Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLog041 . rN uWlE ,O'r . I' U NOV - 9 II m ';OUN1:Y- 'n," y OE\'ElUP"k\iT A Pope Resources Campan)' COVER SHEET T RAN s M I T T A L TO: Josh Peters COMPANY: JCDCD SUBJECT: Marina Expansion DATE: November 7, 2000 COMMENTS Mr. Peters: Enclosed please find a copy of a letter that recently went to Mr. Grant Colby regarding the marina expansion. This has been provided to you for your information. If you have any questions, please contact Jon Rose at 360-697-6626 ext. 527. Thank you. From the desk of ... LOG ITEM ,Pan<<> ( ~ '#f..{ ( ~~ _of-ex- ~ Sue Schroader Project Administrator P.O. Box 1780 Poulsbo, WA 98370 sues@orminc.com (360)-697-6626 ext. 549 Fax: (360)-697-1156 ~ e e A Pope Resources Company November 6, 2000 Grant Colby PBM #56 2442 NW Market Street Seattle, W A 98107-4137 Re: Port Ludlow Marina Expansion Dear Mr. Colby: You and other neighbors have expressed concern regarding the expansion o( our Port Ludlow Marina. Further, there has been some confusion regarding the issue of spacing between your docks and the docks in the proposed slip expansion. Part of the confusion seems to extend from changes between the initial site plan we circulated and the latest site plan. Initial Site Plan. 4/5/00- Exhibit A The initial site plan prepared by our consultants was based upon then current information, and was completed prior to performing a mapping survey. The purpose of the site plan was to generate comments and discussion from the community and public review agenCIes. While preparing the plan, our consultants turned to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers .. and Jefferson County permits that authorized construction of your docks. Those permits and their supporting documentation depicts a 440- foot dimension separating your docks and ours (see the Hearing Examiner's report and your site plan, Exhibits Band C respectively). Latest Site Plan. 7/25/00. - Exhibit D After subjecting the plan to community input and performing field mapping, our consultants found the distance separating our respective docks was only 277 feet. For that reason, the design was reconfigured to allow a greater separation between the.docks. I have indicated the former dock location on the enclosed site plan of 4/5/00. Hopefully, this will help to explain some of the changes between the two designs. LOG ITEM Page z... OfS # lI( , .:z.. . 19245 Tenth Avenue Northeast, P,O, Box 1780, Poulsbo, Washington 98370-0239 (360) 697-6626, Seattle: (206) 292-0517, Fax: (360) 697-1156 .... .U e . Marina Expansion - Public Disclosure A number of the neighbor comments indicated surprise and concern that the marina was going through an expansion. Most of their concern centers on impacts to their view. For your information and others, our company has been contemplating the expansion for approximately 10 years. In fact, the expansion was reviewed by Jefferson County and numerous permitting agencies during the approval of the 1993 Programmatic EIS (see Exhibit E). This included many meetings, public input, media coverage, and public notices. Later, during the Port Ludlow Planning Forum (between 1996 and 1999), there was continued discussion and public dialogue regarding all of our development plans in the area, including the marina. Grant, I hope this letter clarifies some of the confusion regarding our long term plans to expand the marina, and the differences between the two site plans. During our years at Port Ludlow, we have worked diligently to be responsible and constructive neighbors... (In fact, we even wrote letters supporting your project, see Exhibits F andG). ' That being said, we still believe the concern expressed by you and your neighbors is understandable. We will keep them in mind as we continue working on our project. As I've stated before, I am willing to meet with you or discuss the project any time you so desire. Sincerely, n Rose, P .E. Vice