HomeMy WebLinkAbout74- County Presentation-Pomona Woods 2022 September PresentationPomona Woods Public
Hearing -Introduction
Presenter: Amanda Hunt
Assistant Planner
Jefferson County Department of Community Development (“DCD”)
Exhibit 74 Page 0921
Exhibit 74
DCD Staff Introduction
PROJECT PLANNER: Amanda Hunt, Assistant Planner
ahunt@co.Jefferson.wa.us
360-379-4458
Review of application materials
Public Notice
Additional information requests
Communication with applicable parties
Staff Report
Jefferson County Recommendation of Approval
SEPA Determination recommendation to responsible SEPA official
Exhibit 74 Page 0922
Amanda Hunt -Background
2020 -2022:Assistant Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community
Development
2020 Previous Position: Staff 1 Planner, Anchor QEA
2019 Graduation: Bachelor of Arts in Environmental Studies, Minors:
Geography & Environmental Policy, Western Washington University (WWU),
Bellingham, WA
Previous CUP Projects:
Utility & Shoreline -Shine Plat Water System Extension Project
Industrial Mining -Shold Pit Mine Consolidation Project
Exhibit 74 Page 0923
Proposal
Applicant: Ann Burkhart, Pomona Woods LLC
Proposal: Type III Conditional Use Permit for a Small –Scale Tourism and
Recreational Use Retreat Center
Oak Bay Road in Port Hadlock, Washington
Guest reservations for group activities such as yoga retreats, business
group retreats, and corporate or not-for-profit strategic planning
Pomona Woods Retreat Center
12,000 square feet gross floor area (two stories)
6,000 sq. ft building plus 1,155 sq. ft for stairs/handrails
24 rooms, 35 guest maximum, 7 employees
Exhibit 74 Page 0924
Proposal Cont.
1 Caretaker Residence (710 square feet)
1 Caretaker Parking Area (1 stall)
1 Main Parking lot (30 stalls)
1 On-Site Septic System (3,487.5 gallons a day)
1 Access Road
1 Commercial Sign
60,621 square feet of new impervious surface (includes all road ways, parking
areas, and building footprints)
1 Lawn Area
2 Rain Gardens
“No Trespassing” Signs
50 Foot Landscaping Buffer
Exhibit 74 Page 0925
Exhibit 74 Page 0926
Exhibit 74 Page 0927
Exhibit 74 Page 0928
Exhibit 74 Page 0929
Exhibit 74 Page 0930
Permit Process
May 4, 2021: Pre-Application Conference
Pursuant to 18.20.350(9)(f), JCC Type III Conditional Use Permit under JCC 18.40.530
with a public hearing and decision by the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner
June 23, 2021: Jefferson County DCD received the application
August 12, 2021: Site Visit
September 1, 2021: Application deemed substantially complete
September 15, 2021: Notice of Application
A public comment period was open for 15 calendar days (September 15, 2021 -
September 30, 2021) at 4:30pm
DCD received 29 written public comments and 2 comments from state agencies
March 2, 2022: DCD Staff issued SEPA Determination, DCD Staff Recommendation, and
Notice of Public Hearing
March 16, 2022: Appeal of SEPA Determination
March 17, 2022: Public Hearing (for Public Testimony)
Exhibit 74 Page 0931
Permit Process cont.
May 2022: Re-scheduled Public Hearing due to new Additional Information
2022 Habitat Assessment, Wetland. LLC
June –July 2022: Site Visits conducted & Additional Information Received
July 13, 2022 DCD Staff Biologist Site Visit
July 18, 2022 Assistant Planner Site Visit
Revised Site Plans, Critical Areas Report
August 2022: Additional Information Received
Revised Stormwater Site Plan/Stormwater Plan, Final Critical Areas Report, Upland Restoration
Memo
August 31, 2022: March 2, 2022 SEPA Determination Withdrawal & New August 31, 2022
SEPA Determination
Amended Staff Report, Notice of Public Hearing
September 14, 2022: Appeal of SEPA Determination of Non-Significance
September 26, 27, and 29, 2022: Public Hearing
Exhibit 74 Page 0932
SEPA Determination
Lead Agency: Jefferson County Department of Community Development
Determination of Non-Significance was issued on March 2, 2022.
WAC 197-11-734: "Determination of Non-Significance" (DNS) means the written
decision by the responsible official of the lead agency that a proposal is not
likely to have a significant adverse environmental impact, and therefore an EIS
is not required (WAC 197-11-310 and 197-11-340).
This determination was made after review of a completed SEPA Environmental
Checklist other applicable information submitted, and an inspection of the site
Earth, Air, Water, Plants, Animals, Energy and Natural Resources, Environmental
Health, Noise, Traffic, Land Use and Shoreline, Housing, Aesthetics, Light and Glare,
Recreation, and Transportation
Best Management Practices referenced in the DCD Staff Report are described in the
SEPA Environmental Checklist
Exhibit 74 Page 0933
SEPA Determination cont.
May 2022: New wetland findings were submitted to the record
Summer 2022: Revised SEPA Environmental Checklist, Updated Permit
Application Materials, Inspection of the Site, Revised Site Plan, Critical Areas
Report, Upland Restoration Memorandum, and other applicable documents.
Delineated: 2 Type “Ns” Streams, 4 Category IV Wetlands
August 31, 2022: Withdrew March 2, 2022 SEPA Determination of Non-
Significance
New SEPA Determination of Non-Significance issued on August 31, 2022:
Jefferson County has determined that the above described proposal, conducted
in conformance with the applicable Jefferson County Codes and Ordinances,
would not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and
additional mitigation or an environmental impact statement is not required.
Exhibit 74 Page 0934
SEPA Determination cont.
WAC 197-11-158: SEPA/GMA project review
Growth Management Act (“GMA”) County
(1) Provide adequate analysis of and mitigation for the specific adverse
environmental impacts.
(2) Determine whether the impacts have been adequately addressed in the
comprehensive plan, applicable development regulations, or other local, state, or
federal rules or laws.
Avoiding or otherwise mitigating the impacts
Designating as acceptable the impacts
Base or condition approval of the project on compliance
“Nothing in WAC 197-11-158 requires review of the adequacy of the environmental
analysis associated with the comprehensive plans and development regulations that are
being relied upon to make that determination”.
Exhibit 74 Page 0935
Conditional Use Criteria
(a) The conditional use is harmonious and appropriate in design, character and appearance with the existing or intended character and quality of development in the vicinity of the subject property and with the physical characteristics of the subject property;
(b)The conditional use will be served by adequate infrastructure including roads, fire protection, water, wastewater disposal, and stormwater control;
(c)The conditional use will not be materially detrimental to uses or property in the vicinity of the subject parcel;
(d)The conditional use will not introduce noise, smoke, dust, fumes, vibrations, odors, or other conditions or which unreasonably impact existing uses in the vicinity of the subject parcel;
(e) The location, size, and height of buildings, structures, walls and fences, and screening vegetation for the conditional use will not unreasonably interfere with allowable development or use of neighboring properties;
(f)The pedestrian and vehicular traffic associated with the conditional use will not be hazardous to existing and anticipated traffic in the vicinity of the subject parcel;Exhibit 74 Page 0936
Conditional Use Criteria Cont.
(g)The conditional use complies with all other applicable criteria and standards of this title and any other applicable provisions of the Jefferson County Code or state law; and more specifically, conforms to the standards contained in Chapters 18.20 and 18.30 JCC;
(h)The proposed conditional use will not result in the siting of an incompatible use adjacent to an airport or airfield;
(i)The conditional use will not cause significant adverse impacts on the human or natural environments that cannot be mitigated through conditions of approval;
(j)The conditional use has merit and value for the community as a whole;
(k)The conditional use is consistent with all relevant goals and policies of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan; and
(l)The public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effect. Consideration shall be given to the cumulative effect of similar actions in the area.
Exhibit 74 Page 0937
Staff Recommendation
DCD Staff recommends approval of the Type III Conditional “C” Use permit for a small-
scale tourist and recreational retreat center, subject to 35 conditions of approval
2018 Comprehensive Plan -Goals LU-G-7 and LU-G-26, and Framework I and III
Development and Performance Standards in JCC 18.30 and JCC 18.20
Conditional Use Criteria in JCC 18.40.530
Application reviewed and approved by:
Jefferson County Department of Environmental Health
Jefferson County Department of Public Works
East Jefferson County Fire District
Jefferson County Public Utility District
SEPA Determination of Non-Significance –Approved by Jefferson County DCD
Director
Exhibit 74 Page 0938
Staff Recommendation cont.
