HomeMy WebLinkAboutSpecial Report (117)
w. Devid Loggy. CPSS and Wetland Specialist
P. O. Box 2347. Port Angeles. WA 98362
Phone: 360-457-3920 - Fax: 360-457-0131
Toll Free :866-80&3920
eel Phone: 360-175-0901
E-mail: wdploggyOolypen.com
,l.
.
CertifiAc1
Speciatizing in:
Soil Mapping and Classification
Soillnvesti(lations and Soil Site Analysis
Wetland Mapping. Delineation and Restoration
Soil Redolt PotetltiaI Monitoring for H)<dric Soil Det.ermination
December 15,2005
Mr. David Johnson
Jefferson County Department of Community Development
621 Sheridan Street
Port Townsend, W A 98368
Dear Mr. Johnson:
I am sending this wet1and environmentally sensitive area report directly to you as Mary Lynch say 1hat she
bas been holding most ofher conservation regarding her property with you. She will most likely be contacting you as
soon as she get her copies of this report.
The only potential development site for a single-family-residence appears to be the southwest comer of the
parcel. This upland area including the buffer is 17,264.61 square feet in area. The buffer in this upland area is
10,748 square feet in area. There might be enough uplands on the parcel to the south to place a septic field in the
very southwest comer of Mary's parcel and filling some wetlands to an accommodate sufficient area for a single-
family residence. A properly designed two story residence might fit in the upland with some buffer impact without
filling any wetlands. Of course buffer reduction would have to be approved as standard wetland buffer width averag-
ing as set forth in the county regulation appears unfeasible. The only other un-buffered upland is 3,797.8 square feet
along the southeast comer of the parcel and placing additional buffer here would not be very beneficial to the reduced
buffer area at the development site. There is a public water line along side the property so there is problem for a wa-
ter source.
I did not want to discuss this potential site with Mary until you had a chance to review the report and receive
some feed back from you. I did want Mary to get ber hopes up again about being able to sen the property for devel-
opment.
Page 2
The only other potential uses of the parcel is to lease it out as pasture or possIbly use it in the future as a wet-
land mitigation banking area.
Please contact me if you have any questions or need additional information. I have enclosed my professional
qualification for your information.
Sincerely;
w'~
W. David Loggy, CPSS
Enclosures: 2
W. 0IMd LoaY, CPSS and Wetland Specialist
P. O. Box 2347, Port Angeles. WA98362-0303
Phone:36O-457 -3920 - Fax: 360-451-0131
Toll Free Phone 866-805-1491
Email: wdploggyOolypen.com
Spel:""" in:
Sol.......... - ~
Sol 1m J I ~IS'" SolI SiIe AnIII}Isis
WeIIBnd ....... DeIIneeIIon and ResIDRJtion
Sol RecIDac Potenti8I MonitDrII1& for HydrIc Sol DelermiII8tIon
"-
V
CertifiAct
Professioaal QalificatioD aDd Experieace
w. David Loggy
Loggy Soil & Wetlaad CollRltiag
Title: Consulting Soil Scientist
Total Yan ExperieBces: 39
Washington Society of Professional
Soil Scientists
Society of Wetland Scientists
National Society of Consulting Soil
Scientist, Inc
Better Business Bureau
PROFESSIONAL SPECIALTIES:
Soils
Surveys and Inventories
Soil Classification. Genesis,
Morphology - USDA,UNlFIED, and
ASSHO
Identification ofHaards &: Limitations
Hydric Soils of Problem &: Atypical
Wetland Situations
Field Fertility Testing
Erosion Potential, Control and Plans
Correlation of Agri. Soil Class-
ification to UNIFIED &: ASHO
Attributes Affecting Septic Design-
Depth to Seasonal Water Tables
Wetlands
Inventories, Type Determinations,
Delineations, Function &: Value
Analysis, &: Reports
Mitigation Plans and Monitoring
.EnbaJx:ement and Restoration
Soil Redox Potential Monitoring
EnviroluBeDtaI
Soils, Wetland &: CAS Data for ECs.
DEIS &: FEIS
Education:
BS, Range Conservation, Colorado State
University, 1966 ~orareasofstudy,
included Biology, Ecology and Soils)
Associate of Arts, (Pre-Forestry).
Casper College. J 96J
Certif"acatioRlAffiliatioas:
Certified Professional Soil Scientist (CPSS)
No. 576, (ARCP ACS). 26 years
Member:
Positions Held: Newsletter Editor &: Board Member
for Wabington Society of Professional
SoilScicntist
Awards: Five Certificates of Merit Awards
For Sustained Superior Performance
T~.~I Soil M..-Il r .. Senica V.s. Forat Ser-
vice. I conducted soil and wildland watershed support
services for slope stability analysis, landslide stabilization,
application of soil quality standards, erosion analysis and
site surveys. I aIIo ideatUied wed8-., aad iaterpreted
Private Soil aad W........ Co....ltia.-l997 to PnlIeat. wedaad nd Ityclrie ... data for tilaber IIIIIe ....n.g,
I have coad.cted soil slope ItaIJiIity auIyIis 011 id~ 1ay0llt, .............., r... ., ... ..,.1 ..... re-
fled critieal..... for tiJaber Ilarvest sites ad 1I0uiag 8e8l'C1I studies. I provided soil analysis for rock pit devel-
develop.eat sites iD Skagit aad CIaIhua Cooties. I opment. road location, and construction, and administr'a-
have aIIo developed .. erosioa coatrol pIaa for a Iaow8- lion, recreation sites, administrative sites, ski areas, mine
iag developaeat plat ia C..... Conty ad eoadueted development, hydroeledric sites and a pulp mill air pollu-
wetlaad iaveatories, deliaeatioa aad rellabilitatioa pro- lion study.
jects for reality eompaaies, developen aad private
IaBdowaen ia CIaIhua, Skagit, Saollo.isll, Jeffenoa
nd IaIaad Co.aties, ad witIUa tile city boudaries of
Port ADgeIes, Port Towuead, Lake Fonst Park nd
Marysville.. Have coad.eted ad beea s.beoatraetor
oa wetlaad projects siaee ia tile above area siace 1997.
Sum...,. ofExperieaees
Project and Program Manager, or Interdisplinary Team
Member on 25 major projects in Colorado and Alaska.
Thirty an one half years experience in soil survey, and wa-
ter planning and budgeting for forest planning, mining and
ski area projects, long term and independent timber sales,
and road layout and consCruction. Tweaty yean of 8-
perieaee iD wedaacI........ aad ......-.eat, ad
ripariu baffer ...~..._t uti esea.....eat.
Siace 1979 uve doae wetlaacl aad IIope ltability dete....
milUltlna aDd uaIysis, ad soil el"Ollioa pIaa work ia
SaollOlllisll, ...., SJuicit, JeffenOIl ad CIaIWa
Couties, aad tile dties of Port ADgeIes, Port Towa-
sea" Lake Fonst Park ad MarysviIIe.
Fifteen technical reports and papers authored or c0-
authored.
Traiaia& ia U.s. &.1 Cro.... ofEapleen WetIaad
DeIiaeatioII Method aacI State of Wullillgtoa's Pro-
poeed Wedud FIIIICtioaI Aalnf~at MetItod. USDA,
NRCS. Traiaiag ia Advuced Hvdrie SoDa ia acco....
daace to s1udanIs of die NatiOIlal Tee~ C_IRit-
tee for IIvdrie Soils. Trm.-- ia sItonIiae hw_arv
detenaiDatioa.
Selected Project Experieaee
Nebruka, CoIondo aacI AJuka that iDeladed IIIOI"e
tIlaa 85 orpDic ad ......101 serieL TIairty of die
soils were 0...... .......ltyclrie ... _DCiated
witIa estaary, aDd bog ad feD wetIaads (both forested
aad aon-forested).
Water MaJaage8aeat, VA Forest Service. Developed
modeling protocol for erosion and sediment transfer haz-
ards, and co-developed geomorphic risk assessment of
potential fish habitat impacts for forest management alter-
native practices. Co-deftIoped a ......mcatioD syste.
for field ideatifyiag CIaa m StreaIIIs (eqaivaleDt to
die State ofW........'. Type .. Waten) bMed 011
leCliaaeatatiOll poteDdaI. Co-a1dIIond a protocol for
ideatifyiag, ell] if,...... ~ 34......11abitat
types aiag GIS 100 aad .....t co.....aides databases
for 8.E. Alaska. As Watershed Program Manager for 5
years, I supervised three soil scientists, and two hydrolo-
gists. I coordinated, fIUUUt~ directed and budgeted the
Ketchikan Area's watershed program and projects, involv-
ing watershed analysis, soil and hydrology management
consulting, and COOJdinated the watershed program of
wolk with other resouree units. As soil survey supervisor
in Alaska, I supervised ftom 6 to 12 people in 2 person
crews per year.
Forest ad Project Planning, V.8. Forest Senice. I was
the Soil and Water Consultant or lOT member for environ-
mental analyses for two Ketchikan Pulp eo:s Long Term
Sale - five year periods. many smaller timber sales, the
u.s. Borax Molybdenum Bulk Sampling Mine Access
Road, Swan Lake Hydro-electric Dam, and Tongass Land
Natioaal Cooperative Soil Survey, U.s. Fonst Senice. Management Plan Revision (1987-90). I wrote soil and
I have thirty years experience in soil identification, cJassi- water standards and guidelines, management prescriptions,
fication, soil sampling. standard testing methods, and map- and the soil, water, air and wetland section for environ-
ping soils to the National Cooperative Soil Survey. I su.... mental analysis. I eo-alltltond ad edited a white paper
veyed uti mapped aadlor supervised die surveyiag oa ripariaa eoacepts for 8.E. Alaska.
aad aaappiag of 3 lIIiIIioa acns betweea tile states of
~ J;
W. DrMd Loggy, CPSS and Wetland Specialist
P. O. Box 2347, Port Angeles. WA 98362
Phone:36O-451-392O-Fax: 360-451-0131
Email: wdploggyOolypen.com
Web Page: OIypen.comJwdploggy
~1C1n.:
Sol....... end 71 1 17iI.dtiu..
