HomeMy WebLinkAboutLog001
,-" 'l
DRAFT OUTLINE
Jefferson County PUD#l Pre-Application PRE04-00035 October 29, 2004
DCD Conference Room 10:00 am
Attendees: Mike Moren I 'J1""'- ~S.2:1NG.L.et.1 t.€". ) Jl....... ~ P~t>.a\
Jim Pearson, DPW; Randy Marx of Env Health; Stacie Hoskins, DCD'
Public Works:
Stormwater: DOE Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington
Roads: Submit Stormwater Management Plan
~~~
~~~~~
~~
b<sE. .Nl.<(~ ~~ ~ ~ f.,r.....J...r~ ~~..,..JPciu..L
~~ ~ ~ ~ I~J (} O'
(loa..'... ~~~~ \ ~ ~~""'-' (1
t Sc> {lr ~IJ ~'eAN "-be fw - h~ IN'''-r \QJ~'
Environmental Health:
Water:
Septic
Commun' drainfield: Need
Work throu or
. ed.
. ogs to identify area (15 - 20 holes)
over threshold. PUD would own and operate once
Commu' ea or individual drain fields: .. 1 ua easements. Want to see four
holes per system (2 for . or reserve). Then can permit systems later on
existin i won't have to have a l' oles dug. Permitted through Jefff Co
E ealth.
l>uN'-f ~oW' ~ ~ ~.- r-:. ~ ~ t C' - ~ J...-t~~o --<... .-9.....
~ J~ \. -:r~. co.'::" ~-l. ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~
>>- ~w\~~ ~e- ~ "~"
4~~~ ~-t..~~~\~
~ ~O ~~ ~ 4.>rI~.t ~ '
~~~~.
.~ ~ ~UJ ~~~-~t-
~ 0 n ~ ~ d-. ~l,... ~ ~ ~.J.. ~ J.-:./f"
~ k.r- t ~ ~~. r ~ \.a\..t- ~ ~ 1.i l'(" ~
~ U-a.- t ~ ('.~AJ. - Uf '" ~ , LOG ITEM
# (
Page--1-ofd~~
PRE04-00035 _JCPUD#LBeckett Point.doc
Page 1 of 2
.. ,
DRAFT OUTLINE
DRD:
1. Zoned RR 1:20
2. ESA's: Suburban Shoreline designation
Shoreline also designated as Type 1 Stream, Wetland as Type 5: proposed UDC
Amendments may impact Fish & Wildlife buffers. Due to be completed by end of
2004.
Wetlands: Type II require 100-foot buffer, mitigation to reduce (reg's changed in
2001.) Update delineation with buffer and discuss mitigation.
Flood: Follow Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance
LSHA 1,2 & 3 and Seismic hazard: Geotechnical report to address stability of soils
Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area
Fish & Wildlife (Eagle, Great Blue Heron) Send to WDFW; - .c. ~\A.... r- T........t-.
Coastal SIPZ
3. ESA's and buffers depicted on site plan; Wetland Delineation, geotechnical report
4. Unified Development Code available online at:
http://www.co.iefferson.wa.uslcommdevelovment/udc/default.htm
.......
UDC Section 3, Table of Uses
Minor Utility Development in RR 1:20 zone is C(a) Use Base fee
Notice of application
Notice Board
612.00
124.00
8.00 ~,
UDC Section 5, Shoreline Management Master Program
Utilities in a Suburban Shoreliune Designation is identified as a Secondary use.
Shoreline Substantial Development (Secondary Use) Base fee 1,409.00
Requires Notice of Application included above
Notice Board included above
Notice of Hearing 124.00
SEP A review (if required-difficult to read Figure 3)
432.00
12, 1.- r'J/). ~
'l,?~9 ,
-=. ~ ~C::::rN\"~'" ~~~.
~ ~^ - ~W ~~_
-40~~
~ ~~ ~-~ ~ LJ-L ~~.c
~~~..
PRE04-00035_JCPUD#I_Beckett Point.doc
LOG ITEM
# {
Pag~.. 2 _ofd,5f
-"-
Page 2 of 2
Beckett Point 2003
Page 1 of 3
# \
Page 6
M
ofdSr
Beckett Point 2003
Page 2 of 3
# I
Page~of~$f
.' ~
Beckett Point 2003
Page 3 of 3
# 1
Page .5 of ~
...
~~
,
\
Page 1 of 2
Stacie Hoskins
From: Stacie Hoskins
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 20057:33 AM
To: 'Jean Carr'
Subject: RE: Beckett Point Question
Hi Jean,
The fees total $2,492.00 for land use review, and you may submit one check for the fees. The breakdown is
as follows:
1. Conditional (Administrative) Use Permit
$612 Base Fee
127 Notice of Application
8 Notice Board
2. Shoreline Substantial Development (Secondary Use)
1,177 Base Fee
o Notice of Application - included above
o Notice Board - included above
127 Notice of Public Hearing
3. SEPA Review: @$441
Please include this summary with your application so the Permit Technician may receipt in the fees.
Public Works and Environmental Health Department fees are not included in this summary. Public Works will
bill the applicant prior to permit decision. Health Dept fees should be based on the type of septic
application. Contact a Permit Technician at (360) 379-4450 regarding septic fees.
Please contact me with any other questions.
Regards,
Stacie L. :}{oskins
Development Services Manager, DRD
Jefferson County Department of Community Development
621 Sheridan Street
Port Townsend, WA 98368
Phone 360-379-4463
Fax 360.379.4451
shoskins@co.jefferson.wa.us
-----Original Message-----
From: Jean Carr [mailto:JCarr@parametrix.coml
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 20054:04 PM
To: Stacie Hoskins
Subject: Beckett Point Question
Hi Stacie
We are just about ready to submit our application, and I want to be
sure we include the right fees. It looks to me from your fee schedule
like we need:
8/3/2005
#
Page-0
LOG ITEM
I
of~
1. Conditional (Administrative) Use Permit: @ $625
2. Shoreline Substantial Development (Secondary Use): @ $1,439
3. SEPAReview: @$441
...
..... ~ ,~
Is this correct? Also, can we provide one check for all the fees
combined?
Thanks Stacie!
Jean Carr
Parametrix
Olympic Office
(360) 459-3609
jcarr@parametrix.com
Page 2 of 2
#
Page 1
LOG ITEM
{
of ;1&f
8/3/2005
10.77 Ch. ~m
rrIrrI
(1)0
..."
mg
5:!.
("")""D
:r:2
%
!'lP,88 -f # .
e?S~
p aJ~ ~
~~
...
a
-1~
~
~~
? a
. a ""
<:)'I~
~
~?88
~S~~
P 62
aJ""l~
-
k
<..9 ~
.>>
".s.
P,
G>
<Z
~
-\
~-~
I
o
~J
-=1'
m
~
>(I)m
%0 IT1
Z c: 0
ITI-f "
X~9
~Q
:cz
...
b
::....\
<9~~
IJIO-?h'f-~
~ ~ ~
~C
~
~~
N-~
~~
~O~
'XS8 '1'1
II~................ '"
"- ,>/~Vt"'" ;...-'\ \ ~ \ \~ \
,~~y~ "'-= ~ \
OJ.'''Y/ ~ q~ \ q \ . ~ -.:::.:::-
(~:~71 ~ ~ q ;. '- ~::: ;0.- -
'<I ~-
'\. 6'~
~~. A O~<t:
':Af)- Oq,,,,. 7>-
,y~
~~
~~
G")
o
<
..
-i
)>(1) m
ZO ITI
Z c: ("")
ITI-t "
x:r: ~
CD
~"'D
02
:r:z
-t
VlG)O
p:loo
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o
o
CD
...
+
+
+
+
I
I
I
I
I
I
1+
I
I
I
1+
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\+
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\+
\
\
I
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
LOG ITEM
I
+
Q.
III
1:.::E
-II
0_
D. .-
M In
G1='ti
~.= .S!.
.!!l ~ e
1L1llD.
x-
0
'" ~
Q. X
'iil Q. 0
.:5- '"
'" Q.
Z Z Q.
< .:5-
I- 0
U F '"
F ~ z
UlQ. ~
"'''' Q.
ZUl Q.
~O '"
::> '"
I- Q. ::>
~~ 0 Q.
~~ Z 0
::> z
0 ::>
,,0 '" 0
ZU " '"
'" "
F...J '" '"
Ul...J 0 0
><3< Z Z
"'~ ::> ::>
0 00
'"
'" '"
< 0
'" '"
"- Z
'" "- ::>
~ ::> 0
lD '"
~ 0 "
Z "''''
:I: < ~~
" ~ z'"
:;: ~ ::>Ul
>- 0",
'" I- "''''
< 0 Ul::>
Z 0 OUl
is "- Q.Ul
0'"
'" 0 "''''
0 on Q.Q.
I
0
...J
>- '"
'" '" G:
::> 0 Z
g " <(
'" '"
t5 ~~ 0
U u< 0
~I ,,~ '"
Ul
~~ 0
Q.
0
><< '"
"'Q. Q.
D ~
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
i
.
! ~~I-
W
>C w
~<1Z ~
E :;;!
::! ~
l. 0
. '"
Page 1 of 1
Stacie Hoskins
From: Stacie Hoskins
Sent: Wednesday, March 16,200510:21 AM
To: Peter Bonyun; Colleen Zmolek; Kathie Anne Sukert; Rebecca Carlson
Subject: exempt storage buildings
Hi All,
Just a reminder that all new structures are subject to the Environmentally Sensitive Area buffers, and people
inquiring about sheds need to know they must maintain ESA buffers.
I spoke with two representatives for the Beckett Point Homeowner's Association today, and they are going
around and around with Mrs Olsen, a resident of Beckett Point. Mrs Olsen has provided documentation from
the International Building Code stating that a 200 sq ft structure is EXEMPT from a permit.
Please note that UDC Section 3.6.5 states the section is applicable as follows:
Any land use or development activity which is subject to a development permit or approval under this Code may only
be undertaken on land located within or containing an ESA or its buffer if the provisions of this Section 3.6.4 are met.
Uses and activities in environmentally sensitive areas, or their buffers for which no permit or approval is required by
any other cOimty ordinance, remain subject to the development standards and other requirements of this Section.
New sheds are not li~;ted under exemptions.
Thanks,
Stacie L. Hoskins
Associate Planner, DRD
Jefferson County Department of Community Development
621 Sheridan Street
Port Townsend, WA )8368
Phone 360-379-4461
Fax 360-379-4451
shoski n s@co.jefferson.wa.us
3/16/2005
LOG ITEM
# I
Page ID ~ of JSI
Map OUq)u" .
Page 1 of 1
[J
;W
o
Legend
Seleded Features
Road System
PllIR:ltIIfHoI
2000 Mdal PI'IOlOS
Boundsdes
o ~Cady
. w_
DOihlrCl:'luniM
OR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL Y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
spect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
lIection. Wed Mar 16 09:46:06 2005
LOG ITEM
"L L
#U"
Page...JL.. of JS5r
http://gisserver/servlet/com,esrLesrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0&F orm= ... 3/16/2005
Map OutPut . ,
Legend
[J Seleded FeaCUres
.;vi Road Syatem
o Parcellli-H
2000 JUlMI PI'lotofl
BotJndalles
o .IIllILWbl Ctad)o
. w...
DOIhltCGunfi!o!l
OR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONlY-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
espect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
lIection. Wed Mar 16 09:46:06 2005
Page 1 of 1
t.~f
'ifc.r
LC)G ITEM
I
Paa~3 12- of~<1'"
,;~', ~
http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceN ame=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4,O&F orm=... 3/16/2005
Map Output . ,
Page 1 of 1
Cl
#'
D
Legend
Sell!lded FeabJ..liI
Road SysteM
Patcllll&-H
2000 Aerl8l Photos
BOIJndartelil
o ~Cl:uiIy
. Wti8
DOIlIlrCcunfil!lli
OR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
espect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
lIection. Wed Mar 16 09:46:06 2005
LOG ITEM
4+ ~
'tt
Page-J . of~
http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap,Esrimap?ServiceN ame=::ovmap&ClientV ersion==4.0&Form=::., , 3/16/2005
d. Coverage. This Section applies to all uses
and aclMties within ESAs or their
designated buffers unless otherwise exempt
The foIowing permits and approvals shan be
subject to and coordinate with the
requirements of this section: clearing and
grading; site plan approval; sewage
disposal; subdivision or short subdivision;
binding site plans; building permit; planned
residential development; shoreline substan-
tial development; variance; conditional use
permit; cet1ain forest practice permits (Class
IV General. Class III Conversion Option
Harvest Plans); other permits leading to the
development or alteration of land; and
rezones if not combined with another
development permit. In instances where a
proposal involves a parcel of real property
with more than one ESA or _ESA buffer, the
standards that pertain to each identified ESA
shall apply. When provisions of this...,section
conflict with one another, or when Provisions
of this section conflict with any other local
law, the provision that provides more
protection to the ESA shall apply. No permit
Involving a designated environmentally
sensitive area shan be approved unless it Is
determined to be in compliance with this
code.
Any action taken in an Environmentally
Sensitive Area designated under this section
that Is In violation of the standards and
conditions contained herein is expressly
prohibited.
e. General exceptions. The Administrator
may grant an exception to the requirements
of this Section. In determining whether an
exception Is appropriate, the Administrator
shan require that the proposed land or water
use win not create unmltigatable significant
adverse environmental Impacts. In making
this determination, the Administrator may
require that an appfacant prepare a Special
Report (per Section 3.6.10). tn granting an
exception. the Administrator may require
conditions of approval, including mitigation,
as necessary to ensure that the subject land
or water use action wUI not pose a risk of
adverse enWonmentaIlmpacts.
f. General exemptionS.
(1) The foIowing activities are exempt from
the requirements of this Section:
i. Emergencies that threaten the
public health, safety and welfare.
An -emergency" is an unanticipated
and immediate threat to public
..ea.., safety, or the environment
which requires action within a time
3-13a
.
SECTION 3 . lAND USE DISTRICTS
within an area designated as
Mineral Resource land (MRL), you
may be subject to inconveniences
or discomforts arising from such
operations, incIucflf'lQ but not limited
to noise, tree removal, odors,
fumes, dust, smoke, the operation
of machinery, and the storage and
disposal of aggregate products.
One or more of the inconveniences
described may occur as a result of
extraction and processing opera-
tions which are in conformance with
existing laws and regulations. Jef-
ferson County has determined that
the use of certain real properties for
mineral resource extraction and
processing activities is necessary
to ensure resource availability in
the County. The County win not
consider to be a nuisance those
Inconveniences or olSCOmforts
arising from extraction and
processing operations, if such oper-
ations are consistent with c0m-
monly accepted best management
practices and comply with local.
state, and federal taws:
3.6.4 Environmentally Sensitive Areas
District (ESA).
a. Purpose. The Environmentally Sensitive
Areas Overtay DIsbict (ESA) is adopted to
inpIement the policies of the
Comprehensive Plan for five types of
Environmentally Sensitive Areas as defined
in Sections 3.6.5-3.6.9:
(1) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas.
(2) Frequently Flooded Areas.
(3) Geologically Hazardous Areas.
(4) FISh and Wildlife Habitat Areas.
(5) WeUands.
b. Applicability. Any land use or development
activity which is subject to a development
permit or approvaIlR1der this Code may only
be undertaken on land located within or
containing an ESA or its buffer if the
provisions of this Section. 3.6.4 are met
Uses and activities in environmentaIy
sensitive areas. or 1heir buffers for . no
permit or b an other
o remain ect to the
standards and other
~ofthiS
Co Allowable Uses. All uses shan be subject to
requirements specified in Table 3.1 for the
underlying district. unless otherwise
specified in this Code.
lJniIied Development Code
Secfbf 3 . Land Use Districts
Amended by Ordinance No. 06-0510-04
lOG ITEM
#- /
Page..J:L of.dGE....
..,
SECTION 3 . lAND USE DISTRICTS
too short to allow compliance with
this Section.
ii. Normal and routine maintenance
and operation of pre-existing
retention! detention facilities,
biofilters and other stonnwater
management faciIties, irrigation
and drainage ditches, farm ponds,
fish ponds, manure lagoons, and
livestock water ponds, provided that
such activities shan not involve c0n-
version of any weUand not currently
being used for such activity
ii. Structural alterations to buildings,
permitted under the provisions of
this Code, that do not alter the
structural footprint or introduce new
adverse impacts to an adjacent
environmentally sensitive area.
iv. Nonnal and routine maintenance or
repair of existing utility structures
within a right-of-way or existing
utility corridor or easements,
including the cutting, removal
and/or mowing of vegelation above
the ground.
v. Forest Practices conducted pur_
suant to RCW 76.09, except Class
IV .(general conversions) and
Conversion Option Harvest. Plans
(COHP).
vi. NonnaI and routine installation and
maintenance of propane storage
tanks and wood stoves for single
family houses or mobile homes.
g. Nonconfonnlng Uses.
(1) Any use or structure in existence on the
date this code becomes effective that
does not meet the buffer. requirements
of this section for any designated aiticaI
area shaI be considered a legal
nonconfonning use.
(2) Any use or strucIure for which an
application has vested or for which a
permit has been obIained prior to the
effective date of this Code, that does
not meet the buffer requirements of this
section for any designated ESA, shall
be considered a legal nonconforming
use.
(3) A legal nonconforming use or structure
may be repaired or maintained without
limitation by this section.
(4) A legal nonconfonning use or structure
that has been damaged or destroyed by
fire or other calamity may be restored
and its immediateJy previous use may
be resumed.
h. Reasonable Economic Use Variance. If
the application of this Section would deny all
reasonable economic use of the property,
the applicant may appJy for a reasonable
economic use variance, only upon denial of
a pennit due to the requirements of this
Section.
(1) The applicant shaI apply to the
Department, and the Department shaD
prepare a recommendation to the
Hearing Examiner. The property owner
andIor applicant for a reasonable use
variance has the blI'den of proving that
the property is deprived of aU
reasonable use;
i. Notice. The Hearing Examiner shall conduct
a public hearing on the variance request.
Decisions of the Hearing Examine~hall be
final and conclusive unless appeaied to the
Appellant Examiner. Public notice shall be
provided as follows:
(1) The Department shaD arrange for at
least one publication of the notice of
hearing to appear in a newspaper of
general circulation within the County at
least (10) days before the hearing.
Payment of all publication fees shaH be
the responsibility of the applicant
(2) The Department shall send notice to
adjacent property owners advising
them of the hearing. The notice shaD
be maIed to the owners of record of aU
property lying within three hundred
(300) feet of the property at issue, at
least ten (10) days before the public
hearing. Names and addresses of
adjacent property owners shaD be
provided to the. Department by the
applicant, subject to Department
approval.
(3) The Department shaD provide the
appfJCant with at least two (2) copies of
the heaing notice, and one copy of an
affidavit of posting. The applicant shall
post the notices and maintain them in
place for at least ten (10) days prior to
the hearing, not incIucrmg the day of
posting or the day of the hearing. The
notices shall be placed in conspicuous
locations on or near the property and
. shall be removed by the applicant after
the hearing. Notices shall be mounted
on easily visible boards provided by
the Deparbnenl The affidavit of
Unified Development Code
Sec60n 3 . Land Use Districts
Amended by Ordinance No. 06-051041
3-13b
LOG \TEM
$8:96_ \5 oC-
.
SECTION 3 . lAND USE DISTRICTS
'.
Posting shaH be signed, notarized. and
returned to 1he Department alleast ten
(10) days prior to 1he hearing.
(4) AI hearing notices sha1 include a legal
description of the property irwoIved,
and a concise descripIiun of the
variance reqlleSted in nonlegal
language.
a. Findings. A teaSOnabIe economic use
varialace may be granIed only when the
Hearing Cxaminer inds Ilatthe ~
meets aI of the Uowing aiteria:
(1) No reasonable economic use wiIh less
impact on the ESA or its buIrer is
possible.
(2) There is no feaslJle on-site alternative
to the proposed adivities that would
Blow 8 reasonable economic use wiIh
less advenle impac:ts to environ-
-" - '. -mentally. -sensitive areas or ESA
buffers. Feasible on-site alematives
shaI include. but are not Imited to:
reduction in density; phasilag of project
implemeldaIioc.; change in timing of
activities; and revision of roacJ or
parcel layout or related site pIaming
considefations.
(3) The ~ valiance wi! result in
the mininun feasible aItefation or
impairment to the environmentally
sensitive areas functional c:harao-
teri$tic$ and .ecisting contours. wge.
taIion. fish and wikIire 'Iesources, and .
hydr01ogicai c:ondifions.
(4) DisUbance of environmentally sen-
sitive .-eas has been minWnIzed by
locating any nec;e$saty alteration in
ESA buffers to the minimum extent
possible.
(5) The proposed variance wi not cause
degradation to swface or ground water
quality.
(6) The proposed variance compIie$ with
.. Federal. State and local statutory
and common law, incIucIing the
Endangeted Species Ad. and
statutory IaW$ related to secIment
c:ot*oI. pollution control. toodpIain
- restricIions. and on de wastewater
-disposal. and common law relating to
property and nuisance.
(7) There wit be no material ~ to
nearby public or private property and
no material threat to the health or
safety of people on or otf the property.
(8) The inabiIily to derive reasonable
economic use of 1he property is not
the result of actions by 1he appracant in
segregating or dividing 100 hI'nN:>rtu
and creating 1be ~
condiion after the etredive date of this
. code.
b. Conditions.
(1) In gran6ng approval for reasonable
economic use variances. the 'ieali'9
&anIiner may requn IRiligalelg con-
diIions that wile in the ExamineR
judgment. sUbsIanIiaIIy sean the
objedivcs of this code.
(2) In g1a1619 approval b reasonable
economic use Yarialk:e$ involving
ttesfgnated weIands. the Heating
Ocamkter shaI c:onsider the following
mitigating conditions: .
i. Provision . of a I1IiIgation plan
demonsbataag how the applicant
intend$ to subslanUalyrestore .'-.
the site to predewIopment
conditions Wowing project
completion; and
i. The restoration. aeaIion or
er."1ancemenl of weIands and
1heir bufIieIs in order to offset the
impaQs resuIIing tom 100
applicants actions; the overall
goal of any restoraIioI.. creation
or enhancement prqect shall be
no net loss of wetlaacls iJnetion
and acreage.
3.6.5 CritIcal Aquifer Recharge Areas.
a. ClassIfication. Critical NPIer Recharge
Areas are naturally susceptible due to 1he
existence of permeable sols or a seawater
wedge in coasIIne aquIers. CertaIn
overlying land uses can lead to water quality
andfor quantity degradaUon. The foIowing
das$Ifications define CrIIicaI Aquifer
Recharge Areas.
(1) SUsceptIble AquIfer Rec:harge Areas
. are tho$e with geologic and hydrologic
c:onditions that promote rapid
In8Iration of recharge waters to
groundwater aquifeR. For 1he
purposes of this sedion. U1Iess
dherwise detemiled by preparation
of an Aquifer Recharge IRa Report .
auUlorized l.Ilder 1his secIion. 1he
foIowing geologic units. as Identified
from available state of WashingtOll
Oepertment of NabnI Resources
geologic mawin9, define Susceptible
Aquifer Recharge Areas for east
Jeffersoo County.
i. Alluvial fans (Ha),
LOG ITEM UnitiedDevebpmentCode
# {Section 3 . Land Use Districts
. As amended by Ordiilance No. 07-0723-02
Page-Uof 'L.~
3-14
SECTION 3 . lAND USE DISTRICTS
.
the applicant shall include on the
face of any such instrument the
boundary of the streamside
buffer area.
iv. The applicant may also choose
to dedicate the buffer through a
conservation easement or deed
restriction that shall be recorded
with the Jefferson County
Auditor. Such easements or
restrictions shall, however, use
the forms approved by the.
Prosecuting Attorney.
h. Conditions.
(1) General. In granting approval for a
project application subject to the
provisions of this section, the
Administrator may require mitigating
conditions that will, in the Admini-
strator's judgment, substantially
secure the objectives of this section.
(2) Basis for Conditions. All conditions
of approval required pursuant to this
section shall be based upon either the
substantive requirements of this
section or the recommendations of a
qualified professional utilizing best
available science, contained within a
special report required under this
section.
3.6.9 Wetlands.
a. Classification/Deslgnation.
(1) Classification. Wetlands shall be
classified using the Washington State
Department of Ecology's Wetland
Rating System for Western Washing-
ton, ~ Edition, 1993. Wetland
delineations shall be detennined by
using the Washington State Wetlands
Identification and Delineation Manual,
March 1997, or as amended hereafter.
(2) Designation. As determined using the
Washington State Department of
Ecology's Wetland Rating System for
Westem Washington, ZMI Edition,
1993, all Category I wetlands,
Category II wetlands 2,500 square feet
or larger in size and Category III and
IV wetlands 10,000 square feet or
larger in size, shall be subject to the
standards of this section.
(3) Sources Used for Identification.
Sources used to identify designated
3-28
wetlands include, but are not limited
to:
I. United States Department of the
Interior, Fish and Wildlife
Service, National Wetlands
Inventory.
ii. Areas identified as hydric soils,
soils with significant soil inclu-
sions and "wet spots" within the
United States Department of
Agriculture/Soil Conservation
Service Soil Survey for Jefferson
County.
iii. Washington State Department of
Natural Resources, Geographic
Information System: Hydro-
graphy and Soils Survey Layers.
(4) Wetland Maps. The wetland maps
prepared by the County have been
produced for informational purposes
only and are not regulatory devices
forming an integral part of this section.
b. Regulated Activities. Any land use or
development activity shall be subject to the
provisions of this Section, Includlna but not.
limited to the following activities which are
directly undertaken or originate in a
regulated wetland or its buffer, unless
exempted: _
(1) The removal, excavation, grading, or
dredging of material of any kind,
including the construction of ponds
and trails;
(2) The dumping, discharging, or filling of
any material;
(3) The draining, flooding, or disturbing of
the wetland water level or water table;
(4) The driving of pilings;
(5) The placing of obstructions;
(6) The construction, reconstruction,
demolition, or expansion of any
structure;
(7) The destruction or alteration of
wetland vegetation through clearing,
harvesting, shading, intentional bum-
ing, application of herbicides or
pesticides, or planting of vegetation
that would alter the character of a
regulated wetland, provided that these
activities are not part of a forest
practice governed under Chapter
LOG ITEM
Unified Development Code
., Section 3 . Land Use Districts
t"'"
<'~.<!",.. .,-
, "010' ,_.~.,! ,f ~ -"",,:1
. {...~ '.,' -~
of
~
76.09 RCW (Forest Practices Act) and
its rules; or
(8) Activities that result in:
L A significant dlange of water
temperaUe;
i. A significa-. dlange of Physical
or chemical characteristiCs of
wetlands water sources,
including cpdty; or
Ii. The introducIion of poIIutan1s.
cc: Eiempt~ -
(1) Wetlands.. The foIowitlg uses shall be
allowed wiQjn a regulated weUand
wiIhout having t) meet the protection
stanc:IanIs., or feCI'*emenIs for weUand
studies or mi6gaIun set forth in this
section, 11hey ae not prohibited by
any other law. However. forest prac-
tices and conventions are governed by
- - .chapter 76.09 RCW and its roles.
L Normal maintenance. repair. or
operation of ~ structures.
facilities. or improved areas,
SlICIl as on-de septic systems,
lawns, landsGapiug, orchards,
gardens. trails., and driveways.
Maintenance and repair do not
Include any modification that
changes the character. scope,
or size of the original structure.
facility. or iqxoved area. and do
not Include the construction of a
maintenance road.
&. Modification or expansion of
existing uses and structures,
pursuant to the requirements of
the nonconfonning use and
structure provisions of this Code.
ii. Outdoor recreational activities,
Including hunting. and fishing
(pursuant to state law).
birdwatchi1g. hiking, bicycl"ang,
boating, and $Wimming.
iv. The harvesting of wild crops in a
manner that is not Iriurious to
natural reproduction of such
crops and provided the
harvesting does not require
tilling sol. planting crops, or
changing existing topography,
water conditions, or water
sources.
v. Existing and ongoing agricultural
activities on lands enrolled in the
Open Space Tax Program for
agriculture or on lands
designated as Agricultural lands
of long.. Tenn Commercial
Significance on the
Unified Development Code
Section 3 - Land Use Districts
Amended by Ordinance No. 06-()510-04
SECTION 3 . lAND USE DISTRICTS
. .. . -. . .
official map of Comprehensive
Plan land "Use Designations.
For the purpose of this section,
existing and ongoing 'means th~
agricuItt.rn, activities have been
conducted within the five-year ,
period lea<fmg up to the adoptipn
of Ordinance No. 05-0428-03 on
April 28, 2003 .
vi. NomtaI maintenance, but not
c:onstnIction, of drainage
cliches.
vi. Use of existing nature trails.
vii. Ind~aion of navigation aids
and bcMnIary markers.
Ix. Site irwesIigati~ work neces-
sary for a project application
submIIaI. such as surveys. sol
logs. pen:oIaIion tests. and other
related activiIies. In every case.
weiand impacts shall be
-- " - - --- -ft'iinirftized and cflSfiJi'tiOO areas
shaI be lmmediateIy'restored.
x. Dria1g or digging and main-
tenance of weRs, provided that
wetland impacts are minimized
and disbbed areas are immedi-
~ resbed.
(2) Wetland Buffers. In addition to those
activi6es aIowed in regulated wetlands
in this Section. the following activities
are aIOwed within weUand buffers
without having to meet the protection
standards. or requirements for wetland
studies or mIiga60n set forth in this
sec6on, provided that impacts to
buffers are minimized and that
disUbed areas are immediately
restored except as specifically allowed
in subsection (2).1. below.
I. In association with a single
famIy residence only, the
esIabIshment and expansion of
lawns. landscaping, orchards,
gardens. and fences. provided
that:
A. Lawns. landscaping, or-
chards, and gardens shall
be aIowed within the outer
25 percent of the buffer
wid8l where no reasonable
alternative is availabie. No
sbucture other than fences
nor any impervious sudace
shaI be included In the
above; and
B. Fences shan be designed to
aIow the unimpeded pas-
sage of surface water
beneath them.
LOG ITEM
# I
Page---1lof 2~
3-29
SEcTION 3 .'llAND Use DISTRICTS
i. Activi6es having rilimal
adverse impacts on buffers and
no advef$e impacts on regulated
wetlands. These include low
intensily. passive recreational
acIiviIies. such as peMous
traIs, nonpetmaIMri wiIc8e
waldlil19 binds, sdentific o!
educaIo.aaI activiIies, and sportS
fisI*v or hunIing. TtaIs witin
bu<<eIs shall be designed t)
m111i1.1mpacts t) the wetland, _
and &hall not Include any
ImpeMous swfaces.
Ii. WiIhIn the buIfers. of Category HI
and rI wetlands only. vegQ-
IaUon-Ined $wales designed for
sfonnwater management or
conveyance when topographic
resfrainls defemlil.e there are no
oller upIaIict alternative 1oca-
tions. Swales used for detention
purposes may onIy'be placed In
the outer 25 percent of the
buft'er. Conveyance swales may
be.PIaced through the buffer. if
necessary.
d' Protection stMcIanIs.
(1) General. Appica60n tOr ii' project on a
parqI of real ~ c:ontaIning a
designated weUalad or Is buft'er shaI
adhere t) the reqQrements set forth
below.
(2) DelIMauon./va applicant submitting a
project ~ shall also submit,
and have approved, a wetland
deIinea6cin report., as specifiecI In
Section 3.6.10(;). MditionaIIy, the
ioIowfng ~ shall apply:
L The Ioca6on of tile we'Uand and
Is boundary shall be detennIned
hough the performance of a
field InvesUgaUon utilizing the
. metlodoIogy contained in the
WashIngton State Wetlands
Identitication and DelineatIon
Manual. March 1997. or as
amended hereafter.
&. If the wetland is located off of
the properly InYoIved in the
project application and is
inacx:essible. the best a~bIe
Information shaD be used to
3-30
,~
, determine the wetland boundary
. and class.
Ii. Mer approval ~ the deliaealioo
report.' the wetland boundary
&hall be staked and lagged In
the field. '
Iv. This JeqUirement may be waived.
.... the foIowing circum-
.aces:
A. SIngIe-I".mIt Resiliences.
The ~ for a
wetland deIneation and
special repOrt may be
waived. for construction of a
singIe-famIy residence on
an exIsUng lot of IeCOI'd if
field InVestiga60ii by Comly
staff Indicates the foIoWing:
1. SUfticIent Infonnation
exists for stall t)
estiInate the b0un-
daries of a weiand.
without a deInea6on;
and
2. The singIe-famIy resi-
dence and aI acces-
sory strucbns and
uses are not pr0-
posed to be located
witin. the distances
Identified In Table 3-3.
below. 110m .the
estimated wetland
boundary.
B. SUbdivisions 'and Short
SUbdivisions. The requke-
ment for a wetland deIftea-
tion and special report 'Will
be waived for subcIvisions
and short subdivisions of an
existing lot of reconIlf field
Investigation by Comly staff
Indicates the~
1. SUfticient Infonna6on
exists for staff to
estimate the b0un-
daries of a weUand
without a delineation;
and
2. Building envelopes or
building setback lineS
are not proposed to
be located within the
L()G ITErv1
UniIied Development Code
# __' Section 3 . Land U:.e Districts
Pat~~~ \ 1\ of
v-t c=..___;_L
4
SECTION 3 . LAND USE DISTRICTS
distances identified in
Table 3-3, be/ow, from
the estimated wetland
boundary .
Table 3-3. Minimum Wetland Buffers Necessary
as part of Qualifying for a Waiver from
Delineation and, Special Report
Requirements.t1,2.3)
I
"
III
IV
Required Distance from
Estimated Wetland Boundary
(feet)'41
225
150
75
37
tained. Such separation may
consist of logs, a tree or hedge
row, or other prominent physical
marking approved by the
Administrator.
ii. Buffer perimeters shan be
marked with temporary signs at
an interval of one per parcel or
. every one hundred (100) feet,
whichever is less. Signs shall
remain in place prior to and
during approved construction
activities. The signs shall
contain the following statement
"Wetland & Buffer - Do Not
Remove or Alter Existing Native
Vegetation."
iii. In the case of short plat, long
plat, binding site plan, and site
plan approvals under this Code,
the applicant shall include on the
face of any such instrument the
boundary of the wetland and its
buffer.
iv. The applicant may also choose
to dedicate the buffer through a
conservation easement or deed
restriction that shall be recorded
with the Jefferson County .
Auditor. Such easements or
restrictions shall, however, use
the forms approved by the
Prosecuting Attorney.
(5) Buffers - Standard Requirements.
The following buffer provisions shall
apply:
i. Buffer areas shall be required to
provide sufficient separation
between the designated wetland
and the adjacent proposed
project.
ii. The appropriate width of the
wetland buffer shall be
determined by either:
application of the standard
buffer widths. set forth below in
Table 3-4; or by variations to the
standard buffers as allowed in
Sections 3.6.9(d)(6), 3.6.9(d)(7),
or 3.6.9(d)(8), below.
iii. Buffers shall remain naturally
vegetated except where the
vegetation has been disturbed,
invaded by highly undesirable
Wetland
Category
Notes:
1. These buffers are one part of the compl~te
requirements necessary to qualify for a waiver. See
Section 3.6.9.d.2 above.
2. These are not starldanJ weUand buffers: they are
optional buffers for cases when a delineation is not
made. These minimum waiver buffers, shown in Table
3-3, are 1.5 times the standard buffer widths identified
in this section. If a single-family residence, building
envelope, or setback line in a subdivision is proposed
to be closer to the weUand than the distance identified
in the table, a weUand delineation report must be
performed. ' .
3. The same opportunities for exemption from delineation
shall apply to uncategorized weUands. The Department
of Community Development shall be responsible for
detennining the weUand category.
4. The following shall not be located within the distances
identified in the table: 1) single-family residences and
an accessory structures and uses; 2) subdivision
building envelopes and setback lines.
(3) Drainage and Erosion Control. An
applicant submitting a project
application shaD also submit, and have
approved, a drainage and erosion
control plan as specified in this
Section. The plan shall discuss,
evaluate and recommend methods to
minimize sedimentation of designated
wetlands during and after construction.
(4) Buffer Marking. Upon approval of the
delineation report the location of the
outer extent of the wetland buffer shall
be marked in the field as follows:
i. A permanent physical separation
along the upland boundary of
the weUand buffer area shall be
installed and permanently main-
Unified Development Code
Section 3 . Land Use Districts
#
P'~l'g.~
d,.. ,,;;'
LOG ITEM
(
{<X of 2F%
3-31
SECTION 3 . lAND USE DISTRICTS
Table 3-4.
species (e.g., noxious weeds),
or would substantially benefit
from the increased diversity of
introduced species. Where
buffer disturbance has occurred
during construction, replanting
with native vegetation shall be
required. Minor pruning of
vegetation to enhance views
and removal of undesirable
species (e.g., alders) may be
permitted by the Administrator
on a case-by-case basis.
iv. All buffers shall be measured
perpendicularly from the wetland
boundary as surveyed in the
field.
Standard wetland buffer widths
shall be as established in Table
3-4.
Standard Buffer Widths for Wetlands
Standard
Buffer Width
v.
Wetland
Category
I 150 ft
" 100 ft
III 50 ft
W 25ft
(6) Reducing Buffer Widths. The
Administrator may reduce the standard
wetland buffer widths, when the
project applicant demonstrates both of
the following to the satisfaction of the
Administrator:
i. Standard wetland buffer width
averaging as set forth in this
section is unfeasible.
ii. The project application includes
a buffer enhancement plan using
native vegetation which sub-
stantiates that an enhanced
buffer will improve the functional
attributes of the buffer to provide
additional protection for func-
tions and values.
(7) Increasing Buffer Widths. The
Administrator may increase the
standard wetland buffer widths when a
larger buffer is necessary to protect
wetland functions and values based
on local conditions. This determination
shall be made only when the
3-32
Department demonstrates anyone of
the following through appropriate
documentation:
i. A larger buffer is necessary to
maintain viable populations of
existing species.
ii. The wetland is used by species
listed by the Washington State
Deparbnent of Wildlife as
endangered, threatened, or
sensitive, or has documented
priority species or habitats or
essential or outstanding poten-
. tial habitat for those species, or
has unusual nesting or resting
sites (e.g., heron rookeries and
raptor nesting trees).
iii. The adjacent land is susceptible
to severe landslide or erosion,
and erosion control measures
will not effectively prevent
adverse wetland impacts.
iv. The adjacent land has minimal
vegetative cover or slopes
greater than forty-five (45)
percent.
(8) Averaging Buffer Widths. The
Administrator may modify the standard
wetland buffer widths set forth in this
section by averaging. Buffer width
averaging shall be allowed only when
an individual or firm meeting the
criteria of. Subsection 3.6.10(j)(2)
demonstrates all of the following to the
satisfaction of the Administrator:
i. Width averaging will not
adversely impact the wetland
functional values.
ii. The total area contained within
the wetland buffer after averag-
ing is. not less than that
contained within the standard
buffer prior to averaging.
iii. The standard buffer width has
not been reduced by more than
twenty-five (25) percent.
e. Non-Compensatory Enhancement. Non-
compensatory enhancement are those
wetland enhancement projects which are
conducted solely to increase the functions
and values of an existing wetland and which
are not required to be conducted pursuant to
the mitigation requirements of Section
LOG ITEM
,}
'f<~
~'\....:...
#t j
~'''' ~of
i' ,)Jr. ".~"', .
~'I>;\ Gt':"A':~'':;1'
""..,f
Unified Development Code
Section 3 . Land Use Districts
SECTION 3 . lAND USE DISTRICTS
3.6.9.f, below. There are two types of n0n-
compensatory enhancement: '
(1) Type 1 Non-Compensator
Enhancement. Type 1 non-
compensaIory enhancement projects
involve 1he filing, draining, or
excavating of a regulated wetland. AI
applications for Type 1 non-
compensaIory enhancement projects
shaD be accompanied by an
enhancement plan prepared In
accordance with subsections (1)i-.i,
below, which demonstrates that 1he
proposed activities wit result in an
increase in wetland functions and
values.
l. The enhancement plan must ,be
submitted for review and
approval by the Administrator:
Ii. The enhancement plan must
either be prepared by a qualfied
wetlands consultant or accepted
In writing by 1he U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, the Washington
Department of FISh and Wildlife,
or the Washington Oeparbnent
of Ecology.
(2) Type 2 Non-Compensatory
Enhancement. . Type 2 non-
compensaIory enhancement projects
involve wetland alterations that do not
include 1he filing, draining, or
excavating of a regulated wetland.
Such projects might involve the
removal of non-native plant species or
the planting of native plant specles. All
applications for Type 2 n0n-
compensatory enhancement projects
shaft be accompanied by an
enhancement plan prepared in
accordance with SUbsections (2)i-.iii.
below, which demonstrates that the
proposed ac(ivities wit result 'in an
Increase in wetland functions and
values.
- - I. ' The enhancement plan shaD be
submitted for review and
approval by the Administrator;
Ii. The enhancement plan must
Include a detailed description of
the activity including the
following Information:
A. The goal of the enhanc&-
ment project;
B. What plants, if any, will be
removed or planted;
C. How the activity will be
conducted, including the
type(s) of tools or machln-
ery to be used; and
D. The qualifications of the
irdviduaI who wiI be
conducting the enflarK>>.
moot activity. '
Iii. The enhancement plan must
either be prepared by a qualified
weUands consultant or accepted "
In writing by the U.S. FISh and
Wildlife Service, the Washington
Depar1ment of FISh and Wildlife,
or the Washington Department
of Eco1ogy.
f. Mitigation. The overaD goal of mitigation
shaD be no net loss of wetland function,
value, and acreage.
(1) Mitigation . Sequence. Mitigation .
includes avoiding, minimizing, or
c:ornpensatinQ. for adverse impacts to
regulated wetlands or their buffers.
When a proposed use or development
activity poses potentially significant
adverse inpacts to a regulated
Wetland or its buffer, the preferred
sequence of mitigation as defined
below shaD be followed. unless the
applicant demonstrates that an
overriding public benefit would warrant
an exception to this preferred
sequence.
l. Avoiding the Impact altogether
by not taking a certain, action , or
parts of actions on that portion
of the site which contains the
regulated wetland or Its buffer;
ii. Minimizing inpacts by limiting
the degree or magnitude of the
action and Its implementation;
iii. Rectifying the impact by
repairing, rehabititating, or
restoring the affected
environment;
Iv. Reducing or eliminating the
impact over time by preservation
and maintenance operations
during the life of the action; or ,
v. CompensatIng for the Impact ~
replacing, enhancing, or provid-
Unified Development Code
Sec60n 3 . Land Use Districts
LOG ITEM
# I
Page 20 of~_
3-33
SECTION 3 . lAND USE DISTRICTS
, .
ing substitute resources or
enviroNnents.
(2) Compensatory Mitigation-General
Requirements. As a condition of any
permit or other approval aIowing
alteration which results in the loss or
degradation of regulated wetlands. or
as an enfon:ement action pursuant to
Section 10 of this Code, compensatofy
mitigation shaI be required to offset
impacts resulting from the actions of
the appIcant or any Code violator.
i. Except persons exempt under
this Section, any person who
aItsIs or proposes to alter
regulated welIands shaD restore
or create areas of weUand
equivalent to or larger than
those altered in order' to
compensate for wetland losses.
The foIowing Table 3-5 specifies
the ratios that apply to aeation
or restoration which is in-kind,
on-site, and is accomplshed
prior to or concurrenOy with
alteration:
Table 3-5. Required Replacement RatIos for
CompensatoryWetland Mitigation.
Wetland Category
Replac8ment Ratiott,
6:1
3:1
2:1
2:1
1.25:1
I
II or III
· Forested
. Saub-Stvub
. Emergent
IV
Note:
1. The first number In the ratio specifies the acreage of
wetlands 10 be created. and the second number
specifies the acreage of weUands proposed 10 be
altered or lost. The replacement ratios are derived
from Department of Ecology PublIcation No. 97-112
(1998): -..tow EooIogy Regulates WeUands:
2. Enhancement of astIng wetlands, may be cOllsldered
as compensation; but above ratios must then be
doubled. -:.
3. Compensation must be completed prior to weUand
destruction, where possible.
4. Compensatory mitigation must follow an approved
compensatory mitigation plan pursuant to this section,
with the replacement ratios as specified above.
5. Compensatory mitigation must be conducted on
property which wiI be protected and managed 10 avoid
fur1her development or degradation. The appIcant or
Code violator must provide for long-term preservation
of the compensation area.
3-34
6. The appIcant shall demonstrate suIIicient scientific
expertise, supervisory ~, and financiat
resom:es, Including bonding, 10 carry out the project.
The appIicaIlt must demonstrate the capability for
monitoring the site and making oorrections if the project
fails 10 meet projected goals.
(3) Compensatory Mitigation - Type.
Location. and nmlng.
i. . Priority will be given to in-Idnd,
on-site compensation If feasible
and if the wetland to be lost has
a moderate to high functional
value.
i. When the wetland to be
impacted is of a limited
functional value and is
degraded, compensation may be
of the wetland community type
most likely to succeed with the
highest functional value
possible.
iii. Out-of-kind compensation may
be allowed when out-of-kind
replacement wiD best meet
identified goals (for example.
replacement . of historically
diminished wetland types).
Where out-of..ldnd replacement
is accepted, greater acreage
replacement ratios may be
required to compensate for lost
functional values.
iv. Off-site compensation can be
allowed only if:
A. On-site compensation is not
feasible due to hydrology,
soils, waves, or other
factors;
B. On-site compensation Is not
practical due to probable
adverse impacts from
surrounding land uses;
C. Potential functional values
at the site of the proposed
restoration are significanUy
greater than the lost
wetland functional values;
or
D. Off-site compensation will
be conducted in accordance
with Section 3.6.9.f(4)
(Cooperative Compensation
Projects).
LOG ITEM
Unified Development Code
Section 3 . Land Use Districts
Amended by Onfmance No. 05-0428-03
#
Pag;;) ~\ . of
. ,
v. Except in the case of
cooperative compensation
projects, off-site compensation
must occur within the same
watershed where the weiland
loss occurs, provided that
Category-IV wetlands may be
replaced outside of 1I1e
watershed if there is no
reasonable technical alternative.
The stormwater storage function
provided by Category-IV wet-
lands must be provided for within
the design of the development
project.
vi. Except in the case of
cooperative compensation pr0-
jects, in selecting compensation
sites applicants must pursue
locations in the following order of
preference:
A. Filled, drained, or cleared
sites which were formerly
wetlands and where appro-
priate hydrology exists; and
B. Upland sites, adjacent to
wetlands, if the upland is
significantly disturbed and
does not contain a mature
forested or shrub com-
munity of native species,
and where the appropriate
natural hydrology exists.
vii. Construction of compensation
projects must be timed to reduce
impacts to existing wildlife and
flora. Construction must be
timed to assure that grading and
soil movement occurs during 1I1e
dry season. Planting of vege-
tation must be specifically timed
to 1I1e needs of the target
species.
(4) Cooperative Compensation
Projects. The County may
encourage, facilitate, and
approve cooperative projects
where one or more applicants, or
an org~tion with
demonstrated capability, may
undertake a compensation
project if it is demonstrated that
i. Creation of one or several larger
wetlands may be preferable to
many small wetlands;
Unified Development Code
Section 3 . Umd Use Districts
Amended by Ordinance No. 04-0422-02
SECTION 3 . LAND USE DISTRICTS
ii. The group demonstrates the
organizational and fiscal
capability to act cooperatively;
iii. The group demonstrates that
long term management of the
compensation area can and will
be provided; and
Iv. There is a clear potential for
success of the proposed com-
pensation at the identified
compensation site. Conducting
compensation as part of a
cooperative process does not
reduce or eliminate the required
replacement ratios outlined in
this Section.
3.6.10 Special Reports.
a. Waivers. The Administrator many waive the
requirement for a special report when an
applicant demonstrates aU of the following:
(1) The proposal involved will not affect
the environmentally sensitive area in a
manner contrary to the goals,
purposes and objectives of this Code.
(2) The minimum protection standards
required by this section are satisfied.
b. General Contents.
(1) Scale Map and Written Report.
Special reports for environmentally
sensitive areas shall include a scale
map of the development proposal site
and a written report.
(2) Impacts Assessment. The special
report shall identify and characterize
any critical area as a part of the larger
development proposal site, assess
impacts of the development proposal
on any environmentally sensitive areas
on or ad"jaCeIlt to the development
. proposal site, and assess the impacts
of any alteration proposed for a critical
area.
(3) Protection Mechanisms. The special
report shall propose adequate
protection mechanisms that may
include mitigation, maintenance and
monitoring plans, and performance
surety.
(4) Preparer - Proof of Qualifications.
Special reports shall include docu-
mentation certifying the qualifications
of the preparer.
c. Consultants.
(1) Retaining Consultants. Jefferson
County may retain consultants to
assist in the review of special reports
LOG~'TEM 3-35
# t .-
Page"~ 7~~of~
SECTION 3 . lAND USE DISTRICTS
outside the range of staff expertise.
The applicant shall pay for the costs of
retaining said consultants.
d. Responsibility.
(1) General. Special reports shall include
documentation certifying the quaftfica-
tions of the preparer.
(2) Determining Accuracy and
Sufficiency. The Adminislrator shall
verify the accuracy and sufficiency of
all special reports.
(3) Nonacceptance of Inaccurate or
Insufficient Reports. If the Admini-
strator finds that a special report does
not accurately reflect site conditions, or
does not incorporate appropriate
protection mechanisms, the Admini-
strator shall issue a report citing
evidence (e.g., soil samples, well log
data, etc.) that demonstrates where
the special report is insufficient or in
error. The applicant may then either
revise the special report and submit
another special report, or appeal the
administrative determination pursuant
to this Code. '
e. Aquifer Recharge Area Report.
(1) General. Aquifer Recharge Area
Reports serve as the primary means
for Jefferson County. . to verify the
accuracy of its Critical Aquifer
Recharge Area map and to determine
specific aquifer protection measures to
be applied to prevent significant
adverse groundwater quality impacts.
(2) Aquifer Recharge Area Report
Content M Initial evaluation shall be
made by a qualified groundwater
scientist/engineer. The Aquifer
Recharge Area Report shall include:
I. A detailed description of the
project, inclucflng all processes
and other activities which have
the potential for contaminating
groundwater.
Ii. A hydrogeologic evaluation
which includes, at a minimum:
A. A description of the
hydrogeologic setting of the
aquifer region;
B. Site location, topography,
drainage, and surface water
bodies;
C. Soils and geologic units
underlying the site;
3-36
LOG ITEM
#
P"':;;fl~ ~ 'h of
~...f., iJl.J# -..e=J
(3)
D. Groundwater characteristics
of the area, inclUding flow
direction and gradient,
and existing groundwater
quality;
E. The location and charac-
teristics of wells and springs
within one thousand (1,000)
feet of the site;
F. M evaluation of existing
groundwater recharge, and;
G. A cflScussion and evaluation,
of the potential impact of the
proposal upon groundwater
recharge.
iii. A contaminant transport analysis
for the uppermost groundwater
supply aquifer assuming an
accidental spill or release of
project specific contaminants or
on-site sewage discharge, or
both if applicable;
Iv. A discussion and evaluation that
details available on-site spill
response and containment
equipment, employee spill
response training, and emer-
gency service coordination
measures;
v. Proposed beSt management
practices to minimize exposure
of permeable surfaces to
potential pollutants and to
prevent degradation of ground-
water quality; and;-
vi. Requirements for a monitoring
program with financial
guarantees/assurances that the
monitoring program will be
implemented.
Professional Qualifications. The
minimum qualifications for ground-
water scientists and engineers
performing groundwater and con-
taminant transport evaluations and
preparing Aquifer Recharge Area
Reports shall be established pursuant
to acceptable industry standards for
training and experience and as
established by the State of Wash-
ington in the Washington Admini-
strative Code or by statute.
County Review. Reports shall be
forwarded to the Jefferson County
Environmental Health Division for
technical review. The Environmental
(4)
Unifielj Development Code
Section 5 ~ Land Use Districts
Amended by OrdilUlllce No, 07-1224-01
. .
SECTION 3 . lAND USE DISTRICTS
Health Division shall review the
Reports within thirty days of receipt to
determine their adequacy. The
County may request additional
information in order to determine the
adequacy of the Reports. The
Administrator shall determine
appropriate conditions as identified in
the Report to mitigate proposed land
uses. The Administrator shaD be
authorized to collect fees necessary
to recover costs associated with
processing and review of Aquifer
Recharge Area Reports,
implementation of the protection
standards contained in this section,
and administration of the general
provisions of the Aquifer Recharge
Area provisions of this Code. Such
fees will be incorporated into the
Jefferson County Fee Schedule.
f. Drainage and Erosion Control Plan.
(1) General. This plan shall address best
management practices which are
physical, structural or managerial
practic;es, that when used singly or in
combination, prevent or reduce
pollution of water.
(2) Qualifications of the Preparer.
Drainage and erosion control plans
shall be prepared by a licensed
professional engineer, except for small
parcel erosion control plans.
(3) Information Requirements. The
design standards and information
requirements for submission of
drainage and erosion control plans
shall be established in accordance
with the Department of Ecology's
Stormwater Management Manual
currently adopted by Jefferson County.
g. Geotechnical Report.
(1) General. This report shall include a
description of the geology of the site,
conclusions and recommendations
regarding the effect of geologic
conditions on the proposal, and
opinions and recommendations on the
suitability of the site to be developed.
(2) Qualifications of the Preparer.
Geotechnicaf reports shall be prepared
by a licensed geotechnical engineer, a
professional geologist, or a licensed
professional engineer knowledgeable
in regional geologic conditions with
professional experience in landslide.
erosion, or seismic hazard evaluation.
(3) Information Requirements.
i. A description of the geologic
setting of the region, based upon
readily available data, including:
A. Site location and
topography;
B. Soils and geologic units
underfying the site; and
C. The location and charac-
teristics of springs within
one thousand (1,000) feet of
the site.
ii. An evaluation of the potential
impact of the proposal upon
existing geological hazards.
iii. A discussion and evaluation of
the potential impact of the
proposal upon existing
geological hazards.
iv. Recommendations on appro-
priate protection mechanisms, if
necessary, to minimize the risk
of erosion or landslide.
h. Grading Plan.
(1) General. This plan shall identify the
proposed development project
including the movement of material
onsite, along with the proposed and
existing contours of the site, and
cross-sections thereof.
(2) Qualifications of the Preparer.
Grading plans shall be prepared by a
rtcensed professional engineer or an
indMdual with at least three years
experience in the preparation of
grading plans who is knowledgeable of
Unified Development Code
Section 3 . Land Use Districts
Amended by Ordinance No. 04-0422-02
- 3-37
LOG ITEM
# 1
Pag2~,_02Lof ~<;~
SECTION 3 . lAND USE DISTRICTS
. I
sol conc:fdions and geology in
Jefferson County.
(3) Information Requirements.
i. A description of the generai
vicinity of the proposed site.
ii. The property limits and accurate
contours of existing ground and
. details of terrain and area
drainage.
iii. limiting dimensions, elevations
of finish contours to be achieved
by the grading, and proposed
drainage channels and related
construction.
iv. Detailed plans of all surface and
subsurface drainage devices,
walls, cribbing, dams and other
protective devices to be con-
structed with, or as a part of, the
proposed work together with a
map showing the drainage areas
and the estimated runoff of the
areas served by any drains.
v. The location of any buildings or
structures on the property where
the work is to be perfonned and
the location of any buldings or
structures on land of adjacent
owners that are within fifteen
(15) feet of the property or which
may be affected by proposed
grading operations. '
vi. A discussion and evaluation of
the. potential impact of the
proposed grading upon desig-
nated critical areas.
vi. Recommendations on appro-
priate protection mechanisms, if
liecessary, to prevent degrada-
tion of designated critical areas
and to ensure pubrlC safety.
i. Habitat Management Plan
(1) General. This report shan identify how
the development impacts of the
proposed project will be mitigated. The
Washington Department of Fish and
Wildrlfe Priority Habitat and Species
Management Recommendations shall
be the basis for this report.
(2) Qualifications of the Preparer.
Habitat management plans shaH be
prepared by persons who have a
minimum of a Bachelor's Degree in
3-38
Wildlife or FISheries Habitat Biology, or
a related degree in a biological field
from an accredited coHege or
university with a minimum of four
YeatS experience as a practicing fish
or wikIife habitat biologist.
(3) Information Requirements.
i. A map(s) prepared at an easily
readable scale, including the
following information:
A. The location of the
proposed development site,
~ncJuding property limits;
B. The relationship of the site
to surrounding topographic
and cultural features;
C. The nature and density. of
the proposed development
or land use change;
D. Proposed building locations
and arrangements; and
E. ~e boundaries of forested
areas.
ii. A legend that includes the
foUowinQ information:
A. A complete and accurate
legal description as pre-
scribed by the triggering
application fonn (the
description shaH include the
total acreage of the parcel);
B. Title, sCale and, north
arrows;
C. Date, including revision
dates, if applicable; and
D. Certificates by' a
professional biologist as
appropriate.
iii. A report that contains the
following information:
A. A description of the nature,
density and intensity of the
proposed development in
sufficient detal to allow
analysis of such land use
change upon identified fish
and wildlife habitat;
B. The applicanfs analysis of
the effect of the proposed
development, activity or
land use change upon the
fish or wildlife species
LOG ITEM
#
r:. Jl"".....'...,-. '~2:b .
r~ "ri,'''':'. >:,..."......1
""'.:::$""'.
Unified Development Code
Section 3 . Land Use Districts
of
" .. .
SECTION 3 . LAND USE DISTRICTS
identified by the Washington
Department of Fish and
Wildlife within the identified
priority habitat, utilizing the
management guidelines;
C. A plan by the applicant that
shall explain how any
adverse impacts created by
the development will be
mitigated.
iv. Possible mitigating measures
that may include, but are not
limited to:
A. Establishment of buffer
zones;
B. Preservation of critically
important plants and trees;
C. Umitation of access to
habitat area;
D. Seasonal restriction of con-
struction activities; and
E. Establishing a timetable for
periodic review of the plan.
j. Wetland Delineation Report.
(1) General. This report shall be required
when a proposed development
encroaches upon a designated
wetland or its buffer, and shall be used
to identify the boundaries and
classification of the designated
wetland.
(2) Qualifications of the Preparer.
Wetland delineation reports shall be
prepared by either a biologist with
wetlands expertise, or an individual or
firm who has been certified by the
United States Army Corps of
Engineers, Region 10, to perform
wetland delineations.
(3) Information Requirements.
i. A map(s) prepared at an easily
readable scale, including the
following information:
A. Wetland boundaries;
B. Sample site and sample
transects;
C. Boundaries of forested
areas; and
D. Boundaries of wetland
classes if multiple classes
exist
ii. A legend that includes the
following information:
A. A complete and accurate
legal description. as pre-
scribed by the triggering
application form (the
description shall include the
total acreage of the parcel);
B. TrtIe, scale and north
arrows;
C. Date, including revision
dates, if applicable; and
D. Certificates by a pro-
fessional biologist as
appropriate.
iii. A report that contains the
following information:
A. A discussion of the
delineation methods and
results, with special empha-
sis on technique used from
the Washington State
Wetlands Identification and
Delineation Manual, March
1997, or as amended
hereafter;
B. A description of relevant site
information acquired from
the National Wetland,lnven-
tory maps and the Soil
Survey for Jefferson
County;
C. The acreage of each
wetland on the site, based
on the survey, if the
acreage will impact the
buffer size determination or
the project design; and
D. All completed field data
sheets numbered to cor-
respond to each sample
site.
