The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBLD2020-00647 - CANCELLEDSupplemental Shoreline Application Page 1 of 2 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 Tel: 360.379.4450 | Fax: 360.379.4451 Web: www.co.jefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment E-mail: dcd@co.jefferson.wa.us SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT A completed application form is a requirement of submittal. Include “N/A” in spaces that do not apply. By signing this application form, the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein, and in any attachments, is true and correct to the best of his or her knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in making any issued permit null and void. Owner Signature: Date: _________ Print Name: MLA # Case # Application Type (select one): Statement of Exemption: See Examples on back side of application Variance* Substantial Development* Conditional Use (administrative)* Conditional Use (discretionary)* 1)Does your proposal require in water work and/or works below ordinary high-water mark? Yes No 2)Does your proposal require 10,000 sq/ft or more of impervious surface and/or non-single-family structures of 5,000 sq/ft or more? Yes No *If either of the boxes for 1 or 2 above are checked yes or if the permit type above has an asterisk then a pre-application conference is required prior to submitting for a shoreline permit. Site Information Assessor Tax Parcel #: Name of Body of Water: Property Owner Name(s): Project Description Describe the existing property use and condition: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Proposed distance from ordinary high water mark to use/development: feet Describe the proposed property use: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________ SCAN ME Dosewallips 900 +/- feet 4 Clarence G Selvog and Barbara K Petzoldt JTWROS BLD20-00647 4 966900076, 966900077 A proposed manufactured home on the site. The site is within shoreline extension due to a FEMA Flood Zone. 4 The property has an existing garage and is otherwise vacant. Supplemental Shoreline Application Page 2 of 2 These activities require a formal statement of Exemption issued by Jefferson County. Check ‘Statement of Exemption’ box on the front of this form and submit with Permit Application to apply for your Exemption Approval. 18.25.570 Statement of Exemptions (1)The administrator is hereby authorized to grant or deny requests for statements of exemption from the shoreline substantial development permit requirement for uses and developments within shorelines that are specifically listed above. Such statements shall be applied for on forms provided by the administrator. The statement shall be in writing and shall indicate the specific exemption of this program that is being applied to the development, and shall provide a summary of the administrator’s analysis of the consistency of the project with this program and the Act. As appropriate, such statements of exemptions shall contain conditions and/or mitigating measures of approval to achieve consistency and compliance with the provisions of this program and Act. A denial of an exemption shall be in writing and shall identify the reason(s) for the denial. The administrator’s actions on the issuance of a statement of exemption or a denial are subject to appeal pursuant to the appeal provisions in Article X of this chapter. 18.25.560 Exemptions listed – This is a summary from JCC18.25.560, please review the code section for detailed information regarding these exemptions. (1)Fair Market Value. (2)Maintenance and Repair. (3)Residential Bulkhead. (4)Emergency Construction. (5)Agriculture. (6)Drainage. (7)Navigation Aids. (8)Single-Family Residences. (9)Residential Docks. (10) Irrigation. (11) State Property. (12) Energy Facilities. (13) Site Exploration. (14) Noxious Weeds. (15) Watershed Restoration. (16) Watershed restoration project” (17) Watershed restoration plan” (18) A public or private project, the primary purpose of which is to improve fish or wildlife habitat or fish passage. OFFICE USE ONLY Shoreline Development Permit Fees Type I Exemption ($679.00) Type II Conditional Use – Administrative ($1,552.00) Type II Conditional Use – Discretionary ($1,552.00) Type III Substantial Development ($2,425.00) Type III Variance ($2,037.00) Notice of Application; All type II and III ($149.00) Notice of Hearing; All type III ($149.00) Notice Board; All type II and III ($12.00) Scan ($24.00) SEPA; if required per CAM or PRE ($970.00) Hearing Examiner; if required per CAM or PRE ($1,298.44) Subtotal Technology Fee – 5% Total Fees* $ *Additional fees may apply. 679.00 (679-288(already paid)) = 391.00 remaining 410.55 remaining 19.55 Date: 1/21/2021 Invoice ID: 2021BLD20-00647 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street | Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4450 | email: dcd@co.jefferson.wa.us www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment Invoice Date Due: 2/20/2021 REMIT TO: BILLING ADDRESS: Please return the above portion with your payment SMP Exemption Base 391.00 Tech Fee 19.55 $410.55Total Amount Due: Jefferson County DCD 621 Sheridan St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 CLARENCE SELVOG 10950 W UNION HILLS DR # 1324 SUN CITY AZ 85373-1558 BARBARA K PETZOLDT JTWROS Permit Number: BLD20-00647 SMP Exemption Base 391.00 Tech Fee 19.55 Total Amount Due:$410.55 Payment is accepted by cash, check, debit or credit card (Visa, Mastercard, Discover). To pay by credit card, go to http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/617/Credit-Card-E-Check-Payments-for-Permits, and click on the "Online Credit Card & echeck Payments" link on the left side of the page. For questions: call 360-379-4450. PH (360) 385-5800 FX (360) 385-5945 customerservice@jeffpud.org 310 Four Corners Road, Port Townsend, WA 98368 To: Jefferson County Environmental Health Department From: Lazy-C Water System System Operator(s): Doug Reeder State ID Number: 02676T Number of existing connections: 119 (Estimated) Number of permitted connections: 168 Number of committed connections: This water system is capable of; and will supply potable water to the following location: Assessor’s Parcel ID# 966-900-077 Legal Description Lazy C Ranch Division 1, Lot 84 Subject, Restrictive Covenant #536046 *** Water connection is available once all fees and/or charges have been paid *** Site address: 60 Pinto Lane Brinnon, WA 98320 Signature: Date: 12/23/2020 Title: Engineering Director THIS IS A NON-BINDING STATEMENT OF WATER AVAILABILITY. IT PROVIDES THAT AT THE TIME OF REQUEST, WATER IS AVAILABLE WITHIN THIS SYSTEM. THIS NOTIFICATION IS GOOD FOR ONE YEAR. Board of Commissioners Jeff Randall, District 1 Kenneth Collins, District 2 Dan Toepper, District 3 Kevin Streett, General Manager Geohazard Checklist 1. Which of the following are mapped on-site? Land Slide Hazard: Moderate __N/A__ High ____ Recent Landslide ____ Old Slide ____ Erosion: __N/A__ Seismic: _Yes__ Shoreline Slope Stability: Unstable Slope____ Unstable-Recent Slide___ Unstable – Old Slide____ Intermediate_____ Modified ___Stable Slope __X__ Two or more? Yes ____ No _X___ 2. Existing Development? Yes _X__ No ___ Evidence of geohazard? Yes___ No _X__ 3. Is the slope greater than 15 %? (rise/run = %) Yes ____ No _X__ 4. Will the development be less than 35 feet from the top or toe of slope? Yes ____ No __X__ 5. Does the site have a less stable slope form? Yes ____ No __X__ Divergent ____ (most stable) Planar __X__ (more stable) Convergent ____ (less stable) 6. Is there any information regarding stability of the soil e.g. septic soil logs, NRSC soil survey etc. Yes ____ No___ 7. What type of vegetation on-site? Heavily Vegetated with Native (most stable) ____ not well vegetated (less stable) __X__ Recent Timber Harvest ____ (least stable) 8. Site Visit recommended on moderate or greater risk areas to look for indicators (see list) – Any indicators? Yes ____ No __X__ soil creep with slight raveling on steepest slope 9. Were there any other Geotechnical Report’s done on adjacent properties? Yes ____ No _X___ If yes, did the Geotech indicate a geohazard or unstable slope? Yes ____ No ____ TO: Austin Watkins, Interim Director / UDC Administrator FROM: David D. Ullrich, Assistant/Associate Planner DATE: April 19, 2021 RE: 60 Pinto Lane, Brinnon WA 98320 Geotechnical Report Waiver Request – Approval Recommendation Clarence Selvog and Barbara Petzoldt applied for a geotechnical report waiver during the course of a Buildng Permit (BLD2020-00647) and Septic permit (SEP2021-00018) application. They plan to construct a modular home and septic system upgrade. Their property is mapped as a seismic area. I have reviewed the waiver request submitted by Clarence Selvog and Barbara Petzoldt, available map and data, and completed the attached geohazard checklist. They will implement applicable best management practices during construction. The building area has a slope of about 4% and the parcel has an overall slope of 4%. Based on our available data, the building site, proposed development, and analysis from the geohazard checklist I find that the standards for a geotechnical report waiver, under Jefferson County Code 18.22.910, have been satisfied. ___ Approved ___ Denied ______________________________________________ Austin Watkins, Interim Director / UDC Administrator Attachments: Supplemental application waiver from special reports Geohazard Checklist Site Plan TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Austin Watkins, Interim Director / UDC Administrator David D. Ullrich, Assistant/Associate Planner April 19, 2021 60 Pinto Lane, Brinnon WA, Parcel ID No. 966900077, Geotechnical Report Waiver Request – Approval Recommendation Clarence Selvog and Barbara Petzoldt applied for a geotechnical report waiver during the course of a Buildng Permit (BLD2020-00647) and Septic permit (SEP2021-00018) application. They plan to construct a modular home and septic system upgrade. Their property is mapped as a seismic area. I have reviewed the waiver request submitted by Clarence Selvog and Barbara Petzoldt, available map and data, and completed the attached geohazard checklist. They will implement applicable best management practices during construction. The building area has a slope of about 4% and the parcel has an overall slope of 4%. Based on our available data, the building site, proposed development, and analysis from the geohazard checklist I find that the standards for a geotechnical report waiver, under Jefferson County Code 18.22.910, have been satisfied. _X_ Approved ___ Denied ______________________________________________ Austin Watkins, Interim Director / UDC Administrator Attachments: Supplemental application waiver from special reports Geohazard Checklist Site Plan Geohazard Checklist 1. Which of the following are mapped on-site? Land Slide Hazard: Moderate __N/A__ High ____ Recent Landslide ____ Old Slide ____ Erosion: __N/A__ Seismic: _Yes__ Shoreline Slope Stability: Unstable Slope____ Unstable-Recent Slide___ Unstable – Old Slide____ Intermediate_____ Modified ___Stable Slope __X__ Two or more? Yes ____ No _X___ 2. Existing Development? Yes _X__ No ___ Evidence of geohazard? Yes___ No _X__ 3. Is the slope greater than 15 %? (rise/run = %) Yes ____ No _X__ 4. Will the development be less than 35 feet from the top or toe of slope? Yes ____ No __X__ 5. Does the site have a less stable slope form? Yes ____ No __X__ Divergent ____ (most stable) Planar __X__ (more stable) Convergent ____ (less stable) 6. Is there any information regarding stability of the soil e.g. septic soil logs, NRSC soil survey etc. Yes ____ No___ 7. What type of vegetation on-site? Heavily Vegetated with Native (most stable) ____ not well vegetated (less stable) __X__ Recent Timber Harvest ____ (least stable) 8. Site Visit recommended on moderate or greater risk areas to look for indicators (see list) – Any indicators? Yes ____ No __X__ soil creep with slight raveling on steepest slope 9. Were there any other Geotechnical Report’s done on adjacent properties? Yes ____ No _X___ If yes, did the Geotech indicate a geohazard or unstable slope? Yes ____ No ____ HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN 60 Pinto Lane Jefferson County, Washington Prepared for Bing Selvog 10950 W Union Hills Drive #1324 Sun City, AZ 85373 (509) 948-6924 March 10, 2021 Prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc. 1157 3rd Avenue, Suite 220A • Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 • Project Number 3408.01 Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan i March 10, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................1 STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................1 PROJECT PROPOSAL ........................................................................................................................1 ENVIRONMENTAL AND HABITAT CONDITIONS ...............................................................................1 STATE AND FEDERALLY LISTED SPECIES AND CRITICAL HABITAT ............................................. 1 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE, PRIORITY HABITATS AND SPECIES ........ 2 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM ........ 2 JEFFERSON COUNTY CRITICAL AREA AND HABITAT MAPPING................................................... 2 RESEARCH AND SITE INVESTIGATION ........................................................................................... 3 WILDLIFE INVENTORY ................................................................................................................... 3 CRITICAL AREAS ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................................... 4 IMPACT ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................................................4 No-Net-Loss Assessment .......................................................................................................... 