefferson Permit Center file.
26 Kelli Larson, Engineering Tech II, presented the Staff Report/record.
27 David Tonkin, Petitioner.
28 The public hearing was closed at 1:10 p.m.
29
David Tonkin, Petitioner
Irondale # 6 Blk 145 Alley
Findings, Conclusions
and Recommendotion
Page 1
-
1 TABLE OF EXHIBITS:
2 EXHIBIT/A TT ACHMENT DOCUMENT DATE
1 Staff Report together with 11 Attachments 9/23/2004
3 from County Engineer Monte Reinders 9/23/2004
A Memo
4 B Memo from Public Works Transportation Planner 8/7/2004
C Memo from Dept of Community Development 9/21/2004
5
D Email from puget Sound Energy 8/17/2004
6 E Fax from Qwest 8/19/2004
7 F Approval - Parks Advisory Board Meeting 9/1/2004
G Certificate of Appraisal with maps 7/24/2004
8 H Assessor's and Vicinity Maps No date
9 I Posting Notice Verification 9/16/2004
J Publication of Hearing Notice Verification No date
10
K APO List 8/4/2004
11
12 FINDINGS OF FACT
13 1. The petition is to vacate all of the platted alley in Block 145
14 of Irondale No 6, approximately 12'x200'.
15 2. The principal petitioner is is David Tonkin.
16 3. The petitioner states:
"Our new manufactured home must be installed length-wise north to
17 south because of the design of the septic system (SEP02-00225).
The door from the utility room that would enter the garage is at
18 the south end of the parcel, there is no room for the garage. If
the alley is vacated, we will gain 6 feet of property and reduce
19 the setback to 5 feet. This will provide room for the garage.H
20 4. Road vacations are exempt from SEPA, per WAC 197-11-800 (2) (h) .
21 5. The agency reviews are summarized in the following table:
22 Attachment Agency Comment
A County Engineer Recommends Approval
23 B Transportation Planner No objection
24 C Community Development Recommends Approval
D Qwest Telephone No objection
25 E Parks Advisory Board No objection
26 The following did not respond and are assumed to have no objection:
- Sheriff's Office/Emergency Services
27
- Jefferson County P.D.D. #1
28
29 6. The certificate of appraisal indicates a value of $1,400.00
David Tonkin, Petitioner Page 2 Findings, Conclusions
Irondale #6 B!k 145 Alley and Recommendolion
1 7.
The appraisal of $1,400.00 would result in a cost to the
2 petitioner of $700.00 (50% of the appraised value). The Petitioner
3 testified that he had reviewed the appraisal by Ralph Ericksen and had
4 no obj ection.
5 8.
The County Engineer responded with the following after his
6 investigation:
7
a.
Irondale No 6 was recorded on June 28, 1910, and therefore
8 is not statutorily vacated under RCW 36.87.090.
9
b.
The alley does not provide area circulation or utilities.
10
c.
Emergency services will not be impaired.
11
d.
The alley does not abut a body of water.
12
e.
The proposed vacation will not land lock ,any parcel.
13
f.
The licensed appraiser indicates a value of $1,400.00.
14 REVIEW CRITERIA
15 Right-of-way vacation petitions are subject to JCC Chapter 12.10, Road
16 Vacations, and in particular the review criteria of JCC 12.10.130.
17 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
18 The following conclusions may contain additional Findings of
19 Fact:
20 1.
The Hearing Examiner is duly appointed by the Jefferson County
21 Board of Commissioners to hear petitions for right-of-way vacations
22 and make recommendation to the Board.
23 2.
A review of the proposal's compliance with the seven criteria
24
specified by JCC 12.10.110 follows:
25
(1) The proposed road vacation complies with the Jefferson
County comprehensive plan and any other applicable plans,
policies, or ordinances.
26
27 3.
Since the plat is designated/zoned Rural Residential 1:5 and
28 surrounding properties are in'different ownerships, the proposed
29 residential use is appropriate. This criterion is met.
