HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAM2022-00444 - Geohazard Area10/12/22, 1:42 PM Online Appointment Scheduling Software :: Free Scheduler for Appointments
https://secure.acuityscheduling.com/appointments/view/906035343?print=1 1/6
Tia Schwarz
Tuesday, October 11, 2022
3:00pm - 3:30pm
30min
Land Use CAM Phone Call with Customer Assistance Meeting (CAM) Calendar
Phone (360) 930 2717
Email tia@fasttrackci.com
Time zone (GMT 7:00) Paci c Time
Scheduled by a client on September 28, 2022 at 9:15pm
View all changes & noti cations sent
LO C AT I O N
Phone Call (Sta will call the phone # given)
C L I E N T U S E R
Tia Schwarz (tia@fasttrackci.com)
Notes
N OT E S A B O U T T H I S A P P O I N T M E N T
No notes
N OT E S A B O U T T H I S C L I E N T
No notes
Notes about this client show on all of their appointments
Completed
10/12/22, 1:42 PM Online Appointment Scheduling Software :: Free Scheduler for Appointments
https://secure.acuityscheduling.com/appointments/view/906035343?print=1 2/6
History
P R E V I O U S A P P O I N T M E N T
None
N E X T A P P O I N T M E N T
None
CAM Details
PA R C E L N U M B E R
502313042
I N F O R M AT I O N R E Q U E S T E D - L I S T A L L Q U E S T I O N S A N D A N Y I N F O R M AT I O N YO U W O U L D L I K E T O A D D R E S S .
1) Proposing to build a SFR that has a footprint of 600 sqft. No additional impervious surface to be added.
This project quali es as a Small Project per the Stormwater Flow Chart, however, the central section of this
parcel (not including the proposed build site) is considered a "Moderate" Landslide Hazard area. I am
inquiring what stormwater steps will be necessary with that in mind. Do we need an engineer to come up
with a drainage plan?
2) There is a discrepancy with the North property line. The "Aker Short Plat" from 1988 shows the
Northwest property pin to be approx 25' south of what the Land Survey from 2006 is showing based o of
a Quit Claim Deed recording (File No: 513887). Which line will be honored for building setbacks? On the
GIS mapping site, the cleared proposed build location looks to be not fully on this parcel in question. I
anticipate some turbulence with applying for the building permit with this in mind, and would like to know
how to best resolve and avoid issues later.
3) Is a Geological Hazard Assessment provided by a Geotech with conclusions and recommendations for
the tree removal and drainage option pertaining to the landslide or erosion hazard su cient to address
building with the parcel having a section that is a "Moderate" Landslide Hazard Area? And will a
Geological Hazard Assessment provided also help with the Stormwater requirement?
P L E A S E U P L O A D A N Y D O C U M E N T S E .G . S U R V E Y S , S I T E P L A N S , M A P S E T C . T H AT M AY B E H E L P F U L F O R S TA F F T O P R O V I D E
C U S T O M E R A S S I S TA N C E .
Preliminary Site Plan.pdf
I F Y O U H AV E M O R E T H A N O N E D O C U M E N T T O U P LO A D, C L I C K "C H O O S E F I L E ..." B E LO W T O A D D A S E C O N D D O C U M E N T.
Short Plat.pdf
I F Y O U H AV E M O R E T H A N T W O D O C U M E N T S T O U P L O A D, C L I C K "C H O O S E F I L E ..." B E L O W T O A D D A T H I R D D O C U M E N T.
10/12/22, 1:42 PM Online Appointment Scheduling Software :: Free Scheduler for Appointments
https://secure.acuityscheduling.com/appointments/view/906035343?print=1 3/6
Land Survey.pdf
CAM Notes (internal use only)
C A M #
CAM2022 00444
Z O N I N G
RR 5 - Rural Residential
S H O R E L I N E D E S I G N AT I O N
None
S P E C I F I C R E Q U E S T E D I N F O R M AT I O N
1) Proposing to build a SFR that has a footprint of 600 sqft. No additional impervious surface to be added.
This project quali es as a Small Project per the Stormwater Flow Chart, however, the central section of this
parcel (not including the proposed build site) is considered a "Moderate" Landslide Hazard area. I am
inquiring what stormwater steps will be necessary with that in mind. Do we need an engineer to come up
with a drainage plan?
An engineered stormwater plan is required if the applicant is proposing to alter the existing stormwater
drainage on the subject property. If the applicant is proposing to introduce additional stormwater
(associated with an additional structure) to the existing drianage pipe, a licensed stormwater engineer
shall review the proposal and submit a engineered stormwater letter and/or engineered stormwater plan
verifying the existing drainage pipe can manage all impervious surfaces proposed.
Je erson County will also request that the professional geologist address the proposed additional
stormwater dispersion onto the steep slope and into the erosion hazard area. This review can be
submitted as an addendum of the existinng geological hazard assessment.
2) There is a discrepancy with the North property line. The "Aker Short Plat" from 1988 shows the
Northwest property pin to be approx 25' south of what the Land Survey from 2006 is showing based o of
a Quit Claim Deed recording (File No: 513887). Which line will be honored for building setbacks? On the
GIS mapping site, the cleared proposed build location looks to be not fully on this parcel in question. I
anticipate some turbulence with applying for the building permit with this in mind, and would like to know
how to best resolve and avoid issues later.