4 LIMITATIONS ...................................................................................................................................5 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................................6 FIGURES & PHOTOPLATES Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Existing Conditions Figure 3 Proposed Conditions Figure 4 Jefferson County Critical Areas Figure 5 WDFW Priority Habitat and Species Photoplates Site Photos Appendix A Wetland Determination Data Form Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan i March 10, 2021 SIGNATURE PAGE The information and data in this report were compiled and prepared under the supervision and direction of the undersigned. ___________________________ Joanne Bartlett, SPWS Senior Biologist Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan 1 March 10, 2021 INTRODUCTION Ecological Land Services, Inc. (ELS) has been contracted by Bing Selvog to complete a habitat management plan (HMP) for the proposed single-family home on property at 60 Pinto Lane, Jefferson County Tax Parcel Nos. 966900076 and 966900077, in Brinnon, Washington. This property is in a portion of Section 34, Township 26 North, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian (Figure 1). STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION These existing platted lots are on the southeast side of Pinto Lane within the residential neighborhood of Lazy C Ranch on the west end of Brinnon (Figure 2). Both lots are currently developed with a garage/shop on the eastern lot (077) and an above-ground septic system on the western lot (076) (Photoplate 3). The remainder of the lots are composed of open maintained grounds with a line of conifer trees along the east property line, a group of large western red cedar trees at the southwest corner, and a small group of coniferous and deciduous trees at the northwest corner (Photoplates 1 and 2). The latter group of trees lies on a raised area at the northwest corner and the remainder of the lots is generally level to gradually sloping down from east to west (Photoplate 2). There is an existing access across the roadside ditch near the shared line between the lots. PROJECT PROPOSAL The two lots are partially developed with a garage/shop on the eastern lot and an aboveground drainfield on the other. A single-family home is proposed between the two existing features (Figure 3). It is positioned to allow direct connection to the existing drainfield and where vegetation removal is limited to a grassy/weedy area (Photoplate 3). None of the native woody vegetation on these lots will be removed to accommodate the home. ENVIRONMENTAL AND HABITAT CONDITIONS STATE AND FEDERALLY LISTED SPECIES AND CRITICAL HABITAT Federally listed fish, bird, and mammals within the Olympic National Park and Jefferson County were identified using the WDFW, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries, and United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) websites and are presented in Table 1. State and federal status and presence of critical habitat are also included in the table. Table 1: State and Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species and Critical Habitat Species, ESU1 or DPS2 State Status4 Federal Status3 Critical Habitat5 in Project Vicinity Fish Puget Sound ESU Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Candidate Threatened Yes Hood Canal Summer-run Chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) Candidate Threatened Yes Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Candidate Threatened No Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma) None PST No Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan 2 March 10, 2021 Species, ESU1 or DPS2 State Status4 Federal Status3 Critical Habitat5 in Project Vicinity Birds Marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) Endangered Threatened No Yellow-billed Cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus) Endangered Threatened No Streaked Horned lark (Eremophila alpestris strigata) Endangered Threatened No 1) ESU - Evolutionarily Significant Unit. A distinct group of Pacific salmon. 2) DPS – Distinct Population Unit. 3) Endangered - In danger of becoming extinct or extirpated; Threatened - Likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range and that has been formally listed as such in the Federal Register under the Federal Endangered Species Act; Sensitive - Vulnerable or declining and could become Endangered or Threatened in the state; Species of Concern - An unofficial status, the species appears to be in jeopardy, but insufficient information to support listing. State candidate species include fish and wildlife species that the Department will review for possible listing as State Endangered, Threatened, or Sensitive. A species will be considered for designation as a State Candidate if sufficient evidence suggests that its status may meet the listing criteria defined for State Endangered, Threatened, or Sensitive. 4) WDFW, PHS website 2021 5) NOAA 2021 6) USFWS 2021 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE, PRIORITY HABITATS AND SPECIES The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitat and Species (PHS) website (WDFW 2021) identifies presence of priority habitat and species areas within this area of Brinnon as presented in Table 2 (Figure 5). Table 2: WDFW, Priority Habitats and Species Priority Habitat or Species Priority Area Roosevelt elk (Cervus canadensis roosevelti) Regular concentration Harlequin duck (Histrionicus histrionicus) Breeding area Northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) Occurrence WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM The Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR), Natural Heritage Program identifies 19 sensitive, 4 threatened, and 1 endangered species of rare plants in Jefferson County (WDNR 2021). Golden paintbrush is listed as threatened by the WDNR and is also federally listed as threatened (USFWS 2021). JEFFERSON COUNTY CRITICAL AREA AND HABITAT MAPPING The Jefferson County Critical Area Maps viewed through the online mapping website was used to identify the presence of critical areas found within the vicinity of these lots (Figure 4). The map indicates that the lots lie within a large wetland unit and that there is a Type 3 stream to the east. However, there are no wetlands on these lots nor on the lots within this residential development. There is a stream mapped across the development to the northeast of these lots, but a stream channel was not observed in this location. There are spotted owl and marbled murrelet areas mapped offsite to the north. Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan 3 March 10, 2021 RESEARCH AND SITE INVESTIGATION Birds Marbled murrelet Marbled murrelets nest in mature or old-growth forests near coastlines in which the trees are at least 32 inches diameter at breast height (dbh) with a multistoried canopy, moderate to high canopy closure or an open crown canopy. Large vertical and horizontal snags are also present at various stages of decay. These birds more commonly nest in forest stands that are greater than 500 acres and less commonly nest in stands less than 100 acres. Murrelets typically utilize the largest tree in the stand for their nests. Yellow-billed cuckoo Yellow-billed cuckoos are found in deciduous forests where they forage in dense trees and shrubs. They nest in a tree or shrub usually 2 to 12 feet above the ground typically on a flimsy platform of short twigs on a horizontal branch. Streaked horned lark Streaked horned larks are found in prairie and grassland, coastal beaches, and sparsely vegetated shorelines along the lower Columbia River. This species nests and feeds in bare areas of fields and pastures. Spotted owl Spotted owls are found in low to mid-elevation mature to old growth forests with dense canopies consisting mainly of Douglas fir having several vertical layers of vegetation. They nest in trees with broken tops and other natural hollows and in old stick nests of other species. Harlequin ducks Harlequin ducks are found in fast flowing rivers during the breeding season and move to slower flowing water when with chicks. Rivers with islands or sand bars are preferred habitat for resting and they are found in rocky coastal cliffs in the winter months. They nest in holes in trees, rocky ledges, and occasionally on the ground. Plants The WDNR lists 24 sensitive, threatened, and endangered species that occur within Jefferson County (WDNR 2021). The lots for which this assessment was completed are partially developed and regularly maintained so there was no suitable habitat for the listed plant species. None of these species were observed on these lots and there was no suitable habitat noted within the residential development. Wildlife Inventory The January 2021 site visit observed no suitable habitat for the listed species as described above. There are small groupings of trees on the lots, but they do not represent part of mature or old-growth forest and include only a few deciduous trees. The research conducted for this project indicates that the lots are not within critical habitat for any of the listed species. No other wildlife species were observed on these lots during the site visit. Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan 4 March 10, 2021 Critical Areas Assessment The lots within this residential subdivision are mapped as containing wetlands according to the Jefferson County Critical Areas map (Figure 4). The vegetation conditions, which include maintained open land and pockets of trees, are not indicative of wetlands. Data to confirm the absence of wetlands was collected in the lowest elevation area of the lots, which is in the northeast corner where the vegetation was dominated by maintained grasses, hairy cat’s ear (Hypochaeris radicata, FACU), and creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens, FAC). The soil profile in this area was composed of two compacted gravelly sandy loam layers. The upper 12 inches had a brown (10YR 3/2) matrix color and below 12 inches, the soil had a yellow brown (2.5Y 3/2) matrix color. Redoximorphic concentrations were not observed within either layer of the soil. Water was not present during the February 12, 2021 site visit and there was no evidence of wetland hydrology. There was also no evidence of water elsewhere on these lots. The vegetation criterion was met because there was greater than 50 percent dominance by FAC species, but the area was determined to upland because there were no positive indicators present for hydric soils or wetland hydrology. The data collected in this area is indicative of conditions across the remainder of these lots, which slope up to the southwest and west. There were no wetlands or streams observed within 300 feet of the lots because of the dense residential development on all sides. IMPACT ASSESSMENT These lots are currently partially developed with a garage/shop on the eastern lot with groups of trees on two sides. The western lot is undeveloped except for an existing aboveground drainfield. A single-family home is proposed between the garage/shop and drainfield where maintained grass dominates. The existing onsite structures were constructed without removal of any of the existing groups of trees and because the home is proposed between the garage/shop and drainfield, there will be no removal of woody vegetation for the current proposal. Therefore, the vegetation conditions onsite will not change except where the house will be constructed (removal of the grass and weeds) and will not change the condition of any potential habitat. No-Net-Loss Assessment The single-family home will introduce a new building to the neighborhood but because the surrounding lots are fully developed, there will be no change to the habitat available to the listed species. There will also be no change to the noise levels that can affect habitat use by the listed species because of the developed conditions in this area. Stormwater generated on the developed lots will discharge into the roadside ditch along the north line. There will be no increase to the amount of stormwater onsite because of the current compacted conditions of the lots and the placement of only a single residence. Because this project proposes no change to any suitable habitat for the listed species and there will be no new impacts to habitat or critical areas , mitigation is not proposed. Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan 5 March 10, 2021 LIMITATIONS ELS bases this report’s determinations on standard scientific methodology and best professional judgment. In our opinion, local, state, and federal regulatory agencies should agree with our determinations. However, the information contained in this report should be considered preliminary and used at your own risk until it has been approved in writing by the appropriate regulatory agencies. ELS is not responsible for the impacts of any changes in environmental standards, practices, or regulations after the date of this report. Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan 6 March 10, 2021 REFERENCES Jefferson County Code (JCC). 2020. Chapter 18.22 Critical Areas, Article VI Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas. Jefferson County Tax Public Land Records. 2021. https://gisweb.jeffcowa.us/LandRecords/. Website accessed February 2021. NOAA Fisheries (NOAA). 2021. Protected Resources App-West Coast Region. https://www.webapps.nwfsc.noaa.gov/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=7514c715 b8594944a6e468dd25aaacc9. Website accessed February 2021. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021. Information for Planning and Conservation (IPaC) Website. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/. Website accessed February 2021. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 2021. Priority Habitats and Species PHS on the Web. https://geodataservices.wdfw.wa.gov/hp/phs/ Website accessed February 2021. Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR). 2021. Natural Heritage Program Website. http://www.dnr.wa.gov/natural-heritage-program. Accessed February 2021. FIGURES & PHOTOPLATES 47.7043° Latitude -122.9248° Longitude SITE 3/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 1 7 : 4 6 A M C: \ U s e r s \ C P a y n e \ B o x \ E L S \ W A \ J e f f e r s o n \ C o u n t y \ 3 4 0 8 - S e l v o g \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - 6 0 P i n t o L a n e H M P \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - F i g u r e s C A D O n l y \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 . d w g Cp a y n e N 6 :( DA T E : DW N : RE Q . B Y : PR J . M G R : CH K : PR O J E C T N O : Fi g u r e 1 VI C I N I T Y M A P 3/ 1 0 / 2 1 34 0 8 . 0 1 60 P i n t o L a n e H M P Bi n g S e l v o g Se c t i o n 34 , T o w n s h i p 26 N , R a n g e 2W , W . M . Je f f e r s o n C o u n t y , Wa s h i n g t o n CD P JB JB JL L SC A L E I N F E E T 0 20 0 0 40 0 0 11 5 7 3 r d A v e . , S u i t e 2 2 0 A Lo n g v i e w , W A 9 8 6 3 2 Ph o n e : ( 3 6 0 ) 5 7 8 - 1 3 7 1 Fa x : ( 3 6 0 ) 4 1 4 - 9 3 0 5 ww w . e c o - l a n d . c o m LOCATION MAP WASHINGTON SITE NOTE: Quadrangle topographic map from USGS. PROJECT VICINITY MAP SCALE IN MILES 520 Mt. St. Helens SKAMANIA N. Bonneville Stevenson Carson 14 WashougalCamas Vancouver Battle Ground Woodland Ridgefield CLARK 5 500 503 205 Kalama Longview ToutleCastle Rock COWLITZ 504 4Cathlamet WAHKIAKUM 6 101 401 103 105 PACIFIC Ilwaco Long Beach Ocean Park South Bend Raymond 101Westport Ocean Shores Copalis Beach Pacific Beach Taholah Quinalt Aberdeen Montesano Elma Oakville 12 8 105 109 101 GRAYS HARBOR Queets 101 Kalaloch Port Townsend Port Ludlow Quilcene Brinnon 101 19 104 20 JEFFERSON CLALLAMForks110 101 113 112 101 112 Port Angeles Sequim Neah Bay Clallam Bay Friday Harbor Blaine Ferndale Bellingham 542 542 9 Lynden5 539 SAN JUAN WHATCOM ConcreteAnacortes Mount Vernon Sedro-Woolley 5 20 11 530 SKAGIT Lynnwood Mulkiteo Everett Marysville Monroe Arlington Darrington 5 9 2522 SNOHOMISH Mt St Helens KING Seattle Shoreline 90 Carnation North Bend Redmond Enumclaw Auburn Issaquah Burien Kent Renton 405 18 169 410 169 202 Mt. Rainier Eatonville 4 Puyallup Tacoma Gig Harbor 165 162 164 161 7 702 507 Roy DuPont Carbonado 5 5 Olympia Shelton Yelm Tenino 508 Centralia Chehalis Pe Ell Morton 12 Toledo 7 505 Winlock PIERCE LEWIS THURSTON 5 5 KITSAP Poulsbo 3 16 Bremerton SITE Do u g l a s F i r ( 1 ) - 2 4 " d b h Do u g l a s F i r ( 2 ) - 4 8 " d b h We s t e r n R e d C e d a r ( 5 ) - 6 t o 1 6 " d b h Bi g l e a f M a p l e ( 1 ) We s t e r n R e d Ce d a r M u l t i T r u n k e d ( 4 ) - 4 8 t o 6 0 " d b h -1 0 0 ' t a l l Yo u n g D o u g l a s F i r T r e e s - 2 0 ' t a l l Gr a n d F i r ( 1 ) - 3 6 " d b h Do u g l a s F i r ( 1 ) - 3 6 " d b h Si t k a S p r u c e ( 1 ) - 3 6 " d b h Pin t o L n Ex . S e p t i c S y s t e m Mo r g a n L n Ex . G a r a g e / S h o p TP - 1 3/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 1 7 : 4 6 A M C: \ U s e r s \ C P a y n e \ B o x \ E L S \ W A \ J e f f e r s o n \ C o u n t y \ 3 4 0 8 - S e l v o g \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - 6 0 P i n t o L a n e H M P \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - F i g u r e s C A D O n l y \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 . d w g Cp a y n e N 6 : ( DA T E : DW N : RE Q . B Y : PR J . M G R : CH K : PR O J E C T N O : 11 5 7 3 r d A v e . , S u i t e 2 2 0 A Lo n g v i e w , W A 9 8 6 3 2 Ph o n e : ( 3 6 0 ) 5 7 8 - 1 3 7 1 Fa x : ( 3 6 0 ) 4 1 4 - 9 3 0 5 ww w . e c o - l a n d . c o m DA T E : DW N : RE Q . B Y : PR J . M G R : CH K : PR O J E C T N O : Figure 2 EX I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S 3/ 1 0 / 2 1 34 0 8 . 