HomeMy WebLinkAboutLog007
~
I
""
t
lI\
J f{~
...~ J 2_
d .d IJ1 /J ~
/~ ~~ t.z~~ ~
\:f\ --"3 ~;- ~ t ~
., (~J J h
~YoJ.) U VI
\1.~1 ~~_ ~ ~____
....,
Q.,.-
.s? ...
-+-; 2~ '::l -k~
." t (J ,>.( \.'1 / ~
. . J. ~ A: ? 'J ~..~~ b.-15 .,
./ ,) . -"'" '../ V ,...
.Q...IJ. I ~ ~ v~ y' .....10
(b J ~ ~ \.J 6' ~-r <cr
~'U \ r (( ,)0 t.:.v" utI t) (~u\
ifl" v , ~) ( '- v _
o @ 6gj 0Q
JEFFERSON COl;. . rv
RECEIVED FROM
'6 ; ~. L
V .!. /':, ~
!!. <-:t..> ~ 3 ' )
~ I J ........V1/O
~- V P 0.0 i-~ ~
.D ;t 1---r L 6 t
,; ?,r>Pj~, ~) ~. jJ~~"- 1
77J"{JJ ~~ ':{b.o_
v L>.. cJ ( -:-: -l ~~ 1" --;y, /.J... j
a::. <,J VI ~'~ !- C'\? "OJ @I
e tY &
€J6rtJ ~
, "f:J.
""" , '
~d1-f;\
':t ? ~
!7 v
.-? ;4 J
~ -3 _)0
~ /"0 ("
qJ, ~~
-{(~
.( 7 M
(f) ~ €)
.....
( 4
s ~
S] ~~
~ J, lI\ \\
e g @(fY
j). [-0
::i
w
~
-
C)
o
...J
:tt
NO, ':~. ('j' 6~ 9- '7
".;",..' \.,"
DATE ~/I /00
BARS.
AMOUNT
/7f)
C')
C
(f)
d
3:
m
:II
C')
o
-0
-<
RECEIVED BY
:)J "'_-::1:":1: TOTAL
A~Q~ # . - - , . ...LOr-L,..
l70
- ~.'.
',,-,
. ~andy Kline
I
'-.'
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd,com]
Monday, April 03, 2000 2:00 PM
rkline@co.jefferson,wa.us
Jon@orminc.com
RE: Pre-Application Meeting for Port Ludlow Marina
Thanks Randy, I'll get a consensus from our group and let you know on the best date,
Regarding SEPA, the OPG land use attorney states that this project should be handled either as an Addendum or
as an Expanded Checklist Hope that helps you in your decision,
>>> Randy Kline <rkline@co,jefferson,wa.us> 03/31/00 10:01AM >>>
Nicole,
I've put together another set of dates that hopefully will work out a little
better for you,
Wednesday, April 19, 2000 - 10:00 am or 2:00 pm
Friday, April 21, 2000 - 10:00 am or 2:00 pm
Tuesday April 25, 2000 - 10:00 am or 2:00 pm
Wednesday, April 26, 2000 - 10:00 am or 2:00 pm
In reference to SEPA, I will be meeting with the Jerry Smith, the Lead
Planner for Port Ludlow, in order to discuss this issue on Monday of next
week. This matter will then be further discussed with our manager on
Thursday. I intend to contact you on Friday with an indciation of the
County's position.
Enjoy the week-end.
Sincerely
Randy Kline
Jefferson County Department
of Community Development
360.379.4464 (ph)
360.379.4451 (fax)
> ----------
> From: Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd,com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 9:01 AM
> To: rkline@co.jefferson.wa,us
> Subject: Re: Pre-Application Meeting for Port Ludlow Marina
>
> I hate to cause problems, but none of those dates work for me (its spring
> break for my kids school and I'll be out the 7th through the 14, So could
> you see if you have any dates starting the week of the 17th? I am
> available the 19th or 21 st and open all of the following week.
>
>
> >>> Randy Kline <rkline@co,jefferson,wa.us> 03/28/00 04:43PM >>>
> Dear Nicole:
>
> I've put together a few potential dates for the Port Ludlow Marina
> Expansion
> pre-application conference, At this point I am available for anyone of
> the
> following:
>
> Friday April 7, 2000 - 10:00 a.m. or 2:00 p,m,
> Monday April 1 0, 2000 - 10:00 a.m. or 2:00 p,m.
> Wednesday April 12, 2000 - 10:00 a.m, or 2:00 p,m.
Page 1
I vo k +0 tJ\~~
Or~\^",
~
...()G ITEM
# 7'
Page Z- Of11-
...-
',-"
>
> Jerry Smith, the Lead Planner for Port Ludlow, will also be attending the
> pre-application conference, Please contact me once you have settled on a
> date,
>
> Sincerely
> Randy Kline
> Jefferson County Department
> of Community Development
> 360,379.4464 (ph)
> 360.379.4451 (fax)
>
>
>
>
I
""--'"/
Page 2
_OG ITEM
'# -Z
Page --3-of~
.....-
t'
"--'"
"-)
,Randy Kline
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
David Alvarez
Monday, April 24, 2000 9: 15 AM
Randy Kline
AI Scalf; Warren Hart
FW: PORT LUDLOW-MARINA EXPANSION
Colleagues:
Here are some messages that relate to the stand-alone marina project It appears that Faith has truly done
her homework and found statutory and ordinance language that prevents the piece-mealing that ORM is trying to to
move forward with, I know you guys are busy but these two messages from Faith are well worth the reading as are
my brilliant (?) e-mails too, You should read everything,
David Alvarez, Extension 219,
-----Original Message-----
From: Faith Lumsden [mailto:flumsden@whidbey,com]
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2000 9:20 AM
To: David Alvarez; 'jon rose'; marcodesaesilva@dwtcom
Cc: AI Scalf
Subject: RE: PORT LUDLOW-MARINA EXPANSION
Jon and Marco - In reviewing the ordinance and David's message below,
please also take a look at RCW 36,70A.362, During our mediation sessions,
one concern of several community members (and of mine) was that there was
not a formal or designated "resort plan" and that infrastructure impacts
had not been fully considered and mitigated. 36,70A.362(4) and (5), The
group, particularly the environmental parties and the north bay residents
originally wanted the environmental review done BEFORE the resort plan was
approved, They bought into the very large scale maximum buildout seen in
section 3,901 of the ordinance because they were assured that nothing would
get built until full environmental review had been completed, There was a
great desire from parts of the group to pin down what really comprised the
resort plan, FL
-----Original Message-----
From: David Alvarez [mailto:dalvarez@co,iefferson,wa.us]
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2000 8:46 AM
To: 'jon rose'; 'faith lumsden'; 'marcodesaesilva@dwtcom'
Subject: FW: PORT LUDLOW-MARINA EXPANSION
Colleagues:
I am forwarding to Jon Rose and the legal staff for ORM at DWT the
following memo which explains the thinking of Faith Lumsden, I agree with
Faith that although the resort can be built in phases, that can only occur,
according to the MPR Ordinance, after SEPA review of the entire resort plan,
which in its present form (MPR Ordinance 3.901) includes 17 items. The
alternative is to have ORM change the resort plan so that the marina is the
sole and entire resort plan, Then, there will have to be a major revision to
the resort plan if other proposals are to someday be built at the resort
area,
Page 1
LOG ITEM
# '7
Page -Y-Of 3 J
.....-
,,--
"
, ,
'-"I
\.",,-,./
,..- Again, I would argue that ORM and the community reached the
