HomeMy WebLinkAboutWetland Delineation 002342037
W. David loggv. CPSS and Wetland Specialist
P. O. Box 2347. Port Angeles. WA98362
Phone: 360-457-3920 - Fax: 360-457-0131
Toll Free :866-805-3920
Cell Phone: ~775-0901
E~il: wdploggyOolypen.com
,L
~
CertifiArl
Specializing in:
Soil Mapping and C1assifrcation
Soil Investigations and Soil Site Analysis
Wetland Mapping. Delineation and Restoration
Soil Redox Potential Monitoring for Hydric Soil Determination
December 15,2005
Mr. David Johnson
Jefferson County Department of Community Development
621 Sheridan Street
Port Townsen~ W A 98368
Dear Mr. Johnson:
I am sending this wetland environmentally sensitive area report directly to you as Mary Lynch say that she
has been holding most of her conservation regarding her property with you. She will most likely be contacting you as
soon as she get her copies of this report.
The only potential development site for a single-family-residence appears to be the southwest comer of the
parcel. This upland area including the buffer is 17,264.61 square feet in area. The buffer in this upland area is
10,748 square feet in area. There might be enough uplands on the parcel to the south to place a septic field in the
very southwest comer of Mary's parcel and filling some wetlands to an accommodate sufficient area for a single-
family residence. A properly designed two story residence might frt in the upland with some buffer impact without
filling any wetlands. Of course buffer reduction would have to be approved as standard wetland buffer width averag-
ing as set forth in the county regulation appears unfeasible. The only other un-buffered upland is 3,797.8 square feet
along the southeast comer of the parcel and placing additional buffer here would not be very beneficial to the reduced
buffer area at the development site. There is a public water line along side the property so there is problem for a wa-
ter source.
I did not want to discuss this potential site with Mary until you had a chance to review the report and receive
some feed back from you. I did want Mary to get her hopes up again about being able to sell the property for devel-
opment.
Page 2
The only other potential uses of the parcel is to lease it out as pasture or possibly use it in the future as a wet-
land mitigation banking area.
Please contact me if you have any questions or need additional infonnation. I have enclosed my professional
qualification for your information.
Sincerely;
w'~
w. David Loggy, CPSS
Enclosures: 2
W. David Loggy, CPSS and Wetland Specialist
P. O. Box 2347, Port Angeles. WA 98362-Q303
Phone:360-457 -3920 - Fax: 360-457-0131
Toll Free Phone 866-805-1497
Email: wdploggyOolypen.com
SpeciaIlzIng in:
Sol M8ppIng and '7 ! 'bticJn
SoIlrM1stipt/o1lS and Soil Site An8I)'sis
Wetland Mapping, DeIlneatlon and Restoration
Soil RedOx Potential MonitorIIW for Hydric Soil DetermInation
",
e
Cart if i Ad
ProfessioDaI Qualification aDd Experience
W. David Loggy
Loggy Soil & Wetland Consulting
Title: Consulting Soil Scientist
Total Years Experiences: 39
PROFESSIONAL SPECIALTIES:
Soils
Washington Society of Professional
Soil Scientists
Society ofWetJand Scientists
National Society of Consulting Soil
Scientist, Inc
Better Business Bureau
Surveys and Inventories
Soil Classification, Genesis.
Morphology - USDA,UNIFIED, and
ASSHO
Identification of Hazards & Limitations
Hydric Soils of Problem & Atypical
Wetland Situations
Field Fertility Testing
Erosion Potential. Control and Plans
Correlation of Agri. Soil Class-
ification to UNIFIED & ASHO
Attributes Affecting Septic Design-
Depth to Seasonal Water Tables
Wetlands
Inventories, Type Determinations,
Delineations, Function & Value
Analysis, & Reports
Mitigation Plans and Monitoring
Enhancement and Restoration
Soil Redox Potential Monitoring
Environmental
Soils, Wetland & CAS Data for ECs.
DEIS & FEIS
Education:
BS, Range Conservation, Colorado State
University, 1966 (Major areas of study,
included Biology, Ecology and Soils)
Associate of Arts, (Pre-Forestry),
Casper College, 1961
CertiflCationl Affiliations:
Certified Professional Soil Scientist (CPSS)
No. 576, (ARCP ACS), 26 years
Member:
Positions Held: Newsletter Editor & Board Member
for Washington Society of Professional
Soil Scientist
Awards: Five Certificates of Merit Awards
For Sustained Superior Performance
TeduIicaI Soil ~t SeI'Yiee8 U.s. Forest Ser-
vice. I conducted soil and wildland watershed support
services for slope stability analysis, landslide stabilization,
application of soil quality standards, erosion analysis and
site surveys. I also identified wedJuld-, and iaterpreted
Private Soil and Wetland CODSDItiRP-l997 to Praent. wetlaad and IIydrie soils data for tUnber sale pIaDRn.g,
I have coadacted soil slope stability aaaIysis oa ideati- layollt, admblistratio-, fertility and regeaeratioa re-
tied critical areas for timber h.arvest sites and h.ousing search. studies. I provided soil analysis for rock pit devel-
developmeat sites in Skagit aad CIaIIam Counties. I opment, road location, and construction, and administra-
have also developed aa erosion coatrol plaa for a hous- tion, recreation sites, administrative sites, ski areas, mine
iag development plat in CIaUam County aad coaducted development, hydroelectric sites and a pulp mill air pollu-
wetlaad inveatories, deliDeatioa aad rehabilitation pro- tion study.
jects for reality companies, developers aad private
landowners in CIaIIam, Skagit, SDohomish, JeffersoD
aad Is...d CoaDties, aad withiD the city boundaries of
Port Aagdes, Port TOWDSeDd, Lake Forest Park aad
Marysville.. Have coDducted aad beea subeoatractor
OD wetlaad projects siace iD the above areas since 1997.
Summary of ExperienCe8
Project and Program Manager, or Interdisplinary Team
Member on 25 major projects in Colorado and Alaska.
Thirty an one half years experience in soil survey, and wa-
ter planning and budgeting for forest planning, mining and
ski area projects, long term and independent timber sales,
and road layout and construction. TweDty yean of ex-
perieace in wetlaad mapping aad maaagemeDt, and
ripariaa baffer .........ent and establishment.
Since 1979 have doae wetland aad slope stability deter-
miaation aad aaaIysis, and soil erosioa plan work in
Snohomish, IsIaad, Skagit, Jefferson and CIaIIam
Counties, and the cities of Port AageIes, Port ToWD-
send, Lake Forest Park aad Marysville.
Fifteen technical reports and papers authored or c0-
authored.
Training in U.s. Anny Crops of Eagineers Wetlaad
DeliDeatioa Method and State ofWashiagtoD's Pro-
poBed Wetlaad Funetioaal AssessmeDt Method. USDA,
NRCS. Training in Advaaeed Hvdric Soils in aceor-
daace to staDdanls of tile Natioul Tecluaieal COIIIIIIit-
tee for Hvdric Soils. Traini." ia .horeliae bcMuuIarv
detenniaatioD.
SeIeeted Project Experienc:e
NatioDaI Cooperative SoD Sarvey, U.s. Forest Service.
I have thirty years experience in soil identification, classi-
fication, soil sampling, standard testing methods, and map-
ping soils to the National Cooperative Soil Survey. I sur-
veyed aad mapped aad/or supervised the surveyiag
aDd mappiag of 3 milliOD acres betweeD the states of
Nebnska, Colorado and Alaska dult iadaded more
tbaa 8S orgaaic and miaenl soD series. Thirty of the
soils were orpllic and Jaiaenlllydric soils ateodated
with estuary, and bog aad feD wedaacls (both forested
aad nOD-forested).
Water Maaagement, U.s. Forest Service. Developed
modeling protocol for erosion and sediment transfer haz-
ards, and co-developed geomorphic risk assessment of
potential fish habitat impacts for forest management alter-
native practices. Co-developed a dassificatioD system
for field ideDtifyiDg Class m Streams (equivalent to
the State ofWuhingtoa'. Type 4 Waters) bMed oa
sedimeDtatioa potentiaL Co-aath.ored a protocol for
idelltifybag, daIIif'ymg .....1Uppiag 34wedaad laabitat
types using GIS soil aad plaat commuDities databases
for 8.E. Alaska. As Watershed Program Manager for 5
years, I supervised three soil scientists, and two hydrolo-
gists. I coordinated, managed, directed and budgeted the
Ketchikan Area's watershed program and projects, involv-
ing watershed analysis, soil and hydrology management
consulting, and coordinated the watershed program of
work. with other resource units. As soil survey supervisor
in Alaska, I supervised from 6 to 12 people in 2 person
crews per year.
Forest aDd Project Plaaaiag, U.S. Forest Service. I was
the Soil and Water Consultant or IDT member for environ-
mental analyses for two Ketchikan Pulp Coo's Long Tenn
Sale - five year periods, many smaller timber sales, the
u.s. Borax Molybdenum Balk Sampling Mine Access
Road, Swan Lake Hydro-electric Dam, and Tongass Land
Management Plan Revision (1987-90). I wrote soil and
water standards and guidelines, management prescriptions,
and the soil, water, air and wetland section for environ-
mental analysis. I co-authored aad edited a white paper
OD riparian CODcepU for 8.E. Alaska.
W. David Loggy. CPSS and Wetland Specialist
P.O. Box 2347. PortAngefes. WA98362
Phone:360-457 -392O-Fax: 360-457~131
Email: wdploggyOolypen.com
Web Page: OIypen.comjwdploggy
SpecIalizing in:
Soil MIIppirW ... ";' ] 5 "ficatIon
Soil ~1S- Soil SIte AnaI)'sis
Wetland Mapping, DeIIne8tIon and RestoratIon
Soil Redox PotentlaI MonItorIng for Hydric Soil Det8nninlltion
,l.
