HomeMy WebLinkAboutLog169
J\
May 24, 2004
15), IE ~ IE n WIle ~
\J\1 JUII 11 IXlC lW
Jefferson County
Department of Community Development
621 Sheridan Street
Port Townsen~W A 98368
JEFFERSON COUNTY
OEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Re: Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (DSEIS) for Port Ludlow
Resort Revision Plan
Attention: Mr. Al Scalf
Director of Community Development
Dear Mr. Scalf,
As the property owners most impacted by the DSEIS for the Port Lu<llow Resort Plan Revision, we
strongly recommend you reject the DSEIS as written.
The Lot Owners Association of Port Ludlow (LOA) represents over 532 fulltime residents and a total of
approximately 1,000 taxpaying citizens. The following items represent our major concerns for the
safety and welfare for the citizens of our community.
. Vehicle traffic has been ignored for the most part in the DSEIS, and will be a major factor in
how the build-out will cause serious problems related to safety, i.e., emergency, delivery, and
construction vehicles. In addition, once the build-out has been completed and the population is
increased, the flow of traffic and parking, as shown in the current DSEIS, is not adequate.
Another consideration should be the intersection of Walker Way and Oak Bay Rd., an extremely
dangerous intersection. Marina View Dr. is the only street that connects the entire Resort
complex as well as.,. .""i Beach Club. The County, to prevent the potentially deadly accidents that
are sure to occur,. .,' uld consider this a number one priority.
,
. Developer responsibility to the Master Plan Resort Designation has been an uphill battle for the
citizens of Port Ludlow. Although Port Ludlow Associates (PLA) has the right to complete the
resort development originally started by Pope Resources, we are concerned that the current
DSEIS, does not protect the community from irresponsible development. If past performance is
indicative of the future, a viable resort is not likely, and the community could be left with an
overcrowded subdivision.
. The Beach Club is a private club, serving the needs of the residents of the North Bay community.
PLA should not assume that the Beach Club facilities and/or parking spaces will be available for
conferences, etc. Although PLA does have a current lease with the Ludlow Maintenance
Commission (LMC), the Beach Club's operations management, this lease, which provides for
use of28 parking spaces for overflow parking only, will expire in 2013. The reference in the
DSEIS to 56 available parking spaces is not correct. In addition, offstreet parking for the new
residental area is not properly addressed in the DSEIS. With the increase in population density
LOG ITEIVi
#~
page--t-- ofL
. ~
.'''"'
Jefferson County
Page 2
proposed by PLA, it appears there is not adequate parking for the condo and townhome
residents, the marina, the Harbonnaster, and the new recreational fal?ility.
. The LNP 25.5 states that ~~Port Ludlow shall accommodate a variety of housing types, including
affordable housing, single family and multifamily housing, and assisted living care facilities."
The DSEIS makes no reference to any assisted living care facilities. This type of housing would
be a desirable addition to benefit the community.
In summary, the DSEIS should be rejected in its entirety beca,use of significant errors and omissions.
As it is currently written, it does not adequately address the environmental impact to the resort and
the Port Ludlow community.
Thank for your attention to this important matter.
~AjB~~~~~~~
rJi~~WlS, p' Sl ent
LOG iTEM
~~~pl of ~
.... ---
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, CONCUR WITH THE ATTACHED
LETTER. MAY 26, 2004
NAME
~b~~)~
~~
",9/
~~,;
LOG ITEM
~~ _o( :B ..
ADDRESS
~~~~
62J O......~" c /1/
:2{)
Ul ~~~
//JAhn~ ~
a3
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, CONCUR WITH THE AlTACHED
LETTER. MAY 26, 2004
I
! I '
//~ jl(J'4","~
J{ ~ . vY\ I,
Gill ~ L~ A I W;1J
-
L~ ,~P:~ r Lcl.JUe~
t " ('\ ',--_ '\
' , '~
'1 I "
,
C
LOG ITEM
#M.
Page--L-of <t ~
ADDRESS
~ ~YC~e-&l'/
A.M.~l& G\ IV f p, L q 8 ?,t.. S
I;) D B~';"aj LA-1v ~
3~~
/7:3- ,(/o6LE& L:/tJJe-
It)..
/0 [)
'~C~'l- L
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, CONCUR WITH THE ATTACHED
LETTER. MAY 26, 2004
NAME ADD~
Cl~€ 'Yvvr--k-iZymc. - fJ Z ~~_
f/ .. v ,"
/J? . ,,~17 ],' ,-- V
.::;/. I?,~ I // f ~., 1 "'XJ h-/' 'u/
l
\ J., ~'" :/
r " W:", ./ ..... " ,,'/"" , _ "'J
,',..,~~'-t-' l lrz;. c./flC
'7~cl Hn (,.R%--r iJlZ
.'
q /
tf( If I /j~zt1 L. ~ 7---
/ '
r2 ~ ~WT-e 14 I/-e..
6"3 5(0'1/ {OV!<T
I '~( C c( (A;-J.j, L~
~"')K A.Q\.; v yy') c-r.
/D I ,/;~!, Uthr Lu.
.'" <. ) LfJ 'I
c;{~i. / eJ.. !r~lt, LLl ~
~() ~A\~ \L? ~ 'lj.(. ~ L..r
.
lfAAtL C!![fttlL>
~, fAt L/t~tA,~
\
I'" ~
t\ ~J '" ,Ai \"
.:::: : ~_" L\..-Kz-"".... _" '
IV
S C. i), (' ,,\ Ii?, ,-",' /.... i) lv' 'l-:
I ~:J "'-' '-' ,,",
,"
]) ~'~A"
f' ~ .,
,., i,.,I ~-_,
, ,~" I.
\ ("-LA- ,"
"").'7 : "
.. //( {::n.i iL
3 (I'", ~) ..II ;:;
_ _ I t';:."'} V 17 (} I C (~.)
/7 I
Ad
;f
Ii
LOG iTEM
#-1LoCf
Page~_of. 'i_
.C
..
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, CONCUR WITH THE ATTACHED
LETTER. MAY 26, 2004
NAME
().f. IlYrrd.f
Mdt ~?11 r' J-h~<.R.fV
.
?Jl~ l/an~A&
I 7'
,:..4/l/{ 'I b# ~
&IJR(, ((At suJecfL
~~lrgr;~l
ADDRESS
3 ~ T,; (.(~A 1,.t!J(/
_ I ,.p, . .v
.2 7 1\ ~ o0LriR'~
J?L
(;) J _
~7 f Pill Lit,:;,. LL(~
q,
K .
<5' / #P~".~S i-AII/'E"
, e
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, CONCUR WITH THE ATTACHED
LETTER. MAY 26, 2004
"AME
;--;{A.-i" J;t t'1__~(..,c-i.r2
~:7 rJ~t?P~MO
, 3/#;,4::. 5 Uiihl .
'v~
~,-.\;J(y\~..2 k~~v~~~
ADDIJESS
))} / -:;:: c;L ..;}"- !- r.I If' L .
,
~t/ r~~~~ .bY'
t3 l?~ldu/I~ L~A<~"
(OJ. jI~ ~
\O~!~"
LOG ITEfV1
P~~_~oG?
. c
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, CONCUR WITH THE ATTACHED
LETTER. MAY 26, 2004
NAME
kd//:o1U~ <J .)/ -:bNJJi-~
LOG !TEM
# /( ~
Page ~ - o(~ '_
ADDRESS
~A tlVJes
76' .s~ t!..r. /Jdif .;k~7
.J