Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP2013-00051 - COMMUNICATION Donna Frostholm From: Carl Smith Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 10:02 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: FW: bonding options Donna: The Douglas's want to have the CASP bond fee waived. In the email below, I found a couple of code sections that might justify it. Would you please look at these and then discuss this with me verbally. Thanks,Carl From: Philip Morley Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 7:29 AM To: Carl Smith Subject: RE: bonding options Carl, have you determined whether the bonding requirement for the Douglas restoration project can be waived? Pls advise,as Ms. Douglas is scheduled to meet with me next week. Thx. Philip Philip Morley Jefferson County Administrator pmorlev @co.iefferson.wa.us (360)385-9100 x-383 This is a reminder that all email to or from this email address may be subject to the Public Records Act contained in RCW 42.56. Additionally, all email to and from the county is captured and archived by Information Services. From:Carl Smith Sent:Thursday, February 19, 2015 1:57 PM To: Philip Morley Subject: bonding options Philip: Monte said he doubts a private individual could get a bond. Usually a contractor license is required. Also,the bond amount in this case is low so the bond fee may not be enough for a bonding company to bother with. Another line of reasoning: Since the Douglas's are doing this improvement voluntarily(it's not caused by a new development requiring a building permit) we could waive the bond entirely and hope all goes well or have the shoreline permit state they will replant if the plantings fail. The critical areas code allows for general exemptions(see18.22.070 #4 and 21 below)or provisions of the CASP to be waived (see 18.22.550 below): 18.22.070 General exemptions.a ARE The following activities in critical areas or their buffers are exempt from the requirements of this chapter: 1 (1)Agricultural activities when undertaken pursuant to best management practices to minimize impacts to critical areas and consistent with JCC 18.20.030. (2) Forest practices regulated and conducted in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 76.09 RCW and forest practice regulations,WAC Title 222, and which are exempt from Jefferson County jurisdiction. (3) Maintenance or reconstruction of existing public or private roads, paths, bicycle ways,trails, bridges, and associated storm drainage facilities when undertaken pursuant to best management practices to minimize impacts to critical areas and to immediately restore any disturbed critical area or its buffer; provided, that reconstruction does not involve expansion of facilities. (4)Maintenance and repair of existing drainage facilities or systems, including, but not limited to,ditches, culverts,catch basins,and outfalls when undertaken pursuant to best management practices to minimize impacts to critical areas and immediately to restore any disturbed critical area or its buffer. (5) Utility activities,when undertaken pursuant to best management practices to minimize impacts to critical areas and immediately to restore any disturbed critical area or its buffer: (a) Normal and routine maintenance or repair of existing utility facilities or rights-of-way. (b) Installation, construction, relocation and replacement, operation, repair, or alteration of all utility lines, equipment, or appurtenances, not including substations, in improved road rights-of-way. (6) Reconstruction, remodeling, or maintenance of existing structures. This exemption shall not apply to reconstruction which is proposed as a result of structural damage associated with a geologically hazardous area and does not allow further intrusion into a wetland,fish and wildlife habitat conservation area and/or their buffers. (7) Site investigative work. Site investigative work necessary for land use application submittals, including but not limited to surveys, soil logs, and percolation tests involving no fill or use of heavy equipment in a wetland, or a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area or their buffers; provided, that disturbed critical areas and their buffers are immediately restored and best management practices are implemented and excavation for soil logs or percolation tests are filled. (8) Emergency action.Action that is taken which is necessary to resolve or prevent imminent threat or danger to public health or safety, or to public or private property, or serious environmental degradation. If the nature of the emergency is such that it is not possible to first seek review,the department, as well as any federal or state agencies with jurisdiction (e.g.,the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers), must be notified of the action within 30 days of the initiation of the emergency work. 2 (9)Artificial wetlands and artificial ponds. (10) Flood control. Operation, maintenance and repair of dikes, ditches, reservoirs, and other structures and facilities which were created or developed as part of normal flood control activities, except that this exemption does not extend to the permanent draining or permanent alteration of any regulated wetland. (11) Irrigation. Operation, maintenance and repair of ditches, reservoirs, ponds and other structures and facilities. (12) Recreational uses, swimming, boating and fishing. Maintenance and repair of docks, piers, boat launches and floats in lakes(provided that the proposed action complies with the requirements of the Shoreline Management Act), in deep water habitats one acre or greater in size when such activities are for recreational purposes and do not involve alteration of or construction through, over or in a regulated wetland. Other outdoor activities, including hunting and fishing (pursuant to state law), bird watching, hiking, bicycling. (13) Existing residential landscaping. Planting, irrigating,fertilizing, spraying, mowing and pruning and maintenance and repair of structures when such activities are part of existing normal residential landscaping activities and no building permit is required. This exemption does not allow further intrusion into a wetland, fish and wildlife habitat conservation area, geologically hazardous area or their buffers. (14)All wetlands wherein wetland conditions are being maintained only because of human-induced water, even if it can be determined that the wetland conditions would no longer exist if the activity(for example, irrigation or pumping water)were to be terminated. (15) Removal or destruction of noxious weeds listed in Chapter 16-750 WAC is the responsibility of the landowner; provided,that the following conditions are met: (a)The removal or control of noxious weeds shall follow guidelines issued by the Jefferson County noxious weed control board.The Jefferson County noxious weed control board shall coordinate with the department of planning and community development for the control of noxious weeds in wetlands. (b)All herbicide applications in aquatic environments shall conform to the rules of the Department of Ecology, Department of Agriculture and Department of Natural Resources, pursuant to Chapters 173- 201, 16-228, and 222-38 WAC. (16)The harvesting of wild crops in a manner that is not injurious to natural reproduction of such crops and provided the harvesting does not require tilling soil, planting crops, or changing existing topography,water conditions, or water sources and provided these activities do not have any adverse impacts on protection of the critical area or its buffer. 3 (17)The enhancement of a buffer by planting indigenous vegetation. (18)The construction of unpaved trails when located in the buffer areas and elevated when located in wetlands,which are not intended for motorized use, and which are no wider than five feet, unless additional width is necessary for safety along a precipice, steep hillside, or other hazardous area. (19) Installation of navigation aids and boundary markers. (20) Drilling or digging and maintenance of wells; provided,that impacts to critical areas and their buffers are minimized and disturbed areas are immediately restored. (21)The administrator may determine that an activity is closely allied or similar to any activity in this list. If such an activity does not impact the functions and values of any critical area or its buffers,it may also be determined to be exempt.[Ord. 3-08§ 1] 18.22.550 Waiver.P. _SHARE _.. .' The administrator may waive portions of a critical area stewardship plan (CASP) if, in his/her opinion, critical area functions and values will not be adversely affected by a proposed activity.An approved CASP must be recorded on the property deed (recorded with the Jefferson County auditor) and must remain in effect unless replaced by a new or updated CASP approved by the county. [Ord. 3-08§ 1] Carl Smith,AICP Director, Department of Community Development Jefferson County 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 V:360-379-4493 F:360-379-4451 csmith@co.jefferson.wa.us www.cajefferson.wa.us SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. 4 Donna Frostholm From: Carl Smith Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 1:14 PM To: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com Cc: Philip Morley; Donna Frostholm Subject: Quilcene restoration project Hello Kathleen: This is to inform you that, pursuant to its authority under Jefferson County Code 18.22.550(Waiver),the County will not require a cash performance bond as a requirement of the Critical Area Stewardship Plan (CASP)for your restoration project on County owned land in Quilcene Bay. All other requirements of the CASP will remain in force. On behalf of the County, I wish you success with this project. Best regards,Carl Carl Smith,AICP Director, Department of Community Development Jefferson County 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 V: 360-379-4493 F:360-379-4451 csmith@co.jefferson.wa.us www.cojefferson.wa.us `A SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. 1 ii! 1 jivie, ,j j7,4_1, 0- -amo` `fq- 06-6( "e a_J._) 5. C-0 Ida wv . l ._ ?, /� � v l ./t'tA/t /fri / 4 - ,L6t/ik. Ct 0-6- 0 ill 1 V 9 / �' e€ 4,,,,,,,,v4 m eu,-t 6--cdkyl,a-e 24,1 2,, s ' .,,,o --t(4 0-7-1- 5 = - ' , ),,tj ms* i - • u _. It/k-( 7-94.6) .. -e%pc_ ; do it w(„_„ v a-�fir^ et h e e C`®Lulu-t l+ p : , > di LO-7 Li L .4 L► - , , 0 -f--j ; / ...- fr is WO i ,> . . A .;■-•A /. 1 AI, L?-dei 1/ 1- IAt .1 ..■ i L' IN ., i ,:, _i/4_.,...1 Of ,. rmitiii I>S/06 -"If. v ' d iir / -- V4____ i ea i :a •A-, , i j jt* _1.' 4, - 41 4l // 4. - = • ' - I --174174-k=-F -- ---C-40,--e,C------ I4° -C-44----- -. C-1--,i ' I II • , 4 ■ o' .0" I _ 1 Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 7:35 AM To: 'Bigelow, Margaret M (DFW)' Subject: FW: mla13-00165 douglas sepa determination Attachments: douglas mdns.pdf Margie: Attached is the final SEPA threshold determination for the intertidal re-channelization work in Quilcene Bay proposed by Kathleen Douglas. DCD has issued a MDNS for this work. Let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Donna Frostholm Jefferson County DCD 1 Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 7:38 AM To: Leanne Jenkins (ljenkins@jamestowntribe.org) Subject: FW: mla13-00165 douglas sepa determination Attachments: douglas mdns.pdf Leanne: Attached is a Final SEPA Threshold Determination issued by Jefferson County DCD for the intertidal re-channelization work in Quilcene Bay. Regards, Donna Frostholm Associate Planner/Wetland Specialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, Washington 98368 360-379-4466 dfrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us DCD is open from 9:00am—12:00pm and 1:00pm—4:30pm Monday through Thursday; DCD is closed on Friday. All emails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 Donna Frostholm From: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 4:11 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Carl Smith; Reimer Douglas; marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Subject: RE: MLA13-00165 Permitting Importance: High Donna: I appreciate the call-back in answer to my question about the bond amount. Frankly,$6,079 was a shock as was learning we even needed a bond. I understand the rationale for a performance bond and that the money will be returned in 5 years. However,the fact remains that we don't have$6K to put up for a bond at this time. Is there any way to reduce the amount since all our efforts/resources directly benefit the county? We are at^ $34,000 and counting for our contribution to restore county property. This amount doesn't include another MSA bill coming plus now more money to the county for permitting and then of course eventual work on the beach. Besides the bond,adding to my concern is my experience that the slightest delay has a domino effect on other agencies with the potential result we again miss the window for digging on the beach. We appreciate your consideration. I hope you consider the enormous hours/efforts I have put in doing what is right. I also hope you take into account your experience of me- I keep my word and am dedicated to beach restoration. Regards, Kathleen From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent:Wednesday, February 04, 2015 1:51 PM To: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com Subject: MLA13-00165 Permitting Kathleen: Today I issued your CASP permit and have sent it along with the information for posting the CASP performance bond. The full amount of the performance bond can be refunded at the end of the 5-year monitoring period, assuming all performance measures have been met. Once the performance bond has been paid, I can issue the shoreline permit. Please be aware that you pre-paid for 7 hours of review time for the shoreline application and I have spent more than 7 hours reviewing the application. I have not yet calculated the total hours worked on the shoreline permit, but that fee will also need to be paid prior to issuing that permit. Once the shoreline permit is issued,you will have all your county permits. Regards, Donna yrostltoCm Associate Planner/WetlandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street 1 Tort Townsend Washington 98368 36o-379-4466 dfrostho Cm@co jefferson.wa.us DCD is open from 9:00am—12:00pm and 1:00pm—4:30pm Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All emails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 2 Donna Frostholm From: MSA <marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 1:43 PM To: Tong, Kristina G NWS; Bigelow Schirato, Margaret M (DFW); Donna Frostholm Cc: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com Subject: Re: Douglas Stream Project Revised Planting Plan Attachments: DouglasRevisedPlantingPlan.pdf Hi All, After yesterday's submission to Jefferson County, we received a few comments. Those comments were address and this new revised planting plan was made. Please note that this copy has been accepted by Jefferson County and will be the final version. Cheers, Nam Siu Marine Biologist and Project Manager Marine Surveys Et Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Web: marinesurveysandassessments.corn Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:05 PM, MSA<marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com>wrote: Hi All, Please find attached a revised planting plan for the Douglas stream restoration project. A hard-copy is also being delivered to the Jefferson County DCD. Please let us know if you have any questions or comments. Cheers, Marine Surveys Et Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Web: marinesurveysandassessments.corn Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 1 Marine Surveys & Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.corn Web: marinesurveysandassessments.corn Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 2 Douglas Stream Restoration Project Planting Plan Jan 28,2015 • . l ." ; l ,' t r I .. + 0 20 40' „ �ti ',' i ----�-- 5.0 halMil • ilia[IN Ill • do i 6.0 I Ail 7.0 , I / DOUGLAS ��r .,8.0 9.0 r f PROPERTY f CURRENT STREAM # { CHANNEL AREA ' A EXISTING STREAM ALIGNMENT i ••• s „ i (ill RESTORED STREAM ALIGNMENT ) i 4'.. a / I GUOSKEY ' •s•-•� • •••• t a + PROPERTY RESTORED STREAM •,•'`\'•;.i.�:...•'...7.---.•: • • ! i •CHANNEL AREA • •• O°�4,•\ SAS MHWE I•.•r• AS MHW I •DRIFT LOGS APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS • \J� MHW i FOR PLANTINGS •• fj 10.53' , ON 1 TO 3'CENTERS * •.