President Property Development Olympic Property Group C: Josh Peters, Jefferson County Department of Community Development Jack Gosset, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers James Treadway Bill Funke D.A. Routt , Shannon Kinsella, Reid Middleton Assoc. Nicole Faghin, Reid Middleton Assoc. Greg McCArry, OPG Tom Griffin, OPG LOG 'ITEM ? fa Page '~of.lD-e '# Cfl 03/08/00 4:07 pm "" U :::0 rTl I" ~ 7' J> :::0 -< (') o z (') rTl U -l \24 \99\014\DESIGN\4914-FILl.dwg 0- S~ ~~ 6 w", "'. ~=< ^" ~O ~~ '" "'1 o '" o o ~ o c '" U) U) I o ~ Z )> '" m )> " " '" o X ~ ~ m ~~~Cl:2;g:t ~gOFm~Vi ~;]M~~6jUj ~:"~~~8" ;:Q~05:~" ~~Ui-<og~ 00 c d~~S~~ "1JQa~-O~ ~[;lViF~~ 3:)> W-U' =lz~",~~ ~O:2o~g -00 ~O-t c:~~iTIzo ~3:~~-U"'1 g~ Z~:i! z~ tlfi'" ;-i ~ () o C} "'1- 00 '" ' 3:~ )>0 zpl '" o ;;J~:!J ooz :;::-<Q I~ -l>:.~ -<'" i!l, Or;j~ en. "U~t' ~no :;:: c: . =i=<!-< '" 0 ""z .I.~liJ InI Oow 0;;00 ~~~ oQ "'10 ",0 zn ",'" Z ~ U) z -., 6 ~ ,/ Z31 - '" o o o =<!~ J2Vi ~g )i wz ~~ ^"'1 ~r ~o !:lj?; z '" ) N N '" =::::::::::m It' ,..~o z ~ o f ::O-i 0' Ol , :z ;z: / ~ ~/ w g7'- .'u) we: r::;:" "l)(J) ~ " [!:! '- ~ '~;:L:"""""..""." """"JM , ----- ----,;::: , "" . .>C) '_._ _,r-'/" ~{-; ", ~- """.",':":b / / 03: Z;z G)- I~ ~N m "'1 5~ ~o -<'" Ofi ",0 ~z o:!J c: <> nc m", U)m I )> o Z G) z o -< r~ 0- CN -< - ~:; lD~ "'- ~::;J ~Jj ~~ ",r ;0.., o ;;0 '" q (J) C " (J) / f. / CJ 3E / / / '" X ~ Z '" '" ,. z '" ~ / / " /f ! / / U\ C -0 U\ N rn 0 8 ~ ... ... il; t U> $ U> U> l\: '" 'l: 0> '" '" '" 0 '" ,~ DO ,~ U; U> '" '" .... '" ... o Ul 0 0> Ul '" '" ~ ~" 5 ... c ';;1 ~~~.. ~~~ ~~iI ~ >-t r ./ ()~ a t 8~ - ;;Ow t 52c :!l z;o F ~'" ~ ;<-"- " ' " 0 Pf;; ~ o ... "- o ~ q 0 o I 8 '" r I w' ~! ~ -= ~ VI j == r- 0 ~ G) eo :::::j ~ ~ m s: > -0 <i ~~ So ~ s ~ o " n 0 C) ~ ~ " ;:: II' Ul q ~~o ll!S!1~ =..- , D 12 u j) .~, l. ,/ -</ "" " -(..-- , \ \', 'I , I ) "l,_L.-''/ (" .~ 52 ..~!1" " z '" rn ;0 l;! '" ;:E ~ "- , I , I / I 1/ ' \:\ ( ,( \ \,\ \\ j -l > i i ; ; I ,/ i'l i'I' ! / / / I' ! ~ n 1\ Il ) 1\ !" i .J I ; ;; / :' ! f I ....... I l: --1/1; ) ',7/, ,//11 '/ f" / " / I l' 'I / I '1/ /, / If 1,/ / / / I ' 'i Iii f; /! ,. //1' : , ' i / / " I' I'! ! ; ; ~ : ! j' i / / / /: / )1 ,/,!) ) ",':0 ',J / /1 / ,/ /, ' -, , .' ,I , , A (:' Vi I /t / '/_",J- // .,' ,(,,'/i , / ,: j': I / / ',q I I vi,/' I' '''' \, i I I f -;.., ,L -', "'1 I ,'I ,tfJl I 1/,/ / / / ,1,f--r II 1\ /I,"'I,--r,(/I : , I : i Ii: j i I: ; : : \ !. i { \ i! \ [i ~ m ~ filii] I :: I: /' , , , I c.o ~?<~ ~Oiii ~CD~ !:i~~ U)P ~~ ~~ z o <: {" , / Z -1 728 134th Street SW ' Suite 200 Everett, Washington 98204 Ph: 425 741-3800 PORT LUDLOW MARINA EXPANSION ALTERNATE NO. 1 ...... . . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 e &mn OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY RE: Shoreline Substantial ) Development Permit [Secondary Use] ) application by Louis Scott for a ) pier, ramp and a four-slip dock ) for private, joint use, extending ) out 195 feet to the 8.5 foot mean ) low water mark in Port Ludlow Bay.) ) ) File No. SDP97-0003 ill n.. ~ b !997 ~&~Org~r J JEFFERSO COUNTl' PERMIT ENTER FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION FINDINGS OF FACT BACKGROUND INFORMATION Proposal: Construct a pier, ramp and a four-slip dock for private, joint use by the owners of the adjoining uplands. The structure will extend out 195 feet to the 8.5 foot mean low water mark in Port Ludlow Bay. The facilities include a 120 foot pier placed on top of a 30 foot high bluff, a 4 foot by 44 foot long wooden ramp, and a dock covering a water area of 66 feet by 96 feet. Applicant: Louis Scott PO Box 65079, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 Property Location: The property is located at 9071 Oak Bay Road. Legal Description: The upland portion of the project site is described as Lot 1 of the Scott Short Plat located within section 16, Township 28 North, Range 1 West, WM. The Jefferson County Assessors tax parcel number is 821 162 010. Shoreline Designation: The waters of Port Ludlow Bay are designated Aquatic and are further identified as Shorelines of Statewide Significance. The uplands portions of the site are designated Urban. Louis Scott Shoreline Permit SDP97-0004 Findings. Conclusions page (;,i!1-and Decision Page 1 LOG ITEM ,# ----1L-'- e . 