SoIIIIIl~&- Sol SIte Analysis
WetIIInd MBppirW. DeIIneetIon and RestondIon
Sol RedcIt Potenti8I MonitDriIIIIIl for HydrIc SoII:IeteI,,*1IIIIon
,t.,
~
CertifiAct
ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVE AREA STUDY
PREPAIRED FOR THE
PROPERTY OF
Mary Lynch
Located in portion of the
Northwest 1/4 of
Seetioa 34, T.30N, R.02W, W.M.
Proposed Project:
Wetland Delineation
Project N..e:
Lynch 002342037
Reference:
Jeft'enoa Couaty
DepartlDeat of Commuaity Developmeat
Prepared for:
Mary Lyach
P.O. Box 114898
BozeInaa, MT 59719
Prepared By:
Loggy Soilaad Wetlaad Cousultiag
W. David Loggy, CPSS
P.O. Box 2347
Port Angeles, W A 98362-0303
(360) 457-3920
December, 6, 2005
~ !
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
CONSULTING COMPANY 1
TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA INVISTIGATION 1
LAND OWNER 1
APPLICANT 1
PROPOSED PROJECT 1
PARCEL NUMBER 1
SITE LOCATION 1
PLANNING AREA 1
EXISTING CONDITIONS 1-8
Landscape Position 1
S~e~~rem 2
Geologic Materials 2
Water types present 2
5.NON-WETLAND SITES 2
A. PLOT No.1 2-4
6. WETLAND SITES 4
A. PLOTS No. 1 thru 3 4-8
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA DETERMINATION & DELINEATION 8
WETLAND CLASSIFICATION 8
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA BUFFER REQUIREMENTS 9
TABLES
TABLE ONE - DOMINATE AT VEGETATION ON PLOT 1
TABLE TWO - DOMINATE AT VEGETATION ON PLOT 2
TABLE THREE - DOMINATE AT VEGETATION ON WETLAND PWT 1
TABLE FOUR - DOMINATE AT VEGETATION ON WETLAND PWT 2
TABLE FIVE DOMINATE AT VEGETATION ON WETLAND PLOT 3
TABLE SIX- WETLAND CLASSIFICATION
TABLE SEVEN - WETLAND LANDSCAPE FUNCTIONS
2
3
5
5
6
8
9
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - APPROACH AND MEmODS
APPENDIX B - FIELD DATA SHEETS AND PLANT LIST
APPENDIX C - MAPS, AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE
WETLAND AREA DRAWINGS
...
SUMMARY OUTLINE
The parcel of land is located along the west edge of Jefferson County north of
Highway 101 and Old Gardener Road. It is a 4.85 acre parcel that has 3.6 acres of
wetland.
The wetland on the parcel is part of larger herbaceous pasture type area. The
wetland on the parcel is the completely herbaceous in nature. The herbaceous vegetation
consists of grasses, rushes and sedges with some forbs. The wetland classifies as a Class
III wetland. The parcel is presently is in fallow management. There is part of an existing
man made pond located near the northeast comer of the property. A shrub-scrub forested
upland area occurs along the east side of the property. Two other upland areas were
found on the parcel. The first occurs in the southwest comer of the parcel and the other
upland is a narrow strip of land with a northeast and southwest orientation in
approximately the middle of the parcel.
There are no drainage channels on the parcel and runoff occurs as either surface
flow or subsurface flow in a north and northeast direction. A portion of a pond occurs on
the parcel and the pond is larger than the portion shown on the drawing in Appendix C.
... ~
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA REPORT
CONSULTING COMPANY:
Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting
TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA INVESTIGATION:
Soils
Wetlands
Fish & Wildlife Habitat Areas
LAND OWNER:
APPLICANT:
PROPOSED PROJECT:
TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S):
SITE LOCATION:
LEGAL LOCATION:
STREET ADDRESS:
ROAD ROUTE INSTRUCTIONS:
PLANNING AREA:
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS:
1. LANDSCAPE POSITION:
HILLSLOPES
FLOODPLAINS
TERRACES
MARINE TERRACES
ALLUVIAL FAN
VALLEYS
LANDSLIDE
OTHER (EXPLAIN)
Lynch 002342037
1
D
~
D
Mary Lynch
P.O. Box 295
Emigrant, MT 59027-.0295
Mary Lynch
Delineation of wetland for selling property
002342037
The NW Y4 of Section 34, Township 30 North,
Range 2 West, W.M.
N/A
From Port Townsend take State Highway 20
south to Highway 101 and turn west on
Highway 101. Turn right off Highway 101 onto
Old Gardener Road. Follow Old Gardener Road
to Old Schoolhouse Road and turn north on the
road. The lot is on the right (east side) of Old
Gardener Road approximately 1;2 mile from the
intersection of Old Gardener Road and Old
Schoolhouse Road.
Discovery Bay
181
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
STREAM & RIVER
BASINS
DEPRESSIONS
COASTAL DUNES
MARINE BLUFF
SWALES
LAKES & PONDS
LSWC 12/06/05
..... 1..
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED
2. SLOPE GRADIENT: 2 to 10 percent
3. GEOLOGIC MATERIALS
ALLUVIAL
COLLUVIAL
GLACIAL
OUTWASH
DRIFT
LACUSTRINE
EOLIAN
o
o
o
o
o
o
ASH 0
ORGANICS 0
TILL
COMPACT 0
ABLATION ~
RESmUUM 0
4. WATER TYPES PRESENT:
IRRIGATION DITCH 0
STREAM 0 RIVER 0 LAKE 0 POND ~
IRRIGATION DITCH ASSOCIATED WITH STREAM, RIVER or POND 0
STREAM, RIVER POND OR LAKE NAME:
N~ ~
TYPEI WATER
TYPE3 WATER
TYPE 5 WATER
o
o
~
TYPE2 WATER
TYPE 4 WATER
N/A
o
o
o
5. NON-WETLAND SITES
A. PLOT No.1
Plot data can be viewed in Appendix B.
i.
VEGETATION TYPE:
Herbaceous ~
Scrub-Shrub 0
Native ~
Non-Native ~
Estuarine
Forested
o
o
TABLE ONE
DOMINATE VEGETATION ON PLOT 1
PLANT INDICATOR PERCENT
COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS COVER
Common velvetJUaSs Rokus lanatus FAC. 50
OrchanJ ~ Dactylis glomerata FACU 20
Canada thistle Cirsium arvense FACU+ 20
Lynch 002342037
2
LSWC 12/06/05
.of,. :(
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED
TABLE TWO
DOMINATE VEGETATION ON PLOT 2
PLANT INDICATOR PERCENT
COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS COVER
Tall fescue Festuca arundinacea FACU 20
Common velvetgrass Holcus lanatus FAC. 40
Orchard mass Dactvlis clomerata FACU 20
it SOn.s
NRCS Soil Map Unit and Series:l
Field Identified Map Unit & Series:
Belfast poorly drained Varient
Loamy-skeletal, istoc, mesic Aquic
Hapoxerepts
SOIL DEPTH:
Shallow 0
Moderately deep 0 Deep 0
Very Deep 181
SOIL DRAINAGE:
Excessively WdlD
Mod. Well [81
Very Poorly 0
SOILS ON PLOT 1
Somewhat Excessivdy Well
Somewhat Poorly
o
o
Well 0
Poorly 0
SUBSOIL:
o to 3 inches of very dark brown (lOYR 2/2) strong fine to
medium granular structured silt loam with many very fine, fine
& medium roots; clear wavy boundary.
3 to 8 inches of very dark grayish brown (IOYR 3/2) moderate
medium subangular block structured gravelly silt loam with
many very fine, fine & medium roots; clear wavy boundary.
SOIL SURFACE:
SUBSTRATUM:
8 to 12 inches of dark grayish brown (IOYR 412) moderate
medium subangular blocky structured very gravelly silt loam
with common fine & medium and few coarse roots; abrupt wavy
boundary.
12 to 15 inches of grayish brown (IOYR 5/2) matrix with strong
brown (7.5YR 4/6) common fine prominent redoximorphic
features; moderate fine subangular blocky structured gravelly
loamy sand with common very fine & fine roots; very abrupt
wavy boundary.
1. Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington, J975. Fred R McCreary, United States Department of
Agriculture, Soil conseIVation Service, in cooperation with the Washington Agricultural Experiment Station.
Lynch 002342037
3
LSWC 12/06/05
...
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED
15 to 20 inches oflight gray (lOYR7/1) matrix with yellowish
brown (1 OYR 5/6) many moderate prominent redoximorphic
features; massive extremely gravelly loamy sand with few very
fine roots.
HYDRIC SOILS: YES 0
If yes, identify hydric soil criteria: 2 3
NO
~
SOILS ON PLOT 2
SOIL SURFACE:
o to 3 inches of very dark gray (lOYR 3/1) weak fine granular
structured silt loam with many very fine, fine & medium roots;
clear wavy boundary.
3 to14 inches of very dark grayish brown (lOYR 312) strong
medium subangular block structured gravelly loam with
common very fine, & fine roots; clear wavy boundary.