E. Project cross sections, both
before and after completion,
in relation to the surface
elevation of the wetland
must be indicated for
proposed activities which
involve cutting or filling
operations within the
wetland or its proposed
buffer.
Unified Development Code
Section 3 . Land Use Districts
LOG ITEM
# I
Pagadh .ofJIi.
3-39
SECTION 3 . LAND USE DISTRICTS
... . ~ ... ...
F. Classification of the wetland
in accordance with the
standards adopted in this
Section and a detailed
written analysis of the
existing regulated wetland
including: vegetation com-
munities classified per the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service Classification of
Deepwater Habitats (1979);
species ~mpositiQrl of
vegetation communities,
including presence and
percent cover; existing
soils; and existing hydro-
logic conditions including
inflow/outflow, source of
water within the system,
relative water quality, and
seasonal changes in hydro-
logy, if applicable.
G. A detailed analysis of
wildlife species use of the
wetland and its buffer.
H. A detailed analysis of the
e~ng wetland buffer
including species compo-
sition and perCent coverage,
whether the buffer is
disturbed or not. and the
functional value of the buffer
in relation to the regulated
wetland.
I. If the development activity
would eliminate all or part of
a regulated wetland then a
detailed compensatory miti-
. gation plan as outlined in
Section 3.6.10.j(4), below
must be provided.
(4) Mitigation Plan Contents. All wetland
restoration, creation, and enhance-
ment projects required by this Code,
either as a condition of project
approval or as the result of an
enforcement action, shall follow a
mitigation plan prepared by a qualified
specialist as defined herein and
conducted in accordance with the
requirements described in this Code.
The applicant or violator must receive
written approval of the mitigation plan
by the Administrator prior to com-
mencement of any wetland restoration,
creation, or enhancement activity.
3.6.11 Airport Essential Public Facility
District (A).
a. Purpose. The purpose and intent of this
section is to regulate land uses within the
-Airport Essential Public Facility" overlay
district in 'order to encourage orderly
economic development in a manner
compatible with airport operations and
adjacent properties and to protect existing
general aviation public use airports from
conflicting or incompatible adjacent land
uses or activities.
b. Designation. The overlay district (see
Official Comprehensive Plan Map) applies to
all Port of Port Townsend owned property
within the Jefferson County International
Airport (JCIA). The JCIA is a general
aviation airport that provides recreational,
business, flight training, charter and air taxi
services and other uses.
c. Allowable and Prohibited Uses. All new
development within the Jefferson County
International Airport shall be restricted to
uses which are clearty identified as aviation
support facilities or aviation related
. development
(1) Aviation Support Facilities. Aviation
Support Facilities are those uses
which directly support flight operations
and the operation of the Jefferson
County Airport, and include, but are
not limited to: .
i. Passenger service terminals,
including food service;
ii. Navigational aids;
iii. Runway aprons;
iv . Terminal buildings;
v. Hangars;
vi. Fuel storage facilities;
vii. Operations/maintenance
facilities;
VIII. Automobile parking.
(2) Aviation Related Development:
Aviation Related Development are
those uses which are reliant upon the
airport for their businesses, which
include but are not necessarily limited
to:
i. Aircraft repair facilities;
LOG ITE~:A
~,,' \
"11-
F.. J"~".w::) d:L' (;;'f"L 'rlt
a"'...."""".! ~
Q - .~.-
3-40
Unified Development Code
Section 3 . Land Use Districts
.'
--,- "~
H"-~&. " ~
--.--'-----.-- ~"D. .~___ _;-___. ._
.o...lr=.r.:&. _ ..____..
---- . -. -----Ht--c--- ~-----
--~=-~~~~ .~~~_:==,--~
.-~----.---.--J~ 'f -----
o. "~,~__.__ .
t ~,_
----- -+
--.---.- -1' ------- --'--'---'
- -------
--- ,- - 1_____,-_._-,-,
-.-------------.,-- t __ _ ___ ___
. . - -----~---------+-_._~- --=----
~-~-~-------------+~=-. -=-
H_____'===_j. . ___ .. -== __=~~'_
-- t
+ --------- ---, -'._-,._-
- --- - - - -f~'-~,~-------- -
--,.--.- ----".---.-'--..-'-.=1.= · LOGlTEfVf
_________--c--- .#.. \ _
..-- - 1
I ,PaQc~ of dSf? _----
----.-
. ';i)>
., "
JEFFERSON COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
TYPE I LAND USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: FREDERICK A FORSTER
15922 SE 42ND PL
BELLEVUE WA 98006
DATE ISSUED: April 10, 2003
DATE EXPIRES: April 10, 2008
MLA NUMBER: MLA03-00098
PROJECT PLANNER: S HOSKINS
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
ROAD APPROACH & 911 - BECKETT POINT RD
Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD)
PROJECT LOCAnON:
Parcel numbers 931 970023 and 002231 001, Beckette Point South Beach Annex, Lot 35, in Section ~3, Township
30, Range 02 West, WM, located on Beckett Point Rd, Port Townsend, WA 98368 -
FINDINGS:
1.) The Administrator finds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Development
Code, all other applicable ordinances and regulations, and is consistent with the Jefferson County
Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map.
2.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on March
12, 2003 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the
Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an
investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property:
Suburban Shoreline, Fish & Wildlife Habitat (Blue Heron), Wetlands, Seismic Hazard, Flood, Susceptible
Aquifer Recharge Area, Coastal Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone (SIPZ).
3.) Washington State Department of Fish & Wildlife offered no comment on the application. The site is cleared,
and the proposal will not conflict with blue heron habitat.
4.) The wetlands are located opposite Beckett Point Rd from the subject parcel. The Administrator determined the
wetland buffer value is negated at the road.
5.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow
percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic
formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells
and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson
County.
6.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid
infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers.
7.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and
groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and
after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms.
8.) Buffers are areas that shall be maintained in their natural condition, however, minor pruning or alteration of
vegetation may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished.
9.) Among the native conifer species which may be used in buffers or for re-vege~tion include, but are not limited
to: Grand Fir (Aibes grandis), Sitka Spruce (Picea Sitchensis), Shore Pine (Pinus Contorta), Douglas Fir
(Pseudotsuga Menziesii), Western Red Cedar (Thuja Plicata), and Western Hemlock (Tsuga Heterophylla).
Among native tree species which may be used includes: Vine Maple (Acer Circinatum), Big-Leaf Maple (Acer
Macrophyllum), Red Alder (Alnus Rubra), Pacific Madrone (Arbutus Menziesii), Quaking Aspen (Populus
Tremula), Black Cottonwood (Populus Trichocarpa), Bitter Cherry (prunus Emarginata), Oregon White Oak
(Quercus Garryana), Cascara (Rhamnus Purshiana), Pacific Willow (Sa/iz Lasiandra1,.. an. d SCO. uler's Willow
(Saliz Scouleriana). LOG iTEM
I
p(;f~i;i~:-3 0 ___of ~)f
,( <t
Among the native shrub species which may be used are: Sevice-Berry (Amalanchier Alnifolia), Red Osier
Dogwood (Comus Stolonifera) Salal (Gaultheria Shallon), Ocean Spray (Holodiscus Discolor), Indian Plum
(Oemlaria Cerasiformis), Pacific Ninebark (Physocarpus Capitus), Red Flowering Currant (Ribes
Sanguineum), Wild Rose (Rosa Nutkana), Swamp Rose (Rosa Pisocarpa), Willows (Salix ssp.), Red
Elderberry (Sambucus Racemosa), Snowberry (Symphoricarpos Albus), Evergreen Huckleberry (Vaccinium
Ovatum), Red Huckleberry (Vaccinium Parvifolium).
10.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater
intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells
drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional
treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwaterlfreshwater interface is primarily a function of
the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals (primarily
through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate
groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land
use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a
manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent
possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer.
11.) The parcel is located within a coastal SIPZ (seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS
map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion
Policy (Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002) that apply to well drilling proposals and building permil
applications on existing lots of record.
. ~...
A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but no history of
chloride concentration above 100 mgll in groundwater sources within 1000 feet. ' -
12.) The standard setback for residential structures, including common appurtenant structures such a$ garages anc
workshops, shall be thirty (30) feet or one (1) foot for each foot of bank height, whichever is greater. This
setback shall be measured from the bank's edge when the bank's height exceeds 10 feet. When the bank's
height is less than 10 feet, the setback shall be measured from the ordinary high water mark. The setback
shall not exceed 100 feet.
13.) The proposal was reviewed against the site plan determination criteria of the Unified Development Code
(Section 8.7). The criteria for approval is as follows:
1. The proposed site plan conforms to all applicable county, state, and federal land use, environmental and
health regulations and plans, including but not limited to the following: The Jefferson County Comprehensive
Plan and the provisions of the Unified Development Code.
Staff comment: The application was reviewed for consistency under the proviSions of the Unified Development
Code, Comprehensive Plan, and Shoreline Master Program. The application was found in compliance with all
ordinances pertaining to the proposed development.
2. Adequate provisions for utilities and other public services necessary to serve the needs of the proposed site
plan have been demonstrated, including open spaces, drainage ways, roads, and other public ways, potable
water, sewerage disposal, fire flow and other improvements.
Staff comment: The proposal was not reviewed for open space as the parcel is approximately 3,167 square .
feet (0.072 7 acres) in size.
This SPAAD has not been reviewed for adequacy of sewerage disposal. Jefferson County Department of
Environmental Health commented on the application on March 18, 2003 and determined the 20 foot building
setback from the road should be adequate to allow tanks and a driveway assuming the parcel connects to the
future community drainfield. Environmental Health also noted no plans are currently before the county to instal
the community drainfield and the number of bedrooms allowed to connect is not known.
PUD #1 completed a Water Availability Notification May 3, 2003 for Lot 35 of Beckett Point Beach Annex.
This connection is required prior to building permit final sign off and would fulfill the requirements for potable
water and fire flow.
Beckett Point Rd is a county local access road. A road approach permit (RAP03-00049) was reviewed
under this application. An address of 1024 Beckett Point Rd has been assigned to the parcel.
The applicant shall adhere to the Washington State Department of Ecology Stormwater Management
Manual for stormwater control.
3. The probable significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed site plan, t~~r ~'h8J1. ny .
practical means of mitigating adverse impacts, have been considered such that the pr~.' JlWMve an
unacceptable adverse effect upon the quality of the environment, in accordance w, the State Environmental
of
.----
. >
.....
Policy Act (SEPA) implementing the provisions contained within Section 8 of this Code and Chapter 43.21 C
RCW.
Staff comment: Single family residences are EXEMPT from the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). WAC
197-11-800(1 )(b)(i) identifies the construction of any residential structure of four (4) dwelling units.
4. Approving the proposed site plan will serve the public use and interest and adequate provision has been
made for the public health, safety and general welfare.
Staff comment: The proposal will not affect the public health, safety, and general welfare.
14.) The revised site plan as submitted with the Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD) application on
March 18, 2003 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson
County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped
approved site plan dated February 2, 2003 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County
Department of Community Development.
15.) This approval is for a SPAAD only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with
applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and cOnditions which may be placed on future
permits.
CONDITIONS:
1.) All construction activities shall not encroach upon the buffer. This includes the storage or preparation of
materials. ,
2.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation.
The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, durin,g-construction
the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs) and facility design standards as identified and
defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the puget Sound Basin.
3.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on
Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all
stormwater runoff onsite.
4.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL & AT RISK SIPZ:
Water conservation measures:
1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved
means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly.
2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens.
Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross
connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water.
3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens.
4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three (3) gallons per minute.
5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets; faucets and shower restrictors and other
water saving plumbing fixtures.
6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation).
5.)
Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be .
illustrative of the types of water conservation measures.
VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL & AT RISK SIPZ:
1. Installation of a flow meter,
2. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration.
3. Submittal of monitoring data to County.
MANDATORY MEASURES FOR COASTAL SIPZ:
1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public
water system if available.
2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an
individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirement: -
a. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application.
3. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water.
Flood proofing measures are to be used as required by the Jefferson County Flood Damage Prevention
Ordinance.
All new construction shall use construction methods which minimize flood damage.
New construction shall have the lowest floor elevated to at least one foot above base fI~a~1\ If
Fully enclosed areas below the lowest floor that are subject to flooding are prohibit urheW ~s ~
automatically equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls by allowing for the ~try and exit f floodwater.
Pag<~:.3t _ot~~
6.)
7.)
8.)
9.)
10.)
, .
Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect
or must meet or exceed the following criteria: a. A minimum of two openings having a total net area of not less
than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding shall be provided. b. The
bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above grade. c. Openings may be equipt with screens,
louvers, or other coverings or devices provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of floodwater.
11.) All new construction shall: a. be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of the sturcture. b.
be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage and potential damage to adjacent
properties. c. be constructed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. d. have structural
components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effects of buoyancy. e. electrical,
heating, ventilation, plumbing, air-conditioning equipment, and other service facilities shall be designed and/or
othelWise elevated or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components
during conditions of flooding.
12.) Flood proofing of structures shall be provided by one or more of the following methods: a. Landfill: (Note:
Landfills are not permitted in the f1oodway.) The placement offill may be utilized to elevate the structure and
must comply with the standards and poliCies of the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program, if applicable.
b. Pole, pier or piling construction: The use of poles, piers, or piles for the foundation of the structure may be
used to allow the unrestricted flow of flood waters during periods at a base flood. The lowest floor must be one
foot above the base flood level. c. Parallel Foundation Walls: Foundation walls may be designed and
constructed to provide open spaces through which water can flow unrestricted to equalize pressure. In velocity
flood situations, it is important that all foundation walls be parallel to the flow of the floodwaters. d. Extended
Foundation Walls and Basements: (Note: Extended foundation walls and basements are not permitted in the
f1oodway.) The lowest habitable floor of a residence may be constructed on foundation walls that extend above
grade to one foot above the height of the base flood provided that residential construction complies with the
requirment of Section 5.101 (2), -Residential Construction; regarding the design of enclosed areas.
13.) Utilities shall be designed as specified in Section 5.20 of Ordinance No. 18-1120-95. -
14.) Upon submittal of a building permit application, the applicant must provide a flood elevation certificate.
15.) Duration of Approval - Several of the included findings shall become conditions upon the submittal of a building
and septic permit. The duration of approval of the Site Plan shall be effective for five (5) years from the date of
original approval by the Administrator. If a building permit has not been issued within the five (5) year period,
the Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD) cannot be revived or extended except by new
application that must meet all the existing criteria and conditions listed in this Section. Knowledge of the
expiration date shall be the responsibility of the applicant. The county will not provide notification prior to
expiration.
'#
Limitations of Approval - Approval of the site plan shall not guarantee the performance of specific site features
or improvements (e.g. wells, septic systems, stormwater drainage facilities, etc.) and shall not be immune from
changes in state or federal law which are enacted or have an effective date after the date of ths Site Plan
Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD) and which may affect the performance and implementation of the
site plan and associated use or activity. Any subsequent land division or boundary line adjustment of a parcel
or lot which has received site plan approval advance determination under this Section 8.7 shall void soch site
plan approval and require a new site plan approval advance determination application. Approval of a site plan
under this section does not constitute authority to comence any development or building activity until such time
as final authorizing permits are issued (e.g., septic, wells, stormwater management, or building permit, etc.).
Modification to an approved site plan may be required by the applicant and approved by the Administrator
subject to the provisions for Type I decisions. (Please request a copy of Section 8.7 of the UDC for criteria
pertaining to modifications).
16.) The applicant shall.adhere to the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual at time of
development application.
17.) A minimum of two (2) on-site parking spaces are required for the single family residence.
18.) Maximum building height is 35 feet.
19.) Total impervious surface coverage shall not exceed 25%. Impervious surface includes driveways, rooftops,
concrete, etc. Pre-existing legal lots of record less than one acre in size in Rural Residential Districts are
subject to the stormwater requirements in UDC Section 6.7 and must meet the -Area of Impervious Surface
Coverage- to the maximum extent practicable as determined by the Administrator. -
20.) Minimum setback from the parcel boundary adjacent to Beckett Point Rd is 20 feet. Minimum setback from
Ordinary High Water Mark is 30 feet. Minimum side setbacks are 5 feet.
21.) THIS SPAAD IS ONLY VALID IF A COMMUNITY DRAINFIELD FOR BECKETT POINT IS INSTALLED AND
MADE AVAILABLE TO LOT 35 OF BECKETT POINT SOUTH POINT BEACH ANNEX. THIS SPAAD
APPROVAL SHALL BE CONSIDERED NULL AND VOID WITHOUT A SEWER CONNECTION.
LOG ITEM
F)a.gs?: of
. "
.,
NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances,
regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development.
Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable development and performance
standards of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code.
If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all
activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Adminis1rator shall be notified at once.
The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became
effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any
person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that "takes" listed spedes (defined as causing harm,
harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy
penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as "critical habitat" for a listed spedes. Development of
property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures
are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine
shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following:
- Set back buildings, utilities and roads as far as possible from surface waters (streams, rivers, lakes, marine
waters), or at least 150 feet from the edge of the water
- All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters
- Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees
- Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there
- Infil1rate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging dintctly into
surface waters or roadside ditches -
Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species "taking," even if you are in compliance with
Jefferson County development codes. The risk d a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a
professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the
biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle at (206)526-6613, or the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at (503) 231-6121.
APPEALS:
Pursuant to RCW 36.70C, the applicant or any aggrieved party may appeal this final decision to Jefferson County
Superior Court within twenty-one (21) calendar days of the date of issuance ofthis land use decision. For more
informatio e ed to judical appeals see UDC Section 8.5.2.
l'IE r\1
I
32- of;lS8
._-- --
~(/(JJ8b Z,.p,ry _- 9?L. -~ - :9Npfld
f?'M '3(7/1 =rn;;rg l-;d q/VCp =1> Z~9/ - ~7...t~ Cl.32t;i
C/"'r;'~;j -..If; 1J 'f- -.- .. . i;_ ~ y-..
Z' = -J-1 - :r7~ ",61 J. a 'fl'&7.?I ..t.NI~. .J-/.~ilgt '/";./
/ II I' / I . -- e-/t2. K
"-- ',/1 r;;JQ n:
I ..
aL(9 ..L-o;z,a;rdd-
:;r~. rrff:;>ft3!td
Of) ..!?~ -L t71
_./~ >:
w
,.9 ::1;/s;. J _____
--,f ',~: r
r ~.-
f
,
I
....
SS;; ..JC17
X:;;N~tr ~
#..t(1~ 1..JN/cx:I ..I-I.~
~ ZC10t. b/~ b ()()(j).p n021ttcf
: fvr;ud/';!/v~a' 7~
lN3~d0l3^3a ..uINn~~~o~ ~o 'ld30
AlNnOO NOSH3~~3r
eooz Z HdY
NV'ld g~IS
a~AOHddV
J.N3l'\1d013^30 AlINnllVr.lO:l :10 'ld
AlNnOO NOSli3~:.!3r
..<<_. .. ~
t I
\ ~'. ,,~' ':-""-'~i 0 I
_.. ~ fA ~ ~ ~ c,~J ij'
........ . .........._ M..... ....__..__....._ ........... .......::...:-.....
Ol;'i!'1;.I-Q7//<;7 ...~ i7d!:?IY~
.,
\.
,
I ~(}/
u.?7
,.9
l
I
I
I
i
I
I
t
_......-~...I
I .
f
"
I
J
f
j
, '
1
I
I
f
. -....- ,....- ,.- ;:::I'::Jrm~
;f7;;~ ,t;
~.
1p~/Cl7/ne
7 -f:1'l.J.N.z.I.tJt:J,
It i ~. i
~ .~
.2:. l~-
~ JOI
10)
!~
! ,
i
,
i
...in .
71t'/.l'/Y~/~a
J./YiIV-tr..L::a f7
- -!7'E -' fT7
.J;.9
I
I
i
I
I
I
L~
/<1'i
tf
- e e
4-< '<:t
0 0
0
- N
II) ---
1,0
~ ---
0
~ -
-
II)
~
~
~
Z
[II
1,0
(")
0\
00
II
Cl
......
1;'-.
~
cod
S
o
o
N
o
....
o
..s::::
fr
I-<
o
..s::::
~
II)
s::
......
'E
.8
rll
---
II)
....
......
rll
.0
II)
~
rll
;::l
d
~
l=i
o
~
~
(,j...l
II)
.-
o'
o
LOG ITEM ~
# I ]
Page ~1_'( of ~~E'i
.r::1
M~O~m e e
FEATURES NOT SURVEYED-002 231 001/BECKETT POINT
Page 1 of 1
::';;~"_""'~_"I
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
ollection. Wed Oct 0614:09:522004
LOG ITEM
# I
Page 3.<) of g5K
http:// gisserver/servlet/ com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovrnap&ClientV ersion=4. O&F orm=... 10/612004
Map Output
e
e
Page 1 of 1
.;v' Legend
Road System
0 AsMssor Map&-H
0 Parcels-H
Boundaries
0 ~~
0 w_
D 0II'a' Caorii!!s
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ,
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
lIection. Wed Oct 1311:31:002004
LOG ITEM
# I
Page~_of{)'5R:
http:// gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/1312004
Map Output
e
e
Page 1 of 1
;V Legend
Road Syslam
0 Assessor Maps-H
0 Pan::els-H
Boundaries
0 ~C<u1!y
0 w_
0 0II'I!lr~
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
ollection. Wed Oct 13 11 :31 :002004
LOG ITEM
#_.. I
Pag€)3 7 ofL58
-
http:// gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceName=ovrnap&ClientV ersion=4.0&F orm... 10/13/2004
Assessor Detail Building #1
Page 1 of 1
Assessor Detail Building #1
Parcel Number: 931910003
Buildin Number
1
Buildin Exterior
Building Type: CABIN
Building Style: 1 STY
Building Quality:AVERAGE
Building Condition: FAIR
Foundation: POST & BLOCK/PIERS
Exterior: SIDING/STUCCO (LAP)
Roof Cover:WOOD SHINGLE
Buildin Rooms
Bedrooms: 0
Full Baths: 0
Half Baths: 0
1st Addition
ype:
rea: 0
ear Built: 0
Exterior:
Roof:
Year Built
1945
Buildin Area
1st Floor Area: 375
2nd Floor Area: 0
3rd Floor Area: 0
Loft Area: 0
ttic Area: 0
otal Area: 375
Basement Area: 0
Mobile Home
Make:
Model:
Length:
Width:
ear Built:
kirting:
rea: 0
2nd Addition
Year Remodeled
o
Buildin Interior
Int. Walls (Cabin): FINISHED INTERIOR WALLS
Heat: WOOD ONLY/NONE
000 STOVE
rade: FAIR
Floor Cover (1):
Floor Cover (2):
Gena e
To view another buildin associated with this arcel. Seled buildin
ype:
rea: 0
ear Built: 0
Exterior:
Roof:
123
HOME I COUNTY INFO I DEPARTMENTS I SEARCH
Best viewed with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 or later
eWLoQQ.w_s. - Mac
ITEl\1
(
f~i'~i'.:;;~_~..._of ~~_
http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/ assessordetail.asp ?ParceLNO=93191 0003
10/13/2004
Parcel Print
Parcel Number: 931910003
Page 1 of 1
06/11/2004
OWner Mailing Address:
BECKETT POINT FISHERMEN'S CLUB
% DAVID G GOODING
PORT TOWNSEND WA 983685717
Site Address:
555 BECKETT POINT RD
PORT TOWNSEND 98368
Section:
Qtr Section:
Township:
Range:
Planning area:
Sub Division:
Land Use Code:
23
NE1j4
30N
2W
Quimper (2)
BECKETT POINT HWY HEIGHTS ADD
1100 - HOUSES (single units, non-farm)
School District:
Fire Dist:
Tax Status:
Tax Code:
Port Townsend (50)
Cape George (6)
Taxable
161
Property Description:
BECKETT POINT HWY HEIGHTS ADD I LOT 8 IMPS ONLY I
o No Photo Available
(
i1:,;,';';.;':~'d;;'<"--2'"'''''' ~'f ~-q
"',;;,;.... e'l
~",.~ _..""'''''......,..,.., -'--
http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp ?P ARCEL_NO=93191 0003
10/13/2004
Parcel Tax History
Page 1 of 1
Valuation Information for Parcel Number: 931910003
Assessed fair Market Value
Improvements: $6710
Improved Land: $0
Property Sales Information
Affidavit Number: Z3481
Legal Document Description: QCD
3/2/94
Sales Amount: $0
Sales Code:
Unimproved Land: $0
Taxable Value: $6710
Current and Prior Year Taxes
Tax Year Tax Amount
1997 80.72
1998 76.64
1999 82.02
2000 79.9
2001 74.12
2002 71.66
2003 72.2
2004 70.08
Taxes Paid
80.72
76.64
82.02
79.9
74.12
71.66
72.2
35.04
Current and Prior Year Port Ludlow Drainage
Year Tax Amount
Not applicable for this Parcel
Taxes
Taxes Paid
NOTE: This is for informational use only. Do not pay taxes based off this
information. Please refer to your current tax statement or contact the Treasurer's
office at (360)385-9150
HOME I COUNTY INFO I DEPARTMENTS I SEARCH
Best viewed with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 or later
fJ Windows - Mac
(
"-~~'.'-'(i. .;'~'- 'd5&
V &'\).,:;.,
",,,",", .,,,,~~"~c<<~t#l, '
http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/valuationdetail.asp ?Parcel_no=93191 0003
10/13/2004
Beckett Point 2003
Page 1 of 3
LOG ITEM
~ge!i~ ofC;S8
Beckett Point 2003
Page 2 of 3
LUl:J I
# } :~
Page_~2.. of ~
Beckett Point 2003
Page 3 of 3
ofJ5D4
Map O~tput
Page 1 of 1
0 Legend
P an::a1S-H
Contours
, 10FOOICMbur
/''0''
/
;./ !iI FOCiI CMbur
Boundaries
0 Je!I!IorIla'l C<ul!y
0 w_
0 CItIer~
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
ollection. Wed Oct 06 13:49:57 2004
LOG ITEM
1...1- I
'd'
Pb.8e3!/-of~~
http:// gisserverlservlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm=... 10/612004
Map Output
Page 1 of 1
0 Legend
P arc:e1&-H
Centours
/v 10FCXII~
j'/ 5:JFCXII~
2000 Aerial PhOtos
Boundaries
0 J<llbsol Cartr
0 w_
0 Otu~
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
lIection. Wed Oct 0613:51:01 2004
LOG ITEM
it
Page_LIS- of~&
http:// gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovrnap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm=... 10/6/2004
Map Output
Page 1 of 1
0 Legend
Paroels-H
Contours
N 10 FlXII C<ri:Iur
I
;./ 5J I'lXII C<ri:Iur
Lands.lide Hazard
. SIid<!s
. High
. MOdeI'aI/!
,..., ~
2000 Aerial Photos
Boundaries
0 .JeIIersoo Cotriy
0 Wt/t:!r
0 Ohr~
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONl y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
collection. Wed Oct 06 14:11 :562004
LOG ITEM
-lJ.
~'r (
Pagel/X; ofOl-Sg
\
http:// gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovrnap&Client V ersion=4.0&F orm=... 10/612004
.'M6-272-09501 Location.
(1) Persons shall design and install ass to meet the minimum horizontal
separations shown in Table I, Minimum Horizontal Separations:
TABLE I
Minimum Horizontal Separations
N_pllblk wcD or nc"" .. 100 ft. SOft. SOft.
PubUe driaIcIDc wafer _D 100 ft. 100 ft. 100 ft.
Pubic drlnkJnc water ~ 200fL 200ft. 100 fL
SPrlDc or sarrace water -"
as drlaJdac water SOIll"CeJ,J 100 ft. SOft. SOft.
Pressarlzed water sapJll1 ...- 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 fL
Properly dec:ollUlllssJoaed _... 10 fl NlA N/A
Surlac:e water
MarfDe water 100 fl SOft. 10 ft.
...... FresIa water 100 fL SOft. 10 ft.
BuDdIne rolllldau.. 10 fL - S'fL" 2fL
Property or c__at ... · 5 fL SfL N/A
IDtcrecptor Ie........ .....,
draiuge ditches
Dowa-gradleat' 30 fL S fL N/A
Up-gradieDt' lOfL NlA N/A
DoWD1:radlellC cats or beDks
witla at least 5 tc. or .........
1IIlCIIs&arbed soil ...e .
restrkOYe layer dae .. .
stncCanl or textual cha. . 25ft. NlA N/A
DowD1:radlellC cats or b..b
with less than 5 tc. or ....1aaI,
undJstlll'bed, soD abon .
ftSCrkOyc layer dae .. .
slndural or textaraJ chaace SO rL N/A N/A
'f~
1 WBllildiag sewer" IS dcfiaecl by tile lDost CVJaI edllioa of lite u..rOl'lD P1uIbi., Code. "No8-perforated dlalribudoaw lacJ8des
pressUR sewer lruspon Iiaes.
1 If S1IrUce Wiler is ,sed IS a pablie driakias Wlter supply, lite cIestper .... locale lite ass oatside or lite Rquift:d suitaly
CODlrol aRt,
1 Measured from lite oldiaal)' ligll-Wller mart.
I
I
· ne Ioal heallla offICer may approve I sewer IraRspon !iac wlllaia 10 feet of I waler supply IIRC If Ihc sewer lIac Is roRsCnncd
ia acc:orducc wilb sec:tioa 2.4 of IItc dcpartlDeat of ccology's "Crileril For Sewaae Worts DcsIga: revised Oclobcr 1985, or
eqaivalcnl.
24
I
-.-...."...~ -'-'._-'-"--.~...J5 K
?",., !t1-'"''
~ "T.''''';' "(."~'" .-:."~- t'" ....-j
r~" ~.~'';: :~:..{:;-":f;~,., }..",; :s
It'
. ..~
./
~C"""'O(""~"4) 2.'J:t;"'D,^"",, BI2."s.S.
;lDIS.C Sr.T IN C....,c.fl.c...." AT
T""e. aO....T L....u...c.14,""'.. F~...I..'''T'V
~'T"""""e:D MV'/.Oo-r '''101 IC),I-
II- - 4.
r- -, J:.~.:.. '-. !?'.J'
N7e .26'10:;
...
llf
~~
~:;
ES
...
I~
I!!~
<>
tDei
i"
<
'"
o 10 20
H......l
ill
I
IlO
I
SCALE, '" 20'
.----- ..'o1f"CI>(",~"")"".,,,...,......:.. PO"T
'vi....... U"""Sl Of'4 $.,0.10" Po.,.
-r....... I So .. '-'........c...S CocwCIL.
FOell"'': Nw Cotto t:,...,TLrr.a...
Se.eTICHot 2.41, 'l.I;C VOl.. IS 0' 'S,,,.""evt. P.II'I
Jr
I
1:1
.
'"
~! 01
;1:.::
~~
.!,
1
1
I
\
\
\ '
. I
'I
\
,.
--_;Uti:?
/..... 'D
I ~';~
I ...,,-1ifo...tUNfoo Pa..
." "tn~."".' p~.....,..
I ~ PA~~ ~I
"
"
"
(..,.,...) - - -1- - ....
you.....o 4.......04~ c...,.,c,. ~'t
~:.:~ ~ ~:~:: i:~~ 7.4
,.,
N ...
N
(.)
'" (.)
., '"
CO
N
...
o ...
~13
. ...
> .
0,>
Dig
FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS AND PUT NOTES SEE VOL. 15 OF SURVEYS PAGE
IN. SVI/4N111/4. SECTION 24. T.30 N.. R.2 U.. UM.
\WI' U'm .... I'Ul'IMO 11 "Ica TAavu. (GOV. T LOT 2)
11I1_ ... ",-u .TH a __ IlRftatu: 'IT*'-
""'lOll tMl....nt __ 'I'm TiM't. Hllel..... cn.
.. PORn 'tlIlIIt _Ill. ., 1M: ....,*'""'.
AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE
'~~.~I!~!~I~t~
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
1"'8 !itA, *"E-C11.r Ul'lInIHtl ~ ,,,..,!:y
l'/All[ VltIDl "' fU!"PYI.I. IN COIINMIWtc(
III," TN( 1[G'Jfllrnoc1S 0' fit[ .....U
IIEtoItIIJNC ACT AT 1'Hr _EMf'! elf.
""I\TN lO'SELL
OH oIUNl 16. tOO.
-~"'~, ..."".
151
If'Y~ aE~I~~.&&.....u, PUT
JEFFEll8Dll COUIlTl'. UA8IlINClTOH.
f'DI\. AlII
11000 SURVEYl NG 1 NC ;'...... F16
2155 DISCOVEflT RD. PDR, TOUN6E"ND. UA. gUISe
PHONE 3tiO-a05-59te rAX 360.379.5659
J&!I!!2. 0 f('T !I,," AE8A1t WIT" CAI' .~.VOOD 'I.' i'JlII"
. 'CUID 1IDNl.ItDr! AI NOTtO
. In !I rOOT ITUl nHCE P0ll1 ON p,u.,nTf L UK
D
X
<.
\.::.
-...I
~
K'T JIt.~ OIl: ,. MAIL FDJ ttMv ., fTATIOtIS
"",,,..,,,,._.L~_
1.10' r:/ 1~
..-:rtJ._--', ,d.....llJ-
BY
COUNTERSIGNED
~o
.0
N
~N
1) ~<l..
m ,"i"h
{.'.1 f
~
()
--
CD
f'T1
(J)O
0"
cf'T1
-1=1
:I:
-c
OJo
f'T1_
l>Z
0-1
:c
Q
"<?
~
~~
?Q
.~~
q
>(1) aJ
ZO rr1
ZC: (")
1"1-1 "
x:r: 3
aJ
~."
(")~
:r:z
...
>(1) m
%0 ,."
zc:O
1"1-1 "
x:r: 9
CD
~."
02
:r:z
-I
B
10.77 en.
=Em
1"1fT1
U)(")
..."
m9
~.
0'"
:r:2
z
-I
f.
s;nr=t88
~-4~~
"">-4(".1
p><r-....
CD~~
~
.?,p ~
.>>
CI.;.
-
~
G">
~
v
.....4
~~c
-o/O~Jl'f"~
I$' ~ A
~co~~
~
b
::.-\
.;...>
II ~ ............
"/~V("'" ;..;\ ~,~ ,
0;~v ~ ~ 119":, 9~ \ ,'"I, _ ::: :::_
/(;s.,Y/ '\~ ~, ..>_~-
"Qf '\~';:.--
~.~ ~e
~~. A o~~
~rOq,)-7>
~~
~~
~J'
.p.(i)O
. 00
:::l<;'N
o -IN
. ~
r-N
00
-10
U
N
U(i)O
CXlOO
Co <;, ~
U-;.J:a.
o,-N
. 00
-10
0.l
N
'f
Qo
Z-.,.
"^
~ <:
o-'^
1
....
I
VI
~
1330.91'
. ~ 9~~E~
~j;jr-~'::E-48
(Xl,^ 0, ~"S,~ . ,
Q> .L~ ~
. 1I'Q-~ ~
. "( ~'-1
~%
-st~.
G')
o
<
..
--i
5
--i
tv
Page 1 of 1
Stacie Hoskins
From: Allegra Bothell [allegra@drizzle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 1 :58 PM
To: Stacie Hoskins
Subject: Beckett Point
Stacy,
The house sits on lot #29 and #30. The vacant lot next door is #31.
See you Wednesday at 3pm.
Thanks,
Allegra
Allegra Bothell
Windermere Port Townsend
Office 360.385.9344
Mobile 360.301.5953
Email allegra@allegra-bothell.com
Web www.allegra-bothell.com
~~~~
~l)~ - kU-
F I.. W a~'VY1 C?_...- u. -". \ n-"~,,
i lS'-"l't ~, ~~~ ~ ~
888N4 c..... - Jl.,.U-
~ - ku"
~~~~\\%~ ~ \N:1L--~
~~ &.P:t .-/)eeL
th~ ~ (L\J\<.. ~ U'AA (3)
0:>'TS ,~ +- (~
t~ ll\?P~
~\f?JL ~ '1;"3~ -la:ott~ gg f.Mtol~~
~.~ ~13' \~4 \'3 - t't€ ~~ ~ ~'t /'-f ~ \S-
(S6't ~~--rr- fr. t.D). ~
~y I~ ~ ~f€ . '*'~~~ 6(:. ~'f (...l" ~ ~~ '"
1 0/612004
(t"'.'~"::":'-6J._'N' V""- ~J'dSf.
'..,,, :., ." ..."..." # .;:1"
~ .""'..i.J:,,',;'::'>,,":, _,_'~ I
Message
Si-Q C<i
F,(I
Page 1 of 1
~
Michelle Farfan
~ ~f><"- ~ \o(Co{~,{
To: ptnancy@olypen.com
Subject: RE: 2 Very Quick Questions
Hi Nancy:
Sorry for the delayed response. I have been out sick since 8/31 for 2 weeks and playing new grandma since
9/13.
The UDC does have a moratorium on subdivision on Marrowstone Island. Even if the parcel would meet the
criteria to subdivision it cannot happen basically until public water is provided. The UDC became effective on
January 16, 2001.
As far as BP, I would like to suggest you meet with Stacie Hoskins, I have been assigned the Port Ludlow Lead
Planner and it seems to be consuming the majority of my time. Stacie is very capable and if she is unsure about
something she will talk to me about it. Stacie has done several reviews of projects in BP. If this is acceptable to
you her number is 379-4463 or email atshoskins@co.iefferson.wa.us.
I'll look for the last email (dated July 30, 2004. I have a hard copy) and if I have it I'll forward it to you.
L.o+s-
Michelle
-----Original Message-----
From: Nancy Stelow [mailto:ptnancy@olypen.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 11:18 AM
To: Michelle Farfan
Subject: 2 Very Quick Questions
Michelle,
You responded to an emaill sent a few months ago and I have lost it. The questions dealt with
Beckett Point and building on Garden Club Road, on Marrowstone.
If possible, I would like to set an appointment and sit down and chat about 2 lots that have not been
built on in BP, they think are buildable and by today's standards I am not so sure.
But, my primary interest at the moment is: I asked about a rumor of Marrowstone moratorium on
building. I think you said, no, there is no moratorium, but you said something was stopped effective
2000. My brain cells have died in that memory section of my brain.
There is a 15 acre piece with a house on it that I perceive is zoned 1 in 5, so with the right
ingress/egress, etc, I perceive it could be subdivided in the future.
Can you refresh my memory of what was in place so that could not happen?
And if I can set an appointment to discuss Beckett Point...,what is your schedule this week or week
of the 27th?
Thanks Michelle!
Nancy Stelow
,,,. '~^'.'""'-5L-" roa
~\. ,':~ .,"",;1";" ,':~'" f"~?-. ~i' ' .
~.>' c;,"i,';:;~,;t;'~;r~.' , ,~V
9120/2004
~-'~
'!f""'=-jj
"-=-"9
~-"lj
~'fj
~-~
"'F"'~
~--"9
~-~
~------
1
'4
..,
I
i
"'"
i
~
-1
~
I
1
"I
I
~
i
..
[.'0""7""""''''''''7.' . I.
FROM ,__~,_~"'-----, -"---'- DATE t,~!.;s/~'tifiJj
TIME l~:_~t .....,-,
COMPANY
.......__1~..~_l~l,Ce-....._.....,...,.--.,--._---...... FAX
~., ~'l.. ~ (C\ \'i lo"-i - ttc teN ~ ~ 't ~.
::t ~ ~ ~ ~ ^~ ~O ~~ \-\1\...'-
*ff.6C'~tN4' )1'4 ~~"\
ttf;'cL ~
"I
ift
.,,=--'~.- G'f~
-.~ ---
Map Output
Page 1 of 1
0 Legend
Ass.es.so( Maps-H
0 Paroel&-H
Landstide Hazard
. S!idas
. Hi(tl
. t.locIclralcI
- S/ifIC
I ,
2000 Aerial Ptlotos
Boundaries
0 ~ Co.Intf
0 w_
0 0hIr~
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL Y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
lIection. Wed Oct 13 11 :26:20 2004
LOG ITEM
#
Page_53 of as' g
http:// gisserver/serv let/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceName=ovrnap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/1312004
Map Output
Page 1 of 1
0 Legend
~ssor Maps-H
0 Parcels-H
Landslide Hazard
. SIiicbS
. HPi'I
. M<'J<b'alil
=' ~
2000 Aerial PhOtos
Boundal'ills
0 ~ COI&'II)'
0 w_
0 oto:s Cc:u1Ms
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
collection. Wed Oct 13 11 :26:20 2004
LOG ITEM
#
Page~5:i ofd<)K
http:// gisserverlservlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/13/2004
Map Output
Page 1 of 1
0 Legend
Assessor Maps-H
0 Parcel&-H
2000 Aerial Photos
Boundaries
0 ~CW'1Iy
0 w_
0 Oh;r~
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL Y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
ollection. Wed Oct 13 11 :27:032004
LOG ITEM
#
Page~Of dS"o
http:// gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceName=ovrnap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm. ,. 10/13/2004
Map Output
Page 1 ofl
0 Legend
Assessor Maps-H
0 Parcels-H
2000 Aerial Photos
Boundalies
0 ~Cculty
0 WtIrJr
0 Ob:s C<ames
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
lIection. Wed Oct 13 11 :27:03 2004
LOG ITEM
#
?age_~)b of..6$.[
http:// gisserverlservlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/13/2004
Map Output
Page 1 ofl
~ Legend
Road System
0 Assessor Maps-H
0 Paroels-H
Contours
^/ 10 f' cd Cali:lur
"
;"/ ro Fool Cali:lur
Boundaries
0 Jo!5an!an C<Uily
0 w_
0 Otler Cades
!
1\4"4'> p-cMded by ~CanIy CerrI-oI So-.;oe GIS
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
ollection. Wed Oct 13 11 :27:54 2004
LOG ITEM
#
pageS=7 ofp
http:// gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/13/2004
Map Output
1
ill"", ~decI by JefI=<rI C<U1f)- C<>'1hlI ~-= GIS
Page 1 of 1
Legend
.;-/ Road System
o Assessor Maps-H
o Paroels-H
Contours
,N 10 Fool ConbJr
,N 00 Fool ConbJr
Boundaries
0 ~ C<ioriy
0 WtkJ<
0 0Ih0t~
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL Y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
ollection. Wed Oct 13 11 :27:54 2004
LOG ITEM
#
, Pag~L_l)(J of~J>
http:// gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceName=ovmap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/13121Y04
m
f'TI
(J)O
0"
c:f'TI
-1=1
:t:
-c
CJo
f'TI _
l>Z
0-1
::c
B
70.77 Ch,
~m
1"'1fT1
(1)0
-I^
m~
>!."
(')0
::1:_
Z
-t
---
~,
Q
'7~
~
~0:
'..... Q
'<b~
q
~?88
. ~N
~~...~
P 68
CD......
~
~
<.9 ~
.>>
"..s.
C>
~
0#
...4
b
::.-\
~~c
+O..p)J~~
~ ~ A
~CO~)'
;y
)>(1) a:J
ZO rr1
ZC: (')
fT1-t ^
)(:t: 3
a:J
~."
(')Q
:t:z
-I
CD
~
.....".
)>(.1) a:J
%0 rr1
% c: (')
fT1-t ^
X:I: 9
a:J
fTI
>."
02
:J:Z
-I
./1 ~.............. ",
^,/~V<", ......., \ ~, ~,
^./~y~ 1': \.~" __
^'''Y/ ~ 9~ \. 9 \ . ~ ;::' ;::' _
/'/S) ~ 9 ',-">:::=:"'-
"Q;/ ~:::=--
~~e
~~ A O~~
";,tf,. O~;-7>
~~
~..y
?'"~
Q> ~~ ~
. 1( 0 r~ ~
. . '( ;0'-1
,c~
-s'~.
G")
o
<
..
-f
IA
VlG)O ~
.p.G)Q ())OO r ....
. 00 Co <;. N 0
~<;'N VI-i~
O-lN orN -f N
. ~
rN . 00
-10
00 VI . T
-10 N
VI
N
00 N
~..
/0-
~ <'0
~o
0 ~
N 1
-N 1330.91'
.,..
I
VI Ul r-?o~ ~8 P'!:;;5?o~~-l8
0 R
z gm~ "" OJ ,n ,..... ~........?';..
. ,
,
~
'i
,
, I
CkJ'
-rJ
, I
I ".~,f
I~
S>
~
N
---
~
~
~3:
O~
o..w
iI-CO
\....\)~
'.. W3:
~~
....~O
coZ
i" ~
f-(/)
Zf-
. O-::J:
. C)
Q..-
LaJ
f-::J:
f-
"'~
/
,J\
"
~
d-~
<$;~~
~~~~
~~~
foe.
d-~ G
~ ~<o<v'f
V.....<<; ~x.. ~<J-
<o~ ,?O ~
t:- vx..
~~ <o<v'f .
~l;j ~~x..
<o<vv~ ,?O
\
'""~::;..'...'~.7'....~.om._..'_';:~..i,...'T~
.,/:' """~__...~~,,,;~-.e--~
Proposed UDC Amendments
Pursuant to Review of Best Available Science
(Christensen 2004)
Note: All references to Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas (FWHAs) in the UDC to be
changed to Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (FWHCAs). These include, but
are not limited to, references in Sections 1, 2, and 3.
UDC SECTION 3 - LAND USE DISTRICTS
Note: Table of Contents to be modified appropriately.
3.6.7 Geologically Hazardous Areas
a. Classification/Designation
(2) Designation. The following erosion, landslide, aRG-seismic. and channel miqration
zone (CMZ) hazard areas shall be subject to the standards of this section:
iv. Channel Miaration Zones (CMZs). Areas subiect to the natural movement of
stream channel meanders. In the Hiqh Risk CMZ area, channel miqration is likely within
the next 100 years; in the Moderate Risk CMZ area, channel miqration is possible in the
next 100 years. Areas protected from channel movement due to the existence of
permanent levees or infrastructure improvements such as roads and bridqes constructed
and maintained by public aqencies are excluded from the Hiqh or Moderate Risk
desiqnation. These areas also do not include areas outside the meander hazard which
may be subiect to rapid movement of the entire stream channel or avulsion.
(3) Sources Used for Identification.
vii. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. 2004. Channel Miqration
Zone Study for the Duckabush, Dosewallips, Biq Quilcene and Little Quilcene Rivers,
Jefferson County, Washinqton. Denver, CO.
viii. Perkins Geoscience. 2004. Channel Miqration Hazard Maps for the Dosewalltps,
Duckabush, Biq Quilcene and Little Quilcene Rivers, Jefferson County. Washinqton.
Seattle, WA.
b. Protection Standards.
(6) Buffers - Standard Requirements.
vii. A buildinq setback line is required to be five (5) feet from the edqe of any buffer area
for a landslide hazard area OR to outside the full extent of the Hiqh Risk channel
miqration zone. whichever is qreater.
Proposed UDC Amendments per BAS Review
LOG
September 22, 2004
Page 1 of 5
#
17'
f"'l,..".,.., /.", < .,.~
f" .t..'.::.~; .......llL.\... (; r .
J .
3.6.8 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas.1
a. Classification/Designation. Fish and wildlif-e h3bit3t areasFish and Wildlife
Habitat Conservation Areas (FWHQAs) include both aquatic and terrestrial areas
within Jefferson County. The approximate location and extent of critical fish 3nd
wildlife h3bit3t 3re3sFish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas are displayed
in the Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife's (WDFW) Priority Habitat and
Species (PHS) Program database, and Jefferson County's Core Wildlife Habitat
Conservation Areas database. The following designations shall be used in
classifying ~environmentally critical areas to be regulated under this section.
(1) Those waters that meet the criteria for type S, F, Np, and Ns as set forth in
Chapter 222-16-030 and Chapter 222-16-031 WAC. Included in this
definition are streams, lakes, and marine waters that are requlated under
RCW 90.58 RCW, Shoreline Manaqement Act, and wetlands associated to
requlated water bodies.
f4-f(2) Areas that are recoqnized by Federal or State aqencies for which federal
or state endanqered, threatened, and sensitive species of fish and wildlife
have a primary association. This includes known locations of nests,
rookeries, or other breedinq areas; and habitat areas tarqeted for
preservation by Federal, State and/or local qovernment which provide
wildlife habitat benefits.
(3) Areas that contain habitats and species of local importance, includinq-areas
identified as Core Wildlife Habitat in Jefferson County's Wildlife Habitat
Conservation Areas database~
(3)Thoso w3tors th3t meet the criteria for type 1, 2, 3, '1 3nd 5 stro3ms as set
forth in Ch3pter 222 16 030 IN/\C.
(4) Areas with which fedoral or st3te ond3ngered, threatened, 3nd sensitive
species of fish and wildlife have 3 primary 3ssociation.
b. Sources Used for Identification. Sources used to identify fish and INildlife
h3bit3t 3ro3sFish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas include, but are not
limited to:
(1) United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, National
Wetlands Inventory.
(2) Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Water Type Index
Maps.
(3) Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife, Non-Game and Priority
Habitats_and Species Data Bases.
(4) Jefferson County Shoreline Master Proqram and associated inventory and
analysis.
(5) National Wetlands Inventory database.
(6) Coastal Zone Atlas, Jefferson County.
(7) WRIA 16, WRIA 17, WRIA 20, and WRIA 21 Limitinq Factors Analyses.
(8) Jefferson County's Core Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas database.
1 As stated above, all references to Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas (FWHAs) in this section and
the UDC as a whole will be replaced with Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas
(FWHCAs).
September 22, 2004
Page 2 of 5
Proposed UDC Amendments per BAS Review
----=~"1.~.' ofgL Sa
! -
e. Regulated Activities.
(2) All land divisions...
ii. The applicant must submit a Habitat Manaqement Plan if the proposal is located within
a desiqnated Core Wildlife Habitat Area or Corridor, unless the proposal is for a PRRD.
as requlated in Section 3 of this Code. The Habitat Manaaement Plan must
demonstrate that the land division and subsequent development will not result in
fraamentation and loss of wildlife habitat function.
Hill. After preliminary approval...
mjy. Buffer areas...
(4) Bank Stabilization.
LA stream channel and bank, bluff, and shoreline may be stabilized when naturally
occurring earth movement threatens existing legal structures (structure is defined for this
purpose as those requiring a Building Permit pursuant to the Uniform Building Code),
public improvements, unique natural resources, public health, safety or welfare, or the
only feasible access to property, and, in the case of streams, when such stabilization
results in maintenance of fish habitat or improved water quality. as demonstrated
throuqh a Habitat Manaqement Plan or equivalent study or assessment. Bluff, bank and
shoreline stabilization shall follow the standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline
Master Program, Geologically Hazardous Areas provision in this Section, and the
Floodplain Management Ordinance.
lL The Administrator may-shall require that bank stabilization be designed by a
professional engineer licensed in the State of Washington with demonstrated expertise
in hydraulic actions of shorelines. For bank stabilization projects within FWHQAs, the
applicant must provide a qeotechnical report that demonstrates that omphasis shall bo
placed on bioengineering solutions (vegetation versus hard surfaces) unless provod by
the 3pplicant to be are infeasible. The report must document the enqineerina rationale
why bioenqineerinq solutions are infeasible in a manner which can be confirmed by
review by other enqineerinq professionals. Bank stabilization projects may also require a
Hydraulic Project Approval from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife which
will be determined after consultation with WDFW.
(5) Gravel Mining. Gravel mining is discouraged within FWHAs or their buffers, and it
shall not be permitted if it causes unmitigatable significant adverse impacts, but it may
be allowed following the review and approval of a Habitat Management Plan, including a
detailed mining and reclamation plan pursuant to the applicable performance standards
in Section 4 (Mineral Extraction) or as otherwise required in this Code.
(6) Forest Practices, Class IV General. Timber harvesting with associated
development activity involving land conversions from Forest Use, or otherwise meeting
the DNR definition as a Class IV General application, shall comply with the provisions of
this Section, including the maintenance of buffers, where required. Proposals
correspondinq with Class IV General applications and located within a desianated Core
Wildlife Habitat Area or Corridor must either conform to the minimum standards of UDC
Section 4.16.7 or include a Habitat Manaqement Plan that demonstrates that the activity
will not be detrimental to the function of the Core Wildlife Habitat Area or Corridor.
Proposed UDC Amendments per BAS Review
LOG ITEI\A September 22,2004
. ... Page 3 of 5
.&1.
1}~
r"JIF~:::=-~ '1 ov~,..rd~
f' t::t":~,::;;_~';: .-) - 00
\;o;!t' "" .
I A
.
n
g. Protection Standards.
(4) Vegetation Retention.
iv. Veqetation in a delineated channel miqration zone (CMZ) shall be manaqed
consistent with DNR Forest and Fish rules for timber harvest. which encouraqe the
development of mature trees to provide a source of habitat-forminq larqe woody debris
(LWD). [222-30-020(12) WAC]
(5) Buffers - Standard Requirements.
v. Standard streamsiGe buffer widths shall be applied to each side of the stream
waterbody in accordance with Table 3-2.
Table 3 2. Standard Streamside Buffers.
8uffef
Stream Type 'Nidths
Typo 1 & 2 4-aG-ft
Typo 3 +OO-ft
Type '1 +OO-ft
Type 5 --W-ft
~Joto: Stro3m typo shQ.lf bo doterminod
using tho crito.riQ sot forth in ChQptor 222
16030 LJI/AC.
Table 3-2. Standard Streamside Buffers.
Buffer
Stream Tvpe Widths
Cateqorv S 150 ft
Cateqorv F 150 ft
Cateqory Np 100 ft
Cateqorv Ns 50 ft
Note: Stream type shall be determined
usinq the criteria set forth in Chapter 222-
16-030 WAC (Chapter 222-16-031 WAC
until adoption bv the Forest Practices
Board)
vi. The standard marine shoreline buffer width shall be 100 feet. The first 50 feet of the
buffer is an "inner core" buffer to be requlated as per buffers listed in Table 3-2. The
next 50 feet of buffer is to be manaqed for low impact as an "outer core" buffer. In the
outer core buffer, native veqetation is encouraqed. If landscapinq or lawn is to be
planted. pesticides-includinq herbicides-and fertilizers shall be prohibited to maintain
the non-native veqetation.
(7) Increasing Buffer Widths.
Fi~ii(:";;7" [/ r'i:~O
":"~' ~-...L---.\.';' i v(
Proposed UDC Amendments per BAS Review
September 22, 2004
Page 4 of 5
l ,.
.
n
iV.lf tho FWH/\ lios within ~m 3re3 where there is evidonce of 3 migr3ting stre3m or river
ch3nnel, incro3sod protection will be necess3ry. B3sed upon sito h3bit3t conditions and
spocios prosence, the buffer m3Y be extondod.
'v'-;-iv. If streams are located in ravines...
3.6.9 Wetlands.
d. Protection Standards.
Table 3-3.
Minimum Wetland Buffers Necessary as part of Qualifying for a
Waiver from Delineation and Special Report Requirements.li. 2.3)
Required Distance from
Estimated Wetland
Boundary (feet)14)
na300
150
75
J+52
Wetland
Category
I
II
III
IV
Table 3-4. Standard Buffer Widths for Wetlands
Wetland
Category
I
II
III
IV
Standard
Buffer Width
4W-200 ft
1 00 ft
50 ft
~35 ft
3.6.13 Planned Rural Residential Developments (PRRDs).
10. Modification of Permitted Densities - Density Bonuses.
d. Criteria for Approval of Bonus Densities.
(5) Environmental Design. Items for consideration under this criterion include on-site
designs providing regional benefits, including drainage control using natural drainage
and landscaped drainage retention facilities; flood control measures, particularly those
measures serving regional needs; significant public access provided to designated
potential open space or park areas, shoreline areas, trails, scenic sites and viewpoints;
provision for substantial and exceptional landscape treatment; preservation of critical fish
and wildlife habitat identified for thre3tened and ond3ngerod species; and the use of
recycled materials and resource conserving designs.
[End]
~.~c_"~_~__
~::?';;f\.;'j t~,td--' Sf'
It ~"'-;y"i,,+ ",,,/~
"'" _._iLz. _,,_~. __,_
Proposed UDC Amendments per BAS Review
September 22. 2004
Page 5 of 5
Stacie Hoskins
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Stacie Hoskins
Tuesday, October 19, 2004 7: 12 AM
'Michael Moren'
Randy Marx; Jim Pearson
RE: Beckett Point project
Hi Mike,
We're confirmed for October 29, 2004 at 10:00 am for the Beckett Point sewage system pre-
application.
See you then,
Stacie L. Hoskins
Associate Planner
Jefferson County Department of Community Development
621 Sheridan Street
Port Townsend, WA 98368
Phone 360-379-4463
Fax 360-379-4451
shoskins@co.jefferson.wa.us
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Moren [mailto:mmoren@parametrix.com]
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 1:16 PM
To: Stacie Hoskins
Subject: RE: Beckett Point project - Figure 3
Stacie,
Oct. 29th would also be the best date in October for us.
Thank you,
Mike Moren
Parametrix, Inc.
5700 Kitsap Way, Suite 202
Bremerton, WA 98312-2234
mmoren@parametrix.com
p: (360) 850-5320
f: (360) 479-5961
Phone 360-379-4463
Fax 360-379-4451
shoskins@co.jefferson.wa.us
1
-"---.0 (p-- ;;F' /}~?L
_"""""'_ '<.,.>-s t:7'-I
Parametrix
ENGINEERING. PLANNING. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
5700 KITSAP WAY, SUITE 202
BREMERTON, WASHINGTON 98312-2234
T. 3600377.0014 F. 360.479.5961
www.parametrix.com
TRANSMITTAL
FORM
To:
Jefferson County - Department of
Community Development
621 Sheridan St.
Port Townsend, WA 98368
Date:
Project Number:
Project Name:
October 29, 2004
256-1820-009
Beckett Point Sanitary
Improvements
We are transmitting the following materials:
One copy of the Wetlands Delineation and Ranking report for Beckett Point.
Comments:
A Wetlands Delineation and Ranking Report for Beckett Point was prepared by Dr. Kenneth M. Brooks of
Pacific Rim Aquatic Environmental Sciences in 2000. The majority of the existing development lies along
the perimeter of a large sand spit jutting out into Discovery Bay. The report identified, classified and
delineated a wetland in the middle of the sand spit. This report will be used for the wetland delineation
and classification for this project.
These are:
o PER YOUR REQUEST
o FOR YOUR INFORMATION
o FOR YOUR REVIEW AND APPROVAL
~ FOR YOUR FILES
o FOR YOUR ACTION
Sent Via:
o U.S, MAIL
o GROUND SERVICE
o EXPRESS OVERNIGHT
o COURIER
o HAND DELIVERY/PICK UP
Si"T/ti
Mike Moren
~
cc:
LfJG ITEM
F'i.",;,,,',,,, fa 7
i" Ci..... ,;
""'7 ~
.of ;;'S'K"
(Rev. 07/03)
;>~, ,
'~,
Wetlands Deiineation and Ranking
Tax Lot 1 in Sections 23 and 24 of Township 30N, Range 2Win Jefferson
County, Washington as shown on the Official Record Map of the Cape George
Fishermen, Inc~ Salmon Club drafted in 1951 and adoptedfor club records on
June 10, 1958.
Produced for:
Mr. Tom Shute, Board of Trustees
Beckett Point Fisherman's Club, Inc.