1 Zoning: The Jefferson County Growth strategies Ordinance 2 classifies the site and surrounding Port Ludlow area as Planned Rural 3 Community, one residence per three acres. 4 Property Description: The proposed dock site is located on a 5 vacant parcel created by the applicant as part of a three lot short 6 plat recorded in September of 1994. The subject parcel is a 7 rectangular shaped lot of approximately 8,900 square feet. The 8 property slopes moderately to steeply away from Oak Bay Road and 9 Scott Court at approximately 13 degrees. This slope terminates at an 10 approximately 30 foot high bluff which is nearly vertical for 11 approximately the lower 20 feet. This bank is designated as unstable 12 in the Coastal Zone Atlas. A primitive trail winds down from the 13 bluff to a wooden staircase that allows beach access. 14 The intertidal and shallow subtidal areas of the site is 15 characterized by a very gentle grade. The line of mean lower water 16 is approximately 100 feet out from the ordinary high water mark. The 17 substrate is composed of silt, sand, gravel, and small cobbles. 18 A benthic survey of the site was conducted by Applied Environmental 19 Services, Inc. (AES) on August 27, 1994 as part of the previous 20 Shoreline Substantial Development application. This survey 21 documented the existense of attached marine vegetation including 22 ulva, gracilaria, laminaria, and fucus and hardshell clams, crab, and 23 flat fish. 24 Surrounding Conditions: The nearest boat slips in the Port Ludlow 25 Marina are approximately 440 feet easterly of the proposed slips. 26 The Port Ludlow Marina extends about 1,700 feet into Port Ludlow Bay. 27 The nearest residence on the north side of Oak Bay Road is the Evelyn 28 Wootton residence, which is about 1,200 feet from the end of the 29 proposed dock. LOG ITEM # YJ '-- N uBndings. Conclusions ~ and Decision Page .lZ.-Of1L Louis Scott Shoreline Permit SDP97-0004 Page 2 e . 1 2 PROCEDURAL INFORMATION 3 Applicable Jefferson County Ordinances: 4 State Environmental Policy Act [SEPAl 5 Shoreline Management Master Program for Jefferson County and 6 Port Townsend, adopted September 19, 1988, as amended. 7 Jefferson County Interim Critical Areas, Ord. No. 05-0509-94 8 Jefferson County Optional Consolidated Permit Review Process, 9 Ord. No. 08-0408-96. 10 Date of Completed Application: March 20, 1997 11 Hearing Date: July 15, 1997. 12 Site Visit: July 15, 1997. 13 SEPA:A Final Mitigated Determination of NonSignificance [MDNS] was 14 issued May 28, 1997. The appeal period ended June 7, 1997. No 15 appeal was filed. 16 Notices: Mailed: June 17, 1997 17 Posted: July 1, 1997 18 Publication: July 2, 1997 (Port Townsend- 19 Jefferson County Leader) . 20 TESTIMONY: 21 The public hearing was opened on July 15, 1997 at 1:05 p.m. in the 22 Courthouse Lower Level Conference Room. After the procedures for the 23 public hearing were explained, testimony was accepted. All testimony 24 was taken under oath. A verbatim recording of the public hearing was 25 made and is maintained in the Jefferson Permit Center file. 26 John McDonah, consultant to the Department, presented the staff 27 report and gave testimony regarding the application and record. The 28 Staff Report contained Attachements A through Q. Attachment Q is the 29 Case Log identifying 71 items in the Department file. Mr. McDonah Louis Scott Shoreline Permit SDP97-0004 Page 3 ~ Findings. Conclusions n and Decision Page hofa LOG ITEM # '{( .---- e - 1 submitted a report by GeoResources dated June 22, 1997, but received 2 the day of public hearing. 