0 1 60 P i n t o L a n e H M P Bing Selvog Se c t i o n 34 , T o w n s h i p 26N , Range 2W , W.M. Je f f e r s o n C o u n t y , Washington CD P JB JB JL L SC A L E I N F E E T 0 60 12 0 NO T E ( S ) : 1. Ae r i a l f r o m G o o g l e E a r t h ™ 2. We t l a n d a n d t e s t p l o t s l o c a t e d u s i n g h a n d h e l d G P S w i t h s u b m e t e r a c c u r a c y . SI T E LEGEND:Site Boundary Parcel Boundary Dripline Boundary Test Plot Location TP - 1 3/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 1 7 : 4 6 A M C: \ U s e r s \ C P a y n e \ B o x \ E L S \ W A \ J e f f e r s o n \ C o u n t y \ 3 4 0 8 - S e l v o g \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - 6 0 P i n t o L a n e H M P \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - F i g u r e s C A D O n l y \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 . d w g Cp a y n e N 6 : ( DA T E : DW N : RE Q . B Y : PR J . M G R : CH K : PR O J E C T N O : 11 5 7 3 r d A v e . , S u i t e 2 2 0 A Lo n g v i e w , W A 9 8 6 3 2 Ph o n e : ( 3 6 0 ) 5 7 8 - 1 3 7 1 Fa x : ( 3 6 0 ) 4 1 4 - 9 3 0 5 ww w . e c o - l a n d . c o m LEGEND:Site Boundary Parcel Boundary DA T E : DW N : RE Q . B Y : PR J . M G R : CH K : PR O J E C T N O : Figure 3 PR O P O S E D C O N D I T I O N S 3/ 1 0 / 2 1 34 0 8 . 0 1 60 P i n t o L a n e H M P Bing Selvog Se c t i o n 34 , T o w n s h i p 26N , Range 2W , W.M. Je f f e r s o n C o u n t y , Washington CD P JB JB JL L SC A L E I N F E E T 0 40 80 NO T E ( S ) : 1. Si t e p l a n f r o m C r e a t i v e D e s i g n S o l u t i o n s . SI T E 3/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 1 7 : 4 6 A M C: \ U s e r s \ C P a y n e \ B o x \ E L S \ W A \ J e f f e r s o n \ C o u n t y \ 3 4 0 8 - S e l v o g \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - 6 0 P i n t o L a n e H M P \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - F i g u r e s C A D O n l y \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 . d w g Cp a y n e SITE N 6 :( DA T E : DW N : RE Q . B Y : PR J . M G R : CH K : PR O J E C T N O : Fi g u r e 4 JE F F E R S O N C O U N T Y C R I T I C A L A R E A S 3/ 1 0 / 2 1 34 0 8 . 0 1 60 P i n t o L a n e H M P Bi n g S e l v o g Se c t i o n 34 , T o w n s h i p 26 N , R a n g e 2W , W . M . Je f f e r s o n C o u n t y , Wa s h i n g t o n CD P JB JB JL L SC A L E I N F E E T 0 20 0 40 0 11 5 7 3 r d A v e . , S u i t e 2 2 0 A Lo n g v i e w , W A 9 8 6 3 2 Ph o n e : ( 3 6 0 ) 5 7 8 - 1 3 7 1 Fa x : ( 3 6 0 ) 4 1 4 - 9 3 0 5 ww w . e c o - l a n d . c o m NOTE(S): 1.Map provided on-line by Jefferson County at web address: https://jeffcowa.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer Sheet: 1 File: ..\..\..\..\..\..\..\..\Downloads\Legend.pdf Missing or invalid reference NOTE: Map provided on-line by Washington State Department of Fish & Wildlife at web address: http://apps.wdfw.wa.gov/phsontheweb/ SITE 3/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 1 7 : 4 6 A M C: \ U s e r s \ C P a y n e \ B o x \ E L S \ W A \ J e f f e r s o n \ C o u n t y \ 3 4 0 8 - S e l v o g \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - 6 0 P i n t o L a n e H M P \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - F i g u r e s C A D O n l y \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 . d w g Cp a y n e N 6 :( DA T E : DW N : RE Q . B Y : PR J . M G R : CH K : PR O J E C T N O : Fi g u r e 5 WD F W P R I O R I T Y H A B I T A T A N D S P E C I E S 3/ 1 0 / 2 1 34 0 8 . 0 1 60 P i n t o L a n e H M P Bi n g S e l v o g Se c t i o n 34 , T o w n s h i p 26 N , R a n g e 2W , W . M . Je f f e r s o n C o u n t y , Wa s h i n g t o n CD P JB JB JL L SC A L E I N F E E T 0 25 0 50 0 11 5 7 3 r d A v e . , S u i t e 2 2 0 A Lo n g v i e w , W A 9 8 6 3 2 Ph o n e : ( 3 6 0 ) 5 7 8 - 1 3 7 1 Fa x : ( 3 6 0 ) 4 1 4 - 9 3 0 5 ww w . e c o - l a n d . c o m Dosewallips River LEGEND: Elk - Regular Concentrarion Harlequin Duck - Breading Area Northern Spotted Owl - -Occurrence 1157 3rd Ave., Suite 220A Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 Fax: (360) 414-9305 DATE: 2/23/21 DWN: JB PRJ. MGR: JB PROJ. #: 3408.01 Photoplate 1 Project Name: 60 Pinto Lane Client: Bing Selvog Jefferson County, Washington Photo 1 was taken from the northwest corner of the two lots at 60 Pinto Lane. It looks north along Pinto Lane; the driveway in this photo leads to the home just north of these lots. Photo 3 was taken from the same location as Photos 1 and 2. It looks southeasterly across the lots toward the southern of the two lots. Photo 2 was taken from the same location as Photo 1 and looks east along the north edge of the lots. The trees in this view line the north property line next to the existing garage. 1157 3rd Ave., Suite 220A Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 Fax: (360) 414-9305 DATE: 2/23/21 DWN: JB PRJ. MGR: JB PROJ. #: 3408.01 Photoplate 2 Project Name: 60 Pinto Lane Client: Bing Selvog Jefferson County, Washington Photo 4 was taken from about midway along the south property line and looks west toward Pinto Lane. There is a small group of trees on the raised hummock at the southwest corner. Photo 6 was taken from the same location as Photos 4 and 5. It looks easterly toward the southeast corner. There is a group of large cedars in this location. There are homes visible beyond the trees. Photo 5 was taken from the same location as Photo 4 and looks north across the lots. The existing garage is in the background with the existing drainfield visible on the middle right. 1157 3rd Ave., Suite 220A Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 Fax: (360) 414-9305 DATE: 2/23/21 DWN: JB PRJ. MGR: JB PROJ. #: 3408.01 Photoplate 3 Project Name: 60 Pinto Lane Client: Bing Selvog Jefferson County, Washington Photo 7 was taken from the driveway entrance, which lies near the middle of the two lots. It looks northeasterly across the north lot toward the existing garage. Photo 9 was taken from the same location as Photos 7 and 8. It looks southeasterly across the southern of the two lots. The home will be located in this area. Photo 8 was taken from the same location as Photo 7 and looks easterly across the center of the two lots. The home is proposed to the right of the garage/shop. APPENDIX A US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast – Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region VEGETATION – Use scientific names of plants Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Dominance Test Worksheet: 1. Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. 3. Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 4. 50% = , 20% = = Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OBL species x1 = 4. FACW species x2 = 5. FAC species x3 = 50% = , 20% = = Total Cover FACU species x4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) UPL species x5 = 1. mowed grasses* 35 yes FAC Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Ranunculus repens 10 no FAC Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. Hypochaeris radicata 5 no FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. Geranium robertianum 5 no FACU 1 – Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6. 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.01 7. 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. 9. 5 - Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 11. 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 50% = 27.5, 20% = 11 55 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 2. 50% = , 20% = = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 45 Remarks: *mowed grasses assumed FAC-Hydrophytic vegetation criterion is met because there is greater than 50% dominance by FAC species. Project Site: 60 Pinto Laane City/County: Brinnon/Jefferson Sampling Date: 2/12/21 Applicant/Owner: Bing Selvog State: WA Sampling Point: TP 1 Investigator(s): J. Bartlett Section, Township, Range: S 34 T 26 N R 2 WWM Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 1-2 Subregion (LRR): LRRA Lat: 47.074 Long: -122.924 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Bf Belfast fine sandy loam NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology , significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology , naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks: These lots are located within a residential development and are partially developed. They are both primarily composed of maintained grasses with a garage/shop on the eastern lot and an above ground drainfield exists on the western lot. Test Plot 1 was conducted in the low area at the northeast corner. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast – Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: TP 1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 3/2 100 gr sa lo 12-20 2.5Y 3/2 100 gr sa lo gr - gravelly sa - sandy lo - loam 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix, RC=Root Channel Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Matrix (F3) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if present): Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: The hydric soil criterion is not met because the matrix chroma in both layers is too high and there are no redoximorphic concentrations. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (B11) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Stunted or Stresses Plants (D1) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? (includes capillary fringe) Yes No Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: The wetland hydrology criterion is not met because there was no water present during the field visit and there was no evidence of long term hydrology. Project Site: 60 Pinto Lane HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN 60 Pinto Lane Jefferson County, Washington Prepared for Bing Selvog 10950 W Union Hills Drive #1324 Sun City, AZ 85373 (509) 948-6924 March 10, 2021 Prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc. 1157 3rd Avenue, Suite 220A • Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 • Project Number 3408.01 Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan i March 10, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................1 STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................1 PROJECT PROPOSAL ........................................................................................................................1 ENVIRONMENTAL AND HABITAT CONDITIONS ...............................................................................1 STATE AND FEDERALLY LISTED SPECIES AND CRITICAL HABITAT ............................................. 1 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE, PRIORITY HABITATS AND SPECIES ........ 2 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM ........ 2 JEFFERSON COUNTY CRITICAL AREA AND HABITAT MAPPING................................................... 2 RESEARCH AND SITE INVESTIGATION ........................................................................................... 3 WILDLIFE INVENTORY ................................................................................................................... 3 CRITICAL AREAS ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................................... 4 IMPACT ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................................................4 No-Net-Loss Assessment .......................................................................................................... 4 LIMITATIONS ...................................................................................................................................5 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................................6 FIGURES & PHOTOPLATES Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Existing Conditions Figure 3 Proposed Conditions Figure 4 Jefferson County Critical Areas Figure 5 WDFW Priority Habitat and Species Photoplates Site Photos Appendix A Wetland Determination Data Form Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan i March 10, 2021 SIGNATURE PAGE The information and data in this report were compiled and prepared under the supervision and direction of the undersigned. ___________________________ Joanne Bartlett, SPWS Senior Biologist Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan 1 March 10, 2021 INTRODUCTION Ecological Land Services, Inc. (ELS) has been contracted by Bing Selvog to complete a habitat management plan (HMP) for the proposed single-family home on property at 60 Pinto Lane, Jefferson County Tax Parcel Nos. 966900076 and 966900077, in Brinnon, Washington. This property is in a portion of Section 34, Township 26 North, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian (Figure 1). STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION These existing platted lots are on the southeast side of Pinto Lane within the residential neighborhood of Lazy C Ranch on the west end of Brinnon (Figure 2). Both lots are currently developed with a garage/shop on the eastern lot (077) and an above-ground septic system on the western lot (076) (Photoplate 3). The remainder of the lots are composed of open maintained grounds with a line of conifer trees along the east property line, a group of large western red cedar trees at the southwest corner, and a small group of coniferous and deciduous trees at the northwest corner (Photoplates 1 and 2). The latter group of trees lies on a raised area at the northwest corner and the remainder of the lots is generally level to gradually sloping down from east to west (Photoplate 2). There is an existing access across the roadside ditch near the shared line between the lots. PROJECT PROPOSAL The two lots are partially developed with a garage/shop on the eastern lot and an aboveground drainfield on the other. A single-family home is proposed between the two existing features (Figure 3). It is positioned to allow direct connection to the existing drainfield and where vegetation removal is limited to a grassy/weedy area (Photoplate 3). None of the native woody vegetation on these lots will be removed to accommodate the home. ENVIRONMENTAL AND HABITAT CONDITIONS STATE AND FEDERALLY LISTED SPECIES AND CRITICAL HABITAT Federally listed fish, bird, and mammals within the Olympic National Park and Jefferson County were identified using the WDFW, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries, and United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) websites and are presented in Table 1. State and federal status and presence of critical habitat are also included in the table. Table 1: State and Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species and Critical Habitat Species, ESU1 or DPS2 State Status4 Federal Status3 Critical Habitat5 in Project Vicinity Fish Puget Sound ESU Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Candidate Threatened Yes Hood Canal Summer-run Chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) Candidate Threatened Yes Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Candidate Threatened No Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma) None PST No Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan 2 March 10, 2021 Species, ESU1 or DPS2 State Status4 Federal Status3 Critical Habitat5 in Project Vicinity Birds Marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) Endangered Threatened No Yellow-billed Cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus) Endangered Threatened No Streaked Horned lark (Eremophila alpestris strigata) Endangered Threatened No 1) ESU - Evolutionarily Significant Unit. A distinct group of Pacific salmon. 