SUBSOIL:
SUBSTRATUM:
14 to 25 inches of dark gray (1 OYR 4/1) matrix with many fine
to medium prominent dark yellowish brown (1 OYR 4/6)
redoximorphic features; massive very gravelly loamy sand with
few fine & medium roots.
HYDRIC SOILS: YES 0
H yes, identify hydric soil criteria: 4 5
NO
~
iii. WATER SOURCE FOR HYDROLOGY:
Precipitation ~ Unconfined Aquifer, Tidally Influenced 0
Unconfined Aquifer ~ Marine, Tidally influenced 0
Lake 0 Stream Discharge 0
iv. AQUIC CONDITIONS:
Endosaturation ~
Episaturation 0
Anthric Saturation
o
2 USDA, NRCS. 2002 Field IndicatOfS of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 5.1. G.w. Hurt, PM. Whited, and RF.
Pringle ( eds.). USDA, NRCS in cooperation with the national T eclmical Connnittee for Hydric Soils, Fort Worth, TX.
3 STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY. Washington State Wetlands Identification and
Delineation Manual. Ecology Publication #96-94, March 1997.
4 USDA, NRCS. 2002 Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 5.1. G.w. Hurt, P.M. Whited, and R.F.
Pringle (eds.). USDA, NRCS in cooperation with the national Teclmical Connnittee for Hydric Soils, Fort Worth, TX.
5 ST ATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY. Washington State Wetlands Identification and
Delineation Manual. Ecology Publication #96-94, March 1997.
Lynch 002342037
4
LSWC 12/06/05
"'
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED
6. WETLAND SITES
APPROACH AND METHODS USED IN WETLAND DELINEATION AND
DETERMINATION ARE DETAILED IN APPENDIX A.
A. PLOTS No.1 thru 3
Plot data can be viewed in Appendix B.
i.
VEGETATION TYPE:
Herbaceous [8]
Forested 0
Native [8]
Non-Native [8]
Estuarine 0
Scrub-Shrub 0
TABLE mREE
DOMINATE VEGETATION ON WETLAND PWT 1
PLANT INDICATOR PERCENT
COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS COVER
Common velvet~ Holcus lantanas FAC 40
Soft rush Juncus efIusus FACW 20
Am>stisSJ> Agrostis sp. FAC 15
Orchardgrass Dactylis glomerata FACU 20
Tall fescue Festuca arundinacea FACU 5
TABLE FOUR
DOMINATE VEGETATION ON WETLAND PWT 2
PLANT INDICATOR PERCENT
COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS COVER
Common velvetgrass Holcus lantanas FAC 40
Orchard~s Dactvlis Jdomerata FACU 30
Agrostis sp Agrostis SJ>. FAC 20
Lynch 002342037
5
LSWC 12/06/05
..,
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED
TABLE FIVE
DOMINATE VEGETATION ON WETLAND PWT 3
COMMON NAME
ii. SOILS
SCIENTIFIC NAME
PLANT INDICATOR
STATUS
FAC
FAC
FAC
FACU
PERCENT
COVER
40
20
20
10
D
NRCS SOIL MAP UNIT AND SERIES:'
FIELD IDENTIFIED MAP UNIT & SERIES:
SOIL DRAINAGE:
Excessively WellD
~od. VVell D
Very Poorly D
SOILS ON VVETLAND PWT 1
SOIL DEPTH:
Shallow D
SOIL SURFACE:
SUBSOIL:
Belfast poorly drained variant
Sandy-skeletal mixed mesic Typic
Endoaquepts
~oderately deep D Deep ~
Very Deep 0
Somewhat Excessively Well
Somewhat Poorly
D
o
VVeU 0
Poorly ~
o to 3 inches very dark gray (lOYR 3/1) weak fine granular
structured silt loam with many very fine, fine & medium roots;
clear wavy boundary.
3 to 6 inches of dark brown (7.5YR 312) moderate medium
subangular blocky structured gravelly silty clay loam with many
very fine, fine and medium roots; clear wavy boundary.
6 to 9 inches of brown (I OYR 4.2) moderate coarse subangular
blocky structured gravelly loam sand with common very fine and
fine roots; clear wavy boundary.
9 to 20 inches of dark gray (lOYR 4/1) & gray (lOYR 5/1)
moderate medium subangular blocky structure gravelly loamy
sand with many coarse prominent red (2.5 YR 4/6)
redoximorphic features; common very fine & fine roots; abrupt
wavy boundary.
20 to 26 inches of dark grayish brown (2.5Y 4/2) weak coarse
subangular blocky structured gravelly loamy sand with many
moderate prominent strong brown (7.5YR) redoximorphic
features; common fine roots; clear wavy boundary.
6 Soil SUIVey of Jefferson County Area, Washington, 1975. Fred R. McCreaI}', United States Department of
Agriculture, Soil conservation Service, in cooperation with the Washington Agricultural Experiment Station.
Lynch 002342037
6
LSWC 12/06/05
~
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED
SUBSTRATUM:
26 to 32 inches olive brown (2.5Y 4.3) single grain sand with
common fine promcommon fine prominent strong brown (7.5
YR 4/6) redoximorphic features; weak fine roots.
SOIL SURFACE:
SOILS ON WETLAND PWT 2
SUBSTRATUM:
o to 9 inches of very dark grayish brown (10YR 312) moderate
medium granular structured silty loam with common very fine,
fine & medium roots; clear wavy boundary.
9 to 20 inches of dark grayish brown (lOYR 4/2) massive
gravelly loamy sand with common medium prominent
redoximorphic features; few very fine and fine roots
SOIL SURFACE:
SOILS ON WETLAND PWT 3
SUBSOIL:
SUBSTRATUM:
o to 4 inches of black (10YR 2/1) moderate
fine granular structured silty loam with common very fine, fine
& medium roots; clear wavy boundary.
4 to 8 inches of black (7.5YR 2.5/1) weak fine subangular
blocky structured sandy loam with common very fine, fine &
medium roots; abrupt wavy boundary.
8 to 13 inches of very dark grayish brown (1 OYR 312) moderate
fine subangular blocky structured sihy clay loam with common
fine prominent reddish brown (5YR 4/4) redoximorphic features;
common very fine & fine roots; abrupt wavy boundary.
13 to 17 inches of black (lOYR 3/1) strong fine subangular
blocky structured sandy clay loam with few fine prominent
reddish brown (5 YR 4/4) redoximorphic features; common very
fine & fine roots; abrupt wavy boundary.
17 to 31 inches of dark grayish brown (IOYR 412) weak medium
subangular blocky structured extremely gravelly loamy sand
with common moderate prominent reddish brown (5YR 4/4)
redoximorphic features; common very fine & fine roots.
HYDRIC SOILS: YES ~ NO
H yes. identify hydric soil indicaton:
o
F4 Depleted below Dark Surface 7,
43 f (2) (a)Soils with contrasting
mottles and/or low chroma matrix 8
7 USDA, NRCS. 2002 Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 5.1. G.w. Hurt, P.M. Whited, and R.F.
Pringle (eds.). USDA, NRCS in cooperation with the national Technical Committee for Hydric Soils, Fort Worth, TX.
8 STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY. Washington State Wetlands Identification and
Delineation Manual. Ecology Publication #96-94, March 1997.
Lynch 002342037
7
LSWC 12/06/05
$.., .f".
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED
iii. WATER SOURCE FOR HYDROLOGY:
Precipitation ~ Unconfined Aquifer, Tidally Influenced 0
Unconfined Aquifer r81 Marine, Tidally influenced 0
Lake 0 Stream Di!ICharge 0
iv. AQUIC CONDITIONS:
Endosaturation r81
Episaturation 0
Anthric Saturation
o
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA DETERMINATION & DELINEATION:
The wetland boundary is marked with 3" x 5" orange plastic wire whips. The wetland whips are
consecutively numbered. The whips have the station numbers for compass traverse, the date the
boundary was established and the lettering LSWC indicating Loggy Soil and Wetland consulting as the
delineator. Each wetland whip has an orange wetland boundary ribbon attached to it.
The environmentally sensitive area associated with the tax parcel is shown in the
Environmentally sensitive area Drawing in Appendix C. The bearings and distances of the wetland
stations for the wetland boundary in the drawing of this report were established using a staff or hand held
compass and hip chain. The drawing in this report is not a legal survey. The location of the
property lines are either estimated from fence lines or monuments or from property survey plats.
WETLAND CLASSIFICATION:
WETLAND SIZE ON PROPERTY: 158,225.54 Square feet (3.6 acres)
WETLAND CLASSIFICATION BASED ON ~ 9
CLASS I
o
CLASsn
o
CLASS m
181
CLASS IV
o
WETLAND CLASSIFICATION BASED ON FISH AND WILDLIFE CLASSIFICATION1o
TABLE SIX
WETLAND CLASSIFICATION
Wetland Water Water Special
Habitat System Class Subclass Res6mes Chemistry Soil Modifiers
ALL Palustrine Emen!ents Persistent Saturated Circumneutral Mineral none
9 STAlE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOOY. Washington State Wetland rating System.
Western Washington, Second Edition. Publication #93-74, August 1993
10 Lewis M Cowardin, Virginia Carter, Francis C. Golet and Edward T. LaRoe, Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater Habitats of the United Stat~ U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service FSW/OBS-
79/31, December 1979
Lynch 002342037
8
LSWC 12/06/05
.. .'