3 Wendell stroud, President of Marine Floats, testified as the 4 representative of the Applicant. Mr. Stroud testified that he had 5 reviewed the Staff Report and its recommended conditions and found 6 all acceptable. Mr. Stroud presented three display boards containing 7 color photographs illustrating the site and surroundings, and one 8 scale model of the site, proposed building and proposed pier, ramp 9 and dock system. The model was not entered as an exhibit; however, 10 Exhibit 6 was reserved for photographs to be taken of the model by 11 the staff or Mr. Stroud. 12 Mr. Stroud described the space between the proposed dock and the 13 closest slips within the Port Ludlow Marina. Mr. Stroud argued that 14 the space was sufficient for craft entering the marina. He also 15 testified that the marina was full for slips- of the size the 16 Applicant is proposing. 17 With regard to the Staff recommended conditions, Mr. Stroud testified 18 that he had reviewed the conditions and concurred. He noted with 19 regard to Condition 2 that "live aboards" will not be permitted. 20 Evelyn Wooten,' a neighbor directly across Oak Bay Road, testified in 21 opposition to the application. Ms. Wooten argued that the reduction 22 from 200 feet to 195 feet (distance from mean low water mark) made no 23 difference. Ms. Wooten was referring to a previous application for a 24 200 foot facility that required a variance from the 60 foot limit. 25 Ms. Wooten argued that her main objection was the impact on her view. 26 When the Applicant placed a buoy to mark the proposed dock, it 27 appeared from her windows and deck that it extended half way across 28 the bay. 29 Louis Scott Shoreline Permit SDP97-0004 Page 4 Findings,~nclusions LOG ITEM Page ~of~ Decision # ' il ( - ~ e e 1 Wendell Stroud, in rebuttal testimony, noted that the Shoreline 2 Management Master Program was amended for joint use docks to allow 3 extension to 195 feet. Mr. Stroud argued that the greater distance 4 was to give an incentive to joint use docks; thereby reducing the 5 number of docks. 6 There being no other parties to testify, the public hearing was 7 closed at 1:45 pm. 8 EXHIBITS: 9 Exhibit 1: Staff Report dated July 10, 1997, together with Attachments A 10 through Q. ~1 Exhibit 2: Geotechnical Report prepared by GeoResources, dated June 22, 1997 12 Exhibit 3: Photo Display Panel :3 Exhibit 4: Photo Display Panel 14 Exhibit 5: Photo Display Panel 15 Exhibit 6: Photos of Display Scale Model 16 Exhibit 7: Guest List (sign up sheet) for Public Hearing. : 7 FINDINGS: 18 1. The Staff Report contains a detailed analysis of the proposed 19 shoreline substantial development permit application's compliance 20 with applicable policies and regulations. The Hearing Examiner has 21 reviewed the Staff Report, viewed the property in the field, 22 conducted a public hearing, and now adopts the Staff Findings and 23 Conclusions 1 through 11 at pages 4 through 12 as his own Findings, 24 except as may be specifically corrected below. 25 2. As noted under Surrounding Conditions above, the nearest boat 26 slips in the Port Ludlow Marina are approximately 440 feet easterly 27 of the proposed slips. The Port Ludlow Marina extends about 1,700 28 feet into Port Ludlow Bay. The nearest residence on the north side 29 LOG ITEM # t.(( , .B1\.<ilLngs, Conclusions '6~ ~nR Decision Page -f-Lof...Lb... Louis Scott Shoreline Permit SDP97-0004 Page 5 ...- e e 1 of Oak Bay Road is the Evelyn Wootton residence, which is about 1,200 2 feet from the end of the proposed dock. 3 3. The Evelyn Wootton residence at 141 Drew Lane (Lot 24, Area 5, 4 Port Ludlow # 1) overlooks the subject project and has a view of Port 5 Ludlow Bay. Ms. Wootton testified that the buoy placed to show the 6 extent of the proposed dock at 200 feet appeared from her residence 7 to be half way across the Bay. While the Bay is generally about 8 3,000 feet across, Ms. Wootton's house and the proposed dock may be 9 in line with the end of Port Ludlow Point, a small peninsula 10 extending into the Bay from the opposite shore. That reduced 11 distance is about 1,600 to 1,700 feet across. The proposed dock 12 would occupy nearly one-eighth the distance; however, viewi~g from 13 the Wootton residence would appear greater due to the perspective. 