. agreement found in the Ordinance and that the marina proposal (as put
forward at this time) would not be in compliance with that agreement
In light of the above, I would hope that ORM would reconsider its
proposal for the expansion of the marina as that proposal now exists, Le"
free-standing from any other proposal for the resort area,
Note to Marco- Do we still need to talk on Tuesday at 2 PM? It
seems all the possible positions have been laid out by everyone including
Faith,
On a separate front, the Development Agreement moves to public
hearing on May 1, Let us put on the back burner any disagreement we might
be having about the marina proposal until after that public hearing,
Note to Faith--If there is money left in your contract and if time
permits, it probably would be good for you to be present at the public
hearing for the Development Agreement
David Alvarez 360 385 9219
-----Orig inal Message-----
From: Faith Lumsden [mailto:f1umsden@whidbey.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2000 2:13 PM
To: David Alvarez
Cc: AI Scalf
Subject: RE: PORT LUDLOW-MARINA EXPANSION
David, I think you are right, the marina expansion is included in what the
group discussed as part of the Resort Plan, Allowing the marina expansion
to proceed without meeting the requirements for a Supplemental EIS does not
fit very well with the language in section 3.9. As I recall, the mediation
group did discuss what would happen if the Resort Plan changed and we looked
at two instances. First, if they wanted to do more than what was set out in
the ordinance at 3.901 , they would have to go through either a major or
minor revision process
For changes that were within the parameters set out in 3,901, but smaller,
there was acknowledgement that the SEIS, if already done, would cover the
smaller projects, If the SEIS had not been done already, then it (the SEIS)
could be scaled back to address the smaller plan, We talked about a smaller
plan, but not one quite this small (marina only),
I do not see an alternative to requiring an SEIS or new EIS prior to or as
part of the marina expansion, Section 3.902 (1) and (6), And the SEIS
needs to cover the actual Resort Plan, not just the marina expansion.
But, here are a few thoughts. The easy way out - in the short term - is to
revise the Resort Plan so it only includes the marina expansion, They still
have to do an SEIS, but only on the marina, not on the whole resort Not a
bad solution - - except they would have to go through a major revision
process later, when they want to do the rest of the resort
The ordinance clearly allows phasing the resort buildout, after completion
of the full SEIS and approval of the full buildout plan, (Remember DCD has
to issue a report with any required changes or mitigating conditions as part
Page 2
LOG ITEM
# I
Page ~Of..l.L
,--
, ~ .'
\.--)
'~
9f the SEPA review), I suppose it might be possible to scope an EIS that
. 'lays out a phasing plan, identifies areas of current concern, but does not
include analysis of the issues except for the first phase, the marina, It's
a bit iffy, but may deserve closer analysis. I want to avoid piecemealing
the review, but certainly understand their desire to expand the marina
without doing a full Resort Plan EIS,
Still the ordinance says and the mediation group expected that the Resort
Plan would get full review before individual pieces of the resort buildout
were undertaken, I think the ordinance is very clear on that point. I
expect to be in the office Monday morning, please give a call if you want to
discuss this.
Re the development agreement, I will be sending over my final report to the
Board and will cc you, I understand the hearing is set for May 1 at 2:00,
Katherine Laird called to see if I was planning to attend, I have not heard
that I am particularly needed, and so am not currently planning to attend,
I expect Katherine will also want to talk about the marina expansion
question. Please let me know if it is all right for me to pass on my
thoughts to her.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Alvarez [mailto:dalvarez@co,iefferson,wa,us]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2000 11 :51 AM
To: 'faith lumsden'
Cc: AI Scalf
Subject: FW: PORT LUDLOW-MARINA EXPANSION
Faith- We (the County and ORM) are really at a deadlock on the issue
listed below. The issues are described below, but the County feels that if
it looks at the 100 slip expansion of the marina outside of the context of
an entire resort plan then the COunty is allowing ORM to do piecemeal-ing of
the resort plan in direct contradiction to the language of the Port Ludlow
MPR Ordinance. Section 3.904. The Ordinance reflects the deal that ORM
came to with the community regardless of whether the WAC's regarding SEPA
allow phased review, Isn't that how you would read it? I am writing to you
because you were present at the table during the talks that were
memorialized into the Port Ludlow MPR Ordinance.
I would appreciate your comments in this regard and would further
appreciate receiving them before 10 AM on Tuesday, April 25th because ORM
has applied for a pre-application conference and I want to resolve this with
their Seattle-based lawyer before I go to a 3-day WAPA conference late next
week,
Thanks, David Alvarez, Phone #360-385-9219.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Alvarez
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 11 :54 AM
> To: 'jon rose'
> Cc: 'faith lumsden'
> Subject: PORT LUDLOW-MARINA EXPANSION
>
> Jon-
>
> I am informed that ORM will be present at the County Dept. of
Page 3
LOG 'TEM
# :t
P~geLOf.3.L,
..--
of (;..._
"--
\ ,
'--"'
, > Community Development for a pre-application hearing on May 3 at 9:30 AM,
~ > I am further informed that the subject of this pre-application meeting is
> to discuss the process of applying for and obtaining the necessary County
> permits for an expansion of the marina by 100 slips, I am also informed
> that at the planner-to-planner level there is some disagreement between
> County staff and ORM staff as to what type of EIS, if any, would be needed
> with respect to the plans to add 100 marina slips, I was told that ORM
> felt an "addendum" to the existing EIS would be enough and the COunty felt
> such a proposal would require a "supplemental" EIS.
