Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutInterlocal Agreement Clallam, Jefferson, Kitsap Counties w Salish BH Interlocal re Opioid Settlement - 101022 pursuant to Section 15 of the Allocation Agreement for the purposes of receiving,managing, distributing,and administering Opioid Funds allocated to Clallam,Jefferson, and Kitsap counties consistent with the Approved Purposes set forth in the One WA MOU and consistent with the purposes set forth in Section 8 of the Allocation Agreement. H. SBH-ASO's Tribal members are subject to separate agreements concerning Opioid Funds,are not subject to the One WA MOU or the Allocation Agreement described herein,and thus it is unnecessary to join SBHI-ASO's Tribal members as parties to this Agreement. I. This Agreement is made pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 39.34 RCW. J. This Agreement does not contemplate a joint budget. K. This Agreement does not contemplate the joint acquisition of property by the parties. At termination, each party will remain the sole owner of its own property. AGREEMENT 1. The foregoing Recitals A through H are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein. 2. Clallam,Jefferson,and Kitsap counties hereby designate SBH-ASO as the Olympic Opioid Abatement Council pursuant to Section C.4.h of the One WA MOU and pursuant to Section 15 of the Allocation Agreement to oversee allocation,distribution, expenditures,and dispute resolution of Opioid Funds allocated to Clallam,Jefferson,and Kitsap counties consistent with the Approved Purposes set forth in the One WA MOU and Allocation Agreement and consistent with the purposes set forth in Section 8 of the Allocation Agreement (collectively"Approved Purposes"). 3. Clallam,Jefferson, and Kitsap counties shall pay over to SBH-ASO those Opioid Funds distributed to Clallam,Jefferson,and Kitsap counties or authorize that Opioid Funds allocated to Clallam,Jefferson,and Kitsap County be paid over directly to SBH-ASO. 4. SBH-ASO shall maintain Opioid Funds in a separate fund and Opioid Funds shall not be comingled with other funds received by SBH-ASO from HCA or other sources. 5. Ten percent(10%)of Opioid Funds received by SBH-ASO will be reserved, on an annual basis, for administrative costs related to managing, distributing,and administering Opioid Funds consistent with Approved Purposes. SBH-ASO will provide an annual accounting for actual costs and any reserved funds that exceed actual costs will be reallocated to Approved Purposes. 6. Opioid Funds will be subject to mechanisms for auditing and reporting to provide public accountability and transparency. All records related to the receipt and expenditure of Page 2 Opioid Funds shall be maintained for no less than five(5)years and such records shall be available for review by the Parties to this Agreement, government oversight authorities,and the public. Each party shall be responsible for its own compliance with the Washington Public Records Act, chapter 42.56 RCW (as may be amended). This Agreement, once executed,will be a"public record"subject to production to a third party if it is requested under the chapter 42.56 RCW. 7. SBH-ASO will be responsible for the following actions with respect to Opioid Funds: a. Overseeing distribution of Opioid Funds to programs and services within the Olympic Community of Health Region regional service area for Approved Purposes. b. Preparing annual expenditure reports for compliance with Approved Purposes. c. Reporting and making publicly available all decisions on Opioid Fund allocation applications,distributions,and expenditures by SBH-ASO. d. Developing and maintaining a centralized public dashboard or other repository for the publication of expenditure data for expenditures of Opioid Funds by SBH-ASO, which it shall update at least annually. e. If necessary,require and collect additional outcome-related data to evaluate the use of Opioid Funds. f. Hearing complaints by Clallam,Jefferson,and/or Kitsap Counties regarding alleged failure to(I)use Opioid Funds for Approved Purposes or(2)comply with reporting requirements. 8. If any Party to this Agreement believes another Party violated the terms of this Agreement,the WA One MOU,and/or the Allocation Agreement,the aggrieved Party may seek judicial enforcement of the terms of this Agreement,the WA One MOU,and/or the Allocation Agreement. The Parties hereby stipulate that venue of any action shall be Thurston County Superior Court in accordance with RCW 4.12.080. Prior to filing any such action,the alleging Party shall first provide the alleged offending Party notice of the alleged violation(s)and a reasonable opportunity to cure the alleged violation(s). In such an enforcement action,any alleging Party or alleged offending Party may be represented by their respective public entity in accordance with Washington law. 9. Nothing in this MOU shall be interpreted to waive the right of any Party to seek judicial relief for conduct occurring outside the scope of this Agreement that violates any Washington law. In such an action,the alleged offending Party may be represented by their respective public entities in accordance with Washington law. In the event of a conflict, any Party may seek outside representation to defend itself against such an action. 