760 Beckett Point Road
Port Townsend, WA 98368
Produced by:
Dr. Kenneth M. Brooks
Pacific Rim Aquatic Environmental Sciences
644 Old Eaglemount Road
Port Townsend, WA 98368
5 August, 2000
ITE~v1
pi~;:~ (P8 _ of dSf
"
~., ...
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
Page
1
"
1
1
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
7
7
8
9
11
2, Qualifications
3. Property Description
4. In-Office Survey
4.1. Soils
4.2. National Wetland Inventory
5, Field Inspection Notes
5.1. Topography
5.2. Soils
5.3. Vegetation
5.4. Hydrology
5.5. Wetland determination
5.6, Wetland ranking
6. Conclusions and Recommendations
7. References
8. Appendices
1. Upland Log (1). 1987 Corps of Engineers Routine On Site Data Sheet
2. Wetland Log (2). 1987 Corps of Engineers Routine On Site Data Sheet
3. Wetland Log (3). 1987 Corps of Engineers Routine On Site Data Sheet
4. Upland Log (4). 1987 Corps of Engineers Routine On Site Data Sheet
5. Wetlarid Log (5). 1987 Corps of Engineers Routine On Site Data Sheet
6. Washington State Department of Ecology Wetlands Rating Field bata Form
,~~i:
P,0::~";) ~1' ~of~ ii
~
.. .. ..
List of Figures
Figure la. Southeast portion of Tax Lot 1 in Sections 23 and 24 of Township 30N,
Range 2W in Jefferson County, Washington as shown on the Official Record
Map of the Cape George Fishermen, Inc. Salmon Club drafted in 1951 and
adopted for club records on June 10, 1958. This delineation was completed
on July 30, 2000 by Dr. Kenneth M. Brooks. 2
Figure Ib, Northeast portion of Tax Lot 1 in Sections 23 and 24 of Township 30N,
Range 2W in Jefferson County, Washington as shown on the Official Record
Map of the Cape George Fishermen, Inc. Salmon Club drafted in 1951 and
adopted for club records on June 10, 1958. This delineation was completed
on July 30, 2000 by Dr. Kenneth M. Brooks. 3
Figure 2. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory of Beckett Point,
Jefferson County, Washington. 5
-'~C.--=;~O-(;r~~ iii
;""''''~--..,...'''''' ~
"
~ .. ,
Wetlands Delineation and Ranking
Tax Lot 1 in Sections 23 and 24 of Township 30N, Range 2W in Jefferson County,
Washington as shown on the Official Record Map of the Cape George Fishermen, Inc.
Salmon Club drafted in 1951 and adopted for club records on June 10, 1958.
1.0. Introduction. Aquatic Environmental Sciences examined this property on July 30,2000.
Wetlands were determined using the routine method defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetlands Delineation Manual (Technical Report Y-87-1) as required in paragraph 11.1003.3.a.
of the Jefferson County Interim Critical Areas Ordinance (1994). These procedures also satisfy
the requirements of the "Vi{ ashington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual
(Ecology Publication #96-94, dated March 1997). The property and delineation is described in
Figures (1a) and (1b).
2.0. Author's Qualifications. Dr. Brooks is the owner of Aquatic Environmental Sciences, Inc.
He has a Doctorate in Marine Biology from the University of Washington School of Ocean
Sciences and Fisheries and was Director of the Fisheries Technology Program at Peninsula
College from August 1992 until January 1997. The author is a Qualified Level (I) and Level (IT)
wetland consultant in Clallam County and has ten years experience in delineating, constructing
and managing wetlands throughout western Washington, Wetland mitigation projects include
several major projects approved by the Department of Ecology, Environmental Protection
Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In 1996, Dr. Brooks inventoried all of the
wetlands on the Long Beach Peninsula for the City of Ocean Shores under a grant with the
Department of Ecology.
3.0. Property Description. This property (Tax Lot 1) is located on a sandy spit centered at
approximately 48.070 N by 122.880 W. Excepting the sandy-gravelly fill, observed soils are
generally composed of sands (0.250 to 1.00 mm) with an overlying layer of organic matter that
varies between 5 cm and 15 cm in depth. The perimeter of the spit has been filled and is nearly
fully developed with vacation homes and permanent residences. This is particularly true on the
seaward side of Beckett Point Road. The inland side of the road is partially developed and
generally devoted to garages supporting the homes located on the seaward side.
A very steep hill butts the property to the northeast providing an adequate buffer with no
development. A tidal lagoon is located in the northeastern 1/3 of the unfilled portion of the high
tidal marsh comprising much of the wetland. Anecdotal history conveyed by Mr. Tom Shute
indicat~d that the lagoon once enjoyed an opening to Discovery Bay. However, that opening
was filled with the completion of Beckett Point Road, which now cuts off the lagoon from any
tidal flushing. The lagoon remains brackish with a salty crust lying on the soil's surface in areas
that were not inundated during this survey. The lagoon's water level is reported to rise in the
winter and fall in the summer. That is likely the result of the collection of rainwater and/or
shallow groundwater flowing down the steep hill from the northeast. This freshwater would sit
on top of the underlying saltwater permeating the sandy substrates. Much of this description is
hypothesis based on anecdotal evidence and the author's experience and training in physical
oceanography, Neither the hydrology nor the geology of the spit was rigorously investigated
during thIs survey.
I
&'''"'
'..,....-1\.1
I j" !M)t;
, ~~;f
JL "d~
""",\.-.",
~ _ t.d .
1
. I ~
,...-
\)~
~..
"t'
ee,
\
... ...
150'
,~
<1;-
7a~, Lo,i;....1
2..5.5 ACY"es
North
. ~",'"
,. .:,;.:~:':'.~';('~:'>"
-.......,.. .,....
.,.,-;, ~'\," -->:;,/r"':,:','J_ '
'. '-.. ',. -- ,"
~ ' . -""';c'"
Soil Log
_ _ _ WetlandBoundary
... Delineation transect
Figure 1a. Southeast portion of Tax Lot 1 in Sections 23 and 24 of Township 30N, Range
2W in Jefferson County, Washington as shown on the Official Record<Map of the Cape' .
George Fishermen, Inc. Salmon Club drafted in 1951 and adopted for club records on June
10, 1958. This delineation was completed on July 30, 2000 by Dr. ~t Brooks.
+,.., ~',-,/:;'fo,-~:~ ~
"""-:.., ~- l"'\fKY
_~#v-LI::-...\~,~J'~~
f/ltJNe:X
rH 13CIlCH I
C'l"1tJ . .
Figure lb. Northeast portion of Tax Lot 1 in Sections 23 and 24 of Township.30N, Range
2W in Jefferson County, Washington as shown on the Official Record Map of the Cape ~ .
George Fishermen, Inc. Salmon Club drafted in 1951 and adopted for Clllb.reeordsoD Jun.
10, 1958. This delineation was completed on July 30, 2000 by Dr. Kenneth M. .rooks.
01 g
Wetland Boundtuy
Delineatiatl.transe
"~"'.,....>~.~ 2. ''''';:~
."",J.-.~"-,-t~,.,,,}- ~
, I
.
~~ ::if/) iS~
g~~~~j~ ~'i. fg I<
-<<<'4.jjJ ~o,g 0 ~ 0 ~
iiitiBi!@~~~i
Q
C
~
o
Q
...-
v.I
-
4)
.......
fU
E
Q
o
Q
or-
.'-'"~-1< .~m t>d--~
'dJ 1
"..,..,,'~ . . ,~-
1
~
~
~
.=
I
!
.J'.
.s
~
i
1
r;Q.
'S
i
!
=
....
J
~
'iJ
!
i
z
B
.E
~
fI:.l
!i
""
~
."
=
i
~
r.q
j;)
~
i'
~
.. ), ,
5.0, Field Inspection Notes. This property was platted and portions filled for residential
development before the Clean Water Act was enacted. Road construction, filling and home
construction have significantly changed the geology and hydrology of Beckett Point by
stabilizing the shoreline and by cutting off the flow of seawater into the tidal lagoon: Native
soils throughout the property are dominated by sand. Excepting'the area lying to the southeast,
the entire wetland boundary is well defined by historic filling. A single transect was evaluated
along the southeastern wetland boundary to establish the wetland boundary in this gently
sloping area.
5.1. Topography. The property is flat with a steep hill lying to the northeast. That
hillside represents the only natural landscape surrounding the wetlands observed on this
property. The remainder of the wetlands are ringed with homes and Beckett Point Road.
5;2, Soils. The southwestern 1.4 of the spit is upland (Log 1). The soils are dominated
by sand with a matrix color of lOY/4 in the Munsel gley chart. However, the color is
associated with the color of the parent material and not with chemical processing in an
anaerobic environment. The upland soils were not mottled and had a relatively high chroma.
Upland soils on the hillside lying northeast of the spit (Log 4) were also sandy with a high
chroma matrix color of 4/5GY. They were not mottled and showed no secondary ,
characteristics of prolonged saturation.
The Munsell Gley Chart #1 color of wetland soil at Log (2) was 5/IOGY; at Log (3),
lOCated in the tidal lagoon, soils were darker with the same chroma at 3/lOGY.Wetland soils
at Log (5) had a'Munsell color of 4/l0Y. All of these wetland soils were dull and gleyed.
Soils at Log (3) contained more clay than at other sites, were darker and hydrogen sulfide was
organoleptically detectable at depths greater than 40 cm. Surficial substrates to a depth of
approximately 15'cm in the tidal lagoon also contained more finely divided organic matter than
was observed in other wetland areas.
5.3. Vegetation. Plant preferences are those given in Reed (1988) for Region (9). The
plant community within the wetland boundaries is dominated by saltgrass (Distichlis spicata),
seaside arrowgrass (Triglochin maritimum), Pacific silverweed (Potentilla pacifica), perhaps
European beach grass (Ammophila arenaria) and glasswort (Salitomia virginica). The
wetland located in the most northeastern portion of the spit (delineation flags 29 through 32)
contains a dense stand of what appears to be teasel (Dipsacus ct fullonum or sylvestris). This
is an introduced species and I must say it is quite spectacular.
Upland plants include Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) on the northern hillside,
rosehips (Rosa ct gymnocarpa), a variety of grasses, thistle (Circium sp.) and madrone
(Arbutus menziesii).
5.4. Hydrology. Soils in the tidal lagoon were inundated to an undetermined depth
over an area of greater than one acre. Soils throughout the remainder of the delineated wetland
remained saturated on July 30, 2000. The entire wetland area met the hydrologic requirements
of the 1987 USACE manual during the dry part of the year.
".."'~"""..""<c"''"_,.'''''_''''~..,.,...~.~
7~,~",;'i.f:d~a 6
, .
.
5.5. Wetland determination. The NWI was constructed in large part through the
examination of aerial photography without the benefit of ground truthing. A$ previously
stated, this survey found hydrology, soils and vegetation meeting requiremenls to designate the
entire area within.the delineation boundary described in Figures (1a) and (lb) as a regulated
wetland,
5.6. Wetland ranking. The ranking of this wetland is complicated by previous
development, which has significantly altered the hydrology. Estuarine wetlands are defined by
Cowardin et al. (1979) as those that, "Consist of deepwater tidal habitats and adjacent tidal
wetlands that are usually semi-enclosed by land but that have open, partly obstructed, or
sporadic access to the open ocean, and in which ocean water is at least occasionally diluted by
freshwater runoff from the land." The construction of Beckett Point Road intercepted the flow
of seawater into the interior tidal pond on this property and strictly speaking, these 'wetlands do
not meet Cowardin's definition because they do not have access to the ocean. The presence of
salt tolerant plants and a crust of salt near the tidal lagoon suggested that this environment is
still brackish. The wetland is greater than five acres and therefore would be considered
Category I, if it indeed were an estuary.
H the wetland is not considered an estuary, then its lack of complexity; lack of
connection to other valuable habitats, and lack of natural buffers significantly reduces the value
of this area. It scored only 12 points in the significant habitat value assessment included in
Appendix (7). The wetland would be considered a Category ill wetland with this score.
The classification of this wetland has some sigruficance for property owners
surrounding this parcel. The Jefferson "County Interim Critical Areas Ordinance, at paragraph
6,505.5, requires a 75' buffer for Low Intensity land uses around a Class I wetland and a 25'
buffer around a Class ill wetland.
It is the opiition of this author that the Beckett Point wetlands represent a special case
not strictly meeting Cowardin's definition of an estuary and having higher ecological value
than would be recognized in a strict interpretation of the Washington State Wetland Rating
System. Category I wetlands are those described as the "cream of the crop," Among other
things, they are wetlands that are rare within a given region or that are relatively undisturbed
and contain ecological attributes that are impossible to replace within a human lifetime, if at
all. Wetlands such as that found at Beckett Point are certainly rare within our region. The
pond likely provides a shelter for marine birds during periods of high winds and heavy seas
and there are not many areas within Puget Sound that have healthy communities of salt tolerant
plants like saltgrass and glasswort. It would indeed be very. difficult, if not impossible, to
construct a wetland mimicking the functions and values found at Beckett Point.
In contn:lst, Class ill wetlands are those that provide important functions and values. In
general, these wetlands are smaller, less diverse, and/or more isolated in the landscape than
Category IT wetlands. They occur more frequently, are difficult to replace, and need a
moderate level of protection, The Beckett Point wetland is isolated, it is not very diverse, 'but it
is quite large. It would be essentially ilJlPossible to replace.
Lastly, Category IT wetlands are those that, "1) provide habitat for very sensitive or
important wildlife or plants; 2) are either difficult to replace; or 3) provide very high functions,
particularly for wildlife habitat." It is the author's opinion that Category IT best fits the current
.~".~ .,~~~~~ 7
. .
state of the Beckett Point wetlands and Category IT is the classification determined for this
report. It should be noted that a well-constructed channel to Discovery Bay, coupled with
careful yard keeping by the residents, could nearly restore this wetland to Class I with
significant habitat value for a broad range of marine fauna and flora. The Jefferson County
Intenm Critical Areas Ordinance requires a 50' buffer from Class IT wetlands for low intensity
land uses.
6,0. Conclusions and Recommendations. The wetland was delineated on July 30,
2000. The delineation is marked in the field by 57 wire flags placed on the boundary of the
wetland. The location of the flags was enhanced by tying surveyor's ribbon as high on
adjacent vegetation as possible. The approximate location of each of the 57 flags is given in
Figures (la) and (lb). The delineation was not surveyed and no claim with respect to the
exactness of Figures (la) and (lb) is made. Individual property owners can assess the location
of the wetland boundary adjacent to their property by locating the wire flags. I recommend
that each property owner permanently mark those locations because the flags will be lost
within a year or two. In general, the wetland boundaries are well defined by the previously
placed fill. Because each lot was filled to a different location, the wetland boundary, while
well defined, is very irregular. .
I recommend that the wetland be designated as Category IT and that a 50' setback be
required. Based on field observations, it appears that most new construction on the interior
side of Beckett Point Road will require a variance from Jefferson County.
The Beckett Point Fisherman's Club asked that Idetermine the boundary of the buffer
in the southwest corner of the wetland to determine the permit requirements for construction of
a covered picnic structure on the playground. A flag was placed at a distance of 75' from the
wetland boundary during the July 30, 2000 delineation. Based on thedassification of this
wetland as Category IT and not Category I, that flag can be moved 25' toward the wetland. In
either case, there is adequate room to construct the picnic cover outside the wetland's buffer
and a variance is not required. Prior to construction closer than 75' from ~e wetland
boundary, I recommend that the Jefferson County Planning Department concur with the
Category IT recommendation. Please call if I can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
~,..d4M,
Gnneth M. Brooks
Aquatic Environmental Sciences
c,(,c,(,(,e-(,,,,,,,c
",."ort:SSIOtv....{,"'ee
fifJ <l~ ,........ n erc:t
",. "<.Thtt
"" ~ .' '. 0....
........ 0.' Kenneth M "~O~
" . . . \,\
: 0< : Brooks : (i) ~
0) Ul"
\)-" .--ca
:'2.'. ~ :Co?:
~"6'. .'" :Otto.
~ 0 . .P... . ">) 4tt
...... ~J'I". #1253 . . ',(0 44
~.D ~ .........1)""
~ 4
.... APB 44
"PPll1l9'11t,tt
. .. "~.~- j-7 ;:~}t?)217 8
,- "."..''''<-.;;"",.".....'''',Ji>".,'''''''~.,' ,t2:::::fd..e..,
~>-.._--..~-....-....-:.-':"_....__..-..".-...:..~,... .A....
. .
.
Wetland Bibliography'
Bigley, R.E., and S.W. Hull. 1993. ReCognizing Wetlands and Wetland Indicator Plants on
Forest Lands. Washington State DNR, Forest Land Management Division, Contribution
No. 500.
Caduto, M.J., 1990. Pond and brook: a guide to nature in freshwater environments.
University Press of New England, Hanover, NH 03755
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife
Service Document FWS/OBS-79/31. Office of Biological Services, Washington, D.C.
20240.
King County. 1986. Wetland Plants of King County, and the Puget Sound Lowlands.
Kitsap County Interim Critical Areas Ordinance. 1994. Including amendments as adopted
February 27; 1995 by the Kitsap county Board of Commissioners. Kitsap County
Ordninance No. 170-1994. 69 pp, plus appendices.
Federal interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation. 1989. Federal Manual for Identifying
and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, -U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S,D.A. Soil
Conservatio.n Service, Washington, D.C. Cooperative technical puplication. 76 pp. plus
appendices.
MunselL 1994. Munsell Soil Color Charts, Macbeth Division of Kollmorgan Instruments
Corporation, 405 Little Britain Road, New Windson, NY 12553. ,
Franklin, J.F.. and C.T; Dyrness. 1973. Natural Vegetation of Oregon and Washington. USDA
Forest Service General Technical Report PNW -8.
Jefferson County Ordinance No. 05-0509-94. 1994, Interim Critical Areas Ordinance. 68 pp,
Kozloff, E.N. 1976. Plants and Animals of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington
Press, Seattle and London.
Ni~ring, W.A. 1992. The Audubon Society nature Guides - WETIANDS. Alfred A, Nopf,
Inc. New York, NY
North Bend Critical Areas Ordinance. Chapter 14.10.
~."'._--'-'-'-.-~?1?'
,],[_"",!C; i:~f!... 9
. ,
Reed, P.B., Jr., 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Northwest
(Region 9). U.S. Fish WildI. Servo BioI. Rep. 88(26.9). 89 pp.
Steward, A.N., J.D. LaRea andH.M. Gilkey. 1963. Aquatic Plants of the Pacific Northwest.
Oregon State University Press, Corvalis, Oregon.
U.S. Soil Conservation Service. 1993. Western Wetland Flora - Field Office Guide to Plant
Species, USDA Soil Conservation Service, West national Technical Center, Portland,
Oregon.
U.S. Soil Conservation Service. 1992. Soil Survey of Snoqualmie Pass Area, Parts of King
and Pierce Counties, Washington. 601 pp, plus appendices.
Washington State Department of Ecology. 1993. Washington State Wetlands Rating System-
Western Washington. Second Edition. Publication #93-74. .
Washington State Department of Ecology. 1997. Washington State Wetlands Identification and
Delineation Manual. Ecology Publication #96-4. 93 pp. plus appendices.
""..m"'_,,~1?J:'""W~-"_'_._
,,1~~L.,~.C. Jd3.. 10
. )
DATA FORM 1
WETLAND DETERMINATION
El
, .
APPl1e~ flA _ ~ I Applie..ioo
Name:' t.. -oMt 17..< Number: .2lJtJ7
s....:~ .Cou..y: ~I Legal Deserip.io.:
Date: 1//)f) Plot No.: I lir
Project .
Nallle: hal'#- ,()-JfJL
Town8hip:~Range:_____ .
S~ction: 2312tp
.
Vegetation llist t~e threo dominant species in each vegecation layer (S if
only 1 or 2 layers)). Indicate species with observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations wich an ascerisk.
Indicator Indicator
Species Status Species Status
,:i
:f
Trees
. ~~tjv .
2. .
3.
lI~L
~
7'.' Yd~.
8. /!- .
. Vlr~iP(rrJ
F/Jevl .
~V~ff,~ PA&l t-
. ,
9.
Other indicators: _
; 4,Ly,rLJ;"~-
: I 1
Sedes and phase: tl>- On hydric so11s u.st? Yes~i No--=...:
Mottled: Yes_; No~. Mottle color: N(j ~atrix col~r: 'lfJY/;{:((}4 i)
Gleyed: Yes_ No~ Other indicators: /\1tlnJl...- , .: ~
Hydr.ic so11s: Yes_ No-X-.; Basis: ~e <~L _ Jt.,nA'l-offleJ -~Ld' I
. , 4ail' ~ d ~ .,(,II dytt.. del '
, .
j
Saplings/shrubs Woody vines : .
4. /lfP7llt 10. ~e$/J ~ NUrK/hII4
S. H.
6. 12.
% of species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: ~'.
flydrophytic'vegetation: Yes ____ No~. ~s: Ala
AIL
.,
: J:I'
~r.
':
I'
:1
Ii
So11
Hydrologr .
,
Inundated: Yes___; No~. Depth of standing water:
Saturated soils: Yes_____i No~. Depth to
Other indicators:
r
.I
,
e
Wetland hydrology:
Atypical situation: Yes~; No~. ~&:
Normal Circumstances? Yes~ No_____. ~
Wetland Determination: Wetland i Nonwetland X . ' !
Co"".ne~: <>If ~ Ii) l"'f.dk/if!i$ d#IML ~ ?L ~ '"" 1
->>I'd Jr1 ~ "'- ~iL J ~ ~ /A.,.,- ^- ~ M>7l- i
~ AJ'{J--z::Lu pv k ~,rmined by: .
'r I B2'
I
~
i
rr ~:. ;'1'1
'^.'''''',.....''_'n...'~
-, 00-" (i}j'ii3?9
.~~~~~,,><'''- -~-
.'
DATA FORM 1
WETLAND DETERMINATION
!
'd~
-...... .
. ,
.II
~ .
,
I
APPl1~t /., L. I Application
Name: :u il A;,J Ii . "<<';~ tJLN~be r: ,:l(JJ) 7 .
. State: fjJ,' co...ty:,z;ff~Le.al .e~cr1Pt1on.
Date: D / DIJ Plot No.: IJ! )~
.
'Vegetation (list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (S if
,
only 1 or 2 layers)). Indicate species with observed morpfiological or known
physiological' adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator
Status
Project . p; .
Name: .i5 e~.Jt elf' .
Tovnship:~Range:~
Section: r2~ ~ ~ y. i
, . ,
I
I
\
I
, "
Spec'ies
SpeCies
Indicator
Status
,.
:1
.
Trees
Herbs
--;: Alert-fi/IA, /1n$~r'iv~ tJ.6 L
8. Tr;~/Odt~N h1-9-.~tip1utYJ 06~
9. ~1~1/~ yjl'9il1lit~ t96L
Woody~Je's' c -'S 'S/rU/7t j-,4f.,U)
10. ~'
11.
12. f}/
% of species that are OBL. FACW. and/or FAC:~~ Other indicators:
HydrophyUc vegetation: Yes ~ No _' Basis: /CJ (iG, L
hlh1e
-
1.
2.
3.
Sapl1nRslshrubs
4.
.l/ltl'Je
5.
6.
...-......
li
Jii
'r.
f
Soil
Series arid ;phase: ~/) On hydric soils lis~? Yes~; No____.
Mottled: Yes_____; No~. Mottle color: ; Ma~rix color:~;lJ~cr)(
Gleyed: Yes~ No_ Other indicators: .10:J.. (7~~ _ I
Hydr.1c soils: Yes~ No_; Basis: .1'tJ"J Jvnh17.':! 11J~1
.J
r
r.
Hydrology
Inundated: Y~s_____; No~. Depth of standing w~ter:
Saturate<! soils: Yes-A-; No_. Depth to saturated soil: AUrMa e-
. i"
Other indicators:
,i
I'
,I
'I
II
1
"
i
f.
!
,
I'
I
Wetland hydrology: Yes~;No_____. Basis:
Atypi,cal situation: Yes~; No~. i5-e{. MD--4/
Normal Circumstances? Yes~ No_____.
Wetland Determination: Wetland Ut!5 _ - ; NQnwetland "
Comments: /i)crdl ;t;dv",J/ ~4- /./ff tk~~~;L -- th./..t~
, , Ii. ,~ ~'I r~ --'/, //
.f ~ ;~t. .ete=10.d by'f:""d ~/~
1u>t-~!- 4~1 db!d - &-I ~ dI/ ~ f TEet 'I
I ,-1. o/) /A ( i\ IV-"~--~~~
-...."'....-. ---,...~-
~"
~~
I
DATA FORM 1
WETLAND DETERMINATION
~;.
~
APP1i~t llA' ~ I Application
Name: - eOfe.' u-.t f7, ~/"ro~VI'CYII.,tyj..mber: ~t)7
Stat.: ~" Cou.ty'~t9C~~La8al D.actiptio~'
Date: 7. 0 fob Plot No.: it)~
I
Project 6 l1i_ ..J
Name: ~at..Jf Pdut,{ .
Town8h1p:~Range:~
Section: ;{.3 f el. 4-
:Jj
:/I'
.: I
i
.
Vegetation I (list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (S if
only 1 or 2 layers)). Indicate species with observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator
Status
Species
Species
Indicator
Status
~
1.
2.
'3.
Herbs '
--:;-: :Sa )'"[0 rn,/}
8. 0i'S f, l-J, lis
I
I
I
I
I
r-i/'j'AlIC19 l)I$L . i
~jt6)~ I?Jcw
9.
Saplings/shrubs
4. &~LUI f;f" (r7lL ~~ ).
S.
Woody vines
1
6. 12.' ~ r
% of species that are OBL, FACW. and/or FAC:~Other indicators: A3,Af ~~tuDtJ~~~' ~
- . -~~ Mr, ;;;1/7 - I
Hydrophytic: vegetation: Yes ~ No _' Bas!s: .fil/PItA-m-.t SrnJU~. !
10. AfcrnR.-
11.
So11
Series and phase: (1~. On hydric soils list?
Mottled: Yes_____; No~. Mottle color:
Gleyed: Yes~ No_____ Other tndicators:,
Hyd~ic soils: Yes~ NO_____t Basis:
I'
,.'
"I!
Hydrology
Inundated: . Yes_____i
Saturated.soils:
Other indicators: IJ, . /.J)k-
Wetland hydrology: Yes~i No_____. lu r:;gi;U-
Atypical situation: Yes~i No~. ;
Normal Circ~mstances? Yes~ No_. , ---.; I
Wetland Determination: Wetland 1/1',;;<. - I.'~j 1:vr/monweJland . I
Comments: At / tit! difk//;~ i'frT #U/VU~~ ,u UI J:~-
. ::cermi..d bY'P AI b~p
.-....
. ,
....wp.......R.~" ............ 4f2f'cAi D/X (;;l \ ~
._._.__.._~ ~)
..:,......:.,~'
,",,""', . ;'=.. . _:""."'~. <~- ."
I:
1 :;
1 ~r;j.
I ..
I
, I
I
I
i i j I
I 1&_0/ A. y~ . :--:
Other indicato:s:f~~~d~f
.d~/J:i <kh", - . ~!
/ i i
i
I
i
. ,
:b/
DATA FORM 1
WETLAND DETERMINATION
APPl:I.%t dJ.. A i k I rJAppl1cat:1on
Name: I'JrJi. ~ ~. I"nllA)s!/JfJ1mber: ~07
State: A.I~ . C_ty'::k~ Legal ;aCriPuo..
Date: ?a lOt) Plot No.: ;t
projec~ .JJ, ~
Name: eUe/1 W.
Township:~Range:-EiJ/
Section:. ..:7.3 {.:}lj.
.
I
Vegetation (list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if
only ,1 or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator Indicator
SpeCies Status Species Status
Trees
1. j). Hr"
2.
3.
Saplin$!:s/shrubs
4. M'7lJZ.
...
Herbs
--;-: tJr,aum ~- ("~ tVrJ/bfSl)
, 8. I#tti(4/-'h'd J~e$ -
9.
)c4-(!C( -
.1cf1
Woody vines o.
10. /1~
5.
11. .
6. 12.
% of species that are OBL. FACW, and/or FAC: ~ .
Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes _ No~. l:;;,s:
So11
Series and phase:
Mottled:
&
list? Yes X ; No .
, ; Matrix col~r: 1-y'-:;r;"j
.
-'
-'
Hydrology
Inundated: Yes~; No~.
Saturated soils: Yes_____; No~.
Other indicators:
Wetland hydrology: Yes_, No~.
Atypical'situation: Yes____, No~.
Normal Circumstances? Yes~ No_____.
.Wetland DetermjPation: Wetland
co..ents~~ X45
~
II
~
-"'1
I
, :1 r
, I
1'1 :
f
.
11
11
f
I
..--.. .
. ,
~
I .
~_lJi
'''~>''~:~~~=:-a
-"""1""='"""'
IIA. _, . I
/1/)
.
Ii
".'- ,
DATA FORM 1
WETLAND DETERMINATION
ifS;-
--...1
I
:
Appli ant
Name. , h.. )
Sta.e. tlI~ Coua.y
Date: 7 ~O/D/) Plot No.:
,
Appl1cation
N~mber:
Legal Description:
tJ~.
project~ If~.
Name: ~t '0;.4
Township: ~() ~nge:~1
Section: d3 ~'1
Vegetation [list the three. dominant species tn each yegetation layer (S if
only 1 or 2 layers)). Indicate hpecies wtth observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator
Status
:1:1
r
I
SpeCies
'Species
Indicator
Status
/
Herbs i
---;: 5a~; l<h'niA r';i;J1<4 - M L - I :
,8. te;;se/- ..D;jf'sIf,t..t(5 e/-. Iu //(;}17~ _ AJr
~. ~jJ;)~ CM:S~/eJ'1I.;//"7 -. 06L
Sapl1nRsI shrubs Woody vines /:Ji;,sh [,h/'1- :5/, i~\, '6&.L
:: ~ - ;~: #0>7e' I ,I 1
. !
-6. . 12. ! . , ,
% of spadas tbo< ara 08L, FACIl, and'or FAC..Ytt% Otba~..:Odi~'ors. ~~:
Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes x.. No _~ Basis: -' LI1 /., . _.
~
'..
ii
Jj
r
f;
i
1. /V1J7tJL
2.
3.
,j
I'
:1
-.... 'I
,
~
I
~
ij
5011 1
Series a~d phase: ae - On hydric so11s list? Yes~.~.) No_. fi
HotUad. Yas_; No-L. Hottla color. N.j. ;_ ; Mat~ri color. t1{ey -1//0 Y h.26""i
Gleyad' Yas-X- No_ Otber iOdicators._~~_ . N/2-S- .>.:url!/.
Hydr.ic soils: Yes~ No----:-; Basis: /e:: -~~ . . I
-rk3 ~ ~ !;-tJjd;- i
Hydrology
Inundated: Yes_i No~.' Depth of standing water-: _
I .
Saturated so11s: Yes X i No . Depth to saturated so11: db t!r#J
Other indicators: . ~_ .Lrllf
Wetland hydrology: Yes -K-,i No _____. BasiS: S Ii Iu n9 J.i1H1 -
Atypical. s;ltuation: Yes..2S:..J No_.
Normal Circumstances? Yes_____ ~o~.
Wetland. Determination: Wetland;X . i- Nonwetland . ,
c_a~:,?4 ~ 1d1Jt.,.J/;.J N"-d~kW4/ -t ~ ,
4ht~ ~t !#'j<U- .t :!::!!.a~~~~!fp*:t::i?t --:.
~d(l4 ~ -':~ ~(tLAI'-~)a/~4rv, I
I iJ; 't ~ It ~ f ;;.::~S:= . J:~~:.~J.
" ~ '.. )~/Y-'-"'i~~~~
,1, t1 , ~ ",/, , I ?~.1,,,,, ,~
.'''''''-''''''.,...'.<-
,
,.
.,i:
'l
u
. /.
Wetlands Rating Field Data Form
J
I
I
Background Information:
Name of Rater: ~~ffiliatiOn: AES.
~~1+- t>b'l\)t
Date:
7/3(}/ty, .
, f
I
,
I
;
...
...
Name of wetland (if known):
Government Jurisdiction of wetland: ....:ru.~ds(,.\-.\~~\ .1-0~ P.riVn _
I r I .
Sccti()n:~~f.;t;T()wnship: ~ 0
of 1/4 S: -
Range: a ~ -
,
,
Location: 1/4 Section: ...
Source~ of Information: (Check all sources that apply)
Site visit~ V"'" USGS Topa Map: _ NWI map: ~ Aerial Photo: _ Soils survey: ..k:::::"""
II
~
.1
.,
~
1
Other: ~ Describe:
When The Field Data form is complete enter Category here:
0.1. High Ouality Natural Wetland
Circle Answers
Answer this question if you have adequate information ur experience to do so.
If not find someone with the expertise to answer the questions. Then, if the
answer to questions la, Ib and Ic are all NO, contact the Natural Heritage
program ofDNR
la. Human caused disturbances.
-
Is there-significant evidence of human-caused changes to topography or
hydrology of tile wetland as indicateeJ-by any of tile following conditiolLc;'!
Consider only changes that may have taken place in the last 5 decades. The
impacts of changes done earlier have probably been stabilized and the wetland
ecosystem will be close to reaching some new ~uilibrium that may represent
a high quality wetland.
I;i
;11
.~
f
I
lal. Upstream watershed> 12% impervious.
la2. Wetland is ditched and water now is not ubstructed.
la3. Wetland has been graded. filled,loggcd.
la4. Water in wetland is controlled by dikes. weirs, etc.
laS. Wetland is grazed.
~. I '~=glMberoW).!t. ~
~.~ '~.~~~~.
rV\ AY-\ I\.i (.I,
,
;
Yes: ~() tu Q.2
Ycs: ~o to Q.2
Yes: ~o to Q.2
Yes: ~o to Q.2
Yes: go to Q.2
~o toQ.2
No: go to lb.
25
Af1}~l1ai~ (6J
"".~~R77~
..~""--
})(
"
,
.
1 b Are there populations of non-native plants which arc currently pr~ent, ~: go to Q,2
cover more than 10% of the wetland, and appear to be invad1ng native: ~go 10 Ic.
populations? Briefly describe an){ nOllt:native plant POP1!la~ons and
Information source(s): " eAs.,~1 tAN N "2.$;00 'tf fl.,y,., ~g ~~
1c. Is there evidence of human-caused disturbances which have visibly
degraded water quality. Evidence of the degradation of water quality
include: direct (untreated) runoff from roads or parking lots; presence,
or historic evidence, of waste dumps; oUy sheens; the sme)) of organic
chemicals; or' iti tack use, Briefly descr;lbe:
. \ It .
C.2. Irreplaceable Ecological Functions:
Docs the wetland:
e have atlea...t 1/4 acre of organic soils deeper than 16 inches
and the wetland is relatively undisturbed; OR
[IIf the answer is NO because the wetland is disturhed briefly describe:
Indicators of disturbance may include: '
, - Wetland has been graded, filled, logged;
- Organic soils on the surface are dried-out for
more than half of the year;
- Wetland receives direct stormwater runoff from
urban or agricultural areas.);
OR
9 have a forested class greater than 1 acre;
OR
9 have characteristics of an estuarine system; (~(JU...-t.J) '\ -\- ~f\
OR ' -\-0 ~\~QcNe'Yt.\
e have eel grass. Hoaling or non-floating kelp ~eds'! d
-
2a. Bogs and Fens ,
Are any of the three following conditions met for the area of organic ~oil?
I
. I
2a.l. Are Sphagnum mosses a common ground cover (>3(~90) and the:
cover of invasive species (see Table 3) is less than 1O%? :
Is the area of sphagnum mosses and deep organic soils> 1/2 acre?
Is the area of sphagnum mosses and deep organic soils 1/4-1/2 acre?
2a.2. Is there an area of organic soil which has an emergent class with at least
one species from Table 2, and cover of invasive species is < 10% (see Table 3).
Is the area of herbaceous plants and deep organic soils> 1/2 acre"!
Is the area of herbaceous plants and deep organic soils 1/4-1/2 acre'!
26
. 0 to Q.2 ,
NO: Possible Cat. I
contact DNR
;1
~(
~
J
(NO to all: go to Q.3)
YES go to 2a
YES: Go to 2b
:f
:/;j
'I;
b
i
i
I
YES: Category 1
YES: Category In
NO: Go to 21.3
YES: Category I
YES: Category II
NO: Go to 2a.3
""'.-~"~I~
;':."".Q,~~".;o,,:._ .......,.~.."'..1>"__
. .
j.5'
. I
"
,
..
2a.3, Is tfie vegetation a mixture of only hcrhaccuus plants'and Sphagnum
mosses with no scrub/shrub or forested classes'!
Is the area of.herbaceous plants, Sphagnum, and deep organic
soils> 1/2 acre?
Is the area of herbaceous plants. Sphagnum, and deep organic
soils 1/4-1/2 acre?
Q.2b. Mature forested wetland. .
2b.l: Does,50% of the cover of upper forest canopy consist of evergreen
trees older than 80 years or deciduous trees older than 50 years?
Note: The size of trees is often not a measure of age. and size cannot
be used as a surrogate for age (see guidance). .
2b.2. Does 50% of the cover of forest canopy consist of evergreen trees older
than 50 years, AND is the structural diversity of the foresUligh as .
characterized by an additional layer of trees 20'-49' tall, shrubs 6' - 20',
tall, and a herbaceous groundcover?
2b.3. Does ( 25% of the areal cover in the herbaceouslgroundcover or
the shrub layer cOnsist of invasive/exotic plant species from the list on p. 19'1
Q.2c. Estuarine wetlands.
I
2eI. Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge, National P!lfk.
National Estuary Reserve, ~atural Area Preserve. State Park, or i
Educational. Environmental or Scientific Reserves designated under
WAC 332-30'-1511..... .
2c.2. Is the wetland> 5 acres; . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; . . . . .. ........
_Notl:: If an area contains patches of salt tolerant vegetation that are
J) less than 600 feet apart and that are separated by mudflats that go
dry on a Mean Low Tide, or
, 2) separated by tidal channels that are less than 100 feet wide;
all the vegetated areas are to he considered together in calculating
the wetland area. '
or is the wetland 1-5 acres; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ................
or is the wetland < 1 acre? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YES: Category I
YES: Category II
NO: Go to Q.3.
YES: Category I
NO: Go to 2h.2
YES: Go to 2b.3
NO: Go to Q.3
YES: Category I
NO: Go toQ.3
j
I
~: CalegoIjy I
~Go to 2cl2
!
~atego~ I
~~I('J no w
OC-\oBo..)(r ~
.,~~ ~-
YES: Go to 2c.3
YES: Go to 2c.4
M.."'_~O-L7"~'-
."o'~., . ;:,~.'
M=_
'" ..-.._._.",~,~--
J!i
'f
27
I,;
'I'
!
" .
2c.3. Does the wetland meet at least 3 of the fllllowing 4 criteria:'.. .....,
- minimqm existing evidence of human related disturbance such as
diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing or the presence of non-
native plailt species (see guidance for definitiun);
- surface water connection with tidal saltwater or tidal freshwater;
"
"
- at least 75,% of the wetland his a 100' buffer of ungrazed pasture,
o~n water. shrub or forest;
- has at least 3 of the following features: low marsh; high marsh; tidal
channels; lagoon(s);wood,y debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland
2c.4. Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 2c3. (above)'?.
Q.2d. Eel Grass and Kelp Beds.
2d.1. Are eel grass beds present? . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . ., ......... 'l" . . ,
j
2d.2. Are there floating or non-floating kelp bed(s) present with greater than
50% macro algal cover in the month of August or September'! . . . .
0.3_ CategorY IV wetlands.
3a. Is the wetland: less than 1 acre and.
hydrologically isolated and,
comprised of one vegetated class that is dominated (> 80% areal cover)
by one species from Table 3 (page 19) or Table 4 (page 20 )
3b. Is the w~land: less than two acres
and, hydrologically isolated,
with one vegetated,class!. and> 90% of areal cover is any combination of
species from Table 3 (page 19)
3c. Is the wetland excavated from upland and a pond smaller than 1 acre
without a surface water connection to streams. lakes, rivers, or other
wetland. and has < 0.1 acre of vegetation.
2H
YES: Category I
NO: Category II
YES: Category II :
NO: Category III :
.,
I,i
:f
I
YES: Category I
NO: go to 2d.2
YES: Category I
NO: Category II
YES: Category IV
NO: go to 3b
YES: Category IV
NO: go to 3c
YES: Category IV
NO: go to Q.4
"
:Ii:
r
I
~
i;l.
i
.", '~<?~=.,_..;;_.>>
~;.Q'4'~ . 0 ~_
. .
. .
. \
D
. .
Q.4. Significant habitat value.
Answer all questions and enter duta requested.
4a. Total wetland area I
Estimate area, select from choices in the near-right column, and sCore in the
far column: I
,.)6' ~.. . 11.1
Enler a<"Teage of wetland here:_acrcs, and source: tSll.4L, f P I:Ir -
Scrub-Shrub: if the area of scrub-shrub class is > 1/4 acre,
Forested: if area of forested class is > .114 acre,
Add the number of wetland classes, above, that qualify, and then
score according t~ the columns at right.
e.g. If there are 4 classes (aquatic bcd-;, open water, emergent &
scrub- shrub), you would circle 8 points in the fartight column.
4c. Plant species diversity.
For each wetland class (at right) that qualifies in
4b above, count the number of different plant species
you can find that cover more than 5% of the ground.
You do not have to name them.
Score i!fCOlumn,at far right:
e.g. If awet1and has an aquatic bed class with 3 ~pecies,
an em~gent class with 4 species and a scrub-shrub
class with 2 species you would circle 2, 2, and 1 in the
far column.
Note: Any plant species with a cover of> 5%
qualifies for points within a clas.~, even those
that are not of that class.
Clas:i .
quatic Dcd,
/UJ7lIl... ,.
Emergent
I
I
I
I
Scrub-Shrub
I
fo"orestcd
Circl~ scores that qualify
~ !~
I ~ .
m
I 3
2
>200
40-2()()
10-40
5 - 10
I - 5
0.1 - .
< 0..
1
()
"
i/
# of classes fui.n1s
1.......0
@.....@
3.. .....6
4.......8
5.......10
# species in class
.
2
3
>3
1
2-3
~
>5
I
2
3-4
>4
I
2
3-4
>4
filln1s
()
1
2
3
I:
Jl
'r
~
o
1
CD
3
o
I
2
3
,()
1
2
3
29
"."""."-R.." ."7[.
,.. ...~. ..':::~'7;-;:p-
:.~C~
, I
...
...
4d. Structural diversity.
If the wetland has a forested class, add J point if each of the following
classes is present within the forested class and is hlri!er than 1/4 acre:
-trees > SO' tall . . . . . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-trees 20'- 49' taU . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-shrubs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . , . . . .
-herbaceous ground cover. . . . , . . . . . . , .
Also add } point if there is any "open water" or "aquatic bed" class
immediately next to the forested area (ie. there is no scrub/shrub or
emergent vegetation between them). .
4e. Decide from the diagr.uns below whetherinterspcrsion between
wetland classes is high, moderate, low or none'] I f you think the
amount of interspersion falls in between the diagrams score accordingly
(i.e. a modemtely high amount of insterspcrsion would score a4,
while ~l moderately low amount would score a 2)
none
moderate
moderate
4f. Habitat features.
Answer questions below. cirele features that apply, and score to right:
Is there evidence that the open or standing water was caused by beavers
Is a heron rookery located within 300'']
Are raptor ne.e;t/s located within 300'']
Are there at least 3 standing dead trees (sn~gs) per acre greater (han
10" in diClmeter at "breast height" (DB H)'!.
Arc there atleac;;t 3 downed logs per acre with'a diameter
> 6" for at least 10' in length'!
Arc there areas (vcgetated or unvegetatcd) within the wctlandthat are
ponded for at least 4 months out of the year, and the wetland has nOL
qualified as having an open water class in QuesLion 4b. '] .
30
YES-}
YES-I
YES - ]
YES-]
YES -, I
High,. 5
Moderate ,. 3
Low - I
None - ()
J
J;I
l
low
high
YES = 2
YES = J
YES = 1
YES = 1
0E~
/to
<f~~
"
"
~f!
i
,
I
if
~.
'.'''?lJQ='~,,?f$[
. ,
>J
...
.
--.-..-. -_... -_.,--'_......__...............~~_.._h...O"___._
'.,--....................
4g. Connection to streams. (Score (me answer only,)
4g,l. Does the wetland provide habitat for fish at any time of the year AND
does it have a perennial surface water connection to a fish bearing stream.
4g,2 Does the wetland provide fish habitat seasonally AND does it have
a seasonal surface water connection to a fish bearing stream.
4g.3 Does the wetland function to export organic matter thrnugh a surface
water connection at all times of the year to a perennial stre~.
4g.4 Does the wetland function to 'export organic matter through a surface
water connection to a stream on a seasonal haSis? .
4h. Buffers.
Score file existing buffers on a scale of 1-5 hased on the following four descriptions.
If tAe condition of the huffers do not exactly match the description, SCOre either a
~int higher or lower depending on whether the huffers are less of more degraded.
I
i
. !
Forest, saub, native grassland or open watC?f bufters are present for
more than }()()'around 95% of the circumference.
Forest, saub, native grassland, or open water buffers wider than HX)'
fqr more than 1/2 of the wetland circumference, or a forest; scrub.
graSslands, or open water buffers for more than SO' around 95% of the
clrcumference.
Forest. scrub, native grassland, or open water buffers wider than } (X)'
for more than 1/4 of the wetland circumference, or a forest, scruh. native
'grassland, or open water buffers wider than 50' for more than 1/2 ufthe
wetland circumference.
Nu roads. huildings ur paved areas within .1 ()()' uf the wetland fur In(lrC than
95% of the wetland circumference.
'"No roads, buildings or paved areas within 25' of the wetland for more
than 95% of the circumference, or .
No roads buildings or paved areas within SO' of the wetland for more than
1/2 of the wetland circumference.
Paved areas, industrial areas10r rc.~identiai construction (with less than 50'
hetween houses) are less than 25 feet from the wetland for more than 95%
of the circumference of the wetland.
YES = ti
YK<; = 4
YES =4
YES=2
:l-
I
!
!
i
I
I
I
Scor~ = 5
i
Score = 3
.,
!I
i
-
~re:=]:)-
Score = 2
Score = I
Score = 0
.
!i
~i
J
I
f
I
31
"..~"":2fT-;.F.-; ::::0-
. .:.J,.~..~~=,.,"'>__'" ~O
- "",..-.".''''''''......,....",.'.-;..f''',..4
~ .
.
__ J "-' .
WBSTBCH COMPANY
&mroomemat ConauIting - Site PcnaJCCfng'
TRANSMITTAL
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
IfIt...&.. r 2..'" .
l1.,I:J k~J:,..
B~--'l ~h___
U(:--Z:.; Y-Q..- f=~p."
&'L:.I-./t I'~ ~;,.1 ~ "7 F/ .
COMMENTS:
~V!~ r
G'_.../6<~ ~~~;;:-r- +. -- ~ ~ ~~...t.-:7"f PT-:
Ii:. I 'b2.r" Jt -:6 ~ ~ - -r[ -... 1-:>:.
:J2 J_-~"p
,1
J
W901S/070694ms
-'-2:-'~~Ei"7'-~
~L.~_~" ....c%
." ""U'~"'.""""..:.i",,,,.:.,",,,,.,.,,
P.O.80z 2816 . Port Angeles, WashiJIgtoa 98362 . Telephone: (360) 452.0186 . Fa: (360) 452-4118
cmaII: bshcaOt.eDfornrd.eoul
. I
-a t
WBSTBCH COMPANY
Eudt-vdft'laatal Coasaldag . SIR P-.....A......
May 27, 2002
Mr. Bob Leach
Northwestern Territories, Inc.
717 South Peabody Street
Port Angeles, W A 98362
Dear Mr. Leach:
Enclosed is a letter repon on the Beckett Point Alternatives and their potential
environmental feasibility. This report is based on our previous work and a brief site
reconnaissance update carried out with Mr. Bill Payton of NTI on May 14, 2002. I have
also reviewed your map of alternative routes and the wetland repon prepared for the
Beckett Point Fisherman's Club in August of 2000.
Please let me know if you have any questions on this repon. An invoice is enclosed for this
work. Thank: you.
Sincerely,
J!~~
G. Bradford Shea, Ph.D.. REA
Principal
"
GBS/ms
Enclosures
WI789BKT.ALT/052702gbs
. ""~2r3"'~'''--'
,.=L.,.", . .,,:ii~
P.o. Jkq 2876. POl'tAagela, W....lnttcJR 98362. Tde:phoa.C2 (360) 452-0186. Pa: U6Q) 45~118
cmail:bshea~
"
((
'" f
BECKBTf POINT ALTERNATIVES:
IiNVIRONMENTAL FEASIBIIlTY
Three aJternative routes for a proposed pipeline route for the Beckett Point Community
Drainfield project were reviewed as a follow-up to Wesr.echts Preliminary Environmental
Feasibility Report (Wesrech 2001). These alternative romes were developed by
Nonhwe.stern Territories. Inc. (NT12001, 2002). At present, design is for a 4-6 inch pipe
(probably PVCor possibly ductile iron in some areas) buried to a depth of approximately
three feet. All three alternatives would involve individual pumps or pumps for small
aggregare groups of residences. Effluent would be pumped along a main line (4-6 inches)
located along Becken Point Road (within the Beckett Point Community).
Alternatives #1 and #2 would involve routing the line extension through Beckett Point Hill
Park (#1) or along Beckett Point Road (#2) extending from the base of the hillslope
leading out of the community, while 13 would route a line sttaighl up the hillslope from
the end of Beckett Point Road. The three proposed alternatives are as follows;
1) This alternative would involve construction of the pipe through Beckett Hill
Park and then crossing Beckett Point Road just below (and south of) the old
gravel pit. The line would then go in a fairly direct line through existing
forest [0 the proposed drainfield area.
2} This alternative would invofve construction along Beckett Point Road to the
entrance of the old gravel pit and from there, overland up the hillslope
through existing forest to the drainfield area.
3) This alternative would place the line up the hillslope, roughly parallel to and
east of the existing water line. The effluent line would then continue up the
hillslope through existing forest to the drainfie1d area.
The three alternatives each have differing potential effectS on the environment, depending
on the routing, construction methods, slope stabilization and erosion control methods
(particularly for #3) and timing of construction. A variety of environmental mitigation
measures may be employed to reduce potential. impacts of constrUction. Operational
impacts are not anticipated, except in the potential case of a leak.
W1789BKT.ALTIOS2702gbs
?{'L-'~-i'~-'
,"". ~>..sf'
"""'''''''--,,,...,..,,.,...,,,,,,,
t
. . ... ,
Alternative #1. Beckett Point BiIlside Park
This alternative runs along graveled roads through the residential area of Beckett Point
Hillside Park. It will not involve running the line under as much area. of the paved road
(Beckett Point Road) and will thus simplify and possibly speed up consttuction. The route
south of the old gnlvel pit is near some identified nest of important species (heron and bald
eagle) .
We recommend that these nests be identified as to status prior to construction and that the
route be timed to avoid nesting periods (generally late July through September is optimal)
and if any nest is very near the route, that the route be changed to allow at least 200 feel
between the pipeline construction and the nest.
Alternative #2. RtaP.kett Point R~
This alternative would continue up the hillslope on Beckett Point Road, possibly
necessitating construction in the roadway, and thus potential road closures. This route
goes through the old gravel pit and also passes close to eagle and heron nests as identified
by the Priority Habitats Division of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
(WDFW2001). Again, construction should occur during the late summer as defined above
and nests should be identified prior to construction and a buffer established around active
nests during consuuction..
Alternative #3.
This alternative would involve construction on a hiIJslope of approximately 30.35 degrees,
involving difficult construction and probable erosion of the hillside. It is true that the
water line was laid along this approximate route, however, the effluent line would have
to parallel the water line, southeast of the existing line. There may be difficulty avoiding
me water storage tank an::a. and some potential for erosion or sedimentation of the marsh
still exists. Apparently, however. the water line was laid without significant environmental
damage.
A wetland area is located immediately below the slope which would be used and would lie
in the probable path of any erosion (Comparison of maps between Brooks (2000) and NTI
2(02). This route also would result in some risk to coDSUUction personnel. While this
route appears from mapped infonnation [0 be slightly further from listed nest sires. me
data. for these sites is old (early 1990s) and nest locations may have changed. Again. we
recommend that any construction be done in lare summer and that the area be surveyed
first for active nestS. An Erosion Control Plan should be prepared prior to construction and
soils along the trench should be immediately restabilized following construction.
WT789BKT.ALT/052702gbs
"L""~'."-!1. ~'" .._~".,"--
,?~
'n'W" '~'. ", . c_'C."''''~ '"''::''''''''''f~':'''''''':''''~'''''''''''
"
. J' ... .
...
Recommended Alternative
From the analysis above, lhe preferred ahen18.tive to minimize environmental impacts
appears to be Alternative #1 through Beckett Point Hill Park. Construction timing is
recommended to occur during lhe period from late July through the end of September and
standard erosion control methods should be employed to proteCt shoreline resources. The
exact routing to enter the old gravel pit area should be fine tuned after a bird survey to
identify existing nesting sites. It may be necessary to prooeed further north on Beckett
Point Road before cutting cross country toward the dminfield area in order to miss me nest
sites.
Recommended Mitiearion Measures
In summary. recommended mitigation measures include the following:
1) Restricting construction [0 late summer (late July through September)
2) Conducting an updated nesting survey prior to construction and then fine
tuning the route to avoid active nest sites to the extent possible and to
minimize need for tree removaL
3) Employ standard erosion control measures LO protect shoreline resources (in
the case that Alternative #3 is chosen, a more sophisticated Erosion Control
Plan should be prepared and submitted to the County, and [0 Stale Resource
Agencies for review prior (0 construction).
Other mitigative measures could be developed, however, the measures listed above are
expected to substantially offsel impacts of the pipeline ponion of the proposed project.
WT789BKT.ALT/OS2702gbs
,.. ,. .........Z:rT:-...~-;~7'--'
".,:J"I!._"..,. ~~
.,
.. 904d 1t::l.LO.L
.. ... .'.
REFBRENCBS
Brooks, K.M.2000. Wetlands Qelineation and Rankine Report: (as shown in Official
Record Map of Cape George Fisherman, Inc. Salmon Club). Pacific Rim Aquatic
Environmental Sciences. Port Townsend, WashingtOn.
Northwestern Territories, Inc. 2002. Community Wastewater Treatment Systems.
PrelimiD8IY Engineerine ~n. Beckett Point. NTI. POIt Angeles, Washington.
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2001. Habitats and Species R~n in the
Vi~nitv of T30R02W~ Section 23. Priority Habitats and Species Division. Olympia,
Washington.
Westech Company. 2001. PrelimillaQ' Environmental Feasibili~ Rqlon: Beckett Ppim
CommunitY WasteW3teT Treatment System. Jefferson CountY- Washi....&tOn_ Port
Angeles, WashingtOn.
WT789BKT.AL T/052702gbs
-"'-"--/j1- . C ~_
.,,~::I-~ .
lS 3Sntl>-l
....Z
(.)Q
~~
0(.)
Q:O
D....J
o
C')
If)
I~
, r<y;
I \)
~.
.bc4
~
!.
ca
:Ii
b
-.-
c c
.0 :g
....11.>
t:13
!CDCD
::::J.lll:: .~
_UO
-CD..
ii:ml1.
D.
c(
:liW
Z;Ci!
Q~
~~
(J
o
..oJ
11.
~W
g
~(/)
_0
ZZ
(J
:>
I
III
..
~
j
t;~ s
I
W_ ~
-'Z
Q O- W
Q:~ >< g
~<1Z
D..> (/)
0
E Z
Rl
...
Rl 0
a..
!~;
l~:
I '
,
". .~
~
ca
"C
_c
C ::::J
.- 0
OlD
11.
Nt:~
!CDCD
::::J .lll:: a.
gi e
u.IDD.
III
3
()
{I')
!
J:
(/)
u::
l-W
zz
o::i
e.~
~~
fd~
1IIe.
I
I
c I
z
w I
e
w
..oJ
i
I
..
::!
...
~
~
I
~
><
!<1Z
Rl
...
Rl
a.. 0
w
g
(/)
o
z
2
w
t-
-
,~
~
(I'
c>)
'",~ ~,;J~
..{.: f'\
~
o
-l
~
oL
~
~
~
OJ
iU
'"
...
~
i!l
~
l!l
iU 0
It)
!( N
0
~
I<1Z
III
...
:.
a.
C'lS
-:Ii
c
.- CD
o~
(")11.(1)
(1)==13
... CD CD
::::J~'~
QUO
._ CD ..
u..ml1.
,.....
x
0
a::: ,.....
0- X
,..... 0- 0
Vl c( a:::
~ '-' 0-
~ Z e.
0 c(
F '-'
U ~ ~
F z
VlO- Vl ~
~w
ZVl 0-
~o :::E 0-
::> :::E
~ 0- ::>
a:::~ 0-
~a::: 0
~~ z 0
::> z
Z 0 ::>
<:)0 ~ 0
zU a::: ~
F-J w W
Vl-J 0 0
x~ z z
w'-' ::> ::>
e @0
~
a:::
c( a:::
:::E w 0
I.L Z
a::: I.L ::>
~ ::> 0
II) a:::
c( 0 Cl
3t z a::: a:::
J: c( ~~
Cl ~ Zw
J: ~ ::>Vl
>- Ow
a::: I- Wa:::
c( 0 Vl::>
z 0 OVl
25 I.L ~~
a::: 0 a::: a:::
0 It') 0-0-
= 0
-J
>- W
a::: !i:
0 z
Cl <(
w a:::
1-0 0
c(z
Uc( 0
Cl~ W
Vl
~~ 0
0-
Vl 0
xc( a:::
we. e.
C'I 8 ~
I
I-
W
~
~
W
-I
c(
U
(/)
o
z
0
w C/) ~
c!) 5 ~g
~ c!) ~..J~
J: ~~ oUr
0 ~~ zi=..J
0 C/) o~o
::i i5 ll..~ o ()
C/) ~ z ~
5 0
~ w
c!) A! C/)
~ 0::
w ~ ~ C/)
III C/)
u:: w
11. 0
:Ii ~
j..Jw
in 11.:CC~
c~~
ZWo
jCZ
0
~
e -I
~
W
C
Z
j
.9
..J
~
c!)
~
:E
o::i
ltic!)
....Z
0::
i1l
..J
()
C
..J
W
~zW
-O;Ci!
~i=()
C~~
..JU)Z
II(
o
ii: <(,
~
ti
..J
~
~
Z
~
Z
o
~
W!(
tig~
~ll..~
().~
z-
o~
0<0
~
c!)
~~
Wz
~~
",'.~ '
~~ ':
";...
I
W
~
00
!!!irl
0_
I-u.
ZZ
~~
..JO
H::o
WI-
J:1i
!::w!;C
s:~o
~u::~
:JI-OC/)
~ffi~~
n.3a.~
:::!:u.:::!:-
:Ju.:JS:
a.wa.C/)
z
o
~
~c!)
C/)~
wt)
~-
w~
~J:
u.O
~i
w
a.
0:
~
w
l5
C/)
. e
~
z
~
A.
:Ii
j..Jw
11.-;Ci!