AACPACII
~
Certif iArl
ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVE AREA STUDY
PREPAIRED FOR THE
PROPERTY OF
Mary Lynch
Located in portion of the
Northwest 1/4 of
Section 34, T.30N, R.02W, W.M.
Proposed Project:
Wetland Delineation
Project Name:
Lynch 002342037
Reference:
Jefferson Connty
Department of Community Development
Prepared for:
Mary Lynch
P.O. Box 114898
Boamau, MT 59719
Prepared By:
Loggy Soilaud Wetland Coasaltiag
W. David Loggy, CPSS
P.O. Box 2347
Port Angeles, W A 98362-0303
(360) 457-3920
December, 6, 2005
~.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
CONSULTING COMPANY 1
TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA INVISTIGATION 1
LAND OWNER 1
APPLICANT 1
PROPOSED PROJECT 1
PARCEL NUMBER 1
SITE LOCATION 1
PLANNING AREA 1
EXISTING CONDITIONS 1-8
Landscape Position 1
Slope gradient 2
Geologic Materials 2
Water types present 2
5.NON-WETLAND SITES 2
A. PLOT No.1 2-4
6. WETLAND SITES 4
A. PLOTS No.1 thro 3 4-8
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA DETERMINATION & DELINEATION 8
WETLAND CLASSIFICATION 8
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA BUFFER REQUIREMENTS 9
TABLES
TABLE ONE - DOMINATE AT VEGETATION ON PLOT 1
TABLE TWO - DOMINATE AT VEGETATION ON PLOT 2
TABLE THREE - DOMINATE AT VEGETATION ON WETLAND PWT 1
TABLE FOUR - DOMINATE AT VEGETATION ON WETLAND PLOT 2
TABLE FIVE DOMINATE AT VEGETATION ON WETLAND PLOT 3
TABLE SIX- WETLAND CLASSIFICATION
TABLE SEVEN - WETLAND LANDSCAPE FUNCTIONS
2
3
5
5
6
8
9
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - APPROACH AND MEmODS
APPENDIX B - FIELD DATA SHEETS AND PLANT LIST
APPENDIX C - MAPS, AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE
WETLAND AREA DRAWINGS
...
SUMMARY OUTLINE
The parcel of land is located along the west edge of Jefferson County north of
Highway 101 and Old Gardener Road. It is a 4.85 acre parcel that has 3.6 acres of
wetland.
The wetland on the parcel is part of larger herbaceous pasture type area. The
wetland on the parcel is the completely herbaceous in nature. The herbaceous vegetation
consists of grasses, rushes and sedges with some forbs. The wetland classifies as a Class
III wetland. The parcel is presently is in fallow management. There is part of an existing
man made pond located near the northeast comer of the property. A shrub-scrub forested
upland area occurs along the east side of the property. Two other upland areas were
found on the parcel. The first occurs in the southwest comer of the parcel and the other
upland is a narrow strip of land with a northeast and southwest orientation in
approximately the middle of the parcel.
There are no drainage channels on the parcel and runoff occurs as either surface
flow or subsurface flow in a north and northeast direction. A portion of a pond occurs on
the parcel and the pond is larger than the portion shown on the drawing in Appendix C.
'.
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA REPORT
CONSULTING COMPANY:
Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting
TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA INVESTIGATION:
Soils
Wetlands
Fish & Wildlife Habitat Areas
LAND OWNER:
APPLICANT:
PROPOSED PROJECT:
TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S):
SITE LOCATION:
LEGAL LOCATION:
STREET ADDRESS:
ROAD ROUTE INSTRUCTIONS:
PLANNING AREA:
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS:
1. LANDSCAPE POSITION:
HILLSLOPES
FLOODPLAINS
TERRACES
MARINE TERRACES
ALLUVIAL FAN
VALLEYS
LANDSLIDE
OTHER (EXPLAIN)
Lynch 002342037
o
~
o
Mary Lynch
P.O. Box 295
Emigrant, MT 59027-.0295
Mary Lynch
Delineation of wetland for selling property
002342037
The NW 'l'4 of Section 34, Township 30 North,
Range 2 West, W.M.
N/A
From Port Townsend take State Highway 20
south to Highway 101 and turn west on
Highway 101. Turn right off Highway 101 onto
Old Gardener Road. Follow Old Gardener Road
to Old Schoolhouse Road and turn north on the
road. The lot is on the right (east side) of Old
Gardener Road approximately Y2 mile from the
intersection of Old Gardener Road and Old
Schoolhouse Road.
Discovery Bay
~
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
STREAM & RIVER
BASINS
DEPRESSIONS
COASTAL DUNES
MARINE BLUFF
SWALES
LAKES & PONDS
1
LSWC 12/06/05
y.
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED
2. SLOPE GRADIENT: 2 to 10 percent
3. GEOLOGIC MATERIALS
ALLUVIAL
COLLUVIAL
GLACIAL
OUTWASH
DRIFT
LACUSTRINE
EOLIAN
o
o
o
o
o
o
ASH 0
ORGANICS 0
TILL
COMPACT 0
ABLATION [gI
RESIDUUM 0
4. WATER TYPES PRESENT:
ffimGATIONDITCH 0
STREAM 0 RIVER 0 LAKE 0 POND [gI
ffimGATION DITCH ASSOCIATED WITH STREAM, RIVER or POND 0
STREAM, RIVER POND OR LAKE NAME:
N/A ~
TYPE 1 WATER
TYPE 3 WATER
TYPE 5 WATER
o
o
[gI
TYPE 2 WATER
TYPE 4 WATER
N/A
o
o
o
5. NON-WETLAND SITES
A. PLOT No.1
Plot data can be viewed in Appendix B.
i.
VEGETATION TYPE:
Herbaceous [gI
Scrub-Shrub 0
Native I2?J
Non-Native ~
Estuarine
Forested
o
o
TABLE ONE
DOMINATE VEGETATION ON PLOT 1
PLANT INDICATOR PERCENT
COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS COVER
Common velvetmass Holcus lanatus FAC. 50
Orchard grass Dactylis glomerata FACU 20
Canada thistle Cirsiwn arvense FACU+ 20
Lynch 002342037
2
LSWC 12/06/05
~
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED
TABLE TWO
DOMINATE VEGETATION ON PLOT 2
PLANT INDICATOR PERCENT
COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS COVER
Tall fescue Festuca anmdinacea FACU 20
Common velvetroass Holcus lanatus FAC. 40
Orchard grass Dactylis g}omerata FACU 20
ii. SOILS
NRCS Soil Map Unit and Series:l
Field Identified Map Unit & Series:
Belfast poorly drained Varient
Loamy-skeletal, istoc, mesic Aquic
Hapoxerepts
SOIL DEPTH:
Shallow 0
Moderately deep 0 Deep 0
Very Deep 181
SOIL DRAINAGE:
Excessively Well 0
Mod. Well t81
Very Poorly 0
Somewhat Excessively Well
Somewhat Poorly
o
o
WeD 0
Poorly 0
SOILS ON PLOT 1
SUBSOIL:
o to 3 inches of very dark brown (1 OYR 212) strong fine to
medium granular structured silt loam with many very fine, fine
& medium roots; clear wavy boundary.
3 to 8 inches of very dark grayish brown (1 OYR 3/2) moderate
medium subangular block structured gravelly silt loam with
many very fine, fine & medium roots; clear wavy boundary.
SOIL SURFACE:
SUBSTRATUM:
8 to 12 inches of dark grayish brown (IOYR 4/2) moderate
medium subangular blocky structured very gravelly silt loam
with common fine & medium and few coarse roots; abrupt wavy
boundary.
12 to 15 inches of grayish brown (lOYR 5/2) matrix with strong
brown (7.5YR 4/6) common fine prominent redoximorphic
features; moderate fine subangular blocky structured gravelly
loamy sand with common very fine & fine roots; very abrupt
wavy boundary.
1. Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington, 1975. Fred R. McCreary, United States Department of
Agriculture, Soil conservation Service, in cooperation with the Washington Agricultural Experiment Station.
Lynch 002342037
3
LSWC 12/06/05
J_
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED
15 to 20 inches oflight gray (lOYR7/l) matrix with yellowish
brown (1 OYR 5/6) many moderate prominent redoximorphic
features; massive extremely gravelly loamy sand with few very
fine roots.
HYDRIC SOILS: YES 0
If yes, identify hydric soil criteria: 2 3
NO
I2J
SOILS ON PLOT 2
SOIL SURFACE:
o to 3 inches of very dark gray (lOYR 3/1) weak fine granular
structured silt loam with many very fine, fine & medium roots;
clear wavy boundary.
3 to14 inches of very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) strong
medium subangular block structured gravelly loam with
common very fine, & fine roots; clear wavy boundary.
SUBSOIL:
SUBSTRATUM:
14 to 25 inches of dark gray (lOYR 4/1) matrix with many fine
to medium prominent dark yellowish brown (1 OYR 4/6)
redoximorphic features; massive very gravelly loamy sand with
few fine & medium roots.
HYDRIC SOILS: YES 0
If yes, identify hydric soil criteria: 4 5
NO
1'81
iii. WATER SOURCE FOR HYDROLOGY:
Precipitation I2J Unconfined Aquifer, Tidally Influenced 0
Unconfined Aquifer I2J Marine, Tidally influenced 0
Lake 0 Stream Discharge 0
iv. AQUIC CONDITIONS:
Endosaturation 1'81
EpisaturatioD 0
Anthric Saturation
o
2 USDA, NRCS. 2002 Field fudicatoIS of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 5.1. GW. Hurt, P.M. Whited, and RF.