2018 Comprehensive Plan, Zoning, and Location
Rural Residential (1:20) and (1:5)
JCC 18.15.040 Categories of land use, Table 3-1. Allowable and Prohibited Uses
JCC 18.20.350(9)(a) -RR-20 –10 acres minimum to support all required amenities,
utilities, and impacts of the proposal
RCW 36.70A.070(5) –Rural Elements
“ A County should foster land use patterns and develop a local vision of rural
character that will: “Help preserve rural-based economies and traditional rural
lifestyles; encourage the economic prosperity of rural residents; foster
opportunities for small-scale, rural-based employment and self-employment;
permit the operation of rural-based agricultural, commercial, recreational, and
tourist businesses that are consistent with existing and planned land use patterns;
be compatible with the use of the land by wildlife and for fish and wildlife habitat;
foster the private stewardship of the land and preservation of open space; and
enhance the rural sense of community and quality of life.”.
Exhibit 74 Page 0939
Staff Recommendation cont.
Critical Areas
Geologic Hazard Assessment, prepared by Stratum Group, dated July 14, 2021
Critical Areas Report, prepared by Wetland. LCC, dated July 22, 2022
80% of the property will remain naturally vegetated as a result of the project
No direct, permanent impacts to any wetlands, streams, or buffers
No comments from WDFW or USFWS
Mitigation-Temporary Road Approach
Disturbance to outer 25% of Wetland E’s buffer. 374 square feet of native sword
fern plantings.
Restore all portions of un-used road approach areas as native, upland forest. 1,978
square foot restoration area. Includes 80 native shrub plantings, gravel removal,
de-compacting soils, and installing bark in bare soil areas.
Exhibit 74 Page 0940
Staff Recommendation cont.
The applicant has modified the proposal to address public concerns
Increased Setbacks
Additional Landscaping/Screening
Revised SEPA Environmental Checklist
Public Water Connection
Staff Recommendation of Approval
Compliance with the 2018 Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Jefferson County
Code, SEPA Determination of Non-Significance, zoning requirements and definitions,
and proposed best management practices
Exhibit 74 Page 0941
On behalf of Jefferson County DCD, I thank you all for attending
the Pomona Woods Public Hearing
Exhibit 74 Page 0942
EXTRA SLIDE: SEPA Determination cont.
How Jefferson County DCD gathered information
Application Materials
Revision Requests (Site Plan, Geotech Report, SEPA Checklist)
Requested written approval from applicable departments and agencies
How Jefferson County DCD reviewed information
Annotated SEPA Checklist
Reviewed Jefferson County Code (EX: Performance Standards, Development
Standards)
Consulted Jefferson County DCD Staff/Review Team for guidance
WAC 197-11-158
How Jefferson County DCD presented information
Staff Report
Recommended Conditions of Approval
March 2022 & August 2022 SEPA Determination of Non-Significance
Exhibit 74 Page 0943
Jefferson County Witness
All Impacts: Amanda Hunt, Jefferson County DCD, Assistant Planner. (Possible
testimony as the project planner on all aspects of the project).
Wetlands: Donna Frostholm, Jefferson County DCD, Associate Planner (Possible
testimony on all aspects of critical areas review, and as a wetlands specialist).
Road, Traffic, and Stormwater: Monte Reinders, Jefferson County Public Works
Director and County Road Engineer. (Possible testimony on road or traffic issues,
including bicycle and pedestrian traffic, and stormwater review).
Exhibit 74 Page 0944
Applicant Witnesses/Experts
Noise: Kevin Warner, Principal, Environmental Noise Scientist, Landau Associates. Mr.Warner’s
resume is included as an exhibit. Mr. Warner may testify regarding noise impacts from construction
and operation of the Project. Mr. Warner may respond to testimony offered by Appellant relating to these matters. Applicant estimates Mr. Warner’s direct testimony may take approximately 60 minutes.
Traffic and Transportation: Mike Swenson, PE, PTOE, Principal, Transpo Group. Mr. Swenson’s resume is included as an exhibit. Mr. Swenson may testify regarding the traffic and transportation impacts of the Project. Mr. Swenson may respond to testimony offered by Appellant relating to these
matters. Applicant estimates Mr. Swenson’s direct testimony may take approximately 60 minutes.
Drainage and Stormwater: Laura Bartenhagen, PE, LEED AP, Principal, ESM Consulting Engineers
LLC. Ms. Bartenhagen’s resume is included as an exhibit. Ms. Bartenhagen may testify regarding drainage and stormwater impacts of the Project. Ms. Bartenhagen may respond to testimony offered by Appellant relating to these matters. Applicant estimates Ms. Bartenhagen’s direct testimony may take approximately 30 minutes.
Wetland: Jennifer Marriott, PWS, Owner, Wet.Land. Ms. Marriott’s resume is included as an exhibit. Ms. Marriott may testify regarding the wetland impacts (if testimony on that subject is admitted) and habitat impacts of the Project. Ms. Marriott may respond to testimony offered by Appellant
relating these matters. Applicant estimates Ms. Marriott’s direct testimony may take approximately
60 minutes.
Landslide and Erosion: Dan McShane, President and Senior Geologist, Stratum Group. Mr. McShane’s resume is included as an exhibit. Mr. McShane may testify regarding landslide and erosion impacts of the Project. Mr. McShane may respond to testimony offered by Appellant relating to these matters. Applicant estimates Mr. McShane’s direct testimony may take approximately 30 minutes.Exhibit 74 Page 0945
Applicant Expert Reports
Pomona Woods Transportation Review by Mike Swenson, PE, PTOE, Principal,
Transpo Group, dated May 4, 2022
Habitat Assessment of Area Proposed for Disturbance by Jennifer Marriott,
PWS, Owner, Wet.Land, dated May 4, 2022
Review of Pomona Woods Acoustical Review by Greenbusch Group Inc. by
Kevin Warner, Principal, Environmental Noise Scientist, Landau Associates,
Inc., dated May 4, 2022.
Exhibit 74 Page 0946
Appellants Experts
Traffic: Ross Tilghman, Tilghman Group, Transportation Planner. Mr. Tilghman will
testify about the project’s traffic impacts and the inadequacy of the developer and
County’s analysis of traffic impacts. Mr. Tilghman’s testimony will relate to paragraphs
10–13 of the notice of appeal.
Noise: Adam Jenkins, Greenbusch Group, Acoustic Engineer. Mr. Jenkins will testify
about the project’s noise impacts and the inadequacy of the developer and County’s
analysis of noise impacts. Mr. Jenkins’s testimony will relate to paragraphs 10 and 18 of
the notice of appeal.
Wetlands: Nam Siu, Department of Fish and Wildlife, Biologist. Mr. Siu will testify
about the existence of wetlands and wetland buffers on and near the project site.
Mr. Siu’s testimony will relate to paragraphs 10 and 21 of the notice of appeal.
Exhibit 74 Page 0947
Appellants Witness
Gorden James may testify regarding land use impacts, as well as stormwater
erosion already that has eroded 30 feet each way of his bank.
Chris Malan may testify regarding stormwater runoff, wastewater runoff, and
erosion.
Terri Ross may testify regarding traffic, aesthetic impacts, and land use impacts.
Kathleen Heinez may testify regarding noise, water runoff, wetlands, and water
availability.
Marcia and Evan Koening may testify regarding traffic impacts, noise, and
aesthetics.
Frances Rawski may testify regarding the project’s impact on the Quimper well,
water availability, and land use impacts.
Exhibit 74 Page 0948
Appellant provides the following list of
exhibits
Appellant Ex. 1 Ross Tilghman CV.
Appellant Ex. 2 Adam Jenkins CV.
Appellant Ex. 3 Ross Tilghman report.
Appellant Ex. 4 Adam Jenkins report.
Appellant Ex. 5 Driveway photos (five).
Appellant Ex. 6 Runoff and erosion photos (eighteen).
Appellant Ex. 7 Google Earth vicinity screenshot (far).
Appellant Ex. 8 Google Earth vicinity screenshot (near).