>
> This matter has been discussed in some detail by the County with me,
>
>
> I was also under the impression that attorney DeMarco from Tremaine,
> Wright, et al would contact me about this last week. He or she never did,
>
>
> It is our conclusion that Port Ludlow-MPR Ordinance Section 3,902,
> item #1, is controlling, (See page 20 of 26.) That section suggests that
> at a minimum there should be no piecemealing. This proposal for 100 slips
> (which apparently is a freestanding and sole application with respect to
> the Port Ludlow resort area) appears to be precisely an attempt to
> piecemeal.
>
> Section 3.902 of the MPR Ordinance also states that a supplemental
> EIS is needed "prior to issuance of building permits for any new resort
> development." This only serves to dovetail with what is in Section 3,904
> of the MPR Ordinance, which again speaks of a Supplemental EIS.
>
> These are the concerns and the questions that will be posed to ORM
> staff at the pre-application hearing, I see the language of the MPR
> Ordinance as quite straightforward in this regard, Pleasee take these
> statements under advisement, discuss them with your attorney if need be
> and contact me before the pre-application meeting if any questions or
> concerns arise. I generally DO NOT attend pre-application meetings, I am
> at (360) 385-9219.
>
> Please also write back with your list of phone numbers, as I can't
> seem to find them, '
>
> David Alvarez
>
>
>
Page 4
LOG rl EM
# '7
Page .L.oL1l
..-
. ,'l'
~ -
'-
Randy Kline
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
David Alvarez
Monday, April 24, 2000 9:15 AM
Randy Kline
AI Scalf; Warren Hart
FW: PORT LUDLOW-MARINA EXPANSION
Colleagues:
Here are some messages that relate to the stand-alone marina project. It appears that Faith has truly done
her homework and found statutory and ordinance language that prevents the piece-mealing that ORM is trying to to
move forward with. I know you guys are busy but these two messages from Faith are well worth the reading as are
my brilliant (?) e-mails too, You should read everything,
David Alvarez, Extension 219.
-----Original Message-----
From: Faith Lumsden [mailto:flumsden@whidbey.coml
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2000 9:20 AM
To: David Alvarez; 'jon rose'; marcodesaesilva@dwt.com
Cc: AI Scalf
Subject: RE: PORT LUDLOW-MARINA EXPANSION
~~~ ~~~f\
Jon and Marco - In reviewing the ordinance and David's message below,
please also take a look at RCW 36,70A.362. During our mediation sessions,
one concern of several community members (and of mine) was that there was
not a formal or designated "resort plan" and that infrastructure impacts
had not been fully considered and mitigated, 36,70A.362(4) and (5), The
group, particularly the environmental parties and the north bay residents
originally wanted the environmental review done BEFORE the resort plan was
approved, They bought into the very large scale maximum buildout seen in
section 3,901 of the ordinance because they were assured that nothing would
get built until full environmental review had been completed. There was a
great desire from parts of the group to pin down what really comprised the
resort plan, FL
-----Original Message-----
From: David Alvarez [mailto:dalvarez@co,iefferson,wa.usl
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2000 8:46 AM
To: 'jon rose'; 'faith lumsden'; 'marcodesaesilva@dwt.com'
Subject: FW: PORT LUDLOW-MARINA EXPANSION
Colleagues:
I am forwarding to Jon Rose and the legal staff for ORM at DWT the
following memo which explains the thinking of Faith Lumsden. I agree with
Faith that although the resort can be built in phases, that can only occur,
according to the MPR Ordinance, after SEPA review of the entire resort plan,
which in its present form (MPR Ordinance 3,901) includes 17 items. The
alternative is to have ORM change the resort plan so that the marina is the
sole and entire resort plan, Then, there will have to be a major revision to
the resort plan if other proposals are to someday be built at the resort
area.
Page 1
, I .c.jvJ
#
-'j
r-
Page LQf-SL
'-'"
Again, I would argue that ORM and the community reached the
agreement found in the Ordinance and that the marina proposal (as put
forward at this time) would not be in compliance with that agreement.
In light of the above, I would hope that ORM would reconsider its
proposal for the expansion of the marina as that proposal now exists, Le"
free-standing from any other proposal for the resort area.
Note to Marco- Do we still need to talk on Tuesday at 2 PM? It
seems all the possible positions have been laid out by everyone including
Faith.
On a separate front, the Development Agreement moves to public
hearing on May 1. Let us put on the back burner any disagreement we might
be having about the marina proposal until after that public hearing,
Note to Faith--If there is money left in your contract and if time
permits, it probably would be good for you to be present at the public
hearing for the Development Agreement.
David Alvarez 3603859219
-----Original Message-----
From: Faith Lumsden [mailto:f1umsdenaI1whidbey,com]
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 20002:13 PM
To: David Alvarez
Cc: AI Scalf
Subject: RE: PORT LUDLOW-MARINA EXPANSION
David, I think you are right, the marina expansion is included in what the
group discussed as part of the Resort Plan. Allowing the marina expansion
to proceed without meeting the requirements for a Supplemental EIS does not
fit very well with the language in section 3.9. As I recall, the mediation
group did discuss what would happen if the Resort Plan changed and we looked
at two instances, First, if they wanted to do more than what was set out in
the ordinance at 3,901, they would have to go through either a major or
minor revision process
For changes that were within the parameters set out in 3,901, but smaller,
there was acknowledgement that the SEIS, if already done, would cover the
smaller projects. If the SEIS had not been done already, then it (the SEIS)
could be scaled back to address the smaller plan, We talked about a smaller
plan, but not one quite this small (marina only).
I do not see an alternative to requiring an SEIS or new EIS prior to or as
part of the marina expansion. Section 3.902 (1) and (6). And the SEIS
needs to cover the actual Resort Plan, not just the marina expansion.
But, here are a few thoughts, The easy way out - in the short term - is to
revise the Resort Plan so it only includes the marina expansion, They still
have to do an SEIS, but only on the marina, not on the whole resort. Not a
bad solution - - except they would have to go through a major revision
process later, when they want to do the rest of the resort.
The ordinance clearly allows phasing the resort buildout, after completion
of the full SEIS and approval of the full buildout plan. (Remember DCD has
to issue a report with any required changes or mitigating conditions as part
Page 2 LOG ITEM
# 7 Page ~Of..&..
~
I
~.
of the SEPA review). I suppose it might be possible to scope an EIS that
lays out a phasing plan, identifies areas of current concern, but does not
include analysis of the issues except for the first phase, the marina. It's
a bit iffy, but may deserve closer analysis, I want to avoid piecemealing
the review, but certainly understand their desire to expand the marina
without doing a full Resort Plan EIS.