• • , Ill 0,` • }• MHHW t kit 136 JEFFERSON COUNTY PROPERTY • ! ` HOME OWNERS 1 I1 ASSOCIATION PROPERTY i i t t t t Existing native plant species from the The following native plants will be moved Current Stream Channel Area will be andror purchased to be planted on moved and replanted in the Restored Stream I-3'centers Channel Area.New native plant species will be added to the area to bring the Dunegrass(Etyma moths) total number of plants in the area up to 70 Saver burweed(Ambrosia chamissonis) The Monitoring Plan as specified by the Seashore saitgrass(Oistrchas sprcafa) Jefferson County DCD will be followed American g€asswort(Sal/coma virpsnicn) Plantain species Donna Frostholm From: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 3:23 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: 'MSA' Subject: RE: RE: Beach restoration Thanks Donna! I'll work with Amy. From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent:Thursday,January 15, 2015 2:19 PM To: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com Cc: 'MSA' Subject: RE: RE: Beach restoration Kathleen and Amy: See attached letter for biological addendum letter. Best, Donna Frostholm Associate Planner/Wetland Specialist Jefferson County DCD From: Kathleen @kmdouelas.com [mailto:Kathleen @kmdouglas.com] Sent:Wednesday,January 14, 2015 2:03 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: FW: RE: Beach restoration Sorry it bounced back due to the wrong email! From: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com Sent:Wednesday,January 14, 2015 2:01 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Carl Smith; marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com; Reimer Douglas; iustin @nti4u.com; 'kathleen @kmdouglas.com' Subject: RE: Beach restoration Hi Donna, Thanks for the great news yesterday. We are so glad the permit only requires additional planting to fulfill county requirements. We will work with Amy/MSA when you document the additional requirements. (Amy, per Donna you should expect the info today or tomorrow.) Best to you and thank you for all your hard work, Kathleen Donna Frostholm From: Tong, Kristina G NWS <Kristina.G.Tong @usace.army.mil> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 3:42 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Tong, Kristina G NWS Subject: RE: MLA13-00165 Douglas Shoreline Application - Quilcene Bay(UNCLASSIFIED) Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Donna, Thanks for the information. I would appreciate receiving a copy of what they submit. I unfortunately found out the PN did not go to the neighbors. So I sent them the PN and heard back from Mr. G. We exchanged a number of emails. He did not have any substantial project specific comments on the proposed project. I am proceeding to finalize my review of their application. I hope to finish my review by the end of the month at which time I will then forward the documents to my supervisor who completes the final review and makes the final decision. Also, before we can make a final decision we need to have a 401 WQC decision from Ecology. I will double check, but I believe I do not have this yet. Thanks,Tina From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 2:29 PM To: Tong, Kristina G NWS Subject: [EXTERNAL] MLA13-00165 Douglas Shoreline Application - Quilcene Bay Tina: Just as an update,Jefferson County DCD is asking the applicants to provide more habitat benefits since the proposal was submitted as restoration of the intertidal area and to address some of the concerns expressed by the Jamestown S'Klallam tribe. Once this information has been submitted, DCD would be in a position to issue permits. I would like to check in with and see about the status of your review. Thanks, Donna Frostholm Associate Planner/WetlandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port ?ownsenc‘ Washington 98368 36o-379-4466 dfrostholm@cojefferson.wa.us DCD is open from 9:00am—12:00pm and 1:00pm—4:30pm Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All emails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE 2 Regards, Donna Frostholm From:Justin Wilson [mailto:lustin @nti4u.com] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 2:53 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: 'MSA'; Kathleen @kmdouglas.com; Carl Smith Subject: RE: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Hi Donna, We are part of the design/environmental team with MSA on this project to restore the shoreline. Can the BE and JARPA submitted to you by MSA be utilized as the updates to documents that you have outlined for submitted revisions? We can prepare the extra documentation as requested, but seems like extra time, money, and effort for something that has already been completed & submitted. I apologize if I am missing something in the communications. Best Regards, Justin From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 2:19 PM To: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com; MSA Cc: Justin Wilson Subject: RE: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Mike: I received the BE and JARPA that you sent earlier this week. I have not yet reviewed the submittal but want to check in with you on the following: • Is the July 25, 2014 BE intended to address fish and wildlife habitat conservation area requirements in Chapter 18.22 JCC(or is it limited to T&E species for the federal ESA)? • I do not see a date on the re-submitted JARPA. Was it revised based on the site visit with agencies earlier this year? Justin: I will need the following, which should be based on proposal revisions that were agreed upon earlier this year when we met onsite: • The BE submitted by MSA shows engineered drawings with a revision date of July 18, 2014. Are these the most recent drawings? If so, please send me three (3) copies of the site plan and the detailed sheets with original stamp and signature. • Provide information about the number of cubic yards of materials/sediments that: (1) will be scalped from the high points; (2) will be placed in the intertidal zone to reconfigure the channel; and (3)will need to be moved to an off-site location. Identify the disposal site location for any materials that will be transported offsite. Make sure the method of conducting the channel revision and the limits of the work areas are specified. • As I recall, NTI prepared the original Environmental Checklist. Revise, as appropriate,and re-submit the Environmental Checklist based on proposal changes made during the on-site meeting earlier this year with agencies. Regards, Donna Frostholm From: Kathleen@kmdouglas.com [mailto:Kathleen @kmdouglas.com] Sent:Tuesday, September 09, 2014 8:00 PM 2 To: MSA; Carl Smith Cc: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Thanks Mike! Donna,will you please let us know your next steps and timeline? We so want to get the beach restoration done before wild winter weather(you remember the drenching rain!) Best, Kathleen From: MSA [mailto:marine.surveys.inc@gmail.com] Sent:Tuesday, September 09, 2014 7:56 PM To: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com; Carl Smith Cc: Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Hi Donna, I've re-sent the up-to-date BE and JARPA reflecting all that we decided on since the site visit. These documents also reflect the comments and requests of the Corps to date. All attached documentation is identical to what the Corps has received. Please let us know if you need any more information to aid in your review. We are excited with the progress so far, and hope to keep this project moving along quickly! Thanks again, Mike and the crew at MSA On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Kathleen @kmdouglas.com<Kathleen@kmdouglas.com>wrote: Donna, I appreciate the fast response. I'll work with MSA to make sure the DCD has what it needs. Best, Kathleen From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 9:28 AM 3 To: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com Subject: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Kathleen: DCD has received a public notice from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) for your application. I want to make sure that you know that DCD has not received the information requested in our March 16, 2014 letter, which I sent out after the site visit. The only item I received to date is a revised site plan. In order for DCD to move forward with our noticing of the application, this department will need the updated information (and this information should match what was sent to the Corps. Please let me know if you have any questions. Donna JrosthoCm Associate Planner/Wetland Specialist Jefferson County Department of Community DeveCopment 621 Sheridan Street Tort Townsend"Washington 98368 dfrosthoCm@cojefferson.wa.us DCD is open from 9:00am—12:00pm and 1:00pm—4:30pm Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All emails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Marine Surveys Et Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com 4 Donna Frostholm From: Justin Wilson <justin @nti4u.com> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 12:30 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: 'MSA'; Kathleen @kmdouglas.com; Carl Smith Subject: RE: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Donna, Thank you for the prompt reply. We will coordinate with MSA to get you these few last items to keep this project moving in a positive direction. Justin From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 11:33 AM To: Justin Wilson Cc: 'MSA'; Kathleen @kmdouglas.com; Carl Smith Subject: RE: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Hi Justin: The resubmitted BE and JARPA are part of a total package that needs to be revised—all required documents need to be updated and reflect the current proposal, as discussed onsite with the Corps. The Environmental Checklist, not the BE or the JARPA, is the document state agencies use for their SEPA review so it must be updated prior the County noticing the application. Possibly, MSA can assist you with the revisions since the description of the project in the Environmental Checklist needs to be consistent with the BE and the JARPA. DCD needs to review the proposal against drawings that are to scale and have the engineers stamp and signature. Please submit three copies of the site plan and the detail drawings(that also identify how much materials will be scalped, how much will be placed in the intertidal area, and how much (if any)will be removed from the site). If any materials will be removed, please indicate the disposal site in the Environmental Checklist. Regards, Donna Frostholm From:Justin Wilson [mailto:iustin@nti4u.com] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 2:53 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: 'MSA'; Kathleen @kmdouglas.com; Carl Smith Subject: RE: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Hi Donna, We are part of the design/environmental team with MSA on this project to restore the shoreline. Can the BE and JARPA submitted to you by MSA be utilized as the updates to documents that you have outlined for submitted revisions? We can prepare the extra documentation as requested, but seems like extra time, money, and effort for something that has already been completed & submitted. I apologize if I am missing something in the communications. 1 Best Regards, Justin From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 2:19 PM To: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com; MSA Cc: Justin Wilson Subject: RE: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Mike: I received the BE and JARPA that you sent earlier this week. I have not yet reviewed the submittal but want to check in with you on the following: • Is the July 25, 2014 BE intended to address fish and wildlife habitat conservation area requirements in Chapter 18.22 JCC(or is it limited to T&E species for the federal ESA)? • I do not see a date on the re-submitted JARPA. Was it revised based on the site visit with agencies earlier this year? Justin: I will need the following,which should be based on proposal revisions that were agreed upon earlier this year when we met onsite: • The BE submitted by MSA shows engineered drawings with a revision date of July 18, 2014. Are these the most recent drawings? If so, please send me three (3) copies of the site plan and the detailed sheets with original stamp and signature. • Provide information about the number of cubic yards of materials/sediments that: (1) will be scalped from the high points; (2)will be placed in the intertidal zone to reconfigure the channel; and (3)will need to be moved to an off-site location. Identify the disposal site location for any materials that will be transported offsite. Make sure the method of conducting the channel revision and the limits of the work areas are specified. • As I recall, NTI prepared the original Environmental Checklist. Revise, as appropriate, and re-submit the Environmental Checklist based on proposal changes made during the on-site meeting earlier this year with agencies. Regards, Donna Frostholm From: Kathleen@kmdouglas.com [mailto:Kathleen @ kmdouglas.com] Sent:Tuesday, September 09, 2014 8:00 PM To: MSA; Carl Smith Cc: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Thanks Mike! Donna,will you please let us know your next steps and timeline? We so want to get the beach restoration done before wild winter weather(you remember the drenching rain!) Best, Kathleen From: MSA [mailto:marine.survevs.inc @gmail.com] Sent:Tuesday, September 09, 2014 7:56 PM To: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com; Carl Smith 2 Cc: Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Hi Donna, I've re-sent the up-to-date BE and JARPA reflecting all that we decided on since the site visit. These documents also reflect the comments and requests of the Corps to date. All attached documentation is identical to what the Corps has received. Please let us know if you need any more information to aid in your review. We are excited with the progress so far, and hope to keep this project moving along quickly! Thanks again, Mike and the crew at MSA On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Kathleen(&kmdouglas.com<Kathleen @kmdouglas.com> wrote: Donna, I appreciate the fast response. I'll work with MSA to make sure the DCD has what it needs. Best, Kathleen From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm@co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 9:28 AM To: Kathleen( ,kmdouglas.com Subject: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Kathleen: DCD has received a public notice from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) for your application. I want to make sure that you know that DCD has not received the information requested in our March 16, 2014 letter, which I sent out after the site visit. The only item I received to date is a revised site plan. In order for DCD to move forward with our noticing of the application, this department will need the updated information (and this information should match what was sent to the Corps. 3 Please let me know if you have any questions. Donna Jrostholm Associate Planner/WetlandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, 'Washington 98368 dfrosthohn@cojefferson.wa.us DCD is open from 9:00am—12:00pm and 1:00pm—4:30pm Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All emails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Marine Surveys Et Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.corn Web: marinesurveysandassessments.corn Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. E This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. 4 Donna Frostholm From: MSA <marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 8:46 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Sorry about that. Sent too soon. Continued: Mike: I received the BE and JARPA that you sent earlier this week. I have not yet reviewed the submittal but want to check in with you on the following: • Is the July 25, 2014 BE intended to address fish and wildlife habitat conservation area requirements in Chapter 18.22 JCC(or is it limited to T&E species for the federal ESA)? The BE addresses the FWHCA requirements in 18.22 in addition to the ESA-listed species.We specifically address the WDFW Priority Habitats and Species at and near the project site (including forage fish, non-ESA listed salmon, and shellfish at the site). It also discusses, in depth how the habitat will be improved by the proposed action. • I do not see a date on the re-submitted JARPA. Was it revised based on the site visit with agencies earlier this year? Yes,this JARPA has the updated information from the site visit. Thank you as always for the help on this project. Let me know if you need any other information on these questions for your review.We are excited to keep the progress coming! Mike and the crew at MSA On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:38 PM, MSA<marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com>wrote: Hi Donna, Thank you for the quick response on this project. I just wanted to quickly answer your two questions for me: On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Donna Frostholm<DFrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Mike: I received the BE and JARPA that you sent earlier this week. I have not yet reviewed the submittal but want to check in with you on the following: • Is the July 25, 2014 BE intended to address fish and wildlife habitat conservation area requirements in Chapter 18.22 JCC(or is it limited to T&E species for the federal ESA)? • I do not see a date on the re-submitted JARPA. Was it revised based on the site visit with agencies earlier this year? 1 Justin: I will need the following, which should be based on proposal revisions that were agreed upon earlier this year when we met onsite: • The BE submitted by MSA shows engineered drawings with a revision date of July 18, 2014. Are these the most recent drawings? If so, please send me three (3) copies of the site plan and the detailed sheets with original stamp and signature. • Provide information about the number of cubic yards of materials/sediments that: (1) will be scalped from the high points; (2) will be placed in the intertidal zone to reconfigure the channel; and (3) will need to be moved to an off-site location. Identify the disposal site location for any materials that will be transported offsite. Make sure the method of conducting the channel revision and the limits of the work areas are specified. • As I recall, NTI prepared the original Environmental Checklist. Revise, as appropriate, and re-submit the Environmental Checklist based on proposal changes made during the on-site meeting earlier this year with agencies. Regards, Donna Frostholm From: KathleenPkmdouglas.com [mailto:Kathleen@kmdouglas.com] Sent:Tuesday, September 09, 2014 8:00 PM To: MSA; Carl Smith Cc: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Thanks Mike! Donna,will you please let us know your next steps and timeline? We so want to get the beach restoration done before wild winter weather(you remember the drenching rain!) Best, Kathleen 2 From: MSA [mailto:marine.surveys.inc @Rmail.com] Sent:Tuesday, September 09, 2014 7:56 PM To: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com; Carl Smith Cc: Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Hi Donna, I've re-sent the up-to-date BE and JARPA reflecting all that we decided on since the site visit. These documents also reflect the comments and requests of the Corps to date. All attached documentation is identical to what the Corps has received. Please let us know if you need any more information to aid in your review. We are excited with the progress so far, and hope to keep this project moving along quickly! Thanks again, Mike and the crew at MSA On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Kathleen @kmdouglas.com<Kathleen@kmdouglas.com>wrote: Donna, I appreciate the fast response. I'll work with MSA to make sure the DCD has what it needs. Best, Kathleen From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 9:28 AM To: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com Subject: shoreline application MLA13-00165 3 Kathleen: DCD has received a public notice from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) for your application. I want to make sure that you know that DCD has not received the information requested in our March 16, 2014 letter, which I sent out after the site visit. The only item I received to date is a revised site plan. In order for DCD to move forward with our noticing of the application, this department will need the updated information(and this information should match what was sent to the Corps. Please let me know if you have any questions. Donna yrostholm . .Associate PCanner/WetCandSpeciaCist 1 Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port'Townsend Washington 98368 dfrosthoCm@cojefferson.wa.us DCD is open from 9:00am—12:00pm and 1:00pm—4:30pm Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All emails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Marine Surveys &: Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc@qmail.com 4 Web: marinesurveysandassessments.com Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 Marine Surveys & Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.corn Web: marinesurveysandassessments.corn Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 Marine Surveys & Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Web: marinesurveysandassessments.corn► Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 5 Donna Frostholm From: Justin Wilson <justin @nti4u.com> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 2:53 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: 'MSA'; Kathleen @kmdouglas.com; Carl Smith Subject: RE: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Hi Donna, We are part of the design/environmental team with MSA on this project to restore the shoreline. Can the BE and JARPA submitted to you by MSA be utilized as the updates to documents that you have outlined for submitted revisions? We can prepare the extra documentation as requested, but seems like extra time, money, and effort for something that has already been completed & submitted. I apologize if I am missing something in the communications. Best Regards, Justin From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 2:19 PM To: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com; MSA Cc: Justin Wilson Subject: RE: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Mike: I received the BE and JARPA that you sent earlier this week. I have not yet reviewed the submittal but want to check in with you on the following: • Is the July 25, 2014 BE intended to address fish and wildlife habitat conservation area requirements in Chapter 18.22 JCC(or is it limited to T&E species for the federal ESA)? • I do not see a date on the re-submitted JARPA. Was it revised based on the site visit with agencies earlier this year? Justin: I will need the following, which should be based on proposal revisions that were agreed upon earlier this year when we met onsite: • The BE submitted by MSA shows engineered drawings with a revision date of July 18, 2014. Are these the most recent drawings? If so, please send me three (3) copies of the site plan and the detailed sheets with original stamp and signature. • Provide information about the number of cubic yards of materials/sediments that: (1) will be scalped from the high points; (2)will be placed in the intertidal zone to reconfigure the channel; and (3) will need to be moved to an off-site location. Identify the disposal site location for any materials that will be transported offsite. Make sure the method of conducting the channel revision and the limits of the work areas are specified. • As I recall, NTI prepared the original Environmental Checklist. Revise, as appropriate, and re-submit the Environmental Checklist based on proposal changes made during the on-site meeting earlier this year with agencies. Regards, Donna Frostholm 1 From: Kathleen@kmdouglas.com [mailto:Kathleen @ kmdouglas.com] Sent:Tuesday, September 09, 2014 8:00 PM To: MSA; Carl Smith Cc: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Thanks Mike! Donna, will you please let us know your next steps and timeline? We so want to get the beach restoration done before wild winter weather(you remember the drenching rain!) Best, Kathleen From: MSA [mailto:marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com] Sent:Tuesday, September 09, 2014 7:56 PM To: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com; Carl Smith Cc: Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Hi Donna, I've re-sent the up-to-date BE and JARPA reflecting all that we decided on since the site visit. These documents also reflect the comments and requests of the Corps to date. All attached documentation is identical to what the Corps has received. Please let us know if you need any more information to aid in your review. We are excited with the progress so far, and hope to keep this project moving along quickly! Thanks again, Mike and the crew at MSA On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Kathleen @kmdouglas.com<Kathleen @kmdouglas.com> wrote: Donna, I appreciate the fast response. I'll work with MSA to make sure the DCD has what it needs. Best, Kathleen 2 From Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm(aico jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 9:28 AM To: Kathleen@a,kmdouglas.com Subject: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Kathleen: DCD has received a public notice from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) for your application. I want to make sure that you know that DCD has not received the information requested in our March 16, 2014 letter, which I sent out after the site visit. The only item I received to date is a revised site plan. In order for DCD to move forward with our noticing of the application,this department will need the updated information(and this information should match what was sent to the Corps. Please let me know if you have any questions. Donna yrosthotm Associate Planner/WetlandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend Washington 98368 dfrosthoCm@cojefferson.wa.us DCD is open from 9:00am—12:00pm and 1:00pm—4:30pm Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All emails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Marine Surveys & Assessments 3 Email: marine.survevs.inc @gmail.com Web: marinesurvevsandassessments.corn Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 E I This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. 4 Donna Frostholm From: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 8:00 PM To: MSA; Carl Smith Cc: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Thanks Mike! Donna,will you please let us know your next steps and timeline? We so want to get the beach restoration done before wild winter weather(you remember the drenching rain!) Best, Kathleen From: MSA [mailto:marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com] Sent:Tuesday, September 09, 2014 7:56 PM To: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com; Carl Smith Cc: Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Hi Donna, I've re-sent the up-to-date BE and JARPA reflecting all that we decided on since the site visit. These documents also reflect the comments and requests of the Corps to date. All attached documentation is identical to what the Corps has received. Please let us know if you need any more information to aid in your review. We are excited with the progress so far, and hope to keep this project moving along quickly! Thanks again, Mike and the crew at MSA On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Kathleen(a,kmdouglas.com<Kathleen @kmdouglas.com>wrote: Donna, I appreciate the fast response. I'll work with MSA to make sure the DCD has what it needs. Best, Kathleen 1 From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm @a,co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 9:28 AM To: Kathleen(akmdouglas.com Subject: shoreline application MLA13-00165 Kathleen: DCD has received a public notice from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) for your application. I want to make sure that you know that DCD has not received the information requested in our March 16, 2014 letter, which I sent out after the site visit. The only item I received to date is a revised site plan. In order for DCD to move forward with our noticing of the application, this department will need the updated information(and this information should match what was sent to the Corps. Please let me know if you have any questions. Donna Frostuiolm .associate TCanner/WetlandSpecia[ist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Tort'rownsencd'Washington 98368 dfrosthoCm@cojefferson.wa.us DCD is open from 9:00am—12:00pm and 1:00pm—4:30pm Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All emails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 2 Marine Surveys Et Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Web: marinesurveysandassessments.com Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 3 Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:29 AM To: 'Justin Wilson'; 'Kathleen Douglas (KMD Consulting)' Cc: Carl Smith Subject: RE:JARPA rivision &Application Checklist, 9/18/12 meeting with JEFFCO Hi Kathleen and Justin: Here are some additional thoughts and clarifications from DCD: • For 2b below, the revised drawing is to show all property ownerships with existing and proposed actions, including re-grading and alignment of the creek discharge overlain on an aerial photo. • For 2d below, "verbiage" means a plan to salvage native plants in the project area and then re-plant them following construction. • DCD will send a copy of JARPA Attachment A with county signature on to Kathleen to include in the application submittal. • DCD will send a copy of the Master Permit application with county signature on to Kathleen to include in the application submittal. • The fees at the time of permitting for a shoreline exemption: $1,417 ($518 for shoreline exemption, $899 for SEPA review). Justin asked if a critical areas stewardship plan (CASP) could be submitted later. The county agreed to this since the Corps may have comments that would need to be incorporated into the report. Therefore,there may be an additional $518 CASP fee required at the time of CASP submittal. • JARPA and SEPA should provide additional information about the project (methods for moving sediments in intertidal zone, plant salvaging and replanting, etc.). • The entire length of the dredged channel on county land needs to be re-contoured to more natural conditions. Regards, Don+iaw Frostho-Uni .associate PCanner/Wet(andSpeciaCist Jefferson County Department of Community DeveCopment 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend Washington 98368 dfrosthoCm @cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Justin Wilson [mailto:justin @nti4u.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 5:49 PM To: 'Kathleen Douglas (KMD Consulting)' Cc: Carl Smith; Donna Frostholm Subject: JARPA rivision &Application Checklist, 9/18/12 meeting with JEFFCO Hi Kathleen, 1 I will briefly summarize the meeting that I had with Carl S. & Donna F.from Jefferson County regarding the proposed Shoreline Restoration project. I will start out by listing items that will need to be submitted as part of the Shoreline Exemption Application package: 1. Master Permit Application will need to be filled out again. 2. JARPA(Revised) a. Include a construction cost estimate &options (Less than $5,718 for exemption). b. Update map importing a color image behind CAD plan w/survey data. c. Show more clearly a balance of materials—No import or export(no net change). d. Verbiage for re-establishing native plantings in project area. e. Utilize verbiage as stated in the Nationwide 27 Army Corps. permit 3. SEPA checklist(This previously submitted document will need to be incorporated with this package). 4. Site Plan—This will be the same document as the one used w/JARPA, but submitted separately also. 5. Proposed Drawings and Details—This will be the same updated plan as used in the JARPA. 6. Geotechnical Report—Carl has exempted the requirement for a Geotech Report on this project. 7. Critical Areas Stewardship Plan (CASP)—This document can be forthcoming for this project. a. A list of possible Wetland Biologists (7) is included in the attached pdf document. 8. Habitat Assessment (or Biological Evaluation)—N/A if we get a Corps Permit from Joanne Gardener(new person). 9. Stormwater Calculation Worksheet—This will be straight forward. 10. Fees Due at Time of Application -$899 for SEPA Review, and $518 for CASP. Total of$1,417 for shoreline exemption 11. A building permit will not be needed to construct with the shoreline. We also discussed construction options and what may be required for quality control during construction to assure that proper proposed grades are constructed, and that other aspects are constructed per reviewed plans. Carl & Donna—Please feel free to add any information to this list of items that you feel would be beneficial to the approval of this permit. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Justin Justin Wilson, P.E. Principal Engineer NTI Engineering & Land Surveying 360.452.8491 office 360.460.0683 cell www.nti4u.com NOTICE: This email and any attachments contains confidential,proprietary or privileged information intended for the addressees only. This information is copyrighted and protected by law. If you are not the intended addressee,you are not authorized to use,transfer, or rely upon the information in any way. If you have erroneously received this transmission, delete any electronic or hard copies and contact the sender immediately 2 ■ S`d1OflOo 2:131A11321)8 N331HJ VN ==, IAN IJOr MOr CI.' O _ 3N3011If10 `dvO21 'id WldLiWM 1.06 eM ,3 „aod ii de0 - k? O Ns, dr <,< _ - NOIl`MO1S3?: H0b'39 JN2133NI9N3 11N ' �� "°■sS 3 N''-d 311S ww.a o rZ E ci_ 0. . No -r, a .." 2 © 1 . ti w ', I \io 00 raj ° oi. O i j - f a 1' ;r T 86I 8 r b b - r 1 Sig // ggi , r, 1. ;� 1 a a r T 1 \_ '1 N 1 Z ( I Q 2. _ 1 x I 1 q� I �< xat ■ 11 I N 12'4 1 I - W J e NS o- �' f I I � ww s r I CO ' I `� / Q I LL .� 11 � x d 8 �`` m ` B Y I = 4Q "Ei A \At L 1 I O -1 I ai 1 1 1 Ii \ 1 \ I o \ \ 1 ', \ 8 a, i 6 1 , 1 , 1 a , i 7 e 1 i 1 , Donna Frostholm From: Justin Wilson [justin @nti4u.com] Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 1:45 PM To: Donna Frostholm; 'MSA'; 'Tong, Kristina G NWS' Cc: 'Gardiner, Joanne L NWS'; 'Kathleen @kmdouglas.com'; Daniel.dafoe @dfw.wa.gov Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Site visit for proposed recountour of unnamed stream (NWS-2014-46) (UNCLASSIFIED) Hi Donna, yes, I believe that you described the proposed re-habilitation tasks correctly. The plan is to minimize any negative impacts while restoring the original stream outfall characteristics, prior to the 2008 excavation on Jefferson County property. Thanks, Justin Justin Wilson, P.E. Principal Engineer NTI Engineering&Land Surveying 360.452.8491 office 360.460.0683 cell www.nti4u.com NOTICE: This email and any attachments contains confidential,proprietary or privileged information intended for the addressees only. This information is copyrighted and protected by law. If you are not the intended addressee,you are not authorized to use,transfer, or rely upon the information in any way. If you have erroneously received this transmission, delete any electronic or hard copies and contact the sender immediately From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 9:40 AM To: MSA; Tong, Kristina G NWS Cc: Gardiner, Joanne L NWS; Kathleen @kmdouglas.com; Daniel.dafoe©dfw.wa.gov; Justin Wilson Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Site visit for proposed recountour of unnamed stream (NWS-2014-46) (UNCLASSIFIED) Just to make sure I am clear about the revision: in looking at this drawing, there will be no grading or re-contouring of the area between the east side of the existing channel (except to create a berm in the southern portion of the property) and the east property line. The work is limited to moving material from the high area west of the existing channel to create a berm to redirect the water. Is that correct? Thanks, Do vtcv Frost-holm/1i .Associate PCanner/WetCandSpeciaCist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, 'Washington 98368 dfrosthoCm @co jefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 From: MSA [mailto:marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 10:01 AM To: Tong, Kristina G NWS Cc: Gardiner, Joanne L NWS; Kathleen @kmdouglas.com; Daniel.dafoe @dfw.wa.gov; Donna Frostholm; Justin Wilson Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Site visit for proposed recountour of unnamed stream (NWS-2014-46) (UNCLASSIFIED) Hi all, I am just checking in on the Kathleen Douglas stream restoration project in Quilcene. Any comments or concerns on the revised site plans from Justin at NTI (re-attached below)? If you have time this week, it would be great to hear these. I'd like to wrap up the comments by Friday so we can submit a revised Biological Evalulation shortly and keep the process moving along. If this timeframe is unrealistic, please let me know as well. Thanks again, Mike On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Tong, Kristina G NWS <Kristina.G.Tong @usace.army.mil> wrote: Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE To all, Just a clarification to item 1. There will need to be some fill in waters of the U.S., but the new site plan should show the minimum amount of fill needed to redirect the stream back. Thanks, Tina Original Message From: MSA [mailto:marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 9:57 AM To: Gardiner, Joanne L NWS; Kathleen @kmdouglas.com; Tong, Kristina G NWS; Daniel.dafoe @dfw.wa.gov; Donna Frostholm; Justin Wilson Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Site visit for proposed recountour of unnamed stream (NWS-2014-46) (UNCLASSIFIED) Hi all, I just wanted to thank you for making the trip out to Kathleen's site in Quilcene yesterday. Amy and I were very encouraged with the meeting and excited that we have a practical, straightforward permitting plan. I just wanted to share with you our "next steps" to make sure all are on board. 1. Justin will create a new site plan to redirect the stream back towards its natural meander. This plan will avoid filling any waters of the U.S. 2. We will share this draft with all of you for comment. 2 3. Once all are okay with the plan, MSA will create the monitoring plan and update the biological evaluation and associated JARPA as needed. We'll then submit this as an addendum to the Corps and County. We plan on having all the permits in order prior to the 2014 work window(7/16-10/14) and to conduct the work within this window. Please feel free to comment at all steps in the process. This restoration project is definitely a collaborative effort, and we thank you for joining in, Mike and Amy On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Gardiner, Joanne L NWS <Joanne.L.Gardiner@usace.army.mil>wrote: Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Hi Mike, I'm glad you'll both be joining us for the site visit. Your questions are understandable and exactly why we've arranged for a site visit: to walk the site and discuss the most appropriate way to permit the project based on the project purpose. We're looking forward to meeting everyone on March 18. Regards, Jo Jo Gardiner Regulatory Branch U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District 206-764-6878 Original Message From: MSA [mailto:marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 1:20 PM To: Gardiner, Joanne L NWS Cc: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Site visit for proposed recountour of unnamed stream(NWS-2014-46) (UNCLASSIFIED) Hi Joanne, My name is Mike Levine, and Amy Leitman and I at Marine Surveys & Assessments have been assisting Mrs. Douglas with the biological reporting on her stream restoration project. 