HomeMy WebLinkAboutLog159
Page 1 of 1
David W. Johnson
From: David W. Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 200512:44 PM
To: 'James parker'
Subject: RE: Permitting
Hold off on the maps. I may need them later, but I think they may need to be changed a bit. I don't like the fact
that it says," possibly within 200 feet." It would be better to say, "within 200 feet." Ifs also a bit confusing. Better
to keep things simple. For the Shoreline case we would just want maps that show Phase I and especially where it
comes within 200 feet of the shoreline - there is a map like that in the Delineation which I thought was more
useful than the big one. We can discuss this more when we prepare for the hearing.
I will go ahead and create a separate MLA for the Conditional Use Type II permit which will need to be noticed
again - but like I said - will not have a public hearing (unless the Administrator's decision is appealed). It is
probable that the Shoreline permit will be appealed. In that case, we won't issue the Conditional Use until that is
resolved. Once it does get resolved, the Conditional Use will be ready to issue.
From: James parker [mailto:jparker@jeffpud.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:43 AM
To: David W. Johnson
Subject: RE: Permitting
Yes.
Thanks. I have made a few more of the larger maps, do you still need them?
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: David W. Johnson [mailto:dwjohnson@co.jefferson.wa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:01 AM
To: James parker
Subject: Permitting
Jim,
Originally we wanted to combine the Shoreline permit with the Conditional Use and review them
together. Now with the prospect of waiting until the Phase II wetland delineation is done to have the
hearing, I think it makes more sense to separate the two and have the hearing for the Shoreline permit
alone, and then when the delineation is completed, review the Conditional Use. Because the Shoreline is
a Type III it will need to be processed first anyway, and also the Conditional Use does not require a public
hearing.
Does this meet your approval?
David Wayne Johnson
Assistant Planner
Jefferson County Dept of Community Development
360.379.4465
#:
Page
LOG ITl::M
{~
( ot--:S
12/14/2005
SECTION 8 . PERMIT ApPLICATION AND REviEW PROCEOUREslSEPA IMPLEMENTATION
Code, all development permit applications' shall
be classified as one of the following: Type I; Type
II, Type III, or Type IV. Legislative decisions are
classified as Type V actions and are addressed
in Section 9 of this Code. Exemptions from the
requirements of project permit application
processing are set forth in Section 8.1.8 of this
Section 8.
3. Determination of Proper Type of Procedure.
a. Detennination by the Administrator. The
Administrator ~ determine the proper
procedure for aft development applications. If
there is a question as to the appropriate type
of procedure, the Administrator shaft resolve
it in favor of the higher numbered procedure
type, except as specifically authorized for
discretionary conditional use permits under
Section 8.8.4(b), below.
::::::"). b. Optional Consolidated Permit
~ Processing. An application that involves two
(2) or more procedures may be processed
collectively under the highest numbered
procedure required for any part of the
application or processed individually under
each of the procedures identified by this
Code. The applicant may determine whether
the application shall be processed
collectively or individually. If the application
is processed under the individual procedure
option, the highest numbered type procedure
must be processed prior to the subsequent
lower numbered procedure.
c. Declsion-maker(s). The Board of County
Commissioners is the highest decision-
maker, followed by the Appellate Hearing
Examiner, the Hearing Examiner and the
Administrator. Joint public hearings with
other agencies shaI be processed in
accordance with Section 8.1.5 of this Section
8.
d. Administrator. Upon issuance of a
determination of completeness as described
in Section 8.2.3, the Administrator shaft
assign a project planner to the project who
will coordinate and be responsible for all
phases of development application
administration.
e. SEPA Review. Project review conducted
pursuant to the State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, shall
occur concurrenOy with project review. The
SEPA review process, including all public
comment procedures, is set forth in Section
8.10 of this Section 8. Nothing contained in
Sections 8.1 through 8.5 of this Section 8
shall be construed as restricting the need for
full environmental review in accordance with
Sections 3.6.4 through 3.6.11 and Section
8.10 of this Section 8.