Still the ordinance says and the mediation group expected that the Resort
Plan would get full review before individual pieces of the resort buildout
were undertaken. I think the ordinance is very clear on that point. I
expect to be in the office Monday morning, please give a call if you want to
discuss this.
Re the development agreement, I will be sending over my final report to the
Board and will cc you, I understand the hearing is set for May 1 at 2:00,
Katherine Laird called to see if I was planning to attend. I have not heard
that I am particularly needed, and so am not currently planning to attend,
I expect Katherine will also want to talk about the marina expansion
question. Please let me know if it is all right for me to pass on my
thoughts to her.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Alvarez rmailto:dalvarez@co,iefferson,wa,usl
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2000 11 :51 AM
To: 'faith lumsden'
Cc: AI Scalf
Subject: FW: PORT LUDLOW-MARINA EXPANSION
Faith- We (the County and ORM) are really at a deadlock on the issue
listed below. The issues are described below, but the County feels that if
it looks at the 100 slip expansion of the marina outside of the context of
an entire resort plan then the COunty is allowing ORM to do piecemeal-ing of
the resort plan in direct contradiction to the language of the Port Ludlow
MPR Ordinance. Section 3.904. The Ordinance reflects the deal that ORM
came to with the community regardless of whether the WAC's regarding SEPA
allow phased review. Isn't that how you would read it? I am writing to you
because you were present at the table during the talks that were
memorialized into the Port Ludlow MPR Ordinance.
I would appreciate your comments in this regard and would further
appreciate receiving them before 10 AM on Tuesday, April 25th because ORM
has applied for a pre-application conference and I want to resolve this with
their Seattle-based lawyer before I go to a 3-day WAPA conference late next
week,
Thanks, David Alvarez. Phone #360-385-9219.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Alvarez
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 11 :54 AM
> To: 'jon rose'
> Cc: 'faith lumsden'
> Subject: PORT LUDLOW-MARINA EXPANSION
>
> Jon-
>
> I am informed that ORM will be present at the County Dept. of
Page 3
LOG 'TEM Page ~of3.L
# ., ----
--"
, "---"
\..---1
> Community Development for a pre-application hearing on May 3 at 9:30 AM,
> I am further informed that the subject of this pre-application meeting is
> to discuss the process of applying for and obtaining the necessary County
> permits for an expansion of the marina by 1 00 slips. I am also informed
> that at the planner-to-planner level there is some disagreement between
> County staff and ORM staff as to what type of EIS, if any, would be needed
> with respect to the plans to add 100 marina slips. I was told that ORM
> felt an "addendum" to the existing EIS would be enough and the COunty felt
> such a proposal would require a "supplemental" EIS.
>
> This matter has been discussed in some detail by the County with me.
>
>
> I was also under the impression that attorney DeMarco from Tremaine,
> Wright, et al would contact me about this last week. He or she never did.
>
>
> It is our conclusion that Port Ludlow-MPR Ordinance Section 3,902,
> item #1, is controlling, (See page 20 of 26.) That section suggests that
> at a minimum there should be no piecemealing, This proposal for 100 slips
> (which apparently is a freestanding and sole application with respect to
> the Port Ludlow resort area) appears to be precisely an attempt to
> piecemeal.
>
> Section 3.902 of the MPR Ordinance also states that a supplemental
> EIS is needed "prior to issuance of building permits for any new resort
> development." This only serves to dovetail with what is in Section 3,904
> of the MPR Ordinance, which again speaks of a Supplemental EIS.
>
> These are the concerns and the questions that will be posed to ORM
> staff at the pre-application hearing, I see the language of the MPR
> Ordinance as quite straightforward in this regard. Pleasee take these
> statements under advisement, discuss them with your attorney if need be
> and contact me before the pre-application meeting if any questions or
> concerns arise. I generally DO NOT attend pre-application meetings. I am
> at (360) 385-9219.
>
> Please also write back with your list of phone numbers, as I can't
> seem to find them.
>
> David Alvarez
>
>
>
Page 4
LOG 'TEM
# '1
page jLof.J.L
-~
..
""""-'"
!
, i
'-..V
,
Randy Kline
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd.com]
Wednesday, March 01,20009:33 AM
Rkl ine@co.jefferson,wa,us
Jon@orminc,com; Shannon Kinsella
pt. Ludlow
Randy: We would like direction on whether you will require and Addendum to the Port Ludlow EIS. I will assume
this is NOT a Supplement since it is not new information, rather an expansion of information already identified in the
original EIS (i.e. add 100 slips to the marina). Please let me know as soon as possible so we can begin our
permitting efforts in the correct manner. Thanks,
Nicole Faghin
Senior Planner
Reid Middleton
728 1834th St. SW
Everett, WA 98204
(425) 741-3800
Fax: (425) 741-3900
nfaghin@reidmidd,com
L- ~-:,\ S
S'; 1 '-
'<"" '-
'\1\ J;-\
Page 1
~uG 1TEM
# -r
Page ~Of~
r. ......,..,--
----
,
~,
,
Randy Kline
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd,com]
Tuesday, March 21,2000 12:36 PM
Rkl ine@co.jefferson.wa.us
Jon@orminc,com; jon@pentecenv,com; Shannon Kinsella
pt. Ludlow Marina Pre-App
Hi Randy. We would like to go ahead and schedule a full pre-application meeting with you for the Port Ludlow
Marina expansion, Our goal will be to file our application by about May 22,2000. Could you let me know when you
have time available? Perhaps you could give me a few options as I will need to then coordinate schedules for a
number of people coming from different directions. Thanks,
Nicole Faghin
Senior Planner
Reid Middleton
728 134th St. SW
Everett, WA 98204
(425) 741-3800
Fax: (425) 741-3900
nfaghin@reidmidd,com
Page 1
LOG iTEM
# '1
Page 13 ofJ,L
---
-.
I
I
\~/
,
Randy Kline
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd.com]
Thursday, April 06, 2000 11 :49 AM
rkl ine@co.jefferson.wa.us
Jon@orminc.com; Shannon Kinsella
RE: Pre-Application Meeting for Port Ludlow Marina
Randy:
We are having great difficulty finding dates when everyone can meet for the pre-application meeting. I have 2
suggestions:
1) On May 3 the OPG team will be meeting with RMI. Could we also schedule the Pre-App for that day?
