HomeMy WebLinkAboutLog064
/.
e
e
-
.Josh Peters
From:
Sent:
To:
Anne Shaffer [shaffjas@dfw.wa,gov]
Thursday, October 11, 2001 10:06 AM
Nicole Faghin; Josh Peters; Edwin,J,Gossett@NWS02,usace,army,mil;
martha,hurd@wadnr,gov; jste461 @ecy.wa.gov
Scoping comments, Re: Port Ludlow Revisions
Subject:
.
Card for Anne Shaffer
Josh,
Additional scoping comments included in the following, thanks....
Thanks Nicole,
The attached files were the most use (the faxed letter is in black and
white). A few more points. On the figures it is impossible to tell
which elements are in addition to the 2000 proposal and which are in
place of the 2000 proposal (see key for quick illustration). To clarify,
the portions of the plan that are the blue 2000 proposal, are now
dropped? The blue with red outline and hatching overlay are both 2000
and
2001, and the red hatching is additional 2001 proposal, correct?
If this is so, by my quick review it looks like there is a new kayak
float, which will need to be moved deeper than -20 even with grating ,
and revised so it is as narrow as possible (see Fresh and Williams in
press. Bottom line, on water grating doesn't work... These authors same
work in 1995 documented that anything over 2 meters wide impacted
nearshore habitat.).
On your table, please clarify what the net increase in overwater
structure of the 2001 proposal is from the existing facility (not the
2000 proposal), and what depths the increased overwater structure
occupies. This will need to be: l)minimized to the absolute possible,
and no increase in over water structure may occur shallower than -15
MLLW. Once all minimizing/avoiding has taken place, and it is confirmed
that no
eelgrass will be impacted, if there is any additional increase in
overwater coverage (again which may only occur deeper than -15MLLW)
than we will need to discuss a minimum of 2:1 mitigation. I have offered
mitigation options in the past, including moving existing in and
overwater structure, including, the gas float offshore,
I also received a letter of comments from Colby and concur with water
quality concerns, including pump out station capacity and locations.
These should be addressed.
I may have more comments as I receive additional clarifying information.
Formal copy of this input will follow shortly. Look forward to
replys. . . JAS .
Nicole Faghin wrote:
> Anne and Jack:
>
> You will be receiving a letter today from Port Ludlow Associates
restarting our permitting process. Along with that letter is a drawing
showing the existing marina, the layout proposed in the 2000 JARPA and
the new layout (2001). I'm sending you an email of those drawings in
PDF format so you can see the full effect of the color drawings showing
1
.I.
Pl~e let me know if you have any Jltstions.
all those differences.
.
>
.> Nicole Faghin
> Director of Planning
> and Environmental Services
> Reid Middleton
> 728 134th St. SW
> Everett, WA 98204
> (425) 741-3800
> Fax: (425) 741-3900
> nfaghin@reidmidd.com
>
>
> Name: 4914c.pdf
> 4914c.pdf Type: Portable Document Format (application/pdf)
> Encoding: base64
>
>
> COLOR Chart (1) .pdf
(application/pdf)
Name: COLOR Chart (1) .pdf
Type: Portable Document Format
>
>
Encoding: base64
> Name: Nicole Faghin.vcf
> Nicole Faghin.vcf Type: VCard (text/x-vcard)
> Encoding: quoted-printable
DI-aj:t-a
2
lOG HEwl
~~ (Ott--
p\~ge-8:-_0~ ;r