Pringle (eds.). USDA, NRCS in cooperation with the national Teclmical Connnittee for Hydric Soils, Fort Worth, TX.
3 ST ATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOOY Washington State Wetlands Identification and
Delineation Manual. Ecology Publication #96-94, March 1997.
4 USDA, NRCS. 2002 Field fudicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 5. L G.w. Hurt, P.M. Whited, and RF.
Pringle (eds.). USDA, NRCS in cooperation with the national Teclmical Connnittee for Hydric Soils, Fort Worth, TX.
S STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEP ARTMENf OF ECOLOGY. Washington State Wetlands Identification and
Delineation Manual. Ecology Publication #96-94, March 1997.
Lynch 002342037
4
LSWC 12/06/05
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED
6. WETLAND SITES
APPROACH AND METHODS USED IN WETLAND DELINEATION AND
DETERMINATION ARE DETAILED IN APPENDIX A.
A. PLOTS No.1 thru 3
Plot data can be viewed in Appendix B.
i.
VEGETATION TYPE:
Herbaceous ~
Forested 0
Native ~
Non-Native ~
Estuarine 0
Scrub-Shrub 0
TABLE THREE
DOMINATE VEGETATION ON WETLAND PLOT 1
PLANT INDICATOR PERCENT
COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS COVER
Common velvetmss Holcus lantanas FAC 40
Soft rush Juncos effusus FACW 20
Agrostis SP Agrostis SP. FAC 15
Orchardgrass Dactylis g!omerata FACU 20
Tall fescue Festuca arundinacea FACU 5
TABLE FOUR
DOMINATE VEGETATION ON WETLAND PLOT 2
PLANT INDICATOR PERCENT
COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS COVER
Common velvetmss Holcus lantanas FAC 40
Orchardgrass Dactylis clomerata FACU 30
Agrostis sp Agrostis $0. FAC 20
Lynch 002342037
5
LSWC 12/06/05
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED
TABLE FIVE
DOMINATE VEGETATION ON WETLAND PWT 3
PLANT INDICATOR PERCENT
COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS COVER
Common velvetmass Holcus lantanas FAC 40
English plantain Plantago lanceolata FAC 20
Agrostis sp Agrostis sp. FAC 20
Orchardm-ass Dactylis glomerata FACU 10
ii. SOILS
NRCS SOIL MAP UNIT AND SERIES:6
FIELD IDENTIFIED MAP UNIT & SERIES:
SOIL DEPTH:
Shallow 0
Belfast poorly drained variant
Sandy-skeletal mixed mesic Typic
Endoaquepts
Moderately deep 0 Deep ~
Very Deep 0
SOIL DRAINAGE:
Excessively Well 0
Mod. WeD 0
Very Poorly 0
Somewhat Excessively Well
Somewhat Poorly
o
o
WeD 0
Poorly ~
SOIL SURFACE:
SOILS ON WETLAND PWT 1
SUBSOIL:
o to 3 inches very dark gray (lOYR 3/1) weak fine granular
structured silt loam with many very fine, fine & medium roots;
clear wavy boundary.
3 to 6 inches of dark brown (7.5YR 312) moderate medium
subangular blocky structured gravelly silty clay loam with many
very fine, fine and medium roots; clear wavy boundary.
6 to 9 inches of brown (10YR 4.2) moderate coarse subangular
blocky structured gravelly loam sand with common very fine and
fine roots; clear wavy boundary.
9 to 20 inches of dark gray (lOYR 4/1) & gray (lOYR 5/1)
moderate medium subangular blocky structure gravelly loamy
sand with many coarse prominent red (2.5 YR 4/6)
redoximorphic features; common very fine & fine roots; abrupt
wavy boundary.
20 to 26 inches of dark grayish brown (2.5Y 412) weak coarse
subangular blocky structured gravelly loamy sand with many
moderate prominent strong brown (7.5YR) redoximorphic
features; common fine roots; clear wavy boundary.
6 Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington, 1975. Fred R. McCreary, United States Department of
Agriculture, Soil conservation Service, in cooperation with the Washington Agricultural Experiment Station.
Lynch 002342037
6
LSWC 12/06/05
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED
SUBSTRATUM:
26 to 32 inches olive brown (2.5Y 4.3) single grain sand with
common fine promcommon fine prominent strong brown (7.5
YR 4/6) redoximorphic features; weak fine roots.
SOn..s ON WETLAND PLOT 2
SOIL SURFACE:
SUBSTRATUM:
o to 9 inches of very dark grayish brown (lOYR 3/2) moderate
medium granular structured silty loam with common very fine,
fine & medium roots; clear wavy boundary.
9 to 20 inches of dark grayish brown (lOYR 4/2) massive
gravelly loamy sand with common medium prominent
redoximorphic features; few very fine and fine roots
SOIL SURFACE:
SOILS ON WETLAND PLOT 3
SUBSOIL:
SUBSTRATUM:
o to 4 inches of black (lOYR 2/1) moderate
fine granular structured silty loam with common very fine, fine
& medium roots; clear wavy boundary.
4 to 8 inches of black (7.5YR 2.5/1) weak fine subangular
blocky structured sandy loam with common very fine, fine &
medium roots; abrupt wavy boundary.
8 to 13 inches of very dark grayish brown (lOYR 3/2) moderate
fine subangular blocky structured silty clay loam with common
fine prominent reddish brown (5YR 4/4) redoximorphic features;
common very fine & fine roots; abrupt wavy boundary.
13 to 17 inches of black (lOYR 3/1) strong fine subangular
blocky structured sandy clay loam with few fine prominent
reddish brown (5 YR 4/4) redoximorphic features; common very
fine & fine roots; abrupt wavy boundary.
17 to 31 inches of dark grayish brown (lOYR 4/2) weak medium
subangular blocky structured extremely gravelly loamy sand
with common moderate prominent reddish brown (5YR 4/4)
redoximorphic features; common very fine & fine roots.
HYDRIC SOILS: YES 18] NO
If yes, identify hydric soil indicators:
o
F4 Depleted below Dark Surface 7,
43 f (2) (a)Soils with contrasting
mottles and/or low chroma matrix 8
7 USDA, NRCS. 2002 Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 5.1. G.w. Hurt, P.M. Whited, and RF.
Pringle ( eds.). USDA, NRCS in coopemtion with the national T eclmical Committee for Hydric Soils, F ort Worth, TX
8 STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOOY. Washington State Wetlands Identification and
Delineation Manual. Ecology Publication #96-94, March 1997.
Lynch 002342037
7
LSWC 12/06/05
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED
iii. WATER SOURCE FOR HYDROLOGY:
Precipitation ~ Unconfined Aquifer, Tidally Influenced 0
Unconfined Aquifer ~ Marine, Tidally influenced 0
Lake 0 Stream Discharge 0
iv. AQUlC CONDITIONS:
Endosaturation ~
Episaturation 0
Anthric Saturation
o
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA DETERMINATION & DELINEATION:
The wetland boundary is marked with 3" x 5" orange plastic wire whips. The wetland whips are
consecutively numbered. The whips have the station numbers for compass traverse, the date the
boundary was established and the lettering LSWC indicating Loggy Soil and Wetland consulting as the
delineator. Each wetland whip has an orange wetland boundary ribbon attached to it.
The environmentally sensitive area associated with the tax parcel is shown in the
Environmentally sensitive area Drawing in Appendix C. The bearings and distances of the wetland
stations for the wetland boundary in the drawing of this report were established using a staff or hand held
compass and hip chain. The drawing in this report is not a legal survey. The location of the
property lines are either estimated from fence lines or monuments or from property survey plats.
WETLAND CLASSIFICATION:
WETLAND SIZE ON PROPERTY: 158,225.54 Square feet (3.6 acres)
WETLAND CLASSIFICATION BASED ON ~ 9
CLASS I
o
CLASS II
o
CLASS m
l8]
CLASS IV
o
WETLAND CLASSIFICATION BASED ON FISH AND WILDLIFE CLASSIFICATION1o
TABLE SIX
WETLAND CLASSIFICATION
Wetland Water Water Special
Habitat System Class Subclass Re2imes Chemistry Soil Modifiers
ALL Palustrine Emergents Persistent Saturated Circumneutral Mineral none
9 STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARlMENT OF ECOLOGY. Washington State Wetland rating System,
Western Washington, Second Edition. Publication #93-74, August 1993
10 Lewis M Cowardin, Virginia Carter, Francis C. Golet and Edward T. LaRoe, Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater Habitats of the United States, U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service FSW/OBS-
79/31, December 1979
Lynch 002342037
8
LSWC 12/06/05
TABLE SEVEN
WETLAND LANDSCAPE FUNCTIONS
CRITERIA FUNCTION ASPECT
Habitat Type See table six
Habitat Diversity
Habitat Size 3.6 A. of wetlands,
Upland Habitat Type 0.83 A. of grass & forbs uplands, 0.38 A. forest >20 feet high &
shrub-scrub upland
Significant Habitat Pond on parcel north of this one provides some water for migratory
Features waterfowl
Species Use No species of concern
Anadromous fish use N/A
Significant Wildlife No
Movement Corridor
M2mt. & Modifications Fallow pasture
FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS:
TYPE 1 0 TYPE 2 0 TYPE 3 0 TYPE 4 0 TYPES ~
ENVIRONMENT ALL Y SENSITIVE AREA BUFFER REQUIREMENTS
New Development
Wetland Class I
Class II
Class m
Class IV
150 feet
100 feet
50 feet
25 feet
o
o
o
o
Aquatic Areas Type 1&2
Type 3
Type 4
Type 5
150 feet 0
100 feet 0
100 feet 0
50 feet 121*
Pond is part of the wetland so a buffer is not applied.