C~O
ZWC/)
jC~
i
e "'>,
~
W
C
Z
j
~
:::!:
~
:J:
(J
Z
W
~
~=~
~~~
I1.WO
..JCZ
c(
(J
ii: <'I I
~
l~"..
, '<5,
l~~
;---~
!g
;
CD
:>
c
-.2
c-
.- U
o CD
~11.U)
t:-
! CD B
::::J.lll:: .-
QUa.
._ CD >t
u.ID~
i
~
III
..
~
u:
j
s
I
1!1
i!j
><
L
..
ell
E
Rl
...
Rl
a..
'"
--DRAFT OUTLINE
Jefferson County PUD#l Pre-Application PRE04-00035
DCD Conference Room
Attendees: Mike Moren
Jim Pearson, DPW; Randy Marx of En v Health; Stacie Hoskins, DCD
October 29, 2004
10:00 am
Public Works:
Storm water: DOE Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington
Roads: Submit Stormwater Management Plan
Environmental Health:
Water:
Septic
Community drainfield: Need enough soil logs to identify area (15 - 20 holes)
Work through DOH for permitting if over threshold. PUD would own and operate once
established.
Community area for individual drain fields: Need individual easements. Want to see four
holes per system (2 for primary and 2 for reserve). Then can permit systems later on
existing infor and won't have to have ad,ditional holes dug. Permitted through Jefff Co
Env Health.
LOG ITEM
#
Page-1()~ ofd$f
PRE04-00035 _JCPUD#I_Beckett Point.doc
Page 1 of 2
~DRAFT OUTLINE
DRD:
1. Zoned RR 1 :20
2. ESA's: Suburban Shoreline designation
Shoreline also designated as Type 1 Stream, Wetland as Type 5: proposed UDC
Amendments may impact Fish & Wildlife buffers. Due to be completed by end of
2004.
Wetlands: Type II require 100-foot buffer, mitigation to reduce (reg's changed in
2001.) Update delineation with buffer and discuss mitigation.
Flood: Follow Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance
LSHA 1, 2 & 3 and Seismic hazard: Geotechnical report to address stability of soils
Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area
Fish & Wildlife (Eagle, Great Blue Heron) Send to WDFW;
Coastal SIPZ
3. ESA's and buffers depicted on site plan; Wetland Delineation, geotechnical report
4. Unified Development Code available online at:
http://www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/udc/default.htm
UDC Section 3, Table of Uses
Minor Utility Development in RR 1:20 zone is C(a) Use Base fee
Notice of application
Notice Board
612.00
124.00
8.00
~C(to
l~C')
UDC Section 5, Shoreline Management Master Program
Utilities in a Suburban Shoreliune Designation is identified as a Secondary use.
Shoreline Substantial Development (Secondary Use) Base fee 1,409.00
Requires Notice of Application included above
Notice Board included above
Notice of Hearing 124.00
1\'1 '1
SEP A review (if required-difficult to read Figure 3)
432.00
127
~<f (. ~
LOG ITEM
#
Page [03 ofdEZ
PRE04-00035 _JCPUD#I_Beckett Point.doc
Page 2 of 2
U)
CD
U)
:::)
"tJ
CD
-
:c
-
.c
e
a.
"tJ
c
ca
CD
:c
ca
~
.E
<c
-
.
C"')
CD
:c
ca
I-
:It
~"'
='
!jE)'i
~"l
, 'I M
~! uoge~H , CD CO UJ UJ UJ CDM ('0 ..,f 0 0 0 0 0
E! CDM CD CD CD Cl CD ..... (,) (,) Cl CD Z Z Z Z Z
f*:::I~ saAJasaJd 'SlfJed en..,f >- >- >- en..,f CD
.~ en C\l
(0
,,~ M I
UJ UJ CDM ..,f UJ UJ 0 M
le!4snpul MeaH CD CO UJ ('0 0 0
CDM CD CD CD Cl CD..... (,) (,) Cl CD Z CD CD Z z
en..,f >- >- >- en..,f CD >- >-
en
M
(MafAJSI3 pue alml!no) CD CO UJ UJ UJ CDM ('0 ..,f 0 UJ 0 0 0
CDM CD CD CD Cl CD ..... (,) (,) Cl CD Z CD Z Z Z
6U\lII1:lIljnuennl!4S11pUI1II6n en..,f >- >- >- en..,f CD >-
en
,
('AOO 1Ia19)
JeIlISIlfIUI Jq/ln M
!9: CD CO UJ UJ UJ CDM ('0 ..,f 0 UJ 0 0 0
CDM ~ ~ ~ Cl CD ..... (,) (,) Cl CD Z CD Z Z z
en..,f en..,f CD >-
(MOO 1laJ9) en
l~l!!4$lIPIII1IIfin
M
lepJSnpUJ iDco UJ UJ UJ CDC") ('0 ..,f 0 0 UJ 0 0
CDM CD ~ ~ Cl CD ..... (,) (,) Cl CD Z Z CD Z z
paseg"a~,m~H en..,f >- en..,f CD >-
en
M
$~ CI) UJ CI) CDM ('0 ..,f 0 0 0 UJ 0
peOJssOJ:) leJauaa CD CD CD Cl CD..... (,) (,) Cl CD Z Z Z CD z
en..,f >- >- >- en..,f CD >-
en
M
peoJSSOJ:) JOp'S,^ CD co UJ UJ CI) $~ ('0 ..,f 0 0 0 UJ 0
CDM ~ ~ CD Cl (,) Cl CD Z Z Z CD z
JPOOlpoqq61aN cn...,f >- en..,f (,) CD >-
en
M
CD co UJ UJ CI) CDM ('0 ..,f 0 0 0 0 0
peOJSSOJ:) lI:)lJallJaAUO:> CDC") ~ ~ CD Cl CD ..... (,) (,) Cl CD Z Z Z Z z
en..,f >- en..,f CD
en
M
JatUa:) a6eJl1ft. JeJnH CD co CI) CI) CI) CDM ('0 ..,f 0 0 0 UJ 0
CD
CDC") CD ~ ~ Cl CD ..... (,) (,) Cl CD Z Z Z >- z
en..,f >- en..,f CD
I en
-
: J L C")
(Ii~'iOlTna'~, CD co UJ CI) CDM ('0 ..,f UJ 0 0 -0 Cl
CDM -0 CD CD Cl CD ..... (,) $ CD z z (,)
en..,f (,) >- >- en..,f I , >-
en
~
M
CD CO CI) CI) CDM ('0 ..,f UJ 0 0 -0 Cl
sanYO~/na ~ CDM -0 CD ~ Cl CD..... (,) (,) Cl CD ~ Z Z (,)
en..,f (,) >- en..,f CD
en
M
$~ CI) CI) CDM ('0 ..,f UJ 0 0 C3 Cl
sa~S/na~ -0 CD ~ Cl CD ..... (,) (,) Cl CD ~ Z z
en..,f (,) >- en..,f CD
en
6UIPIoqUI , leJnH M
CD co UJ CI) CDC") ('0 ..,f 0 0 ('0 UJ
CDM -0 ~ ~ Cl CD ..... (,) (,) Cl CD Z Z (,) ~ Cl
'lep,laWWO:) - JSajO:l en..,f (,) en..,f CD -
en
~co M C") M
~ pue aw!Jd UJ UJ CDC") ..,f UJ ..,f ..,f UJ
'<I"M -0 (,) ('0 Cl CD CD Cl
CD..,f CD CD Cl CD ..... (,) CD CD CD >-
;eJl1JIn'IJ6y (,) >- >- en..,f CD >- CD CD
~oll en en en
C>
CD c: ~
"0 CD u;
u; C> UJ C
'5 m ~ ....
~ 5 e ,f2 10
UJ (;) 0.. Q 0
UJ CD oll ~ UJ ~ ~ .;,
CD UJ CD .!2 <:>
UJ UJ ::> C> CI) 8
CD Q ~
CI) E ::> ~ c: ~ ::>
CD ~ u; CD c:
~ 'B 0 UJ 0 ~ c: II) III
0 CI) LL
'0 .s CI) m . UJ UJ CD UJ CD ::> .E:
. ('0 ('0 CD LL UJ CD e "0 CD E "0 ~
U. > UJ c: ~ 8 ~ ~ ~:ii
..... -c ::> 0 l5 l5 . < 0..
0.. =
CI) u; c: m m- .5 olll? ro '0 oll CD -.I E
CD c: ~ l5 52 (,) :::E :::E oll E 0 :> I
UJ l!! 10 UJ . UJ.Q UJ ~
::> . .Q '2 <Ii <Ii CD UJ ~o c: UJ ~ CO) "0
t:: > t: ::> UJ <( <UJ .a ~
8 . -c J5 8- E 'E 'E Jg ~~ c:
UJ 0.. ::> "0 "0 CD :; "0
S ::> E CD CD >: ~ ,0 c:
5 0.. CI) E E ~ 't)-C: c: c:UJ (,) 'fi CD
B c: 0 1:5 <.2. m m::> 'C: E
::> CD .~ <Ii l!! (,) 0. 0. C> :5 CD
. 0 0 < 'E UJ "0 <
0 -0 .r= I- ::> - CD = c: CI) q:
oc J5 10 ro ~ ~ "0 ~ l!!c: m 5E:;: -0
~ ::> -0 1? ::>= a:: UJ
0.. 0.. CD CD CD CD .a =:~ CD CD
l!! -0 E CD Cl Cl E ao ,g ... CD (~ (E ITEM
c: <Ii oll :; CD=
8- ('0 ~ m E ~ ~ ('0 (,) ('OJ::. co .c "S: ...~
"0 T E T . ::>en ::> E=
E i: m .~ -c ::> c::
CD m &. c:: 0 5 5 c:: . C> <:T .... ~f3 :i z ::>
I- 0.. I- ::> (,) ::> < <0
..
Page. I 0 t.f of a.5f
/
//
./
v
ENVIRONMENTAL URBAN SUBUR- CONSER- NATURAL AQUA TIC*
DESIGNATIONS BAN VANCY
ADVERTISING
, On-premise S S S X C
Off-premise C C C X X
AGRICULTURE S S P C N/A
AQUACULTURE
Passive Enhancement P P P C P
Extensive Upland P S S X N/A
Extensive Intertidal P S P S** +-
Extensive Subtidal S S S S** +-
Intensive Upland P S S X N/A
Intensive Subtidal S S S S** +-
BOAT LAUNCHES P P S C +-
COMMERCIAL
Water-related P S S, X +-
and/or dependent
and/or enjoyment
Non-water dependent C C C X X***
DOCKS, PIERS, AND S S S C +-
FLOATS
DREDGING S S C X +-
FOREST MANAGEMENT S P P C N/A
INDUSTRIAL AND PORT
FACILITIES
Water related P S C X +-
and/or dependent
Non-water dependent S C C X X
LANDFILLS
Upland P P S X N/A
Aquatic S C C X +-
MARINAS P S C' X +-
MINING C C C X +-
MOORING BUOYS S P P C +-
PARKING FACILITIES
Vistas S P P C C
Non-vistas S S C C 'C
RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
Over-night P S S X X
Day use P P S C +-
RESIDENTIAL P P S X X
DEVELOPMENT
SCIENTIFIC AND P P P S +-
EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
SHORE DEFENSE WORKS S S S C C
TRANSPORTATION P S C C +-
FACILITIES "r . ~
UTILITIES P , S \ C C C
,
P - Primary S - Secondary
N/A - Not Applicable
C - Conditional
+- - Same as upland
X - Prohibited
.,
*
Projects in the aquatic designation that originate waterward of the extreme low tide (see Figure 3), but
have been classified with an arrow +- shall be considered the same as the adjoining upland.
** See Section 5.30, Aquaculture, Policy #11 LOG ITEM
*** See Subsection 4.106, "Port Townsend Urban Waterfront Special District" for exception.
fi-
40
"ft<'~ It .
- .~inr::. /oS of.D~
>a'~,;;:'j~~.... ~
Policy
To protect, conserve, and manage existing resources and valuable historical and cultural areas
in order to ensure sustained resource stabilization and that sensitive natural conditions are not
subject to inappropriate uses.
'-
4.104 SUBURBAN
Definition
Areas where residential activity may approach urban density, but usually where densities
permit space for small numbers of livestock, gardens, or wood lots. These areas are served by
individual or community water supplies, but generally are not linked with utilities from an
urban center. Commercial activities to serve the needs of the immediate area are considered
an integral part of this designation.
Policy
To provide permanent residential and recreational areas outside of urban areas, so long as
development of these areas provides adequate facilities for sewage disposal, water supply, open
space, and the like without severe degradation to the lifestyle that was sought initially.
4.105 URBAN
~;
Definition
The urban environment is an area of high intensity land use, including residential,
commercial, and industrial' development. Urban shorelines should be designated for high
intensity' use or multifamily residential development. The urban designation may also be
applied to areas of lower intensity use where the surrounding land use is urban and urban
services are available.
Policies
1.
Development in urban areas should be managed so it enhances and maintains the
shoreline for a variety of urban uses, with preference given to water dependent and
water related uses. Water-enjoyment uses that provide access to and enhance
enjoyment of the shoreline for a substantial number of persons should also be given
priority in urban areas.
Efficient utilization of existing urban areas in a manner consistent with this program is
encouraged before further expansion into non-urban areas occurs.
Pedestrian and visual access should be provided to and along the urban waterfront area.
Public access to and along the water's edge should be coordinated in a walkway system
and linked to adjacent existing or future walkways.
,
2.
3.
LOG ITEM
F
31
":Zjc:;_.LoLof ~
......
During application review,~the basic element or intent of a proposed development will guide
in the determination of the proposal's particular use activity. When a proposal contains two
or more use activities within a shoreline designation, each activity may be reviewed
independently and the total project considered on the whole.
In the review of a shoreline permit, consideration will be given to the cumulative impact the
project may have with similar use activities. This review is to ensure that the resulting total
effect will not thwart the intent and policies of the particular shoreline environmental
designation, nor result in substantial degradation of the shoreline itself.
4.201 PRIMARY
Definition
In general, those categories of uses that are deemed as being preferable with the definition and
policy of a particular shoreline designation.
Criteria
Primary uses are presumed to be generally consistent with the policies and definition of the
shoreline designation where it is located. Projects will be reviewed for consistency with
specific goals and policies and must comply with the performance standards specified for the
particular type of development being reviewed.
...
4.202 SECONDARY
Definition
Those uses that are not automatically deemed as being preferable within the- scope of the
definition or policy of a particular shoreline environmental designation.
Criteria
Applicants for shoreline substantial development permits for secondary uses will have the
burden of proof to demonstrate that:
1. The proposal will not be contrary to the general intent of the Shore-line Management
Act, nor shall it be contrary to the goals, policies, and performance standards of this
Master Program.
2. The proposed project will not materially interfere with the public use of public lands
and waters or the private use of adjacent private lands.
3. The proposed project will not cause unnecessary adverse effects on the environment or
other properties and will be compatible with other permitted uses in the area.
. -.,
LOG ITEM
36
*
::~~3_(D 7 of d5(f
I
.
.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Upon completion of installation or maintenance projects, banks shall be restored to a
suitable configuration and stability, replanted with native species, and provided with
maintenance care until the newly planted vegetation is established.
Utility discharges and outfalls shall be located, designed, constructed, and operated so
degradation to water quality, marine life, and general shoreline ecosystems is kept to
an absolute minimum.
Both during and after installation, utilities shall assure that geohydraulic shore
processes and marine life are basically maintained in their natural condition.
Utilities located in flood prone areas shall be provided with adequate flood protection
and shall not be installed to increase flood hazard or other damage to life or property.
Flammable or toxic materials shall not be stored in areas subject to flooding.
Utilities shall not be installed in areas subject to geological hazards, unless it can clearly
be demonstrated that such hazards can be overcome.
11.
12.
LOG ITEM
#
PafF~ (O~ of~
80
\
'\
\
24.
salt or fresh water, unless the purpose of the vacation is to enable any public authority
to acquire the vacated property for port purposes, boat moorage or launching sites, or
for park, view point, recreational, educational, or other public purposes, or unless the
property is zoned for industrial purposes. Further, such vacation shall not be
accomplished for any purpose that is not consistent with this Master Program, and
then only when all appropriate federal, state, and local permits have been issued for the
intended use.
Transportation facilities in flood:ways shall be designed to minimize flood water
diversion or obstruction to flood water flow.
~
5.200 UTILITIES
Definition
Services or facilities that produce, transmit, carry, store, process, or dispose of electric power,
gas, water, sewage, communications, oil, and the like.
Policies
1. Whenever utilities must be placed in a shoreline area, the location should be chosen to
not' obstruct or destroy scenic views. Wherever feasible, these facilities should be
placed underground or designed to do minimal damage to the aesthetic qualities of the
shoreline area.
2. To an extent feasible, Jefferson County and the City of Port Townsend should
incorporate major utility corridors on shorelines into their programs and plans for
public access to and along water bodies.
3. Utilities should be located to meet the needs of future populations in areas planned to
accommodate this growth.
4. Upon completion of installation and maintenance projects of shorelines, banks should
be restored to preproject configuration, replanted with native species, and be provided
with maintenance care until the newly planted vegetation is established.
Performance Standards
1. Utilities shall be installed adjacent to or within existing utility or circulation easements
or rights-of-way whenever feasible.
2. Utilities shall be installed underground whenever feasible.
3. Utilities shall be designed and installed to meet future needs when possible.
4. When feasible, utility corridors shall serve multiple uses such as shoreline access or
recreational trails or pathways.
5. Utilities installed in the water, beach, or upon tidal areas shall assure that water quality
and marine life will not suffer degradation.
6. Installation of utilities shall assure the prevention of siltation or beach erosion.
79
LOG ITEM
#
Page_~o~
.
r.., \ ) ~ ~
I I!
~ ,>-_"J."
r- '
JEFFERSON COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
OCT - 8
<I..'..
621 Sheridan Street. Port Townsend. Washington 98368
360/379-4450.800/831-2678.360/379-4451 Fax
Pre-Application Conference
The Jefferson County Unified Development Code (UDC) requires that before an application is made for all Type II and
Type III project applications and Type I applications proposing impervious surfaces of ten thousand (10,000) square feet
or more and/or non-single family structures of five thousand (5,000) square feet or more, a pre-application consultation
must be held. The consultation includes preliminary review and administrative assistance. This service does not include
extensive field inspection or correspondence. Pre-application consultation' does not limit subsequent administrative
review.
At the conference, Department of Community Development personnel shall provide the applicant with:
(1) A list of the requirements for a completed application;
(2) A general summary of the procedures to be used to process the application;
(3) The references to relevant code provisions or development standards that may apply to the approval of the
application; and
(4) A list of any applicable hourly review fees that may be charged by one or more County agencies upon the
filing of a project permit application with the County.
Discussions at the conference or the information provided by the staff shall not bind or prohibit the County's future
application or enforcement of all applicable laws and regulations. No statements or assurances made by County
representatives shall in any way relieve the applicant of his or her duty to submit an application consistent with all relevant
requirements of County, state and federal codes, laws, regulations and land use plans.
NAME:
Jefferson County Public Utility District No.1
MAILING ADDRESS:
PO Box 929, Port Hadlock, WA 98339
REPRESENTATIVE:
N/A
Parametrix, Inc.
(VVORK) (60) 385-5800
Contact: Mike Moren, Project Engineer
TELEPHONE: (HOME)
MAILING ADDRESS:
5700 Kitsap Wayj Suite 202 Bremerton, WA 98312
TELEPHONE: (HOME)
N/A
(VVORK)
(360) 377-0014
1. Please answer all questions on this form completely.
2. Attach a sketch of the Conceptual Design for the proposed use or activity, showing the following information:
a. Vicinity sketch;
b. North arrow and scale;
c. Property boundaries and identification of land uses on adjacent properties;
d. Means of ingress and egress;
e. propertynot drainage;
f. Possible locations of sewage disposal and water supply systems;
g. Location of utility easements; and
h. Proposed location of buildings, including setbacks to property boundaries.
3. Attach payment of the applicable fee, as set forth in the Jefferson County Fee Ordinance.
~ I""""ta""""'" ......r-.. ~
L U I I L-Iva
PRE-APP CONFERENCE.DOC REV. 0412212OO3
H.
., .~1
Paga -LL1L-of ~.:Jo
.
Property Description
General Location: Approx Imate I y s I x m i u I es southwest of Port Townsend, Wash i ngton, west of the
intersection of Cape George Road and Beckett Point Road.
Legal Description (from Property Tax Statement): P
ILot 1 & TL Tax BI 37.15 CH Parcel No.
Lot 2 & 3
9-Digit Parcel Number (from Property Tax Statement): Parce I No. 002231001 and 002242003
Total Acreage: 92 (Approx.) Zone: 1 :20 % Lot Coverage: 0.004%
Section 24, Township 30N, Range 2W
Applicant:
DOwner
o Contract Purchaser
o Lessee
QJ Other Jefferson County PUD No. 1
Project Description
To abandon individual on-site septic treatment systems and provide a central low pressure sewer
collect'o
existing shoreline community of Beckett Point, Washington.
Property Owner (name and mailing address): Beckett Point Fi sherman's CI ub c/o Patty Sah linger
890 Beckett Point Road, Port'Townsend, WA 98368
Standard Disclosure
Information provided to a prospective applicant during the pre-application consultation is based on County regulations in effect at the
time of the pre-application consultation. Revised or new Countv reaulations could affect a future development application. A pre-
application consultation does not vest a future development application.
By signing the application form, the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their
knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected
property. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application
packet may result in this permit being null and void.
I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities, judgments, court costs, reasonable
attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting
of this permit
I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees, representatives or agents for the sole
purpose of application review and any required later inspections. This right of entry shall expire when the County (through the
Administrator or the Administrator's repres tives) concludes the application has complied with all applicable laws and regulations.
Access and rig~ef~ry to the a icant' pro rty shall be requested and shall occur only during regular business hours.
,
(SIGNATURE)
Q r',' ",...~~
v ,_)Cf ~T)
I hereby designate Mike Moren, Parametr i x, I nc.
ronfee-u ~ ..:... LA' ,
(LANDOWNER SIGNATURE) ~
to act as my agent in matters related to this pre-application
rf;;fio'f ... ;1
PRE-APP CONFERENCE, DOC REV, 04/22/2003
#
Page,
.....-. _.,.~.:
fir)
of~
Page 2
.
r
;
,
r~\ I !-
I'll),
! : r-" ~
Parametrix
. ..;
ENGINEERING. PLANNING. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
5700 KITSAP WAY, SUITE 202
BREMERTON, WASHINGTON 98312-2234
T.360.377.0014 F. 360.479.5961
.www.parametrix.com
October 8, 2004
Jefferson County Department of Community Development
621 Sheridan Street
Port Townsend, W A 98368
Re: Request for Pre-Application Conference for Beckett Point Community
Large On-Site Septic System Project
Dear Sir/Madam:
"
~ \
OCT - 8
Parametrix, Inc. (Parametrix) has been retained by the Jefferson County Public Utility District No. 1 (PUD
No.1) to design two large on-site septic (LOSS) systems for the shoreline community of Beckett Point,
Washington. The purpose of this letter and its enclosures is to request a Pre-Application Conference with the
Jefferson County Department of Community Development (DCD) to discuss the project and its permitting
requirements.
Beckett Point is located approximately six miles southwest of Port Townsend, Washington, on the east side of
Discovery Bay, and consists mainly of recreational beach houses (see enclosed Figures 1 and 2). The Beckett
Point Fisherman's Club owns the property and individual lots are leased. There are approximately 100
existing residences, full or part time, Most of the residences are located on a large sand spit. Currently,
sewage treatment is provided by individual septic systems that are in questionable condition on the sand spit.
During 2003, the Washington State Department of Health - Office of Food Safety and Shellfish Programs,
conducted a shoreline survey of the Discovery Bay shellfish growing area. Although no "Direct Impact" or
"Indirect Impact" sources of pollution were identified on or around Beckett Point, the survey did identify
many parcels with on-site septic systems and labeled these as a "Potential Source" of pollution due to their
age, soils, and close proximity to the shoreline. The report recommended that Beckett Point be placed on the
"Concerned Status" for point source contamination.
It is the intent of Parametrix to design two independent community LOSS systems, under the Washington
State Department of Health - LOSS Division (DOH) jurisdiction, to replace the existing individual septic
systems. Sewage would be collected and conveyed by low-pressure sewer systems (LPSS) to a series of large
septic tanks. The LPSSs will each consist of several small underground sewage grinder pump stations located
mainly within the beach area. Sewage will be transported to the septic tanks through small-diameter, two or
three inch pressure pipelines. LPSSs of this type have been used in many communities adjacent to both fresh
and marine water bodies, and have much less of an environmental impact than traditional gravity sewer
systems. From the septic tanks, effluent will be pumped to large pressure drainfields located in a forested area
on the eastern portion of the property above the beach community. The drainfields, located at least 600 feet
horizontally from the nearest shoreline, will greatly reduce the potential for contamination of shellfish near
the Beckett Point community. The enclosed Figure 3 identifies the approximate locations of the proposed
pump stations, pressure pipelines, septic tanks and drainfields as well as the Ordinary High Water (OHW)
mark. Typical drawing sections of the underground grinder pump stations, utility trenches and drainfield
dosing tanks are shown in Figure 4.
LOG ITEM
#
Page_II'Z-- of~
-
<(
5
--
l!
W
to-
;Z
W
(/)
'" \.
; \ l I.
,t L,
11"
t:. f"
L: .
t
OCT - 8
October 8, 2004
Page 2
_' .._{~f. L:' .. "
The Rural and Natural Resource Land Use and Zone Designations and Shoreline Designation Overlay map
of Jefferson County identified the entire shoreline around Beckett Point as a "Suburban" designation. The
pump stations and pressure pipelines in the beach area will be located within the existing Beckett Point Road
right-of-way. No construction activities will be located within ordinary high waterline.
A Wetlands Delineation and Ranking Report for the Beckett Point community was prepared by Pacific Rim
Aquatic Environmental Sciences of Port Townsend, Washington in August, 2000. The report identified and
delineated a palustrine Class II wetland in the beach area, requiring a 50-foot buffer for low intensity land
uses. The wetland and 50-foot buffer boundaries are shown on Figure 3. Some pressure pipeline will be laid
within this buffer - within the existing Beckett Point Road - however, no construction activities will occur
within the wetland. Underground Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) will be used to install some sections
of the pressure pipelines to avoid conflicts with the wetland.
Parametrix has also obtained information from the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife
(WDFW) on Priority Habitats and Species in the project area. Great Blue Heron and Bald Eagle habitat have
been identified near the project area. It is anticipated that this may have an impact on the timing of
construction, and a Bald Eagle Management Plan may have to be prepared. Further coordination with the
WDFW will be necessary as part of the permitting process.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (360) 850-5320.
Sincerely,
P ARAMETRlX
Mike Moren
Project Engineer
Enclosures
cc: Jim Parker, Jefferson County PUD No. I
C: \Documents and SettingsVim ParkerILocal SettingslTemporary Internet FilesIOLKIABIL-JeffCo Pre-application 09-09-04 email.doc
LOG ITEM
#
Pagei! 3 of~
~o ~
~ z}>l
1" "
m ~
I
f
I
~
.
~
\llll!!
"CDlQ
o 0 c
-;>;' .,
CD CD CD
o ..
....
<\I
-0
0_
-:2
2...
-<
s:
III
"C
11>
r'.~_ . .,_ _,~;~.o<
r ["\ \ 1"'.
l \ )1 r__H
\; ,
t
!
:l!.....
." -..~.
. ~r;:;:~
~\
I.
I
!
.f. r
.-0
0;;0
00
>t..
-tm
-0
O-t
z
~o "lJ
~
Z ..
~ z1>~
m )C
~
.,,'"
;om
00
."",
~~
.-0
ZZ
m...
...
C;;
:I:
m
;0
;::
~
z
en
p
c
'"
"1:l111"T\
.., CD -.
OnlC
i:;:;
::I._Ill
'< - '"
llld'
0-
c a
='
C.
m
-<
~
....
m
Q
m
z
c
! .
~\
'f'-"f1~. 'i
,\ '\
IlL);
~ ~ r.~
,.'.,
. t)
4.-;
.J.J."
. -ire.
~
Page-L(5
o(~
-IlJl"TI
'< CD -.
"tlnCC
n~~
III _CD
Cii:;....
III 0
n -
~:J
0-
:J
<
f
III
..
~
..
3
1
.,
;c
~
-I
I~'g~
"'-I"U
~;!::m
mr-l
;;0
m
z
(')
:J:
e:
z
0
m
~~ ..
,.. C)
I~~~ I;.
'--"U
mre:
s:
"U
-I ,.'1
)>
Z
^
n
o
z
....
e:
.-
n
o
z
o
c
::;
;::'tl
~~
"N
>~
'-m
'"
m
o
o
Z
Gl
'"
>>
n
"
"
;=
.-
;::
~
"
;;
.-
cn"tJm"'tJ
~C"'"C
~~E~
:r:>m<
mZZ>
cnO-lC
;2!:!!~
g~:;;
....;n't
~~8
~~t5
~5i1l
~nI
~
5
z
:;!
z
"
~
m
....
r..
, .
;::00
>>c
...."
2~
~m
~~
z~
GlO
~
....
5
z
-I
,~ ~
(';
I~ (')m~
'" ;;0
n-l)>
~(5z
Z"TI
ffi
r
o
12
m
>>
"
z~
Gltn
.-6
ii: -
i;j
8'
e:
z
0
m
~~
, C)
F~~ OJ
"f!.;!::"U
mre:
s:
"U
C/l
-I
~
(5
Z
n>>n ...." 0
ozo ~ffi in
.-....z
s;:;;n "gJ n
:I:
".-" Gl ,.
Om S; "
,..... Gl
....m 00 m
~ 00
5
z
LOG ITE V1
#
Page~_of.d.2f
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o
o
lJ)
....
+ +
+ +
"-
"-
"-
"-
"-
"-
"-
+ '-',
,
,
,
,
,
,
+ + "
,
,
,
,
,
+ + + "
,
,
,
,
"
,
+ + + +',
,
'",,-
,
,
,
+ + + + + '~
,
,
"-
"-
"-
,
+ + + + + + ~
,
"-
""
,
,
,
+ + + + + + + "'~
+
+
+
LOG ITEM
"
ff
Page.JJLofdQl.
Do
IV
"C~
- II
0..
Il. .-
C'l U)
1I='lj
~.= .!!.
.2l~~
II..IIIIl.
+
x-
0
'" x-
a..
Vi' a.. 0
~ '"
'" a..
z z a..
~ 0 ~
0 F '"
F ~ z
"'a.. '" ~
"'w a..
z'" a..
~~ ~
::> ~
a.. ::>
~:;: 0 a..
<~ z 0
::> z
~Z 0 ::>
,,0 '" 0
ZO " '"
'" "
F...J W W
"'...J 0 0
x'!< Z Z
w~ ::> ::>
0 00
'"
'" '"
< 0
~ w
I:: Z
'" ::>
~ ::> 0
lD '"
< 0 "
~ Z "''''
:I: < ~~
" F Zw
:;: ~ ::>",
>- Ow
'" >- w'"
< 0 "'::>
Z 0 0",
lL a..",
15 Ow
'" 0 "''''
0 '" a.. a..
\
+
+
+
+
+
0
+ ...J
>- W
'" '" c;:
::> 0 Z
g " :;;:
Z ~o '"
0 ~~ 0
0 0
i~ "F w
'"
~~ 0
a..
0
x< '"
wa.. 0..
~ ~
~
I
I
~ ~~>-
w
lC w
I<rZ ~
:. '"
IL 0
~o
.0
l'V
~N
B
10.77 Ch.
=Em
...,rr1
(1)0
-I"
m~
~.
(")'"'D
:x: 2
%
-I
I'
CD
(TJ
(/)n
o^
c:(TJ
-1=1
::c
-C
aJo
(TJ_
>z
('")-1
:c
Q
-1~
~
~~
? a
'Q ~
~~
q
(n?88
t.l ~N
<oS~~
p 52
CD~~
~
~
<.9 CJ
.>>
C'..s.
GJ
~
...
.....\
)>(1) m
%0 rrI
ZC: 0
ITI-I "
><:x: 9
m
~'"'D
(')2
:t:z
-I
b
::.-\
~~c
-tOJj)l~
:,y~A
~COq,~
~
.;->
)>(1) m
zo rr1
zc: 0
rr1-1 ^
><:x: 9
a:J
fI1'"'D
)>0
0-
::t:z
-I
OJ
fT1
(')
^
fT1
=I
II ~.............. '"
"/~V('"'""""'\\ ~\ ~ \
^l~Y~ v. \~\ \ __
^'-ty/ ~ q-~ q \ . ~ ;::' ;:: -
(); I S),/ " 9 \ '- ...). ::::: ;;..-
Q; ~--
~.~ 8e
~~. A 01-~
~rO~~7>
~~
~..y
~J'
q> ~
. ~() ~ ~
. . '( A)'-1
,0%
-f~.
-0
;-f
:::0
!='
G")
o
<
..
-i
.p.G")o
. 00
:::L<;. N
O-lN
. ~
r-N
00
-10
{"N
N
t.I
{"NG")O ~
cooo 5
C:x> <;. N ....
{"N-;~
or-N -i ~
. 00
-10
{"N '1
N
N
Qo
;t.."
,>.
~ <:
0,>.
1
....
I
Vl
o
z
1330.91'
. ~ 9~~E~
P'f;:j5?o~~~8
(X),^ I....~.......~..
; .
~=I=t:
to
(I) r
Sl~~
~ ~
~
0
N
-
0\
....... N
C+-o -
0
0 .......
.......
OJ
bO
~
p..
o
M
0\
00
"
8
C'--
p.,
~
s
o
o
~
.....
o
fr
"""
o
..1::
r.f.l
-
OJ
l::
.....
]
o
~
-
OJ
.....
.....
r.f.l
is
~
~
d
~
d
o
r.f.l
"""
~
(.j....j
OJ
.-;;
o
(.)
vi
~
LOG ITEM ~
# ~
page--fli of~
"<:t
0
0
- N
c,..... -
0'1
0 N
- -
0
<I) -
OJ)
~
p..
-
M
0'1
00
II
8
C'-.
0-
m
~
e
o
o
N
o
.....
o
.t::
e-
O
.t::
m
-
~
.....
-
<I)
~
o
.t::
m
Q)
.....
.....
m
~
-rn
::i
d
~
~
o
m
~
~
C,j....i
<I)
-""':":
o
C)
rJi
~
LOG ITEM S
# ~
Page_t20 of~
......
~
o
......
Q)
0.0
cd
~
III
......
Q)
~
~
~
Q)
z
III
'<:t
o
o
N
---
0\
~
o
......
N
M
0\
00
II
Q
.....
c-..
0-
tn
cd
S
o
o
N
o
.....
o
..s:::
fr
I-<
~
---
Q)
l=1
.....
.-
Q)
I-<
o
..s:::
tn
---
Q)
.....
.....
tn
~
~
tn
::;j
cod
~
d
o
tn
I-<
~
c+-;
Q)
.-
o'
()
rIi
g.
~
of~
LOG ITEM
#
PcHJS 12-1
..;.I _
~
- 0
<+-< 0
N
0 -
- 0'1
<I) ~
OJ) 0
~ -
Pol
-
<I)
OJ)
~
Pol
~
<I)
Z
rIl
M
M
0'1
00
II
8
c--.
~
~
s
o
o
N
o
.....
..8
fr
~
o
..c:::
en
-
<I)
~
....
-
<I)
~
o
..c:::
en
Q)
.....
. ...
en
~
~
en
;::::l
d
~
d
o
en
~
~
ti-<
<I)
.-
o'
t.)
vi
Q..
LOG ITEM 8
# :::::
Pag9JZ-~ ofd~
"<:t
0
...... 0
4-< ~
0 0\
...... ~
<!) 0
OJ) ......
ro
~
"<:t
M
0\
00
II
8
C'-.
0-
~
8
o
o
N
o
.....
o
..s:::
e-
o
..s:::
tn
-
<!)
s::
.....
]
~
-
<!)
.....
.....
tn
-8
~
tn
;::l
d
~
d
o
tn
I-<
~
ti-<
<!)
.~
o
to'!
tn
0-
LOG ITEM s
# ~
Page_!23-o~ds1
-
e;.....
o
-
Q)
01)
~
p..
III
-
Q)
~
p..
~
Q)
z
III
'<:t
o
o
N
----
0"1
~
o
-
lr)
M
0"1
00
II
Q
~
1:'-
~
S
o
o
N
o
.....
o
..s:::
e-
O
..s:::
00
----
Q)
r::
.....
]
o
..s:::
00
GJ
.....
.....
00
is
~
00
;:j
cod
~
d
o
00
I-<
~
t.i-<
Q)
.-
o'
o
fJi
LOG ITEM ft
s
.I.t ::::::::
fJ ..
~1\,;:J~';;;F~~lda!l-Of 'J~ ~
Vl>."l<o_.ji-J ~o .......
~ Co". _
~
0
- 0
t.j..; ~
0 0'1
- ~
(\) 0
00 -
C':l
~
1.0
~
0'1
00
II
8
c-..
0-
tI.l
C':l
S
o
o
N
o
-
o
...s:::
fr
I-<
o
...s:::
tI.l
--
(\)
.5
-
(\)
I-<
~
Q)
-
.....
tI.l
-fl
~
tI.l
;::s
cd
~
~
o
tI.l
I-<
!.2
<.i-<
(\)
.'"":'"
o
~
tI.l
LOG ITEM J
!: '..k~ f~~
'~"'x. ~, f,:\ 0
j...-.....~'t.,JI"".... .__
- -.::t
0
~ 0
0 N
- -
0'\
(l) ~
OJ) 0
c;l
~ -
[fJ
-
(l)
OJ)
c;l
~
~
Z
III
t-
~
0'\
00
"
Cl
.....
C'-.
~
c;l
e
o
o
N
o
.....
..8
fr
l-i
o
..J:::
00
-
(l)
;:::
......
-
(l)
l-i
o
..J:::
00
-
(l)
.....
......
00
~
~
00
;::::l
d
~
d
o
00
l-i
~
l.i-<
(l)
.-
0'
e,)
u:i
LOG ITEM ~
~ 8
;:geL~Of~
Map Output
Page 1 of 1
o
Legend
Parcels-H
2000 Aerial PhokJs
Boundaries
o ~CW'fry
o w_
D~~
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL Y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
ollection. Fri Oct 2907:51 :142004
LOG ITEM
~'\~" .,)./dL of 0lSil.
http:// gisserver/servletJ com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceName=ovmap&Client V ersion=4. O&F OrIn... 10/29/2004
Map Output
Page 1 of 1
0 Legend
PatalJs.H
ContOtlts
)\./ 10 FOOl Con\:U
I
;./ 5:l FOOl Con\:U
Boundaries
0 ~ CourlIj
0 w_
0 ClI'lor ~
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
ollection. Fri Oct 29 07:50:26 2004
LOG ITEM
#
Pag~3-OCofd5;f
http:// gisserverlserv let/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/2912004
Map Output
FEATURES NOT SURVEYED-JCPUD#1, PRE04-00035
o
!
!-l-~~lOy~~~~QlIS_1
"""
;tV Legend
Road System
0 PatallS-H
Contours
/".r./ 1Q Fool Conlcu:
,
fr &I Fool Conlcu:
Boundaries
0 JcIIclrlla'r CW'lIy
0 Wtt'a
0 Oflat ~
!
I
i
!
~
I
J
Page 1 of 1
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
collection. Fri Oct 29 07:36:04 2004
LOG ITEM
#
Pag3w/J$of 05K
http:// gisserverlservlet/ com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceName=ovrnap&ClientV ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/29/2004
Map Output
Page 1 of 1
FEATURES NOT SURVEYED-JCPUD#1, PRE04-00035
, I /
00224~1 002242023 0
.o497710000a\ I I
977100005 .1.;;:""""002242001
~ '--..971100916.. I
971100004 '-977100911 002242018
9n100902'>"\I~ 971100917LL
9711009()1 971101004~ ,977100912,
'97110100U.-L971101ll10.'(" .
. --971101009 ,
, t'
0022 ...4~ I '<:<002242:025
It f ( '>'<'"
I if. J'~-:",
d:::'OO1 ,it r4:201~~
j~,;./ .......:::::..----! 002242003 r-r-I
. .~... ..--""--. ----'
./..i l~ '....~.~
..;;/. ~2231001 ~l I I
~.. If \~. / 002242005'
/ /1 "-'
ll/
Ll
/; (l" /",=- 002231001
. i .if _4P'-- _____------
l~ 002231001. / ==d'... .-
'i 002231001 "'eii.
It <.:70::;7 ,...../.
. '~~.../--
.~---~
o
Legend
Parcels-H
Landslide Hazard
.
. Hq.
.
M_
S!ide!S
......,
Sli!:tIl
':;'-,.
Boundaries
~CW!l!y
002242003
o
o
o
w_
ObI< COuil!ieS
&
-;"ap!i ~ by Jel!Motl C<uI!-f ~ ~GlS I
<L
6100
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
ollection. Fri Oct 2907:47:072004
LOG ITEM
#
PagelJJLo'f~~
http:// gisserverlservletlcom.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/2912004
Map Output
Page 1 of 1
,,;::::::'~......
,/ ' "",
".I ,f,l ./'-~~"'"
;'/:,") l ',......
./.," ~'1
,/ ~)!
,,/' ~'l
././~ I
,I.~'t"" tt"".,c;::;"'~"""'~==-"-' ,
;?" ,,<>' ----~~
i,! ,;...... it. -~-
'1/ / ... ~
~;_///
FEATURES NOT SURVEYED.JCPUD#1, PRE04-00035
, I '
____-~ 0022420?1002242:023' 0
[--- "--'-. I I
,(9V1~\
9T11oo!lo5J,~-, 002242001
j '--.~-- 971U1OOI6. I
/977100004 '-977UlOO11 002242018
mU10902-->..,-j-977100917 I~
9771??oo1 977101004'~ 977100912
)971101001 ~71101010'Z_.(
"',,//' ,.00 221 ~~/'l//~~- -9771010(9)' '~>~::::l:lO?242025
, l ...........,-.
, 1/... 'l->~,
J,''''" tJ ) -.............
/002231001 l/ 002242010 ',> Legend
{I I ",
/ /i I 002242011 0 patcel&-H
// 002242003 r-+-. Seismic:: Hazard
I Boundaries
I I
002242005
I
~-
o
o
o
~ Co.olly
w_
otIe<~
.t
--.-----~----l 002242003
""-----
--...------
------.
4
...~ p-cMdod by ~ Co.olly CG1lral Ser.;ces GIS I
o
615ft
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
collection. Fri Oct 29 07:46:27 2004
LOG ITEM
-f.J.
'it.
II P;g~:~LJ.L of a.S!
http:// gisserver/serv let! com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm... 1012W21J04-
I
Map Output
Page 1 of 1
FEATURES NOT SURVEYED-JCPUD#1, PRE04-00035
o
I ! I
0022dMl i roZZ<t2OZ! : tlOn42Ot'<ll
<............... 1--POCKETUI-='=
I.~m':::"'~~'\ I I
;.' orn<<l\108", 1.c'lnl~ 0022"~1
/ ---9m~'''''''{ wnOO9tS ),
/......~ ----.....-/19711~t!l;/\", I
, mlOOlJOol>> c_ _ 911100/,111' II oon"ZOJ4 1002:2..2012:
,9f11~l__"'-: ...-------r--.......-"'mIOiXl'~l, I
/ 'nl~ 9ntO'00!> /'... -( 971100$12 \. I
~ e71100001>-:: ~ \....971t1HOOll;...., ~9111000Hll... )
, ( /-/ __ /\ ml:~~Ji I Vt;;~;=.;i r ~~c111U)/)\)19
;/ ~h /91110tOOl~Hn.lcm:STA"E911101(J(IW.~J).:/1 I
JI r/ ~~~-
, ~{I>::oo, / I .",,'",. l'~
" . /'1' I -F! """'"'>
<:..---"~,, / / I
'....':'7 i r--
i
I :
, I
i I
) 1002242022
I I
'L
.
""'.,""
J
~.......,ass..,.~~c...Sar.;czt;GIS.1
"'"
.# Legend
Road Systllm
0 ParoelS-H
. 2000 Shore Photos-H
Shorelines-Ales
.# ~
.# ~lIU1II
.# UdlM
.# ~
.# IotaTJ
.# N3lural
.# ~
.# N~
.# O\h!r
Boundaries
0 ~CcuII;
0 Wale:
0 Clto!s' ~
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONl y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
ollection. Fri Oct 29 07:37:37 2004
LOG ITEM
,.J.
t'!'-r
'~'.'~in '::\ / ) ~ . f '1c9
-'~ ''''.Lf...L~O O~
http:// gisserverlservlet/ com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/29/2004
Map Output
Page 1 of 1
FEATURES NOT SURVEYED-JCPUD#1, PRE04-00035
o
j",S:.::.-\ ~-
971ffi0901. ' ~ ,
L.9111~,-..\\J,;~~~,.., oon4XV}1
/1 -. on.~~ I /~11'!oog=!J ,f", I
I "'"..... 9~'009(4) l~w:~;~I.m;~\ j 0022421)'8 10Q1142O"l1
,/~'~L._'//,~I'""__ ~"""9!7'[ffl11> Ii.......
/~n,~ <97116n~ ,,~, 'W7100012, I
flntOtl\JO~' -<'" '. 'r-mlG'OO6 ).." '9111001l18.
\.// //\ fl/~~:~~f~ I m~~=l:) r.... "9n~~~9 )
I //:: /.m"o''''r-~''''''"''.~'''''''''''''::I~: i
'''.2''00'' . ':>,
[' i / '....,~." oon4~
II ' ", "',
1;'/ II ""."':"
V I I 1<::'>"
/ / ! 002242010 ,<"..
I' : I '--
,~,' //'I[ ~0022"''''
1./ <::..... !
// .,....J1 I 0012A200$
(~/ ~~ i
//... I I
If' ) 1
(. I I
(I 11001242'(.105 001':2.42022
;; ,
;,''1' I i
,Y; I I
;/1. /~ ~-I i j
~ ~ ~
;/ 00223'''' ...:/", --~---~ I
,/// ~.'--
/1 ;::OO223loot
L;,~'~/~/
j
~_II'~trr~~~~GlSl
0 Legend
ParcebHi
Streams
;V TJIP"9
;V TJIP"5
;V TJIP"4
;V TJIP"3
;V TJIP"2
;V TJIP"I
;V ~
Boundaries
0 ~ CouI1ly
0 Wtf7iJz
0 ~~
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
ollection. Fri Oct 29 07:41 :46 2004
LOG ITE~A
#
Pag3.LJ 3 ofd..5J:
http:// gisserverlserv let! com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/29/2004
Map Output
Page 1 of 1
FEATURES NOT SURVEYED-JCPUD#1, PRE04-00035
, I I
/'_~__ 002242021002242023' G
llln1~\ I I
917100005\~-.002242001 I
I '-....., 9171009UL I
/977100904 '-977100911 00'2:242018
9n100902->'\I~977100911 LL
9771??oo1 977101004~ ,977100912,
~).977,il'00t ...Ll...917101010"'-...{
00224~/ -977101009'1':::::;'<::002242025
110,
l'; I/l/ -<>.....
~ " t'.:-....
002231001 ! / 002242010 '....::::--
" ( I oon42011'
-!J 0022<>>>> H-
I I
r:J
--~ -
~~~~ I 002242003
----1
--------...
---.....-------
i
.... p-aoid;>:jlr>: ~CWIIly ~ &s:Yioe!s GIS I
0.
675fl
o
.
Legend
ParcalS-H
wetlands
Boundaries
D
D
D
~CWIIly
w_
0ilIlcY ~
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
ollection. Fri Oct 29 07:44:28 2004
LOG ITEM
#
PagC3IJ'IofdSf
http:// gisserverlservlet/ com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovrnap&ClientV ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/2912004
Map Output
00z242021 .I "
l~~\, "-12023/
977100905 J,;:-- 002242001
I '--...._- 977100916. I
I.. 977100004 '- 977100911 002242018
971100902 -~~--\I- 977100917 I~
9771??oo1 97710tOO4{ ,.977100912,
)- 9T710100t J.J.....971t0101O".,,{
00224~/- -977101009',I:::<:,_'''^'''''' "^"""
I i I '- "".,..,4""",.,
,V;;/ ,'<~i~~
002231001 i l 002242010. '-',,'-
~~ Ii r r'"
~~ -"--...:.:..~___// 002242003 I
.,---"
I
-~1003 ---E!-
-....~---l 002242003
~-----------
-----....-.----
Page 1 of 1
Legend
patoel!rH
FEMA FIRMS
.Po
. ANI
.XfOJ
. OlD"
o
Boundaries
o ~cCJuntj
o w_
DOID"~
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
collection. Fri Oct 2907:47:442004
LOG ITEM
#
Paf::~.iJS Q'f dSO
http:// gisserver/servlet/ com. esri. esrirnap.Esrirnap ?ServiceN ame=ovrnap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/29/2004
FEATURES NOT SURVEYED-JCPUD#1, PRE04-00035
, I /I'
~___ 0022420210022426n' 0
l~'~\ I SC
9nU10OO5 ~002242001
1..-'-.~!l11l00!l16 \. I
.,..:.917100904 '-917100!111 002242018,
91710000z~-....'\""T-917100!11'7 ~
9171??oo1917101004(, ,917100!112,
-' 9itt01001 -Ll!mto10tO"-..,'
// v -91710100!1 ,'_;:-
r =w=> i~~~
1001 I' 00'2242010 '-":;
--::---.::.~ ,I I ~2011'
>/ "Z........j I 00'2242003 I
If C~:,)-' rT
fr./" \,._, / 002242005
, ;J/' - _L~ ,'I
II" ~~,~-r, ~-
II 002:n100t4' ~...------ --------...... 002242003
i~1 I .1102231001 --""
1 \-.~~_../ -......- 00'2242003
V:""/' ~ r .
~. --......... ~----
----........
Map, Output
~
L4aps ~by~C<UIly CabI~G1S I
C?
675ft
o
Legend
Parcels-H
Critical Aquifer- Recharge
Areas
o
.
o
.
.
o
o
o
SUse-UNK
&l.RPA . suse
suse
&l.RPA
&l.RPA' UNK
BoundariEls
~C<UIly
WtIa
Olta'~
Page 1 of1
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL Y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
collection. Fri Oct 2907:48:152004
LOG ITEM
#
Pi:,g;:~LJLofd$
http:// gisserverlserv let/corn.esri.esrirnap.Esrirnap ?ServiceN ame=ovrnap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orrn... 10/29/2004
Map Output
FEATURES NOT SURVEYED-JCPUD#1, PRE04-00035
7' , I '
, ~.......... 0022420210022A2023!_ 0
/(m1CI(~\'1
, 9r7100!l05l{....- 002242001
./ 1""'~9m00916." I V
,I 19171('J1()OO4 '- 917 1 OO9n 002242018'
;/' 917100902'-~917100911 I
( 97710000t,917101004( 917100912,
01/ ~ ):917101001 U___9m~::1~'i~"" LL
002242003 r<" ,
, Ii 1/ ',~42025
. l I 'f~;,,,
002231001 I 002242'OtO "y
.;:::=::..~ If f l~
:%> '~'-.J.I 002242003
~i _""j
J'" (~ ~
I 002231001
~ '_--...... 002242005
/il .L ~ 1
if PO," ~---00~1001~~ '. ~-
Ili002231OO1/ ~ - . -.:'.0022A2003
I If 002231001- "-'" ,
.J, I f /:./:/ "". " 002242003
q~/
~
Ll. ~ II)' JdI/lrsCn CW'Ily C~ S<\MOeS ~ I
<!
61Sfl
o
Legend
Parcel!;.H
Wela-ChlOride
Page 1 ofl
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
ollection. Fri Oct 29 07:48:40 2004
100""""""
"* ~ 1OOw2Xl
*
2XlOt~
SIPZ
N. Ris/I. SlPZ
.
o
o
o
o
High Ris/I. SlPZ
eaa.w SlPZ
Boundaries
~CW'Ily
Wtle
Cl!hor~
LOG ITEM
#
Pag3_l3_7_ofdsd
http:// gisserverlservlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/29/2004
Map Output
Page 1 of 1
FEATURES NOT SURVEYED-JCPUD#1, PRE04-00035
~
1002142012'
I
~OI'XI1;J
,'_i1n1~'-
',J;;,~~JaI~t41!....-.-
'~1~~ ~}.r -~
~F~ ['lm~J~7~OO9lt..
~- '_. "'-,91110Q911). ,
..'~ I. . 91110tOO'> ,~, "pnl@12" l
1'9T1U109l!' '. '.--t111\Y'100& ~" "tnHOml
'~.-'---_-': \.,~~~7O::1~ ) ~;:~::~ ,"', '- 9~:\X,!H.
tntOtOOl 'r-'.-.1 00111010'3 -.J.-----J P""01tl!:'$001242001
~\"
I<>:~" oon41""
i "<::~-.,.,-.
I f'''<",
R~<
I ;
II 002:2A2'OOS ! 00'12<I2OZ!
; I
I i
"-, I
..........''-.J
'-,
o
.
Legend
pstcels-H
Priority Habitats and
Species
Boundaries
o
o
o
~ COIJ'lly
w_
Ob!r~
J............,"""''''''""_.. I
'1Y1
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
collection. Fri Oct 29 07:43:24 2004
LOG ITEM
#
D::))'''ii(~ /") 9" .O''[:d.", I~
i- v:.;;j;.UI.....L~~ ~~ ~
http:// gisserverlservlet/ com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/29/2004
LOG ITEM
002242001>
Map Outpu~ "
FEATURES NOT SURVEYED-JCPUD#1, P
'%}
, 002242021002'242023
//
/ 1~1
4/~'oo' ~ l
j.' ,6~ ~'''':~'',- /~I
'I .....::::::;.;
if, /.-~--..... "-
, f ~1~)
l' '-...J'
II
l'/i
/71 .~OO2231oo1
I }002231001/ --~
; l~002231oo1
: IJ /F'/"
.~ ~ ".-/
~'
:J 971100001l'
f1 m100l1M .. _J00224200!
~_ .971100916
, 971100004 - 917.00911 002'242018
> 917.00902 971100917
971100901 971101004 917100912
/"'971101001 971101010 ~ -
~"''''''''J .
002242010
002242011 '
002242.0030
-~~--. 002242003
~
'---
~-........._-
~.
t.4.p-<Mdo:lby~Ca.dyC_ti ~~
o
. 615ft
#
Paa:3 / :1 f Of
"'" _I.J__
http:// gisserver/servletl com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovma
... I
.4'1
Map Output
,.J
Page 2 of2
.' '
o
Legend
Parcels-H
Cotlnty ZOning
. RtdRI!!!.id!lt6aI1:6
. RtdR1!!!.id!lt6aI1:10
.H"""1~
.~~IfJ:j,
.f..i!td~
~;.~~::~ UtA
. UC
.
.
lIB
11II ~NC
. Camm<ltda!FOICSo1
. Rtd FOICSo1
. ~FOICSo1
y//,
';/); PI' 1:2:1
~~~ IlL 1:2:1
;~~ I'iqm EPF
~~: W,,*, Mgml EPF
....ilit:lry~
. PaNll'JldR~
D N__FOICSo1
. N__Parlt
. N__R~
iii MPR.SirIje Family
. MPR.s.nnds
.
*
.
~
.
ffiillillI UGA-lcWr De'Is. Res.
ffiillillI UGA-Mad, De'Is. R...,
ffiillillI UGA-tlit,1l De'Is. Res.
~UG.MJrbtoIf..i!td~
. UGA-UrbtoI Camm<ltda!
Iillillill UGA-Viilib ~ Camm<ltda!
ffiillillI UGilrNiie
, A::.1T~UGA
'l~
%/// Hd1R~
~~R~
. Nd! ZtIn<Id
RuB!~ 1:2:1
Rurlll ViiI;aga ~
~GC
~.CC
Wmr~
LlPR....u~iIy
MPR.~Cam"""
MPR.ViiI;aga ~
LlPR.Op<In ~
MPR.~
Boundaries
o ~Cour/l)'
o Wmr
Dom~
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL Y-
Wefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy~~",::
collection. Fri Oct 29 07:49:12 2004 " \.:
ITEM
n-
P""""'"..../u
· ;:::'~~_..:.~ofd~
http:// gisserverlservlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/29/2004
,'"
SECTION 3 . LAND USE DISTRICTS
b. Relationship to Other Regulations. While
the Jefferson County Floodplain Manage-
ment Ordinance requires consistency with all
other applicable laws. In the event that a
conflict should exist the sbicter standard
shail apply to the regulated development.
3.6.7 Geologically Hazardous Areas.
a. Classlfication/Deslgnatlon.
(1) Classification. Geologically haz-
ardous areas shaD be classified based
upon a combination of erosion.
landslide and seismic hazard.
(2) Designation. The foIIowlng erosion,
landslide and seismic hazard areas
,shaD be sUbject to the standards of
this section:
i. Erosion Hazard Areas. Areas
containing soils or soil com-
plexes described and mapped
within the United States Depart-
ment of Agriculture! Soil
Conservation Service Soil
SUrvey for Jefferson County as
havi1l9 a severe or very severe
erosion hazard potential.
ii. landslide Hazard Areas. Areas
potentially subject to mass
movement due to a combination
of geologic, topographic and
hydrologic factors including:
A. Areas of historic failures or
potentially unstable slopes,
such as:
1. areas described and
mapped as having
severe or very severe
building 6mitations for
dweIfings withoUt
basements within the
United States Depart-
ment of Agriculture!
Soil Conservation
Service SoIl Survey
for Jefferson County;
2. areas described and
mapped as recent or
old landslides or
slopes of unstable
materials within the
Washington State
Department of
Ecology Coastal Zone
3-18
Atlas of Jefferson
County; and
3. areas descnbed and
mapped as areas of
poor natural stability.
former landslides and
recent landslides by
the Washington State
Department of Natural
Resources, Division
of Geology and Earth
Resources.
B. Areas potentially unstable
as a result of rapid stream
Incision. stream bank
erosion, or undercutting by
wave action; and
C. Areas with any Indications
of earth movement. such
as:
1. rockslides;
2. earthflows;
3. mudftows; and
4. landslides.
Iii. Seismic Hazard Areas. Areas
subject to severe risk of damage
as a result of earthquake
induced ground shaking. slope
failure. set6ement, soU lique-
faction, or surface faulting.
These areas are identified by
the presence of: poorly drained
solis with greater than fifty
percent (50%) silt and very litUe
coarse material; loose sand or
gravel. ,peat, artificial flU and
landslide materials; or soil units
with high organic content
(3) Sources Used for identification.
Sources used to identify geologically
hazardous areas include, but are not
6mited to:
i. United States Department of
AgriCulturelSoU Conservation
Service, SoIl Survey for
Jefferson County.
iI. Washington State Department of
Ecology, Coastal Zone Atlas.
iii. Washington State Department of
Natural Resources, Slope
Stability and Geologic MaPS of
Eastem Jefferson County.
unmelt Development Code
Section 3 . Land Use Districts
'P'-""~'~W"-'-~'-_,d'5f
SECTION 3 . LAND USE DISTRICTS
iv. Washington State Department of
Natural Resources, Geographic
Infonnation System: Soil Survey.
v. Washington State Department of
Natural Resources, Geologic
Maps of Eastem Jefferson
County, Compressibility of Earth
Materials in Eastem Jefferson
County.
vi. United States Department of the
Interior, USGS Quad Maps.