David Tonkin, Petitioner
Irondale # 6 Blk 145 Alley
Page 3
Findings, Conclusions
and Recomrnendation
1
(2) Roads should not be closed, vacated, or abandoned when land
uses or development plans, or occurring patterns, indicate their
usefulness for area circulation. Prior to a vacation decision, an
examination should be made of its probable effect on overall area
circulation in the neighborhood. Single or multiple vacations
should be considered a positive tool toward improving
neighborhood circulation and accesses.
2
3
4
5
4.
The alley parallels and is only 100 feet from Prospect Avenue.
6 The alley is not needed for area circulation.
This criterion is met.
7
(3) The effectiveness of fire, medical, law enforcement, or
other emergency services should not be impaired by the closure,
vacation, or abandonment of county roads. Appropriate authorities
should be consulted with respect to this policy.
8
9
10
The appropriate authorities were notified of the petition. Their
5.
11 lack of response to this type of petition in this plat was
12 anticipated. This criterion is met.
13
(4) Roads should not be closed, vacated, or abandoned when such
routes can effectively be used for utility corridors. Suitable
utility easements could be retained as a means of satisfying this
policy. Public and private utility companies and their plans
should be consulted with respect to this policy. In compliance
with RCW 36.87.140, the board of county commissioners may retain
an easement within the subject vacated area for the construction,
repair, and maintenance of public utilities and services.
14
lS
16
17
18
None of the applicable agencies have utilities in the alley.
6.
19
This criterion is met.
20
(5) Roads should not be closed, vacated, or abandoned when such
routes can be effectively used for trails or pathways. Suitable
trail easements could be retained as a means of satisfying this
policy. The Jefferson County parks, recreation, and open space
plan should be used as a guide to determine trail needs.
21
22
23
7.
The Park Advisory Board found no need. This criterion is met.
24
(6) In compliance with RCW 36.87.130, no county road or part
thereof should be vacated that abuts on a body of salt or fresh
water, unless the vacation is to enable any public authority to
acquire the vacated property for port purposes, boat moorage, or
launching sites or for park, viewpoint, recreational,
educational, or other public purposes, or unless the property is
zoned for industrial purposes.
2S
26
27
28
8.
The alley does not abut a body of water.
This criterion is met.
29
David Tonkin, Pelitioner
Irondale #6 Blk 145 Alley
Findings, Conclusions
and Recommendation
Page 4
1
(7)
The proposed vacation will not land lock any parcel of property.
2 9.
Prospect Avenue is open on the north and Stromberg Avenue is open
3 on the east. Victory Avenue is not open on the west, but is available
4 to be opened. This criterion is met.
5 10.
The land appraisal is by a licensed appraiser, Ralph Ericksen.
6 The resulting market value of $1,400.00 is proper.
7
8
RECOMMENDATION
9
Based on the testimony presented at the Public Hearing, the documents
10
and exhibits admitted into the record, a visit to the site and
11
surroundings, and the above Findings and Conclusions, the Hearing
12
Examiner recommends that the vacation of the alley petitioned by David
13
Tonkin be APPROVED.
14
DATED this 8th day of October 2004.
15
Irv Be~ ~
16
17
Jefferson County Hearing Examiner
18
19
ib
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
David Tonk.in, Petitioner
Irondale #6 Blk 145 A.lley
Findings, Conciusions
and Recommendation
Page 5
z
. . , ./ >
Z-L' 'JV^ .1 3^V Jld~Å lO
~ 00 NÒ COÒ .... è!i~ .... N ~ ~ 10 CO"
;=N ~Ò ~ I') N .... 0 0) 10 I~ CO 10
N CO 10 I')
~ ;=~ .... ....~ I') I') I') I') I') I') N N N N ~ j
å o~ ~.... N F:: ......
-10 O~ ~N ,--.. / I \,;
O· O· CI I') , !\
\ rJ -\AI -10 -10 -Jo W ")
I- ~ ~
~ I - " I- 10 1.& " J \ /
Ö ....ö I')Ò IOÖ « - -
.... ;:0) ...." ' ..J CO "- :!: ::.. ~ fo-
0) ~O) ~N a.. 00) I:!