Lynch 002342037
9
LSWC 12/06/05
APPENDIX A
APPROACH AND METHODS
APPROACH AND METHODS
Wetland Determination
Two levels of information were gathered for this analysis. These included:
a) Review of preliminary site data and,
b) On-site investigation to determine the presence of wetlands.
a) A review of existing information was conducted to develop background knowledge of
physical features, and to identify the potential for wetland occurrence on the subject
property. The resource documents available for preliminary review of the site conditions
included: USDA Soil Conservation Service (SCS), "Soil Survey of Jefferson County
Area Washington", (1990) aerial photography, and Jefferson County Planning
Department data.
b) During the on-site investigation, wetland areas were determined and verified on the basis
of three parameters: Hydrophytic Vegetation, Hydric Soils, and Wetland Hydrology, as
recommended in the Washintrton State Identification and Delineation Manual (Washington
State Department of Ecology, Ecology Publication #96-944, March 1997). Wetlands
categories and wetland vegetation classes were identified and classified using the Washinlrton
sate Wetlands Ratin2 System of Western Washinlrton. Second Edition (Washington State
Department of Ecology, Ecology Publication #93-74, August 1993).
A positive wetland determination is made when all three parameters are present, or in certain
situations determined following the guidelines recommended in wetland determination procedures, or for
atypical situations or problem areas.
Hvdrophvtic Ve2etation
Areas where more than 50% of the dominant species present from all strata are hydrophytes
(plants adapted to growth and reproduction in saturated soil conditions) are considered to be inside the
wetland boundary, unless clear evidence of hydric soils or wetland hydrology cannot be established. A
species is considered dominant if it is equal to or greater than 20% areal cover, or exerts a controlling
influence on, or defmes the character of a community. Hydrophytic vegetation is determined to be
present, when under normal circumstances:
More than 50% of the dominant plant species in a plant community have an indicator
category of Obligate Wetland (OBL), Facultative Wetland (FACW), and/or Facultative (FAC) as listed in
"National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9)", (Reed, Porter B., Jr.,
1988), and the "1993 Supplement to National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest
(Region 9)" dated December 1993 that became effective on March 31, 1994. Indicator categories of
FACW+, FACW-, FAC+, are included as FACW status.
'F AC+ species are considered to be wetter (i.e., have a greater estimated probability of occurring
in wetlands) than F AC species, while F AC- species are considered to be drier (i.e., have a lesser estimated
probability of occurring in wetlands) than F AC species.' Plant indicator status definitions are presented in
TABLE 1 below.
.'
This Plant Indicator Status Categories system was developed for the USFWS National Wetlands
Inventory by Cowardin et al. (1979). The National Plant List Panel, Reed, Porter B., and Jr. modified it in
1988 and 1993. The Wetland Indicator Category (WIC) used in this report refers to the plants Indicator
Svmbol as referred to in the table below.
Purpose and Approach Continued
National Indicators reflect the range of estimated probabilities (expressed as a frequency of
occurrence) of a species occurring in a wetland versus a non-wetland across the entire distribution of the
species. ("National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9)", Reed, Porter B.,
Jr., 1988), and the 1993 Supplement to List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region
9) dated December 1993 that became effective on March 31, 1994. Percentages expressed as estimated
probability.
TABLE 1
Indicator Cateaorv
Indicator Svmbol
Definition
OBLIGATE WETLAND
PLANTS
OBL
Occur almost always, >99% (estimated
probability) in wetlands under natural
conditions. < 1% in non wetlands.
FACULTATIVE WETLAND
PLANTS
FACW
Usually occur in wetlands, 67-99% and
1-33% in non-wetlands.
FACULTATIVE PLANTS
FAC
Equally likely to occur in wetlands and
non-wetlands 34-66%.
F ACUL T A TIVE UPLAND
PLANTS
FACU
Usually occur in non wetlands 67-99%,
but occasionally found in wetlands 1-33%.
OBLIGATE UPLAND
Plants
UPL
Almost always occur in non-wetlands of
Northwest Region 9, >99%. <1%
in wetlands.
Hvdric Soils
There have been tremendous scientific changes since 1991 in several of the indicators such as the
introduction of aquic conditions to cover the requirements for saturation, reduction, and morphological
indicators used to define the modified aquic moisture regime, and mottles and low chroma colors being
replaced by redoximorphic features. Because of these changes, we consult the US Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service. 1998. If Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the
United States, Reversion 5.1 If. G. W. Hurt, Whited, P. M., and Pringle, R F. (eds.), USDA, NRCS, Ft.
Worth, TX for guidance and decision in making final hydric soils determinations.
Additionally, compliance to changes in Hydric Soils of the United States published in Federal
RegisterNol. 59, No. 133/July 13, 1994 and Vol. 60, No. 37/February 24, 1995 addressing Criterion 2 of
the Criteria for Hydric Soils definition is being observed. The main purpose for the criteria is to create
Hydric Soil Lists. Criteria 1, 3, and 4 can serve as both database criteria and as indicators for
identification of hydric soils. When Criteria 1,3, and 4 are used to document the presence of a hydric soil,
proof that anaerobiosis exists must also be obtained. Criterion 2 serves only to retrieve hydric soils from
the database. Also, the wording for Criteria 1 and 2 were changed in 1999 to incorporate recent changes
in Soil Taxonomy (Soil Survey Staff, 1999).
Purpose and Approach Continued
Field indicators of hydric soil conditions in this document, (Land Resource Region (LRR) A that
includes Western Washington), are presented here in an abbreviated form and include:
(1) ALL SOILS:
A1. Histosols - (organic soils having 16 inches or more of the upper 32 inches as organic
peat or muck soil material); A2. Histic Epipedons - (normally a peat or muck surface horizon or
layer 8 inches or more thick); and A4. Hydrogen sulfide - (sulfidic odor in soil material within 12
inches of the soil surface).
(2) SANDY SOILS:
S1 - a mucky modified mineral layer; S4 - a gleyed matrix; S5 - sandy redox concentrations;
and S6 - a matrix stripped of iron/manganese oxides and/or organic matter.
(3) LOAMY AND CLAYEY SOILS:
F1 - a mucky modified mineral layer; F2 - a gleyed matrix; F3; - a depleted matrix without a
dark surface and F4 and F5 - a depleted matrix with dark or thick dark surfaces; F6 - a dark
surface and a redox 4 inch thick layer :512 inches deep with a matrix value:53 with a chroma:51 or
2 or less with 2:2% and 2:5% distinct or prominent redox concentrations respectively; F7 - a dark
surface layer with redox depletions 4 inch thick with value 2:5 and chroma :52 and:5 12 from the
surface of the soil that has a matrix value :53 and chroma :51 or :52 and 2:10% and 2:20% redox
depletions respectively; and F8 - redox concentration within 6 inches of a soil surface in
depressions subject to ponding.
Wetland Hvdrolo2V
Water is the driving force for wetlands. Indications of wetland hydrology are those where the
presence of water has an overriding influence on characteristics of vegetation and soils due to anaerobic
and reducing conditions, respectively.
Areas that are seasonally saturated and/or inundated to the surface for a consecutive number of
days for more than 12.5% of the growing season are wetlands provided the soil and vegetation parameters
are met. Areas wet between 5% and 12% of the growing season in most years mayor may not be
wetlands. Areas saturated to the surface for less than 5% of the growing season are non-wetlands.
Wetland hydrology exists if field indicators are present.
Field indicators of wetland hydrology may include, but are not limited to visual observations of
inundation, ponding, soil saturation, oxidized root channels (rhizospheres) associated with living roots
and rhizomes, watermarks, drift lines, water-borne sediment deposition, or wetland drainage patterns.
The growing season starting and ending dates are required to evaluate hydrologic data. For
'.
Purpose and Approach Continued
wetland determinations, the growing season is determined using the local SCS county soils surveys.
Generally, the growing season is calculated based on the "28 degrees F or lower" temperature threshold at
a frequency of "5 years in 10". For much of western Washington at low elevations, the mesic growing
season (March 1 to October 31) has been considered a good rule. However, in some areas of the Puget
Sound Lowlands and coastal areas the growing season occurs all year round because the soil temperature
at 19.7 inches below the soil surface is higher than 4 I degrees F.
Plant Identification and Classification
Primary references used for scientific plant names and the endemic and non-native or exotic
status of plants to the North Olympic Peninsula were determined as found in Flora of the Pacific
Northwest by Hitchcock and Cronquist, Univ. of Washington Press, 1972. Other references referred to
included: (1) A Field Guide to the Common Wetland Plants of West em Washington & Northwestern
Oregon by Sarah Spear Cooke, editor, Washington Native Plant Society, May 1997; Wetland plants of
Oregon & Washington by Jennifer Guard, Lone Pine Publishing, 1995; (2) Plants of the Pacific
Northwest Coast- Washington. Oregon. British Columbia & Alaska edited by Pojar and Mackinnon, D.C.
Forest Service, Research Program, Lone Pine Publishing, 1994 and, D.C. Forest Service, Research
Program, Lone Pine Publishing, 1994; and (3) Northwest Weeds by Ronald 1. Taylor, Mountain Press
Publishing Company, 1990
APPENDIX B
WETLAND FIELD DATA SHEETS
WETLAND CLASSIFICA nON SHEETS
.~-
DATA FORM 1
(W A State WetlaDd DeliDeatioD Manual or
1987 Co WetlaDd DeliDeatioD Manua
ProjeetlSite: Y[ C/It- VO Z J Z- 00.5
ApplieaatlOWlle "/f) /!--lei 1; 11~
Iavistigator(s):W. David Loggy, Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting
Do DO..... cin:amstaDces uist OD tile site! Yes
Date: ~ Zr, ~ :5
Co_tyl 32.f~e('1S~
City: /4 /f
State: W A
CommoDity ID:
Is the site sigaificutly distubed (Atypical Sitaatioll)
Is the area a poteatial problem area
Tnuased ID:
pi
VEGE ATlON
Boa_lit Plallt S .