3 We both plan to join on the site visit as well- it is a great opportunity for a restoration project. I am writing to inquire how, specifically, the project is incomplete as an application and why it fails to meet the conditions of NWP 27. We were considering that this permit authorizes "modification s of the stream bed and/or banks to restore or establish stream meanders ," as this condition seem s especially applicable here. I look forward to helping with this application as soon as possible. Thank you for the guidance on this project, Mike Original Message From: Gardiner, Joanne L NWS [mailto:Joanne.L.Gardiner @usace.army.mil] Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2014 1:45 PM To: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com Cc: Tong, Kristina G NWS; Donna Frostholm;justin@nti4u.com Subject: Site visit for proposed recountour of unnamed stream (NWS-2014-46) (UNCLASSIFIED) Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Ms. Douglas, It was nice talking with you yesterday morning. We have received your application for a Department of the Army (DA)permit to re-contour an existing unnamed stream that empties into Quilcene Bay near East Quilcene, Washington. We have assigned the project the reference number NWS-2014-46. Please cite the reference number in any correspondence with us concerning this project. I will be the project manager processing this application. I have conducted an initial review of the application and it is incomplete. Additional information is required to complete the application. As we discussed yesterday, at this time it appears that your project does not qualify for a Nationwide Permit 27 as proposed; however, we would like to arrange a site visit to determine the best approach for permitting the proposed work. As you are proposing to conduct work on land owned by Jefferson County, it is imperative that we meet with you,the County, and your contractor Justin Wilson. At this time, are available on the following days of March. Please be aware that Tina's schedule fills up VERY quickly so we would appreciate a response as soon as possible. March 7 March 14 March 17 March 18 March 21 4 I will be out of the office from February 9 - 25. In my absence, Tina will try to determine a time we are all available so please make sure you "reply to all" with any proposed dates. We look forward to meeting everyone soon! Thank you, Jo Jo Gardiner Regulatory Branch U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District 206-764-6878 Amy Leitman Marine Surveys & Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Web: marinesurveysandassessments.com Office: 360 385-4073 <te1:360%20385-4073> Cell: 360 301-0262 <te1:360%20301-0262> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Amy Leitman Marine Surveys & Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Web: marinesurveysandassessments.com Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 5 Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Amy Leitman Marine Surveys Et Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Web: marinesurveysandassessments.com Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 Q ovostr This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. tr free 6 Donna Frostholm From: Tong, Kristina G NWS <Kristina.G.Tong @usace.army.mil> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 11:05 AM To: MSA; Gardiner,Joanne L NWS; Kathleen @kmdouglas.com; Daniel.dafoe @dfw.wa.gov; Donna Frostholm;Justin Wilson Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Site visit for proposed recountour of unnamed stream (NWS-2014-46) (UNCLASSIFIED) Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE To all, Just a clarification to item 1. There will need to be some fill in waters of the U.S., but the new site plan should show the minimum amount of fill needed to redirect the stream back. Thanks,Tina Original Message From: MSA [mailto:marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 9:57 AM To: Gardiner,Joanne L NWS; Kathleen @kmdouglas.com; Tong, Kristina G NWS; Daniel.dafoe @dfw.wa.gov; Donna Frostholm;Justin Wilson Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Site visit for proposed recountour of unnamed stream (NWS-2014-46) (UNCLASSIFIED) Hi all, I just wanted to thank you for making the trip out to Kathleen's site in Quilcene yesterday.Amy and I were very encouraged with the meeting and excited that we have a practical, straightforward permitting plan. I just wanted to share with you our"next steps" to make sure all are on board. 1.Justin will create a new site plan to redirect the stream back towards its natural meander. This plan will avoid filling any waters of the U.S. 2. We will share this draft with all of you for comment. 3. Once all are okay with the plan, MSA will create the monitoring plan and update the biological evaluation and associated JARPA as needed. We'll then submit this as an addendum to the Corps and County. We plan on having all the permits in order prior to the 2014 work window(7/16-10/14) and to conduct the work within this window. Please feel free to comment at all steps in the process.This restoration project is definitely a collaborative effort, and we thank you for joining in, Mike and Amy On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Gardiner,Joanne L NWS<Joanne.L.Gardiner @usace.army.mil>wrote: 1 Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Hi Mike, I'm glad you'll both be joining us for the site visit. Your questions are understandable and exactly why we've arranged for a site visit:to walk the site and discuss the most appropriate way to permit the project based on the project purpose. We're looking forward to meeting everyone on March 18. Regards, Jo Jo Gardiner Regulatory Branch U.S.Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District 206-764-6878 Original Message From: MSA [mailto:marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 1:20 PM To: Gardiner,Joanne L NWS Cc: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Site visit for proposed recountour of unnamed stream (NWS-2014-46) (UNCLASSIFIED) Hi Joanne, My name is Mike Levine, and Amy Leitman and I at Marine Surveys&Assessments have been assisting Mrs. Douglas with the biological reporting on her stream restoration project. We both plan to join on the site visit as well- it is a great opportunity for a restoration project. I am writing to inquire how, specifically, the project is incomplete as an application and why it fails to meet the conditions of NWP 27. We were considering that this permit authorizes "modification s of the stream bed and/or banks to restore or establish stream meanders ," as this condition seem s especially applicable here. I look forward to helping with this application as soon as possible.Thank you for the guidance on this project, Mike Original Message 2 From: Gardiner,Joanne L NWS [mailto:Joanne.L.Gardiner @usace.army.mil] Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2014 1:45 PM To: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com Cc:Tong, Kristina G NWS; Donna Frostholm;justin@nti4u.com Subject: Site visit for proposed recountour of unnamed stream (NWS-2014-46) (UNCLASSIFIED) Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Ms. Douglas, It was nice talking with you yesterday morning. We have received your application for a Department of the Army(DA) permit to re-contour an existing unnamed stream that empties into Quilcene Bay near East Quilcene, Washington. We have assigned the project the reference number NWS-2014-46. Please cite the reference number in any correspondence with us concerning this project. I will be the project manager processing this application. I have conducted an initial review of the application and it is incomplete. Additional information is required to complete the application. As we discussed yesterday, at this time it appears that your project does not qualify for a Nationwide Permit 27 as proposed; however, we would like to arrange a site visit to determine the best approach for permitting the proposed work. As you are proposing to conduct work on land owned by Jefferson County, it is imperative that we meet with you,the County, and your contractor Justin Wilson. At this time, are available on the following days of March. Please be aware that Tina's schedule fills up VERY quickly so we would appreciate a response as soon as possible. March 7 March 14 March 17 March 18 March 21 I will be out of the office from February 9 - 25. In my absence,Tina will try to determine a time we are all available so please make sure you "reply to all" with any proposed dates. We look forward to meeting everyone soon! Thank you, Jo Jo Gardiner Regulatory Branch U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District 206-764-6878 3 Amy Leitman Marine Surveys&Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Web: marinesurveysandassessments.com Office: 360 385-4073 <te1:360%20385-4073> Cell: 360 301-0262 <te1:360%20301-0262> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Amy Leitman Marine Surveys &Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Web: marinesurveysandassessments.com Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE 4 ° w d cri ~ C7. > O O cC °. 2 G en O U o `n " p w o A C : 0 p Q N cd rn .0 id •...� w >,01 0 ,.0 c0 a) .fl= }' 0 y ,, 05 v N > .O cC E N p °. v N O0 4; O h O 7 7 s. A C ,, E v' W p O cct › •in Z W .5 3 W O• pU U cOd C `0 U O •wC M °' Nal Ow 0 0 Ow 0 ow ow a > O W N 'a N - N �a�1 N W1 N N a N W °. co m co Q M Q M A M A N °e Q 00 •� m ..r M M C ca Q k" x 7 1,...}..: eo E° d & te C c A WQ v ° p • A M r, • a c = 0 b b -O = b o •▪ A ` z z x x x z x z a) a. CA cl „ N N O Ct U c e u 0 U pip N A •--. .A::\i M V N O O w N N ea A N M M M M _ _ _ _ 0 0 0 0 ,--i 0 ae N N N N N N N N ti 0 0 0 0 CD 00 GI en N Ny m en •-•• M M /11111 3 et a) >, . 2 a J > d W °' w I. 4 � 0. W o, E 2 •- .2 A o \1% A ; x U dU v Wa Ua Q d d U V') to 00 N M O_ O M cn cn O — N N M m > O O O 0 0 0 O O Q A O 0... A A Q Q Donna Frostholm From: Tong, Kristina G NWS <Kristina.G.Tong @usace.army.mil> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 7:09 AM To: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com; Donna Frostholm;justin @nti4u.com; daniel.dafoe @dfw.wa.gov Cc: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com; Gardiner,Joanne L NWS;Tong, Kristina G NWS Subject: March 18 @ 1030 Site visit confirmed (UNCLASSIFIED) Attachments: SKMBT_C45014021107020.pdf Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE To all: This is to confirm the site visit will be on March 18, 2014 at 10:30 am. I also invited Dan Dafoe with the WDFW to attend. The street address for the Douglas residence is 101 Wampam Point Road, Quilcene, WA 98376. We will meet here. The project location is on the tidelands fronting this property. Driving directions(per JARPA): follow highway 104 west to Chimacum/Quilcene exit. Turn right at the end of the exit onto Center Road. Continue 7.7 miles and turn left on East Quilcene Bay Road. Go 1.9 miles, turning right (just past Lindsey Hill Road) at Wampum Point sign. Go through East Bay gate. Douglas property is second house. Attached are the permit application drawings. Thanks, Tina Kristina Tong, Senior Scientist U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, Regulatory Branch 206-764-6913 Original Message From: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com [mailto:Kathleen @ kmdouglas.com] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 2:00 PM To: Donna Frostholm; Gardiner,Joanne L NWS Cc: Tong, Kristina G NWS;justin @nti4u.com; marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Site visit for proposed recountour of unnamed stream (NWS-2014-46) (UNCLASSIFIED) Excellent! Original Message From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 1:13 PM To: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com; Gardiner,Joanne L NWS Cc: Tong, Kristina G NWS;justin @nti4u.com; marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Subject: RE: Site visit for proposed recountour of unnamed stream (NWS-2014-46) (UNCLASSIFIED) March 18 would work for me. Donna Original Message From: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com [mailto:Kathleen @kmdouglas.com] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 12:09 PM To: Donna Frostholm; Gardiner,Joanne L NWS Cc: Tong, Kristina G NWS;justin @nti4u.com; marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Subject: RE: Site visit for proposed recountour of unnamed stream (NWS-2014-46) (UNCLASSIFIED) Good morning! I've freed up dates. I'm now available: March 17 & 18 &21st. I'm NOT available as of this morning on March 14. Donna, do any of these other dates work for you? Justin? Amy? Thanks and I appreciate the effort to get a date nailed down. Kathleen Original Message From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:39 AM To: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com; Gardiner,Joanne L NWS Cc:Tong, Kristina G NWS;justin @nti4u.com Subject: RE: Site visit for proposed recountour of unnamed stream (NWS-2014-46) (UNCLASSIFIED) Hello All: Of the three days that work for Kathleen, I am only available on March 14. Donna Frostholm Associate Planner/Wetland Specialist Jefferson County DCD Original Message From: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com [mailto:Kathleen @ kmdouglas.com] Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2014 4:31 PM To: Gardiner,Joanne L NWS Cc:Tong, Kristina G NWS; Donna Frostholm;justin @nti4u.com Subject: RE: Site visit for proposed recountour of unnamed stream (NWS-2014-46) (UNCLASSIFIED) Thank you Jo for moving on this quickly. The dates that work for me are: March 7, 14 and 21. If only the March 17 or 21 work for everyone else, I will see what I can do to have someone take my classes. Best regards, Kathleen 2 Original Message From: Gardiner,Joanne L NWS [mailto:Joanne.L.Gardiner @usace.army.mil] Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2014 1:45 PM To: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com Cc:Tong, Kristina G NWS; Donna Frostholm;justin@nti4u.com Subject: Site visit for proposed recountour of unnamed stream (NWS-2014-46) (UNCLASSIFIED) Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Ms. Douglas, It was nice talking with you yesterday morning. We have received your application for a Department of the Army (DA) permit to re-contour an existing unnamed stream that empties into Quilcene Bay near East Quilcene, Washington. We have assigned the project the reference number NWS-2014-46. Please cite the reference number in any correspondence with us concerning this project. I will be the project manager processing this application. I have conducted an initial review of the application and it is incomplete. Additional information is required to complete the application. As we discussed yesterday, at this time it appears that your project does not qualify for a Nationwide Permit 27 as proposed; however, we would like to arrange a site visit to determine the best approach for permitting the proposed work. As you are proposing to conduct work on land owned by Jefferson County, it is imperative that we meet with you, the County, and your contractor Justin Wilson. At this time, are available on the following days of March. Please be aware that Tina's schedule fills up VERY quickly so we would appreciate a response as soon as possible. March 7 March 14 March 17 March 18 March 21 I will be out of the office from February 9 -25. In my absence,Tina will try to determine a time we are all available so please make sure you "reply to all" with any proposed dates. We look forward to meeting everyone soon! Thank you, Jo Jo Gardiner Regulatory Branch U.S.Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District 206-764-6878 3 Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE 4 Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 8:49 AM To: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com Cc: Carl Smith;justin @nti4u.com; marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Subject: RE: Re; Geo-hydrologist for Wampum Point beach restoration Hi Kathleen: The intent of the pre-application notes, along with my comments below in this email chain about the hydrologic report and the indemnification, are intended to provide you with the information you need to know for submitting a complete application. I have to follow the Jefferson County Code so I cannot deem an application complete prior to submittal; however, DCD has given you the information you need to prepare a complete application for submittal. Since the expected date of implementing the new shoreline regulations has been pushed back by a few weeks (early January is now expected to be the soonest we would be implementing the new regulations), you have gained some time. Given all this, I hope you feel more assured. To facilitate getting the County signature for the application, please be sure (1) that the revisions to the JARPA that DCD requested in my 11/4/13 email to MSA are made and (2)that the revisions that DCD requested in my 9/27/12 email to NTI have been addressed in the package you drop off a DCD next week. DCD understands your concerns and we are trying to assist you to the extent that we can. I hope this helps... Dove vice Frostholmv .Associate Planner/WetlandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port'Townsend, 'Washington 98368 dfrosthoCm@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com [mailto:Kathleen @kmdouglas.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 3:21 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Carl Smith; justin @nti4u.com; marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Subject: RE: Re; Geo-hydrologist for Wampum Point beach restoration Importance: High Hi Donna— I appreciate the clarification below: we will march to the mid-week timeline. In full transparency, our expectation is that the county will move the application expediently through the process since you and the county have been working closely with us for two years-frankly, 2-3 weeks seems rather surprising at this stage. 1 In addition, do we have your/DCD assurance that the application will be vested if we meet our timeline? As you know, we are spending time, etc. on this beach restoration project and need to know that the application is vested so we do not need to spend more time and money following new regulations. Thank you again, Kathleen From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm@co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent:Tuesday, December 03, 2013 2:39 PM To: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com Cc: Carl Smith; Justin @nti4u.com; marine.surveys.inc@gmail.com Subject: RE: Re; Geo-hydrologist for Wampum Point beach restoration Hi Kathleen: See below... From: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com [mailto:Kathleen @kmdouglas.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 12:18 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Carl Smith; iustin@nti4u.com; marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com; Kathleen @kmdouglas.com Subject: Re; Geo-hydrologist for Wampum Point beach restoration Importance: High Hi Donna, Justin has recommended that we have Steve Luxton write the hydrology report. Per Justin, Steve is semi-retired and works part time for NTI. He has worked full time for NTI, worked in the Middle East on hydrology projects, In Seattle at URS, WH Pacific down in Oregon and other locations. Before I contract with Steve for this work, I wanted to make sure this approach would meet the county's requirements. As you know, time is of the essence so Amy,Justin and I plan is to have all documents at the county for sign-off by mid-next week(before 12/15 when the new Shoreline Management rules go into effect). At this point, Steve is scheduled to meet me on-site in Quilcene Friday morning. Information required from you: 1. Will our plan as outlined above meet the county requirements? Just as a reminder: the County Administrator needs to sign the application form for this project, and Carl and I will need to take a complete application package to him for his signature. Please allow several days for Carl and me (and possibly the County Deputy Prosecuting Attorney)to review the application package and take it to the County Administrator. It looks like the new shoreline regulations are going to be pushed back by a couple of weeks so if you get us the entire submittal by mid-next week, that should give Carl and me enough time to get it through for signature and get it ready for submittal before the new regulations become effective. 