Exhibit 74 Page 0949
Jefferson County Response
Traffic: Cyclist Collision
Hazard
Traffic: Vehicle
Collision Hazard
Traffic: Obstruction of
Oak Bay Road During
Construction
Landslides and Erosion
Stormwater Runoff
Insufficient Availability
of Water
Aquifer Recharge
Noise
Light and Glare
Aesthetics Impacts
Habitat
Wetland and Streams
Exhibit 74 Page 0950
Traffic: Cyclist Collision Hazard
Appellant (IV, 12): “The developer’s application materials, and the County’s
SEPA review based thereupon, do not disclose or analyze the project’s traffic
impacts with regard to cyclists. Oak Bay Road has an extremely narrow
shoulder, such that there is insufficient room for cars to safely pass cyclists.
The application and SEPA materials do not discuss the extent to which the
increased traffic from the project will increase the risk to cyclists along Oak
Bay Road. The failure to analyze this issue means the SEPA determination was
not based on information reasonably sufficient to evaluate the project’s
impacts. The probable impacts of this issue will be significant and adverse”.
Exhibit 74 Page 0951
Traffic: Vehicle Collision Hazard
Appellant (IV, 13): “The developer’s application materials, and the County’s
SEPA review based thereupon, do not disclose or analyze the project’s traffic
impacts with regard to other vehicles. Driveways that outlet onto Oak Bay
Road lack sufficient sight lines to enable safe ingress and egress. By increasing
traffic along Oak Bay Road, the project increases the already substantial risk
experienced by users of these driveways. The failure to analyze this issue
means the SEPA determination was not based on information reasonably
sufficient to evaluate the project’s impacts. The probable impacts of this
issue will be significant and adverse”.
Exhibit 74 Page 0952
Traffic: Obstruction of Oak Bay Road
During Construction
Appellant (IV, 14): “The developer’s application materials, and the County’s SEPA review based thereupon, do not disclose or analyze the project’s traffic
impacts with regard to construction impacts. During construction of the
project, commercial trucks hauling construction materials and performing the
logging operations that are part of the project will have to load and unload at
the edge of Oak Bay Road. During the loading and unloading, traffic along Oak Bay Road will be partially obstructed, and the collision hazard along Oak Bay
Road will be increased. The failure to analyze this issue means the SEPA determination was not based on information reasonably sufficient to evaluate
the project’s impacts. The probable impacts of this issue will be significant and adverse”.
Exhibit 74 Page 0953
Traffic (IV, 12-14)
DNS Analysis: With respect to this topic of appeal, how did you analyze the
potential impacts to the environment on this issue?
Jefferson County Code
Exhibit P: SEPA Review and Stormwater Site Plan Review and Comments
Memorandum
Exhibit C: SEPA Environmental Checklist
Road Approach Permit (RAP2021-00068)
Directional Sign
Conditions of Approval
Exhibit 74 Page 0954
Traffic (IV, 12-14)
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Jefferson County Department of Public Works: Traffic impacts for commercial
projects and projects requiring SEPA review are reviewed by the Jefferson County
Department of Public Works (JCC 18.05.060). A Public Works Development Review
Engineer submitted a SEPA Review and Stormwater Site Plan Review and Comments
Memorandum(s)(see “Exhibit P”) to Jefferson County DCD to analyze transportation
impacts.
JCC 18.05.060 Department of public works –Duties and responsibilities.
JCC 18.30.080(1)(r) Roads
Exhibit 74 Page 0955
Traffic (IV, 12-14)
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
SEPA Review Comments Memorandum: Public Works reviewed and commented on
existing road features, levels of service, current accident rates, current average daily
traffic trips, and proposed average daily traffic trips along Oak Bay Road.
CRAB Mobility Data –County Road Administrative Board
Recommendation: “Based on the minor increase in traffic, and low accident rate
history along Oak Bay Road in the vicinity of the proposed project, the Department
recommends finding that the proposal is not likely to result in significant adverse
impacts related to transportation”.
Recommendations did not include mitigation for cyclists risks, increased traffic,
line of sight from neighboring properties, or road obstruction from commercial
trucks. Jefferson County DCD therefore did not require the applicant to pursue
additional mitigation measures for traffic related impacts.
Exhibit 74 Page 0956
Traffic (IV, 12-14)
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
SEPA Review Comments Memorandum: Based on the minor increase in traffic, and
low accident rate history along Oak Bay Road in the vicinity of the proposed project,
Public Works recommends finding that the proposal is not likely to result in significant
adverse impacts related to transportation.
JCC 18.20.140(1)(b) Commercial uses –Standards for site development.
JCC 18.20.350(3)(a)(iii) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
JCC 18.20.350(3)(g) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
See “Exhibit P”, p. 7 and 8 of 11
Exhibit C, p. 13, 14, 19, 20, and 21 of 23, Exhibit R, p. 16 and 21 of 31
Exhibit 74 Page 0957
Traffic (IV, 12-14)
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Road Approach Permit (RAP2021-00068): Approved by a Public Works Engineering
Technician on December 20, 2021 to develop a safe commercial parking area
(“commercial road approach” or “commercial road apron”) for the applicant to park
off of Oak Bay Road.
The Oak Bay Road right of way is constricted on the subject property’s side.
Upon conditional use permit approval, the applicant may begin constructing the
private driveway from the approved approach area.
Loading on Oak Bay Road is not an allowed use. The commercial road approach is
sized for commercial sized trucks. Logging equipment and vehicles are expected to
be able to park in the established approach area. Should the approach need to be
widened, the applicant shall work with Jefferson County DCD and Public Works to
amend the site plan and road approach.
Condition No. 33 of 35
Exhibit 74 Page 0958
Traffic (IV, 12-14)
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject,
how did you look for mitigation measures?
Directional Sign: Located 10 feet from Oak Bay Road, north of
the driveway entrance.
Standing parallel to the road to avoid obstructing the line of
slight.
JCC 18.30.150 Signs
Exhibit C, p. 14 and 17 of 23, Exhibit R, p. 20 and 21 of 31,
Exhibit G
Condition No. 24 of 35
Exhibit 74 Page 0959
Traffic (IV, 12-14)
Conditions of Approval: How did you incorporate mitigation measures into the
conditional use permit? What conditions have you recommended for the project
to mitigate foreseen impacts?
Conditions of Approval
No. 24 of 35: Sign Best Management Practices
No. 25 of 35: An approved Road Setback Variance Permit from the Jefferson
County departments shall be required prior approval of the building permit
application and prior to installation of any commercial sign within the 20-foot
setback of the Oak Bay Road right-of-way.
No. 33 of 35: Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped,
approved site plan dated March 2nd, 2022 shall be resubmitted for review and
approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Proposed
changes may require modifications to the conditional use permit.
Exhibit 74 Page 0960
Traffic (IV, 12-14)
DNS - Conclusions
Oak Bay Road is a rural minor collector within the federal functional classification
system. Pursuant to JCC 18.20.350(3)(g), traffic analysis (“traffic analysis report”)
is not required for a rural minor collector.
The proposal was determined to not exceed the “Average Daily Trip” capacity for Oak Bay Road. No additional conditions or access improvements are required.
Based on the minor increase in traffic, and the low accident rate history along Oak
Bay Road in the vicinity of the proposed project, Public Works recommends finding that the proposal is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts related to
transportation.
As conditioned, the Road Approach Permit (RAP2021-00068) is sized for commercial vehicle access and turn around. Logging trucks and equipment are expected to have parking space for loading and unloading activities.
The proposed Directional Sign will stand parallel to Oak Bay Road to avoid
obstructing the line of slight. No other structures will be located near the road right of way.
Exhibit 74 Page 0961
Traffic (IV, 12-14)
Other Questions:
The analysis of traffic impacts associated with the project was conducted by the
Jefferson County Department of Public Works. Monte Reinders, Jefferson County Public
Works Director and County Road Engineer can provide testimony on road or traffic
issues, including bicycle and pedestrian traffic, and stormwater review. I will ask that
you defer that or those questions to that expert.
OR “I would like to confirm with my council before answering that question”.
Exhibit 74 Page 0962
Landslides and Erosion
Appellant (IV, 15): “The developer’s application materials include a Geotech
report that finds that development of the project will not cause or
exacerbate the risk of landslides or erosion. This claim is incorrect.
Development of the project will increase the risk of landslides and erosion.