(4) Geologic Hazard Area Maps. The
maps prepared by the County using
the identification sources listed in this
section have been produced for infor-
mational purposes only and are not
regulatory devices fonning an integral
part of this ordinance.
b. Protection Standards.
(1) General. Application for a project on a
parcel of real property containing a
designated geologically hazardous
area or its buffer shall adhere to the
requirements set forth below.
(2) Drainage and Erosion Control.
i. An applicant submitting a project
application shall also submit,
and have approved, a drainage
and erosion control plan, as
specified in this section, when
the project application involves
either of the following:
A. The alteration of a geo-
logically hazardous area or
its buffer; or
B. The creation of a new
parcel within a known geo-
logically hazardous area.
ii. Drainage and erosion control
plans required under this section
shall discuss, evaluate and
recommend methods to mini-
mize sedimentation of adjacent
properties during and after
construction.
ili. Surface . drainage shall not be
directed across the face of a
marine bluff, landslide hazard or
ravine. The applicant must
demonstrate that the stonnwater
discharge cannot be accom-
modated onsite or upland by evi-
dence of a geotechnical report,
unless waived by the Admini-
strator. If drainage must be
discharged from a bluff to
adjacent waters, it shall be
collected above the face of the
bluff arid directed to the water by
tight line drain and provided with
an energy dissipating device at
the shoreline, above OHWM.
iv. In addition to any erosion control
methods specified in the
drainage and erosion control
plan, the Administrator may
require hydroseeding of
exposed or disturbed areas.
(3) Clearing and Grading.
i. In addition to the general
clearing and grading provisions
in Section 6, the following
provisions shall also apply:
A. Clearing within geologically
hazardous areas shall be
allowed only from April 1 to
November. 1, unless the
applicant demonstrates that
such activities would not
result in impacts contrary to
the protection requirements
herein;
B. Only that clearing neces-
sary to install temporary
sedimentation and erosion
control measures shall
occur prior to clearing for
roadways or utilities;
C. Clearing limits for roads,
septic, water and storm-
water utilities, and tempo-
rary erosion control facilities
shall be marked in the field
and approved by the
Administrator prior to any
alteration of existing native
vegetation;
D. Clearing for roads and
utilities shall remain within
construction limits which
must be marked in the field
prior to commencement of
site work; and
E. The authorized clearing for
roads and utilities shall be
the minimum necessary to
Unified Development Code
Section 3 . Land Use Districts
3-19
"~'>2~z'~,~"-'''..~.
~."
SECTION 3 . LAND USE DISTRICTS
accomplish project specific
engineering designs and
shall remain within ap-
proved rights-of-way.
ii. The following provisions regard-
ing grading shall apply:
A. An applicant submitting a
project application shall also
submit, and have approved,
a grading plan, as specified
in this section, when the
application involves either
of the following:
1. The alteration of a
geologically hazard-
ous area or its buffer;
or
2. The creation of a new
parcel within a known
geologically hazard-
ous area.
B. Excavation, grading and
earthwork construction
regulated under this section
shall only be allowed from
April 1 to November 1,
unless the applicant demon-
strates that such activities
would not result in impacts
contrary to the protection
requirements herein.
(4) Vegetation Retention. The following
provisions regarding vegetation
retention shall apply: '
i. During clearing for roadways
and utilities, all trees and
understory lying outside of
approved construction limits
shall be retained: Provided that
understory damaged during
approved clearing operations
may be pruned.
ii. Damage to vegetation retained
during initial clearing activities
shall be minimized by directional
felling of trees to avoid
environmentally sensitive areas
and vegetation to be retained.
iii. Retained trees, understory and
stumps may, subsequently be
cleared only if such clearing is
necessary to complete the
proposal involved in the
triggering application.
(5) Buffer Marking. The location of the
outer extent of landslide hazard area
buffers shall be marked in the field' as
follows:
i. A permanent physical separation
along the boundary of the
landslide hazard area shall be
installed and permanently
maintained. Such separation
may consist of logs, a tree or
hedge row, fencing, or other
prominent physical marking
approved by the Administrator.
ii. Buffer perimeters shall be
marked with temporary signs at
an interval of one per parcel or
every one hundred (100) feet,
whichever is less. Signs shall
remain in place prior to and
during approved construction
activities. The signs shall
contain the following statement:
"Landslide Hazard Area & Buffer
- Do Not Remove or Alter Exist-
ing Native Vegetation."
iii. In the case of short plat, long
plat, binding site plan or site
plan approvals under this Code,
the applicant shall include on the
face of any such instrument the
boundary of the landslide hazard
area and its buffer.
(6) Buffers - Standard Requirements.
The following landslide hazard area
buffer provisions shall apply:
i. Buffer areas shall be required to
provide sufficient separation
between the landslide hazard
area and the adjacent proposed
project.
ii. The appropriate width of the
landslide hazard area buffer
shall be determined by either:
application of the standard
buffer width set forth below; or,
by acceptance of a geotechnical
report meeting the criteria of this
section.
iii. Buffers shall remain naturally
vegetated. Where buffer
disturbance has occurred during
3-20
Unified Development Code
Section 3 . Land Use Districts
construction. replanting with
native vegetation shaD be
required. .
iv. Buffers shaD be retained in their
natural condition. however.
minor pruning. of vegefatiQn to
enhance views may be
penniUed by the Administrator
on a case by case basis.
v. /II buffers shall be measUred
perpendicularly from I1e top, toe
or edge of the IandsIde hazard
~ boundary.
vi. A standard buffer of thirty (30)
feet shall be established from
the top. toe and aI edges of
landslide hazard areas.
-.... - ....._,- ....- -.- '" .... - -~
(7) Reducing Buffer Widths. The
AdminisIrator may reduce the standard
landslide hazard area bufferwidth only
when the project applicant
demorlShates. to the satisfaction of the
AdrMlisIIator, that the project cannot
meet the reqtRd seIback.. The
reduced buffer must adecptalely ,
profec:t the proposed project and the
landslide hazard area to the maxinun
extent possible.. Under no c:iR:um-
stances shall the buffer width be
reduced to less th8n fifteen (15) teet.
. (8) IncntasIng Buffer WidIhs. The
AdminisIrator may Increas e the
stalldaI'd IandsIde hazard area buffer
widIh' when a larger buller is
necesSalY to.protect the proposed
project and the landslide hazard area.
This determination shall be made
when the Administrator c:Iemon$bates
eny one of the following through
appropriate documentation:
L The IandsIde area is oostabIe
and ac6ve.
i. The ac:Ijaari land is suscepIibIe
to Sevete landslide or erosion.
and erosion c:onboI measures
will not effectively protect the
proposed project or the IandsIde
hazard area.
ii. The adjacent land has minimal
vegetative cover.
(9) Geotechnical Report.
L An ~ submitting a project
application shaI submit, and
Unified Development Code
Secfioo 3 . Land Use DistIicts
.
SECTION 3 . lAND Use DISTRICTS
have approved, a geotechnical
report. as specified in Section
3.6.10 of this Code, wheI1 the
application involves any of the
following:
A. The alteration of a IandsIde
hazard area or its buffer.
B. The aeation of a new
pan:eI within a known
IandsIde hazard area.
C. The construction of a
pubIcIy owned faciIty in a
designated seismic. hazard
area.
i. ~ a geotechnical report is
required for.-a IandsIde hazard
',.,.- '-'. "'- .~~ area..the, project,.,appIication
shall not be approved unless the
geotechnical report certifies aI
of the foIowing:
A. TheIe is minknaI IandsIde
hazard as proven by a lack
d evidence of IaIIdsIide
. activity in the vicinity in the
past
B. An analysis of slope stability
idi: a Ie s 1hat the proposal
wllnotbe subjec:tto risk of
1andsIde; or the proposal or
the IandsIde hazard area
can be modified so that haz-
ards are eIminated;
C. The proposal wII not
increase swface water dis-
charge or sedimentation to
adjacert propet1ies' beyond
PredeveIoPmentc:onditions;
D. The proposal wiD not :
deaease slope stability on
adjacert properties; and
E. /II newly aeated buikIng
sites wiI be $1abIe Wlder
normal geologic conditions
(If applicable).
Ii. Where a geotechnical report is
required 10r a seismic hazard
area. Ute project application
shaH not be approved unless the
geotechnical report demon-
strates that the proposed project
wII adequately protect Ute pubrlC'
safety.
3-21
m",w"'2?13:~~""'a 2ff
SECTION 3 . lAND Use DISTRICTS
".
c. Concrrtions.
(1) General. In granting approval for a
project application subject to the
provisions of this section. the
Administrator may require mitigating
conditions tf)at will,' in the
Administrato(~ judgment. substantially
sean the objectives of this section.
(2) Basis for Conditions. AI condiIions
of approval requked ptnUant '> this
secIion shall be based upon eiIher the
substantive reqtftments of this
section or the, recommenda6ons of a
quaIfied professional. confained wiIhin
a special report reqWed under this
section.
. 3.6.8 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas.
a. ~ Fish and
wikmfe habitat areas (FWHAs) include both
aquaIic and terrestrial areas wfIhin Jefferson
County. The appn>>cinlate location and an
of criticaf fish and wiIdUfe habitat areas are
displayed in the Washington 0epaI1ment of
Fish & WIc8e's (WDfW) Priorily Habiiat
and Species (PHS) Program datab6-.. The
foIowing designaIions shall be used in
classifying ESAs '> be regcllafed under tis
section.
(1) AI seasonal ranges and habitat.
elements 'wiIh which &fate Istad
cancIdate and moniIor species or
priority game and non-game species
have a primary associalioo.
(2) AI habitats wiIh which species of local
inIportaace have a primary
association. '
(3) Those waters that meet the aIeria tOr
~ 1, 2. 3. 4 and 5 sbeams as set
forth in Chapter 222-16-030 WAC.
(4) Areas whh which federal or slate
endangered. threatened. and sensiUve
species of fish and wiIdIfe have a
primary assocIa6on.
b. Sources, Used for identification. Sources
used to identify fish and wildlife habitat areas
Include. but are not Imited '>:
(1) United Slates 0epaI1ment of the
interior. Fish and WIcIie Service,
National Wetlands Inventory. .
(2) -.Washington State Department of
NaUaI Resources, Water Type Index
Maps.
(3) Washington State Department of Fish
and Wildlife. Non-Game and Priority
Habitats_and SpecIes Data Bases.
c. Fish and Wddlife Habitat Area Maps. The
above maps have been produced for
infonnationaf purposes only and are not
reguIafoIy devices forming an Integral part of
this section.
d. Exempt Activities. The following uses shall
be allowed within a FWHA or its buffer if
they are not prohibited by any other ~,
provided they are conducted so as to
minimize any impact on the function and
character of the FHWA or its buffer. and
provided they are consistent with an
County-approved Habitat Management ~
or other Special Report requiied by this
sec6on. or any state or federaIy approved
management plan for an endangered.
....eatened, or sensitive species.
(1) ReconsIruc6on of sIruclures desfroyed
by fire or other means. provided that
completed application tOr reconsfruo.
lion OCCUIS within the previous
sIrucIuraI footprint and wiIhin two (2)
years of the destruc6on. ThIs provision
Is Intended to apply only to that poItion
of a buikIng which Ies wiIhin a FWHA
or Is buffer. .
(2) "1"h&'removaI of 'nwdOus-'Weeds from
buffer areas. --
(3) 8dsting and ongoing landscaping
activities (such as lawn and garden
maintenance) and existing and ongoing
agriculture activities on lands enroIed in
the Open Space Tax Program for
agriculUe or on lands designated as
Agricultural L..ands of , Long-Term
Commercial Significance on the official,
map of Comprehensive Plan Land Use
Designations. For the purpose of this
section. existing and ongoing means
that agricufturaf activities have been
conducted within the five-year period
leacing up to the adoption of Ordinance
No. 05-0428-03 on April 28, 2003.
(4) The enhancement of a buffer by
planting indigenous vegetaUon.
(5) The construction of traIs which shall
be unpaved when located in the buffer
areas and elevated when located in
wetlands. which are not intended for
motorized use, and which are no wider
than five (5) feet, mIess additional
width Is necessary for safety along a
predpice. steep ~. or other
hazardous area.
(6) Harvesting wild crops which do not
significantly affect the viabIiIy of the
wild crop. 1he function of the FISh and
WIdIife Habitat Area or regulated
buffer (does not Include tiling of soli or
alteration of the Ash and Wildlife
Habitat Area. except as provided in
(3). above).
(7) Any of the General ExempUons
authorized by Section 3.6.4. .
3-22
Unified Development Code
Section 3 - Land Use Districts
Amended by Ordinance No. 06-0510-04
\
I qq,-:":a;g~<
,
,
SECTION 3 . LAND USE DISTRICTS
the applicant shall include on the
face of any such instrument the
boundary of the streamside
buffer area.
iv. The applicant may also choose
to dedicate the buffer through a
conservation easement or deed
restriction that shall be recorded
with the Jefferson County
Auditor. Such easements or
restrictions shall, however, use
the forms approved by the.
Prosecuting Attorney.
h. Conditions.
(1) General. In granting approval for a
project application subject to the
provisions of this section, the
Administrator may require mitigating
conditions that will, in the Admini-
strator's judgment, substantially
secure the objectives of this section.
(2) Basis for Conditions. All conditions
of approval required pursuant to this
section shall be based upon either the
substantive requirements of this
section or the recommendations of a
qualified professional utilizing best
available science, contained within a
special report required under this
section.
3.6.9 Wetlands.
a. ClassificationlDesignation.
(1) Classification. Wetlands shall be
classified using the Washington State
Department of Ecology's Wetland
Rating System for Western Washing-
ton, 2nd Edition, 1993. Wetland
delineations shall be determined by
using the Washington State Wetlands
Identification and Delineation Manual,
March 1997, or as amended hereafter.
(2) Designation. As determined using the
Washington State Department of
Ecology's Wetland Rating System for
Western Washington, 2nd Edition,
1993, all Category I wetlands,
Category II wetlands 2,500 square feet
or larger in size and Category III and
IV wetlands 10,000 square feet or
larger in size, shall be subject to the
standards of this section.
(3) Sources Used for Identification.
Sources used to identify designated
3-28 '
wetlands include, but are not limited
to:
i. United States Department of the
Interior, Fish and Wildlife
Service, National Wetlands
Inventory.
ii. Areas identified as hydric soils,
soils with significant soil inclu-
sions and "wet spots" within the
United States Department of
Agriculture/Soil Conservation
Service Soil Survey for Jefferson
County.
iii. Washington State Department of
Natural Resources, Geographic
Information System: Hydro-
graphyand Soils Survey Layers.
(4) Wetland Maps. The wetland maps
prepared by the County have been
produced for informational purposes
only and are not regulatory devices
forming an integral part of this section.
b. Regulated Activities. Any land use or
development activity shall be subject to the
provisions of this Section, induding but not
limited to the following activities which are
directly undertaken or originate in a
regulated wetland or its buffer, unless
exempted:
(1) The removal, excavation, grading, or
dredging of material of any kind,
including the construction of ponds
and trails;
(2) The dumping, discharging, or filling of
any material;
(3) The draining, flooding, or disturbing of
the wetland water level or water table;
(4) The driving of pilings;
(5) The placing of obstructions;
(6) The construction, reconstruction,
demolition, or expansion of any
structure;
(7) The destruction or alteration of
wetland vegetation through clearing,
harvesting, shading, intentional burn-
ing, application of herbicides or
pesticides, or planting of vegetation
that would alter the character of a
regulated we~and, provided that these
activities are not part of a forest
practice governed under Chapter
Unified Development Code
""'""""'5"~"~""~"~'''~ Section 3 . Land Use Districts
/1,.,,,,. ,d:$Q
76.09 RCW (Forest Practices Act) and
its rules; or
(8) Activities that result in:
i. A significant change of water
temperature;
i. A significant change of PhYsical
or chemical characteristics of
wetlands water sources,
including quantity; or
it The i*oduction of poIIuIants.
c. Exempt ActivIties.
(1) Weaancb. The following uses shall be
&lowed within a regulated wetland
without having ., meet the protection
standa.ds. or requirements for wetland
studies or mitigation set bfh in this
sec6on, I they are not prohibited by
any other law. However, forest prac-
tices and COIlveI1ions are governed by
.Chapter 76.09 RCW and Its rules.
L Normal maintenance, repair, or
operation of existing structures,
facilities. or improved areas.
such as on-site septic systems,
lawns, landscaping. orchards,
gardens. traIs, and driveways.
Maintenance and repair do not
Include any modification that
changes the character, scope,
or size of the original sbucture,
facIity, or improved area. and do
not Include 1he consbuction of a
maintenance road.
i. Modification or expansion of
existing uses and structures,
pursuant ., the requirements of
the nonconforming use and
sbucture provisions of this Code.
ii. Outdoor recreational activities,
including hunting' and fishing
(pursuant to state law),
blrdwatchlng. hiking, bicycrmg,
boating. and swimming.
Iv. The harvesting of wild crops In a
manner that is not Injwious to
natural reproduction of such
crops and provided the
harvesting does not require
t1lrmg soil, planting crops. or
changing existing topography,
water conditions, or water
sources.
v. Existing and ongoing agricultural
activities on lands enrolled in the
Open Space Tax Program for
agriculture or on lands
designated as Agricultural Lands
of Long-Term Commercial
Significance on theoUnified Development Code
Section 3 - Land Use Districts
Amended by Ordinance No. 06-0510-04
SECTION 3 . lAND USE DISTRICTS
... .,.
official map ,of Comprehensive
Plan Land" Use Designations.
For the purpose of this section,
existing and drigoing means th!'it
agricultural activities have been
conducted within the five-year ,
period leading up to the adoptipn
of Ordinance No. 05-0428-03 on
April 28, 2003 .
vi. NonnaI maintenance, but not
consfruction. of drainage
citches.
vi. Use of existing nature flails.
vii. IrstaIIa60n of navigation aids
and boundary maricet's.
Ix. Site inves6gaIive WOlfe neces-
saty for a project application
submiIfaI. such as SUIWyS, soil
logs, pen:oIation tests, and other
related adMUes. In every case,
weiand ,~ .~ be
.... ., .. ' .. ,--- -Ihtriiriiized and c:IiStiiitiea areas
shaI be ImmediatelY restored.
x. 0rIIing or digging and main-
tenance of weBs, provided that
wetland ImpacIs are minimized
and cIsUbed areas are immedi-
~ restored.
(2) WeUand Buffers. In addition to those
activities &lowed in regulated wetlands
In this Section. 1he following activities
are allowed wiIhin wetland buffers
wifhout having ., meet the protection
standards. or ~ forweUand
studies or mitigation set forth In this
sec6on. provided that ~ to
buffers are minimized and that
disbJrbed areas are immecfl8tely
restored except as specifically allowed
in subsection (2)J. below.
I. In association with a single
famIy residence only, the
establishment and expansion of
lawns, landscaping. orohards,
gardens. and fences, provided
that:
A. Lawns. landscaping, or.
chards. and gardens shaD
be allowed within the outer
25 percent of the buffer
widfh where no reasonable
alternative is available. No
strucIure other than fences
nor any Impervious surface
shaI be included In the
above: and
B. Fences shaH be designed to
allow the unimpeded pas-
sage of sudace water
beneath them.
3-29
''''''''''''''-7''''''--,. =....,. .,,~..-
lu~c,.C).5g
"".~.J".".,.,".".=-.,..c."" ..........,......"".".~.....>.,'",.,~'"
SEcTION 3 .i..ANo USE DISTRICTS
ii. ActiviIies having minimal
adverse Impads on buffers and
no adverse impacts on regulated
wetlands. These include low
intensity, passive recreational
activI6es. such as pervious
1raIs. I1OIIpe1manent wildlife
watcNng blinds. scientific O!:
edutaIionaI activi6es. and spoI1S
~ or ~. TiaiIs wifhin
buIfer.s shaI be designed to
ntiI_1mpads to the weUand"
and shaI not Include my
ImpeMous Slriaces.
Ii. Witin 1he buffers. of CategoIy III
and rv weIIaIlds only, vegQ-
IatJon.Ined swales designed b'
sfonnwater management or
conveyance when topographic
restrainls detemlill81here are no
other ~ alternative 1oca-
tions. Swales used b' detention
purposes may onIy'be placed In
the outer 25 pen::ent of 1he
buffer. Conveyance swales may
be ,Placed hoUgh the buffer, I
necessaIY.
d.' ProtectIon SfandanIs.
(1) General. Application tOr 8 project on 8
parCQI of real property c:onIahWlg 8
~ weIaIld or Is buffer shaI
acI1ere to 1he Ieqt*ements set b1h
below.
(2) DeUnGatIon. hi applicant submit6ng 8
pcoJect application shall also submit.
and have approved. a weiand
deIineaticin report., as specified in
~ 3.6.10(1). MditionalIy, 1he
following pf'OVisions shaft apply:
L The IocaCion of ttie we'tIand and
Is boundaty shaI be detennIned
1hrough the performance of 8
field Investigation utilizing the
. meChodoIogy contained In the
Wa$hIngton state Wetlands
IdentiIication and Delineation
Manual, Man:h 1997, or 8S
amended hereafter.
Ii. If the wetland Is located off of
the property kwoIved In the
project application and Is
inaccessible. the best 8~
Information shaH be used to
3-30
. determine the weUand boundary
, and class.
Ii. Mer approval of the deIneation
report.' the wefand boundary
shall be staked and lagged In
1he field.
Iv. ThIs requirement may be waived.
l.Ilder the foIowing circum-
stances:
A. Slngle-:-amiIy ResIdences.
The requirement b' a
weiand delileation and
special report may be
waived. tOr construcIion of a
sIngIe..famIy residence on
an existing lot of record I
field lnVesligalioii by Coooty
staff Indicates 1he foIoWing:
1. Sufticient InIOmtation
exists for sI:aIf to
estimate 1he b0un-
daries of 8 weiand,
wIIhout a deIneation;
and
2. The singIe-famIy resi-
dence and aI acces-
fJtJfY strucbes and
uses are not pr0-
posed ~ be located
wifhin. the distances
identified In Table 3-3,
below, from the
estinlated wea8nd
boundaty.
B. Subdivisions 'and Short
Subdivisions. The reqth-
ment for a wetland de1inea-
tion and spedaI report 'WIll
be waived for subc:Iivislons
and short subdivisions of an
existing lot of Iecocd I field
Investigation by County staff
indicates the following:
1. SUfticient Itlfonllation
exists for sI:aIf to
estimate the b0un-
daries of a wetland
without a delineation;
and
2. BuIding envelopes or
building setback &nes
are not proposed to
be located within the
.\ ':t} .1.. . a..~
Unified Development Code
. Section 3 . Land Use DistIicts
SECTION 3 . LAND USE DISTRICTS
distances identified in
Table 3-3, below, from
the estimated wetland
boundary.
Table 3.3. Minimum Wetland Buffers Necessary
as part of Qualifying for a Waiver from
Delineation and Special Report
Requirements.(1.2.3)
I
II
III
IV
Required Distance from
Estimated Wetland Boundary
(feet)14)
225
150
75
37
tained. Such separation may
consist of logs, a tree or hedge
row, or other prominent physical
marking approved by the
Administrator.
ii. Buffer perimeters shall be
marked with temporary signs at
an interval of one per parcel or
every one hundred (100) feet,
whichever is less. Signs shall
remain in place prior to and
during approved construction
activities. The signs shall
contain the following statement:
"Wetland & Buffer - Do Not
Remove or Alter Existing Native
Vegetation."
iii. In the case of short plat, long
plat, binding site plan, and site
plan approvals under this Code,
the applicant shall include on the
face. of any such instrument the
boundary of the wetland and its
buffer.
iv. The applicant may also choose
to dedicate the buffer through a
conservation easement or deed
restriction that shall be recorded
with the Jefferson County..
Auditor. Such easements or
restrictions shall, however, use
the forms approved by the
Prosecuting Attomey.
(5) Buffers - Standard Requirements.
The following buffer provisions shall
apply:
i. Buffer areas shall be required to
provide sufficient separation
between the designated wetland
and the adjacent proposed
project. .
ii. The appropriate width of the
wetland buffer shall be
determined by either:
application of the standard
buffer widths set forth below in
Table 3-4; or by variations to the
standard buffers as allowed in
Sections 3.6.9(d)(6), 3.6.9(d)(7),
or 3.6.9(d)(8), below.
iii. Buffers shall remain naturally
vegetated except where the
vegetation has been disturbed,
inva~~:~i~ ~?'t'desirable
Wetland
Category
Notes:
1. These buffers are one part of the comp~te
requirements necessary to qualify for a waiver. See
Section 3.6.9.d.2 above.
2. These are not staOdard weUand buffers: they are
optional buffers for cases when a delineation is not
made. These minimum waiver buffers, shown in Table
3-3, are 1.5 times the standard buffer widths identified
in this section. If a single-family residence, building
envelope, or setback line in a subdivision is proposed
to be closer to the weUand than the distance identified
in the table, a weUand delineation report must be
performed.
3. The same opportunities for exemption from delineation
shall apply to uncategorized weUands. The Department
of Community Development shall be responsible for
determining the weUand category.
4. The following shall not be located within the distances
identified in the table: 1) single-family residences and
all accessory structures and uses; 2) subdivision
building envelopes and setback lines.
(3) Drainage and Erosion Control. An
applicant submitting a project
application shall also submit, and have
approved, a drainage and erosion
control plan as specified in this
Section. The plan shall discuss,
evaluate and recommend methods to
minimize sedimentation of designated
wetlands during and after construction.
(4) Buffer Marking. Upon approval of the
delineation report the location of the
outer extent of the wetland buffer shall
. be marked in the field as follows:
i. A permanent physical separation
along the upland boundary of
the wetland buffer area shall be
installed and permanently main-
Unified Development Code
Section 3 . Land Use Districts
." ."''''''~_A'''~'-'~'-'''';.'---f1
lt~",d~",
SECTION 3 . LAND USE DISTRICTS
Table 3-4.
Wetland
Category
species (e.g., noxious weeds),
or would substantially benefit
from the increased diversity of
introduced species. Where
buffer disturbance has occurred
during construction, replanting
with native vegetation shall be
required. Minor pruning of
vegetation to enhance views
and removal of undesirable
species (e.g., alders) may be
permitted by the Administrator
on a case-by-case basis.
iv. All buffers shall be measured
perpendicularly from the wetland
boundary as surveyed in the
field. '
Standard wetland buffer widths
shall be as established in Table
3-4.
Standard Buffer Widths for Wetlands
Standard
Buffer Width
Department demonstrates anyone of
the following through appropriate
documentation:
i. A larger buffer is necessary to
maintain viable populations of
existing species.
ii. The wetland is used by species
listed by the Washington State
Department of Wildlife as
endangered, threatened, or
sensitive, or has documented
priority species or habitats or
essential or outstanding poten-
. tial habitat for those species, or
has unusual nesting or resting
sites (e.g., heron rookeries and
raptor nesting trees).
iii. The adjacent land is susceptible
to severe landslide or erosion,
and erosion control measures
will not effectively prevent
adverse wetland impacts.
iv. The adjacent land has minimal
vegetative cover or slopes
greater than forty-five (45)
percent.
(8) Averaging Buffer Widths. The
Administrator may modify the standard
wetland buffer widths set forth in this
section by averaging. Buffer width
averaging shall be allowed only when
an individual or firm meeting the
criteria of Subsection 3.6.100)(2)
demonstrates all of the following to the
satisfaction of the Administrator:
i. Width averaging will not
adversely impact the wetland
functional values.
ii. The total area contained within
the wetland buffer after averag-
ing is not less than that
contained within the standard
buffer prior to averaging.
iii. The standard buffer width has
not been reduced by more than
twenty-five (25) percent.
e. Non..compensatory Enhancement. Non-
compensatory enhancement are those
wetland enhancement projects which are
conducted solely to increase the functions
and values of an existing wetland and which
are not required to be conducted pursuant to
the.. mitigation requirements of Section
v.
I
II
III
IV
150 ft
100 ft
SOft
25ft
3-32
(6)
Reducing Buffer Widths. The
Administrator may reduce the standard
wetland buffer widths, when the
project applicant demonstrates both of
the following to the satisfaction of the
Administrator:
i. Standard wetland buffer width
averaging as set forth in this
section is unfeasible.
ii. The project application includes
a buffer enhancement plan using
native vegetation which sub-
stantiates that an enhanced
buffer will improve the functional
attributes of the buffer to provide
additional protection for func-
tions and values.
Increasing Buffer Widths. The
Administrator may increase the
standard wetland buffer widths when a
larger buffer is necessary to protect
wetland functions and values based
on local conditions. This determination
shall be made only when the
(7)
\
d/(;~
Unified Development Code
Section 3 . Land Use Districts
l~q
SECTION 3 · lAND USE DISTRICTS.
3.6.9.1, below. There are two types of non-
compensatory enhancement
(1) Type 1 Non-Compensatory
Enhancement. Type 1 non-
compensatofy enhancement projects
involve the filling, draining, or
excavating of a regulated wetland. All
applications for Type 1 non-
compensatofy enhancement projects
shaI be accompanied by an
enhancement plan prepared in
accordance with subsections (1)i-.Ii,
below, which demonstrates that the
proposed activities wiI result in an
increase In wetland functions and
values.
I. The enhancement plan must.be
submitted for review and
approval by the AdminisIrator.
Ii. The enhancement plan must
either be prepared by a qualified
wetlands consultant or accepted
In writing by the U.S. FISh and
Wildlife Service, the Washington
Department of FISh and Wildfife,
or the Washington Department
of Ecology.
(2) Type 2 Non-Compensatory
Enhancement. Type 2 n0n-
compensatory enhancement projects
Involve wetland alterations that do not
Include the filling, draining, or
excavating of a regulated wetland.
Such projects might involve the
removal of non-native plant species or
the planting of native plant species. All
applications for Type 2 non-
compensatofy enhancement projects
shaH be accompanied by an
enhancement plan prepared In
accordance with subsections (2)i-.lii,
below, which demonstrates that the
proposed activities wiI result'ln an
Increase in wetland functions and
values.
- - i. . The enhancement plan shaH be
submitted for review and
approval by the Administrator;
Ii. The enhancement plan must
Include a detailed description of
the activity including the
following Information:
A. The goal of the enhance-
ment project;
B. What plants, if any, will be
removed or planted;
C. How the activity will be
conducted, including the
type(s) of tools or machin-
ery to be used; and
O. The qualifications of the
Individual who wiI be
conducting the enhance-
ment activity. .
iii. The enhancement plan must
either be prepared by a qualified
wetlands consultant or accepted '.
in writing by the U.S. FISh and
Wddlife Service, the Washington
Department of FISh and Wildlife,
or the Washington Department
of Ecology.
f. Mitigation. The overaU goal of mitigation
shaI be rio net loss of wetland function,
value, and acreage.
(1) Mitigation Sequence. Mitigation.
includes avoiding, minimizing, or
compensating for adverse impacts to
regulated wetlands or their buffers.
When a proposed use or development
activity poses potentially significant
adverse Impacts to a regulated
Wetland or Its buffer, the preferred
sequence of mitigation as defined
below shaH be followed. unless the
applicant demonstrates that an
overriding public benefit would warrant
an exception to this preferred
sequence.
I. Avoiding the inpact altogether
by not taking a certain. action. or
parts of actions on that portion
of the site which contains the
regulated wetland or Its buffer;
ii. Minimizing inpacts by limiting
the degree or magnitude of the
action and Its Implementation;
iii. Rectifying the impact by
repairing, rehabilitating, or
restoring the affected
environment;
iv. Reducing or eliminating the
impact over time by preservation
and maintenance operations
during the life of the action; or
v. Compensating for the impact by
replacing, enhancing, or provid-
Unified Development Code
Section 3 . Land Use Districts
3-33
",:?C",...,:.......-.:.,...."....,,:M~'"'.......,.
IJ:D .~
SECTION 3 . lAND USE DISTRICTS
ing substitute resources or
environments.
(2) Compensatory Mitigatlon-General
Requirements. As a condition of any
permit or other approval allowing
alteration which results in the loss or
degradation of regulated weUands, or
as an enforcement action pursuant to
Section 10 of this Code, compensatory
mitigation shaD be required to offset
impacts resulting from the actions of
the app&cant or any Code violator.
i. Except persons exempt under
this Section, any person who
alters or proposes to alter
regulated wetlands shaD restore
or create areas of weiand
equivalent to or larger than
those altered in order to
compensate for wetland losses.
The following Table 3-5 specifies
the ratios that apply to creation
or restoration which is in-kind,
on-site, and is accomplished
prior to or concurrenUy with
alteration:
Table 3-5. Required Replacement RatIos for
Compensatory Wetland Mitigation.
Wetland Category
Replacement Ratio(1)
6:1
I
II or III
. Forested
. Saub-SIvub
. Emergent
3:1
2:1
2:1
1.25:1
IV
Note:
1. The first number In the ratio specifies the aaeage of
weUands to be created, and the second number
specifies the aaeage of wetlands proposed to be
altered or lost The replacement ratios are derived
from Department of Ecology Publication No. 97-112
(1998): -....ow Ecology Regulates WeUands."
2. Enhancement of existing weUands, may be considered
as compensation; but above ratios must then be
doubled. _
3. Compensation must be completed prior to wetland
destruction, where possible.
4. Compensatory mitigation must follow an approved
compensatory mitigation plan pursuant to this section,
with the replacement ratios as speclfied above.
5. Compensatory mitigation must be conducted on
property which will be protected and managed to avoid
further development or degradation. The applicant or
Code violator must provide for long-term preservation
of the compensation area.
6. The applicant shall demonstrate sufficient scientific
expertise, supervisory capability, and financial
resources, Including bonding, to cany out the project.
The applicant must demonstrate the capability for
monitoring the site and maklng cooeclions if the project
fails to meet projected goals.
(3) Compensatory Mitigation - Type,
location, and TIming.
i. . Priority wiD be given to in-kind,
on-site compensation if feasible
and if the wetland to be lost has
a moderate to high functional
value.
Ii. When the wetland to be
impacted is of a limited
functional vaJue and is
degraded, compensation may be
of the weUand community type
most likely to succeed with the
highest functional value
possible.
Iii. Out-of-kind compensation may
be allowed when out-of-kind
replacement wiD best meet
identified goals (for example,
replacement of historically
diminished wetland types).
Where out-of-kind replacement
is accepted, greater acreage
replacement ratios may be
required to compensate for lost
functional values.
iv. OIf-site compensation can be
allowed only if:
A On-site compensation is not
feasible due to hydrology,
soKs, waves, or other
factors;
B. On-site compensation is not
practical due to probable
adverse Impacts from
surrounding land uses;
C. Potential functional values
at the site of the proposed
restoration are significantly
greater than the lost
wetland functional values;
or
D. OIf-site compensation will
be conducted in accordance
with Section 3.6.9.f(4)
(Cooperative Compensation
Projects).
3-34
Unified Development Code
Section 3 . Land Use Districts
,~nded by Ordinance No. 05-0428-03
a..~i
v.
SECTION 3 . LAND USE DISTRICTS
vi.
Except in the case of
cooperative compensation
projects, off-site compensation
must occur within the same
watershed where the wetland
loss occurs, provided that
Category-IV wetlands may be
replaced outside of the
watershed if there is no
reasonable technical alternative.
The stormwater storage function
provided by Category-IV wet-
lands must be provided for within
the design of the development
project
Except in the case of
cooperative compensation pro-
jects, in selecting compensation
sites applicants must pursue
locations in the following order of
preference:
A Filled, drained, or cleared
sites which were formerly
wetlands and where appro-
priate hydrology exists; and
B. Upland sites, adjacent to
wetlands, if the upland is
significantly disturbed and
does not contain a mature
forested or shrub com-
munity of native species,
and where the appropriate
natural hydrology exists.
Construction of compensation
projects must be timed to reduce
impacts to existing wildlife and
flora. Construction must be
timed to assure that grading and
soil movement occurs during the
dry season. Planting of vege-
tation must be specifically timed
to the needs of the target
species.
Cooperative Compensation
Projects. The County may
encourage, facilitate, and
approve cooperative projects
where one or more applicants, or
an organization with
demonstrated capability, may
undertake a compensation
project if it is demonstrated that
Creation of one or several larger
wetlands may be preferable to
many small wetlands;
vii.
(4)
i.
Unified Development Code
Section 3 . Land Use Districts
Amended by Ordinance No. 04-0422-02
ii. The group demonstrates the
organizational and fiscal
capability to act cooperatively;
iii. The group demonstrates that
long term management of the
compensation area can and will
be provided; and
iv. There is a clear potential for
success of the proposed com-
pensation at the identified
compensation site. Conducting
compensation as part of a
cooperative process does not
reduce or eliminate the required
replacement ratios outlined in
this Section.
3.6.10 Special Reports.
a. Waivers. The Administrator many waive the
requirement for a special report wh~ an
applicant demonstrates all of the follOWIng:
(1) The proposal involved ~n not af!ect
the environmentally sensitive area In a
manner contrary to the goals,
purposes and objectives of this Code.
(2) The minimum protection standards
required by this section are satisfied.
b. General Contents.
(1) Scale Map and Written Report.
Special reports for environmentally
sensitive areas shall include a scale
map of the development proposal site
and a written report.
(2) Impacts Assessment. The special
report shall identify and characterize
any critical area as a part of the larger
development proposal site, assess
impacts of the development proposal
on any environmentally sensitive areas
on or adjacent to the development
. proposal site, and assess the im~~cts
of any alteration proposed for a cntical
area.
(3) Protection Mechanisms. The special
report shall propose adequate
protection mechanisms that may
include mitigation, maintenance and
monitoring plans, and performance
surety.
(4) Preparer - Proof of Qualifications.
Special reports shall includ~ d?cu-
mentation certifying the qualIfications
of the preparer.
c. Consultants.
(1) Retaining Consultants. Jefferson
County may retain cons~ltants to
assist in the review of Special reports
3-35
LQ~
-""~
,<:3:: ' ',""
SECTION 3 . lAND USE DISTRICTS
outside the range of staff expertise.
The applicant shall pay for the costs of
retaining said consultants.
d. Responsibility.
(1) General. Special reports shall include
documentation certifying the qualifica-
tions of the preparer.
(2) Determining Accuracy and
Sufficiency. The Administrator shall
verify the accuracy and sufficiency of
all special reports.
(3) Nonacceptance of Inaccurate or
Insufficient Reports. If the Admini-
strator finds that a special report does
not accurately reflect site conditions, or
does not incorporate appropriate
protection mechanisms, the Admini-
strator shall issue a report citing
evidence (e.g., soil samples, weD log
data, etc.) that demonstrates where
the special report is insufficient or in
error. The applicant may then either
revise the special report and submit
another special report. or appeal the
administrative determination pursuant
to this Code. .
e. Aquifer Recharge Area Report.
(1) General. Aquifer Recharge Area
Reports serve as the primary means
for Jefferson County to verify the
accuracy of its Critical Aquifer
Recharge Area map and to determine
specific aquifer protection measures to
be applied to prevent significant
adverse groundwater quality impacts.
(2) Aquifer Recharge Area Report
Content An initial evaluation shall be
made by a qualified groundwater
scientist/engineer. The Aquifer
Recharge Area Report shall include:
i. A detailed description of the
project, including all processes
and other activities which have
the potential for contaminating
groundwater.
Ii. A hydrogeologic evaluation
which Includes, at a minimum:
A. A description of the
hydrogeologic setting of the
aquifer region;
B. Site location, topography,
drainage, and surface water
bodies;
C. Soils and geologic units
underlying the site;
3-36
\
l~~
(3)
D. Groundwater characteristics
of the area, including flow
direction and gradient,
and existing groundwater
quality;
E. The location and charac-
teristics of wells and springs
within one thousand (1,000)
feet of the site;
F. An evaluation of existing
groundwater recharge, and;
G. A discussion and evaluation
of the potential impact of the
proposal upon groundwater
recharge.
iii. A contaminant transport analysis
for the uppermost groundwater
supply aquifer assuming an
accidental sptll or release of
project specific contaminants or
on-site sewage. discharge, or
both if applicable;
Iv. A discussion and evaluation that
details available on-site spill
response and containment
equipment, employee spill
response training, and emer-
gency service coordination
measures;
v. Proposed beSt management
practices to minimize exposure
of permeable surfaces to
potential pollutants and to
prevent degradation of ground-
water quality; and;.
vi. Requirements for a monitoring
program with financial
guarantees/assurances that the
monitoring program will be
implemented.
Professional Qualifications. The
minimum qualifications for ground-
water scientists and engineers
performing groundwater and con-
taminant transport evaluations and
preparing Aquifer Recharge Area
Reports shall be established pursuant
to acceptable industry standards for
training and experience and as
established by the State of Wash-
ington in the Washington Admini-
strative Code or by statute.
County Review. Reports shall be
forwarded to the Jefferson County
Environmental Health Division for
technical review. The Environmental
(4)
UnifieJj Development Code
Section '5 - Land Use Districts
~ed by OrdilUlnce No. 07-1224-01
SECTION 3 . lAND USE DISTRICTS
Health Division shall review the
Reports within thirty days of receipt to
determine their adequacy. The
County may request additional
information in order to determine the
adequacy of the Reports. The
Administrator shall determine
appropriate conditions as identified in
the Report to mitigate proposed land
uses. The Administrator shall be
authorized to collect fees necessary
to recover costs associated with
processing and review of Aquifer
Recharge Area Reports.
implementation of the protection
standards contained in this section,
and administration of the general
provisions of the Aquifer Recharge
Area provisions of this Code. Such
fees win be incorporated into the
Jefferson County Fee Schedule.
f. Drainage and Erosion Control Plan.
(1) General. This plan shall address best
management practices which are
physical, structural or managerial
practktes, that when used singly or in
combination, prevent or reduce
pollution of water.
(2) Qualifications of the Preparer.
Drainage and erosion control plans
shall be prepared by a licensed
professional engineer, except for small
parcel erosion control plans.
(3) Information Requirements. The
design standards and information
requirements for submission of
drainage and erosion control plans
shall be established in accordance
with the Department of Ecology's
Stormwater Management Manual
currently adopted by Jefferson County.
g. Geotechnical Report.
(1) General. This report shall include a
description of the geology of the site,
conclusions and recommendations
regarding the effect of geologic
conditions on the proposal, and
opinions and recommendations on the
suitability of the site to be developed.
(2) Qualifications of the Preparer.
Geotechnical reports shall be prepared
by a licensed geotechnical engineer, a
professional geologist, or a licensed
professional engineer knowledgeable
in regional geologic conditions with
professional experience in landslide,
erosion, or seismic hazard evaluation.
(3) Information Requirements.
i. A description of the geologic
setting of the region, based upon
readily available data, including:
A. Site location and
topography;
B. Soils and geologic units
underlying the site; and
C. The location and charac-
teristics of springs within
one thousand (1,000) feet of
the site.
ii. An evaluation of the potential
impact of the proposal upon
existing geological hazards.
iii. A discussion and evaluation of
the potential impact of the
proposal upon existing
geological hazards.
iv. Recommendations on appro-
priate protection mechanisms, if
necessary, to minimize the risk
of erosion or landslide.
h. Grading Plan.
(1) General. This plan shall identify the
proposed development project
including the movement of material
onsite, along with the proposed and
existing contours of the site, and
cross-sections thereof.
(2) Qualifications of the Preparer.
Grading plans shall be prepared by a
licensed professional engineer or an
indMdual with at least three years
experience in the preparation of
grading plans who is knowledgeable of
Unified Development Code
Section 3 . Lond Use Districts
Amended by Ordinance No. 04.0422-02
3-37
).6;~.a~
SECTION 3 . lAND USE DISTRICTS
soil conditions and geology in
Jefferson County.
(3) Information Requirements.
i. A description of the general
vicinity of the proposed site.
ii. The property limits and accurate
contours of existing ground and
detaOs of terrain and area
drainage.
iii. Umiting dimensions, elevations
of finish contours to be achieved
by the grading, and proposed
drainage channels and related
construction.
Iv. Detailed plans of all surface and
subsurface drainage devices,
walls, cribbing, dams and other
protective devices to be c0n-
structed with, or as a part of, the
proposed work together with a
map showing the drainage areas
and the estimated runoff of the
areas served by any drains.
v. The location of any buildings or
structures on the property where
the work is to be performed and
the location of any buildings or
structures on land of adjacent
owners that are within fifteen
(15) feet of the property or which
may be affected by proposed
grading operations.
vi. A discussion and evaluation of
the. potential impact of the
proposed grading upon desig-
nated critical areas.
vii. Recommendations on appro-
priate protection mechanisms, if
necessary, to prevent degrada-
tion of designated aitical areas
and to ensure public safety.
i. Habitat Management Plan
(1) General. This report shall Identify how
the development impacts of the
proposed project will be mitigated. The
Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife Priority Habitat aM Species
Management Recommendations shall
be the basis for this report.
(2) Qualifications of the Preparer.
Habitat management plans shall be
prepared by persons who have a
minimum Qf a Bachelor's Degree in
Wildlife or Fisheries Habitat Biology, or
a related degree in a biological field
from an accredited college or
university with a minimum of four
years experience as a practicing fish
or wildlife habitat biologist.
(3) Information Requirements.
i. A map(s) prepared at an easily
readable scale, including the
following infonnation:
A. The location of the
proposed development site,
!ncluding property limits;
B. The relationship of the site
to surrounding topographic
and cultural features;
C. The nature and density of
the proposed development
or land use change;
D. Proposed building locations
and arrangements; and
E. ~e boundaries of forested
areas.
ii. A legend that includes the
following" information:
A. A complete and accurate
legal description as pre-
scribed by the triggering
application fonn (the
description shall include the
total acreage of the parcel);
B. TdJe, scale and. north
arrows;
C. Date, including revision
dates, if applicable; and
D. Certificates by a
professional biologist as
appropriate.
iii. A report that contains the
following infonnation:
A. A description of the nature,
density and intensity of the
proposed development in
sufficient detaO to allow
analysis of such land use
change upon Identified fish
and wildlife habitat;
B. The applicant's analysis of
the effect of the proposed
development, activity or
land use change upon the
fish or wildlife species
3-38
\
l.$5
-
Unified Development Code
Section 3 . Land Use Districts
~St6.
SECTION 3 . LAND USE DISTRICTS
identifled by the Washington
Department of Fish and
Wildlife within the identified
priority habitat, utilizing the
management guidelines;
C. A plan by the applicant that
shall explain how any
adverse impacts created by
the development will be
mitigated.
/'
iv. Possible mitigating measures
that may include, but are not
limited to:
A. Establishment of buffer
zones;
B. Preservation of critically
important plants and trees;
C. Limitation of access to
habitat area;
D. Seasonal restriction of con-
struction activities; and
E Establishing a timetable for
periodic review ofthe plan.
j. Wetland Delineation Report.
(1) General. This report shall be required
when a proposed development
encroaches upon a designated
wetland or its buffer, and shall be used
to identify the boundaries and
dassification of the designated
wetland.
(2) Qualifications of the Preparer.
Wetland delineation reports shall be
prepared by either a biologist with
wetlands expertise, or an individual or
finn who has been certified by the
United States Army Corps of
Engineers, Region 10, to perfonn
wetland delineations.
(3) Information Requirements.
i. A map(s) prepared at an easily
readable scale, including the
following infonnation:
A. Wetland boundaries;
B. Sample site and sample
transects;
C. Boundaries of forested
areas; and
D. Boundaries of wetland
classes if multiple classes
exist.
ii. A legend that includes the
following infonnation:
A. A complete and accurate
legal description . as pre-
scribed by the triggering
application fonn (the
description shall include the
total acreage of the parcel);
B. Title, scale and north
arrows;
C. Date, including revision
dates, if applicable; and
D. Certificates by a pro-
fessional biologist as
appropriate.
iii. A report that contains the
following infonnation:
A. A discussion of the
delineation methods and
results, with special empha-
sis on technique used from
the Washington State
Wetlands Identification and
Delineation Manual, March
1997, or as amended
hereafter;
B. A description of relevant site
infonnation acquired from
the National Wetlandlnven-
tory maps and the Soil
SUIVey for Jefferson
County;
C. The acreage of each
wetland on the site, based
on the survey, if the
acreage will impact the
buffer size detennination or
the project design; and
D. All completed field data
sheets numbered to cor-
respond to each sample
site.
E. Project cross sections, both
before and after completion,
in relation to the surface
elevation of the wetland
must be indicated for
proposed activities which
involve cutting or filling
operations within the
wetland or its proposed
buffer.
Unified Development Code
Section 3 . Land Use Districts
3-39
.JQ~,
CdS!
SECTION 3 . LAND USE DISTRICTS
F. Classification of the wetland
in accordance with the
standards adopted in this
Section and a detailed
written analysis of the
existing regulated wetland
including: vegetation com-
munities classified per the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service Classification of
Deepwater Habitats (1979);
species composition of
vegetation communities,
including presence and
percent cover; existing
soils; and existing hydro-
logic conditions including
inflow/outflow, source of
water within the system,
relative water quality, and
seasonal changes in hydro-
logy, if applicable.
G. A detailed analysis of
wildlife species use of the
wetland and its buffer.
H. A detailed analysis of the
existing wetland buffer
including species compo-
sition and percent coverage,
whether the buffer is
disturbed or not, and the
functional value of the buffer
in relation to the regulated
wetland.
I. If the development activity
would eliminate all or part of
a regulated wetland then a
detailed compensatory miti-
gation plan as outlined in
Section 3.6.10.j(4), below
must be provided.
(4) Mitigation Plan Contents. All wetland
restoration, creation, and enhance-
ment projects required by this Code,
either as a condition of project
approval or as the result of an
enforcement action, shall follow a
mitigation plan prepared by a qualified
specialist as defined herein and
conducted in accordance with the
requirements described in this Code.
The applicant or violator must receive
written approval of the mitigation plan
by the Administrator prior to com-
mencement of any wetland restoration,
creation, or enhancement activity.
3.6.11 Airport Essential Public Facility
District (A).
a. Purpose. The purpose and intent of this
section is to regulate land uses within the
MAirport Essential Public Facility" overlay
district in . order to encourage orderly
economic development in a manner
compatible with airport operations and
adjacent properties and to protect existing
general aviation public use airports from
conflicting or incompatible adjacent land
uses or activities.
b. Designation. The overlay district (see
Official Comprehensive Plan Map) applies to
all Port of Port Townsend owned property
within the Jefferson County International
Airport (JCIA). The JCIA is a general
aviation airport that provides recreational,
business, flight training, charter and air taxi
services and other uses.
c. Allowable and Prohibited Uses. All new
development within the Jefferson County
Intemational Airport shall be restricted to
uses which are clearly identified as aviation
support facilities or aviation related
. development.
(1) Aviation Support Facilities. Aviation
Support Facilities are those uses
which directly support flight operations
and the operation of the Jefferson
County Airport, and include, but are
not limited to: .
i. Passenger service terminals,
including food service;
ii. Navigational aids;
iii. Runway aprons;
iv. Terminal buildings;
v. Hangars;
vi. Fuel storage facilities;
vii. Operations/maintenance
facilities;
viii. Automobi.le parking.
(2) Aviation Related Development:
Aviation Related Development are
those uses which are reliant upon the
airport for their businesses, which
include but are not necessarily limited
to:
i. Aircraft repair facilities;
3-40
Unified Development Code
Section 3 . Land Use Districts
.15:1
lJ.:~
procedures shall be exempt.
(20) Building codes. The adoption by ordinance of all codes
as required by the state Building Code Act (chapter 19.27 RCW).
(21) Adoption of noise ordinaDces. The adoption by
counties/cities of resolutions, ordinances, rules or regulations
concerned with the control of noise which do not differ from
regulations adopted by the department of ecology under chapter
70.107 RCW. When a county/city proposes a noise resolution,
ordinance, rule or regulation, a portion of which differs from
the applicable state regulations (and thus requires approval of
the department of ecology under RCW 70.107.060(4)), SEPA
compliance may be limited to those items which differ from state
regulations.
(22) Review and c~t actions. Any acti vi ty where one
agency reviews or comments upon the actions of another agency or
another department within an agency shall be exempt.
(23) utilities. The uti1ity-rela~ed actions listed below
shall be exempt, except for installation, construction, or
alteration on lands covered by water. The exemption includes
installation and construction, relocation when required by other
_h, gov.ernmental bodies, repair, replacement ,maintenance-r operation
or alteration that does not change the action from an exempt
c:)..ass.
(a) All communications lines, including cable TV, but not
including communication towers or +elay stations.
(b) All storm water, water and sewer facilities, lines,
equipment, hookups or appurtenances including, utilizing or
related to lines eight inches or less in diameter.
(c) All electric facilities, lines, equipment or
appurtenances, not including substations, with an associated
voltage of 55,000 volts or less; and the overbuilding of existing
distribution lines (55,000 volts or less) with transmission lines
(more than 55,000 volts); and the undergrounding of all electric
facilities, lines, equipment or appurtenances.
(d) All natural gas distribution (as opposed to
transmission) lines and necessary appurtenant facilities and
hookups.
(e) All developments within the confines of any existing
electric substation, reservoir, pump station or well: Provided,
That additional appropriations of water are not exempted by this
subsection.
(f) Periodic use of chemical or mechanical means to maintain
a utility or transportation right of way in its design condition:
Provided, That chemicals used are approved by the Washington
state department of agriculture and applied by licensed
personnel. This exemption shall no~ apply to the use of
chemicals within watersheds that are controlled for the purpose
of drinking water quality in accordance with WAC 248-54-660.
(g) 'All grants of rights of way by agencies to utilities for
use for distribution (as opposed to transmission) purposes.
(h) All grants of franchises by agencies to utilitie~~
(i) All disposals of rights of way by utilities.
(24) Batural resources management. 'In: addition to the other
WAC (9/10/03 10:03 AM)
[ 87 ]
""""'<'''--'~-'''''-.,.::::?'
,JSg""..,~Q"
SECTION 4 . PERFORMANCE AND USE-SPECIFIC STANDARDS
(4) Within three (3) days after termination
of any temporary outdoor use permit,
such use shall be abated and all
structures, signs and evidence of such
use removed. The Administrator may
require a cash bond be posted by the
applicant upon application to defray
the cost of cleanup and repair of the
property should the applicant fail to do
so; and
(5) Temporary outdoor use permits not
exercised within one hundred eighty
(180) days of issuance shall be null
and void.
5. In addition to any other remedy provided by this
Section, at any time when such temporary
outdoor use is operated in violation of required
conditions of this section, or otherwise found to
constitute a nuisance, the County may revoke the
temporary outdoor use permit. The permittee
shall be given notice of and an opportunity to
contest the revocation prior to a final
determination. If, in the opinion of the
Administrator, the violation poses a life, health, or
safety threat, the use permit may be revoked
immediately, and the permittee shall be given the
opportunity to request consideration and/or
appeal.
6. Where any provision of this Section 4.38,
Temporary Outdoor Uses,is in conflict with
Chapter 8.20 JCC, Public Assemblies, the
provisions of Chapter 8.20 JCC shall control.
. 4.39 Temporary Festivals.
1. Temporary Festival. A temporary festival is
generally defined as any musical, cultural, or
social event conducted in an indoor or outdoor
site or facility that is of a duration of more than
one (1) month out of any 12-month period, and
attracts two hundred fifty (250) or more people in
anyone (1) day. For the purposes ofthis Section,
each week during which the temporary festival
operates for two or more days shall be
considered a full week.
2. The temporary festivals are allowed, subject to a
conditional use permit, unless otherwise
regulated by the requirements and provisions of
Chapter 8.20 JCC, Assemblies.
3. Temporary festivals are subject to the following
regulations:
a. Those regulations specified above for
temporary outdoor events;
b. Operators of temporary festivals shall submit
a part of the application for conditional use
permit written plans of operation describing
those means and methods to be employed
Unified Development Code
Section 4 . Performance and Use-Specific Standards
to minimize impacts to neighboring parcels
resulting from the temporary festival,
including traffic, litter, trespass, vandalism,
property damage, and sanitation.
c. The provisions of Chapter 8.20 JCC,
Assemblies, where applicable.
4. Violations. In addition to any other remedy
provided by this Chapter, at any time when such
temporary festival is operated in violation of
required conditions. of this Section or a
conditional use permit, or otherwise found to
constitute a nuisance, the County may revoke the
conditional use permit. The permittee shall be
given notice of and an opportunity to contest the
revocation prior to a final determination. If, in the
opinion of the Administrator, the violation poses a
life, health or safety threat, the use permit may be
revoked immediately, and the permittee shall be
given the opportunity to request consideration
and/or appeal.
5. Where any provision of this Section 4.39,
Temporary Festivals, is in conflict with Chapter
8.20 JCC, Public Assemblies, the provisions of
Chapter 8.20 JCC shall control.
4.40 Utility Developments, Minor.
1. Minor Utility Development. Minor utility
developments include utility developments designed
to serve a small local community, are not manned and
would be considered normal utility services for the
area, including but not limited to:
a. Electrical generating facilities less than ten
(10) megawatts in output;
b. Electrical distribution and transmission lines
less than 115 kV;
c. Electrical substations;
d. Water and sewer pipelines;
e. Pipelines for petroleum or petroleum
products with an inside diameter less than
six (6) inches or less than five (5) miles in
length;
f. Pipelines for natural gas, synthetic natural
gas, or liquid propane gas with an inside
diameter less than twelve (12) inches or less
than five (5) miles in length;
2. The following standards apply to all. minor utility
developments:
a. Utility developments shall comply with the
goals and policies of the Comprehensive
Plan and the requirements of the Shoreline
Master Program;
b. New utility distribution lines shall be placed
underground wherever reasonable and
practical. Undergrounding of existing lines in
the course of routine maintenance and
4-29
.:~L~1'~~"':d~~
...
SECTION 4 . PERFORMANCE AND USE-SPECIFIC STANDARDS
replacement is encouraged where practi-
cable, particularly where such under-
grounding would enhance recognized scenic
and open space areas and resources;
c. Environmental impacts resulting from
installation or maintenance of utilities and
utility facilities shall be avoided or minimized.
Where no feasible alternative to the impact
exists, and mitigation is not feasible,
appropriate compensating measures should
be developed;
d. Utilities and transportation facilities shall be
installed in the same rights-of-way when the
effect will be to reduce the adverse impacts
on the physical environment;
e. Extension of community sewerage lines
outside of existing areas shall be allowed
only if:
(1) The extension is demonstrated to be
necessary to remedy existing or
potential groundwater contamination
problems or to correct existing or
impending health hazards, as
determined by the County Health
Official; or
(2) The extension is to provide sewage
collection and treatment service to a
public elementary or secondary
school; and
f. Routine maintenance and replacement of
wired utility transmission and distribution
lines and poles within existing rights-of-way,
where environmentally sensitive areas are
not present and where exempt from SEPA
and Shoreline Master Program review, are
authorized without further permit application
and development approval, provided that
such construction and activities shall comply
with applicable performance and
development standards of this Code.
g. It shall be the affirmative duty of the
applicant who proposes a minor utility
development to determine if any state or
federal permits or licenses are necessary
and then to obtain those permits or licenses
at their own expense.