2) DPS – Distinct Population Unit. 3) Endangered - In danger of becoming extinct or extirpated; Threatened - Likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range and that has been formally listed as such in the Federal Register under the Federal Endangered Species Act; Sensitive - Vulnerable or declining and could become Endangered or Threatened in the state; Species of Concern - An unofficial status, the species appears to be in jeopardy, but insufficient information to support listing. State candidate species include fish and wildlife species that the Department will review for possible listing as State Endangered, Threatened, or Sensitive. A species will be considered for designation as a State Candidate if sufficient evidence suggests that its status may meet the listing criteria defined for State Endangered, Threatened, or Sensitive. 4) WDFW, PHS website 2021 5) NOAA 2021 6) USFWS 2021 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE, PRIORITY HABITATS AND SPECIES The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitat and Species (PHS) website (WDFW 2021) identifies presence of priority habitat and species areas within this area of Brinnon as presented in Table 2 (Figure 5). Table 2: WDFW, Priority Habitats and Species Priority Habitat or Species Priority Area Roosevelt elk (Cervus canadensis roosevelti) Regular concentration Harlequin duck (Histrionicus histrionicus) Breeding area Northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) Occurrence WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM The Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR), Natural Heritage Program identifies 19 sensitive, 4 threatened, and 1 endangered species of rare plants in Jefferson County (WDNR 2021). Golden paintbrush is listed as threatened by the WDNR and is also federally listed as threatened (USFWS 2021). JEFFERSON COUNTY CRITICAL AREA AND HABITAT MAPPING The Jefferson County Critical Area Maps viewed through the online mapping website was used to identify the presence of critical areas found within the vicinity of these lots (Figure 4). The map indicates that the lots lie within a large wetland unit and that there is a Type 3 stream to the east. However, there are no wetlands on these lots nor on the lots within this residential development. There is a stream mapped across the development to the northeast of these lots, but a stream channel was not observed in this location. There are spotted owl and marbled murrelet areas mapped offsite to the north. Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan 3 March 10, 2021 RESEARCH AND SITE INVESTIGATION Birds Marbled murrelet Marbled murrelets nest in mature or old-growth forests near coastlines in which the trees are at least 32 inches diameter at breast height (dbh) with a multistoried canopy, moderate to high canopy closure or an open crown canopy. Large vertical and horizontal snags are also present at various stages of decay. These birds more commonly nest in forest stands that are greater than 500 acres and less commonly nest in stands less than 100 acres. Murrelets typically utilize the largest tree in the stand for their nests. Yellow-billed cuckoo Yellow-billed cuckoos are found in deciduous forests where they forage in dense trees and shrubs. They nest in a tree or shrub usually 2 to 12 feet above the ground typically on a flimsy platform of short twigs on a horizontal branch. Streaked horned lark Streaked horned larks are found in prairie and grassland, coastal beaches, and sparsely vegetated shorelines along the lower Columbia River. This species nests and feeds in bare areas of fields and pastures. Spotted owl Spotted owls are found in low to mid-elevation mature to old growth forests with dense canopies consisting mainly of Douglas fir having several vertical layers of vegetation. They nest in trees with broken tops and other natural hollows and in old stick nests of other species. Harlequin ducks Harlequin ducks are found in fast flowing rivers during the breeding season and move to slower flowing water when with chicks. Rivers with islands or sand bars are preferred habitat for resting and they are found in rocky coastal cliffs in the winter months. They nest in holes in trees, rocky ledges, and occasionally on the ground. Plants The WDNR lists 24 sensitive, threatened, and endangered species that occur within Jefferson County (WDNR 2021). The lots for which this assessment was completed are partially developed and regularly maintained so there was no suitable habitat for the listed plant species. None of these species were observed on these lots and there was no suitable habitat noted within the residential development. Wildlife Inventory The January 2021 site visit observed no suitable habitat for the listed species as described above. There are small groupings of trees on the lots, but they do not represent part of mature or old-growth forest and include only a few deciduous trees. The research conducted for this project indicates that the lots are not within critical habitat for any of the listed species. No other wildlife species were observed on these lots during the site visit. Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan 4 March 10, 2021 Critical Areas Assessment The lots within this residential subdivision are mapped as containing wetlands according to the Jefferson County Critical Areas map (Figure 4). The vegetation conditions, which include maintained open land and pockets of trees, are not indicative of wetlands. Data to confirm the absence of wetlands was collected in the lowest elevation area of the lots, which is in the northeast corner where the vegetation was dominated by maintained grasses, hairy cat’s ear (Hypochaeris radicata, FACU), and creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens, FAC). The soil profile in this area was composed of two compacted gravelly sandy loam layers. The upper 12 inches had a brown (10YR 3/2) matrix color and below 12 inches, the soil had a yellow brown (2.5Y 3/2) matrix color. Redoximorphic concentrations were not observed within either layer of the soil. Water was not present during the February 12, 2021 site visit and there was no evidence of wetland hydrology. There was also no evidence of water elsewhere on these lots. The vegetation criterion was met because there was greater than 50 percent dominance by FAC species, but the area was determined to upland because there were no positive indicators present for hydric soils or wetland hydrology. The data collected in this area is indicative of conditions across the remainder of these lots, which slope up to the southwest and west. There were no wetlands or streams observed within 300 feet of the lots because of the dense residential development on all sides. IMPACT ASSESSMENT These lots are currently partially developed with a garage/shop on the eastern lot with groups of trees on two sides. The western lot is undeveloped except for an existing aboveground drainfield. A single-family home is proposed between the garage/shop and drainfield where maintained grass dominates. The existing onsite structures were constructed without removal of any of the existing groups of trees and because the home is proposed between the garage/shop and drainfield, there will be no removal of woody vegetation for the current proposal. Therefore, the vegetation conditions onsite will not change except where the house will be constructed (removal of the grass and weeds) and will not change the condition of any potential habitat. No-Net-Loss Assessment The single-family home will introduce a new building to the neighborhood but because the surrounding lots are fully developed, there will be no change to the habitat available to the listed species. There will also be no change to the noise levels that can affect habitat use by the listed species because of the developed conditions in this area. Stormwater generated on the developed lots will discharge into the roadside ditch along the north line. There will be no increase to the amount of stormwater onsite because of the current compacted conditions of the lots and the placement of only a single residence. Because this project proposes no change to any suitable habitat for the listed species and there will be no new impacts to habitat or critical areas , mitigation is not proposed. Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan 5 March 10, 2021 LIMITATIONS ELS bases this report’s determinations on standard scientific methodology and best professional judgment. In our opinion, local, state, and federal regulatory agencies should agree with our determinations. However, the information contained in this report should be considered preliminary and used at your own risk until it has been approved in writing by the appropriate regulatory agencies. ELS is not responsible for the impacts of any changes in environmental standards, practices, or regulations after the date of this report. Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan 6 March 10, 2021 REFERENCES Jefferson County Code (JCC). 2020. Chapter 18.22 Critical Areas, Article VI Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas. Jefferson County Tax Public Land Records. 2021. https://gisweb.jeffcowa.us/LandRecords/. Website accessed February 2021. NOAA Fisheries (NOAA). 2021. Protected Resources App-West Coast Region. https://www.webapps.nwfsc.noaa.gov/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=7514c715 b8594944a6e468dd25aaacc9. Website accessed February 2021. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021. Information for Planning and Conservation (IPaC) Website. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/. Website accessed February 2021. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 2021. Priority Habitats and Species PHS on the Web. https://geodataservices.wdfw.wa.gov/hp/phs/ Website accessed February 2021. Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR). 2021. Natural Heritage Program Website. http://www.dnr.wa.gov/natural-heritage-program. Accessed February 2021. FIGURES & PHOTOPLATES 47.7043° Latitude -122.9248° Longitude SITE 3/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 1 7 : 4 6 A M C: \ U s e r s \ C P a y n e \ B o x \ E L S \ W A \ J e f f e r s o n \ C o u n t y \ 3 4 0 8 - S e l v o g \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - 6 0 P i n t o L a n e H M P \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - F i g u r e s C A D O n l y \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 . d w g Cp a y n e N 6 :( DA T E : DW N : RE Q . B Y : PR J . M G R : CH K : PR O J E C T N O : Fi g u r e 1 VI C I N I T Y M A P 3/ 1 0 / 2 1 34 0 8 . 0 1 60 P i n t o L a n e H M P Bi n g S e l v o g Se c t i o n 34 , T o w n s h i p 26 N , R a n g e 2W , W . M . Je f f e r s o n C o u n t y , Wa s h i n g t o n CD P JB JB JL L SC A L E I N F E E T 0 20 0 0 40 0 0 11 5 7 3 r d A v e . , S u i t e 2 2 0 A Lo n g v i e w , W A 9 8 6 3 2 Ph o n e : ( 3 6 0 ) 5 7 8 - 1 3 7 1 Fa x : ( 3 6 0 ) 4 1 4 - 9 3 0 5 ww w . e c o - l a n d . c o m LOCATION MAP WASHINGTON SITE NOTE: Quadrangle topographic map from USGS. PROJECT VICINITY MAP SCALE IN MILES 520 Mt. St. Helens SKAMANIA N. Bonneville Stevenson Carson 14 WashougalCamas Vancouver Battle Ground Woodland Ridgefield CLARK 5 500 503 205 Kalama Longview ToutleCastle Rock COWLITZ 504 4Cathlamet WAHKIAKUM 6 101 401 103 105 PACIFIC Ilwaco Long Beach Ocean Park South Bend Raymond 101Westport Ocean Shores Copalis Beach Pacific Beach Taholah Quinalt Aberdeen Montesano Elma Oakville 12 8 105 109 101 GRAYS HARBOR Queets 101 Kalaloch Port Townsend Port Ludlow Quilcene Brinnon 101 19 104 20 JEFFERSON CLALLAMForks110 101 113 112 101 112 Port Angeles Sequim Neah Bay Clallam Bay Friday Harbor Blaine Ferndale Bellingham 542 542 9 Lynden5 539 SAN JUAN WHATCOM ConcreteAnacortes Mount Vernon Sedro-Woolley 5 20 11 530 SKAGIT Lynnwood Mulkiteo Everett Marysville Monroe Arlington Darrington 5 9 2522 SNOHOMISH Mt St Helens KING Seattle Shoreline 90 Carnation North Bend Redmond Enumclaw Auburn Issaquah Burien Kent Renton 405 18 169 410 169 202 Mt. Rainier Eatonville 4 Puyallup Tacoma Gig Harbor 165 162 164 161 7 702 507 Roy DuPont Carbonado 5 5 Olympia Shelton Yelm Tenino 508 Centralia Chehalis Pe Ell Morton 12 Toledo 7 505 Winlock PIERCE LEWIS THURSTON 5 5 KITSAP Poulsbo 3 16 Bremerton SITE Do u g l a s F i r ( 1 ) - 2 4 " d b h Do u g l a s F i r ( 2 ) - 4 8 " d b h We s t e r n R e d C e d a r ( 5 ) - 6 t o 1 6 " d b h Bi g l e a f M a p l e ( 1 ) We s t e r n R e d Ce d a r M u l t i T r u n k e d ( 4 ) - 4 8 t o 6 0 " d b h -1 0 0 ' t a l l Yo u n g D o u g l a s F i r T r e e s - 2 0 ' t a l l Gr a n d F i r ( 1 ) - 3 6 " d b h Do u g l a s F i r ( 1 ) - 3 6 " d b h Si t k a S p r u c e ( 1 ) - 3 6 " d b h Pin t o L n Ex . S e p t i c S y s t e m Mo r g a n L n Ex . G a r a g e / S h o p TP - 1 3/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 1 7 : 4 6 A M C: \ U s e r s \ C P a y n e \ B o x \ E L S \ W A \ J e f f e r s o n \ C o u n t y \ 3 4 0 8 - S e l v o g \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - 6 0 P i n t o L a n e H M P \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - F i g u r e s C A D O n l y \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 . d w g Cp a y n e N 6 : ( DA T E : DW N : RE Q . B Y : PR J . M G R : CH K : PR O J E C T N O : 11 5 7 3 r d A v e . , S u i t e 2 2 0 A Lo n g v i e w , W A 9 8 6 3 2 Ph o n e : ( 3 6 0 ) 5 7 8 - 1 3 7 1 Fa x : ( 3 6 0 ) 4 1 4 - 9 3 0 5 ww w . e c o - l a n d . c o m DA T E : DW N : RE Q . B Y : PR J . M G R : CH K : PR O J E C T N O : Figure 2 EX I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S 3/ 1 0 / 2 1 34 0 8 . 0 1 60 P i n t o L a n e H M P Bing Selvog Se c t i o n 34 , T o w n s h i p 26N , Range 2W , W.M. Je f f e r s o n C o u n t y , Washington CD P JB JB JL L SC A L E I N F E E T 0 60 12 0 NO T E ( S ) : 1. Ae r i a l f r o m G o o g l e E a r t h ™ 2. We t l a n d a n d t e s t p l o t s l o c a t e d u s i n g h a n d h e l d G P S w i t h s u b m e t e r a c c u r a c y . SI T E LEGEND:Site Boundary Parcel Boundary Dripline Boundary Test Plot Location TP - 1 3/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 1 7 : 4 6 A M C: \ U s e r s \ C P a y n e \ B o x \ E L S \ W A \ J e f f e r s o n \ C o u n t y \ 3 4 0 8 - S e l v o g \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - 6 0 P i n t o L a n e H M P \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - F i g u r e s C A D O n l y \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 . d w g Cp a y n e N 6 : ( DA T E : DW N : RE Q . B Y : PR J . M G R : CH K : PR O J E C T N O : 11 5 7 3 r d A v e . , S u i t e 2 2 0 A Lo n g v i e w , W A 9 8 6 3 2 Ph o n e : ( 3 6 0 ) 5 7 8 - 1 3 7 1 Fa x : ( 3 6 0 ) 4 1 4 - 9 3 0 5 ww w . e c o - l a n d . c o m LEGEND:Site Boundary Parcel Boundary DA T E : DW N : RE Q . B Y : PR J . M G R : CH K : PR O J E C T N O : Figure 3 PR O P O S E D C O N D I T I O N S 3/ 1 0 / 2 1 34 0 8 . 