14 4. Staff had recommended during the SEPA review that a geotechnical 15 report be prepared due to the Unstable designation of the site as 16 shown on the Shoreline Atlas. That report by Bradley P. Biggerstaff, 17 Engineering Geologist, was submitted at the public hearing [see 18 Exhibit 2]. Mr. Biggerstaff observed surficial sloughing a~d 19 erosion, but found no evidence of deep-seated movement. He concluded 20 that the Unstable designation is related to the steepness of the 21 shoreline bluff slope. Mr. Biggerstaff concluded that the proposed 22 development and pier will not have an adverse impact on slope 23 stability or erosion at the site provided recommended conditions are 24 followed. 25 5. A shoreline permit application for a 200 foot pier was submitted 26 in 1994 and could not be approved. Amendments were later made to the 27 Shoreline Management Master Program to encourage joint use whereby 28 the maximum allowable pier length was changed from 60 feet ~o a 29 maximum of 195 feet. LOGfTEM # <.{I rJ;ings. Conclusions al1~ Decision Page ()of~ louis Scott Shoreline Permit SDP97-0004 Page 6 ...- e e 1 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 2 1. The Staff Comments contain both findings and conclusions in 3 analyzing the project's compliance with applicable policies and 4 criteria. Each of those Comments for items 1 through 11 at pages 4 5 through 12 are correct. Those policies will be met by the proposed 6 Substantial Development Permit as designed and conditioned. 7 2. View is a consideration under the Shoreline Management Act. 8 View issues can be categorized as "view obstruction" "panoramic or 9 outstanding views" and "view esthetics". For instance, the 10 Shorelines Hearing Board held: "There is a fundamental interest 11 under the master program and policies of the Shorel~ne Management Act 12 to prevent encroachment of the shoreline with structures and 13 obstruction of views." 1 In this application, the issue is not view 14 obstruction - but rather view esthetics since the project would place 15 a pier and dock within the view. The view would change from a 16 somewhat natural setting (recognizing that the Wootton's view also 17 contains the Port Ludlow Marina on the left or east). The Shorelines 18 Hearings Board considered a similar appeal regarding a view onto 19 Griffin Bay: "The view to Griffin Bay afforded waterfront properties 20 close to the site is now of a largely natural looking setting. From 21 the DeMuth's, the dock would intrude into a part of this view. We are 22 unable to find, however, that the project as proposed would represent 23 an aesthetic affront or significantly compromise the quality of the 24 shoreline envi ronmen t." 2 The conclusion here regarding view is 25 similar in that the visual impacts of the project are not a 2E substantial degradation of the existing character of the area. 27 28 1 John and Barbara Stevens v. State of Washington, Department of Ecology, Final Findings of Fact, SHB NO. 94-15. 2 DeMuth v. San Juan County, SHB No. 89-63 (1990). 29 Louis Scott Shoreline Permit SDP97-0004 Page 7 LOG ITEM # ql __ Findings. Conclusions Page f1 t::':JJlecision e e 1 RECOMMENDATION 2 The Shoreline Substantial Development Permit application as requested 3 by Louis Scott for a 195 foot pier, ramp, and four-slip dock for 4 private, joint use by the owners of the adjoining property is hereby 5 APPROVED, subject to the following conditions: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 7. 21 22 8. 23 24 25 26 9. 27 10. 11. 28 29 12. 