TABLE SEVEN
WETLAND LANDSCAPE FUNCTIONS
CRITERIA FUNCTION ASPECT
Habitat Type See table six
Habitat Diversity
Habitat Size 3.6 A. of wetlands,
Upland Habitat Type 0.83 A. of grass & forbs uplands, 0.38 A. forest >20 feet high &
shrub-scrub upland
Significant Habitat Pond on parcel north of this one provides some water for migratory
Features waterfowl
Species Use No species of concern
Anadromous fish use N/A
Significant Wildlife No
Movement Corridor
M2mt. & Modifications Fallow pasture
FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS:
TYPE 1 0 TYPE 2 0 TYPE 3 0 TYPE 4. 0 TYPE 5 181
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA BUFFER REQUIREMENTS
New Development
Wetland Class I
Class n
Class m
Class IV
158 feet
100 feet
50 feet
25 feet
o
o
181
o
Aquatic Areas Type 1&2
Type 3
Type 4
Type 5
150 feet 0
100 feet 0
100 feet 0
50 feet ~*
Pond is part of tbe wetland so a buffer is not applied.
Lynch 002342037
9
LSWC 12/06/05
'. .
APPROACH AND METHODS
Wetland Determination
Two levels of information were gathered for this analysis. These included:
a) Review of preliminary site data and,
b) On-site investigation to determine the presence of wetlands.
a) A review of existing information was conducted to develop background knowledge of
physical features, and to identify the potential for wetland occurrence on the subject
property. The resource documents available for preliminary review of the site conditions
included: USDA Soil Conservation Service (SCS), "Soil Survey of Jefferson County
Area Washington", (1990) aerial photography, and Jefferson County Planning
Department data.
b) During the on-site investigation, wetland areas were determined and verified on the basis
of three parameters: Hydrophytic Vegetation, Hydric Soils, and Wetland Hydrology, as
recommended in the Washinfrton State Identification and Delineation Manual (Washington
State Department of Ecology, Ecology Publication #96-944, March 1997). Wetlands
categories and wetland vegetation classes were identified and classified using the Washinl!ton
sate Wetlands Ratine: Svstem of Western Washinuon. Second Edition (Washington State
Department of Ecology, Ecology Publication #93-74, August 1993).
A positive wetland determination is made when all three parameters are present, or in certain
situations determined following the guidelines recommended in wetland determination procedures, or for
atypical situations or problem areas.
Hvdrophvtic Vee:etation
Areas where more than 50% of the dominant species present from all strata are hydrophytes
(plants adapted to growth and reproduction in saturated soil conditions) are considered to be inside the
wetland boundary, unless clear evidence of hydric soils or wetland hydrology cannot be established. A
species is considered dominant if it is equal to or greater than 20% areal cover, or exerts a controlling
influence on, or defines the character of a community. Hydrophytic vegetation is determined to be
present, when under normal circumstances:
More than 50% of the dominant plant species in a plant community have an indicator
category of Obligate Wetland (OBL), Facultative Wetland (FACW), and/or Facultative (FAC) as listed in
"National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9)", (Reed, Porter B., Jr.,
1988), and the "1993 Supplement to National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest
(Region 9)" dated December 1993 that became effective on March 31, 1994. Indicator categories of
FACW+, FACW-, FAC+, are included as FACW status.
'F AC+ species are considered to be wetter (i.e., have a greater estimated probability of occurring
in wetlands) than F AC species, while F AC- species are considered to be drier (i.e., have a lesser estimated
probability of occurring in wetlands) than F AC species. I Plant indicator status definitions are presented in
TABLE 1 below.
.... _It
This Plant Indicator Status Categories system was developed for the USFWS National Wetlands
Inventory by Cowardin et at (1979). The National Plant List Panel, Reed, Porter B., and Jr. modified it in
1988 and 1993. The Wetland Indicator Category (WI C) used in this report refers to the plants Indicator
Svmbol as referred to in the table below.
Purpose and Approach Continued
National Indicators reflect the range of estimated probabilities (expressed as a frequency of
occurrence) of a species occurring in a wetland versus a non-wetland across the entire distribution of the
species. C'National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9)", Reed, Porter B.,
Jr., 1988), and the 1993 Supplement to List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region
9) dated December 1993 that became effective on March 31,1994. Percentages expressed as estimated
probability.
TABLE 1
Indicator Cateaorv
Indicator Symbol
Definition
OBLIGATE WETLAND
PLANTS
OBL
Occur almost always, >9<J01o (estimated
probability) in wetlands Wlder natural
conditions. <1% in non wetlands.
FACULTATIVE WETLAND
PLANTS
FACW
Usually occur in wetlands, 67-99% and
1-33% in non-wetlands.
F ACUL T ATIVE PLANTS
FAC
Equally likely to occur in wetlands and
non-wetlands 34-66%.
FACULTATIVE UPLAND
PLANTS
FACU
Usually occur in non wetlands 67-990/0,
but occasionally fOWld in wetlands 1-33%.
OBLIGATE UPLAND
Plants
UPL
Almost always occur in non-wetlands of
Northwest Region 9, >9<JO/o. <1%
in wetlands.
Hvdric Soils
There have been tremendous scientific changes since 1991 in several of the indicators such as the
introduction of aquic conditions to cover the requirements for saturation, reduction, and morphological
indicators used to define the modified aquic moisture regime, and mottles and low chroma colors being
replaced by redoximorphic features. Because of these changes, we consuh the US Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service. 1998. "Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the
United States, Reversion 5.1". G. W. Hurt, Whited, P. M., and Pringle, R. F. (eds.), USDA, NRCS, Ft.
Worth, TX for guidance and decision in making final hydric soils determinations.
Additionally, compliance to changes in Hydric Soils of the United States published in Federal
RegisterNol. 59, No. 133/July 13, 1994 and Vol. 60, No. 37/February 24, 1995 addressing Criterion 2 of
the Criteria for Hydric Soils definition is being observed. The main purpose for the criteria is to create
,\. ..!
Hydric Soil Lists. Criteria I, 3, and 4 can serve as both database criteria and as indicators for
identification of hydric soils. When Criteria 1,3, and 4 are used to document the presence ofa hydric soil,
proof that anaerobiosis exists must also be obtained. Criterion 2 serves only to retrieve hydric soils from
the database. Also, the wording for Criteria 1 and 2 were changed in 1999 to incorporate recent changes
in Soil Taxonomy (Soil Survey Staff, 1999).
Purpose and Approach Continued
Field indicators of hydric soil conditions in this document, (Land Resource Region (LRR) A that
includes Western Washington), are presented here in an abbreviated form and include:
(1) ALL SOILS:
AI. Histosols - (organic soils having 16 inches or more of the upper 32 inches as organic
peat or muck soil material); A2. Histic Epipedons - (normally a peat or muck surface horizon or
layer 8 inches or more thick); and A4. Hydrogen sulfide - (sulfidic odor in soil material within 12
inches of the soil surface).
(2) SANDY SOILS:
SI - a mucky modified mineral layer; S4 - a gIeyed matrix; S5 - sandy redox concentrations;
and S6 - a matrix stripped of iron/manganese oxides and/or organic matter.
(3) LOAMY AND CLAYEY SOILS:
Fl - a mucky modified mineral layer; F2 - a gIeyed matrix; F3; - a depleted matrix without a
dark surface and F4 and F5 - a depleted matrix with dark or thick dark surfaces; F6 - a dark
surface and a redox 4 inch thick layer ~12 inches deep with a matrix value ~3 with a chroma ~1 or
2 or less with ~2% and ~5% distinct or prominent redox concentrations respectively; F7 - a dark
surface layer with redox depletions 4 inch thick with value ~5 and chroma ~2 and ~ 12 from the
surface of the soil that has a matrix value ~3 and chroma ~l or g and ~1O% and ~20% redox
depletions respectively; and F8 - redox concentration within 6 inches of a soil surface in
depressions subject to ponding.
Wetland Hvdrolo2V
Water is the driving force for wetlands. Indications of wetland hydrology are those where the
presence of water has an overriding influence on characteristics of vegetation and soils due to anaerobic
and reducing conditions, respectively.
Areas that are seasonally saturated and/or inundated to the surface for a consecutive number of
days for more than 12.5% of the growing season are wetlands provided the soil and vegetation parameters
are met. Areas wet between 5% and 12% of the growing season in most years mayor may not be
wetlands. Areas saturated to the surface for less than 5% of the growing season are non-wetlands.
Wetland hydrology exists if field indicators are present.
Field indicators of wetland hydrology may include, but are not limited to visual observations of
inundation, ponding, soil saturation, oxidized root channels (rhizospheres) associated with living roots
and rhizomes, watermarks, drift lines, water-borne sediment deposition, or wetland drainage patterns.
The growing season starting and ending dates are required to evaluate hydrologic data. For
"" ~~
Purpose and Approach Continued
wetland determinations, the growing season is determined using the local SCS county soils surveys.
Generally, the growing season is calculated based on the "28 degrees F or lower" temperature threshold at
a frequency of "5 years in 10". For much of western Washington at low elevations, the mesic growing
season (March 1 to October 31) has been considered a good rule. However, in some areas of the Puget
Sound Lowlands and coastal areas the growing season occurs all year round because the soil temperature
at 19.7 inches below the soil surface is higher than 41 degrees F.
Plant Identification and Classification
Primary references used for scientific plant names and the endemic and non-native or exotic
status of plants to the North Olympic Peninsula were determined as found in Flora of the Pacific
Northwest by Hitchcock and Cronquist, Univ. of Washington Press, 1972. Other references referred to
included: (1) A Field Guide to the Common Wetland Plants of Western Washington & Northwestern
Oregon by Sarah Spear Cooke, editor. Washington Native Plant Society, May 1997; Wetland plants of
Oregon & Washington by Jennifer Guard, Lone Pine Publishing, 1995; (2) Plants of the Pacific
Northwest Coast- Washington. Oregon. British Columbia & Alaska edited by Pojar and Mackinnon, D.C.