2) Could we conduct the Pre-App by phone as a conference call? We may have a wider range of options,
Our biggest problem this month is that I am out all next week and part of the following week. Shannon is out all the
week of April24 - 28,
I will be here today and would like to discuss the SEPA issues with you before I leave. Please call as soon as you
can, I will only be available until 3:15 p,m. then in meetings the rest of the afternoon.
>>> Randy Kline <rkline@co,jefferson,wa,us> 04/04/00 02:07PM >>>
Nicole:
April 19, 2000 is the one date that Jerry Smith will be unable to attend.
would certainly like to have Jerry there so, unless its too difficult to go
with one of the other dates, lets try to reschedule.
The meeting will be held in the conference room in the Department of
Community Development at 621 Sheridan Street in Port Townsend. County
representatives will include myself and Jerry Smith, I contacted our
Environmental Health and Public Works Departments and both did not feel it
necessary to attend. If there are specific individuals you would like to
see in attendance please let me know.
I will not be in the office tomorrow, is it possible to defer our SEPA
descussion until Thursday afternoon?
Randy Kline
Jefferson County Department
of Community Development
360,379.4464 (ph)
360,379.4451 (fax)
> ----------
> From: Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 10:45 AM
> To: rkline@co.jefferson,wa.us
> Cc: Jon@orminc.com; Shannon Kinsella
> Subject: RE: Pre-Application Meeting for Port Ludlow Marina
>
> The consensus from our end is April 19 at 10 a,m. Please let me know if
> this is confirmed on your end.
>
> Where will the meeting be held? Who from the County will be there?
>
> I would like to discuss SEPA with you further, Will you be available
Page 1
'- ,-,...;)i rEM Page 1</
#,' 7 ' . _ -4-0f.1L.
...-.
> tomorrow?
>
> >>> Randy Kline <rkline@co,jefferson.wa.us> 03/31/00 10:01AM >>>
> Nicole,
> I've put together another set of dates that hopefully will work out a
> little
> better for you.
>
> Wednesday, April 19, 2000 - 10:00 am or 2:00 pm
> Friday, April 21, 2000 - 10:00 am or 2:00 pm
> Tuesday April 25, 2000 - 10:00 am or 2:00 pm
> Wednesday, April 26, 2000 - 10:00 am or 2:00 pm
>
> In reference to SEPA, I will be meeting with the Jerry Smith, the Lead
> Planner for Port Ludlow, in order to discuss this issue on Monday of next
> week, This matter will then be further discussed with our manager on
> Thursday. I intend to contact you on Friday with an indciation of the
> County's position.
>
> Enjoy the week-end.
> Sincerely
>
> Randy Kline
> Jefferson County Department
> of Community Development
> 360,379.4464 (ph)
> 360,379.4451 (fax)
>
>
>
> > ----------
> > From: Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 9:01 AM
> > To: rkline@co.jefferson.wa.us
> > Subject: Re: Pre-Application Meeting for Port Ludlow Marina
>>
> > I hate to cause problems, but none of those dates work for me (its
> spring
> > break for my kids school and I'll be out the 7th through the 14. So
> could
> > you see if you have any dates starting the week of the 17th? I am
> > available the 19th or 21 st and open all of the following week.
>>
>>
> > >>> Randy Kline <rkline@co,jefferson.wa,us> 03/28/00 04:43PM >>>
> > Dear Nicole:
>>
> > I've put together a few potential dates for the Port Ludlow Marina
> > Expansion
> > pre-application conference, At this point I am available for anyone of
> > the
> > following:
>>
> > Friday April 7, 2000 - 10:00 a.m. or 2:00 p.m,
> > Monday April 10, 2000 - 10:00 a.m. or 2:00 p,m.
> > Wednesday April 12, 2000 - 10:00 a.m, or 2:00 p,m,
>>
> > Jerry Smith, the Lead Planner for Port Ludlow, will also be attending
Page 2
LOG ~TEM page IS'" Of$..L
# 1---
-/
> the
> > pre-application conference. Please contact me once you have settled on
>a
> > date.
>>
> > Sincerely
> > Randy Kline
> > Jefferson County Department
> > of Community Development
> > 360.379.4464 (ph)
> > 360,379.4451 (fax)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Page 3
LOG ITEM
# '1
...,-
Page -'4-9f'$L
.~
Randy Kline
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd.com]
Tuesday, April 04, 2000 10:45 AM
rkl ine@co.jefferson.wa,us
Jon@orminc.com; Shannon Kinsella
RE: Pre-Application Meeting for Port Ludlow Marina
The consensus from our end is April 19 at 10 a.m. Please let me know if this is confirmed on your end,
Where will the meeting be held? Who from the County will be there?
I would like to discuss SEPA with you further. Will you be available tomorrow?
>>> Randy Kline <rkline@co.jefferson,wa.us> 03/31/00 10:01AM >>>
Nicole,
I've put together another set of dates that hopefully will work out a little
better for you,
Wednesday, April 19, 2000 - 10:00 am or 2:00 pm
Friday, April 21 ,2000 - 10:00 am or 2:00 pm
Tuesday April 25, 2000 - 10:00 am or 2:00 pm
Wednesday, April 26, 2000 - 10:00 am or 2:00 pm
In reference to SEPA, I will be meeting with the Jerry Smith, the Lead
Planner for Port Ludlow, in order to discuss this issue on Monday of next
week, This matter will then be further discussed with our manager on
Thursday, I intend to contact you on Friday with an indciation of the
County's position,
Enjoy the week-end.
Sincerely
Randy Kline
Jefferson County Department
of Community Development
360.379.4464 (ph)
360,379.4451 (fax)
> ----------
> From: Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd,com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 20009:01 AM
> To: rkline@co.jefferson,wa,us
> Subject: Re: Pre-Application Meeting for Port Ludlow Marina
>
> I hate to cause problems, but none of those dates work for me (its spring
> break for my kids school and I'll be out the 7th through the 14, So could
> you see if you have any dates starting the week of the 17th? I am
> available the 19th or 21 st and open all of the following week,
>
>
> >>> Randy Kline <rkline@co.jefferson.wa.us> 03/28/00 04:43PM >>>
> Dear Nicole:
>
Page 1
LOG iTEM
# 1
Page ..tL..Of3L
',-
> I've put together a few potential dates for the Port Ludlow Marina
> Expansion
> pre-application conference, At this point I am available for anyone of
> the
> following:
>
> Friday April 7, 2000 - 10:00 a.m, or 2:00 p.m.