Because the conclusion of the geotech report is factually incorrect, the SEPA
determination was not based on information reasonably sufficient to evaluate
the project’s impacts. The probable impacts of this issue will be significant
and adverse”.
Exhibit 74 Page 0963
Stormwater Runoff
Appellant (IV, 16): “The developer’s stormwater management plan fails to
consider the environmental effects of increased stormwater runoff onto the
neighboring properties. The failure to analyze this issue means the SEPA
determination was not based on information reasonably sufficient to evaluate
the project’s impacts. The probable impacts of this issue will be significant
and adverse”.
Exhibit 74 Page 0964
Landslides and Erosion & Stormwater
DNS Analysis: With respect to this topic of appeal, how did you analyze the
potential impacts to the environment on this issue?
Jefferson County GIS Maps
Exhibit C: SEPA Environmental Checklist
Exhibit E: Stormwater Plan/Stormwater Site Plan
Exhibit G: Site Plan
Exhibit H: Geologic Hazard Assessment
Exhibit P: SEPA Review and Stormwater Site Plan Review and Comments
Memorandum
Best Management Practices
Jefferson County Code
Exhibit 74 Page 0965
Landslides and Erosion & Stormwater
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Jefferson County GIS Maps: Slight Landslide Hazard Area, Shoreline Slope Stability Area-
Intermediate Slope
Exhibit 74 Page 0966
Landslides and Erosion & Stormwater
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
2021 Geologic Hazard Assessment Letter: Prepared by Dan McShane, L.E.G., M.Sc.,
Licensed Engineering Geologist (licensed engineer stamp p. 6 of 6).
“The property is not a landslide or erosion hazard area and will not be at risk of
landslides or erosion. Furthermore, development will not increase the risk of
landslides or erosion as long as the recommendations of this report are followed”
(p. 6 of 6).
JCC 18.20.350(3)(a)(iii) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
JCC 18.20.350(3)(j)(iv) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
JCC 18.22.530 Protection standards.
JCC 18.22.540 Required assessments and reports.
Exhibit 74 Page 0967
Landslides and Erosion & Stormwater
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Stormwater Management Plan/Site Plan: The proposal addresses stormwater
generated on the 21.54-acre site by a new driveway, parking, and buildings of up to
60,621 square feet of new impervious surface, and approximately 192,722 square feet
of land disturbing activity.
Dispersion stormwater systems, rain gardens, meets requirements for steep slope
ratios, and other BMP’s
The proposed project meets all 9 minimum requirements of the 2019 SWMMWW.
The stormwater management plan shall be designed to meet Minimum
Requirements #1 -#9 of the 2019 SWMMWW (meaning stormwater must be
managed on-site) and wetland protection standards set forth in JCC Chapter 18.22
Critical Areas, Article VII. Wetlands.
The stormwater system will be reviewed again by Public Works for consistency with
the 2019 SWMMWW at the time of building application.Exhibit 74 Page 0968
Landslides and Erosion & Stormwater
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Stormwater Management Plan/Site Plan: The proposal addresses stormwater
generated on the 21.54-acre site by a new driveway, parking, and buildings of up to 60,621
square feet of new impervious surface, and approximately 192,722 square feet of land
disturbing activity.
JCC 18.20.350(3)(a)(iv) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
JCC 18.30.070 Stormwater management standards.
Exhibit P, p. 6 –7 and 9 -11 of 11, Exhibit C, p. 3 -5, 6 and 13 of 23
Condition No. 6 of 35, 20 of 35
Exhibit 74 Page 0969
Landslides and Erosion & Stormwater
Conditions of Approval: How did you incorporate mitigation measures into the conditional use permit? What conditions have you recommended for the project to
mitigate foreseen impacts?
Conditions of Approval
No. 4 of 35: Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or
construction.
No. 5 of 35: Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48 RCW and WAC 173-201A
No. 6 of 35: Construction site operators must apply for a permit at least 60 days prior to discharging stormwater from construction activities and must submit it on or before the
date of the first public notice.
No. 12 of 35. The applicant shall follow geotechnical recommendations provided in the 2021 Geological Hazard Assessment.
No. 13 of 35: Geotech Follow Up Letter
No. 20 of 35: The applicant shall follow the JCPW Recommendations and Public Works
Department Fees Requirement sections of the SEPA Review and Stormwater Site Plan
Review and Comments Memorandum(s) dated September 30, 2021.Exhibit 74 Page 0970
DNS - Conclusions
The proposal meets the requirement for critical areas in JCC 18.22 and the
stormwater requirements for new development in JCC 18.30.
The 2021 Geologic Hazard Assessment Letter was prepared by Dan McShane, an
Licensed Engineering Geologist, and submitted to Jefferson County DCD. The report
satisfies the landslide and erosion protection standards in JCC 18.22.530.
The proposed features of the project were confirmed to be in locations not at risk of
land movement.
The professional geologist confirmed that Full Dispersion is appropriate for proposal.
The applicant shall follow the JCPW Recommendations and Public Works Department
Fees Requirement sections of the SEPA Review and Stormwater Site Plan Review and
Comments Memorandum(s) dated September 30, 2021.
Stormwater controls will be inspected by Public Works during the building permit
application review.
Exhibit 74 Page 0971
Insufficient Availability of Water
Appellant (IV, 17):“The developer’s application materials include a
certification of water supply, and the staff report includes a determination by
County staff that adequate water supplies exist to support the development.
In reality, the local aquifer is insufficient to support the project. Jefferson
County Public Utility Department does not have a connection to the property,
and such a connection may not be possible. Nothing in the application
materials explores alternative water sources in the event the JPUD
connection proves to be impossible. Nothing in the application materials or
SEPA materials evaluates the environmental impacts if the developer does
decide to drill a well into the aquifer. The failure to analyze this issue means
the SEPA determination was not based on information reasonably sufficient to
evaluate the project’s impacts. The probable impacts of this issue will be
significant and adverse”.
Exhibit 74 Page 0972
Insufficient Availability of Water
DNS Analysis: With respect to this topic of appeal, how did you analyze the
potential impacts to the environment on this issue?
Jefferson County Code
Exhibit L: Certificate of Water Supply Utility Service
Exhibit C: SEPA Environmental Checklist
Conditions of Approval
Exhibit 74 Page 0973
Insufficient Availability of Water
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subjects, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Well: The original well proposal is no longer proposed for the Retreat Center.
Potable Water & Utilities: A Certificate of Water Supply Utility Service was
submitted to Jefferson County DCD on January 31, 2022. JPUD has acknowledged that the Quimper Water System has the capacity in installed facilities and water rights to
serve the proposed development with improvements, and that the service to the
proposed project is consistent with the utility's water system plan.
The Jefferson County Environmental Health has approved the conditional use of this
project for available potable water, provided that there is an appropriately approved and installed water main extension from the Quimper Water System #05783 to serve the project.
A building permit will not be approved if there is no proof of potable water.
JCC 18.30.030(1) Water supplies. “Potable water shall be delivered by a means approved
by the Washington Department of Health and/or Jefferson County public health”.
Exhibit C, p. 7, 21 and 22 of 23, Exhibit R, p.
Condition No. 9 of 35 and 10 of 35
Exhibit 74 Page 0974
Insufficient Availability of Water
Exhibit L: Certificate of Water Supply Utility Service
Exhibit 74 Page 0975
Insufficient Availability of Water
Conditions of Approval: How did you incorporate mitigation measures into the
conditional use permit? What conditions have you recommended for the project
to mitigate foreseen impacts?
Conditions of Approval
No. 9 of 35: Environmental Health-Potable water specific condition. The
conditional use for this project is approved for available potable water provided
that there is an appropriately approved and installed water main extension from
the Quimper Water System #05783 to serve the project. Future building permits
will not be approved for available potable water unless the water tap is located on
the subject parcel and connection is available.
No. 10 of 35: Potable water supply and sewage disposal facilities adequate to
serve the proposed use shall be provided. Occupancy shall not be permitted before
water supplies and sewage disposal facilities are approved and installed.
Exhibit 74 Page 0976
Insufficient Availability of Water
DNS -Conclusions
The applicant originally proposed a well to supply potable water to the subject
property. In response to public concern, the applicant explored an alternative
water source by contacting the Jefferson County Public Utility District (JPUD) to
determine if a public water connection was feasible.