J7mtH~t tIt.fwJ
(/bctl" J
,kavJ tt6
tk'faih tifSlk
(?14r)
HYDROPBYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS:
% F DolDiaaats OD FACW aad FAC: I
Check aU indieaton tluat apply * eIplaia
Regie'" kDowledce of pint CODImaaities
Physiologieal or reprodKtive adaptatioDS
Teehaieal Uterature
Stnt1I.
%
Cover
btdicator
--
rTI-L
Stnt1I.
%
Cover lIIdicator
lie "J
50
/.)-er P
It:? I1-a/
l /.0rP
J f-u-,p
~o
/~
AI:)
/'-?k.u.
Hydroplaytie vegetatioa preseDt!
~
Wetlaad pint list (Nat'l or regioBaI)
Morphologieal adaptatioDS
Wedaad plaat data base
Ratioaale for decisioDSIRemarks:
Other:
Based 08:.
laches
laehes
Yes
Wetland Hydrology IDdieaton
Primary Indicators:
8- lauadated
Sawnted i.Uppw 11 mo.
o Water Marks
o Drift Liaes
o SedimeDt Depo8iU
o Draiuaae Patteras i. Wetluds
Secondary Indicators (2 or more reouired)
D 0Ddized Rot CIlauds ill Uppa-l1 illClIes
o Water SCafDed Leava
D LoeaI Soil SlU'vey Dala
D FAC-NEUI'RAL Tat
o Other I ill i. Remarks
Field ObservatioDS:
REMARKS:
~ #/
sons
Map Unit Name: I. dH-st e;>i!J/{.. J/JIlI1'..hV~.() j/ f/I--,qr
(Series and Phase): DraiDageClass: fbcui!f..-Y t7AMIta;...O
Tuonomy (Subgroup): /rJ(?N~ ~
Field observation conrU'ID mapped uit Yes 0 No IAI
Corrected Map UDit Name or Tuoaomy (SDbgroup):Lo'a. l (n b
-Sk-.e. e~ ISo C
Profile DescriDtioU:
DeptIa Matrix Color Mottle or Redos: Colon Mottle or Redos: TextDre, Concretioas,
(In~laes) HorizoD (Munsell Moist (MDDSeII Moist) AbuDduceISizeI Stnactare, etc.
CODtrast
r'~ )
(7-3 17-1 /0 y,< i. 2,.;
.B-tg SlVl IbyiL3 "2
B- 2- 13 k-? z, Jo'(te Lf/'J
JZ-l ) () If IJ. s: 2.- - 7tENK. Lilb
///"/1( %
(1~ )
~ Soil Indicaton:
HiUosoI
o Histie Epipedoa
o Sulfidk Odor
o Aquie Moisture Regime
o RedDcing Conditions
o Gleyed or Low.cbroma Colon
o Concretions
o HigIa Organk CoateDt iD Sarface Layer of Sand Soils
o Organk Streaking m Sody Soils
o LiUed OD Local Hydric Soils List
o LiUed on National Hydric Soils List
o Other (Es:plain in Remarks)
Hvdric Soils
REMARKS:
Yes 0 No rtf
j2.e~o 'l I pZt--"q; ~t.0 reef
T~l.5
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydropbytk Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
REMARKS:
Yes No
Yes 0 No JZf
Yes 0 NOjO
Is tile sample pomt within a wetland
Yes
'.
DATA FORM 1
(W A State Wetland Detineation Manual or
1987 Co Wetland DeliDeation Manual
ProjeetJSite: I'J v-?t 002 3 '-t 2 (') 0 5
Applicaat/oWlle . (h ~ ,'I /j# cA
Invistigator(s):W. David Loggy. Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting
Do normal ciftamstaJaces exist oa the site? Yes No
Date: ,; u. b 5
Coutyl ~ f.+er~
City: ~f J1-
State: W A
Commuaity ID:
Truseet ID:
Is the site sipificaatly disturbed (Atypical Sitaatioa)
Is the area a potential problem area
Plot ID: Ii ~ .IL 2-
VEGETATION
%
Cover IDdicator
po ,P'~
L/o -/J-G
;2D ;t'~
Do.i..at Plaat
Stnt1l.
%
Cover Iaclicator
HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATO :
%OFDommantsOB FACWand FAC: I 2 =>
Cheek aD iadicaton tllat apply * explain
Regioul knowledge of pJut commuities
Physiologieal or reproduetive adaptatioBl
TechDieal Literature
ga70
Wetland plant list (Nat'1 or regional)
Morphologieal adap1atioBl
Wetland plant data base
Other:
Hydropllytic vegebltioa present? Yes
Ratioule for decisioulRelDarks:
HYDROLOGY
Is it the . season? Yes N
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, lake, or tidal gauge
o Aerial photographs
o Other
Field Observations:
Bued 0.:. r. Ie &' L9U~ /, ,
Wetland Hydrology Inclicaton
Prima" Indicators:
HI..aelated
Saturated ill Upper 11 inehes
o Water Marks
o Drift LilIes
o Sediaeat Deposits
o Draiaage Patteras ia WetIaIlds
~
SO
Map UDit Nallle: L ~
(Series ad PItase):
TuoDomy (Subaroup):
raeld observatio. CODfinD .apped uait Yes 0 No Wf
Corrected Map Uait Nallle or TU080.Y (Subgroup): j{(X!.
HZ,
I )J?f.I r
DraiDageClass: ~~i'J17 C!rtt(l1~
...ske{ eW
c.. rn e.5. t C.
Profile DeseriDtioU: Ss>;l "Si k ?ii 'f
Depth Matrix Color Mottle or Redox Colon Mottle or Redox Textve, CODCretioU,
(IDcbes) Horizoll (Muuell Moist (MuseU Moist) AbuadaaceJSizeI Structure, de.
CODtnst
t!J-3 ;1.1 Jt)~~
~~/L/. &J It? Lf I?. S 2-
C-' /p tflL 4/, )o'j'R- 4/6 /llflr/1'
1'-1- 2. '5
!Ix!!ds. SoiIlDdlcaton:
U HistosoI
o Histie EpipedoD
o Sulfidic Odor
o Aquic Moisture Regime
D RedDciDg Conditiou
D Gleyed or Low-CbroJDa Colon
Yes 0 "No ~
D Concretions
D Hip OrpDic Conteat ia Surface Layer of SaDd Soils
D Organic StreakiDg iD Sandy Soils
D Listed 08 Local Hydric Soils List
D Listed OD National Hydric Soils List
D Other (Explain in Re.arks)
Hvdric Soils
REMARKS:
/f/p f c:/J'I-;€~ <;'n~l-Lj h '5t.1. Y! ~t:...e ~ J~ r 5 ;'net (~t<.J't:>f""?
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydropbytic Vegetatio. Present?
Wetla.d Hydrology PreseDt?
Hydric Soils Preseat?
REMARKS:
Yes
Yes 0
Yes 0
Is the sample poiJIt within a wetland
Yes
DATA FORM 1
(W A State Wetland DeHneatioD MaDDaI or
1987 Co Wetland DeliDeatioD MUDa)
ProjectlSite: rt t(}O 1- ~4:J- ~o5
Applieaatlowner: Mff1e f/ f;J1~/z.
Invistigator(s):W. David Loggy. Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting
Do normal circumstances esist on th.e site? Yes No
Date: ~? ~5
Coantyl Je {(.er~
City: )/l4
State: W A
Community ID:
Is the site sipificutly distarbed (Atypical Situatioa)
Is the area a potential problem area
#1-
VEGETATION
Straw.
%
Cover laclieator Domiaut PInt
I/o P/k-
:26 rAe to
Jf; ~
;;;0, //0..1
Stratu.
%
Cover I.dicator
Bydropllytic vegetation present? Yes
3 :::: 6::> 4' t:>
Wetland put list (Nat'l or regional)
Morpllologieal adaptations
Wedaad plant data base
Ratio.aIe for decisiollSlRemarks:
OtIter:
HYDROLOGY
Is it the . season? Yes N
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, lake, or tidal gauge
o Aerial photographs
o OtJaer
Field Observatioas:
2. I_lies
Inehes
Yes
HI...dated
Saturated ill Upper 12 inches
o Water Marks
o Drift LilIes
o Wi... Deposits
o Draiuge PatterllS i. WetlaDds
Secoadan Indicaton a or more reauired)
o Osidi:tecl Rot no...... ill Upper 12 iaclles
D Water StaiMd Leay,.
D Local Soil Sarvty Data
D FAC-NEUTRAL Tat
o Other ]( ill ill ae...rks
I'~ If;r'~)~ tk S~'n>J /J...rz
~<; \-{HL~ -C,.t7Ov\.t So;'t ctl4v'(:~:~J€(\("5 L,C5 '-
REMARKS: T1.a-
~ '-\.. VIA-VI/\.. '-e.-.('-
"
son.s
Map Unit Name:
(Series and Phase):
Taxonomy (Subgroup): 'c:7t
Field observation coafinn mapped uait Yes 0 No ~
Corncted Map UDit NaJDe or TaoHmy (Sabgroup): S ;tN. C1cf...$ k e { ("'~~.r
I
r
Drainage Class: ft;e>I2L 'I Ekll-t ilW
- /') ^ I.