2. If we submit all documentation to the county, including indemnification, mid-week, will the county sign-off on it by end-of-week? Once the application package is dropped off at DCD for County Administrator signature, Carl and I will work to get the signed application back to you as soon as possible. Given staffing constraints here and the holidays, it is unlikely that staff will be able to determine that the application is complete (which is what vests the application to current regulations) by the end of the week that it is submitted. It may take 2-3 weeks from the time it is submitted to the time the application package makes it to my desk. If I am not able to look at the application within 28 days of submittal, the application is considered complete by this department. 2 Please see the pre-app notes for what constitutes a complete application (note that the geotech report was removed, and a hydrologic report and a signed/notarized License and Indemnification was added). 3. What permit fee will I need to pay next week at submittal? If you apply for a shoreline substantial development permit,the fee is$3,500. If you apply for a shoreline exemption,the fee is$1,983 (and you would also need to submit an itemized cost estimate at the time of application). Final Note: DCD will need 2 copies of the JARPA for the County Administrator to sign—original signatures will be needed for the Jefferson County submittal and for the Corps submittal. Thanks as always and for your help, Kathleen III 3 o_LL ,J).-0,(5f C . v-et ININWI UMW 401 O 12,A_ M MIAILL.,mwawilt..i .0 Donna Frostholm To: Justin Wilson Cc: Carl Smith; marine.surveys.inc@gmail.com; Kathleen @kmdouglas.com Subject: RE: Re; Geo-hydrologist for Wampum Point beach restoration Based on the description of his experience and credentials, it sounds like Steve is qualified to prepare the report, which would need his stamp and an original signature in the copy submitted to DCD. From: Justin Wilson [mailto:justin @nti4u.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 3:06 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Carl Smith; marine.surveys.inc @ gmail.com; Kathleen©kmdouglas.com Subject: RE: Re; Geo-hydrologist for Wampum Point beach restoration Hello Donna, Could you please verify for us that Steve Luxton, MSc., P.E. signature will be acceptable for the Geo-hydrologist Report that is required for this project. Steve has many years of experience with shoreline Geomorphology issues just like this. We have site visit planned for this Friday. I am sure that Steve's signature will work, but we just want to make sure prior to finalizing submitted documentation. We all just want to make sure that this is a responsible and successful rehabilitation project for the good of Kathleen and the general public of Jefferson County. Thank you for your assistance with this endeavor. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Regards, Justin Justin Wilson, P.E. Principal Engineer NTI Engineering&Land Surveying 360.452.8491 office 360.460.0683 cell www.nti4u.com NOTICE: This email and any attachments contains confidential,proprietary or privileged information intended for the addressees only. This information is copyrighted and protected by law. If you are not the intended addressee,you are not authorized to use,transfer, or rely upon the information in any way. If you have erroneously received this transmission, delete any electronic or hard copies and contact the sender immediately From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm(aco.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 2:39 PM To: Kathleen@kmdouglas.com Cc: Carl Smith; justin(anti4u.com; marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Subject: RE: Re; Geo-hydrologist for Wampum Point beach restoration Hi Kathleen: See below... From: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com [mailto:Kathleen@kmdouglas.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 12:18 PM To: Donna Frostholm 1 Cc: Carl Smith; justin@nti4u.com; marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com; Kathleen @kmdouglas.com Subject: Re; Geo-hydrologist for Wampum Point beach restoration Importance: High Hi Donna, Justin has recommended that we have Steve Luxton write the hydrology report. Per Justin, Steve is semi-retired and works part time for NTI. He has worked full time for NTI, worked in the Middle East on hydrology projects, In Seattle at URS, WH Pacific down in Oregon and other locations. Before I contract with Steve for this work, I wanted to make sure this approach would meet the county's requirements. As you know,time is of the essence so Amy,Justin and I plan is to have all documents at the county for sign-off by mid- next week(before 12/15 when the new Shoreline Management rules go into effect). At this point, Steve is scheduled to meet me on-site in Quilcene Friday morning. Information required from you: 1. Will our plan as outlined above meet the county requirements? Just as a reminder: the County Administrator needs to sign the application form for this project, and Carl and I will need to take a complete application package to him for his signature. Please allow several days for Carl and me (and possibly the County Deputy Prosecuting Attorney)to review the application package and take it to the County Administrator. It looks like the new shoreline regulations are going to be pushed back by a couple of weeks so if you get us the entire submittal by mid-next week, that should give Carl and me enough time to get it through for signature and get it ready for submittal before the new regulations become effective. 2. If we submit all documentation to the county, including indemnification, mid-week, will the county sign-off on it by end-of-week? Once the application package is dropped off at DCD for County Administrator signature, Carl and I will work to get the signed application back to you as soon as possible. Given staffing constraints here and the holidays, it is unlikely that staff will be able to determine that the application is complete (which is what vests the application to current regulations) by the end of the week that it is submitted. It may take 2-3 weeks from the time it is submitted to the time the application package makes it to my desk. If I am not able to look at the application within 28 days of submittal,the application is considered complete by this department. Please see the pre-app notes for what constitutes a complete application (note that the geotech report was removed, and a hydrologic report and a signed/notarized License and Indemnification was added). 3. What permit fee will I need to pay next week at submittal? If you apply for a shoreline substantial development permit,the fee is$3,500. If you apply for a shoreline exemption, the fee is$1,983 (and you would also need to submit an itemized cost estimate at the time of application). Final Note: DCD will need 2 copies of the JARPA for the County Administrator to sign—original signatures will be needed for the Jefferson County submittal and for the Corps submittal. Thanks as always and for your help, Kathleen O ovostr This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. w fn. 2 Donna Frostholm From: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 3:21 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Carl Smith;justin @nti4u.com; marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Subject: RE: Re; Geo-hydrologist for Wampum Point beach restoration Importance: High Hi Donna— I appreciate the clarification below: we will march to the mid-week timeline. In full transparency, our expectation is that the county will move the application expediently through the process since you and the county have been working closely with us for two years-frankly, 2-3 weeks seems rather surprising at this stage. In addition, do we have your/DCD assurance that the application will be vested if we meet our timeline? As you know, we are spending time, etc. on this beach restoration project and need to know that the application is vested so we do not need to spend more time and money following new regulations. a V - puj,�+,� -ufic� Thank you again, ��a�'' Kathleen .0 �"`,�,i. From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent:Tuesday, December 03, 2013 2:39 PM To: Kathleen(c@kmdouglas.com Cc: Carl Smith;justin @nti4u.com; marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Subject: RE: Re; Geo-hydrologist for Wampum Point beach restoration Hi Kathleen: See below... From: Kathleen @kmdouglas.com [mailto:Kathleen @kmdouglas.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 12:18 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Carl Smith; justin @nti4u.com; marine.surveys.inc @ gmail.com; Kathleen @kmdouglas.com Subject: Re; Geo-hydrologist for Wampum Point beach restoration Importance: High Hi Donna, Justin has recommended that we have Steve Luxton write the hydrology report. Per Justin, Steve is semi-retired and works part time for NTI. He has worked full time for NTI, worked in the Middle East on hydrology projects, In Seattle at URS, WH Pacific down in Oregon and other locations. Before I contract with Steve for this work, I wanted to make sure this approach would meet the county's requirements. As you know,time is of the essence so Amy,Justin and I plan is to have all documents at the county for sign-off by mid- next week(before 12/15 when the new Shoreline Management rules go into effect). At this point, Steve is scheduled to meet me on-site in Quilcene Friday morning. Information required from you: 1 1. Will our plan as outlined above meet the county requirements? Just as a reminder:the County Administrator needs to sign the application form for this project, and Carl and I will need to take a complete application package to him for his signature. Please allow several days for Carl and me (and possibly the County Deputy Prosecuting Attorney)to review the application package and take it to the County Administrator. It looks like the new shoreline regulations are going to be pushed back by a couple of weeks so if you get us the entire submittal by mid-next week, that should give Carl and me enough time to get it through for signature and get it ready for submittal before the new regulations become effective. 2. If we submit all documentation to the county, including indemnification, mid-week, will the county sign-off on it by end-of-week? Once the application package is dropped off at DCD for County Administrator signature, Carl and I will work to get the signed application back to you as soon as possible. Given staffing constraints here and the holidays, it is unlikely that staff will be able to determine that the application is complete (which is what vests the application to current regulations) by the end of the week that it is submitted. It may take 2-3 weeks from the time it is submitted to the time the application package makes it to my desk. If I am not able to look at the application within 28 days of submittal,the application is considered complete by this department. Please see the pre-app notes for what constitutes a complete application (note that the geotech report was removed, and a hydrologic report and a signed/notarized License and Indemnification was added). 3. What permit fee will I need to pay next week at submittal? If you apply for a shoreline substantial development permit,the fee is$3,500. If you apply for a shoreline exemption,the fee is$1,983 (and you would also need to submit an itemized cost estimate at the time of application). Final Note: DCD will need 2 copies of the JARPA for the County Administrator to sign—original signatures will be needed for the Jefferson County submittal and for the Corps submittal. Thanks as always and for your help, Kathleen 2 Donna Frostholm To: MSA Cc: Kathleen Douglas (KMD Consulting); Carl Smith -j- /I 13 Subject: RE: JARPA Kathleen Douglas Hi Amy: Thanks for sending this over for our review. Overall this looks really good, but there are a few revisions the County would like made before the form is signed (see attached). The County would like Kathleen and Reimer Douglas to be the applicants,Justin Wilson with NTI to be the representative, and Jefferson County to be the property owner. Since the County is not a co-applicant, we would like these revisions reflected in the JARPA. Another revision is to clarify that the only property owner for this application is the County. It is our understanding that all work will be conducted on land owned by the County (and that property owned by Kathleen will be used to access the work area). Just to make sure we are all 'on the same page', please let me know if you have a different understanding. The County would like to see the entire package being submitted to the Corps prior to signing the JARPA. Once it is all compiled, would you (or Kathleen or Justin) drop off a complete copy at DCD? DCD will take the entire package to Philip Morley when we go over to get his signature. Thanks much and let me know if you have any questions, �avula�Fro-stholAtv .Associate Planner/WetlandSpeciaCist Jefferson County Department of Community Deveoopment 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend Washington 98368 dfrostkam@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. From: MSA [mailto:marine.surveys.inc@lgmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 1:36 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Kathleen©kmdouglas.com Subject: JARPA Kathleen Douglas Hello Donna, Attached is the revised JARPA for the Kathleen Douglas project. We want to send a copy of the Original BE (without the mitigation, since they do not require it) into the USACE as soon as possible. We will need you or someone in the county to review the JARPA to make sure it is acceptable to you, and then to sign it. Please print the signature page, sign it, and then call us and we can come to pick it up. We will then take the BE and the JARPA and forward it to Kathleen who would like to hand-deliver it to the Corps by late week or early next week. Thanks Amy Amy Leitman Marine Surveys Et Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Web: marinesurveysandassessments.com Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 2 JARPA Comments: Part 2. Please make Kathleen and Reimer Douglas the applicants. Part 4. Jefferson County is the only property owner so fill in Part 4 and delete the 3 X's. Use information from Part 2 to fill in Part 4. My email address is dfrostholm @co.lefferson.wa.us 5a—Based on input from NTI, all work will be conducted on County intertidal land so 'Private' should not be checked. 5b. Add before the address for Kathleen: "Intertidal land is located immediately adjacent to...". 5g: Add before parcel number for Kathleen: "Intertidal land is located immediately adjacent to...". 5h. Add the following property owners: William and Lindsay Wright, 25008 SE Mirrormont Way, Issaquah,WA 98027 Robert Palmer, P.O. Box 1560, Port Townsend, WA 98368 Using JARPA Attachment C, add the following: Claudia and Lawrence Sherman, 18544 NE 19th PI, Bellevue,WA 98008 AJ and Jacqueline Schwagler, 233 Alice Rd, Port Angeles, WA 98363 5o. Add as a preface to the first sentence: "Structures on parcels immediately adjacent to County intertidal property consist of residential/vacation...". 6a. Add as a last sentence: "The work area will be access via private property owned by the applicants (101 Wampum Point Road)." 6b. Delete the "X"for Residential. 6f. Change first sentence from "...prior JARPA permit..." to "...prior HPA permit...". 8c. Add to end of paragraph (revise as necessary to match the biological reports you have prepared for the project): "A Biological Evaluation has been prepared for federal permitting and an addendum letter has been prepared to address Jefferson County requirements for critical areas." 8f. I do not know if DCD has the plan sheets that will be submitted to the Corps so I cannot check the upper limits of fill distribution. Please check plan sheets to confirm that fill will not be placed beyond county property line or in any area of native vegetation (landward of the existing channel). 10a. For the Corps permit, you do not need to check a SEPA box since the application has not come in to the County yet. When you apply to the County, check the box that says: A SEPA determination is pending with Jefferson County(lead agency). The expected decision date is winter or spring 2014. 10b. After SDP Exemption, add: "based on cost of project" 10b. Check the boxes in front of Flood Development Permit and Critical Areas Ordinance. 10b. State Governments: Has Bridget Kaminsky-Richardson with Washington Department of Natural Resources been contacted? If not, she should be prior to submittal of the County application to determine if an Aquatic Resources Use Authorization is needed. Attachment A. Since the County is the only property owner for this application,fill in Part 4 and delete Attachment A. II A Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:29 AM To: 'Justin Wilson'; 'Kathleen Douglas (KMD Consulting)' Cc: Carl Smith Subject: RE: JARPA rivision &Application Checklist, 9/18/12 meeting with JEFFCO Hi Kathleen and Justin: Here are some additional thoughts and clarifications from DCD: • For 2b below, the revised drawing is to show all property ownerships with existing and proposed actions, including re-grading and alignment of the creek discharge overlain on an aerial photo. • For 2d below, "verbiage" means a plan to salvage native plants in the project area and then re-plant them following construction. • DCD will send a copy of JARPA Attachment A with county signature on to Kathleen to include in the application submittal. • DCD will send a copy of the Master Permit application with county signature on to Kathleen to include in the application submittal. • The fees at the time of permitting for a shoreline exemption: $1,417 ($518 for shoreline exemption,$899 for SEPA review). Justin asked if a critical areas stewardship plan (CASP) could be submitted later. The county agreed to this since the Corps may have comments that would need to be incorporated into the report. Therefore,there may be an additional $518 CASP fee required at the time of CASP submittal. • JARPA and SEPA should provide additional information about the project (methods for moving sediments in intertidal zone, plant salvaging and replanting, etc.). • The entire length of the dredged channel on county land needs to be re-contoured to more natural conditions. Regards, Donnncv Frostho-Lm, .Associate Tanner/Wetland Specialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port 7ownsend,Washington 98368 dfrostholm@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Justin Wilson [mailto:justin @nti4u.