Forest Service, Research Program, Lone Pine Publishing, 1994 and, D.C. Forest Service, Research
Program, Lone Pine Publishing, 1994; and (3) Northwest Weeds by Ronald 1. Taylor, Mountain Press
Publishing Company, 1990
.\. ,t
APPENDIX B
WETLAND FIELD DATA SHEETS
WETLAND CLASSIFICATION SHEETS
'\
DATA FORM 1
(W A State Wetland DeliDeation Manual or
1987 Co Wetland Deliaeation Man.
ProjedlSite: rz cAt, Vb Z ;, 2- 00.5
ApplicaatlOWlle .J11/P1ef 41ld,
hvistigator(s):W. David Loggy, Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting
Do .0..... circuIs1aaces oist o. tile., Yes
Is tile . sipificutIy distubed (Atypical Sitatioll) Yes
Is tile area a poteadal probleJa area
Date: Ii Zt, L> 5
Contyl .:r2-fk~~
City: /4 '/f
State: W A
Co..uity ID:
TI'IlIIIed ID:
pi
VE 0
%
StndII. Cover hMIicator
50 fil-L
/krJ> ~o ~4c-4
)I-u b AlP F/kJA.
StndII.
%
Cover IacIieator
lle,b
Jt? I1-at
~
Hyd....pltytic vegeCatio. prese.t'
WetIad pJut list (Nat'l or ngiouI)
Morplaologieallldaptatio_
WedaIId pint data bale
Ratioule for deebioulRe_arks:
Othr:
Hued 0.:.
laelles
Iaehes
Yes
Wetlalld Hydrology IIIdicaton
Pri--ry Indic:aton:
B-IuJldated
Satanted ill Upper 11 iacIt.
o Water Marb
o Drift LilIes
o Sedi..... >>ep.ib
o Draiaqe Pattena ill WetIuds
~ndarv Indic:aton 12 or .ore reauired}
0- 0IidizaI Rat ~ ill Upper U illclta
D Water StaiIIed Uaws
D Local Soil Suwy Data
D FAC-NEUTIlAL Tat
o Other I ill RnIa....
Field Observatioas:
REMARKS:
~
".
11/
S ILS
Map U.itName: /:. MHLst ."p~/l j/1l1W~O j/ r/J.--vr
(Series and Phase): Dniage Class: ;:bc>4LY t7~~
Tuonomy (Subgroup): Neuc.{G.- )of
Field observation CODa.... mapped nit Yes 0 No IA:'
Correded Map UIIit NUIe or Taxonomy (S",roap):Lo ~St:e.l0~ ISo be
Profile DescriDtioas:
DeptIa Matrix Color Mottle or Redox Colon Mottle or RedoI Text&~ Coacretiou,
(Iaaes) Horima (M..... Moist (M.... Moist) A....duceISizIeI Stncta~ de.
COBtnst
€;-3 11-1 /t?t~ i. v
~-tg 8LVI )tY/~3 ?
B- l. Bl.Vz, Jor/( t./ I~
1'2- I }o~1t s. 2.- . ~fNR. LIlt
jp1R %
",...e. )
rte )
~S:::-ton:
o Histie Epipecloa
o Sulftdie Odor
o Aquie Moisture Regime
o Red_dug Conditions
o Gleyed or Low.c.1'OBIa Colon
OCoacretioas
o Hip Orpaic Contellt ia Snrface Layer of Sand Soils
o Orguic StreakiDg ia Sanely Soils
o Listed oa Local Hydric Soils List
o Listed OD National Hydric Soils List
o OtIler (EIp1aia in Remarks)
Hvdric Soils Yes 0 No Jtl
REMARKS: j2-e/iO'l.. I f1Zt?Q) rvt0 !ec<"
~:5
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydropllytie Vegetatioa Presat?
WetlaBd Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Presat?
REMARKS:
Yes No
Yes 0 No ~
Yes 0 No)Q
Is tk ..ple poiat witIaia a wedud
Yes
...
DATA FORM 1
(W A State Wetland Delineation Man.... or
1987 Co Wetland Delineation Mall
ProjedlSite: J1 v?t t> 02 :s tf2 () 0 5
Applieaatlowae . (h A-re ,'{" ./;h ch
Iavistiptor(s):W. David Loggy, Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting
Do aonaal ciramastaaces eat oa the site! Yes
Is tile site ....~1ItIy diItubed (AtypiaI Sitatioll)
Is the area a potea" pruble.. area
Date: 7; 24- b 5
Co_tyl ~~
City: AI, f1-
State: W A
Co....mty ID:
Trusect ID:
ftt2-
VEGETATION
%
CoYer IIIdicator DHaiuat PInt
StratII.
%
Ower Iadieator
~ F~
Lit:) J/f-G
;;lD ~ ~
HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATO :
%OF Do..iaaats OR FA aad FAC: . / g;:..
Cheek aU iacIicaton tIaat apply * "plaiD
Regioal kaowIedge of.....t eo....1IIIities
Pbysiological or reproduetive "aptatiou
Teelmical Literature
gg 10
WetIaad p....t list (Nat'1 or regioaaI)
Morpllologial adaptatioas
Wedaad pint data base
Other:
Hydroplaytie vegetatioa praeat!
Ratioule for deeislents/Re_arks:
8-lHadated
Saturated ill Upper 11 iBdtll
o Water Marb
o Drift LiMa
o Wi..... DepoIiD
o Draiaage Patterw ill WetIuda
Secondary Indicaton (2 or DIOR reaaind)
o Osidizcd Rat CItuMII ill Upper U iIIdIes
o Water SDiIled Leaves
o LoaI Soil SlIIwy Data
o Ji'AC-NEUI'RAL Tat
Other . ill
REMARKS: /# ar'1f!EeA. :$ /Jt:!1 ~ ~ rtn9~~ S; tUJ
6c,Uro.mef'- W.J-k:uJ2 cPf1<!> t&> 2~H~ &r11~; /cj''N~ck/'/~!tcs-
HYDROLOGY
Is it tile . _.! Yes N
Recorded Data (Describe ia Re..arks)
Stream, lake, or tidal page
o Aerial pbotographs
o OtIIer
Field Ollservatiou:
Rued oa:.
'..
Map UDit NaJH: L.4,
(Series ad PIlate):
Taxonomy (S......,): H
Field observatioa COD"'" .apped unit Ves 0 No ~
Corrected Ma, UDit Name or Tax_, (SUgnMIp): '2tJ:7t:!-
HZ,
I Jj?U r , _ /1
D..... CIus: .4.,1;17 clr1'!t( 11 f!'V
...s lee{ eW
c.. rn E.> r r:
Prollle DacriDtions: ~ i L Si k ;Ii Lf
DeptIa Matrix Color Mottle or Redox Colon Mottle or Redox Tatue, CoacretIou,
(ladles) Korimll (M.... Moist (M.... Moist) AbuclaaceJSizel StnIeC8re, etc.
Coatnst
f!:;-3 A-J /EJYf( M
~-JLj. &J ;,,'(12. 3
c:..' /tJ ilL 4/1 Jt) 'Ii:. L//~ /J1ri-,If(
14- ZS
~ Soil ~lcaton:
HistosoI
o IIistie Epipedoa
D Sulfidic Odor
D Aquie MoishIre Repne
D Redaeiag Coaditiou
D Gleyed or Low-C1a1'ODla Colon
D CoacretioIIs
D IIigIa Orpllic Contellt ill Sarface Layer of SaneI Soils
D Organic Streaking in Sanely Soils
D Listed OD Local Hydric Soils List
D Listed oa National Hydric Soils List
D Other (Explain iD Remarks)
Hvdric Soils
REMARKS:
vesD ,.No~
/f/p f d Me j:.. <1.-ndJ tLf h :5t.1 x ~ ,Ie, }-e r ~ ;'net ( ~rc.-Ior'
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydroplaytie Vegetatioa Prese&t?
WellaRd Hydrolev Present?
Hydric Soils Pnseat?
REMARKS:
Is th sample point witItJa a wetlaad
Yes
Yes
Yes D No 23
Ves D No.Bf
''\. I'"
DATA FORM 1
(W A State Wetland Delineation Manual or
1987 Co Wetland Delineation Manu
ProjectJSite: ;t ((Jo 1.- 34l- t?o5
Applicutlowaer: Mtf7'l fl t.;11~1t.
I.vistiptor(s):W. David Loggy, Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting
Do .0...... cin:1IBIStaaces e_ oa tile site? Yes
'2? 'OS
Coaatyl fe {(.er~
City: MW-
State: W A
COBIIBuaity ID:
Trauect ID:
Is tile site sipificudy distarbed (Atypical SituatiOla)
Is tile area a poteatial problem area
if/:-
VEGETATION
'"
DHaiIWlt PInt senc.. Ower hMlicator Do.iuat PInt Stra..
~ ~" )~b Ajo ~
Sp!2t-l2w:.n (.JtA,re~) IIer6 ::26 ~Ae0
~~ ~/ l/er6 Jf/ ~
tf). ~~ J f/ /I-ot!,y'lb ~D, ~
;!'/fa (fell r) I/cer b :5 ~~
HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS:
% F Doaaiuats 08 FACW aad FAC:
Clleck aD iIldicaton tllat apply * eIphill below. :4 3 -:: ~ 4# 't>
RegioaaI bowIedge ofplaat COIIIIBIIIIities Wetlaad plaat list (Nat'1 or regio....)