(',A.. 'C'Y) (c.. I! f I c:. :: S1 t.J.6 ,f Le.. -e r.s
Profile DeseriDtions: :5$>: l p"( ~.J:!:: 2...
Depth Matrix Color Mottle or Redox Colors Mottle or Redox Tenure, Coneretioas,
(lnehes) HorizoD (Munsen Moist (ManseU Moist) AbuDducelSizeJ Structure, ete.
Contrast
/1:1 Yo< !/) s; IJ ) f1il sfrtt. fie I
b-S Il-I )
..3/J F J<-I root.> I C-.t..0
3,- Co 13-<v I ,:/-,S 11< 3/z 9. s {' 6~ 2. fl1 s.b Ie.. 5 frt(.(cj.~-U'~j
5yf ~ {loots. C-Lb
fc-f J3lV7- ~~ I j :2 t $1>1<:. .s r.e.uc.:rt....re- J
;2 tI ~ f r-t?o bs Cu..>
7-.5'113 1/./6 ~1$;' ~YY1s17J:. .s-fr1l6 I'l<(? I
q"ZD IbW5 J
~vjl:2.1 (pcpc-s I t:l..W
i-~e 16 515' JC sf/Ie s r-uo j
2"o-2c::' ~fi r't::>[) t'S I 0 tv
:zcf-S'b 'h5Lfi~ !.fIb 5j 5) / /If (\DO-CS
~ Soil Indicators:
U HistosoI
o Histic Epipedoa
o Sulfidic Odor
j Aquie Moisture Regime
Redaeing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Cbroma Colors
Hvdric Soils yes)tf No 0
REMARKS:
o ConeretioDs
o High Orgaaic Conteat ia Sarface Layer of Sand Soils
o Organic StreakiDg in Sandy Soils
o Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
o Listed on National Hydric Soils List
o Other (Explain in RellUlrks)
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydropbytic: Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
REMARKS:
Yes No
Yes ~ No 0
Yes J8t No 0
Is the sample point within a wetland
Yes
DATA FORM 1
(W A State Wetland Delineation Manual or
1987 Co Wetland Delineation Manual
ProjedlSite: rJ dt" I!? 0'2 L/' 0 D 5
Applicaat/owae. 111 ~ 1 L 111 (
Date: ~ -v"" 0 5
Cootyl ~e f.-f.~(' S~
City: ,Ai 11-
State: W A
IDvisOgator(s):W. David Loggy, Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting
Do DOrmaI circumstances exist oa tile site? Yes
CommuBity 10:
Tnuaseet 10:
Plot 10: W
#-"2--
Is tile site sipificaatly distarbed (Atypical Sitaatioa)
Is tIae area a poteDtiaI problem area
VEGETATION
%
Cover ladieator
Lfo f~
~o ,c A-()..(
~ fr+&
Do.iuat PIa.t
Stratu.
%
Cover IIldieator
HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS:
%OF Domiaaafs OB FACW aad FAC: ~
Check aU iadicaton that apply * expIaia beIo .
Regio.... ImowIedge of pint commuaities
Physiological or reproclllCtive adaptatioas
TechDieaI Literature
Hydroplaytic vegetatioa preseat?
&,&, r9!o
Wetlaad plaDt list (Nat'. or regioaal)
Morphologieal adaptatioas
Wetlaad plaDt data base
Rationale for decisiollSlRe..rks:
Other:
Field Observatioas:
D.lalllldated
o Satunted iD upper 11 inches
o Water Marks
o Drift LiDes
o Sedi-.ellt Deposits
o DraiIIage Pattens i. Wetluds
Secondary Indicaton (1 or more reouired)
Ei 0DdiRd Rot aw.... ia upper U illclla
a Water Staiaed Lava
a Local Soil Sarvey Data
a FAC-NEUl'RAL Tat
o Other '. iD Remarks
REMARKS: 11M 4rea )Jqt; /It?, auy F?t2//;J /'O~ 1~
SUM 'i'A~{I - W~'t-L[wl) d'(1e> b.. 2s t-t ~~ ~ Sa:> 'I l
Iaclaes
IDelaes
Yes
s;J~'/uj
Cl(C(t1C1Ci ~erl (S ~(05
,I ~...
SOILS
Map UDit Name:
(Series and Phase):
TUODOIDY (Subaroup):
Field observatioD CODfInD mapped uait Yes D No 9if
CorrectedMapUDitN...eorTuoDomy(Sabgroup): r:,"'.//. rJ /...1 ' (\
~,~fJ'f-..sf'-e.~ l'~
~
Drainage CJus: ilo tJ. 4 d~j" ~
~e5lC r rC &.004
ProOle DeseriDtioas: ~; ( pi b- :it 3
Depth Matris Color Mottle or Redox Colon Mottle or Redox Tatare, CODCretioU,
(laches) HorimD (MuaseU Moist (MuueU Moist) AbaDdanceJSizrJ Struct1Ire, de:.
CODtnIst
tp-q
q...')..()
Jpt(1d ~
jl/r<< f2-
tiS C(I( rip
")
~ SoillDdicaton:
HistosoI
D Histic Epipedoa
D Sulfidic Odor
D Aquic Moisture RegilDe
g ReduciDg CoDditioas
)Q Gleyed or Low-Chl'OlDa Colon
D CoBCretioas
D High OrgaDic ConteDt ill Surface Layer of Sand Soils
D Organic StreakiDg iD Sandy Soils
D Listed OD Local Hydric Soils List
D Listed OD NatioDal Hydric Soils List
D Other (EllplaiD in Remarks)
Hydric Soils
REMARKS:
Yes fKI No D
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic VegetatioD Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
REMARKS:
Yes No
Yes Pi No D
Yes~ No 0
Is tile sample poiDt witIIiD a wetland
Yes
DATA FORM 1
(W A State Wetland Delineation Manual or
1987 Co Wetland Delineation Manual
ProjectlSite: 4q ;1 dt f:J 013 L/ :). (;/ 0 5
Applicaat/owner:;r7 fl Q.. c..fj,l A-; ;1&
z{.. 0 6
Ief-gei1.:5U--r-1
City: J/ If
State: W A
CommuDity ID:
IDvistigator(s):W. David Loggy, Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting
Do nonul cin:umstaDces eDst on the site! Yes
Is the site sipificaatly disturbed (Atypical Situatioa)
Is the area a potential problem area
Transect ID:
PIotID: VJ~ 4- 3
VEGETATION
%
Cover IIldieator
~ ~4L-
:;).0 ~flG
~ Ffic..
/0 /J9c.
HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATO :
%OF Doaaiaants OB FACW and FAC: 3 8 =
Cheek all iladicators that apply * opIaia beIo .
Regional kIlowledge ofplaat communities
Physiological or reproductive adaptations
TechDa Literature
Hydrophytic VegetatioD present!
Field Observations:
Based on:.
Do.iaut PIa.t
%
Cover Indicator
Strag.
Wetland plaat list (Nat'l or regional)
Morpbolopeal adaptations
WetlaDd plaDt data base
Other:
Rationale for decisioasIRemarks:
Wetland Hydrology Indiaton
Primary Indiaton:
a- ....dated
Saturated m Upper 11 iDCbes
o Water Marks
o Drift LilIes
o Sediment Deposits
o Dramage Patterns iD Wetlaads
Secondary Indieaton (1 or more reauired)
o 0DcIDed Rot CIauads ill upper 12 iaclles
o Water Staiaed Leava
o Local Soil Sarvey DlIm
o FAC-NEUI'RAL Test
o Other I laiD ill Remarks
~ /7~ Y?~iJte; ~.r.c ~/af
;V11~~IP) (;~ Ju )v1tt: ~/ / (~)(A I/'4 krr'5 ~(CS/
REMARKS: //ff //-ttt;../I
~(ItVMIQ-r ~l0~~W
;".~.."
t
SOILS
Map Unit Name: /; at' /7 ~ J/ ft-IU r1--"u r 1 J. I
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class: ftp&~ a'~ /I ~
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
Field observation confirm mapped unit Yes 0 No 0{ fli( XaP_
Corrected Map Uait Name or Toonomy (Subgroup): 5I}.-NOr(.....0k:~e~ vM. ('s rc 7Cr. /6 [,1 ctl)o6....
113
Profile DescriDtions: L) t' t t f I' f- M 5
Depth Matrix Color Mottle or Redox Colors Mottle or Redox Texture, Coneretioas,
(Inches) Horima (ManseR Moist (Munsel Moist) AbaaducelSizeI Structure, etc.
Contrast
@ - t./- /HI /o'l~ 11
4<-g A-(~ },,611( '2. ~ I
i8WI( /tJ ~K 3/'1/ -5"tj 12. tJ./'f (f () M ft1 {Yf..(. " --e.