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 5:49 PM To: 'Kathleen Douglas (KMD Consulting)' Cc: Carl Smith; Donna Frostholm Subject: JARPA rivision &Application Checklist, 9/18/12 meeting with JEFFCO Hi Kathleen, I will briefly summarize the meeting that I had with Carl S. & Donna F.from Jefferson County regarding the proposed Shoreline Restoration project. 1 I will start out by listing items that will need to be submitted as part of the Shoreline Exemption Application package: 1. Master Permit Application will need to be filled out again. 2. JARPA(Revised) a. Include a construction cost estimate &options(Less than $5,718 for exemption). b. Update map importing a color image behind CAD plan w/survey data. c. Show more clearly a balance of materials—No import or export (no net change). d. Verbiage for re-establishing native plantings in project area. e. Utilize verbiage as stated in the Nationwide 27 Army Corps. permit 3. SEPA checklist (This previously submitted document will need to be incorporated with this package). 4. Site Plan—This will be the same document as the one used w/JARPA, but submitted separately also. 5. Proposed Drawings and Details—This will be the same updated plan as used in the JARPA. 6. Geotechnical Report—Carl has exempted the requirement for a Geotech Report on this project. 7. Critical Areas Stewardship Plan (CASP)—This document can be forthcoming for this project. a. A list of possible Wetland Biologists (7) is included in the attached pdf document. 8. Habitat Assessment (or Biological Evaluation)—N/A if we get a Corps Permit from Joanne Gardener(new person). 9. Stormwater Calculation Worksheet—This will be straight forward. 10. Fees Due at Time of Application -$899 for SEPA Review, and $518 for CASP. Total of$1,417 for shoreline exemption 11. A building permit will not be needed to construct with the shoreline. We also discussed construction options and what may be required for quality control during construction to assure that proper proposed grades are constructed, and that other aspects are constructed per reviewed plans. Carl & Donna—Please feel free to add any information to this list of items that you feel would be beneficial to the approval of this permit. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Justin Justin Wilson, P.E. Principal Engineer NTI Engineering&Land Surveying 360.452.8491 office 360.460.0683 cell www.nti4u.com NOTICE: This email and any attachments contains confidential,proprietary or privileged information intended for the addressees only. This information is copyrighted and protected by law. If you are not the intended addressee,you are not authorized to use,transfer, or rely upon the information in any way. If you have erroneously received this transmission, delete any electronic or hard copies and contact the sender immediately 2 ., -. _ ,. . . , , - i-,-.),,r '' .1 V , /eez-h 4t/ : _.,,, A ---/ - (4441/(1 gwiel- . 9 Oi. 4_-/If /144-fieir affhce-aa-1/4 .(.) CLv-151-7(".7 .4'( 514‘.aCe/1(4-e. ,er-oct Ot i,i' 174, 4-e . _ 7) 6 502A c lk -e-ek le..rz' 7) , k r, i eim,7 (0) C 4 4---f P —i)6,4 At_et, ±: f 1 IT r--.! lk? A-'674-2 C-C_ --it) _7 .. tZt_ `fTritt- CAS, M•riree"/ k04.a", ,41,41/7 6. e 71)14-e4 4-N —. .,04572,571- 1 ' , : , 6P,e, ' fry ..7P-0c(1 ) C ,u,-- s0 p 5-D P -6Y o ptaAA U-1 e/W 61) PA-AT ttl■/1SL ccp-eA May 8, 2013 To: Jefferson County Commissioners Cc: Phillip Morley, Carl Smith, Donna Frostholm Dear Sirs, We want to share with you the Letter to the Editor we wrote and submitted this week to the Port Townsend Leader. At this time we don't know whether or not it will be published, but if not, we wanted make you aware of our appreciation for the work Jefferson Community Development is doing to resolve the beach dredging on county land and in front of property. Enclosed please find a copy of our letter, as well as photos that depict the damage to the beach during the past 4%years. The JARPA that began the problem is also included. We want to reiterate that this is a man-made problem that will require a man-made solution. My husband and I have waited to see if nature would take care of the issue. Unfortunately, damage to the beach has escalated the past year. We are looking forward to a restored beach. Thank you and sincere regards, Kathleen and Reimer Douglas Home: 206-524-6640 Cell: 206-335-2991 Seattle address: 2021 N 78,Seattle 98103 Quilcene address: 101 Wampum Pt. Road 1131,31303 sSd1 still vsn ti:, N "~W�.,,,, C>0 F 1331,31101 St/ID-1 SW vsn ■ • 0 W CSC 213A3110J SSV -152113 ysn 4 '(''.; dill 0 e V \ SI, GO ,ol::unuawy 9 ,411 iii, , V ,,, y. P,-1 Vopj nu=ury 1111..... o D n o iI 0 0 CT r. 3 m c c- r+ e-r, tt Cos d CA C i. 4 fV 0 d L4 0 May 5, 2013 TO: Port Townsend Leader editor: We are writing out of deep concern for the county beach in front of our property. Trenching of county beach in December 2008 has eroded the sand spit and beach habitat as shown in these 5 photos. This is a man-made problem which requires a man-made solution. We been working with the Jefferson Department of Community Development staff on beach restoration for the last 18 months. Our experience is the county is committed to doing what is right. What has been an eye-opener is the length of the process and the negative impact of staff cutbacks. In fact, in January Community Development staff hours were decreased from 40 to 32 hours a week. This decrease in staffing means not all violations are addressed in a timely manner or followed up on at all. It's easy to blame"the county"without realizing the difficulty of their tasks with reduced staffing. We worry this will encourage even more flagrant disregard for the permitting process. We want to protect public land and habitat of this beautiful part of the country we call home. Sincerely, Kathleen and Reimer Douglas, Quilcene Mailing address: 2021 N. 78 Street,Seattle WA 98103 Home: 206-S24-6640 Cell: 206-335-2991 ach before digging in 2008 Sand spit cut through. Photo 2012 trench deeepening,. summer 2012. Same view as left(7/2009)in early 7/2009 sand spit washing away. 20a it a • fa • JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE I LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA11-00105 APPLICANT: ROBERT H PALMER JR PO BOX 1560 PORT TOWNSEND WA 983680052 Application Received Date: May 9, 2011 Application Complete Date: June 29, 2011 Application Notice Date: August 10, 2011 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 1954 EAST QUILCENE RD Parcel number 701 194 010, Section 19, Township 27, Range 1W, WM, located at 1954 East Quilcene Rd, Quilcene 98376 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: Shoreline exemption to dredge stream channel. Approximately 370 linear feet of the channel, just upstream of Quilcene Bay, will be dredged to reduce the potential for flooding of the residential lot. Dredged materials will be stockpiled on the property. The proposal is subject to review under the SEPA. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this ( ) g application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m.on August 24, 2011. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday,p da then the comment period Y, p shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION AND PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable development regulations, and the project review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an EIS is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold (final) determination may be obtained upon request, and will be mailed to any person commenting upon the notice of application. The SEPA Official has determined that: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The Department expects to issue a DNS for this proposal. if the proposal is approved, policies and performance standards found in the Jefferson County Code and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan will be used to form permit conditions intended to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Additional conditions or mitigation measures may be required under SEPA. This will be the only opportunity to make comments related to SEPA. There will not be another comment period after the threshold (final) SEPA determination is made. In addition, since this is a Type I permit application, the threshold determination cannot be appealed except to Superior Court. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: This is a Type I Permit Application and there will be no public hearings. The final permit decision for this Type I permit application will be made by the Administrator. The decision cannot be appealed except to Superior Court APPEALS: Appeals of SEPA decisions are described above in the SEPA Information and Preliminary Determination section. Project Planner. Donna Frostholm,360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community Development web page at www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ Page uf3 Al Scalf From: Al Scalf Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 10:45 AM To: David Alvarez; Stacie Hoskins; Roseann Carroll; Donna Frostholm Cu: 'Mark R. Johnsen' Subject: RE: Palmer Permit Application(Jefferson County) This would be MLA 114U5 received on May A for o: Shoreline permit SEPA review GAGP—cridoa| area stewardship plan The water table is still very high. The project planner will be Donna Frostholm Al . � From: David Alvarez Sent: Monday,June 13, 2011 9:32 AM To: Al Scalf; Stacie Hoskins; Roseann Carroll Cc: Mark R. Johnsen Subject: Palmer Permit Application(Jefferson County) Colleagues: It appears that Mr. Palmer's attorney want a quicker turn-around on the Palmer application. He states that he has been informed that there is no planner assigned to the Palmer file. In any event, please make sure this application gets handled as expeditiously as possible. I am NOT telling you to put this at the front of the line. David Alvarez From: Mark R.Johnsen [moUto:M]ohnsen Sent: Monday,June 13, I011 9:15 AM To: David Alvarez Subject: FW: Palmer Permit Application(Jefferson County) Hi David. Could you check to see if there is a hold-up at the Permit Center on an application from Palmer? Thanks Mark R. Johnsen Attorney /zo1 3rd Avenue,Suite c000 Seattle,Washington 98101 • direct 20e-224-8020 • main 206z23-1313 • fax 206'6e2-7100 Visit our website www.karrtuttle.com 6/13/2011 Page 2 of 3 A Law Firm for the Pacific Northwest From: Mark R.Johnsen Sent: Monday,June 13, 2011 8:46 AM To: 'Dennis D. Reynolds Law Office' Subject: RE: Palmer Permit Application(Jefferson County) Dennis, my role is pretty much limited to defending counties in litigation matters. I don't get involved in permitting. If your client feels he is not getting a response, he should probably set u p a meeting with the permit center. Mark From: Dennis D. Reynolds Law Office[mailto:dennis @ddrlaw.com] Sent: Sunday,June 12, 2011 11:30 AM To: Mark R.Johnsen Subject: FW: Palmer Permit Application(Jefferson County) Mark?Trying to be cooperative here and not run up litigation costs. If I am doing something wrong here,or there is something I need to know about these clients,please advise. Dennis D. Reynolds Law Office • 200 Winslow Way W. Suite 380 Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 www.ddrlaw.com 206.780.6777, tel/206.780-6865, fax 206.604.5739, cell This message and any attachments hereto are intended only for use by the addressee(s)named herein. It may contain confidential,proprietary or legally privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any copying,distribution or dissemination of this communication,and any attachments hereto.is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,please immediately notify sender and permanently delete the original message from your computer and delete any copy or printout thereof. We reserve the right to monitor all email communications. Although we believe this email and any attachments are virus-free,we do not guarantee that it is virus-free,and we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from its use. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation. From: Dennis D. Reynolds Law Office [mailto:dennis @ddrlaw.com] Sent:Thursday,June 09, 2011 9:41 AM To: 'Mark R.Johnsen' Cc: 'David Alvarez' Subject: Palmer Permit Application(Jefferson County) Mark,the Palmer's hired Ms. Leann McDonald,an experienced permit coordinator,to file an application and seek approval for continuing maintenance of the creek.The application was filed with the County several months ago. It is an emergency situation,in that the construction opportunity is in the summer,when the creek is dry and something needs to be done this year to prevent more flooding. I am advised that the Department of Community Development has not assigned a planner to the file.Thus, my client want to convene a meeting with the Director to push some action. I will not be involved with the meeting, but how does the County want to handle the meeting re ER 408? Please advise. There is no intent to discuss the litigation at the meeting, only the permit application. Dennis D. Reynolds Law Office 6/13/2011 Page 3 of 3 • 200 Winslow Way W. Suite 380 Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 www.ddrlaw.com 206.780.6777, tel/ 206.780-6865, fax 206.604.5739, cell This message and any attachments hereto are intended only for use by the addressee(s)named herein. It may contain confidential,proprietary or legally privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any copying,distribution or dissemination of this communication,and any attachments hereto,is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,please immediately notify sender and permanently delete the original message from your computer and delete any copy or printout thereof. We reserve the right to monitor all email communications. Although vie believe this email and any attachments are virus-free,we do not guarantee that it is virus-free,and we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from its use. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation. A Please consider the environment before printing this email IMPORTANT/CONFIDENTIAL:This e-mail message(and any attachments accompanying it)may contain confidential information,including information protected by attorney-client privilege.The information is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). Delivery of this message to anyone other than the intended recipient(s)is not intended to waive any privilege or otherwise detract from the confidentiality of the message. If you are not the intended recipient,or if this message has been addressed to you in error,do not read,disclose,reproduce,distribute,disseminate or otherwise use this transmission,rather,please promptly notify the sender by reply e-mail,and then destroy all copies of the message and its attachments,if any. IRS Circular 230 Disclaimer: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS,we inform you that to the extent this communication contains advice relating to a Federal tax issue,it is not intended or written to be used,and it may not be used,for(i)the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed on you or any other person or entity under the Internal Revenue Code or(ii)promoting or marketing to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. 6/13/2011 - — I < State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Mailing Address:600 Capitol Way N, Olympia WA 98501-1091, (360)902-2200,TDD (360)902-2207 Main Office Location: Natural Resources Building, 1111 Washington Street SE, Olympia WA September 6, 2011 John Gusoskey Post Office Box 397 Quilcene, Washington 98376 Dear Mr. Gusoskey: SUBJECT: HPA REVOKED FOR STREAM DREDGING IN UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO QUILCENE BAY(WRIA 17.0121),TRIBUTARY TO HOOD CANAL IN JEFFFERSON COUNTY,WDFW LOG NO. 115558-02 On August 10,2011, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW)issued you Hydraulic Project Approval(HPA) 115558-02 for the project described above. I must now revoke your HPA. Under WAC 220-110-030(19),WDFW may modify(which includes revoke) an HPA when conditions change. The project renewal was incorrectly issued without the completion of the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)process. The original permit was issued as an expedited permit and did not require SEPA but it may not be renewed. If you would like to still do the project,apply for SEPA approval with Jefferson County and resend your application for the HPA with updated information. I apologize for the confusion. If you wish to appeal this decision,you may file a written request for appeal under WAC 220- 110-340(Informal Appeal of Adverse Administrative Decision)or WAC 220-110-350 (Formal Appeal of Adverse Administrative Decision).I have enclosed these WACs. September 6, 2011 Page 2 If you have any questions, please call me at 360-427-2179. Sincerely, 77)ezxl J Margie Schirato Area Habitat Biologist Enclosure(s) cc: Bill Wright,william.wright5 @comcast.net File • WAC 220-110-340 INFORMAL APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS The department recommends that a party aggrieved by the issuance,denial, conditioning,or modification of an HPA contact the department employee responsible for making the decision on the HPA before initiating an informal appeal. Discussion of concerns with the department employee often results in a resolution of the problem without the need for an informal appeal. The department encourages aggrieved parties to take advantage of the informal appeal process before initiating a formal appeal. However,the informal appeal process is not mandatory,and a person may proceed directly to a formal appeal under WAC 220-110-350. (1)This rule does not apply to any provisions or conditions in pamphlet HPAs or supplemental approvals as defined in WAC 220-110-020. A person who disagrees with a provision or condition in a pamphlet HPA or its supplemental approval may apply for an individual,written HPA. (2)Any person with standing may request an informal appeal of the following department actions: (a)The issuance,denial,conditioning,or modification of an HPA;or (b)An order imposing civil penalties. (3)A request for an informal appeal shall be in writing and shall be received by the department within thirty days from the date of receipt of the decision or order. "Date of receipt"means: (a)Five business days after the date of mailing; or (b)The date of actual receipt,when the actual receipt date can be proven by a preponderance of the evidence.The recipient's sworn affidavit or declaration indicating the date of receipt,which is unchallenged by the agency, shall constitute sufficient evidence of actual receipt. The date of actual receipt,however,may not exceed forty-five days from the date of mailing. (4)Requests for informal appeal shall be mailed to the HPA Appeals Coordinator,Department of Fish and Wildlife,Habitat