Physiologieal or reprodaetive adaptatio.. Morpllologieal adaptatio_
Teehaieal Uterature WetIaad plaat data base
'"
Cover ladieator
Hydl'Op.ytic vegetatioa pnseat? Yes
Ratioule for decisioulRe.arb:
0tJaer:
HYDROLOGY
Is it tile . seasoa? Yes N
Recorded Data (Describe ia Reoaarks)
Streaaa, lake, or tidal page
o Aerial pltotograplts
o OtIIer
Field Observatioas:
ZIaeIaes
Iaehes
Yes
B- .....ted
Saturated ia upper IZ inches
o Water Mans
o Drift Liaes
o SedUIeat DepesiD
o Draiuae Patteru ia Wetluds
~ IDdicatom(2 or IROn reauired}
o 0Ddia4 Rat 0....... ill Upper 11 iItdles
o Water StaIMd Laves
o Local Soil Sufty Data
o J'AC-NEUI'ItAL Tat
0tIaer :I . ia Be....
I'~ JIJ 4)~ ~ SfJ"U. 'ruJ /I-n
~'7 \--(~ -Cr1Ov\.t So,\' ott4v~Je"(<5 L,es <-
REMARKS: ~
~ '^-.Vv...N\lI...,-e--<,-
" ,
~/HAI~O
I
r
DniDap a.ss:fi~I2L y ~11-1 uta
Map Unit Name:
(Series ad PIIue):
Tuo.o.y (Subgroup): 'c'7t
Field obserY.tioII COIIftrm ..pped unit Yes 0 No ~
Corredecl Map Unit Name or Tuoao.y (S........p): S ,fIlt1.7r..$ k Q ((?W
fJJ..~e,;( c.. TiflCo t'rtkt. LI..~ ts
Profile DeseriDtions: Sjp; t P'" t- J:b 2...
Deptll Matrix Color Mottle or Redox Colon Mottle or Redox Tut1Ire, COHretiou,
(Indaes) HorizoII (Ma"" Moist (MuseII Moist) AbudaaceISiRI Stnctare, ete.
CODtnst
/.tJ y~ 1/) 5, I' ) rtfr1 sfru /Ie I
b-S IH )
.5'tJ~ F J4 (loots' C-L.0
3....10 /3.<v I '+,5 tft< ~!z 5. s i 6~ 2.111 so Ie.. '5 frtuJw- ~j
YI M floots' c.-w
(p-1 I3lVl. ~s I' 1. t s b>l<. .s r~c..-~ j
;;.b ~ of f"t9ot1:, Cu..>
f.-.5'1€ tJ-/6 s.'s j ~m:>bl:. .sofriLe) ~I
~..2o IbW5 ..J
~y)12 "*t-s 1 tlW
1-~e lift Jts' Ie sb/c. s r-uu J
Zo-2.b ~f! r'b!) t'S I 0. LV
:zt./-3~ r.5'/f 'fIb Sj Sf I Jlt (l&>o-C:S
~ SoiIlIldieaton:
HistosoI
o Histic Epipedoa
o SuUidie Odor
Aquie MoistIIre Regime
Red.dol Coaditions
Gleyed or Low-Cltro.. Colors
o COIIefttio8s
o Hip Orpaie CODteIIt in Sarface Layer of Sand Soils
o Orpnie Strealdal in Sudy Soils
o Listed 011 Local Hydric Soils List
o Listed on N.tioaal Hydric Soils List
o OtIaer (Explain in Reaarks)
Hvdrie Soils
Yes jx[ No 0
REMARKS:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydropltytie Veptatio. Present?
WetJud Hydrology Present?
Hydrie Soils Present?
REMARKS:
Yes No
Yes ~ No 0
yes,W No 0
Is tile sample point witIUD . wetland
Yes
....
DATA FORM 1
(W A State Wetland DeliDeation Manual or
1987 Co Wetland DeliDeation Manu
Projeet/Site: 11 ~' I!? 0'2 L/ ~ 0 D 5
Applicaatlowae .m ~1 t111
Date: ;t; ~ 0 5'
Coutyl e::r~~('~
City: Ai 11-
State: W A
Co.alllllity ID:
Trusect ID:
Iavistigator(s):W. David Loggy, Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting
Do aonaal circtuBStaaees exist oa tile site? Yes
Is tile site sipifiauttIy distubed (Atypical Situatioa) Yes
Is tile area a poteatial preble. area
VEGETATION
Plot ID: W
#-'2-
%
Cover Iadieator DHlilWlt PInt
Lit) f~
~C> ,cA-v-<
-:;.a f 4&
HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS:
o/.OF Doaaiaaats 0 FACW ad FAC: 2
Claeek aU iadicaton dud apply * opIaia
RegioaaI bowIedge of pint COIBIBIIIIities
Pbysiological or reprodlldive adaptatio_
Tecbaa Litenture
Hydropltytie vegetatioa preseat?
Stram.
%
Cover Iadiator
~I.o r9!o
Wedaad pJut list (Natl or regioaal)
Morpllologieal adaptatioas
WetIaad plot data ....
Ratioule for decisiollllRe.arks:
0tIaer:
Buedoa:.l11ld Vi!. tP L)ve er'
Wetland Hydrology bldialtors
Prburv Indicaton:
Secondary In~~ a or .ore reouiredl
D 0Ddbcd Rat n..-a. ial1pper U laclles
o Water S1aiaed Leaves
o Local Sail SIuwy Data
o FAC-NEU'J'RAL Tat
0tIIer . ia Relurb
REMARKS: lIH 4 r~ )Jq-; /?t:>. ~ /?t2/ i1 ~~ ~
SVlMVVtL€-.(' - W~wl) d'<blo.. Z;s~~ ~ ~~ 1
Field ObservatiollS:
8- r..1ldated
Saturated ia Upper 11 iadI.
o w.... Marb
o Drift Liaes
o SediIMllt Deposits
o Draiuge PattenII ia WetIuds
5"/-<2/ hj
CkcutQ~ ~er1 { 5 ~(v5
"
, I ~.-.,
"'2./
Map Uait Name: I rw r
(Series ad PIaase): DnbIage Class: f&o i!. 4 d~.i f\ ~
TUOIlOlaY (Subp'oup):
Field olMervatioa coaftna .apped nait Yes 0 No PQ
CorrectedMapUaitNalBeorTuoao.y(Sabpoap): S~f)c(....s~€{.Q.!~ ~es leI Ie &.oot:t
Profile DescriDtioas: ~: ( pi b- :It 3
DeptIa Matrix Color Mottle or Redox Colon Mottle or Redox Tatare, COlICntioBt
(ladles) HoriI.IOIl (MuaseII Moist (Mu"" Moist) AbundaacelSizel StructIIre, ete.
CODtrast
IP-q
q -- ')..r.)
Jpl(12 %-
/pejR fz
tl5 f.(1!. ft.,;.
")
IWI!:!t Soill....pton:
DlIktosoI
o Histie EpipedoD
o Sulfidie Odor
o Aquie Moisture Jte&ime
g RedueiDg Conditioas
)Q Gleyed or Low-CII1'08Ul Colon
Hvdric Soils Yes JXI No 0
DcOIICI'etioa
o Hip Orpuk Conteut ill Surface uyer ofSaad Soils
o Orpaie StreakiDg fa Sandy Soils
o Listed 011 Local Hydric Soils List
o Listed OD National Hydric Soils List
o 0tUr (Explain in Re.arks)
REMARKS:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydropltytic VegeCatiOll Praeat?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
REMARKS:
Yes No
Yes JX No 0
Yes~ No 0
Is tIte ..ple poiIIt witUt a wetlud
Yes
DATA FORM 1
(W A State Wetland DetiDeatioD Mullal or
1987 Co Wetland DetiDeatioD Mull
Projeet/Site: A.q t1 dt tJ 0 131/ ~ 00 ;5
Applicaatlowaer: ;fI fl ~ Jf ,:: ~ n
Iavistigator(s):W. David Loggy, Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting
Do aonul eire8.lllStaaces eDst oa the site! Yes
Is tile site sipificaady disturbed (Atypical Situatioa)
Is the ana a poteatial proble. ana
HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATO :
%OF DoIaiaaata OR FACW ad FAC: 3. ~ ::
Cheek.. iadicaton that apply * opIaia
Regioaal kaowIedge ofplaat COIa.aaities
Physi01ogicai or reprodlldive adaptations
Teelaaieal Literatwre
HYDR LOGY
Is it the . _a1 Yes N
Recorded nata (Describe ia Remarks)
StreaJa, lake, or tidal page
o Aerial photopaphs
o OtIaer
Field Observations:
..
VEGET- TION
Bydl'Op'ytie veptatioa preseat!
2-~ 06
Couty .:Te~.:5u-r1
City: AR '4
State: W A
Co...aity ID:
TI'IUIIeCt ID:
Plot ID: t.0
4-3
%
Ower Iadieator
iio pftc
;I.i> ,-Ct96
~ Fr.!-c-
/0 /79c.
svu..
%
Cover Indieator
Duli...t PInt
Ratioule for decisioDslRe.......:
Wedaad pint list (Nat'. or regioaal)
Morplaolo&ieal adaptations
WellaRd plaat data base
0tIler:
Based oa:.
Wedud Hydrology ladicaton
PriDlarv Indicators:
B- Ia...ted
Saturated ia Upper 11 iadles
o Water Marks
o Drift LiHs
o SedimeDt Deposia
o Drainage Pattel'lll ia Wed...