$- /1 .eotK(yt.J-- feJcpJ{
/3 -J S tv.t. /t?YR 3;1 srR '-111- -/'ew II:J:. ,(J~
~~In ~
/3 JU. ('7&mllltyr; Af'
I -3/ 4rJr JY1 e.J. PtOo X
(l~ ';
~ Soil Iadicators:
HistosoI
o Histk Epipedon
o Sulfidic Odor
o Aquic Moisture Regime
0, RedaciDg Conditions
~ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
o CollCl'etions
o HigII Orpaic Coateat ill Sarface Layer of S.ad 80m
o Organic Streaking in Sandy Som
o Listed on Local Hydric Som List
o Listed on National Hydric Som List
o Other (Explain in Remarks)
Hydric Soils
Yes f)4 No 0
REMARKS:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetatioa Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
REMARKS:
Yes No
Yes )(. No 0
yes)gf No 0
Is the sample point within a wetland
Yes
Wetlallds RatiJIg Field Data FOnD
Background ItIfonnation: U~r ,SF'-I I ,,1 J
Name ofRater:~ [lAltD 1.&C6~;' Affiliation: lU(>UtJl.t~ ~~;1 j(C} Dale: 91~b/v6
I I
Name ofwedand (if mown):
Government Jwisdiction of wetland: S~~~r~ C 04..l.,\iL~
Location: 1/4 Section: tlU;~fl/4~ Section:#. Towmhip:!P)/Rmtgr:: ~td
Sources of InfomudIon: (Check all soun:es that 8P1J1y)
Site visit:. ~SGS Topo Map:_ NWI map: / Aerial Photo: ;/' Soils survey: /'
Other: Describe:
When The Field DIIta fonD is comp_ enter CaIA:goty here: ~
Q. t. High Quality Natural Weiland
Answer this question if you ha'ie adequate information or experience to do so. If
not find someone with the expertise to answer the questions. Then. if the answer
to questions 1 a. 1 b and I c are an NO, contact the NatwaJ Heritage program of
DNR.
I.. Hu.... ca..... disttlrbaaas.
Is there significant cvickftce of bumaD-caused changes to topogJ8phy or
bydrology of the wetland as indicated by any of the following ronditions?
Consider only changes that may have taken place in the last 5 decades. The
iInpects of changes done earlier have probably been stabilized and the wetland
ecosystem will be close to rcac:hing some new equilibrium that may represent 8
high qWJlity wetland.
18.1 Upstream watershed> 12% impervious.
la2. Wetland is ditched and water flow is not obstructed.
183. Wetland bas been graded. filled. logged.
la4. Water in wetland is controlled by dikes. weirs, c:tc.
laS. Wetland is grazed.
1a6. Other indicators ofdisturbenoe (list below)
CiR:Ie Answers
Yes: go to Q.2
Yes: gotoQ.2
Yes: go to Q.2
Yes; go to Q.2
Yes: go to Q.2
~: go to Q.2
~goto lb.
2S
!
1 b Are theJe populations of Don-native plants which are currently present, ClOver
more than 10% of the wetland. and appear to be invading native popubItions?
Briefly describe any non-nativc plant populations and
lnfonnation sourcc(s):
I c. Is tbcrc evidaK:c ofhuman-causcd distuIbences which have visibly
degraded water quality. Evidence of the degradation ofwater quality include:
dim:t (untreated) nmoff from roads or perking loIs; presence. or historic
evidence, of waste dumps; oily sheens; the smell of organic chemicals; or
livestoc:k use. Briefly describe:
Q.2. ~ EcoIogiaII Functions:
Does the wetland:
have at least 1/4 acre of organic soils deeper than 16 inches .
and the wetland is relatively undisturbed; OR
[If the answer is NO because the wetland is disturbed briefly
describe:
Indicators of distw'bencc may include:
- Wetland has been graded, filled, logged;
- Organic soils on the surface are dricd-out for more than half
of tile year; /
- Wetland m:eives direct stonnwater nmofffiorn urban or V
agricultural areas.];
OR
have a forested class greater than I acre;
OR
have characteristics of an estuarine system;
OR
have eel....~.
Z.. Bogs.nd Feas
Are any oCtile three following conditions met for the area of orgamic soil?
or rJOn.floatina ltcID beds?
2a.I. Are Sphagnum. mosses a common ground cover (>30%) and the cover of
invasive species (see Table 3) is less than 10%1
Is the area of sphagnum mosses and deep organic soils> 1/2 acre?
Is the area ofspbagnum mosses and deep organic soils ~-112 acre?r
2a.2. Is there an area of organic soil which bas an emergent class with at least
one species from Table 2, and cover of invasive species is < 10% (see Table 3)7
Is the area ofberbac:eous planls and deep organic soils> 112 aae?
Is the area ofbertl8ccous plants and deep organic soils 1I4-1f2aere?
26
~
Yf*',Jgo to Q.2
tole.
YES: go to Q.2
NO: Possible Cat. I
Con1act DNR
6._ all: go to Q.3)
~o to 28
YEs: Go to 2b
Yes: Go to 2c
Ycs: Go to 2d
YES: CaIegoIy I
YES: Category II
NO: Go to 28.3
YES: Category I
YES: Category II
NO: Go to 28.3
!.
28.3. Is the vegetation a mixture of only hCJb8ccous plants and Sphagnum
mosses with DO scrubIshrub or forested claslJcs?
Is the area ofherbaooous plants, Sphagnum, BOd deep organic
soils > 1/2 acre? YES: Category I
Is the area ofhcrb8ccous plants. Sphagnum. and deep organic
solis V..Ifl acre? YES: Category 11
NO: Go to Q.3.
Q.lb. Mature forested wedaad.,
2b.l. Does 50% of the cover of upper best canopy consist of e-.et81~ YES: Category J
trees older than 80 ,.an or deciduous trees older than 50 ,.an? NO: Go to 2b2
Note: The size of trees is often not a measure of age. and silie ClIIlDot
be used as a surrogate for age (see guidance).
21>.2. Does 50% of the cover of forest canopy consist of evergreen trees older YES: Go to 2b.3
than 50 years. AND is the structural diversity of the forest high as NO; Go to Q.3
characteriztccl by an additional layer oftft:es 20'-49'taI1. shrubs 6'- 20'.
tall, and a herbaceous groundcover?
21>3. Does < 25% of tile iueaI cover in the hetbeceousIgroundc:overOl' YES: Category I
the shrub laver consist of invasivclexotic plant S))eCies from the list on o. 19? NO: Go to Q.]
Q.1c. Eatuarille wdIa.....
2c.l. Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, YES: Category I
National Estuary Reserve.. Natural Area Preserve, State Park. 01' NO: Go to 2c2
EdUQtioDal, Environmental 01' Scientific Rescr\IQ ~ Wlder
WAC 332-30-15 I?
2(;.2. Is the wetland > 5 acres; ........................................ ......... ..... ... YES: Category I
NOW: If an area contains patches of salt tolc:rant vegetation that are
]) less than 600 feet apart and that are separated by mudflats that go
dry on a Mean Low Tide. 01"
2) separated by tidal channels that are less than 100 feet wide;
all the vegetated areas are to be considered together in calculating the
wetland area..
or is the wetland 1-5 acres; ......................................................... YES: Go to 2c.3
or is the wetland <1 acn:? .. ......... ....... ........ ..... ............. ....... ....... YES: Go to 2c.4
27
t
2c:.3. Does 1hewetland meet at least 3 of1he following 4 criteria: .......
- minimum existing evidence of human n:laaed disturbance such as
diking. ditching, filling. cultivation, grazing or tile pn;sencc of non-
native plant species (see guidance for definition);
- surfaa: water connection with tidal saltwata' or tidal freshwater;
- at least 75% of the wetland has a 100 butTer ofungrazed pasture.
open water. shrub or fon:st:;
- has at least 3 of tile following features: low marsh; high marsh; tidal
channels; lagoon(s);woody debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland.
2c.4. Does the wetland meet all of the four aiteria under 2c3? (above)?
Q.2d. Ed Gnu .... Kelp Beds.
2d.1. Axe eelgrass beds present? ..... ........ ..... ............................ ....
2d.2. Are their floating or non-floating kelp bed{s) present with weater than
50% maao aIgaJ cover in the IDOIlIh of August or September?.. ... .. .... --..
Q.3. Category N wetlands.
3a. Is the wetland: less tban I am:_
hydrologically isolaled g
comprised of one vegetated class that is dominated (> 80% areal cover)
by one species fiom Table 3 (pege 19) or Table 4 (page ~)
3b. Is the wetland: less than two acres
and. hydrologically isolated.
with one vegetated class. and > 90% of areal cover in any combination of
species from Table 3 (page 19)
3c. Is the wetland excawted from upland IDd a pond smaller than 1 acre
without a surface water connection to streams, lakes., rivers. or other
wetland. and has < 0.1 aae of v
28
YES: CategoJy I
NO Category II
YES: Category II
NO: m
YES: Category I
NO: go to 2d.2
YES: Category I
NO: Category U
: c.tegoJy IV
go to 3c
Q.... Slgnific:llnt Mb.... V81ue.
Answer all questions and enter data requested.
4a. Total wetland area
Estimate area. select from choices in the near-right colunm, and score in the
far coIunm:
Enter acreage of wetland bere:Laaes, and source: ~!?H ~kJJ .
f('~vI-f. A ~lJ Sjte vtf,/f ~i7"lJ,fIoLHte~f:~j.,.ffl,
~~l11dre {to. ea f~ ~ () fLe(\ P4('per-!/~.?,
4b. WdIud ~: Circle the wetland el.ses below thal qualify:
Open Water: if the area of open water is> 1/4 acre
Aquatic Beds: if the area of aquatic beds > 1/4 acre:
Emergent: if the area of emergent class is > 1/4 acre,.V
Scrub-Shrub: iftbe area of ~sbrub class is > 114 aae,
Forested: if area offores1ed class is> 1/4 acre.
Add the number of wetland classes, above, that qualify, and then
Score aec:ording 10 the columns at right.
e.g.. [fthere are 4 classes (aquatic beds. open water, emergent &
Scrnb-shrubl, you would circle 8 points in the far riaJat column.
ok. Pint species divenit)'.
For each wetland class (at right) that qualifies in
4b above., COWlt the number of different plant species
you can find that cover more than 5% of the ground.
You do not have to name them.
