Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout110822 Re_ CAM Follow Up 10_26- BLD2022-00400 & SEP2022-00023________________________________ ALERT: BE CAUTIOUS This email originated outside the organization. Do not open attachments or click on links if you are not expecting them. ________________________________ Please confirm receipt of below email, and reports provided, and if possible what is the next step, and how long it may take for Elisa and TJ to receive clear directions on the next steps required, if anything at all. We thank you for your time and attention. Respectfully Sally L Ellis Permit Consultant ________________________________ From: sally ellis <salanjake@hotmail.com> Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2022 9:48 PM To: Bryan Benjamin <BBenjamin@co.jefferson.wa.us>; Brent Butler <bbutler@co.jefferson.wa.us> Cc: Elisa Cole <elisalynne@yahoo.com>; jeffbocc@co.jefferson.wa.us <jeffbocc@co.jefferson.wa.us>; Nathan Cleaver <Nathan@nathancleaver.com>; Information <info@nathancleaver.com> Subject: Re: CAM Follow Up 10/26- BLD2022-00400 & SEP2022-00023 Bryan & Brent Please find the REVISED site map for Cole/Johnson per your request, we have added the Ag Bld. and potable blds, to our Building site map. Elisa has worked very hard and found a report on the Lower Big Quil River for the watershed project of 2015, that was prepared , by Pat McCullough at Engineering Services Associates INC. Mr. Cullough also so kind enough to provide a letter on Elisa Cole behave and gave her copies of this report to share with you and your office and or FEMA if necessary. He believes this report will prove that her property is not in the 100 year Flood plain. Pat also hopes this report as we do will eliminate the FEMA Requirements- Flood Elevation certificate Flood proofing Certificate FEMA BioOP required for Utilities It was said in the CAM meeting that if we go though the LOMA process it would take more time, then just suppling these additional reports, However after Elisa and her partner research the into these elevations and the additional cost of them, it could increase my project anywhere from $21,400.00 to $66,400.00 We are hoping that Pat McCullough report once read by DCD, you will eliminate all /or most of all of the additional reports, and certificates that DCD is currently telling Elisa Cole and TJ Johnson must be obtained to continue with developing this property. We appreciate your time, and help with the development of this parcel. Elisa will drop off the attached revised site map and letter, and report from Pat McCullough. ________________________________ From: Bryan Benjmin <BBenjamin@co.jefferson.wa.us> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2022 12:27 AM To: Elisa Cole <elisalynne@yahoo.com>; sally ellis <salanjake@hotmail.com> Subject: CAM Follow Up 10/26 Hello Elisa and Sally, Wanting to follow your customer assistance meeting with some notes to make sure you feel prepared for next steps. At today’s CAM we discussed: a.) the location of existing structures; b.) the applicability of the boundaries of the special flood hazard area; c.) the presence of a hydrological evaluation of flood hazards on the site; and after the CAM d.) the type of biological evaluation that may be required. See my notes on each of the following: a. Our first step is to receive and review a revised site plan (or set of plans) showing the location of the existing structures on site. The site plan should be to scale and identify the current location of each building on site. Sally, you provided me with information of each building in a 10/7 email, but we will need these shown on the site plan. The revision should retain the location of the well, the pump house, and the proposed location of the water and electric lines. Please provide these maps both on paper copy to the DCD office and to me electronically; b. Director Butler will review the revised site plan against our official FEMA maps and determine applicability of FEMA regulations—his determination will confirm whether or not existing infrastructure is actually located within the special flood hazard area; c. The presence of a hydrologic study may be used in a LOMA processes, but this is a time and labor intensive process that involves complex evaluation of the study compared to FEMA’s methodology for determining the extent of flood hazard areas. It may be simpler to proceed in a different manner, but the LOMA process can be considered further once DCD has reviewed the revised site plan and provides you with more information on the applicable regulatory standards d. Elisa, you called after the CAM appointment to inquire about which report is required—FEMA has its own standard for biological evaluation/assessment, so the biologist should be aware/knowledgeable about FEMA requirements for evaluation of ecosystems within SFHAs. The biologist you referenced seems to have made this distinction and (from the information I have) is correct that the report is addressing FEMA habitat evaluation standards. Please let me know if you have any other questions for me! Thank you for your patience and continuing to work with our staff on this project— Bryan Benjamin Assistant Planner Jefferson County Department of Community Development (360) 379-4459 bbenjamin@co.jefferson.wa.us <mailto:bbenjamin@co.jefferson.wa.us> PUBLIC RECORDS ACT NOTICE: All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is exempt from disclosure under state law, including RCW 42.56. 瑮⽹畯䔽捸慨杮⁥摁業楮瑳慲楴敶䜠潲灵⠠奆䥄佂䙈㌲偓䱄⥔振㵮敒楣楰湥獴振㵮㍤㝥㔰〷晥ㄲ戴㍤ぢ愰㑤戸㤶㝡㙦〰䈭敲瑮䈠