10. This Agreement is subject to the terms and conditions of the Parties' interlocal Page 3 agreement establishing the SBH-ASO (KC-279-19, as it may be amended or superseded from time to time), except that in the event of an inconsistency between this Agreement and the Parties' interlocal agreement establishing the SBH-ASO, unless otherwise provided, the inconsistency is resolved by giving precedence in the following order: a. Applicable Federal and Washington State Statutes and Regulations. b. All terms and conditions in this Agreement, including the One WA MOU and the Allocation Agreement. c. The Parties' interlocal agreement establishing the SBH-ASO(KC-279-19, as it may be amended or superseded from time to time). d. Any other material incorporated herein by written reference. 11. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. The Parties agree not to deny the legal effect or enforceability of this Agreement solely because it is in electronic form or because an electronic record was used in its formation. The Parties agree not to object to the admissibility of this Agreement in the form of an electronic record,or a paper copy of an electronic document,or a paper copy of a document bearing an electronic signature, on the grounds that it is an electronic record or electronic signature or that it is not in its original form or is not an original. 12. This Agreement shall take effect upon the date of its full execution and shall expire on the date that the Interlocal Agreement establishing the SBH-ASO expires(KC-279-19, as it may be amended or superseded from time to time). 13. Each Party represents that all procedures necessary to authorize such Party's execution of this Agreement have been performed and that the person signing for such Party has been authorized to execute this Agreement. 14. Once fully executed,this Agreement shall by filed by Kitsap County with the Kitsap County Auditor. 15. The parties shall keep and maintain all records required by law in connection with the performance of this Agreement. 16. The parties signed this Agreement in the State of Washington. The laws of the United States and the State of Washington govern this Agreement,as if applied to transactions agreed upon and to be performed wholly within the State of Washington.No Party shall argue or assert that any state law other than Washington law applies to the governance or construction of this Agreement. 17. This agreement may be amended to address distribution of additional funds received from settlements with and/or litigation against opioid pharmaceutical supply chain participants. Page 4 1 u-. Approved this I0) day of O / ,2022 JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS I j ,,,•(.. Held enhour. Chair Kate can mmissione r eg Brotherton, Commissioner y? Y �1< J ` V •q/ 1 "tgs"" � / ; fo Attest: , - k I 4 / . (---a 41- 6c,((a(/v4 _ " • Carolyn Gallaway,Clerk of thiBoard • • Approved as to form only: C 0+ ,- October 5, 2022 Philip C. Hunsucker, Date Chief Civil Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Page 6 Approved this 5 day of pub , 2022 KITSAP COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, in its capacities as the governing body of Kitsap County and as the administrative entity for the Salish Behavioral Health Organization :,:i; tf, le i Edward E. Wolfe, Chair til Charlotte Garrido, Commissioner NOT PRESENT Rob Gelder, Commissioner A test: Dana Daniels, Clerk of the Board P ! ®; ••• •••.tV. 1, e i i#t •.yam• •••: * } �•♦s•• 4 Page 7 Consent Agenda JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA REQUEST TO: Board of Commissioners Mark McCauley,County Administrator FROM: Philip C. Hunsucker,Chief Civil Deputy Prosecuting Attorney DATE: October 10,2022 RE: Opioid Litigation—Interlocal Agreement Between Clallam County,Jefferson County, Kitsap County and Salish Behavioral Health Administrative Services for Administration of Funds Distributed Per the Allocation Agreement between the State and Local Governments for$430 Million State Settlement with 3 Large Distributors STATEMENT OF ISSUE: In 2018, Jefferson County engaged the Keller Rohrback (KR) law firm to pursue affirmative claims against Opioid manufacturers and distributors. Jefferson County is one of several Washington municipalities (counties and cities) represented by KR. Other Washington municipalities in the Opioid litigation are represented by another law firm. A lawsuit filed by KR on behalf of Jefferson County is part of multi-district Opioid