The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About110722 Rebuttal to BOCC October meeting________________________________ ALERT: BE CAUTIOUS This email originated outside the organization. Do not open attachments or click on links if you are not expecting them. ________________________________ To: Jefferson County Board of Commissioners Clallam County Board of Commissioners Allison Berry I am a Washington state citizen, a Clallam County resident, as well as a parent and grandparent. This letter is in rebuttal to comments that were made last month by Allison Berry during the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners meeting. I will be responding to various claims made by her, and quoting what was stated by her: “The other question that this person had was about a little girl who has become a bit of a poster child for the anti-vaccine group.” Ms Berry, I and many of us prefer to be known as “vaccine-risk-aware.” Would you please use that moniker moving forward? “She’s a little girl--I think she’s now 13—who was reportedly in one of the Pfizer trials and there have been anti-vaccine videos made about her, she’s been on a lot of right-wing talk radio and media, and it’s just a really sad situation. “One of the challenges in these cases is that it’s very difficult to verify because the trial, for appropriate HIPAA reasons, doesn’t share the names of the kids who were in it, and so it’s very difficult at the healthcare system to say whether or not this girl was even in the trial, and there’s not really any evidence that the health challenges she’s facing right now are at all related to her vaccine.” This little girl is joined by her mother at every single press conference (that major media has no intention of ever airing). Her mother outlines exactly what they went through as trial participants, and how corrupt that system is and continues to be. Could you please look into the actual footage, and stop claiming they weren't part of any scientific study? “I would say, yes, it’s a very challenging situation. As a primary care provider who cares for young children who sometimes have very difficult to diagnose concerns, I would say that I hope this girl gets excellent medical care and has her concerns listened to…it’s just really unclear that those concerns are related to the vaccine, and it’s sad to see that her medical case is being used to drive an anti-vaccine narrative. I don’t think that’s an appropriate thing to do with children and it also is a distortion of the data around vaccine side effects.” Why is it unclear? Was she or wasn't she vaccinated? Why can't we ask questions? Why do you consider it inappropriate to ask questions about vaccine side effects concerning children? Why is it a "distortion" of the data? What does that mean? “Vaccine side effects—severe side effects—are incredibly rare. We’re talking on the order of ten to forty per million doses of vaccine received, and those side effects that we know of of severe side effects, the most common one is anaphylaxis, that’s related to any medicine or vaccine that you get, that can always happen, but it’s very, very rare.” What exactly is the data about vaccine side effects? Have you even heard of VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System)? It was created by the CDC: Home - OpenVAERS <https://openvaers.com/> <https://openvaers.com/> Home - OpenVAERS The graph shows that most vaccine injuries occur within the first two weeks after vaccination, yet they are counted as unvaccinated during this time. The next most common one that we have diagnosed is myocarditis. When you’re talking about young men who have received their second dose, that’s on the rate of 70 per million doses delivered and that is dramatically less than the rate of myocarditis from COVID-19 itself.” Myocarditis is not a symptom of Covid-19. In fact, Covid-19 itself is a symptom. Coronavirus is causing all the symptoms, but myocarditis is not one of them! Did you know that coronaviruses cause the common cold, and the seasonal flu? “I think often unfortunately what happens is those those who have an agenda will find one person who was severely affected by their vaccine and hold up that case to convince other people not to get vaccinated.” Were you aware that Pfizer itself (one of the Covid-19 vaccine manufacturers) recently admitted they were never looking to stop transmission of this coronavirus? The admission was notable because the main reason for exploring the vaccine was to protect other people. If that vaccine wasn't known for sure to limit transmission at the time it became available, then government and private organizations were acting with incomplete information critical to their decision-making process. In the forum, the company executive stated: “Regarding the question around, did we know about stopping immunization before it entered the market, no,” Small said. “We had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market.” Pfizer Exec Admits Vaccines Weren’t Tested For Stopping Transmission Before Hitting Market <https://dailycaller.com/2022/10/12/pfizer-coronavirus-covid-vaccine-testing-transmission-european-union-par liament/> “And that is a really a misuse of someone’s trauma to cause other people to be harmed because it ignores the incredible risk of COVID-19 itself. Over 1,700 children in the United States have died to COVID-19. And so when you see these groups purporting to be out there to protect children, it’s really disingenuous because I don’t see them sharing the stories of all of those children who have died, or all of those children who have permanent disability from their COVID-19 infection.” Were you aware that thousands of people have been mistreated and mishandled medically it today's hospitals, due to Covid protocols? The way our nation's hospitals have handled the plandemic has contributed to thousands upon thousands of unnecessary injuries and deaths: https://chbmp.org/ “So that’s what I have to say about that poor girl and I hope she gets well and she and her family are well-supported and that she can get out of the public eye because I don’t think that’s a very healthy place for a kid to live.” Thank you for pointing that out. If you really look into the scientific articles, children are at greater risk from the injections than they are from the disease itself. Non-elected agency members such as yourself are appointed by corporate sponsors and government agencies to continue to spout the propaganda-driven narrative of today. Striving for “proof of immunity” is the way out of this condition, not just a vaccine. There are proven methods for keeping ourselves healthy, and all of our Agencies do not want anyone to follow them. Are you going to continue believing in those dictates? I would like to direct you to the Mission Statement for InformedChoiceWA: Our mission is to educate and advocate for medical freedom, informed consent, and scientific integrity in public health policy, to actively support legislation that furthers this mission and to oppose legislation that hinders it, and to raise funds to support our work, the work of partner organizations, legal actions, and other avenues as necessary. https://informedchoicewa.org/abou t-us/ Respectfully submitted, Sue Coffman 714-337-4331 ICWA Team Leader Legislative District #24 https://informedchoicewa.org/