0 1 60 P i n t o L a n e H M P Bing Selvog Se c t i o n 34 , T o w n s h i p 26N , Range 2W , W.M. Je f f e r s o n C o u n t y , Washington CD P JB JB JL L SC A L E I N F E E T 0 40 80 NO T E ( S ) : 1. Si t e p l a n f r o m C r e a t i v e D e s i g n S o l u t i o n s . SI T E 3/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 1 7 : 4 6 A M C: \ U s e r s \ C P a y n e \ B o x \ E L S \ W A \ J e f f e r s o n \ C o u n t y \ 3 4 0 8 - S e l v o g \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - 6 0 P i n t o L a n e H M P \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - F i g u r e s C A D O n l y \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 . d w g Cp a y n e SITE N 6 :( DA T E : DW N : RE Q . B Y : PR J . M G R : CH K : PR O J E C T N O : Fi g u r e 4 JE F F E R S O N C O U N T Y C R I T I C A L A R E A S 3/ 1 0 / 2 1 34 0 8 . 0 1 60 P i n t o L a n e H M P Bi n g S e l v o g Se c t i o n 34 , T o w n s h i p 26 N , R a n g e 2W , W . M . Je f f e r s o n C o u n t y , Wa s h i n g t o n CD P JB JB JL L SC A L E I N F E E T 0 20 0 40 0 11 5 7 3 r d A v e . , S u i t e 2 2 0 A Lo n g v i e w , W A 9 8 6 3 2 Ph o n e : ( 3 6 0 ) 5 7 8 - 1 3 7 1 Fa x : ( 3 6 0 ) 4 1 4 - 9 3 0 5 ww w . e c o - l a n d . c o m NOTE(S): 1.Map provided on-line by Jefferson County at web address: https://jeffcowa.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer Sheet: 1 File: ..\..\..\..\..\..\..\..\Downloads\Legend.pdf Missing or invalid reference NOTE: Map provided on-line by Washington State Department of Fish & Wildlife at web address: http://apps.wdfw.wa.gov/phsontheweb/ SITE 3/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 1 7 : 4 6 A M C: \ U s e r s \ C P a y n e \ B o x \ E L S \ W A \ J e f f e r s o n \ C o u n t y \ 3 4 0 8 - S e l v o g \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - 6 0 P i n t o L a n e H M P \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - F i g u r e s C A D O n l y \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 . d w g Cp a y n e N 6 :( DA T E : DW N : RE Q . B Y : PR J . M G R : CH K : PR O J E C T N O : Fi g u r e 5 WD F W P R I O R I T Y H A B I T A T A N D S P E C I E S 3/ 1 0 / 2 1 34 0 8 . 0 1 60 P i n t o L a n e H M P Bi n g S e l v o g Se c t i o n 34 , T o w n s h i p 26 N , R a n g e 2W , W . M . Je f f e r s o n C o u n t y , Wa s h i n g t o n CD P JB JB JL L SC A L E I N F E E T 0 25 0 50 0 11 5 7 3 r d A v e . , S u i t e 2 2 0 A Lo n g v i e w , W A 9 8 6 3 2 Ph o n e : ( 3 6 0 ) 5 7 8 - 1 3 7 1 Fa x : ( 3 6 0 ) 4 1 4 - 9 3 0 5 ww w . e c o - l a n d . c o m Dosewallips River LEGEND: Elk - Regular Concentrarion Harlequin Duck - Breading Area Northern Spotted Owl - -Occurrence 1157 3rd Ave., Suite 220A Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 Fax: (360) 414-9305 DATE: 2/23/21 DWN: JB PRJ. MGR: JB PROJ. #: 3408.01 Photoplate 1 Project Name: 60 Pinto Lane Client: Bing Selvog Jefferson County, Washington Photo 1 was taken from the northwest corner of the two lots at 60 Pinto Lane. It looks north along Pinto Lane; the driveway in this photo leads to the home just north of these lots. Photo 3 was taken from the same location as Photos 1 and 2. It looks southeasterly across the lots toward the southern of the two lots. Photo 2 was taken from the same location as Photo 1 and looks east along the north edge of the lots. The trees in this view line the north property line next to the existing garage. 1157 3rd Ave., Suite 220A Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 Fax: (360) 414-9305 DATE: 2/23/21 DWN: JB PRJ. MGR: JB PROJ. #: 3408.01 Photoplate 2 Project Name: 60 Pinto Lane Client: Bing Selvog Jefferson County, Washington Photo 4 was taken from about midway along the south property line and looks west toward Pinto Lane. There is a small group of trees on the raised hummock at the southwest corner. Photo 6 was taken from the same location as Photos 4 and 5. It looks easterly toward the southeast corner. There is a group of large cedars in this location. There are homes visible beyond the trees. Photo 5 was taken from the same location as Photo 4 and looks north across the lots. The existing garage is in the background with the existing drainfield visible on the middle right. 1157 3rd Ave., Suite 220A Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 Fax: (360) 414-9305 DATE: 2/23/21 DWN: JB PRJ. MGR: JB PROJ. #: 3408.01 Photoplate 3 Project Name: 60 Pinto Lane Client: Bing Selvog Jefferson County, Washington Photo 7 was taken from the driveway entrance, which lies near the middle of the two lots. It looks northeasterly across the north lot toward the existing garage. Photo 9 was taken from the same location as Photos 7 and 8. It looks southeasterly across the southern of the two lots. The home will be located in this area. Photo 8 was taken from the same location as Photo 7 and looks easterly across the center of the two lots. The home is proposed to the right of the garage/shop. APPENDIX A US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast – Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region VEGETATION – Use scientific names of plants Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Dominance Test Worksheet: 1. Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. 3. Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 4. 50% = , 20% = = Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OBL species x1 = 4. FACW species x2 = 5. FAC species x3 = 50% = , 20% = = Total Cover FACU species x4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) UPL species x5 = 1. mowed grasses* 35 yes FAC Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Ranunculus repens 10 no FAC Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. Hypochaeris radicata 5 no FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. Geranium robertianum 5 no FACU 1 – Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6. 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.01 7. 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. 9. 5 - Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 11. 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 50% = 27.5, 20% = 11 55 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 2. 50% = , 20% = = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 45 Remarks: *mowed grasses assumed FAC-Hydrophytic vegetation criterion is met because there is greater than 50% dominance by FAC species. Project Site: 60 Pinto Laane City/County: Brinnon/Jefferson Sampling Date: 2/12/21 Applicant/Owner: Bing Selvog State: WA Sampling Point: TP 1 Investigator(s): J. Bartlett Section, Township, Range: S 34 T 26 N R 2 WWM Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 1-2 Subregion (LRR): LRRA Lat: 47.074 Long: -122.924 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Bf Belfast fine sandy loam NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology , significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology , naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks: These lots are located within a residential development and are partially developed. They are both primarily composed of maintained grasses with a garage/shop on the eastern lot and an above ground drainfield exists on the western lot. Test Plot 1 was conducted in the low area at the northeast corner. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast – Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: TP 1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 3/2 100 gr sa lo 12-20 2.5Y 3/2 100 gr sa lo gr - gravelly sa - sandy lo - loam 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix, RC=Root Channel Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Matrix (F3) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if present): Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: The hydric soil criterion is not met because the matrix chroma in both layers is too high and there are no redoximorphic concentrations. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (B11) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Stunted or Stresses Plants (D1) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? (includes capillary fringe) Yes No Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: The wetland hydrology criterion is not met because there was no water present during the field visit and there was no evidence of long term hydrology. Project Site: 60 Pinto Lane Up Front Parcel Review Parcel Date Completed: Owner Name: Add. Name: Mailing Address: Site Address(es): Parcel Number: S-T-R: --Total Acreage Legal Description Land Use: Flood District:Fire District:Planning Area: Flood Map (FIRM) Panel No: School District Zoning: [ ] Zoning ________________________________________________________________________________ [ ]Setbacks:Front:_______Left Side:__________Right Side: __________ Rear:_______________ Informed by JCC 18.30 or Title 17 for Master Planned Resorts: Shoreline Setback:____________Critical Area Buffer__________________________________________ Building Setback: ______________________________________________________________________ Adjoining Forest Lands: Commercial/ ____________ Rural/______________Inholding_______________ [ ] Lots/Require Declaration of Restrictive Covenant YES NO, submitted: YES NO __________________ [ ] Legal Access to Property YES NO _____________________________________________________ [ ] Parcel Tags or Scanned Documents YES NO List:_________________________________________ [ ] Sepcial Reports Nearby YES NO List:____________________________________________________ [ ] Shoreline Designation: YES NO _______________________________________________________ [ ] Critical Areas Geologically Hazardous Areas YES NO Shoreline Slope Stability:____________Landslide____________Erosion_____Seismic___________ CMZ: none High Risk Moderate Risk Disconnected CMZ__________________________ Report Submitted________________________________________________________________________ FWHCA: YES NO Stream type: __________________________ Pond or Lake < 20 acres________ Marbled murrelet/Spotted owl_____________ marine nearshore______________ Wetlands:YES NO ___________________________________________________________________ Flood:YES NO List FIRM map:_______________________________________________________ Flood Certificate: ______________________________________________________ Aquifer Recharge Area:YES NO___________________________________________________________ SIPZ: none At Risk High Risk Coastal ________________________________________[ ] Site Visit conducted YES NO _____________________________________________________ [ ]Notice Provisions/Disclosure Forest Lands:YES NO Airport YES NO MRL YES NO Agricultural Lands: YES NO No Shooting Zone:YES NO [ ]Archaeology:YES NO _____________________________________________________________ BLD20-00647 01/14/22021 Clarence Selvog Barbara Petzoldt 10950 W. Union Hills Dr. #1324 Sun City, AZ 85373-1558 60 Pinto Lane Brinnon, WA 98320 BLD20-00647 S34 T26N, R 2W .44 Lots 83 and 84, Lazy C Ranch SF Brinnon #4 53031C1283C Brinnon #46 RR-5 4 RR-5 4 4 20'5'5'5' 150 N/A Yes No 4 Yes 4 No No 4 Yes Shoreline Environmental Designation, Shoreline Reaches 4 4 No None None No Yes None No N/A No AE 53031C1283C required Yes SARPA + SUSC None No 4 No No No No Yes 4 No Land Use Requirements [ ] SEPA Required:YES EXEMPT _________________________________________________ [ ] Landscaping Required: Yes No_______________________________________________________ [ ] Parking Spaces Required NO 2 Other_______________________________________________ [ ] Building Height: 35' UBC Standard __________________________________________________ [ ]Stormwater: New Impervious Surface_____________Land Disturbing Activity ________________ Min Req #1 thru #5Stormwater Req's: Min Req #2 Min Req #1 thru #9 Engineering ________________ Drainage District Review Required___________ [ ] Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Submitted: Yes No __________________________________ [ ] Impervious Surface coverage percentage: __________________________________________ Resource Lands & Public: 10%Rural Residential: 25%Rural Industrial: Per UDC Sec 6.7 Rural Commercial: 60%Area of Building Coverage: 60% in Rural Industrial Lands only [ ] ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan case N/A YES ________________________________ New Parcel Tags entered in Permit Plan N/A YES ____________________________________ Special Reports Scanned N/A YES _________________________________________________ [ ] ADU Proposed YES NO Square Footage: ______________________ [ ] Total Building (s) Size:____________________________________________________________ RVC: 20,000 SF CC: 5,000 SF NC: 7,500 SF GC: 10,000 SF All others: subject to septic & water constraints/None specified [ ] Road Classification:_______________________________________________________________ Road Approach:EXISTING NOT REQ'D RAP__________________________________________ [ ] Require Final Zoning Approval/inspection YES NO __________________________________________ [ ] UGA No Protest Agreement YES NO, submitted: YES NO _____________ [ ] Recorded Date of Subdivision:_______________AFN____________________________Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions:_____________________________________<5yrs=Plat Conditions on plat or Old Ordinance Reviewed By: Additional Notes: 4 14984 No No No 4 25% 5892 4 4 Yes N/A N/A 4 Exempt WAC197-11-800(1)(b)(i) 4 No 4 2 4 4 4 No 4 2506sf, New Modular home-1498sf, existing garage- 1008 4 Local access N/A No 4 No No NA 06/29/19664 NA no special conditions NA David Ullrich JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street | Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4450 | email: dcd@co.jefferson.wa.us www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment January 21, 2021 CLARENCE SELVOG BARBARA K PETZOLDT JTWROS 10950 W UNION HILLS DR # 1324 SUN CITY AZ 85373-1558 RE: SITE ADDRESS: 60 PINTO LN CASE #: BLD20-00647 Dear CLARENCE SELVOG: The Department of Community Development is in the process of reviewing your a pplication. The following information is needed to continue review of your project. The proposed manufactured home is within a FEMA Flood Zone, it is required to submit a flood elevation certificate prepared by a Washington State Licensed Engineer or Architect familiar with FEMA regulations per Jefferson County Code (JCC) 15.15.070 (1)(b)(iii). The manufactured home must be elevated on a permanent foundation such that the lowest floor of the manufactured home is elevated one foot or more above the base flood elevation and be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system to resist flotation, collapse and lateral movement per JCC 15.15.080(2) (c). Additionally, the proposal is required to meet federal FEMA regulations which includes the requirement of a Habitat Assessment by a Washington State Licensed Biologist that directly follows the requirements laid out by the FEMA Puget Sound BiOp Floodplain Ha bitat Assessment Worksheet (attached). In addition, the FEMA flood zone extends the shoreline jurisdiction to cover all of your parcel and therefore, requires a shoreline exemption to be approved. Please see the attached form, sign and return it. In addition, the shoreline exemption requires additional fees. Please see the attached invoice. The proposal includes two parcels, they must be combined or tied together to approve the building permit. You can apply for a lot consolidation land use permit to permanently combine the lots together to one parcel or you can complete a restrictive covenant that ties the parcels together until the building and other components are removed. Please see the attached restrictive covenant, have it notarized and then return