A Certificate of Water Supply Utility Service was submitted to Jefferson County
DCD on January 31, 2022. JPUD has acknowledged that the Quimper Water System
has the capacity in installed facilities and water rights to serve the proposed
development with improvements and that the service to the proposed project is
consistent with the utility's water system plan (see “Exhibit L”, p. 4).
This proposal is not a “phased project”, nor is there well drilling or installation
proposed for this project. SEPA Review of a well is therefore not required.
Future building permits will not be approved for available potable water unless
the water tap is located on the subject parcel and connection is available. This
requirement is included as a recommended condition of approval.
Final approval will be determined when a building permit application is submitted
to the Jefferson County Department of Environmental Health and DCD.
Exhibit 74 Page 0977
Aquifer Recharge
Appellant (IV, 18): “The local aquifer is already inadequate to support the
existing users, especially during summer. By adding impervious surface, the
developer will reduce the rate of aquifer recharge, worsening the already
severe water shortage for existing properties that depend on the aquifer. The
County explicitly declined to require the developer to complete an aquifer
recharge report, nor do any of the other application materials consider the
project’s impacts on aquifer recharge. The failure to analyze this issue means
the SEPA determination was not based on information reasonably sufficient to
evaluate the project’s impacts. The probable impacts of this issue will be
significant and adverse”.
Exhibit 74 Page 0978
Aquifer Recharge
DNS Analysis: With respect to this topic of appeal, how did you analyze the
potential impacts to the environment on this issue?
Jefferson County GIS Maps
Jefferson County Code
Exhibit C: SEPA Environmental Checklist
Exhibit H: Geologic Hazard Assessment
Exhibit P: Agency –Department Comments
Best Management Practices
Conditions of Approval
Exhibit 74 Page 0979
Aquifer Recharge
Jefferson County GIS Maps
Exhibit 74 Page 0980
Aquifer Recharge
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subjects, how did you look
for mitigation measures?
Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas: Aquifers are regulated under Article III. Critical
Aquifer Recharge Areas of the Jefferson County Code. According to the Jefferson
County GIS Maps, the proposal is not located in Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas or
Special Aquifer Recharge Protection Areas (JCC 18.22.310)
JCC 18.22.310 Classification/designation.
Exhibit 74 Page 0981
Aquifer Recharge
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subjects, how did you look
for mitigation measures?
Critical Aquifer Recharge Area Report: According to JCC Table 18.22.330(1), small-
scale recreation and tourist uses are not designated as a “High Impact Activity”.
According to 18.22.330(1)(c) or (1)(d), Critical Aquifer Recharge Area Reports are
required when a “High Impact Activity” is proposed within a Susceptible Aquifer
Recharge Area or a Special Aquifer Recharge Protection Area.
JPUD has acknowledged that the Quimper Water System has the capacity in
installed facilities and water rights to serve the proposed development with
improvements. No concerns related to aquifer impacts were identified by JPUD.
JCC 18.20.350(3)(J)(iv) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses: “Adequately
protects critical areas including surface and groundwater resources;”
JCC 18.22.330 Protection standards
Exhibit C, p. 7 of 23, Exhibit R, p. 12 –13 of 31
Conditions No. 9 of 35 and 10 of 35
Exhibit 74 Page 0982
Aquifer Recharge
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subjects, how did you look
for mitigation measures?
Stormwater Runoff: A Stormwater Management Plan has been approved by Jefferson County Public Works. Per the Stormwater Management Plan and Site Plan, full
dispersion, rain gardens, and best management practices will be utilized.
Based on the requirement to implement an approved Stormwater Site Plan, Public
Works recommends finding that the proposal is not likely to result in significant
adverse impacts related to stormwater runoff.
Geologic Hazard Assessment: “Stormwater from the access drive and buildings should be fully dispersed consistent with the Stormwater Manual and based on the
size of the property, forested condition and soil types this can be readily
accomplished”.
JCC 18.22.330(3) Protection standards
JCC 18.30.060(1) and (4) Grading and excavation standards.
Exhibit C, p. 5, 7, 8, and 13 of 23, Exhibit R, p. 19 -20 of 31
Conditions No. 1 of 35 and 20 of 35 Exhibit 74 Page 0983
Aquifer Recharge
Jefferson County GIS Maps
Exhibit 74 Page 0984
Aquifer Recharge
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subjects, how did you look
for mitigation measures?
Coastal Saltwater Intrusion Protection Zone: According to the Jefferson County
GIS Maps, there is a Coastal SIPZ located on the subject property as defined in JCC
18.22.310(3)Seawater Intrusion Protection Zones. A well is no longer proposed for
this project. Per JCC 18.22.330(2) and (8), the applicant meets the protection
standards for Seawater Intrusion Protection Zones.
JCC 18.22.310(3)Seawater Intrusion Protection Zones
JCC 18.22.330(2) Protection standards
Exhibit C, p. 15 of 23, Exhibit R, p. 12 and 13 of 31
Exhibit 74 Page 0985
Aquifer Recharge
Conditions of Approval: How did you incorporate mitigation measures into the
conditional use permit? What conditions have you recommended for the project
to mitigate foreseen impacts?
Conditions of Approval
No. 1 of 35: The applicant shall obtain approved building permits to include Fire
Code review and a Stormwater Plan reviewed by the Jefferson County Department
of Public Works.
No. 9 of 35: Future building permits will not be approved for available potable
water unless the water tap is located on the subject parcel and connection is
available.
No. 10 of 35: Potable water supply and sewage disposal facilities adequate to
serve the proposed use shall be provided. Occupancy shall not be permitted before
water supplies and sewage disposal facilities are approved and installed.
No. 20 of 35: The applicant shall follow the JCPW Recommendations and Public
Works Department Fees Requirement sections of the SEPA Review and Stormwater
Site Plan Review and Comments Memorandum(s) dated September 30, 2021.
Exhibit 74 Page 0986
Aquifer Recharge
DNS - Conclusions
According to the Jefferson County GIS Maps, the subject property is not located in a critical aquifer recharge area, but is located in a coastal saltwater intrusion
protection zone.
A well is not proposed for this proposal. Per JCC 18.22.330(2) and (8), the applicant meets the protection standards for Seawater Intrusion Protection Zones.
Per JCC 18.22.330(1), the proposal is not defined as an “high impact activity” and
is not located in a susceptible aquifer recharge area or a special aquifer recharge
protection area. Therefore, a critical aquifer recharge area report is not required for the proposal.
Geological Hazard Assessment (Stratum Group): “Stormwater from the access
drive and buildings should be fully dispersed consistent with the Stormwater Manual and based on the size of the property, forested condition and soil types this can be readily accomplished”. The applicant shall follow the Stormwater
Management Plan as approved and conditioned in the Staff Report.
JPUD has acknowledged that the Quimper Water System has the capacity in installed facilities and water rights to serve the proposed development with
improvements. JPUD has not identified concerns related to the aquifer capacity.
Exhibit 74 Page 0987
Noise
Appellant (IV, 19): “The developer’s application materials, and the County’s
SEPA review based thereupon, do not disclose the level of noise the project
will produce, both during construction and operation. The staff report
acknowledges there has been no noisy study. Potential noise sources not
analyzed include construction-related noise (including logging and grading);
traffic noise from guests, staff, and vendors; and noise from guests and staff
using the grounds of the facility once it is complete. The failure to analyze
this issue means the SEPA determination was not based on information
reasonably sufficient to evaluate the project’s impacts. The probable impacts
of this issue will be significant and adverse”.
Exhibit 74 Page 0988
Noise
DNS Analysis: With respect to this topic of appeal, how did you analyze the
potential impacts to the environment on this issue?
Jefferson County Code
Exhibit C: SEPA Environmental Checklist
Exhibit R: Staff Report
Exhibit G: Site Plan/Landscaping Plan
Best Management Practices
Conditions of Approval
Exhibit 74 Page 0989
Noises
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Guest Arrival & Departure: Guests will arrive between 8:00 am and 7:00 pm on their
arrival day and leave between 8:00 am and 11:00 am on their departure day.
