HomeMy WebLinkAboutLog070
Michelle Farfan
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
David Alvarez
Wednesday, January 14, 200410:32 AM
AI Scalf
Michelle Farfan
FW: Port Ludlow Bay Village
LOG ITEM
#,0
Pager \
of l
- ------....
After further consideration, I think I need to add the following to our thought process.
The PLA is proposing a plat alteration, but the plat alteration DOES NOT violate any covenants if PLA is resubdividing
land it owns. In the absence of any restrictive covenants being violated, the signatures of all owners are not needed.
Thus I agree with Davis Wright Tremaine and not Farady of Foster Pepper.
The application for the plat alteration will be governed by RCW 58.17.215 and because of the 2000 Development
Agreement with the then owner (ORM) the MPR Code, L.U.P.O. and the 1992 Subdivision Ordinance.
Please confirm that I least have the right ordinances.
DA
-----Original Message-----
From: David Alvarez
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 9:02 AM
To: Michelle Farfan
Cc: AI Scalf
Subject: Port Ludlow Bay Village
By now you should have a letter from the attorney for PLA (Davis, Wright and Tremaine Law Firm).
You will need to answer in your own mind two questions.
1. Is what PLA is proposing a plat alteration
2. If it is a plat alteration, then what does PLA as the applicant have to do? I know the UDC is silent in this
regard. But still what do they have to do?
Let us meet at 2:30 PM to discuss these issues.
David Alvarez
Chief Civil DP A
Ext. 219
1