4.41 Utility DevelopmentS, Major.
1. Major Utility Developments. Major utility
developments include utility development
designed to serve a broader community or
regional area, or are manned, including but not
limited to:
a. Electrical generating facilities greater than
ten (10) megawatts in output;
4-30
b. Electrical transmission lines exceeding
115 kV;
c. Pipelines for petroleum or petroleum
products with an inside diameter of six (6)
inches or greater and exceeding five (5)
miles in length;
d. Pipelines for natural gas, synthetic natural
gas, or liquid propane gas with an inside
diameter of twelve (12) inches or greater and
exceeding five (5) miles in length;
e. Other similar utility or energy facilities not
meeting the definition of a minor utility
development.
2. The following standards apply to all major utility
developments:
a. The need for the particular location proposed.
shall be demonstrated by the applicant to the
satisfaction of the Approval Authority,
including a full accounting of altemative
locations and sites;
b. The physical and economic impacts of such
facilities shall be evaluated, and measures to
mitigate these impacts provided; and
c. Development shall comply with the require-
ments of Section 4.22, Industrial Uses -
Standards for Site Development.
d. It shall be the affirmative duty - of the
applicant who proposes a major utility
development to determine if any state or
federal permits or licenses are necessary
and then to obtain those permits or licenses
at their own expense.
4.42 Veterinary Clinics or Hospitals.
1. Veterinary clinics or hospitals are subject to the
following standards:
a. Current construction, maintenance and
operation standards of the American Animal
Hospital Association shall apply at all times;
b. Boarding and grooming of animals, other
than that incidental to medical and surgical
care, shall be allowed subject to meeting the
provisions. for commercial animal kennels
and shelters in Section 4.6 of this UDC; and
c. Development shall comply with the require-
ments of Section 4.22 Industrial Uses -
Standards for Site Development; including
requirements for off-street parking, visual
screening, and landscaping.
.~L._~
~/&O . ,~ .._
Unified Development Code
Section 4' Performance and Use-Specific Standards
JEFFERSON COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
621 Sheridan Street. Port Townsend. Washington 98368
360/379-4450. 360/379-4451 Fax
www.co.jefferson.wa.uslcommdevelopment
Master Permit Application
Project Description (indude separate sheets as necessary):
MLA:
Tax Parcel
Number:
Site Address and/or Directions to Property:
Property Owner{s) of Record:
Telephone:
Mailing Address:
Applicant/Agent (if different from owner):
Telephone:
Mailing Address:
Property
Size:
(acres/square feet)
Fax:
emait:
Fax:
email:
What kind of Permit? (Check each box that applies)
o Building
o Demolition Penn it
o Single Family
o Garage Attached I Detached
o Manufactured Home
o Modular
o Commercial *
o Change of Use
o Address
o Propane
o Allowed "Yes" Use Consistency Analysis
o Stonnwater Management
o Site Plan Approval Advance Detennination (SPAAD) *
o Temporary Use
o Wireless Telecommunication *
o Forest Practices ActIRe\ease of Six-Year Moratorium
* Ifa uite a Pre - icatJon Conference ** R uites a Pre-A lication Conference
Please identify any other local, state or federal permits required for this proposal, if known:
o Road Approach
o Variance (Minor, Major or Reasonable Economic Use)
o Conditional Use [C(a), C(d), or C] **
o Discretionary "0" or Unnamed Use Classification
o Special Use (Essential Public Facilities) **
o Boundary Une Adjustment
o Short Plat **
o Binding Site Plan **
o Long Plat **
o Planned Rural Residential Development (PRRD)/Amendments **
o Plat Vacation/Alteration **
o Shoreline Master Program ExemptionlPennit Revisions **
o Shoreline Management Substantial Development **
o Shoreline Management Variance
o Comprehensive PlanlUOCJLand Use District Map Amendment
o Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment
I hereby designate
OWNER SIGNATURE
DESIGNATION OF AGENT
to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for pennit(s).
Date:
By signing this application form, the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein, and in any attachments, is true and correct to the best of
his, her or it's knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet
may result in this pennit being null and void.
I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities, judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and
expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit
1 further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees, representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application
review and.any required later inspections. Access and right of entry to this property shan be requested and shaI1 occur only during regular business
hours.
Signature: Date:
The action or actions Applicant win undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or
endangered species and could lead to a potential "take" of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the
"Endangered Species Acf' or "ESA. " Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions 1hat will be undertaken because this
permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual, group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your
action(s) even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code. The Applicant acknowledges that he, she or it holds individual
and non-transferable responsibility for adhering to and complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaimer a~ si.Q!l~..~n~..9a~it~w.
Signature: Date:
.d~~
G:\permitCenter\FORMS\DRD FORMS\Master Permit Application 7-8-04.doc
OWNER BULDER STATEMENT
The signer of this statement does hereby certify that they are the Owners of the parcel referenced herein, that they are not licensed contractOls and that
they will be assuming the responsibility of the General Contractor for the proposed project. .
Signature: Date:
GENERAL CoNTRACTOR OR MANUFACTURED HoME INSTALlER:
PHONE:
( )
EMAlL:
WAINS
NUMBER
PHONE (
EMAIL
FAX:
(
MAILING ADDRESS:
CoNTRACTOR'S LICENSE
NUMBER:
AACHITECTIENGINEER:
MAILING ADDRESS:
FAX: (
Project Type:
o New
o Addition
o AlterationlRemodel
o Repair
o Demolition
Frame Type:
o Wood
o Steel
o Concrete
o Masonry
o Other:
Bathrooms:
Existing:
Proposed:
Total:
Shoreline:
Type of Sewage Disposal:
o Sewer
o Community System
o Individual System
SEP Permit #
Water Supply:
o Private well 0 Two Party
o Public
Name of System:
Bank
Height:
Type of Heat:
Bedrooms:
Existing:
Proposed:
Total:
Setback:
If this Is a Commercial Prolect you must answer the followina:
Number of Parking Spaces: Current: Proposed: Number of ADA Parking Spaces:
Number of occupants Oncludes owners, tenants, employees, etc) Current Proposed
IBC Occupancy: IBC Type of construction: Will you have Food Service? Yes I No
If this Is a Prooane Tank and/or Aopliance Installation Dermit. mark all items below that aDDlv:
o Underground Tank 0 Above ground Tank Size of Propane Tank:
o Heat Stove 0 Cook Stove 0 Woodstove 0 Fireplace Insert 0 Hot Water Tank 0 Pellet Stove 0 Other
Is this aopliance belna Installed In a Manufactured I Mobile Home? Yes I No
When applying for a permit to Install a propane tank you must also submit a site plan showing all of the buildings, all property
lines, tank location and size, distances from the propane tank to all property lines, buildings and septic system components,
Inc/udin the teSelVe atea.
Main Floor
2 Floor
3 Floor
Mezzanine:
Heated Basement
Unheated Basement
Other Unheated
Garage/Carport
Decks
Other
ESTIMATED COST (REQUIRED)
-Fair market value of aII/abor and materials foundation to finish
G:\PennitCenter\FORMS\DRD FORMS\Master Pennit Application 7-8-04.doc
..
..r~.
JEFFERSON COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
621 Sheridan Street. Port Townsend. Washington 98368
360/379-4450.800/831-2678.360/379-4451 Fax
Conditional Use Permit
Purpose
The purpose of the conditional use permit process is to provide flexibility in the application of the use regulations contained in the
Unified Development Code (UDC) in order to accommodate uses that may be appropriate in an established district under certain
circumstances, but inappropriate in the same district under other circumstances.
The Conditional Use Application is a supplement to the Master Land Use Permit Application Form. Conditional use approval may
involve either a Type II or Type III review process under the UDC. depending on the specific type of use.
No conditional use permit can be granted unless consistency with the performance standards of Section 4, the development standards
of Section 6, the procedural requirements of Section 8.4, and the approval criteria of Section 8.8, and other applicable requirements of
the UDC have been satisfied.
Types of Conditional Uses
Conditional uses are typed and identified in Table 3-1 of the UDC, or may be classified as such by the Administrator pursuant to
Section 3.2 of the UDC. There are three broad types of conditional uses identified in the UDC.
Conditional r'C"] Use: Proposed uses that require a discretionary approval process and a public hearing before the Hearing
Examiner. Applications for uses listed as a "c" in Table 3-1 of the UDC are processed according to the procedures for Type III land use
decision established in Section 8.4 of the UDC.
Conditional Administrative r'C(a)"] Use: Proposed uses that require approval by the Administrator but do not require a public
hearing. Applications for uses listed as an administrative conditional use permit (Le" "C(a)") in Table 3-1 of the UDC are processed
according to the procedures for Type II land use decisions established in Section 8.4 of the UDC.
Conditional Discretionary r'C(d)] Use: Proposed uses that, at a minimum, require approval by the Administrator but that, at the
discretion of the Administrator, may be referred to the Hearing Examiner for a public hearing and final decision. Applications for uses
listed as discretionary conditional use permits (Le" "C(d)") in Table 3-1 of the UDC are, at a minimum, processed according to the
procedures for Type II land use decisions established in Section 8.4 of the UDC. However, pursuant to Section 8.8.4(b), the
Administrator may on a case-by-case basis refer a discretionary conditional use permit application to the Hearing Examiner to be
processed according to the procedures for Type III land use decisions.
In order to refer a "C(d)" application to the Hearing Examiner, the Administrator must make one of the following findings:
· In the exclusive, discretionary judgment of the Administrator, the application involves potentially significant issues relating
to location, design, configuration, and potential impacts to surrounding properties and the community that can be more
appropriately considered and addressed through a public hearing before the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner; or
· In the exclusive, discretionary judgment of the Administrator, the application seeks approval of a use involving complex
legal issues necessitating special expertise in the decision-maker.
Process
Step 1 - Pre-Application Conference: A pre-application conference is required for all conditional use permits. Conceptual plans,
county requirements, future permit requirements, etc., and answers to related questions are discussed at the conference. Information
provided by Department of Community Development staff helps the applicant to prepare a better application and potentially decreases
code-related questions and time required for formal review.
Step 2 - Determination of Completeness: Following submittal of your application, county staff will make a determination within
28 days as to whether your application is substantially complete.
Step 3 - Formal Application Review and Decision: Following the determination of completeness, a final decision must be made by
the county within 120 calendar days. The final decision may be made by either the Administrator (for all "C(a)" and certain "C(d)"*uses) or the Hearing Examiner (for all "c" and certain"C(d)" uses) depending on the type of conditional use. Public hearings before
the Hearing Examiner are required for all .C. uses and may be required for certain .C(d)" uses. In all conditional use permit cases the
decision may be appealed.
CONomONAL USE APP.OOC REV. 1/612004
Page 1
, '''''':~:7h3~"'.~~t
.~
~"
Approval Criteria
Your conditional use application will be evaluated on the basis of the criteria listed in the relevant section of the Jefferson County
Unified Development Code (see UDC Section 8.8.5), and in some instances, inspection of the property.
The county may approve or approve with modifications an application for a conditional use permit (Le., uses listed in Table 3-1 as
"C(a), .. "C(d)" or "Cj Qnly if all of the following criteria are satisfied:
· The conditional use is harmonious and appropriate in design, character and appearance with the existing or intended
character and quality of development in the vicinity of the subject property and with the physical characteristics of the
subject property;
· The conditional use will be served by adequate infrastructure including roads, fire protection, water, wastewater
disposal, and storm water control;
· The conditional use will not be materially detrimental to uses or property in the vicinity of the subject parcel;
. The conditional use will not introduce noise, smoke, dust, fumes, vibrations, odors, or other conditions or which
unreasonably impact existing uses in the vicinity of the subject parcel;
. The location, size, and height of buildings, structures, walls and fences, and screening vegetation for the conditional
use will not unreasonably interfere with allowable development or use of neighboring properties;
· The pedestrian and vehicular traffic associated with the conditional use will not be hazardous to existing and
anticipated traffic in the vicinity of the subject parcel;
· The conditional use complies with all other applicable criteria and standards of this Code and any other applicable
local, state or federal law; and more specifically, conforms to the standards contained in Sections 4 and 6 of this
Code;
. The proposed conditional use will not result in the siting of an incompatible use adjacent to an airport or airfield;
. The conditional use will not cause significant adverse impacts on the human or natural environments that cannot be
mitigated through conditions of approval;
. The conditional use has merit and value for the community as a whole;
. The conditional use is consistent with all relevant goals and policies of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan;
and
· The public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effect. Consideration shall be given to the cumulative effect of
similar actions in the area.
In instances where all of the above findings cannot be made, the application shall be denied.
The County, in accordance with section 8.8.6 of the UDC, may impose additional conditions on a particular use if it is deemed
necessary for the protection of the surrounding properties, the neighborhood, or the general welfare of the public. The county may add
conditions which:
. Increase requirements in the standards, criteria or policies established by the UDC;
. Stipulate an exact location for the conditional use on the subject property as a means of minimizing hazards to life,
limb, property damage, erosion, landslides or traffic;
. Require structural features or equipment as a means of minimizing hazards to life, limb, property damage, erosion,
landslides or traffic; or
. Contain restrictions or provisions deemed necessary to establish parity with uses permitted in the same zone with
respect to avoiding nuisance generating features in matters of noise, odors, air pollution, wastes, vibration, traffic and
physical hazards.
Approval of the conditional use is effective for three (3) years from the date of original approval. If a building permit has not been issued
within the three (3) year period, the conditional use approval will expire. Minor modifications to a previously approved conditional use
may be approved subject to the provisions of Section 8.8.9 of the UDC.
CONDITIONAL USE APP.DOC REV. 1/6/2004
\\o{
Page 2
'r-b
~G
.
,
JEFFERSON COUNTY
department of community development
621 Sheridan Street. Port Townsend. Washington 98368
360/379-4450 . 360/379-4451 Fax
Conditional Use Application
IMLA#
PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME:
The purpose of the conditional use permit process is to provide flexibility in the application of the use regulations contained in the
Unified Development Code (UDC). No conditional use permit can be granted unless consistency with the performance standards of
Section 4, the development standards of Section 6, the procedural requirements of Section 8.4, and the approval criteria of Section 8.8,
and other applicable requirements of the UDC have been satisfied. Approval of the conditional use is effective for three (3) years from
the date of original approval. If a building permit has not been issued within the three (3) year period, the conditional use approval will
expire.
The following questions will assist in the evaluation of the conditional use request
1. Describe the reauested conditional use.
2. Explain how the conditional use is harmonious and appropriate in design, character and appearance with the existing or
intended character and aualitv of develooment in the vicinity and with the ohvsical characteristics of the subiect orooertv.
3. Describe the infrastructure including but not limited to roads, fire protection, water, wastewater disposal, and stormwater control
which will serve the reauested conditional use.
4, Describe the location. size. and heiaht of buildinas structures, sianaae walls and fences, and screening veaetation for the use.
5. Describe any noise, smoke, dust, fumes, vibrations, odors, outdoor lights or other impacts will be generated by the conditional
use.
6. Describe the oedestrian and vehicular traffic and Darkina area associated with the conditional use.
CONDITIONAL USE APP,DOC REV. 11612004
Page 3
-..."".. """"ll-~'''.'''''~''~''':'~'--~-
"...CrJS"....fid$$
..
7. Will the proposed conditional use result in the sitina of an incompatible use adiacent of an airport or airfield?
>
8. Are there any significant adverse impacts on the human and natural environments caused directly by the conditional use? If yes,
can these imoacts be mitiaated?
9. Describe how granting the conditional use will not be materially detrimental to uses or property in the vicinity of the subject
parcel.
10. Describe how arantina the conditional use will not be substantially detrimental to the public interest.
11, Does the conditional use have merit and value for the community as a whole?
12. Describe how the conditional use complies with all other applicable criteria and standards of the Unified Development Code
(UDC) and any other applicable local, state or federal law; and more specifically, conforms to the standards contained in
Sections 4 and 6 of the UDC.
13. Describe how the conditional use is consistent with all relevant goals and policies of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan.
ACKNOWlEDGEMENT
By signing the application form, the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of
hislher knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this
application packet may result in this permit being null and void.
(APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE)
(DATE)
rNOTE: Representative authorization is required if application is not signed by the Owner.]
CONDITIONAL USE APP.DOC REV.1/6I2OO4
\
Page 4
lle~
g<l
./
JEFFERSON COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
621 Sheridan Street. Port Townsend. Washington 98368
360/379-4450 . 800/831-2678 . 360/379-4451 Fax
http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopmenV
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SDP), SDP
Exemption, Shoreline Conditional Use and Shoreline Variance
The shoreline permit application information and instruction material is designed to help you understand the basics of how
freshwater and saltwater "shorelines" (as defined below) are regulated in Jefferson County and the steps for acquiring
shoreline permits or permit exemptions for activity within shoreline jurisdiction. Familiarizing yourself with this information
before applying will facilitate a timely and well-informed decision on your application. In most cases, you will need to
complete, sign and submit the Pre-Application Conference request form first. Department of Community Development
(Department) staff will provide you the Master Land Use Application (MLA), Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application
(JARPA), and other required application materials at the Pre-Application Conference and explain in greater detail the
shoreline review process for your proposal. The project planner will assist you throughout the process and remain your
County point of contact for information regarding the status of your shoreline, Building, and other related permits.
About Shoreline Permits
The goal of the Washington State Shoreline Management Act (SMA) of 1971 is ''to prevent the inherent harm in an
uncoordinated and piecemeal development of the state's shorelines" (RCW 90.58.020). The SMA and Section 5 of the
Jefferson County Unified Development Code (UDC)-the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program (SMP)-regulate
use and development along the shorelines of Jefferson County. Shoreline jurisdiction (a.k.a., shorelines) includes all
marine waters, streams with a mean annual flow greater than 20 cubic feet per second, lakes larger than 20 acres, and
upland areas called "shore lands" 200 feet landward from the edge ("ordinary high water mark" or "floodway," whichever is
greater) of these waters. In addition, shoreline jurisdiction includes wetlands and river deltas hydrologically associated
with the above-defined waters, and all wetlands within the 100-year floodplain. See SMP Appendix A for a list of
jurisdictional lakes, rivers, and creeks in Jefferson County.
Any person who wishes to undertake "substantial development" within shoreline jurisdiction must first apply for a
Substantial Development Permit (SDP). Development is defined as "a use consisting of the construction or exterior
alteration of structures; dredging; drilling; dumping; filing; removal of any sand, gravel, or minerals; bulkheading; driving of
piling; placing of obstructions; or any project of a permanent or temporary nature which interferes with the normal public
use of the surface of the waters overlying lands subject to the act at any stage of water level" (WAC 173-27-030(6)).
Examples of development regulated under the SMP include the construction or installation of houses, gazebos, decks,
docks, stairs, fences, stormwater tightlines, bulkheads, roads, culverts, etc., regardless of the need for a Building Permit.
Certain developments are considered "exempt" (listed in WAC 173-27-040 and codified in SMP 3.40) from the SDP
requirement. Any person who wishes to undertake "exempt development" within shoreline jurisdiction must first apply for
an SDP Exemption. To say that a development is "exempt" under the SMP means only that it is exempt from the
requirement to obtain an SDP. Exemption from SDP requirements does not mean that the development is exempt from
the provisions of the SMP or the SMA. The SOP Exemption may contain conditions to ensure that the activity is
consistent with the SMA, SMP, and other sections of the UDC.
Each shoreline is characterized by an environment designation, which under the current SMP are Aquatic, Natural,
Conservancy, Suburban, Urban, or a combination of these. The Classification Table (SMP 4.40) sets forth permitted,
conditional and prohibited uses within the various shoreline environment designations. An application is categorized in
this way as a Primary Use SDP, Secondary Use SDP, or Shoreline Conditional Use. If an element of the proposal varies
from the policies and performance standards of the SMP, a Shoreline Variance will also be required. Be advised that
"exempt development" may require review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), be processed as a
Conditional Use depending on the environment designation, and/or be accompanied by a Shoreline Variance according to
the specifications of the proposal.
The Washington Department of Ecology (DOE) shares responsibility for administering the SMA with local government
0N AC 173-27). Shoreline Conditional Use Permits and Variances must be submitted to DOE for review after issuance by
the local government. DOE has 30 days to approve, approve with conditions, or disapprQy~",tl1.f;Lagtip9. Barring appeal,
Shoreline SDPs and SOP Exemptions issued by the local government represent the finaldeCisioA under shoreline review.
SHORELINE APP.DOC REV. 5/29102
. ., _"."~_M'.''''''_~'., "~"".s;
dl~-l." ,~_"Q
Page 1
(
'-
Process
Step 1 - Pre-Application Conference Required (Optional for SOP Exemptions): A Pre-Application Conference (Pre-
App.) is required for an SOP, Conditional Use, and Variance and is optional but strongly encouraged for many types of
SOP Exemptions. The Department may require a Pre-App. for an SOP Exemption application that is not categorically
exempt from review under SEPA or otherwise presents complex review issues. Conceptual plans, County requirements,
necessary permits, etc., and answers to related questions are discussed at the Pre-App., which may occur either at the
Department or at the project site, when possible in the company of the Area Habitat Biologist representing the Washington
Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), if Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is also required (see WAC 220-110-010).
Staff will provide you with the required application forms at the Pre-App. If your application does not require a Pre-App.,
those forms are found at the Department and on the Department website. The JARPA is also found on-line at this URL:
http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programslsealpac/jarpa.html. and the SEPA Environmental Checklist at this URL:
http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programsJsealsepailorms..htm. We recommend that you develop and submit a "Conceptual
Design," as described in the Pre-App. request form, before completing the JARPA and final plan designs. Your project
proposal may be influenced by the Pre-App., which is intended to identify early in the process elements of your proposal
that may be in conflict with Jefferson County policies, ordinances, and performance standards. Remedying these issues
before applying for a permit saves times and fosters a smoother permit process.
Step 2 - Determination of Completeness: Following submittal of your application, which will include the MLA; JARPA;
location map, plan view site plan, and cross-sectional drawing as described in the one-page "Guidance for Completion of
Drawings" included among the JARPA instructions; and the SEPA Environmental Checklist (if necessary, see WAC 197-
11-800 for categorical exemptions); staff will make a determination within 28 days as to whether your application is
complete. You may be required to submit additional information within a specified time period.
Step 3 - Formal Application Review, Public and Agency Comment Period, and Decision: Following the
determination of completeness, a final decision must be made by the County within 120 calendar days, though typically
the timeframe is shorter. There are instances, however, when the "clock" is stopped to obtain additional information or
pursue studies relevant to project review. The specific process to be followed is determined by the Permit Type as
established in UDC Table 8-1. In summary, shoreline review is categorized in this fashion in Table 8-1:
· Type I: SOP Exemptions, though SOP Exemptions that are not categorically exempt from SEPA review are
processed as a Type II decision due to public notice requirements related to SEPA review (see UDC 8.10 for
SEPA implementation)
· Type II: Primary Use SOP
· Type III: Secondary Use SOP, Shoreline Conditional Use Permit, Shoreline Variance
Public notice requirements are detailed in UDC Section 8. In general, public and agency comment periods for shoreline
permits are 30 days (UDC 8.3.8.b). For Type II permits, following the comment periOd the Department renders a decision,
subject to appeal. For Type III permits, following the comment period the Department schedules an Open Record Public
Hearing, after which the Hearing Examiner renders a written decision, subject to appeal, within 10 working days.
Shoreline decisions are transmitted to DOE per WAC 173-27-130. For Shoreline Conditional Use Permits and Shoreline
Variances, DOE has 30 days to approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove the action. DOE.will notify the applicant
of the concurrence decision and, if approved, work may begin after a 21-day appeal period, unless an appeal is made to
the Shoreline Hearings Board. SOPs issued by the local government represent the final decision under shoreline review,
barring appeal under the UDC or to the Shoreline Hearings Board within 21 days after DOE receives the transmittal. SOP
Exemptions can only be appealed to Superior Court. UDC 8.5 and 8.10.12 (SEP A) outline the local appeal process. SOP
Exemptions expire in one year. For Shoreline SOPs, Conditional Use Permits, and Variances, permitted activities must
be commenced within two years (with the possibility of a one-year extension) and authorization to conduct permitted
development activities expires in five years (with the possibility of a one-year extension). See WAC 173-27-090.
Step 4 - Building Permit and other permits/approvals may be required: It is important to note that many shoreline
permits and SOP Exemptions require a Building Permit before construction may commence. The shoreline approval is a
land use approval only. The Building Permit application may be submitted concurrently with the shoreline application or
after shoreline approval is acquired. The project planner will assist the applicant in determining whether a Building Permit
anellor other County permits, such as a Storm water Management Permit, are required. Permits or approvals from other
agencies may also be required, such as HPA from WDFW, authorization from the Washington Department of Natural
Resources for use of state-owned aquatic lands, Army Corps of Engineers (CaE) Section 404 or 10 permit, or
Endangered Species Act consultation. The JARPA is intended for multi-agency review and begins with a check box for
other aquatic resources permits or approvals required for the proposal. The project planner will assist you in determining
what is required by other agencies, but it is ultimately the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all necessary
permits and approvafs are acquired. The Department generarry forwards the JARPA and other application-materialS to
agencies with jurisdiction during the project review process. You may be contacted directly by those agencies and asked
to provide additional information. We will help coordinate multi-agency review as much as. possible,
SHORELINE APP.DOC REV. 5129102
tla<f>
:56.
Page 2
Approval Criteria and Permit Conditions
Your shoreline application will be evaluated on the basis of the information you provide, the criteria listed in the relevant
section of the SMP and other applicable sections of the UDC, including the provisions for environmentally sensitive areas.
Shoreline use and development must also be consistent with the SMA and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan.
Section 4 of the SMP describes the shoreline environment designations and project classifications (SOP and Conditional
Use), including relevant review criteria. Section 5 outlines policies and performance standards for various uses and
development within shoreline jurisdiction. Section 7 provides criteria for review of Variances. If your proposed use or
development is not listed in the Classification Table (4.40), it will be processed as a Conditional Use.
The Department or the Hearing Examiner may place conditions on your shoreline permit or SOP Exemption in order to
ensure consistency with the SMA, SMP, UDC and the Comprehensive Plan. Permit conditions may also be established
as a result of SEPA review. At times, a multi-agency review process may result in a request to the applicant for additional
information based on the permit or approval process of another agency with jurisdiction. Information, mitigation
measures, or permit conditions found in studies, permits or approvals required by other agencies may become permit
conditions in Jefferson County permits granted to the applicant.
Where to Find More Information
The UDC is found at the Department or on-line at this URL: http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopmenV. The
current SMP is Section 5 of the UDC. A July 2000 draft SMP is also found on-line at the URL above. Jefferson County
will update the SMP within the next few years, using the July 2000 draft as a framework. Until such time as the SMP is
updated through a public participation and legislative process, the 1989 SMP with amendments remains in effect. All
County codes may be viewed or purchased at the Department. Other useful information may be found on-line:
· DOE Shorelands & Wetlands (http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sealshorelan.html)
· State Permit Assistance Center (http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sealpac/index.htmlor call 1-800-917-0043)
· Washington Administrative Code (http://slc.leg.wa.gov/wacbytitle.htm then click Title 173 WAC for DOE)
· WDFW Hydraulic Project Approval (http://www.wa.gov/wclfw/hab/hpapage.htm)
· US Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District (http://nws.usace.army.miVreg/reg.htm)
COMMONLY REQUESTED INFORMATION ABOUT SHORELINE USE AND DEVELOPMENT
Single-Family Residence Construction in Shoreline Jurisdiction or near Marine Shorelines
SDP EXEMPTION, REQUIRED APPLlCA TION FORMS, AND STORMWA TER MANAGEMENT PROVISIONS
SMP 3.402.5 provides that construction by an owner, lessee, or contract purchaser of a single-family residence for the
owner's or owner's family's use is considered "exempt development" under certain provisions. Projects of this nature in
shoreline jurisdiction require a written SOP Exemption along with the Building Permit and other applicable Jefferson
County approvals. Generally, a JARPA form will not be required to accompany the MLA form in order to make a complete
application for proposed construction of a single-family residence in shoreline jurisdiction that meets the criteria of SMP
3.402.5. Please note that there are special stormwater management provisions for construction within 500 feet of any
marine shoreline, pursuant to UDC 3.6.5.c(3) Seawater Intrusion Areas. Refer to the Stormwater Calculation Sheet and
UDC 6.7 Stormwater Management Standards for more information about the stormwater management requirements for
residential construction near marine shorelines. Generally, if the UDC Administrator concurs that stormwater infiltration is
not "practicable" and. a tightline stormwater runoff utility that terminates at or near the marine shoreline is included in the
development application, a JARPA will be required along with the MLA and other application materials. SEPA review and
HPA from WDFW may also be required depending on the specifications of the proposal. Additionally, a Drainage and
Erosion Control Plain may be required even if the development falls below the threshold levels found in UDC 6.7 if there
are environmentally sensitive areas on the parcel (see UDC 3.6.4 et seq., 6.6.4, 6.7, the Stormwater Management
Permits information sheet, and the section below concerning removal of vegetation along marine shorelines).
RESIDENTIAL DEVliLOPMENT SETBACKS FROM THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OR TOP OF BANK
SMP 5.160 Residential Development governs residential setbacks. Performance Standard #10 of that section states,
"The standard setback for residential structures, including common appurtenant structures such as garages and
workshops, shall be thirty (30) feet or one (1) foot for each foot of bank height, whichever is greater. This setback shall be
measured from the bank's edge when the bank height exceeds 10 feet. When the bank's height is less than 10 feet, the
setback shall be measured from the ordinary high water mark. The setback shall not exceed 100 feet." Refer to SMP
5.160 for additional provisions related to residential development in shoreline jurisdiction. Please note that
recommendations found in geotechnical reports prepared pursuant to UDC 3.6.7 Geologically Hazardous Areas may
extend the required ~uilding setback beyond that of the standard shoreline setback p~e~rl~bYSM,P 5.160.
SHORELINE APP.OOC REV. 5129102
l~ 1-"d'Sg
Page 3
Removal of Vegetation and Other Land-Disturbing Activities along Marine Shorelines
UDC 3.6.4 addresses environmentally sensitive areas, among which are fish and wildlife habitat areas (FWHAs).
FWHAs include marine shorelines per UDC 3.6.8.a, in that Type 1 waters include all marine waters of the state and at this
time marine shorelines provide primary association habitat for Federal and State-listed endangered, threatened, and
sensitive species (Le., Puget Sound Chinook, Hood Canal Summer Chum, and/or CoastaVPuget Sound Bull Trout).
Among the provisions in UDC 3.6.8 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas, are general prohibitions related to the alteration of
FWHAs or their buffers (UDC 3.6.8.f)-including clearing, grading, and removing vegetation-regardless of whether a
permit is required for the activity or not. Additionally, there are protection standards (UDC 3.6.8.g) that address
drainage and erosion control, grading, vegetation retention, and buffers for activities on parcels that contain a designated
FWHA or its buffer. UDC 3.6.8.g(5) states that FWHAs shall have buffers and building setb!icks established. The FWHA
buffer for marine shorelines is 30 (thirty) feet, which is the minimum "standard setback for residential structures" in the
SMP (see previous paragraph). The buffer/setback is measured from the ordinary high water mark or the top of the bank
for banks that exceed to feet invert'lCaf height Please note thaHand-disturbing activity in the 30:.foot marine shoreline
buffer, including the removal of vegetation, may occur only with Department approval under specific circumstances.
If the marine shoreline parcel in question also contains a geologically hazardous area-such as an erosion, landslide, or
seismic hazard area-additional protection standards apply (UDC 3.6.7(b)), including the provision that excavation,
grading and earthwork construction regulated in UDC 3.6.7 shall only be allowed from April 1 to November 1, unless the
applicant demonstrates that such activities would not result in impacts contrary to the protection requirements therein.
Landslide hazard area buffer widths are determined pursuant to UDC 3.6.7(b)(6) and, in general, a geotechnical report
prepared by a qualified professional is required for a complete development application pursuant to UDC 3.6.7(b)(9).
For more information on this topic, refer to DOE Publication 93-31, "Vegetation Management: A Guide for Puget Sound
Bluff Property Owners." DOE offers property owner guides on its website, including a "Vegetation Management Guide"
(http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/pubs/93-31/intro.html). a guide to "Slope Stabilization and Erosion Control Using
Vegetation" (http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/pubs/93-30/intro.html). a guide to "Surface Water and Groundwater on
Coastal Bluffs" (http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/pubs/95-107/intro.html). and a guide entitled, "At Home with
Wetlands: A Landowner's Guide" (http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/pubs/90031/index.html). Call DOE Publications
at (360) 407-7472 or visit the DOE website to order hard copies of these or other DOE publications.
Shore Defense Works
Shore defense works must comply with the SMP and the UDC section on environmentally sensitive areas (3.6.4-3.6.10).
Banks, bluffs, and shorelines may be stabilized only under certain circumstances and when applicants demonstrate that
bioengineering solutions are infeasible and that bank stabilization will result in the maintenance of fish habitat or improved
water quality (UDC 3.6.8.e(4)). "Soft-bank protection" methods are generally preferred over "hard-bank protection"
methods by regulatory agencies, including Jefferson County. Among soft-bank protection methods are biotechnical bank
stabilization and bioengineering, where vegetation is planted specifically to address erosion and slope stability; the
placement and fastening of large wood along the toe of a bank to retain sediments and absorb wave energy; and beach
nourishment projects, where sediment is artificially added to the beach to re-create the natural beach conditions that have
a certain amount of built-in erosion protection. Hard-bank protection methods include seawalls and wood and riprap
bulkheads. For more information on bank protection methods, please refer to DOE Publication #00-06-012, "Alternative
Bank Protection Methods for Puget Sound Shorelines," May 2000, and the DOE property owner guides cited above.
Pre-Existing Uses and Development
Shoreline uses or developments that pre-date the SMA or the Jefferson County SMP are called "pre-existing." If the use
of a development is consistent with the SMP, permits are only required if new development is proposed. If the use of a
pre-existing development is proposed to be changed, the new use must be consistent with the SMP. If the proposed new
use is a Conditional Use in the SMP, a Conditional Use Permit is required whether or not new development is proposed.
"Legal nonconforming" describes those uses or structures legally constructed or established prior to the effective date of
the applicable SMP provisions that do not conform to present shoreline management rules or policies. Legal
nonconforming use and development is regulated pursuant to WAC 173-27-080. Generally, such "grandfathered" use and
development may continue as long as it is not enlarged, intensified, increased, or altered in any way that increases its
nonconformity. Nonconforming uses are considered abandoned if they are discontinued for more than twelve consecutive
months or for twelve months during any two-year period. Any subsequent use must conform to the requirements of the
SMA and SMP and cannot be changed to another nonconforming use or moved any distance within the shorelines of the
state. It is sometimes important to distinguish between a nonconforming structure with a conforming use and a
nonconforming use. Please contact the Department for more information about sp~cificp(eiexisting use or development.
[end]
SHOREliNE APP.DOC REV. 5129102
\
\1Q
is~
Page 4
I.'
;..
AGENCY USE ONLY
Agency Reference #:
Circulated by:
Date Received:_
(local govt. or agency)
.. lWl
\0 I am applying for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Project per requirements of RCW 75.20.350. You must submit a copy
of this completed JARPA application form, and the (Fish Habitat Enhancement JARPA Addition) to your local
Government Planning Department and Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Area Habitat Biologist on the same day.
NOTE: LOCAL GOV'TS - You must submit any comments on these projects to WOFW within 15 working days.
JOINT AQUATIC RESOURCES PERMIT APPUCATION FORM (JARPA)
(for use in Washington State)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT IN SLACK INK
...
...
Based on the instructions provided, I am sending copies of this application to the following: (check all that apply)
o Local Govemment for shoreline: 0 Substantial Development 0 Conditional Use 0 Variance 0 Exemption 0 Revision
o FlOodplain Management 0 Critical Areas Ordinance
o Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for HPA
o Washington Department of Ecology for 401 Water Quality Certification Nationwide Permits (to Regional office-Federal Permit Unit)
o Washington Department of Natural Resources for Aquatic Resources Use Authorization Notification
o Corps of Engineers for: 0 Section 404 0 Section 10 permit
o Coast Guard for Section 9 Bridge Permit
o US Fish & Wildlife Service or National Marine Fisheries Service for Endangered Species Act (ESA) Consultation
SECTION A . Use for all permits covered by this application. Be sure to ALSO complete Section C (Signature Block) for all permit applications.
1. APPLICANT
MAILING ADDRESS
WORK PHONE
E-MAIL ADDRESS
HOME PHONE
FAX #
" an agent is acting for the applicant during the permit process, complete #2.
2. AUTHORIZED AGENT
MAILING ADDRESS
WORK PHONE
E-MAIL ADDRESS
HOME PHONE
FAX #
3. RELATIONSHIP OF APPLICANT TO PROPERTY: 0 OWNER 0 PURCHASER 0 LESSEE 0 OTHER:
. NAME, ADDRESS. AND PHONE NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNER(S). IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT:
. LOCATION (STREET ADDRESS. INCLUDING CITY. COUNTY AND ZIP CODE. V\lHERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY EXISTS OR WILL OCCUR)
LOCAl GOVERNMENT WITH JURISDICTION (CITY OR COUNTY)
WATERBODY
TRIBUTARY OF
It'vRIA #
% SECTION
GOVERNMENT LOT
SHORELINE DESIGNATION
LATITUDE & LONGITUDE
IF KNOWN:
TAX PARCEL NO:
ONING DESIGNATION
DNR STREAM TYPE. IF KNOWN
~.'..'...c--.ru... '.-.... ........-,. -.......&.. = ~.?
~"-:'w__~,.,_ ,- -.,... , ,.m -.""'. .'" ,", ~,
_!tl....<l - -- ."E"~' _'.-"M.U.
JARPA, Revised 12/98, contact Ecology's Permit-AssistaJ}ce Center for latest version, 360/407-7037
Page 1 of4
6. DESCRIBE THE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY, AND STRUCTURES EXISTING ON THE PROPERTY. IF AN'( PORTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY IS ALREADY COMPLETED ON
fHIS PROPERTY, INDICATE MONTH AND YEAR OF COMPLETION.
. ,
IS THE PROPERTY AGRICUL TURAllAND? 0 YES 0 NO
ARE YOU A USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANT?
DYES ONO
\.
a. DESCRIBE THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND/OR Fill OORK FOR THE PROJECT THAT YOU WANT TO BUILD THAT NEEDS AQUATIC PERMITS: COMPLETE PlANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR ALL OORK WATERWARD OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OR LINE. INCLUDING TYPES OF EQUIPMENT TO BE USED. IF APPLYING
FOR A SHORELINE PERMIT, DESCRIBE ALL OORK WITHIN AND BEYOND 200 FEET OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK ATTACH A SEPARATE SHEET IF ADDITIONAL SPACE IS
NEEDED.
7b. DESCRIBE THE PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSED OORK AND 'MiY YOU WANT OR NEED TO PERFORM IT AT THE SITE. PLEASE EXPLAIN AN'( SPECIFIC NEEDS THAT HAVE INFLUENCED
THE DESIGN.
!
7c. DESCRIBE THE POTENTIAl IMPACTS TO CHARACTERISTIC USES OF THE WATER BODY. THESE USES MAY INCLUDE FISH AND AQUATIC LIFE, WATER QUAlITY, WATER SUPPLY,
RECREATION. and AESTHETICS. IDENTIFY PROPOSED ACTIONS TO AVOID, MINIMIZE, AND MITIGATE DETRIMENTAL IMPACTS, AND PROVIDE PROPER PROTECTION OF FISH AND
AQUATIC LIFE. ATTACH A SEPARATE SHEET IF ADDITIONAL SPACE IS NEEDED.
LZ~..,;;;~(
PREPARATION OF DRAWlNCS: SEE SAMPLE DRAWINGS AND GUIDANCE FOR COMPLETING THE DRAWINGS. ONE SET OF ORIGINAL OR GOOD QUAUTY REPRODUCIBLE DRAWINGS
~BE ATiACHED;~NQTB-APPllGANTS ARE ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT PHOTOGRAPHSOF'!':IE~~el'SI'fl:.' ,BUT lliESE DO}NOT SUBSTITUTE FOR DRAWINGS. THE CORPS OF
ENt1INEERS7iNl!R:~RIiHfEfiW'RE DRAWINGS ON 1-112 X 11 INCH SHEETS. LARGER DRAWINGS_V ..c~ilcQb.n/:;... tsnnnER AGENOES.
. -...
, , l..~.,Ig>,<\...Revised t2l9~comacr;Ecology's Permit Assistance Center for latest version. J60/401~7U3T
Is. WILL THE PROJECT BE CONSTRUCTED IN STAGES?
DYES ONO
PROPOSED STARTING DATE:
ESTIMATED DURATION OF ACTIVITY:
R CHECK IF ANY STRUCTURES WILL BE PLACED:
o WATERWARD OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OR LINE FOR FRESH OR TIDAl WATERS; AND/OR
OWATERWARD OF MEAN HIGH WATER LINE IN TIDAL WATERS
10. WILL FILL MATERIAL (ROCK, FILL, BULKHEAD, OR OTHER MATERIAl) BE PLACED:
\ 0 WATERWARD OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OR LINE FOR FRESH WATERS?
o WATERWARD OF THE MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER FOR TIDAl WATERS?
1,. WILL MATERIAl BE PLACED IN WETLANDS?
IF YES:
IF YES, VOLUME (CUBIC YARDS) /AREA {ACRES
IF YES, VOLUME (CUBIC YARDS) AREA (ACRES)
DYES ONO
A IMPACTED AREA IN ACRES:
B. HAS A DELINEATION BEEN COMPLETED? IF YES, PLEASE SUBMIT WITH APPLICATION.
C. HAS A WETLAND REPORT BEEN PREPARED? IF YES, PLEASE SUBMIT WITH APPLICATION.
DYES ONO
DYES ONO
D. TYPE AND COMPOSITION OF FILL MATERIAl (E.G.. SAND, ETC.):
E. MATERIAl SOURCE:
F. LIST AlL SOIL SERIES (TYPE OF SOIL) LOCATED AT THE PROJECT SITE, & INDICATE IF THEY ARE ON THE COUNTY'S LIST OF HYDRIC SOILS. SOILS INFORMATION CAN BE OBTAINED
FROM THE NATURAl RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS):
12. WILL PROPOSED ACTIVITY CAUSE FLOODING OR DRAINING OF WETLANDS?
IF YES, IMPACTED AREA IS _ ACRES.
DYES ONO
13. WILL EXCAVATION OR DREDGING BE REQUIRED IN WATER OR WETLANDS?
IF YES:
o YES ONe
A VOLUME: {CUBIC YARDS)/AREA (ACRES)
B. COMPOSITION OF MATERIAl TO BE REMOVED:
C. DISPOSAl SITE FOR EXCAVATED MATERIAl:
D. METHOD OF DREDGING:
14. HAS THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAl POLICY ACT {SEPAl BEEN COMPLETED?
SEPA LEAD AGENCY: SEPA DECISION: DNS, MONS. EIS, ADOPTION, EXEMPTION
SUBMIT A COPY OF YOUR SEPA DECISION LETTER TO WOFW AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE APPLICATION
DYES DNO
DECISION DATE (END OF PERIOD):
15. LIST OTHER APPLICATIONS, APPROVAlS, OR CERTIFICATIONS FROM OTHER FEDERAl, STATE OR LOCAl AGENCIES FOR ANY STRUCTURES, CONSTRUCTION, DISCHARGES, OR
OTHER ACTlVmES DESCRIBED IN THE APPLICATION (I.E., PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAl, HEAlTH DISTRICT APPROVAl, BUILDING PERMIT, SEPA REVIEW, FEDERAl ENERGY
REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSE (FERC), FOREST PRACTICES APPLICATION, ETC.) AlSO INDICATE WHETHER WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND INDICATE AlL EXISTING WORK ON
DRAWINGS.
TYPE OF APPROVf.L
ISSUING AGENCY
IDENTIFICATION
NO.
DATE OF APPLICATION
DATE APPROVED COMPLETED?
16. HAS ANY AGENCY DENIED APPROVAL FOR THE ACTIVITY DESCRIBED HEREIN OR FOR ANY ACTIVITY DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE ACTMTY DESCRIBED
HEREIN? 0 YES 0 NO IF YES, EXPLAIN:
L1J.. ~"
.
~....
- '.-JARP~, Revised 12198, contact Ecology's Perl1!J!..i\.ssistance Cefir~r (QrJatesLVetsion, 360/407-7037
Pa~e-3-of<4' u~ .
SECr/ON B - Use for Shoreline and Corps of Engineers permits onlv:
7. TOTAl COST OF PROJECT. THIS MEANS THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THE PROJECT. INCLUDING MATERIALS. lABOR, MACHINE RENTALS, ETC.
18. LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH JURISDICTION:
9. FOR CORPS, COAST GUARD. AND DNR PERMITS, PROVIDE NAMES. ADDRESSES. AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS OF ADJOINING PROPERTY O\NNERS, LESSEES, ETC..
PlEASE NOTE: SHOREUNE MANAGEMENT COMPUANCE MA.Y REQUIRE ADDITIONAL NOTICE - CONSUL T YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT.
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE NUMBER
erml' covered by this a lication
. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE FOR A PERMIT OR PERMITS TO AUTHORIZE THE ACTNlTIES DESCRIBED HEREIN. I CERTIFY THAT I AM FAMILIAR WITH THE
NFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION, AND THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWlEDGE AND BELIEF, SUCH INFORMATION IS TRUE, COMPLETE, AND
CCURATE. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I POSSESS THE AUTHORITY TO UNDERTAKE THE PROPOSED ACTIVITIES. I HEREBY GRANT TO THE AGENCIES TO WHICH
IS APPLICATION IS MADE, THE RIGHT TO ENTER THE ABOVE-OESCRIBED LOCATION TO INSPECT THE PROPOSED, IN-PROGRESS OR COMPLETED INORK. I
AGREE TO START INORK ONlY AFTER AlL NECESSARY PERMITS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT
I HEREBY DESIGNATE
TO ACT AS MY AGENT IN MATTERS RELATED TO THIS APPLICATION FOR PERMIT(S). I UNDERSTAND THAT IF A FEDERAl PERMIT IS ISSUED,
I MUST SIGN THE PERMIT.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
DATE
SIGNATURE OF lANDO\NNER (EXCEPT PUBLIC ENTITY lANDO\NNERS. E.G. DNR)
THIS APPLICATION Mllll BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT AND THE AGENT, IF AN AUTHORIZED AGENT IS DESIGNATED.
18 U.S.C 51001 provides that: Wloever. in any mamer within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifIeS, conceals. or covers up by any Irick. scheme, or device a
material fact or makes any false, ficlijious, or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knaNing same to contain any false. fICtitious. or fraudulent statement or
entry. shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both.
COMPLETED BY LOCAL OFFICIAL
A. Nature of the existing shoreline. (Describe type of shoreline, such as marine, stream, lake, lagoon, marsh, bog, swamp, flood
plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as accretion, erosion, high bank, low bank, or dike; material such as sand, gravel,
mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any:)
B. In the event that any of the proposed buildings or structures will exceed a height of thirty-five feet above the average grade
level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential units, existing and potential, that will have an obstructed
view:
C. If the application involves a conditional use or variance, set forth in full that portion of the master program which provides that
the proposed use may be a conditional use, or, in the case of a variance, from which the variance is being sought:
These Agencies are Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action employers.
For special accommodation needs, please contact the appropriate agency in the instructions.
L1.'f
~S(
JARPA, Revised 12/98, contact Ecology'sl>ermitAs$istance Center for latest version, 360/407-7037
Page 4 of 4
JEFFERSON COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
621 Sheridan Street . Port Townsend. Washington 98368
360/379-4450 . 3601379-4451 Fax
http://www.co.jefferson.wa.uslcommdevelopmentl
Stormwater Calculation Worksheet
I MlAt
PROJECT/APPlICANT NAME:
DETERMINING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS: This stonnwater caJcuIation wor1csheet should be completed first
to classify the proposal as "small: "medum,. or'1arge: The size detennines whether a Stonnwater Site Plan is requll9d in conjunction
with a stand-alone stonnwater management pennit application, building pennit application, or other land use approval application that
involves stonnwater review. The basic infonnation wi! also be helpful for completing a Stonnwater Site Plan, if requll9d.
...
Size of parcel
acres
PARCEL SIZE n.E.. SITE)
hi acre contains 43,560 square feel Multiply the acreage by this figure.
Size of parcel in square feet
sq/ft
Land-disturbfng activity is any activity that results in movement of earth, or a change in the existing soil cover (both vegetative and
non-vegetative) and/or the existing soil topography. Land disturbing activities include, but are not limited to clearing, grading, fiDing,
excavation, and compaction associated with stabilization of structures and road construction.
Native vegetation is vegetation comprised on plant species, other than noxious weeds, that are indigenous to the coastal region of the
Pacific Northwest and which reasonably could have been expected to naturaJly occur on the site. Examples include species such as
Douglas fir, westem hemlock, western I9d cedar, alder, big-leaf maple, and vine maple; shrubs such as willow, elderberry, salmonberry,
and salal; herbaceous plants such as swon:f fem, foam flower, and fireweed.
LAND DISTURBING AcnVITY. CONVERSION OF NATIVE VEGETATION. AND VOLUME OF CUTIFILL
Calculate the total area to be cleared, graded, filled,
excavated, and/or compacted for proposed development
project. Include in this calculation the area to be cleared for:
Construction site for structures sq/ft
Drainfield, septic tank, etc. sqlft
WeB, utilities, etc. sq/ft
Driveway, parking, etc. sq/ft
Lawn, landscaping, etc. sqlft
Other compacted surface, etc. sq/ft
Total Land Disturbance sq/ft
[over]
ston'IMmer calc worl<sheet - REV. 1011J2003
Answer the following two questions related to
conversion of native vegetation:
Does the project convert * acres or more of
native vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas?
Circle:
Yes
No
Does the project convert 2 * acres or more of
native vegetation to pasture?
Circle:
Yes
No
Indicate Total Volumes of Proposed:
Cut
Fin
(culyd)
l7~ b~ 1
Impervious surface is a hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil manUe as under natural conditions
prior to developmenl A hard surface area which causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow
from the flow present under natural conditions prior to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to roof
tops, walkways, patios, driveways, parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphaJt paving, gravel roads, packed earthen materials,
and oiled, macadam or other surfaces which similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater.
STORMWATER CALULATIONS -IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
NEW
Total New
EXISTING
$QIft Structures (aU roof area) $QIft
$QIft Sidewalks $QIft
$QIft Patios $QIft
$QIft Solid Decks $QIft
(without infiltration below)
$QIft Driveway $QIft
$QIft Other $QIft
~ Total Existing ~
Structures (all roof area)
Sidewalks
Patios
Solid Decks
(without infiltration below)
Driveway
Other
TOTAL NEW + TOTAL EXISTING"
sqllt
"This amount will be used to check total lot coverage.
The following questions will help determine whether the proposed project is considered development or redevelopment.
DEVELOPMENT Y. REDEVELOPMENT
Divide the total ex/slina impervious surface above by the size of the parcel and convert to a percentage: %
Does the site have 35% or more of existina impervious surface?
Circle:
Yes
No
FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS: If the answer is yes, the proposal is considered redevelopment and the attached Figure 2 should be
used to determine the applicable Minimum Requirements. If the answer is no, the proposal is considered new development and the
attached figure 1 shOuld be used. At this juncture, the applicant should refer to the applicable Flow Chart to detennine the Minimum
Requirements for stonnwater management. DCD staff will help verify the classification of the project and the application requirements.
For proponents of "smalr projects who must comply only with Minimum Requirement #2-construction Stonnwater PoUution
Prevention-an additional submittal is not required. The proponent Is responsbIe for employing the 12 Elements to control erosion and
prevent sediment and other pollutants from leaving the site during the consbuction phase of the project. Pick up the Construction
Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BliPs) Packet. Proponents of "medium- projects-those
that must meet only Minimum Requirements 11 1hrough ,5-and for "1arge-projects-thosethat must meet an 10 Minimum
Requirements-are required to submit a Stonnwater Site Plan. DCD has prepared a submittal template of a Stonnwater Site Plan,
principally for rural residential projects. Complete the template in the Stonnwater Site Plan Instructions and Submittal Template or
prepare a Stomiwater Site Plan using the step-by-step guidance in the Stonnwatef Management Manual.
APPUCANT SIGNATURE
By signing the Stonnwater Calculation Worksheet, I as the applicant/owner attest that the infonnation provided herein Is true and
correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify 1hat this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of aH
owners of the affected property. -
(LANDOWNER OR AlJTHORlZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE)
(DATE)
stomwvater calc WOlksheel- REV. 1C11/2003
\1v
d--S~
2
If.
JEFFERSON COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
621 Sheridan Street. Port Townsend. Washington 98368
360/379-4450 . 3601379-4451 Fax
htlp:/lwww.co.jefferson.wa.uslcommdevelopmentl
Stormwater Site Plan Instructions and Submittal Template
"Medium" and "Large" Projects
[Includes Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and Permanent Stormwater Control Plan]
The submittal template for a Stormwater Site Plan has been developed from information presented in the Department of
Ecology 2001 Stormwater Management Manual for WestemWashington (Manua!), which is the set of stormwater
management standards for new development and redevelopment in Jefferson County.
The Stormwater Site Plan, Minimum Requirement #1 in the Manual, is the comprehensive report containing all of the
technical information and analysis necessary to evaluate a proposed new. development or redevelopment for compliance
with stormwater requirements. A Stormwater Site Plan is required for all "medium" and "large" projects. (For background
information, refer to the Stormwater Management Information Sheet.)
The Stormwater Site Plan includes a Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP - Minimum
Requirement #2) that addresses sediment and erosion control during construction and a Permanent Stormwater Control
Plan that addresses stormwater on the project site in its developed condition through dispersion, infiltration, or, if
necessary, flow control and/or treatment facilities.
The steps for preparing and the content of a Stormwater Site Plan are summarized below and more fully described in
Chapter 3 of Volume I of the Manual. The attached submittal template is intended to be a format applicable to typical rural
residential construction. For these cases, completion and submittal of the template results in a complete land use
application.
THE TWO MAIN COMPONENTS OF A STORMWATER SITE PLAN
I. Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
A Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is a document that describes the potential for pollution
problems on a construction project and which explains and illustrates the measures to be taken to control these problems.
The basis for requiring a SWPPP, the twelve elements required to be in a SWPPP, the suggested step-by step procedure
to follow, and the suggested Best Management Practices (BMPs) to follow, are all described in Volume II of the Manual.
A SWPPP consists of two sections, a narrative and the drawings. A description of the contents of the narrative and the
drawings sections, and checklists for each of these sections, are in Section 3.3 of Volume II. For typical rural residential
projects, DCD provides a Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Uanagement Practices (SUPs) Packet
to assist with the preparation of the Construction SWPPP.
II. Permanent Stormwater Control Plan
A Permanent Stormwater Control Plan is a document that describes the basis for, and the means of implementing,
permanent Best Management Practices (BMPs) for flow control and treatment facilities after the project is completed. The
content of a Permanent Stormwater Control Plan is described in Section 3.1.5 of Volume I of the Manual. The permanent
BMPs and facilities for flow control and treatment are described in Volumes III, IV, and V of the Manual. The submittal
template is intended for rural residential projects that can fully disperse or infiltrate stormwater. The template may not be
appropriate or sufficient for applications involving larger or more complex projects.
stonnwater site plan template - rev. 1 M/2003
..
INSTRUCTIONS
To prepare a Stormwater Site Plan, follow the steps outlined below, complete the Stormwater Site Plan template, sign and
submit together with the Master Land Use Application (MLA). This information may also be provided on other diagrams,
plans, studies, or attachments submitted with the project application. If so, please indicate such on this supplemental
permit application. As the template is designed mostly for rural residential development, it may not be as useful for a
larger project as an independently prepared Stormwater Site Plan. For any particular project, the Administrator may
waive specific submittal requirements determined to be unnecessary for review of the application.
Note: Prior to filling out the submittal template, read through these steps for preparing a Stormwater Site
Plan. Preliminary or draft versions of the indMduaJ components may be helpful in the case that
redesigning an original layout would result in a proposal that has less environmental impacts and is
significantly simpler in terms of meeting stormwaterrequirements. For example, if the proposal can
utilize the "full dispersion" BMP (T5.30 in the ManuaQ, there is no need to provide for flow control or
flow treatment on the site. For more information on the easiest way to meet stormwater
requirements, refer to the "Low Impact Development" Information Sheet. .BMPs used during the
construction phase and that are included in the Construction SWPPPmay aiso.beuseful as elements
of the Permanent Stormwater Control Plan.
STEP 1: COLLECT AND ANAL VZE INFORMATION ON EXISTING CONDITIONS
Collect and review information on existing site conditions, including topography, drainage pattems, soils, ground cover, critical areas,
adjacent areas, existing development, existing stormwater facilities. The Jefferson County website provides an Internet Map Server
(IMS) function (http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us). If available, a Development Review Division (DRD) planner may be able to assist you in
collecting this information.
Analyze the information to determine site limitations, including:
· Areas with high potential for erosion and sediment deposition (based on soil properties, slope, etc.);
· Locations of sensitive and critical areas (e.g., vegetative buffers, wetlands, steep slopes, floodplains, geologically hazardous
areas, streams, susceptible aquifer recharge areas, etc.); and
· The natural receiving waters to which the stormwater runoff either directly or eventually discharges.
This information will be useful in site design and in the. completion of the Permanent Stormwater Control Plan and Construction
SWPPP.
STEP 2: PREPARE PREUMINARY DEVELOPMENT LAYOUT
Based upon the analysis of existing site conditions, locate the buildings, driveways;'roads;"parking'lots,~nd landscaping features for the
proposed development. Consider the following points when laying out the site:
· Fit development to the terrain to minimize land disturbance; contine construction activities to the least area necessary and
away from critical areas;
· Preserve areas with natural vegetation (especially forested areas) as much as pOSSIble;
· On sites with a mix of soil types, locate impervious areas over less permeable soil (e.g., till) and try to restrict development
over more porous soils (e.g., outwash);
· Cluster buildings together;
· Minimize impervious areas; and
· Maintain and utilize the natural drainage pattems.
The preliminary development layout will assist in determining threshold discharge areas for calculating whether size thresholds under
Minimum Requirements #6, #7, and #8 (for 'arge" projects) are exceeded and as a basis for the drawings and maps required for the
Stormwater Site Plan.
_ter site plan t~ate - rev. llV1l2OO3
"J
\1~
~,2
STEP 3: PERFORM AN OFF-SITE ANALYSIS
This step is for 'arge" projects (i.e., adding 5,000 square feet or more of new impervious surface, converting o/.t acres of pervious
surfaces to lawn or landscaped areas, or converting 2 Y.z acres of forested area to pasture) at the discretion of the UDC Administrator.
See Section 2.6.2 of the Manual for more information.
STEP 4: REVIEW THE APPUCABLE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
The Stormwater Calculation Worksheet is a required submittal for all development and redevelopment land use applications.
Completing the Worksheet helps determine the broad category of the proposal-"smaII," "medium," or 'arge" project-and the
applicable Minimum Requirements. "Smalr projects need to meet Minimum Requirement #2 only. "Medium" projects need to meet
Minimum Requirements #1 through #5. "large" projects need to meet all the Minimum Requirements, #1 through #10. The Minimum
Requirements are as follows:
1. Preparation of Storm water Site Plans (Chapter 3 of Manual) 6. Runoff Treatment
2. Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 7. Flow Control
3. Source Control of Pollution 8. WeUands Protection
4. Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls 9. Basin/Watershed Planning
5. On-site Stormwater Management 10. Operation and Maintenance
The Manual provides descriptions and instructions in Volume I, Chapter 2. Information sheets, application materials, and DRD planners
can help describe the Minimum Requirements to applicants.