JCC 8.70.050(4) & (6) Public nuisance noises -Noise Control Ordinance
JCC JCC 18.20.350(3)(iii) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
JCC 18.30.190 Noise
Exhibit C, p. 13 of 23, Exhibit R, p. 19 of 31, Exhibit G
Condition No. 14 of 35, 17 of 35, 21 of 35, and 22 of 35
Exhibit 74 Page 0990
Noises
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Traffic Noise (Commercial Deliveries): Deliveries will be scheduled during normal
business hours of 8:00 am -5:00 pm.
Traffic Noise (Driveway & Parking): Guests will be strongly encouraged to carpool or
make use of shuttles.
Due to the building locations and heavily forested setbacks, traffic noise generated from
the driveway is not excepted to become a public nuisance to neighboring properties.
Speed Limit signs (15 mph) will be posted on the driveway to minimize noise and protect the road.
JCC 8.70.050(4) & (6) Public nuisance noises -Noise Control Ordinance
JCC 18.20.140(1)(c) Commercial uses –Standards for site development
JCC 18.20.350(3)(iii) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
JCC 18.30.190 Noise
Exhibit C, p. 13 of 23, Exhibit R, p. 19 of 31, Exhibit G
Condition No. 14 of 35, 17 of 35, 21 of 35, and 22 of 35
Exhibit 74 Page 0991
Noises
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Short Term Construction (including logging): Limited to 7:00 AM -10:00 PM.
Builder will be typically on site from 7:00AM to 3:30PM. Builder will minimize the noise
during the first hour of the acceptable noise period (before 8 AM) by focusing on lower
noise construction activities such as staging, team meetings, plan reviews and material
mobilization. Minimize weekend work and evening work. Owner will be living on-site
to monitor noise and other impacts.
JCC 8.70.100 Liberal construction
WAC 173-60-040 Maximum permissible environmental noise levels
JCC 18.20.140(1)(c) Commercial uses –Standards for site development
JCC 18.20.350(3)(iii) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
JCC 18.30.190 Noise
Exhibit C, p. 14 of 23, Exhibit R, p. 19 of 31, Exhibit G
Condition No. 14 of 35, 17 of 35, 21 of 35, and 22 of 35Exhibit 74 Page 0992
Noises
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Long Term Business Operations: Outside Team Building Activities will occur between
9:00 am and 8:00 pm. Most meetings will be held indoors. 35 guests maximum.
Amplification of noise is prohibited.
Retreat Center Quiet Hours 10:00 pm –8 am. Guest contracts, website language and guest orientations will emphasize the need to respect neighbors.
WAC 173-60-040 Maximum permissible environmental noise levels
JCC 8.70.050(4) & (6) Public nuisance noises -Noise Control Ordinance
JCC 18.20.140(1)(c) Commercial uses –Standards for site development
JCC 18.20.350(3)(iii) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
JCC 18.30.190 Noise
Exhibit C, p. 14 of 23, Exhibit R, p. 19 of 31, Exhibit G
Condition No. 14 of 35, 17 of 35, 21 of 35, and 22 of 35
.Exhibit 74 Page 0993
Noises
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Best Management Practices
Landscaping: As shown on the revised site plan (dated 11/19/2021), Screen A
Landscaping of 50 feet will be maintained around the perimeter of the property.
Walking Trails: Walking trails shall not disturb the 50-foot landscaping buffer as
shown on the approved site plan revised November 22, 2021.
Setbacks: The nearest existing single-family residence along Oak Bay Road
approximately 500 feet from the proposed retreat center. The proposed caretaker
residence is approximately 350 feet from the nearest existing single-family
residence.
Exhibit 74 Page 0994
Noise
Conditions of Approval: How did you incorporate mitigation measures into the
conditional use permit? What conditions have you recommended for the
project to mitigate foreseen impacts?
Conditions of Approval
No. 14 of 35: “The project shall not introduce noise, smoke, dust, fumes,
vibrations, odors, or other conditions or which unreasonably impacts existing uses
in the vicinity of the subject parcel pursuant to JCC 18.20.350”.
No. 17 of 35:“The applicant shall implement best management practices to limit
noise impacts to existing uses in the vicinity of the subject parcel and to avoid any
public nuisance pursuant to JCC 8.70.050. Amplification shall not be allowed on
site”.
No. 21 of 35: The applicant shall maintain a 50-foot landscaping buffer.
No. 22 of 35: Walking trails shall not disturb the 50-foot landscaping buffer as
shown on the approved site plan revised November 22, 2021.
Exhibit 74 Page 0995
Noises
DNS -Conclusions
The proposal is conditioned to limit noise impacts to existing uses in the vicinity of
the subject parcel and to avoid any public nuisance pursuant to JCC 8.70.050.
Short Term and Long Term noise will not occur between hours considered to be a
public nuisance:
Between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Sunday through Thursday (example: 10:00
p.m. Sunday to 7:00 a.m. Monday) or between 11:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on Friday or
Saturday (example: 11:00 p.m. Friday to 7:00 a.m. Saturday),
WAC 173-60-040: Maximum permissible environmental noise Levels
The applicant has proposed multiple best management practices to mitigate for
recreational and commercial levels of noise. The proposal has been conditioned to
require these best management practices to be implemented during all
development and proposed operation activities.
Exhibit 74 Page 0996
Noises
DNS -Conclusions
There is no proposed recreational or tourism related equipment or machinery that
indicate the potential for a significant noise impact. Noise Studies have been
recommended in the past for the projects below:
Mechanical Equipment & Building Fans: MLA18-000102 –ZON18-00039 (cannabis
production/processing facility)-CUP III
Concrete Floor/New Fan System: MLA17-00019 -ZON18-00001 (cannabis
production/processing facility)-CUP III
The proposed structures are setback at sufficient distances from neighboring
property lines.
The Jefferson County Code does not require a quantitative measure of noise
produced for small scale recreational uses.
Exhibit 74 Page 0997
Light and Glare
Appellant (IV, 20):“The developer’s application materials, and the County’s
SEPA review based thereupon, do not disclose the level of light and glare the
project will produce. The project will introduce a new, commercial facility in
a residential neighborhood. The impacts will include light, including new
outdoor light sources, and glare from the large windows of the project. The
failure to analyze this issue means the SEPA determination was not based on
information reasonably sufficient to evaluate the project’s impacts. The
probable impacts of this issue will be significant and adverse”.
Exhibit 74 Page 0998
Light and Glare
DNS Analysis: With respect to this topic of appeal, how did you analyze the
potential impacts to the environment on this issue?
Jefferson County Code
Exhibit C: SEPA Environmental Checklist
Exhibit R: Staff Report
Exhibit G: Site Plan/Landscaping Plan
Best Management Practices
Conditions of Approval
Exhibit 74 Page 0999
Light and Glare
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look
for mitigation measures?
Outdoor Safety Lights: Outdoor safety lights to mark pathways. Lights will be
located lower than 20 feet and will be aimed low to encourage star gazing by guests.
Shielded or Recessed -Direct glare and reflections will be contained within the
boundaries of the parcel.
Directed downward and away from adjoining properties.
JCC 18.20.350(3)(h) -Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
JCC 18.30.140(1) Lighting
Exhibit C, p. 14, 17 and 18 of 23, Exhibit R, p. 20 of 31
Condition No. 19 of 35
Exhibit 74 Page 1000
Light and Glare
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Retreat Center Windows (4,500 sq.ft): Roll shades will be installed to control light
and glare during night time hours.
Proposed landscaping, setbacks, and existing vegetation will screen light and glare
from neighboring properties and Oak Bay Road
JCC 18.20.350(3)(f) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
JCC 18.20.350(3)(h) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
JCC 18.30.140 Lighting
Exhibit C, p. 18 of 23, Exhibit R, p. 20 of 31
Condition No. 14 of 35, No. 19 of 35
Exhibit 74 Page 1001
Light and Glare
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Retreat Center Exterior: Charred wood technique or “shou sugi ban”. Color and
material are not expected to produce visual or glare impacts.
JCC 18.20.350(3)(h) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
Exhibit C, p. 16 of 23, Exhibit R, p. 20 of 31
Condition No. 14 of 35, No. 21 of 35
Vehicle Lights: Passenger vehicles and delivery trucks are expected to be on-site
during operation of the retreat center. In the short term, construction and logging
vehicles will also be present on the subject property during logging and construction
operations.
50 feet of forest landscaping and setbacks will provide sufficient screening.
Main parking area is located away from adjacent residences. Driveway running
adjacent to north property line is mostly adjacent to commercial forest lands.