N O~ O~ O· ......., " 0.... lOCO Þ 100) ~Ñ ~ 10" CO 10
Ò -10 -JO I -JO 0) ~ I') ~ N.... ........ .... ....
~ 10 .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
3^V ~31Ål
CO «
0)
[co 0 .... Þ 100) 0 .... è!i~ .... N I') ~ 10 CO"
N I') ~ 10 CO N I- - 0 10
" 0) .... - ....- CO 10 ~ ~ N I') 0) ~ .~ CO
f¡ f .... - - .... - ü I') I') I') N N N
11 N N I') I') ¡j ~
\ w .- t / \
~ a.. I') V """ \
( , (/)
rJ 0 ~ . ....
j ~ D::: 10 !LJ I ) W 1.& II )
~ ... ~ :e a.. f\ f.:t Þ > I\. ¡::.
"- CO ;¡:
~ 0) 10 " CO 10 I') N ....0 W ~ « 0 10
. ~ I') 0) " 0.... NI~ 10" CO ~
I') I') I') 1')1') I') I') 1')1') N 10 0) 0... I~ I') ~ lOCO Þ 100) NN ....... .... .... ....
N !::: 10 - ... .... .... .... .... -....
'3^V >lO OO/9VO~ 'JV^ 3183N~VJ
/
DO 0 .... 10 ~ 0 .... .... N ., ~ 10
CO " N I') ~ 10 CO ~ N .~ è!i~ 10"
0) .... .... .... ~ I') N - 0 0) 10 CO 10
.... .... .... .... .... - CO 10 I') N
i- )' N N I') I') I') I') I') N N N ~ i"
~ \ ~ I') I "( ñ \ V "\
( " . I
!3 (~ ~ - .....
, ¡..& I" J ~ i'" oj
10 \ IJ
~ :::- 10 CO r-:t ¡:: L
N
. ~ 0) 10 " CO 10 ~ ~ N ....0 0) ~ " 0.... ~ 0 0)10 IO~
I') I') I') 1')1') I') I') 1')1') N 10 0) 0 ;:I~ I') ~ lOCO Þ 100) NN N .... - "CO .... ....
N !::: .... ....
10 .... .... .... .... .... -....
3^V V) 8~38~O~lS w
0
CO 0 .... ~ 10 ~ 0 '/' CO 10 « .... N I') ~
CO r-.. N I') ~ 10 CO N IW .... .... è!i~ 10 10 "
0) .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ~ I') ~ I') N I') 0 0) 10 :~ CO 10 0
~ - I') I') I') I') N N N N [(
~ ~ N )'
C> N l ~ (f) V ~
I ~ ~ « I') ~ ~ I ~ «
~ ~ en ~ J \ - -
\ !' II ~ => \ .... ::r !) 0 J
1'-' 10 \.. ~ ~
N - :..- 10 / [t: :::-
- N ~ 10 ~ Þ V
I') ~
. ~ 0) CO " CO 10 ~ I') N ....0 0) " 0 Ñ~ 0 0)10 IO~
I') I') I') 1')1') I') 1')1') 10 I~ lOCO Þ N "CO
I') N N « 0) 0 .... I') ~ CO 0) N .... .... .... .... .... ....
!::: CO .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
'3^V I- Å~OlJI^
I~
Ie 0 .... Þ 10 ~ 0 Ðï ....
CO ... N I') ~ 10 CO N 0 10 è!i~ .... N I') ~ 10
0) .... .... .... .... .... .... .... - CO 10 ~ I') N ~ 0) 10 ~ CO CO "
Ñ I') ~ I') N N N N
.- :-- 9 N I') I') I') )'
/' l'"" \ ~ g: I') / IC r\
~ ~ ... 4-
\ ..... ~ ~ ~' ..