> Monday April 10, 2000 - 10:00 a.m. or 2:00 p,m,
> Wednesday April 12, 2000 - 10:00 a.m. or 2:00 p.m.
>
> Jerry Smith, the Lead Planner for Port Ludlow, will also be attending the
> pre-application conference, Please contact me once you have settled on a
> date,
>
> Sincerely
> Randy Kline
> Jefferson County Department
> of Community Development
> 360.379.4464 (ph)
> 360,379.4451 (fax)
>
>
>
>
Page 2
LOOffEMpage .i..Lot~
.." 1 '____- '
.-.
'~/
Randy Kline
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd,com]
Monday, April 03, 2000 2:00 PM
rkli ne@co.jefferson.wa,us
Jon@orminc.com
RE: Pre-Application Meeting for Port Ludlow Marina
Thanks Randy. I'll get a consensus from our group and let you know on the best date.
Regarding SEPA, the OPG land use attorney states that this project should be handled either as an Addendum or as
an Expanded Checklist. Hope that helps you in your decision.
>>> Randy Kline <rkline@co,jefferson,wa.us> 03/31/00 1 0:01AM >>>
Nicole,
I've put together another set of dates that hopefully will work out a little
better for you.
Wednesday, April 19, 2000 - 10:00 am or 2:00 pm
Friday, April 21, 2000 - 10:00 am or 2:00 pm
Tuesday April 25, 2000 - 10:00 am or 2:00 pm
Wednesday, April 26, 2000 - 10:00 am or 2:00 pm
In reference to SEPA, I will be meeting with the Jerry Smith, the Lead
Planner for Port Ludlow, in order to discuss this issue on Monday of next
week. This matter will then be further discussed with our manager on
Thursday, I intend to contact you on Friday with an indciation of the
County's position,
Enjoy the week-end.
Sincerely
Randy Kline
Jefferson County Department
of Community Development
360,379.4464 (ph)
360,379.4451 (fax)
> ----------
> From: Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 9:01 AM
> To: rkline@co.jefferson.wa,us
> Subject: Re: Pre-Application Meeting for Port Ludlow Marina
>
> I hate to cause problems, but none of those dates work for me (its spring
> break for my kids school and I'll be out the 7th through the 14. So could
> you see if you have any dates starting the week of the 17th? I am
> available the 19th or 21 st and open all of the following week.
>
>
> >>> Randy Kline <rkline@co.jefferson.wa,us> 03/28/00 04:43PM >>>
> Dear Nicole:
>
> I've put together a few potential dates for the Port Ludlow Marina
Page 1
LOG lTEMpage ~otSL
# '7 "''''-_
~
> Expansion
> pre-application conference, At this point I am available for anyone of
> the
> following:
>
> Friday April 7,2000 - 10:00 a.m. or 2:00 p.m,
> Monday April 10, 2000 - 10:00 a.m, or 2:00 p,m.
> Wednesday April 12, 2000 - 10:00 a.m. or 2:00 p.m,
>
> Jerry Smith, the Lead Planner for Port Ludlow, will also be attending the
> pre-application conference, Please contact me once you have settled on a
> date,
>
> Sincerely
> Randy Kline
> Jefferson County Department
> of Community Development
> 360.379.4464 (ph)
> 360.379.4451 (fax)
>
>
>
>
Page 2
LOG ITEM Page 20
# -'] ~___' --.;......{)t$L
. .
-~
Randy Kline
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd,com]
Thursday, March 30, 2000 2:26 PM
rkl i ne@co.jefferson.wa,us
Jon@orminc.com; Shannon Kinsella
Re: Pre-Application Meeting for Port Ludlow Marina
I'd like to follow up on another Pre-application issue. We need some feedback about how to proceed with SEPA.
1. Since the project was listed in the Programmatic EIS for the overall Port Ludlow development, I would have
assumed that this is an Addendum to the original EIS, However, others have said it is a Supplemental. What is the
County's position.
2. We would like to know if we can proceed to prepare the EIS without going through a Checklist, Le, how could we
proceed directly to a DS and then scoping process so that the documentation can begin as soon as possible?
Let me know how to go forward with this. Thanks.
Nicole Faghin
Senior Planner
Reid Middleton
728 134th St. SW
Everett, WA 98204
(425) 741-3800
Fax: (425) 741-3900
nfaghin@reidmidd,com
Page 1
LOG ITEM
# ~
Page U ,of.!L.
....
~
Randy Kline
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd.com]
Wednesday, March 29, 2000 10:01 AM
rkl ine@co.jefferson,wa.us
Re: Pre-Application Meeting for Port Ludlow Marina
I hate to cause problems, but none of those dates work for me (its spring break for my kids school and I'll be out the
7th through the 14, So could you see if you have any dates starting the week of the 17th? I am available the 19th or
21 st and open all of the following week.
>>> Randy Kline <rkline@co.jefferson.wa.us> 03/28/00 04:43PM >>>
Dear Nicole:
I've put together a few potential dates for the Port Ludlow Marina Expansion
pre-application conference. At this point I am available for anyone of the
following:
Friday April 7, 2000 - 10:00 a,m. or 2:00 p.m.
Monday April 10, 2000 - 10:00 a,m. or 2:00 p,m.
Wednesday April 12, 2000 - 10:00 a.m. or 2:00 p.m.
Jerry Smith, the Lead Planner for Port Ludlow, will also be attending the
pre-application conference, Please contact me once you have settled on a
date,
Sincerely
Randy Kline
Jefferson County Department
of Community Development
360.379.4464 (ph)
360.379.4451 (fax)
Page 1
LOG ITEM
# I
page~of-.1L
r'
..-..
Randy Kline
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd,com]
Tuesday, May 02,200010:44 AM
rkli ne@co.jefferson.wa.us
Jon@orminc,com; Shannon Kinsella
RE: Pre-Application Meeting
See you at 9:30 tomorrow. We will bring along the $80. I just want to clarify some of the issues to be discussed. I
understand that Olympic Property Group has been talking to folks at the County about SEPA issues so we may want
to hold off on that discussion, Otherwise it seems our primary issue may be parking, What else should I anticipate?