4. Project Permit Application Framework.
TABLE 8-1: PERMITS - DECISIONS
Type 11 Type II Type III Type IV Type V
Allowed uses not Classification of unnamed Reasonable economlc use FlnaI plats under Section 7 Special use permits
~ notice of and cflSCfetionary uses variances under Section under Section 3.3.5
application (et, "Yes- under Section 3.2 3.6.4(h)
uses Isted in able 3-1,
building permits, septic
pennits etc.)
Minor amendments to Release of six-year FPA PRRDs under Section Final PRROs under Jefferson County
planned rural residential moratorium for an 3.6.13 and major amend- Section 3.6.13 Comprehensive Plan
deve~ents fRRDs~ individual single-family ments to f'RRDs under amendments under
under ction .6.13.1 residence under Section Section 3:6. f3~15(c) Section 9
4.16
Home businesses Short subdivisions under Shoreline substantial I Amendments to develop-
:~ under Section Section 7.4 ~ment permits for ment regulations
. . ary uses, and ~ amendments to
conditional and variance this and the Land
permits under the Use Districts Map
Jefferson County
Shoreline Master Program
(SMP)
Temporary outdoor use Binding site plans under Plat alterations and Amendments to the
pennits under Section Sectioil 7.5 vacations under Section Jefferson County SMP
4.38 7.1.3(d) LOG IT ~ utility plans
Stormwater Administrative conditional long subdivisions under ments thereto
management permits use ~rmits under Section Section 7.5 (Cfl
under Section 6.7 8.8. (a) [i.e., listed in #
Table 3-1 as "C(a)1
at 3
Page
l--L
- ..-...-.
8-2
Unified Development Code
Section 8 . Pennit App6cation and Review ProcedureslSEPA Implementation
>-
c::
H
::J
C3 u..
!: u..
.~ 0
(I)
"C
o 0
:::E: c::
o
c
(I)
(I)
Q
00
v-
Ol
Ol
-
o
C\J
- (.!)
Ol .::..:::
"C
C,.)
'-
...... en
Cl ::J
o
......
:J
<E:
"C
..c
..0
:z
Cl
H C) C)
..c ..c
Q C,.) C,.)
o
....J a.. a..
- -
I- I-
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o 00
o c
o <E:
o 0
c::
"C
C,.) w
I-
o <E:
(I) I-
(.!) 00
I-
o
Cl
I
:z
o
I-
(.!)
:z
H
:I:
00
<E:
3:
u..
o
w
I-
<E:
I-
00
o
C\J
C\J
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
lJ'J
CY')
I-
<E:
I-
00
"C '-
C,.) (I)
C
'- 3
(I) 0
:J)
(tl (I)
c..
x ......
(tl
I- I-
#
(I)
Q
'-
co
a..
* *
3:
-
c::
I-
00
~
>-
3:
:I:
o
Ol
lJ'J
V-
(I) (I)
(t) "C
::J 0
C,.)
"C
C ::J
co _
....J C,.)
:::E:
w
x
w
c::
W
:I: _
I-
o
I-
o CD
C)
en co
:J a..
...... -
co
...... 0
00 :>
o
o
o
o
......
(I)
"C >
o (tl
C,.) "C
x q..
(tl q..
I- <E:
o
o
lJ'J
CY')
I-
'- <E:
CD I-
:J) 00
co
c..
x
co
I-
'0
c-J
rt
\
b
()
<t
~
.~
. ....L.-
.c-:-,
N ."
\ 1~
j
('-J
()
.:)
(:J
\
\5;
()
.:2,>
~)
f....J j
\J
I-
o
Cl
I
:z
o
I-
(.!)
:z
f-l
:I:
00
<E:
3:
CD
CY')
CY')
t-
oo I
W v-
C,.) 0
H lJ'J
:> CD
c:: Ol
w
00
u..
o
CD <E:
W CY') 3:
I- CY')
<E: t-
I- v-
00 <E:
W X H
o a..
....J CD :::E:
<E: >-
W 0 ....J
c:: a.. 0
W
I-
<E:
I-
00
LOG ITEM
# (5Cj ~
Page_2-otL:
:J)
(I)
.::..:::
00