Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLog213 t. ,~ \-. ,. /..' August 27,2004 Mickey Gendler Gendler & Mann, LLP 1424 Fourth Avenue, Suite 1015 Seattle, W A 98101 Juelanne Dalzell JEFFERSON COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY Courthouse - P.O. Box 1220 Port Townsend, Washington 98368 Telephone (360) 385-9180 FAX (360) 385-0073 David W. Alvarez, Deputy Prosecutor Tracey L. Lassus, Deputy Prosecutor John Raymond, Deputy Prosecutor D. Geral Barnhart, Deputy Prosecutor Lianne Perron-Kossow, Victim Witness Advocate Re: Public Records request dated August 23, 2004. Dear Mr. Gendler: Your office sent two letters dated August 23,2004. Both letters indicated that you were making a continuing, prospective request for public records, specifically the one page letter asked for communications from July 1, 2004 into the future and your two page letter asked that you be copied on correspondence (e-mail, facsimile, paper) "from this point forward." Copies of those letters are attached. The Public Disclosure Act requires that any local government make public records available for public inspection and copying. See RCW 42.17.260 and RCW 42.17.270. County records are made available for inspection and copying once they are created. You (or someone on your behalf) are welcome to make an appointment to review specified identifiable records at our offices during normal business hours. We will also mail you identifiable public records with a voucher for payment in the amount of 15 cents per page plus postage. However, under RCW 42.17.270 public agencies are required only to honor requests for "identifiable pubic records". Until documents are created or arrive at a County office (if an applicant sends them in) they are neither in ''writing,'' nor an "identifiable record" and thus are not "public records," as that term of art is defined at RCW 42.17.020(36). Put another way, a record generated or received on September 23, 2004, for example, did not exist at the time of your request dated August 23, 2004. Thus, at the time of any prospective request (including yours) there can be no documents in existence that would be responsive to anyone's request for future records. LOG ITEM # c9. ,~ Page----L-.of ~ ~_. la~~ .1i . , In light of the above, your August 23, 2004 letters will be and are being treated as requests for public records in existence as of that date. Various county departments will either offer you the opportunity to review the responsive documents at County offices or will send you copies with a voucher for payment at the rate of $.15 per page. Ahead of this letter I sent you responsive documents totaling 85 pages. You are, of course, free to renew your public records request (or make any other request) in writing in the future. Any future public records request that is prospective or perpetual in nature will not be responded to in that manner. Instead, the County's response to such a request will provide you with responsive and non-exempt documents in existence on or BEFORE the date of that particular request. Similar letters are being sent to PLA, Mr. Powers and Mr. Loomis, all of whom have also made prospective or perpetual public records requests. Very truly yours, ~ David Alvarez Chief Civil Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Enclosure Cc: Bert Loomis (w/o Ene.) Les Powers (w/o Ene.) Marco de Sa e Silva, attorney for PLA (w/o Ene.) Greg McCarry, PLA (w/o Ene.) County Commission (w/Enc.) John Fischbach, County Administrator (w/o Ene.) Lorna Delaney, Clerk to the BoCC (w/Enc.) Al Scalf, DCD Director (w/o Ene.) '.III€D (w/o Ene.) RoseAnn Carroll, DCD (w/Enc.) Lt)G ITEM # Ql~ Page_ ~of :;2;. .' --"'..