Program,600 Capitol Way N.,Olympia, Washington 98501-1091; e-mailed to HPAapplications @dfw.wa.gov; faxed to(360)902-2946;or hand-delivered to the Natural Resources Building, 1111 Washington Street S.E.,Habitat Program,Fifth floor. (5)The request shall be plainly labeled as "Request for Informal Appeal" and shall include the following: (a)The appellant's name, address,e-mail address(if available),and phone number; (b)The specific department action that the appellant contests; (c)The date the department issued,denied,conditioned,or modified an HPA,or the date the department issued the order imposing civil penalties; (d)The log number or a copy of the HPA,or a copy of the order imposing civil penalties; (e)A short and plain statement explaining why the appellant considers the department action or order to provide inadequate protection of fish life or to be otherwise unlawful; (f)A clear and concise statement of facts to explain the appellant's grounds for appeal; (g)Whether the appellant is the permittee,HPA applicant, landowner,resident, or another person with an interest in the department action in question; (h)The specific relief requested; (i)The attorney's name, address,e-mail address(if available)and phone number, if the person is represented by legal counsel; and (j)The signature of the appellant or his or her attorney. (6)Upon receipt of a valid request for an informal appeal,the department may initiate a review of the department action.If the appellant agrees,and the appellant applied for the HPA,resolution of the appeal may be facilitated through an informal conference. The informal conference is an optional part of the informal appeal and is normally a discussion between the appellant,the department employee responsible for the decision,and a supervisor.The time period for the department to issue a decision on an informal appeal is suspended during the informal conference process. (7)If a resolution is not reached through the informal conference process,or the appellant is not the person who applied for the HPA,or the appeal involves an order imposing civil penalties, an informal appeal hearing shall be conducted by the HPA appeals coordinator or designee.Upon completion of the informal appeal hearing,the HPA appeals coordinator or designee shall recommend a decision to the director or the director's designee. This recommended decision shall be approved or disapproved by the director or the director's designee within sixty days of the date the informal appeal was received by the department,unless an extension of time is agreed to by the appellant. The department shall notify the appellant in writing of the decision of the director or the director's designee. (8)If the department declines to initiate an informal review of its action after receipt of a valid request,or the appellant still wishes to contest the department action following completion of the informal appeal process,the appellant may initiate a formal appeal under WAC 220-110-350. Formal review must be requested within the time periods specified in WAC 220-110-350. WAC 220-110-350 FORMAL APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS The department recommends that a party aggrieved by the issuance,denial, conditioning, or modification of an HPA contact the department employee responsible for making the decision on the HPA before initiating a formal appeal. Discussion of concerns with the department employee often results in a resolution of the problem without the need for a formal appeal. The department encourages aggrieved parties to take advantage of the informal appeal process under WAC 220-110-340 before initiating a formal appeal. However,the informal appeal process is not mandatory, and a person may proceed directly to a formal appeal. (1)This rule does not apply to any provisions or conditions in pamphlet HPAs or supplemental approvals as defined in WAC 220-110-020. A person who disagrees with a provision or condition in a pamphlet HPA or its supplemental approval may apply for an individual,written HPA. (2)Any person with standing may request a formal appeal of the following department actions: (a)The issuance,denial,conditioning,or modification of an HPA;or (b)An order imposing civil penalties. (3)As required by the Administrative Procedure Act, Chapter 34.05 RCW,the department shall inform the HPA permittee or applicant,or person subject to civil penalty order of the department,of the opportunity for appeal,the time within which to file a written request for an appeal, and the place to file it. (4)A request for a formal appeal shall be in writing and shall be filed with the clerk of the pollution control hearings board(PCHB)and served on the department within thirty days from the date of receipt of the decision or order."Date of receipt"means: (a)Five business days after the date of mailing;or (b)The date of actual receipt,when the actual receipt date can be proven by a preponderance of the evidence. The recipient's sworn affidavit or declaration indicating the date of receipt,which is unchallenged by the agency, shall constitute sufficient evidence of actual receipt. The date of actual receipt,however,may not exceed forty-five days from the date of mailing. (5) Service on the department shall be mailed to the HPA Appeals Coordinator,Department of Fish and Wildlife,Habitat Program, 600 Capitol Way N., Olympia,Washington 98501-1091; e-mailed to HPAapplications @dfw.wa.gov; faxed to(360)902-2946;or hand-delivered to the Natural Resources Building, 1111 Washington Street S.E.,Habitat Program,Fifth floor. (6)The time period for requesting a formal appeal is suspended during consideration of a timely informal appeal. If there has been an informal appeal,the deadline for requesting a formal appeal shall be within thirty days from the date of receipt of the department's written decision in response to the informal appeal. (7)The request for formal appeal shall contain the information required by WAC 371-08-340. (8)The department in its discretion may stay the effectiveness of any decision or order that has been appealed to the PCHB. The department will use the standards in WAC 371-08-415(4)to make a decision on any stay request.At any time during the appeal to the PCHB,the appellant may apply to the PCHB for a stay of the decision or order,or removal of a stay imposed by the department. (9)If there is no timely request for an appeal,the department action shall be final and unappealable. V/ Liles O ' Z J O Z a OZ i 3 as i m N ^(ii 3 ry ) 8 $ r ! ■ N O Ld (/) W 0 1- (n I— o Lao- rj0 soo o p oob � 91LZ9Z (ML - NLZ -OZ b/LMS) Ca9= o_m CC NN CO.(�.� 99q 101 1;AO0 L 1Cl 1 =F°ZF m M vi r)/'/ !°°961101 D \ \` -- Q O 4 U ��' ■^4 o n a„ ? = ' 0J c LP Owp ° gin /) /n.o°9s° "V' Z9° ° ,o) ,O W Owo+ca o O... r / / CD o !kY m /- R.° o O Q° g u Oh Ki S A �--I ` ° N 1-, s �K "0z m m Y 6 n °n 0 P Q p n< R Ice%.>>0 GEN`LI n rn m o - QU\\, H N n P5' f DOry 5.:4 / ib m N u E / > SI S p < / 2 ~Wr / oro 83 ° _ nA 3 •e °pM 8° :4 / rry \Q ,,loi 'es, 1'4' \ ,--- -5 0, 1 db Z i f'd O 0,XVL �., £''Z1 ` S di 0 NI,d y3j1. 4,..7,,,'-- s c. CA v /� / W W _•Y61-Lgc_.Sbl_L .S6{ "- -- ZOOZ [ Q I pwOWCC Uw?/ / •N I I o I -Ir� O M2NwJ ° n ._L � c o, Nfr3� o I ; ----- 03 0jt- i OoX U 1- I d i= Z'Ma J I- ----- a Q g m / Zacn�`'� .. ~ uj-s =OZ N ~ w lVlo1 OV bl'95) I ' , w w j H , ~ J Z__7 On k3 v ~O-a �' o A.I Nnoo w N N Z w U =Z 3al � (Ml - NLZ - 6L V/LMS) \ K. \ — °.g ■ p x* ' Q V� Q w 1 5 Z i - S rc m Z Z W 9] h a N J yS a 8 w O m Za 0 — 8 x3 6 IrT j Z T UQZ¢ i a "L: m W w' 0 i;1 <O r w "1 C , to 5 if) r0 O3 -0 * Zil E' 12 z- rti ..c . ,.. a, -- _• = 1 co ..i. E.,- 0 E , o 0 1 CD -1ln :6 '"I' o_ n v, CD m I - 0 Z ' t 1 cu CD 9 I'.' . 1 = i ' Z -, o 5 .--1 -:.... - - 5.-m- o c ,-, crg 0 < -a I 07 o-e (x) = o.. -o — CD , ,-• 0 * . = ro -e v) = • I , lb , ,......10ort,. , ..,.,•.,. ,,,,,: ::<------c°C-)::::; 7,.. . , lie-It ' (4 I 0 . 1 ). m . . " (5 . i3; ., , „,,, z . 1, — 0 ; .. I ' I ° ' C F'`” r-,,,g r, , ;.. - I,. $' :. v' ;,' .17".%, 'c' r . i , ,,, - .' ", 2 - I , ' ‘;''' ' " ," a; , , ,'' ..< 7 i g. • - , -c5 , c.. . ..., I t o -0 ', i.... ...•. 1 ..#* 0:1,, ro .- , z • . 41, .-Z ...... --- - . i - 4- - J 0 V r- 0 ... . ,c,".. E • i .2 I.. 2 e . • '". ::: , , , , r■l. .... ..,.... , 1=. *" v.: • v r) i :2 w • 1 - . i ,• rb e. ,.. • el,-., ... ) _41:.,,tio . . . . . 1 . (r) ..) 2 0 tv . , -0 ' '' 01. ...-•;.f -'7 ID'""4. 0 C.,, 5. .. . _ c., . . A CD a 3 ,---------- ' I'l Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map r_--- 7011 c III 701195007 j l 1 � u 701195006 L i0191000 1 I 1910L 00 �' i/ 1( 701195002 a - 70119500' a 701195005' ,' . 701195004 i I� 70120600 MAP• 4 j F701196405 —' ,, 41„......... 709:195004.-. I 701195001-.=` Legend 701195002 10ft7 �� ,- Selected Features !+.,,?91028 l 701196003 't,,p,d --` 3 Towns N 1 * County Soar ,° \.....___ �,.N;tt0 gd{ 701203001 101 ism --- • RuratCanters JC Roads 701195010 /01194030 Parcels-H 6 ;a5k DNR Streams k14701194010 , ,I 701194012 ' r. Habitat II 7011'•tr r 701203002 N•Non-fisn Nairn.* I Np.Nonfan Habitat'Pow nu1 701194026--'- 701194023 ` ,.. i ,r.` Ns•Non-fish IIabnat•Saasona 701194025 t ', 1'f S Inventor as Shomuna 701194007 94007 '.:,994004 _____v_701203006 i '7-- \ r------7 --- 701194006', ; 701794009 I 701194013 701194003 701194017 I 'afar o'u:<kd :_Acr°s:n Ccu ri Ccx-a Se,cY*s 615 0 _463ft' 10'20;1)DE. FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 23 10:22:02 2012 http://maps.co.jefferson.wa.us/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&C1... 7/23/2012 a Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 3:10 PM To: David Alvarez Cc: Carl Smith; Stacie Hoskins Subject: Monday Meeting Attachments: east quil bay timeline july 2012.docx; 115558-02-42439-1155581.pdf; douglas project area.pdf David: Here is a brief summary of some of the issues that DCD would like to discuss with you before proceeding with a violation (a COM case has not yet been prepared at DCD). There are three property owners along Quilcene Bay who have been involved with DCD about stream dredging: 1. Robert and Janet Palmer—have a stream on their property(along with Gusoskys) and DCD issued a permit for stream dredging in October 2011; these property owners are currently in litigation with the county for sediments entering the portion of the stream on their property. 2. John and Muriel Gusoskey—have stream on their property(along with Palmers)and they never came in for permitting after an emergency Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) was issued by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW) in December 2008. 3. Reimer and Kathleen Douglas—recently had a pre-application meeting with DCD to restore a portion of the stream dredging conducted in 2008 that that extends into Quilcene Bay—they want to restore the bay to previously-existing conditions, which involves filling in the excavated channel. Violation Issue: Prior to dredging the stream in the winter of 2008/2009,John Gusosky contacted DCD about permitting for stream dredging. He was told he needed a permit. He was also told by DCD that if he obtained an emergency HPA from WDFW, he would need to come in for full shoreline permitting. He has never applied for'after-the-fact' county permitting. Current Issue: Kathleen Douglas has applied for a pre-app, which was held June 7, 2012, to restore the portion of Quilcene Bay to conditions prior to the 2008/2009 dredging. Some (but not all) concerns to discuss on Monday: 1. DCD wants to have John Gusoskey come in for permitting for 2008/2009 dredging. This stream also meanders onto property owned by the Palmers. 2. It appears that WDFW issued an HPA in 2008 to John Gusoskey that allowed him to dredge beyond his property boundaries. 3. Jefferson County owns one of the parcels that was dredged (County owns intertidal land); therefore,the County needs to be an applicant on any permitting submittal. 4. Options available to the County in JCC 18.50(Enforcement) if Gusoskey does not come in for an 'after-the-fact' permit. Attached: 1. Chronology of events for these three parcels. 2. JARPA and site plan for Gusoskey HPA in December 2008. 3. Douglas proposal. Thanks for coming over here—I think it will help if we are looking at aerial photographs. Donna.Fro-Alto-4w Associate PCanner/WetrandSpecialist 1 Jefferson County Department of Community Development 'i Sheridan Street Port Townsend, 'Washington 98368 dfrostholm @co jefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 2 II TIMELINE FOR STREAM DREDGING AT QUILCENE BAY May 7, 2008(Palmer): DRD minutes say that permits are needed, may not be allowed to dredge stream, check with WDFW. October 8, 2008(Gusoskey): DRD meeting minutes say that SEPA review and a shoreline permit would be needed; Al Latham may be able to help with SEPA; possible streamlined fish enhancement project. December 12, 2008(Gusoskey): WDFW issues HPA(Control Number 115558-1)with an expiration date of February 11, 2009. December 16, 2008(Gusoskey): WDFW sends BoCC a letter pertaining to Hardship Declaration by WDFW under RCW 77.55.012(12). December 24, 2008(Gusoskey): DRD meeting minutes state that a decision was made that a permit was needed. January 21, 2009(Gusoskey): DRD meeting minutes state that Mr.Gusoskey was notified by DCD that a permit would be needed for work conducted under the hardship HPA. May 9, 2011(Palmer): The Palmers submit an application for a shoreline exemption to dredge stream. August 10, 2011 (Gusoskey): WDFW issues HPA(Control Number 115558-2)to dredge the unnamed stream. September 6, 2011 (Gusoskey): WDFW sends letter to revoke HPA issued August 10, 2011. September 22, 2011(Palmer): WDFW issues expedited HPA(Control Number 123600-1)with an expiration date of October 15, 2011. October 10, 2011(Palmer): Representative for the Palmers sends email asking DCD to issue permit as USACE may have permit situation worked out. October 11, 2011(Palmer): DCD issues final MDNS and shoreline exemption. May 21, 2012 (Douglas): Pre-app received to fill in the portion of the channel on county land. June 7, 2012(Douglas): On-site pre-application meeting with property owner,engineer, and surveyor. While on the beach, Gusoskey comes out to determine why we are meeting and then to discuss proposal. June 14, 2012(Douglas): Donna forwards pre-app info on to WDFW,WDNR,WDOE, and COE. June 26, 2012(Douglas): WDFW send letter to applicants and NTI (representative)that SEPA is needed for stream re-location project. July 16, 2012(Douglas): Kathleen Douglas and Justin Wilson come in to DCD to discuss with the Director(and Donna). Donna Frostholm From: Turcotte, Carol M (DFW) [Carol.Turcotte @dfw.wa.gov] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 9:34 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: HPA for Gusoskey Control Number 115558-1 (PDR#12346 ) Attachments: 115558-02-42439-115558[1].pdf; 115558 declaration of hardship.pdf; 115558 revoke letter attachment.do.pdf Ms. Frostholm, Attached per your email to Chris B rn es are WDFW r eco r ds relating to HPA 11 5558 i ssued in 2008 to Jo hn Guso k ey for dredging of an unnamed stream to Quilcene Bay. let me know if you have any questions. g g Y Y Yq Carol Turcotte Public Disclosure Officer Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife mail: 600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, WA 98501-1099 location: 1111 Washington Street S.E., Olympia, WA 98504 (p) 360-902-2253 (f) 360-902-2171 carol.turcotte dfw.wa.gov From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:dfrostholm@ co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 3:01 PM To: Byrnes, Chris J (DFW) Subject: HPA for Gusoskey Control Number 115558-1 Hi Chris: On December 12, 2008, WDFW issued an HPA for stream dredging to John Gusoskey. The proposal was to dredge an unnamed stream to Quilcene Bay. Provision 4 of the HPA says that the work was to be accomplished based on plans and specifications approved by WDFW. Jefferson County DCD is hoping to get copies of those plans. John Gusoskey never came in for'after-the-fact' shoreline permitting and it appears that the dredging may have extended beyond that approved by WDFW onto intertidal land owned by Jefferson County. Also, another property owner is looking into getting a permit to put the intertidal portion of the stream back to the condition prior to the 2008 HPA. Because of the recent interest in another permit by a different property owner, DCD is hoping to get copies of approved plans and specifications at your earliest convenience. Would you let me know if DCD can get copies of plans approved by WDFW for HPA 115558-1? Thanks much, Davwux Fro-stkO-imii .associate PCannerfWetlanc(Specialist Jefferson County Department of Community Deveoopment 621 Sheridan Street Port?Townsend, Washington 98368 dfrosthohn@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. 1 All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails maybe subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 2 C6 r) c l yrN -� l = /► tie Licit SMk p ii cco31-,sw e 3460 -196 ir S-7 ng2,.0 Qb. Q . } T3?dd 2282692_092 s8>IS0S118 S4e0T 8002-82-01 ss g srnrF .. vim 47 State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE 48 Devonshire Road$Montesano,Washington 98563-9618$(360)249-4828,TDD(360)902-2207,Fax(360)664-0689 December 23,2008 Jefferson Coun ty Board of Commissioners P.O.Box 1220 Port Townsend,WA 98368 Subject: Hardship Declaration by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife under RCW 77.55.021 (12) Dear Commissioners: On December 12,2008 WDFW made a declaration of hardship at the following location(s)in Jefferson County for the protection of life, the public, property or fish life and issued Hydraulic Project Approval(s) 115558-1 for removing stream bed gravel and sand.at these location(s). 83 Wampum Point Road.off of East Quilcene Bay Road. Project is located on an Unnamed Tributary to Quilcene WRIA, 17.0121. Latitude N 47.81502 Longitude W 122.84944 Sincerely /*we/44 Stephan A.Kalinowski Habitat Program Manager Region Six Tel.No.(360)249-1227 SAK:sak EX115558-1 20081215 cc: WRIA file tea, sTAZ.