Condition No. 21 of 35 Exhibit 74 Page 1002
Light and Glare
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject,
how did you look for mitigation measures?
Directional Sign: Located 10 feet from Oak Bay Road, north of
the driveway entrance.
Illumination from sign light fixtures will be shielded and
directed in a manner not to adversely affect neighboring
properties or create a hazard to on-coming Oak Bay Road
traffic.
JCC 18.30.140 Lighting
Exhibit C, p. 14 and 17 of 23, Exhibit R, p. 20 and 21
Condition No. 24 of 35
Exhibit 74 Page 1003
Light and Glare
Conditions of Approval: How did you incorporate mitigation measures into the
conditional use permit? What conditions have you recommended for the project
to mitigate foreseen impacts?
Conditions of Approval
No. 14 of 35: Will not introduce other conditions which unreasonably impact
existing uses in the vicinity of the subject parcel pursuant to JCC 18.20.350.
No. 19 of 35: Light and Glare Best Management Practices
No. 21 of 35: The applicant shall maintain a 50-foot landscaping buffer, as shown
on the approved site plan revised November 22, 2021, for the life span of the
proposal pursuant to JCC 18.30.130(8).
No. 24 of 35: On-Site Sign Best Management Practices
Exhibit 74 Page 1004
Light and Glare
DNS -Conclusions
The proposal meets the performance and development standards in JCC 18.20 and
JCC 18.30 relating to light and glare.
The applicant is proposing Charred wood technique or “shou sugi ban” for the
exterior of the Retreat Center. These type of materials are not expected to reflect
light or cause significant glare.
EX: Aluminum Cell Towers-Painted green or brown to avoid reflection
The proposed buildings and main parking area are not located along landscaping
lines.
The nearest existing single-family residence along Oak Bay Road is approximately
500 feet from the proposed retreat center. The proposed caretaker’s residence is
approximately 350 feet from the nearest existing single-family residence.
All Interior lot lines will employ a 50 foot landscaping buffer, which is 35 feet
larger than the required landscaping standard for small-scale recreational and
tourist use development.
The Jefferson County Code does not require a quantitative measure of light and
glare produced for small scale recreational uses.Exhibit 74 Page 1005
Aesthetic Impacts
Appellant (IV, 21): “The developer’s application materials, and the County’s
SEPA review based thereupon, do not discuss the aesthetic the project will
produce. The project will introduce a large, tall, bulky, commercial facility in
a residential neighborhood. The County has failed to evaluate whether the
landscaping is adequate to buffer the aesthetic impacts from surrounding
properties—the County simply assumes that it will be adequate. The failure to
analyze this issue means the SEPA determination was not based on
information reasonably sufficient to evaluate the project’s impacts. The
probable impacts of this issue will be significant and adverse”.
Exhibit 74 Page 1006
Aesthetic
DNS Analysis: With respect to this topic of appeal, how did you analyze the
potential impacts to the environment on this issue?
Jefferson County Code
Exhibit C: SEPA Environmental Checklist
Exhibit R: Staff Report
Exhibit G: Site Plan/Landscaping Plan
Best Management Practices
Conditions of Approval
Exhibit 74 Page 1007
Aesthetic Impacts
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Building Height: 27 feet (2 stories).
Mature trees (50 –200 feet) will surround the proposed buildings
JCC 18.30.050 Density, dimension, and open space standards. Table 6-1. Density,
Dimension and Open Space Standards.
JCC 18.20.350(3)(h) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
Exhibit C, p. 16 of 23, Exhibit R, p. 20 of 31
Retreat Center Exterior: Charred wood technique or “shou sugi ban”
Color and material are not expected to produce visual or glare impacts.
JCC 18.20.350(3)(h) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
Exhibit C, p. 16 of 23, Exhibit R, p. 20 of 31
Condition No. 14 of 35, No. 21 of 35
Exhibit 74 Page 1008
Aesthetic Impacts
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Retreat Center Windows (4,500 square feet): Roll shades will be installed to control
light and glare during night time hours.
Proposed landscaping and setbacks will screen light/glare from neighboring
properties
JCC 18.20.350(3)(f) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
JCC 18.20.350(3)(h) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
JCC 18.30.140 Lighting
Exhibit C, p. 18 of 23, Exhibit R, p. 20 of 31
Condition No. 14 of 35, No. 19 of 35
Exhibit 74 Page 1009
Aesthetic Impacts
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Retreat Center Footprint (including stairs and ramps): 7,155 square feet. The gross
floor area is 12,000 square feet.
Proposed landscaping and setbacks will screen buildings from neighboring properties
JCC 18.30.050 Density, dimension, and open space standards. Table 6-1. Density,
Dimension and Open Space Standards.
JCC 18.20.350(3)(9) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
JCC 18.20.350(3)(h) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
Exhibit C, p. 3 of 23, Exhibit R, p. 1 and 20 of 31, Exhibit G
Exhibit 74 Page 1010
Aesthetic Impacts
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Caretaker Residence: 710 square foot area.
Proposed landscaping and setbacks will screen buildings from neighboring
properties
JCC 18.30.050 Density, dimension, and open space standards. Table 6-1. Density,
Dimension and Open Space Standards.
JCC 18.20.350(3)(9) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
JCC 18.20.350(3)(h) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
Exhibit C, p. 3 of 23, Exhibit R, p. 1 and 20 of 31, Exhibit G
Exhibit 74 Page 1011
Aesthetic Impacts
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Both Parking and Building Locations: West side of the 21-acre property, leaving
approximately 666,000 square feet of mature forest between the development site
and Oak Bay Road.
Proposed landscaping, setbacks, and existing vegetation will screen buildings from
neighboring properties and Oak Bay Road
JCC 18.20.350(3)(f) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
JCC 18.20.350(3)(h) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
JCC 18.30.130(5) Landscaping
Exhibit C, p. 3, 11, 16 and 17 of 23, Exhibit R, p. 20 of 31, Exhibit G
Condition No. 14 of 35
Exhibit 74 Page 1012
Aesthetic Impacts
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Landscaping: 50 foot Screen A Landscaping Buffer, which 35 feet larger than the
minimum landscaping requirements for small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
The 50-foot landscaping buffer is composed of mature trees that range from
approximately 50 to 200 feet in height, which exceeds the proposed height of the
two buildings.
The 50-foot landscaping buffer shall remain in natural condition and shall be
monitored to ensure the health of landscaping vegetation.
JCC 18.20.350(3)(f) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
JCC 18.20.350(3)(h) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
JCC 18.30.130(5) Landscaping
Exhibit C, p. 9 of 23, Exhibit R, p. 3, 15, and 19 of 31
Condition No. 21 and 22 of 35 Exhibit 74 Page 1013
Aesthetic Impacts
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject,
how did you look for mitigation measures?
Walking Trail Signs: Located along 50 foot landscaping buffer.
Directional Sign: Located 10 feet from Oak Bay Road, north of the
driveway entrance.
Standing parallel to the road to avoid obstructing the line of
slight.
JCC 18.30.140 Lighting
JCC 18.30.150 Signs
Exhibit C, p. 14 and 17 of 23, Exhibit R, p. 20 and 21 of 31,
Exhibit G
Condition No. 24 of 35, No. 25 of 35
Exhibit 74 Page 1014
Aesthetic Impacts
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Driveway: Approximately 259 feet away from the southern property line, and
approximately 80 feet from the northern property line.
Retreat Center Parking Lot: 30 parking stalls, 9,222 square feet
Caretaker Residence Parking Lot: 1 parking stalls, 882 square feet
At the closest point, the proposed parking areas start at 82 feet from the southern property line and 349 feet from the northern property line.
JCC 18.30.050 Density, dimension, and open space standards. Table 6-1. Density, Dimension and Open Space Standards.
JCC 18.20.350(3)(f) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
JCC 18.20.350(3)(h) Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
JCC 18.30.130(5) Landscaping
Exhibit C, p. 3, 5, 8 and 20 of 23 , Exhibit R, p. 16, 21 and 22 of 31, Exhibit G
Condition No. 26 of 35, No. 27 of 35 Exhibit 74 Page 1015
Aesthetic Impacts
Conditions of Approval: How did you incorporate mitigation measures into the
conditional use permit? What conditions have you recommended for the project
to mitigate foreseen impacts?