The most recent legally established land division action on the property will determine the current
property lines. According to the property history, a Boundary Line Adjustment (SUB2007 00031) was
approved in 2007. It is highly recommended to ask the Je erson County Assessor's O ce if the 2006
survey is the most recent survey conducted for the property, and if this is the survey approved with
SUB2007 00031.
Creating and altering private easement areas are a private legal matter.
10/12/22, 1:42 PM Online Appointment Scheduling Software :: Free Scheduler for Appointments
https://secure.acuityscheduling.com/appointments/view/906035343?print=1 4/6
3) Is a Geological Hazard Assessment provided by a Geotech with conclusions and recommendations for
the tree removal and drainage option pertaining to the landslide or erosion hazard su cient to address
building with the parcel having a section that is a "Moderate" Landslide Hazard Area? And will a
Geological Hazard Assessment provided also help with the Stormwater requirement?
The Geological Hazard Assessment must contain language addressing the proposed new structure
and/or development footprint in the landslide hazard area, and any stormwater or construction
recommendations associated with the proposed new structure. If it currently does not contain such
language, an addendum shall be required in conjunction with a building permit application. See the
answer for question #1 regarding stormwater review.
G E O L O G I C A L LY H A Z A R D O U S A R E A S
yes
G E O L O G I C A L LY H A Z A R D O U S A R E A S N O T E S
See notes above.
W E T L A N D S
no
W E T L A N D S N O T E S
N/A
F I S H & W I L D L I F E H A B I TAT C O N S E R VAT I O N A R E A S
no
F I S H & W I L D L I F E H A B I TAT C O N S E R VAT I O N A R E A S N O T E S
N/A
F E M A F L O O D
no
F E M A F L O O D N O T E S
N/A
C R I T I C A L A Q U I F E R R E C H A R G E A R E A
yes
C R I T I C A L A Q U I F E R R E C H A R G E A R E A N O T E S
According to the Je erson County GIS Maps, there is a critical aquifer recharge area located on the
10/12/22, 1:42 PM Online Appointment Scheduling Software :: Free Scheduler for Appointments
https://secure.acuityscheduling.com/appointments/view/906035343?print=1 5/6
subject property. No special report is required for the proposal.
Aquifer Recharge Areas in Je erson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow
percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic
formations that contain su cient saturated permeable material to yield signi cant quantities of water to
wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of
Je erson County. Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate
water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection
measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs)
and facility design standards as identi ed and de ned in the Stormwater Management Manual for the
Puget Sound Basin.
S E AWAT E R I N T R U S I O N P R O T E C T I O N Z O N E (S I P Z )
no
S E AWAT E R I N T R U S I O N P R O T E C T I O N Z O N E (S I P Z ) N OT E S
N/A
R E P O R T S R E Q U I R E D F O R D E V E L O P M E N T O R P R O J E C T
yes
R E P O R T S R E Q U I R E D F O R D E V E L O P M E N T O R P R O J E C T N O T E S
1. Geological Hazard Assessment Addendum (if applicable) prepared by a professional geologist
S E T B A C K N O T E S S P E C I F I C TO P R O P E R T Y
General Setbacks & Other Building Standards for Residential Development:
1. 20 ft from local access
2. 5 ft from the sides and rear of any structure to the property line
3. 25 % impervious surface limit
4. 35 ft building height limit
5. 2 parking spots required
6. Commercial Forest (Parcel 503360001)- 250 ft building setback
Critical Areas:
1. Top of the Slope Setback (determined by professional geologist)
S T O R M W AT E R N OT E S
Stormwater Manual:
https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/ezshare/wq/Permits/Flare/2019SWMMWW/2019SWMMWW.htm#Topics/Volu
meV/DispersionBMPs/BMPt530.htm
Development adding over 2,000 sq. ft of impervious surface- The applicant will submit the "Medium
Stormwater Packet" at the time of the building permit application.
10/12/22, 1:42 PM Online Appointment Scheduling Software :: Free Scheduler for Appointments
https://secure.acuityscheduling.com/appointments/view/906035343?print=1 6/6
Development adding under 2,000 sq. ft of impervious surface- The applicant will submit the "Small
Stormwater Packet" at the time of the building permit application.
An Engineered Stormwater Plan will be required if the project meets any of the criteria below:
- Sites with greater than 15% slopes may require applicants hire a geologist to recommend if a drainage
method is appropriate.
- If you cannot do full dispersion on parcels larger than 5 acres, engineering is required.
- Discharging directly to a marine water via tight line must be engineered.
- Other site constraints (i.e. critical areas, setbacks, lot size, etc.) that would require engineered
consultation and design.
Z O N I N G N OT E S
N/A
S H O R E L I N E N OT E S
N/A
PA R C E L TA G N OT E S
N/A
R E C O M M E N D E D N E X T S T E P S
N/A
A D D I T I O N A L N OT E S
N/A