1. Prior to submittal of a building permit, the mitigation measures outlined in the Final Threshold Determination dated May 29, 1997 shall be performed and submitted to the Jefferson County Permit Center for review. The results and recommendations of the required geotechnical report and landscape architect, upon review and acceptance by the Permi Center staff, shall constitute additional conditions of approval for th facility. Boats that are occupied shall not be permitted to moor at the facility longer than three (3) days unless pump-out facilities are available in the immediate vicinity. The design, location, and construction of the facility as well as their subsequent use shall avoid adverse effects on fish, shellfish, wildlife, marin~ vegetation, water quality, and geohydraulic processes. Construction methods shall minimize the use of materials hazardous to the environment. All lumber and other materials treated with preservative shall be sufficiently cured to minimize leaching into the water or shore bed, in accordance with the Best Management Practices approved by the Washingto Department of Fisheries and Wildlife. The use of other suitable materials, such as stell or high strength plastic, is encouraged. The facility shall be designed and constructed to minimize hazards to users and to be capable of withstanding the historic extremes of wind, wave, and tides at their location. Railings, if provided, shall be of clear or open framework design and conform to the Uniform Building Code where required. Utility service on the facility shall be placed on or under the deck. Overhead utility service is prohibited. Lighting shall be shielded to prevent unnecessary glare off-site and to minimize hazards to navigation. The applicant shall have prepared a mutually acceptable and legally enforceable joint use agreement that shall address, at minimum the following: (1) apportionment of construction and maintenance expenses, (2) easements and liability agreements, and (3) use restrictions. Prio to construction, the applicant shall provide this agreement for review and approval by the Jefferson County Permit Center by the Jefferson County Prosecuting Attorney. The facility shall be marked as necessary to avoid hazardous conditions for water surface users as specified by the U.S. Coast Guard. The total length of the facility shall not exceed 195 feet in length. The dock portion of the facility shall not extend more than three feet in height above the water nor exceed eight feet in width. Total individual float area shall not exceed 160 square feet in size. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. louis Scott Shoreline Permit SDP97-D004 Page 8 Findings, Conclusions fA . 4-.d Decision Page ~OI!.,12:.:::. LOG 'TEM # 'lJ ll--- .. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 26 27 28 29 e e 13. The facility shall be set back a minimun of 10 feet from the adjoining property lines, unless closer placement is mutually agreed to by contract or covenant with the adjoining property owner. A copy of this contract or covenant must be filed with the County Auditor's Office and submitted with the building permit application. Department of Public Works: 14. The applicant shall submit plans for construction of the facilities and any land disturbing activities to the Department of Public Works for review and approval in accordance with the Department's review schedule. Based on the submitted plans, additional drainage plan preparation may be necessary. 15. The proponent shall notify the Department of Public Works during various phases of construction in accordance with the Department's inspection schedule. Typically the following inspections are required: A. Installation of temporary erosion and sediment control measures. B. Clearing and pier subgrade preparation. C. Construction of stormwater management facilities. D. Final inspection. Additional inspections may be necessary based on site specific conditions or the nature of the project. 