Conditions of Approval
No. 14 of 35: Will not introduce other conditions which unreasonably impacts
existing uses in the vicinity of the subject parcel pursuant to JCC 18.20.350.
No. 21 of 35: 50 Foot Screen A Landscaping Buffer
No. 22 of 35: Walking Trails
No. 23 of 35: All proposed signs shall adhere to sign standards in JCC 18.30.150.
No. 24 of 35: Sign Best Management Practices
No. 25 of 35: Sign Road Setback Variance Permit
No. 26 of 35: Parking must meet on-site parking capacity.
No. 27 of 35: ADA/handicapped compliance parking
Exhibit 74 Page 1016
Aesthetics Impacts
DNS - Conclusions
The applicant has meet the building size requirements in JCC 18.20 and the
building height requirements JCC 18.30.
The proposed parking areas and buildings are not located along landscaping lines.
The nearest existing single-family residence along Oak Bay Road is approximately
500 feet from the proposed retreat center. The proposed caretaker’s residence is
approximately 350 feet from the nearest existing single-family residence.
All Interior lot lines will employ a 50 foot landscaping buffer, which is 35 feet
larger than the required landscaping standard for small-scale recreational and
tourist use development.
The applicant is proposing hardie board or cedar plank exteriors (dark brown) for
the exterior of the Retreat Center. These type of materials are not expected to
reflect light or cause significant glare. Windows will have roll shades installed to
control light or glare at night.
No additional reports, analysis, or mitigation are required per Jefferson County
Code for aesthetic features of small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
Exhibit 74 Page 1017
Habitat
Appellant (IV, 22): “The project includes logging of old trees to accommodate the
new commercial facility. This will result in a loss of habitat for wildlife. The
developer’s SEPA materials list some species that are suspected to be present,
but do not evaluate these species’ use of the property, nor the project’s impacts
upon these species. The failure to analyze this issue means the SEPA
determination was not based on information reasonably sufficient to evaluate
the project’s impacts. The probable impacts of this issue will be significant and
adverse”.
Exhibit 74 Page 1018
Habitat
DNS Analysis: With respect to this topic of appeal, how did you analyze the
potential impacts to the environment on this issue?
Jefferson County GIS Maps
Site Visit
Exhibit C: SEPA Environmental Checklist
Exhibit G: Site Plan
Best Management Practices
Jefferson County Code
Exhibit 74 Page 1019
Habitat
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Jefferson County GIS Maps:Geological hazardous areas (slight landslide hazard
area and shoreline slope stability area-intermediate slope) and coastal saltwater
intrusion protection zone. No bodies of water were shown through the Geographic
Information Systems mapping.
In addition, the GIS maps showed no evidence of Riparian Cover (PNPTC, 2009), Channel
Migration Zones, or Marbled Murrelet and Spotted Owl Habitat Areas.
As defined in JCC 18.22.610(1), vegetation and trees alone are not designated as fish and
wildlife habitat conservation areas.
JCC 18.22.210(1) Identification and mapping of critical areas
JCC 18.22.610(1) Classification/designation.
Exhibit 74 Page 1020
Habitat
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Site Visit: A Site Visit was conducted by the assigned Assistant Planner and Staff
Biologist on August 12, 2021.
No wetlands or streams were observed by the road side culverts or within the inland dry
valleys running toward Oak Bay Road.
Vegetation near the culverts indicate soil may be moist during the dry season, but the
water was not found to form a seasonal or active stream or wetland.
Chapter 18.22 Critical Areas, Article IX. Special Reports
Exhibit 74 Page 1021
Habitat
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Endangered Species Database IPaC: The following species
were found to occur near the project area; (1) Golden Paintbrush (Threatened Plant), (2)
Marbled Murrelet (Threatened Bird), (3) Streaked Horned Lark (Threatened Bird), (4) Yellow-billed Cuckoo (Threatened Bird), (5) Bull Trout (Threatened Fish) and (6)Taylor's Checkerspot (Endangered Insect).
IPAC: Information for Planning and Consultation –“Planning tool that streamlines the
USFWS environmental review process”.
USFWS or WDFW have not designated Endangered or Threatened Species habitat (“Critical Habitat”) on the subject property, nor have they submitted comments on this
proposal.
JCC 18.22.610(1) Classification/designation. FWHCAs include those areas identified as being of critical importance to the maintenance of endangered, threatened, or sensitive species of fish, wildlife or plants, or designated habitats and species of local importance.
Chapter 18.22 Critical Areas, Article IX. Special Reports
Exhibit C, p. 8 –11 of 23, Exhibit R, p. 25 -26 of 31.
Condition No. 4 of 35, 5 of 35, and 20 of 35. Exhibit 74 Page 1022
Habitat
Jefferson County Code: For any impacts on this subject, how did you look for
mitigation measures?
Best Management Practice(s):
The project area is located approximately 900 feet from Puget Sound and 80% of
the subject property will remain heavily forested upon completion of the project.
Retreat center landscaping we will focus on native planting, with the exception of
a small grassy lawn and adjacent vegetable garden.
Monitor forest health through daily walks throughout the property, scheduling and
implementing annual arborist/forester visits, and by keeping all utilities,
stormwater controls, and best management practices, such as the proposed rain
garden, in operating condition throughout the life time of the proposal.
Invasive plants like English Ivy, Himalayan blackberry and Holly are proposed to be
promptly removed upon observance to manage the spread of invasive species
known to occur after ground disturbance.
Exhibit 74 Page 1023
Habitat
Conditions of Approval: How did you incorporate mitigation measures into the
conditional use permit? What conditions have you recommended for the project
to mitigate foreseen impacts?
Conditions of Approval (Best Management Practices)
No. 4 of 35: Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing,
grading, or construction. Sand, silt, clay particles, and soil will damage aquatic
habitat and are considered to be pollutants.
No. 5 of 35: Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters
of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48 RCW, Water Pollution Control, and WAC
173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington,
and is subject to enforcement action.
No. 20 of 35: The applicant shall follow the JCPW Recommendations and Public
Works Department Fees Requirement sections of the SEPA Review and Stormwater
Site Plan Review and Comments Memorandum(s) dated September 30, 2021.
Exhibit 74 Page 1024
Habitat
Wetlands: A Habitat Assessment, prepared by Wet.land, LCC (dated May 4, 2022),
was submitted in conjunction with applicant’s appeal response.
Potential Category IV Slope Wetland (25 –50 foot wetland buffer) was observed on
parcel 921192003.
Based on visual estimates, the Category IV Wetland is located more than 50 feet from
the subject property. The Wetland buffer does not extend onto the subject property.
The proposal meets the wetland protection standards in JCC 18.22.730.
50-foot Screen A Landscaping Buffer & caretaker’s residence is located approximately 82
feet from parcel 921192003.
Condition No. 33 of 35: Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped,
approved site plan dated March 2nd, 2022 shall be resubmitted for review and approval
by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Proposed changes may
require modifications to the conditional use permit.
Jefferson County DCD does not require additional wetland mitigation measures for the
proposal. No proposed amendments to the recommended conditions of approval has
been requested.
Exhibit 74 Page 1025
Habitat
DNS -Conclusions
Jefferson County GIS Maps did not indicate the presence of streams or
wetlands on the subject property or adjacent properties.
A Site Visit was conducted by the assigned Assistant Planner and Staff Biologist
on August 12, 2021. No wetlands or streams were observed by the road side
culverts, or within the inland dry valleys running toward Oak Bay Road.
USFWS or WDFW have not designated Endangered or Threatened Species
habitat (“Critical Habitat”) on the subject property (IPAC), nor have they
submitted comments on this proposal.
Existing trees or vegetation are not regulated for habitat protection unless the
existing trees or vegetation are located in a fish and wildlife habitat
conservation area as defined in JCC 18.22.610(1).
80% of the subject property will remain heavily forested upon completion of
the project.
Best Management Practices
Exhibit 74 Page 1026
Wetlands
Appeal 22, Wetland and Streams: “The applicant’s revised critical areas
report mis-types and mis-delineates onsite and adjacent offsite wetlands, and
mis-types onsite and adjacent streams. In reality, the wetlands and streams
are required to have larger buffers than those depicted on the critical areas
report. The proposed septic field, road construction, and building
construction all intrude upon the buffers”.
Exhibit 74 Page 1027