REMARKS: //ff /Hf-I#I
~lI\V~"VQ\{ ~l0~~.W
i. ,to
son.s
Map Unit Name: I:. a1' p~ J/MrrJ-./Vr 1 J. (
(Series and Pbase): Drainage Class: t tJ7&,4..- d~ II ~
Tuoaomy (Subgroup):
Field observation confinD mapped nait Yes D No ~ frt.( X~
Corrected Map UDit Na.. or Tuoaomy (Subgroup): SI}-NOY>-0/l.ef.e~ ~ f'S rc 10. /6 t.(IcOo6..
113
Profile DescriDtioas: L) tI t ~ f t' b-- .J;f 5
DeptIa Matrix Color Mottle or Redox Colon Mottle or Redox Textare, CoaeretiollS,
(Inches) HorizoD (MuseU Moist (MuDSdl Moist) AbuduceiSizrl stnctu~ etc.
Contrast
&-Lf /HI /o'ltf3 7/
4--g ft.( 2- ~S''fJ( 2.~ I
:l5 WI ( / t? lit 3/'1/ ~r iJ.. t.f Ilf (! t> M fY{ f.Y&.<.. " --e.
[3- 11 .eorKM~ /2e/bx
Ctv~, /t' y,t' 3;{ srrlJ Y /1- -few li:;,fJ~
'l2bm / y) I)(
/3 JU. 4ml11tn1 ~ e
'W!1tJr7"J . X
(Ie ';
~ SoB Iadicaton:
HistosoI
D Histie Epipedoa
D Sulfidic Odor
D Aquie Moistnre Regime
bt Redudlll Coaditions
Pi Gleyed or Low-Cllroma Colon
D Coaeretioas
D Hip Orpllic ConteDt ill Sarface Layer of Sand Soils
D Organic Streakinl iD Sandy Soils
D Listed 011 Local Hydric Soils List
D Listed oa National Hydric Soils List
D Other (Explain ill Remarks)
Hvdric Soils
REMARKS:
Yes t)lj No D
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytie Vegetatioll Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
REMARKS:
Yes No
Yes )s( No D
Yes)rj No D
Is tile sample point withiR a wetland
Yes
"'.. .~
Weduds RatiJIg.'FieId Data P.....
BackgIound tnfonnation:
U&4Y$Pi/f ?1 J
Name ofRater.'y"h7M'fO l.cC6f Affiliafion:JU..U,u..t<$tt.<u!i;1Atq 0Ile: ft~~e?6
NalDeofWdland (ifkDown);
~jurisd.1dionofwetl8nd: Sc:!"~1X~~ C Oc...{,"-~
Location; 1I4Soction:,(/U.~fl/4~Section:.#- Towmbip:/P)/R1lI1.ff:: ~td
Sowces of 1nfonnaIIor.: (Check aU SOIII'C8IJ ... apply)
Si~ visit: ~SGS Topo Map:_ NWI map: /' Aerial Photo: /' Soils suney: /'
Odler: Describe:
Wben The F"aeJd DIda fonD is COIIIpIete enk:rCategory here: ~
Q. t. .HigII QuaIty. Natural WettMd
CRIe Answers
Answer this qucstioo if you baWl adequate information or experience to do so. If
not fiDd someone widl the expertise to answer die questions. Then. if die 8IISWCr
to questions 1 a. 1 b and 1 c are all NO. contact the N8tw1lI Heri18ge prognmI of
DNR.
I.. Du... a..... distllrtJallaS.
Is there sipificant evidence ofbumaaH:auscd cJ.w::s to .........~1 or
hydrology of1be wetland lIS indicated by any of dtc: following c:onditions?
Consider only changes that may have taken pIacle in the last 5 decades. The
impIcts of changes done earlier have probably been stabilized and the wed8nd
eoosystan will be close to radling some new c:qmlibrium that may (O~~ a
high qu-'ity ~.
Yes: go to Q.2
Yes: go 10 Q.2
Yes: go to Q.2
Yes: go to Q.2
Yes: go to Q.2
. gotoQ.2
NO 1010 lb.
I a.l Upstn:am watershed > 12% impervious.
ta2. Wetland is ditched and water flow is not obstructed.
tal. Wetland bas bccD graded, fillcd.1oged.
la4. Water in wetland is c0ntr0lied by dita. weirs, c:tc.
laS. Wetland is gJ1Illed.
186. Other indicaton of disturbmce (list below)
2S
1 ~..
1 b Are 1berc populations of non-native plants which are currently present, ClOver
IIIOI'e tban 10% of the wetIaod. and appear to be ~ native ~?
Briefly describe any non-native plant popoIations and
Information souroc(s):
1 c. Is ~evidencc ofhuJnan.<:aused distw'blmces which have visibly
degraded water quality. Evideooe of the degradation of water quality include:
direct (untraded) nmoff from fOIIds 01' perking 1015; presenee. or histaric
evidence. of wask: dumps; oily sheens; the smell of tlIpIlic chanic8Is; or
livestock use. Briefly describe:
Q.2. ............ EcoIogk" Fundiona:
Does the wetland:
have at least 1/4 acre of organic soils deeper than 16 inches .
and the wetland a rdati~ uodisturbccl; OR
[If the answer is NO because the WdI8ncl is disturbed briefly
describe:
Indicators of cliatu.b8ncc may iocIude:
- Wetland has been graded, filled, logged;
- Organic soils on the surface are dried-out for more than half
of the year; #"
- Wetland RlOCives direct stormW*r runofffium urb8n 01' V
agricultural amIS.];
OR
have a fon:stllCl class graIer than I acre;
OR
have cIIaractaistU:s of an estuarine system;
OR
bave eel or non- beds?
1.. Bop ud Feu
Are any of the three following conditions met for tbc area of orpnic soil?
2&.1. Are Sphagnum. mosses a common ground ClOver (>30%) and the cover of
invasive species (see Table 3) is less tban 10%1
Is the area of sphagnum mosses and deep OIpIlic soils> In. acre?
Is the area ofspbagnum mosses and deeporpric: soils Y.-In. acre?
18.2. Is 1IIere an area of orpoic soil wbicl1 his .. cmergc:nt class with at le8st
one species from Table 2."" cover ofinvasM spacies is < 10% (see Table 3)1
Is the area ofberbaeeous planls and dcepoepnic soils> In. aae?
Is the area ofherbel;eous pl8ts lAd deep eJIIiIDK: soils 1/4-1~?
26
YES go to Q.2
tole.
YES:lOtoQ.2
NO: Possible Cat. I
ContIIet DNR
all: go to Q3)
go to 2.
YES: Go to 2b
Yes: Go to 2c
Yes; Go to 2d
YES: C8k:goIy I
YES: Caaepry II
NO: 00 to 28.3
YES: CatcgoJy I
YES: CA:gory.U
NO: Go to 2a.3
't ~.,
28.3. Is the vegetation . mixture of only hc:IbItcous plants and Sphagnum
mosses with no sc:rubIshrub or forested cIIs8es7
Is the area ofherb8ceous plams. ~ md dceporgmie
soils> 1/2 acre? YES: Catqory I
Is the.a ofherbeceous pa.nes. Sphagnum. - deep 0IpDic
soils Y..lfl a;re? YES: Category II
NO: Go to 0.3.
Q.1b. Malan ..41" wetIIuMI.
2b.l. Does SO% of the covel'of upper fOrest c:8OOpy cxmsist of eweagrem YES: Category J
trees old<< than SO )'CtB$ or deciduous trees older than SO years? NO: Go to 2b2
Not4: The size of1reeS is often not . measure of age, and si2e aumot
be used as a surropte for !IF (see guidInce).
2b.2. Does 50% of tile cover of forest canopy consist of evergreen trees older YES: Go to 2b.3
than SO ~ AND is the structural diversity orabe forest high IS NO: Go to Q.3
clwactailJlICl by an additionaIlll)'CI' of tftles 1J1-4f11al1, shrubs 6'- 1J1.
taU, and a herbac:eous groundoover?
2b.3. Docs < 25% of tile ireaI eover in 1he hedIecleousIgroundccM:r ar YES: CaIepIy I
fhe$fuub IllvcrCOlJSist of invasivelexotic:: plant SIleCies from the list on I). 191 NO: Go to Q.3
Q.2c. ...................
2c.l. Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge. National Part. YES: Category I
National Esu.y Reserve. Natural Area Presavc, Stale PM'k. or NO: Go to 2c.2
Educational, Environmadal or Sc:icDtific Rescna ~ under
WAC 332-3()"ISI?
2c.2. Is 1he wetland > 5 acres; ....-................-...-..--.-..-.......... .... YES: CaIegory I
NIM: If an area contains patches of salt tolerant vegdation that are
]) less than 600 feet apart and that are seperatcd by mudflats tbat go
dry on.. Mean Low ride. or
2) separated by tidal channels that are Jess than 100 feel wide;
&lIthe vegetated areas are to be oonsidered together in calculating the
wetland ara.
or is the wetland 1-5 acres; ......................................................... YES: Go to 2c.3
or is the wedaod < 1 8I::fe? .......................................................... YES: Go to 2<<:.4
27
t #
2c.3. Does 1he wetland meet at Ie8st 3 ofthc following 4 criteria: .......
- minimwn existing evidence of human related disturbmc:e such as
cIiJdna. ditdain& filling. euItivldioa, grazing or the pn:sencc of n0n-
native p1ant species (see guidance for definition);
- surface WlIIIer CIOMClCtion with tidal _twIIIrlr (II' tidal tiabwaIer;
-at least 75% of the wetland hau 100 butTer ofllDgl'8Zl:d pasture.
open water. shnJb or fon:st;
- bas at least 3 of the following features: low marsh; high marsh; tidal
channds; Iagoon(s);woody debris; or oootiguous fi'esIlwaf<< wetIaDd.
2c.4. Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 2c3? (above)?