Qm
Aquatic
S<:ore in column at far right:
e.g. )f a wetland has an aquatic bed class with 3 species. an Emergent
emergent class with 4 species and a scrub-shrub
class with 2 species you would circle 2, 2. and I in the
far cohmm.
NtJtt: Any plant species with a cover of > 5%
qualifies for points within a class, even those Scrub-Scrub
that are not of that class.
Forested
Cirdt _1IIIlt""""
~
>200
40-200
1040
5-103
1-5
0.1-1
<0.10
points
6
5
~
.
#OfC~........~
.................
3............ 6
4 __......... 8
5 ............ 10
# species in class Points
I 0
2 1
3 2
>3 3
J 0
2-3 I
4-S cD
>5
I 0
2 I
3-4 2
>4 3
1 0
2 I
34 2
.>4 3
29
4d. Structu,..' divenity.
I(the wetland has a forestedelass. add) point ifeadl of tile following
Classes is present within the forested class and is larger than 1/4 aae:
-trees> SO' tall..... ... --.." ......... .....
-tn:es 20'- 49' tall........................
-shrubs........... n.............. ............
-herbaceous ground cover..., , ... ... " ...
Also add I point iflhcn: is any "open water'" or..aquatic: bed" class
lnunecliately next to the forated 8ft:ll (i.e. them is no scrubIsbrub or
ctation between them .
4e. Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between
wetland classes is high. moderate, low or none'llf you think the
amount ofinterspersion faUs in between the diagnuns score accordingly
(i.e. a modenltely high amount of interspersion would score a 4.
wbile a modendeIy low amount would score a 2)
Ill'llO:
I..'w
(""
tIl,'~k','ll."
1l1"11,', ;\Il"
hi!="
4f Habitat leatllres.
Answer questions below. circle features that apply. and score to right:
Is there evidence that the open or standing water WIllI caused by beavers
Is a heron rookery located within 300'?
Are raptor nest/s IocaIed within 300'1
Are theR at least 3 standing dead trees (snags) per aae greatertban
10" in diameter at "breast height" (DBH)?
~ there at least 3 downed lop per 8CR with a di8metcr
> '" for at least 1 0' in length?
Are there areas (vegetated or unvcgetated) within the wetland that are
ponded for . least .. mooths out oftbe year. and the wetland has not
qualified as having an open WIlla' class in Question 4b, ?
30
YES-I
YES - I
YES-I
YES-I
YES I
High - 5
)/0
3
~
YES=2
YES-I
YES = I
YES = I
YES = 1
#/j)
YES = 2
..
41. COD.ectiO. to streaJu, (Sc:ore ODe mIIWfl' 0.".)
4g.l. Does the waland provide bBbitBt for fish at any time of 1be year AND YES = 6
does it have a perennial surface water conncctiao to a fish-bc:aring stn:am.
4g.2 Does the wetland provide fish habitat seasonaUy AND does it have YES = 4
a seasonal surfillce water oonnection to a flSh-bcariDgstream..
4g.3 Does the waland function to export organic nudter through a surface YES = 4
water oonncction at all Omcs ofthc yar to a pe.a..lial sIream..
4g.4 Does the wetland function to export mganic matter through a slll'flM:c YES ~~
water oonnection to a saream on a seasonal b8sis? C)
411. Baffers.
Score the existing buffers on a sc:aIc of J -~ based on the following four desaiptions.
If the condition of the buffers do not exactly IIIldICh the description. saxe either a
point higher or lower depending on whether the buffers are less or tnOl'e degraded.
Forest, scrub. native grassland or open water buffers are present for
more than 100'ar0u0cI95% oCtile: cin:umferencc. Score = 5
Forest. scrub, native grassland, or open Wlda' buffas wider than 100'
for IIlOfe than 1/2 of the wetland circumference, or a f~ scrub.
grasslands, or open water buffers for more than 50' around 95 % of the -e
circumference.
Forest, scrub, native grassland, or open water buffers wider than 100'
for more than 1/4 of the wetland cin:umference, or a forest. scrub, IWive
grassland, or open watu buffers wider ..... 50' for more than 1/2 of the
wetland cin::umference. Score = 2
No roads. buiktilJ&.'i or paved an:as within 100' of the wetland for ~ than
95% oCtile wetland circumference.. Score = 2
No roads. buildings or pawd areas withift 2S' of the wettand for more
than 95% of tile circumfen:nce. or
No roads buildings or paved areas within 50' of the wetland for moo: than
1/2 of the wdland circumference. Score = 1
Paved areas. iodusb'iaJ areas or residential construction (with less than 50'
between houses) are Jess than 2S feet from the wetIaJId for more than 9S "
of the circumfen:nce of the wetland. Score = 0
31
4i. ConlHdioll to other habiat aras:
Select the description. wbich best matches the site being evaluated.
-Is the wetland oonnocted to, or part of, a riparian conidor at least J 00' wide
connecting two or more wetlands; or. is there an upland connection present> 1 00'
wide with good forest or shrub cover (>25% cover) coonecting it with a
Signifiamt Habitat Area?
YES = 5
-Is the wetland connected to any other Habitat Area with either 1) a forestcdIsbrub
corridor < 100' wide. or 2) a corridor that is > 100' wide, but has a low vegetati~
cover less than 6 feet in height?
YesO
-Is the wetland connected to. or a part of, a riparian corridor between 50 - 100' wide
with scrub/shrub or forest cover CODDCCtion to other wetlands?
Yes = 3
- Is the wetland connected to any other Habitat ArQ with narrow corridor (<I ()(Y)
ofIow vegetation (< 6' in height)?
Yes = I
. Is the wetland and its buffer (ifthe buffer is less than 50' wide) completely isolated
by development (UIban, residential with a density gmsrer than 21aue. or industrial)?
Yes = 0
Now add the scores clf'cled (for Q.5a - Q.5i above) to get a total.
Is tile T.llreater tItn or eq'" tell poiBiI!
/J..a-'/AJrS
~-c-=~
NO = Category I I
32
~
~
APPENDIX C
MAPS, AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND ENVIRONMENT ALL Y
SENSITIVE WETLAND AREA DRAWINGS
~
~~lgl~1
Ua.w
~W~0
ZV1~~
~
~
~
.!.
..
..
a..
<(
:E
z
o
-
~
o
o
..J
W
t-
-
C/)
IE~~
~ \Il~
l"iiitll:tl
~;! i;~~!~~ ~
I')
"l
o
o
(R-_-a( ./1 IN)
>>
.
- ~.
I
I ~
. s
.;!
1;_ !
i ll~~
a
~ ,
d4 Ie.
'" ~!
~ 1,,:1.
.. ~..
Ii!
8 III
I~. i
!~ ,/
~... /. ! 1i!
. : e~
<p/ . li!(
f ..
A" . ro~ i.t ~I~
!C 1-:. i~31.
Jrg I~~: .1 .
lag! ;!-~ .,
010
.-
.,.. 36,..-:
I
I
I
1> ~
<J ~
I
<noa
"
~
-{
i
.-
...
...
"
..
...
ft
l;
~2
Is.
i;!
-5
8..1,
~~::
8"",
...
>-N
a;
e
CIS
~
-
o
<U
'is
::J
(/)
~
\i'J
b5
V')
"<(
>..
f-
~
C)
D
~
V)
~
~
~
I
i I 'INM
'Mto(Hi '.NO~a
ilJ:i.... ~;; lW .~;~~iog : 'Z'SlOMM'S
~ a I ; ~ 868t ~ ~ xog 'OCl1 6EOEtE200 84HO ZW3 84UO
Ii j; 4:>U,("1 ,(J~'" UO!:j.JOd e U! UO!lBOOl
d5 ' I" H39wnN
Ii I d NOUV)I:1UN301 N0I.1.dl~OS3Q
~ 0.; 1: ~~ J.N:lI'.:> XVJ. NOUVOOl
If I ~o WNMO 9NIMWO WHY MInH)
A.UJ:ldO~ ONVU3M
-c----_!.~.~~~ 3 .60 .v~ .1': N
~-'\~ -- i
'.~~.\ ~
~.. !
'...........<to' i
,..- -\ "'l,l/~ .. .!
'\\....:.,~-_.-
I
r
,L
I-~
l -----.:., '_.
I
I
l)
I I
i I
i ~ I
i ! I
; ~ I
I i I
I II I
I 1>< I
I I
i I
I
I . I
, ~ j
I 1fI I
! ~ ' I
'L \, I
i ~ .~. ~ I
i~ ""1 !e I
~ : ~ ..~~ ~ :
~ I :i ..~~....... I ~ I'
~! i ~ :i
~ I B I
<Xl I f{ I
~ I! '
,!!! I
I 0 '
I ~ '
I L .'
I ~ Ii
I ~ ~
I ~ [
! I -.-1
i I
I I
I I
I I
i '
I J
i I
I I
I I
I '
,
I / i!
i ,-- !- "I
! ' i~!
L--__~~,__~:'"."_':'_N__L .! i . ~
-.--.--.-_...J
-_..__._--oo~ 3s00H1OOH;S-olO------------------
6~OZ~ZOO
3W\fN 311.:1
So-8o-Z~
31'1/0
Afl601 P!^ea M
AS NMWO
+il:r
;. ~ '-
" ,/~--.i-
i1
t I
Ii
I:
i '"
'"
W l!!
~ 4:
.i
dl
! ~ns aNY11V~31
. 'rJ .LON SI ~NIMWa
lIPlue, l8.Juoz/JOH
eJ'fJ se~u~sIP ""
~
,os..';Ot .0
.09. .... ::nws
r--I
I:!,'
i
I..'
?;o
~
c::
:g S
'-- '" ~
4: S ~
~ u. ~