litigation in federal court in Cleveland, Ohio. The represented Washington municipalities negotiated a memorandum of understanding, that was approved by the BoCC on April 4, 2022. That MOU is called the One Washington Memorandum of Understanding Between Washington Municipalities and controls how funds recovered by the Washington municipalities will allocate settlements among themselves. The MOU requires distributions by regions. The MOU says, "Prior to any distribution of Opioid Funds within the Allocation Region, the Participating Local Governments must establish an Opioid Abatement Council (OAC)to oversee Opioid Fund allocation,distribution,expenditures and dispute resolution. The OAC may be a preexisting regional body or may be a new body created for purposes of executing the obligations of this MOU." Clallam and Kitsap County approved having the Salish Behavioral Health Administrative Services for Administration (SBH-ASO) serve as the regional coordinator for the distribution of funds under the MOU. Separately,the State of Washington has been pursuing its own affirmative claims against Opioid manufacturers and distributors. The represented Washington municipalities and the Washington Attorney General (AG) have been discussing for approximately two years a structure for distributing to Washington municipalities funds obtained as part of any recovery on the State's claims for Opioid abatement. These negotiations moved slowly until June 2022. In June 2022, the State settled with the three major distributors of Opioids, McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and, AmerisourceBergen Corporation. KR has been 1 Consent Agenda negotiating an Allocation Agreement with the AG's office for allocation of the settlement among the State and the Washington municipalities. A final Allocation Agreement was reached on August 8, 2022, and is attached. Under the Allocation Agreement, the Washington municipalities receive 50 percent of the net settlement amount of$430 million. Under this Allocation Agreement,Jefferson County's is expected to be will be$807,231.86,calculated: $430,000,000.00 Total Settlement $215,000,000.00 112 to Local Governments $182,750,000.00 Less 15%Attorney's Fees 0.4417137380% Jefferson County Share Allocated to Jefferson $807,231.86 County All the funds allocated to Jefferson County must be used for Opioid abatement. And,per the MOU,the all the funds allocated for Clallam,Jefferson,Kitsap Counties will be distributed through SBII-ASO. The Chief Civil Deputy Prosecuting Attorneys for Clallam,Jefferson,Kitsap Counties worked together to prepare an interlocal agreement(ILA)necessary to effectuate the distributions through SBH-ASO. The ILA is attached and already has been approved by Kitsap County. ANALYSIS: To effectuate the MOU and the Allocation Agreement,the BoCC should approve the ILA. FISCAL IMPACT: Likely$807,231.86 for Opioid abatement through SBH-ASO. Jefferson County still has claims against the Opioid manufacturers and remaining distributors. RECOMMENDATION: Approve and sign the ILA. DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Philip C. Hunsucker,Chief Civil Deputy Prosecuting Attorney at Extension 219. REVIEWED BY: Ae ro z ark McC cy, County Administrator Date 2 CONTRACT REVIEW FORM Clear RI' (INSTRUCTIONS ARE ON THE NEXT PAGE) CONTRACT WITH: Salish Behavioral Health&Clallam and Kitsap Counties Contract No: PAO-2022-001 Contract For: Administration of Opioid Settlement Funds Term: Undefinate COUNTY DEPARTMENT: PAO Contact Person: Philip C.Hunsucker,Chief ChM Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Contact Phone: (360)385-9219 Contact email: phunsucker@co.jefferson.wa.us AMOUNT: $807,231.86 PROCESS: Exempt from Bid Process Revenue: $807,231.86 Cooperative Purchase Expenditure: $807,231.86 Competitive Sealed Bid Matching Funds Required: - Small Works Roster Sources(s)of Matching Funds - Vendor List Bid Fund# RFP or RFQ Munis Org/Obj - if Other:Settlement APPROVAL STEPS: STEP 1: DEPARTMENT CERTIFIES COMPLIANCE WITH JCC 3.55.0S0 AND CHAPTER 42,23 RCW. CERTIFIED: El N/A:Q ' '2"` October 5,2022 Signature Date STEP 2: DEPARTMENT CERTIFIES THE PERSON PROPOSED FOR CONTRACTING WITH THE COUNTY (CONTRACTOR) HAS NOT BEEN DEBARRED BY ANY FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL AGENCY. October 5,2022 CERTIFIED: El N/A: C Signature Date STEP 3: RISK MANAGEMENT REVIEW(will be added electronically through Laserfiche): Electronically approved by Risk Management on 10/5/2022. STEP 4: PROSECUTING ATTORNEY REVIEW(will be added electronically through Laserfiche): Electronically approved as to form by PAO on 10/5/2022. BOCC already approved this funding distribution. This ILA just implements a prior decision of the BaCC. STEP 5: DEPARTMENT MAKESREVISIONS & RESUBMITS TO RISK MANAGEMENT AND PROSECUTING ATTORNEY(IF REQUIRED). STEP 6: CONTRACTOR SIGNS STEP 7: SUBMIT TO BOCC FOR APPROVAL 1