Note: "Large" projects, as part of meeting Minimum Requirements #6 - Runoff Treatment - and #7 - Row Control, are
compared to Table 2.1 and Table 2.2 in the Manual to determine whether on-site stormwater management BMPs are
sufficient or treatment facilities or flow control facilities are required. The flow control determination may necessitate use
of the Western Washington Hydrology Model managed by the Department of Ecology. Consult Sections 2.5.6 and 2.5.7
of Volume I, Chapter 2 of the Manual for more information.
Again, the easiest way to meet stormwater requirements is to design the project so that natural drainage is preserved, impervious
surface is limited, and full dispersion (BMP T5.30) is implemented. By using 'ow impact development" techniques in the site design,
the need for treatment and flow control facilities is eliminated, simplifying preparation of the Stormwater Site Plan and often the site
construction process itself. For more information on these techniques, consult the "Low Impact Development" Information Sheet.
STEP 5: PREPARE A PERMANENT STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN
Select stormwater control BMPs and facilities that will serve the project site in its developed condition. The selection process is
presented in Volume I, Chapter 4. After consideration is given to how selected BMPs and facilities fit within and serve the entire
preliminary development layout, the designer may want to reconsider the site layout to reduce the need for construction of facilities or
the size of the facilities by reducing the amount of. impervious surfaces created and increasing the areas to be left undistUrbed. The
Permanent Stormwater Control Plan should contain the following sections (Section 3.1.5 of Volume I, Chapter 3):
· Existing Site Hydrology (Le., the behavior of water on the site-above, below, and on the ground)
· Developed Site Hydrology (special requirements for projects and threshold discharge areas within projects that requirement
treatment and flow facilities)
· Performance Standards and Goals
· Flow Control System
· Water Quality System
· Conveyance System Analysis and Design
Essentially, in terms of site hydrology, the developed condition of the site should match the pre-developed condition, with is forested
land cover (unless reasonable, historic information is provided that indicates the site was prairie prior to settlement). For 'arge"
projects, totals of impervious surfaces, pollution-generating impervious surfaces, and poUution generating pervious surfaces must be
tabulated for each threshold discharge area for which on-site BMPs are the sole stormwater management approach.
stormwater site plan terrplate - rev. 1011/2003
3
12~
a&r
STEP 6: PREPARE A CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)
The Construction SWPPP for projects adding or replacing 2,000 square feet of impervious surface or more or clearing 7,000 square
feet or more (i.e., "medium" or 'arge" projects), must contain sufficient information to demonstrate to the UDC Administrator that the
potential pollution problems have been adequately addressed for the proposed project. An adequate Construction SWPPP includes a
narrative and drawings. The narrative is a written statement to explain and justify the pollution prevention decisions made for a
particular project. The narrative contains concise information conceming existing site conditions, construction schedules, and other
pertinent items that are not contained on the drawings. The drawings and notes describe where and when the various BMPs should be
installed, the performance the BMPs are expected to achieve, and actions to be taken if the performance goals are not achieved.
There are 12 Elements that must be considered in the development of a Construction SWPPP, unless site conditions render that
element unnecessary and the exemption from that element is clearly justified in the narrative. The 12 Elements cover the general water
quality protection strategies for limiting site impacts during construction and are described in detail in Section 2.5.2, Volume I of the
Manual.
The 12 Elements of Minimum Requirement #2, Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention, are:
1. Mark Clearing Umits 5. Stabilize Soils 9. Control Pollutants
2. Establish Construction Access 6. Protect Slopes 10. Control De-watering
3. Control Row Rates 7. Protect Drain Inlets 11. Maintain BMPs
4. Install Sediment Controls 8. Stabilize Channels and Outlets 12. Manage the Project
For ease of use, the Stormwater Site Plan submittaJ template below includes a section that lists the 12 Elements and provides the
opportunity to include sufficient information for rural residential and other relatively simple Construction SWPPPs. For more complex
projects, a separate narrative and set of plans may be preferred or required.
Volume II of the Manual is dedicated to Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention. A step-by-step BMP selection process and a
complete description of the BMPs applicable to each element is provided in Chapters 3 and 4. Additionally, oeD provides a
Construction Stormw~ter Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet that summarizes the 12
Elements and excerpts from the Manual sample sediment and erosion control measures for typical rural residential development. The
Packet should prove useful for completing the Construction SWPPP component of the submittal template.
On construction sites that infiltrate all stormwater runoff, the primary consideration in the preparation of the Construction SWPPP is the
protection of the infiltration facilities from fine sediments during the construction phase and protection of ground water from other
pollutants. On construction sites that discharge to surface water, the primary consideration in the preparation of the Construction
SWPPP is compliance with the State Water Quality Standards. The step-by-step procedure outlined in Volume II, Section 3.2 is
recommended for the development of these Construction SWPPPs.
STEP 7: COMPLETE THE STORMWATER SITE PLAN
The Stormwater Site Plan encompasses the entire submittal to Jefferson County in conjunction with a land use or building permit
application. The following documents or sections should be included:
. Project Overview
. Existing Conditions Summary
· Off-site Analysis Report (if required; usually for 'arge" projects)
· Permanent Stormwater Control Plan
· Special Reports and Studies (such as soil testing, wetland delineation, etc., if applicable)
· Other Permits (approvals required by other regulatory agencies that include stormwater management conditions)
· Operation and Maintenance Manual (for each flow control and treatment facility, if applicable)
· Bond Quantities Worksheet (for performance bond or other financial guarantee for proper construction and operation of
construction site BMPs and permanent drainage facilities, if required)
The submittaJ template below is designed for rural residential and other relatively small or simple projects. For larger and more
complex projects-particularly those that involve stormwater treatment and/or flow control-more information may be required and an
independent Stormwater Site Plan may be the preferable submittal format.
STEP 8: CHECK COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
A Stormwater Site Plan as designed and implemented should specifically fulfill all Minimum Requirements applicable to the project.
The applicant should review to check that these requirements are satisfied and that all information provlded is true and correct prior to
signing and submitting the Stormwater Site Plan. (The signature box appears at the end of the submittal template.)
stormwater site plan terT1llate - rev. 10r'1/2003
4
\
\~
'j?;~
JEFFERSON COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
621 Sheridan Street. Port Townsend. Washington 98368
360/379-4450.360/379-4451 Fax
http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/
IMLA#
PROJECT/APPUCANT NAME:
Please answer all of the following questions to the best of your ability. Where the question calls for depiction on a site map, the
applicant may choose to either incorporate the elements into the general plot plan for the Master land Use Application or to submit a
separate stormwater site plan map.
Project Overview
1. Describe the proposed developed conditions of the site. Indicate position and relative size of proposed improvements on the
site map.
Existing Conditions Summary
2. Describe the existing topography. Indicate contours on the site map.
3. Describe the existing vegetation. Indicate native vegetation areas on the site map.
4. Describe the existing soils. Indicate soil type on the site map.
5. Describe the existing site hydrology (i.e., drainage; behavior of water on the site-above, below, and on the ground). Indicate
existing stormwater drainage to and from the site on the site map. Depict separate drainage basins on the site map, if
applicable, and indicate acreage of each.
6. Describe any excess levels of noise generated by the proposed use or activity:
stormwater site plan template - rev. 1lY112OO3
5
n~.~L8:Z=_~-" ...;?~
7. Describe significant geographic features and critical areas (i.e., environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands, streams,
steep slopes, etc.) on the site. Indicate location on the site map.
8. Describe the general vicinity of the site, including adjacent land uses and structures, utilities, roads, and sensitive/critical areas
(streams, weUands, lakes, steep slopes, etc.).
Permanent Stormwater Control Plan
This portion of the Stonnwater Site Plan consists of the selection and installation .of the appropriate stonnwater control BMPs
and facUities to remain in place after construction of the project is completed.
"Medium" size projects are required to have the totals calculated of all impervious surfaces, pollution-generating impervious
surfaces, and pollution-generating pervious surfaces to verify that the thresholds for treatment facilities and flow control
facUities are not exceeded.
9. Describe the developed site hydrology, as proposed. Indicate whether stonnwater will be fully dispersed (i.e., per BMP T5.30
in the Manual) or, if not, what types of stonnwater flow control will be utilized for the site or specific threshold discharge areas
within the site. Locate these facilities on the site plan and differentiate proposed facUities from existing facilities.
10. If the project requires the use of stonnwater treatment facilities, describe the types of stonnwater treatment facilities proposed
for use on the site. Locate these facilities on the site plan and differentiate proposed facilities from existing facilities. [This is
nonnally for 'arge" projects or projects that involve the potential for dispersion of contaminants.)
11. Describe the performance goals and standards applicable to the project.
.
12. Describe the flow control system.
s1e>rmwater site plan template - ffN. 10/112003
\'itl ;),.5~
6
13. Describe the water quality system.
14. Describe the conveyance system analysis and design.
15. Describe the source of fill material, physical characteristics of fill material, and deposition of excess material.
16. Proposed methods of placement and compaction consistent with the applicable standards on Appendb( Chapter 33 of the
Uniform Building Code.
17. Describe the proposed surfacing material.
18. Describe methods for restoration of the site.
19. An Operation and Maintenance Manual is required for each flow control and treatment facility. [This is normally required for
"large" projects only and only those for which facilities are required to control flow or treat runoff.] If included, list the Manuals
here.
20. Ust here and include any special reports or studies conducted to prepare the Stormwater Site Plan.
.
21. Ust other necessary permits and approvals as required by other regulatory agencies. If those permits or approvals include
conditions that affect the drainage plan or contain more restrictive drainage-related requirements, describe those conditions or
restrictions here.
stormwater site plan template - rev. 10/1/2003
7
-.-.-'.-,."--'''''''':'''-''''_<'0.''''''''
IfJ''''~&f
CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)
The Construction SWPPP addresses sediment and erosion control during construction. The BMPs indicated by the applicant in the
template that follows must be installed on the ground during all construction phases of the project. The proponent is responsible for
preventing sediment and erosion impacts to environmentaRy sensitive areas and off-site areas. Consult the Construction Stormwater
Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management PracUces (BMPs) Packet for guidance, particularly with rural residential
development.
SECTION 1- CONSTRUCTION SWPPP NARRATIVE
1. Construction Stormwater Pollution Plan Elements. Describe how each of the Construction SWPPP elements has been or
will. be addressed. Identify the type and location of BMPs used to satisfy the required element. If an element is not applicable
to the proposal, justify in writing. Descriptions of the 12 Bements are found at section 2.5.2 of the Manual (beginning on page
2-15).
12 Required Elements - Construction SWPPP
1. Mark Clearing Umits.
2. Establish Construction Access.
3. Control Flow Rates.
4. Install Sediment Controls.
5. Stabilize Soils.
6. Protect Slopes.
7. Protect Drain Inlets.
stonnwater site plan template - rev. 11W112OO3
\g:l,L ~S~
8
,
12 Required Elements - Construction SWPPP (continued)
8. Stabilize Channels and Outlets.
9. Control Pollutants.
10. Control De-Watering (the act of pumping groundwater or stormwater away from an active construction site).
11. Maintain Best Management Practices (BMPs).
,.
12. Manage the Project.
2. Adjacent Areas.
a. Description of the adjacent areas that may be affected by site disturbance (e.g., streams, lakes, wetlands, residential
areas, roads).
,
b. Description of the downstream drainage path leading from the site to the receiving body of water (minimum distance of 400
yards).
3. Environmentally Sensitive Areas.
a. Description of environmentally sensitive areas that are on or adjacent to the site.
Slonnwater site plan template - rev. 1011/2003 9
.......'.fS'..... Jsr
/.,.".....
,
b. Description of special requirements for working in or near environmentally sensitive areas.
4. Erosion Problem Areas. Description of potential erosion problems on site in the context of the characteristics of the on-site
soils (e.g., erodibility, settleability, penneability, depth, texture, soil structure).
5. Construction Phasing.
a. Construction sequence
b. Construction phasing (if proposed)
6. Construction Schedule. Wet season is October 1 through April 30 (page 2-21 of the Manual).
I. Provide a proposed construction schedule.
II. Wet Season Construction Activities.
a. Proposed wet season construction activities.
b. Proposed wet season construction activities for environmentally sensitive areas.
7. Financial/Ownership Responsibilities.
a. Identify the property owner responsible for the initiation of bonds and/or other financial securities.
b. Describe bonds and/or other evidence of financial responsibility for liability associated with erosion and sedimentation
impacts.
8. Engineering Calculations. Provide Design Calculations on a separate sheet for the following, if applicable.
a. Sediment PondslTraps.
b. Diversions.
c. Waterways.
d. RunotflStonnwater Detention Calculations
s~ site plan tElf1lllate - rev. 1MI2003 l 10
\.81.e . (} i)~
SECTION 11- EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
Sediment and erosion control measures may be depicted on the master land use application plot plan, a stormwater site plan, and/or a
separate Construction SWPPP site plan. This is a checklist to ensure that the following are depicted on a site plan:
1. General.
a. Vicinity Map
b. Jefferson County Approval Block
c. Erosion and Sediment Control Notes
2. Site Plan.
a. Legal description of subject property.
b. North arrow.
c. Indicate boundaries of existing vegetation (e.g., tree lines, pasture areas, etc.).
d. Identify and label areas of potential erosion problems.
e. Identify FEMA base flood boundaries and Shoreline Management boundaries (if applicable).
f. Show existing and proposed contours.
g. Indicate drainage basins and direction of flow for individual drainage areas.
h. Label final grade contours and identify developed condition drainage basins.
i. Delineate areas that are to be cleared and graded.
j. Show all cut and fill slopes indicating top and bottom of slope catch lines.
3. Conveyance Systems.
a. Designate locations for swales, interceptor trenches, or ditches.
b. Show all temporary and permanent drainage pipes, ditches, or cut-off trenches required for erosion & sediment control.
c. Provide minimum slope and cover for all temporary pipes or callout pipe inverts.
d. Shows grades, dimensions, and direction of flow in all ditches, swales, culverts and pipes.
e. Provide details for bypassing off-site runoff around disturbed areas.
f. Indicate locations and outlets of any dewatering systems.
4. Location of Detention Best Management Practices (BMPs). Identify location of detention BMPs.
5. Erosion and Sediment Control Facilities.
a. Show the locations of sediment trap(s), pond(s), pipes and structures.
b. Dimension pond berm widths and inside and outside pond slopes.
c. Indicate the trap/pond storage required and the depth, length, and width dimensions.
d. Provide typical section views through pond and outlet structure.
e. Provide typical'details of gravel cone and standpipe, and/or other filtering devices.
f. Detail stabilization techniques for outletlinlet.
g. Detail controVrestrictor device location and details.
h. Specify mulch and/or recommended cover of berms and slopes.
i. Provide rock specifications and detail for rock check dam(s), if applicable.
j. Specify spacing for rock check dams as required.
k. Provide front and side sections of typical rock check dams.
I. Indicate the locations and provide details and specifications for silt fabric.
m. Locate the construction entrance and provide a detail.
6. Detailed Drawings. Any structural practices used that are not referenced in the Ecology Manual should be explained and
illustrated with detailed drawings.
7. Other Pollutant BMPs. Indicate on the site plan the locations of BMPs to be used for the control of pollutants other than
sediment (e.g., concrete wash water).
8. Monitoring Locations. Indicate on the site plan the water quality sampling locations to be used for monitoring water quality on
the construction site. Sampling stations should be located upstream and downstream of the project site.
stormwater site plan template - rev. 10/112003
/8:,1. d5r
11
Stonnwater Site Plan Changes
If the designer wishes to make changes or revisions to the originaUy approved Stonnwater Site Plan, the proposed revisions shall be
submitted to DCD prior to construction. The submittal shall include substitute pages that include all proposed changes, revised
drawings showing any structural changes, and any other supporting information that explains and supports the reason for the change.
Final Corrected Plan Submittal
If the project included construction of conveyance systems, treatment facilities, flow control facilities, or structural source control BMPs
(not standard on-site stonnwater management BMPs), the applicant shaR submit a final corrected plan ("as-builtsj when the project is
completed. These should be engineering drawings (stamped by a licensed cMI engineer) that accurately represent the project as
constructed.
APPUCANT SIGNATURE
By signing the Construction SWPPP worksheet, I as the applicant/owner attest that the infonnation provided herein is true and
correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of aU
owners of the affected property.
(lANDOWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE)
(DATE)
THIS SPACE MAY BE USED FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES, IF NEEDED:
Sl~er site plan lllfl'lllate - fiN. 1M/2003
L .., ,Un,
\ <&~ . > ~ S<6
12
Jefferson County Department Of Community Development
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT HANDOUT
Select definitions from the 2001 Department of Ecology
S'IorImPaterManagement ManllaJ for Western Washington.
2.3 Definitions Related to Minimum Requirements
A full listing and definition of stormwater-related words and phrases that
are used in this manual is given in the glossary. A few of the key
definitions are listed here for ease in understanding the requirements that
follow.
· ArteriIll- A road or street primarily for through traffic. A major
arterial connects an Interstate Highway to cities and counties. A minor
arterial connects major arterials to collectors. A collector connects an
arterial to a neighborhood.. A collector is not an arterial. A local
access road connects individual homes to a collector.
· Effective Impervious surface - Those impervious surfaces that are
connected via sheet flow or discrete conveyance to a drainage system.
Impervious surfaces on residential development sites are considered
ineffective if the runoff is dispersed through at least one hundred feet
of native vegetation in accordance with BMP T5.30 - ''Full
Dispersion,>> as described. in Chapter 5 of V olume V.
· Highway - A main public road connecting towns and cities
· Impervious surface - A hard surface area that either prevents or
retards the entry of water into the soil mantle as under natural
conditions prior to development. A hard surface area which causes
water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate
of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to
development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not
limited to, roof tops, walkways, patios, driveways, parking lots or
storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads,.packed earthen
materials, and oiled, macadam or other surfaces which similarly
impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. Open, uncovered
retention/detention facilities shall not be considered 8:8 impervious
surfaces for purposes of determining whether the thresholds for
application of minimum requirements are exceeded. Open, uncovered
retention/detention facilities shall be considered impervious surfaces
for purposes of runoff modeling.
2-4
Volume 1- Minimum Technical Requirements
(4,ugust 2001
i
.~ ... ". ",.,. '~_..~
/fl, ,.Q".
· Land disturbing IIctivity - Any activity that results in movement of
earth, or a change in the existing soil cover (both vegetative and non-
vegetative) and/or the existing soil topography. Land disturbing
activities include, but are not limited to clearing, grading, filling, and
excavation. Compaction that is associated with stabilization of
structures and road construction shall also be considered a land
disturbing activity. Vegetation maintenance practices are not
considered land-disturbing activity.
· . Mllintentlnce - Repair and maintenance includes activities conducted
on currently serviceable structures, facilities, and equipment that
involves no expansion or use beyond that previously existing and
results in no significant adverse hydrologic impact. It includes those
usual activities taken to prevent a decline, lapse, or cessation in the use
of structures and systems. Those usual activities may include and
. replacement of disfunctioning facilities, including cases where
environmental permits require replacing an existing stIucture with a
different type stIucture, as long as the functioning characteristics of the
original stIucture are not changed. One example is the replacement of
a collapsed, fish blocking, round culvert with a new box culvert under
the same span, or width, of roadway. For further details on the
application of this manual to various road management functions,
please see Section 2.2.
· NtItive l'egetlltion - Vegetation comprised of plant species, other than
noxious weeds, that are indigenous to the coastal region of the Pacific
Northwest and which reasonably could have been expected to
naturally occur on the site. Examples include trees such as Douglas
Fir, western hemloc~ western red cedar, alder, big-leaf maple, and
vine maple; shrubs such as willow, elderberry, salmonberry, and salal;
and herbaceous plants such as sword fern, foam flower, and fireweed.
· New development - Land disturbing activities, including Class N -
general forest practices that are conversions from timber land to other
uses; structural development, including construction or installation of a
building or other structure; creation of impervious surfaces; and
subdivision, short subdivision and binding site plans, as defined and
applied in Chapter 58.17 RCW. Projects meeting the definition of
redevelopment shall not be considered new development.
· PoUution-genertding impervious surfllce (PGIS) - Those impervious
surfaces considered to be a significant source of pollutants in
stormwater runoff. Such surfaces include diose which are subject to:
vehicular use; industrial activities (as further defined in the glossary);
or storage of erodible or leachable materials, wastes, or chemicals, and
which receive direct rainfall or the run-on or blow-in of rainfall.
Erodible or leachable materials, wastes, or chemicals are those
August 2001
Volume 1- Minimum Technical Requirements
2-5
\:\Q ~5~
, .
substances which, when exposed to rainfall, measurably alter the
physical or chemical characteristics of the rainfall runoff. Examples
include erodible soils that are stockpiled, uncovered process wastes,
manure, fertilizers, oily substances, ashes, kiln dust, and garbage
dumpster leakage. Metal roofs are also considered to be PGIS unless
they are coated with an inert, non-leachable material (e.g., baked-on
enamel coating).
A surface, whether paved or not, shall be considered subject to
vehicular use if it is regularly used by motor vehicles. The following
are considered regularly-used surfaces: roads, unvegetated road
shoulders, bike lanes within the traveled lane of a roadway, driveways,
parking lots, unfenced fire lanes, vehicular equipment storage yards,
and airport runways.
.The following are not considered regularly-used surfaces: paved
bicycle pathways separated from and not subject to drainage from
roads for motor vehicles, fenced firelanes, and infrequently used
maintenance access roads.
· Pollution-generating pervious surfaces (pGPS) - Any non-
impervious surface subject to use of pesticides and fertilizers or loss of
soil. Typical PGPS include lawns, landscaped areas, golf courses,
parks, cemeteries, and sports fields.
· Pre-developed condition - The native vegetation and soils that existed
at a site prior to the influence of Euro-American settlement. The pre-
developed condition shall be assumed to be a forested land cover
unless reasonable, historic information is provided that indicates the
site was prairie prior to settlement.
· Project site - That portion of a property, properties, or right of way
subject to land disturbing activities, new impervious surfaces, or
replaced impervious surfaces. .
· Receiving waters - Bodies of water or surface water systems to which
surface runoff is discharged via a point source of stormwater or via
sheet flow.
· Redevelopment - On a site that is already substantially developed (i.e.,
has 35% or more of existing impervious surface coverage), the .
creation or addition of impervious surfaces; the expansion of a
building footprint or addition or replacement of a structure; structural
development including construction, installation or expansion of a
building or other structure;; replacement of impervious surface that is
not part of a routine maintenance activity; and land disturbing
activities.
2-6
(--"-,
Volume 1- Minimum Technical Requirements
"""~..., .."'-"-;~\
~ "T':'-A&gust 2001
., ";'12~"-d~,
· Reploced impervious surface - For structures, the removal and
replacement of any exterior impervious surfaces or foundation. For
other impervious surfaces, the removal down to bare soil or base
comse and replacement.
· Site - The area defined by the legal boundaries of a parcel or parcels
of land that is (are) subject to new development or redevelopment. For
road projects, the length of the project site and the right-of-way
boundaries define the site.
· Source control BMP - A structure or operation that is intended to
prevent pollutants from coming into contact with stormwater through
physical separation of areas or careful management of activities that
are sources of pollutants. This manual separates source control BMPs
into two types. Structural Source Control BMPs are physical,
structural, or mechanical devices, or facilities that are intended to
prevent pollutants from entering stormwater. Operational BMPs are
non-structural practices that prevent or reduce pollutants from entering
stormwater. See Volume N for details.
· Threshold Discharge Area - An onsite area draining to a single
natural discharge location or multiple natural discharge locations that
combine within one-quarter mile downstream (as determined by the
shortest flowpath). The examples in Figure 2.1 below illustrate this
definition. The purpose of this definition is to clarify how the
thresholds of this manual are applied to project sites with multiple
discharge points.
EIMlpIeof. PnljIcISII
willa. ............
Dlld.,.... ........
n..IIoId....... AIw
~: ".~:'~:.;..:: .!
~.,~ "._0'(/
. J>.~:..' .~....: ~7-..,':
. .~.~!o~:-r,-. ."
. .~" .
~:"':::".-oa_'" '.
:'. >.... . .-..~ .
" . "he. ....
...:..m.:,=..
. j.~/..~~ ".~,.' -.
:It ---,
! '- ........
; ~
.. LOCIIioll
!
...
:~ NIIuIaI J!
~ DiIdJeIve i
\ LClCIIIona f
\ ;
.
! ~
.; \
i ~
\
~, ; :
.''': I
KNh~Mm~_________~____~__
(shortest low pe1h) ..; *..;
e--. of. JInlfect SI8
willi"""" ........
~.........
1IlI'MhGId at ell.... AnI!
'\..
'\
'\
.,
e-.pe.ofa PNject..
willi .............
Dfld .............
'11lfMbotd a.dIaI.. ~
,/
/
I
,
.
.
Figure 2.1 Threshold Discharge Areas
August 2001
Volume 1- Minimum Technical Requirements
2-7
\
\'\~ .~<&
~
l'
JEFFERSON COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
621 Sheridan Street. Port Townsend. Washington 98368
360/379-4450.800/831-2678.360/379-4451 Fax
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to
consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement
(EIS) must be prepared for all. proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the
environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts
from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency
decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Jefferson County
uses this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring
preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best
description you can. Answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your ability.
In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without
the need to hire experts. If you do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write
"do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
The county can assist you in filling out your checklist.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline and landmark designations.
Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, Jefferson County can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on
different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its
environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or
provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts.
C:\W1NDOWS\TEMP\sepa info form_FINAL.doc
1019/01
I'iJ . .;;&'
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
.,
CASE #
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPAl, RCW43.21 C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the
environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be
prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The
purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts 'from your proposal;
reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done; and help the agency decide whether an EIS is
required.
PROPONENT:
ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE: (home)
(business)
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE/CONTACT:
ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE: (home)
(business)
DIRECTIONS
This checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The questions apply to the entire
proposal, including those phased over a period of time or on separate parcels of land.
Answer each question accurately and completely to avoid unnecessary delays in processing this checklist. If you
do not know an answer, write "unknown," or if a question does not apply, write "not applicable."
Answers to some questions may require special expertise or technical assistance from qualified persons. The cost
of obtaining such information is the responsibility of the proponent.
Attach any additional information (reports, studies, maps, illustrations, leases, permits, etc.) that may further
describe the proposal or be required by Jefferson County.
Contact the Jefferson County Development Review Division for assistance in completing the checklist and for
information on the administrative procedures for its processing.
PLEASE PRINT IN INK OR TYPE EACH ANSWER. DO NOT WRITE IN THE AREA DESIGNATED "EVALUATION."
PROPOSAL AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION (include all factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and
purpose):
/9'/
,.."._. Page 1 of 1D
dSf
PROPERTY AND AREA DESCRIPTION:
I
Address:
Legal (from property tax statement): Lot:
Block:
Subdivision:
Tax Parcel:
Quarter Sections:
Section:
Township:
N
Range:
WM
Tax Number:
Land Area (dimensions):
Describe the location, physical characteristics, and extent of land area to be affected: include all factors that
will give an accurate understanding of the property and its environment:
SCHEDULE (beginning and ending dates of the proposal, including phases):
OVERALL PLAN (describe future additions, expansions, or related activities or plans by others that may affect the
proposal) :
REQUIRED APPROVALS (all local, state, and federal approvals required for the completion's of this proposal and if
any approvals are pending that are related to the proposal):
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA (any existing or proposed environmental information such as studies or documents related
to the proposal):
l~ \l:~ Page 2 of 10
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMENTS
EARTH EVALUATION
1. Check the item that describes the site:
otlat Orolling Ohilly Osteep slopes
Omountainous Oother:
2. What is the steepest slope on the site: Identify the approximate
percent of the slope:
3. What general types of soils are found on the site (sand, gravel, peat,
muck) ? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify
them and note any prime farmland:
-
4. Are there surface indications or a history of unstable soils in the
immediate vicinity? If so, describe them:
5. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or
grading proposed. Identify the source of the fill:
6. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If
so,generallydescribe it:
7. About what percent of the site would be covered with impervious
surfaces after construction of the project (that is, asphalt or buildings)?
8. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control erosion or other
impacts to the earth, if any:
AIR EVALUATION
9. What types of emiSSions to the air, if any, would result from the
proposal during construction and when the project is completed (dust,
car odors, industrial wood smoke)? Generally describe and give
approximate quantities, if known:
10. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odors that may affect
your proposal? If so, generally describe them:
....~b
I ..
,." Page 3 of 10
d:;f
AIR (continued) EV ALUA TION
11. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other
impacts to the air, if any:
WATER EVALUATION
Surface Water
12. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the
site, including year-round or seasonal streams, salt waters, lakes,
ponds, and wetlands? If yes, describe the type and provide names. If
appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into:
-
13. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to the described
waters (within 200 feet)? If yes, describe the work and attach
available plans:
14. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed or
removed from the surface waters or wetlands and indicate the area of
the site that would be affected. Identify the source of the fill material:
.
15. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions?
Give a general description and identify the purpose and approximate
quantities, if known:
16. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note the
location on the site plan:
17. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface
waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of
discharge:
Ground Water EVALUATION
18. Will ground water be withdrawn or will water be discharged to
groundwater? Give a general description and identify the purpose and
approximate quantities, if known:
Page 4 of 10
lO(l
Ground Water (continued) EV ALUA TION
19. Describe the waste material that would be discharged into the ground
from septic tanks or other sources, if any (domestic sewage; industrial
wastes and chemicals contained; agricultural wastes). Describe the
general size of the system; the number of such systems; the number of
houses to be served, if applicable, or the number of animals or humans
the system(s) is expected to serve:
Water Run-Off EVALUATION
(includino storm water)
20. Describe the source of run-off, including storm water. Describe the
method of collection and disposal, if any, including any known
quantities. Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other
waters? If so, describe it: . -
21. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally
describe how:
22. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and
run-off water impacts, if any:
PLANTS EVALUATION
23. Check the types of vegetation found on the site;
Deciduous tree: Oalder Omaple Eispen
Oother:
Evergreen tree: Dfir Ocedar Opine
Oother:
OShrubs OGrass OPasture OCrop/Grain
Wet Soil Plants: Ocattail Obuttercup Obulrush Oskunk cabbage
Oother:
Water Plants: Owater lily Oeelgrass Omilfoil
Oother:
Other:
24. What kind and amount of vegetation would be removed or altered?
25. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site:
26. Describe the proposed landscaping, use of nature plants, or other
measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
li<f
a$(f Page 5 of 10
ANIMALS EVALUATION
27. Check any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the
site or are known to be on or near the site:
Birds: Dhawk Dheron Deagle Dsongbirds
Dother:
Mammals: Ddeer Dbear Delk Dbeaver
Dother:
Fish: Dbass Dsalmon Otrout Dherring Dshellfish
Dother:
28. List any threatened or endangered species to be on or near the site:
29. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, how?
-
30. Describe proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES EVALUATION
31. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)
would be used to meet. the completed project' s energy needs?
Describe whether it would be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.:
32. Would the project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe the affect:
33. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of
this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control
energy impacts, if any:
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH EVALUATION
34. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that
could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe the
hazards:
35. Describe special emergency services that might be required:
.
36. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health
hazards, if any:
\C{.~
ll,~~
Page 6 of 10
NOISE
37. What types of noise exist in the area that may affect your project
(traffic, equipment, operation)?
38. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with
the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (construction, traffic,
operation) ? Indicate what hours noise would come from this site:
39. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if
any:
-
LAND AND SHORELINE USE
40. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
.
41. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe the use:
42. Describe any structures on the site:
43. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what structures?
.
44. What is' the current comprehensive plan or community development
plan designation of the site? Identify the plan:
45. If applicable, what is the current Shoreline Master Program designation
of the site?
46. Has any part of the site been classified as an " environmentally
sensitive" area? If so, specify the pa'rt:
47. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the
completed project?
48. Approximately how many people would the completed project
displace?
49. Describe proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,
if any:
20<7
~~
Page 7 of 10
.
LAND AND SHORELINE USE (continued) EV ALUA TlON
50. Describe proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with
existing and projected land uses and plans, if any:
HOUSING EVALUATION
51. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate
whether the housing is high, middle, or low income:
52. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate
whether the housing is high, middle, or low income:
53. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if
any:
-
AESTHETICS EVALUATION
54. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including
antennas? What is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
55. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
56. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if
any:
LIGHT AND GLARE EVALUATION
57. What type of light or glare would the proposal produce? What time of
the day would it mainly occur?
58. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or
interfere with views?
59. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your
proposal?
60.- Describe proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare
impacts, if any:
RECREATION EVALUATION
61. What designate and informal recreational opportunities are in the
immediate vicinity?
20\
.1S'l>
Page 8 of 10
RECREATION (continued) EVALUATION
62. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If
so, describe the displacement:
63. Describe the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on
recreation, including recreational opportunities to be provided by the
project or proponent, if any:
HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION EVALUATION
64. Are there any places or objects listed on or proposed for national,
state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the
site? If so, generally describe them:
.-
65. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, cultural,
archaeological, or scientific importance known to be on or next to the
site:
. .
66. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
TRANSPORTATION EVALUATION
67. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe the
proposed access to the existing street system. Show on the site plat.
68. Is the site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the
approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?
69. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How
many would the project eliminate?
70. Will the proposal require any new roads, streets, or improvements to
existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally
- describe them, indicating whether they are public or private:
.
71. Will the project use water, rail, or air transportation, or occur in the
immediate vicinity of these facilities? If so, generally describe the use:
2a..Z
d.G<f
Page 9 of 10
.
TRANSPORTATION (continued) EVALUATION
72. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the
completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would
occur:
73. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control transportation
impacts, if any:
PUBLIC SERVICES EV ALUA TION
74. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (fire
protection, police protection, health care, schools)? If so, generally
describe the results:
-
-
75. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on
public services, if any:
UTILITIES EVALUATION
76. Check which utilities are currently available at the site:
Owater Oelectricity Onatural gas o refuse service
Otelephone Oseptic system Osanitary sewer
Oother:
77. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility
providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site
or in the immediate vicinity that might be needed:
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I acknowledge that all information provided in this checklist and all attached material is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I
understand the lead agency is relying on this information to make its decision. In addition, I understand that review under SEPA does not
constitute approval or a proposal; compliance with local, state, and federal regulations applicable to the proposal shall constitute approval.
(Check with appropriate agencies to determine what approvals are required.) SEPA approval is based on the information I have provided. If
found inaccurate, approval could be withdrawn.
By signing the application form, the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their
knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet
may result in this permit being null and void.
I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities, judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees
and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit.
I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and it's e'!lployees, representatives or agents for the purpose of
application review and any required later inspections. Access and right of entry to the applicant's property or structure shall be requested and
shall occur during regular business hours.
(authorized signature) (date)
/FEE RECEIPT# CHECK# INITIALS DATE I
h:\home\plncntr\infoplng\sepa,doc 01/00
293 '''$ Page 10 of 10
..1,~
Stacie Hoskins
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Michael Moren [mmoren@parametrix.com]
Monday, October 18, 20049:12 AM
Stacie Hoskins
Beckett Point project - Figure 3
B 1820009P04T04F.
05BW.pdf
Stacey,
I have attached Figure 3 to go with Figures 1, 2, and 4 for the Beckett
Point Sanitary Improvements project. My supervisor is currently in a
meeting. As soon as I talk to him regarding the possible October dates
for the Pre-Application Conference, I will let you know. Please call me
in the meantime if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Mike Moren
Parametrix, Inc.
5700 Kitsap Way, Suite 202
Bremerton, WA 98312-2234
mmoren@parametrix.com
p: (360) 850-5320
f: (360) 479-5961
1
~or ;lSt
I
I
I
I
I
I
r+
I
I
I
\+
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\+
\
\
\
\
\ +
\ I>:
\ ::>
\ 12
\ ~
\ U
\+ i ~
\ ~
\ w
I
.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
<:)
d
CD
....
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
CJ.o~
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
d5:f
a.
I'll
'E::E
-Gl
0..
II.. .-
M rn
Gl='t;
... j Gl
j ~'[
u..1DII..
Ii)
>::
Z
~
U
F
III a.
>::W
ZIIl
~~
~:;;
~~
,,0
zU
F...
Ill...
x!i
w~
X'
0
I>: X'
a.
a. 0
~ I>:
a.
Z a.
0 ~
F >::
;!: Z
III ;!:
a.
'" a.
::> '"
a. ::>
0 a.
Z 0
::> Z
0 ::>
I>: 0
" I>:
I>: "
w w
0 0
Z Z
::> ::>
o 00
>::
I>:
<
'"
I>:
~
~
I>: 0
W
... Z
... ::>
::> 0
lD I>:
0 "
Z 1>:1>:
< ~~
F Zw
~ ::>1Il
Ow
f- WI>:
0 Ill::>
f: o III
a. III
Ow
0 1>:1>:
II> a. a.
!
0
...
>- W
~ ;;:
Z
" ;;:
~O I>:
0
(j~ 0
"F w
III
~~ 0
a.
0
x< I>:
wa. a.
D ~
:I:
"
:;:
>-
I>:
<
Z
15
I>:
o
~
r
I
s ~~Iii
lC ~
i <1z ~
E :;!
:! U
II '"
Do 0
.. :~
Stacie Hoskins
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Stacie Hoskins
Tuesday, October 19,20047:12 AM
'Michael Moren'
Randy Marx; Jim Pearson
RE: Beckett Point project
Hi Mike,
We're confirmed for October 29, 2004 at 10:00 am for the Beckett Point sewage system pre-
application.
See you then,
Stacie L. Hoskins
Associate Planner
Jefferson County Department of Community Development
621 Sheridan Street
Port Townsend, WA 98368
Phone 360-379-4463
Fax 360-379-4451
shoskins@co.jefferson.wa.us
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Moren [mailto:mmoren@parametrix.com]
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 1:16 PM
To: Stacie Hoskins
Subject: RE: Beckett Point project - Figure 3
Stacie,
Oct. 29th would also be the best date in October for us.
Thank you,
Mike Moren
Parametrix, Inc.
5700 Kitsap Way, Suite 202
Bremerton, WA 98312-2234
mmoren@parametrix.com
p: (360) 850-5320
f: (360) 479-5961
Phone 360-379-4463
Fax 360-379-4451
shoskins@co.jefferson.wa.us
1
20b
clSt
Page 1 of 2
Stacie Hoskins
From: Randy Marx
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 9:11 AM
To: Stacie Hoskins
Subject: RE: JC PUD#1 pre-application
sounds ok to me... Please confirm
Randy
-----Original Message-----
From: Stacie Hoskins
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 9:04 AM
To: Jim Pearson; Randy Marx
Subject: RE: JC PUD#l pre-application
How about Friday 10/29 in the morning, say 10 am?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Pearson
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 8:59 AM
To: Stacie Hoskins; Randy Marx
Subject: RE: JC PUD#l pre-application
I'll be gone on 10/22, just back on 10/26 AM, and in a meeting on 10/27. Got some other dates? 10/26 or 10/27
PM? 10/28 or 10/29?
-----Original Message-----
From: Stacie Hoskins
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 8:55 AM
To: Randy Marx; Jim Pearson
Subject: JC PUD# 1 pre-application
Hi Randy & Jim,
I have a pre-application request from Parametrix for JC PUD #1 to build a central low
pressure sewer collection system (LPSS), Large on-site septic (LOSS), and pressure
drainfield systems for the Beckett Point development. It appears the area proposed is
currently completely forested and pipes will need to go within the wetland buffer. I'll route
information packets to you today.
Are you available Friday, Oct 22 at 11am, Tuesday, Oct 26 at 10 am or Wednesday,
Oct 27 at 10 am for their pre-application?
Thanks,
Stacie
Stacie L. Hoskins
Associate Planner
Jefferson County Department of Community Development
621 Sheridan Street
Port Townsend, WA 98368
Phone 360-379-4463
Fax 360-379-4451
~o7
~
10/18/2004
Stacie Hoskins
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Michael Moren [mmoren@parametrix.com]
Monday, October 18, 2004 1: 16 PM
Stacie Hoskins
RE: Beckett Point project - Figure 3
Stacie,
Oct. 29th would also be the best date in October for us.
Thank you,
Mike Moren
parametrix, Inc.
5700 Kitsap Way, Suite 202
Bremerton, WA 98312-2234
mmoren@parametrix.com
p: (360) 850-5320
f: (360) 479-5961
>>> "Stacie Hoskins" <shoskins@co.jefferson.wa.us> 10/18/2004 10:09:41
AM >>>
Thanks Mike.
As it looks now, I'm trying for Friday Oct 29th at 10 am, but I still
need Public Works to confirm. I'll let you know.
Stacie
Stacie L. Hoskins
Associate Planner
Jefferson County Department of Community Development
621 Sheridan Street
Port Townsend, WA 98368
Phone 360-379-4463
Fax 360-379-4451
shoskins@co.jefferson.wa.us
1
dog-.. ~a
Page 1 of 2
Stacie Hoskins
From: Stacie Hoskins
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 10:25 AM
To: Randy Marx
Subject: RE: JC PUD#1 pre-application
Friday, October 29, 2004 at 10 am it is then. Thanks guys. "'5
-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Marx
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 9: 11 AM
To: Stacie Hoskins
Subject: RE: JC PUD#l pre-application
sounds ok to me... Please confirm
Randy
-----Original Message-----
From: Stacie Hoskins
Sent: Monday, October 18, 20049:04 AM
To: Jim Pearson; Randy Marx
Subject: RE: JC PUD#l pre-application
How about Friday :'0/29 in the morning, say 10 am?
-----Origina I flJessage-----
From: Jim Pearson
Sent: Mon(~:cY, October 18, 2004 8:59 AM
To: Stacie: ioskins; Randy Marx
Subject: r.=:: JC rUDit1 pre-application
I'll be gone 10/22, j'Jst back on 10/26 AM, and in a meeting on 10/27. Got some other dates? 10/26 or
10/27 PM? 10/28 or 10/29?
-----Original Message-----
Fro : ::tac:e Hoskins
Sent: r,10nday, October 18, 2004 8:55 AM
T~: -. ":ldy Marx; Jim Pearson
Sub~:.:ct: JC PUD#l pre-application
Hi RJndy & kn,
I have a pre-application request from Parametrix for JC PUD #1 to build a central low
pressui-e sewer collection system (LPSS), Large on-site septic (LOSS), and pressure
drai ,fi~,ld systems for the Beckett Point development. It appears the area proposed
is ( , n~" cOinpletely forested and pipes will need to go within the wetland buffer.
1'1'. '- ~2; Formation packets to you today.
Arc ,:":(.1 a\'ailJble Friday, Oct 22 at llam, Tuesday, Oct 26 at 10 am or
We ilLS( "V, Oct 27 at 10 am for their pre-application?
Thai,~s,
Stc,c,C
cJo1.
.~<f:.
10/1812004
Page 1 of 1
Stacie Hoskins
From: Stacie Hoskins
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 8:55 AM
To: Randy Marx; Jim Pearson
Subject: JC PUD#1 pre-application
Hi Randy & Jim,
I have a pre-application request from Parametrix for JC PUD #1 to build a central low pressure sewer
collection system (LPSS), Large on-site septic (LOSS), and pressure drainfield systems for the Beckett Point
development. It appears the area proposed is currently completely forested and pipes will need to go within
the wetland buffer. I'll route information packets to you today.
Are you available Friday, Oct 22 at llam, Tuesday, Oct 26 at 10 am or Wednesday, Oct 27 at 10 am
for their pre-application?
Thanks,
Stacie
Stacie L. Hoskins
Associate Planner
Jefferson County Department of Community Development
621 Sheridan Street
Port Townsend. WA 98368
Phone 360-379-4463
Fax 360-379-4451
shos ki ns@co.jefferson.wa.us
~L{
Q?0<f
10/18/2004
r-}
...\
JEFFERSON COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
..\.\)
\~
I
t
OCT - 8 2fV\j
.\..1, ,
..
t \.
621 Sheridan Street. Port Townsend. Washington 98368
360/379-4450' 800/831-2678 .360/379-4451 Fax
Pre-Application Conference
The Jefferson County Unified Development Code (UDC) requires that before an application is made for all Type II and
Type III project applications and Type I applications proposing impervious surfaces of ten thousand (10,000) square feet
or more and/or non-single family structures of five thousand (5,000) square feet or more, a pre-application consultation
must be held. The consultation includes preliminary review and administrative assistance. This service does not include
extensive field inspection or correspondence. Pre-application consultation does not limit subsequent administrative
review.
At the conference, Department of Community Development personnel shall provide the applicant with:
(1) A list of the requirements for a completed application;
(2) A general summary of the procedures to be used to process the application;
(3) The references to relevant code provisions or development standards that may apply to the approval of the
application; and
(4) A list of any applicable hourly review fees that may be charged by one or more County agencies upon the
filing of a project permit application with the County.
Discussions at the conference or the information provided by the staff shall not bind or prohibit the County's future
application or enforcement of all applicable laws and regulations. No statements or assurances made by County
representatives shall in any way relieve the applicant of his or her duty to submit an application consistent with all relevant
requirements of County, state and federal codes, laws, regulations and land use plans.
NAME:
Jefferson County Public Utility District No.1
MAILING ADDRESS:
PO Box 929, Port Hadlock, WA 98339
REPRESENTATIVE:
N/A
Parametrix, Inc.
(WORK) (360) 385-5800
Contact: Mike Moren, Project Engineer
TELEPHONE: (HOME)
MAILING ADDRESS:
5700 Kitsap Way~ Suite 202 Bremerton, WA 98312
TELEPHONE: (HOME)
N/A
(WORK)
(360) 377-0014
1. Please answer all questions on this form completely.
2. Attach a sketch of the Conceptual Design for the proposed use or activity, showing the following information:
a. Vicinity sketch;
b. North arrow and scale;
c. Property boundaries and identification of land uses on adjacent properties;
d. Means of ingress and egress;
e. Property/lot drainage;
f. Possible locations of sewage disposal and water supply systems;
g. Location of utility easements; and
h. Proposed location of buildings, including setbacks to property boundaries.
3. Attach payment of the applicable fee, as set forth in the Jefferson County Fee Ordinance.
PRE.APP CONFERENCEDOC REV. 04/2212003
Page 1
fJI..2,-
.d.~t
Property Description
General Location: Approximately six miules southwest of Port Townsend, Washington, west of the
intersection of Cape George Road and Beckett Point Road.
Legal Description (from Property Tax Statement): P
ILot 1 & TL Tax B1 37.15 CH Parcel No.
Lot 2 & 3
9-Digit Parcel Number (from Property Tax Statement): Parce I No. 002231001 and 002242003
Total Acreage: 92 (Approx.) Zone: 1 : 20 % Lot Coverage: 0.004%
Section 24, Township 30N, Range 2W
Applicant:
DOwner
D Contract Purchaser
D Lessee
Rl Other Jefferson County PUD No. 1
Project Description
To abandon individual on-site septic treatment systems and provide a central low pressure sewer
r
community of Beckett Point, Washington.
Property Owner (name and mailing address): Beckett Po i nt Fi sherman I s Club c/o Patty Sah li nger
890 Beckett Point Road, Port. Townsend, WA 98368
Standard Disclosure
Information provided to a prospective applicant during the pre-application consultation is based on County regulations in effect at the
time of the pre-application consultation. Revised or new Countv reaulations could affect a future development application. A pre-
application consultation does not vest a future development application.
By signing the application form, the applicanUowner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their
knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected
property. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicanUowner with respect to this application
packet may result in this permit being null and void.
I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities, judgments, court costs, reasonable
attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting
of this permit.
I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees, representatives or agents for the sole
purpose of application review and any required later inspections. This right of entry shall expire when the County (through the
Administrator or the Administrator's repres tives) concludes the application has complied with all applicable laws and regulations.
Access and rig~~. ntry to the a icant' pro erty shall be requested and shall occur only during regular business hours.
(SIGNATURE) '8 Oct ~)
I hereby designate Mike Moren, Parametr i x, I nc.
OOofe",~~,~ L, A . ,
(LANDOWNER SIGNATURE) ~
to act as my agent in matters related to this pre-application
0!71o~
(DATi)
r
r
~\
j!
II
\ OCT - 8
""
"i. t
PRE-APP CONFERENCE.DOC REV. 04/22/2003
oU3
dbt
Page 2
r
.
~\
j'
[~ I
IJ
: r.
OCT - 8
Parametrix
ENGINEERING. PLANNING. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
5700 KITSAP WAY, SUITE 202
BREMER TON, WASHINGTON 98312-2234
T. 360 -377.0014 F. 360.47905961
V\.''W\\'".parametrix.rom
October 8, 2004
Jefferson County Department of Community Development
621 Sheridan Street
Port Townsend, W A 98368
Re: Request for Pre-Application Conference for Beckett Point Community
Large On-Site Septic System Project
Dear Sir/Madam:
Parametrix, Inc. (Parametrix) has been retained by the Jefferson County Public Utility District No. 1 (PUD
No.1) to design two large on-site septic (LOSS) systems for the shoreline community of Beckett Point,
Washington. The purpose of this letter and its enclosures is to request a Pre-Application Conference with the
Jefferson County Department of Community Development (DCD) to discuss the project and its permitting
requirements.
Beckett Point is located approximately six miles southwest of Port Townsend, Washington, on the east side of
Discovery Bay, and consists mainly of recreational beach houses (see enclosed Figures 1 and 2). The Beckett
Point Fisherman's Club owns the property and individual lots are leased. There are approximately 100
existing residences, full or part time. Most of the residences are located on a large sand spit. Currently,
sewage treatment is provided by individual septic systems that are in questionable condition on the sand spit.
During 2003, the Washington State Department of Health - Office of Food Safety and Shellfish Programs,
conducted a shoreline survey of the Discovery Bay shellfish growing area. Although no "Direct Impact" or
"Indirect Impact" sources of pollution were identified on or around Beckett Point, the survey did identify
many parcels with on-site septic systems and labeled these as a "Potential Source" of pollution due to their
age, soils, and close proximity to the shoreline. The report recommended that Beckett Point be placed on the
"Concerned Status" for point source contamination.
It is the intent of Parametrix to design two independent community LOSS systems, under the Washington
State Department of Health - LOSS Division (DOH) jurisdiction, to replace the existing individual septic
systems. Sewage would be collected and conveyed by low-pressure sewer systems (LPSS) to a series of large
septic tanks. The LPSSs will each consist of several small underground sewage grinder pump stations located
mainly within the beach area. Sewage will be transported to the septic tanks through small-diameter, two or
three inch pressure pipelines. LPSSs of this type have been used in many communities adjacent to both fresh
and marine water bodies, and have much less of an environmental impact than traditional gravity sewer
systems. From the septic tanks, effluent will be pumped to large pressure drainfields located in a forested area
on the eastern portion of the property above the beach community. The drainfields, located at least 600 feet
horizontally from the nearest shoreline, will greatly reduce the potential for contamination of shellfish near
the Beckett Point community. The enclosed Figure 3 identifies the approximate locations of the proposed
pump stations, pressure pipelines, septic tanks and drainfields as well as the Ordinary High Water (OHW)
mark. Typical drawing sections of the underground grinder pump stations, utility tr~nqhe~and drainfield
dosing tanks are shown in Figure 4.
rif't
a~
OCT - 8
October 8, 2004
Page 2
The Rural and Natural Resource Land Use and Zone Designations and Shoreline Designation Overlay map
of Jefferson County identified the entire shoreline around Beckett Point as a "Suburban" designation. The
pump stations and pressure pipelines in the beach area will be located within the existing Beckett Point Road
right-of-way. No construction activities will be located within ordinary high waterline.
A Wetlands Delineation and Ranking Report for the Beckett Point community was prepared by Pacific Rim
Aquatic Environmental Sciences of Port Townsend, Washington in August, 2000. The report identified and
delineated a palustrine Class II wetland in the beach area, requiring a 50-foot buffer for low intensity land
uses. The wetland and 50-foot buffer boundaries are shown on Figure 3. Some pressure pipeline will be laid
within this buffer - within the existing Beckett Point Road - however, no construction activities will occur
within the wetland. Underground Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) will be used to install some sections
of the pressure pipelines to avoid conflicts with the wetland.
Parametrix has also obtained information from the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife
(WDFW) on Priority Habitats and Species in the project area. Great Blue Heron and Bald Eagle habitat have
been identified near the project area. It is anticipated that this may have an impact on the timing of
construction, and a Bald Eagle Management Plan may have to be prepared. Further coordination with the
WDFW will be necessary as part of the permitting process.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (360) 850-5320.
Sincerely,
P ARAMETRIX
Mike Moren
Project Engineer
Enclosures
cc: Jim Parker, Jefferson County PUD No. I
C: \Documents and SettingsVim ParkerILocal Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKIAB\L-Jeff Co Pre-application 09-09-04 email.doc
0-15
0&.
~o
;p
z ..
o ..
~ z1> ~
~
"UlJl"T1
~ ~ cC.
CD" ,.. C
o CD ..,
__CD
s;~
o 0
5'5'
~..
s:
III
"
'"
<",
-;:0
QO
Zc...
-m
-10
-<-I
~. ~
Vb
,(7 t:-
)>2/ 0
z of>
)>
()
OC 8
r-
o
Iz ~
0-1
(J) -
00
~z
s:
>
"U
l.
&[{P
~t'
~o ~
Z 3
~ Z1> ~..
f': ..
m 0
~
I
'''D
;um
00
"1:i
!lJ=1
:;I"
,-0
ZZ
m-i
"
0;
I
m
'"
'"
,.
Z
ci>
i2
c
'"
"to!!
O(DCC
"'C ~ E;
III III III
::l.::tt\)
'<"
DJO
o -.
c: a
:l
Q.
AI
~
r-
m
(;)
m
I ~
I
ocr
...
8
)
~
..
3
~
;c
_ _ _ _ _ !<h~I~~ITh_
12
m
l>
;0
z~
"''''
r6
~ -
=<
en
cn-om-o
:?::C"TlC
~~E~
I>m<
mZZ)>
cnO-lC
~!!~
~~~
-l?J:t
c
Z 8'
0
m
r c
'''' C'l
I~~~ Z
0
m
1,1
r-"ll
mrC
s: OmZ
"ll ~-IO '"
-I F:~"ll
)> mrC
Z s:
;S; "ll
rJl
-I
)>
-I
5
-IlJI" Z
'< CD -. I ()l>() -<"
'E. ~ cg O)>() -<" 0
mzo ~iJj -< ozo ~ffi u;
r-<z
~ !. ~ )>-<2 ",g: l> ~~~ ",g: ()
07"0 2 :c
-- ~5~ '" '" '" :Ii
rJl"ll-l>o S; ~ 0-< ~
CD 0 ?<m en l>m '"
en m ~ en m
() -. ?< -<
~:::::I B
o - B 2
::s Z
<
CD'
~
UI
COi"di,L,1.
_'__.~./~n'_ ","",c.'"~~^
-I
I~O~~
en-l"ll
~~m
mr-l
;U
m
Z
n
:E:
-I
-<
,~ "ll
n
15 ~~
~-I~
~5z
Z"
in
r
o
",en
l>C
-<;0
()"
:cl>
m()
xm
-;0
~rn
2-<
"'0
;0
l>
-<
B
2
'"
~
~
~
..-'
~
d>
8 <''''- ....OV11O \..~ "i6 0 6
~~~~.;;J~1"i 8~ ~ -J Ili t"')
I
..
.~6'O~~~ V N~
'<"'0 N
0
OF
::> ~
'<'"
r-Z
N 00
N
~ . N tl')1-
81- ~g
I- ~go 'It I- .
'ltl-tl') N> 0
g N>o:> NOr::
o .
NO . O(,!).qo
o 0:>
0""'"
..,
I-
'"
>
o
C>
~~~
.,,~
<~~
<t~ I'a-(~
q,,,~0' .'/~
~-~~ lOt)
-~-~ '\ ~ '\~ /,,"~
-;:;' ;:;- - '\ ~'\ '\ ~o '\;~ '\:;y ^~-C.y
,,~ ,,~ ~ "'->^C>t'y
.......... 'tt
t-
zx
-0
0<
D..w
co
G :J:X
~ I-LaJ
O~%
LaJ 0%
OJ Vl<
,~
~cfO,
y. 0" >
v_,- ~~ 0
Y"'"o> ~ T Jj:~b
~
o
~
.....
zx
-()
~~
CD
~ xx
~ t-LaJ
o ::::>> z
LLI 0%
CD Ul<
<"
~
<~v~
O(y' (9'
-<q}Ota
v~~'4'
a
:J
~
...
b
<-'
t,
~Ub,
t:>~
~
~
~~
t:>
::I:
I-U
z<
-LU
Om
c..
I=~
LU:::J
~o
uV)
LU
aJ
Yv
<<it
(!) ~
~
.ld
-
85=
_.;;I~ d
a!;....~
88F~
'1
t-
Z
-x
00
D..~
5m
~t-
OVl
LaJLaJ
ca~
--..
'110 t.t. '0 J
-;~:~ >\
......
t+-<
o
......
a.>
OJ)
C\$
p..
......
a.>
~
p..
~
a.>
Z
-.:t
o
o
N
-
0'1
~
o
......
o
M
0'1
00
II
8
C"-.
P-
~
S
o
o
N
o
......
o
...t::
P-
~
o
...t::
tI.l
Q)
.S:::
.-
......
a.>
I-<
o
...t::
tI.l
-
a.>
......
.-
tI.l
-8
~
tI.l
;::S
d
~
d
o
tI.l
I-<
~
<.j..j
a.>
."?
o
~
tI.l
~
LOG ITEr,,1 ~
# g
..L ;.s:::::-
~
P~'v)_22c C(~
Q)
OJ)
c:3
P-4
"<:t
o
o
N
--
0\
~
-
-
c.....
o
-
III
-
LOG 'TE~ A
-
M
0\
00
"
o
......
c-.
0-
~
S
o
o
N
o
.....
.8
e-
o
..d
tI)
--
Q)
~
.....
]
o
~
Q)
.....
.....
tI)
{5
~
tI)
;:l
d
~
~
o
tI)
I-<
~
4-<
Q)
.~
6'
e.)
r.ti
~
~
!
Q)
~
P-4
~
Z
III
#
~:ll:"~ ) "'1L ('f.~
. "''''. -og---
.....
c......
o
.....
Q)
CO
cd
p..
.....
Q)
~
p..
~
z
III
..q-
o
o
N
-
01
~
o
.....
N
M
01
00
II
8
c-.
~
cd
S
o
o
N
o
.....
o
..s:::
fr
I-<
o
..s:::
tI.l
-
Q)
s::
.-
.....
Q)
I-<
o
..s:::
tI.l
-
Q)
.....
.-
tI.l
~
~
tI.l
;::l
d
~
d
o
tI.l
I-<
~
<+-<
Q)
LOG \TEf'A
.~
o
o
cJi
g.
~
!
'l'"
JJJ:: ridS&:
......
4-<
o
......
Q)
01)
CIS
t:l..
III
......
Q)
~
t:l..
~
Q)
z
LOG ITE; 11
I;"~ ~., L1 ~ A C,fd5t
r .....,;, '#~..L,;. ---
"<:t
o
o
~
01
~
o
......
M
M
01
00
II
8
C'-.
0-
en
CIS
S
o
o
N
o
-
.8
fr
I-<
o
~
--
Q)
~
.....
......
Q)
I-<
o
..c::
en
--
Q)
-
.-
en
~
~
en
~
d
~
d
o
en
I-<
~
<.j...j
Q)
.~
o'
u
en
g-
~
~
......
c.......
o
......