the original to Jefferson County Community Development for Administrator Approval. Once the document receives administrative approval, the land use planner will contact you to record the document with the Jefferson County Auditor. Finally, the proposed project is within a seismic hazard. JCC 18.22 requires a geotechnical evaluation for this property. Alternatively, you may submit a request for a geotechnical report waiver to be reviewed. Please submit the above information to the Department of Community Development within 90 days of the date of this letter which would be 4/21/2021. Please call 360-379-4450 to speak with the assigned planner if you have any questions. Sincerely, _____________________________________ David Ullrich Department of Community Development Staff JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street | Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4450 | email: dcd@co.jefferson.wa.us www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment April 2, 2021 CLARENCE SELVOG BARBARA K PETZOLDT JTWROS 10950 W UNION HILLS DR # 1324 SUN CITY AZ 85373-1558 RE: SITE ADDRESS: 60 PINTO LN CASE #: BLD2020-00647 Dear CLARENCE SELVOG: The Department of Community Development is in the process of reviewing your application. The following information is needed to continue review of your project. The submitted FEMA Flood Elevation Certificate indicates a Base Flood Elevation of 73.2 feet. Additionally, the FEMA firm panel 53031C1283C confirms this elevation. Per Jefferson Count y Code (JCC) 15.15.080 (2)(c):"Manufactured homes. All manufactured homes in the floodplain to be placed or substantially improved on sites shall be elevated on a permanent foundation such that the lowest floor of the manufactured home is elevated one foot or more above the base flood elevation and be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system to resist flotation, collapse and lateral movement." From a building standpoint, this requires an engineered foundation plan with attachment points and engineered flood openings for the foundation. Please contact our plans examiner at jkmonore@co.jefferson.wa.us or 360-379-4461 with questions. Jefferson County has mapped your parcel as a geologically hazardous area. The proposed location of the new manufactured home is within this geologically hazardous area, please submit Geotechnical Report Waiver or a Geotechnical Report prepared by a qualified professional with a state stamp that addresses 18.22 JCC and supports the proposed location of the building. Please submit the above information to the Department of Community Development within 90 days of the date of this letter which would be 7/1/2021. Please call 360-379-4463 to speak with the assigned planner if you have any questions. Sincerely, _____________________________________ David Ullrich Department of Community Development Staff JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street | Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4450 | email: dcd@co.jefferson.wa.us www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment April 2, 2021 CLARENCE SELVOG BARBARA K PETZOLDT JTWROS 10950 W UNION HILLS DR # 1324 SUN CITY AZ 85373-1558 RE: SITE ADDRESS: 60 PINTO LN CASE #: BLD2020-00647 Dear CLARENCE SELVOG: The Department of Community Development is in the process of reviewing your application. The following information is needed to continue review of your project. The submitted FEMA Flood Elevation Certificate indicates a Base Flood Elevation of 73.2 feet. Additionally, the FEMA firm panel 53031C1283C confirms this elevation. Per Jefferson County Code (JCC) 15.15.080 (2)(c):"Manufactured homes. All manufactured homes in the floodplain to be placed or substantially improved on sites shall be elevated on a permanent foundation such that the lowest floor of the manufactured home is elevated one foot or more above the base flood elevation and be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system to resist flotation, collapse and lateral movement." From a building standpoint, this requires an engineered foundation plan with attachment points and engineered flood openings for the foundation. Please contact our plans examiner at jkmonore@co.jefferson.wa.us or 360-379-4461 with questions. Jefferson County has mapped your parcel as a geologically hazardous area. The proposed location of the new manufactured home is within this geologically hazardous area, please submit Geotechnical Report Waiver or a Geotechnical Report prepared b y a qualified professional with a state stamp that addresses 18.22 JCC and supports the proposed location of the building. Please submit the above information to the Department of Community Development within 90 days of the date of this letter which would be 7/1/2021. Please call 360-379-4463 to speak with the assigned planner if you have any questions. Sincerely, _____________________________________ David Ullrich Department of Community Development Staff TO: Austin Watkins, Interim Director / UDC Administrator FROM: David D. Ullrich, Assistant/Associate Planner DATE: April 19, 2021 RE: 60 Pinto Lane, Brinnon WA 98320 Geotechnical Report Waiver Request – Approval Recommendation Clarence Selvog and Barbara Petzoldt applied for a geotechnical report waiver during the course of a Buildng Permit (BLD2020-00647) and Septic permit (SEP2021-00018) application. They plan to construct a modular home and septic system upgrade. Their property is mapped as a seismic area. I have reviewed the waiver request submitted by Clarence Selvog and Barbara Petzoldt, available map and data, and completed the attached geohazard checklist. They will implement applicable best management practices during construction. The building area has a slope of about 4% and the parcel has an overall slope of 4%. Based on our available data, the building site, proposed development, and analysis from the geohazard checklist I find that the standards for a geotechnical report waiver, under Jefferson County Code 18.22.910, have been satisfied. ___ Approved ___ Denied ______________________________________________ Austin Watkins, Interim Director / UDC Administrator Attachments: Supplemental application waiver from special reports Geohazard Checklist Site Plan Geohazard Checklist 1. Which of the following are mapped on-site? Land Slide Hazard: Moderate __N/A__ High ____ Recent Landslide ____ Old Slide ____ Erosion: __N/A__ Seismic: _Yes__ Shoreline Slope Stability: Unstable Slope____ Unstable-Recent Slide___ Unstable – Old Slide____ Intermediate_____ Modified ___Stable Slope __X__ Two or more? Yes ____ No _X___ 2. Existing Development? Yes _X__ No ___ Evidence of geohazard? Yes___ No _X__ 3. Is the slope greater than 15 %? (rise/run = %) Yes ____ No _X__ 4. Will the development be less than 35 feet from the top or toe of slope? Yes ____ No __X__ 5. Does the site have a less stable slope form? Yes ____ No __X__ Divergent ____ (most stable) Planar __X__ (more stable) Convergent ____ (less stable) 6. Is there any information regarding stability of the soil e.g. septic soil logs, NRSC soil survey etc. Yes ____ No___ 7. What type of vegetation on-site? Heavily Vegetated with Native (most stable) ____ not well vegetated (less stable) __X__ Recent Timber Harvest ____ (least stable) 8. Site Visit recommended on moderate or greater risk areas to look for indicators (see list) – Any indicators? Yes ____ No __X__ soil creep with slight raveling on steepest slope 9. Were there any other Geotechnical Report’s done on adjacent properties? Yes ____ No _X___ If yes, did the Geotech indicate a geohazard or unstable slope? Yes ____ No ____ HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN 60 Pinto Lane Jefferson County, Washington Prepared for Bing Selvog 10950 W Union Hills Drive #1324 Sun City, AZ 85373 (509) 948-6924 March 10, 2021 Prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc. 1157 3rd Avenue, Suite 220A • Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 • Project Number 3408.01 Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan i March 10, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................1 STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................1 PROJECT PROPOSAL ........................................................................................................................1 ENVIRONMENTAL AND HABITAT CONDITIONS ...............................................................................1 STATE AND FEDERALLY LISTED SPECIES AND CRITICAL HABITAT ............................................. 1 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE, PRIORITY HABITATS AND SPECIES ........ 2 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM ........ 2 JEFFERSON COUNTY CRITICAL AREA AND HABITAT MAPPING................................................... 2 RESEARCH AND SITE INVESTIGATION ........................................................................................... 3 WILDLIFE INVENTORY ................................................................................................................... 3 CRITICAL AREAS ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................................... 4 IMPACT ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................................................4 No-Net-Loss Assessment .......................................................................................................... 4 LIMITATIONS ...................................................................................................................................5 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................................6 FIGURES & PHOTOPLATES Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Existing Conditions Figure 3 Proposed Conditions Figure 4 Jefferson County Critical Areas Figure 5 WDFW Priority Habitat and Species Photoplates Site Photos Appendix A Wetland Determination Data Form Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan i March 10, 2021 SIGNATURE PAGE The information and data in this report were compiled and prepared under the supervision and direction of the undersigned. ___________________________ Joanne Bartlett, SPWS Senior Biologist Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan 1 March 10, 2021 INTRODUCTION Ecological Land Services, Inc. (ELS) has been contracted by Bing Selvog to complete a habitat management plan (HMP) for the proposed single-family home on property at 60 Pinto Lane, Jefferson County Tax Parcel Nos. 966900076 and 966900077, in Brinnon, Washington. This property is in a portion of Section 34, Township 26 North, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian (Figure 1). STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION These existing platted lots are on the southeast side of Pinto Lane within the residential neighborhood of Lazy C Ranch on the west end of Brinnon (Figure 2). Both lots are currently developed with a garage/shop on the eastern lot (077) and an above-ground septic system on the western lot (076) (Photoplate 3). The remainder of the lots are composed of open maintained grounds with a line of conifer trees along the east property line, a group of large western red cedar trees at the southwest corner, and a small group of coniferous and deciduous trees at the northwest corner (Photoplates 1 and 2). The latter group of trees lies on a raised area at the northwest corner and the remainder of the lots is generally level to gradually sloping down from east to west (Photoplate 2). There is an existing access across the roadside ditch near the shared line between the lots. PROJECT PROPOSAL The two lots are partially developed with a garage/shop on the eastern lot and an aboveground drainfield on the other. A single-family home is proposed between the two existing features (Figure 3). It is positioned to allow direct connection to the existing drainfield and where vegetation removal is limited to a grassy/weedy area (Photoplate 3). None of the native woody vegetation on these lots will be removed to accommodate the home. ENVIRONMENTAL AND HABITAT CONDITIONS STATE AND FEDERALLY LISTED SPECIES AND CRITICAL HABITAT Federally listed fish, bird, and mammals within the Olympic National Park and Jefferson County were identified using the WDFW, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries, and United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) websites and are presented in Table 1. State and federal status and presence of critical habitat are also included in the table. Table 1: State and Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species and Critical Habitat Species, ESU1 or DPS2 State Status4 Federal Status3 Critical Habitat5 in Project Vicinity Fish Puget Sound ESU Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Candidate Threatened Yes Hood Canal Summer-run Chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) Candidate Threatened Yes Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Candidate Threatened No Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma) None PST No Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan 2 March 10, 2021 Species, ESU1 or DPS2 State Status4 Federal Status3 Critical Habitat5 in Project Vicinity Birds Marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) Endangered Threatened No Yellow-billed Cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus) Endangered Threatened No Streaked Horned lark (Eremophila alpestris strigata) Endangered Threatened No 1) ESU - Evolutionarily Significant Unit. A distinct group of Pacific salmon. 2) DPS – Distinct Population Unit. 3) Endangered - In danger of becoming extinct or extirpated; Threatened - Likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range and that has been formally listed as such in the Federal Register under the Federal Endangered Species Act; Sensitive - Vulnerable or declining and could become Endangered or Threatened in the state; Species of Concern - An unofficial status, the species appears to be in jeopardy, but insufficient information to support listing. State candidate species include fish and wildlife species that the Department will review for possible listing as State Endangered, Threatened, or Sensitive. A species will be considered for designation as a State Candidate if sufficient evidence suggests that its status may meet the listing criteria defined for State Endangered, Threatened, or Sensitive. 4) WDFW, PHS website 2021 5) NOAA 2021 6) USFWS 2021 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE, PRIORITY HABITATS AND SPECIES The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitat and Species (PHS) website (WDFW 2021) identifies presence of priority habitat and species areas within this area of Brinnon as presented in Table 2 (Figure 5). Table 2: WDFW, Priority Habitats and Species Priority Habitat or Species Priority Area Roosevelt elk (Cervus canadensis roosevelti) Regular concentration Harlequin duck (Histrionicus histrionicus) Breeding area Northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) Occurrence WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM The Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR), Natural Heritage Program identifies 19 sensitive, 4 threatened, and 1 endangered species of rare plants in Jefferson County (WDNR 2021). Golden paintbrush is listed as threatened by the WDNR and is also federally listed as threatened (USFWS 2021). JEFFERSON COUNTY CRITICAL AREA AND HABITAT MAPPING The Jefferson County Critical Area Maps viewed through the online mapping website was used to identify the presence of critical areas found within the vicinity of these lots (Figure 4). The map indicates that the lots lie within a large wetland unit and that there is a Type 3 stream to the east. However, there are no wetlands on these lots nor on the lots within this residential development. There is a stream mapped across the development to the northeast of these lots, but a stream channel was not observed in this location. There are spotted owl and marbled murrelet areas mapped offsite to the north. Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan 3 March 10, 2021 RESEARCH AND SITE INVESTIGATION Birds Marbled murrelet Marbled murrelets nest in mature or old-growth forests near coastlines in which the trees are at least 32 inches diameter at breast height (dbh) with a multistoried canopy, moderate to high canopy closure or an open crown canopy. Large vertical and horizontal snags are also present at various stages of decay. These birds more commonly nest in forest stands that are greater than 500 acres and less commonly nest in stands less than 100 acres. Murrelets typically utilize the largest tree in the stand for their nests. Yellow-billed cuckoo Yellow-billed cuckoos are found in deciduous forests where they forage in dense trees and shrubs. They nest in a tree or shrub usually 2 to 12 feet above the ground typically on a flimsy platform of short twigs on a horizontal branch. Streaked horned lark Streaked horned larks are found in prairie and grassland, coastal beaches, and sparsely vegetated shorelines along the lower Columbia River. This species nests and feeds in bare areas of fields and pastures. Spotted owl Spotted owls are found in low to mid-elevation mature to old growth forests with dense canopies consisting mainly of Douglas fir having several vertical layers of vegetation. They nest in trees with broken tops and other natural hollows and in old stick nests of other species. Harlequin ducks Harlequin ducks are found in fast flowing rivers during the breeding season and move to slower flowing water when with chicks. Rivers with islands or sand bars are preferred habitat for resting and they are found in rocky coastal cliffs in the winter months. They nest in holes in trees, rocky ledges, and occasionally on the ground. Plants The WDNR lists 24 sensitive, threatened, and endangered species that occur within Jefferson County (WDNR 2021). The lots for which this assessment was completed are partially developed and regularly maintained so there was no suitable habitat for the listed plant species. None of these species were observed on these lots and there was no suitable habitat noted within the residential development. Wildlife Inventory The January 2021 site visit observed no suitable habitat for the listed species as described above. There are small groupings of trees on the lots, but they do not represent part of mature or old-growth forest and include only a few deciduous trees. The research conducted for this project indicates that the lots are not within critical habitat for any of the listed species. No other wildlife species were observed on these lots during the site visit. Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan 4 March 10, 2021 Critical Areas Assessment The lots within this residential subdivision are mapped as containing wetlands according to the Jefferson County Critical Areas map (Figure 4). The vegetation conditions, which include maintained open land and pockets of trees, are not indicative of wetlands. Data to confirm the absence of wetlands was collected in the lowest elevation area of the lots, which is in the northeast corner where the vegetation was dominated by maintained grasses, hairy cat’s ear (Hypochaeris radicata, FACU), and creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens, FAC). The soil profile in this area was composed of two compacted gravelly sandy loam layers. The upper 12 inches had a brown (10YR 3/2) matrix color and below 12 inches, the soil had a yellow brown (2.5Y 3/2) matrix color. Redoximorphic concentrations were not observed within either layer of the soil. Water was not present during the February 12, 2021 site visit and there was no evidence of wetland hydrology. There was also no evidence of water elsewhere on these lots. The vegetation criterion was met because there was greater than 50 percent dominance by FAC species, but the area was determined to upland because there were no positive indicators present for hydric soils or wetland hydrology. The data collected in this area is indicative of conditions across the remainder of these lots, which slope up to the southwest and west. There were no wetlands or streams observed within 300 feet of the lots because of the dense residential development on all sides. IMPACT ASSESSMENT These lots are currently partially developed with a garage/shop on the eastern lot with groups of trees on two sides. The western lot is undeveloped except for an existing aboveground drainfield. A single-family home is proposed between the garage/shop and drainfield where maintained grass dominates. The existing onsite structures were constructed without removal of any of the existing groups of trees and because the home is proposed between the garage/shop and drainfield, there will be no removal of woody vegetation for the current proposal. Therefore, the vegetation conditions onsite will not change except where the house will be constructed (removal of the grass and weeds) and will not change the condition of any potential habitat. No-Net-Loss Assessment The single-family home will introduce a new building to the neighborhood but because the surrounding lots are fully developed, there will be no change to the habitat available to the listed species. There will also be no change to the noise levels that can affect habitat use by the listed species because of the developed conditions in this area. Stormwater generated on the developed lots will discharge into the roadside ditch along the north line. There will be no increase to the amount of stormwater onsite because of the current compacted conditions of the lots and the placement of only a single residence. Because this project proposes no change to any suitable habitat for the listed species and there will be no new impacts to habitat or critical areas , mitigation is not proposed. Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan 5 March 10, 2021 LIMITATIONS ELS bases this report’s determinations on standard scientific methodology and best professional judgment. In our opinion, local, state, and federal regulatory agencies should agree with our determinations. However, the information contained in this report should be considered preliminary and used at your own risk until it has been approved in writing by the appropriate regulatory agencies. ELS is not responsible for the impacts of any changes in environmental standards, practices, or regulations after the date of this report. Bing Selvog-60 Pinto Lane Ecological Land Services, Inc. Habitat Management Plan 6 March 10, 2021 REFERENCES Jefferson County Code (JCC). 2020. Chapter 18.22 Critical Areas, Article VI Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas. Jefferson County Tax Public Land Records. 2021. https://gisweb.jeffcowa.us/LandRecords/. Website accessed February 2021. NOAA Fisheries (NOAA). 2021. Protected Resources App-West Coast Region. https://www.webapps.nwfsc.noaa.gov/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=7514c715 b8594944a6e468dd25aaacc9. Website accessed February 2021. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021. Information for Planning and Conservation (IPaC) Website. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/. Website accessed February 2021. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 2021. Priority Habitats and Species PHS on the Web. https://geodataservices.wdfw.wa.gov/hp/phs/ Website accessed February 2021. Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR). 2021. Natural Heritage Program Website. http://www.dnr.wa.gov/natural-heritage-program. Accessed February 2021. FIGURES & PHOTOPLATES 47.7043° Latitude -122.9248° Longitude SITE 3/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 1 7 : 4 6 A M C: \ U s e r s \ C P a y n e \ B o x \ E L S \ W A \ J e f f e r s o n \ C o u n t y \ 3 4 0 8 - S e l v o g \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - 6 0 P i n t o L a n e H M P \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - F i g u r e s C A D O n l y \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 . d w g Cp a y n e N 6 :( DA T E : DW N : RE Q . B Y : PR J . M G R : CH K : PR O J E C T N O : Fi g u r e 1 VI C I N I T Y M A P 3/ 1 0 / 2 1 34 0 8 . 0 1 60 P i n t o L a n e H M P Bi n g S e l v o g Se c t i o n 34 , T o w n s h i p 26 N , R a n g e 2W , W . M . Je f f e r s o n C o u n t y , Wa s h i n g t o n CD P JB JB JL L SC A L E I N F E E T 0 20 0 0 40 0 0 11 5 7 3 r d A v e . , S u i t e 2 2 0 A Lo n g v i e w , W A 9 8 6 3 2 Ph o n e : ( 3 6 0 ) 5 7 8 - 1 3 7 1 Fa x : ( 3 6 0 ) 4 1 4 - 9 3 0 5 ww w . e c o - l a n d . c o m LOCATION MAP WASHINGTON SITE NOTE: Quadrangle topographic map from USGS. PROJECT VICINITY MAP SCALE IN MILES 520 Mt. St. Helens SKAMANIA N. Bonneville Stevenson Carson 14 WashougalCamas Vancouver Battle Ground Woodland Ridgefield CLARK 5 500 503 205 Kalama Longview ToutleCastle Rock COWLITZ 504 4Cathlamet WAHKIAKUM 6 101 401 103 105 PACIFIC Ilwaco Long Beach Ocean Park South Bend Raymond 101Westport Ocean Shores Copalis Beach Pacific Beach Taholah Quinalt Aberdeen Montesano Elma Oakville 12 8 105 109 101 GRAYS HARBOR Queets 101 Kalaloch Port Townsend Port Ludlow Quilcene Brinnon 101 19 104 20 JEFFERSON CLALLAMForks110 101 113 112 101 112 Port Angeles Sequim Neah Bay Clallam Bay Friday Harbor Blaine Ferndale Bellingham 542 542 9 Lynden5 539 SAN JUAN WHATCOM ConcreteAnacortes Mount Vernon Sedro-Woolley 5 20 11 530 SKAGIT Lynnwood Mulkiteo Everett Marysville Monroe Arlington Darrington 5 9 2522 SNOHOMISH Mt St Helens KING Seattle Shoreline 90 Carnation North Bend Redmond Enumclaw Auburn Issaquah Burien Kent Renton 405 18 169 410 169 202 Mt. Rainier Eatonville 4 Puyallup Tacoma Gig Harbor 165 162 164 161 7 702 507 Roy DuPont Carbonado 5 5 Olympia Shelton Yelm Tenino 508 Centralia Chehalis Pe Ell Morton 12 Toledo 7 505 Winlock PIERCE LEWIS THURSTON 5 5 KITSAP Poulsbo 3 16 Bremerton SITE Do u g l a s F i r ( 1 ) - 2 4 " d b h Do u g l a s F i r ( 2 ) - 4 8 " d b h We s t e r n R e d C e d a r ( 5 ) - 6 t o 1 6 " d b h Bi g l e a f M a p l e ( 1 ) We s t e r n R e d Ce d a r M u l t i T r u n k e d ( 4 ) - 4 8 t o 6 0 " d b h -1 0 0 ' t a l l Yo u n g D o u g l a s F i r T r e e s - 2 0 ' t a l l Gr a n d F i r ( 1 ) - 3 6 " d b h Do u g l a s F i r ( 1 ) - 3 6 " d b h Si t k a S p r u c e ( 1 ) - 3 6 " d b h Pin t o L n Ex . S e p t i c S y s t e m Mo r g a n L n Ex . G a r a g e / S h o p TP - 1 3/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 1 7 : 4 6 A M C: \ U s e r s \ C P a y n e \ B o x \ E L S \ W A \ J e f f e r s o n \ C o u n t y \ 3 4 0 8 - S e l v o g \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - 6 0 P i n t o L a n e H M P \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - F i g u r e s C A D O n l y \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 . d w g Cp a y n e N 6 : ( DA T E : DW N : RE Q . B Y : PR J . M G R : CH K : PR O J E C T N O : 11 5 7 3 r d A v e . , S u i t e 2 2 0 A Lo n g v i e w , W A 9 8 6 3 2 Ph o n e : ( 3 6 0 ) 5 7 8 - 1 3 7 1 Fa x : ( 3 6 0 ) 4 1 4 - 9 3 0 5 ww w . e c o - l a n d . c o m DA T E : DW N : RE Q . B Y : PR J . M G R : CH K : PR O J E C T N O : Figure 2 EX I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S 3/ 1 0 / 2 1 34 0 8 . 0 1 60 P i n t o L a n e H M P Bing Selvog Se c t i o n 34 , T o w n s h i p 26N , Range 2W , W.M. Je f f e r s o n C o u n t y , Washington CD P JB JB JL L SC A L E I N F E E T 0 60 12 0 NO T E ( S ) : 1. Ae r i a l f r o m G o o g l e E a r t h ™ 2. We t l a n d a n d t e s t p l o t s l o c a t e d u s i n g h a n d h e l d G P S w i t h s u b m e t e r a c c u r a c y . SI T E LEGEND:Site Boundary Parcel Boundary Dripline Boundary Test Plot Location TP - 1 3/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 1 7 : 4 6 A M C: \ U s e r s \ C P a y n e \ B o x \ E L S \ W A \ J e f f e r s o n \ C o u n t y \ 3 4 0 8 - S e l v o g \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - 6 0 P i n t o L a n e H M P \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - F i g u r e s C A D O n l y \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 . d w g Cp a y n e N 6 : ( DA T E : DW N : RE Q . B Y : PR J . M G R : CH K : PR O J E C T N O : 11 5 7 3 r d A v e . , S u i t e 2 2 0 A Lo n g v i e w , W A 9 8 6 3 2 Ph o n e : ( 3 6 0 ) 5 7 8 - 1 3 7 1 Fa x : ( 3 6 0 ) 4 1 4 - 9 3 0 5 ww w . e c o - l a n d . c o m LEGEND:Site Boundary Parcel Boundary DA T E : DW N : RE Q . B Y : PR J . M G R : CH K : PR O J E C T N O : Figure 3 PR O P O S E D C O N D I T I O N S 3/ 1 0 / 2 1 34 0 8 . 0 1 60 P i n t o L a n e H M P Bing Selvog Se c t i o n 34 , T o w n s h i p 26N , Range 2W , W.M. Je f f e r s o n C o u n t y , Washington CD P JB JB JL L SC A L E I N F E E T 0 40 80 NO T E ( S ) : 1. Si t e p l a n f r o m C r e a t i v e D e s i g n S o l u t i o n s . SI T E 3/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 1 7 : 4 6 A M C: \ U s e r s \ C P a y n e \ B o x \ E L S \ W A \ J e f f e r s o n \ C o u n t y \ 3 4 0 8 - S e l v o g \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - 6 0 P i n t o L a n e H M P \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - F i g u r e s C A D O n l y \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 . d w g Cp a y n e SITE N 6 :( DA T E : DW N : RE Q . B Y : PR J . M G R : CH K : PR O J E C T N O : Fi g u r e 4 JE F F E R S O N C O U N T Y C R I T I C A L A R E A S 3/ 1 0 / 2 1 34 0 8 . 0 1 60 P i n t o L a n e H M P Bi n g S e l v o g Se c t i o n 34 , T o w n s h i p 26 N , R a n g e 2W , W . M . Je f f e r s o n C o u n t y , Wa s h i n g t o n CD P JB JB JL L SC A L E I N F E E T 0 20 0 40 0 11 5 7 3 r d A v e . , S u i t e 2 2 0 A Lo n g v i e w , W A 9 8 6 3 2 Ph o n e : ( 3 6 0 ) 5 7 8 - 1 3 7 1 Fa x : ( 3 6 0 ) 4 1 4 - 9 3 0 5 ww w . e c o - l a n d . c o m NOTE(S): 1.Map provided on-line by Jefferson County at web address: https://jeffcowa.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer Sheet: 1 File: ..\..\..\..\..\..\..\..\Downloads\Legend.pdf Missing or invalid reference NOTE: Map provided on-line by Washington State Department of Fish & Wildlife at web address: http://apps.wdfw.wa.gov/phsontheweb/ SITE 3/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 1 7 : 4 6 A M C: \ U s e r s \ C P a y n e \ B o x \ E L S \ W A \ J e f f e r s o n \ C o u n t y \ 3 4 0 8 - S e l v o g \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - 6 0 P i n t o L a n e H M P \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 - F i g u r e s C A D O n l y \ 3 4 0 8 . 0 1 . d w g Cp a y n e N 6 :( DA T E : DW N : RE Q . B Y : PR J . M G R : CH K : PR O J E C T N O : Fi g u r e 5 WD F W P R I O R I T Y H A B I T A T A N D S P E C I E S 3/ 1 0 / 2 1 34 0 8 . 