Nicole Faghin
Senior Planner
Reid Middleton
728 134th S1. SW
Everett, WA 98204
(425) 741-3800
Fax: (425) 741-3900
nfaghin@reidmidd,com
>>> Randy Kline <rkline@co.jefferson,wa.us> 04/27/00 01 :47PM >>>
Nicole,
Thank you for sending in your Request for Shoreline Pre-Application
Consultation form. I failed to mention that there is an $80,00 fee for the
pre-application conference (which is wound into your permit fee in the event
that you apply within six months), If possible, please send the fee prior
to the conference, otherwise just bring it with you on May 3rd,
Thanks in advance for your cooperation,
Sincerely,
Randy Kline
Jefferson County Department
of Community Development
360,379.4464 (ph)
360,379.4451 (fax)
> ----------
> From: Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 10:53 AM
> To: rkline@co,jefferson,wa.us
> Subject: RE: Pre-Application Meeting
>
> Thanks. I'll send that along in the next few days,
>
> Lets confirm the 9:30 date on Wednesday May 3. Could you send me the
> location again? Thanks.
>
> >>> Randy Kline <rkline@co.jefferson.wa,us> 04/17/00 04:31 PM >>>
> <<Shorepre,doc>>
> Here you are Nicole.
> Randy Kline
> Jefferson County Department
Page 1
#.
\....J\.;.lJEM
?
Page Z~ ofR"
~'"
..-..
> of Community Development
> 360.379.4464 (ph)
> 360.379.4451 (fax)
>
> > ----------
> > From: Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd,com]
> > Sent: Monday, April 17, 20004:23 PM
> > To: rkline@co,jefferson.wa,us
> > Subject: RE: Pre-Application Meeting
>>
> > Looks like this is electronic. Could you send me an electronic version
> of
> > the form? It will be much easier to fill out then. Thanks! I hope
> > everyone else can make it on the 3rd. I'll let you know,
>>
> > >>> Randy Kline <rkline@co,jefferson.wa,us> 04/17/00 03:51 PM >>>
> > Nicole:
>>
> > Both myself and Jerrry Smith will be able to attend on Wednesday May 3rd
> > at
> > 9:30 a.m. Please be sure to submit a formal pre-application form prior
> to
> > our May 3rd meeting.
>>
> > See you on the 3rd.
> > Randy Kline
> > Jefferson County Department
> > of Community Development
> > 360.379.4464 (ph)
> > 360,379.4451 (fax)
>>
>>
> > > ----------
> > > From:
> > > Sent:
> > > To:
> > > Cc:
> > > Subject:
>>>
> > > At this point we seemed to have agreed upon our Pre-Application
> meeting
> > to
> > > occur at pt. Townsend on May Wednesday May 3. We need to know a time
> > for
> > > the meeting, Could we try for 9:30? Will that work for everyone?
> Let
> > me
> > > know ASAP.
>>>
> > > Nicole Faghin
> > > Senior Planner
> > > Reid Middleton
> > > 728 134th St. SW
> > > Everett, WA 98204
> > > (425) 741-3800
> > > Fax: (425) 741-3900
> > > nfaghin@reidmidd.com
>>>
Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd,com]
Monday, April 17, 2000 3:31 PM
rkline@co.jefferson.wa.us
Jon@orminc.com; Sues@orminc,com; Shannon Kinsella
Pre-Application Meeting
Page 2
LOG ITEM
# i
Page zt-Of.~.L.
.....-
~
Randy Kline
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd.com]
Tuesday, April 18, 2000 10:53 AM
rkline@co,jefferson.wa.us
RE: Pre-Application Meeting
Thanks. I'll send that along in the next few days.
Lets confirm the 9:30 date on Wednesday May 3. Could you send me the location again? Thanks,
>>> Randy Kline <rkline@co.jefferson,wa.us> 04/17/00 04:31PM >>>
<<Shorepre,doc>>
Here you are Nicole.
Randy Kline
Jefferson County Department
of Community Development
360.379.4464 (ph)
360.379.4451 (fax)
> ----------
> From: Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2000 4:23 PM
> To: rkline@co,jefferson,wa,us
> Subject: RE: Pre-Application Meeting
>
> Looks like this is electronic. Could you send me an electronic version of
> the form? It will be much easier to fill out then. Thanks! I hope
> everyone else can make it on the 3rd. I'll let you know.
>
> >>> Randy Kline <rkline@co.jefferson.wa,us> 04/17/00 03:51 PM >>>
> Nicole:
>
> Both myself and Jerrry Smith will be able to attend on Wednesday May 3rd
> at
> 9:30 a,m. Please be sure to submit a formal pre-application form prior to
> our May 3rd meeting.
>
> See you on the 3rd.
> Randy Kline
> Jefferson County Department
> of Community Development
> 360.379.4464 (ph)
> 360.379.4451 (fax)
>
>
> > ----------
> > From: Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd.com]
> > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2000 3:31 PM
> > To: rkline@co,jefferson,wa.us
> > Cc: Jon@orminc,com; Sues@orminc,com; Shannon Kinsella
> > Subject: Pre-Application Meeting
>>
> > At this point we seemed to have agreed upon our Pre-Application meeting
> to
> > occur at pt. Townsend on May Wednesday May 3, We need to know a time
Page 1
LOG ITEM .. r ~
# 1 pogeh-o..
...--.
> for
> > the meeting. Could we try for 9:30? Will that work for everyone? Let
> me
> > know ASAP.
>>
> > Nicole Faghin
> > Senior Planner
> > Reid Middleton
> > 728 134th St. SW
> > Everett, WA 98204
> > (425) 741-3800
> > Fax: (425) 741-3900
> > nfaghin@reidmidd.com
>>
>
Page 2
~/
LOG ITEM
# '1
. . l' ..-
page2LL.o~
.--~
Randy Kline
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd,com]
Monday, April 17, 20004:23 PM
rkl ine@co,jefferson.wa.us
RE: Pre-Application Meeting
Looks like this is electronic, Could you send me an electronic version of the form? It will be much easier to fill out
then. Thanks! I hope everyone else can make it on the 3rd, I'll let you know.
>>> Randy Kline <rkline@co.jefferson.wa.us> 04/17/00 03:51 PM >>>
Nicole:
Both myself and Jerrry Smith will be able to attend on Wednesday May 3rd at
9:30 a,m. Please be sure to submit a formal pre-application form prior to
our May 3rd meeting,
See you on the 3rd.