16. The applicant shall obtain Hydraulic Permit Approval (HPA) from the Washington State Department of Fisheries and Wildlife prior to construction. RECOMMENDED this 29th day of July, 1997. \~ Irv Berteig Jefferson County Hearing Examiner 19 20 NOTICE: 21 A copy or notice of this Decision and Appeal Instructions was 22 transmitted by the Jefferson County Permit Center to the following: 23 24 Date Transmitted: 7,3/,.&;7 9- 25 Wendell Stroud, Marine Floats, PO Box 336, Tacoma, WA 98401 Phyllis Scott, PO Box 65079, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 Suzi Hutchison, 1696 La Jolla Dr., Thousand Oaks, CA 91362 Evelyn H. Wootton, 141 Drew Lane, Port Ludlow, WA 98365. louis Scott Shoreline Permit SDP97-D004 Findings, Conclusions LOG ITEM ~and Decision # c.{t . . Page lJ, 01.11. Page 9 * a- o ...(::.Q - =i m 3: , "'0 I>> ~ ~~ I ' , r !o ! '[. ! !~ : , : 5 !~ Ii ~.~ b f~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ...~ ~ - '),; I y ,t.. i,] I ~ ;i.: ~ ~I rJ \I '9.- ~ ' l' :: f "'.... """. ~ ~ !9~r ~ :;; ;2 ~,' r.::::t ~;;g, t II IIU : ,. :~.; 1 to ClI::::s '~ ~ :;) ,;:> IiiiiJ n' 1';-"..,-;;2J --, ;:2 ~ --, '-"'~-- '-------- r- I. o .' G) :::t '\11 g:. .,'., 4 ' " ~~ , lEe " ..... t'"t- n> f" ! J tll} ti ' It' .1;' ~~~~ ..S> '.,j ~ tft ~~ :JIg: ~~ s;lZ ~g :JI~ I IOfU 111,. In! . " .~ ., i ' e -, e J.J ':(1 ~ e.) I :c I, )\1 ..~. '" \- -, 1- JI 1\ ~ ~ ~ ( == ; ~ ~ ~ (jd> o ""0 "" s:: (tl "" _ ""'f s:: ~ ..... cr ~'-< 3 o C1 -. = .., ~ c:... 0 (tl s:: s:: Q. _ ""0 cr '-< ..... '-< NOO tJlc:... ~ (tl - N -, '-< 0;;>3 0""'f""O o en _. o (? ::: 3:cr ~~ -- Z~ )>CJ t; ~~ ~ *5 Z G> rr\ ~ \J" m -- ~ CJ Z ~~ ,&, ~ ~ == ~ co ~ 1-3 ~ ,/ ,/ e -e .. e ;J>I--i 'i:iZ ~S2 rn ~> ~ I-j NtT:1 OC/J 8'i:i I--i tT:1 ?O ~ C/J ~-e o ~ C/J I--i ~ tT:1 'i:i r ~ o "Tj o m "'tl ~ r -.. '"T1 oFT; C'"T1 eX '"T1 :;: rr: ~;;.,::r; ! CC!/ ;;::0 , ::::;;;C~I' -<0. co oCtI ~~~~~2 m.'.' -.I C"':.': r- -< c:: ~ ~ m Z -.... ---__w~ ~~~~~~~~--~-.._--- . a- o G> .........- .o..t m s: "tJ <8 \~ ~ Source: Pope Ae.ource., 1992 PORT LUDLOW BAY I A ICALlIN 'EIT " -............... . 1M... I" 11.. I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I DEVELOPED PER 1987 PLAN II~~~I~~I~~~~~~~~~~~I PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREAS ~ ~ I c=:::::~.., ~ '- [I fn'i'j] ("',m Z "'., O~, c:> fc~ :;:-",,-,"Tl -- ~,;J ,- rn <.:.:: ..- :n C(f) '~c:'-'11 -~o I L 1!1. 3~li c:.-= F? g 25 C..;;:::.1 I < z c::> "'::""::1 m~ c::> 5-< r;;;";O;1 '"t) U U U ~ --- o m e e ~ e == ~ = ~ ~ ~ Port Ludlow Figure 3 Program Development Plan ~ , e t::.=~_ e Pope Resources A UfTitlld PartMrship EXHIBIT E 781 Walker Way Port Ludlow, Washington 98365 (206) 437-2101 FAX (206) 437-2522 August 23, 1994 Mr. Lou Scott P.O. Box 65079 Port 11lo1ow, \VA 98365 Dear Mr. Scott: As requested I have reviewed your proposal for a dock which contains 6 long slips. As owners of the Port Ludlow Marina, Pope Resources would naturally be concerned over increased competition; however, our larger slips are full and have waiting lists; thus, I don't feel your project will conflict with ours. In fact, your project is so unique and well planned, I believe it will enhance the area. I fully support your proposal. Sinc~ Joe Michelsen Vice President of Development JM:pam LOG !TEM # 3,( ~ LOG ITEM pagJ'lLotl2- # eft .,.... '1. . e EXIIIBl.LG ,. --................ IIYiI September 1, 1994 40 Teal Lake Road Port Ludlow. Washington 98365 (206) 437-9434 1-800-872-1323 Mr. Lou Scott 200 Montgomery P.O. Box 65079 Port Ludlow, W A 98365 Good morning Mr. Scott: I understand that you will be requesting approval to install a dock with six large boat slips before the County shoreline hearing. As manager of an office which annually meets with approximately 3000 people considering moving to Port Ludlow, I can assure you and the County that there is a significant number of these people who would like to build a home on property with direct access to a dock. LOG ITEM .# -;:;.3 LOG iTEM ~ # cjJ ';--'aqe l.a.-of..ta-