0 1 60 P i n t o L a n e H M P Bi n g S e l v o g Se c t i o n 34 , T o w n s h i p 26 N , R a n g e 2W , W . M . Je f f e r s o n C o u n t y , Wa s h i n g t o n CD P JB JB JL L SC A L E I N F E E T 0 25 0 50 0 11 5 7 3 r d A v e . , S u i t e 2 2 0 A Lo n g v i e w , W A 9 8 6 3 2 Ph o n e : ( 3 6 0 ) 5 7 8 - 1 3 7 1 Fa x : ( 3 6 0 ) 4 1 4 - 9 3 0 5 ww w . e c o - l a n d . c o m Dosewallips River LEGEND: Elk - Regular Concentrarion Harlequin Duck - Breading Area Northern Spotted Owl - -Occurrence 1157 3rd Ave., Suite 220A Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 Fax: (360) 414-9305 DATE: 2/23/21 DWN: JB PRJ. MGR: JB PROJ. #: 3408.01 Photoplate 1 Project Name: 60 Pinto Lane Client: Bing Selvog Jefferson County, Washington Photo 1 was taken from the northwest corner of the two lots at 60 Pinto Lane. It looks north along Pinto Lane; the driveway in this photo leads to the home just north of these lots. Photo 3 was taken from the same location as Photos 1 and 2. It looks southeasterly across the lots toward the southern of the two lots. Photo 2 was taken from the same location as Photo 1 and looks east along the north edge of the lots. The trees in this view line the north property line next to the existing garage. 1157 3rd Ave., Suite 220A Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 Fax: (360) 414-9305 DATE: 2/23/21 DWN: JB PRJ. MGR: JB PROJ. #: 3408.01 Photoplate 2 Project Name: 60 Pinto Lane Client: Bing Selvog Jefferson County, Washington Photo 4 was taken from about midway along the south property line and looks west toward Pinto Lane. There is a small group of trees on the raised hummock at the southwest corner. Photo 6 was taken from the same location as Photos 4 and 5. It looks easterly toward the southeast corner. There is a group of large cedars in this location. There are homes visible beyond the trees. Photo 5 was taken from the same location as Photo 4 and looks north across the lots. The existing garage is in the background with the existing drainfield visible on the middle right. 1157 3rd Ave., Suite 220A Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 Fax: (360) 414-9305 DATE: 2/23/21 DWN: JB PRJ. MGR: JB PROJ. #: 3408.01 Photoplate 3 Project Name: 60 Pinto Lane Client: Bing Selvog Jefferson County, Washington Photo 7 was taken from the driveway entrance, which lies near the middle of the two lots. It looks northeasterly across the north lot toward the existing garage. Photo 9 was taken from the same location as Photos 7 and 8. It looks southeasterly across the southern of the two lots. The home will be located in this area. Photo 8 was taken from the same location as Photo 7 and looks easterly across the center of the two lots. The home is proposed to the right of the garage/shop. APPENDIX A US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast – Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region VEGETATION – Use scientific names of plants Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Dominance Test Worksheet: 1. Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. 3. Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 4. 50% = , 20% = = Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OBL species x1 = 4. FACW species x2 = 5. FAC species x3 = 50% = , 20% = = Total Cover FACU species x4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) UPL species x5 = 1. mowed grasses* 35 yes FAC Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Ranunculus repens 10 no FAC Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. Hypochaeris radicata 5 no FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. Geranium robertianum 5 no FACU 1 – Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6. 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.01 7. 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. 9. 5 - Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 11. 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 50% = 27.5, 20% = 11 55 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 2. 50% = , 20% = = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 45 Remarks: *mowed grasses assumed FAC-Hydrophytic vegetation criterion is met because there is greater than 50% dominance by FAC species. Project Site: 60 Pinto Laane City/County: Brinnon/Jefferson Sampling Date: 2/12/21 Applicant/Owner: Bing Selvog State: WA Sampling Point: TP 1 Investigator(s): J. Bartlett Section, Township, Range: S 34 T 26 N R 2 WWM Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 1-2 Subregion (LRR): LRRA Lat: 47.074 Long: -122.924 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Bf Belfast fine sandy loam NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology , significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology , naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks: These lots are located within a residential development and are partially developed. They are both primarily composed of maintained grasses with a garage/shop on the eastern lot and an above ground drainfield exists on the western lot. Test Plot 1 was conducted in the low area at the northeast corner. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast – Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: TP 1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 3/2 100 gr sa lo 12-20 2.5Y 3/2 100 gr sa lo gr - gravelly sa - sandy lo - loam 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix, RC=Root Channel Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Matrix (F3) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if present): Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: The hydric soil criterion is not met because the matrix chroma in both layers is too high and there are no redoximorphic concentrations. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (B11) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Stunted or Stresses Plants (D1) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? (includes capillary fringe) Yes No Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: The wetland hydrology criterion is not met because there was no water present during the field visit and there was no evidence of long term hydrology. Project Site: 60 Pinto Lane Page 1 of 2 AFTER RECORDING, RETURN TO: Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Avenue Port Townsend, WA 98368 HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT Grantee: Clarence Selvog and Barbara Petzoldt 60 Pinto Lane Brinnon, WA 98320 Grantor: Jefferson County Department of Community Development, a political subdivision and governmental entity within Washington State. Property: Assessor’s property tax parcel no.: 966900076, 966900077 Legal description: Lots 83 and 84 Lazy C Ranch Address: 60 Pinto Lane, Brinnon, WA 98320 Please read this form carefully and be aware that, in applying for and receiving a permit for development, you are knowingly and willfully seeking a waiver from the requirement of a professional geotechnical report describing your Property, proposed development, and potential risk of earth movement. Your Property contains a mapped Geologically Hazardous Area, a Critical Area as defined by Chapter 18.22 of the Jefferson County Code. Mapped Geologically Hazardous Areas may contain site features, such as soil, hydrology, or topography features that increase the risk of earth movement, which may present a risk to life and property. In accordance with permitting the construction of the items described and listed below within an Environmentally Sensitive Area, Applicant(s) acknowledge and agree as follows: 1. Applicant(s) desire to construct a Septic system update and modular home. The Property is located within a Geologically Hazardous Area within a Seismic Hazard area. Applicant(s) agree that they are fully aware of the risks inherent in development in a Geologically Hazardous Area. 2. Applicant(s), as their own free and voluntary act, accept, and assume all risks of loss or damage arising out of the conditions described herein and further agree to relieve Jefferson County, its agencies, divisions, officers, agents, and employees of any liability, damages, claims, or other expenses arising as a result of or allegedly as the result of the approval of the development and the approval of the Applicant(s)’ proposed development. 3. Applicant(s) agrees to and shall hold harmless and indemnify the Jefferson County, its agencies, divisions, officers, agents, and employees from and against any and all liability, loss, claims, suits, damages, costs, expenses (including attorney’s fees) that may arise at any time, occur or be generated as a result of any reduction in the fair market value of the Applicant(s)’ Property and/or any damage to personal property or personal injury by reason of the conditions existing now or any time hereafter on or around the Applicant(s)’ Property or due to any design, development, or construction pursuant to the building permit, stormwater management system approval, septic permit, or any other development permits issues thereunder by the Jefferson Page 2 of 2 County, its agencies, divisions, employees, agents, officers, or representatives pursuant to any then applicable state statute, administrative code, regulation, or Jefferson County ordinance. 4. If any term of this Waiver is to any extent invalid, illegal, or incapable of being enforced, such term shall be excluded to the extent of such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability; all other terms shall remain in full force and effect. 5. All associated permits must be obtained or development must be substantially started within one-year from the effective date of this Waiver. If this condition is not met, the Waiver shall be void. 6. Development and associated permits must substantially comply with the Exhibit “A” Site or Development Plan. 7. The approved site plan is in the Department of Community Development case file: BLD2020- 00647 and/or SEP2021-00018. 8. This Waiver is not a permit of any type. Applicant(s): ___________________________________ _____________________ Owner Date ___________________________________ _____________________ Owner Date Dated this day of ____________________, 20__. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) On this day personally appeared before me, ___________________________________, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal this day of , 20__. _______________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at _________________________________ My commission expires: ______________________ Approved: __________________ UDC Administrator Date Jefferson County Department of Community Development Development Review Division 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT Grantors: ___________________________________________________ Grantee: Jefferson County Department of Community Development THIS DECLARATION is made and entered this day of _______________, 20__, by _______________________________________________, hereinafter referred to as "Owner(s)," the legal and equitable owner(s) of the real property described herein. A. RECITALS 1. Legal Description: This Restrictive Covenant shall affect and restrict the real property ("the property") legally described as follows: Parcel Number __________________________________________ Section __________________Township ___ Range_____________ Subdivision ____________________________________________ Block _________________ Lot(s) _____________________________ staff verification 2. Building Permit Application. The Owner(s) have applied or will apply for a building permit through the Jefferson County Department of Community Development ("the County") to make certain improvements upon the above-described property. 3. Purpose. For purposes of complying with the County's building and land use codes and ordinances, the Owner(s) desire to treat all of the above-described property as one building tract, and in particular, desires to do so for the purpose of constructing a _______________________________________ as required by county code. 4. Assurance to County. The Owner(s) desire to assure the County that the property described above shall be and remain as one building tract for purposes of improvements to be constructed upon the property; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits derived by this Restrictive Covenant, the Owner(s) declare, covenant and agree as follows: Clarence G Selvog and Barbara K Petzoldt JTWROS 21 966900076, 966900077 34 manufactured home Clarence G Selvog and Barbara K Petzoldt JTWROS January 26 N 21 83 and 84 SCCLAZY C RANCH DIV 1 LOT 83 SUBJ/REST COVT #536046 2 W B. COVENANT 1. Specific Restriction and Covenant. The property described above, shall constitute a single building site, and no lot or lots or any part thereof shall be transferred or conveyed in any manner unless and until the building(s), structure(s) are made to conform to the then-existing zoning provisions on a reduced site. This restrictive covenant shall not be removed unless such an action is approved by the County. 2. Covenant Running with the Land. This restrictive covenant affects and restricts the described property and shall be construed as a covenant running with and touching and concerning the land and inuring to the benefit of the Owner(s), the public generally, and the County. 3. Binding upon Successors and Assigns. This restrictive covenant shall bind and restrict the land, the Owner(s), their heirs, grantees, successors and assigns. 4. Recording. Upon its execution, this Declaration shall be recorded with the Jefferson County Auditor. All contracts and deeds or other instruments of conveyance relating to the property or any part thereof shall contain reference to this covenant. 5. Enforcement. In addition to any other party having a legal right to enforce this covenant, the County shall have the right to enforce and compel compliance with this covenant, including all remedies available at law and equity. The County shall have the right in any such proceeding to recover its attorney fees and costs. 6. Compliance with Code Requirements. This Declaration does not amend or modify, nor is it intended to amend or modify any requirements of the County's ordinances or any other law or regulation dealing with or affecting the use of land or construction of improvements upon lands. 7. Estoppel. The Owners by this Declaration specifically estop themselves and all of their successors and assigns and all persons presently or hereafter having any interest in the property from asserting or contending in any manner that this restrictive covenant is not a full and adequate covenant running with the land and binding upon the property. 8. Severance. Invalidation of this covenant by judgment or court order shall not affect any of the other covenants which shall remain in full force and effect. 9. Warranty of Authority. The Owner(s) signing below warrant that they are the sole Owners in fee of the real property described above and are authorized to make this Declaration and so bind the property. 10. Governing Law. This RESTRICTIVE COVENANT shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. 11. Disclaimer. Since no survey was submitted as part of your Restrictive Covenant, the County accepts no liability for what facts a survey might have revealed. A survey might have revealed that a structure or improvement believed to be on the grantor’s property is, in fact, located wholly or partially upon someone else’s property or upon property that is not the subject of this application. But, in the absence of a survey, the GRANTOR bears sole responsibility if such a problem arises. Dated this day of ____________________, 20__. ______________________________ Owner Owner STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) On this day personally appeared before me, ___________________________________, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal this day of , 20__. __________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at _________________________________ My commission expires: ______________________ Approved: __________________ UDC Administrator Date C: Sherrie Shold, Assessor’s Office (send copy of recorded Covenant)