Q.2d. Ed G.... ... Kdp ....
2d.1. Are eeIgnIss beds present? .............................................. ....
2d.2 Are their floating (II' non-ftoating kelp bcd(s) present with pelda'than
50%maa'O algal cover in the monIb of August or September?..............
Q.3..Cat8gory IV wetIIInda.
3a. Is the waI8nd: less than I aae_
hydrologically isoIMed m
comprised of one vegetated class that is cIominataI (> 80% areal cover)
by one species &om Table 3 (pece 19) or T8ble4 (pep 20)
3b. Is the wetland: less than two acres
and. hydrotogically isolated.
with one vegetated dass. and> 90% of'" cover in any combin&boa of
species from Table 3 (page 19)
3c. Is the WdI8Dd excawted &om upland IDlt a pond smaller than 1 HIe
without a surface water connection to streams. lakes. rivers, or other
wetland. and bas < 0.1 aH of v
28
YES: C8IIlgOIy I
NO Category II
YES: Category II
NO: m
YES: Category I
NO: go to 2d.2
YES: Category I
NO: CategclIy n
t ,~
Q....Slgnlficllnt MbItld VIII....
Answer all questions and enter ... requested
4a. TOIaI wetland 8JU
Estimate area. select fimn choices in the near-right column. and score in lhe
farcolunm:
Enter acreage ofwetland ~:Laaes, and source: z~h ~kJ) .
f('~.M.. A ~ld Site IIt~,.f /irJo"IJ,~/cI.ittej>l!f'~f.t~.
J:,n<:l11j~ au ea 1'(2. CHt 0 Hue.(l p4<,p~b~bl
.. WdIud ...: Cildc 1he Wdllnd classes below Ibal qualify:
Open Water: if the area of open water is> 1/4 acre
Aquatic Beds: if the area of IqUldic beds > 1/4 em::
Emergent: iftbe area of emergent class is > 1/4 acre,.V
Scrub-Sbrub: if 1he 8JU of sc:rub-sbnIb class is > 1/4 acre,
Fon:stcd: if area of tOrested class is > 1/4 8Cfe.
Add the number of wetland classes, above, that qualify. and then
ScoIe according to the colwrms lit right.
e.g. (fthere an: 4 classes (aquatic beds. open WIder. emergent &:
Scmb-shrub). you would circle 8 poinb in the far riaht column.
4&:. Plat apedes divenit)'.
For each wetland c:Ius(at right) tII8t quali6cs in
4b above., count the number of different plant species
you can find that cover more then S% of1he ground.
YOIldo not have to nmne than.
Qm
Aquatic
Score in colWIID at far right:
e.g. If a wetland has an aqUBtic bed class with 3 species. .. EmergerJt
emcrgeatclass with 4 species and a scruIHIuub
class with 2 species you would cin:1e 2. 2. and 1 in the
&r coJUDUL
~: Any plant species with a cover of> 5%
qualifies for points within a class, even those Scrub-Saub
that lIRl DOt of that class.
Forested
Cirde_ .......,
tm:i
>200
40-200
I ().4()
5-103
1-5
0.1-1
<0.10
~
6
S
a>
,
#ofclasscs ~
c;::........... 0
..............
3 ............ 6
4 _..._..... 8
S _........ 10
1# $pICies in .....- ~inIs
I 0
2 I
3 2
>3 3
I 0
2-3 1
4-S cD
>S
1 0
2 1
3-4 2
>4 3
1 0
2 1
J..4 2
.>4 3
29
..
4d. StnadllnI.dMnity.
If the wetland bas a foIested class, add 1 point if each of the following
Classes is ~ wi1hin the forested c;Ia"s and is IIIIp than 1/4 acre:
..tJ:ees > SO' tall............................
-1nleS 20';.. 49' tall........................
-shnlbs........... ..n..... ......-.. ..........
-bcrbaceousgro_ CIOvet................
Also add I point if ~.is any .... water" or "aquatic: bed" class
brm...diately next to die fOJatl:d an:a (i.e. there is DO scnab'shrub or
. on. between them .
4e. ~ tiom the diIlpmsbclow whether iRtaspersion betwem
wetland classes is high, moderate, low or none? If you think the
8I1lOUDt()f intenlpersion falls in between the diagrams score accordingly
(i.Co a moderately high amount of interspersion would score a 4,
while a ~atdy low amount would SCX)Ie a 2)
Ill'll':
",w
l~",
ll",~k'.Ik'
......""".0\1'.
hi~'-
4'W"-"" I'eatIIns.
Answer questions below~ circle features that apply, and score to right:
1$ tI1eJe evidenc:e that t1lcopalOJ' .......W8Ier' was caused by baYCIS
Is a heron rookay located witbin 300'1
Ate JIIIltOI' ...us Ioc:a1Id wi1hin 300"1
Arc tba'eat least 3 __... delICI Cnle:S (snap) pel' 8CIe p:atc:r than
10" in diameterat"hrcast. height" (DBH)?
Arc. dar; at least 3 ctownedJoppcr ac:rc with. ~
> ,.. for at least 111 iD Ic:agtb?
An: 1hae alaS (vepbIted or ~) wUhin t1lc wetland that are
ponded for atla&t 4.1NlGths out of tile year, and the wetland has DOt
qualified as haYiDg 8ft open WIIk:r dass in Question 4b. ?
30
YES - 1
YES-l
YES-I
YES-I
YES 1
High - S
/If)
3
't
YES=2
YES-I
YES = I
YES = I
YES = 1
/If)
YES = 2
\. -~
4i. Coaaedioll to otlaer llalliDt eras:
Select the description. wbich best IIUIIChes the site being cwIuated.
-Is tbe wetland c:onnectcd to, or part of, a riparian corridor at least 100' wide
CIOI1DCCtin& twO or anore wetJaRds; or. is there an upland connection present> 100'
wide with good fon:st or shrub ClmIet (>25% cowr) connecting it with a
SignirtaUlt Habitat An2?
-Is the wedaod COIIdClCted to any odJcr HabitM Area with either 1) a ~
corridor < 100' wide. or 2} a corridor that is > 100' wide. but bas a low vegelati~
cover less than 6 feet io beight?
-Is the wetland c:onnccted to. or a part of: a riparian corridor between 50 - 100' wide
with S('.I'UhIsbrub or forest cover COIlDCdioo to other wetl8nds?
- Is the wetland conncctcd to any other Habitat An:a with narrow corridor (<100')
of low vegetation (<: 6' in height)?
e-Is the wetJand and its buffer (if the buffer is less than 50' wide) completely isolated
by deve)opma1t (urbID. Jaidcntial with a density greater than 21~ or indus1rial)?
YES = S
yes(j)
Yes = 3
Yes "" 1
Yes "" 0
Now add ... scores cJn:Ied (for 0.511- Q.Si 1Ibove) to get a.... /3 "a'/;(/' r5
.. tile Teal............ 01'...... 11 peWIt ~ - ,..-..~
NO = ea."..
32
.!
t
APPENDIX C
MAPS, AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND ENVIRONMENTALLY
SENSITIVE WETLAND AREA DRAWINGS
2l~~ 1 ... iiieStl
-- ~~Igr~ .~ I
~ !Ii~!~~ 0
(>j
l!i,\ 111 ..,.
1Il~ ...,
ua..w ('oj
3:w3:<':> 0
0
z V)\- 0:::
... ta-_-or ./1 ~ ~ ~
..-ora Vl
I t]
ti
, "<l;
::...
I.. f-
I la. ~
u! Q
1> if IB5 l)
M
~ ~
I ..a 3 lil
~
i ti
~
.
... I
...
"
~
_ll:
8':1d
~f...
g~:
......
-
I
. S
I!
1;4 !
i I;~
B
# .
d. Ie.
S!
l!; 1I~:' .
..
Ii
8 III
a~ I
~i /'
~/ /.. ! f
. S e~
. l!~
J ro~ ,tat ~~
A' . I;ai
~ !.S.
Irli ng, I!~S
Cl10
D..
<(
:E
z
o
-
!C(
o
o
-I
W
I-
-
en
a;
e
CU
a..
-
o
CD
"E
::::s
CIJ
~
it
~
r-----------____
I -------
I
I
I
I
I It'>
,0
't"-
,M
I
IW
1M
jo
,It'>
, """"
I 0
,C\I
2.'
-.
w
en
B
8
Q
~
I
I
I
I
"'- .
,
'-- . ;..
", .~....~.~.~.-
LEGEND
Buffer Areas 1/ / / / ~
Pond Area K X X X XI
Fences .......
Property Boundary _ _ . _ _ . _ .
.....
.(0
It--:
!re
'w
, II
i~
, .
,~
,,-
I~
'2.'
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
--I
LOGGY SOIL AND
~NDCONSULnNG
P. O. Box 2347
Port Angels, WA 98382
(0) 380-457-3920
(F) 380-467-0131
~....
.=002:
v.- .._
c..- c v'
>. ..- res...
..;.J e '"'
~~ ~m
~o~
Q.;
~~I-
w wit: Z
Q. w
ild
Q.O
! en
'-' J; &r: a
z ><5~ ~
i ~ g; E ('t')
al !Zi 8
al ~ 6
.~ ZZ ~~N~
E o~ c;'5cri!
Pi ~ g; .6 ~ ~ 0:: :t
- ot] 8uj;:;i~
90 ~~~~
W =(/).-:
Q ..:1'5
~~ wC>>
......J ~:lEa
jj ~~ ~~
~~ ~ ~8N
~ II:
~ .
II i
I
... .
i :
~~ gi
Jl CD z::)
lS..J 0
c- ~c
~I is
~~ ~~
QW
..J