Q)
OJ)
C':l
~
[fJ
......
Q)
~
~
~
z
1I1
'=:t
o
o
~
0'\
~
o
......
'=:t
M
0'\
00
II
Cl
.....
t;'-.
@-
C':l
S
o
o
N
o
.....
..8
fr
I-<
o
.t::
CJ)
---
Q)
~
.-
......
Q)
I-<
o
.t::
CJ)
Q)
.....
.-
CJ)
~
~
CJ)
;::l
d
~
d
o
CJ)
I-<
~
C.j...j
Q)
LOG ITEZA
.~
o'
u
rn
~
-E
':'-:
!
#
~.~ J '1 ') (j c7. 'JC1?
ffJ K<2O"-1_ ~
-.:t
- 0
c..-. 0
0 ~
- 0\
Q) ~
01}
cd -
p..
-
lrl
~
0\
00
II
8
1:'-'
IE
cd
S
o
o
N
o
.....
o
..s::l
e-
o
..s::l
rI.l
--
Q)
l:::
.....
-
Q)
I-<
.8
rI.l
--
Q)
.....
.....
rI.l
~
~
rI.l
;:j
d
~
s:i
o
rI.l
I-<
~
(.j...;
Q)
III
r~~'1
11< Cf~
~..--
.~
o'
(.)
00
~
~
~
Q)
~
p..
~
Q)
Z
LOG ITEr~
-
~
o
-
Q)
~
~
[I]
-
Q)
0.0
~
~
~
Q)
z
lIJ
"<:t
o
o
N
-
0'\
N
25
-
1.0
~
0'\
00
II
8
1:'-'
0-
CI.l
~
S
o
o
N
o
-
o
,J::l
fr
I-<
o
,J::l
CI.l
-
Q)
::::
.....
-
Q)
I-<
o
,J::l
CI.l
-
Q)
-
.....
CI.l
ii
~
CI.l
;:j
~
~
d
o
CI.l
I-<
~
~
Q)
.-
o'
o
en
LOG ITE~A ~
8-
# ~
Pt.:; )~(p c~~~.E
-
<+-<
o
-
a)
01)
ro
~
[fl
-
a)
gp
~
~
a)
z
III
-::t
o
o
N
-
0\
N
-
o
-
t'-
M
0\
00
II
Q
......
C"-.
IF
ro
S
o
o
N
o
.....
o
..c:
fr
I-<
o
~
-
a)
s:::
.....
]
o
..c:
00
-
a)
.....
.....
00
13
~
00
;:i
cd
~
d
o
00
I-<
~
C+-i
a)
.-
o'
u
00
~
~
O{~!
LOG ITErv1
#
p~~3"aJ-l
Map Output
Page 1 of 1
o
Legend
Pan::e1s-H
2000 Aerial PhOtos
Boundaries
o ~CW't.y
o Wtks
Dor.s~
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL Y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
ollection. Fri Oct 2907:51 :142004
LOG ITE7A
.l.f
11"'r
P ",".m "=d$if
.....' c~
..., .'---- .
http:// gisserverlservletlcom.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/29/2004
Map Output
Page 1 of 1
0 Legend
Patalls-H
ContotJl'S
/'/ 10l'o:IICalIcu
;-/ 50 1'0:11 CalIcu
Boundaries
0 ~Cou1tt
0 w_
0 0lI15' CcuI'iiM
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
ollection. Fri Oct 29 07:50:26 2004
LUG ITEr 11
',~
~ j
... ~~ ).~ I Ofd!2
http:// gisserverlservlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/29/2004
Map Output
Page 1 of 1
FEATURES NOT SURVEYED-JCPUD#1, PRE04-00035
o
;~._~_""""""""_"" I
"..
;V' Legend
Road System
0 Parcel&-H
Contours
/./ 10FClC/l~
;./ saFClC/l~
Boundaries
0 ~COWly
0 We
0 otleI!' ~
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
collection. Fri Oct 29 07:36:04 2004
LOG \TE~ ~1
.i',~
',-:-' \ ~j 0 or dfZ.
"~"::# {~,~,~ .'~
http:// gisserverlservletl com.esri.esrimap,Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/29/2004
Map Output
FEATURES NOT SURVEYED-JCPUD#1, PRE04.00035
Page 1 of 1
,..--g' I I
.. J..- 002242021002242'023' 0
-6'977100900\ I I
977100005 J,:::-- 002242001
, rIfI----,_ 917100916. I
917100!l()4 '- 917100911 002242018
977100902 '-:""-\"1-~977100911 LL
9771??oo1 917101004(.917100912,
/7 .... .. .. .",...i.o. , I ""~:g.';:"~,
002242003 l".~-,
... ,/ ).' I j -<~42025
" J'I -f>"
b~loo1, / 00221 4=2O~-;;:
'-.;-,;./ ~-... I ............""""' H
1/ ........~'-J.. VULL84L,^^, -
j:/ /...------..............
/; ( .'-.
, .ll 00m1001 ) I I
~' /f \__... / 002242005
j# - I
~;;/ ~~002231oo1
,. p r~'-______-
,.~002231oo1 <_e::'_----- ,r--
{ l ._.".oo~'oo'
.1 i~ //' ,/
,\..~--.-- /
.~....-/----
002242003
4
........ ptMdod by ~COOIly C<slr.tj ~ GIS I
o
pSfI
0 Legend
Parcell;-H
Landslide Ha:tam
. SidM
. HigI
. t.I~
Si!Jll
Boundaries
0 ~ COOlly
0 W:M:
D 0Iler~
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
collection. Fri Oct 2907:47:072004
Le..,.... ITr""l\A
.... 1I,;J C.i'
,
.
.,
http:// gisserverlservlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/29/2004
Map Output
Page 1 of1
o
.
Legend
Parc:e1s-H
SeiSmiC Ha%.atd
Boundaries
o ~CWll}r
o WtktI
DOlMr~
~
. t.4~ ~ by ~C<:u\ly c-.. &rtiocls GIS I
o
67511
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
ollection. Fri Oct 29 07:46:27 2004
LOG ITE~;;1
+~
'Ii'"
r'"~':} /}~;z.. c1~
.1 .,,,,, "!.;'J e:t::.J_ -
http:// gisserverlserv 1etlcom.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&C1ient V ersion=4, O&F orm... 10/2912004
Map Output
Page 1 of 1
FEATURES NOT SURVEYED-JCPUD#1, PRE04-00035
G
oou..-
!oonoUOOll
J
~.IpI:':-~_e:.n,c-lIIs..-GIS I
~ Legend
Road System
0 ParcelS-H
. 2000 Sham PhatolHi
Shamtinlls-AlcS
OOU<2003
~ ~
~ ~.....
~ Urlloo
~ s.t:utJM
~ I:Ibr;l
~ N.....
. ~ ~
~ N~
;V Otu
I BotJndaries
0 ~~
0 w:tJs
0 Otu C<u\ies
"',.
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
collection. Fri Oct 29 07:37:37 2004
LOG IT:::~.1
,,~ ,",,- :'lld:33 c t '1 ~O"
~ 'f...-... ,$ .~_
"..", _..- .. --- -
http:// gisserverlservlet/ com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/2912004
Map Output
I ~ I
'{~~;~'4 ~=K142021 , 00224202'3 iOOU42OO1!
I 9m~ ,.U,.. -----I' OOZ24:lOOt
./' 9T1t~.~ 91tl(;lOt;~ ''t, I
/..... ~...~) j imlX>>16 / },
~ 9T.~'00'it:J4 /"J ~.~ ~71~11 '\ oon4201a t oo:n42011
./ml~(/// ,~--r---~ """'9;"/)0<,111",... i I...........
/1n~.00901 .(9711;Jln.y, .;........ i71'lOOl112...' I
gTf'&m~J ..-(/" \-071tOl()OO '>" '.n100vl.1 I
\/"/ ,/',\ ~~:7O:'~ I 9r;;~:;::,~) r" "1l1~~~9
~-?~ /t'1710'OOl't---'--'~~_"11101(i(lll:~ I
I // I>'
Otl22ot'2003/ ',~ .......,
I' 1/ I ""'::>..""''''''
IJ/ r "I:<~
// I 0022"~IO I ,..,.~<
/-', i,{ Imm4'ro",,,,,,
/~/~''';::...... //1
,'/ .."-JII ~ -
/~/ ...........----........, .~/ I -
,t' ( "" Iii
;,;:? \",2>>",,, ') I I Ii
;,Y \'-., /' i 1"""'_
j/.._j I '
// I I I
Ij ___ I 1 I
/1-- .~~:::""'=;:-00223100'~~) i J
II ~/ ""-'" I
(I """'".. ~//. ~~-~ -. I
,;1 /;"_
Iii //00223100'/
I( ~;;/ //
~/ I
.....-"".....-:::;'
j
~-~toy~CIuIl)~_.s...-CIS I
"'"
Page 1 of1
0 Legend
PatallS-H
Streams
;V T)IIl<l9
;V T)IIl<l5
;V T)IIl<l4
;V T)IIl<l3
;V T)IIl<l2
;V T)IIl<ll
;V I:l!I'O'
Boundaries
0 ~CaRy
'0 WtMc
0 1:l!I'O'~
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL Y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
ollection. Fri Oct 2907:41 :462004
LOG ITE~ ,1
#
F\::: )d:3!f- ci:,)sf
http:// gisserverlserv1et/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&C1ient V ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/29/2004
Map Output
Page 1 of 1
FEATURES NOT SURVEYED-JCPUD#1, PRE04-00035
I I '
I<~-~-"_ 002242021001 m2023r- 0
./971100!l08\ I
971100!l05 J~,002242001 I
I '-....- 977100916 . I
i 977100904 '- 977100911 002242018
9rit00002 "~_<I-.917100917 LL
9771??oo1 977101004~ ,977100912,
;. 97710100,ll...977101010'(,,.{
/,~~-917101009. '-
00221 if 1'<:>~42025
'/ ' .~
~ ' -~~
002231001 1/ 002242010. "-,-::: Legend
! i ~. ""T". 0 P.""....
j/ 002242003 . I . wetlands
Boundaries
I ~cc..nt;
____002242003*0022420051
-----
--""---_ 002242003
'-~----1
----------..
------
---.
o
o
o
Wllk:t:
Ohlt~
1
L1. ~ IT, ~ cc..nt; C<silrllI ~ GIS L
o
67j.tl
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
collection. Fri Oct 29 07:44:28 2004
LOG ITE~i1
f"L," ") J:6S cf 'I (""'&
-.-- ....... -~-
http:// gisserverlservletl com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/2912004
Map Output
Page 1 of 1
FEATURES NOT SURVEYED..JCPUD#1, PRE04-00035
I I '
,.C~'- 002:242021002:242.0231 G
,,(9ij1~\ I I
mU)()OOS \~,002:242001
I ----.-- 9nUlOO16_ I
/917100904 '-917100911 002:242018
977100s02--:..--..,-,--W7100917 ~
9771??oo1 917101004( ,977100912,
_:. 917101001 ~1710101()'(_.{
'././~ -917101009.>,.
0022/ ~r j '<:~;~4202S
1/ ....'i>~"
002231001 II' 002242010, .......;:: Legend
I', ' '
,,-~::.~~.> I),' i r'-+ 0 ParcelS-H
..::::::!,. 002242003 I FEMA. FIRMS
I I ANI
r:J
-OO2:242003i.
. .~-----.....'-... 002:M2003
---J
---
-------
---------
---.
.A
.
.)(500
.DirI<F
Boundaries
o
D
D
~C<uIl)'
w*'
DirI<F~
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
collection. Fri Oct 29 07:47:44 2004
LC.3 ITE?A
~t1.
P::-,~,~ C;;~
~._. ~ _ K
'i,J ....~._..
http:// gisserverlservlet/ com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovrnap&Client V ersion=4. O&Form... 10/29/2004
FEATURES NOT SURVEYED-JCPUD#1 PRE04-00035
. I /1
1.~~~2242021i22~4z023f- G
91i1C~)OO5 ~002242001
I .-",,,fln1Ooo"l\ I
/977100\l()4 '- 917100011 002242018"-...
9ri1()()oo2""~1'917100017 t L
977100ll0f977101004k.911100012,
-'911.i01001J.-L..!I1711l11l10'\.X n_
/;y' - 9171()10001~ '\.
002211j4~ j ":::::..~00:2242025
. /'."'... -"
/l V 'l~.',
1001 I 002242010, .....<:~
<~''- /1 I 00:1242011
/>/~" '::;,,:,:::;../ 002242003 r--+-
f.,',.. I
'I 00223100:1 ) I ,
1/; \~.,._/ GL 002242005,
/,! I ,002.23100:1 ____
il LJ:::../ ------" 00:2242003
f. _~/ -"""'___"",---
~ -----
"-...
Map Output
&
....~Irj--CtulttCenlral~GJS t
o
j2,51t
Page 1 of 1
o
Legend
ParoelHi
Critical Aquifer Red1arge
Amas
r::J
.
r::J
.
.
r::J
r::J
r::J
SlJSCwUNK
SARPA" SlJSC
SlJSC
SARPA
SARPA . UNK
Boundaries
-- Ctultt
WtiIIs
0Ih:lr~
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL Y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
lIection. Fri Oct 2907:48:152004
.f'.... ITC~.I1
l..~ _ ...;l i- i 'i I
Ch3.lc(~~
http:// gisserverlservlet/ com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/29/2004
Map Output
FEATURES NOT SURVEYED-JCPUD#1, PRE04-00035
7. '"
.. --...~ ~--'_ 002242021002242023' 0
/ f~OO!lOs\ I ~
v/ 91i 100005 J';:"'- 0022A2001
/' / c.---.... 9171ClOO16.. I V
//917100!104 '-- 977100!l" 002242018
l 977U)og(rl"-/.-.:I"917100!l17 I I
.w.' 9771??oo1 9171()1004'~, 977100!l12 , .
'h~)9771011x)1 J..J.JI1710flUO.".LLL-
~ /'1ii/ -''''''~,j~~2025
/. _. III1 l~r>"
002XU001 t 002242:0UI ~
~" I l ..,,:.~
/I,.----<:":'::::!../ 002242003 IT I
I" ~'0(1) I
~ ~/ 0022A~
.'i? - ~
/'/1.
II 71. b' ~-=002:231001r---=f"'.
;;002231001 <f;tf" ~----- -
ij 002:23100~
I ~;:;p 002242003
1
"4il1jJ$~lry~C<UllyCerllr.1ll~G1S ,
o
6751t
o
Legend
Pan::e1S-H
welllrChlOl'id9
Page 1 of 1
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL Y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
collection. Fri Oct 29 07:48:40 2004
100",,_
"* bolt_ 100 and:;m
*
:;m at highar
SIPZ
PI. Risk S1l'Z
.
o
o
o
o
Ii"" Risk SlPZ
CCaWIl S1l'Z
Boundaries
~C<Ully
w_
0I00r~
LO"" ITr-" 1
~ Ii- ..,.
# 1.... .
r~: ~.~_cl~o
. -_..s_
http:// gisserverlservletJcom.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceName=ovmap&Client V ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/29/2004
Map Output
FEATURES NOT SURVEYED-JCPUD#1 PRE04-00035
Page 1 of 1
..~~
'.'::-
. -.........nrooou
1.'~1"'f1~"'"
';n~~.p 3fi.~, -~tj
i~ ',.nl~~ -
-- "1<:0-:
~ ''lmrotl;?''~OOIIH\ 00'n42O'l2
~~ __" ....."i~t(l)9H'" !
.;,=~ \9n~~jj'ro1~~~'__ ~~_7;:~~.l
-- \t1"l:r~t~! 9~~::;:I;)r,"~!~f9
tnlo100Ir----'-'"Olrlt}IOI1....l.--------"~:.ol~
'j::;,-
I .,
'~<~-,-..<yjn4m1-
.,<'....
i r:"
1- 1.2~
i :
I I 00VAr022
I I
( I
: I
I I
I~-
~" I
......-.....-..1"-----
J........_"""""*"_OO.I
"'"
o
.
Legend
Pal'Ol'lls-H
Priority Habitats and
Sp9deS
Boundaries
o
o
o
~ COUIlly
Wda
0tJ0r~
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL y-
efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its
ollection. Fri Oct 29 07:43:24 2004
LOG ITE?1
#
PC.~')J3j__cld.d
http:// gisserverlservlet/ com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/29/2004
Map Output
"J'.; FEATURES NOT SURVEYED-JCPUD#1 PR
'} 002242021002'242023
,}
;,j 977.00008
; 977.00905 ,002'242:001
~ 977.00916
... 977.00004 9771009n 00224~18
~ . 977100!l02 977100917
~ 9111??oo1 911101004 97710091:2
11 / / .m....; ~ 97!.~;g''''1
/l~ ~,
,/002231001 ,I! 002:24~10
j~ .",,,.m """"..
I,l ~=;) L
l ~.~ 002'242:005'
/) ,
lJ/'
o/l ~~~
~002231001/ ...........-- -----.....--_002'242003
f l' ,/~'OO' .---~--.....-.....
, (~~~// ~~
~-.....;..--/
4
M.ptMdcldby~COUt1l)' ~ ~G1S I
Q, .
67:51t
LOG ITErv1
ti.~'"'.>:;; "":~c~.
http:// gisserver/servlet/ com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovma
'i
Page 2 of2
Map Output
.#
0 Legend
P arcell>-H
County Zoning
. Ru!al~1:ti
. Ru!al~ 1:10
Runl!~ 1~ .
. H......,.~
. R~~iIrl
. lil#1I ~
:~%:; U't.4
. U'C
. Ru!al ViItga CdIbor
. ~GC
III ~cc
1m ~HC
. Comm....aal fcre!lt
. Ru!al fcre!lt
. ~f~
,,;( f'lJl~
;:/;
~~ ALl~
:~:. !\irp::KlEPF
~~ Wasae Llgml EPF
. MiIi'bry~
. P;td.S M:l R~
II NtIi:tWJ Fcre!lt
. NolIilWII Pa!Io.
:1 NolIilWII ~
W_ 8o:f<IS
. LlPR.SitJj<l famiy
. LlPR.SI'T","*
. ..IPR....LlB:J'niy
L1PR.Re5a1 Complex
. MPR.ViItga Ca'1Ier
~ L1PIMlp"" Spac>:!
. LlPR~
lliill!ill UGYL.c:r.r El<!s'J$. Rs.
.......,
ffilillill UGYLlod. El<!s'J$. Rs.
.."..-
lliill!ill UGYHigh El<!s'J$. Rs.
........
11I1 UGYUtbItllil#1l ~
. UGYUtbItl Comm....aal
ffilillill UGY\MiI<lt 0riI!I1b:l Comm....aal
..,.,.,
lliill!ill UGYPd:tic
PorIT~UGi\
~ H<ilR~
~ ~R~
. Hal Zan!'ld
Boundaries
0 ~ Ccur/l)'
0 W_
0 CIItD'~
,
-
,- " IT-"1
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONL Y_ L..V" ., t...
Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warran.iy with
respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accura.9Y~o.f'its" ,.
collection. Fri Oct 29 07:49:12 2004 1""'",.,_;") aI-. 4 (_C(~
http:// gisserverlservlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4. O&F orm... 10/2912004
Cases
BLD90-00009 MEYERS
Application Received: 1/4/1990 Permit Issued/Case closed: 1/4/1990
studio with attached garage
No findings, conditions, or pennissions found.
XMP88-00065 CAPE GEORGE FISHERMANS C
Application Received: 11/9/1988 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled:
PROPOSAL: The project IS to move and secure floating logs in the Beckett Point Lagoon. The logs would be secured
with cables and staples.
No findings, conditions, or pennissions found.
XMP99-00005 MOGA
Application Received: 2/22/1999 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled:
A tightline to the beach has been aesigned to convey stormwater to the beach created by development of the lot.
No findings, conditions, or pennissions found.
CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR
Parcel 002231001
Printed: October 12, 2004
Name
Review Type
Status
C
Case Finaled:
P
w
Planner
TVALIANT
J PETERS
CAROO-00323 BECKETT POINT FISHERMEN'S F
Application Received: 7/18/2000 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: 2/7/2003
picnic table cover
No findings, conditions, or pennissions found.
BLD98-00637 MOGA F
Application Received: 10/6/1998 Permit Issued/Case closed: 2/24/1999 Case Finaled: 7/12/2001
single family residence
1.) ALL conditions of the critical area waiver must be met.
2.) The drain water tightline shall be installed within 30 days of the completion of the foundation pour.
CAR96-00119 MOGA F L MARK
Application Received: 8/16/1996 Permit Issued/Case closed: 3/23/1998 Case Finaled: 3/23/1998
Binding Advance Determination tor proposed single family residence.
1.) The subject property is located at Beckett Point Road, in Jefferson County, Washington. An application requesting a
Binding Advance Determination for a four lot parcel was reviewed by Jefferson County Permit Center Staff.
2.) The application was reviewed by Jefferson County Permit Center staff on August 16, 1996 for the potential presence
of critical areas regulated under the provisions of the Ordinance, and the following critical areas were confirmed as
potentially present on the subject property: Bald Eagle Habitat Area, Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area, Seismic Hazard
Area, and Shoreline.
3.) On September 23, 1996, a request was sent to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife to determine if an eagle
management plan was needed. Although wintering bald eagles use the subject property for perching sites, no active
nests are located within a quarter mile of the parcel, therefore an eagle management plan is not required.
4.) A site inspection by Permit Center Staff was performed on October 1, 1996.
5.) Permit Center Staff found that surrounding the proposed building site on Lot 14 are densely vegetated areas. The
vegetation is primarily native Pacific northwestern plants. The dominate vegetation includes: Douglas-fir
(Pseudotsuga menziesii), madrona (Arbutus menziessii), ocean spray (Holodiscus discolor), common snowberry
(Symphoricarpos albus), braken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), trailing blackberry (Rubus ursinus), baldhip rose (Rosa
gymnocarpa) and salal (Gaultheria shallon).
6.) Several substantial snags (dead standing trees) are located on the subject property. The diameter at breast height
(DBH) of each snag was measured by Permit Center staff; sizes averaged 27" DBH. These snags provide important
wildlife habitat for species such as : bald eagle, kingfisher, and woodpecker. The root structure of the snags and the
existing live vegetation provide slope stability to the shoreline bluff.
7.) Where a single dwellling unit is wihin 300 feet of 1 side of the proposed building site, the setback shall be the
difference (average) between the required setback and that of the neighboring structure.
8.) Permit Center staff measured slopes with a clinometer, the site consists of a large hill which has an easment road to
the northeast and the shoreline on the west side. Along the northeast boundary of the property the grade was 35%,
and along the west boundary for approximately seventy-five (75) feet is a 25% grade until the shoreline bluff is
reached which has a grade greater than 70%.
9.) These bluffs are considered unstable and are located in a landslide and seismic hazard area. The potential for an
earthquake of a high magnitude occuring in western Washington in the near future is considered a high probability by
regional experts.
10.) On June 13,1997, A geological report written by Gerald Thoresen, Consulting Geologist, was submitted to the Permit
Center regarding the subject property. .,. ... ...... ... .. .....? ....
11.) Should the design of the storm water plan involve a tightline to the beach, the applicant wouldneedto,apply for a
shoreline exemption permit. Pa.e 1 of 8:;:{Zj~::'-.;~
Cases Name Review TVDe Status Planner
12.1 Patios and decks shall be of slated wood designs, so as to allow water to drain and not to collect and concentrate
water runoff.
13.) Native vegetation within the geological hazard setback area of 40 feet,from the top of the bluff, shall remain in its
natural state or be suplemented with plantings of the suggested native vegetation.
14.) Vegetation retained on-site following completion of clearing for roadways, utilities and the like, may be cleared only if
such clearing is absolutely necessary to complete the proposal (Note: This condition shall not be construed as
allowing removal of native vegetation within a designated critical area or its associated buffer).
15.) All trees and understory lying outside of approved construction limits shall be retained during clearing for roadways
and utilities. Understory damaged during approved clearing operations may, however, be pruned.
16.) Landslide hazard areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur
during construction, replanting with native vegetation shall be required by the Critical Area Administrator. No alteration
shall be made to the landslide hazard area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the Critical Area
Administrator.
17.) Based on the above findings and facts, any development activity upon this parcel shall submit for review and approval
the following document: a revised Universal Plot Plan. A plot plan is required which indicates proposed building and
septic sites with setback locations in reference to each other, adjacent property lines, and the shoreline. The plot plan
submitted indicates a thirty (30) foot setback for the proposed structure. This is not an allowed setback and needs to
be modified before the plot plan can be accepted.
18.) The applicant shall to the best extent possible, preserve existing large conifers and snags for priority species wildlife
habitat. Selective limbing of trees is a preferred method if view windows and/or safety are an issue.
19.) The large conifer trees and snags shall be retained to the best extent possible for protection of wildlife habitat.
Selective limbing of trees is a preferred method if view windows and/or safety are an issue.
20.) Per averaging the setback between the adjacent single family residence, and the recommended setback in the report
submitted June 13, 1997 by Gerald Thorsen, Consulting Geologist; a minimum setback from the top of the shoreline
bluff of forty (40) feet shall be established.
21.) The applicant shall develop and submit to the Permit Center for approval, a "Small Parcel Erosion Control Plan." (see
enclosures). The subject permit will not be issued unless the applicant submits to the Permit Center, a copy of the
"Small Parcel Erosion Control Plan". Once the subject permit has been issued, the applicant shall fully implement the
provisions of the submitted "Small Parcel Erosion Control Plan", and contact the Permit Center to arrange a schedule
of inspection for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Permit Center verifies plan
compliance.
CAR99-00023 MOGA F L MARK
Application Received: 10/6/1998 Permit Issued/Case closed: 2/21/1999 Case Finaled: 2/21/1999
Critical Area Review for proposed single family residence, in response to complaint COM98-0057.
1.) A complaint (#COM98-0057) regarding improper implementation of storm water control at the subject property was
filed with the Permit Center on 9/25/98. Acting upon the above information, Jefferson County staff conducted a site
inspection of the subject property on 10/7/98 and confirmed storm water control and Best Management Practices
were not being implemented as required by conditions found in previously issued permits XMP98-0007, CAR96-0119
and SEP97-0286.
2.) Specifically, the conditions 1 through 11 as stated in document CAR96-0119, dated September 8,1997, required
installation of a stormwater tightline to the beach, and compliance with the Small Parcel Erosion Control Plan
submitted 2/26/98.
3.) The applicant was notified of this determination on October 21, 1998.
4.) The applicant responded to Jefferson County staff and stated that a construction crew was working on implementing
the proper BMP's and installing a rock wall at the road and driveway entrance to correct the problem.
5.) Staff conducted a subsequent site inspection and confirmed that proper BMP's had been installed to correct the
situation.
6.) The applicant shall implement fully the approved "Small Parcel Erosion Control Plan" dated 2/26/98. A Certificate of
Occupancy will not be issued until the Permit Center verifies plan compliance.
7.) All construction activities, including the storage and preparation of materials, shall not encroach upon the designated
geologically hazardous area, or its associated buffer.
8.) Clearing limits for roads, septic, water and stormwater utilities, and temporary erosion control facilities shall be clearly
identified on site and inspected by the Critical Area Administrator, or their designee, prior to the commencement of
any clearing activities.
9.) Clearing for roads and utilities shall remain within marked limits.
10.) No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of
temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures has been completed.
11 .) Prior to and during approved construction activities, the perimeter of the landslide hazard area buffer shall be marked
with a temporary sign. The sign shall be placed in such a manner that it can be directly observed from the construction
area. The sign shall contain the following statement: "Landslide Hazard Area and Buffer - Do not Remove or Alter
Existing Native Vegetation."
I
d'l,(.~
Page 2 of8
Cases Name Review TVDe Status Planner
12.)' Landslide hazard areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur
during construction, replanting with native vegetation shall be required by the Critical Area Administrator. No alteration
shall be made to the landslide hazard area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the Critical Area
Administrator.
13.) Residential structures shall not exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height.
14.) Surface drainage shall not be directed across the face of a marine bluff, landslide hazard or ravine. If drainage must
be discharged from a bluff to adjacent waters, it shall be collected above the face of the bluff and discharged to the
water by tight line drain and provided with an energy dissipating device at the shoreline. A shoreline permit is required
to discharge water at the shoreline.
15.) The applicant shall fully implement all conditions contained in the shoreline permit exemption dated 3/28/98 for the
installation of a stormwater tight-line. The exemption permit expires 3/28/99.
16.) By agreement with AI Scalf, Jefferson County Shoreline Administrator, the tightline may be installed after the building
foundation,for the single family residence, has been constructed. The tightline shall be installed within 30 days of
completion of the foundation pour.
17.) All prior conditions contained in the signed waiver of CAR96-0119 shall be followed except where such conditions
contradict those contained in this document (CAR99-0023), CAR99-0023 shall supercede CAR96-0119.
COM98-00057 MOGA F
Application Received: 9/25/1998 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: 2/24/1999
Storm water plan and approved best management practices not being implemented. Neighbor is concerned that
geohazard area is eroding.
No findings, conditions, or pennissions found.
COM99-00010
Application Received: 3/24/1999
Eagle nest located near property.
below his property.
No findings, conditions, or pennissions found.
XMP98-00007 MOGA
Application Received: 2/26/1998 Permit Issued/Case closed: 3/23/1998
tight line to beach for stormwater
1.) The proposal is consistent with Exemptons Section 3.402(1) of the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management
Master Program.
A Small Parcel Erosion Control Plan has been submitted as part of this application.
The proposal is for a stormwater outfall to extend down the base of a bluff for dispersal at an energy dissipator.
The proponent shall notify the Jefferson County Permit Center, (360) 379-4450, Development Review Division 48
hours in advance prior to commencing construction in order to allow monitoring and ensure conformance with project
conditions.
The proponent shall comply with conditions as set forth in the Critical Area Waiver (CAR96-0119).
No fill or other material may be placed in the waters or intertidal areas of Jefferson County.
Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Program other than as described above shall receive separate review
from this office.
Prior to commencing construction, proponent should contact the Washington State Department of Fisheries at (360)
895-4757 to determine whether this action is subject to the Washington State Hydraulics Code.
This approval pertains to Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program requirements only. The
approval of any other agency with jurisdiction or any other required permits shall be obtained prior to undertaking the
project.
ZON03-00013 MLA03-00098 FORSTER
Application Received: 3/4/2003 Permit Issued/Case closed: 4/10/2003
Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD)
1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on March 12,
2003 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified
Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site
inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Suburban Shoreline, Fish &
Wildlife Habitat (Blue Heron), Wetlands, Seismic Hazard, Flood, Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area, Coastal
Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone (SIPZ).
2.) Washington State Department of Fish & Wildlife offered no comment on the application. The site is cleared, and the
proposal will not conflict with blue heron habitat.
3.) The wetlands are located opposite Beckett Point Rd from the subject parcel. The Administrator determined the
wetland buffer value is negated at the road.
4.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation
of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are g,ologieforrnatiol1S that contain
sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells arTd springs. A~Uifers serve as
the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. .. '.'> .",J""M"~
c2'1$ .. ,... .... .......
Page 3 of 8 . . ..
MOGA F
Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: 3/25/1999
Backhoe working on property. Large amounts of debris/dirtltrees/slufflng off bluff
A
L MARK
Case Finaled:
2.)
3.)
4.)
5.)
6.)
7.)
8.)
9.)
I
Case Finaled:
A
S HOSKINS
Cases
5.} .
6.}
7.}
8.}
Name Review TVDe Status Planner
Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of
recharge waters to groundwater aquifers.
Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and
groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after
construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms.
Buffers are areas that shall be maintained in their natural condition, however, minor pruning or alteration of vegetation
may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished.
Among the native conifer species which may be used in buffers or for re-vegetation include, but are not limited to:
Grand Fir (Aibes grandis), Sitka Spruce (Picea Sitchensis), Shore Pine (Pinus Contorta), Douglas Fir (pseudotsuga
Menziesii), Western Red Cedar (Thuja Plicata), and Western Hemlock (Tsuga Heterophylla).
Among native tree species which may be used includes: Vine Maple (Acer Circinatum), Big-Leaf Maple (Acer
Macrophyllum), Red Alder (Alnus Rubra), Pacific Madrone (Arbutus Menziesii), Quaking Aspen (Populus Tremula),
Black Cottonwood (Populus Trichocarpa), Bitter Cherry (Prunus Emarginata), Oregon White Oak (Quercus Garryana),
Cascara (Rhamnus Purshiana), Pacific Willow (Saliz Lasiandra), and Scouler's Willow (Saliz Scouleriana).
Among the native shrub species which may be used are: Sevice-Berry (Amalanchier Alnifolia), Red Osier Dogwood
(Corn us Stolonifera) Salal (Gaultheria Shallon), Ocean Spray (Holodiscus Discolor), Indian Plum (Oemlaria
Cerasiformis), Pacific Ninebark (Physocarpus Capitus), Red Flowering Currant (Ribes Sanguineum), Wild Rose
(Rosa Nutkana), Swamp Rose (Rosa Pisocarpa), Willows (Salix ssp.), Red Elderberry (Sambucus Racemosa),
Snowberry (Symphoricarpos Albus), Evergreen Huckleberry (Vaccinium Ovatum), Red Huckleberry (Vaccinium
Parvifolium ).
g.} Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion
is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland
areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost.
Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge
(primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals (primarily through wells). The Washington
Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in
Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to
marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the
saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the
aquifer.
10.} The parcel is located within a coastal SIPZ (seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map.
There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy (Resolution
44-22, effective September 23, 2002) that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing
lots of record.
A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but no history of
chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in groundwater sources within 1000 feet.
11.} All construction activities shall not encroach upon the buffer. This includes the storage or preparation of materials.
12.} Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The
submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project
shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs) and facility design standards as identified and defined in the
Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin.
13.} To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on
Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all
stormwater runoff onsite.
14.} VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL & AT RISK SIPZ:
Water conservation measures:
1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means
and allowed to be released to the soil slowly.
2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless
catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed
between the potable supply and impounded water.
3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens.
4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three (3) gallons per minute.
5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets and shower restrictors and other water
saving plumbing fixtures.
6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation).
Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is lntencted to be illustrative
of the types of water conservation measures. '
,L-_
cJlJ0
Page 4 of8
.:%8'
Cases
15.)'
17.)
18.)
19.)
20.)
21.)
22.)
23.)
24.)
25.)
16.)
Name Review TVDe Status Planner
VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL & AT RISK SIPZ:
1. Installation of a flow meter.
2. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration.
3. Submittal of monitoring data to County.
MANDATORY MEASURES FOR COASTAL SIPZ:
1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water
system if available.
2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an individual
well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirement:
a. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application.
3. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water.
Flood proofing measures are to be used as required by the Jefferson County Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance.
All new construction shall use construction methods which minimize flood damage.
New construction shall have the lowest floor elevated to at least one foot above base flood elevation.
Fully enclosed areas below the lowest floor that are subject to flooding are prohibited unless designed to automatically
equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls by allowing for the entry and exit of floodwater. Designs for meeting
this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect or must meet or exceed the
following criteria: a. A minimum of two openings having a total net area of not less than one square inch for every
square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding shall be provided. b. The bottom of all openings shall be no higher
than one foot above grade. c. Openings may be equipt with screens, louvers, or other coverings or devices provided
that they permit the automatic entry and exit of floodwater.
All new construction shall: a. be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of the sturcture. b. be
constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage and potential damage to adjacent
properties. c. be constructed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. d. have structural components
capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effects of buoyancy. e. electrical, heating, ventilation,
plumbing, air-conditioning equipment, and other service facilities shall be designed and/or otherwise elevated or
located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding.
Flood proofing of structures shall be provided by one or more of the following methods: a. Landfill: (Note: Landfills are
not permitted in the f1oodway.) The placement of fill may be utilized to elevate the structure and must comply with the
standards and policies of the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program, if applicable. b. Pole, pier or piling
construction: The use of poles, piers, or piles for the foundation of the structure may be used to allow the unrestricted
flow of flood waters during periods at a base flood. The lowest floor must be one foot above the base flood level. c.
Parallel Foundation Walls: Foundation walls may be designed and constructed to provide open spaces through which
water can flow unrestricted to equalize pressure. In velocity flood situations, it is important that all foundation walls be
parallel to the flow of the floodwaters. d. Extended Foundation Walls and Basements: (Note: Extended foundation
walls and basements are not permitted in the f1oodway.) The lowest habitable floor of a residence may be constructed
on foundation walls that extend above grade to one foot above the height of the base flood provided that residential
construction complies with the requirment of Section 5.101 (2), "Residential Construction," regarding the design of
enclosed areas.
Utilities shall be designed as specified in Section 5.20 of Ordinance No. 18-1120-95.
Upon submittal of a building permit application, the applicant must provide a flood elevation certificate.
The standard setback for residential structures, including common appurtenant structures such as garages and
workshops, shall be thirty (30) feet or one (1) foot for each foot of bank height, whichever is greater. This setback
shall be measured from the bank's edge when the bank's height exceeds 10 feet. When the bank's height is less than
10 feet, the setback shall be measured from the ordinary high water mark. The setback shall not exceed 100 feet.
("HOC ',oN
CJ.<{1 ~
Page 5 of8
Cases
26.)'
27.)
28.)
29.)
30.)
Name Review TVDe Status Planner
The proposal was reviewed against the site plan determination criteria of the Unified Development Code (Section 8.7).
The criteria for approval is as follows:
1. The proposed site plan conforms to all applicable county, state, and federal land use, environmental and health
regulations and plans, including but not limited to the following: The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and the
provisions of the Unified Development Code.
Staff comment: The application was reviewed for consistency under the provisions of the Unified Development Code,
Comprehensive Plan, and Shoreline Master Program. The application was found in compliance with all ordinances
pertaining to the proposed development.
2. Adequate provisions for utilities and other public services necessary to serve the needs of the proposed site plan
have been demonstrated, including open spaces, drainage ways, roads, and other public ways, potable water,
sewerage disposal, fire flow and other improvements.
Staff comment: The proposal was not reviewed for open space as the parcel is approximately 3,167 square feet
(0.072 7 acres) in size.
This SPAAD has not been reviewed for adequacy of sewerage disposal. Jefferson County Department of
Environmental Health commented on the application on March 18, 2003 and determined the 20 foot building setback
from the road should be adequate to allow tanks and a driveway assuming the parcel connects to the future
community drainfield. Environmental Health also noted no plans are currently before the county to install the
community drainfield and the number of bedrooms allowed to connect is not known.
PUD #1 completed a Water Availability Notification May 3, 2003 for Lot 35 of Beckett Point Beach Annex. This
connection is required prior to building permit final sign off and would fulfill the requirements for potable water and fire
flow.
Beckett Point Rd is a county local access road. A road approach permit (RAP03-00049) was reviewed under this
application. An address of 1024 Beckett Point Rd has been assigned to the parcel.
The applicant shall adhere to the Washington State Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for
stormwater control.
3. The probable significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed site plan, together with any practical
means of mitigating adverse impacts, have been considered such that the proposal will not have an unacceptable
adverse effect upon the quality of the environment, in accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
implementing the provisions contained within Section 8 of this Code and Chapter 43.21 C RCW.
Staff comment: Single family residences are EXEMPT from the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). WAC
197-11-800(1 )(b)(i) identifies the construction of any residential structure of four (4) dwelling units.
4. Approving the proposed site plan will serve the public use and interest and adequate provision has been made for
the public health, safety and general welfare.
Staff comment: The proposal will not affect the public health, safety, and general welfare.
Duration of Approval - Several of the included findings shall become conditions upon the submittal of a building and
septic permit. The duration of approval of the Site Plan shall be effective for five (5) years from the date of original
approval by the Administrator. If a building permit has not been issued within the five (5) year period, the Site Plan
Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD) cannot be revived or extended except by new application that must meet
all the existing criteria and conditions listed in this Section. Knowledge of the expiration date shall be the responsibility
of the applicant. The county will not provide notification prior to expiration.
Limitations of Approval - Approval of the site plan shall not guarantee the performance of specific site features or
improvements (e.g. wells, septic systems, stormwater drainage facilities, etc.) and shall not be immune from changes
in state or federal law which are enacted or have an effective date after the date of ths Site Plan Approval Advance
Determination (SPAAD) and which may affect the performance and implementation of the site plan and associated
use or activity. Any subsequent land division or boundary line adjustment of a parcel or lot which has received site
plan approval advance determination under this Section 8.7 shall void such site plan approval and require a new site
plan approval advance determination application. Approval of a site plan under this section does not constitute
authority to comence any development or building activity until such time as final authorizing permits are issued (e.g.,
septic, wells, stormwater management, or building permit, etc.). Modification to an approved site plan may be
required by the applicant and approved by the Administrator subject to the provisions for Type I decisions. (Please
request a copy of Section 8.7 of the UDC for criteria pertaining to modifications).
The applicant shall adhere to the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual at~i",E:iofdeYf:llopment
application. J
A minimum of two (2) on-site parking spaces are required for the single family residence.i . .""0.', '.'. ',"""'?Y..',' .'," "'.. ".... ,.'...;....-c>',.". '."
Maximum building height is 35 feet. ,<{CJ, .~.. '
Page 6 of8
Cases Name Review TVDe Status Planner
31.)' Total impervious surface coverage shall not exceed 25%. Impervious surface includes driveways, rooftops, concrete,
etc. Pre-existing legal lots of record less than one acre in size in Rural Residential Districts are subject to the
stormwater requirements in UDC Section 6.7 and must meet the "Area of Impervious Surface Coverage" to the
maximum extent practicable as determined by the Administrator.
32.) Minimum setback from the parcel boundary adjacent to Beckett Point Rd is 20 feet. Minimum setback from Ordinary
High Water Mark is 30 feet. Minimum side setbacks are 5 feet. .
33.) The revised site plan as submitted with the Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD) application on March
18, 2003 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department
of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated
February 2, 2003 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community
Development.
34.) This approval is for a SPAAD only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable
codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits.
35.) THIS SPAAD IS ONLY VALID IF A COMMUNITY DRAINFIELD FOR BECKETT POINT IS INSTALLED AND MADE
AVAILABLE TO LOT 35 OF BECKETT POINT SOUTH POINT BEACH ANNEX. THIS SPAAD APPROVAL SHALL
BE CONSIDERED NULL AND VOID WITHOUT A SEWER CONNECTION.
BLDOO-00471 BECKETT POINT FISHERMEN'S
Application Received: 7/18/2000 Permit Issued/Case closed: 2/19/2003 Case Finaled:
PICNIC TABLE COVER
No findings, conditions, or permissions found.
PREOO-00013
Application Received: 4/4/2000
Picnic Table Cover.
No findings, conditions, or permissions found.
PRJOO-00169
Application Received: 7/19/2000
Picnic Table Cover.
No findings, conditions, or permissions found.
R
BECKETT POINT FISHERMEN'S
Permit Issued/Case closed: 4/19/2000 Case Finaled:
F
J PETERS
BECKETT POINT FISHERMEN'S
Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled:
P
PRE04-00035 JEFFERSON COUNTY PUD #1
Application Received: 10/12/2004 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled:
CENTRAL LOW PRESSURE SEWER SYSTEM
No findings, conditions, or permissions found.
SDPOO-00017 BECKETT POINT FISHERMEN'S F J PETERS
Application Received: 9/7/2000 Permit Issued/Case closed: 10/16/2000 Case Finaled:
The proposal is to construct a log structure on a concrete slab to cover an eXisting picnic table in the playground area
at Beckett Point. This proposal is exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to
WAC 197-11-800.
1.) Substantial progress towards comletion of the project shall be performed within two years of the issuance of the
permit.
2.) Should the facility fail in the event of storms, earthquakes, tsunamis or other such events, the joint-owners shall be
responsible for any debris which falls to the beach and within the waters of the State of Washington. Furthermore, the
joint-owners shall provide for the removal of any structural debris from the beach as a result of this project.
3.) This approval pertains to Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program requirements only. The approval
of any other agency with jurisdiction or any other required permits shall be obtained prior to undertaking the project.
4.) Work within the shoreline jurisdiction other than as described in this permit application shall receive separate review
from this Department.
5.) The proponent shall notify the Jefferson County Department of Community Development at (360) 379-4450 forty-eight
(48) hours prior to commencing construction in order to allow monitoring and ensure compliance with permit
conditions.
6.) A building permit shall be obtained from the Jefferson County Department of Community Development prior to
commencing construction.
7.) A building permit is required for this project.
SEP97 -00286 MOGA F
Application Received: 11/14/1997 Permit Issued/Case closed: 3/24/1998 Case Finaled: 2/5/1999
P
S HOSKINS
1. )
2.)
3.)
4.)
This permit is granted based on the recorded NOTICE TO TITLE combining lots 11,12,13,14 of hill park addition to
meet the minimum land area required under WAC 246-272 Onsite Sewage Code. NOTICE recorded 12/30/97
Risers are required to grade with secured lids over the inlet and outlet of the septic tank. Minimum 24" riser over inlet.
All components of the septic system are to be completely protected from vehicul~r traffic or mechanical disturbance.
Protective barriers are required around drainfield.
AN ANTI-SIPHON DEVICE MAY BE REQUIRED.
Page 7 of8
J.l(~
;J$t
Name Review TVDe Status Planner
TRENCH TO BE EXCAVATED TO A MINIMUM OF 24" DEPTH AND THEN BACKFILLED WITH ASTM 33 TYPE
SAND TO 24" AS PER DESIGN.
Compliance with the conditions of the signed Critical Area Waiver and the Binding Advanced Determination is
required.
AS PER WAC 246-272 ALL ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS REQUIRE MONITORING. THIS MONITORING IS
PROVIDED BY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE JEFFERSON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION AND
THE JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT #1. THIS SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM WILL REQUIRE
AN ACTIVE MONITORING CONTRACT WITH THE PUD #1 PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE SEWAGE
DISPOSAL SYSTEM.
Health Dept. required to observe pressure test, 48 hour notice to be given.
50 ft. setback from bank to be maintained WITH PRIMARY AND RESERVE DRAINFIELDS.
Drainlines are to be installed along the natural contours.
Contact designer prior to installation for staking of drainfield area.
Dose counters and timmers are required in the control panel for drainfield components.
Divert all sources of drainage including roof drains away from septic tank and drainfield area.
Approval/issuance of a sewage disposal permit does not guarantee the approval of other development or a building
permit on this site. Compliance with other Jefferson County and Washington State Codes is required.
Approval of this sewage disposal permit does not preclude the permit holder from complying with the Critical Areas
Ordinance for other development on the site.
XMP91-00002 CAPE GEORGE FISHERMAN'S ( A
Application Received: 3/5/1991 Permit Issued/Case closed: 3/5/1991 Case Finaled:
PROPOSAL: Proposal 1 IS to remove 220 feet of destroyed bulkhead southwest of an existing boat launch at Beckett
Point and to construct 3 beach drift sills for beach restoration and erosion control.
No findings, conditions, or permissions found.
Cases
5.) .
6.)
7.)
8.)
9.)
10.)
11.)
12.)
13.)
14.)
15.)
Page 80f8
,
d{)O
d$'
Parcel Print
Page 1 of 1
Parcel Number: 002231001
06/11/2004
OWner Mailing Address:
BECKETT POINT ASHERMEN'S CLUB
% DAVID G GOODING
242 TAYLOR ST
PORT TOWNSEND WA 983685717
Site Address:
Section:
Qtr Section:
Township:
Range:
Planning area:
Sub Division:
Land Use Code:
23
NE1/4
30N
2W
Quimper (2)
School District:
Fire Dist:
Tax Status:
Tax Code:
Port Townsend (50)
Cape George (6)
Taxable
161
7500 - RESORTS, R.V. PARKS
A/V OF IMPS ASSIGNED SEPARATE #'S
Property Description:
S23 T30 R2W I LOT 1 & TL TAX B I 37.15CH I I
~ No Photo Available
(
8$1' ~
http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL _ NO=002231 001 10/12/2004
Parcel Print
Parcel Number: 002242003
OWner Mailing Address:
BECKETT POINT ASHERMEN'S CLUB
% DAVID G GOODING
242 TAYLOR ST
PORT TOWNSEND WA 983685717
Site Address:
Section:
Qtr Section:
Township:
Range:
Planning area:
Sub Division:
Land Use Code:
24
NW1/4
30N
2W
Quimper (2)
School District:
Fire Dist:
Tax Status:
Tax Code:
06/11/2004
Port Townsend (50)
Cape George (6)
Taxable
161
IMPROVEMENTS CARRIED INDIV ON BECKETT POINT CARDS IMPS ONLY
8300 - FOREST LAND (designated)
Property Description:
S24 T30 R2W I LOT 2 & 3 I
~ No Photo Available
Page 1 of 1
,.,.J
d$() ,ar=!
http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?P ARCEL _ NO=002242003 10/1212004
Map Output
Page 1 of3
Features not surve ed Parcel #s 002231001 & 002242003
(
"'J$'J" , a.:~
http:// gisserverlservlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=ovmap&ClientV ersion=... 10/12/2004
>-
0:: 'lit
H 0')
:::J 0')
CJ I.L.. "C
:z I.L.. - c.J
H 0 'lit
0 0 c.J c.J
CD - en t- -
(I) IJ) (Y) en w en
"C IJ)
0 0 '- en
:::E 0:: "C ...... (j) ~
c.J 0 :::J 0::
0 <I:
...... "C C) C) a.
:J .L:. .L:. .L:.
<I: ..c c.J c.J :>-
:z 0::
a. a.
- -
t- t- O
CJ
IJ)
I"- CD I"-
CD :::J
:::J (I) (I) ...J I"-
...J (j) "C c.J IJ)
c.J :::J 0 I
c.J en CD
en "C (0
C :::J :z (Y)
:z CO - W CD
W ...J c.J :::E 0')
:::E 0::
0 0:: W
(0 W ::I: <I:
::I: en (!J :3::
N CD en H :z
CJ H W I.L.. H
X I.L.. ...J 0
(Y) <I: ID t- O t- O
N t- t- <I: :z 0 en :z
N :3:: :z x - H (!J W
CJ N ...J H <I: 0 0:: en
CJ 0:: t- O t- o. (!J 0 :z
(Y) a. ...J :3::
0 clS ::I: t- O >- 0
"C (Y) c.J t- x t- H <I: t-
c.J t- IJ) t- t- (I) w :>- t-
w C) ~ <I: t-
O (Y) t- ~ (j) CO c.J 0 N 0::
(I) N 0 I"- c.J :J a. w 'lit 0
(!J en ...J (Y) W ...... - ID ~ N a.
ID CO
...... 0
IJ) en :>-
CJ I"-
CJ N
IJ)
(Y)
N ~
N c.J
0 W
0 ID CD
CJ 'lit IJ)
CJ (Y) I"-
CJ CJ "C '- (0 l"- N
c.J (I) IJ) :J)
# c CJ ~ (I)
'- 3 '- c.J ~
C (I) 0 ...... m w
(I) (I) :J) (I) :J) ID .L:.
(I) 0 co (I) "C > co f 0
'- '- a. 0 co a. '-
0 co x ...... c.J "C x j,Sf 8~t co
en a. co co (I)
t- t- x q... t- en
co q...
* * t- <I:
~
>-
e::: ~
H 0')
::J 0')
C u.. "C
:z u.. - c.J
H 0 ~
0 0 c.J
~ - en -
CD UJ (Y') en Cl en
"C UJ W
0 0 '- t-
::E e::: "C +' (I) <I:
c.J Cl ::J :z
0 (!)
+' "C 0) 0) H
:J ~ ~ ~ en
<I: .c c.J c.J w
:z Cl
a. a.
- -
t- t- O
0
(Y')
CD CD f"-
CD ::J
::J CD CD .J f"-
.J (I) "C c.J UJ
c.J ::J 0 I
c.J en CD
en "C (0
c: ::J :z (Y')
:z CO - W CD
W .J c.J ::E 0')
::E e:::
0 e::: w
(0 W :::I: <I:
:::I: en (!) 3::
C\J en H :z
0 H W u.. H
C\J u.. .J Cl
~ CD t- O t- Cl
C\J t- <I: :z 0 en :z
C\J 3:: :z x - H (!) W
0 C\J H <I: 0 e::: en
0 e::: (Y') 0 t- o. (!) 0 :z
(Y') a. .J 3::
a ~ t- Cl >- 0
"C (Y') t- x t- H <I: t-
c.J t- C\J t- t- CD w :>- t-
w 0) ~ <I: t-
o ~ t- ~ (I) co c.J Cl C\J e:::
CD C\J 0 c.J :J a. w ~ 0
(!) en .J w +' - a:l ~ C\J a.
a:l co
+' 0
(Y') UJ en :>-
a f"-
a C\J
C\J UJ
~
C\J ~
C\J c.J
a w
a a:l CD
a ~ UJ
a (Y') f"-
a a "C '- (0 f"- C\J
c.J CD UJ :::J)
# c: a ~ CD
'- 3 c.J ~
c: CD 0 +' W
CD CD :::J) CD a:l ~
CD 0 co CD "C > 0
'- '- a. 0 co ( '-
0 co X +' c.J "C co
en a. co .d6S J~ CD
t- t- x q.. en
co q..
* * t- <I:
UDC CONSISTENCY REVIEW
Project Planner: S HOSKINS
Master#PRE04-00035 Review Type Proiect Description
PRE04.00035 CENTRAL LOW PRESSURE SEWER SYSTEM
Primary: JEFFERSON COUNTY PUD #1
PO BOX 929
PORT HADLOCK W A 98339
Site Address:
780 BECKETT POINT RD
PORT TOWNSEND WA, 98368
BECKETT POINT FISHERMEN'S CLUB
OWN % DAVID G GOODING
242 TAYLOR ST
PORT TOWNSEND WA 983685717
PARAMETRIX
REP ATTN: MIKE MOREN
5700 KITSAP WAY STE 202
BREMERTON WA 98312
Project Location: Parcel Numbers 002 231 001 & 002 242 003 in Section 23 & 24, Township 30, Range 02 West,
WM, Located on Beckett Point Rd, Port Townsend, W A 98368
Parcel Number: 002231001 S-T -R: 23-30N-D2W
Legal Description S23 T30 R2W LOT 1 & TL TAX B 37.15CH
Flood District: Fire District: 6
Flood Map (FIRM) Panel No: 5300690135B School 50
COMP PLAN DESIGNATION:--U. J , ZIO
COMMUNITY PlAN: UGA:
W ATER SUPPLY UTILITY: Service Area
[ ] Plot plan states "property line"
[] Assesor's Map (Property lines on submitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the Assessor's 114 map)
[] Legal Access to Property YES NO
[] Parcel Tags or Scanned Documents YES NO
[] ESA's: Special Reports~arby YES NO
Shoreline ~~ NO R\>~
Stream Type ES NO l st 5
Fish & Wild1' ES NO ClA:~ ~~, ~~ ,("~
Wetlands: NO
R~e~lanits.y €9 ~. c..~ Ql..,~ ~~~V, ~ro~1!fb1 I"C) ~
SeIsmIc: ES NO
Landslide: NO I ( 'l.. 4':l ON ~~
Flood: NO ~~ f ~ :DO\-\-.
Erosion: YES @
Aquifer Recharge Area:@NO ~~C ~ (,s\\J1:.~ ~~r~
SIPZ: none At Risk High Risk Coastal U
Stonnwater site plan submitted: Yes No
Forest Lands: YES NO
Adjoining Forest Lands:
[] Mineral Lands: YES NO
[] Stonnwater: New Impervious Surface Land Disturbing Activity ESA's
Stonnwater Req's: Min Req #2 Min Req #1 thru #5 Min Req #1 thru #10 Engineering
Notice ProvisionslDisclosure: AiIport YES NO MRL YES NO Forest Lands YES NO
Landscaping Required: Yes No
Parldng Spaces Required NO 2 Other
Building Height: 35' UBC Standard
Impervious Surface covemge percentage:
Resource Lands & Public: 10% Rural Residential: 25% Rural Industrial: Per UDC See 6.7
Rural Commercial: 60% Area of Building Coverage: 60% in Rural Industrial Lands only
Total Building (s) Size:
RYC: 20,000 SF CC: 5,000 SF NC: 7,500 SF GC: 10,000 SF All others: suqect to septic & water conslrairtslNore specified
Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear:
Shoreline Setback:
LSHA Setback:
Road Oassification: ~ .f'.s\..rr t.J) (~lq~~c:\)
Road Approach: EXISTING NOT REQ'D RAP
SEP A Required: YES EXEMPT
Flood Certificate:
Existing Case(s) & Condition(s):
Violations: Yes No
Recorded Date of Subdivision:
Plat Conditions:
Lots/Require Declaration of Restrictive Covenant
[] Site Visit conducted YES NO
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
Total Acreagt 26
Land Use: 7500
Planning Area: 2
Zoning:
MPR:
PUD:
Commercial/
RuraV
Inholding
[
[
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
Over 5yrs=UDC
<5yrs=P1at Conditions on plat or Old Ordinance
YES NO, submitted: YES NO
AFN
I
asre'-"^' . r()
d...;>a ...
ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan case N/A YES
New Parcel Tags entered in Permit Plan N/A YES
Special Reports Scanned N/A YES
No parcel tags found for parcel
Associated CASES status issued finaled description
002231001
XMP88-00065 P PROPOSAL: The project is to move and secure floating logs in
the Beckett Point Lagoon. The logs would be secured with
cables and staples.
XMP99-00005 W A tightline to the beach has been designed to convey stormwater
to the beach created by development of the lot.
BLD90-00009 C 1/4/1990 studio with attached garage
CAROO-00323 F 2/7/2003 picnic table cover
COM98-00057 F 2/24/1999 Storm water plan and approved best management practices not
being implemented. Neighbor is concerned that geohazard area
is eroding.
COM99-00010 F 3/25/1999 Eagle nest located near property. Backhoe working on property.
Large amounts of debris/dirtltrees/sluffmg off bluff below his
property.
CAR96-00119 F 3/23/1998 3/23/1998 Binding Advance Determination for proposed single family
residence.
XMP98-00007 A 3/23/1998 tight line to beach for stormwater
CAR99-00023 F 2/21/1999 2/21/1999 Critical Area Review for proposed single family residence, in
response to complaint COM98-0057.
BLD98-00637 F 2/24/1999 7/12/2001 single family residence
PRJOO-00169 P Picnic Table Cover.
PREOO-00013 F 4/19/2000 Picnic Table Cover.
BLDOO-00471 R 2/19/2003 PICNIC TABLE COVER
PRE04-00035 P CENTRAL LOW PRESSURE SEWER SYSTEM
SDPOO-00017 F 10/16/2000 The proposal is to construct a log structure on a concrete slab to
cover an existing picnic table in the playground area at Beckett
Point. This proposal is exempt from review under the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) pursuant to WAC
197-11-800.
SEP97 -00286
XMP91-00002
3/24/1998
3/5/1991
F
A
2/5/1999
PROPOSAL: Proposa11 is to remove 220 feet of destroyed
bulkhead southwest of an existing boat launch at Beckett Point
and to construct 3 beach drift sills for beach restoration and
erosion control.
I
is ":-1
~
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TIME SHEET
JEFFERSON COUNTY pun #1
Date
~
I:\R_ML T _Case_CRMLA.rpt
Time
~
3:20-1.:40
Comments
PRE04-00035
S HOSKINS
~I./ M\~ t"J1r--.L r~
~ 1~oG o~ .-f~'
/
EZ ~g
October 12, 2004