10 \ J
"- ~ ~ 10
N CO ~ -
~ 0) CO " CO 10 I') N ....0 ~ f- ~ ~I') ~. 0 0)10
. ~ I') 0) 0....
I') I') I') 1')1') I') I') 1')1') N 10 « ,.... 0) 0 ;:I~ I') ~ 1010 Þ COO) NN ~ ~ ~ 1')1"')
N !::: ..J CO .... .... .... .... .... -....
'3^V ~ '^3~ONV-
[co 0 - ~ 10 ~ 0 ~ .... 10 è!i~ .... N I') ~ 10
CO I"- 0) .... N I') ~ 10 CO N ~ I') N ~ 0 0) 10 " CO CO ,....
.... - .... .... .... .... .... « CO 10 I') I') I') I') N N N N N
Ñ N I') I')
/' 11 )' 1\ ~ ,I') / ~ b' \
- " I- ~ It.... f-'\
ü
J I) ~ w ,'- ,
10 \ )
"- :t ::. 10 a.. ~ ::.
N (/) 10
... .... ~ 0) CO ,.... I"') N ~ 0 Ñ~ ~ ~I~ .~ 0) CO
CO ~ ~ I"') ....0 0) ,.... þ 0 ~ 1"')1"')
to ~ I"') I"') I') I') I') I') 1')1"') N 10 D::: 0) 0.... '~ I"') ~ lOCO 10 0) N
N ~ a.. 10 .... .... - .... .... .... .... ....
^ I~ 0 1 IOc 'f:/ 1)1 N 10"
0 !;: ~ ~ 2 .... 10 ~ ~ ~~ .... I"') ~ 10
10 CO ,.... CO 0) N I')~ ,.... CO 0) I') ~ I') N .... 0 0) 10 " 10
.... .... ........ .... .... .... I') I') I') I') I') N N N N
f ~ Ñ N ~ .......
/' \ ~ I') ~ ~
( N ~ W ~ I þ r ~
\ I" J ~ C> 10 \ 7
"- I~ - « ~ -
:e (/) CO V
'- -' I-
CO ~ => ,.... ~ 0) 0 0 ~~'r:::!2!Q"'t
N ~ 0 0) CO" IO~ I') N ~ 0 0) 10 0) 0 .... N I') lOCO " CO N Ñ~ ~
~ ~ I"') 1"')1') I"') 1')1') I') I') I') N N " 10 .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
N ....
10
I-
o
-I
6-9
Õ .-. I". 1'''I~I;::It:I~I~I::!:''''-' -" W ..........
::::.~~
0)
~
9
lOCO
~
10
~
10
N
~
o
'"
'"
')
Regular Agenda
JEFFERSON COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA REQUEST
TO: Board of County Commissioners
John F. Fischbach, County Administrator
Frank Gifford, Public Works Director 5o..J:1
DATE: October 18,2004
FROM:
SUBJECT: Standard Road Vacation Request, Alley in Block 145, Irondale No.6;
David Tonkin, Petitioner
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Road Vacation petition submitted by David Tonkin for all of the platted alley in Block 145,
Irondale No.6. This road vacation was heard before the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner on
October 5, 2004. His recommendation is enclosed.
ANALYSIS/STRATEGIC GOALSIPRO'S and CON'S:
The BOCC is to take into consideration the Hearing Examiner's recommendation, the County
Engineer's report 8: recommendation, and any other comments that may be received from the
public and/or adjoining property owners. No testimony has been received in opposition to this
vacation. The final resolution is attached pending the Board's decision.
FISCAL IMPACT/COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS:
There is no fiscal impact as this is an un-opened and un-maintained alley that is not needed for
area circulation.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Works Department and the Hearing Examiner recommend approval of the request
and the signing of the attached resolution. All conditions have been met and petitioner has
submitted payment for all administrative fees and compensation.
REVIEWED BY:
Q12- a, I¡~ JJ~-1
John F. Fischbach, County Administrator
10 /, '-I I ð 1/
Date