HomeMy WebLinkAboutLog091
Page 1 of 2
*, "'" ~.."
Zoe Ann Lamp
Sent:
To:
Cc:
From: James parker [jparker@jeffpud.org]
Tuesday, March 28, 2006 1 :56 PM
Randy Marx
madronapoint@cablespeed.com; Mike McNickle; Zoe Ann Lamp; AI Scalf; wayward farm; mkhays8@msn.com;
kinghyd @olypen.com
Subject: RE: Becket Point
Randy
Just got email from Zoe. She knew nothing about this requirement and she is the permit writer oking the shoreline permit. I
thought the Friday meeting would be a good opportunity to go over all the issues on Beckett point, instead of always piece
mealing everything.
In your memo you talk about we, is we the health department, or does DOH have to approve? Also what sort of mitigation,
who do I need to work with to go over these issues to get some resolution. There is a meeting on Friday, which I thought was
going to be the meeting to work all the details out necessary to go to the shoreline hearing, that would seem to be a very good
time to go over this issue. I know it is not your fault, but this project is getting more and more frustrating.
Please provide Zoe and I immediate options and where to go from here procedures. I talked to engineers. He says possible to
move some of them but view point lane is impossible. Cost go up and up and up
thanks
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Marx (mailto:rmarx@co.jefferson.wa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 11:13 AM
To: James parker
Cc: Mike McNickle; mamdouh.el-aarag@doh.wa.gov
Subject: RE: Becket Point
Hey Jim
It is state code (WAC 246-272-095010) that septic tanks, holding tanks, pump
tanks, etc. need to be 50 feet from the water.. Besides it makes no sense to
upgrade the septic system for the Becket point community then have a bunch of
brand new non-compliant tanks put into the ground. Some owners will need to
have there plumbing stub outs moved.
If it is physically impossibly to be 50 feet (<50' road to water for example)
then an application for a waiver from state standards is required and we would
look at them on a case by case basis. We would only approve the waiver if there
is no other way. We also would require some form of mitigation.
Hope this helps
"Ra.ula.L 1kwuc
3/28/2006
Page 2 of 2
.. ,..
Always working for a safer and healthier Jefferson County
360 385 9444
From: James parker [mailto:jparker@jeffpud.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 10:03 AM
To: Randy Marx
Subject: Becket Point
Randy:
I talked to parametrix yesterday. They asked if I could find out what your concerns were with the location of the
grinder pumps, and how we can work around it. In general the pumps were to positioned where ever we could get
them to fit. In most cases this would be on the street side, but in some cases it would not. I am not too sure what the
concern was. If the concern is that grinder pumps should not be located on a sand bar, we need to know this - as far
as I can see the whole area is a sand bar. As to the side of the house, it appears there is water on both sides, see
attached picture. I am not sure if this is holding up the shoreline hearing, perhaps we should just have it as an issue
for the hearing to address.
Jim
3/28/2006