Randy Kline
Jefferson County Department
of Community Development
360,379.4464 (ph)
360,379.4451 (fax)
> ----------
> From: Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd,com]
> Sent: Monday, April 17, 20003:31 PM
> To: rkline@co.jefferson.wa,us
> Cc: Jon@orminc.com; Sues@orminc.com; Shannon Kinsella
> Subject: Pre-Application Meeting
>
> At this point we seemed to have agreed upon our Pre-Application meeting to
> occur at pt Townsend on May Wednesday May 3. We need to know a time for
> the meeting. Could we try for 9:30? Will that work for everyone? Let me
> know ASAP.
>
> Nicole Faghin
> Senior Planner
> Reid Middleton
> 728 134th St SW
> Everett, WA 98204
> (425) 741-3800
> Fax: (425) 741-3900
> nfaghin@reidmidd.com
>
Page 1
LOG ITEM,
#, '7
page~~ot~
T~"""
.~
~
Randy Kline
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Nicole Faghin[SMTP:nfaghin@reidmidd,com]
Monday, April 17, 2000 3:31 PM
rkl ine@co.jefferson,wa.us
Jon@orminc.com; Sues@orminc,com; Shannon Kinsella
Pre-Application Meeting
At this point we seemed to have agreed upon our Pre-Application meeting to occur at pt. Townsend on May
Wednesday May 3, We need to know a time for the meeting. Could we try for 9:30? Will that work for everyone?
Let me know ASAP,
Nicole Faghin
Senior Planner
Reid Middleton
728 134th St. SW
Everett, WA 98204
(425) 741-3800
Fax: (425) 741-3900
nfaghin@reidmidd.com
Page 1
LOG ITEM
# 7
P~ge ~of.3:.L
-.
''-"'
Randy Kline
From:
Reply To:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Anne Shaffer[SMTP:shaffjas@olympus.net]
shaffjas@olympus.net
Wednesday, February 09, 2000 4:54 PM
Nicole Faghin
Edwin,J,Gossett@NWS02.usace,army.mil; rkline@co,jefferson,wa,us; Stewart, Jeff R.;
jsch490@wadnr.gov; bob@pentecenv.com; john@pentecenv.com; BURKLBLB@dfw,wa,gov
Re: Port Ludlow Marina Site Visit
II
dfwvesrv.wp
Yish, sorry forgot to attach eelgrass protocol. Try it again
Hello Nichole,
Thanks for the well run and informative meeting today. I think your
project is a good one, and in good shape. I had another
quick thought regarding possible NMFS questions. On previous marina
projects they have stated they consider total overwater
structure, which includes boats that use the facility, Not sure what
they ask for in an analysis, but wanted to give you the
possible heads up,
As I mentioned, there are a couple of additional references that you
should look into for your BE. They are:
1 ,1970's work by Salo;
2, Johannessen, J. 1999. Critical shoreline areas relative to critical
nearshore habitats at Tala Poin to Kala Point, Eastern
Jefferson Co. A report to the Jefferson County Planning Department, Port
Townsend, Wa,
3. Hirshi, R. 1999. Critical nearshore habitats Tala pt to Kala Point
Jefferson County.A report to Jefferson County Planning
Department.
Also, to reiterate WDFW thoughts to date, Dock, kayak, and dingy floats
should be designed to minimize overwater structure.
Structure greater than 6' will need to have grating (except possibly
the outermost float due to heavier construction.
Mitigation may need to be considered as an alternative to this float);
all pilings will need to be non-creosote; eelgrass
survey (quantitative) will need to be done for the D dock expansion to
WDFW specifications, including date of survey
(attached), and; water quality will need to be addressed. This may
include information from your current monitoring work, with
an emphasis on pump out and oil recycling facilities current use and
capacity relative to proposed expansion.
So, that's my two cents to date, Please send a copy of the water quality
monitoring study results, and programmatic EIS when
you have a moment, thanks in advance. Seeyanextweek...JAS,
P,S, John, per our discussion I have put a reprint of my drift algae
publication in the mail to you, Hope you find it of
interest., ,
Nicole Faghin wrote:
> Just a reminder that we will be meeting at 10:45 - 11 at the Port Ludlow Marina tomorrow (Wednesday).
>
Page 1
L0G frEM
#" , 7 '" ,,-:-.Page ~ot-31
~..
...
'-
> The Corps of Engineers will be notifying everyone of a pre-conference meeting at their offices next Wednesday,
February 16,
>
> Let me know if you have any questions.
>
> Nicole Faghin
> Senior Planner
> Reid Middleton
> 728 1834th St. SW
> Everett, WA 98204
> (425) 741-3800
> Fax: (425) 741-3900
> nfaghin@reidmidd.com
Dr 8j:!: a
Page 2
',,-,'..::1 If EM
# 1
>~
P-age Eo ~,~ I
___Of~
'-
ORDINANCE NO. 08-1004-99 repealing the interim development controls of Ordinance /0-/2/4-98 and adopting new development
regulations for the Port Ludlow Planned Resort
RCICF zone recognize the recreational nature of the resort and include the existing and planned
resort complex, as well as limited permanent residential uses, and non-resort community facilities
including a beach club and Kehele Park. Kehele Park is located north of the actual resort area and
serves as a community park.
Section 3.402 Permitted and Conditional Uses: The following uses are permitted within the MPR-
RCICF zone. Within the resort area, for resort facilities only, the uses set forth below are further
described and limited by the Resort Plan, as set forth in section 3.901.
RC/CF USE CHART
USES RC/CF RC/CF
Resort Area Kehele Park
Hotels (Inn) and appropriate associated uses
Conference CenterlBanquet Facility
Parks and Trails as part of a platting or development review
process
Recreation Centerl Clubl Yacht Club
Restaurant/LoungelBar
Marina
Seaplane Dock C
Helipad for Medical Emergencies Only C
Resort Related Retail Use
LibrarylMuseum
Interpretive and Informational Kiosks
Community Organization Activity Facilities, e.g. LMC Beach club
and R V storage properties
Multifamily and Single Family Residential Structures (10 dulac)
Tennis Courts (indoor or outdoor)
Amphitheater
,
CHART INTERPRETATION: a means a use is permitted;
"C" means conditional use approval is required.
3.403 Non-Resort Uses and Properties: Those non-resort controlled uses and activities which
currently exist within the RCICF zone are recognized as valid uses and activities and may continue,
expand, or change in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance. These non-resort uses,
activities, and properties are not regulated by the provisions for the Resort Plan as set forth in
section 3.90.
Page 12 of 26
.. ~G tTEM Pa e3r ~',
:#' 7", , 9 _of..u.-
'" ',",,~