°.a j4 J �t �yaieaeaoy State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Mailing Address:600 Capitol Way N, Olympia WA 98501-1091, (360)902-2200, TDD(360)902-2207 Main Office Location: Natural Resources Building, 1111 Washington Street SE, Olympia WA September 6, 2011 John Gusoskey Post Office Box 397 Quilcene, Washington 98376 Dear Mr. Gusoskey: SUBJECT: HPA REVOKED FOR STREAM DREDGING IN UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO QUILCENE BAY(WRIA 17.0121),TRIBUTARY TO HOOD CANAL IN JEFFFERSON COUNTY,WDFW LOG NO. 115558-02 On August 10, 2011, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) issued you Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) 115558-02 for the project described above. I must now revoke your HPA. Under WAC 220-110-030 (19), WDFW may modify(which includes revoke) an HPA when conditions change. The project renewal was incorrectly issued without the completion of the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)process. The original permit was issued as an expedited permit and did not require SEPA but it may not be renewed. If you would like to still do the project, apply for SEPA approval with Jefferson County and resend your application for the HPA with updated information. I apologize for the confusion. If you wish to appeal this decision,you may file a written request for appeal under WAC 220- 110-340 (Informal Appeal of Adverse Administrative Decision) or WAC 220-110-350 (Formal Appeal of Adverse Administrative Decision). I have enclosed these WACs. September 6, 2011 Page 2 If you have any questions, please call me at 360-427-2179. Sincerely, -797a124,1` Se,L Margie Schirato Area Habitat Biologist Enclosure(s) cc: Bill Wright,william.wright5 @comcast.net File ASS$ srnrF State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE 48 Devonshire Road$Montesano,Washington 98563-9618$(360)249628,TDD(360)902-2207,Fax(360)664-0689 December 23,2008 Jefferson County Board of Commissioners P.O.Box 1220 Port Townsend,WA 98368 Subject: Hardship Declaration by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife under RCW 77.55.021 (12) Dear Commissioners: On December 12,2008 WDFW made a declaration of hardship at the following location(s)in Jefferson County for the protection of life, the public,property or fish life and issued Hydraulic Project Approval(s) 115558-1 for removing stream bed gravel and sand.at these location(s). 83 Wampum Point Road.off of East Quilcene Bay Road. Project is located on an Unnamed Tributary to Quilcene WRIA, 17.0121. Latitude N 47.81502 Longitude W 122.84944 Sincerely ,414hveia.„4. Stephan A.Kalinowski Habitat Program Manager Region Six Tel.No.(360)249-1227 SAK:sak EX115558-1 20081215 cc: WRIA file 1I 4 R�,STAN.DA, Q O 41'4 t980 a0 State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Mailing Address:600 Capitol Way N, Olympia WA 98501-1091, (360)902-2200, TDD(360)902-2207 Main Office Location: Natural Resources Building, 1111 Washington Street SE, Olympia WA September 6, 2011 John Gusoskey Post Office Box 397 Quilcene, Washington 98376 Dear Mr. Gusoskey: SUBJECT: HPA REVOKED FOR STREAM DREDGING IN UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO QUILCENE BAY(WRIA 17.0121),TRIBUTARY TO HOOD CANAL IN JEFFFERSON COUNTY,WDFW LOG NO. 115558-02 On August 10, 2011, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW) issued you Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) 115558-02 for the project described above. I must now revoke your HPA. Under WAC 220-110-030 (19), WDFW may modify(which includes revoke) an HPA when conditions change. The project renewal was incorrectly issued without the completion of the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)process. The original permit was issued as an expedited permit and did not require SEPA but it may not be renewed. If you would like to still do the project, apply for SEPA approval with Jefferson County and resend your application for the HPA with updated information. I apologize for the confusion. If you wish to appeal this decision,you may file a written request for appeal under WAC 220- 110-340 (Informal Appeal of Adverse Administrative Decision) or WAC 220-110-350 (Formal Appeal of Adverse Administrative Decision). I have enclosed these WACs. September 6, 2011 Page 2 If you have any questions, please call me at 360-427-2179. Sincerely, Rtiit Sitau. � Margie Schirato Area Habitat Biologist Enclosure(s) cc: Bill Wright,william.wright5 @comcast.net File '1..� ns , •Nc State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Mailing Address:600 Capitol Way North, Olympia,WA 98501 Main Office Location:Natural Resources Building, 1111 Washington Street SE,Olympia WA June 26, 2012 Kathleen and Reimer Douglas 2021 north 78''' Street Seattle,WA 98103 Dear Mr. &Ms. Douglas; SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR APPLICATION FOR STREAM RELOCATION PROJECT; 10 WAMPUM POINT ROAD, QUILCENE,WA; (WRIA 17.9120); QUILCENE BAY TRIBUTARY TO HOOD CANAL IN JEFFERSON COUNTY, WDFW LOG NO. 127765-01. On June 25,2012, I received your application for a Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) for the project described above. However, I need more information from you so I can determine if your proposed project will impact fish life. Please send one copy of the Final SEPA Determination from your local government and the enclosed cover sheet to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife headquarters at 600 Capitol Way N, Olympia, WA 98501; fax to (360) 902-2946; or email to HPAapplications@dfw.wa.gov. As soon as I receive this information from you I will continue processing your application. If you have any questions,please call at (360) 427-2179. Sincerely, alat.&(' Margie Schirato Area Habitat Biologist Enclosure(s) cc: File Harriet S. Comachione, NTI Engineering& Land Surveying, 914 Washington Street, Ste. 6, Port Townsend,WA 98368 • Colleen Zmolek From: Colleen Zmolek Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 8:15 AM To: 'Leann Ebe McDonald' Subject: RE: Palmer Creek Dredge Hi Leann, In answer to your question if SEPA is required for the dredging of the stream located at 1954 E Quilcene Rd? It does not appear to be categorically exempt under WAC 197-11-800. If not exempt SEPA is required. If meeting the shoreline exemption JCC18.25.090 (1) please submit the estimates for the fair market value. The estimate will include all services for this project. This would include your work estimate. The fair market value definition in Jefferson County Code 18.25.040 (6)is: "Fair market value," for a development, is the open market bid price for conducting the work, using the equipment and facilities, and purchase of the goods, services and materials necessary to accomplish the development. This would normally equate to the cost of hiring a contractor to undertake the development from start to finish, including the cost of labor, materials, equipment and facility usage, transportation and contractor overhead and profit. The fair market value of the development shall include the fair market value of any donated, contributed, or found labor, equipment or materials." Hope this answers your questions. Please do not hesitate to call email if you have any additional questions. Best Regards, Colleen Zmolek Assistant Planner Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4462 czmolek @co.jefferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Monday to Thursday, closed Fridays. Original Message From: Leann Ebe McDonald [mailto:leannm @mac.com] Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 2:03 PM To: Colleen Zmolek 0 Subject: Re: Palmer Creek Dredge Hi Colleen- I received verbal estimates from Doug at Reeves Excavating and Land Clearing and from Tim at Bernt Ericsen to dredge a small streambed (Palmer) at 1954 E Quilcene Rd. Both were around $5000. Therefore, I will be making an appt to submit for a shoreline exemption once I receive the itemized cost estimate of the Q proposed work. I 'm wondering if this project will require a SEPA checklist? Thanks, 1 Leann Leann Ebe McDonald Shoreline Solutions leannm @mac.com 206-842-5572 Office 206-300-2678 Cell On Apr 19, 2011, at 3:12 PM, Donna Frostholm wrote: > Hi Leann: > The proposed work cannot be processed as a maintenance shoreline > exemption. However, if the proposal is less than $5,718 (JCC > 18.25.090 (1) ) based on the definition of fair market value (JCC > 18.25.040 (6) ) , then submit for a shoreline exemption and include an > itemized cost estimate of the proposed work with the submittal. > If you are concerned about getting a shoreline substantial development > permit in before the new SMP is enacted, please be aware there is a > court case decision that says local jurisdictions cannot prohibit an > applicant from applying for a permit. The upshot of this is that you > could submit a shoreline substantial development application before > you have the pre-app. The only downside to that would be if the > submittal is incomplete, then it would not be considered a vesting > application until it has been deemed complete by the County. > I hope this helps, but if you have any additional questions (prior to > the pre-app) , feel free to discuss with the proposal with our > Planner-of-the-Day, Colleen Zmolek (she has been copied on this > email) . > She has previously talked to the applicants about dredging so she is > also familiar with the property owner's concerns. > Donna Frostholm > Associate Planner > Jefferson County DCD > Original Message > From: Leann Ebe McDonald [mailto:leannm @mac.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 10:18 AM > To: Donna Frostholm > Subject: Palmer Creek Dredge > Hi Donna- > > Have you had your planning meeting yet? If not, I just wanted to > remind you to review the Palmer file and see if this could be an > exemption project instead of a SSD. > Thanks, > Leann > Leann Ebe McDonald > Shoreline Solutions > leannm @mac.com > 206-842-5572 Office > 206-300-2678 Cell 2 Colleen Zmolek From: Sent: To: Subject: Colleen Zmolek Tuesday, September 01, 2009 7:40 AM 'Anne Hessburg' RE: Attachments: 18.22 cao.pdf; SMP Residential development 18.25.410.pdf Hi Anne, This is in response to your email received on 8/26/09 about parcel 701194010. The following Critical Areas are mapped on the parcel; stream type "F" fish bearing stream, FEMA Hazard, Coastal Salt Water Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone (SPIZ), Susc Aquifer Recharge Area (SUSC), Shoreline Designation URBAN. The Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area (FWHCA): The stream is a type "F" fish bearing . A setback of 150 feet from the ordinary high water mark (OHWM). I have attached Jefferson County Code (JCC) 18.22 table 18.22.270(1) identifies the buffer requirements. FEMA Flood Hazard area: When locating the structure with the Flood Hazard area a Flood elevation certificate is required. I have attached the JC GIS mapping identifying the flood hazard area. This is a guideline to the location of the flood hazard area. Wetlands: A wetland delineation is required when a structure is not located outside of the maximum requirements in table JCC 18.22.330(2). Shoreline Jurisdiction is 200 feet from ordinary high water mark. When located outside of the Shoreline Master Program (SMP) it is considered Growth Management Act and is reviewed in the JCC 18.22. I have outlined above in regards to streams and wetlands. Jefferson County is the process of updating the SMP. There is no exact time when the the updated shoreline master program (SMP) will be adopted. Department of Ecology is requiring the SMP be updated by 2011. Please give me a call and we can discuss this in further detail. 1 Setbacks: Road Setback in a residential zone from a minor collector road is measured 20 feet from the edge of the road right -of-way. East Quilcene Road is a minor collector road. Property line setbacks when abutting residential property is 5 feet. Shoreline setback is located in JCC 18.25.410(4)(j). Minimum setback is 30 feet from the ordinary high water mark when there is no bank or when the bank is less than 10 feet high. When the is a bank greater than 10 feet height, the setback is 30 feet measured from the top of the bank or 1 foot back from the top of the bank for each foot of bank height whichever is greater. Shoreline setbacks do not exceed 100 feet unless there are severe landslide hazard concerns. To obtain a building permit for a single family residence, the applicant must show proof of potable water, have applied for or approved septic design or sewer connection, and apply for or have an address and road approach permit. I hope this answers your questions. I will be out of the office for the next two weeks. One of my co- workers will be available to answer your questions in my absence or I will be back in the office on 9/16/09. Please call the the front desk to be routed to a planner 360-379-4450. CoCCeen Zmotek Assistant Planner Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4462 czmolekCa�co.jefferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 a.m. —4:3o p.m. Monday to Thursday, closed Fridays. From: Anne Hessburg [mailto:ahessburg @hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:08 PM To: #Development Review Subject: Good afternoon, I am looking for information for building a single family residence on a piece of waterfront property in Quilcene; parcel # 701194010. I'm hoping you will be able to point me in the right direction as to all applicable codes that I will need to adhere to for this project. I believe that there is a stream on the northern property line that is a Type F stream. Where can I find the County code that shows the setback that my project would need to adhere to? 2 Would you please tell me what my shoreline environmental classification and the setback that would need to be adhered to? I heard that the County is in the process of updating the SMP. When will this update be adopted and in affect? How will this effect my project? There may be a small wetland south of this property, but not on the property. Will this affect this project as well? I was looking at your online GIS mapping system and found that the zoning for this property is Rural Residential 1:5. What are the setbacks for this project, associated with this zoning? Other than a building permit, are there any other permits that I will need to obtain in order to build a house? Thank you so much for your time! I appreciate any help you may be able to give me. I am hoping that by asking a lot of questions up front, that this project will go smoothly. Sincerely, Anne Hessburg ahessburg@ hotmail.com Get back to school stuff for them and cashback for you. Try BingT now. 3 Page 1 of 1 Colleen Zmolek From: Stacie Hoskins Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 7:20 AM To: #Planning Team Subject: GMA/SMA buffers Concerning our discussion at DRD yesterday, please note the following: RCW 90.58.030 Note 3 available online at: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=90.58.030 (3)The legislature intends that critical areas within the jurisdiction of the shoreline management act shall be governed by the shoreline management act and that critical areas outside the jurisdiction of the shoreline management act shall be governed by the growth management act.The legislature further intends that the quality of information currently required by the shoreline management act to be applied to the protection of critical areas within shorelines of the state shall not be limited or changed by the provisions of the growth management act." [2003 c 321 § 1.] Look to the location of the critical area to establish buffer(s) under the governing code, not the location of the development. Stacie Se4e 4 g0441/44 Planning Manager Jefferson County Department of Community Development 1\2c) �- � GHQ. aI to 1656a-eked S --r A - oit()0Q1-tain (1, (\)04 i\a,v4‘ Qcc) WQ3tioury ■), • vc.itAlc.-4-1 or\ ve‘- Cvs 7/16/2009 Page l of 2 Colleen Zmolek From: Colleen Zmolek Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 5:27 PM To: 'shermld @comcast.net Subject: RE: Gusoskey's project Dear Dr. Sherman, Michelle has requested that I respond to your email regarding the Gusoske 's •ro.ect. r. Gusoskey was issued a Hardship Declaration and Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) from Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). We have been in contact with Chris Byres from WDFW after receiving your email. Chris issued the HPA and is aware of the situation. He will be contacting and working with Mr. Gusoskey if any portion of project is out of compliance with the approved HPA. Mr. Gusoskey is aware that he will be required to permit work done under the hardship and a silt trap that will installed this spring. The silt trap will prevent the stream channel from filling up in the future. Colleen ZmoCek Assistant Planner Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4462 czmolek@co.jefferson.wa.us From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 9:06 AM To: Colleen Zmolek Subject: FW: Hey Colleen: I'm forwarding this email to you as it is just an inquiry at this time. I don't know anything about it. (Mr. Sherman contacts me as I did a permit for him). The Gusoskey's did get a SFR permit under MLA04-612 that was finaled in 2006. Mo-chi stated in her conditions that this is a Type 3 stream per DNR. Maybe it is really a complaint. Can you check into it? Thanks. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner, FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @cojefferson.wa.us 360-379-4 57 360-379-4473 (fax) 1/22/2009 Page 2 of 2 This document is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain privileged, proprietary or other data protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee or the person responsible for delivering this to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, copying or distributing this document is prohibited. From: Larry Sherman [mailto:shermld©comcast.net] Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 8:16 PM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: Dear Ms. Farfan (Michelle): The following is a copy of the note I sent to Marjie Schirato regarding the construction at East Bay Quilcene involvinging John and Carol Gusoskey's diverting the stream that runs to the south of their property. Can you shed any light on this for me? It is a rather large construction, I will attach a few pictures.Thanks for any insight you can give me.The work is done and seems inappropriate to me. I wonder if anyone else feels this way? Thanks, Larry Sherman The following is my note to Ms. Schirato: "I requested and received a permit to reinforce my rip rap wall at 183 Wampum Point Road in Quilcene about 6 months ago.Thank you for your help with this.The reason I am writing is that I became aware of a project 3 lots down from mine (I am at 183 Wampum Point Road,just off of Lindsay Hill Road and East Quilcene Road intersection. My lot is on the water and of course I realize this engenders special attention to the marine habitat. The project 3 lots down from mine involves at rather large excavation done with some heavy equipment in which a small stream (which I have been told is salmon spawning habitat) has been diverted from its natural course running more or less directly west into Quilcene bay at the sand spit there.An 8 or 10 foot wide ditch has been dug and now makes a right angle in front of the Gusoskey's house and runs across the front of their small rip rap wall into the bay behind the sandy projection of beach.The diversion is quite a big change and actually passes onto the property of the Gusoskey's neighbors to the north (Kathleen and Reimer Douglas).The Douglas's were not aware of this operation and I am surprised that a construction which diverts a stream onto adjoining property would be allowed without some notification of those involved. Can you inform me of whether this was permitted by your agency and why notification of those in near proximity who would be affected was not made?Thank you for looking into this matter. Protection of the marine habitat is important and I thank you for your efforts. Regards," Lawrence Sherman, MD Emergency Physician St. Francis Hospital Cell: 206-276-6220 1/22/2009